2022-11-09 Planning Board Packeto Agenda
Edmonds Planning Board
tn.. }nyo REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
NOVEMBER 9, 2022, 7:00 PM
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and
their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and
taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we
honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
I. Approval of Minutes
3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. Debrief: November 1st Joint Meeting with City Council
B. Review Draft: Comp Plan Vision Statement
C. Civic Center Playfield
Civic Center Playfield Rules Request
D. Discuss Attendance policies for Planning Board
9. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
I. Extended Agenda
10. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
12. ADJOURNMENT
Edmonds Planning Board Agenda
November 9, 2022
Page 1
2.1
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 11/9/2022
Approval of Minutes
Staff Lead: Michael Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michelle Martin
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Approve minutes from the October 26th meeting.
Narrative
October 26th Draft meeting minutes attached.
Attachments:
PB221026 draft
Packet Pg. 2
2.1.a
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of Webinar Meeting
October 26, 2022
Chair Pence called the virtual meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
Board Member Rosen read the Land Acknowledgement:
Board Members Present Staff Present
Roger Pence, Chair Mike Clugston, Senior Planner 'c
Judi Gladstone, Vice Chair' Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Director
Mike Rosen Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Director °
Beth Tragus-Campbell Shannon Burley, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Deputy Director c
Lily Distelhorst (student rep) Rob English, City Engineer a
Brad Shipley, Associate Planner Q
Board Members Absent $
Matt Cheung
Todd Cloutier (excused) N
Richard Kuehn (excused)
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES: OCTOBER 12, 2022
Due to lack of a quorum at this point in the meeting, the approval of minutes was continued to the next meeting.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
Chair Pence reviewed the agenda.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Ken Reidy expressed concern about the lack of progress on the comprehensive city code rewrite. He reviewed
some background on his communications with staff and the Council regarding this over the last ten years. He
was not in favor of relabeling the long -needed code -rewrite as "Development Code Modernization". He stated
that Edmonds citizens and property owners deserve a major code rewrite and have provided plenty of taxpayer
resources over the years for Edmonds city government to finalize this long ago. He also noted that the datum
point referenced in the packet tonight is an ECC issue, not a Development Code Update, and therefore outside
the Planning Board's authority.
'Board Member Gladstone joined the meeting at approximately 7:10 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 1 of 11
Packet Pg. 3
2.1.a
Natalie Seitz asked the Planning Board to consider providing a way for the public to submit written comments
for public hearings like the Council does.
Glen Douglas expressed concern that he doesn't see any projects between 84' Avenue West and Highway 104
on 236th Street. This is a very dangerous street with just ditches and no curbs or sidewalks. School children walk
to Madrona school down this dark, narrow street. He hopes the City will look at taking care of this problem. He
also raised a concern about the intersection of 84th and 236tb which has had 23 accidents in the last three years.
It is a two-way stop with no crosswalks or signals; many people mistake it for a four-way stop. Chair Pence said
he appreciated Mr. Douglas's comments. He frequently travels that section of 236th and agrees that the narrow
county road needs some upgrading.
PUBLIC HEARING
A. 2023-2028 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Public Hearing
as
Senior Planner Clugston introduced this item. City Engineer Mike English made a presentation on the Public
Works 2023-2028 CIP/CFP. He compared and contrasted the CFP and CIP. He reviewed the format of the
combined CFP and CIP document which addresses projects related to Transportation; Utilities (Water, 0
Stormwater, Sewer); Facilities; Wastewater Treatment Plant; and a comparison to the previous year.
0
L
2023 Pavement Preservation Projects: Q
• 2023 Pavement Preservation Program ($1.5M) — 6 lane miles; maintains the City's existing pavement
• Main Street Overlay from 6tn Ave — 9th Ave ($157K) — 2023 design/2024 construction; $750K federal
grant; 11 new ADA ramps
• 76th Ave Overlay Close-out ($15K) c
2023 Safe� & Cqpacity Projects:
• Highway 99 Revitalization/Gateway ($2.6M)
• Highway 99 Stage 3 — 244th Street — 23 8th Street ($1.1 M)
• Highway 99 Stage 4 — 224th Street — 22e Street ($740K)
• 76th Ave/22e Street Intersection ($761K)
• SR-104 Adaptive System ($243K)
• Guardrail improvements ($20K)
• Traffic Signal Upgrades ($30K)
2023 Active Transportation Proiects & Planning:
• Citywide Bicycle Improvements ($1.7M)
• Elm Way Walkway ($901K)
• Transportation Plan Updates ($170K)
• Traffic Calming Program ($33K)
• Pedestrian Safety Program ($20K)
• Citywide Street Lighting Study ($60K)
• Green Streets ($297K)
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 2 of 11
Packet Pg. 4
2.1.a
2023 Water Utility:
• 2023 Replacement Program ($1.75M) - construction
• 2024 Replacement Program ($506K) - design
• Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment ($805K)
Waterline Overlays ($50K)
2023 Stormwater Utility:
•
Storm & Surface Water Comp Plan ($600K)
•
Peninville Creek Basin Projects:
o Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration ($750K)
o Perrinville Creek Flow Management ($120K)
o Perrinville Creek Basin Update ($150K)
•
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements ($190K)
•
Lake Ballinger Floodplain ($750K)
•
Stormwater Overlays ($200K)
y
•
2024 Replacement Program ($290K) — design
c
2023 Sewer Utility:
•
2023 Replacement Program ($1.6M) - construction
00
•
2024 Replacement Program ($349K) - design
o
•
Cured In -place Pipe Rehabilitation ($423K)
a
•
Sewerline Overlays ($200K)
Q
2023 Wastewater Treatment Plant:
L
•
WWTP Clarifier 1 Rehabilitation ($350K)
o
•
Vacuum Filter Replacement ($187K)
N
•
Nuvoda Pre -Design ($300K) — potential solution to nitrogen requirements
a
•
Joint Sealant ($60K) — maintenance
Facilities maintained by Public Works & Utilities include the Boys & Girls Club, the Cemetery Building, City
Hall, the fishing pier, Frances Anderson Center, Fire Station 16, Fire Station 17, Fire Station 20, the Historic
Log Cabin, the Historic Museum, the library, Meadowdale Club House, Old Public Works, the Parks
Maintenance Building, the Public Safety Building, the Public Works O&M, Wade James Theater, and Yost
Pool House. Mr. English reviewed the CIP/CFP schedule. There will be a presentation at City Council on
November 1, a City Council public hearing on November 15, and potential City Council adoption on November
22.
Director Angie Feser presented the Parks, Recreation, and Human Services 2023-2028 CIP/CFP. The PROS
Plan Capital Recommendations related to capital acquisitions include acquisitions to fill park system gaps; open
space and conservation acquisitions; park development and enhancements; Yost Pool replacement; trail
connections; and ADA, accessibility; and other user convenience enhancements. PROS Plan goals focus on
engagement; diversity, equity, and inclusion; parks, trails, and open space; waterfront use and access; natural
resource and habitat conservation; climate change, adaptation, and resiliency; recreation programs and facilities;
cultural services; and park operations and administration. Director Feser reviewed a map showing the
geographic distribution for the 2023-2028 Parks CIP/CFP. Current/ongoing capital projects include the Civic
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 3 of 11
Packet Pg. 5
2.1.a
Park Redevelopment; 96t' Ave Infiltration Project (Civic Park SW mitigation); Greenhouse installation; and
deferred maintenance/small capital projects.
2023-2028 Parks CIP/CFP Proiects:
• Johnson Property — demolition and securing 1-acre property (2023); master plan/public input process
(2025), estimated cost $282,000
• Meadowdale Playfields — in negotiations with the City of Lynnwood; inclusive playground, dugout
roofs, light fixtures, estimated cost TBD
• Mathay Ballinger Park — paved loop pathway, shelter with picnic tables, permanent restroom, estimated
cost $499,300
• Yost Park & Pool — playground replacement (2023); trailibridge repair (2024), tennis court resurface
(2025), pool upgrades (2025), estimated cost $958,200
• Columbarium Expansion Phase II — design complete, fund 130 & 137 (Cemetery Trust Fund), estimated
cost $159,000
• Olympic Beach Park — renovation of existing restroom, estimated cost $53,000
• Pine Street Park — shelter with picnic tables (2024), paved pathway (2024), canopy shade trees (2024),
estimated cost $164,400
'c
• Sierra Park — playground replacement (2024), estimated cost $187,500
• Neighborhood Park SE 1 — ark planning 2024 ark construction 2025 estimated cost $899 100 +
� p p g( )gyp ( )>
°
parkland acquisition (2023)
�
'o
• Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section — addressing accessibility, connect Brackett's
a
Landing North to Marina Beach Park, estimated cost $819,500
Q
• Maplewood Hill Park — playground replacement (2025), oldest playground in park system (38 years
old), estimated cost $144,900
• Marsh Estuary Restoration — estimated cost $14,642,500 + Restoration + Marina Beach Park
c
Renovation
• Elm Street Park — habitat restoration (2026), nature playground (2026), shelter with picnic tables (2026),
estimated cost $225,100
• Neighborhood Park SR 99 — planning (2025), construction (2026), estimated cost $926,100 + parkland
acquisition (2024)
• Neighborhood Park SE 2 — planning (2026), construction (2027), estimated cost $953,900 + parkland
acquisition (2025)
• 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor — Parks project? No funding identified, estimated cost $9,206,600
• Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building — 40+ year old building, estimated cost $5,762,600
• Seaview Park Restroom — ADA improvements, replacement, or renovation of restroom, estimated cost
$417,900
• Yost Pool Replacement — Pool is 50 years old, funding source TBD, estimated cost $23,881,000
2023-2028 Parks CIP/CFP Programs:
• Citywide Park Improvements/Capital Replacement —backlog of 50+projects, small capital projects and
deferred maintenance, job order contracting, estimated cost $2,700,000
• Signage & Wayfinding — trail identification, orientation markers, safety & regulatory messaging, park
hours, park rules & etiquette, interpretive information & warning signs, estimated cost $51,500
• Playground Upgrade Program — playground replacement/inclusive upgrades, locations TBD, estimated
cost $608,900
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 4 of 11
Packet Pg. 6
2.1.a
2023-2028 Parks CIP/CFP Parkland Acquisitions:
• Parkland Acquisitions —neighborhood parks SE1, SR99 & SE2, acquisition as feasible, estimated cost
$5,230,500
• Interurban Trail Expansion — acquisition of lands, easements, and/or rights -of -way, estimated cost
$985,585
Operating Budget Notes:
• Yost Park/Shell Creek Study: $220,000 — ARPA funded, existing conditions analysis (Critical Areas
Report, Cultural Resources Analysis), recommendations and action plan, may become capital project,
potential projects added by Council
Staff is recommending that the prioritization of 2023 projects be Civic Park completion (including 96th Ave
infiltration), greenhouse completion, Mathay Ballinger Park improvements, Yost Park playground, Johnson
property demolition, and Yost Park/Shell Creek Study.
as
r
Board Questions: �
Board Member Campbell asked what the rationale is for keeping the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor in these o
proposals if there is not an interest in keeping it on as a Parks project. Director Feser reviewed the background >
on this project and explained it used to be in Parks and Recreation under Cultural Arts. In September, Cultural °
a
Arts was transferred to Community Services/Economic Development Department. She explained that to help Q
with the transition, Parks had agreed to keep it in their budget through the end of the year.
Board Member Campbell asked about the selection of the traffic calming location. Mr. English reviewed the
evaluation process.
Public Testimony:
The public testimony portion of the hearing was opened at 8:11 p.m.
Teresa Hollis stated she lives near the Gateway neighborhood and has been closely following the Highway 99
Subarea Plan and the buildout by developers. There is an extreme amount of construction activity now in the
south end of the city. She referred to the intersection of 84th and 236th near Madrona school and commented that
the neighbors perceive this as a highly dangerous intersection. She urged staff to get hold of the traffic study
that was done as part of the Terrace Place design review application by Kimley-Horn. That study reported that
the intersection has over twice the rate of accidents than there is at 238th which is a 4-way stop. She urged the
City to consider making the intersection into a 4-way stop. She noted that 39% of the accidents at the intersection
are in the afternoon between 2:30 to 4:30 p.m. 44% of those accidents involved injuries. That is with today's
population. As the 900 new housing units come on board this can be expected to get worse. She contrasted this
with the plan to have a pilot Green Street project on 236th. She thinks the ARPA money would be much better
spent on two more stop signs now. She urged staff to put this in their decision package for 2023. Ms. Hollis also
brought up a particular lot for sale near 84th and 236th which could be a potential location for a pocket park.
Seeing no further comments, the public hearing was closed at 8:18 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 5 of 11
Packet Pg. 7
2.1.a
Board Comments/Questions:
Board Member Rosen thanked everyone who participated in the public comments and in the public hearing. He
asked staff about the intersection that was referenced at 84th and 23e. Mr. English indicated he would get hold
of the study referenced and follow up on this. Board Member Rosen asked about the Planning Board's earlier
recommendation to move the Facilities Building up in the prioritization process. Director Feser stated she would
move that forward to Council as a recommendation from the Planning Board.
Board Member Rosen asked about noting that the allocation for regular maintenance of the Boys and Girls Club
is likely to change. Director Feser gave an update on this project. She explained that the Boys and Girls Club
has informed the City that their intent is to demolish the existing facility and build a new youth -focused building
on their 12,000-foot allocation at Civic Park. They are also talking with Edmonds Center for the Arts about
doing a teen center there and using their gym facilities as well. It is still very early in the design process; it is
unknown when the actual demolition and construction of the building will occur. However, until the building
is demolished, the City owns the building and is responsible for maintaining it. Mr. English added that this was
part of the bond funding and may need to be reallocated to a different deferred -maintenance project. Board
Member Rosen recommended putting a note that things are expected to change, but it is not known exactly
how.
0
Vice Chair Gladstone commented that staff's presentation of what they have planned was really good, but it
was still not clear what the drivers were for the decisions. She suggested in the future that staff explain in their
0-
presentations why decisions were made. She is not seeing where the priorities they have agreed on, such as
Q
equity around the city, are being reflected, particularly on the facilities side. Mr. English explained that the
Comprehensive Plans are the major drivers in how projects are picked. A lot of Public Works' funding is related
cc
to capital maintenance and preservation. Investments are made and prioritized based on the condition of the
asset. In addition, there can be other inputs from the City's Operations group who is familiar with problems and
c
issues out in the field. Additionally, safety, available funding, and grant competitiveness are also considered. N
Board Member Campbell said she would like it to be clarified which items are not determined by the
Comprehensive Plan and where there is opportunity for things like public comment. She would like to see a
more thorough discussion of those things with the Planning Board especially about how they can push this out
into the community more. She is willing to support the proposals as put forward today; however, moving
forward she would like to see it made clear where public can be involved and see a much broader effort at public
involvement. This would make it much more likely that they can reach the equitable engagement goals in 2023
and 2024.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
CAMPBELL, TO FORWARD THE 2023-2028 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) & CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) AS PRESENTED WITH THE NOTES THAT WERE
RECOMMENDED THROUGH THE DISCUSSION REGARDING MOVING THE FACILITIES
PROJECT UP IN THE PROCESS AND ADDING AN ASTERISK COMMENT REGARDING THE
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB. MOTION PASSED 3-1 WITH BOARD MEMBERS PENCE, ROSEN,
AND CAMPBELL VOTING IN FAVOR AND VICE CHAIR GLADSTONE VOTING AGAINST
THE MOTION.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 6 of 11
Packet Pg. 8
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Comprehensive Plan Visioning Summary
Director McLaughlin reviewed the approach used to reach populations they don't often hear from in the public
process. The strategy included inclusive branding, a survey and marketing in multiple languages, meeting
people where they are, having a good neighborhood presence, testing new outreach strategies, and willingness
to make mistakes and learn. The goal was to solicit 3500 comments from the community. One comment equals
each response to a survey question and each comment recorded at an outreach event. Over 8500 comments were
collected. Director McLaughlin reviewed survey results. The majority of survey respondents were from
downtown. She noted that neighborhoods are not clearly defined, so this is fairly subjective. Staff was pleased
with the amount of engagement overall.
Things people love about Edmonds:
• Small-town feel
• Access to waterfront and nature to
as
• Walkability
• Locally owned businesses
• Thriving arts and culture C
How people would like to see their values reflected in Edmonds: Q.
• Environmental stewardship — protect natural areas
Q.
• Commitment to being inclusive and celebrating our diversity $
• Improve infrastructure for walking and biking
• Disparate comments regarding growth: oppose high -density; recognition of need for more housing N
options
What people don't like about Edmonds:
• Being too car -centric — lack of sidewalks, need for better public transportation, speeding drivers, and
imbalance of parking
• Government — inequitable distribution of funds, lack of transparency and accountability, concern that
only the loudest voices are heard
Mixed response to land capacity — increased density is not desired by some; others say there is not
enough housing
What kinds of businesses do people travel outside the city for?
Larger retailers in Lynnwood or U-District — mentions of Alderwood Mall, Central Market, Costco,
Fred Meyer
Sentiment that big -box and large retailers are not needed in Edmonds. It's okay to travel to some things.
Do people work in Edmonds?
• No — 72% and Yes — 28%. 35% of those that do not work in Edmonds are retired. Of those that work
outside of Edmonds, the most prominent work sectors related to education, training, library, healthcare,
and technology.
What people are most concerned about when it comes to the environmental future of Edmonds:
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 7 of 11
Packet Pg. 9
Water protection — sea -level rise, protection of streams, general pollution
Green Space — retaining or replacing tree canopy, notable mention of "right time, right place" for
preservation of views
Land Capacity — density is harmful, citing associate tree canopy loss and increased traffic; others say
density is a solution, citing walkable communities and sustainable buildings as an outcome
Do people feel like their ethnicity and culture are represented in Edmonds and what ethnicities and cultures
would they like to see better represented in Edmonds?
• Most commonly skipped question
• Large majority of those who self -identified as white said yes
For "needs more" responses, most common answers were "all non -white cultures" and
indigenous/Native American
Many found the question divisive
Things the City can do to better celebrate diverse cultures:
• Partner with ethnic and cultural minority communities — honor holidays that aren't white dominant
culture, honor cultural presence through events and public art
• Increase representation in hiring and elected and appointed positions
• Installing streetscape design that acknowledges culture, heritage, and language 0
0
Things that can be done to improve neighborhoods: a
• Walkability — maintain/repair existing sidewalks, lighting, crosswalks for people with mobility issues Q
• Road maintenance and safety — traffic calming, improve cyclists' safety
• More public space — green space, space for families with young children
• Keep small-town atmosphere o
Staff is working on how to synthesize this information into a cohesive vision statement which is forward -looking
20 years into the future. They will continue to analyze results and to work on drafting the vision statement. The
vision statement is expected to be revealed on November 5 at Porchfest. It will be validated through a survey
and a Community Champions Advisory Committee. There will be numerous briefings at Planning Board and
City Council.
Comments/Questions:
Chair Pence asked about the logistics for revealing this at Porchfest which is a music festival. Director
McLaughlin explained how this idea came about and noted it was likely to draw more attention than they ever
could by just revealing the Comprehensive Plan vision statement on its own. They will have airtime and
materials and carve out their space. Chair Pence asked about the boards and commissions advisory group.
Director McLaughlin replied that is expected to be formed in the first quarter of 2023.
Board Member Rosen had the following questions/comments:
• He suggested testing the vision statement for both language and cultural sensitivity. Director
McLaughlin agreed and noted that PRR is doing that.
• He referred to packet page 204 where it references "accountability to businesses" and asked what that
means. Staff replied they would have to follow up on that.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 8 of 11
Packet Pg. 10
2.1.a
He thought that some of the statistics would be significantly modified based on a cross tab. He
recommended doing some cross tabs based on age, retirement, etc. Director McLaughlin replied that
they wanted to keep this survey very approachable and did not ask for race, age, or other demographic
information. That will come later as they get into more topical areas of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr.
Shipley noted they could do some cross tabs on the full survey on things such as how long they have
lived here or neighborhoods.
He referred to packet page 216 regarding parking and said he was surprised that some people wanted
more parking and some wanted less. Director McLaughlin noted that there are some neighborhoods
where there is a lot of parking in some areas (like 5 Corners) and not enough in others.
The Board recessed from 9:05 to 9:10 p.m.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Development Code Update Work Plan
as
Senior Planner Mike Clugston and Director McLaughlin made the presentation regarding the Development
Code Modernization Work Plan. Director McLaughlin reviewed the purpose of development codes and the
history of Edmonds' zoning and ordinance codes. She referred to the datum point mentioned by Mr. Reidy o
earlier and noted this was in the presentation just for levity since it is an obsolete reference. She reviewed staff >
resources available for the code update. There will be a dedicated FTE to manage the code who will manage a
the code, lead legislation, and work with consultants as needed. Staff will collaborate with in-house subject Q
matter experts and have a budget available for on -call services.
Staff views code rewriting as an interactive process of improvements to the Edmonds development codes. It
includes changes to both structure and content; ensures the code is representative of best practices; offers both
flexibility and predictability to developers, design professionals, and contractors; and is outcome focused and
mindful of implications. Staff recognizes that there are structural changes that can happen right away such as
reorganizing Titles 15-24 to be more accessible and usable and improving the search and interactive functions.
It is expected this first round of improvements will be completed by the end of 2022. Content changes are
proposed to be looked at in terms of "minor" and "major" categories. This allows for a more responsive process
that can quickly respond to policy decisions and can be implemented through changes to ECDC 20.80.Overall
changes are intended to use plain language, replace words with graphics and illustrations, and eliminate
unnecessary code.
Minor amendments would promote clarity, eliminate redundancy, streamline processes, better align with best
practices, and correct scrivener's errors. These would be presented directly to Council on a semi-annual basis
(December/June) or more frequently as needed. She reviewed the proposed changes to ECDC 20.80 in the
packet. Major amendments would take more time. They would be vetted thoroughly with detailed data/analysis
and include inclusive public engagement. There is a required process for these through GMA and the City's
code.
Board Member Campbell asked for more detail about the streamlining of processes. She recalled that for the
wireless code review, not having the stakeholders involved on earlier segments didn't come to light until there
was a public hearing. If they are talking about removing steps in the process, she wanted to make sure that public
involvement wasn't compromised. Mr. Clugston acknowledged that the process for the wireless code review
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 9 of 11
Packet Pg. 11
2.1.a
didn't go properly, but staff is working through that. He explained that the minor code amendments would have
no policy impact and are things that could be done very quickly. He reviewed more details of the proposed
amendments to Chapter 20.80. The new process for the minor amendments would streamline the process for
changes that need little or no policy study. Minor code amendments would not go through the Planning Board,
but just go straight to the Council on a semi-annual basis. Major amendments would still go through the Planning
Board process.
Chair Pence referred to section 10.40 of the Planning Board Charter which says that text amendments to the
Development Code come through Planning Board. He thinks they ought to see everything, and it may help to
deal with public skepticism. He noted that things that the staff thinks are minor might not seem minor to the
public.
Vice Chair Gladstone spoke in support of this as long as "minor" is defined well enough and is just basically
used for cleaning up the code. She thought making it go through the Planning Board would be overkill.
Director McLaughlin noted that the amount of time staff generally spends on very minor amendments is
enormous. The process is wildly inefficient, and things are not moving. Taking care of the minor amendments c
in this way will allow more time to deal with real policy issues. Chair Pence suggested asking City Council to
amend section 10.40 to reduce the Planning Board's workload. Staff concurred. c
Board Member Campbell said she has no problems with the process proposed for minor amendments only. She
0-
wants to make sure that the Planning Board still reviews the more substantive items. She referred to the intent
0
of staff to replace words with graphics and recommended having processes in place to ensure appropriate
translations and appropriate ADA compliance. Mr. Clugston explained that Code Publishing offers those
2-
features. Board Member Campbell thanked staff for their explanations.13
Student Representative Distelhorst spoke in support of moving the minor amendments directly to Council
because it will be more efficient for the City and help things move along. She has noticed that some projects get
stuck at the Planning Board, and she has felt like the Board was slowing the process down too much.
Chair Pence noted that board members can still read the City Council packets and make comments if they feel
something needs to be addressed.
Mr. Clugston noted there would be a public hearing on November 30 on the changes to 20.80. He will talk to
the City Attorney to see if any changes need to be made to Chapter 10.40, the Planning Board Charter.
B. Motion to make a budget request to City Council to fund a communications system that supports remote
participation at in -person Planning Board meetings.
Chair Pence explained that Councilmember Teitzel had requested that the Board consider this motion asking
Council to provide funds to allow hybrid meetings to occur.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
CAMPBELL, TO INFORM THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
WISHES TO RETURN TO IN -PERSON MEETINGS IN A HYBRID FORMAT, ONE THAT
PERMITS REMOTE PARTICIPATION BY MEMBERS AND THE PUBLIC. THE BOARD
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 10 of l l
Packet Pg. 12
2.1.a
RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL TO BUDGET FOR A
COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM THAT SUPPORTS SUCH MEETINGS.
VICE CHAIR GLADSTONE OFFERED A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO HAVE THE EDMONDS
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET FOR THE RESOURCES TO SUPPORT SUCH MEETINGS. THE
FRIENDLY AMENDMENT WAS APPROVED.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (4-0) TO APPROVE THE MOTION AS AMENDED.
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
The extended agenda was reviewed. There will be a Special Meeting with City Council on November 1. There
was discussion about the expectations for the format of that meeting as well as other topics on the extended
agenda.
Mr. Clugston asked about the origin and the prioritization of the list of future projects. Board Member Rosen
stated it was a list primarily generated by Rob of projects that were on the radar. The list also reflects items that c
could be brought up whenever there is time on the agenda. Mr. Clugston indicated he would review and possibly
edit the list if some things have been covered or can be deleted. Chair Pence suggested categorizing these items c
in various ways such as whether things need an action by the Planning Board or are just updates, and whether
things are active or not active.
a
Q.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS a
None.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Student Representative Distelhorst requested help with accessing her email. Mr. Clugston indicated he would
follow up with her.
Board Member Rosen noted that the consultant PRR has been referenced quite a bit lately. He wanted to make
it clear that he was an owner and managing principal of PRR in the past; however, he does not have any conflict
of interest. He has been retired from there since 2017 and is not involved in any way with them now.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 10:21 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 26, 2022 Page 11 of 11
Packet Pg. 13
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 11/9/2022
Civic Center Playfield Rules Request
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Human Services
Prepared By: Angie Feser
Background/History
The City of Edmonds parks system typically allows use for the duration of "Dawn to Dusk" to provide
access and use of parks, trails, open space and recreation facilities during daylight hours. It is an industry
standard and all three neighboring jurisdictions of Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace and Shoreline use the
same approach. Snohomish County is 7:00am to dusk for day -use parks. Attached is list of City of
Edmonds Park hours inventoried late this summer.
Neighboring residents, called the Civic Park Residents Group, have formally requested the City's
consideration for rules restricting various activities and lighting within Civic Center Playfield park. There
are three main requests -
1. Change the "Dawn to Dusk" hours to fixed hours of operation including the general park hours being
6:00am to 9:00pm and restricted hours of use for the skate park, tennis/pickleball court, basketball,
soccer [multipurpose lighted athletic fields] and exercise stations to 9:00am to 8:00pm.
2. Prohibit wheeled sports on the walkways and promenade.
3. Limit hours of lighting of the east -west promenade to posted hours of use.
These requests are further detailed in an attachment containing a cover letter dated July 1, 2022 and
includes a 2016 Civic Park Residential Survey and collected Civic Park Residents signatures.
Staff Recommendation
Park Hours
The Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department recommends resuming the City Center Playfield's
"Dawn to Dusk" hours of use for the entire park and amenities. This is the majority of hours of use for
the City of Edmonds parks and an industry standard. The park was designed and built with lighted
athletic fields designed to drain well so use could be extended past daylight and throughout the year.
The athletic field lights are permitted to be on until 10:15pm. These will be the only lighted field
available for community and youth sport usage in the City of Edmonds.
Wheeled Sport Restriction
It is also recommended by staff to not restrict the use of wheeled sports within the park other than the
possible restriction of some types of wheels activity on the rubberized track. The wide sidewalks and
paved paths provide for multiple uses including bicycles, tricycles, strider bikes, scooters, rollerblades
and the like. Currently, there are no prohibition of wheeled sports in any of City of Edmonds parks.
Promenade Lighting Restriction
Although not many of our parks are lighted, the typical practice for pedestrian lighting is to remain on
through dark hours for safety and expanded opportunity of use by park users especially in the fall and
Packet Pg. 14
winter months. There is limited lighting within the park with most of it being the east -west promenade
13' high pedestrian illumination on the northern edge of the concrete path. Discussions with Edmonds
Police Department also support the use of dark hours lighting especially along the promenade for safety
and security of users. One of the purposes of the promenade is to facilitate the ease of moving from one
side of the park to the other without using the alleyways to the north and south of the park.
Recommendation to Council
Staff is requesting the Parks & Planning Board's consideration of the three rule requests and make a
recommendation for City Council's consideration.
Attachments:
Edmonds Park Hours of Operation Sign Inventory
Civic Park Residents Group Rules Request Cover & Signature FINAL
Packet Pg. 15
8.1
City of Edmonds Parks - Sign Inventory (September 2022)
Park Park Opening Park Closing Comments
144 Railroad Ave Tidelands
No hours posted
Brackett's Landing North
6:00 AM
10:00 PM
Brackett's Landing North
6:00 AM
10:00 PM
Brackett's Landing North
6:00 AM
10:00 PM
Brackett's Landing South
Sunrise
Sunset
at entrance to Waterfront Center Park
heading North on waterfront walkway
Brackett's Landing South
6:00 AM
10:00 PM
at South entrance to Waterfront Center Park
from Railroad Ave
Centennial Plaza
No hours posted
City Park
Dusk
States "Park Closed at Dusk" w/ no open
City Park
Dusk
States "Park Closed at Dusk" w/ no open
Civic Center Playfield
Currently under costruction
Dayton St Plazas
No hours posted
Edmonds Library Plaza
No hours posted
Edmonds Marsh
No hours posted
Edmonds Memorial Cemetery
Dawn
Dusk
No hours posted
Waterfront Center Park
Sunrise
Sunset
at entrance to Waterfront Center Park
heading North on waterfront walkway
Waterfront Center Park
6:00 AM
10:00 PM
at South entrance to Waterfront Center Park
from Railroad Ave
Elm St Park
No hours posted
Frances Anderson Center Field
No hours posted
H.O. Hutt Park
No hours posted
Haines Tidelands
No hours posted
Haines Wharf
Dawn
Dusk
Hazel Miller Plaza
No hours posted
Hickman Park
Dawn
Dusk
Hummingbird Hill Park
No hours posted
Interurban Trail
No hours posted
Lake Ballinger Access
No hours posted
Maplewood Hill Park
Dawn
Dusk
No hours posted
Marina Beach Park
Dusk
Open hours/time is taped over
Marina Beach Park
Dawn
Dusk
Marina Beach Park
Dawn
Dusk
Marina Beach Park
6:00 AM
10:00 PM
Marina Beach Park
Dawn
Dusk
Marina Beach Park
Dawn
Dusk
Marina Beach Park
Dawn
Dusk
Marina Beach Park
Dawn
Dusk
Mathay Ballinger Park
Dawn
Dusk
Meadowdale Natural Areas
No hours posted
Ocean Avenue Viewpoint
8:00 AM
Dusk
(3) "No parking Dusk to Sam" Signs
Olympic Beach
No hours posted
Olympic View Open Space
No hours posted
Packet Pg. 16
8.1
Pine Ridge Ext. SW
No hours posted
Pine Ridge Park
Dawn
Dusk
Pine St Park
No hours posted
Richard F. Anway Park
No hours posted
Seaview Park
Dawn
Dusk
Seaview Reservoir
Open Space. On -Street Parking.
Shell Creek Open Space
No signs posted
Sierra Park
Dawn
Dusk
Stamm Overlook
10:00 PM
No "open" hours ."One Hour Parking" "Park
closed 10pm" strictly enforced
Sunset Ave
8:00 AM
10:00 PM
Several "No Parking" 10 PM to 8 AM signs
along Sunset Ave
Veterans Plaza
No hours posted
Wharf Street
"No Parking" sign placed by citizen. Non-
MUTCD sign. No turnaround. Beach access
marked private
Willow Creek Park
No signs found
Yost Memorial Park
Dawn
Dusk
Underwater Dive Park
Signs are located along walkway @ Brackett's
Landing North
r
N
N
a
m
N
a)
a�
IL
L
c
a)
v
U
0
c
m
c
c
a�
in
c
0
c�
L
Q
0
0
L
0
L
CL
C
0
E
W
C
a)
E
:i
Q
Packet Pg. 17
8.2
July 1, 2022
Ms. Angela Feser, Director
Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services
700 Main Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
Dear Ms. Feser:
This letter is from the Civic Park Residents Group, which was formed in
2016 when the park was in its initial planning stages. Currently, it has about 50
members. The purpose of this letter is to request your consideration of specific
operating hours and noise abatement rules for the park when it reopens.
In 2016, a neighborhood survey was conducted to identify issues
important to residents. At this time, plans for revamping the park were first
announced (Attachment 1). Subsequently, three members of our steering
committee —Pat Woodell, Dave Teitzel, and Lucinda McMahan --were asked by
Carrie Hite to join the Civic Park Advisory Committee --a group that represented
stakeholders in planning the design and use of the Park. The steering committee
also has three additional members: James Welsh, Barry Ehrlich, and Kathy
Prewitt.
This month, the steering committee reviewed operating times for other
parks around Edmonds and saw that they all had fixed hours of use. In City
Park, for example, general operating hours are 7:00 am - 9:30 pm. Hours for the
Hazel Miller Spray Park are 10:00 am - 8:00 pm. Yost Park has general operating
hours of 6:00 am - 7:45 pm, with tennis and pickleball permitted between 7:00
am - 9:00 pm.
On the other hand, Civic Park hours were posted as "dawn to dusk" before
the park closed for construction. This designation is like "sunrise to sunset" in
the City's regulations. This appears to be the fall -back schedule for park opening
hours when specific hours are not established by the director of parks and
recreation (Edmonds regulation 5.32.010 Park closing hours).
We believe that "dawn to dusk" hours of use for Civic Park are vague, and
they have been widely open to interpretation in the past. The uncertainty about
"dusk" has contributed to late -night noise from the skate park and other public
activities at Civic Park. Night time noise has been a long-standing issue for
nearby residents (2016 resident survey). Police have been called frequently to
eject late -night skaters, which is a drain on City resources and a burden for
residents, who are awoken late at night by the crash of skateboards and loud
conversation.
Packet Pg. 18
8.2
We would like to respectfully request that you change "dawn to dusk"
hours for Civic Park to fixed hours of operation, based on your authority
described in Edmonds regulation 5.32.020 - Specially designated hours by
op stingy. If you approve of specific hours, we would like to request placement of
time -of -use signs at the entrances to the park and around the areas of the tennis
and pickle ball courts, the basketball courts, exercise stations, and the skate
park.
Using the example of varied open times for activities in City and Yost
Parks, we would like to propose the following hours for Civic Park:
General park hours:
(walkers, joggers)
Hours of use for the
skate park, tennis and
pickle ball, basketball,
soccer, & exercise stations
6:00 am to 9:00 pm
9:00 am to 5:00 pm
We would also like to propose that Civic Park rules of use be modified to
prohibit wheeled sports on the walkways around the park and the promenade --
both to help with noise abatement and to promote safety. This sign on the
Edmonds Marina boardwalk is an example of what might work if a skateboard
logo was added:
In addition to being noisy, wheeled sports pose a safety issue for walkers,
runners, strollers, and baby carriages.
We understand that lighting is planned for the east -west promenade.
Would it be possible to limit hours of lighting to the posted hours of use? We
believe that lighting near the skate park will encourage late -night skating.
X
Packet Pg. 19
8.2
We are delighted that the City is undertaking the task of transforming Civic
Field into a beautiful park and we support the City's efforts. We also understand
and appreciate the hard work that goes into planning and executing a multi -year
project of this scope. We hope a good balance can be found between the
enjoyment of the park by the public and the needs of nearby residents to have a
reasonable degree of quiet during certain hours. Thus, we hope that our requests
will be taken in the spirit of constructive support for residents and users of the
park alike.
Si ely,
Patricia Woodell
Civic Park Steering Committee
Lucinda McMahan
Civic Park Steering Committee
Dave Teitzel
Civic Park Steering Committee
m Welsh, Civic Park Steering
Committee
s
Barry E lich *Kthy PrOtt
Civic Park Steering Committee Civic Park Steering Committee
Attachment 1: 2016 Civic Park Residential Survey
Attachment 2: Civic Park Residents signatures by address
3
Packet Pg. 20
8.2
ATTACHMENT 2
Letter To Angie Feser
dated August 8, 2022
CIVIC PARK RESIDENTS GROUP
REQUEST FOR SPECIFIC HOURS OF USE, LIGHTING HOURS OF USE, AND SAFETY RULES
PLEASE NOTE: Additional signatures are highlighted in bold
ADDRESS
NO. OF
ADDRESS
NO. OF
SIGNATURES
SIGNATURES
611 Bell Street
7
416 Daley Street
3
621 Bell Street
1
424 Daley Street
2
623 Bell Street
2
610 Daley Street
10
625 Bell Street
1
624 Daley Street
2
631 Bell Street
4
628 Daley Street
3
641 Bell Street
5
636 Daley Street
11
645 Bell Street
5
656 Daley Street
4
653 Bell Street
4
658 Daley Street
2
657 Bell Street
1
731 Daley Street
1
755 Daley Street
1
200 7th Avenue North
2
759 Daley Street
2
220 7th Avenue North
2
302 7th Avenue North
2
414 7th Avenue North
1
TOTAL
41
714 Edmonds Street
1
723 Edmonds Street
2
421 Sprague Street
6
429 Sprague Street
4
711 Sprague Street
1
304 4th Avenue
1
1001 5th Avenue
1
TOTAL 53
OVERALL TOTAL 94
Packet Pg. 21
O
C7
la
71
�l
l�
L
n
Q�
1
�1
s
Q'
d
0
Packet Pg. 22
8.2
i
92
0
W
F-�
Q
Q
z
E�
z
H
z
z
Q
F-
z
a
Packet Pg. 23
8.2
W
Q
Q
r
}
F
�
h
W
�
Z
Q
a
Packet Pg. 24
8.2
U
U
U
U N
+, O
b�
o
�4 •u
4 .-
4' U
a)
Q.) o
a�
L°
v �
� o
'S U
U
w
Q
�
r
o�
z
H
H
z
w
z�
J
Q�
a
Packet Pg. 25
8.2
r
W
QN
tJ
N
N
I
N
i
O
Z
H
z
'
Qj
4j
Z
Z
f
W
S
H
�
a
�
�
Packet Pg. 26
8.2
1�
�
�
v
c
�
r
o
E-
z
C
va
c
V
�j
J
�s
C
RN
Packet Pg. 27
8.2
00
�x
�Cd
Cd
Oat
}U
a�
�w
�bjO
-j
.�
Q�
V 1°
45
�b
U �
O U
U �
4) N
cd
L
Cd
O
W U
o
1.4
�ri
Q
A
0
z
F�
z
H
d
C�
W
z
Q
z
a
Z
Packet Pg. 28
8.2
SM
Q
r.�
U
F
q
W
H
z
W
z
a
Packet Pg. 29
8.2
O
z
Q;
O
O
Cq
Mpli
w
Q
v J
n
� J
`
0
F
U?
ws7
Q
a
is j
Packet Pg. 30
8.2
co
W
w
\
r,
4f
E-{
�
N
�
0
zv
�
Q
a
Packet Pg. 31
8.2
N
O
Q
�
0
z
W
H
r-�
U1
W
a
Packet Pg. 32
8.2
W
A
O
z
F
z
C7
z
Packet Pg. 33
8.2
U)
W
Co
rl
0
W
W
Q
f
O
�
E�
z
a
�
d
ti
3
0
w
z
v
Q
z
a
�
Packet Pg. 34
8.2
W
Q
�
z
F+
z
F
C),
4,4
z
Q
w
�
V�
�
Q
a
Packet Pg. 35
8.2
w
rj
N
rA
W
C/?
Q
n
Packet Pg. 36
8.2
g
W
A
O
z
H
z
W
A
a
Packet Pg. 37
8.2
W
Q
O
z
F
z
z
z
�
Q
a
Packet Pg. 38
w
8.2
O
N
�
0
z
H
t�
S
W
�
A
H
a
�
Packet Pg. 39
8.2
DI
Q
�
O
1
1
O
z
F
w
z
�1
`J
W
�
Q
a
Packet Pg. 40
8.2
Q
O
z
E-
lJ
z
\`
Q
z
a
Packet Pg. 41
8.2
U
u
04
.W
cd (1)
o 0
o
a�
m M
Q
w
m�
a �
d�
cd
op,
+; ?
}' U
a�
�bn
o
.{1
•� lJ
4C
U .0
.W
�1 V
U cd
O �
cu
43 cu
cd
Cd
bio4)
0
0
-11
A.
O
z
H
z
z
VJ
z
w
F
�
a
ON
Packet Pg. 42
8.2
-4-J
v
cu
Q o
�W
U
V
N O
0 o
[ � ,
cd
�3
-J
V4-1
U
o
v�
910
$. m
CU
4
U •�
U �
O N
N
cd
�. Cd
0
b'
0
0
F"
O
z
z
z
C/�
c
c-
`L
w
�
�
z
�
w�
a
-�
Packet Pg. 43
8.2
o R.
0 o
v
a�
Cd
b3
Cd
oa
-J
4-' U
a�
4 �°
4-bD
r4
41
4�
.4
�o
C
�o
0.4 ; a
U �
O U
U ~'
-.
U
4.5
Cd
V4
Cd
(U
4-J O
0
0
kv
A
v,
O
z
{�,�
�
H
z
w
[�
a
H
z
`
U)
W
z
L
a
Packet Pg. 44
8.2
w
N N
O 0
4-20
N
v 4-1
w
C�
W
od
�.. U
-b
{-' U
a�
� o
4
a�
-04
O
-- b
-J
U
r+ ..�
cucd
r4 V1
O tip
S
V
N Q]
c
� A
to
'0
Cd z �
bjO V
0
0)
0
A
w
Q
`n
1!,
rt
�1
O
z
H
H
Z
r-i
w
�
�
J
z
Q
�
a
-
Packet Pg. 45
8.2
v �
4. s�
v
v
m
c�
o 0.
U
4-' U
v
4 �°
4-1 to
v o
v �
�b
cd
U
O 47
S
O
C
cd
1�
0
z
E�
z
1
CJ
a
H
C7
w
z
w
H
z
a
�
�
Packet Pg. 46
8.2
U
U
v
r-.
Cd 0)
4
� U
v �
0 0
v
b3
Cd
o Q.
-1,
4-' U
v
o
m .,
v�
(D o
v �
o
4-j�
U �
o v
m
U -5
Cd
.. Cd
v
to
'o
•4
>14-,
o
Co
0
A
N
�S
�
1�
O
z
�
�
V
W
�
z�
1
W
�
z
a
�
Packet Pg. 47
8.2
U
U
v
R.
g
v v
O 04
4, O
V
v
w v
�x
o a
+1 .
}' U
v
�1-4
�Lo
r .
-J
v --�
�L2
v
v �
v
U
S�
U
U
CS$
� v
� O
cd �
�q)
0
0
0
ct
Q
r
O
Z
m
z
�
�
W
Z
a
'L
W
�
C
z
w
H
z
a
�
Packet Pg. 48
8.2
M
a
Q
�
�
h
O
z
t
W
11 f
J
z
Q
w
z
�
Q
a
L
U s
Packet Pg. 49
8.2
E-
q
o
o
<
(�
C�o
�a
z
W
Q
o
r�
IV
N
m
m
,l)
N
rr
a
`m
c
m
U
v
U
J
Q
Z
L'
ca
?�
> s
o�
4�
N
�i
N�
r
a
3
Qi
Oj
�
� 1
to .
C
N .
`
Y �
�
�
a
C
5
qj
Packet Pg. 50
8.2
I
I
W
�
O
z
U)
W
A
W
Packet Pg. 51
8.2
GO
.r,
C� co
cn
0 0
w �
a�
o r�
�U
a�
4 �°
-j
Q�
�Q
4-J4.1
U
� cd
U
O Q7
r4
Q) U�+
a-J G
Cd U
U
Cd
L"
W
Q
N
N
N
O
�
z
r
N
�
�
H
z
W
Q
A
E-
z
a
Packet Pg. 52
8.2
0 +'
4
5-4
mCd
4a�
U
.>
U
w �
'4-j
U �".,
r. C�
U
O +�
U �
Q) �
U U
r' O
� O
O
U
¢+
U
� U
a
bA
Q
�bjO
WO
��
a) W
�:
lV
N
W�
2~
W
C!]
t
\
•
�
o
W
Packet Pg. 53
8.2
TO: Ms. Angela Feser, Director
Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services
700 Main Street
fat
onds, WA 98020
FROM:Woodell, Member
Park Residents Group
ring Committee
SUBJECT: Request Letter to Establish Hours of Use, Hours of Lighting,
and Safety Rules in Civic Park
DATE: August 8, 2022
Hi Angie,
When we originally sent you the 86 signatures for our letter requesting
specific hours of use, lighting limits, and safety rules for Civic Park, we
mentioned that we might be sending you additional signatures.
Two new signature pages from residents at 653 Bell Street and 429
Sprague Street (8 new signatures) are attached. This brings our total signatures
in support of the above requests to 94. Thank you for including these additional
pages to our original request letter and replacing the attached cover page for
Attachment II.
Packet Pg. 54
8.2
N
4-j
N
LO
c
U
.ti
U
Q)
0 0
a�
w �
Cd
as
x
1-,
-
Cd
J
�..
�U
�
o
x�
V
�o
4-J o
°J
U
6, 'd
U
r+" Vl
O
U
rl
Q) u
+J
Cd
� A
., M
N
� O
• � ca
i-i
O
O
z
z
z
U
4
�
Z
O
Q
r
Packet Pg. 55
8.2
U44
�� f eee
Edmonds, VL�`A.
We the undersigned residents of this property would like to request the
following:
• that specific hours of use be established for Civic Park.
• that specific rules governing noise outside the hours of use be
posted in the Park. These rules would restrict noise that would
affect residents living in near the Park.
• that lighting in the park be limited to the hours of use.
our signatures below acknowledge that we are represented by a steering
committee and we approve of the committee to represent us in these matters and
any others that would be beneficial to the interests of nearby park residents.
Packet Pg. 56
9.1
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 11/9/2022
Extended Agenda
Staff Lead: Michael Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michelle Martin
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review Extended Agenda items.
Narrative
Extended Agenda attached.
Attachments:
11.9.2022 Extended Agenda
Packet Pg. 57
9.1.a
Items and Dates are subject to change
PLAKHMS BOARD
Extended Agenda
November 9, 2022
November 2022
Nov 9 1. Civic Park Rules
Nov 23 1. No meeting - Day before Thanksgiving
Nov 30 Special Meeting
1. Public Hearing on Minor Code Amendment Process in Chapter 20.80
ECDC
2. Joint Meeting with Tree Board
December 2022
Dec 14 1. Election of Officers
2. Introduction to CG Step Back Interim Ordinance/Code Amendment in
Chapter 16.60 ECDC
3. Tree Code Update
Dec 28 No meeting — Holiday Break
IdflUdFy cuc3
Jan 11 1. Public Hearing on CG Step Back Code Amendment in Chapter 16.60
ECDC
2. Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department Quarterly Report
Jan 25 1. Comprehensive Plan Update
reoruary cu/-s
Feb 8 1.
Q
l
Packet Pg. 58
items ana pates are
9.1.a
o change
For 1.
Consideration 2
In 2023
3.
4.
5.
Tree code update
Comprehensive Plan work
Critical Aquifer Recharge code update
Wireless code update
CIP/CFP
Future
Consideration 1. Housing Policy Implementation
2. Neighborhood Center Plans (5 Corners)
3. ADA Transition Plan (Parks)
4. Further Highway 99 Implementation, including:
a. Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented design/development
strategies
b. Parking standards
Recurring 1. Election of Officers (Vt meeting in December)
Topics 2. Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department Reports & Updates- First
meeting after previous quarter (1/11/23, 4/12, 7/12, 10/11)
3. Joint meeting with City Council — April or as needed
4. Development Activity Report
a+
Q
2
Packet Pg. 59