Loading...
2023-04-13 Historic Preservation Commission PacketOF LU,� .� O cY do s I, IHy� REGULAR MEETING BRACKETT ROOM 121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020 Agenda Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission APRIL 13, 2023, 5:30 PM REMOTE MEETING INFORMATION: Remote meeting link: https:Hedmondswa- gov.zoom.us/j/87419346600?pwd=YmVIV1JQMjhiMj IrS25pUjY1Wk9BUT09 Meeting ID: 874 1934 6600 Passcode: 629853 This is a Hybrid meeting. The public may attend in -person or on-line. The physical location of the meeting is at Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue N., 3rd floor Brackett Room. You may call in to meeting:US: +1 253 205 0468 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 408 638 0968 LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approve Minutes AGENDA ADDITIONS / CHANGES REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE NEW BUSINESS 1. Potential Addition of 820 Main Street to Edmonds Register of Historic Places 2. Historic District Exploration UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Unfinished Business ACTION ITEMS VIII. COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS IX. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Agenda April 13, 2023 Page 1 XI. Statement Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Agenda April 13, 2023 Page 2 2.1 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/13/2023 Approve Minutes Staff Lead: Michele Szafran Department: Planning & Development Prepared By: Michelle Martin Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve meeting minutes from January 12th (revised) and March 9th, 2023. Narrative Draft meeting minutes from the January 12th (revisions) and March 9th meetings are attached. Attachments: 2023-01-12 HPC Minutes revised 2023-03-09 HPC Draft Minutes Packet Pg. 3 2.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Summary Minutes of Regular Meeting January 12, 2023 CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, AND LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Chair Vogel called the meeting of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:35 p.m. and read the Land Acknowledgement. Commissioners Present Larry Vogel (Chair) Jeremy Mitchell (Vice Chair) (online) Chris Deiner-Karr Katie Kelly David Preston Tim Raetzloff Sam Spencer' Commissioners Absent None MINUTES: Staff Present Michele Szafran, Planner Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Others Present Dave Teitzel, Edmonds City Council Representative Approval of December 8, 2023 HPC Minutes The December 8, 2023 HPC minutes were approved as presented. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES • Chair Vogel added a discussion about accessing emails under New Business. REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE There were no audience comments. NEW BUSINESS 1 Commissioner Spencer arrived at 5:45 p.m. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2023 Pagel of 3 Packet Pg. 4 Q 2.1.a Discussion on support for an addition to the Register: o Commissioner Deiner-Karr gave an update on her weir research. She is at a standstill because she has been unable to locate the folder on documentation about the weir from the Commission's work ten years ago. She will try to get in touch with Diane Cunningham and Steve to see if they have any information. o Commissioner Raetzloff recalled that there was some reason Steve was opposed to putting it on the Register. o Councilmember Teitzel wondered if the weir could still be on the Register if part of it is destroyed. o Commissioner Raetzloff thought they should just worry about getting it on the Register first and get signage put up. o Commissioner Spencer suggested they put in a recommendation identifying the part they would like to save — the part with the hole that would have had the wooden pipe going through it. He noted he has pictures of the two sections as a reference of what it looks like now. o Vice Chair Mitchell noted that there is a section in ECDC 20.45.02 for processes of designating a property or structure. Part D indicates that HPC shall consider the merits of the nomination according to established rules at a public meeting. o Councilmember Teitzel noted that Shell Creek is a salmon -bearing stream, and they get up as far as Glen Street. The City is trying to get the man-made waterfall there resolved so fish can come up and make their way back to Yost Park. He summarized that there is an effort to get salmon up there and restore the stream to its natural streambed. o There was a recommendation to bring this to a public hearing along with a presentation at the next meeting or as soon as possible. Commissioner Deiner-Karr suggested that whoever is the project planner should try to be at the meeting. Councilmember Teitzel thought Director Feser would be the appropriate staff person to attend. Ms. Szafran noted they need to have time to do a staff report, public noticing, and make sure the application is complete. They need to find out what the UTM is. There was a suggestion to get in touch with Diane Cunningham about this. o Chair Vogel commented that there has been some vandalism in the Shell Creek drainage area. Someone has cut down a number of trees which has had an impact on erosion, silting into the stream, and salmon incubation boxes there. o Vice Chair Mitchell stated that all or a portion of a structure can be on the Register. He wondered about the timeline for repair and if they should do the work before putting it on the Register. Putting it on the Register first could hold up the getting the work done. Councilmember Teitzel wasn't sure about the timing because they haven't hired a consultant yet but the hope is to get it done this year. o Commissioner Spencer suggested that they make a recommendation to try to save part of it subject to the engineer's recommendation. He did not think the part they want to save is impeding the stream in any way. The critical aspect is to the get the work done and get the stream where it needs to be. Vice Chair Mitchell commented that even if they have to remove all of it, they can still save a part and put it somewhere else on the site. o There was consensus to have another discussion about this at the next meeting under Unfinished Business with the package that Commissioner Spencer has put together and to invite Director Feser and Joe Scordino. There was discussion about recognizing the site, not the structure. Then, it can still be recognized even if the City is unable to preserve a portion. Councilmember Teitzel commented that the City has every intention of preserving what is preservable. It was emphasized that the HPC was in support of the City's work on this stream. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 5 Q 2.1.a 2. Discussion about email communications — Chair Vogel said he had sent a note about accessing city email and how to forward it to personal email. There was discussion about when and how to do this. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Newsletter — Preservationist Resurrection: o Chair Vogel agreed to be the desktop publisher on this. He thought an article about the water system would be a great. Commissioner Spencer agreed to write it. o Commissioner Raetzloff suggested that a historic event next month could be about the 50t' anniversary of the last train to Duvall. 2. Walking Tours: o There was consensus to do walking tours closer to spring. Commissioner Raetzloff expressed a desire to get trained so he can help with this. ACTION ITEMS • Commissioner Deiner-Karr stated that the calendar portion of the 2024 Calendar is done. As a theme for 2024 she liked Commissioner Spencer's idea of doing Edmonds' oddities. Some ideas were the alligator bus with the kids running to the back and flipping the bus up, the theater with the kids throwing popcorn over the edge, the oldest fire hydrant in the city, Haines Wharf, the troll tunnel, the monorail, the dome, Frank Peabody, the driftwood orca, and Otto's meat market. COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Vogel commented he would not be at the February meeting. Commissioner Raetzloff stated he also would be gone. Vice Chair Mitchell will be chairing the February 9 meeting. He received a nice email from Councilmember Chen thanking the HPC for the calendar. There was discussion about where the calendars went, who might need more, costs, and possibly printing more next year. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS • Commissioner Preston suggested adding a call to action on the back of the calendar to encourage owners of historic properties to list their properties. Chair Vogel agreed and asked him to also write a blurb for the newsletter about that. • Commissioner Deiner-Karr asked about updating the walking map. She also noted she was working with Betty Lou on some research and hoping they can look at some other historical sites. • Commissioner Preston said he enjoyed the calendar and is excited to get the next one out. • Commissioner Kelly wished everyone happy new year. • Commissioner Spencer spoke in support of saving part of the weir and getting a sign put up. • Vice Chair Mitchell wished everyone a happy new year. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:41 p.m. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes January 12, 2023 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 6 Q 2.1.b CITY OF EDMONDS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Summary Minutes of Regular Meeting March 9, 2023 CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL Chair Vogel called the meeting of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:37 p.m. and read the land acknowledgement. Commissioners Present Larry Vogel (Chair) Jeremy Mitchell (Exiting Vice Chair) Chris Deiner-Karr Katie Kelly David Preston Tim Raetzloff Sam Spencer (New Vice Chair) Commissioners Absent None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of January 12, 2023 HPC Minutes Staff Present Michele Szafran, Planner Others Present Dave Teitzel, Edmonds City Council Representative The January 12, 2023 HPC minutes were approved as presented. Scrivener's errors regarding the spelling of Commissioner Deiner-Karr's name were noted. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES Ms. Szafran told the group that the CLG (Certified Local Government) Coordinator with the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Michelle Thompson, might join them at the end of the meeting to introduce herself. REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE There were no audience comments. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes March 9, 2023 Pagel of 4 Packet Pg. 7 N d 0 L 0. a a 2.1.b NEW BUSINESS HPC Member Update Jeremy Mitchell reported that he was appointed to the Planning Board back in February and would need to relinquish his seat provided this doesn't impede the HPC from carrying out any business. He expressed an interested in staying involved in the weir project. There was some discussion about areas of overlap between the HPC and the Planning Board. Chair Vogel suggested that Commissioner Mitchell stay on as an ex officio member and report back to the HPC. Commissioner Mitchell indicated he would be happy to do that as long as he is able. There was some discussion about the requirements for a replacement and a couple potential candidates. Sam Spencer was nominated and unanimously elected Vice Chair. 2. Discussion on support for adding the weir to the Register Vice Chair Spencer and Commissioner Mitchell made a presentation regarding the weir including the background, issues, and repairs under review. There was interest in having the weir designated as a historic structure of some sort based on its historical relevance as part of the original water system in Edmonds. Commissioners expressed a desire to find a way to save the weir while also improving salmon conditions. There was consensus to have Chair Vogel draft and circulate a memo to Director Feser which would express the desire of the HPC to preserve, at a minimum, the portion of the upper weir with the hole in it in its current location and possibly in the future have interpretive signage so people can appreciate the historical significance of it. Councilmember Teitzel commented that Council approved $150,000 in the 2023 budget to contract an engineering study about this erosion problem. He will find out the status of this. Edmonds Motor Court on 0' — Volunteer needed Vice Chair Spencer indicated he already did this. He spoke to the value of being able to write/tell stories about the historical significance of buildings when approaching property owners. Commissioner Deiner-Karr said she would try to find some photos of the Motor Court. 4. Edmonds Resident Interested in potentially listing property (820 Main Street) — HPC volunteer needed Commissioner Spencer volunteered to make this contact. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Newsletter — Preservationist Resurrection Chair Vogel said his plan was to feature an article about what is going on with the weir and Yost Park, but the issue is very convoluted right now. He would still like to feature it but wondered if they should wait until they get some degree of resolution. He commented that it could be presented as an example of some of the types of issues that come up with preservation. He has a nice article about the weir from Vice Chair Spencer that can be Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes March 9, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 8 N as d 0 a a a 2.1.b included along with some of the photos from the PowerPoint presentation. Commissioners thought it was fine to go ahead and feature the article; it could be good to raise awareness. Commissioner Deiner-Karr recommended putting some of the old Preservationist articles in My Edmonds News. Chair Vogel said he would look into this but thought that Teresa would not be interested because it is now "news". Commissioner Deiner-Karr recommended having a discussion next time about the subcategory about some of the historic homes that don't qualify for the Register because they have been modified. She noted that Snohomish has done a lot of this. 2. Walking Tours — These are on hold until spring. NEW BUSINESS (continued) 5. CLG Coordinator Michelle Thompson Introduction d Ms. Thompson introduced herself and praised the group in their great work. She was pleased to hear about the a focus on doing research before approaching property owners about adding them to the Edmonds Register. She a recommended using Sanborn maps in these efforts. She reminded the Commission that they can apply for grant money every year to assist them with their work. She offered to come to a meeting or participate via Zoom if the Commission ever wants to do a Q&A. She invited commissioners to contact her if they want to be added to 'c her email list. Chair Vogel recommended adding the general HPC email to the mailing list so it would come to $ all the commissioners. Ms. Szafran indicated she would arrange that. Commissioner Preston asked about the subcategory issue. Ms. Thompson informed the HPC that they could amend the ordinance related to this. As a CLG it is possible to have criteria that fits Edmonds' needs and allows things to be listed in Edmonds that would not qualify for state or federal lists. She offered to assist with this. Commissioners were very interested in moving forward with this. COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Vogel: • He stated he would get the memo together for Director Feser about their desires regarding the upper weir. • He will continue to work on the Preservationist newsletter and get the weir article done. • He said he was very encouraged about the news from Michelle Thompson that they could amend the ordinance. • He thanked Sam Spencer for his willingness to serve as Vice Chair and to contact the 820 Main Street folks and the Phillips Motor Court owner. • He thanked Jeremy Mitchell for his service and noted he would be missed. • There will be a 21' Legislative District Town Hall meeting on March 18 from 10 to noon at the Waterfront Center to answer questions. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes March 9, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 9 2.1.b Vice Chair Spencer asked others to let him know if they come across people who are interesting to talk to or having interesting information about history so he can get started working on some stories. Commissioner Preston suggested approaching property owners about being on the Register by letting them know they might be eligible for bragging rights. He also shared a story that illustrated the importance of letting people know they can come off the Register at any time. He suggested having the flag salute in addition to the land acknowledgement at the beginning of meetings as other committees in other municipalities have done. He commented that the Edmonds Municipal Code (Chapter 10.9) about the Historic Preservation Commission duties is very interesting. Ms. Szafran also referred to Chapter 20 which talks about adding properties to the Register. Commissioner Deiner-Karr recommended having a workshop to go over the code and have a discussion with Michelle Thompson about updates after the Commission has a chance to discuss potential changes. She reiterated that she would pick up paperwork in Everett about the Motor Court and 820 Main. Commissioner Raetzloff referred to 820 Maple which was taken off the Register after it was put on because they changed the upstairs windows. He wondered what sort of changes need to be made to the ordinance in order to allow more flexibility with the Register. a a Commissioner Mitchell noted that staff is in the process of code modernization so now is a good time to get the a HPC code on their docket. He spoke to the benefit of the HPC for the quality -of -life aspect it adds to the city. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:07 p.m. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes March 9, 2023 Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 10 5.1 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/13/2023 Potential Addition of 820 Main Street to Edmonds Register of Historic Places Staff Lead: {enter Staff Lead or "N/A" here} Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michele Szafran Background/History HPC Member Spencer reached out to the property owner of 820 Main Street regarding the potential listing of the subject site on the Edmonds Register of Historic Place and has indicated that there is preliminary interest. The process for designating a property on the register is included in ECDC Chapter 20.45 (weblink provided), which requires a nomination form (Attachment 1) and a public hearing before the HPC. HPC members are asked to discuss the property in advance of a formal submittal. The following attachments have been added as background material for review and members are invited to provide other relevant background information. Attachments: 1-P40_ -Historic_Register_Nomination_Form 2 1-101_-_Seve n_As pects_of_I ntegrity 3-County Assessor Data 4-InventoryPrintReport_102025_1027922 5-Site Plan -Addition 2004 6-Vicinity Map 7-WIZZARD info ECDC Chapter 20.45 - Edmonds Register of Historic Places Packet Pg. 11 A 5.1.a Edmonds tea® Register of Mwooric Historic Places CUMM&Wlan Nomination Form Type or print all entries — Please complete all applicable sections. Historic Name (if applicable): Common (or Current) Name (if applicable): Site Address / Location Street Address or Location Description: City / ZIP Code: Name: Street Address: City / State / ZIP Code: Name (say "Owner" if same as owner listed above): Contact Address: Street: Contact Phone #: Tax / Parcel Number: Date Form Completed: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Received by: File #: Survey/Site #: Phone #: City / ZIP: I / WE the undersigned certify that we are the owners of the property identified on this form and hereby give our consent to having the property listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. Name (Please Print) Signature Name (Please Print) Signature Date Date Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form Packet Pg. 12 ATTAC H M E 5.1.a Site is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (If checked, skip to Section F) Site is listed on the State Register of Historic Places (If checked, skip to Section F) Historical Significance — Please check all that apply: 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state or local history. 2. Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style or method of design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. 3. Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art. 4. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history. 5. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state or local history. 6. Has yielded or may be likely to yield important archaeological information related to history or prehistory. 7. Is a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event. 8. Is a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site associated with that person. 9. Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events or cultural patterns. 10. Is a reconstructed building that has been executed in a historically accurate manner on the original site. 11. Is a creative and unique example of folk architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical categories; the designation shall include description of the boundaries. Historical Description In the space below, describe the history and significance of the site to Edmonds' heritage. You may elect to describe the site's significance in your own words, attach copies of other documents or photographs, and/or make reference to other materials (noting where those materials are available to be reviewed). For example, you may simply note that the site is on an historical survey, noting the survey name and site number. (Please feel free to attach any additional continuation sheets if you need more space.) Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form Page 2 o/5 Packet Pg. 13 5.1.a This section must be completed if the site is not on the State or National Register, or it is not on an approved historic survey. Please provide as much information as you can. Year Built: Architect: Builder or Engineer (specify): Architectural Style(s)*: Roof Type*: Building Form*: Cladding*: * Note: See later reference sheets for list of choices for these items. Overall Changes from Condition: Original: Excellent Plan: Cladding: Windows: Other: Site: Good Intact Intact Intact Intact Original Site Fair Slight Slight Slight Slight Moved Deteriorated Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Date Moved: Ruins Extensive Extensive Extensive Extensive Unexposed Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Plan Type: Structural System: Foundation: Roof Material: Apsidal Pavilion Balloon/Platform Brick Asphalt Comp Metal — Tile Center Space/ Polygonal Braced Frame Concrete block A. Comp - built up None Courtyard Rectangle Brick Concrete poured A. Comp - shingle Other Cross/Cruciform Round Clay Tile Log A. Comp — rolled Slate E-Shape _Semi -circular _Concrete block None _Tile Unknown Hexagonal Square Concrete poured Other Tile - clay Wood H-Shape Triangular Log Parged Tile - concrete Wood plank Irregular T-Shape Mixed Post & Pier Metal Wood shake L-Shape Unknown None Stone Metal - corrugated Wood shingle None U-Shape _Other Unknown Metal - standing seam Octagonal Y-Shape Plank Other Post & Beam _Steel Stone -cut Number of Stories Stone - uncut Unknown Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form Page 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 14 5.1.a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance: (Use continuation sheets if necessary, and for any photographs or copies you are providing.) (Please list and reference any sources which help document the historical value of the site) Location Detail Parcel # UTM Reference: Township Category District Building(s) Structure Site Object Within a District? Yes No Zone Range Ownership Public Private Both Section '/a Section Northing_ '/a'/a Section Resource Status Usage Survey/Inventory Current: National Register National Landmark State Register Historic: Determined Eligible Other: Contributing? Local District: Yes No Unknown National or State Register / District: Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form Page 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 15 5.1.a Edmonds tea® Register of MwOoric Historic Places CUMM&Wlan Nomination Form Continuation Sheet for Item # a Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form Page 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 16 Office of Cultural Development, Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism Seven Aspects of Integrity By Patricia L. Duncan National Register Coordinator, Division of Historic Preservation A CANDIDATE MUST MEET three requirements to qualify for the National Register of Historic Places, as explained in the February issue of Preservation in Print. Two of these essentials — sig- nificance and age — were covered in that issue. The third qualification — integrity — is the topic of this and the following installments of National Register 101. The National Register defines integrity as the ability of a property to convey its significance. However, "integrity" is a word generally used to describe a person's honesty and sincerity. So, why is a word usually associated with humans used to designate a National Register eligibility requirement? The answer can be found in Webster's New World Dictionary, which adds "completeness" to integrity's defini- tion. Under this broader explanation, buildings, structures, districts, sites and objects can also have integrity. Of the three Register eligibility require- ments, integrity is probably the most complicated and difficult to understand. To simplify things, the National Register staff sometimes tells applicants that integrity means the candidate still has to look historic. However, there are actually seven factors, or "aspects," that must be evaluated to determine if that historic look survives. These aspects are location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. LOCATION is the easiest element of integrity to understand. For National Register purposes, location is the par- ticular point or position where the historic property was constructed, the significant person made his/her contri- bution, or the historic event occurred. Sometimes the relationship between a building and its history is lost if that building is moved from its original site. This is why it is harder to list moved properties on the National Register. To qualify moved candidates must be important to a broader region or group than those associated with the original site. The National Park Service consid- ers original locations so important that it automatically delists (removes from the Register) properties moved to new sites subsequent to their listing. SETTING refers to the character of the place where the historic resource is located. It includes natural and man- made features and how those features relate to the candidate. Items to con- sider include buildings, dependencies, roads, paths, fences, vegetation, open space, topographical characteristics and view sheds. The latter include the views from the candidate as well as of the candidate from nearby properties. For a setting to have integrity for National Register purposes, it should appear much as it did historically. The tower on this Lake Charles Victorian resi- dence is an important part of its design. Were it to be lost, the home's National Register design integrity would be severely compromised. DESIGN is broadly defined by the National Register as "the combination of elements that creates the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a prop- erty." Elements the Register considers when evaluating design integrity include function, structural systems, other tech- nologies, spatial organization, massing, proportion, scale, materials, color, tex- ture and fenestration patterns. Design is not limited to the work of architects. Community planners, engineers and landscape architects have also created designs that might be Register -eligible. If enough of the resource's original Here, the setting (tombstones, paths, fences and trees) reinforces an observer's sense that Grace Episcopal Church in St. Francis- ville is indeed historic. design has been lost, the property will not meet this aspect of integrity. MATERIALS are "the physical ele- ments that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configura- tion to form a historic property." This definition is complicated because it has to cover archaeological as well as architectural and historical candidates. For the purposes of nominating build- ings, materials should be defined as the original wood, nails, shingles, riles, glass, and/or other substances the builders used to create the historic resource. To have integrity, a property must retain its character -defining exterior materials. Sometimes interior integrity of material is needed as well. WORKMANSHIP "is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular cul- ture or people during any given period o in history or prehistory," according to the Register. A craft is an occupation re- quiring special skill, and workmanship refers to the quality of the craftsman's o product. Extraordinary workmanship might be evident in tooling, carving, o painting, graining, turning or joinery. It can be found in vernacular as well ° as high style resources and can include rthe product of one or multiple crafts- men. Finally, it can apply to an entire resource or any of its parts. FEELING is a "property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time." To have the aspect of feeling, a candidate must have surviving physical features that express its historic character and help the visitor experience an awareness of its history and importance. o ASSOCIATION is defined by the t National Register as "the direct link o between an important historic event 0 r or person and a historic property." Association relies upon two factors. First, the site must be the actual place 0 where something happened. Second, that relationship must be evident when a visitor observes the site. This connection can occur only if the property's historic physical features, or character, survive. Only when one understands the seven aspects of integrity can one determine if a candidate has enough integrity to qualify for Register listing. However, evaluating these factors is more complicated than their definitions might suggest. Next month's article will discuss applying the aspects to conduct an integrity evaluation. Much of this article is based upon the National Register Bulletin titled "How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation," which is available online at http://u,ww.nps.gov/history/nr/publica- tions/bulletins/pdfs/nrb 15.pdf. This stained glass window is proof of the skill and talent of the craftsman who designed, assembled and installed it in Lake Charles's Temple Sinai c.1903. Since it is unaltered, it retains its integrity of workmansh ip. The Ascension Parish home of 20th-century literary figure Robert Penn Warren has integrity of as- sociation because he lived there during what scholars regard as a critical period in his life and career. 14 Preservation in Print • March 2011 www.prcno.org ATTACHMENT 2 5.1.c Snohomish County Gntine Govem111ent Information & Services Structure Information Close Whidosv General Desorrotrorr Parcel Number 00434207700540 i.R01; Struchure Claims Dn elibr-, Strllchn,r Type 1 ll? Starti- is Basement Year Built 1901 Exte ^or Features Foundation Conc orCE Exterior Siding -Lap ROOF Type: Gable Pitch: Medium co-w Composition Jrrtenar Features Bedrooms 4 Full or 3:-4 Baths 2 1 ? Baths 0 Floor Area Heat Forced Hot Air - Gas Fireplace Masonr} fireplace Floor 1 Base SF 1223 Fir.LEed SF 1223 Floor 2 Base SF 230 Finished SF 230 Floor B Base SF 662 Finished SF 0 Garage(s)_ Carport(s) and .major outt uilAV(s) Detached, Garage SF 416 Other Features 5.1.c I sFr (Upperj 230 s.f. 15 23 L101 sFr 26 390 s.f. 15 9 9 r 6J is 6 L 6 1 sFr 833 s.f. 17 14 16 6 2004 add. RFX Wd Dk 84 s.f. Det Gar 26 416 s.f. — 16 a� u m IL .L O 2 O N d c O E W O CD d c N co O C O r Q :r c a� O d m r m L O cn Q r C O U M C d E L V O r a Packet Pg. 19 5.1.d i Historic Property Report Resource Name: Location Edmonds St Z � a Q Bell St ro a� t E Anderson Center y Dayton St m Maple W ple St m Pi I!" tit Al Address: 820 Main St, Edmonds, WA 98020 Tax No/Parcel No: 00434207700500 Geographic Areas: Snohomish County, EDMONDS EAST Quadrangle, T271103E24 Information Number of stories: Construction Dates: Construction Type Built Date Historic Use: Category Domestic Domestic Historic Context: Category Architecture Architect/Engineer: Category 1.5 Year 1901 Subcategory Domestic - Single Family House Domestic - Single Family House Name or Company Circa F Property ID: 154128 ATTAC H Thursday, March 23, 2023 Packet Pg. 20 5.1.d Historic Property Report Resource Name: Thematics: Local Registers and Districts Name Date Listed Project History Project Number, Organization, Project Name 2011-08-00161, , Edmonds-2011 Notes Resource Inventory SHPO Determination Not Determined Property ID: 154128 SHPO Determined By, Determined Date Thursday, March 23, 2023 Page 2 J Packet Pg. 21 dHistoric Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 154128 Photos Northern facade. Northern facade A Eastern and northern facades. Thursday, March 23, 2023 Page 3 Packet Pg. 22j 5.1.d dHistoric Property Report Resource Name: Inventory Details - 6/17/2011 Common name: Date recorded: 6/17/2011 Field Recorder: Larry E. Johnson Field Site number: 090 SHPO Determination Detail Information Characteristics: Category Form Type Structural System Cladding Roof Material Roof Type Foundation Roof Type Plan Styles: Period Early 20th Century American Movements (1900-1940) Surveyor Opinion Item Single Dwelling - Bungalow Wood - Platform Frame Wood - Shingle Asphalt/Composition - Shingle Gable Concrete - Poured Shed Rectangle Style Details Craftsman Property ID: 154128 Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local): Yes Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local): Yes Significance narrative: A Craftsman bungalow. Dormers added within the last ten years. Physical description: The house has a rectangular plan with a projecting porch with a gable roof on the north. The main gable ridge runs north -south with the western portion becoming less steep. There is an upper, west -facing shed dormer and an east -west gable on the western side over the living room. There is a chimney at the center of the western facade. The house is clad with double -coursed shingles. All of the windows have been replaced with vinyl sashes. Thursday, March 23, 2023 Page 4 J Packet Pg. 23 5.1.e Sr. elm 1MAVb! iAW9i-% 1 b a w I ee 7v- fC u f$ a ATTAC H M E Packet Pg. 24 " City of Edmonds Historic Register Nomination 0 67.74 135.5 Feet 100.9 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site an( 1,21� P B p pp g reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be acc WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise re © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUC a ■ U 0 x 0 Legend 0 ArcSDE.GIS.STREET CENTERLIN - N >3f — <all other values, 1 N 2 C O 5; 4 E 91 71: 71 8 W O - Sections Boundary +' N Sections i Edmonds Boundary C�5 ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY -BUILDit lC ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN — <all other values, N 00 Interstate - Principal Arterial O_ Minor Arterial; Collector Local Street •a Q State Highways <all other values> +' C 0 +�+ O 1 P-m. 2 Q R County Boundary Parks C ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_WASHII V i ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY CITIES — tD C a� Notes E 820 Main St. Packet Pg. 25 5.1.g d p s WISAARD Home Map Search Resources Information Location Data Map Attachments Narrative Evaluation Information Location Data Map Attachments Narrative Evaluation Resource Information Resource Name: Resource Address: 620 Main St, Edmonds, WA 98020 Is Vicinity?: Property Information Property Type: Building Inventory Information Date Recorded: 06/17/2011 Field Recorder Name: Larry E. Johnson Inventory Level: Reconnaissance Field Site Number: 090 Common Name: Construction Data c r �a Construction Type Year Is Circa? Q Built Date 1901 No R C N r O a Architect/Engineer ,o c No Data Provided For ArchitectfFngineer Q Number of 1.5 nNi Stories: ti c Historic Use E Category Sub Category M r r Q Domestic Domestic - Single Family House Historic Context Category Architecture ATTAC H M E Packet Pg. 26 5.1.g Current Use Category Sub Category Domestic Characteristic Category Foundation Form Type Domestic- Single Family House Item Concrete - Poured Single Dwelling - Bungalow Roof Type Gable Roof Type Shed Roof Material Asphalt/Composition - Shingle Cladding Wood - Shingle Structural System Wood - Platform Frame Plan Rectangle Linear Features No Linear Features Defined for this Property Styles Category Item Early lath Century American Movements (1900-1940) Craftsman Changes to Structures Category Change Level Changes to Plan Changes to Windows Unknown Extensive r Q Packet Pg. 27 5.1.g Changes to Cladding Slight Changes to Interior Unknown Register Stags No Data Provided For Register Status ❑istricts No Data Provided For Districts Thematics No Data Provided For Thematics Local Registers and Districts No Data Provided For Local Registers and Districts Packet Pg. 28 5.1.g Information Location Data Map Attachments Narrative Evaluation Parcel Information Tax Parcel Number: 00434207700500 Plat Block Lot: Acreage: 0.21 Geography Attribution Name Snohomish EDMONDS EAST T27R03E24 Area Type Cou my Quadrangle Townsh i p/Ran ge/Section Coordinate Information UTM Datum: * Zone: * Easting: * Northing: Source User User System Geographic Coordinates Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Information Location Data Map Attachments Narrative Evaluation Statement Of Significance ACraftsman bungalow. Dormers added within the last ten years. Physical Description The house has a rectangular plan with a projecting porch with a gable roof on the north. The main gable ridge runs north -south with the western portion becoming less steep. There is an upper, west -facing shed dormer and an east - west gable on the western side over the living room. There is a chimney atthe center of the western facade. The house is clad with double -coursed shingles. All of the w'mdows have been replaced with vinyl sashes. Bibliography No Bibliography is currently provided Packet Pg. 29 5.1.g Information Location Data Map Attachments Narrative Evaluation Surveyor/Agency Evaluation Property appears to meet criteria for the National Register of Historic Places Property is located in a potential historic ✓ district Property potentially contributes to a ✓ historic district: SHPO Evaluation History SHPO Determination By - Project# Project Name Regulation Notes Determination Date 2011-08-00161 Edmonds-2011 Inventory History Status Type Date 05/23/2011 Draft 05/23/2011 Not Determined By DATA MIGRATION SYSTEM DATA MIGRATION SYSTEM Note r Q Packet Pg. 30 5.2 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/13/2023 Historic District Exploration Staff Lead: {enter Staff Lead or "N/A" here} Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michele Szafran Background/History There is interest in establishing a national or local historic district for the downtown area, which was discussed during Mayor's Nelson's February 2023 State of the City address. There have been several pasl surveys (2005, 2011 and 2015) to identify properties for potential preservation and a potential district; a link to the 2015 survey is attached for reference. The 2005 survey noted that there may be buildings that contribute to 1) a linear historic district composed of early twentieth-century commercial buildings along Main Street and 5t" Ave or 2) a historic district of commercial and residential buildings in the larger downtown/bowl area. The 2015 survey noted that a more thorough survey of the downtown area should be pursued when considering a potential historic district designation to identify contributing or non-contributing buildings and to help define the boundary of a proposed district. This item has been added for a general discussion with HPC members. Staff is seeking feedback in advance of developing a work plan for the project. Grant funding is available from the state that could help fund the preparation of the survey; applications are due in late April. Attachments: Historic Resources Survey 2015 Packet Pg. 31 6.1 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 04/13/2023 Unfinished Business Staff Lead: {enter Staff Lead or "N/A" here} Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michele Szafran Background/History At the HPC's March 9 meeting, board members requested to continue discussion of the following items at their April 13 meeting: 1) Research collections on Motor Court and 820 Main St (Deiner-Karr). 2) The status of the Preservationist Newsletter (Vogel) 3) Organization of walking tours for the spring/summer season. Packet Pg. 32