Loading...
2023-05-11 Historic Preservation Commission Packeto Agenda - Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission REGULAR MEETING BRACKETT ROOM 121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020 MAY 11, 2023, 5:30 PM REMOTE MEETING INFORMATION: Remote meeting link: https:Hedmondswa- gov.zoom.us/j/87419346600?pwd=YmVIV1JQMjhiMj IrS25pUjY1Wk9BUT09 Meeting ID: 874 1934 6600 Passcode: 629853 This is a Hybrid meeting. The public may attend in -person or on-line. The physical location of the meeting is at Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue N., 3rd floor Brackett Room. You may call in to meeting:US: +1 253 205 0468 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 408 638 0968 LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. 7499 : April 13 Draft Meeting Minutes 3. AGENDA ADDITIONS / CHANGES 4. REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE 5. NEW BUSINESS A. 7502 : Historic Preservation Training Session with Q & A 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. 7500 : Continued Discussion of Research, Projects and Events 7. ACTION ITEMS 8. COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS 9. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Agenda May 11, 2023 Page 1 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/11/2023 Approve April 13th meeting minutes Staff Lead: Michele Szafran Department: Planning & Development Prepared By: Michelle Martin Staff Recommendation Approve April 13, 2023 meeting minutes. Narrative The draft meetings minutes for the April 13, 2023 HPC regular meeting are attached. Attachments: 2023-04-13 HPC Draft Minutes Packet Pg. 2 CITY OF EDMONDS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Summary Minutes of Regular Meeting April 13, 2023 CALL TO ORDER, LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, AND ROLL CALL Chair Vogel called the meeting of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:33 p.m. and read the land acknowledgement. Commissioner Preston led the Pledge of Allegiance. Commissioners Present Larry Vogel (Chair) David Preston Tim Raetzloff Sam Spencer Commissioners Absent Chris Deiner-Karr Katie Kelly MINUTES: Staff Present Michele Szafran, Planner Others Present Dave Teitzel, Edmonds City Council Representative Approval of January 12, 2023 (revised) and March 9, 2023 HPC Minutes The January 12, 2023 (revised) and March 9, 2023 HPC minutes were approved as presented. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES Commissioner Preston asked to discuss less rigid standards for designating homes/buildings. This was added to New Business. Chair Vogel added another item to New Business regarding a note he received from Andy Eccleshall. REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE There were no audience comments. NEW BUSINESS Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes April 13, 2023 Pagel of 4 Packet Pg. 3 O Potential Addition of 820 Main Street to Edmonds Register of Historic Places Commissioner Spencer said he met with the owners. Based on visual review, he was tentatively in support of approving this. A complete application is expected in May. The house was built in 1901. Ms. Szafran noted there was an addition in 2004. Some photos from Commissioner Deiner-Karr were reviewed. Once the complete application is received, staff will prepare a report and begin the public hearing process. Ms. Szafran noted they needed more information about the integrity portion of this. Chair Vogel suggested they do not need to be as strict as they have traditionally been if they are following the federal and state guidelines. There was consensus that the HPC should look at loosening requirements in general. If a photo of this home can be located prior to 1972 it would be helpful. There was discussion about whether or not vinyl windows would have an impact. Chair Vogel recalled heated discussions regarding vinyl windows and the Schumacher building. Ultimately, it had been determined that the vinyl windows should not stand in the way of being on the registry. One commissioner noted that in discussions with somebody about the Motor Inn they were very upset that the property was not being kept up. He asked if part of the requirement for the historical designation is that it be maintained. There was agreement that it was not. It was asked if there are any tax benefits to being on the register. The response was that there were no immediate benefits, but if they add on to the property and meet certain requirements, they are not taxed for the addition they make to the property for a certain number of years. It was noted that the benefits of being on the register need to be clarified. There should be a very clear list to hand to the homeowner which could increase the number of homes on the registry. It is also important to differentiate requirements and benefits from being on the federal versus the local registry. Ms. Szafran pulled up the Special Tax Valuation portion of the code and the group discussed it. The owner would have to do improvements of at least a 25% of the assessed value of the home. The qualified rehabilitation costs could be deducted from the assessed value of the property for ten years. Ms. Szafran noted that if someone does something to the structure after receiving this tax credit it gets complicated for the homeowner. Otherwise, there is nothing stopping homeowners from doing anything to their structures because it is more of an honorary designation. Chair Vogel said he will look into this topic and get more clarity. There was discussion about the Mayor's intention of creating a historic district downtown. When this was brought up in the past, there was a lot of pushback from downtown building owners concerned it might restrict what they could do with their building. The Commission discussed what happens if a historic building is torn down. The building is removed from the registry, but the site may still be recognized. There would be no benefit to it though. Commissioner Spencer said he had another house that looks very similar to this on 116 - 0 Avenue that he is trying to get on the register. Chair Vogel said he also has a home as indicated in the note from Andy Eccleshall. Ms. Szafran stated she had invited CLG Coordinator Michelle Thompson to the next meeting. The Commission wants to ask her if there is a handout listing benefits of being on the registry. 2. Historic District Exploration Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes April 13, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 4 O Chair Vogel noted this was brought up in passing during the Mayor's State of the City address but nothing had been done since then. Ms. Szafran thought that was because the ball was in the Commission's court. Chair Vogel said he had told the Mayor to let him know if there was anything he could do to help but he has heard nothing. Ms. Szafran commented that there are different options for doing this. There is a national district possibility and a local district possibility. Either way there needs to be a certain percentage of structures that would contribute to that district. She doesn't know if there needs to be consent by owners or not for the national district. They do have to have a certain percentage of consent for the local district. This percentage would need to be established by Council. Councilmember Teitzel recommended that if they want to pursue this, they should invite everyone to a town hall type forum including citizens, building owners, tenants, downtown merchants, etc. to explain the idea and discuss any concerns. He offered to check to see if some of these buildings would be exempt from new density bills going around Olympia right now. If so, this could be a potential incentive. Motion made by Commissioner Raetzloff to present a resolution that says the HPC favors the creation of a historic district in downtown Edmonds. The purpose would be to try to preserve the way it looks now. The motion died for lack of a second. The group indicated support for finding out more about the Mayor's intentions before making a resolution. Chair Vogel indicated he would contact the Mayor and try to get clarification about his intentions and what this would mean for downtown businesses and property owners. New Category of Designated Homes/Buildings Discussion Chair Vogel commented that the HPC is going to reassess criteria for the main register so this discussion might not be necessary. This is another topic they can ask Michelle Thompson about next month. 4. Note from Andy Eccleshall Chair Vogel read the note from Mr. Eccleshall giving some background on the house and asking about the possibility of being on the registry because of a historical connection. UNFINISHED BUSINESS • The Weir Councilmember Teitzel explained that City Council set aside $120,000 to study the erosion problem in Shell Creek that is being created by the sedimentation behind the weirs. It is in Parks' court right now to do something with it, and it is on hold until June because of Parks' workload. Parks will bring in an expert to help identify an action plan. Part of the action plan will be removing part of the weir as discussed so the stream can be realigned away from the bank and stop the sedimentation. The sedimentation causes problems with the salmon spawning in the lower third of Shell Creek. Commissioner Raetzloff noted that a historic structure at Meadowdale Beach Park was destroyed within the last year. The old culvert under the railroad had to be destroyed in the restoration process. He thought the same thing might happen with the weir even though they don't want it to. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes April 13, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 5 O Chair Vogel asked about differences in opinion between Parks and environmentalists about the criticality of this situation for the salmon. Councilmember Teitzel reviewed Joe Scordino's opinion that this is critical from a salmon spawning standpoint. He believes that Parks' priority is pedestrian accessibility. Councilmember Teitzel stated the need for a holistic plan for the entire basin of the watershed. Chair Vogel said he is still thinking about the resurrection of the Preservationist. He was going to lead with an article about the weir but will have to come up with a different subject matter. He suggested 820 Main might be a possibility; he is open to other ideas. • Research collections on Motor Court and 820 Main Street (Deiner-Karr) Ms. Szafran noted that Commissioner Deiner-Karr had given her some photos but she had not had time to look closely at them. Commissioner Raetzloff gave some detailed history of the historical road configurations in Edmonds. Chair Vogel commented that one of the former members of this commission had passed away recently. ACTION ITEMS No additional items were noted. COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Vogel thanked the commissioners for their work. He is looking forward to the next meeting. He will try to bring coherent information about the actual advantages of being listed on the register. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Commissioner Preston said they need to use Commissioner Raetzloff's expertise in technology to take some videos of older people who have recollections of the history. It was noted that the museum is supposedly doing some of this. Commissioner Preston noted that Steve Beck is someone they should talk to. Commissioner Raetzloff agreed and noted that Steve could tell about the all the cemeteries that have been encroached on above 9th at the lower end of Yost Park and on 212t' behind the insurance agency. The building is probably built on some graves. Commissioner Preston said it would be nice to find out more about that. He is also looking forward to seeing Michelle Thompson next month. Commissioner Preston said he is working on 820 Main and wants to get started on 116 - 0 Avenue. He also wants to try to get the historic significance of Perrinville reinstated. This will be a big project. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes April 13, 2023 Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 6 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/11/2023 Training Session with Q & A Staff Lead: Michele Szafran Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michele Szafran Narrative Michelle Thompson, Certified Local Government (CLG) Coordinator for the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, will provide a training and answer questions. As part of the training session please review ECDC Chapter 20.45 (Edmonds Register of Historic Places), which is attached for reference. Also attached for review are the ten (10) standards relating to the Secretary of the Interior's (SOI) Standards for Rehabilitation. Additional materials that may be discussed include a weblink to "Preservation Briefs - Technical Preservation Services on the U.S. National Park Service website (nps.gov). A weblink to Virginia McAlester's book "A Field Guide to American Houses", which aims to "enable(s) you to identify, and place in their historic and architectural contexts, the houses you see in your neighborhood or in your travels across America. 17th century to the present." The training session will be open to questions as needed. Attachments: SOI-Standards-for-Rehabilitation Chapter 20.45 ECDC Preservation Briefs A Field Guide to American Houses Packet Pg. 7 O Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation Rehabilitation projects must meet the following Standards, as interpreted by the National Park Service, to qualify as "certified rehabilitations" eligible for the 20% rehabilitation tax credit. The Standards are applied to projects in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility. The Standards apply to historic buildings of all periods, styles, types, materials, and sizes. They apply to both the exterior and the interior of historic buildings. The Standards also encompass related landscape features and the building's site and environment as well as attached, adjacent, or related new construction. 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible. 8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 10.New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. Packet Pg. 8 Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES O Page 1 of 11 Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Sections: 20.45.000 Definitions. 20.45.010 Criteria for determining designation in the register. 20.45.020 Process for designating properties or districts to the Edmonds historic register. 20.45.030 Removal of properties from the register. 20.45.040 Effects of listing on the register. 20.45.050 Review of changes to Edmonds register of historic places properties. 20.45.060 Relationship to zoning. 20.45.070 Review and monitoring of properties for special property tax valuation. 20.45.080 Special valuation agreement. 20.45.090 Appeals. 20.45.000 Definitions. The following words and terms apply when used in this chapter and in Chapter 10.90 ECC, unless a different meaning clearly appears from the context: A. "Edmonds historic inventory" or "inventory" means the comprehensive inventory of historic and prehistoric resources within the boundaries of the city of Edmonds. B. "Edmonds historic preservation commission" or "commission" means the commission created by Chapter 10.90 ECC. C. "Edmonds register of historic places," "local register," or "register" means the listing of locally designated properties provided for in ECDC 20.45.010. D. "Actual cost of rehabilitation" means costs incurred within 24 months prior to the date of application and directly resulting from one or more of the following: 1. Improvements to an existing building located on or within the perimeters of the original structure; or Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 9 Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES O Page 2 of 11 2. Improvements outside of but directly attached to the original structure which are necessary to make the building fully useable but shall not include rentable/habitable floor space attributable to new construction; or 3. Architectural and engineering services attributable to the design of the improvements; or all costs defined as "qualified rehabilitation expenditures" for purposes of the federal historic preservation investment tax credit. E. A "building" is a structure constructed by human beings. This includes both residential and nonresidential buildings, main and accessory buildings. F. "Certificate of appropriateness" means the document reflecting that the commission has reviewed the proposed changes to a local register property or within a local register historic district and certified the changes as not adversely affecting the historic characteristics of the property which contribute to its designation. G. "Certified local government" or "CLG" means the designation reflecting that the local government has been jointly certified by the State Historic Preservation Officer and the National Park Service as having established its own historic preservation commission and a program meeting federal and state standards. H. "Class of properties eligible to apply for special valuation in Edmonds" means all properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places or certified as contributing to a National Register Historic District which have been substantially rehabilitated at a cost and within a time period which meets the requirements set forth in Chapter 84.26 RCW, until the city becomes a certified local government (CLG). Once a CLG, the class of properties eligible to apply for special valuation in Edmonds means all properties listed on the Edmonds and/or National Register of Historic Places or properties certified as contributing to an Edmonds and/or National Register Historic District which have been substantially rehabilitated at a cost and within a time period which meets the requirements set forth in Chapter 84.26 RCW. I. "Cost' means the actual cost of rehabilitation, which cost shall be at least 25 percent of the assessed valuation of the historic property, exclusive of the assessed value attributable to the land, prior to rehabilitation. J. A "district' is a geographically definable area, urban or rural, small or large, possessing a significant concentration, linkage or continuity of sites, buildings, structures and/or objects united by past events or aesthetically by plan or physical development. K. "Emergency repair" means work necessary to prevent destruction or dilapidation to real property or structural appurtenances thereto immediately threatened or damaged by fire, flood, earthquake or other disaster. L. "Historic property" means real property together with improvements thereon, except property listed in a register primarily for objects buried below ground, which is listed in a local register of a certified local government or the National Register of Historic Places. Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 10 O Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Page 3 of 11 M. "Incentives" are such rights or privileges or combination thereof which the city council, or other local, state or federal public body or agency, by virtue of applicable present or future legislation, may be authorized to grant or obtain for the owner(s) of register properties. Examples of economic incentives include but are not limited to tax relief, conditional use permits, rezoning, street vacation, planned unit development, transfer of development rights, facade easements, gifts, preferential leasing policies, beneficial placement of public improvements or amenities, or the like. N. "Local review board" or "board" used in Chapter 84.26 RCW and Chapter 254-20 WAC for the special valuation of historic properties means the commission created in Chapter 10.90 ECC. O. "Mitigate" means to alleviate, compensate for or otherwise lessen the effects of a loss of an Edmonds register property through conditions determined by the commission or other designated method. P. "National Register of Historic Places" means the national listing of properties significant to our cultural history because of their documented importance to our history, architectural history, engineering, or cultural heritage. Q. An "object" is a thing of functional, aesthetic, cultural, historical, or scientific value that may be, by nature or design, movable yet related to a specific setting or environment. R. "Ordinary repair and maintenance" means work for which a permit issued by the city is not required by law, and where the purpose and effect of such work is to correct any deterioration or decay of or damage to the real property or structure appurtenance therein and to restore the same, as nearly as may be practicable, to the condition prior to the occurrence of such deterioration, decay, or damage. S. "Owner" of property is the fee simple owner of record as exists on the Snohomish County assessor's records T. "Significance" or "significant" used in the context of historic significance means the following: a property with local, state, or national significance is one which helps in the understanding of the history of the local area, state, or nation (whichever is applicable) by illuminating the local, statewide, or nationwide impact of the events or persons associated with the property, or its architectural type or style in information potential. The local area can include Edmonds, Snohomish County, or the Puget Sound region, or a modest geographic or cultural area, such as a neighborhood. Local significance may apply to a property that illustrates a theme that is important to one or more localities; state significance to a theme important to the history of the state; and national significance to property of exceptional value in representing or illustrating an important theme in the history of the nation. U. A "site" is a place where a significant event or pattern of events occurred. It may be the location of prehistoric or historic occupation or activities that may be marked by physical remains; or it may be the symbolic focus of a significant event or pattern of events that may not have been actively occupied. A site may be the location of a ruined or now nonexistent building or structure, or the location itself possesses historic cultural or archaeological significance. Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 11 O Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Page 4 of 11 V. "Special valuation for historic properties" or "special valuation" means the local option program which when implemented makes available to property owners a special tax valuation for rehabilitation of historic properties under which the assessed value of an eligible historic property is determined at a rate that excludes, for up to 10 years, the actual cost of the rehabilitation (Chapter 84.26 RCW). W. "State Register of Historic Places" means the state listing of properties significant to the community, state, or nation but which may or may not meet the criteria of the National Register. X. A "structure" is a work made up of interdependent and interrelated parts in a definite pattern of organization. Generally constructed by man, it is often an engineering project. Y. "Universal transverse mercator" or "UTM" means the grid zone in metric measurement providing for an exact point of numerical reference. Z. "Waiver of a certificate of appropriateness" or "waiver" means the document indicating that the commission has reviewed the proposed whole or partial demolition of a local register property or in a local register historic district and failing to find alternatives to demolition has issued a waiver of a certificate of appropriateness which allows the building or zoning official to issue a permit for demolition. AA. "Washington State Advisory Council's Standards for the Rehabilitation and Maintenance of Historic Properties" or "State Advisory Council's Standards" means the rehabilitation and maintenance standards used by the Edmonds historic preservation commission as minimum requirements for determining whether or not the property continues to be eligible for special valuation once it has been so classified. [Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. 20.45.010 Criteria for determining designation in the register. Any building, structure, site, object or district may be designated for inclusion in the Edmonds register of historic places if it is significantly associated with the history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or cultural heritage of the community; if it has integrity; is at least 50 years old, or is of lesser age and has exceptional importance; and if it falls in at least one of the following categories: A. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state or local history. B. Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style or method of design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. C. Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art. D. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 12 Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES O Page 5 of 11 engineering or architectural history. E. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state or local history. F. Has yielded or may be likely to yield important archaeological information related to history or prehistory. G. Is a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event. H. Is a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site associated with that person. I. Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events or cultural patterns. J. Is a reconstructed building that has been executed in a historically accurate manner on the original site K. Is a creative and unique example of folk architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical categories; the designation shall include description of the boundaries. [Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. 20.45.020 Process for designating properties or districts to the Edmonds historic register. A. Any person may nominate a building, structure, site, object or district for inclusion in the Edmonds register of historic places. Members of the historic preservation commission or the commission as a whole may generate nominations. In its designation decision, the commission shall consider the Edmonds historic inventory and the city's comprehensive plan. B. In the case of individual properties, the designation shall include the UTM reference and all features, interior and exterior, and outbuildings which contribute to its designation. C. In the case of districts, the characteristics of the district which justifies its designation, and a list of all properties including features, structures, sites and objects which contribute to the designation of the district D. The historic preservation commission shall consider the merits of the nomination, according to the criteria in ECDC 20.45.010 and according to the nomination review standards established in rules, at a public meeting. Adequate notice will be given to the public, the owner(s) and the authors of the nomination, if different, and lessees, if any, of the subject property prior to the public meeting according to standards for public meetings established in rules and in compliance with Chapter 42.30 RCW, Open Public Meetings Act. Such notice shall include publication in the city's official newspaper of general circulation and posting of the property. If the commission finds that the nominated property is eligible for the Edmonds register of historic places, the commission shall make recommendation to the city council that the property be listed in the register with Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 13 Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES O Page 6 of 11 owner's consent. In the case of historic districts, the commission shall research and recommend, and the city council shall adopt by ordinance, a percentage of property owners which is deemed adequate to demonstrate owner consent. The public, property owner(s) and the authors of the nomination, if different, and lessees, if any, shall be notified of the listing. E. Properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places or the State Register of Historic Places shall be deemed eligible for listing in the register without the requirement for review by the historic preservation commission. Formal listing in the Edmonds register of historic places shall only require the owner's consent and approval by the Edmonds city council. Such listing shall still require the UTM reference and identification of contributing features required under subsection (B) of this section. F. Properties listed on the Edmonds register of historic places shall be recorded on official zoning records with an "HR" (for historic register) designation. This designation shall not change or modify the underlying zone classification. [Ord. 3598 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. 20.45.030 Removal of properties from the register. In the event that any property is no longer eligible for listing on the Edmonds register of historic places, the commission may initiate removal from such designation by the same procedure as provided for establishing the designation, ECDC 20.45.020. A property may be removed from the Edmonds register without the owner's consent. [Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. 20.45.040 Effects of listing on the register. A. Listing on the Edmonds register of historic places is an honorary designation denoting significant association with the historic, archaeological, engineering or cultural heritage of the community. Properties are listed individually or as contributing properties to a historic district. B. Prior to the commencement of any work on a register property, excluding ordinary repair and maintenance and emergency measures defined in ECDC 20.45.000(K) and (R), the owner must request and receive a certificate of appropriateness from the commission for the proposed work. Violation of this rule shall be grounds for the commission to review the property for removal from the register. C. Prior to whole or partial demolition of a register property, the owner must request and receive a waiver of a certificate of appropriateness. D. Once Edmonds is certified as a certified local government (CLG), all properties listed on the Edmonds register of historic places may be eligible for a special tax valuation on their rehabilitation (ECDC 20.45.070). [Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. 20.45.050 Review of changes to Edmonds register of historic places properties. A. Review Required. No person shall change the use, construct any new building or structure, or reconstruct, Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 14 Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES O Page 7 of 11 alter, restore, remodel, repair, move or demolish any existing property on the Edmonds register of historic places or within a historic district on the Edmonds register of historic places without review by the commission and without receipt of a certificate of appropriateness, or in the case of demolition, a waiver, as a result of the review. The review shall apply to all features of the property, interior and exterior, that contribute to its designation and are listed on the nomination form. Information required by the commission to review the proposed changes are established in rules. B. Exemptions. The following activities do not require a certificate of appropriateness or review by the commission: ordinary repair and maintenance which includes painting or emergency measures defined in ECDC 20.45.000(K) . C. Review Process. 1. Requests for Review and Issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness or Waiver. The building or zoning official shall report any application for a permit to work on a designated Edmonds register property or in an Edmonds register historic district to the commission. If the activity is not exempt from review, the commission shall notify the applicant of the review requirements. The building or zoning official shall not issue any such permit until a certificate of appropriateness or a waiver is received from the commission but shall work with the commission in considering building and fire code requirements. 2. Commission Review. The owner or his/her agent (architect, contractor, lessee, etc.) shall apply to the commission for a review of proposed changes on an Edmonds register property and request a certificate of appropriateness or, in the case of demolition, a waiver. Each application for review of proposed changes shall be accompanied by such information as is required by the commission established in its rules for the proper review of the proposed project. The commission shall meet with the applicant and review the proposed work according to the design review criteria established in rules. Unless legally required, there shall be no notice, posting or publication requirements for action on the application, but all such actions shall be made at regular meetings of the commission. The commission shall complete its review and make its recommendations within 30 days of the date of receipt of the application. If the commission is unable to process the request, the commission may ask for an extension of time. The commission's recommendations shall be in writing and shall state the findings of fact and reasons relied upon in reaching its decision. Any conditions agreed to by the applicant in this review process shall become conditions of approval of the permits granted. If the owner agrees to the commission's recommendations, a certificate of appropriateness shall be awarded by the commission according to standards established in the commission's rules. Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 15 Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES O Page 8 of 11 The commission's recommendations and, if awarded, the certificate of appropriateness, shall be transmitted to the building or zoning official. If a certificate of appropriateness is awarded, the building or zoning official may then issue the permit. 3. Demolition. A waiver of the certificate of appropriateness is required before a permit may be issued to allow whole or partial demolition of a designated Edmonds register property or in an Edmonds register historical district. The owner or his/her agent shall apply to the commission for a review of the proposed demolition and request a waiver. The applicant shall meet with the commission in an attempt to find alternatives to demolition. These negotiations may last no longer than 45 days from the initial meeting of the commission, unless either party requests an extension. If no request for an extension is made and no alternative to demolition has been agreed to, the commission shall act and advise the official in charge of issuing a demolition permit of the commission's decision on the waiver of a certificate of appropriateness. Conditions in the case of granting a demolition permit may include allowing the commission up to 45 additional days to develop alternatives to demolition. When issuing a waiver the commission may require the owner to mitigate the loss of the Edmonds register property by means determined by the commission at the meeting. Any conditions agreed to by the applicant in this review process shall become conditions of approval of the permits granted. After the property is demolished, the commission shall initiate removal of the property from the register. 4. Appeal of the Commission's Decision on a Waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness. The commission's decision regarding a waiver of a certificate of appropriateness shall be appealable to the hearing examiner pursuant to Chapter 20.06 ECDC within 14 calendar days. The appeal must state the grounds upon which the appeal is based. Appeal of hearing examiner's decision regarding a waiver of a certificate of appropriateness may be appealed to superior court. [Ord. 4154 § 21 (Att. D), 2019; Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. 20.45.060 Relationship to zoning. Properties designated to the register shall be subject to the provisions set forth herein, as well as the bulk, use, setback and other controls of the zoning district in which they are located. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to be repealing, modifying or waiving any zoning provisions. [Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. 20.45.070 Review and monitoring of properties for special property tax valuation. A. Timelines. 1. The assessor forwards the application(s) to the commission. 2. The commission reviews the application(s), consistent with its rules of procedure, and determines if the application(s) are complete and if the properties meet the criteria set forth in WAC 254-20-070(1) and listed in ECDC 20.45.010. Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 16 Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES O Page 9 of 11 a. If the commission finds the properties meet all the criteria, then it may recommend that the city, through its mayor, enter into a historic preservation special valuation agreement (set forth in WAC 254-20-120 and in ECDC 20.45.000(V)) with the owner. Upon execution of the agreement between the owner and commission, the commission approves the application(s). b. If the commission determines the properties do not meet all the criteria, then it shall deny the application(s). 3. The commission certifies its decisions in writing and states the facts upon which the approvals or denials are based and files copies of the certifications with the assessor. 4. For approved applications: a. The commission forwards copies of the agreements, applications and supporting documentation (as required by WAC 254-20-090(4) and identified in subsection (13)(2) of this section) to the assessor; b. Notifies the state review board that the properties have been approved for special valuation; and c. Monitors the properties for continued compliance with the agreements throughout the 10-year special valuation period. 5. The commission determines, in a manner consistent with its rules of procedure, whether or not properties are disqualified from special valuation either because of: a. The owner's failure to comply with the terms of the agreement; or b. A loss of historic value resulting from physical changes to the building or site. 6. For disqualified properties, in the event that the commission concludes that a property is no longer qualified for special valuation, the commission shall notify the owner, assessor and state review board in writing and state the facts supporting its findings. B. Criteria. 1. Historic Property Criteria. The class of historic property eligible to apply for special valuation in Edmonds means all properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places or certified as contributing to a National Register Historic District which have been substantially rehabilitated at a cost and within a time period which meets the requirements set forth in Chapter 84.26 RCW, until Edmonds becomes a certified local government (CLG). Once a CLG, the class of property eligible to apply for special valuation in Edmonds means all properties listed on the Edmonds and/or National Register of Historic Places or Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 17 O Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Page 10 of 11 properties certified as contributing to an Edmonds and/or National Register Historic District which have been substantially rehabilitated at a cost and within a time period which meets the requirements set forth in Chapter 84.26 RCW. 2. Application Criteria. Complete applications shall consist of the following documentation: a. A legal descriptive of the historic property; b. Comprehensive exterior and interior photographs of the historic property before and after rehabilitation; c. Architectural plans or other legible drawings depicting the completed rehabilitation work; d. A notarized affidavit attesting to the actual cost of the rehabilitation work completed prior to the date of application and the period of time during which the work was performed and documentation of both to be made available to the commission upon request; and e. For properties located within historic districts, in addition to the standard application documentation, a statement from the Secretary of the Interior or appropriate local official, as specified in local administrative rules or by the local government, indicating the property is a certified historic structure is required. 3. Property Review Criteria. In its review the commission shall determine if the properties meet all the following criteria: a. The property is historic property; b. The property is included within a class of historic property determined eligible for special valuation by the city under this section; c. The property has been rehabilitated at a cost which meets the definition set forth in RCW 84.26.020(2) (and identified in ECDC 20.45.000) within 24 months prior to the date of application; and d. The property has not been altered in any way which adversely affects those elements which qualify it as historically significant as determined by applying the Washington State Advisory Council's Standards for the Rehabilitation and Maintenance of Historic Properties (WAC 254-20-100(1) and listed in ECDC 20.45.000). 4. Rehabilitation and Maintenance Criteria. The Washington State Advisory Council's Standards for the Rehabilitation and Maintenance of Historic Properties in WAC 254-20-100 shall be used by the commission as minimum requirements for determining whether or not a historic property is eligible for special valuation Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 18 O Edmonds Chapter 20.45 EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Page 11 of 11 and whether or not the property continues to be eligible for special valuation once it has been so classified. [Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. 20.45.080 Special valuation agreement. The historic preservation special valuation agreement in WAC 254-20-120 shall be used by the commission as the minimum agreement necessary to comply with the requirements of RCW 84.26.050(2). [Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. 20.45.090 Appeals. Any decision of the commission acting on any application for classification as historic property, eligible for special valuation, may be appealed to the superior court under RCW 34.04.130 in addition to any other remedy of law. Any decision on the disqualification of historic property eligible for special valuation, or any other dispute, may be appealed to the county board of equalization. [Ord. 3397 § 1, 2002]. Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2C Packet Pg. 19 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 05/11/2023 Unfinished Business Staff Lead: Michele Szafran Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michele Szafran Background/History At the HPC's March 9 meeting, board members requested to continue discussion of the following items: 1) Research collections on Motor Court and 820 Main St (Deiner-Karr). See attached 2) The status of the Preservationist Newsletter (Vogel) 3) Organization of walking tours for the spring/summer season Staff Recommendation Discuss items as noted. Attachments: Research Collections From Chris Deiner-Karr Packet Pg. 20 a IL L7Packet Pg. 21 Snohomish County Online Government Information & Services a Structure Information Close Window General Description Parcel Number 00434207700500 (R01) Structure Class Dwelling Structure Type 1 1/2 Story w/Basement Year Built 1901 Exterior Features Foundation Conc or CB Exterior Siding -Lap ROOF Type: Gable Pitch Medium Cover Composition Interior Features Bedrooms 4 Full or 3/4 Baths 2 1/2 Baths 0 Floor Area Heat Forced Hot Air - Gas Fireplace Masonry fireplace Floor 1 Base SF 1223 Finished SF 1223 Floor 2 Base SF 230 Finished SF 230 Floor B Base SF 662 Finished SF 0 Garage(s), Carport(s) and major outbuilding(s) Detached Garage SF 416 Other Features Packet Pg. 22 O I F Packet Pg. 23 O Cm' L View this sketch in a separate window Use the structure sketches and information at your own risk. Sketches are extracted from County records on a regular basis and may not be current. All structure sketches, maps, data, and information set forth herein ("Data"), are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered official citation to, or representation of, the Snohomish County Code. Amendments and updates to the Data, together with other applicable County Code provisions, may apply which are not depicted herein. Snohomish County makes no representation or warranty concerning the content, accuracy, currency, completeness or quality of the Data contained herein and expressly disclaims any warranty of merchantability, fitness for any particular purpose. All persons accessing or otherwise using this Data assume all responsibility for use thereof and agree to hold Snohomish County harmless from and against any damages, loss, claim or liability arising out of any error, defect or omission contain within said Data. Washington State Law, Ch. 42.56 RCW, prohibits state and local agencies from providing access to lists of individuals intended for use for commercial purposes and, thus, no commercial use may be made of any Data comprising lists of individuals contained herein. Close Window Packet Pg. 24 TAPE PICTURE HERE v BUILDING PERMITS DATE NUMBER AMOUNT CONSTRUCTION DATA -- DATE FINISHED DA PER CE-14T L, NFINISH ED DATE RE m6oc'-co DATE mov ED VALUATION ACRESOR L.C)T Nu"FiER LAND BLDG INITIAL, DATE SALES DATA SALE DATE INSTRUMENT RECEIPT 4 U 10 4 A 4 7 1- (;,'1 F, 1) t I r I 'rip, f. 0 S T p I (-,T 15 A"NFI'� IT Y (IF r�Lt/ n7'T —fin — tr. nT 1L} c."), 1,! 6 F'r r It f, I LC3T', 6 r, 7 HIGHEST AND BEST USE VALUE.- -TM —PROVED UN —IMPROVED TIMBER TOTAL TOTAI ACRES -VALUE ACRES VALUE ACRES VAL i.E ACRES AV TYPE DATE CONST FLOOR ROOF DIMENSION SF CONDITION FACTOR VALUE *b NET BUILT AREA DEP VALUE I Packet Pg. 25 1 ' a ............................ • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r 2�- . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., a . ................... r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i > LU Y Y - r r s . """ f "f "'"' Y� • ! . r a ! n • ♦ ! R R e e . :.i f � � CL t r • ♦ . . . . . . . . . . • . • ♦ . . • . • • ` . 0 .N . . . . . • . . . . . • • . . . . . • . r c,> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O APPRAISAL DATA Packet Pg. 26 Packet Pg. 27