2023-05-16 Regular MeetingEDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APPROVED MINUTES
May 16, 2023
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Neil Tibbott, Council President
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Jenna Nand, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director
Rob English, City Engineer
David Levitan, Planning Manager
Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer
Mike Clugston, Senior Planner
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Olson read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the
original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip
Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We
respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection
with the land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present.
4. PRESENTATIONS
1. PUBLIC WORKS WEEK PROCLAMATION
Mayor Nelson read a proclamation designating the week of May 21-27, 2023 as Public Works Weeks in
Edmonds.
2. NATIONAL POLICE WEEK PROCLAMATION
Mayor Nelson read a proclamation formally designating May 14-20, 2023 as Police Week in the City of
Edmonds, and publicly saluting the service of law enforcement officers in our community and in
communities across the nation.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 1
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER.
Councilmember Chen referred to Item 7.3, ERP Update, which is included for information only, however,
the update makes a decision. He asked if pulling that would make a difference. City Attorney Jeff
Taraday advised that item could be removed from the agenda but there is no council action requested. It is
on the agenda under Received for Filing which council does not vote on. Councilmember Chen agreed to
leave it in on the agenda under Received for Filing.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO
REMOVE ITEM 10.2, RESOLUTION EXPRESSING SUPPORT OF PROHIBITING PUBLIC USE
OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, BECAUSE THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE STATE
LEGISLATURE THIS AFTERNOON MAKES THE RESOLUTION OBSOLETE.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed it was obsolete but it was a good resolution and she complimented the
authors of the resolution for preparing it so quickly.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT AND
COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, OLSON, PAINE AND NAND VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS
TEITZEL AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO.
MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson described the procedures for audience comments.
Marlin Phelps, Marysville, relayed his conversation with a Port of Edmonds employee in 2014 who
gestured to a 32' yacht, stating it had been seen multiple times leaving the marina under the cover of
darkness and returning. While working on a vessel recently, a man his age who grew up in Edmonds said
he hates Edmonds; Robert Barker set him up and he went to prison for possession of a stolen firearm that
he did not own. Robert Barker was the person on the phone when Mr. Feldman yelled into the phone, he's
here right now. Robert Barker has had an illustrious career and is a right wing extremist, a sadistic
psychopath, is the man who set him up and is connected to the murder of Tom Wales. All he needs is the
power of a good judge.
7. RECEIVED FOR FILING
1. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FOR FILING
2. MARCH 2O23 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
3. ERP UPDATE
8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
Councilmember Buckshnis requested Item 6.6, Ordinance to Change to Biennial Budget, be removed
from the consent agenda.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 2
1. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 9, 2023
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL COMMITTEE MINUTES
3. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE
PAYMENTS
4. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT
5. PFD BOARD CANDIDATE APPROVAL
7. APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE BLUELINE GROUP
(BLUELINE) TO PROVIDE CAPITAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT,
ENGINEERING & INSPECTION SERVICES FOR 2023
8. 5-FT DEDICATION FOR 192ND ST SW RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO 9009 192ND
ST SW
9. SNO-ISLE LIBRARY RESTORATION PROJECT - PROOF OF LOSS
DOCUMENTATION
10. AUTHORIZE MAYOR NELSON TO SIGN CONNECTING HOUSING TO
INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (CHIP) GRANT AGREEMENT WITH HOUSING
HOPE
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT
6. ORDINANCE TO CHANGE TO BIENNIAL BUDGET
Councilmember Buckshnis commented this had not gone through the proper channels and it appeared to
be tied to the ERP Update which was on the agenda under Received for Filing. This is a really important
topic that all councilmembers should discuss with the administration. Administrative Services Director
Dave Turley is not at tonight's meeting and she did not think the council should discuss it without him.
Having a biennial budget ordinance on the consent agenda without any council vetting is not a pragmatic
way to approve such an important financial change.
Councilmember Olson pointed out the council had a very extensive discussion about the biennial budget
at the budget retreat which was a public meeting and attended by all councilmembers. A biennial budget
was discussed at length with council, staff and the facilitator who is a budgeting expert.
Councilmember Nand asked whether Mr. Turley required the council pass this ordinance tonight so he
can proceed with the ERP and configure the software with a biennial budget. Mayor Nelson answered that
was the intent.
Councilmember Paine advised this was also discussed by the PSPHSP committee on May 9.
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT, TO
APPROVE THE ORDINANCE TO CHANGE TO A BIENNIAL BUDGET.
Councilmember Buckshnis reiterated there was not a hefty vetting discussion during the retreat. The
ordinance to change to a biennial budget goes with the ERP; the ERP has not yet come to council and
they should be discussed in tandem. She was not under the impression it will take six years to change the
ERP if the City does not change to a biennial budget. There are many reasons it is inappropriate to vote
on the ordinance now without discussing the ERP.
Council President Tibbott said in addition to an extensive discussion with an expert in municipal finance
and nearly an hour of Q&A at the budget retreat, the ordinance was also reviewed by the PPW
Committee. The motion is to approve an ordinance to move forward with a biennial budget process. He
read from the agenda memo, "if we pass a biennial budget ordinance this year, we will have a full year
before we begin preparing the first biennial budget. This gives us ample time to adopt policies that will
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 3
define what a biennial budget will look like for Edmonds." The ordinance authorizes staff to move
forward with establishing a biennial budget process and obtaining the appropriate software. Policies and
procedures will be clarified in coming year."
Councilmember Nand spoke in favor of approving the ordinance, To address concerns about vetting the
ordinance, she commented she had an opportunity to discuss it with Director Turley who indicated the
consensus at the retreat was to go to a biennial budget, not a hybrid, and the internal controls and
mechanisms to provide transparency and accountability to taxpayers as more authority is directed to
Director Turley would be worked into either an amendment or a subsequent ordinance and reflected in the
software. She felt comfortable with Director Turley's response and with voting in favor of this ordinance
so Director Turley can purchase the ERP software and set it up in a timely manner.
Councilmember Chen expressed support for the biennial budget ordinance. The council had extensive
discussion about the pros and cons during council budget retreat including different scenarios such as
hybrid budgeting. The consensus was a biennial budget was appropriate for a city Edmonds' size. Among
the many advantages, a biennial budget avoids having a new councilmember seated following the
election. He recalled during the 2021 election, he got caught in that process and although he had closely
followed the budget and was ready to vote, it created administrative inconvenience and cost the council
and staff additional time. One of the key benefits is to avoid that. He was supportive of the ordinance,
advising it was the right time.
UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL, CHEN,
OLSON, PAINE AND NAND AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING YES;
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO.
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ON PERMANENT ORDINANCE FOR DESIGN REVIEW
PROCESSES AND BUILDING STEP BACKS IN THE CG ZONE TO REPLACE
INTERIM ORDINANCE 4283 (AMD2022-0008)
Senior Planner Mike Clugston reviewed:
• Planning board recommendation and other options considered:
o Packet pages 217 and 250
o Recommended Option 4 (transition consistent with Subarea Plan, certainty for builders,
complies with HB 1293)
o Buildings 55' or less do not require step back
o Buildings > 55' require 10-foot step back at 25' and 30-foot step back at 55' when adjacent to
or across the street from RS zone
o Unanimous vote at April 26 meeting
• Step backs required for bldgs. 55-75' in height:
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 4
UBLC
',EALM (STEP RACKS REQUIRED) SIDE V,
10' STEPRACK @ 25'
An' STEPRAf.K!® SS'
No step backs for bldgs. < 55'
PURL iC GG ZONE 55' EUILUING AW
REALM (NO STEPBAGKS REQUIRED) SIDE \
Design Review Process Options
o Packet pages 243-244
1. Projects > 75' in high rise nodes
a. Type III -A (ADB Review)
b. HB 1293 limits: max of one meeting; two-phase process to be phased out
2. Projects > 35' adjacent to or across the street from RS zone
a. Type Il-A (staff decision with public notice and public comments)
3. Projects < 35' adjacent/across street OR projects < 75' not adjacent
a. Type I (staff decision with no public notice or public comments)
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the ADB review was quasi-judicial. Mr. Clugston answered yes.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled discussing having that delegated to the council since ADB members
are citizen volunteers and that was a lot of responsibility for a volunteer group.
Councilmember Paine raised a point of order, stating Councilmember Buckshnis' comments were off
topic. Councilmember Buckshnis commented it was related to the ADB's review. Councilmember Paine
pointed out changing who holds the quasi-judicial hearing is not the topic of this public hearing. Mayor
Nelson ruled point not taken.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested discussing that later during the code update, commenting this
reminded her of the tree code and the planning board all over again.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 5
Councilmember Teitzel did not recall that HB 1293 included any specific height thresholds above or
below 75'. As he understood staffs presentation, buildings higher than 75' will require ADB review, but
that suggests subjectivity and HB 1293 requires the review be clear and objective. He asked how that
squared with HB 1293. Planning Manager David Levitan said he considered specific height limits clear
and objective; it would be clear to a developer if their project was over 75' in height that it would be
subject to this process. The bill does not preclude the use of a design review process; other house bills
were considered that would have eliminated the opportunity for quasi-judicial public meetings, basically
anything other than administrative design review.
Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing.
Glenn Douglas, Edmonds, a resident of the Gateway community, applauded the planning board. He
watched their meeting online and felt they took everything into consideration and did good job on the
proposal and their selection. He lives kitty-corner from the proposed 261 unit project, which means when
the sun come up in the south, he literally will be in the building's shadow until about 9-10 a.m. Although
he preferred the building not be built, at least the step backs were something. To any councilmember on
the fence about this building, he suggested going to the Sky Nursery parking lot and looking west at the
humongous, behemoth building with no step backs. He suggested taking a picture or visualizing that 7-
story building on the vacant lot at 236t1i & 84t''. That building does not fit with the neighborhood, but he
feared it was too late. There is inadequate infrastructure for that building; as the self-proclaimed
ambassador for 84t' Street W, he was thankful for the stop signs and radar sign. The street is not safe
although he anticipated safety would improve with sidewalks. There is a lot of crime in the area and he
could not envision adding another 500-600 people in that small space would be beneficial to the
neighborhood.
Theresa Hollis, Edmonds, advised that project, Terrace Place, did not complete the design review
process, they timed out. To understand the issues around the proposed changes to the development code,
she read the planning board and city council meeting minutes about the Highway 99 area in 2016 and
2017. She read the Highway 99 Planned Action Report and the Environmental Impact Statement and its
recommended mitigation to increase building heights. She interviewed a long-time past president of the
planning board; read the ADB's handbook which guides their design review process; read the code or
design guidelines for Redmond, Bellevue, Kirkland, Seattle Lake City, Lynnwood, Bothell and Shoreline;
and sent relative documents from those jurisdictions to the ADB and planning board during their review
of the interim ordinance. The pattern in those hundreds of pages of documentation are, 1) we are not
getting the type of redevelopment projects that were expected. The market research done in 2017 did not
predict today's reality, 2) council's decision in 2017 did not require building step backs for projects
across the street from a single family zone was a one-off decision made only by Edmonds and none of the
neighboring jurisdictions, 3) several cities in the region allow tall buildings to be across the street from a
less intensive residential or neighborhood business zone. The transition zone is gone for a lot of those
neighborhoods too, and building design criteria takes its place to achieve a transition, and 4) step backs to
mitigate the bulk and mass of a building is a straight -down, middle-of-the-road technique in the field of
architectural design. It is not an aggressive approach and is one of the best mitigations when there is no
transition zoning. She recommended the council approve the new code language for step backs drafted by
the planning board and then prepare for the next body of work that is significantly larger and more
complex, change budget priorities to fund more sidewalks and a park so there is a pedestrian -oriented
neighborhood envisioned in the planned action, fnetune zoning during the 2024 comprehensive plan
update to produce development that creates jobs, develop regulations out of the supplemental EIS that
will address displacement, and get better incentives for affordable housing.
With no further public comment, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 6
Council President Tibbott expressed his appreciation for the input at the public hearing, noting the council
also received several emailed comments. The council will not be taking action tonight. Mr. Clugston
advised an ordinance will be provided next week for council review and potential approval.
Council President Tibbott commented one of the remaining questions is the distance from the project for
public notice; it is currently 300'. In an intensive commercial zone like this, he felt it would be
appropriate to notify a much larger radius such as 500-1000 feet from a project. Mr. Levitan responded if
the radius notification distance is increased beyond 300', staff will need to consider whether that should
be done for other Type II and III projects. Staff could create maps with 300', 500', or 1000' radius around
any project in a CG zone. He was not aware of any cities that notice beyond 500', 300'-400' is typical for
Type II and III processes. Council President Tibbott requested maps for 400' and 500 feet. The difference
in this area is it is a densely populated area so it affects more people than a typical single family
notification and therefore it would make sense to expand the notification. Mr. Levitan invited input from
other councilmembers regarding the notification radius.
Councilmember Teitzel complimented the planning & development department for the great work done
on this project and for providing a very complete packet. He also complimented the ADB and the
planning board for the work they did on this complicated project, noting it was further complicated by the
work done by the legislature which required flexibility and nimble thinking.
Councilmember Nand also thanked the planning & development department for the excellent work they
do supporting the ADB and planning board, and the community members who shared their perspectives.
She also thanked the various stakeholders who provided rich, contextual comments to the ADB and
planning board during this process. She admired everyone who is able to engage in the political process at
the local level to find solutions for existing and future community members. Unfortunately this process is
under attack by the state legislature and a posture that it is a waste of time and needs to be eliminated.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Nand's comments. She expressed appreciation
for Ms. Hollis, Ms. Seitz, and Mr. Douglas' comments. She asked if this item would be on the consent
agenda. Mr. Levitan answered staff could include options for a notification radius in the ordinance for
council review. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Council President Tibbott's suggestion for 400'-
500' notice due to the bulk of the buildings, lack of robust multifamily design standards and the SEIS has
not yet been completed. Mr. Levitan advised staff will consult with the city attorney regarding potential
changes that would be required outside the interim ordinance. Changing the notification radius would
require cross-referencing distances in Chapter 20 regarding notice of application.
Council agreed to have staff research a 400-500' notification radius.
2. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2024-2029 SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
City Engineer Rob English provided introduction, advising there was a good discussion and Q&A at last
week's PPW Committee.
Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss reviewed:
• Introduction
o Revised Code of Washington (RCW) requires that each city update their TIP by July 1st.
o Document contains all significant transportation projects that a City possibly plans to
undertake in the next six years.
o City of Edmonds policy: TIP financially constrained first three years.
o Federal Grants, State Grants, and Local funds are programmed as revenue source for TIP
projects.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 7
Construction Projects in 2023:
• Annual Overlay Program (Project #1)
o Project Description
■ Approximately 2 lane miles of variable depth overlay along local/collector streets
o Schedule
■ Construction - Summer 2023
o Funding
■ Local funds $1,000,000
■ Utility Funds $450,000
■ Annual Funding Goal $2,800,000 per year
• SR-99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 2 (Project #8)
o Project Description
■ Installation of landscaped raised median along entire corridor from 244th St. SW to 210th
St. SW with 130 trees
■ HAWK signal - 600' north of 234th St. SW
■ Gateway signs on both ends of corridor
o Schedule
■ Design 2020-2022
■ Construction 2022-2024
o Construction Funding
■ Connecting Washington $8,219,000
■ Local funds $270,000
Citywide Bicycle Improvements project (Project #41)
o Project Description
■ Project to be combined with Elm Way Walkway
■ Install sharrows along 80th Ave. W from 228th St. SW to 220th St. SW
■ Install bike lanes along key corridors
- 100th Ave. W / 9th Ave. S from 238th St. SW to Walnut St.
- Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave. S to 84th Ave. W
- 228th St. SW from 78th Ave. to 80th Ave. W
o Schedule
■ Design 2020-2022
■ Construction 2023-2024
o Construction Funding
■ Local Funds $520,000
■ Sound Transit Access grant $1.25 Million
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S (Project #23)
o Project Description
■ Identified as Short Walkway #6 in 2015 Transportation Plan
■ Complete missing sidewalk links (- 700' new sidewalk on south side of street)
■ ADA curb ramp upgrades with stormwater upgrades
■ Project to be combined with Citywide Bicycle Improvements project
o Schedule
■ Design 2021-2022
■ Construction 2023-2024
o Construction Funding
■ Local funds $550,000
■ Stormwater funds (Fund 422) $350,000
2023 Traffic Calming Program (Project #42)
o Project Description
■ Installation of traffic calming devices along certain stretches (based on evaluation results)
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 8
o Schedule
■ Construction Fall 2023
o Funding
■ Local funds $33,000
Construction Projects in 2024/2025:
• Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to 9th Ave (Project #2)
o Project Description
■ Overlay with ADA curb ramps upgrades
■ Pedestrian Improvements at Main at 8th Ave. crossing
o Schedule
■ Design 2023
■ Construction 2024
o Construction Funding
■ Local funds $187,000
■ Secured Federal Grant $750,000
• 84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW (Project #29)
o Project Description
■ Install sidewalk on east side of the stretch
o Schedule
■ Design 2023
■ Construction 2024
o Funding
■ Federal ARPA Funds (secured) $160,000
■ Grant Funds (unsecured) $750,000
■ Local Funds $250,000
Green Streets: 236th St SW from 84th Ave. W to Hwy 99 (Project #33)
o Project Description
■ Roadway narrowing to reduce traffic speeds and to reduce impervious surface (vehicular
capacity retained)
■ Sidewalks and planting strips added
■ Bioretention cells collect runoff from the road through curb cuts
o Schedule
■ Design 2024
■ Construction 2025
o Construction Funding
■ Federal ARPA Funds (secured) $1,385,000
■ Grant Funds (unsecured) $2,413,000
Other Projects in 2024-2029 TIP
• Corridor Improvements
0 228th St. SW from Highway 99 to 95th Pl. W (Project #13)
2027-2029
o SR-99 Revitalization from 244th to 238th Stage 3 (Project #9)
2022-2028
o SR-99 Revitalization from 220th to 224th Stage 4 (Project #10)
2022-2029
o SR-99 Revitalization from 216th to 212th Stage 5 (Project #11)
2027-2029
o SR-104 Adaptive System from 236th to 226th (Project #16)
2022-2027
• Signal Upgrades
o Puget Dr. @ OVD (Project #5) 2027-2028
0 238th St. SW @ 100th Ave. W (Project #6) 2027-2028
o Main St. @ 3rd Ave. (Project # 7) 2028-2029
• Intersection Improvements
0 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW (Project #12) 2021-2027
0 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W (Project #14) 2027-2029
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 9
o Main St. @ 9th Ave. (Project #15)
2027-2029
o SR-104 @ 95th Pl. W (Project #19)
2027-2029
o SR-104 @ 238th St. SW (Project #20)
2027-2029
Active Transportation Projects
0 4th Ave. Corridor Enhancement Walkway (Project #34)
o SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -Motorized Transp. Impr. (Project #36)
o SR-104 @ 100th St. Bike Improvements (Project #42)
o SR-104 / Pine St. Sidewalk (Project #40)
o Walkway projects within proximity to schools / parks
■ Maplewood Dr. Walkway (Project #22)
■ 80th Ave. Walkway from 212nd St. SW to 206th St. SW (Prof. #24)
■ 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. to Olympic View Dr. (Prof. #25)
■ 95th Pl. W Walkway from 224th to 220th (Project # 26)
Other Projects/Planning Documents
o Waterfront Emergency Response Study
o ADA Transition Plan
o Pavement Rating Study
o Safety Plan Update
o Transportation Plan Update
2027-2029
2027-2028
2027-2029
2027-2029
2027-2029
2027-2029
2027-2029
2027-2029
Summary of Secured Transportation Grants (between 2019 and 2023)
Project Name Grant Program Phase Amount S red Award Dace
o Total Secured Transportation Grants/Appropriations over Last 5 Years: $47,000,000
ct Funding
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 10
Councilmember Olson recalled during the budget process, the council did not commit to spending ARPA
funds for Green Streets; the council agreed to leave it in the unfunded years of the CIP/CFP for the
possibility of grant funding. Planning & Development Director Susan McLaughlin referred to the Green
Streets on 236t'', recalling there was discussion by council during the budget process and concern with the
expenditure of ARPA funds. The discussion was related to postponing any spending in 2023, keeping it in
ARPA which is the reason there is a line item in 2024-2025 for the remaining funding allocated through
ARPA. Council was not interested in pursuing Green Streets on Dayton, but were still interested in 236'.
Councilmember Olson recalled the council was loosely interested, the price really got the council's
attention. She was aware there may be other grant funding, but she did not commit to spending ARPA
funds during that process. Ms. McLaughlin said the minutes from the council's discussion could be
obtained to confirm the council's direction. The cost of Green Streets cannot be compared to a sidewalk;
it includes significant utility infrastructure, particularly on 236t'', such as whole block reconstruction, but
that is scalable such as one side of the street. The cost estimate is based on a 10% design concept with all
the bells and whistles included such as complete reconstruction, repaving, undergrounded utilities,
bioretention, lighting, etc., a full investment. Given the lack of public space in that area, Green Streets
often act like a parklike space. She was confident the cost could be reduced.
Councilmember Olson commented the TIP does not include speed abatement for Olympic View Drive,
76t' or 84t''. She recognized if no funding was available, they may not be in the first two years of the TIP,
but sensed there was a lot of interest in the community for speed abatement on those streets. In the context
of the budget discussion and/or an amendment to the TIP, she wanted to add those speed abatement
projects even if it is in the years of the TIP where there is no funding. With regard to the infrastructure
bill, she recognized widening 100' at SR-104 would not be something the City could do on its own, but
widening would be an opportunity for bike lanes and wider sidewalks in Westgate where the City only
plans to install bike lane on one side which she felt that was the right decision for the space available, but
if that intersection could be widened and bike lanes provided on both side, it would be a great
improvement to the City's transportation system.
Mr. Hauss responded SR-104 widening is Project #42 in the out years because no funding has been
secured. Regarding speed abatement, he asked if Councilmember Olson wanted that included in the traffic
calming program. He recalled a request for traffic calming had been submitted for 76'' and it was being
evaluated this year. Requests are accepted early in the year and are evaluated and ranked according to
established criteria. Staff is also considering changing the criteria and the threshold; currently if speeds
meet the 85t1i percentile, a speed study is done; if the 85'1i percentile is 8 mph under the speed limit it does
not qualify. Consideration is being given to reducing that to 7 or 6 mph; the consultant will consider that
as part of the transportation plan.
Councilmember Olson suggested more needs to be budgeted for traffic calming; she was unsure whether
the administration wanted to address that before the budget is presented to council or if councilmembers
needed to submit decision packages. She anticipated there were more requests than the City has funding
for each year. She was hopeful that could be considered during budget process. Mayor Nelson suggested
councilmembers focus their discussion on the agenda item.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with pulling the minutes regarding Green Streets, recalling the council
pulled that project due to the cost. She asked whether the school zone speed cameras were in the TIP. Mr.
Hauss advised that was related to enforcement and the police department was the lead so it was not on the
TIP. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to a letter that council received signed by several citizens
regarding speeding on 76t1i Avenue W from 171't Street SW to SW Meadowdale Beach Road. She asked
how that could be considered for inclusion on the TIP. She offered to provide the letter to staff. Mr. Hauss
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 11
advised the deadline for submitting traffic calming requests is in early in the year. There are currently 15
requests, that could be expanded to 30 if he extends the deadline. It takes a lot of time to coordinate speed
studies, etc. He offered to respond to the letter and copy the council. Councilmember Buckshnis noted the
letter references a 2023 request form. She advised at last night's town hall, someone mentioned a HAWK
signal or other crossing on 244t' at Firdale Village.
Council President Tibbott raised a point of order, stating this is a public hearing and was not the time to
amend the TIP. This is an opportunity for input from the public and clarification/questions regarding
projects on the TIP or how the TIP is created. Tonight's agenda also includes the Transpo Group contract
related to the transportation plan update; many of these questions will be addressed during that process.
He suggested the council focus on the public hearing. Mayor Nelson ruled point taken.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Olson's suggestion to increasing funding for
traffic calming.
Councilmember Nand said she lives a couple yards from Highway 99; the raised median in the SR-99
revitalization project is unique to Edmonds, compared to Lynwood and Shoreline. She described vehicles
scraping the median when driving in the lane next to the median and asked about placing turtles along the
median to warn drivers when they are too close. Mr. English answered that project is not complete; there
will be a shoulder stripe and a 2' shy distance between the lane line and the raised concrete barrier. He
agreed the raised median is different than Shoreline, but it is similar to SR-525 in Mukilteo where there is
a similar 18" barrier curb. One of the reasons for selecting that higher curb was pedestrians illegally
crossing Highway 99; the higher pedestrian curb discourages jaywalking.
Councilmember Nand asked if a consultant would be preparing the Waterfront Emergency Response
Study or was it being done inhouse. Mr. English answered that is a 2024 project; no work is being done
this year. That was added to 2024 by the council during deliberations on the 2023 budget. He anticipated
there would be more discussion on the scope of work during the decision package process in the 2024
budget. Councilmember Nand commented the previous iteration, the waterfront connector, was a
lightning rod and she wanted to distinguish this study from that.
Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for Mr. English and Mr. Hauss' hard work preparing the
TIP. He noted Project #29, walkway from 238' to 234t'', is timely as that area develops and it will help
ease public safety in that area. He referred to Project #38, downtown lighting improvements, recalling
$50,000-$60,000 was budgeted in 2023 for a citywide lighting study. He asked about the results of that
study and what areas would be prioritized. Mr. English explained a vacant project manager position so
that study can begin moving forward. A scoping session was held with the consultant recently; he
anticipated the findings of that evaluation will be presented to council in the fall.
Councilmember Chen commented there are other parts of the City like the southeast portion and north end
on 76' in Perrinville that need lighting. Mr. English answered the evaluation will include the location of
existing lights and gaps as well as identifying areas with the highest need for streetlights to fill those gaps.
The study has been not started yet. The downtown lighting improvement project had the potential for
funding by Sound Transit, but that funding was eliminated due to Sound Transit's funding issues.
Councilmember Teitzel expressed appreciation for staff s answers at the PPW Committee meeting. He
referred to Project #29, 84' Ave walkway from 238'' to 234''', a 4 block stretch of sidewalk on one side of
the street. The 2024 cost is approximately $1 million. Mr. English answered that is a ballpark estimate, a
detailed design has not been done. Councilmember Teitzel assumed a 2-block stretch would be about half
that amount or $500,000. He referred to Project #33, walkway on 236''' from 84' to Highway 99, also
about 2 blocks, that includes installation of a sidewalk on the north side of 236t' from 84t' to Hwy 99, yet
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 12
the total cost is $3 million, roughly 6 times the cost of Project #29 for a 2-block project. He found the cost
difference shocking and wondered if investing that kind of money was warranted to construct a sidewalk
on one side of the street or would it be better to construct traditional sidewalks at a much lower cost and
construct sidewalks elsewhere in the City where there are no sidewalks. He asked staff to justify the cost
difference for that project.
Mr. English answered it was comparing apples to oranges; the Green Streets project has a much larger
scope of work as it provides stormwater treatment and infiltration as well as additional scope items such
as utility undergrounding, road narrowing, etc., a more robust scope of work than just adding a sidewalk
such as on 84' Ave. Councilmember Teitzel said the narrative in the TIP states installation of sidewalk on
the north side of 236' from 84t1i to Highway 99. If that's the case, he asked whether the cost reflects a
traditional sidewalk as the narrative states, or should the narrative be modified. Mr. English agreed the
narrative can be modified.
Mayor Nelson reminded this is the public hearing, not approving TIP.
Councilmember Paine said she was excited to see the ADA transition plan in the TIP, although she would
like to see funding a year earlier. She was also interested in revising the traffic calming program.
Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing.
Glenn Douglas, Edmonds, a resident of the Gateway neighborhood, said as far as he knows, his
neighbors have no interest in a Green Street project. He questioned Ms. McLaughlin's comment that it
will be a community gathering place in the middle of 236t''. Ms. McLaughlin clarified it will be a parklike
space. Mr. Douglas said he did not see that, it is a dangerous street, nearly as bad as 84t' and he disagreed
with spending $6 million on that project instead of putting sidewalks on both sides of 84'. He agreed with
constructing sidewalks on both sides of 236' to Highway 99 particularly since the bus stop is on the west
side and sidewalks are planned on the east side. He applauded Councilmembers Buckshnis and Olson for
recommending the budget for traffic calming be increased, noting $33,000 is not nearly enough. He
acknowledged traffic was bad everywhere; people seem to want to get where they are going faster and
more things like speed cameras, radar speed signs, traffic cushions etc. are needed.
With no further public comment, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing.
Mr. English advised it is the council's decision whether the TIP comes back to council next week for
continued discussion or on the consent agenda.
Council President Tibbott did not think the TIP would be ready to come back to council next week. He
will research last year's discussion about using ARPA funds for Green Streets. He suggested increasing
funding for traffic calming be discussed as part of the 2024 budget. He noted the TIP is a 6-year plan, but
in a short time Transpo Group will be undertaking a planning process for the same time period. He did not
understand why the council would approve the TIP before that planning process is complete as it may
include some different projects such as walkways. Mr. English explained the council needs to adopt the
TIP by July 1. The Transportation Plan update will take approximately 14-15 months and will generate a
new project list, but that will not be complete by July 1. Staff will return next year with hopefully a new
project list as a result of the transportation plan update and update the TIP. Council President Tibbott
referred to an email from Public Works Director Antillon regarding the planning process for updating the
TIP. He expected to bring the TIP back to council in early June.
Councilmember Paine suggested bringing the TIP back for discussion by full council. Tonight was a
public hearing, and she has other questions.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 13
10. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. RESOLUTION RELATED TO PRIMARY CLARIFIER EMERGENCY CORROSION
DAMAGE REPAIR
Public Works Director Oscar Antillon commented staff has been working on this for the last 1-2 years.
Once the clarifier was taken offline and inspected, it was apparent action needed to be taken immediately.
It is basically falling apart and there is not enough time to go through a competitive bid process. The
summer is the only time the work can be done because in the winter all the space in the plant is needed for
treatment. This was discussed with Mayor Nelson and City Attorney Jeff Taraday and it was determined
this was one of the few cases where an emergency declaration was necessary.
Councilmember Teitzel asked how long the rake arm had been in service before it failed and what was the
expected lifespan for a new rake arm. Mr. Antillon answered he believed this was the original rake arm so
it had been in place 30+ years since the plant was last upgraded. The lifespan is typical, but a few more
years could be possible with more maintenance such as every 10 years, which has not been done.
Councilmember Olson thanked Mr. Antillon for answering the questions she provided via email. She
recognized he also has a contracting background and asked if he was comfortable with the fair market
value. Mr. Antillon answered yes, explaining said staff reached out to several contractors and in a way
met the competitive requirement, but did not go through the official procurement process that includes
advertising, etc.
Councilmember Chen relayed his understanding this was not part of new gasification system. Mr.
Antillon answered no, this has been in the CIP for 1-2 years, but it is not part of the gasification process,
just repairs on the WWTP. Councilmember Chen was glad nothing was broken on the new system.
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT, TO
ACCEPT THE RESOLUTION RELATED TO THE PRIMARY CLARIFIER EMERGENCY
CORROSION DAMAGE REPAIR AND TO REPLACE THE RAKE ARM. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY
2. RESOLUTION EXPRESSING SUPPORT OF PROHIBITING PUBLIC USE OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
This item was removed from the agenda via action taken during Agenda Item 5.
3. CITIZEN -INITIATED CODE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW DAY-CARE BUSINESSES AS
A PRIMARY PERMITTED USE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (BN) ZONE
(AMD2023-0001)
Planner Rose Haas reviewed:
Applicant's proposal
o Great Kids Academy and their representative, AD Shapiro Architects, are proposing to
amend ECDC Chapter 16.45 to:
1. Change day-care centers from a primary use requiring a CUP to a primary (outright)
permitted use in the BN zone; and
2. Exempt the outdoor recreation spaces associates with day-care centers from the operating
restrictions in the BN zone, which require most uses to be located within fully enclosed
buildings.
o Changes would apply to all areas within BN zoning
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 14
o Day-care centers currently require a Type III-B CUP which must be reviewed and approved
by the hearing examiner. As a primary permitted use, they would not have to obtain a CUP
which cost approximately $3300 and go through the hearing examiner process which can take
up to 4 months if not longer.
• Component 1: change day-care center from conditional to outright permitted use (ECDC
16.45.010)
A. Permitted Primary Uses
1 Single-family dwellings, as regulated in RS-6 zone.
2. Neighborhood-onenled retail stores, retail service uses, excluding uses such as commercial
garages, used car lots. taverns, theaters, auditoriums, undertaking establishments and those
uses requiring a conditional use permit as listed below,
3. Offices and outpatient clinics, excluding commercial kennels
4. Dry cleaning stores and laundromats.
5. Small animal hospitals.
6. Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17 100 020:
7. Primary and high schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17. 100 050(G) through (R).
8, Day-care centers.
18 Local public facilities designated and sited in the capital improvement plan, subject to the
requirements of ECDC 17 100 050.
7Q`9. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces. and community parks with an adopted
master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17 1! N 1 i
C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit
1. Commercial parking lots,
2. Drive-in businesses;
3. Businesses open to the public between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.:
4 Convenience stores,
5 Local public facilities not planned, designated or sited in the capital improvement plan,
subject to the requirements of ECDC I 1 I'L 4"
6- Day-f.aw Cr mars
7. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums,
8. Museums, art galleries, zoos. and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the
criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85 033.
9 Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug
abusers.
10. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of
ECDC 17 100 070.
• Component 2: Add outdoor play areas to list of uses permitted outside fully enclosed areas
(ECDC 16.45.030)
A. All uses shall be carried on entirely within a completely enclosed building except:
1. Public utilities and parks;
2. Off-street parking and loading areas and commercial parking lots.
3. Drive-in businesses;
4. Plant nurseries;
5, Outdoor recreation spaces associated with day-care centers;
fl_6 Limited outdoor display of merchandise meeting the criteria of Chapter 17 65 ECDC.
o Also required by RCW 43.126
o As a primary permitted use, day -cares would still go through the building, engineering and
planning review process which includes conditions, approval and final inspection process
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 15
which would include parking, landscaping, traffic, water and critical areas. They would also
be required to obtain a business license and any state requirements/licensing.
Proposal's consistency with comprehensive plan
o Commercial Development Goal A: Commercial development in Edmonds shall be located to
take advantage of its unique locational opportunities while being consistent and compatible
with the character of its surrounding neighborhood
o Commercial Development Goal C: Neighborhood Commercial areas are intended to provide
a mix of services, shopping, gathering places, office space and housing for local
neighborhoods.
■ C.2: Permit used in neighborhood commercial areas that are intended to serve the local
neighborhood.
■ C.6: Encourage neighborhood commercial areas to reflect the identify and character of
individual neighborhoods, thus are strengthening their importance as neighborhood
centers
o Planning board and planning staff believe the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive
plan
Staff analysis and planning board recommendation
o At their May 10 meeting, the planning board held a public hearing and recommended the city
council approve the code amendment as shown in Attachment 3, based on the following
findings:
■ Day-care centers provide a vital service to neighborhood area residents on a daily basis,
consistent with ECDC 16.45.000(A)
■ The comprehensive plan's commercial development goals and policies support the
proposal
■ The code amendment would eliminate an onerous CUP process and instead rely on clear
and objective development standards
■ Hearing Examiner precedent indicates day-care centers within BN zone are generally
consistent with comprehensive plan as well as local, state and federal codes and permit
requirements, and have not required additional conditions of approval
■ There are six existing day -cares within or immediately adjacent to BN zones
Process and next steps
o Code amendments are a Type V legislative process, requiring a planning board public hearing
and recommendation to city council
o The planning board held a public hearing on May 10' and unanimously recommended city
council amend ECDC Chapter 16.45
■ The city received one written comment in support of the proposal, and one person
testified during the May 10 public hearing in support of the proposal
o Staff requested expedited review by the Department of Commerce on May 10
o City council is scheduled to hold a public hearing on June 6
o City council is tentatively scheduled to take action on the ordinance on June 20
Councilmember Buckshnis said she has never seen a citizen initiated code amendment. Mr. Levitan said a
citizen initiated the amendment and paid for it. Staff makes a recommendation to the planning board and
the planning board's recommendation is forwarded to council. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her
understanding there is a difference between permits for an in -home child care and school child care. Mr.
Levitan answered this is specific to commercial day-care centers in commercial zones that have 13 or
more children. In -home day -cares, which can have up to 12 children, would not be subject to this process
and can occur in residential zones via the home occupation/business license process. Councilmember
Buckshnis answered this is a great idea, her only concern was traffic although there is a day-care on
Olympic View Drive that seems to deals with the traffic.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 16
Council President Tibbott said he liked idea of this in a neighborhood, but wondered about specifications
for an outdoor play area and hoped when it came to council there would be a description of the criteria for
an outdoor play area in a BN zone. He was particularly interested in noise, safety and supervision. Ms.
Haas answered the requirements for outdoor play areas are outlined in RCW 43.126. With regard to noise,
human voices are exempt between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. so noise should not be an issue. Day -cares go
through a stringent state process related to safety and supervision.
Councilmember Teitzel said he did not see a down side to the proposal and the only comments in the
packet were in favor. He asked if there were any negative comments made at the planning board or
whether staff had heard of any concerns. Ms. Haas answered there were no negative comments.
Councilmember Paine said this was appropriate for neighborhood districts. Her only concern was traffic
calming. She relayed a comment from the public regarding challenges crossing to/from a childcare center
on Firdale Avenue. She commented it would be awesome to co -locate RRFB and crosswalks.
Councilmember Nand said she was familiar with the neighborhood as she grew up in the house across the
street from the proposed site from age 12. She asked if the permitting process required setting aside easily
accessible parking spaces for drop off/pickup. Mr. Levitan said the parking standards in the ECDC would
apply. If a day-care got big enough to require a traffic impact analysis by creating a certain number of PM
peak hour trips, the parking analysis could potentially be included with the traffic analysis. That typically
would not be tripped for smaller projects. If there are concern about that, particularly with expanding that
type of use and eliminating the need for a CUP, conditions could be established by revising the parking
code as part of the larger code modernization process. Councilmember Nand suggested establishing
guidelines for easier ingress/egress to reduce conflicts in the parking lot.
Councilmember Chen thanked the citizen who initiated this and staff for their cooperation to develop a
great packet.
4. PRESENTATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE
TRANSPO GROUP FOR THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE
City Engineer Rob English explained during the presentation and overview of the scope of work at the
March 14 PPW Committee meeting the committee requested a presentation on multimodal level of
service (MMLOS), a new program proposed to be implemented with this contract. Transpo provided a
presentation to the full council and answered questions on May 2. This is the agreement to complete the
transportation plan update. The agreement includes seven tasks; the biggest change is implementation of
the MMLOS, a new program that will require staff training and a new administrative process to manage
concurrency. The transportation plan update supports the City's 2024 comprehensive plan update and will
include public meetings with input on the transportation plan and comprehensive plan. The update will
take approximately 14-15 months. The update of the transportation plan will include development of a
new project list that will be incorporated into next year's TIP.
Mr. English advised Transpo's proposed fee is $386,085 which includes a 5% management reserve of
approximately $18,000. It will be funded by the 012 Street fund in both 2023 and 2024. The cost is higher
than the 2015 plan due to the development of the MMLOS and more public outreach and presentations to
the city council and planning board. Staff recommends approval.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO
APPROVE THE CONTRACT WITH TRANSPO GROUP.
Councilmember Chen asked if this was a state requirement or just initiated by the City. Mr. English
answered the plan should be updated every 6-8 years and it is needed to support the 2024 comprehensive
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 17
plan process. Councilmember Chen observed the MMLOS is a new concept. Mr. English answered it is
not necessarily a new concept, other cities in the region have adopted MMLOS; it is new for Edmonds.
The 2015 plan identified MMLOS as a goal for the next update. MMLOS addresses not only automobiles,
but pedestrian, transit, and bikes, the complete transportation system.
Councilmember Chen observed there are new state requirements like Complete Streets which triggered
the redesign of Highway 99 to include bike lanes. The City is already doing the work to adapt to state
requirements and he asked if it was necessary to spend $390,000 on a consultant or was that something
the City was already doing. Mr. English answered it was necessary; the City's current impact fee is auto
centric, based only on projects related to LOS at intersections. Depending on the metrics the city council
adopts, the impact fees from a MMLOS will help fund sidewalks, bike lanes and intersection
improvements related to automobiles. That is not something staff has the expertise to perform inhouse.
Information related to densities and growth projections will be used to determine trip generation, a new
transportation model synced with projected future development.
Councilmember Olson was excited with the potential for using impact fees for all transportation modes
and expressed support for the contract. She relayed a point raised by a resident, the hope is that
congestion created by narrower streets will cause people to ride a bike or use public transit, when in fact
drivers use side streets which is what's happened on 84' due to Highway 99 construction. She reiterated
the importance of not getting ahead of the declining demand for automobiles before automobiles are not
in demand and end up causing problems on side streets. Mr. English agreed it will be a balance that the
council will have an opportunity to consider.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to Project #12 in the TIP, 76' & 220' Street intersection, redesign the
intersection to reduce intersection delay and improve LOS. He noted that is LOS as currently defined, not
MMLOS. With the update, Transpo will be looking at design elements for future TIPS, but due to timing,
the City is on the threshold of spending nearly $1 million in 2024 on that intersection, designed around
LOS. He asked how to square design under the old standard versus what is coming. Mr. English answered
that was the number #1 transportation project in the 2015 transportation plan and addresses LOS as well
as provides bike lane connection through the intersection, widened sidewalks, and curb ramps. Some
Complete Streets principles apply to intersection in addition to addressing LOS. He did not see stopping
that project because there is too much momentum; the City received grants for design and right-of-way
and the project is positioned well to apply for construction funding.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
II. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson commented on the fabulous warm weather which unfortunately comes with a desire to
spend time in very cold water. He provided a public safety announcement about a unique phenomenon
that happens this time of year, cold water shock. He did not know the specifics of two individuals who got
in trouble in the water this week, unfortunately an 18-year old drown in Lake Sammamish and a 14-year
old spent 5 minutes underwater at Green Lake before being rescued. Cold water shock happens when
someone jumps into cold water and because the water is so cold, a gasp reflex occurs and if the person is
underwater, they inhale water making it much more likely they will drown. The second leading cause of
death for children between the ages of 15-19 is downing. He encouraged everyone to keep an eye on their
children and to remind teens who are tempted to jump in the water of the danger as waters are still very
cold.
12. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 18
Councilmember Chen commented on May 7, the community said goodbye and paid tribute to former
housing commissioner and beloved community member Bob Throndsen. His poem is a perfect reflection
on the May 10 event in Salt Lake City, the Golden Spike Festival, that he participated in. In honor of the
Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) Heritage Month (May), he attended the meaningful Golden
Spike Festival and traced the Chinese railroad builders' first steps back to 1869. On May 10 the Golden
Spike connected the transcontinental railroad in Salt Lake City. In the pursuit of happiness and a better
life more than 200 years ago, the first wave of Chinese immigrants left their homes and came to America
to build a future for themselves and the USA. Among the many contributions that the Asian Americans
made for this great nation, the transcontinental railroad was a milestone. Most of the workers who laid the
track were Chinese immigrants, yet for the next 100 years, following the Chinese Exclusion Action of
1882, Chinese Immigrants in the U.S. bore pain, fear, anxiety, uncertainty, darkness, sadness, tribulation,
and countless trials.
Councilmember Chen read a poem credited to Bob Throndsen: Luckily those immigrants are strong. They
are so strong that out of pain grows healing. Out of fears grows hope. Out of anger grows love. Out of
anxiety grows calm. Out of uncertainty grows promise and out of night grows light. Out of sadness grows
joy. Out of tribulation grows resilience. Out of such trial grows humanity. As one people of the greatest
nation in the world, ,we will continue to grow. May we grow more closer this truth that we all hold to be
self-evident. That all people are treated equal, are created equal, not just made.
Councilmember Teitzel reported on the town hall that he, Councilmembers Olson and Buckshnis co -
hosted at the Edmonds Lutheran Church. A group of citizens attended and has a robust and lively
discussion on a wide range of topics. He expressed appreciation for his co -hosts and the citizens who
attended and dialogued, commenting it is great to have a two-way dialogue instead of three minutes of
one-way comment at council meetings.
Councilmember Paine expressed appreciation for the proclamations, commenting the public works team
gets compliments throughout the year, especially during the snow, about how hard they work. She
anticipated the 4-wheel drive snow removal vehicle will result in more compliments especially from
residents who live on hills. Regard the National Police Week proclamation, she was in Washington DC
for Puget Sound Days on the Hill last week and on her way home, saw the Everett Police honor guard for
the family of Officer Rocha. It is a small airport and it was very moving to see everyone stop and stand
while the families came through. Puget Sound Days on the Hill were very fun and busy. She had an
opportunity to meet with the federal delegation and when she happened to see Senator Cantwell, she
recognized her from Edmonds and specifically called out the Edmonds Marsh as a project Puget Sound
needs that could be funded via the inflation reduction act and the bipartisan infrastructure law. Those are
exciting, promising aspects the City should consider as she would hate to miss out on the largess from the
federal government. She encouraged councilmembers to go to Puget Sound Days on the Hill if they had
the chance.
Council President Tibbott reported on the tree code public meeting held last night at city hall that was
attended by about 15 people and expressed his appreciation for the citizen input. It was his impression the
City has entered into an important conversation/engagement process but a lot more is needed. He
encouraged citizen to participate in the online survey and future events on the topic.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented on the fun she had at last night's town hall, her 11'. She offered
to assist councilmembers with holding a town hall and relayed her plans to hold a budget town hall. She
commented on the importance of the council looking at the quarterly financials again, relaying the council
president and finance chair have indicated they will have those on council's agenda as the public likes to
see them. She concurred with Councilmember Chen on the ERP update; it is an important system that the
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 19
assistant finance director spent a lot of time on, including updating the finance committee last year. She
wanted to ensure the ERP was vetted properly.
Councilmember Buckshnis reported on Spring Fest held this weekend. She looked forward to debriefing
with Council President Tibbott on the tree code, noting it may be appropriate to hold a town hall on the
tree code.
Councilmember Olson reported this weekend was a great reminder of how much we love living here, it
was truly perfection and she appreciated Edmonds this weekend. She wished all the mothers a happy
mother's day, noting it was a big job and she appreciated the job that moms do.
Councilmember Nand commented while the hot weather was lovely for those who have access to air
conditioning or cooler space to get out of the heat, it can be very challenging for vulnerable populations
particularly seniors and unhoused citizens. Snohomish County maintains a webpage regarding extreme
heat and cooling centers and Edmonds Waterfront Center is listed. She emailed the administration and
bcc'd the city council to see if would be feasible and something the City was interested in pursuing, to
place a cooling tent and hydration station somewhere on Highway 99 during times of extreme heat, such
as between 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. on days when the temperature is expected to exceed 85 or 90 degrees. She
hoped that would provide some relief to businesses on Highway 99, especially Safeway on 238', that
have large air conditioned spaces and are inundated and have to deal with a lot of conflicts. Businesses
should not be doing the job that government should be doing, protecting vulnerable populations. She
invited anyone with opinions on where a cooling tent/hydration station should be located during periods
of excessive heat, whether one should be located in Edmonds, etc. to email her and she will pursue it with
the administration and council.
13. ADJOURN
With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m.
SA14
SCOTT PASSEY; .C.. CLERK
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 16, 2023
Page 20