Loading...
2023-08-10 Historic Preservation Commission Packeto Agenda - Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission REGULAR MEETING BRACKETT ROOM 121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020 AUGUST 10, 2023, 5:30 PM REMOTE MEETING INFORMATION: Remote meeting link: https:Hedmondswa- gov.zoom.us/j/87419346600?pwd=YmVIV1JQMjhiMjlrS25pUjY1Wk9BUT09 Meeting ID: 874 1934 6600 Passcode: 629853 This is a Hybrid meeting. The public may attend in -person or on-line. The physical location of the meeting is at Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue N., 3rd floor Brackett Room. You may call in to meeting:US: +1 253 205 0468 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or +1 408 6380968 LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. Flag Salute 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. 7790 : Meeting Minutes June 8th 4. AGENDA ADDITIONS / CHANGES 5. REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE 6. NEW BUSINESS A. 7785 : 820 Main Street Historic Nomination Public Hearing 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. 7786 : Continued Discussion of Research, Projects and Events 8. ACTION ITEMS 9. COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS 10. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS 11. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Agenda August 10, 2023 Page 1 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/10/2023 June 8, 2023 Draft Meeting Minutes Staff Lead: Michele Szafran Department: Planning & Development Prepared By: Michelle Martin Staff Recommendation Approve minutes from the Historic Preservation Commission's June 8, 2023 regular meeting. Narrative Draft meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: June 8, 2023 HPC Draft Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 2 O CITY OF EDMONDS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Summary Minutes of Regular Meeting June 8, 2023 CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT, AND FLAG SALUTE Commissioner Spencer called the meeting of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:30 p.m. and read the Land Acknowledgement) Commissioner Preston led the Pledge of Allegiance. Commissioners Present Larry Vogel (Chair) Chris Deiner-Karr Katie Kelly David Preston Tim Raetzloff Sam Spencer Commissioners Absent None MINUTES: Staff Present Michele Szafran, Planner Others Present Dave Teitzel, Edmonds City Council Representative Approval of May 11, 2023 HPC Minutes The May 11, 2023 HPC minutes were presented. AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES Ms. Szafran distributed copies of the presentation from Michelle Thompson and the draft newsletter. Chair Vogel recommended adding discussions to the agenda about the draft newsletter and about budget ideas. Councilmember Teitzel added that the City Council is starting to think about next year's budget. If there are specific things the HPC wants funded they should let the Council know as soon as possible. REOUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE There were no audience comments. 1 Chair Vogel arrived right after the meeting was called to order and assumed the role of Chair. Historic Preservation Commission June 8, 2023 Pagel of 3 Packet Pg. 3 2 O NEW BUSINESS Discussion about Draft Newsletter Chair Vogel noted that Commissioner Spencer had worked hard on the writing of this while he worked on the layout. The topic was the Yost Park water system and the historical significance of the existing structures. There are environmental issues around it that need to be mentioned, but that is not the focus of the HPC. Councilmember Teitzel commented that this was very well written. Commissioner Deiner-Karr said she had read they had put in fingerlings into the stream already. She wondered if that was premature since they haven't CO done the improvements there yet. Councilmember Teitzel said it was not and noted that Joe Scordino who was in attendance might be able to share more information. d Joe Scordino commented that there are two weirs plus a concrete dam structure under one of the bridges. There's also a very large metal ring structure further down. He wondered if Commissioner Spencer could do some more 2 digging to find out about what the system looked like — how it was set up and how water was delivered. He pointed out that he has been monitoring the creek every month for eight years and noticed that the upper weir was having an impact on the bluff above. In 2019 there were two significant rain events that impacted the weir, the creek, and the bluff. He expressed concern that the whole bluff is going to be impacted with significant erosion problems. He reviewed some background on this and actions he feels should be taken. He recommended that the HPC advocate for keeping the upper structure where it is. He also discussed details of his recommendation for addressing the issues with the creek. Chair Vogel thanked him for the information and a, noted the HPC's focus is on the historical significance of this. They are interested in the visual part and some interpretive signage to tell the history of the area. Councilmember Teitzel agreed with Mr. Scordino that the HPC's focus should be on the upper weir and let the lower weir situation be addressed as needed. The UPC concurred. Chair Vogel commented on his interest in preserving the ring -shaped portion. Mr. Scordino proposed L c an interim approach to hand dig a channel with volunteers to move the creek away from the base of the bluff a before the winter. This would require an emergency permit, and the work would need to be done before salmon x spawning season in September. N Suggestions were made regarding the newsletter: correct the spelling of Joe's name, define weir, and reorganize the part regarding the mission. There was discussion about where this will be distributed. 2. Discussion about Budget Request Items for City Council Chair Vogel will send a memo to Councilmember Teitzel with a request from the HPC for $10,000 for calendars in 2024. 1. Historic Preservation Training Summary Ms. Szafran reviewed the summary document from the training. She encouraged the Commission to keep this handy as reference material. Commissioner Deiner-Karr commented on the need to update the HPC's documents. Ms. Szafran suggested that it may not need to be changed; it might just be the way the code is Historic Preservation Commission June 8, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 4 O interpreted. There was discussion about various houses and historical sites and the desire to increase the number of houses on the Register. Commissioner Deiner-Karr and Ms. Szafran will look to see if one of them has the old 820 Maple application so they can follow up on getting this on the Register. Commissioner Spencer will talk to the new owners about their interest and see if they still have the plaque. 2. Continued Discussion of Research, Projects, and Events There was more discussion about potential houses for the Register. Commissioner Deiner-Karr discussed some research she had done. Commissioner Preston asked how they would handle new homes that have been built on historical sites. Commissioner Deiner-Karr said they would just need to talk to the owner and see if they wanted to have a plaque in their yard and then go through the application process. CO c Chair Vogel asked if they need to get more plaques. Ms. Szafran said she hasn't seen any but she can check around to see if anyone knows. Commissioner Deiner-Karr said she would check with Diane. Commissioner Raetzloff said he might also speak with Diane. Commissioner Raetzloff noted that the full application for 820 Main is in and they are waiting for the staff report and notice requirements. Ms. Szafran said she will try to have it ready for a public hearing next month. d Ms. Szafran noted they have two vacant professional positions and have not gotten any applications. d 3 COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Vogel thanked everyone for showing up and looking at the newsletter. He is very pleased to get it back on track again. He thanked Commissioner Spencer for all his work on it. He is looking forward to looking over the materials distributed by Ms. Szafran. The next meeting is scheduled for July 13. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Commissioner Raetzloff asked about taking another look at the oldest house in Edmonds on 9' Avenue North even though it falsifies history with the new portion of the house. Commissioner Deiner-Karr thought if they focused on who lived there and built it instead of the integrity of the architecture, it could qualify. Commissioner Deiner-Karr stated they need to go back to some of the houses that were previously declined and see if they could qualify under the standards as they understand them now. She will gather a list of all those houses. Councilmember Teitzel spoke to the need to be consistent with the application of the standards. Commissioner Preston read the mission statement of the HPC and recommended adding it to the meeting agenda layout toward the beginning of the meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:06 p.m. Historic Preservation Commission June 8, 2023 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 5 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/10/2023 820 Main Street Historic Nomination Public Hearing Staff Lead: {enter Staff Lead or "N/A" here) Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michele Szafran Background/History Chapter 20.45 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) outlines the process and criteria for designating properties or districts to the Edmonds Register of Historic Places ("register"). On May 18, 2023, the city received a nomination form (Attachment 1) requesting to add the house located at 820 Main Street (Attachment 5) to the register. Application materials include the historic property report (Attachment 2) and images (Attachment 6) from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) database. Per ECDC 20.45.020(D), the Historic Preservation Commission shall hold a public meeting to consider the merits of the nomination according to the criteria in ECDC 20.45.010. Staff Recommendation While staff has concerns about how a 2004 addition and other improvements over the last 20 years (dormers, windows, etc.) may impact the building's historic significance, staff generally finds that the home encompasses traditional craftsman work of the early 20' century development of the city. Staff recommends that the Commission find the nomination meets the criteria for potential designation in the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. Narrative A full analysis of the proposal's consistency with the approval criteria in ECDC 20.45.010 is included in the attached staff report. Attachments: 820 Main St. Historic Designation Staff Report Attachment 1 - Nomination Form Attachment 2 - Inventory Report Attachment 3 - County Assessor Data Attachment 4 - Site Plan for 2004 Addition Attachment 5 - Vicinity Map Attachment 6 - WISAARD Images Attachment 7 - Seven Aspects of Integrity Attachment 8 - Notice of Public Hearing Packet Pg. 6 O City of Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Designation Staff Report `°C. 18y1 Meeting Date: August 10, 2023 Agenda Subject: Application for designation of the house located at 820 Main Street as eligible for inclusion on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places Staff Lead: Michele Q. Szafran, Associate Planner Staff recommendation: While staff has concerns about how a 2004 addition and other improvements over the last 20 years (dormers, windows, etc.) may impact the building's historic significance, staff generally finds that the home encompasses traditional craftsman work of the early 20`' century development of the city. Staff recommends that the Commission find the nomination meets the criteria for potential designation in the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. DRAFT 820 Main St. HistPres designation staff report Packet Pg. 7 O Designation Criteria Criteria Comments 1. Significantly associated with the ® The statement of significance from the history, architecture, archaeology, 2011 survey report notes that the house engineering or cultural heritage of recalls an early 201}i century development Edmond... of the city. While the house was originally constructed in 1901, it was altered circa 2004 with an addition (Attachment 4) as well as upgraded plumbing, electrical, sewer and windows. The Commission must determine if the period of significance is impacted by the addition and improvements. 2. Has integrity... ® Originally constructed in 1901, building shapes and materials are largely intact with the exception of the dormers and addition off the back that occurred circa 2004. Windows have been replaced with vinyl, though most window openings appear similar to original configuration. With the exception of the addition, staff finds that the building configuration and materials are consistent with the original home and thus may be considered to meet the integrity criteria. 3. Age at least 50 years old, or has ® The building was constructed in 1901 and exceptional importance if less than 50 thus is at least 50 years old. The exception years old... to this would be if the addition is factored into the designation. 4. Falls into at least one of the following ❑ To be confirmed by the Historic designation categories: Preservation Commission. Designation Category a. Associated with events that have ❑ Unknown made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state or local history. b. Embodies the distinctive architectural ® Representative of residential construction characteristics of a type, period, style type from the early 20t' Century or method of design or construction, American movements. Shows an early or represents a significant and residential style typical for the area, distinguishable entity whose illustrating local craftsman building components may lack individual techniques and materials. distinction. 820 Main Street historic designation staff report Page 2 of 10 a� �L m x 2 a c 0 c E 0 z 0 A x d m Cn c 0 N 0 a a� 0 Cn a 0 0 c aM .N a� 0 .L 0 N x co c 0 N 00 m E z 0 Q Packet Pg. 8 O Designation Criteria Criteria Comments c. Is an outstanding work of a designer, ❑ None indicated. builder or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art. d. Exemplifies or reflects special ® Representative of early residential elements of the City's cultural, social, building style. economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history. e. Is associated with the lives of persons ❑ None indicated. significant in national, state or local history. f. Has yielded or may be likely to yield ❑ None indicated. important archaeological information related to history or prehistory. g. Is a building or structure removed ❑ None indicated. from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event. h. Is a birthplace or grave of a historical ❑ None indicated. figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site associated with that person. i. Is a cemetery which derives its ❑ No. primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events or cultural patterns. j. Is a reconstructed building that has ❑ No. been executed in a historically accurate manner on the original site. k. Is a creative and unique example of ❑ None indicated. folk architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical, the designation shall include description of the boundaries of categories. 820 Main Street historic designation staff report Page 3 of 10 a� �L m x a _ c E 0 z 0 A x d m W c 0 N 0 a a� W _ 0 c aM .N d C `o N 2 CO c 0 N 00 m E z 0 Q Packet Pg. 9 O 1. Shape: The house is a simple rectangular shaped house with a projecting porch and a gabled roof on the north. 2. Roof and Roof A gable roof type. The main gable ridge runs north -south with the western Features: portion becoming less steep. There is an upper, west -facing shed dormer and an east -west gable on the western side over the living room. Typical modern composition roof materials. 3. Openings Main entry is via gabled bump -out toward Main Street. Window openings (entries, etc): appear to generally be of original form but have been replaced with vinyl/plastic. Upper dormers were added sometime within the last 20 years and an addition to the back of the home occurred in 2004. 4. Projections: The gabled porch identifies entry and relationship to sidewalk/street front. The second story dormer appears to be an addition sometime within the last 20 years and may not be a contributing factor. S. Trim & secondary Aside from general shapes and forms, there is little or no ornamentation or features added detailing. The support posts of the front porch appear to include some details that are not original to the home. The structure consists of wood shingle clad siding in a horizontal pattern. 6. Materials: The house is clad with double -coursed shingles, reminiscent of the early 20`h Century American Craftsman movement. It appears that materials may be the most significant aspect of the home. 7. Setting: The house is located in downtown Edmonds, east of the Frances Anderson Center. The home is on a lot that is approximately 8,799 sq. ft. in a single-family zone with a prominent porch and main entry oriented to Main Street. A newer addition is located on the rear portion of the home and upper -level dormers were added sometime within the last 20 years. 8. Materials at close Typical Craftsman details. range 9. Craft details: Typical Craftsman details. 10. Individual N/A. Interior features are not considered for nomination. rooms/spaces: 11. Related spaces or N/A sequences: 12. Interior features: N/A. Interior features are not considered for nomination 13. Surface finishes & N/A materials: 14. Exposed structure: N/A 820 Main Street historic designation staff report Page 4 of 10 a� �L m x a c 0 c E 0 z 0 x d m c 0 N 0 a d Cn _ 0 0 c aM .N d C �L 0 N x co c 0 N 00 m E z 0 Q Packet Pg. 10 O 820 Main Street — North Fagade (Source unknown) 820 Main Street historic designation staff report Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 11 O 820 Main Street 2023 — North Facade 820 Main Street historic designation staff report Page 6 of 10 Packet Pg. 12 O 820 Main Street — West View 820 Main Street— West View 820 Main Street historic designation staff report Page 7 of 10 Packet Pg. 13 O 820 Main Street — Portion of East View 820 Main Street historic designation staff report Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 14 O Google Street View r. 820 Main Street historic designation staff report Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 15 O Attachments: Attachment 1: Nomination Form Attachment 2: Inventory Report Attachment 3: County Assessor Data Attachment 4: Site Plan — 2004 Addition Attachment 5: Vicinity Map Attachment 6: Wizzard Images Attachment 7: 101_Seven Aspects of Integrity Attachment 8: Public Noticing Notes on historic register nominations: Chapter 20.45.020 ECDC (Edmonds Community Development Code) states that if the Commission finds that the nominated property is eligible for placement on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places, the Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council that the property be listed on the register with owner's consent. According to Chapter 20.45.040 ECDC, listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places is an honorary designation denoting significant association with the historic, archaeological, engineering or cultural heritage of the community. Properties are listed individually or as contributing properties to a historic district. No property may be listed without the owner's permission. Prior to the commencement of any work on a register property, excluding ordinary repair and maintenance and emergency measures defined in Section 20.45.000(H), the owner must request and receive a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Commission for the proposed work. Violation of this rule shall be grounds for the Commission to review the property for removal from the register. Prior to whole or partial demolition of a register property, the owner must request and receive a waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness. Because Edmonds is a Certified Local Government (CLG), all properties listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places may be eligible for a special tax valuation on their rehabilitation. 820 Main Street historic designation staff report Page 10 of 10 Packet Pg. 16 Edmonds Edmanaa Register of Hfsbarlo Historic Places FMEW..MM Nomination Form Type or print all entries — Please complete all applicable sections. Historic Name (if applicable): Common (or Current) Name (if applicable): Site Address / Location Street Address or Location Description: O ° -0 AlA tAJ City / ZIP Code: ga g a Tax / Parcel Number: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Received by: File #: Survey/Site #: Street Address: $ P-0 ' " 4 A W Gr / L City / State / ZIP Code:E—Dmoe crj� W A I Et Zn Pho;#: ` q?0 3jkS Name (say "Owner" if same as owner listed above): 6A&LE Contact Address: Street: Contact Phone #: Date Form Completed: City / ZIP: I / WE the undersigned certify that we are the owners of the property identified on this form and hereby give our consent to having the property listed on the,Edmonds Register of Historic Places. Name (Please Print) CJo Kk3 Signature Name (Please Print) Signature Date Date Remised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form Packet Pg. 17 QDN►J + Gr46PYL. eh:)MoNlpse u3A 9$n-zo EMAI.L tl_ .Czrn c-�e- 714-4zo-3. s Site is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (If checked, skip to Section F) Site is listed on the State Register of Historic Places (If checked, skip to Section F) Historical Significance — Please check all that apply: l . Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state or local history. 2. V—Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style or method of design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. 3. Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art. 4. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or architectural history. 5. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, slate or local history. 6. Has yielded or may be likely to yield important archaeological information related to history or prehistory. 7. Is a building or stricture removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event. 8. Is a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site associated with that person. 9. Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association with historic events or cultural patterns. 10. _ Is a reconstructed building that has been executed in a historically accurate manner on the original site. Is a creative and unique example of folk architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the E L architectural or design professions, and which does not tit into formal architectural or historical categories; the L° designation shall include description of the boundaries. C 0 Historical Description = In the space below, describe the history and significance of the site to Edmonds' heritage. You may elect to 0 describe the site's significance in your own words, attach copies of other documents or photographs, and/or make Z reference to other materials (noting where those materials are available to be reviewed). For example, you may simply note that the site is on an historical survey, noting the survey name and site number. (Please feel free to attach any additional continuation sheets if you need more space.) E S 40 o M 15 -A CD Kt-(� %�-t`gJ S J-0-2 U--L c� � 1 Q o t — LA Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nominarion Form Page 2 of a Packet Pg. 18 O This section must be completed if *the site is not on the State or National Register, or it is not on an approved historic survey. Please provide as much injbrmation as you can. Year Built: t q O t Architect: Builder or Engineer (specify): Architectural Style(-,;)*: CFOIIA M A k� Building Form*: Roof Type*: -A A L r Cladding*: S Lfjy(C * Note: See later reference sheets for list of choices for these items. Overall Changes from Condition: Orininal: --1)L--Exce.11enl Plan: Cladding: Windows: Other: Site: Good Intact _Intact Intact Intact Original Site Fair Slight Slight Slight Slight Moved Deteriorated. Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Date Moved: Ruins Extensive Extensive 11-V Extensive Extensive Unexposed Unknown Unknown Unknown Unknown Plan Type: Structural System: Foundation: Roof Material: Apsidal _Pavilion _Balloon/Platform Brick Asphalt Comp _Metal — Tile _Center Space/ _Polygonal _Braced Frame Concrete block A. Comp - built up _None Courtyard Rectanglei3rick _Concrete pawed71�1- A. Comp - shingle Other _Cross/Cruciform _Round Clay Tile _Log A. Comp — rolled _Slate _E,-Shape _Semi -circular Concrete block _None _Tile Unknown _Hexagonal _Square Concrete poured _Other _Tile - clay Wood _H-Shape _Triangular Log Parged _Tile - concrete _Wood plank _Irregular T-Shape Mixed + Post & Pier Metal _Wood shake L-Shape _Unknown _None _Stone _Metal - corrugated _Wood shingle _None U-Shape _Other _Unknown _Metal - standing searn Octagonal Y-Shape _Plank _Other Post & Beam Steel - cut Number of Stories _Stone Stone - uncut _Unknown Revised on 9114110 P40 - Historic: Register Nomination Form P¢ge ? e?f 5 Packet Pg. 19 0 Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance: }T } l (Use continuation sheets if necessary, crud fc)r• am- photographs or copies you are providing.) (Please list and reference any sources which help document the historical value of the site.) Location Detail Parcel # OQ y, y z0 7%b b j 4 0 UTM Reference: Zone Easting _ Northing Township Range Section %4 Section /4 ''A Section Category Ownership Resource Status Usage District Public —?,-Private Survey/Inventory Current: 5 t 01 Building(s) National Register Structure Both National Landmark Site State Register Historic: Object Determined Eligible Other: Within a District? Contributing'? Local District: Yes Yes National or State Register / District: 'No No (/Unknown Reviser! on 9114110 P40 - Historic Register Nomination Form Pak, Packet Pg. 20 O Edmonds MdMQww Register of Mwbm4a Historic Places jwWwwomm ONUMbOAM Nomination Form Continuation Sheet for Item # Reviser! on 9114110 P40 - Historic: Register Norninurion Forin Page -1 o/ Packet Pg. 21 O i Historic Property Report Resource Name: Location Edmonds St Z � a Q Bell St ro a� t E Anderson Center y Dayton St m Maple W ple St m Pi Address: 820 Main St, Edmonds, WA 98020 Tax No/Parcel No: 00434207700500 Geographic Areas: Snohomish County, EDMONDS EAST Quadrangle, T271103E24 Information Number of stories: Construction Dates: Construction Type Built Date Historic Use: Category Domestic Domestic Historic Context: Category Architecture Architect/Engineer: Category 1.5 Year Circa 1901 F Subcategory Domestic - Single Family House Domestic - Single Family House Name or Company Property ID: 154128 R Q ATTAC H Thursday, March 23, 2023 Packet Pg. 22 O Historic Property Report Resource Name: Thematics: Local Registers and Districts Name Date Listed Project History Project Number, Organization, Project Name 2011-08-00161, , Edmonds-2011 Notes Resource Inventory SHPO Determination Not Determined Property ID: 154128 SHPO Determined By, Determined Date R Q Thursday, March 23, 2023 Page 2 J Packet Pg. 23 O dHistoric Property Report Resource Name: Property ID: 154128 Photos Northern facade. Northern facade Eastern and northern facades. Thursday, March 23, 2023 Page 3 j Packet Pg. 24 1 O dHistoric Property Report Resource Name: Inventory Details - 6/17/2011 Common name: Date recorded: 6/17/2011 Field Recorder: Larry E. Johnson Field Site number: 090 SHPO Determination Detail Information Characteristics: Category Form Type Structural System Cladding Roof Material Roof Type Foundation Roof Type Plan Styles: Period Early 20th Century American Movements (1900-1940) Surveyor Opinion Item Single Dwelling - Bungalow Wood - Platform Frame Wood - Shingle Asphalt/Composition - Shingle Gable Concrete - Poured Shed Rectangle Style Details Craftsman Property ID: 154128 Property is located in a potential historic district (National and/or local): Yes Property potentially contributes to a historic district (National and/or local): Yes Significance narrative: A Craftsman bungalow. Dormers added within the last ten years. Physical description: The house has a rectangular plan with a projecting porch with a gable roof on the north. The main gable ridge runs north -south with the western portion becoming less steep. There is an upper, west -facing shed dormer and an east -west gable on the western side over the living room. There is a chimney at the center of the western facade. The house is clad with double -coursed shingles. All of the windows have been replaced with vinyl sashes. R 0 a as 0 r c m c N c as E t U 0 r Q c a� E t U c2 Q Thursday, March 23, 2023 Page 4 J Packet Pg. 25 O Snohomish County Gntine Government Information & Services Structure Information Close Window General Desmptiorr Parcel Number 0043410-1700500 iRo1; Stuchore C1aas Dwelling Sttuclun Tl pe 1112 Storti wBa=ement Year Built 1901 5 tenor Features Foundation Cone or CB Faaterior Siding -Lap ROOF Type: Gable Pitch Medium CocW Composition Jrrtenar Features Bedrooms 4 Full or 3:-4 Baths 2 1 ? Baths 0 Floor Area Heat Forced Not Air - Gas Fireplace Masonry fireplace Floor 1 Base SF 1223 Finished SF 1223 Floor 2 Base SF 230 Finished SF 230 Floor B Base SF 662 Finished SF 0 0 N Garage(s)7 Carport(s) and .major outbuifdirrg(s) Detached, Garage SF 416 tither Features C O I sFr (Upperj 230 s.f. 15 23 Lio 1 sFr 26 390 s.f. 15 9 9 r 6J is 6 L 6 1 sFr 21 833 s.f. 17 14 16 6 2004 add. RFX Wd Dk 84 s.f. Det Gar 1 416 s.f. 26 — 16 r Q Packet Pg. 27 O CUft$ *tco ATTAC H M E Packet Pg. 28 " City of Edmonds Historic Register Nomination 'LAP 0 67.74 135.5 Feet 100.9 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for �,2�� p B p pp g reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION f 7 Tn 'L 2 :.,i Legend a ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN — <all other values, ++ R 1 � E 2 O Z 5; 4 V .� 9;71;7;8 O - - Sections Boundary N 2 Sections +' N ' Edmonds Boundary ArcSDE.GIS. PROPERTY _BUILDIP ) ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN M — <all other values, O Interstate N O Principal Arterial Q Minor Arterial; Collector Local Street %+ a+ O State Highways .2 — <all other values> > -- 0 ur) 1 a+ � N 2 E t County Boundary v Parks r Q ArcSDE.G IS. PROPERTY WASHII _ O ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY CITIES _ E n ...cnc r_c nnnncnTv rTmc � Notes a 820 Main St. Packet Pg. 29 1 dohpWISAARD Home Map Search Resources PropertyD 1 Main St, Edmonds,98020 Attachment Information Attachment ID: 102659 Attachment Title: Northern facade. Primary: Photo Year Taken: 2011 Circa: Notes: Photo View: Northern facade. Attachment Type: Photo Attached: DATA MIGRATION SYSTEM 71511905 12:00 AM Metadata Edited Date: DATA MIGRATION SYSTEM 1/13/2016 10:12 PM File Summary: IMG_1492.jpg; Photo; 1.19 MB; Source Information: Copyright: Packet Pg. 30 O Attachment Information Attachment ID: 102660 Attachment Title: Eastern and northern facades. Primary: Photo Yea rTaken : 2011 Circa: Notes: Photo View: Eastern and northern facades. Attachment Type: Photo Attached: DATA MIGRATION SYSTEM 7/5/1905 12:00 AM Metadata Edited Date: DATA MIGRATION SYSTEM 1/13/2016 10:12 PM File Summary: IMG_1493.jpg; Photo; 1.17 MB; Source Information: Copyright: Packet Pg. 31 O Attachment Information Attachment ID: 102661 Attachment Title: Northern facade Primary: Photo Yea rTaken: 2000 Circa: Notes: Photo View: Northern facade Attachment Type: Photo Attached: DATA MIGRATION SYSTEM 71511905 12:00 AM Metadata Edited Date: DATA MIGRATION SYSTEM 1/13/2016 10:12 PM File Summary: 00434207700500R011.J'pg; Photo; 45.36 KB; Source Information: Copyright: Packet Pg. 32 Office of Cultural Development, Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism Seven Aspects of Integrity By Patricia L. Duncan National Register Coordinator, Division of Historic Preservation A CANDIDATE MUST MEET three requirements to qualify for the National Register of Historic Places, as explained in the February issue of Preservation in Print. Two of these essentials — sig- nificance and age — were covered in that issue. The third qualification — integrity — is the topic of this and the following installments of National Register 101. The National Register defines integrity as the ability of a property to convey its significance. However, "integrity" is a word generally used to describe a person's honesty and sincerity. So, why is a word usually associated with humans used to designate a National Register eligibility requirement? The answer can be found in Webster's New World Dictionary, which adds "completeness" to integrity's defini- tion. Under this broader explanation, buildings, structures, districts, sites and objects can also have integrity. Of the three Register eligibility require- ments, integrity is probably the most complicated and difficult to understand. To simplify things, the National Register staff sometimes tells applicants that integrity means the candidate still has to look historic. However, there are actually seven factors, or "aspects," that must be evaluated to determine if that historic look survives. These aspects are location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling and association. LOCATION is the easiest element of integrity to understand. For National Register purposes, location is the par- ticular point or position where the historic property was constructed, the significant person made his/her contri- bution, or the historic event occurred. Sometimes the relationship between a building and its history is lost if that building is moved from its original site. This is why it is harder to list moved properties on the National Register. To qualify moved candidates must be important to a broader region or group than those associated with the original site. The National Park Service consid- ers original locations so important that it automatically delists (removes from the Register) properties moved to new sites subsequent to their listing. SETTING refers to the character of the place where the historic resource is located. It includes natural and man- made features and how those features relate to the candidate. Items to con- sider include buildings, dependencies, roads, paths, fences, vegetation, open space, topographical characteristics and view sheds. The latter include the views from the candidate as well as of the candidate from nearby properties. For a setting to have integrity for National Register purposes, it should appear much as it did historically. The tower on this Lake Charles Victorian resi- dence is an important part of its design. Were it to be lost, the home's National Register design integrity would be severely compromised. DESIGN is broadly defined by the National Register as "the combination of elements that creates the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a prop- erty." Elements the Register considers when evaluating design integrity include function, structural systems, other tech- nologies, spatial organization, massing, proportion, scale, materials, color, tex- ture and fenestration patterns. Design is not limited to the work of architects. Community planners, engineers and landscape architects have also created designs that might be Register -eligible. If enough of the resource's original Here, the setting (tombstones, paths, fences and trees) reinforces an observer's sense that Grace Episcopal Church in St. Francis- ville is indeed historic. design has been lost, the property will not meet this aspect of integrity. MATERIALS are "the physical ele- ments that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configura- tion to form a historic property." This definition is complicated because it has to cover archaeological as well as architectural and historical candidates. For the purposes of nominating build- ings, materials should be defined as the original wood, nails, shingles, riles, glass, and/or other substances the builders used to create the historic resource. To have integrity, a property must retain its character -defining exterior materials. Sometimes interior integrity of material is needed as well. WORKMANSHIP "is the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular cul- ture or people during any given period o in history or prehistory," according to the Register. A craft is an occupation re- quiring special skill, and workmanship refers to the quality of the craftsman's o product. Extraordinary workmanship might be evident in tooling, carving, o painting, graining, turning or joinery. It can be found in vernacular as well ° as high style resources and can include rthe product of one or multiple crafts- men. Finally, it can apply to an entire resource or any of its parts. FEELING is a "property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time." To have the aspect of feeling, a candidate must have surviving physical features that express its historic character and help the visitor experience an awareness of its history and importance. o ASSOCIATION is defined by the t National Register as "the direct link o between an important historic event 0 r or person and a historic property." Association relies upon two factors. First, the site must be the actual place 0 where something happened. Second, that relationship must be evident when a visitor observes the site. This connection can occur only if the property's historic physical features, or character, survive. Only when one understands the seven aspects of integrity can one determine if a candidate has enough integrity to qualify for Register listing. However, evaluating these factors is more complicated than their definitions might suggest. Next month's article will discuss applying the aspects to conduct an integrity evaluation. Much of this article is based upon the National Register Bulletin titled "How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation," which is available online at http://u,ww.nps.gov/history/nr/publica- tions/bulletins/pdfs/nrb 15.pdf. This stained glass window is proof of the skill and talent of the craftsman who designed, assembled and installed it in Lake Charles's Temple Sinai c.1903. Since it is unaltered, it retains its integrity of workmansh ip. The Ascension Parish home of 20th-century literary figure Robert Penn Warren has integrity of as- sociation because he lived there during what scholars regard as a critical period in his life and career. 14 Preservation in Print • March 2011 www.prcno.org ATTACHMENT 2 Packet Pg. 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NAME OF APPLICANT: PROJECT LOCATION COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE PUBLIC HEARING CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Public hearing before the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to determine the eligibility of a home located at 820 Main Street for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. John and Cheryl Needham 820 Main Street, Edmonds, WA August 10, 2023 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The city may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Information on this application can be viewed or obtained online at https://www.edmondswa.gov/services/public involvement/public notic es/development notices under the development notice for application number PLN2023-0045, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. A hybrid public hearing will be held by the Historic Preservation Commission on Thursday August 10, 2023 at 5:30 P.M. The physical location is Edmonds City Hall, 121 5th Avenue N, 3rd Floor, Brackett Room. Or join the Zoom meeting at: https://edmondswa-gov.zoom.us/i/87419346600 Or via phone by dialing 253-205-0468 Meeting ID: 874 1934 6600 Passcode: 629853 CITY CONTACT: Michele Q. Szafran, Associate Planner Michele.szafran@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 DATE OF PUBLICATION: July 27, 2023 Packet Pg. 34 W pa r 0 T 0 4-1 � -8 Z Z Z Z w ~ w m }I w ~ w o 2 a rl of V }I �I W H ALLI N O a m r 'O m N i m 3 O C a 0 S VI (D FI w a' v~f V) N O L_ f6 O N Q a C o N N N r Q U) C U VI m 3 w > L_ f0 C O m OC 0 a vt C7 C 0 s H Q V7 i a V N in O Y u CALon, O Y u O W a LA i a 0 V) i a V - LL J = Y v O N LT+ O u N Y to a O V1 i a 0 VI i a o, a� J V) 0 0 zCo 0� 00 r- rn 00 N v v N' Q El I 1 a i ► m . ` :} - a, V �S Packet Pg. 35 FILE NO.: PLN2023-0045 Applicant: Needham, Historic Listing DECLARATION OF POSTING On July 27, 2023, the attached Notice of Public Hearing was posted at the subject property, Civic Hall, and Public Safety buildings. The notice was left at the Library in a temporary location due to construction. I, Michele Q. Szafran, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 27t" day of July, 2023, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: �� �' Li�c-✓ _,.� IBFP747893.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 36 Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/10/2023 Unfinished Business Staff Lead: {enter Staff Lead or "N/A" here} Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michele Szafran Background/History The HPC is scheduled to continue discussion of the following items: 1) Research collections (Deiner-Karr) 2) Preservationist Newsletter Updates 3) Organization of walking tours 4) Annual calendar assignments, duties and general discussion Attachments: Research Collections From Chris Deiner-Karr Packet Pg. 37 Phillips Motor Court O _& - 1k, The bronze icons on this panel include a steering wheel, the view of a 1930s era car from above, a Highway 99 Road Marker, a 30 MPH Speed Limit sign, and a diamond -shaped Road Work Ahead caution sign. Services for motorists are illustrated by the No Vacancy signs, a gas pump and a road map. Packet Pg. 38 O In the earliest days of Edmonds, overland travel was slow and uncertain. The famous Puget Sound "Mosquito Fleet" of steamboats provided the first fast and reliable transport to Edmonds in the late 1800s. When the railroad initiated passenger service in 1910 with twelve trains a day, land -based travel became much more convenient. However, it was the growth in private car ownership and the development of a network of roads, highways, and auto ferries that spurred a population boom for Edmonds and the surrounding communities in the middle of the 20th century. One of Edmonds' most prominent pioneers, A.M. Yost, was the first Edmonds resident to purchase an automobile, in June of 1911. Yost and his family demonstrated their faith in this new form of transportation by founding the Yost Auto Company at 5th Ave South and Dayton St in 1913. The Phillips Motor Court was constructed by Donald Phillips in 1941 to serve motorists passing through Edmonds, offering not just a place for a weary traveler to sleep, but also a garage to keep the family car warm and dry. The buildings are now apartments. Packet Pg. 39 a L7Packet Pg. 40 Snohomish County Online Government Information & Services a Structure Information Close Window General Description Parcel Number 00434207700500 (R01) Structure Class Dwelling Structure Type 1 1/2 Story w/Basement Year Built 1901 Exterior Features Foundation Conc or CB Exterior Siding -Lap ROOF Type: Gable Pitch Medium Cover Composition Interior Features Bedrooms 4 Full or 3/4 Baths 2 1/2 Baths 0 Floor Area Heat Forced Hot Air - Gas Fireplace Masonry fireplace Floor 1 Base SF 1223 Finished SF 1223 Floor 2 Base SF 230 Finished SF 230 Floor B Base SF 662 Finished SF 0 Garage(s), Carport(s) and major outbuilding(s) Detached Garage SF 416 Other Features Packet Pg. 41 O I F Packet Pg. 42 O Cm' L View this sketch in a separate window Use the structure sketches and information at your own risk. Sketches are extracted from County records on a regular basis and may not be current. All structure sketches, maps, data, and information set forth herein ("Data"), are for illustrative purposes only and are not to be considered official citation to, or representation of, the Snohomish County Code. Amendments and updates to the Data, together with other applicable County Code provisions, may apply which are not depicted herein. Snohomish County makes no representation or warranty concerning the content, accuracy, currency, completeness or quality of the Data contained herein and expressly disclaims any warranty of merchantability, fitness for any particular purpose. All persons accessing or otherwise using this Data assume all responsibility for use thereof and agree to hold Snohomish County harmless from and against any damages, loss, claim or liability arising out of any error, defect or omission contain within said Data. Washington State Law, Ch. 42.56 RCW, prohibits state and local agencies from providing access to lists of individuals intended for use for commercial purposes and, thus, no commercial use may be made of any Data comprising lists of individuals contained herein. Close Window Packet Pg. 43 TAPE PICTURE HERE v BUILDING PERMITS DATE NUMBER AMOUNT CONSTRUCTION DATA -- DATE FINISHED DA PER CE-14T L, NFINISH ED DATE RE m6oc'-co DATE mov ED VALUATION ACRESOR LoT Nu"FiER LAND BLDG INITIAL, DATE SALES DATA SALE DATE INSTRUMENT RECEIPT 4 U .5(' 10 4 A 4 7 1- (;,'1 F, 1) t 1 T1 r I 'rip, f. 0 S T p I (-,T 15 A"NFI'� IT Y (IF r�Lt/ n7'T —fin — tr. nT 1L} c."), 1,! 6 F'r r It f, I LC3T', 6 r, 7 HIGHEST AND BEST USE VALUE.- -TM —PROVED UN —IMPROVED TIMBER TOTAL TOTAI ACRES -VALUE ACRES VALUE ACRES VAL i.E ACRES AV TYPE DATE CONST FLOOR ROOF DIMENSION SF CONDITION FACTOR VALUE *b NET BUILT AREA DEP VALUE I Packet Pg. 44 ' a ............................ • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r 2�- . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., a . ................... r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i > LU Y Y - r r s . """ f "f "'"' Y� • ! . r a ! n • ♦ ! R R e e . :.i f � � CL t r • ♦ . . . . . . . . . . • . • ♦ . . • . • • ` . 0 .N . . . . . • . . . . . • • . . . . . • . r c,> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O APPRAISAL DATA Packet Pg. 45 Packet Pg. 46