2015.03.17 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers ~ Public Safety Complex
250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds
SPECIAL MEETING
MARCH 17, 2015
6:45 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
1.(15 Minutes)
AM-7551
Meet with Sister City candidate Alicia Crank for confirmation to the ESCC.
BUSINESS MEETING
MARCH 17, 2015
7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE
2.Roll Call
3.(5 Minutes)Approval of Agenda
4.(5 Minutes)Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A.AM-7562 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 10, 2015.
B.AM-7558 Approval of claim checks #213217 through #213329 dated March 12, 2015 for
$660,479.25.
C.AM-7552 Confirmation of Alicia Crank to the Edmonds Sister City Commission.
D.AM-7554 Authorization for Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with Murray Smith
& Associates for the 2016 Comprehensive Water System Plan Update
E.AM-7557 Approving Changes to Capital Priorities in the 2015 Budget for the Wastewater
Treatment Plant
5.(10 Minutes)
AM-7565
Oath of Office for Newly Promoted Police Sergeant
6.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public
Hearings
7.(30 Minutes)Public Facilities District (PFD)/Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA) Update
Packet Page 1 of 192
7.(30 Minutes)
AM-7564
Public Facilities District (PFD)/Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA) Update
8.(30 Minutes)
AM-7561
Planning Board Update
9.(30 Minutes)
AM-7560
Public Hearing on Draft Culture & Urban Design Element - Comprehensive Plan Update
10.(10 Minutes)
AM-7550
Annual Impact Fee Report
11.(15 Minutes)
AM-7566
Presentation of the December 2014 Financial Management Report.
12.(5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments
13.(15 Minutes)Council Comments
14.Convene in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW
42.30.110(1)(i).
15.Reconvene in open session. Potential action as a result of meeting in executive session.
ADJOURN
Packet Page 2 of 192
AM-7551 1.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:15 Minutes
Submitted For:Dave Earling Submitted By:Carolyn LaFave
Department:Mayor's Office
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Meet with Sister City candidate Alicia Crank for confirmation to the ESCC.
Recommendation
The Sister City Commission and Mayor Earling are recommending appointment of Alicia Crank to the
Sister City Commission.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Alicia Crank was interviewed by members of the Sister City Commission and recommended to Mayor
Earling for appointment to the Commission. Mayor Earling interviewed Ms. Crank and is pleased to
appoint her to the Sister City Commission. Ms. Crank has many years of experience serving on city
commissions and nonprofit boards. Mayor Earling and the Commission members on the interview team
believe Ms. Crank will be an excellent addition to the Commission. She will fill position #1 which was
vacated in December 2014.
Attachments
A_Crank_app
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Scott Passey 03/11/2015 11:29 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 03/11/2015 12:08 PM
Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 03/11/2015 12:12 PM
Form Started By: Carolyn LaFave Started On: 03/11/2015 10:54 AM
Final Approval Date: 03/11/2015
Packet Page 3 of 192
Packet Page 4 of 192
AM-7562 4. A.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:Consent
Submitted By:Scott Passey
Department:City Clerk's Office
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of March 10, 2015.
Recommendation
Review and approve meeting minutes.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attachment 1 - 3-10-2015 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Attachments
Attachment 1 - 03-10-15 Draft Council Meeting minutes
Form Review
Form Started By: Scott Passey Started On: 03/12/2015 02:28 PM
Final Approval Date: 03/12/2015
Packet Page 5 of 192
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
March 10, 2015
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Lora Petso, Councilmember
Joan Bloom, Councilmember (arrived 7:01 p.m.)
Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember
Michael Nelson, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir.
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Scott James, Finance Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 3, 2015
B. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #213122 THROUGH #213216 DATED MARCH 5, 2015
FOR $189,369.00. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS #61520
THROUGH #61529 FOR $484,102.90, BENEFIT CHECKS #61530 THROUGH #61538
AND WIRE PAYMENTS OF $416,726.30 FOR THE PAY PERIOD FEBRUARY 16, 2015
THROUGH FEBRUARY 28, 2015
C. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM BETTY L.
SWARTHOUT ($421.50)
D. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH
MOUNTLAKE TERRACE FOR THE 228TH ST. SW CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
Packet Page 6 of 192
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, congratulated Councilmember Nelson. With regard to the interviews for the
vacant Council position, he was present for most of the interviews and found the process and rules very
fair. Candidates were asked to wait outside the room so they would not hear the questions before their
interview. He observed Gary Haakenson sitting in the back of the room texting, presumably texting the
Council’s questions to another candidate. He suggested in the future electronic devices be required to be
turned off during the interviews. Next, he recalled one of questions asked during the Council interviews
was in regard to raising height limits for a boutique hotel. As everyone knows four stories are required for
boutique hotel, it appeared the goal was preapproval from the candidates for higher building heights. He
noted Councilmember Buckshnis’ campaign materials did not support taller building heights downtown.
Ron Wambolt, Edmonds, commented the previous comment very speculative. He referred to a
propaganda piece about building heights emailed throughout Edmonds by a former resident that contained
many untruths including, “They already have a taller building going up behind the post office downtown.
It will be above the old height limit.” The “they” referred to in the email is the alleged advocates for taller
buildings. Mr. Wambolt provided a review of downtown business zone changes made in early 2006: BC
zones re-designated BD1-BD5, the allowable height remained a conditional 30-feet for only the BD1
zone, design standards adopted for the BD1 zone that included a requirement for a 15-foot first floor and
30-foot height limit, BD2-BD4 zones required 12-foot first floor and no design standards, step-backs
required in BD2-BD4 for a 30-foot height (otherwise 25-foot height), and first floors and entries in all BD
commercial areas required to be at street grade.
Mr. Wambolt relayed the current status as a result of changes made by the City Council in the past few
years: no change to the BD1 zone, step-back requirement removed from the BD2-BD4 zones in exchange
for BD1 design standards. The post office property is located in the BD2 zone; no change was made to the
code to allow the new building to be any higher. The 30-foot height limit adopted in1981 remains in
effect today. The 2006 code would cause a boring big box building to be built on the post office site; the
top floor would need to stepped back to be 30 feet in height. The current, more sensible code allows a 30
foot height without a step-back at the top level but it is required to comply with design standards that will
make it a more pleasing-looking building and not a boring big box. Contrary to the propaganda piece, the
removal of the step-back requirement received final Council approval April 23, 2013 when
Councilmember Mesaros was not a Councilmember.
5. WRIA 8 PRESENTATION
Councilmember Buckshnis introduced Jason Mulvihill-Kuntz, Watershed Coordinator, Lake
Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed (WRIA 8), who explained this was a good time to provide
an update on the progress that has been made and the challenges they continue to face following nearly 10
years implementing the Regional Chinook Salmon Recovery Plan which Edmonds has adopted as its plan
for salmon recovery. The Interlocal Agreement (ILA) that enables the regionally collaborative salmon
recovery work is also coming to an end at the end of 2015. He noted nearly every Puget Sound Salmon
Recovery Watershed Restoration meeting attended by Puget Sound cities is held in Edmonds.
He displayed a map of Lake Washington/Cedar/Sammamish Watershed that drains into the Cedar River,
Issaquah Creek, tributaries that begin in Snohomish County, Lake Washington, Lake Sammamish, and
coastal streams that drain upper portions of King and Snohomish County into Puget Sound. He identified
Tier 1, 2, 3 areas, explaining Tier 1 areas are the most important for restoring and protecting habitat for
returning salmon, Tier 2 are slightly less important habitat but still need to be protected to provide enough
space for salmon, and Tier 3 areas are urban portions of the watershed that do not provide very good
habitat opportunity for salmon but are still important for water quality and water flow purposes. He
Packet Page 7 of 192
advised all lakeshore, Sammamish River, ship canal and the entire marine nearshore are also Tier 1 areas
due to their importance for juvenile Chinook. There are two Chinook populations in the watershed, the
Cedar River population that go through the Ballard Locks to the Cedar River to spawn and the
Sammamish population that go through the Ballard Locks and into Lake Washington, the Sammamish
River, north Lake Washington tributary streams, Lake Sammamish and Issaquah Creek.
Mr. Mulvihill-Kuntz reviewed a timeline for the road to recovery:
1999 Chinook salmon listed as threatened
2001 Jurisdictions sign ILA to recover salmon
2005 Watershed recovery plan completed
2006 Begin first 10 years of implementation
2007 Federal adoption of Puget Sound Recovery Plan
2010 Watershed Summit – assess first five years of implementation
2015 First 10 years of implementation complete. Initial ILA sunsets
He explained the WRIA 8 Recovery Plan is one chapter of the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan (14
watersheds in Puget Sound with similar plans) which is part of the Action Agenda for Puget Sound
Recovery. He described WIRA 8 leadership:
• Work guided WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council
• Stakeholders representing
o King and Snohomish Counties
o 26 cities
o Community and environmental organizations
o Local businesses
o King Conservation District
o Water and sewer districts
o State and federal agencies
o Citizens
• Fostering strong regional collaboration and governance
• Leverage individual jurisdiction dollars for watershed benefits
Mr. Mulvihill-Kuntz described the role of the WRIA 8 Salmon Recovery Council:
• Advancing funding strategy
• Building capacity
• Supporting education and outreach
• Directing implementation
• Providing policy guidance
He displayed and reviewed a spreadsheet of the annual cost share of local government members. Each
local government pays an annual amount to support the work; Edmonds’ share is $13,708 based on
population, assessed value and area. He described what the ILA funds:
• Salmon Recovery Council and regional/state coordination
• Recovery Plan implementation
• Project grant program management
• Project tracking
• Communications, outreach, and education – telling the salmon recovery story
• Technical coordination, including:
o Assessing progress – monitoring and adaptively managing the Recovery Plan
o Instigating critical research
o Maintaining science-based restoration and protection strategy
Packet Page 8 of 192
He commented on the integration of other efforts:
• Fish passage at Ballard Locks
• Salmon SEEson – outreach and education
• Hatchery and harvest management
• Flood risk reduction and floodplain restoration
• Shoreline and riparian area stewardship
• Water quality
• Regional stormwater management
• Noxious weed treatment
• Puget Sound recovery
Needs identified in the WRIA 8 Plan:
• Identifies factors of decline, recovery goals, priority actions, and monitoring needs
• Three types of actions:
o On-the-ground project – habitat protection and restoration
o Land use regulations and planning
o Outreach, education and stewardship
Mr. Mulvihill-Kuntz described what has been accomplished:
• Map of WRIA 8 projects
o 100 projects completed or in progress
o Only 22% of projects in plan completed, did not receive resources that plan identified
• Funding and projects
o Since 2005, 49 project completed /51 projects active
o From 1998 – 2014, allocated over $15 million in KCD and King County Flood Control
District watershed grant funds – leveraging over $28 million
o From 1998 – 2014, allocated nearly $20 million on federal and state funds – leveraging over
$14 million
Chart of WRIA 8 Capital Funding: annual goal and 2006 – 2015 (one time legislative
appropriation, King County Conservation Futures, King County Flood Control
Cooperative Watershed Management Grants, King Conservation District, Regional
Funding, Salmon Recovery Funding Board)
• Habitat protection and restoration
o 2,625 acres protected through acquisition or easement
o Over 450 acres of riparian area treated/planted
o Nearly one mile of levees removed or set back
o Over 73 acres of floodplain reconnected
o Over 8,000 feet of lakeshore restored
• Nearshore restoration
o Chinook use the marine nearshore and coastal stream mouths to avoid predators, find food
and grow as they migrate to the ocean
o Opportunities are limited by railroad
o Restoring Edmonds Marsh and Daylighting Willow Creek:
Reconnects 28 acres of rare tidal salt marsh habitat
Helps control invasive species, improves water quality and reduces risk from projected
sea level rise
Edmonds completing final feasibility study and initiating design
• Ongoing Recovery
o The future of salmon and watershed health is in the hands of every community
o Salmon recovery faces numerous challenges:
Public support and political will
Packet Page 9 of 192
Adequate funding
Climate change and ocean conditions
Land use pressures
• Local governments working together do make a difference.
He described what’s next:
• Renewing WRIA 8 IA and Memorandum of Understanding
o January - May 2015: WRIA 8 presentations to partner jurisdictions; ILA partners review and
provide feedback
o May - July: WRIA 8 staff integrates feedback on ILA and MOU for Salmon Recovery
Council approval
o July - December: Final ILA and MOU available for ILA partners’ approval and signature by
December
Councilmember Bloom thanked him for his hard work in allocating funds for daylighting Willow Creek,
relaying many citizens are excited about that project.
Councilmember Johnson asked what could be expected in the next 10 years in Edmonds and Snohomish
County, whether there will be new projects or just completion of the projects that began in the last 10
years. Mr. Mulvihill-Kuntz answered approximately 700 projects are identified in the current plan for
implementation and only 100 have been started or completed. There are additional projects or areas for
projects identified in the current plan for Edmonds as well in Snohomish County. Many of the projects
will focus on the nearshore environment because a lot of the streams do not drain into a Chinook-bearing
river system but streams draining into the nearshore do support juveniles as they migrate. With regard to
additional projects, typically local government partners, nonprofits or community organizations will
propose a project. If there are no projects in an area, his staff will work with potential sponsors to solicit
projects. Snohomish County is working on a stream mouth restoration project in Meadowdale Park in
Lunds Gulch.
Councilmember Johnson asked what kind of projects could be expected in the nearshore in Edmonds. Mr.
Mulvihill-Kuntz responded the completion of the Edmonds Marsh Restoration Project will be the primary
one. Other areas are stream mouths where they interact with the nearshore environment, ensuring that
sediment sources are available and re-nourished. He did not know of any projects in the Edmonds
nearshore other than Edmonds Marsh and daylighting project. Councilmember Johnson referred to the
Marina Park Master Plan which is a connection from the Marsh to Puget Sound.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Marina Beach Master Plan, noting there are two options and a
third is being considered due to the riparian habitat and buffering. Mr. Mulvihill-Kuntz encouraged the
City to talk to him or his staff if there are opportunities to integrate habitat restoration elements into the
alternatives being considered.
Councilmember Nelson asked the current status of Chinook salmon. Mr. Mulvihill-Kuntz answered not
great. Around Puget Sound they are at 10% of historic numbers; Cedar River production of juveniles (the
most important measurement of how habitat is performing) is hundreds of thousands but only 1% return.
The Cedar River, the highest priority population, is showing an upward trend, and it may be the only
watershed in Puget Sound that is seeing an increase in Chinook. Population numbers evolve year to year
so data is needed over 15-20 years to understand how the population is doing. The Sammamish
population is supported by Issaquah Hatchery and can produce more juvenile Chinook but returns are not
as good as the Cedar River population, only 100s of fish return. Efforts are focused on restoring
native/wild population.
Packet Page 10 of 192
Councilmember Mesaros asked what would be the right ratio of juveniles returning. Mr. Mulvihill-Kuntz
answered the 10-year goal for the watershed on the Cedar is 10,000-12,000 or 10-12%, returning. That
goal was met in 2007 but the aspiration is to do it consistently. The Sammamish population’s return is
consistently much lower than the ten year goal. The way productivity is measured is the number of
juveniles that go out which the watershed has some control over; the watershed does not have control
over the ocean.
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked whether more fish returning was due to improved environment
in Puget Sound. Mr. Mulvihill-Kuntz answered that is unknown; long term data is needed to determine
what is happening. He liked to think that work on habitats, where resources and efforts have been
focused, has resulted in increased juvenile populations. Marine survival of juvenile salmon in general
including Chinook is a hot issue in Puget Sound; something is happening that is killing juvenile salmon
before they reach the ocean. It may be a combination of predation, stormwater toxins, loss of marine
nearshore habitat, etc. A large international project is underway between Washington State, British
Columbia and Canada to determine the cause; it is not just in Puget Sound but the Strait of Georgia.
Mayor Earling requested the City be informed of any projected increase in cost sharing.
6. PRESENTATION OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MURRAY SMITH &
ASSOCIATES FOR THE 2016 COMPREHENSIVE WATER SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE
City Engineer Rob English explained the City’s Water Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2010.
The Department of Health (DOH) requires the plan be updated every six years. The Plan will take 2 years
to complete and the target date for completion is February 2017. The DOH is in process of changing to a
10-year plan so the CIP and planning horizons will be a 10-year projection.
The plan addresses eight elements of the City’s water system (detailed in the agenda memo) but will
focus on updating the CIP and the funding requirements both with regard to water rates and general
facility charges. From that a new CIP will be developed with a list of priorities to pursue and the plan and
modeling will be updated to reflect the work that has been done over last several years.
The overall fee for the contract is approximately $157,000. The 2015 and 2016 CIP identified funds to
complete the work; the overall budget was $175,000. MSA was selected as the preferred consultant via
the City’s purchasing policy. Staff recommends scheduling the agreement on the Consent Agenda for
approval.
Councilmember Petso asked whether DOH would be willing to extend the deadline to 2020. Mr. English
answered that question was asked but since the last plan was based on a six year projection, staff was told
this update will position the City for the ten year update cycle. Councilmember Petso asked whether it
would be possible to do a partial revision such as an updated rate study to extend the plan for four years.
Mr. English answered there are certain requirements that must be addressed.
Councilmember Bloom referred to the language regarding termination and asked whether it was standard
not to include what happens if there are funds left in the contract if either party terminated. City Attorney
Jeff Taraday was not certain whether this was standard contract language; Sharon Cates in his office does
contract reviews. Mr. English advised this is the current boilerplate contract. Councilmember Bloom
asked what happened to the funds if the contract was terminated halfway through the project. Mr. Taraday
explained most consultant contracts are on a time and materials basis; the presumption is they are billing
on an hourly basis. Public Works Director Phil Williams explained it would depend on who terminated
the contract. If the City terminates, there would be a negotiation regarding what work has been done and
the balance of the funds could be used to hire another firm to finish the work. That is usually not a very
efficient method and therefore is not done often. Staff has worked with MSA many times and has found
Packet Page 11 of 192
their work to be very high quality. If the contractor terminates the contract, there would be a similar
process although the City would have more control in the negotiations.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this item on the Consent Agenda.
7. PRESENTATION OF UPDATED STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
REPORT
Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty provided background,
explaining the Strategic Action Plan (SAP) is the City’s roadmap to the future, allowing for cohesive
policy and program decision- making. The SAP was approved by the City Council in April of 2013. It is
not a legal document but a fluid living document that will evolve over time. The SAP which consists of
88 Action Items was created over a 2-year period. The outreach program for the SAP consisted of
surveys, charrettes and focus groups; approximately 2,500 people participated in the numerous public
outreach efforts.
Long Bay Enterprises, Inc. was hired to facilitate the initial implementation of the City’s SAP. The Scope
of Work included:
• Communicate with Lead Agents, key participants and stake holders and assisting in coordination
efforts to complete the SAP Action Items
• Meet with Lead Agents, key participants and stakeholders
• Meet with the SAP Working Group
• Serve as a resource to those working to implement the SAP and discussing ways to move Action
Items towards implementation
• Technical review to clarify wording, consolidate items, make necessary changes Prepare and
present updates throughout the year
The packet contains a redline version of the SAP updated March 17, 2015, Long Bay Enterprises Report
and the worksheets.
Cynthia Berne, Long Bay Enterprises, reviewed:
1. Initial Outreach
• Identify primary lead for each Action Item (AI)
• Met with 22 prospective leads on 34 occasions. Facilitate meetings with leads, work program
for implementation. Ongoing dialogue on worksheets for each lead on each action item
o Now have a primary lead for each item who is committed/responsible for moving it
forward
2. Facilitation meetings with leads
• Meetings with Lead Agents and stakeholders were periodically held to:
o Work with stakeholders to coordinate assignments of a Primary Lead to each AI
o Create a first-level work program for implementation – a blueprint of how each AI will
be addressed; identifying funding challenges, timelines, and conflicts as well as other
road blocks
o Create worksheets for each Primary Lead
3. Coordination with Working Group
• Work Group’s Roles:
o Role 1 Act as a sounding board for ideas on how to move the SAP forward
o Role 2 Give feedback on the progress that is periodically reported
o Role 3 Create a synergy that demonstrates the SAP will be implemented
• Established categories for AIs that did not appear straightforward to implement or that
required review to better understand the intent and/or decide on next steps:
o May require own roadmap (for the most complex AIs)
Packet Page 12 of 192
o Could be consolidated
o Needs clarification of intent or definition of terms used in the AI’s stated objective
• Examples of Work Group’s efforts:
o Roadmaps
o Consolidation of AIs
4. Serving as resource to respective stakeholders and individuals or entities working to implement
the SAP and discussing ways to move items towards implementation
5. Addressing potential conflicts and challenges
• Identified duplicate AIs
• Identified and recommended AIs suitable for consolidation
• Performed a technical review of the entire 2013 approved SAP document to clarify
terminology and intent within the text of each AI.
6. Periodic updates
• Five meetings were held with SAP Working Group
• Presentations to:
o City Council
o Port
o Chamber of Commerce
o Mayor’s Advisory Group
Ms. Berne reviewed implementation progress:
6/18/14 10/28/14 3/3/15
Total action items 86 88* 88*
Action Items with committed Primary Leads 76 84 84
Action Items with unconfirmed Primary Leads 5 0 0
Action Items without a Primary Lead 5 4 4
Completed Action Items 4 5 6
Action items started and in motion 38 62 70
Action items not yet commenced 44 21 12
*Increase in IAs is due to duplicate numbers used in the SAP.
She identified the Primary Leads and how many AIs each are responsible for (as of March 3, 2015):
Chamber of Commerce 3
City Council 2
Cultural Services Division 3
Development Services Department 14
Economic Development Department 22
Edmonds Center for the Arts 1
Edmonds Downtown Alliance 3
Edmonds Senior Center 2
Mayor’s Office 4
Parks & Recreation 14
Police Department 1
Public Works 18
Swedish 1
Ms. Bern reviewed her conclusions:
• The SAP is a visioning document that required a high amount of time and resources to produce. A
few AIs are simple to implement, but many are more complex and will require long-term
collaboration of community organizations as well as strong sources of funds. With any given
“Plan” come innate challenges to implementation:
Packet Page 13 of 192
o Keeping continuous focus on the AIs to bring them to completion.
o Changes in the point person designated by an organization as the Primary Lead.
o Changes in the needs of the community from when the initial AI was created.
o Finding strong funding sources that are reliable for long-term implementation.
o The extensive timeframe required for many of the AIs to be completed can discourage efforts
to implement.
• Strategic Plans must be consistent with a city’s Comprehensive Plan, which is the over-arching
framework by which a city functions. The City of Edmonds’s SAP is an implementation tool of a
number of elements of its Comprehensive Plan.
• All “Strategic Plans” have challenges but they are the framework by which a community can
collaborate and look to the future through a common lens. The implementation of the SAP has
begun with great momentum, collaboration and determination. In April of 2013 the SAP was a
large document of great ideas and now has become a living document which continually spawns
new ideas and allows the community to discuss its needs openly and with purpose.
Ms. Berne reviewed her recommendations: There are a number of paths the implementation of the SAP
can take from this moment forward. The goal is to continue the forward momentum and to establish a
mechanism for tracking progress. The definition of “facilitator” is someone who helps a group of people
understand their common objectives and gives assistance to them on planning how to achieve these
objectives. The implementation of a complex plan such as the SAP welcomes any means to make it easier
to accomplish. One of the elements in Long Bay’s Mission Statement is that we believe our clients are
people not projects. Though the SAP has many projects associated with its implementation, it requires
many peoples’ efforts and collaboration to successfully complete the AIs. Identifying an ongoing
facilitator for the implementation process is highly recommended. The outside date for completion of an
AI is the year 2027. A long range view of the implementation process is essential. The recommendations
for moving forward are stated in two categories below:
• Alternatives to continue implementation of the SAP:
1. Identify a staff person within the City who will take on the role and responsibility of the
facilitator. This is estimated to require 2-3 hours, average per week, over the next year.
Reevaluate this need after one year in April 2016. The basic responsibilities would be
tracking the Worksheets, (or whatever other tracking tool the City wishes to use) contacting
the Primary Leads on a routine basis for updates and assisting in any way possible to
eliminate obstacles and/or brainstorm for solutions.
2. Hire an outside consultant to perform the same duties as stated in item #1 above.
3. Do not have an assigned facilitator for one year. Then in April of 2016 bring someone on
board for approximately one month to determine the progress over the year, understand the
challenges and report on the status to the Council
• Relook at the SAP itself:
1. In April 2016 relook at a number of elements of the SAP.
o There may be some AIs that are not feasible to implement. A number of the AIs have 3-5
tasks within one AI. It might be helpful for implementation to separate such tasks to
allow for success of at least a portion of an AI.
o Evaluate the performance measures stated for each AI. Many of these may be more
informative if reworded or the number of them reduced per AI. In most cases a measure
of success can be very simple but effective to evaluate any given objective. The less
complicated the measurement, the easier it will be to articulate where the successes and
failures are and why.
o Set timelines for routine reviews of the SAP; every 3 years is suggested.
Mr. Doherty clarified the redline version did not contain any substantive changes at policy level to the
AIs, the changes were corrections to wording, consolidation of items, etc. With regard to tracking, the
2015 budget included $2,500 for project management software that Economic Development
Packet Page 14 of 192
Commissioner/SAP Working Group Member Darrol Haug recommended. A 1-year contract was executed
2-3 weeks ago with 20 licenses so the Primary Leads can also use the software.
Councilmember Mesaros suggested a Gantt chart with the projected end of projects. He asked the
projected end date to complete projects. Ms. Berne answered 2027; she agreed a graph with dates would
be a helpful tool. Mr. Doherty said the software has the ability to compute that information into a graph.
Councilmember Buckshnis, a member of the Working Group, asked about assigning a dollar amount to
some Action Items because some will require funding. She suggested adding a capital planning tool to the
SAP. She observed some items were removed or changed and asked whether the intent was for the
Council to reapprove the SAP. Mr. Doherty said yes, re-approval would include accepting the worksheets
and once reapproved, the document will have an update approved date. Councilmember Buckshnis
observed Action Item 1a.14 (66a) was completed removed because it was part of the previous 13 Action
Items. She recalled the Working Group discussed conflicting Action Items related to the senior center.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the Edmonds Downtown Alliance was a new group. Mr.
Doherty said Edmonds Downtown Alliance is new name for Edmonds BID.
Councilmember Mesaros inquired about the expectation of Council approval. He suggested a list be
created of what is anticipated to be accomplished in next 12-18 months. Mr. Doherty answered 70 of the
88 of the Action Items are underway; underway can vary from doing initial research such as the
downtown restrooms; others are closer completion. He anticipated all the Action Items, with the
exception of the ones without a Lead, should see some movement in next 12-18 months. There is a rolling
level of activity for each of 22 Leads.
Councilmember Mesaros asked what staff wanted the Council to do. Ms. Berne clarified the technical
review of document (redline version of the SAP) is what the Council will approve. The Council will want
to look at all the edits, most are not significant policy changes, most are consolidations, language the
Primary Leads wanted clarified, etc. Mr. Doherty provided an example of a consolidation related to the
senior center; the Action Item to relocate the senior center was consolidated with the Action Item to work
with the senior center on its redevelopment plan.
Councilmember Petso said she will not be prepared to approve the SAP on the Consent Agenda and may
need another work session or discussion. She provided an example of one of her questions, 4b.1 was
changed from “Provide quality services, facilities and infrastructures” to “Maintain Public Works Growth
Management Concurrency.” Ms. Berne said if words were not lined out, no change was made. There
originally was no Action Item for this objective in the SAP. There were two in the SAP like that, this one
and one regarding the police; when she met with the Primary Lead, this was their recommendation.
Councilmember Petso said she will forward other questions to staff. She requested at least a couple week
for review.
Councilmember Johnson asked whether Ms. Berne also recommended checking in with citizens’ rankings
and priorities. Ms. Berne answered absolutely; she did not address that in her report because her scope
was implementation. Whenever the Council chooses to relook at the SAP, it will be extremely important
to include a well-planned and organized outreach to citizens.
Councilmember Bloom pointed out the Edmonds Downtown Alliance is also identified as the Edmonds
BID in the SAP. She suggested only one name be used for the organization and that it be included in the
definitions. She also suggested OLAE also be included in the definitions. She suggested reference to
charrette at Edmonds-Woodway High School recognize that it was organized by Student Representative
Alex Springer and former Student Representative Peter Gibson.
Packet Page 15 of 192
Councilmember Bloom referred to Action Item 1a.4 (10) and the strategic objective, “Initiate and expand
retail sales and enhance events and activities including sidewalk cafes and vendors within the business
districts of downtown, Westgate, Firdale Village, 5-Corners, Perrinville, Highway 99.” She pointed out
the Lead, Edmonds Downtown Alliance, cannot do that according to their work plan. Ms. Berne advised
there are co-leads for that Action Item, the Edmonds Downtown Alliance and the Chamber of Commerce.
The worksheets will provide details about the efforts and how it will be split between the organizations.
Councilmember Bloom asked that the Action Items for the Edmonds Downtown Alliance be included in
their work plan. Mr. Doherty agreed to check on that and said no new tasks were added related to the
Edmonds Downtown Alliance. Councilmember Bloom suggested the Economic Development
Department also be a lead. Mr. Doherty agreed that was a gray area; for example in Action 1a.4 (10), the
City has an encouraging role but not a direct role and it is, therefore, appropriate to include the Economic
Development Department as a participant. Ms. Berne said in working with the Edmonds Downtown
Alliance, all the tasks were added to their work plan.
Councilmember Nelson commented review of this document was a great refresher for him. He echoed
Councilmember Johnson’s desire to determine changes in the community’s needs since the SAP was first
created. As a living document, the City needs to check in with the citizens to determine whether their
needs have changed. He cited the importance of continuous focus and performance measures, and
suggested wherever possible remove “potential” performance and make it measurable performance. He
noted the City Council was only the Primary Lead on two Action Items and hoped that could be
increased. For example, Strategic Objective 5, Responsible, accountable and responsive government, 5b,
Promotion and encouragement of an Active and involved community, and 5b.1(70) public access, he
suggested the Council be listed as a Co-Primary Lead with the Mayor’s office.
Ms. Berne advised her technical review was only of the Action Items. She did not review the text, the
summary and the write up of how the plan was developed.
Council President Fraley-Monillas said funds will be required to continue to update the SAP as well as to
continue implementation. She understood it would be difficult for an existing staff member to take that
on. Mr. Doherty said next year’s update and possibly outreach to the public will have a budgetary
implication; it would be incumbent on him to present that to the Council in 2016 budget. In addition,
implementation of some of the Action Items will require funding and the SAP can be used to inform the
budget process.
Councilmember Bloom agreed with Councilmember Nelson’s suggestion to include the Council in Action
5b.1 (70) public access. The City Council should have the ability to conduct town hall meetings, public
open houses, etc. She recalled Councilmember Petso and she held a town hall meeting regarding
Westgate last year and it was important for all Councilmembers to have that opportunity, for the meetings
to be noticed, and staff support provided so that could be done on a regular basis.
Councilmember Bloom referred to Action 5b.2 (60) Communication where the Economic Development
Department is the Lead and the City Council was deleted. She suggested adding the City Council to that
Action Item, citing the importance of communicating to citizens as well as gathering feedback.
For Councilmember Bloom, Ms. Berne identified the four items that did not have leads.
• 1c.1 (14) Employment – Youth, Strategic Objective: Create a young adult job placement service
o Neither the Chamber nor Edmonds Community were willing claim this Strategic Objective.
The Work Group had good ideas but nothing came to fruition with regard to a Primary Lead.
o Strategic Objective: Create a young adult job placement service to help find part and full-time
employment opportunities with Edmonds businesses, schools and organizations.
Packet Page 16 of 192
A lot of organizations could contribute to this Strategic Objective but no one is willing to
be the lead.
Uncertain whether the impetus was high unemployment in young adult population
No primary lead yet
• 2a.2 (33) Farmers’/Public Market – Strategic Objective: Expand into a year-round activity
o Presentation made to the Museum who is interested in an effort to determine if it is feasible
but are not interested in leading that effort.
o Also spoke with Chamber and Salish Crossing.
• 4a.14 and 16 Shuttle services between downtown and Community Transit’s Swift BRT transit
stations on Highway 99 and within the downtown area.
o Reached out to numerous organizations
o Reasonable bus service covers these areas
Councilmember Bloom said the Farmers’ Market is a high priority for economic development; at a
minimum a City department such as Economic Development and/or the Economic Development
Commission (EDC) should be identified as a lead. She suggested a City department also be identified as a
lead for a shuttle service. She noted a shuttle is included in the Transportation Plan and the Marina Beach
Master Plan may integrate the idea of a shuttle due to parking issues. The Echelbargers are interested in a
mid-week market this year; there needs to be a significant effort to support that. She suggested a City
department also be identified as a lead for the Employment - Youth so that someone is moving it forward.
With regard to the market, Mr. Doherty said the strategic objective is “Expand into a year-round
activity…” rather than “explore” or “try.” Identifying a City department as the lead to make that happen is
not appropriate; the City does not make the current Farmers’ Market happen. The Economic Development
Department is listed as a participant. The same is true for a shuttle service and creating a young adult job
placement service.
Councilmember Bloom pointed out the EDC is frequently identified in the document. She suggested
reserving those Action Items until the Council makes a decision whether to sunset, reorganize, etc. that
group. Mr. Doherty suggested adding a note the first time EDC is mentioned that states “EDC and/or its
successor entity.”
Councilmember Johnson point out Youth Employment and the Farmers’ Market ranked very high;
however the shuttle services ranked low and very low. Councilmember Petso noted citizens were not
given the option to say do not do it at all. Her understanding when the SAP was adopted was not all the
Action Items would be implemented; her understanding was the City was okay with the low priorities
being implemented but not via the commitment of significant City resources.
Mayor Earling acknowledged this is a living document but he gets nervous when he hears questions about
what can be accomplished in 12-18 months. If the Council wanted to set timelines, he recommended 18
months because the Council has yet to accept the final report and staff has not verified whether the
software works or what kind of asset it will be in the process. Further, there has been discussion tonight
about the financial implications and he suggested consideration be given to the cost of staff time when
departments are identified as leads.
Council President Fraley-Monillas advised this would be scheduled for 1 hour on April 7. Mr. Doherty
requested Councilmembers provide him their comments/questions.
Mayor Earling commended Ms. Berne for the work she has done. Ms. Berne said it has been a pleasure to
work with the Edmonds community and she truly enjoyed it.
Packet Page 17 of 192
8. PRESENTATION REGARDING CHANGED CAPITAL PRIORITIES IN THE 2015 BUDGET
FOR THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Public Works Director Phil Williams explained the WWTP is a secondary treatment plant with a biologic
process. The aeration basins are full of biological organisms that consume the organic matter, turning it
into biomass. That process requires a great deal of air and there are two large centrifugal blowers, a 200
hp and a 300 hp. Eventually there will be two 150 hp units. The first new technology blower, a turbine
blower was installed in 2009. It worked well for a year and then began experiencing issues that were
covered under warranty through the Korean manufacturer. The unit is not repairable at this time and
needs to be replaced; the five year warranty lapsed in November 2014. The purchase of this unit in 2009
was $360,000. Purchase and installation of one unit was included in the 2015 budget under the current
energy savings contract. The Korean company’s successor in interest, a company that purchased the
technology and intellectual property as well as the manufacturing rights, did not legally take on any of the
liabilities for existing units.
The cost to replace the second unit including purchase, installation, programming, start-up, and testing is
expected to be $528,000. The actual change in capital dollars is $480,000 due to moving some items to
2016. This will not require a change in the sewer fund capital budget. Delay of the pipe replacement
program at Daley due to poor soil conditions will make available approximately $440,000 in additional
capital for the City’s share of the cost. The City's share would be 50.7% or $270,000. Partners in the
WWTP will provide the remaining $246,500. A budget amendment will be proposed to recognize
additional revenue from the WWTP’s partners to pay their share of the project. He also requested
authorization for the Mayor to sign two change orders that exceed $100,000 to implement the plan. He
summarized there were no better options.
Councilmember Johnson paraphrased Mr. Williams’ presentation: the old technology lasted 30-35 years
using higher energy and a proven technology. The warranty on the new technology that resulted in energy
savings lasted five years. She asked whether the old or the new technology was a better long term solution
for the WWTP. Mr. Williams answered he had confidence in the new technology; the issue was the
support from the manufacturer. Staff will continue to explore all options to collect what is owed to the
City under the warranty from the original manufacturer, their successor company, or the City’s own
insurance. At this time any significant recovery seems unlikely. He advised the blowers are very high
RPM units; typical life expectancy is 15+ years; the last two blowers lasted 20 and 30 years. This is a rare
event.
Councilmember Bloom asked whether the Daley Street sewer replacement would ever happen. Mr.
Williams answered it needs to be done but an entirely different approach such as micro-tunneling or
trenchless technology will be explored. A fixed sum is budgeted annually for sewer replacement and the
work is matched to the funding.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this on next week’s Consent Agenda.
Mayor Earling declared a brief recess.
9. SR-104 ANALYSIS INCLUDING WESTGATE AREA
Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss introduced the project team, Don Samdahl and Ryan Abbotts,
Fehr & Peers. Mr. Hauss displayed a map and provided the project description:
• 5-miles of principal arterial from 76th Ave. W to the Edmonds Ferry Terminal
• Various modes of transportation interfacing along regional corridor
o High vehicle average daily traffic (20,000 vehicles per day)
o Multiple bus stops
Packet Page 18 of 192
o High pedestrian activity along certain sections
o Bicycle connections
• Many transportation deficiencies exist at various intersections
He explained the purpose of the analysis was to develop a corridor master plan, identifying safety, access
management and streetscape improvements coordinated with Complete Streets principles and integrated
with the proposed form- based code for Westgate Village (SR-104 & 100th Ave) and other zoning on
SR104
Don Samdahl, Fehr & Peers, reviewed guiding principles for the study:
1. Support both local and regional mobility
2. Improve circulation and safety for biking, walking, and transit access
3. Reinforce land use vision, including at Westgate
4. Create a sense of arrival in Edmonds and tie to the waterfront
5. Coordinate with the state and other entities
6. Take a phased approach that provides benefits over time
7. Promote environmental sustainability and economic vitality
Ryan Abbotts, Fehr & Peers, explained to frame the analysis of the SR-104 corridor, they delineated it
into unique areas. He displayed a map with photos identifying neighborhood connectors, pedestrian-
oriented areas around the ferry terminal, town center area through Westgate, and boulevards to focus the
type of improvements that would be considered for design elements for the SR-104 corridor. To assist in
their analysis, they looked at:
• Sight Lines
• Collisions
• Accessibility (whether pedestrian facilities are adequate per ADA)
• Walk routes, bicycle network and transit route structure
• Traffic & Operations
o Existing and projected future vehicle volumes
o Existing (2015) approx. 21,000 vehicles per day
o Future (2035) approx. 25,000 vehicles per day
o No widening of SR-104 needed
He described input into the study:
• SR-104 Committee
o Councilmember
o Planning Board member
o City Staff
o WSDOT
o Community Transit
• Bicycle Committee
• Public Workshop
Mr. Abbotts displayed a map of the Westgate area, explaining one of the areas of focus was Westgate.
Although many think of Westgate as SR-104 and 100th, it is a broader area; they looked at different nodes
and how they interacted with major activity zone. He displayed a table of walk score ranges in Edmonds,
explaining a walk score of 90-100 is considered a walker’s paradise, 70 to 89 is considered very walkable;
downtown Edmonds is ranked 81 and Westgate is ranked 70.
He displayed a diagram of the Westgate SR-104/100th intersection, advising their analysis confirmed:
• Long-term street lane and width requirements
Packet Page 19 of 192
• Intersection operates acceptably today and in the future
He displayed an Access & Internal Circulation diagram of the Westgate area that identified:
• Existing driveways to remain
• Existing driveways to remove
• Existing driveways to become right turn only
• Existing driveway link to internal circulation drive
• Conceptual internal circulation drive
Mr. Abbotts explained the goal of the Access and Internal Circulation diagram was to create a predictable
traffic pattern and a more friendly walking and driving environment in the area. The specifics regarding
which driveways are moved or closed would happen as development occurs in the area. He provided
cross-sections of Westgate SR 104 and photographic examples of setbacks:
• 12-foot setback
• 15-foot setback
He explained there is currently an 80-foot right-of-way. He identified the distance of a 12-foot and 15-
foot setback using items in the Council Chambers, remarking both 12 and 15 feet provide quite a bit of
room for a planter strip, sidewalk and amenity zone in front of the face of the building.
Mr. Samdahl reviewed Westgate parking standards:
• Current commercial parking ratios: 1 space per 350 to 450 square feet
• Minimum of 1 space per 400 square feet adopted for SR-99
• Westgate is more walkable – a higher minimum ration (e.g. 1 space per 500 square feet) is
reasonable
• Residential uses will have their own parking
• City can fine-tune the minimum parking ratio over time
He relayed their conclusions with regard to Westgate:
• No additional travel lanes needed along SR-104 and 100th Ave W
• Recommended setbacks:
o 15’ at the intersection
o 12’ away from the intersection
• Parking standards: minimum 1 stall per 500 commercial square feet is reasonable, plus residential
parking. Can be refined over time.
Next steps – SR 104 Study:
• Complete analysis of complete streets needs throughout corridor
• Work with committee to prepare corridor master plan and list of project
• Include key projects in Transportation Element of Comprehensive Plan
• Finalize study in late spring 2015
Councilmember Petso asked whether they studied or evaluated the ability to put a protected bike lane on
SR-104. Mr. Samdahl answered that would be very difficult due to the need to maintain the existing
traffic capacity in the 80-foot right-of-way. In most of the corridor the sidewalk and the right-of-way
takes up the 80 feet; adding a protected bike lane would require purchasing additional right-of-way. The
committee felt there were other bike routes that serve a similar function and a bike lane was not
recommended at this time. Councilmember Petso commented what happens in lieu of a bike lane is
people ride on the sidewalks on SR-104 which she assumed would not factor favorably on the walkability
score or Compete Streets Index. Mr. Abbotts said the walkability score does not consider the mix of
users, just the area of access.
Packet Page 20 of 192
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked whether Cascade Bike Club had been consulted. Mr. Bertrand
said that specific issue has not been discussed.
Councilmember Petso explained the Council has already voted on parking and setbacks in Westgate. One
of the things the Council was seeking was a map of the existing right-of-way near Westgate showing
property lines. The Council had been told the road does not necessarily sit within the right-of-way and, as
a result, setbacks were measured from the property line, making it difficult to determine, particular for the
south side of SR-104, how far the building would be from the street. For example the Key Bank building
does not appear to be the anticipated distance from the traffic lane. She asked whether a map of the
existing right-of-way was available now. Mr. Samdahl answered GIS identifies the basic right-of-way
which is overlaid onto the street systems. Although not exact, on SR104 through Westgate it is a fairly
consistent 80 feet. They could measure pretty closely the spacing for certain developments like the bank.
Councilmember Petso recalled that was something the Council wanted, a map showing the right-of-way
relative to the road at the intersection of SR 104 and 100th. Mr. Abbotts said the information available
assumes the GIS is accurate with regard to existing property lines. To be truly accurate would require a
survey of the property boundaries.
Councilmember Petso referred to the analysis that indicates the level of service (LOS) at the intersection
is fine now and will be fine into future. Her understanding was if a vehicle sits through two light cycles
which she did today at 12:20 p.m., that was LOS F, not LOS D. Mr. Abbotts advised there are many
different measures; two cycles does not necessarily mean LOS F. LOS is measured using average vehicle
delays. Councilmember Petso said she and five other cars were there for 3 minutes trying to turn left onto
SR-104 from 9th/100th. She was not blocking the entrance to PCC but 1-2 cars behind her likely were.
That was a concern for her especially with the suggestion to close driveways. Mr. Abbotts said their
analysis considers average days, current traffic counts and current signal timing. If that happens every day
or 80% of the time, it is a typical condition; if it happens once a month, it may not be typical. He
wondered what else was occurring that day to make that happen. Councilmember Petso said it happens
frequently but she was uncertain the percentage of time. Mr. Abbotts said the models look at the average
vehicle delay. Mr. Hauss pointed out that intersection is impacted by ferry traffic. Councilmember Petso
said when she experienced that delay today there was no ferry traffic and it was not rush hour.
Councilmember Petso recalled a question about installing a deceleration lane to get into the PCC parking
lot and asked how much additional right-of-way that would require. Mr. Samdahl answered it would
require at least an 11-foot width for the length of the lane. Councilmember Petso concluded that
presumably would require purchasing additional right-of-way.
Councilmember Petso inquired about a right turn lane near Key Bank for northbound traffic on 100th to
access SR 104. Mr. Samdahl said they considered a road diet with bike lanes on 100th; to make the
intersection operate satisfactorily, there would need to be a northbound right turn lane approaching SR-
104. Councilmember Petso asked whether additional right-of-way would need to be purchased. Mr.
Samdahl answered it would fit within the existing right-of-way.
Councilmember Petso recalled the concept of a road diet was discussed and abandoned during previous
Westgate discussions. She referred to July 23, 2013 Council minutes when the question was asked and
Mr. Clifton’s answer, “The plan is not to reduce the number of lanes on 100th/9th. The traffic impact study
determined it was not appropriate to put 9th Avenue on a road diet and instead recommended leaving the
roadway as it is. She asked whether Fehr & Peers had reviewed that traffic impact study. Mr. Samdahl
answered yes, their volumes closely matched those. They did not have access to the detailed traffic
analysis but they also did some more detailed simulations. A road diet could be considered and they felt it
could operate satisfactorily but it would require some additional investigation. Councilmember Petso
Packet Page 21 of 192
asked what was wrong with the prior study if both used similar traffic counts but reached different
conclusions. Mr. Samdahl said he did not have an answer.
Councilmember Mesaros said he passed through the intersection three times today, once without stopping
for a light at all. He referred to the map of recommended driveway closures around the intersection,
explaining he frequently uses one of the driveways on the northwest corner of SR-104 that is
recommended for closure because it has better sightlines than the driveway closer to the corner. He
recommended closing the driveway that is closer to the corner.
Councilmember Bloom referred to the recommendation for 13-foot sidewalks at the intersection and 8-
foot sidewalks and 5-foot amenity zone away from the intersection. Mr. Samdahl referred to the Westgate
SR-104 cross-section with 12-foot setback, explaining that beginning at the curb there is a 5-foot planter
strip, 8-foot sidewalk, 9-foot setback before the building, a total of 22 feet. The actual setback is the
distance from the edge of the right-of-way to the buildings. Councilmember Bloom asked the total
distance from the curb. Mr. Samdahl answered 22 feet. He explained within 40 feet of the intersection,
they envision the planter strip would largely go away and the sidewalk would be widened to
approximately 13 feet and instead of 9 feet to the building, there would be 12 feet, for a total of 25 feet, 3
feet wider closer to the intersection.
Councilmember Bloom relayed her understanding of the answer to Councilmember Petso’s question was
addition right-of-way would need to be purchased to provide bike lanes with a barrier and they were not
recommending bike lanes on SR-104 or 100th. Mr. Samdahl said they were not recommending bike lanes
on SR-104 but a road diet on 100th could allow for bike lanes further widening. Without the road diet,
there could still be bike lanes on 9th and 100th approaching Westgate but bikes would need to share the
lane near the intersection unless the City purchased additional right-of-way to extend the bike lane.
Councilmember Bloom observed even with a road diet and bike lanes, there would not be separation
between the bike lane and traffic. Mr. Samdahl answered not on 100th. Mr. Hauss noted there are 4-foot
shoulders ½ mile south of the intersection at 238th. The road diet could potentially extend to Main Street
or Caspers. That would require parking studies because it would eliminate parking on one side of 9th.
Councilmember Bloom observed even with a road diet on 9th or 100th, there is no possibility of any
separation between the traffic and bike lane such as candlesticks as recommended by 8-80 Cities. Mr.
Abbotts answered there may be width in that area with a road diet to do a buffered bike lane. A buffered
bike lane is a painted stripe with a diagonal hatch. Councilmember Bloom said 8-80 Cities recommends a
physical barrier between bike lanes and traffic such as candlesticks, grade separation or other barrier. She
recalled hearing that sharrows are not working Seattle. Mr. Abbotts said that could be evaluated. Traffic
volumes on 100th do not warrant a grade separated facility. Protected bike lanes or cycle tracks are
typically reserved for areas that are more dangerous areas or areas with history due to the capital cost.
Councilmember Bloom’s suggestion for a positive barrier between the bicycle facility and the roadway
such as a curb would require raising the entire 10-12 foot width of the cycle track. Candlesticks and paint
are both visual barriers. There is a much larger capital cost with concrete versus paint. Mr. Hauss advised
the existing street width is 44 feet; two 10 foot lanes and an 11-foot turn lane is 31 feet, 7-8 feet for
parking and 5 feet for a bike lane. He summarized there was a limited amount of additional space unless
the road was widened.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if it was common for bicyclist to ride on State highways where there is
that much traffic going that fast. In her experience, they generally divert to other routes such as 100th, into
Shoreline, and onto the Interurban Trail. Mr. Abbotts responded there are a lot of examples of bike lanes
on State highways throughout the United States; they are not conducive to a family. A bike lane on a state
route is for “the spandex crowd,” a facility for a very limited cross-section of cyclists. Depending on the
speed of the roadway, it would also be a bike lane for cyclists who would be comfortable taking the lane.
Packet Page 22 of 192
If the goal is a facility for all users and abilities, that is not a bike lane on a State highway. Mr. Samdahl
said if a bike lane on SR-104 was desired, a positive separation would be preferable. He cited the Burke
Gilman along SR-522 as an example. Even if the width existed, he did not recommend a regular bike lane
on SR-104 due to the speeds and volumes.
Mr. Hauss described alternate routes using existing facilities: the east-west corridor on 220th from 9th to
84th has bike lanes and they will be extended to 76th and the 220th project includes a new traffic signal
with bike lanes. That route has lower speeds and reaches the same point as SR-104. To the south on 100th,
there are existing bike lanes and a 4-5 foot shoulder and a 30 mph speed limit. He summarized there are
alternate bike routes north and south of SR 104.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled during WSDOT’s presentation at the Council retreat two years ago,
WSDOT did not have plans to expand SR-104. To add facilities on SR-104 would require the City
purchase the property.
Council President Fraley-Monillas said she has lived off SR-104 and 76th for 30 years and rarely sees a
bike on Edmonds Way; they typically use 76th and 220th. She sees a bike on SR-104 approximately one a
month, and felt they were taking their life into their own hands due to the speeds and curves. She
suggested Cascade Bike Club be consulted regarding whether SR-104 would be a safe route for bicycles.
Councilmember Johnson said the WDSOT representative who made the presentation at the Council
retreat has also been a member of the technical committee. A district member of WSDOT has also
participated as well as a transit route planner from Community Transit. She thanked Fehr & Peers and
staff for providing this overview for the Council.
Councilmember Petso observed there are no improvements proposed for 76th & SR-104, an intersection
that is extraordinarily slow. Mr. Samdahl responded they are still investigating that intersection and have
collected newer counts. They will provide information on that intersection in the future.
Councilmember Petso asked the date of the traffic counts for Westgate. Mr. Samdahl answered October
2014. Councilmember Petso asked how the counts were adjusted for ferry traffic. Mr. Samdahl said they
were looking at afternoon peak hour conditions; they have seasonal counts on SR-104 and did some
adjustments. The forecasting was not for the peak ferry season; it was a typical time in the fall or spring
but reflects ferry traffic volumes during the hour.
Mayor Earling advised another presentation is scheduled on March 24. He requested Councilmembers
forward questions/comments to Mr. Hauss.
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling had no report.
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked citizens who called and emailed her regarding use of approximately
43% of the Council budget for a communications retraining session on Friday. The contract scope of
work was negotiated and approved solely by the Council President because the code is silent regarding
that administrative duty. The City is also paying former communication consultant Jim Reid $1800 for a
1½ - 2 hour wrap-up. She recognized all the negotiations have been completed and she plans to attend the
meeting. After the last meeting, many people complained to Mr. Reid, Mayor Earling and her that the
facilitator allowed the meeting to not be positive. She felt it was not appropriate for the Council President
to engage in a scope of work without the Council’s consent.
Packet Page 23 of 192
Councilmember Johnson suggested future Council retreats be held within the City limits to facilitate easy
access for citizens.
Councilmember Bloom suggested the Council clarify the role of the Council President in allocating funds
for consultants. She reiterated her request to have Council retreats held within the City limits.
Councilmember Bloom relayed she has requested the Sunset Avenue Walkway be brought to Council for
discussion. There is a lot of discussion and concern occurring online and a lot of people, including her,
feel consideration should not be delayed until the painting has been in place for a year. She relayed
Council President Fraley-Monillas said the earliest this could be scheduled was April 28; she preferred it
be discussed sooner.
Councilmember Petso announced she has selected Randy Hayden for the vacancy on the Economic
Development Commission.
Council President Fraley-Monillas said Councilmember Bloom asked her to schedule public comment
regarding painting of parking lanes on Sunset. She offered to schedule a meeting with Mr. Williams about
the painting and said citizens can come to Council to voice their objections. She is happy to schedule it on
the agenda with the agreement of four Councilmembers; April 28 is the earliest possible date.
Council President Fraley-Monillas explained the Council approved Mr. Reid’s phase 3 with the Council
and the funding on June 16, 2014 under her Councilmember Buckshnis’ Council Presidency. The phase 3
work was not scheduled last year and the funds were not spent.
12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION
PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
At 10:02 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding
potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last
approximately 5 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety
Complex. No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials
present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers Johnson, Fraley-Monillas,
Buckshnis, Petso, Bloom and Nelson. (Councilmember Mesaros did not participate in the executive
session.) Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday and City Clerk Scott Passey. The executive
session concluded at 10:07 p.m.
13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 10:08 p.m.
14. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:08 p.m.
Packet Page 24 of 192
AM-7558 4. B.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Nori Jacobson
Department:Finance
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Approval of claim checks #213217 through #213329 dated March 12, 2015 for $660,479.25.
Recommendation
Approval of claim checks.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non-approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:2015
Revenue:
Expenditure:660,479.25
Fiscal Impact:
Claims $660,479.25
Attachments
Claim cks 03-12-15
Project Numbers 03-12-15
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Scott James 03/12/2015 12:14 PM
City Clerk Scott Passey 03/12/2015 02:24 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 03/12/2015 03:39 PM
Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 03/12/2015 03:44 PM
Form Started By: Nori Jacobson Started On: 03/12/2015 11:10 AM
Packet Page 25 of 192
Final Approval Date: 03/12/2015
Packet Page 26 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213217 3/12/2015 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 346129 MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROL CUST 1-23276
MEADOWDALE CC PEST CONTROL CUST 1-23276
001.000.64.576.80.41.00 82.12
PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL CUST 1-1346166
PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL CUST
001.000.64.576.80.41.00 114.98
Total :197.10
213218 3/12/2015 068657 ACCOUNTEMPS 42488791 TEMPORARY HELP FINANCE DEPT WEEK ENDING
Temporary help week ending 2/27/15 - C
001.000.31.514.23.41.00 351.52
Total :351.52
213219 3/12/2015 074695 AMERICAN MESSAGING W4101046PC Water Watch Pager plus return shipping
Water Watch Pager plus return shipping
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 30.87
Total :30.87
213220 3/12/2015 074718 AQUATIC SPECIALTY SERVICES INC 8236 25 % INVOICE TO PLACE SPRAY EQUIPMENT OR
25 % INVOICE TO PLACE SPRAY EQUIPMENT
132.000.64.594.76.65.00 69,315.20
9.5% Sales Tax
132.000.64.594.76.65.00 6,584.95
Total :75,900.15
213221 3/12/2015 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1987854720 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 16.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.54
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987859008
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16
1Page:
Packet Page 27 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213221 3/12/2015 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987859009
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987859010
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.28
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 8.45
2Page:
Packet Page 28 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213221 3/12/2015 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.50
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.80
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987866029
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 16.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.54
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987870303
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40
3Page:
Packet Page 29 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213221 3/12/2015 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987870304
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987870305
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.28
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 9.41
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.50
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.90
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987877419
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 16.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.54
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987881674
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16
4Page:
Packet Page 30 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213221 3/12/2015 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987881675
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 2.41
STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 2.40
STREET/STORM DIVISION MATS
111.000.68.542.90.41.00 2.80
STREET/STORM DIVISION MATS
422.000.72.531.90.41.00 2.80
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.23
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.23
9.5% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.27
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.26
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987881676
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.31
5Page:
Packet Page 31 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213221 3/12/2015 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 5.28
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.89
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.50
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987888794
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 16.20
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.54
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1987900313
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00 53.17
Total :276.41
213222 3/12/2015 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 79825 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 125.76
UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 125.76
UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 129.58
UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 459.09
UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 459.08
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 11.95
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 11.95
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 12.30
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS79890
6Page:
Packet Page 32 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213222 3/12/2015 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 89.68
UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 89.68
UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 92.40
UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 326.31
UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 326.30
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 8.52
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 8.52
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 8.78
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS79942
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 23.20
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 23.20
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 23.91
UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 106.80
UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 106.80
9.5% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 2.20
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 2.20
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 2.28
7Page:
Packet Page 33 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :2,576.252132223/12/2015 070305 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
213223 3/12/2015 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 36801 ROUGH BOX - ZAMORA
ROUGH BOX - ZAMORA
130.000.64.536.20.34.00 430.00
ROUGH BOX - LARKIN36825
ROUGH BOX - LARKIN
130.000.64.536.20.34.00 430.00
Total :860.00
213224 3/12/2015 012005 BALL AND GILLESPIE POLYGRAPH 15-116 INV 15-116 EDMONDS PD - 3/3/15 POLYGRAPH
3/3/15 PRE-HIRE POLYGRAPH
001.000.41.521.10.41.00 225.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.10.41.00 7.00
Total :232.00
213225 3/12/2015 071348 BERGERABAM 309620 Fishing Pier - Pro Svcs - Design
Fishing Pier - Pro Svcs - Design
016.000.66.518.30.41.00 32,622.43
Total :32,622.43
213226 3/12/2015 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 3477 Fleet Auto Propane 186.4 Gal
Fleet Auto Propane 186.4 Gal
511.000.77.548.68.34.12 178.62
Fleet Auto Propane 300 Gal3499
Fleet Auto Propane 300 Gal
511.000.77.548.68.34.12 282.31
Total :460.93
213227 3/12/2015 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 112544-01 INV#112544-01 - EDMONDS PD - HWANG
MENS BLACK ATAC BOOTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 115.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.93
CR INV#120164-REFUND EXCHANGE OF CAPS120164
3 WATCH CAPS EXCHANGED-BLACK CAPS FOR
8Page:
Packet Page 34 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213227 3/12/2015 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 -35.85
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 -3.41
INV#120164 - EDMONDS PD - CAPS120164
3 WATCH CAPS EXCHANGED- BLACK FOR BLUE.
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 29.85
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 2.84
INV#123116 - EDMONDS PD - FROLAND123116
BDU BLACK PANTS
001.000.41.521.21.24.00 69.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.21.24.00 6.65
INV#125179 - EDMONDS PD - HAWLEY125179
SEW CHEVRONS ON COG
001.000.41.521.10.24.00 5.00
SGT CHEVRONS
001.000.41.521.10.24.00 5.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.24.00 1.04
Total :207.94
213228 3/12/2015 067391 BRAT WEAR 13635 INV#13635 - EDMONDS PD - BALLISTIC VESTS
BALLISTIC VEST - BORST
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 896.00
BALLISTIC VEST - HAUGHIAN
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 896.00
BALLISTIC VEST - SHIER
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 896.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 255.36
INV#14412 - EDMONDS PD - HAUGHIAN14412
JUMPSUIT W/ITEMS INCLUDED
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 515.00
9.5% Sales Tax
9Page:
Packet Page 35 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213228 3/12/2015 (Continued)067391 BRAT WEAR
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 48.93
INV#14413 - EDMONDS PD - BORST14413
JUMPSUIT W/ ITEMS INCLUDED
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 515.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 48.93
INV#14414 - EDMONDS PD - SPEER14414
JUMPSUIT W/ITEMS INCLUDED
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 515.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 48.93
Total :4,635.15
213229 3/12/2015 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN02150998 HELIUM TANK FOR GYMNASTICS
HELIUM TANK FOR GYMNASTICS
001.000.64.571.28.45.00 12.75
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.28.45.00 1.21
Total :13.96
213230 3/12/2015 070792 CH2O 230550 Yost Pool - Boiler Chemicals
Yost Pool - Boiler Chemicals
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 342.47
Yost Pool - Boiler Chemicals
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 342.46
Freight
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 49.89
Freight
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 49.89
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 37.28
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 37.27
Total :859.26
10Page:
Packet Page 36 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213231 3/12/2015 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS E1GA.ROW ENG20140212 E1GA.ROW PERMIT ENG20140212
E1GA.ROW Permit ENG20140212
423.000.75.594.35.41.30 205.00
Total :205.00
213232 3/12/2015 063902 CITY OF EVERETT I15000350 Water Quality Water Lab Analysis
Water Quality Water Lab Analysis
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 923.40
Total :923.40
213233 3/12/2015 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC MAR-15 C/A CITYOFED00001
Mar-15 Fiber Optics Internet Connection
001.000.31.518.87.42.00 406.10
Total :406.10
213234 3/12/2015 075089 COMPUCOM SYSTEMS 62678230 ADOBE ACROBAT XI PRO FOR COURT
Adobe Acrobat XI Pro for J Ferebee
001.000.23.512.50.31.00 253.28
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.31.00 24.06
Total :277.34
213235 3/12/2015 072848 COPIERS NW INV1172127 INV#1172127 ACCT#HMH636 - EDMONDS PD
IRC5045 LEASE 2/5 TO 3/4/15
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 226.77
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 21.54
INV#1172128 CUST#HMH636 - EDMONDS PDINV1172128
B/W METER CHARGE IRC5045
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 42.22
COLOR METER CHARGE IRC5045
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 121.59
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 15.56
Total :427.68
11Page:
Packet Page 37 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213236 3/12/2015 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING FEB 2015 DRY CLEANING JAN/FEB - EDMONDS PD
CLEANING/LAUNDRY JAN/FEB 2015
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 639.06
Total :639.06
213237 3/12/2015 072700 CURVATURE LLC 506144 CONNECTOR TRANSCEIVER
GE SFP, LC Connector LX/LH Transceiver,
001.000.31.518.88.35.00 282.87
Total :282.87
213238 3/12/2015 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3297570 E5GA.RFQ AD
E5GA.RFQ Ad
423.000.75.594.35.41.30 409.50
Total :409.50
213239 3/12/2015 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 352898 E1CA.SERVICES THRU 1/17/15
E1CA.Services thru 1/17/15
112.200.68.595.33.41.00 12,599.63
E1CA.SERVICES THRU 2/14/15354174
E1CA.Services thru 2/14/15
112.200.68.595.33.41.00 1,984.86
E1CA.Services thru 2/14/15
112.200.68.595.20.61.00 5,627.83
Total :20,212.32
213240 3/12/2015 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2015020056 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0
Scan Services for February 2015
001.000.31.518.88.42.00 940.00
Total :940.00
213241 3/12/2015 074492 EARTHCORPS 1 317-14-02 MARSH BUFFER ENHANCEMENT
317-14-02 MARSH BUFFER ENHANCEMENT
132.000.64.594.76.41.00 2,372.61
Total :2,372.61
213242 3/12/2015 070884 EARTHWORK ENTERPRISES INC 140911 Earthwork Enterprises - Hyd Deposit
Earthwork Enterprises - Hyd Deposit
12Page:
Packet Page 38 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213242 3/12/2015 (Continued)070884 EARTHWORK ENTERPRISES INC
421.000.245.110 950.00
Total :950.00
213243 3/12/2015 068292 EDGE ANALYTICAL 15-02530 Water Quality - Water Samples Monitoring
Water Quality - Water Samples Monitoring
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 1,068.00
Total :1,068.00
213244 3/12/2015 074302 EDMONDS HARDWARE & PAINT LLC 000624 PM FERTILIZER
PM FERTILIZER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 26.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.56
Total :29.55
213245 3/12/2015 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 19583 CATALINE 19583 MAKENA CATALINE YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
19583 MAKENA CATALINE YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
122.000.64.571.20.49.00 69.00
19696 KARMALITA AGUILERA YOUTH SCHOLARSH19696 AGUILERA
19696 KARMALITA AGUILERA YOUTH
122.000.64.571.20.49.00 62.00
Total :131.00
213246 3/12/2015 038500 EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER 2015-03-01 03/15 RECREATION SERVICES CONTRACT FEE
03/15 Recreation Services Contract Fee
001.000.39.569.10.41.00 5,000.00
Total :5,000.00
213247 3/12/2015 008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL 225133 INV#225133 CLIENT #308 - EDMONDS PD
EXAMINATION - KIRA
001.000.41.521.26.41.00 47.42
RABIES VACCINATION
001.000.41.521.26.41.00 15.81
DHLPP/LEPTOSPIROSIS VACCINE
001.000.41.521.26.41.00 31.88
13Page:
Packet Page 39 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213247 3/12/2015 (Continued)008688 EDMONDS VETERINARY HOSPITAL
BORDETELLA VACCINE
001.000.41.521.26.41.00 15.81
FECAL EXAM
001.000.41.521.26.41.00 22.48
TRIFEXIS 40, 1-60LB
001.000.41.521.26.31.00 239.40
RIMADYL CHEWS
001.000.41.521.26.31.00 65.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.26.31.00 28.92
Total :466.72
213248 3/12/2015 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 2-26950 LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTREAM LN / MET
LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTREAM LN /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 76.88
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 722-29118
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 41.02
Total :117.90
213249 3/12/2015 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 110801 CITY CLERK COPIER METER READ
City Clerks Copier Meter Read
001.000.25.514.30.45.00 292.22
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.25.514.30.45.00 27.76
COPIER CHARGES C1030111027
Copier charges for C1030
001.000.61.557.20.45.00 1.38
Copier charges for C1030
001.000.22.518.10.45.00 1.38
Copier charges for C1030
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 1.38
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.61.557.20.45.00 0.13
9.5% Sales Tax
14Page:
Packet Page 40 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213249 3/12/2015 (Continued)008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
001.000.22.518.10.45.00 0.13
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 0.13
Total :324.51
213250 3/12/2015 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH614648 E5GA.RFQ AD
E5GA.RFQ Ad
423.000.75.594.35.41.30 178.88
Legal notice: Deer Creek Headwater areaEDH617695
Legal notice: Deer Creek Headwater area
001.000.62.558.60.41.40 65.36
Legal notice PLN2015 0004 LexcomEDH617698
Legal notice PLN2015 0004 Lexcom
001.000.62.558.60.41.40 94.60
Total :338.84
213251 3/12/2015 063953 EVERGREEN STATE HEAT & A/C 27304 Sr Center - Ducting for Installation
Sr Center - Ducting for Installation
016.000.66.518.30.31.00 1,675.00
9.5% Sales Tax
016.000.66.518.30.31.00 159.13
Total :1,834.13
213252 3/12/2015 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU34864 Water - Supplies
Water - Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 50.25
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 4.77
PM: 2 X 36G TYPE 3, WILLIAMS WASHERWAMOU35022
PM: 2 X 36G TYPE 3, WILLIAMS WASHER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.64
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.87
PM: HOTGALV CHAINWAMOU35076
PM: HOTGALV CHAIN
15Page:
Packet Page 41 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213252 3/12/2015 (Continued)066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 143.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 13.59
PM: 3/8 SAE F/W Z, #20WAMOU35083
PM: 3/8 SAE F/W Z, #20
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.59
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.91
Total :243.62
213253 3/12/2015 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0454950 Water Meter Inventory #2025 ~
Water Meter Inventory #2025 ~
421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,478.00
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30 140.41
Water - Pipe0455128
Water - Pipe
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 681.45
7.7% sales tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 52.47
Total :2,352.33
213254 3/12/2015 011900 FRONTIER 253-003-6887 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES
LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 41.67
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL PHONE & PM IP425-745-5055
MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL PHONE
001.000.64.571.29.42.00 84.42
PARKS MAINT IP LINE (10 + TAX)
001.000.66.518.30.42.00 10.95
FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FAX LINES425-771-0158
FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FAX LINES
001.000.66.518.30.42.00 128.11
425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/INTERNET425-771-4741
425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/INTERNET
16Page:
Packet Page 42 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213254 3/12/2015 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER
130.000.64.536.20.42.00 81.59
LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES425-774-1031
LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRADE SPECIAL
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 8.08
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION425-775-1344
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
001.000.64.571.23.42.00 62.05
425-776-5316 PARKS425-776-5316
425-776-5316 PARKS
001.000.64.576.80.42.00 95.18
CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH AVE N425-776-6829
CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM
001.000.66.518.30.42.00 128.11
LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINE509-022-0049
LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.02
Total :666.18
213255 3/12/2015 073821 GEODESIGN INC 0215-152 E4JA.SERVICES THRU 2/20/15
E4JA.Services thru 2/20/15
421.000.74.594.34.41.10 5,171.58
Total :5,171.58
213256 3/12/2015 074358 GEO-TEST SERVICES 31392 E3DE.SERVICES THRU JANUARY 2015
E3DE.Services thru January 2015
112.200.68.595.33.41.00 2,846.05
E3DE.SERVICES THRU FEBRUARY 201531602
E3DE.Services thru February 2015
112.200.68.595.33.41.00 599.04
Total :3,445.09
213257 3/12/2015 075181 GINGER'S PET PARADISE LLC MARCH 2015 ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 3/15 EDMONDS PD
ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 3/2015
001.000.41.521.70.41.00 2,169.62
Total :2,169.62
17Page:
Packet Page 43 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213258 3/12/2015 075175 GOODWIN, BRIAN 138416 REFUND SPAY/NEUTER REFUND #138416
NEUTER REFUND IMP#9116
001.000.345.23.000.00 50.00
Total :50.00
213259 3/12/2015 012199 GRAINGER 9664246387 Fleet Shop Supplies
Fleet Shop Supplies
511.000.77.548.68.31.20 37.77
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20 3.59
Fac Maint - Battery Supply9669770589
Fac Maint - Battery Supply
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 63.57
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6.05
Total :110.98
213260 3/12/2015 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 156642/1 Water Inventory - # 0435
Water Inventory - # 0435
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 464.70
Water Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 640.02
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 44.15
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 60.80
Water Hydrant Parts to be installed156813/1
Water Hydrant Parts to be installed
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 112.76
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.71
Water Hydrant Replacements for 751156814/1
Water Hydrant Replacements for 751
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 4,448.88
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 422.64
18Page:
Packet Page 44 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213260 3/12/2015 (Continued)069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC
Water - Resetters - Non Inv156896/1
Water - Resetters - Non Inv
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 5,119.56
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 486.36
Total :11,810.58
213261 3/12/2015 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I3829567 Water Inventory - #0061 -W-CLMPCI-06-027
Water Inventory - #0061 -W-CLMPCI-06-027
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 607.98
Water Inventory # 563 - W-CPLG-04-020
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 397.74
Water Non Inv - Boxes, Lids, Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 4,793.75
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 95.54
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 455.41
Water Inventory -#476 - W-VALVBR-02-010I3846558
Water Inventory -#476 - W-VALVBR-02-010
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 429.20
#478 W-VALVBR-02-020
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 512.38
#170 YW-FOLOWRCI-12-010
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 235.74
Water Non Inv - Ball Corps, Quick Joint
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2,893.02
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 111.85
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 274.83
Water Meter Inventory - # 0435 ~I3846562
Water Meter Inventory - # 0435 ~
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 3,070.44
19Page:
Packet Page 45 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213261 3/12/2015 (Continued)010900 HD FOWLER CO INC
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.20 291.69
Water - Non Inv - Meter BoxesI3846563
Water - Non Inv - Meter Boxes
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 365.89
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 34.76
Total :14,570.22
213262 3/12/2015 074638 HEALY, TERESA 19601 LITTLE FISHES 19601 LITTLE FISHES INSTRUCTOR FEE
19601 LITTLE FISHES INSTRUCTOR FEE
001.000.64.571.22.41.00 506.25
Total :506.25
213263 3/12/2015 066575 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL 27868435-001 Fac Maint - Equip Rental - Platform Lift
Fac Maint - Equip Rental - Platform Lift
001.000.66.518.30.45.00 256.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.45.00 24.34
Total :280.34
213264 3/12/2015 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2591800 Copy paper
Copy paper
001.000.62.524.10.31.00 119.64
Office and Council Retreat supplies2592644
Office and Council Retreat supplies
001.000.11.511.60.31.00 124.78
Total :244.42
213265 3/12/2015 067568 KPG INC 210315 E3DB.SERVICES THRU 2/25/15
E3DB.Services thru 2/25/15
112.200.68.595.33.41.00 22,629.37
E3DD.SERVICES THRU 2/25/15210415
E3DD.Services thru 2/25/15
112.200.68.595.33.41.00 8,495.95
20Page:
Packet Page 46 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :31,125.322132653/12/2015 067568 067568 KPG INC
213266 3/12/2015 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 02062015-03 City Car Washes
City Car Washes
511.000.77.548.68.48.00 5.03
Total :5.03
213267 3/12/2015 067725 LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTER 80500101782 Unit 11 - 8 Traction Tires
Unit 11 - 8 Traction Tires
511.000.77.548.68.34.30 3,743.28
Tire Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.30 8.00
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.30 355.61
Total :4,106.89
213268 3/12/2015 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER Feb & March Cigna FEBRUARY AND MARCH CIGNA
February 2015 Cinga Insurance Premiums
811.000.231.550 10,719.41
March 2015 Cigna Insurance Premiums
811.000.231.550 10,982.36
Total :21,701.77
213269 3/12/2015 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC Mar-15 03-15 LEGALS FEES
03-15 Legal fees
001.000.36.515.31.41.00 41,000.00
Total :41,000.00
213270 3/12/2015 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO 006912-00 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES GAV MI 150 UNION
PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES GAV MI 150 UNION
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 29.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.76
Total :31.76
213271 3/12/2015 069862 MAKERS ARCHITECTURE AND 1438-2 Development Code Update
Development Code Update
21Page:
Packet Page 47 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213271 3/12/2015 (Continued)069862 MAKERS ARCHITECTURE AND
001.000.62.524.10.41.00 7,090.00
City of Edmonds Dev. Code Update1438-3
City of Edmonds Dev. Code Update
001.000.62.524.10.41.00 3,920.00
Total :11,010.00
213272 3/12/2015 021890 MICONTROLS INC 862541 City Hall - Incoming Freight Charges
City Hall - Incoming Freight Charges
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12.89
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.22
Total :14.11
213273 3/12/2015 063773 MICROFLEX 00021787 02-15 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM
TAX AUDIT PROGRAM
001.000.31.514.23.41.00 57.39
Total :57.39
213274 3/12/2015 067800 MICROFLEX CORP #774353 IN1538315 Fleet Shop - Supplies
Fleet Shop - Supplies
511.000.77.548.68.31.20 216.10
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20 20.52
Total :236.62
213275 3/12/2015 020495 MIDWAY PLYWOOD INC 64722 GREEN RESOURCE CENTER - P. LAM CAFELLE
Green Resource Center - P. Lam. Cafelle
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 155.99
Total :155.99
213276 3/12/2015 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 206147 PM SOD CUTTER
PM SOD CUTTER
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 55.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 5.22
PM TILLER206170
22Page:
Packet Page 48 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213276 3/12/2015 (Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
PM TILLER
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 75.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 7.17
PM GATES BELT, LINE206609
PM GATES BELT, LINE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 62.80
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.97
Total :211.66
213277 3/12/2015 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC ME73941 Unit 106 - Parts
Unit 106 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 93.01
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.84
Total :101.85
213278 3/12/2015 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 14-1605-4 WATER SUPPLY OPERATIONS EVALUATION
COORDINATION & PROJECT MANAGEMENT
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 206.00
DATA COLLECTION & REVIEW
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 1,030.00
FIELD TESTS
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 21.28
EVALUATION OF SUPPLY FACILITIES
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 1,745.00
Total :3,002.28
213279 3/12/2015 068025 NATIONAL PEN CORPORATION 107855489 WOTS PENS
WOTS PENS
117.100.64.573.20.31.00 336.90
Total :336.90
213280 3/12/2015 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0543289-IN Unit 33 - Megaflow AW 32
23Page:
Packet Page 49 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213280 3/12/2015 (Continued)024302 NELSON PETROLEUM
Unit 33 - Megaflow AW 32
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 38.68
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.68
Fleet Filter Inventory0543407-IN
Fleet Filter Inventory
511.000.77.548.68.34.40 554.88
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.40 52.72
Fleet - Filter Inventory0544628-IN
Fleet - Filter Inventory
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.57
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.10
Total :662.63
213281 3/12/2015 025217 NORTH SOUND HOSE & FITTINGS 64036 Unit 63 - Parts
Unit 63 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 166.04
9.2% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 15.28
Total :181.32
213282 3/12/2015 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 2-1141963 YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET
YOST PARK HONEY BUCKET`
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 309.21
HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET2-1143476
HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 587.62
EDMONDS ELEMENTARY HONEY BUCKET2-1148420
EDMONDS ELEMENTARY HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 171.65
CIVIC FIELD HONEY BUCKET2-1152383
CIVIC FIELD HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 113.85
24Page:
Packet Page 50 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :1,182.332132823/12/2015 061013 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC
213283 3/12/2015 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 545 ADB Meeting Minutes March 4 2015
ADB Meeting Minutes March 4 2015
001.000.62.558.60.41.00 187.00
Total :187.00
213284 3/12/2015 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 263031 PW Office Supplies
PW Office Supplies
001.000.65.518.20.31.00 67.41
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00 6.41
PW Office Supplies560950
PW Office Supplies
001.000.65.518.20.31.00 57.18
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.31.00 5.43
OFFICE SUPPLIES649680
Office Supplies
001.000.25.514.30.31.00 220.90
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.25.514.30.31.00 20.99
INV#685477 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD685477
UNIVERSAL LABELS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00 66.55
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00 6.33
P&R PAPER & PENS705307
P&R PAPER & PENS
001.000.64.571.21.31.00 27.83
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.31.00 2.64
Total :481.67
213285 3/12/2015 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130 PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST SW & 84TH AV
PLANTER IRRIGATION 220TH ST SW & 84TH
25Page:
Packet Page 51 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213285 3/12/2015 (Continued)026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 15.53
CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW0001520
CEMETERY 820 15TH ST SW
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 37.60
CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH ST SW0001530
CEMETERY SPRINKLER 820 15TH ST SW
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 17.18
SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR1040002930
SPRINKLER @ 5TH AVE S & SR104
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 17.18
FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / METER R1300021400
FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / METER
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 192.46
PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TH PL SW0026390
PLANTER IRRIGATION 10415 226TH PL SW
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 17.18
Total :297.13
213286 3/12/2015 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00074440 Water - VM Locator Kit
Water - VM Locator Kit
421.000.74.534.80.35.00 3,048.00
Freight
421.000.74.534.80.35.00 18.00
9.5% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.35.00 291.27
Unit 66 - Mounting Bracket00074660
Unit 66 - Mounting Bracket
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 208.09
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 21.26
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 21.79
Total :3,608.41
213287 3/12/2015 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 187214 Storm Dump Fees
26Page:
Packet Page 52 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213287 3/12/2015 (Continued)027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 95.20
Storm Dump Fees187221
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 119.00
Storm Dump Fees187232
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 120.00
Storm Dump Fees187240
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 96.00
Storm Dump Fees187271
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 96.00
Storm Dump Fees187273
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 96.00
Storm Dump Fees187285
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 96.00
Storm Dump Fees187289
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 96.00
Storm Dump Fees187310
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 96.00
Storm Dump Fees187311
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 96.00
Roadway - TopSoil187884
Roadway - TopSoil
111.000.68.542.31.31.00 191.16
7.7% sales tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00 14.72
Storm Dump Fees188138
27Page:
Packet Page 53 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213287 3/12/2015 (Continued)027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 96.00
Storm Dump Fees188176
Storm Dump Fees
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 96.00
PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130189056
PM YARD WASTE DUMP
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 120.00
PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130189067
PM YARD WASTE DUMP
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 120.00
PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130189082
PM YARD WASTE DUMP
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 120.00
Total :1,764.08
213288 3/12/2015 064070 PALMATIER, LISA JAN & FEB 2015 CONCERT COORDINATOR JAN & FEB 2015
CONCERT COORDINATOR JAN & FEB 2015
117.100.64.573.20.41.00 560.00
Total :560.00
213289 3/12/2015 074422 PARTSMASTER, DIV OF NCH CORP 20869203 Fleet Shop Supplies
Fleet Shop Supplies
511.000.77.548.68.31.20 196.33
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.31.20 21.17
9.5% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.20 20.67
Total :238.17
213290 3/12/2015 073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 12790 INV 12790 EDMONDS PD FEB 2015
WEB-BASED PEP TEST (3)
001.000.41.521.10.41.00 60.00
Total :60.00
28Page:
Packet Page 54 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213291 3/12/2015 074793 PETDATA INC 4143 INV#4143 - EDMONDS PD
172 ONE YR PET LICENSES
001.000.41.521.70.41.00 670.80
4 REPLACEMENT TAGS
001.000.41.521.70.41.00 15.60
1 LATE FEE COLLECTED
001.000.41.521.70.41.00 2.50
Total :688.90
213292 3/12/2015 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC F903687 FS 16 - Supplies
FS 16 - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 489.00
Fac Maint - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 54.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 51.59
PS - SuppliesF923996
PS - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 35.33
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.36
PW - SuppliesF944460
PW - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 23.76
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.26
PS - SuppliesG023735
PS - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 85.26
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.10
GREEN RESOURCE CENTER - LITHONIA LIGHTING150976
Green Resource Center - Lithonia
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2,700.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 256.50
29Page:
Packet Page 55 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213292 3/12/2015 (Continued)028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
FAC - SuppliesG216342
FAC - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 47.42
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.50
Svc FeesSC44153
Svc Fees
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.29
Total :3,772.37
213293 3/12/2015 071594 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 230805 INV#230805 - EDMONDS PD
TSR X26 DIGITAL POWER MAG
001.000.41.521.40.31.00 110.40
Freight
001.000.41.521.40.31.00 9.95
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.40.31.00 11.43
Total :131.78
213294 3/12/2015 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 ALARM MONITORING MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE
ALARM MONITORING CLUBHOUSE 6801 N
001.000.66.518.30.42.00 112.47
Total :112.47
213295 3/12/2015 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / ME
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,911.28
YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN WAY / METER200002411383
YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN WAY / METER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 151.92
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST / METER 0200007876143
OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST / METER
421.000.74.534.80.47.00 336.42
FIRE STATION # 16 8429 196TH ST SW / MET200009595790
FIRE STATION # 16 8429 196TH ST SW /
30Page:
Packet Page 56 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213295 3/12/2015 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 682.89
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W / METE200011439656
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 161.08
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / METER 00052200016558856
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / METER
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 591.37
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 0200016815843
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 886.15
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 72ND AVE W /200017676343
FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 72ND AVE W
511.000.77.548.68.47.00 329.22
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE R200019375639
MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 234.70
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 001200019895354
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 377.85
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / METE200020415911
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
001.000.65.518.20.47.00 25.46
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
111.000.68.542.90.47.00 96.73
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
421.000.74.534.80.47.00 96.73
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 96.73
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
511.000.77.548.68.47.00 96.73
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
422.000.72.531.90.47.00 96.73
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE S / METER200024711901
CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE S /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 215.51
31Page:
Packet Page 57 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total :6,387.502132953/12/2015 046900 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY
213296 3/12/2015 075031 REECE, CARLY 3/3 GYM ATTENDANT 3/3/15 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT
3/3/15 VOLLEYBALL GYM ATTENDANT
001.000.64.571.25.41.00 35.00
Total :35.00
213297 3/12/2015 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 150.39
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW3-0197-0800897
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
001.000.65.518.20.47.00 29.99
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
111.000.68.542.90.47.00 113.95
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
421.000.74.534.80.47.00 113.95
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 113.95
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
511.000.77.548.68.47.00 113.95
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW
422.000.72.531.90.47.00 113.92
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW3-0197-0801132
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 160.02
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD3-0197-0829729
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 69.50
Total :979.62
213298 3/12/2015 070042 RICOH USA INC 94242981 MP171SPF DSD Recep copier lease
MP171SPF DSD Recep copier lease
001.000.62.524.10.45.00 30.66
Total :30.66
32Page:
Packet Page 58 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213299 3/12/2015 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY FEB 2015 INVOICE 2/28/15 ACCT#70014 - EDMONDS PD
#160739 2 NPC - 2/5/15
001.000.41.521.70.41.00 23.42
#161279 2 NPC - 2/19/15
001.000.41.521.70.41.00 23.42
Total :46.84
213300 3/12/2015 074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 25781 14108-SUPPORT FEB 2015 WORK COMPLETED
14108-Support February 2015 work
001.000.31.518.88.41.00 3,856.25
Total :3,856.25
213301 3/12/2015 063306 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 1745-2 City Hall - Paint Supplies
City Hall - Paint Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 58.10
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.52
Total :63.62
213302 3/12/2015 068132 SHORELINE CONSTRUCTION CO E1GA.Pmt 4.Final E1GA.PMT 4 FINAL THRU 3/5/15
E1GA.Pmt 4 FINAL thru 3/5/15
423.000.75.594.35.65.30 27,966.88
Total :27,966.88
213303 3/12/2015 036850 SMITH, SHERLUND D 18 LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement
009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,308.80
Total :1,308.80
213304 3/12/2015 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0291-9 LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AVE / METER
LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AVE /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 181.71
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W / METER 12002-7495-9
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 32.86
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W / METER 12004-9315-3
33Page:
Packet Page 59 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213304 3/12/2015 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 55.06
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / METER 1000252006-6395-3
ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / METER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 750.45
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW / METER 12007-4860-6
TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 33.39
LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTREAM LN / ME2008-6520-2
LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTREAM LN /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 156.04
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND AVE S / METE2009-1385-3
DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND AVE S /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 52.99
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS WAY / METER2009-4334-8
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS WAY / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 119.76
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 RAILROAD AVE2010-5432-7
BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 RAILROAD
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 135.30
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W / METER 12011-8789-5
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 37.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W / METER 12011-9222-6
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 33.61
LIFT STATION 7403 BALLINGER WAY / METER2014-2731-7
LIFT STATION 7403 BALLINGER WAY / METER
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 33.39
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1/2 211TH PL SW /2015-0127-7
LIFT STATION #14 7905 1/2 211TH PL SW /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 37.37
LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON ST / METER2015-3292-6
LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON ST / METER
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 482.99
34Page:
Packet Page 60 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213304 3/12/2015 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W / METER 12015-8215-2
TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W / METER
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 50.30
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W / METER 12016-1195-1
TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W / METER
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 60.32
STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 150W) / NO2017-1178-5
STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 150W) /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 948.37
TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW / METER 12019-0786-2
TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW / METER
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 58.78
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W / METE2020-7719-4
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,110.94
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER 10002020-8787-0
LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 255.41
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 RAILROAD AV2021-3965-5
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 RAILROAD
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 53.45
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 7801 212TH ST SW /2021-9128-4
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 7801 212TH ST SW /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 32.86
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / METER 100042022-8909-6
TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 125.97
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / METER 100042022-8912-0
TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 131.33
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W / METER 12023-5673-9
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 44.30
LIFT STATION #1 105 CASPERS ST / METER 12024-9953-9
LIFT STATION #1 105 CASPERS ST / METER
35Page:
Packet Page 61 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213304 3/12/2015 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 1,162.13
STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ 200W) / NO2025-2918-6
STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ 200W) /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 2,677.25
STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 400W) / NOT2025-2920-2
STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 400W) /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 116.09
STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS @ 100W) / N2025-7615-3
STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS @ 100W) /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 14,668.00
STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 250W) / NOT2025-7948-8
STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 250W) /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 337.50
STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150W) / NOT M2047-1489-3
STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150W) / NOT
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 3.75
STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 200W) / NOT2047-1492-7
STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 200W) /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 83.38
STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 400W) / NOT2047-1493-5
STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 400W) / NOT
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 43.94
STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 100W) / NOT2047-1494-3
STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 100W) / NOT
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 11.15
STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 250W) / NOT2047-1495-0
STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 250W) /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 151.58
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 226122053-0758-0
DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 22612
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 412.94
Total :24,681.66
213305 3/12/2015 037376 SNO CO PUD NO 1 390014052 ACCT #00600009120
Advanced Contact fee on jointly owned
36Page:
Packet Page 62 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213305 3/12/2015 (Continued)037376 SNO CO PUD NO 1
001.000.31.518.87.41.00 80.69
Total :80.69
213306 3/12/2015 065910 SNOCOM 911 COMMUNICATIONS 15-0301-2 Q2-15 COMMUNICATIONS
Q2-15 COMMUNICATIONS
001.000.39.528.00.51.00 204,857.76
Q2-15 COMMUNICATIONS
421.000.74.534.80.51.00 5,390.99
Q2-15 COMMUNICATIONS
423.000.75.535.80.51.00 5,391.00
Q2-15 NEW WORLD ASSESSMENT15-0301-2A
Q2-15 New World Assessment
001.000.39.528.00.51.00 17,881.50
Total :233,521.25
213307 3/12/2015 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 65937 PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES
PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 412.00
Total :412.00
213308 3/12/2015 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT CEDM Sewer - Hep B
Sewer - Hep B
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 108.00
Total :108.00
213309 3/12/2015 069844 SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PLLC I150227-3 Water Sewer - Telemetry Server Patch
Water Sewer - Telemetry Server Patch
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 400.00
Water Sewer - Telemetry Server Patch
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 400.00
Total :800.00
213310 3/12/2015 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 550.68
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST103585
37Page:
Packet Page 63 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213310 3/12/2015 (Continued)038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 674.47
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST103586
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 555.23
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N103588
CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 459.89
Total :2,240.27
213311 3/12/2015 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4247667-01 Sewer - 5 Work Jeans - D Crawford
Sewer - 5 Work Jeans - D Crawford
423.000.75.535.80.24.00 249.75
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.24.00 23.73
Total :273.48
213312 3/12/2015 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3002944043 INV#3002944043 CUST#6076358 - EDMONDS PD
MINIMUM MONTHLY CHARGE
001.000.41.521.80.41.00 10.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.80.41.00 0.36
Total :10.36
213313 3/12/2015 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC 17279 LS 1 Upgrades
LS 1 Upgrades
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4,048.38
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 384.60
Total :4,432.98
213314 3/12/2015 075179 TAYLOR, CHRISTIE 19592 GUITAR 19592 ACOUSTIC GUITAR INSTRUCTOR FEE
19592 ACOUSTIC GUITAR INSTRUCTOR FEE
001.000.64.571.22.41.00 239.25
Total :239.25
38Page:
Packet Page 64 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213315 3/12/2015 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 399575 Library - Partitions
Library - Partitions
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4,289.67
Freight
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 235.55
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 429.90
Total :4,955.12
213316 3/12/2015 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 3001677898 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING CIVIC CENTER
ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING CIVIC CENTER
001.000.66.518.30.48.00 51.31
ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING SENIOR CENTER3001677915
ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING SENIOR CENTER
001.000.66.518.30.48.00 15.44
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER3001678119
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER 220
001.000.66.518.30.48.00 250.66
001.000.66.518.30.48.00 23.81
Total :341.22
213317 3/12/2015 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 50153 PM YOST PARK FENCING
PM YOST PARK FENCING
001.000.64.576.80.48.00 586.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.48.00 55.67
Total :641.67
213318 3/12/2015 062693 US BANK 0108 INV#0108 03/06/15 - THOMPSON - EDMONDS P
ENGRAVE HANDCUFFS
001.000.41.521.22.48.00 23.00
35 YR PLATE + ENGRAVING
001.000.41.521.10.31.00 15.87
NIX TEST KITS "U"
001.000.41.521.80.31.00 129.77
39Page:
Packet Page 65 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213318 3/12/2015 (Continued)062693 US BANK
LUNCH ORAL BOARD 2/10/15
001.000.41.521.10.31.00 20.04
LUNCH ORAL BOARD 2/11/15
001.000.41.521.10.31.00 25.24
RETIREMENT PLAQUE MARSH
001.000.41.521.10.31.00 84.32
REG WAPRO - THOMPSON
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 140.00
INV#2519 03/06/15 - POLICE #1 - EDMONDS2519
FUEL/PNWD-IAI - MOORE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 18.67
MEAL/PNWD-IAI - MOORE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 8.58
LODGING/PNWN-IAI - MOORE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 145.01
MEAL/COLLISION INVEST - SHIER
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 141.90
WWTP - FEBRUARY 2015 CC2985
PUMPS 101 - Clay, Jon 02/11/15
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 185.00
The Rusty Rack Guys - Maintenance Parts
423.000.76.535.80.48.21 897.08
WOW 2015 - Conference, Sebers, Rod
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 225.00
WOW 2015 - Conference, Garcia, Dan
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 225.00
WOW 2015 - Conference, Slenker, Robert
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 225.00
WOW 2015 - Conference, VanPelt, Michael
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 225.00
WOW 2015 - Conference, Jones-Thomas,
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 225.00
WOW 2015 - Conference, Funk, Brian
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 225.00
40Page:
Packet Page 66 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213318 3/12/2015 (Continued)062693 US BANK
WOW 2015 - Conference, Nordquist, Jim
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 225.00
WOW 2015 - Conference, Zuvela, Curt
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 225.00
WOW 2015 - Conference, Randolph, Pamela
423.000.76.535.80.49.71 225.00
Bluetooth keyboard for Council3389
Bluetooth keyboard for Council
001.000.11.511.60.49.00 53.81
INV#3520 03/06/15 - POLICE #2 - EDMONDS3520
FUEL/COLL RECON-ROTH-HARBINSON
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 26.60
FEDEX CHG SAGE-GUN REFURBISH
001.000.41.521.10.42.00 193.90
FEDEX CHG RETURN S&W
001.000.41.521.10.42.00 81.09
FEDEX CHG #15-0378
001.000.41.521.10.42.00 14.94
MEAL/COLL REC-ROTH-HARBINSON
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 50.06
MEAL/COLL RECON-ROTH-HARBINSON
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 264.84
MEAL/COLL RECON ROTH-HARBINSOM
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 14.02
MEAL/COLL RECON-ROTH-HARBINSON
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 54.32
FUEL/COLL RECON-ROTH-HARBINSON
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 10.08
FEDEX CHG #14-2493
001.000.41.521.10.42.00 38.78
MEAL/COLL RECON-ROTH-HARBINSON
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 40.85
REG. PWN FIRE-MCINTYRE
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 425.00
41Page:
Packet Page 67 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213318 3/12/2015 (Continued)062693 US BANK
REG. WSPCA K9 - ROBINSON
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 350.00
PLANE/WSHNA HOSTAGE-MACK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 371.85
PLANE/WSHNA HOSTAGE-FROLAND
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 371.85
FEDEX CHG #15-0581
001.000.41.521.10.42.00 15.60
FEDEX CHG #14-2083,15-0640
001.000.41.521.10.42.00 14.94
REG. NEW WORLD - COLLINS
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 1,620.00
4675 PARKS CR CARD4675
DOLLAR STORE: DADDY DAUGHTER DANCE
001.000.64.571.22.31.00 14.24
AMAZON.COM CIRCUS/ACRO AND VAULT
001.000.64.571.28.31.00 13.95
AMAZON.COM STAMPS AND INK PADS FOR
001.000.64.571.28.31.00 34.57
LOWES HAZEL MILLER PLAZA BORDER FENCE
001.000.64.576.81.31.00 131.14
AMAZON FOR ALL PROGRAM PRESCHOOL -
001.000.64.571.28.31.00 3.00
AMAZON CIRCUS/ACRO + VAULT SURFACE
001.000.64.571.28.31.00 13.45
RUBBER STAMP CHAMP SUPERMAN LOGO STAMP
001.000.64.571.28.31.00 12.45
YOGA DIRECT FOR STRETCHING AND OTHER
001.000.64.571.28.31.00 137.71
EDMONDS ART WALK MONTHLY ART WALK DUES
117.100.64.573.20.49.00 60.00
FLAGHOUSE SMALL WEDGE FOR GYMNASTICS
001.000.64.571.28.31.00 149.63
OFFICE DEPOT PM WRITE ON PLAST
42Page:
Packet Page 68 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213318 3/12/2015 (Continued)062693 US BANK
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 45.92
UPS STORE PM SHIPPING
001.000.64.576.81.31.00 18.88
TRADER JOE'S REFRESHMENTS FOR PUBLIC:
001.000.64.571.21.31.00 12.67
UPDATE SNOHOMISH COUNTY4697
Update Snohomish County
001.000.21.513.10.49.00 35.00
Chamber Luncheon
001.000.21.513.10.49.00 20.00
SIT STAND DESK, BLUEBEAM REVU, CAMCORDER5179
Newegg.com - Logitech R400 2.4 GHz
001.000.31.514.23.35.00 46.39
Newegg.com - Logitech R400 2.4 GHz
001.000.31.518.88.35.00 46.39
Bluebeam Revu: Standard Annual
001.000.31.518.88.48.00 819.00
Newegg.com - Samsung F90WN
001.000.23.523.30.35.00 129.99
Newegg.com - ASUS VS Series VS228H-P
001.000.25.514.30.35.00 139.99
Monoprice.com - 3 ft 16AWG Power
001.000.31.518.88.31.00 52.20
Expertsexchange.com - IT Solutions
001.000.31.518.88.49.00 19.95
The Human Solution - Conset 501-11
001.000.31.518.88.35.00 894.00
TOURISM AD IN VANCOUVER SUN/PROVINCE MAR5923
Tourism promotional ad in March 17,
120.000.31.575.42.41.40 845.22
INV#7476 03/06/15 - BARD - EDMONDS PD7476
MINDFLASH-MO FEE FOR ON-LINE TRAINING
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 199.00
REG. CHILD ABUSE - TRYKER
43Page:
Packet Page 69 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213318 3/12/2015 (Continued)062693 US BANK
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 415.00
PLANE/NEW WORLD-BARD
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 280.20
REG. HOSTAGE NEG - MACK
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 195.00
REG. HOSTAGE NEG - FROLAND
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 195.00
PLANE/HUMAN FACTORS-MACK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 546.20
PLANE/FUSION LIAISON-HARDWICK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 180.20
LODGING/FUSION LIAISON-HARDWICK
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 207.20
OTTERBOX BELT CLIP
001.000.41.521.21.31.00 15.90
TLO SEARCHES 2/2015
001.000.41.521.21.41.00 20.00
REG. WHIA CONF - HONNEN
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 300.00
LODGING/WHIA CONF - HONNEN
001.000.41.521.40.43.00 84.70
REG. TASER INST. - GREENMUM
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 200.00
AWC ACTION DAYS7483
AWC Action Days hotel
001.000.21.513.10.43.00 123.88
AWC Action Days parking
001.000.21.513.10.43.00 19.50
March Mayor's meeting
001.000.21.513.10.49.00 13.00
WFOA & WMTA MEMBERSHIPS FOR S JAMES8296
Washington Finance Officers Association
001.000.31.514.20.49.00 50.00
Washington Public Treasurers
44Page:
Packet Page 70 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213318 3/12/2015 (Continued)062693 US BANK
001.000.31.514.20.49.00 40.00
National Wellness Institute- Worksite8304
National Wellness Institute- Worksite
001.000.22.518.10.49.00 875.00
Worksite Wellness Certification flight
001.000.22.518.10.49.00 456.20
WA state employment Law and HR
001.000.22.518.10.49.00 391.25
Advertising- Temp PT Custodian
001.000.22.518.10.41.00 50.00
Advertising- Summer Preschool Supervisor
001.000.22.518.10.41.00 50.00
BARS-GAAP BASIS TRAINING FOR D SHARP8842
Washington Finance Officers Association
001.000.31.514.23.49.00 125.00
Total :16,599.98
213319 3/12/2015 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA 0591413-WA - B Fleet - DOT
Fleet - DOT
511.000.77.548.68.41.00 99.00
Water - DOT0592438-WA
Water - DOT
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 99.00
Total :198.00
213320 3/12/2015 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 5020121 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER
421.000.74.534.80.41.00 68.54
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER
422.000.72.531.90.41.00 68.54
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER
423.000.75.535.80.41.00 70.61
Total :207.69
213321 3/12/2015 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9741162988 C/A 772540262-00001
45Page:
Packet Page 71 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213321 3/12/2015 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
Lift Station access
001.000.31.518.88.42.00 90.72
Total :90.72
213322 3/12/2015 074901 WA FEDERAL %SHORELINE CONSTRUC E1GA.Ret 4 Final E1GA.RET 4.WA FED. 316-4001681.FINAL THR
E1GA.Ret 4.WA Fed 316-4001681 Final
423.000.75.594.35.65.30 1,338.13
Total :1,338.13
213323 3/12/2015 047200 WA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 2015 PRECONF REG 2015 HITE PRECONFERENCE REGISTRATION
2015 HITE PRECONFERENCE REGISTRATION
001.000.64.571.21.49.00 74.00
Total :74.00
213324 3/12/2015 075178 WAGNER, JULIE 3/5 REFUND 3/5 REFUND - CLASS CANCELLED
3/5 REFUND - CLASS CANCELLED
001.000.239.200 136.00
Total :136.00
213325 3/12/2015 075154 WALTER E NELSON CO 476407 Fac Maint - Mulit Fold Towels, Towel
Fac Maint - Mulit Fold Towels, Towel
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 291.25
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 27.67
Fac Maint - Paper Towels, Supplies477146
Fac Maint - Paper Towels, Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 304.80
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 28.96
Fac Maint - Liners, TT, Towels, Supplies477707
Fac Maint - Liners, TT, Towels, Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 379.80
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 36.08
Total :1,068.56
46Page:
Packet Page 72 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
213326 3/12/2015 068227 WCCFA 1767 CONFERENCE REG EDWARDS
CONFERENCE REG EDWARDS
130.000.64.536.20.49.00 99.00
Total :99.00
213327 3/12/2015 047960 WEAN, GREG 19 LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement
LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement
009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,535.86
Total :1,535.86
213328 3/12/2015 074609 WEST COAST ARMORY NORTH 14 INV#14 CUST ID#EPD - EDMONDS PD
RANGE USAGE GAGNER 2/5/15
001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.70
RANGE USAGE GAGNER 2/12/15
001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.70
RANGE USAGE POFF 2/15/15
001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.70
RANGE USAGE GAGNER 2/19/15
001.000.41.521.40.41.00 13.70
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.40.41.00 5.21
Total :60.01
213329 3/12/2015 063008 WSDOT RE-41-JA6590-L013 E7AC.SIGNAL CHANNELIZATIONS ETC JANUARY
E7AC. Signal Channelizations ETC
112.200.68.595.33.41.00 430.64
Total :430.64
Bank total :660,479.25113 Vouchers for bank code :usbank
660,479.25Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report113
47Page:
Packet Page 73 of 192
03/12/2015
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
10:58:42AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
48Page:
Packet Page 74 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA
STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC
STM 190th Pl SW Wall Construction c428 E3FF
STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA
WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA
STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB
WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA
STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE
SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA
SWR 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA
WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA
WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE
STM 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c406 E3FA
STM 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects c407 E3FB
SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA
WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA
STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB
STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA
STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD
STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA
STR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC
WTR 2014 Waterline Replacement Program c422 E4JA
STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC
STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA
STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA
SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA
STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB
WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB
WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC
SWR 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA
WTR 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA
STR 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk c421 E3DA
STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD
WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 75 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA
STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC
STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB
STR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC
STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA
WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB
STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA
STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB
STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE
SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)c390 E2GB
WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA
STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB
PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB
STR Citywide Safety Improvements c404 E2AC
SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD
STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM
PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA
STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c409 E3FD
STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE
FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB
WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC
STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC
FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA
FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB
STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA
PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA
FAC Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades c393 E3LA
STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD
PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB
STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD
STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB
SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 76 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA
STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA
WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK
PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB
STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA
STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE
STM NPDES m013 E7FG
SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB
WTR OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)c141 E3JB
STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN
STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC
WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB
WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD
STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD
FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA
STR School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant c420 E3AA
PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA
FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB
SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA
WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA
WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB
STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB
STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB
General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA
STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB
General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA
STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF
STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG
STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH
STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC
STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA
STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB
STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH
STM Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation c307 E9FB
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 77 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA
ENG Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA
STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA
STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB
STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 78 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STR E0AA c329 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade
STM E0FC c326 Stormwater GIS Support
WTR E0IA c324 AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements
WTR E0JA c363 2010 Waterline Replacement Program
FAC E0LA c327 Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project
FAC E0LB c332 Senior Center Roof Repairs
STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR E1AB c343 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming
STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements
General E1EA c372 SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing
STM E1FD c339 Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades
STM E1FF c341 Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects
STM E1FH c349 Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)
STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
SWR E1GA c347 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement
WTR E1GB c370 Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update
WTR E1JA c333 2011 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E1JB c344 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood
WTR E1JC c345 Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study
WTR E1JD c346 PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment
WTR E1JE c340 2012 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E1JK c375 Main Street Watermain
STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update
STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project
STR E2AC c404 Citywide Safety Improvements
STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
WTR E2CA c388 2012 Waterline Overlay Program
WTR E2CB c389 Pioneer Way Road Repair
STR E2CC c399 5th Ave Overlay Project
PM E2DB c146 Interurban Trail
STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
STM E2FD c381 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 79 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STM E2FE c382 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements
SWR E2GA c369 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update
SWR E2GB c390 Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)
STR E3AA c420 School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant
STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STR E3DA c421 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk
STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STM E3FA c406 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement
STM E3FB c407 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects
STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM E3FD c409 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
STM E3FF c428 190th Pl SW Wall Construction
STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
SWR E3GB c142 OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements
WTR E3JA c397 2013 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
WTR E3JB c141 OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)
FAC E3LA c393 Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades
FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project
STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program
STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals
STR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays
STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project
ENG E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept
STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing
STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements
STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM E4FD c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 80 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
WTR E4JA c422 2014 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update
FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park
FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System
STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming
STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program
STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
SWR E5GA c469 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
WTR E5JA c468 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects
STR E6DA c245 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project
STR E6DB c256 Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project
General E6MA c238 SR99 Enhancement Program
STR E7AA c265 Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements
STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STR E7CB c268 Shell Valley Emergency Access Road
STM E7FG m013 NPDES
PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza
SWR E8GA c298 Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)
SWR E8GD c301 City-Wide Sewer Improvements
PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
PM E8MB c290 Marina Beach Additional Parking
STR E9CA c294 2009 Street Overlay Program
STR E9DA c312 226th Street Walkway Project
STM E9FB c307 Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation
SWR E9GA c304 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design
PM E9MA c321 Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 81 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number Project Title
WTR c141 E3JB OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)
SWR c142 E3GB OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements
PM c146 E2DB Interurban Trail
General c238 E6MA SR99 Enhancement Program
STR c245 E6DA 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project
STR c256 E6DB Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project
STR c265 E7AA Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements
STR c268 E7CB Shell Valley Emergency Access Road
PM c276 E7MA Dayton Street Plaza
PM c282 E8MA Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
PM c290 E8MB Marina Beach Additional Parking
STR c294 E9CA 2009 Street Overlay Program
SWR c298 E8GA Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)
SWR c301 E8GD City-Wide Sewer Improvements
SWR c304 E9GA Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design
STM c307 E9FB Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation
STR c312 E9DA 226th Street Walkway Project
PM c321 E9MA Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements
WTR c324 E0IA AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements
STM c326 E0FC Stormwater GIS Support
FAC c327 E0LA Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project
STR c329 E0AA 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade
FAC c332 E0LB Senior Center Roof Repairs
WTR c333 E1JA 2011 Waterline Replacement Program
STM c339 E1FD Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades
WTR c340 E1JE 2012 Waterline Replacement Program
STM c341 E1FF Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects
STR c342 E1AA Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR c343 E1AB 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming
WTR c344 E1JB 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood
WTR c345 E1JC Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study
WTR c346 E1JD PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment
SWR c347 E1GA 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement
STM c349 E1FH Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 82 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number Project Title
STR c354 E1DA Sunset Walkway Improvements
WTR c363 E0JA 2010 Waterline Replacement Program
STR c368 E1CA 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
SWR c369 E2GA 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update
WTR c370 E1GB Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update
General c372 E1EA SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing
STM c374 E1FM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
WTR c375 E1JK Main Street Watermain
STM c376 E1FN Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STM c378 E2FA North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM c379 E2FB SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM c380 E2FC Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
STM c381 E2FD Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012
STM c382 E2FE 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements
WTR c388 E2CA 2012 Waterline Overlay Program
WTR c389 E2CB Pioneer Way Road Repair
SWR c390 E2GB Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)
STR c391 E2AA Transportation Plan Update
STR c392 E2AB 9th Avenue Improvement Project
FAC c393 E3LA Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades
WTR c397 E3JA 2013 Waterline Replacement Program
SWR c398 E3GA 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
STR c399 E2CC 5th Ave Overlay Project
STR c404 E2AC Citywide Safety Improvements
STR c405 E2AD Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM c406 E3FA 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement
STM c407 E3FB 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects
STM c408 E3FC Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM c409 E3FD Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
STM c410 E3FE Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
PRK c417 E4MA City Spray Park
WTR c418 E3JB 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
FAC c419 E3LB ESCO III Project
STR c420 E3AA School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 83 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number Project Title
STR c421 E3DA 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk
WTR c422 E4JA 2014 Waterline Replacement Program
STR c423 E3DB 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STR c424 E3DC 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STR c425 E3DD 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STR c426 E3DE ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STR c427 E3AB SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STM c428 E3FF 190th Pl SW Wall Construction
STM c429 E3FG Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM c430 E3FH SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM c433 E4FA 2014 Drainage Improvements
STM c434 E4FB LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM c435 E4FC 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM c436 E4FD 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STR c438 E4CA 2014 Overlay Program
WTR c440 E4JB 2015 Waterline Replacement Program
SWR c441 E4GA 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
FAC c443 E4MB Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
FAC c444 E4LA Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
WWTP c446 E4HA Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STR c451 E4CB 2014 Chip Seals
STR c452 E4CC 2014 Waterline Overlays
ENG c453 E4DA Train Trench - Concept
STR c454 E4DB SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing
STM c455 E4FE Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR c456 E4GB Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
STM c459 E4FF Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
WTR c460 E4JC 2016 Water Comp Plan Update
SWR c461 E4GC Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
STR c462 E4CD 220th Street Overlay Project
STR c463 E5CA 2015 Overlay Program
STM c466 E5FA 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
STM c467 E5FB Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
WTR c468 E5JA 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 84 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number Project Title
SWR c469 E5GA 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
STR c470 E5AA Trackside Warning System
STR c471 E5AB 2015 Traffic Calming
STR i005 E7AC 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STM m013 E7FG NPDES
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 85 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
ENG Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA
FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA
FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB
FAC Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades c393 E3LA
FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB
FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA
FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB
General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA
General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA
PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB
PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA
PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA
PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB
PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA
PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA
STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC
STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD
STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF
STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH
STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM
STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN
STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC
STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE
STM 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c406 E3FA
STM 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects c407 E3FB
STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC
STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c409 E3FD
STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE
STM 190th Pl SW Wall Construction c428 E3FF
STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG
STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH
STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA
STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB
STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC
STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 86 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE
STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF
STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB
STM NPDES m013 E7FG
STM Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation c307 E9FB
STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA
STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB
STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD
STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA
STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA
STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA
STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB
STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA
STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA
STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA
STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB
STR Citywide Safety Improvements c404 E2AC
STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD
STR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC
STR School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant c420 E3AA
STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB
STR 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk c421 E3DA
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB
STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC
STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD
STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE
STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA
STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB
STR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC
STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD
STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB
STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA
STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB
STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA
STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 87 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB
STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA
STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC
STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB
STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA
STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA
SWR 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA
SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA
SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)c390 E2GB
SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA
SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB
SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB
SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC
SWR 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA
SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA
SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD
SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA
WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA
WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA
WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB
WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA
WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB
WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC
WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD
WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE
WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK
WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA
WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB
WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA
WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB
WTR OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)c141 E3JB
WTR 2014 Waterline Replacement Program c422 E4JA
WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB
WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC
WTR 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 88 of 192
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA
Revised 3/12/2015 Packet Page 89 of 192
AM-7552 4. C.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Dave Earling Submitted By:Carolyn LaFave
Department:Mayor's Office
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Confirmation of Alicia Crank to the Edmonds Sister City Commission.
Recommendation
The Edmonds Sister City Commission and Mayor Earling recommend Alicia Crank's appointment to the
Commission.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
After interviewing candidate Alicia Crank, Mayor Earling and the Edmonds Sister City Commission are
recommending her appointment to Position #1 on the ESCC. Commission terms are for 3 years with no
term limits.
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Scott Passey 03/11/2015 11:29 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 03/11/2015 12:07 PM
Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 03/11/2015 12:12 PM
Form Started By: Carolyn LaFave Started On: 03/11/2015 11:20 AM
Final Approval Date: 03/11/2015
Packet Page 90 of 192
AM-7554 4. D.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Mike De Lilla Submitted By:Megan Luttrell
Department:Engineering
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Authorization for Mayor to sign a Professional Services Agreement with Murray Smith & Associates for
the 2016 Comprehensive Water System Plan Update
Recommendation
Authorize Mayor to sign the Professional Services Agreement
Previous Council Action
On March 10, 2015, staff presented a Professional Services Agreement with Murray Smith & Associates for the 2016
Comprehensive Water System Plan Update; Council forwarded the item to the March 17, 2015 consent agenda.
Narrative
The City's current Water System Comprehensive Plan was written in 2010 and needs to be updated.
The update will review and evaluate the following elements of the City's water system:
(1) Planning data and demand;
(2) Water system analysis;
(3) Water efficiency and conservation program;
(4) Water rights and system reliability;
(5) Regulatory compliance with water quality monitoring requirements;
(6) Operations and maintenance program;
(7) Capital facility plan; and
(8) Financial program.
The update is also necessary to comply with the Department of Health regulations.
Statements of qualification's (SOQ) were received from three firms in response to the RFQ. Based on a
review of the SOQ's and comparison to the selection criteria, MSA was selected as the preferred
consultant based on their qualifications and experience.
Staff and consultant have agreed upon a scope of services and budget for the project. The negotiated fee
for the professional services agreement has been set at a not-to-exceed amount of $157,576. A copy of
the professional services agreement is attached.
Attachments
Packet Page 91 of 192
Murray, Smith & Associates Agreement
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Engineering (Originator)Robert English 03/11/2015 02:29 PM
City Clerk Scott Passey 03/11/2015 02:41 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 03/11/2015 03:17 PM
Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 03/11/2015 03:19 PM
Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 03/11/2015 01:46 PM
Final Approval Date: 03/11/2015
Packet Page 92 of 192
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, hereinafter
referred to as the "City", and Murray, Smith & Assoicates, Inc. hereinafter referred to as the
"Consultant";
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a
consulting firm to provide services with respect to the 2016 Comprehensive Water System Plan
Update
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and
between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material
necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of
Services that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for
services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full
compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies,
equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be
on a time and expense basis as set forth on the fee schedule found in Exhibit B, provided, in no
event shall the payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of
$157,576.
B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each
voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City biweekly during the
progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed
in conjunction with the City's warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that
has not been submitted to the City Engineer three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such
late vouchers will be checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment
cycle.
C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three years after final
payment. Copies shall be made available upon request.
Packet Page 93 of 192
3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data
and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the
services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property of the
Consultant, provided, however, that:
A. All final reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the Consultant
shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and
shall at that date become the property of the City.
B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review
and copy any work product during normal office hours. Documents prepared under this
agreement and in the possession of the Consultant may be subject to public records request and
release under Chapter 42.56 RCW.
C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the
event that this contract shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work
product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination,
shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a
prerequisite to final payment under this contract. The summary of work done shall be prepared at
no additional cost.
4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this
Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals.
5. Indemnification / Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall defend,
indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any
and all claims, injuries, damages, losses, demands, or suits at law or equity arising from the acts,
errors or omissions of the Consultant in the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries
and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction
determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for
damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting
from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees,
and volunteers, the Consultant’s liability, including the duty and cost to defend, hereunder shall
be only to the extent of the Consultant’s negligence.
The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including
RCW 42.23, which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers.
The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant’s
own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense,
the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51
RCW. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain and
keep in force during the terms of the Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following
insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner
pursuant to Title 48 RCW.
Packet Page 94 of 192
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance as required by the State.
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an aggregate amount not
less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including death and property
damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less than one million
dollars ($1,000,000).
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one
million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit.
D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000).
Excepting the Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by
the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant
shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the
Agreement. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required
insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State
of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within
fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to the
City.
The Consultant’s professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under
this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified
elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant’s professional liability to third
parties be limited in any way.
7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex,
sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces of the
United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, or any
other protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification.
8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an
independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or
representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of
the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents,
employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this contract.
9. City approval of work and relationships. Notwithstanding the Consultant's
status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this contract must
meet the approval of the City. During pendency of this agreement, the Consultant shall not
perform work for any party with respect to any property located within the City of Edmonds or
for any project subject to the administrative or quasijudicial review of the City without written
notification to the City and the City’s prior written consent.
Packet Page 95 of 192
10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party
may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such
termination no fewer than ten days in advance of the effective date of said termination.
11. Integration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document,
the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the Fee Schedule attached hereto as
Exibit B. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended
except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written
Agreement and any provision of Exhibits A or B, this Agreement shall control.
12. Changes/Additional Work. The City may engage Consultant to perform
services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to
additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be
liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation
is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are
encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Services, the City understands that a
revision to the Scope of Services and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in
this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render or the City to pay for
services rendered in excess of the Scope of Services in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment
to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties.
13. Standard of Care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary
knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and
any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a
professional manner consistent with sound engineering practices, in accordance with the
schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for
services of the type described in the Scope of Services.
14. Non-waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time
limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any
other provision.
15. Non-assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be
assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City.
16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not
employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for
the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or
resulting from the award of making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the
City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from
the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement
shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including
Packet Page 96 of 192
regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and
licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to
assure quality of services.
The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & O) taxes
which may be due on account of this Agreement.
18. Notices. Notices to the City of Edmonds shall be sent to the following address:
City of Edmonds
121 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc.
2707 Colby Avenue, Suite 1110
Everett, WA 98201
Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice in the
U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed.
DATED THIS _______ DAY OF __________________, 20_____.
CITY OF EDMONDS MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
By By
David O. Earling, Mayor
Its
ATTEST:
________________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Office of the City Attorney
Packet Page 97 of 192
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 20 , before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared , to me known to be the
of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said
instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said
instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
Packet Page 98 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 1
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
CITY OF EDMONDS
COMPREHENSIVE WATER SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE
FEBRUARY 27, 2015
Project Overview and Understanding
Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. (MSA) has developed the following scope of work and fee
estimate for updating the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Water System Plan (Plan). The City
of Edmonds plans to update its water comprehensive plan to provide a capital improvement plan
that will meet the City’s needs and fulfill regulatory requirements governed by the Washington
State Department of Health (DOH) Office of Drinking Water (ODW) and in accordance with
Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 246-290-100. The City’s existing 2010 Water
Comprehensive Plan was approved by DOH in February 2011. To maintain DOH compliance
and a green status for the water system operating permit, the updated plan must be submitted and
approved before February 2017.
MSA understands that the City desires the following with this project:
• Structure the updated water comprehensive plan to include an annual CIP for the next 10
years instead of 6 years, and structure other elements of the plan to enable the City to request
a 10-year approval from DOH, as desired, based on the upcoming modifications to the WAC
that are expected in July 2016.
• Update and address all elements to comply with DOH guidelines, such as documenting
recent system data, analyses, capital improvement projects, financial program, Operations &
Maintenance (O&M) program, water conservation program and supplemental documents.
• Evaluate the existing water system and capital improvements program (projects & budget)
previously developed by MSA. The evaluation will result in an updated capital improvement
program that prioritizes needs during 10-year and 20-year planning periods and provides a
valuable resource for the City to use in budgeting and scheduling future water system
improvements.
• Address any changes in regulations since 2010 such as updates to the Security and
Emergency Response Planning, Municipal Water Law/Water Use Efficiency Rule, Cross
Connection Control, and applicable sections of the WAC.
• The water comprehensive plan update must meet the requirements of the State of
Washington Growth Management Act (GMA) and be consistent with City and Snohomish
County land use policies.
• Complete the plan and obtain DOH approval within a schedule that will enable the City to
maintain a green operating permit.
This project scope of work is organized into the following two phases.
• Phase 1 – Water System Plan Update and Regulatory Review Plan Submittal
• Phase 2 – Regulatory Review Plan Revisions and Final Plan Submittal
Packet Page 99 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 2
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
Phase 1 - Water System Plan Update and Regulatory Review Plan Submittal
The proposed scope of work for the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Water System Plan has
been developed based on our understanding of the work to be performed. MSA’s proposed work
program is organized by the following major tasks:
Task 1 – Project Management and Coordination
Task 2 – DOH Preplanning Conference
Task 3 – Data Collection
Task 4 – Update Water System Plan Chapters
Task 5 – Update Water System Plan Appendices
Task 6 – Develop Draft Water System Plan
Task 7 – City Review Meetings and Presentations
Task 8 – Develop and Distribute Regulatory Review Plan
Detailed descriptions of each major work task follow.
Task 1 – Project Management and Coordination
This task provides for project management and coordination for this project. The detailed
subtasks are as follows:
1.1 Correspondence and Coordination with City - Coordination will be through the City’s
Project Manager. Coordination with the City Project Manager via phone conversations
and e-mail will include the communication of project status, work activities, and issues
requiring City input.
1.2 Staff and Subconsultant Management - MSA’s Project Manager will manage project
staff and subconsultant FCS Group to ensure all work is in conformance with the scope
of work, fee estimate and schedule.
1.3 Invoicing and Progress Reports - MSA’s Project Manager will monitor project costs
and manage budget and billing tasks, including preparation and submission of monthly
invoices and progress reports.
1.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) – Perform in-house quality assurance
reviews of all deliverables.
Task 2 – DOH Preplanning Conference
This task provides for preparation and participating a preplanning conference with DOH. The
detailed subtasks are as follows:
2.1 DOH Preplanning Conference - Prepare for and attend preplanning conference with
City staff and DOH. Prepare meeting minutes to document discussion and key issues.
Packet Page 100 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 3
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
Task 3 – Data Collection
This task provides for data collection and coordination with City staff for implementation of the
project. The detailed subtasks are as follows:
3.1 Data Collection and Review - MSA will coordinate with City during the data collection
process to ensure all information is gathered prior to developing draft report sections.
MSA will prepare a list of data needs and update as data is obtained. MSA will
coordinate with City during the data collection process to ensure all information is
gathered in advance of initiating the work program.
Task 4 – Update Water System Plan Chapters
This task provides for updating each chapter in the Water System Plan. Under this task, draft
sections will be prepared and submitted to the City electronically for review and comments.
Address and respond to City review comments. The detailed subtasks are as follows:
4.1 Executive Summary - Summarize purpose of the Plan, background and changes that
have occurred since the existing Plan was prepared. Summarize key elements of the Plan
upon completion of chapters and appendices.
4.2 Introduction - Update background of the Plan and summarize changes in the water
system planning requirements. Summarize contents and organization of the Plan.
4.3 Water System Description – Update the existing water system information with new
system information not included in the existing Plan. Elements of this subtask will
include:
A. Review related plans and update information relative to the City. Update service
area descriptions and agreements sections. Update description of existing water
system facilities and operation of the water system.
B. Update the water main inventory table to include both pipe diameter and material.
C. Update the following figures:
• Existing Water System
• Existing Water System Hydraulic Profile
• Service Area and Adjacent Water Systems
4.4 Land Use and Population – Using the City’s latest comprehensive plan and Planning
Department data, update land use information, historical population data and population
projections. Elements of this subtask will include:
A. Review latest comprehensive plan and Planning Department data and update land
use information, historical population data and population projections. Include
City’s updated land use figure in the Plan.
Packet Page 101 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 4
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
4.5 Water Demands – Historical water demands will be evaluated to assist in developing
accurate future demand projections for the planning period identified in the Plan.
Elements of this subtask will include:
A. Update historical wholesale water purchase data and tabulate on an annual basis
for each year from 2009 through 2014.
B. Update historical metered consumption data for each customer class and tabulate
on an annual basis for each year from 2009 through 2014.
C. Calculate unaccounted-for water, distribution system leakage, and provide
estimates for non-revenue uses.
D. Calculate water system peaking factors from review and evaluation of hourly and
daily supply and reservoir data from City’s telemetry system. If data available
cannot be used to determine peak demand factors, MSA will utilize DOH
standards and data readily available from similar systems to assign peak demand
factors.
E. Calculate average day demand, peak day demand, and peak hour demand.
F. Develop demand projections on an annual basis for first ten (10) years and as a
single projection for the 20-year period.
G. Calculate equivalent residential units (ERUs) using water consumption and
supply data.
H. Document the City’s past water use efficiency efforts and impact on water usage
over the past several years.
4.6 Policies and Design Criteria - Update this section of the Plan with changes to laws,
policies and design criteria established by regulatory agencies and the City’s adopted
water system policies and design criteria including: water services, water supply and
facility policies and design criteria.
4.7 Water Source and Quality - Update this section of the Plan as required to meet latest
regulations and changes to the system. Elements of this subtask to be updated include:
A. Most recent Alderwood Water District supply agreement.
B. Summary of current water quality monitoring requirements and results from past
years.
C. Summary of City’s Initial Distribution System Evaluation (IDSE) efforts and
results of recent monitoring.
D. Summary of known future drinking water regulations.
Packet Page 102 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 5
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
4.8 Water System Analyses – Perform water system analyses based on updated water
demands to evaluate the existing system and any changes to the system since 2010,
identify system deficiencies and assist in identifying capital improvements. Elements of
this subtask will include:
A. Conduct pressure zone analysis to evaluate zone boundaries and minimum and
maximum pressures.
B. Perform supply analyses to evaluate capability of existing supply facilities to meet
existing and future demands of the system.
C. Perform booster pump station analysis to evaluate capability of the existing Five
Corners Pump Station to meet the existing and future supply requirements.
D. Perform storage analyses to evaluate capability of existing storage facilities to
meet existing and future storage requirements.
E. Perform hydraulic analyses to evaluate the existing distribution system using the
City’s InfoWater hydraulic model, which will be updated separately by MSA
under the On-call Water Modeling Services agreement.
F. Identify proposed improvements, input improvements into the model and perform
hydraulic analyses to confirm sizing and proper identification of improvements.
G. Evaluate pressure reducing stations, interties and SCADA system, noting
improvements completed since 2010.
H. Perform system capacity analyses as required by the Municipal Water Law.
I. Summarize results of hydraulic analyses and prepare a table that includes pressure
and fire flow capabilities with and without proposed improvements.
4.9 Operations and Maintenance - Update this section with changes pertaining to the City’s
latest Operations and Maintenance Program. Elements of this subtask will include:
A. Update changes in staff, certifications and responsibilities.
B. Update list of preventive maintenance tasks as necessary.
C. Update list of recommended operation and maintenance improvements.
D. Update general staffing analysis to identify staffing requirements to achieve all
operation and maintenance tasks.
4.10 Water System Improvements – Improvements identified in the existing water system
plan will be reviewed and identified as completed or not. The City’s capital
improvement program (CIP) will be updated to carry forward improvements previously
Packet Page 103 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 6
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
identified but not completed and new improvements identified herein. Elements of this
subtask will include:
A. Summarize water system improvements completed since 2010.
B. Describe new water system improvements. Water main improvements will be
grouped and described as a whole.
C. Prepare planning level cost estimates for all improvements, utilizing recent
construction bid tab data.
D. Coordinate with City staff to establish criteria for prioritizing and scheduling
improvements. Using the criteria, prioritize and schedule all improvements.
E. Prepare table of all improvements, showing project costs and implementation
schedule.
F. Update the following figure: Proposed Capital Improvements
4.11 Financial Program – MSA will coordinate and work closely with City’s financial
consultant, FCS Group, for this task and integrate the results of the financial analyses into
the Plan. The improvements in the prior task will be used in this task. Elements of this
subtask will include:
A. General Facilities Charge (GFC) Analysis – Update the inventory of existing
assets to reflect the City’s historical investments in infrastructure, as documented
in the City’s fixed asset schedules. Update the estimate of future capital costs
based on the new capital improvement program, consistent with the requirements
established by Section 35.92.025 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW).
Update the applicable customer base used in the calculation, including both an
inventory of existing customers and estimated growth.
B. Revenue Requirement Analysis – Forecast operating revenues and expenses. This
task will include a validation of rate revenue estimates based on recent customer
data, with projections of future rate revenue considering recent trends in water
consumption. The forecast of other revenues and expenses will be based on the
City’s 2015 Budget, with adjustments for anticipated changes in annual operating
costs resulting from capital projects or other factors. Develop capital cost
projections and a related funding strategy based on the City’s planned capital
improvement projects. Estimate the financial impacts of any additional debt
issued as part of the capital funding strategy. This analysis will consider
projections of GFC revenue based on the updated charges derived in the prior
task, planned use of utility reserves, and potential funding from rate revenue. Test
the sufficiency of current system revenues in meeting the system’s needs, as
defined from two perspectives: the ability to meet cash obligations, and the
attainment of any applicable bond coverage requirements. Develop up to three (3)
Packet Page 104 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 7
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
sensitivity analyses to assess rate impacts of changes in service levels, capital
investment levels, revenue levels, debt, or other factors of interest.
C. Preparation of Financial Chapter – Review the City’s financial performance over
the past six years, summarizing noteworthy financial trends. Evaluate the
affordability of the City’s current and proposed water rates, based on median
household income criteria. Draft the financial chapter text, documenting the GFC
analysis and revenue requirement analysis completed in the prior tasks. The
financial chapter will include a discussion of potential funding sources for the
capital improvement program. Submit the draft financial chapter for review by
City management and MSA, and revise to reflect input received from both parties.
D. Meetings and Public Process – Participate in up to six (6) meetings, which may
include: kick-off meeting, progress review meetings, Planning Board meetings,
Council meetings, or other meetings of interest to the City or MSA.
Task 5 – Update Water System Plan Appendices
This task provides for required elements to be included in the appendices, consisting of the most
recent information available. The detailed subtasks are as follows:
5.1 Review Documents Prepared by City – Review the following existing documents
previously prepared by the City and provide recommended improvements to meet current
regulatory requirements.
a. Water Use Efficiency Program
b. Cross Connection Control Program
c. Coliform Monitoring Plan
d. Emergency Response Plan
5.2 Include Documents in Appendix – MSA will include the following information in the
appendix.
a. Agreements
b. Water Facilities Inventory (WFI) Form
c. Water System Facility Data
d. Consistency Statement Checklist
e. SEPA Checklist (to be completed by the City)
f. Water Use Efficiency Program
g. Water System Construction Standards
h. Cross Connection Control Program
i. Fire Code
j. Annual Water Quality Report
k. Coliform Monitoring Plan
l. Water Ordinances
m. Agency Review Comments
Packet Page 105 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 8
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
Task 6 – Develop Draft Water System Plan
This task provides for developing and compiling the Draft Preliminary Comprehensive Water
System Plan for distribution to the City and use in City meetings and workshops. The detailed
subtasks are as follows:
6.1 Draft Plan Development – Produce draft plan sets in both electronic (PDF) and hard
copy formats. Elements of this subtask include:
A. Develop cover, title page, table of contents, and appendices dividers. Format all
documents produced by MSA and FCS Group to be consistent throughout.
B. Combine all chapters, figures, and appendices into one file and convert to PDF
format. Create CD labels and burn up to five (5) copies of WSP on CD.
C. Produce up to seven (7) hard copy sets of WSP and assemble into 3-ring binders.
D. Perform quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) review by senior staff prior to
distribution of WSP.
Task 7 – City Review Meetings and Presentations
This task provides for project meetings and presentations with City staff. The detailed subtasks
are as follows:
7.1 Review Meetings and Presentations – Meet with City staff at project milestones to
review and discuss draft elements; revise Plan per City comments. Prepare for and attend
meetings and presentations with City staff for the Planning Board and City Council. It is
assumed that up to twelve (12) meetings will be attended by MSA. Of these meetings, up
to four (4) will include presentations. MSA will develop graphic materials and
presentations required for the meetings.
7.2 Provide Responses to Questions and Supporting Information – Assist City staff in
providing supporting information and responding in writing to questions and comments
from the City Council and Planning Board during the period of draft plan review and
presentations to the Planning Board and City Council.
Task 8 – Develop and Distribute Regulatory Review Plan
This task provides for developing a complete plan for distribution to regulatory agencies for
review and comment. The detailed subtasks are as follows:
8.1 Develop and Distribute Regulatory Review Plan – Produce “Agency Review” plan
sets, prepare transmittal letters, required forms and send required copies of WSP to
agencies for review and comment. Elements of this subtask include:
A. Produce “Agency Review” plan sets in both electronic (PDF) and hard copy formats,
as required.
Packet Page 106 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 9
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
B. Prepare DOH water system plan submittal form and checklist.
C. Prepare transmittal letters to the DOH, Snohomish County, City of Everett, Seattle
Public Utilities (SPU) and adjacent purveyors (Olympic View Water & Sewer
District, City of Lynnwood, City of Mountlake Terrace, and Alderwood Water &
Wastewater District).
D. Transmit the following: one (1) hard copy and two (2) CDs to the City of Edmonds;
three (3) hard copies to DOH; one (1) hard copy to Snohomish County; one (1) CD to
each of the following agencies: Olympic View Water & Sewer District, City of
Lynnwood, City of Mountlake Terrace, Alderwood Water & Wastewater District,
City of Everett and SPU.
Phase 2 - Regulatory Review Plan Revisions and Final Plan Submittal
The number of comments, number of meetings, and amount of required plan modifications from
the review by DOH and other agencies is difficult to predict. Once all review comments are
received, a more accurate scope of work and fee estimate can be provided to address these
comments, attend meetings, and produce copies of the final plan. However, for budgeting
purposes, a preliminary scope of work and fee estimate for Phase 2 is included with this
submittal.
MSA’s proposed work program for Phase 2 is organized by the following major tasks:
Task 9 – Regulatory Review Comments Responses
Task 10 – Develop Final Plan
Detailed descriptions of each major work task follow.
Task 9 – Regulatory Review Comments Responses
This task provides for the review of comments from regulatory agencies and preparation of
letters with responses, including modifications to the plan, as necessary.
9.1 Review and Respond to Regulatory Review Comments – Review comments received
from DOH and other regulatory agencies and prepare written responses to each agency
that provided comments. Modify the plan and provide supplemental information, as
necessary.
Task 10 – Develop Final Plan
This task will produce a final Comprehensive Water System Plan per the comments and
recommendations compiled from the City and the regulatory agencies. The final plan will be
transmitted to DOH for final approval. The detailed subtasks are as follows:
10.1 Develop Final Plan - Upon receipt of all comments from the City and other reviewing
agencies, the plan will be revised as necessary and the final document produced. Produce
Packet Page 107 of 192
City of Edmonds MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Water System Plan Update
February 2015 Engineers/Planners Page 10
Exh A - Edmonds WSP Update Scope 2-27-15.Docx
copies of final plan in both hard-copy and electronic formats for City’s use and
distribution. Submit final plan to regulatory agencies for final approval. Deliverables
shall include:
• Six (6) hard copies of the Final Plan, bound in three-ring binders.
• Eight (8) electronic copies of the Final Plan in PDF format on CD.
• One (1) electronic copy of the Final Plan in Word on CD for the City’s use.
Estimated Schedule
MSA shall begin work immediately after receipt of all data provided by the City, which allows
for the most efficient use of staff time to proceed with the work program without delays due to
data needs. The schedule for Phase 2 will depend on the time required for the regulatory
agencies to complete their review and provide comments.
Phase 1
Contract & Authorization March 2015
Data Collection April - June 2015
DOH Preplanning Conference April / May 2015
Update Hydraulic Model July - August 2015
Water System Analyses August - November 2015
Update Water System Plan Chapters July 2015 - April 2016
Update Water System Plan Appendices April 2016
Develop Draft Water System Plan April 2016
Council and Planning Board Meetings and Presentations May - June 2016
Develop and Distribute Regulatory Review Plan July 2016
Phase 2
DOH and Other Regulatory Agency Reviews (estimated) July - September 2016
Regulatory Review Comments Responses October - November 2016
Develop Final Plan and Submit to DOH October - November 2016
DOH Review of Responses and Final Plan Approval December 2016
Fee Estimate
MSA proposes to complete the work as detailed above on a time and expenses basis as
summarized in the enclosed Fee Estimate. The total not-to-exceed amount is based on the scope
of work incorporated herein and will not be exceeded without approval and written authorization.
The Fee Estimate is based upon MSA’s current Schedule of Charges as attached.
Packet Page 108 of 192
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF EDMONDS
COMPREHENSIVE WATER SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE
FEE ESTIMATE
MSA LABOR (HOURS)ESTIMATED FEES
Princ. Engr Engr Engr Sr. Tech Admin MSA
IV VII II II Tech Writer I Total
$206 $161 $119 $119 $127 $88 $77 Hours MSA MSA
Lindberg Meyer Asato Walsh Harjala Breakfield Admin Labor Expense
PHASE 1
Task 1 - Project Management & Coordination
1.1 Correspondence and Coordination with City 16 8 24 4,584$ -$ 130$ 4,714$
1.2 Staff and Subconsultant Management 8 8 1,648$ -$ 40$ 1,688$
1.3 Invoicing and Progress Reports 16 8 24 3,912$ -$ 120$ 4,032$
1.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC)24 24 4,944$ -$ 10$ 4,954$
Subtotal 64 8 0 0 0 0 8 80 15,088$ -$ 300$ 15,388$
Task 2 - DOH Preplanning Conference
2.1 DOH Preplanning Conference 6 8 14 2,524$ -$ 80$ 2,604$
Subtotal 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 14 2,524$ -$ 80$ 2,604$
Task 3 - Data Collection
3.1 Data Collection and Review 2 4 12 2 20 2,638$ -$ 85$ 2,723$
Subtotal 2 4 12 0 0 0 2 20 2,638$ -$ 85$ 2,723$
Task 4 - Update Water System Plan Chapters
4.1 Executive Summary 2 2 12 2 18 2,338$ -$ 10$ 2,348$
4.2 Introduction 1 2 4 2 9 1,180$ -$ 10$ 1,190$
4.3 Water System Description 1 2 4 14 2 23 2,958$ -$ 150$ 3,108$
4.4 Land Use and Population 1 4 16 2 23 2,930$ -$ 10$ 2,940$
4.5 Water Demands 6 8 60 2 76 9,840$ -$ 10$ 9,850$
4.6 Policies and Design Criteria 2 2 4 2 10 1,386$ -$ 10$ 1,396$
4.7 Water Source and Quality 3 6 24 2 35 4,616$ -$ 10$ 4,626$
4.8 Water System Analyses 8 12 80 40 2 142 18,036$ -$ 410$ 18,446$
4.9 Operations and Maintenance 1 2 6 2 11 1,418$ -$ 10$ 1,428$
4.10 Water System Improvements 8 16 40 40 22 2 128 16,714$ -$ 630$ 17,344$
4.11 Financial Program 2 2 4 2 10 1,386$ 28,589$ 10$ 29,985$
Subtotal 35 58 254 80 36 22 0 485 62,802$ 28,589$ 1,270$ 92,661$
Task 5 - Update Water System Plan Appendices
5.1 Review Documents Prepared by City 2 4 12 2 20 2,660$ -$ 10$ 2,670$
5.2 Include Documents in Appendix 1 2 4 2 9 1,158$ -$ 120$ 1,278$
Subtotal 3 6 16 0 0 2 2 29 3,818$ -$ 130$ 3,948$
Task 6 - Develop Draft Water System Plan
6.1 Draft Plan Development 6 4 8 12 30 3,756$ -$ 1,100$ 4,856$
Subtotal 6 4 8 0 0 0 12 30 3,756$ -$ 1,100$ 4,856$
Task 7 - City Review Meetings & Presentations
7.1 Review Meetings (up to 8) & Presentations (up to 4)48 12 24 6 8 98 16,054$ -$ 760$ 16,814$
7.2 Responses to Questions and Supporting Information 4 6 16 26 3,694$ -$ 20$ 3,714$
Subtotal 52 18 40 0 6 0 8 124 19,748$ -$ 780$ 20,528$
Task 8 - Develop & Distribute Regulatory Review Plan
8.1 Develop & Distribute Regulatory Review Plan 4 4 12 12 32 3,820$ -$ 1,150$ 4,970$
Subtotal 4 4 12 0 0 0 12 32 3,820$ -$ 1,150$ 4,970$
PHASE 2
Task 9 - Regulatory Review Comments Responses
9.1 Review, Respond to Regulatory Review Comments 4 8 24 2 38 5,122$ -$ 20$ 5,142$
Subtotal 4 8 24 0 0 0 2 38 5,122$ -$ 20$ 5,142$
Task 10 - Develop Final Plan
10.1 Develop Final Plan 4 4 8 4 12 32 3,696$ -$ 1,060$ 4,756$
Subtotal 4 4 8 0 0 4 12 32 3,696$ -$ 1,060$ 4,756$
TOTAL - ALL TASKS 180 122 374 80 42 28 58 884 123,012$ 28,589$ 5,975$ 157,576$
TotalTASKFCS Group
Subs
City of Edmonds
February 27, 2015
Exh B - Edmonds WSP Update Fee 2-27-15.xlsx
Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc.
Engineers/Planners
2015 Water Comp Plan Update
Page 1
Packet Page 109 of 192
EXHIBIT C
Personnel:
Labor will be invoiced by staff classification at the following hourly rates, which are valid from January
1, 2015 through the duration of the project.
Principal Engineer VI $220.00
Principal Engineer V 212.00
Principal Engineer IV 206.00
Principal Engineer III 198.00
Principal Engineer II 191.00
Principal Engineer I 184.00
Professional Engineer IX 177.00
Professional Engineer VIII 169.00
Professional Engineer VII 161.00
Professional Engineer VI 152.00
Professional Engineer V 144.00
Professional Engineer IV 135.00
Engineering Designer IV 135.00
Professional Engineer III 127.00
Engineering Designer III 127.00
Engineering Designer II 119.00
Engineering Designer I 110.00
Technician IV 127.00
Technician III 115.00
Technician II 102.00
Technician I 88.00
Administrative III 95.00
Administrative II 87.00
Administrative I 77.00
Project Expenses:
Expenses incurred in-house that are directly attributable to the project will be invoiced at actual cost.
These expenses include the following:
CADD Hardware/Software $18.00/hour
Modeling and GIS Hardware/Software $10.00/hour
Mileage Current IRS Rate
Postage and Delivery Services At Cost
Printing and Reproduction At Cost
Travel, Lodging and Subsistence At Cost
Outside Services:
Outside technical, professional and other services will be invoiced at actual cost plus
10 percent to cover administration and overhead.
Everett MURRAY, SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
2015 Engineers/Planners
2015 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
Packet Page 110 of 192
AM-7557 4. E.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:Consent
Submitted For:Phil Williams Submitted By:Phil Williams
Department:Public Works
Committee: Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Approving Changes to Capital Priorities in the 2015 Budget for the Wastewater Treatment Plant
Recommendation
Move to approve a budget amendment recognizing an increase in expected revenue from our Waste
Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) partners in the amount of $246,500 and further authorizing these funds
to be made available to the Waste Water Capital Fund for use in replacing a blower unit at the WWTP.
Previous Council Action
On March 10, 2015, the City Council ordered that this agenda item and approval be moved the consent
agenda for the March 17, 2015, business meeting of the City Council. The amendment to the 2015
Budget will be included in the first quarter budget amendments presented by Finance in April.
Narrative
Throughout 2014 the City experienced reliability issues with its primary blower unit at the Waste Water
Treatment Plant (WWTP). Several repairs to this K-Turbo unit were completed under warranty from the
manufacturer. None of these repairs were able to bring the system to a satisfactory level of reliability. The
2015 budget was prepared assuming adequate repairs would eventually be made or a replacement unit
provided under warranty. Early this year it was learned that the manufacturer had gone out of business
suddenly and that no additional parts would be available from them. Their successor in interest, a
company that purchased the technology and intellectual property as well as the manufacturing rights did
not legally take on any of the liabilities for existing units. They have declined to provide a replacement
unit. We have and will continue to explore all options to collect what is owed to the City under the
warranty from the original manufacturer, their successor company, or our own insurance. At this time any
significant recovery seems unlikely. The new company is headquartered off-shore.
In the meantime this unit needs to be replaced. The cost to do so, including purchase, installation,
programming, start-up, and testing is expected to be $480,000. A reasonable contingency for this project
would be $20,000 for a total of $500,000. The City's share would be 50.7% or $253,500. Our partners in
the WWTP would provide the remaining $246,500.
The 2014 Construction contract for Sewer line replacement was budgeted at $3,188,435. Due to poor soil
conditions that would have resulted in significant cost over-runs a large portion of scope was removed
from that project. The unspent budget for the project was carried over to 2015 and discussions continue
with the contractor regarding the necessary deductive reconciliation change order under his contract. The
City is confident that amount will be in excess of $400,000. That excess amount will remain in the Waste
Packet Page 111 of 192
Water Fund (423). This will more than cover the additional City costs associated with the blower
replacement rendering a budget amendment to increase spending authority unnecessary. A budget
amendment is required, however, to recognize the additional $246,500 in revenue expected from our
partners and authorizing it to be placed into and expended from the Waste Water Capital fund.
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Scott Passey 03/12/2015 11:34 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 03/12/2015 11:53 AM
Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 03/12/2015 11:56 AM
Form Started By: Kody McConnell Started On: 03/12/2015 10:49 AM
Final Approval Date: 03/12/2015
Packet Page 112 of 192
AM-7565 5.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:10 Minutes
Submitted By:Scott Passey
Department:City Clerk's Office
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Oath of Office for Newly Promoted Police Sergeant
Recommendation
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Corporal Shane Hawley was promoted to Sergeant on March 1, 2015. Tonight he will take the oath of
office before the City Council.
Form Review
Form Started By: Scott Passey Started On: 03/12/2015 03:28 PM
Final Approval Date: 03/12/2015
Packet Page 113 of 192
AM-7564 7.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:30 Minutes
Submitted By:Scott Passey
Department:City Clerk's Office
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Public Facilities District (PFD)/Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA) Update
Recommendation
This item is presented for information only.
Previous Council Action
Narrative
PFD/ECA representatives will provide an update on their programs, services, and financial position.
Form Review
Form Started By: Scott Passey Started On: 03/12/2015 03:18 PM
Final Approval Date: 03/12/2015
Packet Page 114 of 192
AM-7561 8.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:30 Minutes
Submitted For:Planning Board Submitted By:Rob Chave
Department:Planning
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Planning Board Update
Recommendation
N/A
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
This is a periodic update from the Planning Board on their current work and activities. The report is
scheduled to be presented by Chair Neil Tibbott and Vice-Chair Phil Lovell.
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Scott Passey 03/12/2015 02:24 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 03/12/2015 03:40 PM
Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 03/12/2015 03:44 PM
Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 03/12/2015 01:49 PM
Final Approval Date: 03/12/2015
Packet Page 115 of 192
AM-7560 9.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:30 Minutes
Submitted For:Shane Hope Submitted By:Rob Chave
Department:Planning
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Public Hearing on Draft Culture & Urban Design Element - Comprehensive Plan Update
Recommendation
Consider information, including any public testimony, on the Draft Community Culture & Urban Design
Element.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
This is a public hearing on the draft Community Culture & Urban Design Element of the Comprehensive
Plan, which is part of the 2015 Update of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. The main changes to the
element involve improvements to the narrative and an attempt to consolidate all design-related goals and
policies rather than having them spread throughout the plan (e.g. downtown design material was
previously in the Land Use Element, but has now been moved into the Urban Design section). The
current Planning Board draft of the element is contained in Exhibit 1, with a version showing all edits in
Exhibit 2. Planning Board minutes are contained in Exhibit 3.
BACKGROUND
The Comprehensive Plan is being updated to meet the state deadline of mid-2015. The main focus is
refreshing data and "cleaning up" or simplifying information, as appropriate. Each element is being
considered sequentially, but no proposed changes will be final until the whole draft Comprehensive
Plan--with all updated elements--can be considered this summer.
NEXT STEPS
- March 17: Public hearing by City Council
- March 24: Study session for City Council to further discuss and provide any comments on this element
- Ongoing work to update other Comprehensive Plan elements (now through June 2015 or thereabouts)
- Consideration of the whole draft Comprehensive Plan in public hearings by the Planning Board and City
Council (June 2015)
Attachments
Exhibit 1: Draft element (clean version)
Exhibit 2: Draft element (markup version)
Packet Page 116 of 192
Exhibit 3: Planning Board minutes
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
City Clerk Scott Passey 03/12/2015 02:24 PM
Mayor Dave Earling 03/12/2015 03:40 PM
Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 03/12/2015 03:44 PM
Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 03/12/2015 01:21 PM
Final Approval Date: 03/12/2015
Packet Page 117 of 192
Community Culture and Urban Design Element
Community Culture
General. Edmonds is one of the oldest settlements in the southwest county area. It lies within
territory once attributed to the Snohomish, Suquamish and Snoqualmie tribes, all of whom spoke
Coast Salish languages. Later explorations were made by both British and Americans. Certain
geographical areas and sites within Edmonds have special significance because of historical,
archeological, architectural, recreational, social, cultural and scenic importance. Contemporary
Edmonds has a reputation as an arts community with strong local organizations supporting visual,
performing and literary arts.
The citizens of Edmonds recognize the historic significance of culture, environment, arts, beauty, and
recreation in our geographic area. A number of professional, non-profit, and volunteer organizations
exist to ensure that these combined elements remain a vital part of the community’s heritage and
quality of life.
Cultural facilities in the City of Edmonds can be divided into three categories:
• Those funded, supported and maintained by private groups and organizations such as the
Edmonds Theater, the Phoenix Theatre, and the various art galleries and art-related
businesses in town;
• Facilities operated and maintained in public/private partnership such as the Historical
Museum, the Wade James Theatre, and ArtWorks at Old Public Works; and,
• Public facilities such as Sno-Isle Regional Library, the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA),
and the Frances Anderson Community Cultural Center.
Outdoor public gathering spaces include:
• Specific parks and sites such as the Hazel Miller Plaza, Edmonds Library Plaza, Frances
Anderson Center amphitheater and the City Park Pavilion, and
• Corridors such as the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor.
Outdoor gathering spaces provide venues for performing, visual and literary events and opportunities
for inclusion of public art. The 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Plan (2009) was developed to enhance
Edmonds’ reputation as a cultural destination and stimulate economic activity in the downtown
through redevelopment of the public right of way to encourage pedestrian flow between the Edmonds
Center for the Arts and downtown retail. The plan includes art elements in a curbless roadway design
as well as incorporation of public art and interpretive elements highlighting local history along the
corridor (see Appendix ##).
The City has a current Community Cultural Plan (2014), adopted by reference as a part of the
Comprehensive Plan, which provides the vision, goals and implementation strategies for the cultural
development of the community. The Community Cultural Plan points to incorporation of public art
Packet Page 118 of 192
and quality design to increase public use and enjoyment of public facilities, spaces, and gateways to
the community.
Historic preservation is an important facet of community culture. The City has an inventory of
various historic buildings and sites. The Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission has been
established to promote historic preservation in the community and encourage owners of historically
significant properties to voluntarily add them to the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. The
Commission partners with other arts and historical organizations, such as the Edmonds South
Snohomish County Historical Society and Museum, in pursuing its mission.
The Community Culture component of the Comprehensive Plan has five goals emphasizing historic,
recreational, social, cultural facilities, and scenic values. Each goal is listed below and followed by
specific policies.
Community Culture Goal A. Encourage the identification, maintenance and preservation of
historical sites in accordance with the following policies:
A.1 Continue to support an historic preservation program to identify and preserve the
city’s historic architectural, archeological and cultural resources for future
generations to study and enjoy.
A.2 Work with other public agencies and the local historical society to determine
priorities and incentives for identifying and preserving historic sites. Incentives
encouraging the adaptive use of historic buildings should be integrated into City
codes and development standards.
A.3 Continue to maintain and expand its inventory of historic sites.
A.4 Use a variety of means to promote public awareness and recognition of the value of
historic resources, especially those listed on the City’s Register of Historic Places.
Look for opportunities to partner with other historical, cultural, or arts
organizations to jointly promote the City’s historic and cultural resources.
A.5 Additions or alterations to significant architectural buildings should conform to the
style and period of the initial construction as much as possible. Development of
adjacent properties should be encouraged to be sympathetic to listed historic sites
by acknowledging and including historic forms, materials, and architectural details
in their design.
A.6 Encourage the adoption of incentives and flexible standards to promote the
adaptive use and restoration of historic properties.
A.7 Maintain a strategic plan to help guide the priorities and activities of the Edmonds
Historic Preservation Commission.
Community Culture Goal B. Encourage recreational opportunities.
B.1 Encourage public access to significant recreational areas and development of
pedestrian friendly connections between areas.
Packet Page 119 of 192
B.2 Significant recreational areas would include, but not be limited to: Puget Sound
Shorelines, Lake Ballinger, Edmonds Marsh, Yost Park, Lund's Gulch, etc.
B.3 Compatible land uses should be made of surrounding areas.
B.4 Promote public awareness and recognition of the value of these resources.
Community Culture Goal C. Identify and maintain significant public and private social areas.
C.1 Compatible land uses should be made of surrounding lands including potential for
incorporation of public art elements.
C.2 Pursue public and private funding for such social areas such as: Senior Center,
Frances Anderson Center, Edmonds Center for the Arts, Edmonds Museum, Wade
James Theatre, Maplewood Rock and Gem Club House, and public plazas.
Community Culture Goal D. Identify, maintain and develop cultural facilities – both public and
private – in a wide variety of areas, including drama, dance, music, visual arts, literary arts, theaters,
museums, and library.
D.1 Encourage compatible land uses surrounding cultural sites including potential for
incorporation of public art elements.
D.2 Pursue public and private funding to develop and operate cultural facilities.
D.3 Cultural sites would include, but not be limited to: the Wade James Theatre, the
Edmonds Center for the Arts, Frances Anderson Center and amphitheater,
Museum, Edmonds Theater, Masonic Hall, Old Public Works, and Sno-Isle
Library.
Community Culture Goal E. Identify, maintain and enhance scenic areas throughout the city.
E.1 Identify and inventory scenic areas and features within the city which contribute to
the overall enjoyment of the environment for both residents and visitors.
E.2 Incorporate scenic and aesthetic design features, such as public art, into the
development of public projects.
E.3 Preserve scenic features whenever possible in the development of public projects.
E.4 Use environmental and urban design review of development projects to avoid or
mitigate impacts to identified scenic features.
Packet Page 120 of 192
Urban Design
General. The man-made environment is an expression of human culture and reflects, in physical
form, the social values of the members of the community. The manner in which the man-made
elements are integrated into the natural environment helps create the community’s special
characteristics and contribute to the quality of life in Edmonds.
The beauty and variety of the natural surroundings in Edmonds and the historical development of the
City have combined to create an interesting and visually attractive community.
However, unsightly development – of poor quality or design – does exist in the City.. Aging
buildings in some parts of the City can create an aesthetic problem if they are not maintained.
Retaining historic buildings can positively reinforce the character of an area such as downtown. The
strip type of development along Highway 99 has often resulted in economic underdevelopment of
private properties that end up being aesthetically displeasing.
Although utility wires are placed underground where new development takes place, overhead wires
still exist in most of the older parts of the City where they interfere with views and create visual
blight.
Commercial signs contribute to the color and variety of community life as well as providing an
important function but they may also create discordant and unsightly conditions where they are
excessive or of poor design.
Street landscaping has been utilized in the past on a limited basis. However, in many areas, parking
lots, access roads, streets and buildings can be better integrated with the landscape.
Design Goals and Objectives. The general design objectives provided with this goal are intended to
provide general guidance, while the subsequent design objectives (Goals B, C and D) for specific
locations or situations are intended to supplement the general objectives and add more guidance for
those specific situations.
General Design Goal A. Design goals and objectives are intended to provide a set of tools for the
City to use to guide future development to result in high quality, well-designed, and sensitive projects
that reflect the values of the citizens of Edmonds. The goals and related objectives contained in this
section are intended to:
• improve the physical appearance and character of Edmonds,
• improve retail and pedestrian circulation options,
• improve business opportunities,
• protect natural environments using sustainable design practices,
• protect and enhance the residential character of Edmonds.
Design Objectives for Site Design. The development of parking lots, pedestrian
walkways and landscaping features is an integral part of how a building interacts with its
site and its surrounding environment. Good design and site planning improves access by
pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles, minimizes potential negative impacts to adjacent
Packet Page 121 of 192
development, reinforces the character and activities within a district and builds a more
cohesive and coherent physical environment.
A.1 Vehicular Access. Reduce the numbers and width of driveways (curb cuts) in order
to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety.
A.2 Layout of Parking. Locating buildings in proximity to the street to facilitate direct
pedestrian access and help define the street edge. Parking should be placed to the
side and rear.
A.3 Connections On- and Offsite. Design site access and circulation within and
between sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Special
attention should be paid to providing and improving connections to transit.
A.4 Building Entry Location. Building entries should be configured to provide clear
entry points to buildings, be oriented to pedestrian walkways/pathways, and
support the overall intent of the streetscape environment. Space at the entry for
gathering or seating is desirable for residential or mixed use buildings.
A.5 Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of each
neighborhood area and provide a common street frontage tieing each site to its
neighbor. Setbacks should be appropriate to the desired streetscape, providing for
transition areas between public streets and private building entries where a variety
of activities and amenities can occur.
A.6 Open Space. For residential settings, create green spaces to enhance the visual
attributes of the development and provide places for interaction, play, seating, and
other activities.
A.7 Building/Site Identity. Improve pedestrian access and way-finding by providing
variety in building forms, colors, materials and individuality of buildings.
A.8 Weather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries for pedestrian weather
protection.
A.9 Lighting. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all areas used by
automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians – including building entries, walkways,
parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces – to support activity and
security.
A.10 Signage. Encourage signage that provides clear information and direction for
properties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from becoming
cluttered. Encourage the use of graphics and symbols in signage to support the
city’s emphasis on uniqueness and the arts.
A.11 Site Utilities, Storage, Trash and Mechanical Systems. Minimize the noise, odor
and visual impacts of utility systems using such features as landscaping, building
forms, or integrated design.
Packet Page 122 of 192
A.12 Integrating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape features and unique landforms
– such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees – into site design whenever
possible.
A.13 Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as fences to
maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses. These
buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the
perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes.
Native plants and rain gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and
runoff retention areas.
Design Objectives for Building Form. Building height and modulation guidelines are
essential to create diversity in building forms, minimize shadows cast by taller buildings
upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure compliance with policies in the city’s
Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public parks and building entries as well as
street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are an important part of Edmonds
character and urban form.
A.14 Building Form. Encourage new construction to avoid repetitive, monotonous
building forms.
A.15 Massing. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildings by encouraging human
scale elements in building design and/or by subdividing building masses vertically
or horizontally.
A.16 Roof Modulation. Use roof forms to help identify different programs or functional
areas within the building and support differentiation of building form and massing.
Roof design, in combination with wall modulation, can allow for additional light to
enter buildings or pedestrian spaces.
A.17 Wall Modulation. Variation in materials, decorative elements, or other features
should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments and streetscapes, or
to help break up large building masses to keep in scale with the surrounding
environment.
Design Objectives for Building Façade. Building facade objectives ensure that the
exterior of a building – the portion of a building that defines the character and visual
appearance of a place – is of high quality and demonstrates the strong sense of place and
integrity valued by the residents of the City of Edmonds.
A.18 Building Façade Design. Encourage building façades that reinforce the appearance
and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting diversity and identity in
building design.
A.19 Window Variety and Articulation. Use window size and placement to help define
the scale and character of the building. Use the organization and combinations of
window types to reinforce the streetscape character or to provide variation in a
façade, as well as provide light and air to the building interior.
Packet Page 123 of 192
A.20 Variation in Facade Materials. Employ variation in materials, colors or design
elements on building façades to help define the scale and style of the structure.
Variation in façade materials can help reduce the apparent bulk of larger buildings
while allowing variety and individuality of building design.
Urban Design Goals and Objectives for Specific Areas. In addition to the general design goal and
objectives described above under Goal A, supplemental design objectives are outlined below for
specific areas or districts within the city.
Urban Design Goal B: Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. Design objectives and standards
should be carefully crafted for the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center to encourage its unique
design character and important place-making status within the city.
B.1 Vehicular Access and Parking. Driveways and curb cuts should be minimized to
assure a consistent and safe streetscape for pedestrians. When alleys are present,
these should be the preferred method of providing vehicular access to a property
and should be used unless there is no reasonable alternative available.
Configuration of parking should support a “park and walk” policy that provides
adequate parking while minimizing impacts on the pedestrian streetscape.
B.2 Pedestrian Access and Connections. Improve pedestrian access
from the street by locating buildings close to the street and
sidewalks, and defining the street edge. Cross walks at key
intersections should be accentuated by the use of special
materials, signage or paving treatments. Transit access and
waiting areas should be provided where appropriate.
B.3 Building Entry Location. Commercial building entries should
be easily recognizable and oriented to the pedestrian
streetscape by being located at sidewalk grade.
B.4 Building Setbacks. Create a common street frontage view with enough repetition to
tie each site to its neighbor. Encourage the
creation of public spaces to enhance the
visual attributes of the development and
encourage outdoor interaction. In the
Waterfront area west of the railroad, buildings
should be set back from the waterfront to
preserve and provide a buffer from existing
beach areas. In the Waterfront area, site
layout should be coordinated with existing
buildings and proposed improvements to
provide views of the water, open spaces, and easy pedestrian access to the beach.
B.5 Building/Site Identity. In the downtown area, retain a connection with the scale and
character of downtown through the use of similar materials, proportions, forms,
masses or building elements. Encourage new construction to use design elements
tied to historic forms or patterns.
Packet Page 124 of 192
B.6 Weather Protection. Provide a
covered walkway for pedestrians
traveling along public sidewalks or
walkways.
B.7 Signage. Lighting of signs should be indirect or minimally
backlit to display lettering and symbols or graphic design
instead of broadly lighting the face of the sign. Signage
using graphics or symbols or that contributes to the historic
character of a building should be encouraged.
B.8 Art and Public Spaces. Public art and amenities such as mini
parks, flower baskets, street furniture, etc., should be
provided as a normal part of the public streetscape. Whenever possible, these
elements should be continued in the portion of the private streetscape that adjoins
the public streetscape. In the 4th Avenue Arts Corridor, art should be a common
element of building design, with greater design flexibility provided when art is
made a central feature of the design.
B.9 Building Height. Create and preserve a human scale for downtown buildings.
Building frontages along downtown streetscapes should be pedestrian in scale.
B.10 Massing. Large building masses should be subdivided or softened using design
elements that emphasize the human scale of the streetscape. Building façades
should respect and echo historic patterns along downtown pedestrian streets.
B.11 Building Façade. Provide a human scale streetscape, breaking up long façades into
defined forms that continue a pattern of individual and distinct tenant spaces in
commercial and mixed use areas. Avoid blank, monotonous and imposing building
facades using design elements that add detail and emphasize the
different levels of the building (e.g. the top or cornice vs. the
pedestrian level or building base).
B.12 Window Variety and Articulation. In the downtown retail and
mixed commercial districts, building storefronts should be
dominated by clear, transparent glass windows that allow and
encourage pedestrians to walk past and look into the
commercial space. Decorative trim and surrounds should be
encouraged to add interest and variety. Upper floors of
buildings should use windows as part of the overall design to encourage rhythm
and accents in the façade.
Urban Design Goal C: Highway 99 Corridor. Additional Design Objectives for the Highway 99
Corridor should support its function as a locus of commercial and potential mixed use activity,
building on the availability of multiple forms of transportation and its proximate location to
surrounding neighborhoods.
Packet Page 125 of 192
C.1 General Appearance and Identity. Design of buildings and spaces along Highway
99 should encourage a feeling of identity associated with different sections of the
highway.
C.2 Site Design. Site design should allow for vechicular access and parking as well as
safe access and circulation for pedestrians. Whenever possible, sites should provide
connections between adjacent businesses and between businesses and nearby
residential neighborhoods.
C.3 Landscaping and Buffering. Landscaping, fencing or other appropriate techniques
should be used to soften the street front of sites and also used to buffer more
intensive uses from adjoining less intensive use areas (e.g. buffer commercial from
residential development).
Urban Design Goal D: Neighborhood Commercial Areas. Design in neighborhood commercial
areas should seek to support the function of the neighborhood center while paying close attention to
its place within the neighborhood setting.
D.1 Landscape and Buffering. Special attention should be paid to transitions from
commercial development to surrounding residential areas, using landscaping and/or
gradations in building scale to provide compatible development.
Streetscape and Street Trees
General. “Streetscape” is a term that refers to the street environment, often including pedestrian features,
landscaping, lighting, pavement materials, and signage. The streetscape plays an important role in the
livability and character of Edmonds. Public streets, with their associated walkways and pedestrian spaces,
provide the places for people to interact with their neighbors, accommodate public events and commerce,
promote human needs for enjoyment and exercise, and can improve the ecological function of the city.
When designed properly, the streetscape complements the urban design elements incorporated into the
development of private property.
A Streetscape Plan was developed in 2002 by the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department
and updated in 2006. It focused on the public realm along streets, certain areas of the City such as the 4th
Avenue Arts Corridor, Highway 99 International area, and downtown.
In 2011, the City adopted a ‘Complete Streets’ program that prioritizes accommodating the needs of all
users – including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit and individual vehicles – in transportation projects. The
intent is to create safe environments for people of all ages and abilities while improving transportation
options and connections between the City’s destinations and centers of activity. A complete streets
approach can improve the ability of residents and visitors to experience the City in a variety of ways
while improving environmental quality, enhancing economic activity, and promoting healthy lifestyle.
Where feasible, street trees or other landscaping located between the travel lane and the sidewalk can
improve the pedestrian experience.
This section has a key goal and several policies specifically related to streetscape and street trees within
the public right of way.
Packet Page 126 of 192
Goals and Policies
Streetscape and Street Trees Goal A. Enhance the public realm through streetscape and street tree
choices.
A.1. Encourage inprovments to streets that link parks, open spaces, recreation centers,
employment centers, and transportation nodes.
A.2. Balance the need for short-term parking for shoppers and loading for businesses
with the need for pedestrian-oriented design, especially downtown.
A.3. As opportunities arise, provide for sustainable streetscapes that can enhance the
natural environment, help ensure safety, and complement the characteristics of
the neighborhood or district in which they are located.
A.4. Promote the planting and maintainence of landscaping and street trees to enhance
City gateways and connections; strengthen the character and identify of
downtown and other retail/commercial centers; and improve the pedestrian
environment.
A.5. Seek to maintain and retain existing healthy trees in the rights-of-way without
sacrificing public safety or public infrastructure or encouraging a hazard or
nuisance.
A.6. Selecting trees for planting in the public rights-of-way should be based on a
variety of factors, such as aesthetics, safety, maintainence, size, spacing,
longevity, location, utilities, habitat compatibility, and other appropriate factors.
Implementation Actions
Implementation actions are steps that are intended to be taken within a specified timeframe to
address high priority Streetscape and Street Tree goals. The actions identified here are
specifically called out as being important, but are not intended to be the only actions or measures
that may be used by the City.
Action 1: Develop an update to the Street Tree Plan by the end of 2016.
Action 2: Develop an Urban Forest Management Plan by the end of 2017.
Packet Page 127 of 192
Community Culture and Urban Design Element
Community Culture
General. Edmonds is one of the oldest settlements in the southwest county area. It lies within
territory once attributed to the Snohomish, Suquamish and Snoqualmie tribes, all of whom spoke
Coast Salish languages. Native Americans made occasional use of the beach areas and lLater
explorations were made by both British and Americans. Certain geographical areas and sites within
Edmonds have special significance because of historical, archeological, architectural, recreational,
social, cultural and scenic importance. Contemporary Edmonds has a reputation as an arts community
with strong local organizations supporting visual, performing and literary arts.
The citizens of Edmonds recognize the historic significance of culture, environment, arts, beauty, and
recreation in our geographic area. A number of professional, non-profit, and volunteer organizations
exist to ensure that these combined elements remain a vital part of the community’s heritage and
quality of life.
Cultural facilities in the City of Edmonds can be divided into two three categories:
• Those funded, supported and maintained by private groups and organizations such as Wade
James Theatrethe Edmonds Theater, the Phoenix Theatre, and the various art galleries and
art-related businesses in town;, and
• Facilities operated and maintained in public/private partnership such as the Historical
Museum, the Wade James Theatre, and ArtWorks at Old Public Works; and,
Public facilities such as Sno-Isle Regional Library, the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA), the
Historical Museum, and the Frances Anderson Community Cultural Center, etc.
•
Outdoor public gathering spaces include:
• Specific parks and sites such as the Hazel Miller Plaza, Edmonds Library Plaza, Frances
Anderson Center amphitheater and the City Park Pavilion, and
• Corridors such as the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor.
Outdoor gathering spaces provide venues for performing, visual and literary events and
opportunities for inclusion of public art. The 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Plan (2009) was
developed to enhance Edmonds’ reputation as a cultural destination and stimulate economic activity
in the downtown through redevelopment of the public right of way to encourage pedestrian flow
between the Edmonds Center for the Arts and downtown retail. The plan includes art elements in a
curbless roadway design as well as incorporation of public art and interpretive elements highlighting
local history along the corridor (see Appendix ##).
Packet Page 128 of 192
M. Because of community emphasis on both the performing and visual arts, community housing for
such events becomes increasingly important to the citizens of Edmonds. The City has completed a a
current Community Cultural Plan (2014), adopted by reference as a part of the Comprehensive Plan,
which provides the vision, goals and implementation strategies for the cultural development of the
community. The Community Cultural Plan points to incorporation of public art and quality design to
increase public use and enjoyment of public facilities, spaces, and gateways to the community.
Goal - Historical
Historic preservation is an important facet of community culture. The City has an inventory of
various historic buildings and sites. The Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission has been
established to promote historic preservation in the community and encourage owners of historically
significant properties to voluntarily add them to the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. The
Commission partners with other arts and historical organizations, such as the Edmonds South
Snohomish County Historical Society and Museum, in pursuing its mission.
The Community Culture component of the Comprehensive Plan has five goals emphasizing
historic, recreational, social, cultural facilities, and scenic values. Each goal is listed below and
followed by specific policies.
N. Community Culture Goal A.. Encourage the identification, maintenance and preservation of
historical sites in accordance with the following policies:
N.1. A.1 The City should cContinue to support an historic preservation program to
identify and preserve the city’s historic architectural, archeological and cultural
resources for future generations to study and enjoy.
N.2. A.2 The City should wWork with other public agencies and the local
historical society to determine priorities and incentives for identifying and
preserving historic sites. Incentives encouraging the adaptive use of historic
buildings should be integrated into City codes and development standards.
N.3. A.3 The City should cContinue to maintain and expand its inventory of
historic sites.
N.4. A.4 Use a variety of means to Written narratives and visual aids should be
made available for sites listed on the City’s register of historic places to promote
public awareness and recognition of the value of these historic resources, especially
those listed on the City’s Register of Historic Places. Look for opportunities to
partner with other historical, cultural, or arts organizations to jointly promote the
City’s historic and cultural resources. This should also include providing markers
and maps for identifying and promoting these sites as visual and cultural assets
within the community.
N.5. A.5 Additions or alterations to significant architectural buildings should
conform to the style and period of the initial construction as much as possible.
Development of adjacent properties should be encouraged to be sympathetic to
listed historic sites by acknowledging and including historic forms, materials, and
architectural details in their design.
Packet Page 129 of 192
N.6. A.6 Conversion/Adaptive Reuse. Part of the direction of the updated plans
and regulations for the Downtown Waterfront area is to provide more flexible
standards that can help businesses move into older buildings and adapt old homes
to commercial or mixed use spaces. An example is the ability of buildings on the
Edmonds Register of Historic Places to get an exception for parking for projects
that retain the historic character of the site. Encourage the adoption of Further
incentives and flexible standards to promote the adaptive use and restoration of
historic properties should be pursued.
O. A.7 The report and recommendations included in ‘A Historic Survey of
Downtown Edmonds’ by BOLA Architecture (February 2005) shall be studied and
used as the basis for development of a Historical Preservation Plan to be included
in a future Comprehensive Plan updateMaintain a strategic plan to help guide the
priorities and activities of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission.
P. Community Culture Goal B. Goal - Encourage Rrecreational opportunities.
P.1. B.1 Encourage public access to significant recreational areas and
development of pedestrian friendly connections between areas..
P.2. B.2 Significant recreational areas would include, but not be limited to: Puget
Sound Shorelines, Lake Ballinger, Edmonds Marsh, Yost Park, University
Properties, Lund's Gulch, etc.
B.3 Compatible land uses should be made of surrounding areas.
P.3. B.4 Promote public awareness and recognition of the value of these
resources.
Q. Community Culture Goal C. Goal - Social. Identify and maintain significant public and private
social areas in accordance with the following policies:.
Q.1. C.1 Compatible land uses should be made of surrounding lands including
potential for incorporation of public art elements.
Q.2. C.2 Pursue public and private funding for such social areas such as: Senior
Center, Frances Anderson Center, Edmonds Center for the Arts, Edmonds
Museum, Wade James Theatre, Maplewood Rock and Gem Club House, and
public plazas.
R. Community Culture Goal D. Goal - Cultural. Identify, maintain and develop cultural facilities –
both public and private – in a wide variety of the areas, of including drama, dance, music, visual arts,
literary arts, theaters, museums, and library.etc. in accordance with the following policies:
R.1. D.1 Encourage compatible land uses surrounding cultural sites including
potential for incorporation of public art elements.
Packet Page 130 of 192
R.2. D.2 Pursue public and private funding to develop and operate such cultural
facilities.
R.3. D.3 Cultural sites would include, but not be limited to: the Wade James
Theatreer, the Edmonds Center for the Arts, Frances Anderson Center and
amphitheater, Museum, Edmonds TheatreTheater, Masonic Hall, Old Public
Works, and Sno-Isle Library.etc.
S. Community Culture Goal E. Goal - Scenic. Identify, maintain and enhance scenic areas
throughout the city in accordance with the following policies:.
S.1. E.1 Identify and inventory scenic areas and features within the city which
contribute to the overall enjoyment of the environment for both residents and
visitors.
S.2. E.2 Incorporate scenic and aesthetic design features, such as public art, into
the development of public projects.
S.3. E.3 Preserve scenic features whenever possible in the development of public
projects.
S.4. E.4 Use environmental and urban design review of development projects to
avoid or mitigate impacts to identified scenic features.
Packet Page 131 of 192
Urban Design: General Objectives
A. General. The man-made environment is an expression of human culture and reflects, in physical
form, the social values of the members of the community.
The manner in which the man-made elements are incorporated integrated into the natural
environment helps creates the community’s special characteristics which identify a community and
contribute to the quality of life in that communityEdmonds.
The beauty and variety of the natural surroundings in Edmonds and the historical development of the
City have combined to create an interesting and visually attractive community.
However, unsightly development – of poor quality and or design – does exist in the City. and may
occur in the future. Aging buildings in some parts of the City, primarily downtown, can also create
an aesthetic problem if they are not maintained. Retaining Removal or poor restoration of
olderhistoric buildings can alters positively reinforce the character of an area such as the downtown
area. The historical and typical strip type of development along Highway 99 has often resulted in
economic and aesthetic underdevelopment of private properties that end up being aesthetically
displeasing.
Although utility wires are placed underground where new development takes place, overhead wires
still exist in most of the older parts of the City where they interfere with views and create visual
blight.
Commercial signs contribute to the color and variety of community life as well as providing an
important function but they may also create discordant and unsightly conditions where they are of
excessive or of poor design.
Street landscaping has been utilized in the past on a limited basis. However, in many areas, parking
lots, access roads, streets and buildings are poorlycan be better integrated with the landscape.
Design Goals and Objectives. The general design objectives provided with this goal are intended to
provide general guidance, while the subsequent design objectives (Goals B, C and D) for specific
locations or situations are intended to supplement the general objectives and add more guidance for
those specific situations.
DGeneral Design Objectives for Site DesignGoal A. Design goals and objectives are a intended to
provide a set of tools for city staff, the ADB, City Council, and the Hearing Examiner the City to use
to direct guide future development in the city to result in high quality, well-designed, and sensitive
projects that reflect the values of the citizens of Edmonds. The goals and related objectives contained
in this section are intended to:
• improve the physical appearance and character of Edmonds,
• improve retail and pedestrian circulation options,
• improve business opportunities,
• protect natural environments using sustainable design practices,
Packet Page 132 of 192
• protect and enhance the single-family residential character of Edmonds.
The development of parking lots, pedestrian walkways and landscaping features is
an integral part of how a building interacts with its site and its surrounding
environment. Design Objectives for Site Design. The development of parking lots,
pedestrian walkways and landscaping features is an integral part of how a building
interacts with its site and its surrounding environment. Good design and site planning
improves access by pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles, minimizes potential negative
impacts to adjacent development, reinforces the character and activities within a district
and builds a more cohesive and coherent physical environment.
A.1 Design Objectives for Vehicular Access. Reduce the numbers and width of
driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety.
A.2 Reduce the numbers of driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian,
bicycle and auto safety by reducing the number of potential points of conflict.
Provide safe routes for disabled people.
Improve streetscape character to enhance pedestrian activity in retail/multi-family/
commercial areas.
Design Objectives for Location And Layout of Parking. Locating buildings in proximity
to the street to facilitate direct pedestrian access and help define the street edge.
Parking should be placed to the side and rear.
A.3 Create adequate parking for each development, but keep the cars from dominating
the streetscape.
Improve pedestrian access from the street by locating buildings closer to the street and
defining the street edge.
Improve the project’s visibility from the street by placing parking to side and rear.
Provide direct pedestrian access from street, sidewalk, and parking.
Integrate pedestrian and vehicular access between adjacent developments.
Design Objectives for Pedestrian Connections On- and Offsite. Design site access and
circulation within and between sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians,
vehicles, and bicycles. Special attention should be paid to providing and improving
connections to transit.
A.4 Design the site access and circulation routes with pedestrians’ comfort and ease of
access in mind.
Create parking lots and building service ways that are efficient and safe for both
automobiles and pedestrians.
Packet Page 133 of 192
Provide direct and safe access along, through and to driveways and adjacent
developments or city streets.
Encourage the use of mass transit by providing easy access to pleasant waiting areas.
Design Objectives for Garage Entry/Door Location.
Ensure pedestrian safety by allowing cars the space to pull out of a garage without
blocking the sidewalk.
Improve pedestrian safety by reducing points of conflict/curb cuts.
Reduce harsh visual impacts of multiple and/or large garage entries/ doors and access
driveways. Reduce the quantity of entries/doors visible to the street.
Design Objectives for Building Entry Location. Building entries should be configured to
provide clear entry points to buildings, be oriented to pedestrian
walkways/pathways, and support the overall intent of the streetscape environment.
Space at the entry for gathering or seating is desirable for residential or mixed use
buildings.
A.5 Create an active, safe and lively street-edge.
Create a pedestrian friendly environment.
Provide outdoor active spaces at entry to retail/commercial uses.
Provide semi-public/private seating area at multi-family and commercial entries to
increase activity along the street.
Design Objectives for Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site
characteristics of each neighborhood area and provide a common street frontage
tieing each site to its neighbor. Setbacks should be appropriate to the desired
streetscape, providing for transition areas between public streets and private
building entries where a variety of activities and amenities can occur.
A.6 To create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of each neighborhood
area.
To create a common street frontage view with enough repetition to tie each site to its
neighbor.
To provide enough space for wide, comfortable and safe pedestrian routes to encourage
travel by foot.
To encourage transition areas between public streets and private building entries where a
variety of activities and amenities can occur.
Packet Page 134 of 192
Design Objectives for Open Space. For residential settings, create green spaces to
enhance the visual attributes of the development and provide places for interaction,
play, seating, and other activities.
A.7 To create green spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and
encourage outdoor interaction.
To provide places for residents and visitors to meet and to interact.
To provide an area for play, seating and other residential activities.
Design Objectives for Building/Site Identity. Improve pedestrian access and way-finding
by providing variety in building forms, colors, materials and individuality of
buildings.
A.8 Do not use repetitive, monotonous building forms and massing in large multi-
family or commercial projects.
Improve pedestrian access and way-finding by providing variety in building forms, color,
materials and individuality of buildings.
Retain a connection with the scale and character of the City of Edmonds through the use
of similar materials, proportions, forms, masses or building elements.
Encourage new construction to use design elements tied to historic forms or patterns
found in the city.
Design Objectives for Weather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries for
pedestrian weather protection.
A.9 Provide a covered walkway for pedestrians traveling along public sidewalks in
downtown.
Protect shoppers and residents from rain or snow.
Provide a covered waiting area and walkway for pedestrians entering a building, coming
from parking spaces and the public sidewalk in all areas of the City.
Design Objectives for Lighting. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all
areas used by automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians – including building entries,
walkways, parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces – to support
activity and security.
A.1.a. A.10 Provide adequate illumination in all areas used by automobiles, bicycles
and pedestrians, including building entries, walkways, parking areas, circulation
areas and other open spaces to ensure a feeling of security.
A.1.b. Minimize potential for light to reflect or spill off-site.
A.1.c. Create a sense of welcome and activity.
Packet Page 135 of 192
A.1.d. Provide adequate lighting for signage panels.
Design Objectives for Signage. Encourage signage that provides clear information and
direction for properties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from
becoming cluttered. Encourage the use of graphics and symbols in signage to
support the city’s emphasis on uniqueness and the arts.
A.11 Protect the streetscape from becoming cluttered.
Minimize distraction from the overuse of advertisement elements.
Provide clear signage for each distinct property.
Use graphics/symbols to reduce the need to have large letters.
Minimize potential for view blockage.
Signs should be related to the circulation element serving the establishment.
Landscaping should be used in conjunction with pole signs for safety as well as
appearance.
Where multiple businesses operate from a central location, tenants should be encouraged
to coordinate signing to avoid the proliferation of signs, each competing with the
others.
Design Objectives for Site Utilities, Storage, Trash and Mechanical Systems. Minimize
the noise, odor and visual impacts of utility systems using such features as
landscaping, building forms, or integrated design.
A.12 Hide unsightly utility boxes, outdoor storage of equipment, supplies, garbage,
recycling and composting.
Minimize noise and odor.
Minimize visual intrusion.
Minimize need for access/paving to utility areas
Design Objectives for SignificantIntegrating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape
features and unique landforms – such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees –
into site design whenever possible.
A.13 Retain significant landscape features and unique landforms such as rock
outcroppings and significant trees.
Limit potential future negative environmental impacts such as erosion, runoff, landslides,
and removal of vegetation and/or habitats.
Buffer incompatible uses.
Packet Page 136 of 192
Integrate buildings into their site by stepping the mass of the building along steep sloping
sites.
Design Objectives for Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as
fences to maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses.
These buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the
perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes.
Native plants and rain gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and
runoff retention areas.
Create a visual barrier between different uses.
Maintain privacy of single family residential areas.
Reduce harsh visual impact of parking lots and cars.
Landscape buffers should reinforce pedestrian circulation routes.
Landscape buffers should not be designed or located in a manner that creates an unsafe pedestrian
environment.
Minimize heat gain from paved surfaces.
Provide treatment of runoff from parking lots.
B. Design Objectives for Building Form.
Building height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversity in building
forms, minimize shadows cast by taller buildings upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure
compliance with policies in the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public
parks and building entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are
an important part of Edmonds character and urban form.
A.14 Design Objectives for HeightBuilding Form. Encourage new construction to avoid
repetitive, monotonous building forms.
A.15 Preserve views to mountains and Puget Sound to the west.
Maintain the smaller scale and character of historic Edmonds.
Minimize blockage of light and air to adjacent properties or to the sidewalk area.
Maintain/protect view from public places and streets.
Design Objectives for Massing. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildings by
encouraging human scale elements in building design and/or by subdividing
building masses vertically or horizontally.
A.16 Encourage human scale elements in building design.
Reduce bulk and mass of buildings.
Packet Page 137 of 192
Masses may be subdivided vertically or horizontally.
Explore flexible site calculations to eliminate building masses that have one story on one
elevation and four or greater stories on another.
Design Objectives for Roof Modulation. Use roof forms to help identify different
programs or functional areas within the building and support differentiation of
building form and massing. Roof design, in combination with wall modulation, can
allow for additional light to enter buildings or pedestrian spaces.
A.17 To break up the overall massing of the roof.
Create human scale in the building.
Use roof forms to identify different programs or functional areas within the building.
Provide ways for additional light to enter the building.
Design Objectives for Wall Modulation. Variation in materials, decorative elements, or
other features should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments and
streetscapes, or to help break up large building masses to keep in scale with the
surrounding environment.
To let more light and air into the building.
Break up large building mass and scale of a facade.
To avoid stark and imposing building facades.
To create a pedestrian scale appropriate to Edmonds.
C. To become compatible with the surrounding built environment.
D. DDesign Objectives for Building Façade.
Building facade objectives ensure that the exterior of a building – the portion of a
building that defines the character and visual appearance of a place – is of high quality
and demonstrates the strong sense of place and integrity valued by the residents of the
City of Edmonds.
A.18 Design Objectives for Building Façade Design. Encourage building façades that
reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting
diversity and identity in building design.
A.19 Ensure diversity in design.
Reinforce the existing building patterns found in Edmonds.
Improve visual and physical character and quality of Edmonds.
Improve pedestrian environment in retail/commercial areas.
Packet Page 138 of 192
Create individual identity of buildings.
Design Objectives for Window Variety Andand Articulation. Use window size and
placement to help define the scale and character of the building. Use the
organization and combinations of window types to reinforce the streetscape
character or to provide variation in a façade, as well as provide light and air to the
building interior.
A.20 Windows help define the scale and character of the building. The organization and
combinations of window types provide variation in a facade as well as provide
light and air to the interior. Small windows are more typically utilitarian in
function, such as bathroom or stairway windows, etc. and can be grouped to
provide more articulation in the facade.
Design Objectives for Variation in Facade Materials. Employ variation in materials,
colors or design elements on building façades to help define the scale and style of
the structure. Variation in façade materials can help reduce the apparent bulk of
larger buildings while allowing variety and individuality of building design.
Urban Design Goals and Objectives for Specific Areas. In addition to the general design goal
and objectives described above under Goal A, supplemental design objectives are outlined below for
specific areas or districts within the city. (note that design objectives for the Downtown Waterfront
Activity Center are contained in the portion of the Land Use Element dealing specifically with that
area).
Urban Design Goal B: Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. Design objectives and
standards should be carefully crafted for the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center to encourage its
unique design character and important place-making status within the city.
B.1 Vehicular Access and Parking. Driveways and curb cuts should be
minimized to assure a consistent and safe streetscape for pedestrians. When alleys
are present, these should be the preferred method of providing vehicular access to a
property and should be used unless there is no reasonable alternative available.
Configuration of parking should support a “park and walk” policy that provides
adequate parking while minimizing impacts on the pedestrian
streetscape.
B.2 Pedestrian Access and Connections. Improve
pedestrian access from the street by locating buildings close to
the street and sidewalks, and defining the street edge. Cross
walks at key intersections should be accentuated by the use of
special materials, signage or paving treatments. Transit access
and waiting areas should be provided where appropriate.
B.3 Building Entry Location. Commercial building
entries should be easily recognizable and oriented to the
pedestrian streetscape by being located at sidewalk grade.
B.4 Building Setbacks. Create a common street frontage view with enough
repetition to tie each site to its neighbor.
Packet Page 139 of 192
Encourage the creation of public spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the
development and encourage outdoor interaction. In the Waterfront area west of the
railroad, buildings should be set back from the waterfront to preserve and provide a
buffer from existing beach areas. In the Waterfront area, site layout should be
coordinated with existing buildings and proposed improvements to provide views
of the water, open spaces, and easy pedestrian access to the beach.
B.5 Building/Site Identity. In the downtown area, retain a connection with
the scale and character of downtown through the use of similar materials,
proportions, forms, masses or
building elements. Encourage new
construction to use design elements
tied to historic forms or patterns.
B.6 Weather Protection.
Provide a covered walkway for
pedestrians traveling along public
sidewalks or walkways.
B.7 Signage. Lighting of signs should be indirect or
minimally backlit to display lettering and symbols or graphic
design instead of broadly lighting the face of the sign.
Signage using graphics or symbols or that contributes to the
historic character of a building should be encouraged.
B.8 Art and Public Spaces. Public art and amenities
such as mini parks, flower baskets, street furniture, etc.,
should be provided as a normal part of the public streetscape.
Whenever possible, these elements should be continued in the portion of the
private streetscape that adjoins the public streetscape. In the 4th Avenue Arts
Corridor, art should be a common element of building design, with greater design
flexibility provided when art is made a central feature of the design.
B.9 Building Height. Create and preserve a human scale for downtown
buildings. Building frontages along downtown streetscapes should be pedestrian in
scale.
B.10 Massing. Large building masses should be subdivided or softened using
design elements that emphasize the human scale of the streetscape. Building
façades should respect and echo historic patterns along downtown pedestrian
streets.
B.11 Building Façade. Provide a human scale streetscape, breaking up long
façades into defined forms that continue a pattern of individual and distinct tenant
spaces in commercial and mixed use areas. Avoid blank, monotonous and
imposing building facades using design elements that add detail and emphasize the
different levels of the building (e.g. the top or cornice vs. the pedestrian level or
building base).
Packet Page 140 of 192
B.12 Window Variety and Articulation. In the downtown
retail and mixed commercial districts, building storefronts
should be dominated by clear, transparent glass windows that
allow and encourage pedestrians to walk past and look into the
commercial space. Decorative trim and surrounds should be
encouraged to add interest and variety. Upper floors of
buildings should use windows as part of the overall design to
encourage rhythm and accents in the façade.
Urban Design Goal C: Highway 99 Corridor. Additional Design Objectives for the Highway 99
Corridor should support its function as a locus of commercial and potential mixed use activity,
building on the availability of multiple forms of transportation and its proximate location to
surrounding neighborhoods.
D.1.a. C.1
D.2. Highway 99
General Appearance and Identity: . Design of buildings and spaces along Highway
99 should encourage a feeling of identity associated with different sections of the
highway.
C.2 Site Design. Site design should allow for vechicular access and parking
as well as safe access and circulation for pedestrians. Whenever possible, sites
should provide connections between adjacent businesses and between businesses
and nearby residential neighborhoods.
C.3 Landscaping and Buffering. Landscaping, fencing or other appropriate
techniques should be used to soften the street front of sites and also used to buffer
more intensive uses from adjoining less intensive use areas (e.g. buffer commercial
from residential development).
Urban Design Goal D: Neighborhood Commercial Areas. Design in neighborhood commercial
areas should seek to support the function of the neighborhood center while paying close attention to
its place within the neighborhood setting.
D.2.a. D.1 Creation of new identity. Development of high intensity nodes.
Better identification of businesses by numbering. Encouragement of
planned business centers and design coordination among neighbors.
Building forms compatible with adjacent uses. Parking areas more clearly
defined to eliminate confusion of driveways, street and parking areas.
Unsightly uses and storage screened by landscaping and fencing.
D.2.b. Signs: Less conflict and confusion among signs. Visible from a
distance at speeds of 35-45 mph. Pole signs no higher than 20' maximum
height. Design approval of signing as a condition of approval for highrise
buildings in "nodes".
D.2.c. Lighting: Oriented away from thoroughfare and residential areas.
Packet Page 141 of 192
D.2.d. Landscaping: Use of landscaping berms in and around parking areas and
setbacks to provide a visual screen.
D.3. Neighborhood Shopping Centers
General AppearanceLandscape and Buffering. Special attention should be paid to
transitions from commercial development to surrounding residential areas, using
landscaping and/or gradations in building scale to provide compatible
development.
D.3.a. : Buildings, similar in scale to single-family houses, compact arrangement
of buildings with safe pedestrian walkways.
Streetscape and Street Trees
General. “Streetscape” is a term that refers to the street environment, often including pedestrian features,
landscaping, lighting, pavement materials, and signage. The streetscape plays an important role in the
livability and character of Edmonds. Public streets, with their associated walkways and pedestrian spaces,
provide the places for people to interact with their neighbors, accommodate public events and commerce,
promote human needs for enjoyment and exercise, and can improve the ecological function of the city.
When designed properly, the streetscape complements the urban design elements incorporated into the
development of private property.
A Streetscape Plan was developed in 2002 by the Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department
and updated in 2006. It focused on the public realm along streets, certain areas of the City such as the 4th
Avenue Arts Corridor, Highway 99 International area, and downtown.
In 2011, the City adopted a ‘Complete Streets’ program that prioritizes accommodating the needs of all
users – including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit and individual vehicles – in transportation projects. The
intent is to create safe environments for people of all ages and abilities while improving transportation
options and connections between the City’s destinations and centers of activity. A complete streets
approach can improve the ability of residents and visitors to experience the City in a variety of ways
while improving environmental quality, enhancing economic activity, and promoting healthy lifestyle.
Where feasible, street trees or other landscaping located between the travel lane and the sidewalk can
improve the pedestrian experience.
This section has a key goal and several policies specifically related to streetscape and street trees within
the public right of way.
Goals and Policies
Streetscape and Street Trees Goal A. Enhance the public realm through streetscape and street tree
choices.
A.1. Encourage inprovments to streets that link parks, open spaces, recreation centers,
employment centers, and transportation nodes.
Packet Page 142 of 192
A.2. Balance the need for short-term parking for shoppers and loading for businesses
with the need for pedestrian-oriented design, especially downtown.
A.3. As opportunities arise, provide for sustainable streetscapes that can enhance the
natural environment, help ensure safety, and complement the characteristics of
the neighborhood or district in which they are located.
A.4. Promote the planting and maintainence of landscaping and street trees to enhance
City gateways and connections; strengthen the character and identify of
downtown and other retail/commercial centers; and improve the pedestrian
environment.
A.5. Seek to maintain and retain existing healthy trees in the rights-of-way without
sacrificing public safety or public infrastructure or encouraging a hazard or
nuisance.
A.6. Selecting trees for planting in the public rights-of-way should be based on a
variety of factors, such as aesthetics, safety, maintainence, size, spacing,
longevity, location, utilities, habitat compatibility, and other appropriate factors.
Implementation Actions
Implementation actions are steps that are intended to be taken within a specified timeframe to
address high priority Streetscape and Street Tree goals. The actions identified here are
specifically called out as being important, but are not intended to be the only actions or measures
that may be used by the City.
Action 1: Develop an update to the Street Tree Plan by the end of 2016.
Action 2: Develop an Urban Forest Management Plan by the end of 2017.
Signs: Use sign concept from downtown.
Lighting: Oriented away from residential areas. Designed for safety rather than advertisement of
uses.
Landscaping: Buffer from street, provide transition from commercial areas to residential areas.
Waterfront Building Design
Buildings should be set back from the waterfront to preserve existing beach areas and provide a
buffer area.
Buildings should be oriented to pedestrians by providing visible activity at the first floor level, using
awnings, windows, etc. Retail uses are encouraged in first floor spaces.
Packet Page 143 of 192
Covered parking areas shall screen cars parked inside them from public rights-of-way.
Waterfront Site Design
The site layout should be coordinated with existing buildings and proposed improvements to provide
views of the water, open spaces, and easy pedestrian access to the beach.
The site design should provide adequate separation of vehicles and pedestrians to avoid conflicts.
On-site parking spaces and paved surfaces should be kept to a minimum. Joint use parking
arrangements and in-lieu parking payments are encouraged. Only the absolute minimum number of
parking spaces to accommodate the use(s) should be permitted on-site.
Waterfront Landscaping
Landscaping should be used to soften edges of buildings and parking areas.
Plant species should be selected to endure salt spray, wind, and soil conditions.
Landscaping should not obscure waterfront views.
Landscaping should be used to separate pedestrians and vehicles.
Street Landscaping
The City should establish a program to place utility wires underground in areas of the City where
scenic vistas will be enhanced or the general environment will be improved. Encourage LID's and
arterial conversions.
The areas of the City which are most suitable for street landscaping should be identified and a
program developed to carry out a public landscaping plan.
Street lighting should be designed to provide comfort, security and aesthetic beauty. [Ord. 2527,
1985.]
Packet Page 144 of 192
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
February 25, 2015 Page 9
Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the City is required to obtain a permit when removing trees within a right-of-way. Mr.
Lien answered that the right-of-way policy related to trees applies to the City, as well. When removing trees in the rights-of-
way, the City is required to obtain a permit from the Engineering Department and pay a fee.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked where the permit fees go, and Mr. Lien answered that they go into the General Fund.
Board Member Rubenkonig requested additional information about the fee-in-lieu-of program, and Mr. Lien advised that the
program still needs to be established to address issues such as what the funds can be used for.
Relative to the issue of views, Board Member Rubenkonig recalled that she previously served on the Architectural Design
Board for eight years. During that time, it was made clear that protection of views was a private matter that property owners
can take up with their neighbors. It is possible to combine easements, create covenants, etc., but views are a private issue and
not something the City will enforce. Mr. Lien agreed that is still the City’s policy relative to views.
Board Member Stewart asked if the proposed language would prohibit a property owner from clearing a forested lot without
having a development proposal in place. Is there another type of permit that would allow the lot to be cleared? Mr. Lien
answered that the existing code clearly states that properties cannot be cleared for the purpose of preparing them for
development or sale. The City does not generally permit tree removal just because. He said he does know if the proposed
code includes this same language, but the intent is to prevent this type of occurrence. He also noted that the subdivision code
only allows a developer to remove the trees necessary to install the improvements.
Board Member Stewart asked if a property owner could obtain a clearing permit to clear the trees. Mr. Lien answered that
clearing on any property within the City limits would require a permit. Board Member Rubenkonig recalled an earlier
situation on Olympic View Drive where an owner cleared property and sold the trees for lumber. She asked if a property
owner could obtain a Forest Practices Permit from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) that would allow him/her to
harvest all of the trees. Mr. Lien pointed out that the properties in the City of Edmonds are not considered forestlands, so a
Forest Practices Permit would not be required to cut down trees in the City. He pointed out that these permits mandate that
the property cannot be developed for at least six years.
Chair Tibbott observed that, based on the proposal, only a limited number of trees could be removed and a certain number of
trees would have to remain on the lot. Mr. Lien agreed that a property owner would not be allowed to remove trees from a
vacant lot just for the sake of clearing a property, and the land clearing regulations would remain in place after the new code
language is adopted. The City would not allow a property owner to cut down all the trees on a site in preparation for a sale or
other similar situation.
Mr. Lien said he does not foresee situations in the City where property owners will clear cut land for lumber. Board Member
Stewart pointed out where there are four lots in Edmonds that constitute over five acres of land. The property has just been
placed on the market, and the owner has already threatened to log the land for lumber. She asked if this property owner could
circumvent the City’s permit requirement by obtaining a permit from the DNR to clear the property. Mr. Lien said he
worked closely with DNR at his previous job. He explained that there are specific requirements attached to a Forest Practices
Permits. For example, a property owner would be required to replant a property within two years. He agreed to seek
feedback from the DNR and provide additional information to the Board.
Mr. Lien closed by advising that the Board would continue its discussion relative to the Tree Code at a future meeting, at
which time more detailed information would be presented.
DISCUSSION ON DRAFT COMMUNITY CULTURE AND URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Mr. Chave referred the Board to the draft Community Culture and Urban Design Element of the Comprehensive Plan
(Attachments 1 and 2). He explained that the “community culture” portion of the element has some additional language
inserted to clarify its role as a distinct section within the overall chapter. The separate Community Cultural Plan (Attachment
3) would be adopted by reference and provides more detail and elaboration. The “Urban Design” portion of the element now
consolidates all design objectives in the Comprehensive Plan, including some that were previously included in the Land Use
Element.
Packet Page 145 of 192
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
February 25, 2015 Page 10
Mr. Chave explained that the goal of the update is to simplify the design objectives into general goal/policy language. He
recalled that, previously, the objectives contained a mixture of policy and code-level detailed language that was inappropriate
for a planning-level document. While simplifying and combining language, staff attempted to maintain the overall policy
direction and make it more clear and concise. For example, duplications and unnecessary verbiage was eliminated.
Mr. Chave specifically referred to the “urban design” portion of the element, which not only contains general design
objectives (Section A) that apply throughout the City, but includes design objectives specifically related to the
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center (Section B) and Highway 99 Corridor (Section C). He explained that the objectives in
Sections B and C are not intended to stand alone, but would be in addition to the general guidelines in Section A. He
emphasized that the intent of the design objectives is to provide “big picture” policy direction; and the details that implement
the objectives are found in the zoning code. He reminded the Board that they would also review the zoning code in 2015, at
which time the design standards could be “beefed up.”
Vice Chair Lovell recalled that, when reviewing the Land Use Element earlier, the Board discussed that the objectives related
to urban design would be moved to the Community Culture and Urban Design Element. He emphasized that the goal is to
have all of the objectives related to urban design in one location in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Chave explained that the
general design objectives (Section A) came directly from the existing Land Use Element. He noted that there are currently no
design objectives specific to Five Corners, Westgate, Firdale Village, etc. He suggested perhaps there could be an additional
Section D to provide specific objectives relative to neighborhood commercial areas.
Vice Chair Lovell recalled that nearly a year ago, the City Council asked the Planning Board to come up with some design
standards for the BD zones. He asked if these areas would be addressed under Section B of the proposed new language. Mr.
Chave explained that design standards for the BD zones were incorporated into the zoning code but not the Comprehensive
Plan. He reminded the Board that the design objectives in the Comprehensive Plan are intended to provide overall policy
direction, and specific standards to implement the policy direction will be located in the zoning code. Vice Chair Lovell said
it might be helpful to provide a reference in the Comprehensive Plan to the applicable zoning code chapters. Mr. Chave said
perhaps a link could be provided in the electronic version, but he cautioned against adding references to specific code
sections in the Comprehensive Plan because code references will change over time.
Board Member Stewart referred to the general statement (1st Paragraph) in the Community Culture and Urban Design
Element and suggested the language should be much stronger to recognize the first people who occupied the land before it
was settled by Mr. Brackett in the late 1800’s. She referred to Item C.1 the Shoreline Master Program (Title 24.20.070),
which says that, “Wherever practical, shoreline development should recognize former and current use of the City’s shoreline
area for such uses as boatyards, railroads, ferry landings, logging, and industrial sites, and recognize the earlier uses of the
shoreline by Native American cultures.” She said it would behoove the City to make stronger mention of Native American
culture in the Community Culture and Urban Design Element, and noted that the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization
Document provides greater detail. She suggested that an additional sentence be added to the paragraph after the first sentence
to read, “It lies within territory once attributed to the Snohomish, Suquamish and Snoqualmie Tribes, all of whom spoke
Coast Salish languages. These people were skilled fishermen, hunters and plant collectors who set up a winter village or
permanent fishing camp and moved to smaller, more informal settlements at different times of the year to exploit locally
available resources.” She acknowledged that not all of her proposed language needs to be added, but enough to make the
point of celebrating the City’s first people. Board Member Robles agreed that more language is needed in the element to
define who the first people were, but maybe not as much as Board Member Stewart proposed. The Board can lean on this
language in the future as they review the remaining elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
Board Member Robles said he understands that the goals and policies called out in this element of the Comprehensive Plan
are intended to be guidelines, but here is very little language relative to cleanliness and maintenance standards. For instance,
there is nothing about removing moss, washing sidewalks or promoting a greener environment. Because the element exposes
the City’s cultural intent, it would be within scope to also provide more specific goals and policies related to cleanliness and
maintenance of properties in the City. Mr. Chave responded that there are some general code requirements for maintaining
structures, etc, but he would be hesitant to put policies related to the notion of cleanliness in the Comprehensive Plan. Board
Member Robles noted that the proposed language provides guidelines for building entrances and lighting, and he suggested
that it could also provide some guidelines for the general appearance of buildings.
Packet Page 146 of 192
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
February 25, 2015 Page 11
Board Member Rubenkonig asked why the Port of Edmonds and the Civic Center Playfield were not specifically called out
on Page 170 as outdoor public gathering spaces. Mr. Chave explained that the list is not intended to be all inclusive, but
simply provide examples of some of the outdoor public gathering places in Edmonds. He agreed that additional items could
be added as examples, but he cautioned that making a longer list could give the impression that it is all inclusive. Board
Member Rubenkonig said she would like the Port of Edmonds and the Civic Center Playfield to be added to the language
because both locations host quite a few public events.
Board Member Rubenkonig referred to Item A.10 (Signage) on Page 177 and noted that, as per the proposed language,
graphics and symbols in signage would be encouraged. She said she understands that graphics make signs more pleasant to
the viewer, but she asked if signs with symbols and graphics in the windows of businesses would be exempt from the sign
code. Mr. Chave said the sign code identifies standards for how much of a window area can be obstructed, but it is up to
individual property owners to decide what to put in their windows.
Board Member Rubenkonig referenced Item A.18 (Building Façade Design) on Page 180 and asked how a building with two
street facades would be handled. Mr. Chave answered that, as per existing code language, specified treatments would be
required on both street facades.
Board Member Rubenkonig referred to Item A.19 (Widow Variety and Articulation) on Page 180 and asked if the proposed
language is intended to only apply to the building front or would the front design dictate the glazing schedule for the entire
building. Mr. Chave said the draft language is intended to address both streetscape design and façade variation. He noted
that the design guidelines for the downtown go much further to talk about what happens on the street front versus blank
walls, etc. on other sides of the building.
Board Member Stewart suggested that the 3rd Paragraph in the Urban Design Section on Page 173 should be changed to read,
“However, unsightly development of poor quality or design does exist in the City. Aging buildings in some parts of the City,
primarily downtown, can create an aesthetic problem if they are not maintained. Removal or poor restoration of older
historic buildings can alter the character of an area such as downtown. The strip type of development along Highway 99 has
often resulted in economic underdevelopment of private properties that end up being aesthetically displeasing.” She said she
would like the language to be phrased in a positive way to explain how the City can create a more aesthetic environment by
retaining the older buildings and remodeling them appropriately. She suggested the proposed language rather than saying
what has been done in the past has had a negative effect on the ambiance.
Chair Tibbott referred to the last paragraph on Page 173, which has to do with the placement of utility wires underground.
He suggested that this paragraph seems to stand alone and does not direct or suggest a specific policy. Mr. Chave said this
paragraph has been included in the element for a long time, and the City has code standards in place to address underground
and overhead utility wires. He said it would be appropriate to include language in the Comprehensive Plan that indicates the
City’s intent behind the code standards is to underground utility wires when possible.
Chair Tibbott asked if Board Member Stewart’s recommended language would imply that the City should encourage the
preservation of historic buildings when possible. Board Member Stewart said it is not just when possible. When the
character and history of a building is such that it defines an area or block, it should be considered before any take down or
remodel is approved. She suggested the language could be further altered to address her intent. Mr. Chave reminded the
Board that the paragraphs in this section are intended to be descriptive rather than policies. Chair Tibbott said that, rather
than trying to create a policy, the Board is trying to create a broad intention for the urban landscape. Mr. Chave said inserting
the word “historic” as recommended by Board Member Stewart, could help make the intent clearer.
Chair Tibbott said his understanding is that any older building in the City could be demolished and replaced with a new one
unless it is on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. Mr. Chave clarified that even buildings on the Register could be
demolished, but it would require the property owner to go through more hoops.
Vice Chair Lovell observed that some of the existing building stock in the downtown is poor, and this should be pointed out.
However, he agreed with the concept of striving to improve the appearance of the existing buildings in keeping with the
character of the downtown. To whatever extent that evolves similarly to the existing architectural framework makes sense,
Packet Page 147 of 192
DRAFT
Planning Board Minutes
February 25, 2015 Page 12
but some building stock is not worth saving. It should be pointed out that these buildings are not the ideal situation for the
downtown and the goal is to improve the properties. While the language can be made more positive, it must also recognize
the present situation. Board Member Robles said that was the point of his earlier remarks about policies relative to
cleanliness and maintenance. Mr. Chave agreed his earlier comments are in line with the descriptions in this section.
Board Member Stewart referenced the bulleted list on Page 174 and suggested that the 4th Bullet be changed to read, “Protect
natural environments using sustainable design practices.” She explained that readers should have a definition of sustainable
design that explains the philosophy that seeks to maximize the quality of the built environment and minimize or eliminate the
impacts to the natural environment. This definition could be added to the Comprehensive Plan in some form.
Next, Board Member Stewart referred to Item A.2 (Layout of Parking) on Page 174. She agreed that the goal is for parking
to be located at the side and rear of a building, but she questioned if stating so in the Comprehensive Plan would be “putting
the cart before the horse” when certain applicable regulations have not yet been approved by the City Council. Mr. Chave
said this is not a new concept. He recalled that the existing code language relative to Westgate and Highway 99 already state
that parking should be located at the rear or side.
Board Member Stewart referred to Item A.4 (Building Entry Location) on Page 175 and suggested that the words “residential
or mixed use buildings” could be eliminated without changing the intent. Board Member Rubenkonig suggested that rather
than using the word “should,” perhaps the sentence should state that it is “desirable for building entries to be configured to
provide clear entry points. . .” Mr. Chave explained that it is fairly common in multi-family settings to have benches or
sitting areas within the setback. He clarified that the design guidelines would only apply to multi-family and not single-
family residential.
Board Member Stewart referred to Item A.7 (Building/Site Identity) on Page 176 and asked why way finding was included as
an element of site identity. She suggested it would be more appropriately placed in Item A.10 (Signage) on Page 177. Mr.
Chave explained that the notion is that a property owner could use both signs and color combinations on buildings to help
identify an entrance location. For example, buildings on corner lots typically locate the main entrance at the corner. It is also
typical to have something significant to the building in that location to call out the entrance. To clarify the intent of this item,
Vice Chair Lovell suggested that the word “recognition” be inserted after “access.”
Board Member Stewart suggested that Item A.12 (Features) on Page 178 should be changed to read, “Integrate natural
landscape features and unique landforms – such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees – into site design whenever
possible.” She expressed her belief that using the term “natural landscape features” broadens the intent and encourages a
more sustainable approach.
Mr. Chave advised that he would make the changes identified by the Board and bring the element back for further review on
March 11th.
REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA
Chair Tibbott briefly reviewed the extended agenda.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Tibbott said he has been wrestling with how the Board can improve its editing process. He suggested that as Board
Members review the documents in their meeting packets, it would make sense for them to forward their recommended
changes in writing to the staff (Diane Cunningham) as soon as possible rather than waiting until the meeting. Mr. Chave
agreed and said this would give staff a jump start on updating the document instead of waiting for the minutes to come out.
Chair Tibbott asked if the style and format for the various Comprehensive Plan elements would be the same. He noted that
the Transportation Element currently looks very different from the other elements the Board has reviewed to date. Mr. Chave
explained that the Transportation Element and Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Element are stand-alone plans. Staff
is less concerned about having the exact same format, but they should still identify goals and policies and provide narratives
that are consistent with the other elements in the plan. Chair Tibbott asked if a “historical context” narrative would be
Packet Page 148 of 192
AM-7550 10.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:10 Minutes
Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Scott James
Department:Finance
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type:
Information
Subject Title
Annual Impact Fee Report
Recommendation
Previous Council Action
Narrative
In 2013, the City adopted Chapter 3.36 of the Edmonds City Code, authorizing the collection of Park
Impact Fees to help pay for park projects that are needed to serve new growth and development. Pursuant
to Chapter 3.36, the Finance Director, on an annual basis, shall provide a report to the Council on the
impact fee account showing the source and amount of all monies collected, earned, or received, and the
public improvements that were financed in whole or in part by impact fees. Attachment 1 is an accounting
of the Park Impact Fee Fund for the year ending December 31, 2014. In summary, the City collected a
total of $203,503.23 in park impact fees during 2014. These revenues combined with the 2014 beginning
fund balance of $2,934.06 resulted in total available funding of $206,437.29. To date, no park impact fees
were expended or encumbered.
Use of Funds
3.36.100.
A. Pursuant to this chapter, impact fees:
1. Shall be used for public improvements that will reasonably benefit new development; and
2. Shall not be imposed to make up for deficiencies in public facilities serving existing developments; and
3. Shall not be used for maintenance or operations.
B. Park impact fees may be spent for public improvements, including, but not limited to, planning,
engineering, surveying, land acquisition, right-of-way acquisition, site improvements, necessary off-site
improvements, construction, architectural, permitting, financing, and administrative expenses, applicable
impact fees or mitigation costs, and any other expenses which can be capitalized.
C. Impact fees may also be used to recoup public improvement costs previously incurred by the city to
the extent that new growth and development will be served by the previously constructed improvements
or incurred costs.
D. In the event that bonds or similar debt instruments are or have been issued for the advanced provision
of public improvements for which impact fees may be expended, impact fees may be used to pay debt
service on such bonds or similar debt instruments to the extent that the facilities or improvements
provided are consistent with the requirements of this section and are used to serve the new development.
Pursuant to Chapter 3.36, impact fees shall be expended or encumbered within 10 years of receipt, unless
Packet Page 149 of 192
Pursuant to Chapter 3.36, impact fees shall be expended or encumbered within 10 years of receipt, unless
the council identifies in written findings extraordinary and compelling reason or reasons for the city to
hold the fees beyond the 10-year period. Under such circumstances, and prior to the expiration of the
10-year period, the council shall establish the period of time within which the impact fees shall be
expended or encumbered.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Park Impact Fees 2013-2014
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Scott James 03/11/2015 10:43 AM
City Clerk Scott Passey 03/11/2015 10:43 AM
Mayor Dave Earling 03/11/2015 12:07 PM
Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 03/11/2015 12:12 PM
Form Started By: Scott James Started On: 03/11/2015 09:57 AM
Final Approval Date: 03/11/2015
Packet Page 150 of 192
Year Beginning Balance Revenue Expenditure Ending Balance Cumulative Expenditures
2013 -$ 2,934.06$ -$ 2,934.06$ -$
2014 2,934.06$ 203,503.23$ -$ 206,437.29$ -$
Total 206,437.29$ -$
Park Impact Fee Financial Report
Packet Page 151 of 192
AM-7566 11.
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:03/17/2015
Time:15 Minutes
Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Scott James
Department:Finance
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Presentation of the December 2014 Financial Management Report.
Recommendation
Previous Council Action
None
Narrative
The December 2014 Financial Management Report is attached for your review.
Staff will make a brief presentation to review the financial results from 2014.
Attachments
December 2014 Budgetary Financial Report
Form Review
Inbox Reviewed By Date
Finance Scott James 03/12/2015 05:34 PM
City Clerk Scott Passey 03/12/2015 07:07 PM
Mayor Linda Hynd 03/13/2015 08:36 AM
Finalize for Agenda Linda Hynd 03/13/2015 08:37 AM
Form Started By: Scott James Started On: 03/12/2015 05:28 PM
Final Approval Date: 03/13/2015
Packet Page 152 of 192
Financial Management Report as of December 31, 2014
CITY OF MUKILTEO
General Fund 2014 operating rev-
enue is $1,988,175 or 5.8 percent
over last years largely due to high-
er sales tax and development relat-
ed revenues. A more detailed
analysis of General Fund revenue
can be found on page 5, with sales
tax performance discussed on page
20.
Special Revenue Funds 2014
revenues are $3,184,666 or 49
percent higher than of 2013. The
2014 revenue increase is primarily
due to:
(1) Operating transfers to Special
Revenue Funds increased by
$648,000.
(2) Grant and Intergovernmental
revenues received increased
by $2,192,000 over 2013.
(3) Charges For Services & Devel-
opment related revenues in-
creased by over $372,000
over 2013.
Special Revenue Fund High-
lights:
Street Fund transfer from the
General Fund increased by
$300,000 over 2013.
Street Construction Fund grants
revenues increased $2,235,000 over
2013.
Hotel/Mote Lodging tax revenues
grew over $6,800 over 2013, see his-
torical revenue chart on page 9.
Real Estate Excise Tax revenues in-
creased $88,000 over 2013.
Park Construction Fund Park Im-
pact Fees increased $200,000 over
2013 and grant revenues increased
by over $62,000.
Utility Funds 2014 revenues are
$12,970,000 lower than last years
largely due the issuance of over
$15,000,000 in bonds.
Utility Fund Grant and Intergovern-
mental revenues received increased
by $407,000 over 2013.
Utility Fund Charges for Service and
Capital Contributions increased by
$1,506,000 over 2013.
Utility Fund proceeds from issuance of
debt decreased by $14,539,000 from
2013.
Summary of All Operating Funds: Revenue
INSIDE THIS
ISSUE:
Revenues By Fund
Summary
3
Expenditures By Fund
Summary
4
General Fund Revenues 5
Expenditures By Fund
Details
8
General Fund Expendi-
ture Detail
14
Investment Portfolio 34
Fund Balance Overview 35
5 Corners Round-About
Financial Management Report
As of December 31, 2014 AT A GLANCE:
General Fund revenues are
higher than last year by 5.8
percent. Sales tax revenue
performance holds steady
(see page 20)
Development revenues are
over 2013.. (see page 5)
The Financial Management Report is a summary report of the City’s
2014 financial results with a comparison to 2013.
Packet Page 153 of 192
Financial Management Report as of December 31, 2014
P A G E 2
Conceptual picture
For Five Corners
Round-About
Complete Five
Corners
Round-About
Summary of All Operating Funds: Expenditures
General Fund expenditures ended
2014 with 92% of the budget
expended. Expenditures in-
creased 17% over 2013, with ex-
penditures increasing $5,521,655
over last year. The increase is
due primarily to amending the
General Fund Budget to include a
$2.7 million bond refunding pay-
ment and also due to increasing
transfers to other funds by
$2,000,0000 and personnel costs
increasing by $787,000.
General Fund expense by catego-
ries are page 8 and departmental
expenses are on page 15—18
Additional General Fund expendi-
tures information can be found on
pages 26—33.
Special Revenue Fund expendi-
tures were budgeted to increase in
2014 over 2013 primarily due to:
additional budget for street im-
provements. 2014 expenditures
are 50 percent ahead of 2013 pri-
marily due to these increases. (see
Pages 9 & 10 for details)
Street Construction Fund 112
expenditures were $2.4 million
over 2013 mainly due to street con-
struction outlays increasing $2.1
million in 2014 over 2013.
The Real Estate Excise Tax
Funds project expenditures in-
creased $220,000 over 2013.
The Water Fund expenditures for
were $688,483 higher than 2013
mainly due to increased capital ex-
penditures. (see page 11 for ex-
penditure details.)
The Storm Fund expenditures for
were $1,438,264 higher than 2013
mainly due to increased capital ex-
penditures. (see page 12 for ex-
penditure details.)
The Sewer Fund expenditures for
were $2,590,203 lower than 2013
mainly due to decreased capital expend-
itures. (see page 12 for expenditure de-
tails.)
The Equipment Rental Fund expendi-
tures for were $56,030 higher than
2013 mainly due to increased repair and
maintenance expenditures ($24,300) and
increased equipment purchases
($32,479) (see page 13 for expenditure
details.)
Notable Highlights
Like other employers, for the past sever-
al years, the City has had to ask its em-
ployees to do more with less. However,
with the improving economy and im-
proving revenues, in 2014, the City add-
ed three new employees.
The City received a $1.67 million retro-
active invoice from Fire District 1 as the
result of their settled labor agreement.
Subsequently to receiving this invoice,
the City negotiated a small reduction
and were able to pay the remaining
$1,603,000 over eight quarterly pay-
ments. The first quarters’ payment was
due January 31, 2015.
The City has yet to settle the 2015 labor
agreements with our Teamsters and
SEIU bargaining groups.
Packet Page 154 of 192
3
Page 1 of 1
Fund
No.Title
2014 Amended
Budget
12/31/2013
Revenues
12/31/2014
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
001 GENERAL FUND 39,047,994$ 34,293,939$ 39,045,428$ 2,566$ 100%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 594,946 350,641 376,448 218,498 63%
011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 903,858 702,029 637,114 266,744 70%
012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 527,115 132,539 19,597 507,518 4%
013 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND - - 136 (136) 0%
014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 8,000 5,278 4,488 3,512 56%
016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 679,800 103,739 575,726 104,074 85%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 20,075 17,376 25,687 (5,612) 128%
111 STREET FUND 1,712,100 1,453,969 1,774,796 (62,696) 104%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 8,610,407 1,662,049 4,329,491 4,280,916 50%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 102,823 65,521 97,673 5,150 95%
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 25 32 61 (36) 242%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 54,140 64,058 71,175 (17,035) 131%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 20,308 17,502 27,671 (7,363) 136%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 1,623 1,490 2,607 (984) 161%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 18,200 28,581 24,072 (5,872) 132%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 904,343 906,778 944,898 (40,555) 104%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 904,243 896,004 942,847 (38,604) 104%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 43,708 37,802 25,968 17,740 59%
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 4,000 308,748 48,634 (44,634) 1216%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 160,136 152,452 184,256 (24,120) 115%
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,352,517 222,863 502,387 850,130 37%
136 PARKS TRUST FUND 186 443 589 (403) 317%
137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 12,970 17,642 20,507 (7,537) 158%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 4,519 9,568 4,628 (109) 102%
139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 645,000 650,836 670,435 (25,435) 104%
211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 28,600 30,874 29,699 (1,099) 104%
213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND 28,626 22,189 28,647 (21) 100%
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,022,798 1,009,901 1,022,795 3 100%
232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND 966,286 - 946,226 20,060 98%
411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - - - - 0%
421 WATER UTILITY FUND 6,249,596 11,760,208 7,409,892 (1,160,296) 119%
422 STORM UTILITY FUND 3,630,158 4,418,972 3,793,575 (163,417) 105%
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 8,470,060 17,926,979 10,206,504 (1,736,444) 121%
424 BOND RESERVE FUND 840,816 1,115,169 840,817 (1) 100%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,478,108 1,441,702 1,518,874 (40,766) 103%
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 45,379 49,846 50,479 (5,100) 111%
627 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 57,973 82,301 (82,301) 0%
79,093,463$ 79,935,693$ 76,287,127$ 2,806,336$ 96%
CITY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Packet Page 155 of 192
4
Page 1 of 1
Fund
No.Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
001 GENERAL FUND 41,303,920$ 32,388,187$ 37,909,842$ 3,394,078$ 92%
009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 503,361 297,265 278,426 224,935 55%
011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 300,000 558,835 - 300,000 0%
014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 8,000 5,280 4,484 3,516 56%
016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 720,200 440,569 316,769 403,431 44%
104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 81,033 60,063 54,281 26,752 67%
111 STREET FUND 1,658,810 1,365,167 1,616,046 42,764 97%
112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 9,013,666 1,812,066 4,239,259 4,774,407 47%
117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 149,349 63,907 89,218 60,131 60%
118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE - - - - 0%
120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 54,000 61,330 46,010 7,990 85%
121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,786 27,283 25,086 1,700 94%
122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,600 3,579 2,020 1,580 56%
123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 19,000 17,140 17,570 1,430 92%
125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,592,712 350,031 509,034 1,083,678 32%
126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 1,199,841 468,534 530,130 669,711 44%
127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 18,200 28,625 3,850 14,350 21%
129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 13,653 141,401 17,469 (3,816) 128%
130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 175,435 134,598 147,925 27,510 84%
132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,070,517 273,149 214,420 1,856,097 10%
136 PARKS TRUST FUND - - - - 0%
138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 5,342 16,062 5,214 128 98%
139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 645,000 650,836 645,000 - 100%
211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 28,600 22,130 28,600 - 100%
213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND - - - - 0%
231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,023,294 1,009,901 1,023,291 3 100%
232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND 966,286 - 946,226 20,060 98%
421 WATER UTILITY FUND 10,145,476 8,220,830 8,909,313 1,236,163 88%
422 STORM UTILITY FUND 7,233,213 3,222,687 4,660,951 2,572,262 64%
423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 14,864,346 13,871,163 11,280,961 3,583,385 76%
424 BOND RESERVE FUND 840,816 271,210 840,815 1 100%
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,093,279 898,514 954,543 138,736 87%
617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 89,615 75,551 52,716 36,899 59%
627 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRCIT - 1,808 92,108 (92,108) 0%
95,847,350$ 66,757,704$ 75,461,578$ 20,477,880$ 79%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Packet Page 156 of 192
5
Page 1 of 3
Title
2014 Amended
Budget
12/31/2013
Revenues
12/31/2014
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
TAXES:
REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 9,857,161$ 9,840,931$ 9,764,899$ 92,262$ 99%
EMS PROPERTY TAX 1 3,105,938 2,794,788 3,032,393 73,545 98%
VOTED PROPERTY TAX 946,303 923,225 940,981 5,322 99%
LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 2 5,525,609 5,325,287 5,840,764 (315,155) 106%
NATURAL GAS USE TAX 8,793 9,552 10,217 (1,424) 116%
1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 590,174 574,838 607,298 (17,124) 103%
ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 1,490,394 1,520,457 1,564,672 (74,278) 105%
GAS UTILITY TAX 819,286 689,795 676,716 142,570 83%
SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 297,972 302,507 303,559 (5,587) 102%
WATER UTILITY TAX 920,882 938,649 1,029,698 (108,816) 112%
SEWER UTILITY TAX 479,750 473,465 520,987 (41,237) 109%
STORMWATER UTILITY TAX 295,972 286,574 299,348 (3,376) 101%
T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 738,219 805,715 832,350 (94,131) 113%
TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 1,544,793 1,384,900 1,353,988 190,805 88%
PULLTABS TAX 62,613 54,229 45,580 17,033 73%
AMUSEMENT GAMES 746 136 37 709 5%
LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX 232,528 227,635 238,644 (6,116) 103%
26,917,133 26,152,682 27,062,133 (145,000) 101%
LICENSES AND PERMITS:
FIRE PERMITS-SPECIAL USE 5,666 5,150 260 5,406 5%
PROF AND OCC LICENSE-TAXI 700 630 630 70 90%
AMUSEMENTS 4,500 4,700 4,675 (175) 104%
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-COMCAST 659,488 668,920 689,382 (29,894) 105%
FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT - 33,222 44,156 (44,156) 0%
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-VERIZON/FRONTIER 115,219 86,889 93,795 21,424 81%
FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-BLACKROCK 14,299 11,451 17,064 (2,765) 119%
FRANCHISE AGREMENT-ZAYO - 5,000 - - 0%
OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 233,162 261,933 274,689 (41,527) 118%
GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 107,360 110,511 126,083 (18,723) 117%
DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 38,500 26,565 46,285 (7,785) 120%
NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE 53,963 67,650 77,850 (23,887) 144%
RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 9,000 9,773 - 9,000 0%
BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 3 503,000 479,193 681,375 (178,375) 135%
ANIMAL LICENSES 53,040 10,225 21,486 31,554 41%
STREET AND CURB PERMIT 151,045 44,909 88,355 62,690 58%
OTR NON-BUS LIC/PERMITS 18,467 10,020 14,981 3,486 81%
1,967,409 1,836,739 2,181,065 (213,656) 111%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 3,176 5,119 3,139 37 99%
ROOFTOP SOLAR CHALLENGE GRANT - 34,000 - - 0%
WA ASSOC OF SHERIFFS TRAFFIC GRANT - 799 - - 0%
WTSC X-52 DUI AND SPEEDING - 583 - - 0%
TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT 7,500 8,571 4,216 3,284 56%
HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 3,000 5,291 3,560 (560) 119%
DOCKSIDE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE 1,834 2,047 1,834 0 100%
WA STATE ADMIN OFFICE COURTS GRANT - 4,228 - - 0%
2014 COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT - - 9,000 (9,000) 0%
WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT - 1,106 - - 0%
NORTHWEST SOLAR COMMUNITIES GRANT 22,000 - 12,750 9,250 58%
SMART COMMUTER PROJECT GRANT - 1,200 - - 0%
PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 187,033 188,570 193,817 (6,784) 104%
MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION 8,916 9,572 10,287 (1,371) 115%
JUDICIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTION-STATE 12,600 12,536 12,376 224 98%
CRIMINAL JUSTICE-SPECIAL PROGRAMS 34,300 35,628 38,062 (3,762) 111%
DUI - CITIES 7,900 7,231 7,193 707 91%
LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 64,675 26,662 75,069 (10,394) 116%
LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 360,879 357,761 354,970 5,909 98%
VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS 39,513 - 41,513 (2,000) 105%
753,326 700,904 767,786 (14,460) 102%
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
CITY OF EDMONDS
1 EMS Property Tax is up $237,605 from 2013
2 2014 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax revenues are $515,477 higher than 2013 revenues
3 Building Structure Permits are up $202,182 from 2013
Packet Page 157 of 192
6
Page 2 of 3
Title
2014 Amended
Budget
12/31/2013
Revenues
12/31/2014
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMTS 1,200 1,629 1,381 (181) 115%
CIVIL PROBATE FILINGS - 16 - - 0%
COURT RECORD SERVICES 50 - - 50 0%
D/M COURT REC SER 50 71 30 20 60%
SHARED COURT COSTS 3,700 - - 3,700 0%
MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 200 256 549 (349) 274%
SALE MAPS & BOOKS 73 192 43 30 59%
CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS 25,086 25,086 25,086 - 100%
BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT - 487 611 (611) 0%
PHOTOCOPIES 4,618 1,894 2,004 2,614 43%
POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 4,000 4,484 3,868 132 97%
ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 4 267,630 201,584 330,188 (62,558) 123%
ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES 1,036 1,460 - 1,036 0%
SNO-ISLE 58,667 57,892 57,369 1,298 98%
GENERAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES - 360 - - 0%
PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 11,000 11,825 18,950 (7,950) 172%
POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 26,000 27,797 30,223 (4,223) 116%
OCDETF OVERTIME 7,340 5,494 11,784 (4,444) 161%
CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.12,300 11,620 12,466 (166) 101%
WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 36,000 32,579 41,175 (5,175) 114%
DRE REIMBURSEABLE - 709 - - 0%
MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 1,500 2,500 6,207 (4,707) 414%
POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 275 - 605 (330) 220%
DUI EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES 700 617 187 513 27%
FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 28,503 50,770 52,730 (24,227) 185%
ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 64,000 71,171 66,212 (2,212) 103%
ELECTRONIC MONITOR DUI 590 - - 0%
BOOKING FEES 6,300 6,529 6,214 86 99%
FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 5,716 7,100 20,037 (14,321) 351%
EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 24,575 17,644 15,251 9,324 62%
EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 5 800,000 818,053 863,361 (63,361) 108%
POLICE FINGERPRINTING - 315 - - 0%
CRIM CNV FEE DUI - 600 - - 0%
CRIM CONV FEE CT 5,700 4,188 2,727 2,973 48%
CRIM CONV FEE CN 2,000 1,717 956 1,044 48%
FIBER SERVICES 37,349 23,880 10,605 26,744 28%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL FIBER SERVICES 7,454 7,200 7,200 254 97%
FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 218 1,178 1,706 (1,488) 782%
ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 6,616 6,075 4,800 1,817 73%
ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 4 95,950 79,891 86,507 9,443 90%
PLAN CHECKING FEES 4 310,000 292,628 468,603 (158,603) 151%
FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 4 2,984 2,400 8,960 (5,976) 300%
PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 4 1,630 966 1,676 (46) 103%
S.E.P.A. REVIEW 4 6,980 6,305 4,145 2,835 59%
CRITICAL AREA STUDY 16,530 19,685 23,390 (6,860) 142%
DV COORDINATOR SERVICES 8,600 10,164 8,684 (84) 101%
SWIM POOL ENTRANCE FEES 61,000 63,844 59,372 1,628 97%
GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 5,500 4,608 6,334 (834) 115%
LOCKER FEES 350 439 424 (74) 121%
SWIM CLASS FEES 32,000 30,132 31,009 991 97%
PROGRAM FEES 757,000 709,193 779,876 (22,876) 103%
TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 120,000 128,796 120,321 (321) 100%
SWIM TEAM/DIVE TEAM 32,500 30,365 34,266 (1,766) 105%
BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 825 695 930 (105) 113%
INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT-CONTRACT SVCS 6 1,902,614 1,742,529 2,073,743 (171,129) 109%
4,804,319 4,528,203 5,302,763 (498,444) 110%
CITY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
5 EMS Transport User Fees are up $45,308 from 2013
6 Engineering has provided a larger amount of services to other departments from 2013 to 2014
4 Development Services has collected a larger amount of fees in 2014 versus 2013
Packet Page 158 of 192
7
Page 3 of 3
Title
2014 Amended
Budget
12/31/2013
Revenues
12/31/2014
Revenues
Amount
Remaining % Received
FINES AND FORFEITURES:
PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 11,000 13,033 7,966 3,034 72%
TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 38,000 33,785 26,247 11,753 69%
NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 310,000 301,015 256,808 53,192 83%
CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)25,000 26,130 20,811 4,189 83%
SPEEDING DOUBLE 330 297 77 253 23%
NON-TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 2,085 298 25,704 (23,619) 1233%
OTHER INFRACTIONS '04 2,300 1,504 762 1,538 33%
PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 52,000 49,789 49,033 2,967 94%
PR - HANDICAPPED - - 450 (450) 0%
PARK/INDDISZONE - 2,972 1,156 (1,156) 0%
DWI PENALTIES 3,000 7,485 6,625 (3,625) 221%
DUI - DP ACCT 3,700 2,927 2,599 1,101 70%
CRIM CNV FEE DUI 700 - 625 75 89%
OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN - - 70 (70) 0%
CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 38,000 40,971 32,670 5,330 86%
CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT - 1,030 2,092 (2,092) 0%
OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 100 84 61 39 61%
OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 - 6,357 6,552 (6,552) 0%
COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 1,900 1,916 1,291 609 68%
CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN - 472 1,130 (1,130) 0%
CRIMINAL COSTS-RECOUPMENTS 120,000 113,712 80,930 39,070 67%
PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 35,000 29,431 29,449 5,551 84%
COURT INTERPRETER COSTS 50 56 227 (177) 453%
BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 4,000 4,360 4,840 (840) 121%
MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 3,600 2,270 250 3,350 7%
650,765 639,896 558,427 92,338 86%
MISCELLANEOUS:
INVESTMENT INTEREST 88,200 5,483 17,036 71,164 19%
INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 1,281 1,601 897 384 70%
INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 4,000 5,127 6,303 (2,303) 158%
PARKING 12,804 10,720 13,377 (573) 104%
SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS 153,200 163,970 135,262 17,938 88%
BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 4,817 7,505 7,400 (2,583) 154%
LEASES LONG-TERM 159,335 167,018 171,728 (12,393) 108%
VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 5,500 7,291 11,163 (5,663) 203%
OTHER RENTS & USE CHARGES 8,400 8,906 8,168 232 97%
DONATION/CONTRIBUTION - 125 - - 0%
PARKS DONATIONS 15,350 11,587 17,791 (2,441) 116%
BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 1,300 1,448 1,652 (352) 127%
POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 4,873 9,231 4,873 (0) 100%
PARKS GRANTS - PRIVATE SOURCES - 1,235 1,642 (1,642) 0%
SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 1,200 1 110 1,090 9%
SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 4,000 3,205 3,371 629 84%
CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY - 6,296 810 (810) 0%
OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT - 6,367 2,867 (2,867) 0%
POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION 477 170 984 (507) 206%
CASHIER'S OVERAGES/SHORTAGES 45 905 (25) 70 -54%
OTHER MISC REVENUES 725,427 1,048 2,331 723,096 0%
SMALL OVERPAYMENT 68 55 32 36 47%
NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 150 210 120 30 80%
NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 1,300 841 488 812 38%
NSF FEES - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT - 150 - - -
FLEX-PLAN SERVICES FORFEITURES - 1,368 - - -
US BANK REBATE - - 1,557 (1,557) 0%
1,191,727 421,864 409,940 781,787 34%
TRANSFERS-IN:
PROCEEDS OF REFUNDING DEBT 2,763,315 - 2,763,314 1 100%
INSURANCE RECOVERIES - 854 - - 0%
TRANSFER FROM FUND 121 - - - - 0%
INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM 104 500 500 - 500 0%
TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 - 12,297 - - 0%
2,763,315 13,651 2,763,314 1 0%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 39,047,994$ 34,293,939$ 39,045,429$ 2,565$ 100%
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 159 of 192
8
Page 1 of 6
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001)
SALARIES AND WAGES 12,955,353$ 11,918,929$ 12,275,351$ 680,002$ 95%
OVERTIME 433,108 426,439 429,788 3,320 99%
HOLIDAY BUY BACK 201,026 175,302 173,507 27,519 86%
BENEFITS 4,684,279 4,176,225 4,605,205 79,074 98%
UNIFORMS 65,210 46,721 51,810 13,400 79%
SUPPLIES 422,863 307,615 398,705 24,158 94%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 276,005 107,568 296,601 (20,596) 107%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,483,763 1,686,173 2,073,922 409,841 83%
COMMUNICATIONS 203,230 186,954 162,663 40,567 80%
TRAVEL 33,685 19,016 27,960 5,725 83%
ADVERTISING 57,375 34,553 33,709 23,666 59%
RENTAL/LEASE 933,815 835,906 936,137 (2,322) 100%
INSURANCE 379,784 399,287 385,627 (5,843) 102%
UTILITIES 457,800 451,498 448,934 8,866 98%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 315,835 282,092 313,055 2,780 99%
MISCELLANEOUS 397,066 289,171 287,463 109,603 72%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 8,316,935 7,910,869 7,912,537 404,398 95%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 180,000 180,000 180,000 - 100%
EXCISE TAXES 6,452 5,280 5,637 815 87%
INTERFUND TRANSFER 5,137,482 1,521,587 3,520,377 1,617,105 69%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 138,734 36,779 161,605 (22,871) 116%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 2,874,066 946,595 2,874,066 (0) 100%
CAPITAL LEASES AND INSTALLMENT PURCHASES 64,654 64,014 64,654 0 100%
OTHER DEBT - 478 479 (479) 0%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 85,400 185,613 85,400 (0) 100%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - - 16,481 (16,481) 0%
INTERFUND SERVICES 200,000 145,523 188,170 11,830 94%
INTERFUND RENTAL - 48,000 - - 0%
41,303,920$ 32,388,187$ 37,909,842$ 3,394,078$ 92%
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE (009)
BENEFITS 312,774$ 188,768$ 190,477$ 122,297$ 61%
IN HOME LTC CLAIMS 183,337 102,167 87,674 95,663 48%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,000 6,081 - 7,000 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 250 250 275 (25) 110%
503,361$ 297,265$ 278,426$ 224,935$ 55%
RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND (011)
MISCELLANEOUS 300,000$ 558,835$ -$ 300,000$ 0%
300,000$ 558,835$ -$ 300,000$ 0%
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014)
SUPPLIES 100$ -$ -$ 100$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100 - - 100 0%
ADVERTISING 100 - - 100 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 7,700 5,280 4,484 3,216 58%
8,000$ 5,280$ 4,484$ 3,516$ 56%
BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUBFUND (016)
SUPPLIES -$ 965$ 914$ (914)$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20,000 127,592 115,564 (95,564) 578%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANENCE 668,200 310,148 199,719 468,481 30%
MISCELLANEOUS - 1,865 571 (571) 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 32,000 - - 32,000 0%
720,200$ 440,569$ 316,769$ 403,431$ 44%
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND (104)
FUEL CONSUMED 3,000$ 5,102$ 5,378$ (2,378)$ 179%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,000 6,182 800 4,200 16%
COMMUNICATIONS 2,233 3,471 2,702 (469) 121%
REPAIR/MAINT 800 20 - 800 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 20,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 25%
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES - 500 - - 0%
INTERGOVTL SVC 50,000 39,789 40,401 9,599 81%
81,033$ 60,063$ 54,281$ 26,752$ 67%
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 160 of 192
9
Page 2 of 6
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
STREET FUND (111)
SALARIES AND WAGES 481,344$ 432,354$ 534,746$ (53,402)$ 111%
OVERTIME 21,400 17,790 26,395 (4,995) 123%
BENEFITS 239,311 191,711 257,133 (17,822) 107%
UNIFORMS 6,000 4,146 4,338 1,662 72%
SUPPLIES 240,000 147,339 205,833 34,167 86%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 26,000 1,981 12,633 13,367 49%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13,700 4,576 6,490 7,211 47%
COMMUNICATIONS 2,500 3,139 4,125 (1,625) 165%
TRAVEL 1,000 693 110 890 11%
ADVERTISING 350 - - 350 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 180,104 159,178 182,457 (2,353) 101%
INSURANCE 82,400 87,201 74,683 7,717 91%
UTILITIES 275,783 249,002 236,707 39,076 86%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 45,000 29,154 28,523 16,477 63%
MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 1,400 5,998 2,002 75%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,000 1,764 1,956 44 98%
INTERFUND TRANSFER 28,805 28,649 28,805 0 100%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 3,149 3,015 3,149 - 100%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 1,964 2,074 1,964 (0) 100%
1,658,810$ 1,365,167$ 1,616,046$ 42,764$ 97%
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE (112)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,022,300$ 956,128$ 734,187$ 1,288,113$ 36%
MISCELLANEOUS - 26,427 - - 0%
INTERFUND TRANSFER OUT 387,043 117,581 43,423 343,620 11%
LAND 373,000 - 431,964 (58,964) 116%
CONST SURFACE CONST PROJECTS 5,653,297 488,250 2,616,441 3,036,856 46%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,203 72,201 72,201 2 100%
INTEREST ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 4,120 4,479 4,118 2 100%
INTERFUND SERVICES 501,703 146,999 336,924 164,779 67%
9,013,666$ 1,812,066$ 4,239,259$ 4,774,407$ 47%
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117)
SUPPLIES 4,200$ 6,334$ 3,110$ 1,090$ 74%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 723 676 324 68%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 130,950 41,817 75,100 55,850 57%
TRAVEL 75 67 11 65 14%
ADVERTISING 4,000 3,775 4,000 - 100%
RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 4,281 1,599 401 80%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300 - - 300 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 6,000 6,910 4,722 1,278 79%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 824 - - 824 0%
149,349$ 63,907$ 89,218$ 60,131$ 60%
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16,000$ 20,373$ 13,412$ 2,588$ 84%
ADVERTISING 33,500 26,801 28,599 4,901 85%
MISCELLANEOUS 500 157 - 500 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS - 10,000 - - 0%
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 4,000 4,000 4,000 - 100%
54,000$ 61,330$ 46,010$ 7,990$ 85%
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121)
SUPPLIES 1,700$ 1,642$ -$ 1,700$ 0%
SMALL EQUIPMENT - 555 - - 0%
INTERFUND TRANSFERS - - - - 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,086 25,086 25,086 - 100%
26,786$ 27,283$ 25,086$ 1,700$ 94%
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122)
MISCELLANEOUS 3,600$ 3,579$ 2,020$ 1,580$ 56%
3,600$ 3,579$ 2,020$ 1,580$ 56%
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123)
PROFESSIONAL SVC 10,500$ 10,247$ 9,500$ 1,000$ 90%
ADVERTISING 4,500 3,905 4,115 385 91%
MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 2,989 3,955 45 99%
19,000$ 17,140$ 17,570$ 1,430$ 92%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
Packet Page 161 of 192
10
Page 3 of 6
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 (125)
SUPPLIES 30,000$ 136,991$ 65,122$ (35,122)$ 217%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 400,000 20,214 145,210 254,790 36%
ADVERTISING - 379 - - 0%
RENTAL/LEASE - 3,399 11,924 (11,924) 0%
UTILITIES - - 2,358 (2,358) 0%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 152,712 90,229 36,271 116,441 24%
INTERFUND TRANSFER 500,000 98,818 - 500,000 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 510,000 - 248,149 261,851 49%
1,592,712$ 350,031$ 509,034$ 1,083,678$ 32%
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ (126)
MISCELLANEOUS 200,000$ -$ 2,500$ 197,500$ 1%
INTERFUND TRANSFER 438,528 438,910 438,527 1 100%
LAND 10,550 - 10,973 (423) 104%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 521,000 - 48,367 472,633 9%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 18,330 17,550 18,330 - 100%
INTEREST 11,433 12,074 11,433 (0) 100%
1,199,841$ 468,534$ 530,130$ 669,711$ 44%
GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127)
SUPPLIES 11,700$ 9,775$ 1,350$ 10,350$ 12%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,000 6,553 - 4,000 0%
INTERFUND TRANSFER 2,500 12,297 2,500 - 100%
18,200$ 28,625$ 3,850$ 14,350$ 21%
SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND (129)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,000$ 27,150 -$ 2,000$ 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS - 114,251 17,469 (17,469) 0%
INTERFUND SERVICES 11,653 - - 11,653 0%
13,653$ 141,401$ 17,469$ (3,816)$ 128%
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMENT (130)
SALARIES AND WAGES 81,251$ 68,794$ 69,753$ 11,498$ 86%
OVERTIME 3,500 2,589 3,704 (204) 106%
BENEFITS 39,056 31,626 31,721 7,335 81%
UNIFORMS 1,000 - - 1,000 0%
SUPPLIES 7,000 5,065 2,986 4,014 43%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 20,000 13,110 22,957 (2,957) 115%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000 200 200 800 20%
COMMUNICATIONS 1,412 1,419 1,503 (91) 106%
TRAVEL 500 - - 500 0%
ADVERTISING 3,200 3,818 1,843 1,357 58%
RENTAL/LEASE 9,216 5,256 9,216 - 100%
UTILITIES 3,800 130 694 3,106 18%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 2,590 3,348 652 84%
175,435$ 134,598$ 147,925$ 27,510$ 84%
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (132)
SUPPLIES -$ -$ 427$ (427)$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (388,483) 280,226 124,930 (513,413) 0%
LAND 700,000 - - 700,000 0%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1,759,000 (8,190) 89,064 1,669,936 5%
INTERFUND SERVICES - 1,114 - - 0%
2,070,517$ 273,149$ 214,420$ 1,856,097$ 10%
SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138)
SUPPLIES 500$ 222$ 99$ 401$ 20%
TRAVEL 3,256 - 3,256 - 100%
MISCELLANEOUS 1,586 15,840 1,859 (273) 117%
5,342$ 16,062$ 5,214$ 128$ 98%
TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT (139)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -$ 1,756$ -$ -$ 0%
INSURANCE 5,000 5,000 2,500 2,500 50%
INTERFUND TRANSFER - 44,277 - - 0%
INTERGOVTL SERVICES 640,000 599,803 642,500 (2,500) 100%
645,000$ 650,836$ 645,000$ -$ 100%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
Packet Page 162 of 192
11
Page 4 of 6
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
LID FUND CONTROL (211)
INTERFUND TRANSFER 28,600$ 22,130$ 28,600$ -$ 100%
28,600$ 22,130$ 28,600$ -$ 100%
2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231)
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 854,667$ 825,373$ 854,667$ -$ 100%
INTEREST 168,023 184,528 168,021 2 100%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 604 - 604 0 100%
1,023,294$ 1,009,901$ 1,023,291$ 3$ 100%
2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND (232)
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 923,199$ -$ 923,198$ 1$ 100%
INTEREST 23,105 - 23,028 77 100%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS 19,982 - - 19,982 0%
966,286$ -$ 946,226$ 20,060$ 98%
WATER FUND (421)
SALARIES AND WAGES 677,172$ 718,884$ 730,135$ (52,963)$ 108%
OVERTIME 24,180 23,408 15,586 8,594 64%
BENEFITS 326,137 305,808 331,660 (5,523) 102%
UNIFORMS 6,800 3,859 3,060 3,740 45%
SUPPLIES 151,838 132,080 128,898 22,940 85%
FUEL CONSUMED - - - - 0%
WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 1,600,000 1,499,289 1,395,278 204,722 87%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 130,816 120,428 120,606 10,210 92%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 25,161 6,669 20,193 4,968 80%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 575,468 370,308 507,972 67,496 88%
COMMUNICATIONS 35,000 29,974 28,051 6,949 80%
TRAVEL 2,600 54 65 2,535 3%
ADVERTISING 500 - - 500 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 104,820 94,450 106,677 (1,857) 102%
INSURANCE 66,869 67,607 74,689 (7,820) 112%
UTILITIES 40,000 33,590 31,567 8,433 79%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 17,600 17,434 17,647 (47) 100%
MISCELLANEOUS 307,880 347,899 392,231 (84,351) 127%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 30,000 25,444 26,306 3,694 88%
INTERFUND TAXES 920,881 938,649 1,029,698 (108,817) 112%
INTERFUND TRANSFER 292,830 397,176 291,663 1,167 100%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 49,849 49,849 23,575 26,274 47%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,614,973 1,991,100 2,526,589 1,088,384 70%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 2,115 2,025 2,115 - 100%
REVENUE BONDS 306,140 209,471 306,140 - 100%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 45,839 45,839 45,839 0 100%
INTEREST 275,912 280,305 275,913 (1) 100%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 22,384 - - 0%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 175 327 (327) 0%
INTERFUND SERVICES 514,096 486,611 476,835 37,261 93%
INTERFUND REPAIR/MAINT - 64 - - 0%
10,145,476$ 8,220,830$ 8,909,313$ 1,236,163$ 88%
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 163 of 192
12
Page 5 of 6
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
STORM FUND (422)
SALARIES AND WAGES 594,775$ 526,084$ 489,825$ 104,950$ 82%
OVERTIME 6,000 15,495 12,292 (6,292) 205%
BENEFITS 258,745 226,528 227,105 31,640 88%
UNIFORMS 6,500 5,820 5,281 1,219 81%
SUPPLIES 58,333 40,356 45,239 13,094 78%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 4,000 3,118 2,060 1,940 51%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,548,909 751,536 928,475 620,434 60%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,200 2,304 3,385 (185) 106%
TRAVEL 4,300 864 - 4,300 0%
ADVERTISING 500 - - 500 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 213,612 215,042 208,702 4,910 98%
INSURANCE 8,089 8,407 36,035 (27,946) 445%
UTILITES 10,500 8,738 8,857 1,643 84%
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 13,000 20,366 11,947 1,053 92%
MISCELLANEOUS 112,100 101,133 101,597 10,503 91%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 75,000 32,162 113,777 (38,777) 152%
INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 295,973 286,574 299,348 (3,375) 101%
INTERFUND TRANSFER 54,291 61,635 51,577 2,715 95%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,881,712 20,000 1,028,873 1,852,839 36%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 105,461 101,469 105,461 - 100%
REVENUE BONDS 149,691 82,905 149,691 0 100%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 32,063 32,063 32,063 1 100%
INTEREST 182,178 187,244 182,176 2 100%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 3,773 - - 0%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 83 165 (165) 0%
INTERFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 614,281 488,990 617,020 (2,739) 100%
7,233,213$ 3,222,687$ 4,660,951$ 2,572,262$ 64%
SEWER FUND (423)
SALARIES AND WAGES 1,650,330$ 1,520,375$ 1,624,152$ 26,178$ 98%
OVERTIME 73,000 92,846 85,018 (12,018) 116%
BENEFITS 760,694 645,686 737,791 22,903 97%
UNIFORMS 11,400 7,907 7,102 4,298 62%
SUPPLIES 399,333 286,908 252,200 147,133 63%
FUEL CONSUMED 90,000 133,031 81,891 8,109 91%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE - - 3,600 (3,600) 0%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 26,000 18,515 57,849 (31,849) 222%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,155,739 1,031,990 1,057,216 98,523 91%
COMMUNICATIONS 40,000 37,689 39,307 693 98%
TRAVEL 7,400 380 893 6,507 12%
ADVERTISING 2,500 145 - 2,500 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 149,968 131,766 146,775 3,193 98%
INSURANCE 155,006 156,092 128,938 26,068 83%
UTILITIES 1,170,600 892,214 964,479 206,121 82%
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 175,000 158,019 194,126 (19,126) 111%
MISCELLANEOUS 217,935 216,119 223,747 (5,812) 103%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 408,889 106,951 97,902 310,987 24%
INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 479,750 473,465 520,987 (41,237) 109%
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 1,230,743 1,406,173 1,128,984 101,759 92%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 449,500 - 32,244 417,256 7%
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 4,866,080 5,270,094 2,756,325 2,109,755 57%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 120,529 116,553 120,529 - 100%
REVENUE BONDS 69,169 222,624 69,169 (0) 100%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 161,191 143,620 161,186 5 100%
INTEREST 125,091 131,245 125,088 3 100%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 37,117 - - 0%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 41 111 (111) 0%
INTERFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 868,499 633,596 663,351 205,148 76%
14,864,346$ 13,871,163$ 11,280,961$ 3,583,385$ 76%
BOND RESERVE FUND (424)
REVENUE BONDS 160,000$ -$ 160,000$ -$ 100%
DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 24,760 - - 0%
INTEREST 680,816 189,115 680,815 1 100%
OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 57,335 - - 0%
840,816$ 271,210$ 840,815$ 1$ 100%
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 164 of 192
13
Page 6 of 6
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511)
SALARIES AND WAGES 201,962$ 178,166$ 195,619$ 6,343$ 97%
OVERTIME 3,000 886 2,309 691 77%
BENEFITS 89,965 79,780 90,431 (466) 101%
UNIFORMS 1,000 762 1,056 (56) 106%
SUPPLIES 96,500 105,729 92,006 4,494 95%
FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 387 708 292 71%
SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 361,700 254,520 243,589 118,111 67%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 8,000 23,061 16,967 (8,967) 212%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000 2,172 882 118 88%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,590 2,225 775 74%
RENTAL/LEASE 14,484 9,290 13,778 706 95%
INSURANCE 32,701 34,153 37,376 (4,675) 114%
UTILITIES 14,000 11,718 11,362 2,638 81%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 60,000 41,737 66,036 (6,036) 110%
MISCELLANEOUS 6,000 5,356 5,289 711 88%
INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,500 2,352 2,408 92 96%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 186,467 133,934 166,414 20,053 89%
INTERFUND RENTAL 10,000 12,922 6,089 3,911 61%
1,093,279$ 898,514$ 954,543$ 138,736$ 87%
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND (617)
BENEFITS 49,619$ 22,484$ 24,481$ 25,138$ 49%
PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 38,796 51,899 28,235 10,561 73%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,200 1,169 - 1,200 0%
89,615$ 75,551$ 52,716$ 36,899$ 59%
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (627)
SUPPLIES -$ 552$ 10,404$ (10,404)$ 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 225 76,399 (76,399) 0%
ADVERTISING 88
MISCELLANEOUS - 943 5,306 (5,306) 0%
-$ 1,808$ 92,108$ (92,108)$ 0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS 95,847,350$ 66,757,704$ 75,461,578$ 20,385,772$ 79%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
Packet Page 165 of 192
14
Page 1 of 1
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
CITY COUNCIL 238,644$ 283,946$ 216,844$ 21,800$ 91%
OFFICE OF MAYOR 251,085 235,609 244,596 6,489 97%
HUMAN RESOURCES 349,938 259,691 331,803 18,135 95%
MUNICIPAL COURT 801,872 730,892 794,813 7,059 99%
CITY CLERK 537,273 588,370 504,023 33,250 94%
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1,781,070 1,394,520 1,707,110 73,960 96%
CITY ATTORNEY 557,900 483,465 559,428 (1,528) 100%
NON-DEPARTMENTAL 17,758,367 11,122,707 15,593,052 2,165,315 88%
POLICE SERVICES 8,962,711 8,949,272 8,718,736 243,975 97%
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV.508,024 370,469 451,113 56,911 89%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2,219,366 1,562,226 1,888,528 330,838 85%
PARKS & RECREATION 3,833,166 3,388,522 3,450,475 382,691 90%
PUBLIC WORKS 2,098,677 1,681,281 1,997,917 100,760 95%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,405,827 1,337,219 1,451,406 (45,579) 103%
41,303,920$ 32,388,187$ 37,909,842$ 3,394,078$ 92%
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
WATER UTILITY FUND 10,145,476$ 8,220,830$ 8,909,313$ 1,236,163$ 88%
STORM UTILITY FUND 7,233,213 3,222,687 4,660,951 2,572,262 64%
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 14,864,346 13,871,163 11,280,961 3,583,385 76%
BOND RESERVE FUND 840,816 271,210 840,815 1 100%
33,083,851$ 25,585,890$ 25,692,039$ 7,391,812$ 78%
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY
CITY OF EDMONDS
CITY OF EDMONDS
General Fund Expenses ended the year at 92% of the budget expended.
Packet Page 166 of 192
15
Page 1 of 4
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES 117,615$ 117,692$ 123,042$ (5,427)$ 105%
OVERTIME 2,000 733 124 1,876 6%
BENEFITS 72,271 69,616 75,377 (3,106) 104%
SUPPLIES 2,000 398 583 1,417 29%
SMALL EQUIPMENT - - 1,805 (1,805) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,000 67,459 1,066 8,934 11%
COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 3,152 3,279 (279) 109%
TRAVEL 2,500 696 1,803 697 72%
RENTAL/LEASE 490 481 518 (28) 106%
REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 1,500 55 - 1,500 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 27,268 23,664 9,249 18,019 34%
238,644$ 283,946$ 216,844$ 21,800$ 91%
OFFICE OF MAYOR
SALARIES 192,115$ 185,986$ 191,269$ 846$ 100%
BENEFITS 46,170 42,490 44,854 1,316 97%
SUPPLIES 2,000 1,424 1,207 793 60%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,500 225 1,154 346 77%
COMMUNICATION 1,400 1,020 713 687 51%
TRAVEL 2,000 686 539 1,461 27%
RENTAL/LEASE 2,400 2,024 2,468 (68) 103%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 3,000 1,754 2,391 609 80%
251,085$ 235,609$ 244,596$ 6,489$ 97%
HUMAN RESOURCES
SALARIES 194,389$ 164,677$ 193,316$ 1,073$ 99%
BENEFITS 59,339 50,284 65,591 (6,252) 111%
SUPPLIES 2,300 4,354 4,207 (1,907) 183%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 100 - 337 (237) 337%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 71,000 23,149 49,391 21,609 70%
COMMUNICATIONS 700 506 1,049 (349) 150%
TRAVEL 500 655 63 437 13%
ADVERTISING 5,000 3,752 4,092 908 82%
RENTAL/LEASE 2,200 2,025 2,470 (270) 112%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 6,000 5,349 6,119 (119) 102%
MISCELLANEOUS 8,410 4,940 5,170 3,240 61%
349,938$ 259,691$ 331,803$ 18,135$ 95%
MUNICIPAL COURT
SALARIES 500,048$ 471,407$ 516,494$ (16,446)$ 103%
OVERTIME - 16 3,024 (3,024) 0%
BENEFITS 177,004 158,012 172,269 4,735 97%
SUPPLIES 9,400 14,170 12,273 (2,873) 131%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,500 1,653 3,744 (1,244) 150%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 69,000 69,341 62,759 6,241 91%
COMMUNICATIONS 2,600 2,539 3,165 (565) 122%
TRAVEL 2,390 2,088 3,617 (1,227) 151%
RENTAL/LEASE 1,070 1,306 1,432 (362) 134%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 610 409 3,242 (2,632) 531%
MISCELLANEOUS 37,250 9,951 12,795 24,455 34%
801,872$ 730,892$ 794,813$ 7,059$ 99%
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
CITY OF EDMONDS
Packet Page 167 of 192
16
Page 2 of 4
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
CITY CLERK
SALARIES AND WAGES 307,596$ 353,666$ 301,730$ 5,866$ 98%
OVERTIME - - 1,777 (1,777) 0%
BENEFITS 101,833 102,173 101,275 558 99%
SUPPLIES 10,237 8,415 7,131 3,106 70%
SMALL EQUIPMENT - 1,560 270 (270) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24,107 44,395 22,685 1,422 94%
COMMUNICATIONS 50,000 45,780 33,368 16,632 67%
TRAVEL 1,000 57 373 627 37%
ADVERTISING 4,200 3,472 1,763 2,437 42%
RENTAL/LEASE 20,000 15,991 19,040 960 95%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 14,300 8,599 10,815 3,485 76%
MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 4,261 3,795 205 95%
537,273$ 588,370$ 504,023$ 33,250$ 94%
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SALARIES 754,909$ 689,098$ 738,062$ 16,847$ 98%
OVERTIME 6,667 6,840 7,067 (400) 106%
BENEFITS 251,163 220,730 256,185 (5,022) 102%
SUPPLIES 76,036 23,949 66,675 9,361 88%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 194,491 78,664 185,634 8,857 95%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 104,691 96,489 75,129 29,562 72%
COMMUNICATIONS 58,960 51,816 39,486 19,474 67%
TRAVEL 1,750 1,036 985 765 56%
RENTAL/LEASE 8,904 8,390 8,032 872 90%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 146,986 151,962 136,764 10,222 93%
MISCELLANEOUS 53,500 28,766 47,207 6,293 88%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 123,013 36,779 145,884 (22,871) 119%
1,781,070$ 1,394,520$ 1,707,110$ 73,960$ 96%
CITY ATTORNEY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 557,900$ 483,465$ 559,378$ (1,478)$ 100%
MISC PROSECUTOR - - 50 (50) 0%
557,900$ 483,465$ 559,428$ (1,528)$ 100%
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
SALARIES 153,871$ -$ -$ 153,871$ 0%
BENEFITS - UNEMPLOYMENT 25,000 24,754 12,410 12,590 50%
SUPPLIES 3,000 - 1,429 1,571 48%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 353,347 227,101 344,607 8,740 98%
RENTAL/LEASE 3,600 3,600 3,600 - 100%
INSURANCE 379,784 399,287 385,627 (5,843) 102%
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - 13,910 13,910 (13,910) 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 55,708 55,593 57,960 (2,252) 104%
INTERGOVT SERVICES 8,236,003 7,349,373 7,838,246 397,757 95%
ECA LOAN PAYMENT 180,000 180,000 180,000 - 100%
EXCISE TAXES 6,452 5,280 5,637 815 87%
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 5,137,482 1,521,587 3,520,377 1,617,105 69%
GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 2,874,066 946,595 2,874,066 (0) 100%
INSTALLMENT PURCHASES 64,654 64,014 64,654 0 100%
INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 85,400 185,613 85,400 (0) 100%
DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS - - 16,481 (16,481) 0%
FISCAL AGENT FEES - 478 479 (479) 0%
INTERFUND SERVICES 200,000 145,523 188,170 11,830 94%
17,758,367$ 11,122,707$ 15,593,052$ 2,165,315$ 88%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Packet Page 168 of 192
17
Page 3 of 4
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
POLICE SERVICES
SALARIES 5,355,748$ 5,127,390$ 5,182,843$ 172,905$ 97%
OVERTIME 410,441 407,670 391,707 18,734 95%
HOLIDAY BUYBACK 201,026 175,302 173,507 27,519 86%
BENEFITS 1,995,759 1,826,734 2,012,464 (16,705) 101%
UNIFORMS 56,910 40,324 42,518 14,392 75%
SUPPLIES 87,500 64,702 64,864 22,636 74%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 20,335 14,008 33,274 (12,939) 164%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 114,725 146,276 106,857 7,868 93%
COMMUNICATIONS 25,592 25,242 25,936 (344) 101%
TRAVEL 14,300 10,706 15,337 (1,037) 107%
ADVERTISING 375 73 62 313 17%
RENTAL/LEASE 608,688 536,766 607,134 1,554 100%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 16,115 6,730 12,359 3,756 77%
MISCELLANEOUS 44,960 30,485 39,483 5,477 88%
INTERGOVTL SERVICES 10,237 488,865 10,391 (154) 101%
INTERFUND RENTAL - 48,000 - - 0%
8,962,711$ 8,949,272$ 8,718,736$ 243,975$ 97%
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV.
SALARIES 216,742$ 214,610$ 224,764$ (8,022)$ 104%
BENEFITS 68,668 63,438 58,700 9,968 85%
SUPPLIES 1,500 901 6,508 (5,008) 434%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 800 539 504 296 63%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145,824 61,859 133,635 12,190 92%
COMMUNICATIONS 1,490 1,477 876 614 59%
TRAVEL 2,000 201 119 1,881 6%
ADVERTISING 39,500 20,682 19,244 20,256 49%
RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 2,379 2,470 (470) 123%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 29,000 4,384 4,293 24,707 15%
508,024$ 370,469$ 451,113$ 56,911$ 89%
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING
SALARIES 1,273,306$ 1,036,527$ 1,156,972$ 116,334$ 91%
OVERTIME 1,300 1,823 5,044 (3,744) 388%
BENEFITS 465,402 368,362 422,123 43,279 91%
UNIFORMS 100 - 120 (20) 120%
SUPPLIES 13,100 11,078 17,350 (4,250) 132%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 8,650 1,359 14,126 (5,476) 163%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 383,256 76,969 195,569 187,687 51%
COMMUNICATIONS 4,600 4,317 4,701 (101) 102%
TRAVEL 1,600 891 2,694 (1,094) 168%
ADVERTISING 4,000 3,892 5,377 (1,377) 134%
RENTAL/LEASE 38,152 33,310 38,800 (648) 102%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 500 112 620 (120) 124%
MISCELLANEOUS 25,400 23,586 25,032 368 99%
2,219,366$ 1,562,226$ 1,888,528$ 330,838$ 85%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES 1,203,904$ 966,112$ 1,111,482$ 92,422$ 92%
OVERTIME 5,000 1,199 2,120 2,880 42%
BENEFITS 423,053 357,672 438,805 (15,752) 104%
UNIFORMS 360 244 109 251 30%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,200 1,002 2,422 (222) 110%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 62,950 840 57,875 5,075 92%
COMMUNICATIONS 11,220 6,087 7,315 3,905 65%
TRAVEL 600 52 373 227 62%
ADVERTISING - 264 - - 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 18,492 13,404 18,492 - 100%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,800 38 956 844 53%
MISCELLANEOUS 15,000 8,662 14,704 296 98%
1,744,579$ 1,355,577$ 1,654,654$ 89,925$ 95%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Packet Page 169 of 192
18
Page 4 of 4
Title
2014 Adopted
Budget
12/31/2013
Expenditures
12/31/2014
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining % Spent
PARKS & RECREATION
SALARIES 1,809,753$ 1,718,242$ 1,659,835$ 149,918$ 92%
OVERTIME 5,000 7,882 14,574 (9,574) 291%
BENEFITS 653,499 581,413 601,228 52,271 92%
UNIFORMS 5,340 4,281 5,401 (61) 101%
SUPPLIES 121,190 103,578 116,004 5,186 96%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 43,929 2,408 43,457 472 99%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 585,263 385,600 449,786 135,477 77%
COMMUNICATIONS 28,818 29,863 26,704 2,114 93%
TRAVEL 4,545 1,949 2,030 2,515 45%
ADVERTISING 4,300 2,418 3,172 1,128 74%
RENTAL/LEASE 170,019 166,687 175,122 (5,103) 103%
PUBLIC UTILITY 175,000 179,256 163,786 11,214 94%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 52,524 43,209 52,117 407 99%
MISCELLANEOUS 87,570 89,105 57,638 29,932 66%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 15,721 - 15,721 0 100%
INTERGOVTL SERVICES 70,695 72,631 63,901 6,794 90%
3,833,166$ 3,388,522$ 3,450,475$ 382,691$ 90%
PUBLIC WORKS
SALARIES 250,358$ 244,852$ 250,222$ 136$ 100%
OVERTIME 200 - - 200 0%
BENEFITS 78,450 66,913 73,261 5,189 93%
SUPPLIES 7,600 4,484 5,018 2,582 66%
SMALL EQUIPMENT - 201 583 (583) 0%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 60 2,196 (1,996) 1098%
COMMUNICATIONS 1,350 1,360 762 588 56%
TRAVEL 500 - - 500 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 7,740 4,327 6,241 1,499 81%
PUBLIC UTILITY 2,800 2,299 2,331 469 83%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,000 - - 1,000 0%
MISCELLANEOUS 3,900 1,206 2,651 1,249 68%
354,098$ 325,704$ 343,263$ 10,835$ 97%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES 624,999 628,669 625,321 (322) 100%
OVERTIME 2,500 276 4,352 (1,852) 174%
BENEFITS 266,668 243,632 270,662 (3,994) 101%
UNIFORMS 2,500 1,872 3,661 (1,161) 146%
SUPPLIES 87,000 70,163 95,458 (8,458) 110%
SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,000 6,175 10,445 (7,445) 348%
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 2,945 11,837 (11,837) 0%
COMMUNICATIONS 13,500 13,796 15,309 (1,809) 113%
TRAVEL - - 27 (27) 0%
RENTAL/LEASE 50,060 45,215 50,319 (259) 101%
PUBLIC UTILITY 280,000 269,943 282,817 (2,817) 101%
REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 73,500 51,720 76,153 (2,653) 104%
MISCELLANEOUS 2,100 2,814 5,046 (2,946) 240%
1,405,827$ 1,337,219$ 1,451,406$ (45,579)$ 103%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 41,303,920$ 32,388,187 37,909,842 3,394,078 92%
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Packet Page 170 of 192
19
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 1,924,425$ 1,924,425$ 1,704,062$ -11.45%
February 4,018,317 2,093,892 6,617,557 64.68%
March 6,290,404 2,272,087 8,899,880 41.48%
April 9,635,977 3,345,573 12,575,092 30.50%
May 18,204,614 8,568,637 19,617,376 7.76%
June 20,118,369 1,913,756 21,270,138 5.72%
July 22,346,244 2,227,874 23,438,395 4.89%
August 24,295,443 1,949,199 25,327,825 4.25%
September 26,205,760 1,910,317 27,168,450 3.67%
October 29,347,664 3,141,904 30,077,234 2.49%
November 37,064,336 7,716,672 37,193,923 0.35%
December 39,047,994 1,983,658 39,045,428 -0.01%
Real Estate Excise Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 74,651$ 74,651$ 92,868$ 24.40%
February 120,737 46,087 149,163 23.54%
March 181,397 60,660 204,533 12.75%
April 256,711 75,314 261,931 2.03%
May 323,837 67,125 326,172 0.72%
June 398,387 74,550 410,270 2.98%
July 483,191 84,805 559,760 15.85%
August 578,011 94,819 666,423 15.30%
September 666,060 88,049 746,012 12.00%
October 768,001 101,941 809,086 5.35%
November 837,495 69,494 891,128 6.40%
December 902,243 64,748 939,931 4.18%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-General Fund
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Real Estate Excise Tax
0
8000000
16000000
24000000
32000000
40000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
General Fund
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Real Estate Excise Tax
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 171 of 192
20
Retail Eating & Drinking
734,130
Contractors 897,543
Wholesale Trade 233,970
Communications 212,456
Misc Retail Trade 691,544
Accommodation 40,938
Business Services 395,252
Health & Personal Care
93,795
Automotive Repair 158,685
Amusement & Recreation
68,093
Retail Food Stores 249,937
Others 303,229
Retail Automotive/Gas
1,557,572
Clothing and Accessories
203,620
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: December 2014
Year-to-Date
Total $5,840,764
($100,000)($50,000)$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 $550,000
Amusement & Recreation
Clothing and Accessories
Health & Personal Care
Communications
Automotive Repair
Business Services
Accommodation
Wholesale Trade
Retail Food Stores
Misc Retail Trade
Others
Retail Eating & Drinking
Contractors
Retail Automotive/Gas
Total
($76,603)
($11,436)
$826
$1,115
$1,863
$2,231
$4,378
$7,785
$21,088
$56,256
$59,625
$76,203
$119,021
$253,129
$515,481
Change in Sales Tax Revenue:
December 2014 compared to
December 2013
Packet Page 172 of 192
21
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 428,831$ 428,831$ 444,169$ 3.58%
February 963,323 534,493 998,510 3.65%
March 1,363,952 400,629 1,477,603 8.33%
April 1,763,418 399,466 1,870,619 6.08%
May 2,251,403 487,985 2,371,435 5.33%
June 2,687,897 436,495 2,812,288 4.63%
July 3,127,170 439,272 3,276,565 4.78%
August 3,623,461 496,291 3,769,832 4.04%
September 4,086,398 462,937 4,267,681 4.44%
October 4,563,331 476,933 4,803,894 5.27%
November 5,078,747 515,416 5,343,751 5.22%
December 5,525,609 446,862 5,840,764 5.70%
Gas Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 113,876$ 113,876$ 103,199$ -9.38%
February 239,319 125,442 198,165 -17.20%
March 342,980 103,661 298,299 -13.03%
April 436,459 93,479 376,839 -13.66%
May 512,262 75,803 435,966 -14.89%
June 565,759 53,498 474,528 -16.13%
July 607,696 41,937 504,520 -16.98%
August 638,725 31,029 528,960 -17.19%
September 666,716 27,990 551,417 -17.29%
October 696,005 29,289 577,044 -17.09%
November 746,459 50,453 608,409 -18.49%
December 819,286 72,827 676,716 -17.40%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Sales and Use Tax
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Gas Utility Tax
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Sales and Use Tax
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Gas Utility Tax
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 173 of 192
22
Telephone Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 126,925$ 126,925$ 120,158$ -5.33%
February 249,682 122,757 248,366 -0.53%
March 386,065 136,384 359,490 -6.88%
April 499,602 113,536 470,135 -5.90%
May 645,057 145,456 581,203 -9.90%
June 768,223 123,165 692,449 -9.86%
July 895,235 127,013 803,786 -10.22%
August 1,037,189 141,953 912,478 -12.02%
September 1,143,101 105,912 1,022,001 -10.59%
October 1,286,698 143,597 1,127,973 -12.34%
November 1,381,314 94,616 1,220,609 -11.63%
December 1,544,793 163,479 1,353,988 -12.35%
Electric Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 158,918$ 158,918$ 175,072$ 10.16%
February 320,172 161,254 352,390 10.06%
March 475,954 155,782 534,485 12.30%
April 631,990 156,035 690,245 9.22%
May 774,898 142,908 839,998 8.40%
June 885,438 110,541 948,700 7.14%
July 991,385 105,947 1,055,702 6.49%
August 1,087,004 95,619 1,156,363 6.38%
September 1,187,503 100,499 1,255,624 5.74%
October 1,274,792 87,289 1,353,054 6.14%
November 1,383,012 108,220 1,464,952 5.92%
December 1,490,394 107,382 1,564,672 4.98%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Telephone Utility Tax
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Electric Utility Tax
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Telephone Utility Tax
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Electric Utility Tax
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 174 of 192
23
Meter Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 429,754$ 429,754$ 489,005$ 13.79%
February 729,586 299,832 828,145 13.51%
March 1,147,622 418,036 1,294,140 12.77%
April 1,435,683 288,061 1,607,107 11.94%
May 1,858,183 422,500 2,073,689 11.60%
June 2,169,885 311,702 2,434,321 12.19%
July 2,657,881 487,996 3,003,419 13.00%
August 3,086,188 428,307 3,496,156 13.28%
September 3,680,575 594,387 4,176,682 13.48%
October 4,108,457 427,882 4,640,322 12.95%
November 4,610,786 502,330 5,176,437 12.27%
December 4,924,500 313,714 5,506,197 11.81%
Storm Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 210,362$ 210,362$ 216,037$ 10.16%
February 663,443 453,081 680,744 10.06%
March 874,097 210,654 896,910 12.30%
April 1,061,161 187,064 1,089,565 9.22%
May 1,272,188 211,026 1,305,756 8.40%
June 1,459,452 187,265 1,498,017 7.14%
July 1,671,872 212,419 1,716,475 2.67%
August 2,138,683 466,812 2,180,039 1.93%
September 2,356,833 218,149 2,395,835 1.65%
October 2,549,604 192,771 2,587,716 1.49%
November 2,766,495 216,890 2,804,087 1.36%
December 2,959,725 193,230 2,996,058 1.23%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Meter Water Sales
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Storm Water Sales
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Meter Water Sales
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Storm Water Sales
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 175 of 192
24
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 434,795$ 434,795$ 479,087$ 10.19%
February 786,497 351,702 860,724 9.44%
March 1,218,216 431,719 1,335,216 9.60%
April 1,568,380 350,165 1,717,700 9.52%
May 2,004,398 436,018 2,195,896 9.55%
June 2,358,600 354,202 2,584,030 9.56%
July 2,803,274 444,674 3,069,159 9.48%
August 3,161,173 357,899 3,458,097 9.39%
September 3,614,263 453,090 3,950,493 9.30%
October 3,973,096 358,833 4,346,368 9.40%
November 4,416,998 443,903 4,826,676 9.28%
December 4,773,750 356,752 5,209,828 9.13%
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales
2014
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 176 of 192
25
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 4,353,622$ 4,353,622$ 4,116,199$ -5.45%
February 7,291,542 2,937,920 5,980,774 -17.98%
March 10,399,709 3,108,167 9,514,450 -8.51%
April 14,081,551 3,681,842 14,163,986 0.59%
May 16,435,777 2,354,226 16,009,991 -2.59%
June 20,230,998 3,795,221 18,147,195 -10.30%
July 23,957,530 3,726,533 20,853,841 -12.95%
August 26,904,694 2,947,164 24,534,694 -8.81%
September 30,752,045 3,847,350 28,291,461 -8.00%
October 33,490,921 2,738,877 30,161,609 -9.94%
November 36,538,679 3,047,758 34,810,144 -4.73%
December 41,303,920 4,765,241 37,909,843 -8.22%
Non-Departmental
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 3,058,379$ 3,058,379$ 2,396,214$ -21.65%
February 3,833,671 775,292 2,563,640 -33.13%
March 4,933,934 1,100,263 4,388,210 -11.06%
April 6,660,754 1,726,820 7,277,792 9.26%
May 6,884,360 223,606 7,363,650 6.96%
June 9,027,957 2,143,597 7,709,624 -14.60%
July 10,696,842 1,668,885 8,424,155 -21.25%
August 11,325,100 628,258 10,027,805 -11.46%
September 13,265,072 1,939,972 11,863,833 -10.56%
October 13,833,442 568,370 11,971,534 -13.46%
November 14,437,686 604,244 14,551,604 0.79%
December 17,758,367 3,320,681 15,593,052 -12.19%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-General Fund
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Non-Departmental
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
14000000
16000000
18000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Non-Departmental
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
6000000
12000000
18000000
24000000
30000000
36000000
42000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
General Fund
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 177 of 192
26
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 17,436$ 17,436$ 14,710$ -15.64%
February 37,196 19,760 29,242 -21.38%
March 56,930 19,734 46,539 -18.25%
April 74,661 17,731 65,481 -12.29%
May 91,717 17,056 85,284 -7.01%
June 111,368 19,651 110,659 -0.64%
July 133,849 22,481 129,296 -3.40%
August 154,203 20,355 145,411 -5.70%
September 171,728 17,524 164,792 -4.04%
October 193,996 22,268 181,581 -6.40%
November 214,250 20,254 198,374 -7.41%
December 238,644 24,394 216,844 -9.13%
Office of Mayor
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 21,493$ 21,493$ 19,866$ -7.57%
February 42,845 21,353 40,990 -4.33%
March 63,933 21,088 61,132 -4.38%
April 84,211 20,278 82,041 -2.58%
May 104,565 20,354 102,277 -2.19%
June 125,279 20,714 122,235 -2.43%
July 146,686 21,408 143,210 -2.37%
August 167,273 20,586 163,387 -2.32%
September 187,312 20,039 183,383 -2.10%
October 209,955 22,643 203,639 -3.01%
November 231,093 21,138 223,683 -3.21%
December 251,085 19,992 244,595 -2.58%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-City Council
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Office of Mayor
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Council
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Office of Mayor
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 178 of 192
27
Human Resources
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 25,798$ 25,798$ 27,275$ 5.72%
February 52,555 26,756 60,853 15.79%
March 84,843 32,288 88,106 3.85%
April 114,019 29,176 112,767 -1.10%
May 143,795 29,775 142,206 -1.10%
June 171,136 27,342 172,043 0.53%
July 199,812 28,676 199,033 -0.39%
August 225,905 26,093 228,816 1.29%
September 257,927 32,022 251,736 -2.40%
October 285,341 27,413 274,401 -3.83%
November 310,098 24,757 302,661 -2.40%
December 349,938 39,840 331,803 -5.18%
Municipal Court
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 59,240$ 59,240$ 58,367$ -1.47%
February 125,452 66,212 116,841 -6.86%
March 193,525 68,074 198,204 2.42%
April 262,436 68,911 257,767 -1.78%
May 327,513 65,077 320,047 -2.28%
June 396,410 68,897 384,624 -2.97%
July 459,812 63,402 451,412 -1.83%
August 527,281 67,468 516,393 -2.06%
September 590,660 63,379 584,516 -1.04%
October 658,527 67,868 652,008 -0.99%
November 725,443 66,915 722,840 -0.36%
December 801,872 76,429 794,813 -0.88%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Human Resources
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Municipal Court
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Human Resources
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Municipal Court
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 179 of 192
28
Community Services/Economic Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 31,471$ 31,471$ 24,299$ -22.79%
February 80,480 49,009 54,146 -32.72%
March 121,436 40,956 83,578 -31.18%
April 161,422 39,986 160,955 -0.29%
May 203,742 42,320 177,081 -13.09%
June 240,317 36,574 200,183 -16.70%
July 291,509 51,193 227,071 -22.11%
August 327,786 36,277 262,287 -19.98%
September 366,394 38,607 302,425 -17.46%
October 408,391 41,998 348,588 -14.64%
November 444,482 36,090 402,674 -9.41%
December 508,024 63,542 451,113 -11.20%
City Clerk
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 39,751$ 39,751$ 40,227$ 1.20%
February 81,417 41,666 85,455 4.96%
March 128,867 47,450 127,044 -1.41%
April 170,636 41,769 164,667 -3.50%
May 217,171 46,535 209,795 -3.40%
June 257,997 40,826 246,693 -4.38%
July 303,101 45,105 290,408 -4.19%
August 347,896 44,795 334,638 -3.81%
September 395,264 47,368 380,235 -3.80%
October 442,040 46,776 428,531 -3.06%
November 489,440 47,400 464,901 -5.01%
December 537,273 47,833 504,023 -6.19%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Community Services/Economic Development
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-City Clerk
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Community Services/Economic Development
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Clerk
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 180 of 192
29
Information Services
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 74,773$ 74,773$ 58,589$ -21.64%
February 168,007 93,233 139,016 -17.26%
March 244,125 76,118 181,347 -25.72%
April 314,480 70,355 227,941 -27.52%
May 385,147 70,667 256,132 -33.50%
June 448,960 63,813 291,238 -35.13%
July 505,646 56,687 443,744 -12.24%
August 557,803 52,157 623,612 11.80%
September 619,290 61,486 704,331 13.73%
October 692,914 73,625 741,922 7.07%
November 784,298 91,383 809,959 3.27%
December 972,641 188,343 932,563 -4.12%
Finance
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 76,488$ 76,488$ 130,464$ 70.57%
February 146,752 70,263 153,899 4.87%
March 212,713 65,961 209,473 -1.52%
April 274,608 61,895 271,170 -1.25%
May 335,512 60,905 332,822 -0.80%
June 406,136 70,624 392,246 -3.42%
July 470,869 64,733 452,362 -3.93%
August 528,622 57,753 511,477 -3.24%
September 592,790 64,168 574,577 -3.07%
October 665,109 72,319 642,314 -3.43%
November 735,415 70,306 706,835 -3.89%
December 808,429 73,014 774,547 -4.19%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Information Services
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Finance
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Information Services
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Finance
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 181 of 192
30
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 46,492$ 46,492$ 32,000$ -31.17%
February 92,983 46,492 91,366 -1.74%
March 139,475 46,492 123,381 -11.54%
April 185,967 46,492 186,128 0.09%
May 232,458 46,492 231,890 -0.24%
June 278,950 46,492 279,764 0.29%
July 325,442 46,492 325,422 -0.01%
August 371,933 46,492 330,595 -11.11%
September 418,425 46,492 421,910 0.83%
October 464,916 46,492 453,910 -2.37%
November 511,408 46,492 500,002 -2.23%
December 557,900 46,492 559,428 0.27%
Police
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 705,829$ 705,829$ 681,573$ -3.44%
February 1,418,624 712,795 1,369,842 -3.44%
March 2,141,608 722,984 2,062,997 -3.67%
April 2,848,325 706,717 2,754,778 -3.28%
May 3,538,280 689,955 3,458,116 -2.27%
June 4,290,002 751,723 4,215,558 -1.74%
July 5,010,051 720,049 4,897,465 -2.25%
August 5,729,498 719,446 5,599,938 -2.26%
September 6,484,162 754,665 6,303,649 -2.78%
October 7,198,283 714,120 7,019,012 -2.49%
November 8,171,414 973,131 7,978,925 -2.36%
December 8,962,711 791,297 8,718,736 -2.72%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-City Attorney
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Police
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
City Attorney
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Police
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 182 of 192
31
Development Services
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 182,478$ 182,478$ 126,887$ -30.46%
February 364,463 181,986 257,352 -29.39%
March 569,107 204,643 387,354 -31.94%
April 747,348 178,241 523,426 -29.96%
May 923,916 176,568 678,695 -26.54%
June 1,094,697 170,781 826,994 -24.45%
July 1,273,462 178,765 997,833 -21.64%
August 1,462,616 189,154 1,193,410 -18.41%
September 1,646,105 183,489 1,347,782 -18.12%
October 1,844,010 197,905 1,505,679 -18.35%
November 2,028,039 184,029 1,679,632 -17.18%
December 2,219,366 191,327 1,888,528 -14.91%
Parks & Recreation
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 245,174$ 245,174$ 237,608$ -3.09%
February 514,878 269,704 486,587 -5.49%
March 802,897 288,020 732,519 -8.77%
April 1,081,862 278,965 977,642 -9.63%
May 1,374,671 292,809 1,271,826 -7.48%
June 1,720,137 345,466 1,534,299 -10.80%
July 2,161,286 441,149 1,921,487 -11.10%
August 2,598,883 437,597 2,368,651 -8.86%
September 2,929,401 330,519 2,688,571 -8.22%
October 3,218,715 289,313 2,931,567 -8.92%
November 3,483,750 265,036 3,150,702 -9.56%
December 3,833,166 349,416 3,450,475 -9.98%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Development Services
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Parks & Recreation
0
400000
800000
1200000
1600000
2000000
2400000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Development Services
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
500000
1000000
1500000
2000000
2500000
3000000
3500000
4000000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Parks & Recreation
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 183 of 192
32
Public Works
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 29,205$ 29,205$ 27,811$ -4.77%
February 57,374 28,169 55,607 -3.08%
March 85,998 28,624 84,738 -1.47%
April 113,676 27,678 114,745 0.94%
May 142,297 28,621 142,879 0.41%
June 171,373 29,077 171,032 -0.20%
July 210,538 39,164 199,315 -5.33%
August 238,755 28,217 227,438 -4.74%
September 266,891 28,136 256,321 -3.96%
October 296,178 29,287 284,363 -3.99%
November 322,670 26,492 311,675 -3.41%
December 354,098 31,428 343,263 -3.06%
Facilities Maintenance
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 109,761$ 109,761$ 118,162$ 7.65%
February 228,319 118,558 229,255 0.41%
March 356,501 128,182 363,708 2.02%
April 468,975 112,475 481,545 2.68%
May 583,345 114,370 588,147 0.82%
June 696,280 112,934 696,472 0.03%
July 809,237 112,957 825,520 2.01%
August 918,038 108,802 940,041 2.40%
September 1,038,936 120,897 1,060,716 2.10%
October 1,145,093 106,158 1,172,625 2.40%
November 1,265,760 120,666 1,294,033 2.23%
December 1,405,827 140,067 1,451,406 3.24%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Public Works
2014
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Facilities Maintenance
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Public Works
Current Year Budget Prior Year
0
300000
600000
900000
1200000
1500000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Facilities Maintenance
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 184 of 192
33
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January 146,184$ 146,184$ 122,149$ -16.44%
February 294,638 148,454 246,682 -16.28%
March 440,139 145,501 376,122 -14.54%
April 586,005 145,866 505,140 -13.80%
May 729,289 143,284 649,144 -10.99%
June 871,313 142,024 793,532 -8.93%
July 1,013,759 142,446 926,107 -8.65%
August 1,157,177 143,418 1,060,795 -8.33%
September 1,305,788 148,611 1,202,684 -7.90%
October 1,461,186 155,398 1,349,933 -7.61%
November 1,605,332 144,145 1,511,643 -5.84%
December 1,744,579 139,247 1,654,654 -5.15%
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report-Engineering
2014
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1800000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Engineering
Current Year Budget Prior Year
Packet Page 185 of 192
34
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
(a)
Term Purchase Purchase Maturity Yield to Weighted
Agency / Issuer Investment Type (months) Date Price Date Maturity Average
Washington State Local
Government Investment Pool
Investment Pool Various 22,105,635$ Various 0.104% 0.051%
Snohomish County
Investment Pool
Investment Pool Various 15,070,639$ Various 0.72% 0.239%
FHLMC Bonds 60 12/28/2012 1,000,000 12/28/2017 0.90% 0.020%
FHLMC Bonds 54 12/27/2012 1,000,000 6/27/2017 0.75% 0.017%
FFCB Bonds 45 12/19/2012 1,000,000 9/19/2016 0.54% 0.012%
FNMA Bonds 60 9/19/2014 1,000,000 9/19/2019 1.87% 0.041%
FFCB Bonds 60 9/23/2014 1,000,000 9/23/2019 2.03% 0.045%
FHLMC Bonds 51 9/26/2014 1,000,000 12/26/2018 1.75% 0.039%
FHLMC Bonds 42 9/19/2014 1,000,000 3/26/2018 1.38% 0.030%
FICO Bonds 33 9/19/2014 1,027,000 6/6/2017 0.96% 0.022%
TOTAL 45,203,274$ 0.52%0.515%
Investment Mix % of Total
State Investment Pool 48.9% Current 6-month treasury rate 0.12%
Bonds 17.8% Current State Pool rate 0.104%
Snohomish County
Investment Pool 33.3% Blended Edmonds rate 0.52%
100.0%
(a) To maturity.
Rate Comparison
City of Edmonds
Investment Portfolio Summary
As of December 31, 2014
Packet Page 186 of 192
35
GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW
12/31/2013 9/30/2014 12/31/2014 Q4 YTD
001-General Fund 6,834,380$ 5,711,368$ 7,969,966$ 2,258,597$ 1,135,586$
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 440,744 519,824 538,766 18,942 98,022
011-Risk Management Fund 387,195 387,877 1,024,309 636,433 637,114
012-Contingency Reserve Fund 5,376,796 5,392,709 5,396,393 3,683 19,597
013-Mulitmodal Transportation FD 55,859 55,957 55,995 38 136
014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 1,062 1,065 1,065 0 3
016-Building Maintenance 64,762 178,124 323,719 145,595 258,957
Total General Fund 13,160,798$ 12,246,925$ 15,310,214$ 3,063,289$ 2,149,416$
GENERAL
FUND
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$13.16 $12.25
$15.31
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Dec 2014
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
General Fund
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2014 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2014 Financial Statements.
Packet Page 187 of 192
36
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
12/31/2013 9/30/2014 12/31/2014 Q4 YTD
General Fund 13,160,798$ 12,246,925$ 15,310,214$ 3,063,289$ 2,149,416$
Special Revenue 5,373,323 6,763,486 6,909,172 145,686 1,535,849
Debt Service 57,161 86,304 86,411 108 29,250
Total Governmental Funds 18,591,283$ 19,096,715$ 22,305,797$ 3,209,082$ 3,714,515$
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCESGOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$13.16
$12.25
$15.31
$5.37
$6.76 $6.91
$0.06 $0.09 $0.09 -
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Dec 2014
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
General
Fund
Special
Revenue
Debt
Service
Governmental Fund Balances-By Fund GroupGovernmentalFund Balances-By Fund Group
$18.59 $19.10
$22.31
-
6
12
18
24
Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Dec 2014
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Governmental Fund
Balances - Combined
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2014 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2014 Financial Statements.
Packet Page 188 of 192
37
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW
12/31/2013 9/30/2014 12/31/2014 Q4 YTD
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund 91,432$ 78,906$ 62,837$ (16,069)$ (28,595)$
111 - Street Fund 215,200 380,056 373,951 (6,105) 158,751
112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 481,154 121,221 571,386 450,165 90,232
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 431,932 434,671 440,387 5,715 8,455
118 - Memorial Street Tree 17,703 17,751 17,763 12 61
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 106,735 122,099 131,900 9,801 25,164
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 61,719 73,489 64,305 (9,185) 2,585
122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 13,858 12,509 14,445 1,936 587
123 - Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 70,429 80,747 76,931 (3,815) 6,502
125 - Real Estate Tax 2 1,101,453 1,732,803 1,537,317 (195,486) 435,864
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 760,453 1,467,586 1,173,169 (294,417) 412,716
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 225,677 247,999 247,795 (204) 22,118
129 - Special Projects Fund 15,289 46,428 46,454 26 31,165
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 70,203 93,951 106,535 12,584 36,332
132 - Parks Construction Fund 718,446 845,649 1,006,412 160,763 287,966
136 - Parks Trust Fund 150,334 150,821 150,924 102 589
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 839,292 855,651 859,799 4,148 20,507
138 - Sister City Commission 2,014 1,149 1,428 279 (586)
Total Special Revenue 5,373,323$ 6,763,486$ 6,883,737$ 120,251$ 1,510,414$
GOVERNMENTAL
Special Revenue
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$5.37
$6.76 $6.91
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Dec-14
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Special
Revenue
Special Revenue Funds
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2014 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2014 Financial Statements.
Packet Page 189 of 192
38
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
12/31/2013 9/30/2014 12/31/2014 Q4 YTD
421 - Water Utility Fund 15,244,015$ 16,104,314$ 13,744,594$ (2,359,720)$ (1,499,421)$
422 - Storm Utility Fund 9,184,099 9,923,669 8,316,723 (1,606,946) (867,376)
423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 43,359,087 43,364,105 42,284,631 (1,079,474) (1,074,456)
424 - Bond Reserve Fund 787,224 787,225 787,226 1 2
411 - Combined Utility Operation - 217,029 - (217,029) -
Total Enterprise Funds 68,574,425$ 70,396,342$ 65,133,173$ (5,263,168)$ (3,441,252)$
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$13,744,594
$8,316,723
$42,284,631
$787,226
$-
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
Water Utility Storm Utility Sewer/WWTP Utility Bond Reserve
Enterprise Fund Balances as of December 31, 2014
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2014 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2014 Financial Statements.
Packet Page 190 of 192
39
SUMMARY OVERVIEW
12/31/2013 9/30/2014 12/31/2014 Q4 YTD
Governmental Funds 18,591,283$ 19,096,715$ 22,305,797$ 3,209,082$ 3,714,515$
Enterprise Funds 68,574,425 70,396,342 65,133,173 (5,263,168) (3,441,252)
Internal Services Fund 6,847,165 7,224,359 7,411,496 187,136 564,331
Agency Funds 247,179 281,876 235,134 (46,743) (12,045)
Total City-wide Total 94,260,051$ 96,999,293$ 95,085,600$ (1,913,693)$ 825,549$
CITY-WIDE
FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
$46,357
$188,777
$7,411,496
$76,568
$9,843
$1,428
$859,799
$150,924
$1,006,412
$106,535
$46,454
$247,795
$1,173,169
$1,537,317
$76,931
$14,445
$64,305
$131,900
$17,763
$440,387
$571,386
$373,951
$62,837
$15,310,214
$1 $20,000,000
Business Improvement District
Firemen's Pension Fund
Equipment Rental Fund
2012 LTGO Debt Service Fund $(0)
L.I.D. Guaranty Fund
L.I.D. Fund Control
Sister City Commission
Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
Parks Trust Fund
Parks Construction Fund
Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
Special Projects Fund
Gifts Catalog Fund
Real Estate Excise Tax 1, Parks Acq
Real Estate Excise Tax 2
Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
Youth Scholarship Fund
Employee Parking Permit Fund
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
Memorial Street Fund
Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
Combined Street Const/Improve Fund
Street Fund
Drug Enforcement Fund
General Fund
Governmental Fund Balances as of December 31, 2014
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2014 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2014 Financial Statements.
Packet Page 191 of 192
40
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW
12/31/2013 9/30/2014 12/31/2014 Q4 YTD
511 - Equipment Rental Fund 6,847,165$ 7,224,359$ 7,411,496$ 187,137$ 564,331$
Total Internal Service Funds 6,847,165$ 7,224,359$ 7,411,496$ 187,137$ 564,331$
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ----
$6.85
$7.22 $7.41
-
2
4
6
8
Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Dec-14
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
Internal Service Fund Balances
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
The ending fund balances for 2014 are preliminary, these will be updated
after the completion of the 2014 Financial Statements.
Packet Page 192 of 192