03/18/2008 City CouncilMarch 18, 2008
Following a Special Meeting at 6:45 p.m. to interview candidates for appointment to the Planning Board
and Architectural Design Board, the Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by
Mayor Haakenson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened
with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Michael Plunkett, Council President
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
D. J. Wilson, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Hilary Scheibert, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Al Compaan, Police Chief
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Mark Correira, Assistant Fire Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Bertrand Hauss, Traffic Engineer
Don Fiene, Assistant City Engineer
Rich Lindsay, Parks Maintenance Manager
Frances Chapin, Cultural Services Manager
Renee McRae, Recreation Manager
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
Addition to 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Agenda
Mayor Haakenson requested an addition to the Consent Agenda as Item Q: "Report on bids opened
March 10, 2008, for the purchase of three (3) Harley Davidson police motorcycles, in the amount of
$31,650.52."
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED
Roll Call UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
Approve B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 4, 2008.
03-04-08
Minutes C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #102704 THROUGH #102868 ISSUED MARCH 6, 2008
Approve IN THE AMOUNT OF $412,628.07, AND #102869 THROUGH #103024 ISSUED MARCH
Claim Checks 13, 2008 IN THE AMOUNT OF $532,579.26. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT
DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #46277 THROUGH #46330 FOR THE PERIOD OF
FEBRUARY 16 THROUGH FEBRUARY 29, 2008 IN THE AMOUNT OF $780,870.78.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 1
Claim for
CONFIRMATION OF NEWLY APPOINTED MEMBERS TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Preservation
COMMISSION AND SISTER CITY COMMISSION.
Damages
D.
ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM MARLA HORNE
Appointments
CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF JENNIFER ANTTILA TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
($200.00).
Surplus
E.
SURPLUS COMPAQ SERVER AND DONATE TO SNOHOMISH COUNTY
Compaq
Server
EMERGENCY RADIO SYSTEM.
Surplus
I
F.
SURPLUS OF COMPUTERS AND MONITORS AND DONATION TO
Computers
INTERCONNECTION.
Use of Marine
16 for LMS
G.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT- USE OF MARINE 16 FOR EMS TRANSPORTS.
Transports
H.
AUTHORIZATION FOR TWO ARTS COMMISSIONERS TO ATTEND THE
Arts
WASHINGTON CULTURAL CONGRESS, APRIL 28-30, WITH FUNDING
Commission
Training
FOR TRAINING FROM BUDGETED FUNDS IN THE 117-100 FUND.
Edmonds
L
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH THE
Market
EDMONDS-SOUTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FOR THE
Contract
EDMONDS MARKET.
Arts Festival
Contract
J.
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH THE
EDMONDS ARTS FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE 2008 EDMONDS ARTS
FESTIVAL.
t of y
K.
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH THE
tract
Contract
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE 4TH OF JULY
PARADE AND FIREWORKS DISPLAY.
Taste of
Edmonds
L.
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH THE
Contract
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR THE 2008 TASTE OF
EDMONDS.
Hot Autumn
Nites Contract
M.
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT WITH THE
GREATER EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR HOT AUTUMN NITES.
Lift Stations 7
N.
AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE LIFT STATIONS 7 & 8
& 8 Replace -
ment
REPLACEMENT AND REHABILITATION PROJECT.
sR99i76th
O.
AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Ave W
Intersection
AGREEMENT WITH HDR ENGINEERING, INC. FOR THE SR99/76TH AVENUE
WEST INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT.
Ord# 3681
P
ORDINANCE NO. 3681 — AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF ECC 5.05.127.1 ON
Spaying or
Neutering of
SPAYING OR NEUTERING OF ADOPTED DOGS AND CATS, AND AMENDING
Adopted Dogs
PROVISIONS OF ECC 5.05.127.4 ON PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO SPAY OR
and Cats
NEUTER ADOPTED DOGS AND CATS.
Purchase
Police
Q.
REPORT ON BIDS OPENED MARCH 10, 2008, FOR THE PURCHASE OF THREE (3)
Motorcycles
HARLEY DAVIDSON POLICE MOTORCYCLES, IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,650.52.
Historic 3.
CONFIRMATION OF NEWLY APPOINTED MEMBERS TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Preservation
COMMISSION AND SISTER CITY COMMISSION.
and Sister
City
Commission
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
Appointments
CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF JENNIFER ANTTILA TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION AND KERRY ST. CLAIR, BETH FUHRIMAN, AND ERIC RADCLIFFE TO THE
SISTER CITY COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 2
2008-2014 4. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2008-2014 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM.
Capital
Improvement
Program Assistant City Engineer Don Fiene presented the 2008-2014 Capital Improvement Program (CIP),
explaining the CIP was a long range planning tool, a spending blueprint that outlined capital
improvements given available resources. Most of the capital improvements in each fund were derived
from the Comprehensive Plan. He noted the Comprehensive Plan process includes input from staff, the
public and consultants as well as a scientific analysis and prioritization of projects. Projects include
physical improvements or replacement of City -owned infrastructure, development of new facilities and is
an ongoing process as needs, public support and priorities change.
Mr. Fiene advised the CIP was updated annually as required by GMA via input from six City
departments: Public Works, Community Services, Engineering, Administrative Services, Wastewater
Treatment, and Parks & Recreation. He provided a summary list of the funds, advising the spreadsheets
contained a detailed list of projects, revenues and cash balances, transfers in, grants, and balance for each
fund. Project descriptions for each project would soon be available on the City's website that identified
the name of the project, the estimated cost, description, benefit/rationale, schedule, and cost. He
displayed and reviewed a sample project description for the Interurban Trail.
Fund 112 (Transportation) and Fund 125 (REET-2 Transportation)
Mr. Fiene explained these funds finance a wide variety of transportation projects including street
overlays, road improvements/widening, traffic signals, road stabilization, traffic calming, bikeways and
walkways. He reviewed sample projects including citywide overlays and a future walkway project.
Funding for transportation capital has improved from two years ago due to the Council's allocation of
REET-2 funds over $750,000 for transportation beginning in 2006. However, there was a loss of $75,000
in Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax in 2006, $150,000 in 2007 and $150,000 in 2008 to operating funds. He noted
if the Olympic View franchise fees were allocated to the General Fund rather than transportation capital,
those funds could assist with overlaying Olympic View Area streets. New legislation allowing
Transportation Benefit Districts could bring in additional transportation funds.
Fund 113 (Multimodal Transportation)
Mr. Fiene explained this funds the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation project that would link
ferry, bus, pedestrian, bicycle, ridesharing and trains at the Pt. Edwards site.
Fund 116 Building Maintenance)
Mr. Fiene explained the sole purpose of this fund was to maintain buildings owned by the City. Sample
projects include the senior center, City Hall, Frances Anderson Center and other City buildings. He
advised Fund 116 was entirely financed by the General Fund which had been impacted by I-747 and I-
695; therefore, grants are necessary for most projects. Funding was currently budgeted through 2008;
funding through 2010 and beyond was a concern as lack of funding could defer building maintenance.
Fund 125 (REET 2 Parks Improvement) and 132 (Park Construction -Grant Funding)
Mr. Fine advised these funded improvements of existing parks, development of new parks, beautification,
streetscape, library, trails, environmental protection/education, cultural arts improvements, pool
improvements, sports field improvements and waterfront improvements. Sample projects include Yost
Pool, 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor, an additional skate park and improvements to Marina Beach Park.
Fund 126 (Parks Acquisition)
This funds land acquisition as well as debt service on City Hall, library roof, and Marina Beach which
totals approximately $700,000 per year, approximately half the incoming funds. Sample projects include
waterfront property acquisition. Grants and outside funding are needed to assist with purchases.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 3
Fund 129 (Special Projects - Economic Development
This fund was established to visually brand the area between 224th St. & 238th St. as the SR 99 Edmonds
International District. This would include installing decorative street lighting, installing way -finding
street signs, traffic safety improvements, enhance bus stops and construct streetscape/gateway elements.
Combined 412 Funds (Water, Storm and Sewer)
Mr. Fiene explained a rate study was conducted in 2005 and new study is planned for 2008. Minor
increases are expected over the next several years.
Fund 412-100 (Water)
Projects in this fund were identified in the approved 2002 Water Comprehensive Pian which will be
updated in 2008. The priorities are to improve fireflow, replace deteriorated pipes, replace 1% of City
pipes per year, and storage and control improvements. Sample projects include water line replacement/
improvements in the Perrinville area in association with the Olympic View Drive improvements.
Fund 412-200 (Storm)
Projects in this fund were identified in the 2003 Stormwater Comprehensive Plan; projects address
capacity problems, maintenance problems and environmental concerns. Sample storm projects include
the emergency North Stream project and the southwest Edmonds basin projects. He noted there were
virtually no drainage systems when the southwest Edmonds area annexed and approximately 3,000 feet of
drainage pipe /infiltration systems have been constructed in that area, primarily designed in-house and
constructed by Public Works crews. A large infiltration project is planned this year at the old Woodway
Elementary School site and a 1500 lineal foot storm project is under construction by Public Works crews.
Fund 412-300 (Sewer)
Projects were identified in the 2006 Comprehensive; priorities include maintenance issues, environmental
issues and capacity problems. He displayed examples of sewer projects including the
rehabilitation/replacement of Lift Stations 7 & 8 and the 7th Avenue North sewer main line project.
Fund 414 (Wastewater Treatment Plant
This funds the replacement of worn machinery/equipment and controls in the wastewater treatment plant
including flow meters, outfall lines, and influent trunk lines. He displayed a sample project of the bar
screen replacement.
Mr. Fiene summarized the transportation capital funding was much improved. Fund 116 continues to rely
heavily on grants to meet project needs. The Public Works Director's proposal to draw additional funds
from the General Fund in years 2010-2013 will assist if approved by the City Council. Other funds
appear to be meeting minimum needs.
Mr. Fiene relayed concerns raised at the Planning Board and staff's response:
• Transfer of $917,500 shown going into Fund 116 from Fund 126 was not reflected correctly on
Fund 126 spreadsheet. This has been corrected and will be reflected as an expenditure in the 126
Fund on the spreadsheet for the final CIP.
• Check to see if REET transfer projections are too high. Staff checked the numbers from 2007
with the Finance Department and the estimates appear good.
• With the RTID vote failure, are the projections for Fund 113 accurate? The Community Services
Director relayed that the projections are current and have been adjusted.
• Request that Fund 116 problems be highlighted. Staff highlighted local funding problems and
necessity of grants and problems that would occur if maintenance is deferred.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 4
• Reflect grant funding secured for the Olympic View Drive & 76th Ave W. emergency project.
This has been reflected in the CIP.
• The Planning Board expressed support for Transportation Benefit Districts.
• Concern that there is no capital fund for the Edmonds fiber network project. The Administrative
Services Director is working on the CIP for this fund and the CIP will be amended to reflect the
fiber optic program later this year when relevant studies and details are completed.
Staff recommends and encourages comments and feedback from. Council and the public at the public
hearing and recommends the Council direct the City Attorney to draft an ordinance adopting the updated
Capital Facilities Plan.
Mayor Haakenson relayed Councilmember Wilson's question regarding the Senior Center Parking lot
improvements. Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh advised the senior center parking lot was
funded via a combination of funding sources, half from Fund 125 and hopefully half from a CDBG grant.
Councilmember Orvis asked whether the revenue from the sale of land associated with the PRD on 80th
was reflected in the CIP. Mr. Fiene answered the revenue from land was not reflected in the CIP.
Councilmember Orvis observed the CIP could be adjusted when that revenue was realized.
Councilmember Orvis inquired about progress on the Interurban Trail. Mr. Fiene answered progress was
slow; a quiet title action was required for a portion of the property. Mr. McIntosh advised the April 15
Council agenda would include a resolution to allow the Parks & Recreation Department to apply for an
RCO (formerly IAC) grant for $450,000. Receipt of that grant would allow construction on the
Interurban Trail to begin September 1, 2009.
Councilmember Wambolt asked about funds for overlays. Mr. Fiene referred to the Overlay Citywide in
Fund 125 REST 2, advising there was $550,000 in 2008 and $400,000 in 2009. He noted the only
overlays in Fund 112 were utility fund overlays. Councilmember Wambolt commented funding may be
problematic if it relied on REST. Mr. Fiene answered in his discussions with the Finance Department this
week, REST revenues were currently looking good. Councilmember Wambolt pointed out his discussion
with Administrative Services Director Dan Clements indicated REET revenues were projected to be only
$800,000 in 2008. Mr. Fiene noted REET revenues for 2007 totaled $1.4 million, including fairly good
revenues for the last half of 2007. Councilmember Wambolt recommended staff confirm those
projections.
Councilmember Wambolt commented grants were being sought for a number of projects and assumed if
the grants were not obtained, the project would not proceed. Mr. Fiene agreed.
Councilmember Dawson requested the Council be provided an update on REET revenues, suggesting a
monthly update. Although the Edmonds market was stronger that some other areas, the market was down
countywide. Next, she commented although the presentation was informative, it would have been more
helpful to have had the project descriptions in the Council packet or available on the City's website as it
was difficult for the Council or the public to comment on the CIP when the project descriptions were not
available for review. Mr. Fiene noted that information was provided in the Council packet in past years,
the goal this year was to have the CIP paperless. He anticipated the project descriptions would be
available on the website soon, once Information Services staff resolved a problem with linking.
Councilmember Dawson asked if there was a timing issue associated with approval of the CIP and if not,
she suggested delaying adoption of the CIP until the project descriptions were available on the website.
Mr. Fiene advised the adoption could be delayed.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 5
Councilmember Wilson observed there was a public education component in Fund 125 and asked what
public education was financed via that fund. Mr. McIntosh answered there was nothing specifically
identified as education; many of the education programs were in the recreation program such as
environmental programs. He noted that most studies and planning included a public education
component. Councilmember Wilson referred to the LEER amendment presented to the Community
Services/Development Services Committee to create a zone that would allow a large water tank for the
new PCC store to be located closer to the street. He noted a public education component would inform
the public about the environmental benefit of the tank. He expressed concern that if no funds were
allocated for public education in Fund 125, none would be expended on public education. Mr. McIntosh
commented on the requirement for environmental education in the utility fund.
Councilmember Wilson suggested the Council deliberate on redevelopment of the senior center at that
location prior to allocating funds for improving the parking lot. Mayor Haakenson advised the funds
were in the CIP in 2009 and required Council approval to be expended. He suggested retaining the funds
in 2009, assuring the parking lot would not be improved if there were plans to redevelop the building.
Councilmember Wilson commented those funds could be reallocated. He referred to Fund 412 and
$20,000 allocated for a Lake Ballinger study in 2009, suggesting additional funds be allocated to that
study in view of the $200,000 in State funds and the request for $200,000 from the federal government.
Mr. Fiene commented on the need to do planning first for Lake Ballinger to determine what was needed
and the cost; the $20,000 was a placeholder and planning -level estimate. Councilmember Wilson
questioned why more was not allocated as a placeholder. Mr. Fiene answered $20,000 was currently
allocated for budget reasons.
Councilmember Wilson referred to Fund 412-100 and the process of repairing water pipes at a rate of 1%
per year. He asked whether that was adequate. Mr. Fiene answered 100 years was the accepted norm for
cast iron; steel lines had slightly less life but nearly all the steel lines had been replaced.
Councilmember Wambolt inquired about construction costs, specifically the estimated cost for the
Frances Anderson Center seismic upgrade of $1.9 million. He recalled the difficulty getting contractors
to bid on projects in the past and asked how the current downturn had affected the bidding climate.
Public Works Director Noel Miller commented the City was going out to bid on two lift stations and
would know more in a few weeks. He noted the Frances Anderson. Center seismic upgrades were
underway. There was only one bid received for that project but it was a good bid and the project was
approximately half complete.
Council President Plunkett asked whether the public had access to all the materials the Council had in
their packet. Mr. Fiene advised the CIP was available via the City Council's agenda on the website.
Councilmember Dawson clarified the project descriptions were not available to the Council or the public
and she preferred they be available for review prior to the Council's adoption of the CIP.
Mayor Haakenson opened the public participation portion of the public hearing.
Al Rutledge, Edmonds, observed a Planning Board Member was present in the audience tonight and
suggested a Councilmember attend Planning Board meetings. He noted there was a lengthy presentation
and questions/answers at the Planning Board public hearing.
Lora Petso, Edmonds, urged the Council not to adopt the CIP, commenting the City was allowed to
amend the Comprehensive Plan once a year so that all amendments were considered together; the only
exception was the CIP in connection with the budget. She opined the CIP was not legal as it did not
implement the Comprehensive Plan with regard to playfields. She noted the CIP needed to include parks,
identify the location of proposed facilities and planned acquisitions which it did not. She noted the City's
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 6
need for playfields, citing an unauthorized practice on a softball field near her home and the danger of an
adult softball team playing at Westgate Elementary fields. She referred to Fund 126, observing the
presentation indicated nearly $1 million would be moved to the Building Maintenance Fund. She
objected to this transfer absent any additional information. She referred to use of Fund 126 for debt
service and discrepancies in the projections for R.EET receipts in 2008. She noted Fund 126 also included
line items for unspecified expenditures other than playfield acquisition, questioning whether this
explanation was adequate. Ms. Petso requested a line item for fields at the Old Woodway Elementary
School and a line item for fields at the former Safeway property. She echoed Councilmember Dawson's
concern that the project details were not yet available. She also questioned the location of the skate park
that was referred to during the CIP presentation.
Jim Young, Edmonds, Planning Board Member, recalled there had been several robust discussions by
the Planning Board regarding the CIP in the past few years and hoped there would be equally robust
discussions by the City Council. He complimented staff for developing the CIP. He made the following
observations as a result of the Planning Board's review of the CIP: 1) he complimented the Council on
the corrective action and collaboration between Parks & Recreation and Public Works Departments to
fund overlays, noting the funding increased the overlay cycle from 60 years to 33 years, 2) he expressed
concern with continued reliance on grants, noting the Federal Highway Administration grant fund was
expected to begin showing a deficit in 2009, and 3) he expressed concern with the term, "deferred
maintenance," noting maintenance would need to be deferred absent a change in how building
maintenance was funded. He urged the Council to discuss building maintenance and if funding could not
be identified, prioritize what maintenance would be deferred.
Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Haakenson closed the public participation portion of the
public hearing.
Councilmember Bernheim asked about the process for amending the CIP. Mr. Fiene answered the CIP
was a blueprint for budgeting; the budget actually allocated funds to projects. Councilmember Bernheim
asked how binding the CIP was on the budget and whether the Council had the ability to amend the CIP
to include other projects. Mr. Fiene answered funds were budgeted for projects contained in the CIP
other than emergency projects. Councilmember Bernheim asked whether the Council was precluded from
allocating funds to projects that were not contained in the CIP. Mr. Fiene answered no.
Council President Plunkett inquired about the impact of extending the opportunity for public comment.
Mr. Fiene answered that would be acceptable.
Councilmember Wilson suggested he and other Councilmembers submit their comments in writing.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether staff's recommendation was to direct the City Attorney to
prepare an ordinance that would be adopted as part of the annual Comprehensive Plan update. Mr. Fiene
answered the CIP was listed in the Comprehensive Plan. The process of adopting the CIP via ordinance
at approximately this time each year had been done for several years. City Engineer Dave Gebert
explained the Six Year CIP was adopted at this time each year so that it was available when budget
preparation began this summer. He noted the annual Comprehensive Plan amendments incorporated the
amended CIP.
Councilmember Dawson suggested a work session prior to the CIP public hearing in the future to ensure
all the information was available.
Council President Plunkett requested staff respond to the questions raised tonight by the audience and the
Council at the continued public hearing.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 7
Councilmember Wambolt echoed Councilmember Dawson's request for an update on the REST,
suggesting that be provided prior to the continued public hearing. Mayor Haakenson suggested that
information be provided at the next Council Committee meetings.
Council President Plunkett advised the public hearing would be continued to the April 15 Council
meeting.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Kiwanis Club
Food Drive Al Rutledge, Edmonds, thanked the public for their generous donations to the Kiwanis March 14-16
Food Drive at Top Foods. He announced the Parks & Recreation Department Easter Egg Hunt on
Easter
ntrFgg Saturday, March 22, advising further inforination was available by contacting the Parks & Recreation
Department.
Aquatic Dr. Cathy Washington, Edmonds, commented on the allocation of $25,000 for a pool feasibility study.
Center She recognized the importance of the development of walkways and bike paths, commenting the City
already had sidewalks, a boardwalk and bike routes designated throughout the City. Observing that a
significant number of voting citizens who were unable to walk or bike due to age, physical challenges or
because they did not want to walk/bike in the rain, she pointed out they could be served by an aquatic
center. She emphasized an aquatic center could serve all citizens, from womb to tomb. Dr. Washington
noted recent Fire Department dispatches indicated 20% of aid responses were to evaluate patients for falls
and referred to a recent newspaper article regarding fall prevention that recommended a regular exercise
program. She referred to her proposal for a cultural and recreational center, the Edmonds Aquatic and
Artist Center, which had tremendous economic and health benefits. She recalled pool feasibility studies
were conducted in 1995 and in 1999 and subsequent unsuccessful efforts to collaborate with Stevens
Hospital and the YMCA. She referred to hundreds of signatures the Citizen Action Committee had
gathered in favor of an aquatics center, questioning why the City was planning another feasibility study
when the voters supported an aquatic center. Dr. Washington encouraged the City to utilize the funds
allocated for a feasibility study to identify a site and begin developing architectural plans for an aquatic
and artist facility.
CIP Process Lora Petso, Edmonds, encouraged the Council to investigate whether adopting the CIP at this stage was
an accurate process. She recalled if a project was not included in the CIP, it was impossible to obtain a
grant for the project. She envisioned park acquisition for playfield use was a virtually automatic grant if
REET it was included in the CIP. With regard to REST revenue, she noted Fund 126 anticipated revenue of
Revenue $1.4 million this year and only $1.1 million in subsequent years. She questioned whether the REST
revenue in Fund 126 matched Fund 125. She relayed a concern with the size of athletic fields cited in the
Park Plan for 6-14 years olds, noting the difference in size between 6 and 14 year olds. She urged the
Council to reject that type of planning and plan the number of fields that were needed.
Skippers site Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to Bob Gregg's demonstration regarding the Skipper's site, noting it
raised many questions such as his indication that he had rights to the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) parking lot adjacent to the Skippers site. Mr. Hertrich relayed his conversation
with the WSDOT legal department who advised the only relationship WSDOT had with regard to parking
lots was with Diamond Parking. He suggested Mr. Gregg provide clarification. Next he referred to the
Parks, Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan, pointing out the minutes of November 28, 2006
Recreation
and open and February 13, 2007 Planning Board meetings that contained comments about the Plan were not
Space comp included. He referred to circles on one of the maps that identified areas where parks were needed,
Plan
pointing out there was no circle on the waterfront. Next, he pointed out there was no pool location
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 8
identified in the Plan and the recommendation for action plans was somewhat limited. He suggested the
discussion regarding the downtown waterfront area be included in the Plan.
Proclamation 6. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF EARTH HOUR 8 - 9 P.M. ON SATURDAY MARCH 29 2008.
in Honor of
Earth Hour
Mayor Haakenson advised "Earth Hour" started in 2007 in Sydney, Australia as a way for that city to
send a powerful message worldwide regarding global warming. Millions of people and over 2,000
businesses participated. This year, he urged Edmonds to join the effort of cities all over the world to
reduce energy consumption and send the message that every action—no matter how small—can impact
our environment. He encouraged everyone in Edmonds to turn off their lights for one hour, from 8:00 to
9:00 p.m., on Saturday, March 29. This hour could be used to change energy -wasting light bulbs to
energy-efficient ones, have a block party with neighbors, or have a candlelit dinner in a participating local
restaurant. Every action has an impact, and the more that could be done to lessen negative effects, the
better chance for a brighter future for our planet.
Mayor Haakenson read a proclamation declaring 8:00 - 9:00 p.m. March 29 as Earth Hour and urging all
citizens to join him, as well as millions of people around the world, in turning out their lights to
significantly reduce energy consumption and positively affect the fight against global warming.
Resolution of 7• WORK SESSION REGARDING A RESOLUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND
Environ- PRINCIPLES.
mental Policy
and Principles
Councilmember Wilson advised the Community Services/Development Services Committee discussed
the policies and principles in the resolution. The intent was to have the Council identify environmental.
principles that would be adopted in the building codes, expressed in the Comprehensive Plan and pursued
by staff and the City as a corporation. And based on the principles, determine what the goals the Council
would like to achieve and ultimately direct staff to dovetail the goals and principles with other initiatives
in the City and potentially magnify those efforts. He noted this was important in view of the development
potential of the Antique Mall and Skippers properties and the presentations to be made next week by the
developers and staff. He envisioned the Council would review and potentially modify the policy and
principles for public comment at next week's meeting. The discussion regarding the Antique Mall and
Skipper's property would then be framed based on how the public chose to engage in this process.
Councilmember Wilson commented if the Council proposed environmental principles and goals and no
one commented, he would conclude environmental sensitivity was not a priority for Edmonds citizens.
Conversely, if the public provided comment on the policies and principles, he envisioned returning them
to the Community Services/Development Services Committee for further review. He urged the Council
to affirm a set of environmental principles to inform developers what the City expected with regard to
future growth as well as to assist staff with the building code rewrite. He noted the resolution contained
sections regarding principles, goals and staff direction.
Councilmember Dawson expressed her appreciation to Councilmember Wilson for proposing this to the
Council, commenting it was a good discussion for the Council to have. She pointed out the draft
document did not address the City's role in the transportation system including Community Transit,
Sound Transit and their role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. She referred to an organization,
Climate Communities, that Snohomish and King Counties as well as other local jurisdictions were
participating in, suggesting the City obtain further information and consider participating in that
organization, observing there was a role for local government to play in the national debate.
Councilmember Bernheim commented to the extent that the resolution purports to be a comprehensive
document about principles, it was difficult for him to comment at this time without further opportunity for
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 9
review. He agreed with Councilmember Dawson's comments regarding the need to address
transportation in the document. He asked whether the resolution had been reviewed by the Community
Services/Development Services Committee. Councilmember Wilson explained it was reviewed by the
Committee last week and because of the upcoming presentations regarding the Antique Mall/Skippers
properties, the Committee wanted to provide the Council an opportunity to review and discuss the
resolution in a work session to facilitate public comment next week. Councilmember Bernheim
expressed support for the resolution, cautioning Councilmember Wilson against presuming that the
community was not interested if they failed to comment. He pointed out the number of sustainability
groups and efforts reflected the community's interest and commitment. He expressed support for the
adoption of green building programs that require builders and buyers to take a longer term viewpoint of
property development. He also expressed support for zero -emission transportation efforts.
Councilmember Olson commented the reason the resolution was forwarded to the Council was to ensure
the policies and principles were part of the discussion regarding the Antique Mall/Skippers
redevelopment. She emphasized this was not a finished product; it was intended to begin the discussion.
Student Representative Scheibert was happy to see this resolution proposed and that Edmonds was setting
the standard. She hoped this would also involve the educational system so that more information
regarding environmental issues was disseminated through the schools.
Councilmember Wilson acknowledged this was not a perfect document and needed additional insight to
be reflective of the community's fundamental principles. He noted the PCC building would be a platinum.
building with regarding to environmental standards. He explained there were four levels, bronze, silver,
gold and platinum; meeting the platinum standard was very difficult. The Community
Services/Development Services Committee learned there were only 18 gold standard buildings in
Washington and less than 1,000 platinum buildings worldwide. Edmonds would be one of very few cities
of its size to have a platinum building. If another platinum building was constructed on the Antique
Mall/Skipper's property, Edmonds would be the only city in the world of its size to have two platinum
buildings. This could set the standard for the world for how an urban city could address redevelopment.
He explained at the Community Services/Development Services Committee meeting, they learned PCC
needed a water tank to collect runoff from the roof which they could not achieve on the site under the
current code. There is also a development on Edmonds Way that wants to reuse stonnwater, an issue the
City codes do not address. He concluded staff could continue to do a great job addressing challenges as
they arose or the City could send a clear message that this mattered to the City. He encouraged the
Council to review the resolution and encouraged the public to provide comment.
Mayor Haakenson declared a brief recess.
Parks, 8. REVIEW OF THE PARKS, RECREATION & OPEN SPACE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND
Recreation & THE COMMUNITY CULTURAL PLAN.
Open Space
Comp Plan;
Community Parks & Recreation Director Brian McIntosh introduced Park Maintenance Manager Rich Lindsay,
Cultural Plan Recreation Manager Renee McRae, Frances Chapin, Cultural Services Manager, and consultant Juliet
Fong, Hough Beck & Baird, Inc. He explained the Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan
and Community Cultural Plan updates have been in process since March 2007 and have followed two
separate yet connecting paths. The Community Cultural Plan and Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan
are independent elements of the City Comprehensive Plan; the Parks & Recreation Department oversees
and implements both plans.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 10
Mr. McIntosh explained comprehensive plans educate, set broad goals and objectives, identify needs, set
policy, and create action plans to assist in guiding staff and the community, and allow department projects
to be grant eligible. Given the constantly changing landscape of active cities such as Edmonds, this plan
provides a general guide and not a blueprint for department and City activity. Budgets, capital
improvement plans, cost of materials, labor, and political direction can, do, and will change frequently
within this six-year plan.
Mr. McIntosh explained separate twenty -person Advisory Committees made up of citizens representing
varied interests met regularly from April through December 2006 to review and refine both plans. Those
forty residents have been provided regular updates since that time and he expressed appreciation for their
dedication of time and intellect over these many months. The members of the Advisory Committees are
individuals and citizens who have different recreational, cultural, and life interests and some represent a
certain population or organization within the City. It was requested early in the process that whatever
their personal interest or affiliation, they take a broader objective in regard to the City's quality of life and
interest in building for the future.
Two advertised open houses were conducted to receive comment from the public. A professional
scientific telephone survey was conducted as well as an opportunity for all to respond to an electronic
survey. The advisory committees helped analyze staff, consultant, public, and their own ideas and
sentiments to reach consensus on all chapters and phases of this plan. The collective expertise,
community knowledge, and survey information identified deficiencies, trends, and universal interests as
well as more specialized needs to create the action plan.
Two updates were provided to the Planning/Parks Board on November 28 and February 13 that resulted
in thoughtful review by Board members. A number of their comments were addressed in subsequent
editing of the Parks Plan. A public hearing at the Planning/Parks Board was held on February 27 with the
Board recommending that the draft plans be forwarded to City Council for review and a public hearing.
Mr. McIntosh highlighted the Department's mission statement in the Executive Summary, "To provide
Edmonds' citizens with a balanced system of parks, recreation, open space and cultural services along
with their support facilities to ensure quality of life. " He explained the Executive Summary was a new
feature in the Plan and provided an overview. He highlighted the economic and health benefits of parks
cited in the Executive Summary.
Juliet Fong, Hough Beck & Baird, Inc., explained the Executive Summary provided an overview of the
plan as well as the vision for the Plan - connectivity, diverse activity and visibility. She noted the last
page of the Executive Summary contained more information regarding each of these elements of the
vision. She briefly reviewed the content of each chapter:
• Chapter I Introduction - sets the framework including a description of the public involvement
process and references other planning documents considered during the planning process.
• Chapter 2 Community Profile - defines the planning area, natural features, demographic
characteristics, land use, cultural resources, and population forecasts. With regard to
demographics, she noted the 2000 Census information was used.
• Chapter 3 Facility and Program Inventory - defines park categories (neighborhood, community,
and regional parks, special use areas, gateways, entrances, beautification areas and cultural
facilities) and inventories existing park facilities.
• Chapter 4 Community Needs Assessment - defines and identifies the current level of service
based on population and a proposed level of service based on what the community process
indicated citizens want in the future. She noted previous plans compared the city's level of
service to national and state standards; the more common practice today was to determine what
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 11
the community wanted to determine a proposed level of service. She noted this chapter contained
the public comments from the stakeholder groups and surveys; it also contained information
regarding trends.
• Chapter 5 Comprehensive Plan Framework: Goals and Objectives - uses the information
including the visionary concepts to determine modifications/additions to the goals and objectives.
• Chapter 6 Action Plan - item by item list of general ideas as well as very specific ideas and lists
all existing parks and desired maintenance upgrades.
• Chapter 7 Funding Plan
• Appendixes - contains facility inventory worksheets, community survey results, and park
descriptions.
Ms. Fong displayed a map identifying existing facilities within the park system including school sites and
civic facilities. She displayed the recommended plan facilities map developed via the community process
of desired facilities. This map contained circles identifying areas where a neighborhood park was
desirable. She noted the Plan recognized the City was an urban community with little available land; one
of the strategies in the Plan was to continue partnering with the schools for neighborhood type functions
on school sites. She identified proposed neighborhood parks on school sites and a desired location for a
community park in the south end of the City. She identified other desirable facilities such as a hand -carry
boat launch and a water trail along the waterfront.
Ms. Fong displayed the recommended plan connections map, commenting the concept of connections was
a dominant feature in the Plan. The intent of the connections map was not to reiterate the transportation
plan but to consider how people recreated with regard to walking and bicycling. She explained
commuters traveled from point A to point B; recreational walkers or bicyclists prefer a loop. She pointed
out loops identified on the map, noting some may have existing walkways and sidewalks and some may
not be complete. The intent was to identify priorities for the walkway/bikeway plan within the loops as
well as potentially mapping them with visual cues on the ground, mileage distances, etc. and use them as
a marketing tool to demonstrate to the community the importance of a healthy, active lifestyle. She noted
missing sidewalk and bikeway connections/links were also identified on the map. The Plan also
discussed safety of these connections.
Ms. Fong referred to the comments from the public hearing, many of which reemphasized the priorities
expressed in the survey results. She referred to comments regarding an aquatics center/pool/year round
facility, noting specifics regarding that planning process were not addressed in the Plan. Other comments
included safety of the trails, connections and bikeways; the waterfront area•, and downtown connectivity.
The Planning Board also provided comment regarding the need for connection to the transportation plan
and public spaces/gathering spaces downtown.
Council President Plunkett asked Mr. McIntosh to comment on planning for a pool. Mr. McIntosh
advised the need for an aquatics facility/year round pool was identified in the survey. The need for an
aquatics center is in the Plan and the CIP. He pointed out $50,000 was allocated in the proposed CIP for
a feasibility study and he planned to increase the amount to $60,000 to survey the public regarding what
they wanted, how a facility could be marketed, and siting.
Council President Plunkett asked what information the feasibility study would provide. Mr. McIntosh
replied an aquatic center and a pool could be the same thing or vastly different. Previous studies have
ranged from a bubble over the existing pool to an Olympic sized aquatic center with a water park. He
noted the pool was at the end of its life and whether it remained in that location as a new covered pool or
in another location, how a pool project would be marketed, etc. would be explored in the feasibility study.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 12
Council President Plunkett requested the Planning Board minutes be provided either in the appendixes or
at the public hearing. Mr. McIntosh agreed they could be provided at the public hearing.
Councilmember Dawson agreed it would be helpful for the Council to see the comments made at the
Planning Board public hearing and suggested they be included in the appendixes, noting the comments
from the survey were included. Mr. McIntosh noted the telephone survey was the only scientific data; a
web survey was also conducted. Councilmember Dawson pointed out the Plan included the web survey
information; therefore, it was appropriate to include the comments made at the public hearing.
Councilmember Dawson referred to the demographics in the telephone survey and questioned whether
there was any effort to obtain a representative sampling. She asked what time the survey was conducted,
noting 81% of the respondents were over the age of 50. She recognized Edmonds had an aging
population but feared the age of the respondents may skew the results if the majority did not have school
age children. Mr. McIntosh advised the survey was conducted at random times during the day including
weekends.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether there was any attempt to have a representative demographic
response to the survey to ensure there was a representative sample of the population. Ms. Fong answered
the randomness of the survey was an important aspect in ensuring the survey was as scientifically
accurate as possible. The surveyors called randomly until a predetermined number of responses were
reached to provide a survey that was statistically accurate to 5%. She acknowledged the responses by
citizens age 50 and above was significantly higher. To offset this, the advisory group talked about the
survey results and how they affected the decision-making process. She noted the advisory group was a
diverse group and represented not only their own interests but the entire community.
Councilmember Dawson pointed out a skate park was one of the lowest scoring facilities. She questioned
why there was reference in the CIP to another skate park when it did not score high in the survey. She
was also surprised how low ballfields scored in the survey, questioning whether that was because most
respondents did not have children that utilized fields. She noted the aquatic facility scored very high in
the survey. She remarked the feasibility study was not intended to determine whether the community was
interested in an aquatic's facility but rather whether it would pencil out with regard to operations as well
as where to site a facility. Mr. McIntosh pointed out the feasibility study would also assist in determining
what type of facility the community wanted.
Councilmember Wilson agreed with Councilmember Dawson's comments regarding the demographics,
noting he was involved in polling in his job and while the survey may be random, it was not scientific.
He pointed out a survey where 2% of the respondents were age 34 or younger was not representative of
the City's demographics and while the results may be enlightening, they did not accurately reflect the
community.
Councilmember Wilson referred to page 4-5, specifically the statement, "The City of Edmonds should
continue to pursue opportunities to acquire waterfront properties and to partner with private owners for
public access to the waterfront." Because the term "waterfront" was often used loosely, he questioned
whether the intent was actually shoreline property and not the Antique Mall/Skipper's properties. Mr.
McIntosh answered it was the shoreline.
Councilmember Wilson asked staff to comment on the hand -carry boat launch site. Mr. McIntosh
answered although it was desirable, it was difficult to site and the locations identified on the map were not
relevant to where such a facility could be located. The survey and advisory groups identified the need for
another hand -carry boat launch on the Edmonds waterfront; the closest was in Snohomish County at Lund
Gulch Park or at Marina Beach.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 13
Councilmember Wilson referred to the statement on page 4-10, "Existing play areas should be updated to
meet current safety standards and provide greater diversity and more imaginative play" and asked which
play areas did not meet current safety standards. Mr. McIntosh advised a staff person certified in
playground safety inspection addressed any safety issues as they arose. The City had a consistent
replacement program; City Park's equipment was next to be replaced. The lifespan of the equipment was
10-18 years and within that time period, safety standards change. He assured the City's playgrounds were
safe and possibly the language in the Plan needed to be updated. When play areas were replaced, it was
with equipment that meets current safety standards. Councilmember Wilson asked for an example of a
play area that was constructed to the standards at the time but was now out of date. He noted if there
were any, the City should spend the funds necessary to ensure play areas met current safety standards. If
there were not any, the language needed to be revised to avoid suggesting that any existed. Mr. McIntosh
assured all the City's playgrounds were safe; the language needed to be updated.
Council President Plunkett asked about the comment in the presentation stating there needed to be a larger
park in south Edmonds. Ms. Fong responded there was desire expressed for a community park at the old
Woodway High School site. She explained a community park was typically larger than a neighborhood
park and contained more community -type functions and activities. For example, one of the discussions in
the process was where to site a dog park if the current park was displaced by Edmonds Crossing. She
noted the national standard for a community park was 20+ acres.
Councilmember Bernheim asked if it was permissible to launch a kayak from any public beach. Mr.
McIntosh responded it was not allowed in many areas, for example the Underwater Park was a sanctuary
and launching a kayak was strictly prohibited. The preferred/designated boat launching site was the south
end of Marina Beach. It was not illegal to launch a kayak at the fishing pier but it was not encouraged.
Councilmember Bernheim pointed out the respondents to the telephone survey stated they were willing to
pay $122 per year for a bond to finance park acquisition. He asked if there was any analysis done with
regard to the amount that would generate. Mr. McIntosh answered no. Councilmember Bernheim noted
respondents to the telephone survey, 80% of whom owned their homes, also indicated they were willing
to pay $100 per year in property taxes to finance property acquisition. He asked if there was any analysis
regarding the amount that would generate. Mr. McIntosh answered no, but it could be determined.
Councilmember Bernheim commented discussions regarding redevelopment of the Antique Mall area
usually included mention of open space, either as a voluntary contribution by the developer, as a zoning
requirement, or as a publicly financed area. Observing the Plan did not identify park land in the Antique
Mall area, he asked whether the Council could approve a project that proposed useful, developed open
space or a park -type area on that site. Mr. McIntosh commented as the Executive Summary stated, the
Plan was not a blueprint but rather a general document. He acknowledged opportunities would arise that
may not be included in the Plan and the Plan could be revised at the Council's discretion. He
recommended any proposed open space/park area be maintained by the property owner.
Councilmember Dawson clarified Councilmember Bernheim's comment regarding survey respondents'
willingness to pay $122 for a park levy, pointing out in response to the question regarding how to pay for
future city recreation programs, the top choice by a huge margin was increased user fees followed by
offering reduced programs; increased city tax revenue had a significantly lower response. She concluded
this revealed an unwillingness to pay higher taxes for recreational opportunities. She referred to the
question regarding the General Obligation Bond which inquired whether respondents would be willing to
pay it and the maximum amount their household would be willing to pay, noting the mean amount on.
acquisition was $122.50. When the question was regarding operations and acquisition, the amount
dropped to $101. She concluded the responses indicated the respondents were not willing to pay for a
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 14
bond measure to operate parks, which was actually the City's greatest need. She pointed out REST funds
provided a reliable and steady source for acquiring park property. She noted the survey respondents were
not asked to compare joint venture opportunities or entrepreneurial financing opportunities but scored
naming rights, sponsorships, etc. much higher than increased taxes.
In response to Councilmember Bembeim's concern that not including reference to a park on the Antique
Mall site could constrain the Council from approving a redevelopment plan, Councilmember Wambolt
pointed out the existing Parks Plan identified a 3-acre park at the old Woodway Elementary Park site, yet
the City purchased a 5.5-acre site.
Councilmember Wilson recommended the Council not derive from this survey that the community did
not support parks.
Councilmember Olson inquired about the status of funding for the fields at the old Woodway High
School site. Mr. McIntosh advised staff did not seek funding from the legislature this year as there was
little chance of funding in this session. Staff is developing plans to submit a request next January.
Cultural Services Manager Frances Chapin reviewed the Community Cultural Plan, explained the update
of the Cultural Plan included a twenty-person Advisory Committee made up of citizens representing
varied interests who considered what had been accomplished, what made Edmonds the kind of
community they wanted to live in and what they hoped it would look like in the future. The ideas in the
updated Cultural Plan evolved from their input and comments from people who attended the two public
meetings held jointly with the Parks Plan. She expressed her appreciation to the members of the public
who engaged in this process.
Ms. Chapin explained the first Community Cultural Plan for Edmonds was developed in 1994, a public-
private collaboration funded by the Arts Commission and the Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation. The
main goals and strategies of the existing Plan revealed the City's leadership role, but that the City was not
solely responsible for implementation; the essential role of private entities, businesses, non-profits,
individuals and other governmental agencies was highlighted throughout the Plan. She noted the
Community Cultural Plan worked in concert with the Parks Plan and the Streetscape Plan. The purpose
of the Cultural Plan was to identify strategies that would guide the City and community in continued
cultural development, support existing and possibly new cultural facilities, integrate cultural planning
with other planning efforts citywide, and utilize cultural resources as part of the community's future
development. She noted two aspects of these strategies were highlighted in the updated Plan, 1) arts to
attract visitors as well as for residents, and 2) the value of participation in cultural activities to the quality
of life. She noted residents see cultural arts as an integral part of the community, part of recreation,
continued education, and economic development.
Ms. Chapin advised the five main goals were similar to the five goals in the original plan and updated in
2001. She referred to a goal in the previous version, "promote the arts as partners in economic
development," noting all five goals were interwoven and all five support economic development.
Therefore this goal was reformulated to read, "Build Edmonds' identity as a cultural destination." She
noted the focus of the strategies under this goal include infrastructure such as the 4th Avenue cultural
corridor and the importance of supporting and enhancing a unique cultural events. She advised the other
four goals remained much the same as the original plan, 1) encourage effective partnerships to support
cultural opportunities and awareness of cultural assets, 2) develop facilities for visual art and enhance
facilities for performing arts, 3) increase visibility and access to information about arts and culture and 4)
broaden community involvement and participation in a diverse range of cultural activities.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 15
She summarized the Plan focused on strategies that the public identified as most important to further these
goals; however, there was room within those strategies and goals for other ideas to emerge. The
strategies reflected themes similar to those in the Parks Plan, connectivity, diverse activity, visibility,
collaboration throughout the community, connections for activities, connections for physical space,
importance of community, and a suggestion that a cultural committee be developed to further promote the
community's values. The facilities goal emphasized the importance of supporting existing facilities such
as Edmonds Center for the Arts, ArtWorks, and the Rotary pavilion and encourages multi -use and co -
located programming while looking at options for expanding opportunities for visual art. The visibility
goal stresses the value of incorporating art and design elements using the visual to reinforce cultural.
identity for the community and visitors. The involvement goal focuses on broadening participation of all
ages in diverse activities throughout the City.
Ms. Chapin explained in the process of updating the Cultural Plan, the community renewed its
commitment to many of the interests first expressed in 1994 and recognized much had changed and been
accomplished in the intervening 14 years. The updated plan incorporates new and reformulated strategies
that build on previous visions and new realities for the future of arts in Edmonds.
Councilmember Dawson inquired about the order that Councilmembers were listed in the
acknowledgements. Ms. Chapin answered it was random but would be corrected to list Councilmembers
alphabetically with the Council President first.
Council President Plunkett advised a public hearing on the Plan was scheduled for April 15.
Adopt -a -Dog
Program 9.
DISCUSSION AND POTENTIAL ACTION REGARDING EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL TRIAL
ADOPT -A -DOG PROGRAM.
Council President Plunkett referred to the indemnification agreement between the City and Old Dog
Haven in Exhibit 1, suggesting no more than two dogs be introduced per month and a ten minute time
limit.
Councilmember Wambolt advised he would not support this program, noting although it was a worthy
cause, he was concerned with setting a precedent.
Observing Old Dog Haven was located in Arlington, Councilmember Wilson asked whether there were
any local facilities. Council President Plunkett advised the dogs were often obtained locally and he was
not aware of any Edmonds -based facilities. Mayor Haakenson advised Adix was the City's purveyor of
animal shelter services and they had no problem adopting dogs. In the interest of fairness,
Councilmember Wilson suggested also including cats.
Councilmember Dawson preferred to display pictures of available dogs on Channel 21 or on the City's
website or to introduce pets available for adoption during audience comments. She agreed with
Councilmember Wilson that cats should be included, noting it was often more difficult to find homes for
cats. However, she indicated she was not opposed to a trial adopt -a -dog program.
Council President Plunkett stated his intent was to try the Adopt -a -Dog program once every few months.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BERNHEIM, TO ACCEPT THE AGREEMENT. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2),
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT AND COUNCILMEMBERS OLSON, DAWSON,
BERNHEIM, AND ORVIS IN FAVOR; AND COUNCILMEMBERS WAMBOLT AND WILSON
OPPOSED.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 16
Audio Tape 1 10. DISCUSSION AND POTENTIAL DIRECTION REGARDING AUDIO TAPE RECORDING OF
Recording of
Executive EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.
Sessions
Council President Plunkett explained before City Attorney Scott Snyder spent more time researching this
issue, he wanted to ensure the Council was interested in pursing it.
Councilmember Orvis expressed support for taping of Executive Session, recognizing there were details
that needed to be worked out. He noted there were other City Councils that taped their Executive
Sessions. He pointed out that although SB 3292 was not approved by the legislature, there were
Councilmembers who favored taping of Executive Sessions.
Councilmember Dawson supported having Mr. Snyder provide the Council a briefing on the feasibility of
enacting local regulations regarding taping Executive Session versus State regulations. She noted it was
more complicated to accomplish city -by -city and she wanted to hear Mr. Snyder's opinion before a great
deal of time was expended on research. She noted if it could not be accomplished in a manner that
created an exemption from the Open Public Records Act, the Council may as well not hold Executive
Session in the future. She noted there were many actions that did not need to be done in Executive
Session and could be done in open session.
It was the consensus of the Council to have Mr. Snyder brief the Council.
11. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF MARCH 11, 2008.
Community/ Community Services/Development Services Committee
Development
ServicesrvicesCouncilmember Wilson reported the Committee discussed the PCC platinum building and supported the
Services
Committee creation of an interim zoning ordinance that would create a special zone that would allow PCC to meet
the LEED development standard. He advised the interim ordinance would require a public hearing and
ultimately consideration of a permit. The Committee also reviewed the resolution regarding
environmental policies and principles which was discussed on tonight's agenda. The final item the
Committee discussed was a request for a bench near the Veteran's Memorial; staff was directed to pursue
locating a memorial bench at the Edmonds Cemetery.
Finance Finance Committee
C°nunittee Councilmember Orvis reported the Committee authorized surplusing of computer equipment which was
approved on the Consent Agenda. The Committee also discussed the City's employee medical coverage
due to the Association of Washington Cities' plan to phase out their existing medical plans, which will
require renegotiating medical coverage with the City's unions. This effort would also include
consideration of self-funded plans. The Committee requested staff bring back a proposed work plan with
timelines to the Committee by the June meeting.
Public Safety Public Safety Committee
Committee Councilmember Bernheim reported the Committee discussed an agreement with the City of Everett for
use of the City's emergency fire boat at Hat Island. This was approved on the Consent Agenda. The
Committee also discussed an exemption that would allow a person adopting a dog or cat to take the
animal home without it being spayed/neutered with an agreement they return for spay/neuter under
penalty of a fine. He encouraged the public to spay/neuter as well as license their pets.
12. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson had no report.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 17
13. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Excused I COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORVIS, TO
Absence EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON FROM THE MARCH 4, 2008 COUNCIL MEETING.
MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON ABSTAINED.
14. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
March 18, 2008
Page 18