04/22/2008 City CouncilApril 22, 2008
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Haakenson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Gary Haakenson, Mayor
Michael Plunkett, Council President
Peggy Pritchard Olson, Councilmember
Steve Bernheim, Councilmember
D. J. Wilson, Councilmember
Deanna Dawson, Councilmember
Dave Orvis, Councilmember
Ron Wambolt, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Hilary Scheibert, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Gerry Gannon, Assistant Police Chief
Duane Bowman, Development Services Director
Stephen Clifton, Community Services Director
Brian McIntosh, Parks & Recreation Director
Noel Miller, Public Works Director
Kathleen Junglov, Asst. Admin. Services Dir.
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Dave Gebert, City Engineer
Bertrand Hauss, Traffic Engineer
Scott Snyder, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Wambolt requested Items E, G and L be removed from the Consent Agenda and
Councilmember Wilson requested Item M be removed.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PLUNKETT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON,
TO
APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
A. ROLL CALL
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 1.5, 2008.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #103628 THROUGH #103759 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$232,492.28 ISSUED APRIL 17, 2008, AND APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT
DEPOSITS AND CHECKS #46430 THROUGH #46479 FOR THE PERIOD APRIL 1
THROUGH APRIL 15, 2008 IN THE AMOUNT OF $775,651.29.
D. COMMUNITY SERVICES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY REPORT
— APRIL, 2008.
F. RESOLUTION NO. 1.169 - JOINING THE CASCADE AGENDA CITIES PROGRAM.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 1
H. RESOLUTION NO. 1171- REGARDING THE "HOLMES CORNER" NEIGHBORHOOD.
I. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN WASHINGTON WILDLIFE &
RECREATION PROGRAM AUTHORIZING RESOLUTION NO. 1172 TO APPLY FOR
STATE FUNDING ASSISTANCE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTERURBAN
TRAIL.
J. REPORT ON BIDS OPENED ON APRIL 1.5, 2008 FOR THE PUMP STATION 13
DEMOLITION AND NEW GRAVITY SEWER MAIN PROJECT AND AWARD OF
CONTRACT TO BUNO CONSTRUCTION, LLC. ($569,095.07).
K. AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS FOR THE CASPERS /PUGET DRIVE/NINTH
AVENUE NORTH WALKWAY PROJECT.
ITEM E: RESOLUTION NO. 1168 - ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF EDMONDS SUSTAINABLE
BUILDING POLICY.
Councilmember Wambolt expressed concern with the way the resolution was written, specifically with
the statement that life cost cycle analysis which looks at the net present value of plan options as an
investment; the goal is to achieve the highest most cost effective environmental performance possible
over the life of the project. He asked whether the intent was for the City to construct a sustainable
building regardless of the cost compared to a non - sustainable building because of the benefits of the
investment. Planning Manager Rob Chave responded his understanding was the life cycle cost analysis
looked at the overall cost of the project long term, factoring in the environmental benefit as part of the
cost benefit analysis. He explained consideration would be given not only to environmental benefits but
also maintenance costs. If it was not cost effective to include an environmental benefit in the building, it
would likely not be included.
Councilmember Wambolt asked how the cost savings of a sustainable building was measured. Mr. Chave
answered the primary considerations would be utility and maintenance costs; there were also benefits to
productivity which he acknowledged were more difficult to quantify. He referred to a cost benefit study
conducted by the Mayors Climate Protection Committee that found a 3% incremental cost to construct a
LEED silver building, an amount that was easily made up in utility savings over a short term.
Councilmember Wambolt suggested the sustainable building policy be amended to require the cost
differential for sustainable building be determined and require the additional cost be offset by lower
operating costs over a reasonable period of time. Mr. Chave explained the life cycle cost analysis was an
industry standard. He noted the City's Facilities Manager Jim Stevens was familiar with this method of
analysis and was confident it did what the City already attempts to do when comparing costs versus
benefits. Councilmember Wambolt was satisfied with the 3% differential to construct a LEED silver
building.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON,
FOR APPROVAL OF ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM G: RESOLUTION NO. 1170 - ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND PRINCIPLES.
Councilmember Wambolt expressed support for this policy, highlighting the statement in the resolution
that the City Council directs city staff to complete the following specific tasks: 1) Inventory and
summarize current City code, policy, and operations and the environmental impact of such, 2) Consider
the status and "lessons learned" of other jurisdictions, both within and outside of the Puget Sound region,
to learn of the experiences, approaches and potential strategies that Edmonds may employ, and 3) Report
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 2
back to the City Council on findings with recommendations for Council to pursue or adopt "best
practices" or strategies to meet the adopted principles and policies. He noted the City would not be
spending much money until those tasks were completed. Mayor Haakenson agreed there would be little
expenditure other than City staff time.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, FOR
APPROVAL OF ITEM G.
Councilmember Bernheim commented staff time was a large burden. He wanted to ensure staff's
energies and resources were focused in the right direction and suggested following up with staff to ensure
they were not overburdened with generalities. Mayor Haakenson pointed out a portion of the resolution
Councilmember Wambolt did not read was that the tasks would be accomplished "either through
allocation of internal staff or retaining an external consultant." Mayor Haakenson pointed out there was
no timeframe in the resolution and staff would work on these tasks as time allowed.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM L: AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL FOR STORMWATER
ENGINEERING SERVICES.
Councilmember Wambolt advised he pulled this item to vote against it, recalling he had not supported it
when it was previously discussed by the Council.
COUNCILMEMBER DAWSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, FOR
APPROVAL OF ITEM L.
Councilmember Dawson commented on the importance of contracting for these services in light of the
Assistant City Engineer's resignation and the City Engineer's impending retirement.
MOTION CARRIED (5 -2), COUNCILMEMBERS ORVIS AND WAMBOLT OPPOSED.
ITEM M: PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTING A SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM (CIP) FOR THE YEARS 2008 THROUGH 2014
Mayor Haakenson scheduled this item later on the Agenda as Item 6A.
3. REPORT REGARDING THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY TOURISM BUREAU.
Amy Spain, Snohomish County Tourism Bureau, provided statistics regarding tourism in Snohomish
County including a 5.9% growth in tourism in 2007 for a total economic impact of $823.4 million. She
described the impacts of tourism in Snohomish County on transportation /fuel, restaurants, retail sales,
recreation and entertainment as well as employment and local and state taxes. She explained the Tourism
Bureau generated nearly 11,000 requests for information via their advertising program in 2007, had
increased visitors to their website, and experienced a 30% increase in visits to Visitor Information
Centers. She described group sale efforts that resulted in over 12,000 room nights for over $14.5 million
in economic impact, record hotel occupancies, record hotel/motel revenue, and free media coverage about
community activities and attractions in Snohomish County.
Ms. Spain provided examples of group sales advertisements the Bureau placed in various publications and
commented on familiarization tours and sales missions the Bureau provided. She described trade shows
Bureau staff attended that generated leads and assistance Bureau staff provided to groups with their
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 3
conference needs. She reported on booked and pending room nights in 2007, a total of over 12,000 room
nights with an economic impact of $14.5 million. She also reported on lost convention business in 2007.
Ms. Spain reported on tourism development for individual leisure travel, describing advertising marketed
to various publications that generated 10,000 requests for information and an additional 15,000 requests
for information on the off - season discount lodging program advertised to the Canadian market. She
provided their primary website, www.snohomis and a secondary website directed to the wedding
market, www.snohomishcountywewddin s. M She commented on distribution of the annual Visitor
Guides, seasonal calendars, and Glimpse of Snohomish County promotional pieces. She described public
relation and media efforts; publication of StoryLine, a bimonthly media newsletter distributed to travel
writers; volunteer hours and services provided at four Visitor Centers and donations from area businesses.
She noted a fourth Visitor Information Center was added in November 2007 at Comcast Arena.
The Bureau's community relation efforts during 2007 included sponsoring six countywide tourism
programs that addressed search engine optimization, public relations, 2010 Olympic games, and
cooperative advertising with the Tourism Bureau. She summarized tourism was a huge economic driver
in Snohomish County tourism, increasing over 6% in 2007, and rapidly approaching a billion dollar
industry.
Councilmember Wilson inquired about marketing efforts for the 2010 Olympics and how to bring those
attending the Olympics to Snohomish County. Ms. Spain referred to SnoGold, a county grassroots effort
with three active committees. The Business Development Committee is preparing team hosting bid
packets for ice facilities in Snohomish County as practice venues for ice sports teams participating in the
Olympics. The Tourism Committee is working with communities and attractions in Snohomish County
to identify festivals /events that travelers in route to the Olympics may want to attend. The Snohomish
County Tourism Bureau also attended two international trade events held locally to meet with travel
providers to market Snohomish County as a gateway to the 2010 Olympics. The Committee estimates
55% of the tickets sold to the 2010 Olympics will be to U.S. residents and approximately half of those
from the western states.
Councilmember Wilson asked that the City be informed if a team were hosted near the Edmonds area. He
referred to the requests for information, inquiring about the number that requested information regarding
Edmonds. Ms. Spain advised with the exception of cooperative advertisements with the City of
Edmonds, advertisements were for Snohomish County and not city specific.
Councilmember Wilson expressed interest in cooperative advertisements opportunities or other ways the
City could work together with the Snohomish County Tourism Bureau, particularly with regard to the
2010 Olympics.
4. REPORT ON MEETING WITH WSDOT REGARDING THE 196TH STREET SW/ 88TH AVENUE W
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS.
Councilmember Olson reported Councilmember Orvis and she met with three members of Washington
State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), the City's Traffic Engineer Bertrand Hauss, and City
Engineer Dave Gebert. At the meeting WSDOT explained when a traffic signal was proposed, they
consider whether it was beneficial to traffic as well as whether it would reduce the number of accidents at
the intersection. At this intersection they found the majority of the accidents would have happened
regardless of whether a traffic signal was in place. WSDOT also considered improvements other than a
traffic signal and developed the right -turn only solution. WSDOT advised the systems warrant was the
weakest warrant, had not been used in 5t /z years and was intended for areas such as Hwy. 99 where the
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 4
goal was to move traffic in a group and therefore would not work well on 196th. If the City installed a
traffic signal without involving WSDOT, the City could be liable for any accidents.
Councilmember Olson recalled the comments at the public hearing addressed the need for a pedestrian
crossing; WSDOT offered to install a camera to determine whether any pedestrian safety improvements
could be installed. She noted the sightline in that area made a pedestrian crossing difficult.
Councilmember Orvis explained Councilmember Olson and he were reporting separately on the meeting
because they disagreed on some of the issues. He was disappointed with the outcome of the meeting with
WSDOT. He explained a traffic signal requires the intersection meet one of five warrants; this
intersection does not meet most of the warrants, but there were two that the intersection was close to
meeting. First the accident warrant; if it could be demonstrated that there had been five accidents that
could have been prevented by a traffic signal, a signal could be installed at the intersection. He noted in
2006 there were six accidents and five accidents in 2007. He disagreed with what accidents WSDOT
determined could have been prevented by a signal.
Councilmember Orvis explained the second warrant was a systems warrant and although considered a
weak warrant, if the intersection met that warrant, a signal could be installed. He explained the systems
warrant was used in areas where there were traffic lights in a line; 196th was one of those streets and in his
opinion could meet the systems warrant. He asked WSDOT what the City needed to demonstrate the
intersection meet that warrant but was unable to obtain that "recipe" from WSDOT. He was frustrated by
WSDOT's determination that a traffic signal could not be installed at the intersection without information
that disqualified all the warrants. WSDOT offered to assist staff in identifying a mid -block crosswalk
solution higher on the hill to improve visibility. He anticipated the Council could proceed in one of four
ways, 1) the recommended action (right turn only from 88th), 2) stop all efforts, 3) wait until staff and
WSDOT worked out the mid -block crosswalk and bring that proposal back to the Council with the
recommended action, and 4) encourage the State Legislature to have WSDOT provide further information
to assist the City in meeting the systems warrant. He preferred option 4 but felt option 3 was worth
pursuing.
Councilmember Wilson requested staff review the consultant's recommendation and the Council's
decision. City Engineer Dave Gebert explained the City hired Traffic Engineers Gray and Osborne to
evaluate the intersection from a vehicular perspective, not from a pedestrian standpoint. They considered
several alternatives to address the problem of sight distance at the intersection and recommended making
the northbound leg of 88th at 196th a right -turn only with a raised traffic island that channeled traffic to the
right. He recalled this was a relatively low cost option that could have been installed with funding from
the City's annual street overlay program. The other alternatives the consultant considered either did not
meet the warrants or were prohibitively expensive. The Council requested staff arrange a meeting with
WSDOT Traffic Engineers and Councilmembers Orvis and Olson.
Councilmember Olson asked for a further explanation of the systems warrant and the type of accidents
that had occurred at the intersection, recalling half of the accidents last year would not have been
prevented by a traffic signal. Mike Swires, WSDOT Snohomish County Area Traffic Engineer,
explained WSDOT had not used the systems warrant in the past 5 -7 years. The places that warrant was
typically used were downtown city grids where there were closely spaced intersections and the signal was
used to keep vehicles together; 196th was not that type of street. The standards used for this class of road
indicate signal spacing should be approximately '/2 mile apart to keep traffic moving and provide
vehicular access to businesses, etc. With regard to the number of collisions, he noted combining WSDOT
with Edmonds data revealed there were six collisions in 2006 and five in 2007 and only two of the five in
2007, the T -bone type accidents, would have been correctable with a signal. The other types of collisions
at the intersection were rear -end collisions and a vehicle that ran off the road. The warrants they typically
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 5
considered compared the volume on the side street, 881h, with the mainline volume on 196"' and the delay
at the cross street versus the delay the mainline would experience with a signal. Based on the consultant's
study, warrant thresholds of 8 hours were not met; this intersection had only 1 -2 hours when they meet
these factors. He concluded this was not a high need intersection as the type of collisions that a signal
would address were not occurring and there were not sufficient delays or volumes to warrant a signal.
With regard to volumes in that area, Mr. Swires noted volumes were relatively light northbound on 88th;
only approximately 10 vehicles turned left during peak hours, and most turned right. There were slightly
more left turns from southbound 88th. He explained a signal would result in an increase in rear -end type
collisions and would not address all angle collisions. WSDOT's recommendation to City staff was rather
than install a signal at an intersection that was not warranted, northbound turns on 88th be restricted to a
right turn only; left turns would still be allowed from 196th to 881h in either direction as well as right turns
from 196th to 88th
Council President Plunkett thanked Mr. Gebert for his service to the City and the people of Edmonds,
commenting his attitude and openness were recognized by the Council as well as by the public. He asked
whether staff would proceed with discussing a mid -block crosswalk with WSDOT if the Council did not
take any further action. He asked where the mid -block crosswalk would be located, anticipating it would
have to be located considerably east. Mr. Gebert advised staff would consider a mid -block crossing in
conjunction with the update of the Walkway Plan in the Transportation Element. The locations
considered included two blocks to the east at the church, noting although pedestrians would have to walk
slightly out of their way, it appeared to be a safer location for a crosswalk.
Council President Plunkett inquired whether it would be unusual to have a crosswalk on a State highway
that was not at a lighted intersection. Mr. Gebert acknowledged it might be unusual and consideration
may need to be given to a flashing light. He noted another possibility may be a pedestrian crossing as
part of the fire station signal.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether left turns would be restricted both directions on 88th onto 196th
She asked why it was not safe to travel through the intersection from northbound 88th but was safe
southbound. Mr. Gebert advised the sight distances were adequate on southbound 88th but were not on
northbound 88th; therefore the study recommended controlling the right turn only on northbound 881h. He
noted the consultant's final report was to restrict turns on northbound 88th to right -turn only.
Councilmember Dawson commented the sight distance of traffic coming up the hill was worse
southbound on 88t' , particularly with the two pronged intersection. Mr. Hauss responded traffic
northbound on 88th did not meet the sight distance requirements for left turn or through movements;
traffic southbound on 88th met the minimum sight distance standards. The consultant's presentation also
compared volumes southbound to northbound volumes and found there was four times more volume
southbound than northbound, yet northbound had a higher accident ratio due to sight distance issues.
Councilmember Dawson stated one of the challenges was traffic volumes varied considerably throughout
the day depending on the arrival of ferries. She asked if the variation in volumes and lack of gaps in
traffic had been considered. Mr. Swires answered the warrants considered traffic over the entire course of
the day and only considered volumes for 88th as compared to 196th. Over a 24 hour period, the warrants
for a signal were not high enough; there was not enough demand on 88th to drive the need for a signal.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether any consideration was given to the significant traffic volumes
created by ferry arrivals. Mr. Swires answered there were warrants that addressed a shorter period of
time; however, they were not used by WSDOT who balanced public need, delays and collision data.
Councilmember Dawson asked whether there was any consideration given to this being a ferry route. Mr.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 6
Swires answered no. He pointed out as drivers recognized turning left from 88th onto 196th as a difficult
maneuver, many used alternate routes such as 80Th which was only 1/2 mile out of their way.
Councilmember Dawson stated when the Council last discussed this, concern was expressed that the
right -turn only would divert traffic onto Maplewood and to the unregulated intersection at 84th rather than
the signal at 80th. She asked if staff had considered that. Mr. Gebert advised staff had not, and recalled
that was identified as a potential alternate route that traffic would take if left turns were restricted on
northbound 88th
Councilmember Wambolt recalled the bigger concern expressed at the public hearing was pedestrian
safety and none of the options including moving the crosswalk east improved pedestrian safety. In his
experience, the only time a pedestrian was safe in a crosswalk was at a traffic signal. He asked whether it
would be practical to install a pedestrian- activated signal. Mr. Gebert answered in his opinion there was
not. Mr. Swires advised the threshold for a pedestrian activated signal was quite high such as the
volumes at intersections in downtown Seattle.
Councilmember Orvis commented there was a pedestrian activated signal on 76th for the school. Mr.
Swires agreed there was a school crossing warrant, however, the 196th /88th intersection had not been
identified as a school crossing location. Councilmember Orvis asked whether there was a parks crossing
warrant. Mr. Swires answered the warrant was driven by pedestrian volume. He reiterated their offer to
install a camera in that location for a few days to record pedestrian volume.
Mayor Haakenson advised he directed staff to order crosswalk flags that would be tested in 2 -3
intersections throughout the City.
Council President Plunkett noted the Council was not comfortable with the consultant's recommendation
to restrict turns as most felt it would divert traffic from an arterial onto residential streets. He appreciated
the additional research by Councilmembers Orvis and Olson and staff, and suggested delaying further
consideration until staff made a proposal regarding a mid -block crosswalk.
Councilmember Orvis agreed it was appropriate to wait for the crosswalk information and seek the
public's input.
Councilmember Bernheim asked whether signs could be installed to slow traffic. Mr. Hauss explained
signs used for traffic calming worked in the short term but not in the long term. Councilmember
Bemheim inquired about a radar speed indicator. Mr. Hauss advised radar speed indicator signs would be
installed eastbound slightly east of Caspers and west bound at the Joyce Apartments.
Mayor Haakenson questioned whether speed was the problem, noting the problem was the inability for
pedestrians to cross as well as sight distance for vehicles. He summarized the Council's action was to
discuss the crosswalk as part of the Transportation Plan update.
Councilmember Dawson recalled at the last meeting when this was discussed, staff indicated they would
continue to monitor the traffic in the area and determine whether drivers were avoiding the intersection.
She supported continuing that effort as well as considering traffic that may be rerouted through the
neighborhood by restricting left turns from 88th
: t117 i ►[ 19CK ]►l i►l 191►Y K`!
Purchase of
Old Milltown Alan MacFarlane, Edmonds, recognized Roger Hertrich, Betty Larman, Fred Bell, Jack Hall and many
Courtyard others for their efforts in regard to the purchase of the Old Milltown courtyard. After a year of speaking
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 7
to the Council, the Mayor and City Council, particularly Councilmember Wambolt, were proceeding with
the purchase. He remarked the Council had saved a small but very important and historic section of the
City which would continue to bring visitors to Edmonds and hopefully act as a proforma for future
historical acquisitions.
Merrily Altier, Edmonds, a resident north of the 196th /88th intersection, explained by traveling through
the neighborhoods, she could turn left at 86th 84th or 80th although left turns at those intersections were
not very safe either. She remarked there was no safe crossing until the signal at 80th. She noted although
crossing from the south provided a much better view of both sides, it was often difficult to see traffic
traveling east up the hill due to the shady area. She agreed it was difficult for drivers in low cars traveling
northbound on 88th to see cars on 196th. She suggested installing a speed limit sign at the Joyce
Apartments as well as mirrors across the street on 88th to allow drivers to see traffic.
Alvin Rutledge, Edmonds, advised he submitted approximately 200 pages of information to the City
yesterday regarding the work of the previous pool committee. He displayed drawings of a pool design at
the old Woodway High School site that was rejected by the Edmonds School District because it
eliminated the fields and tennis courts. He displayed a second design for the old Woodway High School
site, noting these designs were nearly complete and could be used for a pool on the downtown waterfront
site. He displayed a drawing of stadium seating on rollers, remarking this could be used in other areas to
free up space for a pool. He noted Baseball America had a grant program for relocated fields.
Rebecca Wolfe, Edmonds, thanked the Council for passing the resolutions tonight regarding the
sustainable building policy, Cascade Agenda and environmental policies and principles. She urged the
support the Sound Transit package that was currently being developed. She read a piece from
Michael Brian, Chair of the Cascade Chapter of the Sierra Club, explaining the Sierra Club worked hard
last fall to defeat Proposition 1, the road and transit ballot measure because it included 182 miles of new,
global warming, pollution spewing highways; this year was a chance to adopt a transit only package. She
urged Council to use the phrase global warming instead of climate change as climate change was not as
direct or persuasive. She noted the public was not making connections between other issues and global
wanning; a recent list of voters' chief concerns did not include global warming or environmental issues.
She commented on the effect global warming had on the economy and pointed out children were not
being adequately educated regarding global warming.
Betty Larman, Edmonds, pointed out in Europe there were pedestrian islands with barriers and signage
in the center of the street so that pedestrians only crossed half of a street at a time. She noted this was an
inexpensive solution to a pedestrian crossing.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, referred to the crosswalk flags Mayor Haakenson indicated the City was
Tourism purchasing, recalling his interest in having crosswalks repainted. He expressed concern there was little
emphasis by the City on the upcoming Olympics and suggested the Economic Development Director's
title be changed to Tourism Director. He also suggested forming a Tourism Committee comprised of
members of the Chamber of Commerce, City Council, Port of Edmonds and the Snohomish County
Tourism Bureau and led by the Economic Development Director. He commented when at the airport
recently, he noticed there were brochures available for many cities but not for Edmonds. He
recommended using tourism funds to actively promote Edmonds. Next he expressed his support for
conservation and economically reasonable, practical actions to save on utility costs but was concerned
with the generalities in the sustainable building policy. He preferred developing a list of specific actions
that would reduce costs rather than a resolution.
Dave Page, Edmonds, thanked the Council for what was happening on Lake Ballinger, noting the
problems on Lake Ballinger were going to be solved because of Council involvement that began three
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 8
years ago. Next he advised ACE was interested in pursuing a bond issue to purchase the Antique Mall
and Skippers sites. He acknowledged although there was a lot of controversy around this proposal, it
could be accomplished via a great deal of effort. They were beginning to raise funds to support the bond
issue and he encouraged the City to be involved.
Lynn MacFarlane, Edmonds, suggested a time - activated 4 -way stop sign at 881h /196th that could be
activated during times when there were substantial amounts of traffic.
Council President Plunkett recognized Mr. Page who began calling Councilmembers to his office 3 to 4
years ago to discuss Lake Ballinger and soon after that staff got involved. He summarized the work that
was occurring regarding Lake Ballinger to a great extent was due to Mr. Page's perseverance.
6A. PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTING A SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(CIP) FOR THE YEARS 2008 THROUGH 2014
Mayor Haakenson commented this was City Engineer Dave Gebert's last Council meeting and tomorrow
was his last day before he retired. He reiterated how much he had enjoyed having Mr. Gebert on the staff,
commenting he was a consummate professional as well as a nice guy. He summarized it had been a
pleasure having him work for the City, he would be missed and it would be difficult to replace him.
Councilmember Wilson advised he pulled the CIP Agenda Item in order to vote against it.
City Attorney Scott Snyder advised the Council could only pass Comprehensive Plan amendments once a
year; however, there were several exceptions including passing the CIP in conjunction with a budget
amendment. At the last Council meeting, there was a budget amendment on the agenda; tonight there was
not. He encouraged the Council to have their discussion; however, the next opportunity to pass the CIP
would be with the June /July budget amendment.
Council President Plunkett observed there had been a number of issues raised with regard to the CIP
including the downtown waterfront and he anticipated the Council would be having robust discussions
regarding that issue in the future. Once further information was provided by staff and Council had those
robust discussions, he was hopeful the Council could develop consensus on the CIP.
Councilmember Bernheim asked why the Frances Anderson Center seismic retrofit was funded from
Fund 126, Parks Acquisition, rather than Fund 125, Parks Maintenance. Parks & Recreation Director
Brian McIntosh answered there was very specific State language that prohibits the use of development
funds for indoor recreational facilities.
Councilmember Bernheim commented he was inclined to support the CIP even though it did not allocate
$10 million over the next ten years for a swimming pool or allocate funds for the Senior Center, because
the CIP could be modified in the future as necessary. He did not view the proposed CIP as an
impediment to achieving any of these projects.
Councilmember Wilson summarized an email he forwarded to Council: Because plans such as the
Comprehensive Plan, CIP, etc. were documents that reflected the Council's vision and priorities, it was
important to be clear about their vision and priorities when passing these documents. When the Council
approved the document, it became the Council's vision and priority. He identified three major policy
questions that the Council had not fully addressed but would be answered by the passage of the CIP:
1. The waterfront and any public /private space; there had been no adjustments made to the CIP to
reflect public input. He emphasized the need for the CIP to reflect public comment.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 9
2. In 2007 Lake Ballinger endured a 500 -year flood and recently endured a 100 -year and a 50 -year
flood. In January 2007 the Council passed a resolution stating Lake Ballinger was among the
City's highest environmental projects. He noted an Interlocal Agreement process was underway
that would require funds be allocated to match $200,000 in State funds. If it was the Council
vision and among their priorities, funds should be included in the CIP.
With regard to transportation, the Council adopted a policy to allocate REST over $750,000 to
street overlays. Given the serious shortfall anticipated in REST funds, the amount available for
overlays and fixing potholes had decreased to approximately $150,000. He noted although there
had not been a change in policy, the implication was a lowering of the priority of street overlays
which he did not believe the Council had discussed at length. He summarized the Council may
need to consider funding for parks versus funding for roads or a hybrid.
Councilmember Wilson indicated he had intended to vote against the CIP because the Council had not
adequately addressed the above policy issues and the CIP did not reflect the City Council and citizens'
viewpoint regarding those issues. He noted there was also a significant ongoing deficit in building
maintenance funding.
Councilmember Wambolt stated REET funds allocated for street overlays were not used to fix potholes;
the City still repaired potholes. The Council made the decision to allocate REET funds in excess of
$750,000 to street overlays because the City was collecting significantly more than envisioned when the
original policy regarding the use of REET funds was established. This year REET revenue was much
lower and projections envision only $150,000 would be available for street overlays. He emphasized that
was a short term problem and he did not support changing the policy because real estate sales were down
one year as he envisioned REET revenues would increase next year and may not be as bad as originally
anticipated. He referred to a Seattle Times article that reported condominium sales March 2007 compared
to March 2006 had only dropped slightly and the average price was up 20 %. He did not support making
any change with regard to the policy regarding use of excess REET funds for street overlays.
Councilmember Dawson agreed with Council President Plunkett that the Council would have a great deal
of discussion regarding the waterfront redevelopment area and it was not appropriate to include funds in
the CIP without additional work. With regard to Lake Ballinger, she encouraged a Councilmember to
propose an amendment to provide funding for the Lake Ballinger area. With regard to street overlay
funding, she pointed out this had been discussed extensively by the Council and had not been an easy or
uncontroversial decision for the Council to allocate excess REET funds to street overlays. Although that
funding source was in a decline, it was a short term situation. The Council either needed to identify
another source of revenue for street overlays or be truthful regarding the overlay cycle that the funds
would provide. She expressed her appreciation to staff for including realistic amounts in the CIP
consistent with available funding.
Councilmember Orvis commented although the CIP could be better, there were a lot of great projects in
the Plan. He pointed out there was $1.2 million cumulatively through 2014 in the Plan for Lake Ballinger
and he was open to considering an amendment for Lake Ballinger subject to the availability of funds. At
Councilmember Wilson's request, Councilmember Orvis identified Lake Ballinger projects including
$900,000 for the Interurban Trail and funding for Lake Ballinger in Fund 412 Stormwater.
Councilmember Orvis did not support delaying the projects currently in the CIP until more information
on the waterfront redevelopment area was available.
Councilmember Olson asked the ramifications if the Council continued to delay adoption of the CIP.
Development Services Director Duane Bowman emphasized the Council could not pass the CIP tonight.
It could be adopted when staff presented the next budget amendment or as part of budget discussion.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 10
Councilmember Wilson agreed with Councilmember Orvis with the exception of the specifics regarding
Lake Ballinger; his reference to Lake Ballinger was projects related to water quality, flooding and
ecology. He highlighted the total amount in the CIP for Lake Ballinger to address those issues over the
next seven years included $10,000 for lake monitoring, $39,000 for a lake level analysis study, $220,000
for Lake Ballinger and associated projects and no additional funds for water quality, quantity or ecology.
He relayed Mr. Fiene's response that the $20,000 in the CIP for a Basin Study was only a placeholder.
Councilmember Orvis suggested Councilmember Wilson propose specific funding requests for Lake
Ballinger. Councilmember Wilson suggested it would be useful to invite the leaders of the Lake
Ballinger Work Group to make a presentation to the Council regarding projects underway and additional
funding requirements, advising a presentation was tentatively scheduled for May 20. The Lake Ballinger
Work Group was composed of five cities (Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood, Shoreline and Lake
Forest Park), four legislators, WSDOT and Department of Ecology, King and Snohomish Counties, a
representative of Congressman Jay Inslee's office, and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers may begin
participating.
With regard to transportation, Councilmember Wilson inquired what park projects would be eliminated
and what street overlay projects would be added if funding for street overlays was increased by allocating
REET funds in excess of $500,000 to street overlays. He commented Snohomish County's economy was
cyclical with the national economy, and although the velocity of the turnover of housing stock, the
primary driver of REET, has slowed significantly, when the national economy responded and Snohomish
County's economy slowed in the fourth quarter of 2007 or early 2008, REET revenues could decline
further.
6B. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF THE COURTYARD AREA AT OLD MILLTOWN.
Mayor Haakenson commented after a significant amount of work by City staff, the City Attorney and
himself negotiating with Mr. Gregg and his attorney, the Purchase and Sale Agreement was presented for
Council consideration.
City Attorney Scott Snyder advised a revised Purchase and Sale Agreement was distributed to the Council
this evening; the changes addressed issues raised by Councilmember Bemheim today. He suggested the
Council consider amendments by motion.
COUNCILMEMBER WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PLUNKETT, TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT.
COUNCILMEMBER BERNHEIM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
PLUNKETT, TO AMEND SUBSECTION G IN THE INDEMNIFICATION SECTION ON PAGE 7
OF 16 TO READ, "...REGULATORY JURISDICTION OVER HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
EMANATING ON OR MIGRATING FROM THE PROPERTY."
Councilmember Bernheim explained this would expand the scope of hazardous consequences the seller
may be responsible for by including all hazards emanating or migrating from the property.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Wambolt commented this purchase was not contained in the CIP. Parks & Recreation
Director Brian McIntosh advised it would be funded from the Acquisition Fund 126 which included funds
for open space and land and allowed the Council to make purchase decisions such as this. Until a
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 11
decision was made to purchase the property and a dollar amount established, it was difficult to include an
amount in the CIP. Councilmember Wambolt inquired whether there was enough in that line item for this
purchase. Mr. McIntosh answered there was enough in Fund 126 to cover the purchase.
Councilmember Wambolt thanked Mr. MacFarlane for his efforts to make this happen by bringing it to
the Council's attention. He clarified the price the City was paying was below the appraised value; the
City hired an appraiser who appraised the property at $153 /square foot; the owner paid $104 /square foot.
The City negotiated a price that was 16% below the appraised value. He commented although it sounded
like a lot of money for a little strip of land, Edmonds real estate was very expensive.
Councilmember Dawson commented this was a good decision and expressed her appreciation for staff,
the Mayor, Councilmembers and the public's effort to negotiate this purchase. She noted the importance
of maintaining public spaces as the city continued to grow and redevelop. She acknowledged although
this was a lot of money for a small amount of land, once it was gone, it was gone forever and it was
spaces such as this that gave downtown its character. She clarified this was not a General Fund
expenditure; the funds were from REET that allowed the Council to make such purchases when the
opportunity arose. These funds could not be used for general operating expenses or for Police or Fire.
Councilmember Wambolt recognized the group of citizens, led by Betty Larman, who volunteered to
maintain the area.
Mayor Haakenson advised the actual price was $282,766, well below the appraised value.
Councilmember Bernheim pointed out the seller retained a utility and maintenance easement so that up to
60 days per year if necessary the property could be utilized for utility easements by the seller. There was
also a one year construction period that allowed the seller to have a crane operating from the site.
Councilmember Orvis expressed his joy at the City's purchase of this open space, a rarity in downtown
that would allow the City to maintain open space for future generations.
City Attorney Scott Snyder explained while the City had been negotiating for some time, there were 2 -3
fairly significant changes made at the Council's suggestion. The offer would be proposed to the seller
and could be returned to the Council.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
7. MAYOR'S UPDATE ON CLIMATE PROTECTION COMMITTEE
Mayor Haakenson commented the Committee was not interested in the politics of global warming but
wanted to recognize the problem and identify things everyone could do to improve the situation. The
Committee meets monthly, usually on the first Thursday of the month. There were often 25 or more
people in attendance and often include representatives from Sustainable Edmonds and GreenforGood.
Agenda topics they have discussed include fuel economy tips, Environment Day in Olympia, Energy Star
partnership, possible environment open house, City's greenhouse gas findings, and discussion regarding
the Governor's comprehensive climate approach report.
Guest speakers have included Edmonds School District to discuss what the District is doing and a
presentation on "Harnessing the Earth's unlimited free energy — geothermal heat pump technology." A
subcommittee, consisting of Steve Bernheim and several citizens, are working on a greenhouse gas
reduction program geared toward local businesses and will be the featured program at this week's
Chamber of Commerce luncheon. The City's Recycling Coordinator Steve Fisher collected and analyzed
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 12
the City's greenhouse gas output in order to identify the greatest sources of greenhouse gas emissions
from City buildings, understand emission trends, quantify the benefits of specific City activities, provide a
basis for developing an action plan, and set goals and targets for future reductions. Mr. Fisher used
ICLEI's (International Council for Local Environmental Issues) government analysis program to analyze
data for the years 1999 . (base year) and 2006 for the following sectors: buildings, water /sewer, streetlights,
vehicle fleet, employee commute, waste, and "other." Results can be found under "Climate Protection
Committee" on the City's website. His goal was to collect and analyze communitywide data for the same
years.
The Committee has undertaken a study of "green" building codes with the help of Planning Manager Rob
Chave and Planner Jen Machuga and are working on a low- impact development program for the City to
address green building codes and sustainable - building practices. This will be presented first to the
Planning Board and then to the City Council. He referred to PCC's plans for a platinum LEED- certified
building and plans for City LEED certified buildings.
Facilities Manager Jim Stevens has led the effort in signing the City as a partner in the Energy Star
program. This provides the ability to track energy consumption in City buildings and to work toward the
Energy Star "stamp," meaning a building is rated in the top 25% of energy efficiency (on a scale of zero
to 100 %). Currently, City Hall is at 73 %. City staff installed an electrical outlet at the Public Safety
Complex to allow owners of electrical cars to recharge their vehicles. In conjunction with the Puget
Sound Bird Fest in September, the Committee plans an environmental fair to increase awareness and
provide a fun way for families to learn more about sustainability. Liz Stachow, Edmonds Beacon
reporter, is a regular attendee at the meetings and plans to include committee information in her weekly
column. The committee also utilizes the quarterly City newsletter, "Update on Edmonds," to
communicate information to citizens. He referred to Earth Hour on Saturday, March 29 from 8 to 9 p.m.,
an effort to encourage citizens to turn off their lights for one hour to conserve energy. He advised
background information as well as upcoming meeting dates and meeting notes were available under
Climate Protection on the City's website (www.ci.edmonds.wa.us).
8. COUNCIL REPORTS ON OUTSIDE COMMITTEE /BOARD MEETINGS
Councilmember Orvis reported the Disability Board recently considered funding for preventative care
such as an annual physical. He explained the Disability Board oversees benefits for LEOFFI retirees, a
small group of retirees for whom the City is responsible for their medical care. The Board decided to
allow $300 /year for preventative care. Although some studies indicate this preventative care does not
save money, when studies are limited to the age range of the LEOFF 1 members, preventative care does
save money. He commented on stories relayed at the Disability Board of people caring for someone
unable to care for themselves, particularly those whose brain has been injured by disease. He recognized
the grueling, exhausting and thankless nature of providing this care and assured the caregivers that people
did appreciate and care about what they did.
Councilmember Wilson referred to a New York Times article regarding things people could do personally
to cut back on climate change. He noted airline travel was one of the major contributors to greenhouse
gas emissions; Britain would need to cut every other source of emissions in their country to meet their
emission goals if they did not address aviation. For example a recent flight from London to Chicago had
only five passengers, equal to a carbon footprint of 43.2 tons of CO2 per passenger. He noted if all
greenhouse gas production was halted now, there would be another 1.6 degree Celsius increase over the
coming century and a. l inch per year sea level rise for the foreseeable future.
Councilmember Wilson reported on the Edmonds Public Facilities District (PFD) Board meeting, the
Board that oversees the Edmonds Center (ECA) for the Arts. Three PFDs in addition to Edmonds operate
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 13
under the Snohomish County PFD, the Future of Flight Museum, the Comcast Arena and the Lynnwood
Convention Center; the Snohomish County PFD is debating how to allocate excess funds between the
four PFDs. The ECA plans to convert a line of credit to bonded debt and the City is the guarantor of that
debt. He encouraged the public to attend ECA events to ensure the City would not be responsible for that
debt.
Councilmember Olson reported the SeaShore Transportation Forum included an update on the Alaskan
Way Viaduct; crews are working on the south end at street level and plan to begin working on the north
. She was hopeful by year end a decision would be made with regard to the raised portion. The Forum
planned to discuss Sound Transit next month, commenting none of the SeaShore members were in
favor of Sound Transit's current proposal. The Forum changed their meetings to the first Friday of the
month.
Councilmember Wambolt reported the Port Commission approved the design of the Jacobsen Marine
building and Jacobsen is scheduled to apply for a permit for their new building in mid - April. He noted
this would be a nice addition to the Port and will produce sales tax revenue for the City via boat sales. He
reported the Port was having problems with otters; 12% of maintenance time was applied to cleaning up
their messes. The Harbor Inn is now a member of the Best Western chain; one of the last things they had
to do to be accepted by the chain was to build a swimming pool. He referred to comments that there were
no pools in the City, remarking there was a very nice pool at the Harbor Square Athletic Club. The name
of the Deer Creek Hatchery was changed to Willow Creek Hatchery. Councilmember Wambolt reported
the Edmonds- Woodway High School students who presented their redevelopment plans at the Council
meeting would be making a presentation at the Port's next meeting on April 28.
Councilmember Dawson reported there would be a public hearing and update at Community Transit next
week regarding Bus Rapid Transit along Hwy. 99, one of the biggest Community Transit projects in the
Edmonds area. Councilmember Dawson reported Community Transit held their retreat at Semiahmoo
last week and suggested the Council consider it as a location for a future retreat as it was a nice,
reasonably priced facility and an example of a lower level development that fit into the surroundings.
Councilmember Dawson explained due to Marysville's increased population there were now three cities
that meet the definition of large cities but there were only two large city representatives on the
Community Transit Board, Marysville and Edmonds; Lynnwood has two alternate seats on the Board.
She referred to an editorial in the Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace edition of the Enterprise suggesting
Community Transit consider a geographical districting for their Board which would result in two
representatives from the South County area. She noted there were currently three representatives from
those cities serving on the Community Transit Board, a representative from Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace
and the Vice Chair from Brier as well as two alternates from Lynnwood.
Councilmember Dawson referred to Ms. Wolfe's comments regarding the Sierra Club's support for a
Sound Transit vote this year to provide real solutions to congestion in this area, pointing out the other
local officials on the Sound Transit Board and she felt Sound Transit's proposal did not provide real
transportation solutions for South Snohomish County as it relied on Bus Rapid Transit on I -5 and there
were no guarantees from WSDOT regarding a dedicated lane. Further investigation was needed to
develop a regional solution to transportation and congestion. She reported the Sound Transit Board
would be reviewing draft proposals later this week and deciding whether to move them forward for public
comment. She noted this did not necessarily determine whether there would be a vote in 2008 but would
move toward that path. She invited Councilmembers to provide her feedback, noting the feedback she
had received to date had not been favorable toward a 2008 Sound Transit vote.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 14
Councilmember Dawson advised she was appointed to a newly formed Sound Transit Operations
Committee; their first meeting was scheduled on April 24. As a result of that meeting she was unable to
attend the entire SnoCom retreat and asked whether Mayor Haakenson or Assistant Police Chief Gannon
could attend the retreat.
Councilmember Dawson reported she would also be attending the Puget Sound Regional Council general
assembly meeting on April 24. She encouraged all Councilmembers and the Mayor to attend as they were
all members of the general assembly. She invited Councilmembers to provide her with input for that
meeting.
Councilmember Dawson advised she was the only Councilmember planning to attend the Association of
Washington Cities (AWC) Conference in Yakima in June which was the opportunity for cities to vote on
the platform that AWC would act on for the year as well as vote for committee representatives. Because
the City has three votes, she encouraged two other Councilmembers to attend at least on June 20 when the
votes would occur.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Haakenson congratulated Mr. Gebert on his retirement and wished him well in his new life as a
grandfather, Mariner fan and Husky fan.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Plunkett reminded there would be no Council meeting on April 29th as it was the fifth
Tuesday of the month.
Councilmember Orvis reported one of the biggest issues facing the Snohomish County Health Board was
funding and the District would be operating at a deficit next year unless cost reductions were made. Next,
he relayed that recent studies have indicated people in mid -life with large mid - sections were more likely
to develop dementia. He encouraged everyone to lose weight.
Councilmember Wilson commented by the next Council meeting, voters would have received their
absentee ballots for the May 20 EMS election. He noted the Council was on record supporting the EMS
and he urged the public to vote, hopefully in favor of the EMS levy.
Councilmember Wilson expressed disappointment that Stevens Hospital CEO Michael Carter cancelled
his presentation to the Council and deferred any further discussions with the Council until August.
Councilmember Wilson asked if the Council wanted to invite any of the Hospital Commissioners to speak
to the Council, noting some of them would like to speak to the Council and feel stifled by the current
administration. He listed several questions he had planned to pose to Mr. Carter: Why does the new
Development Director, whose job in part is to raise funds for the hospital and who oversees three people,
have a salary of $200,000 and has not raised any funds to date? Why did the Development Director earn
more than the Director of Nursing? Why did Mr. Carter say he did not know what the nurses did with all
their time and why did they need to earn as much as they did? Why after having laid off the Director of
Marketing and saying he was not interested in marketing the hospital externally, the Vice President of
Development hired his wife under a no bid contract to do marketing for the hospital and why that
continues with no public process? Why the Compensation Committee that planned to meet to consider
Mr. Carter's salary never met and why was the work of the never - meeting committee then confirmed at a
Commission meeting at which two of the five members were absent? Why when the first year end
numbers were announced and Mr. Carter's compensation was tied to whether the hospital operated in the
red or black, Stevens Hospital was in the red in January but by February the hospital operated in the
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 15
black? Why was the newest Commissioner, who was elected with the highest percentage victory than any
other election held last year in Snohomish County, had not yet received her orientation packet?
Councilmember Wilson recalled his comments to Mr. Carter that were the hospital to put an initiative on
the ballot in August to raise funds to move the hospital, he would not be informed until it had been filed
with the Snohomish County Auditor, to which Mr. Carter agreed he probably wouldn't. As a result of
that comment, Councilmember Wilson found it particularly disturbing that Mr. Carter had delayed his
discussion with the Council until August. Councilmember Wilson assured he wanted to be a strong
supporter of Stevens Hospital and wanted a hospital in the community and felt it belonged in the current
location. He pointed out the public was outraged at the Seattle Sonics asking the State for $300 million;
Stevens Hospital was asking for $400 million to build a facility.
Councilmember Olson thanked WSDOT for attending tonight's meeting, remarking the City was
fortunate the WSDOT Traffic Engineer lived in Edmonds.
Councilmember Bernheim encouraged the public to attend the April 28 Port Commission meeting where
the Edmonds - Woodway High School students would present their redevelopment proposal to the Port.
He inquired whether the Harbor Square Athletic Club pool was open to the public. Next he encouraged
people waiting in the ferry holding lanes, admiring the view at Sunset Park, waiting to pick up school
children, etc. not to leave their vehicles running as emissions from idling vehicles caused health problems
in areas where pedestrians gathered. He also pointed out an idling vehicle consumed approximately one
gallon an hour or approximately 5 cents a minute.
Councilmember Wambolt acknowledged Harbor Square was a membership organization that required a
monthly fee; admission to a public pool would not be free. Next, he expressed concern with the failure of
the Stevens Hospital CEO to speak to the Council and asked whether he provided a reason for canceling.
Mayor Haakenson relayed Mr. Carter said he was not prepared to come before the Council.
Councilmember Wambolt suggested the public email /write to Mr. Carter asking why he cancelled his
discussion with the City Council. Councilmember Wilson commented he would have provided his
questions to Mr. Carter in advance to allow him to prepare a response.
Councilmember Dawson reported last week Councilmember Bernheim and she spoke at the Senior Center
membership meeting and had a great discussion on a number of topics. She remarked there were exciting
things happening at the Senior Center and she encouraged the public to join. She advised on Tuesday,
April 29 the Council planned to tour the treatment plant.
Councilmember Dawson referred to Councilmember Orvis' comment regarding preventative care, noting
Snohomish the Snohomish County Medical Examiner Office had experienced an increase in cases due to people in
County
Medical their fifties whose death required review by the Medical Examiner's office because they were not treated
Examiner by physicians and had no medical history. She commented this was an interesting trend that the lack of
health insurance and lack of preventative care led to unexplained deaths.
Councilmember Dawson advised this was Administrative Professional's Week and tomorrow was
Administrative Professional's Day. She voiced her appreciation to Jana Spellman, Senior Executive
Council Assistant for the amazing work she does for the Council. She noted Mayor Haakenson had one
Professionals of the finest administrative professionals in the area, Linda Carl. She thanked Ms. Spellman and Ms. Carl
for the great work they and all the administrative professionals in the city did.
Student Representative Scheibert described a conference she attended in Washington DC on reproductive
health and population concerns. She encouraged the public to research the link between access to family
planning and deformation of the environment. She pointed out families in ecological hot spots were using
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 16
slash and burn agriculture to support large families that often were unintended due to limited access to
family planning services. She noted the Sierra Club was one of the hosts of the conference and she
encouraged the public to support their work.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:47 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 22, 2008
Page 17