Loading...
10/17/1995 City CouncilApproved 10124195 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES OCTOBER 17, 1995 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Laura Hall in the Library Plaza Room, 650 Main Street, followed by the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Laura Hall, Mayor Barbara Fahey, Council President Pro-Tem William J. Kasper, Councilmember Michael Hall, Councilmember Dave Earling, Councilmember John Nordquist, Councilmember Roger L. Myers, Councilmember ABSENT Tom Petruzzi, Council President 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA STAFF PRESENT Tom Miller, Police Chief Michael Springer, Fire Chief Art Housler, Administrative Services Director Brent Hunter, Personnel Manager Jeff Wilson, Current Planning Supervisor Jim Walker, City Engineer Christine Weed, Arts Coordinator Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Christine Laws, Recorder COUNCIL MEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MYERS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Kasper pulled Item G. COUNCILMEMBER EARLING MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FAHEY, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The agenda items passed are as follows: (A) ROLL CALL (B) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 3, 1995 (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, 1995 (D) APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #3224S THRU #4435F FOR THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 2, 1995 IN THE AMOUNT OF $113,557.22; APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #3234 THRU CLRO W5 #4535F FOR THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 9, 1995 IN THE AMOUNT OF $234,933.65; AND WAARR APPROVAL OF PAYROLL WARRANTS #955488 THRU #955796 FOR THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 16 THRU SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 IN THE AMOUNT OF $398,285.00 Cl,A"t fpA (E) ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM NANCY M. SCOTT ($1907.13) ppMR60 1,11>6j& (F) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN SERVICE AGREEMENT OR SOLIDS HAULING S�A�i AND DISPOSAL 64f�Sso• (H) REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE DEMOLITION OF ALL STRUCTURES t0 oplt6 �A AT BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH PARK AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT (I) AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS TO PURCHASE UNDERGROUND BORING TOOL ��RS (J) AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BLOWERS FOR THE WATER SECTION S TO PURCHASE FOUR (4) 12-VOLT ELECTRICAL ORDINANC NO. 3047 G SCRIVENER'S ORS LEGAL .5.40 6 (K) PUBLISHED IN CONJUNCTIONNWITH ORDINANCE NO. 3045 EDESCRIPTION ANNEXINGCERTAIN PAS PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE SNOLINE/FORSHEE ANNEXATION AREA p o/ (L) ORDINANCE NO.3048 CORRECTING SCRIVENER'S ERRORS IN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ,egrpA PUBLISHED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ORDINANCE NO. 3046 ANNEXING CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE GATE/EATON ANNEXATION AREA Councilmember Kasper pulled Item G for clarification of the police officer to population ratios. Chief Miller advised that while the population and number of officers change, the ratio remains the same. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO APPROVE ITEM G. MOTION CARRIED. The item passed is as follows: PokS (L (G) AUTHORIZE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO HIRE POLICE PERSONNEL AS A RESULT OF P ANNEXATIONS 3. AUDIENCE Sylvia Sycamore was the only individual to sign up to speak and asked whether it was more appropriate to make her comments under Item 8. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MYERS, TO ALLOW MS. SYCAMORE TO SPEAK UNDER ITEM 8. MOTION CARRIED.. The audience portion of the meeting was closed. 4. PROCLAMATIONS RECOGNIZING NATIONAL RIDE SHARE AND NATIONAL ARTS AND HUMANITIES MONTH E '460 Mayor Hall read a Proclamation declaring October 16-20 as Ride Share Week in Edmonds. She SW0K presented the Proclamation dated October 17, 1995 to Brent Hunter. Mr. Hunter stated that Edmonds is in compliance with the law, and that the program is primarily educational. He noted that the activities of the Downtown Parking Committee were directly related to the ride sharing efforts. He thanked Karen Wiggins for doing a great job. �Af5 gs Mayor Hall then read a Proclamation dated October 12, 1995 which proclaimed October as National Arts and Humanities Month, and presented the Proclamation to Christine Weed. Ms. Weed thanked the Mayor and then went on to advise the audience of the arts activities for the month of October. City Council Approved Minutes October 17, 1995 Page 2 5. INTRODUCTION OF OMBUDSMAN 51pA D 0i63'� Mayor Hall introduced Rudy Jones, a recent Boeing retiree who is volunteering as an ombudsman for the City. He has also volunteered through the community college to get the City people "up -to -speed" on computers. Mr. Jones stated that he really enjoys being Ombudsman and a part of Edmonds, and hopes to be with the City for a long time. Councilmember Earling thanked Mr. Jones for stepping up as a volunteer and asked him to explain to the citizens the procedure for any complaints. Mr. Jones stated that his main job is to keep complaints, or challenges, from falling through the cracks. He stated he could not guarantee that any answer received would be the answer desired, but said he will get an answer. He hopes that through his efforts, citizens will have a higher regard for the mechanisms of the City government, and that he can help them work through the system. Councilmember Earling thanked Mr. Jones for undertaking this job and asked him what a citizen does if they wish to present Mr. Jones with a challenge, and he asked about the City's liability with Mr. Jones being a volunteer problem solver. City Attorney Snyder cautioned that Mr. Jones should not represent that he has any decision -making or resolution authority; only the duty to assist in bringing the matters forward. Councilmember Kasper asked Mr. Jones if he had a job description. Mr. Jones explained that he was in the process of developing one. Mr. Kasper stated that Mr. Jones' role should be laid out and that Council should get input and definitions from the City Attorney as to what the latitudes are. Mr. Snyder stated that the main reason to formalize the duties and descriptions of the position is to make sure that Mr. Jones is covered under the City's insurance policies and indemnification ordinance so that he does not incur any unnecessary expense in the course of performing his duties. 6. HEARING ON THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE HEARING EXAMINER TO APPROVE A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 1.8 ACRES INTO SIX 46AAl�103 SINGLE-FAMILY BUILDING SITES EACH CONTAINING A MINIMUM 12,001 45"PA, SQUARE FEET OF LOT AREA. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO AND A�AP� EAST OF THE EXISTING RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 20621 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE, AND ADJACENT AND NORTH OF 207TH PLACE SW (Applicant: Hadley Nicholson / File No. P-95-103j Councilmember Myers disclosed that the applicant on this matter is a long-time friend: Upon questioning by Mayor Hall, there were no objections noted regarding Mr. Myers' participation. Current Planning Supervisor Jeff Wilson introduced this matter and utilized the overhead to show a vicinity map. On September 17, 1995 the Edmonds Hearing Examiner held a hearing on the proposed preliminary subdivision, of approximately 1.8 acres, into six single-family building lots on the property described (see Exhibit 2) which is located in an RS-12 zone. On October 4, 1995 the Hearing Examiner issued his report recommending approval of the application, subject to the conditions outlined on pages 9 and 10 of his report (Exhibit 3). Discussion followed concerning sidewalks, street widths, and how the property to the North would be accessed. City Council Approved Minutes October 17, 1995 Page 3 Mr. Snyder addressed two issues: the letter of the 13th; and the issue of providing access to a potentially landlocked lot. He explained that the first issue is a flip side to a Referendum 48 issue that Council has been discussing. The ability of the City to require a developer to make plat improvements is bounded by two requirements -- one is that those impositions need to be imposed pursuant to an adopted City policy, or through SEPA; secondly, that they not exceed the impacts of the development for constitutional purposes. He suggested the focus with Staff and Mr. Walker is whether the City has an adopted development regulation which would require a sidewalk. If the answer is no, then the City has no structure to require that imposition, other than the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA). Under SEPA, you can require it only if you have a definition of impacts and pursuant, again, to an adopted City policy. Mr. Snyder stated that as he understands the record and testimony so far, both the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations require only one sidewalk. He noted, for the citizens' information, that the first developer could have requested a latecomers agreement which would have required this development to participate in the cost of a sidewalk on the other side of the street. For whatever reason, that request was not made. The issue isn't whether you can get two sidewalks, but it seems like the first developer missed an opportunity to receive a contribution. As the record stands now and with the existing City ordinance, his legal advice would be that the City has no constitutional or statutory basis on which to require a sidewalk. Mr. Snyder explained that Mr. Kasper was correct in his statement that other cities have uniformly required that landlocked properties, or others where access may be limited, be provided access as developments have progressed through subdivision. The Washington Court of Appeals in March 1995 decided a case involving a Snohomish County plat which prohibited Snohomish County from requiring a developer to extend a road from the back boundary of a plat in order to provide access to a landlocked lot, saying that was a private benefit to the property owner and not legally requireable under a constitutional basis for that development as the cost of the lot constituted a taking. That is something the City will have no right to require unless there is some statutory change. Mayor Hall opened the public portion of the hearing. Rosemary Lowman represented the applicant Hadley Nicholson. Ms. Lowman believes Staff did an excellent job in presenting the applicant's position. She also believes they are in compliance with City codes. Bob Barker, 207th Place S.W. (Lot 6), wrote a letter to Council on behalf of the current residents. One of the main concerns is the sidewalk on Maplewood when it is the only one. He went on to discuss the issue of sidewalks on both sides of the street. He said that Edmonds is the model for South Snohomish County for arts and humanities and should be the same for sidewalks. He feels it is owed to the citizens for safety to have sidewalks so they don't have to walk on the streets. Mary Jane Thompson, owner of the property directly to the North of the development, stated she would like to request that a fence be required between the properties for the length of the property. She also clarified that her access is off of 88th. Mayor Hall closed the public portion of the hearing. City Council Approved Minutes October 17, 1995 Page 4 Councilmember Fahey asked for clarification regarding the sidewalk on Maplewood. City Engineer Jim Walker said that Maplewood is on the city sidewalk plan and Comp Plan to run sidewalks on Maplewood. Mr. Snyder noted that one difficulty, and one reason you sometimes see piecemeal sidewalks, is that when developers make cash contributions, State law requires that the City spend the money within six or seven years. If there is a delay in the development, or the City does not put in any improvements, it must be returned to the developer with interest. Mr. Snyder then asked Staff whether the City has any adopted policy to require a fence at that location. Mr. Wilson indicated that to the best of his knowledge there are no development regulations which require the installation of fences along subdivisions. Councilmember Myers called attention to page 35 regarding road right -of way which he believes answered Mr. Kasper's question. Mr. Walker said that Chapter 18.80.010 provides that in an RS-12 zone, the maximum street width for 10-15 lots is 40 feet of dedicated right-of-way and 22 feet of pavement from curb to curb. Further discussion ensued regarding walkways and sidewalks. COUNCILMEMBER EARLING MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT AS CONDITIONED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. MOTION CARRIED. 7. HEARING ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT TO JUSTIFY A Ao�,f SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF A SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON BUSINESS LICENSES, BUILDING PERMITS AND OTHER FORMS OF DEVELOPMENTS & ,084-r r� ENTERTAINMENT, AND ALSO IMPOSING A SIX-MONTH EXTENSION REGARDING ADULT ,rpa M01tA City Attorney Snyder introduced this subject for Council. On April 25, 1995 a six-month moratorium on adult entertainment was adopted. For the reasons stated in the proposed ordinance, the moratorium needs to be extended an additional six months to April 25, 1996. In order to impose a moratorium, the Council must make findings that support the imposition of the moratorium. He pointed out that attached as Exhibit 2 to Councils' Agenda Memo are excerpts from a study conducted by the City of Austin, Texas in 1986, on the secondary impacts of adult entertainment. The public portion of the hearing was opened and as there were no speakers, the hearing was then closed. COUNCILMEMBER MYERS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FAHEY, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 3049 ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT TO JUSTIFY A SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF A SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON BUSINESS LICENSES, BUILDING PERMITS AND OTHER FORMS OF DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING ADULT ENTERTAINMENT, AND ALSO IMPOSING A SIX-MONTH EXTENSION, PURSUANT TO RCW 36.70A.390. MOTION CARRIED. 8. PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO GRANT ADDITIONAL 90-DAY EXTENSION TO CURRENT 0.00 SE EXTENDED CHAMBERS CABLE FRANCHISE FOR PURPOSES OF COMPLETING fAAOM FRANCHISE RENEWAL PROJECT. City Attorney Snyder introduced this subject in the absence of Community Services Director Paul Mar. He provided a brief history and summary statement as contained in the Agenda Memo. Mr. Snyder City Council Approved Minutes October 17, 1995 Page 5 indicated the prudent action was to request an additional 90-day extension to allow for negotiations to be completed between Chambers Communication and the City of Edmonds. At Ms. Sycamore's request, additional language was added to paragraph 1 requiring that the extension does not provide for a waiver of rights. It seemed an appropriate inclusion because it addresses both parties. She stressed that this matter must move along quickly. Sylvia Sycamore, Chambers Cable, 2225 Coburg Road, Eugene, Oregon, suggested a 30-day extension in order to make this an urgent priority with the City, and she urged the City to make it a priority item. Ms. Sycamore then described some of the options available to the company to move this matter along. Councilmember Hall asked for the City Attorney to respond to the other way to go. Mr. Snyder's concern about having a franchisee operate a franchise has to do with liability. Mr. Snyder stated that the main protections are the indemnity agreements and bonding requirements that are contained in the franchise agreement. If the City does not accept, as Ms. Sycamore indicated, there is a complicated process to bring about an agreement or a franchise. In the interim, there is an area of ambiguity that is not in either parry's interest, in terms of what the value of the franchise is, the ability to finance it, and for the City's protection. He prefers the mutually beneficial situation of having the franchisee operate under an existing franchise and pursue mutual resolution of differences through negotiation. He explained that the other process is very expensive, and while the Council is aware that the City benefits from the franchise fees received from the franchisee, it would cost two or three times what the City would receive over the course of the five or six year franchise. Councilmember Hall stated that he hopes this matter can be handled right away as does Mayor Hall. Mr. Snyder agreed that in good faith all should try to push this as fast as possible. His concern with a 30-day extension are the practicalities. He would prefer to go with the 90 days and use everybody's best efforts to set an expedited hearing schedule. Councilmember Fahey agrees with Councilmember Hall's comments. She, too, has reached a point of frustration with how long this process is taking. She feels Council owes the citizens a resolution to the problem. She believes there is a perception that Council can just summarily replace Chambers as a provider and bring someone else in. Another provider could come and also offer the same service in a competitive arena, and the City can enter into a franchise with them also and negotiate a contract. But the idea that we can summarily remove Chambers and bring someone else in is erroneous. She feels that it is in the best interests of the citizens to get a contract established. Ms. Fahey believes the 90-day extension is appropriate to give Council some latitude, but she would like to approach that with the idea that there will be a schedule provided to the negotiating team, within the next week to ten days, with some established meeting times. Mayor Hall said Councilmember Fahey will be hearing from Council President Petruzzi and Paul Mar on this. COUNCILMEMBER FAHEY MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MYERS, TO 1) APPROVE THE DRAFT ORDINANCE, AND 2) DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO FINALIZE THE ORDINANCE FOR THE 90 DAY EXTENSION TO THE CURRENT EXTENDED FRANCHISE FOR CHAMBERS CABLE. Councilmember Myers would like to be brought up-to-date on the status of the negotiations and suggested an Executive Session to accomplish that purpose. Mr. Snyder noted that there are two ordinances in the packet. It was his suggestion that Councilmember Fahey's motion be clarified to City Council Approved Minutes October 17, 1995 Page 6 indicate it is the faxed version that contains the non -waiver language as the one the franchisee requested, and secondly with regard to Mr. Myers comments, when the franchisee submits its proposal, the Council should expect to kick off the negotiations by having a report from the consultant that outlines the differences between the proposal and the RFP, highlights the consultant's recommendation and receives firm negotiating instructions from the Council to the negotiators. He thinks it would be appropriate for him to contact Mr. Overholt tomorrow in Mr. Mar's absence to indicate the Council desires to pursue an expedited schedule and try and get some dates for Mr. Mar by the time he returns from vacation. MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST VOTING NO. RRy 9. DISCUSSION OF BIDS OPENED OCTOBER 10, 1995 FOR THE LIBRARY PLAZA PLANTER �,�1,F1 REHABILITATION PROJECT 00,6 P0� City Engineer Jim Walker reported that four bids had been received for this project. The low bid of $165,391.27 was received from Pacific Concrete Technologies. The Parks Division was originally going to remove and replace the soil in the planters. Due to work load at this time, the Parks Division could not agree to do the work, but. did agree to support the use of Fund 125 moneys for the soil removal portion of the project. Soil removal was bid at $28„564.80 for all schedules. The contract documents allow the City 30 days to award the contract from the October 10 bid opening date. Councilmember Kasper expressed displeasure with the process. The longer this is let go, the worse it will be. He believed the City was to prioritize building repair. He believes this should be moved on now, and the money should come half from Engineering's capital project budget, and the other half from the landscaping department budget. Discussion followed concerning possible advantages to doing other things, clarification of figures, and what other options are available. He asked Council President Pro - Tern. Fahey to put this matter on the agenda in the next week or two in order to perhaps get a more realistic picture of the project and how the time is to be used. The matter was scheduled for 15 minutes on October 24. Discussion followed concerning the amount of money in the 116 Fund. It was felt that there was a desire to get fore information before an ultimate decision is made, with some discussion about funding partially out of the parks funds. Some type of proposal is also desired to be brought forward if this project is to be completed by early spring. It was generally agreed that deferring maintenance is a foolish thing to do. D1461 10. CONTINUED DISCUSSION ON DIVE/RESCUE TEAM AND RESCUE BOAT FUNDING Go R ffi Fire Chief Mike Springer introduced the subject and suggested that the Rescue Team and Rescue Boat be placed within the Fire Department General Fund, using approximately 3/4 of one cent of the EMS W& levy revenue to cover the 1996 operating budget requests. There was discussion about whether or not VRr the public was advised what the recently passed EMS levy would go to fund. Unlike bonding issues, there is not the need to specifically list all ways in which the money would be used. Councilmember Hall stated that the idea of falling into EMS section makes sense and that we need to complete our base somehow. He says we presently have a skiff where a boat is needed. Councilmember Nordquist indicated this matter was before the Finance Committee on two occasions. The committee found it was rewarding to the Fire Department and Council and felt that the Council should follow the recommended action. City Council Approved Minutes October 17, 1995 Page 7 COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, FOR COUNCIL TO AUTHORIZE THE ELIMINATION OF FUND 624 AND MOVE THE RESCUE BOAT AND RESCUE TEAM INTO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT EMS DIVISION, AND TO FURTHER AUTHORIZE FUNDING OF THIS PROGRAM WITH EMS LEVY REVENUE. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO-TEM FAHEY MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MYERS TO ADD A FIVE MINUTE EXECUTIVE SESSION ON A LEGAL MATTER TO THE END OF THE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. 11. MAYOR Mayor Hall noted receipt of a lease storage space request in the Financial Center, and she is waiting for Mr. Mar's return to deal with that matter. 12. COUNCIL Councilmembers Myers and Earling passed. Council President Pro-Tem Fahey announced they had a very successful GREAT meeting with regard to gA&Prf development of a strategic plan. She will be asking Council President Petruzzi to add a presentation on one of the agendas in the near future.. fol60� Y Councilmember Nordquist again voiced his desire for the City's emergency policies, with regard to the eo`01 railroad, be brought to the attention of the public. Chief Springer stated that the matter is on the agenda for November 28. rOOA gL Councilmember Hall announced receipt of a ferry terminal upgrade announcement on October 18. The TERM project itself can be looked at the Senior Citizen Center from 4-7:00 p.m. TxAfF16 Councilmember Kasper noted for the general information of those attending that you cannot turn onto .61;po' Sunset when the train is there because the traffic signal doesn't work. Lights are fixed on North/South 6006-r traffic. There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting was recessed at 8:43 p.m. to a five minute Executive Session on a legal matter, to adjourn from there. ad, e.W.44,ee SANDRA S. CHASE, CITY CLERK City Council Approved Minutes October 17, 1995 Page 8 �- AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Plaza Meeting Room - Library Building 650 Main Street, Second Floor 7:00 -10:00 p.m. OCTOBER 17, 1995 CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. FLAG SALUTE APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (A) ROLL CALL (B) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 3, 1995 (C) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, 1995 (D) APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #3224S THRU #4435F FOR THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 2, 1995 IN THE AMOUNT OF $113,557.22; APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #3234S THRU #4535F FOR THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 9, 1995 IN THE AMOUNT OF $234,933.65; AND APPROVAL OF PAYROLL WARRANTS #955488 THRU #955796 FOR THE PERIOD OF SEPTEMBER 16 THRU SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 IN THE AMOUNT OF $398,286.00 (E) ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM NANCY M. SCOTT ($1,907.13) (F) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SOLIDS HAULING AND DISPOSAL (G) AUTHORIZE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TO HIRE POLICE PERSONNEL AS A RESULT OF ANNEXATIONS (H) REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE DEMOLITION OF ALL STRUCTURES AT BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH PARK AND ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT (1) AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS TO PURCHASE. UNDERGROUND BORING TOOL (J) AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR BIDS TO PURCHASE FOUR (4) 12-VOLT ELECTRICAL BLOWERS FOR THE WATER SECTION (K) PROPOSED ORDINANCE CORRECTING SCRIVENER'S ERRORS IN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PUBLISHED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ORDINANCE NO. 3045 ANNEXING CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE SNOLINE/FORSHEE ANNEXATION AREA (L) PROPOSED ORDINANCE CORRECTING SCRIVENER'S ERRORS IN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION PUBLISHED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ORDINANCE NO. 3046 ANNEXING CERTAIN PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE GATE/EATON ANNEXATION AREA 3. AUDIENCE (3 Minute Limit Per Person) 4. (10 Min.) PROCLAMATIONS RECOGNIZING NATIONAL RIDE SHARE WEEK AND NATIONAL ARTS AND HUMANITIES MONTH 5. (5 Min.) INTRODUCTION OF OMBUDSMAN -Continued- EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA OCTOBER 17, 1995 PAGE TWO 6. (20 Min.) HEARING ON THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE HEARING EXAMINER TO APPROVE A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE APPROXIMATELY 1.8 ACRES INTO SIX SINGLE-FAMILY BUILDING SITES EACH CONTAINING A MINIMUM 12,001 SQUARE FEET OF LOT AREA. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO AND EAST OF THE EXISTING RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 20621 MAPLEWOOD DRIVE, AND ADJACENT AND NORTH OF 207TH PLACE SW (Applicant: Hadley Nicholson / File No. P-95-103) 7. (10 Min.) HEARING ON A PROPOSED ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT TO JUSTIFY A SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF A SIX-MONTH MORATORIUM ON BUSINESS LICENSES, BUILDING PERMITS AND OTHER FORMS OF DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING ADULT 'ENTERTAINMENT, AND ALSO IMPOSING A SIX-MONTH EXTENSION 8. (10 Min.) PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO GRANT ADDITIONAL 90 DAY EXTENSION TO CURRENT EXTENDED CHAMBERS CABLE FRANCHISE FOR PURPOSES OF COMPLETING FRANCHISE RENEWAL PROCESS 9. (10 Min.) DISCUSSION OF BIDS OPENED OCTOBER 10, 1995 FOR THE LIBRARY PLAZA PLANTER REHABILITATION PROJECT 10. (5 Min.) CONTINUED 'DISCUSSION ON DIVE/RESCUE TEAM AND RESCUE BOAT FUNDING 11. (5 Min.) MAYOR 12. (15 Min.) COUNCIL Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City Clerk at 771-0245 with 24 hours advance notice for special accommodations. The Council Agenda appears on Chambers Cable, Channel 32. Delayed telecast of this meeting appears the following Wednesday evening at 7.00 p.m. on Channel 36, and the following Friday and Monday at noon on Channel 32.