Loading...
06/30/1987 City CouncilTHESE MINUTES SUBJECT TO JULY 7. 1987 APPROVAL EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 30, 1987 The regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7 p.m. by Mayor Larry Naughten in the Plaza Meeting Room of the Edmonds Library. All present joined in the flag sa- lute. PRFCFNT STAFF PRFSFNT Larry Naughten, Mayor Jack Wilson, Council Pres. Steve Dwyer Laura Hall Jo -Anne Jaech Bill Kasper John Nordquist Lloyd Ostrom Scott Tracy, Student Rep. CONSENT AGENDA Mary Lou Block, Planning Div. Mgr. Jim Barnes, Parks'& Rec. Div. Mgr. Art Housler, Admin. Svc. Director Bob Alberts, City Engineer Gary McComas, Fire Marshal Bobby Mills, Public Works Supt. Dan Prinz, Police Chief Chris Beckman, Engineering Coord. Bob Bower, Treatment Plant Supvsr. Scott Snyder, City Attorney Jackie Parrett, City Clerk Margaret Richards, Recorder Items (B), (G), and (J) were removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED, SECOND- ED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, TO APPROVE THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The approved items on the Consent Agenda include the following: (A) (C) D) ROLL CALL AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY FOR GIRLS/BOYS CLUB REHABILITATION --HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1986 GRANT #6 ($30,000) ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM RONNY D. HOLLAND ($290.36) (E) ADOPTED RESOLUTION 658 AMENDING FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL OF LID 210 BY SEGREGATION OF . ASSESSMENT AGAINST PARCELS 29 AND 34 AUTHORIZATION TO EXTEND LEASE WITH UNION OIL COMPANY FOR MARINA BEACH PARCELS APPROVAL OF FIREWORKS STAND PERMITS - ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND ADOPTED ORDINANCE 2624 APPROVING REZONE OF PROPERTY ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 212TH ST. S.W. AND 84TH AVE. W. FROM RM-2.4 TO BN (R-2-87/JIM GRAVES) FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR 12 LOT SUBDIVISION AT 15720 - 68TH AVE. W. (P-4-86/STEELE PARK) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 9, 1987 [ITEM (B) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA] .11 Councilmember Nordquist noted that an Executive Session was held following the agenda of the June 9 meeting in which future expansion of the island at Five Corners was discussed. He requested �h that the requirements for future expansion as discussed during the Executive Session be included in the record. Councilmember Jaech said it was her understanding that the applicant would not be expected to bear the cost of the improvements. COUNCILMEMBER NOROQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, THAT THE CITY FINANCE THE COST TO EXPAND THE ISLAND AT FIVE CORNERS. Councilmember Hall suggested that that issue be further discussed during the Council portion of the meeting. (The Council discussed the issue during the Council portion, but the discussion was not conclusive. Councilmember Nordquist said he would discuss it further next week.) COUNCILMEMBER HALL WITHDREW THE SECOND TO THE MOTION, CAUSING THE MOTION TO FAIL. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO FURTHER DISCUSS THE ISSUE OF LAKESHORE DEVELOPMENT DURING THE COUNCIL PORTION OF THE MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. * Councilmember Hall referred to page 5, paragraph 9 of the June 9 minutes. She noted that she had not made reference to the name "Doug" Kunkel and requested that the name "Doug" be omitted; she referred to page 9, paragraph 6, noting that Dr. LaWarn's name is spelled L-e-W-A-R-N-E. Councilmember Jaech noted that the date of the minutes at the bottom of each page should read June 9 and not June 6. COUNCILMEMBER HALL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS CORRECTED AND AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED. REPORT ON BIDS OPENED JUNE 9, 1987 FOR GYM FLOOR AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO QUEEN CITY INDUSTRIES, INC. 29,776 ITEM G ON THE CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Nordquist inquired if the "Or/Equal" provision was part of the bidding process. City Attorney Scott Snyder stated that the "Or/Equal" provision will become effective July 24, 1987. Councilmember Nordquist expressed concern that the City received a letter from Western Hardwood, Inc. contending that the "Or/Equal" provision was not included as part of the bidding process. Councilmember Dwyer recommended that bids be solicited again because he said the bid that was received was higher than what was budgeted for the project and because a second bidder indicated that there was confusing language in the bid itself. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO SOLICIT FOR BIDS AFTER JULY 24; 1987. Councilmember Nordquist raised a point of order. He inquired if the bids that were received must first be rejected before solicitation for bids can commence a second time. Mr. Snyder replied affirmatively. City Engineer Bob Alberts asked the Council if they were interested in ascertaining the truth of the letter. Mayor Naughten ruled the motion out of order because the bids had not been rejected before the motion was made. Mr. Alberts said the "Or Equal" provision was included in the bid document with information that an "Or Equal" proposal should be submitted by a specific date so the City could analyze it and advise other bidders if it was acceptable, but no one proposed another product as an equal. However, an individual, who Mr. Alberts said he believed was the author of the letter, Dick Ferris, submitted a bid subsequent to the official closing of the bids but the City Clerk could not accept the bid because the process had been officially closed. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, TO REJECT THE BIDS AND REOPEN THE BIDDING PROCESS AFTER JULY 24, 1987. Councilmember Hall expressed concern that the author of the letter may not be the same person who submitted a bid after the closing of the bid call. She suggested that action on the issue be de- ferred until July 7 and requested the Mayor to investigate the matter in the interim. Councilmember Dwyer said he would vote in favor of reopening the bidding process because the budget anticipated only a $30,000 expenditure and because the bid that was received was too high. Councilmember Hall said she believed the bidding process was being reopened for the wrong reason. MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCILMEMBER HALL OPPOSED. AUTHORIZATION TO USE FUND 323 TO INSTALL CORNER PARKS AND SIGNS ($10,000) [ITEM (J) ON THE CONSENT AGENDA) Because vehicles have to pull to the left to make a right turn where a corner park is located, Councilmember Kasper expressed concern that corner parks may interfere with traffic circulation. He suggested that the Engineering Department review the proposed location and configuration for the corner parks. Public Works Superintendent Bobby Mills stated that the Engineering Department drafted and reviewed the plans. * See Council Minutes of June 30, 1987 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 JUNE 30, 1987 Councilmember Wilson said he did not recall that the proposed first location was selected by the Council. Mr. Mills said a list of proposed locations was previously presented to the Council and Staff chose the proposed first location because they felt it was the most appropriate place for a corner park. Councilmember Hall inquired if buses would be able to negotiate the corner at 5th Avenue if a corner park is installed. Mr. Mills replied affirmatively. Councilmember Nordquist inquired if Walnut Street to 5th Avenue will be converted to a single lane. Mr. Mills said 5th Avenue and Walnut Street had been converted to a standard intersection approximately ten years ago. He said the installation of a corner park at that intersection will not hinder traffic because the existing parking stalls adjacent to that intersection will alert drivers of the park. Councilmember Kasper inquired if street trees will be planted. Mr. Mills said street trees are proposed. Councilmember Kasper expressed concern that street trees will impair visibility. Mr. Mills said he preferred that low profile shrubs were planted instead of street trees. COUNCILMEMBER OSTROM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO PURCHASE THE "WELCOME TO EDMONDS" SIGN AND PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORNER PARK AT 5TH AVENUE AND WALNUT STREET AND FUND THE PROJECT FROM FUND 323 IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000. MOTION CARRIED. AUDIENCE Mayor Naughten opened the audience portion of the meeting. Evelyn Laurine, 1233 - 7th Ave. S., reported that the Friends of the Edmonds Library Committee purchased the following items for the library: a typewriter for staff, seasonal decorations, a portable vacuum cleaner, decorations and a boat for the children's section, two folding easels, rp three programs for hearing impaired children, as well as other children's programs, contest priz- es and costumes for staff, banners for the National Library Week and Children's Week, held a party in celebration of completing the children's section, donation of $500 to Everett Community College library, provided assistance in conducting a survey for Sno-Isle regarding the library hours. Ms. Laurine said the Committee furnished the following items which are now City -owned property: Verosol blinds for the staff work area, slack wall for art hangings, ten benches for the plaza, fourteen bookshelves for the children's section, twelve folding tables for the book sale, and ten secretarial chairs. Ms. Laurine thanked the Rotary Club for furnishing an American and State flag, as well as Ed Huntley, Bobby Mills, Linda McCrystal, and Staff for their help and cooperation. Ms. Laurine noted that Don Schroeder will serve as President of the Friends of the Edmonds Library this Fall. Mayor Naughten said the Committee certainly exemplified the meaning of the phrase "Friends of the Library". Bob Noack, 317 - 3rd Ave. S., #103, suggested that the City contact the Department of Transpor- tation and discuss the construction of the secondary wastewater treatment plant below the pro- posed expansion of the ferry terminal. He said the waterfront is a very valuable resource to the City and its citizenry and is very unique and, therefore, should be utilized to its fullest poten- tial. Mr. Noack submitted photographs of the ferry terminal, pilings, and the waterfront to the Mayor. Kirby White, 639 - 8th Ave. S., said he serves on the Citizens Advisory Committee for the secon- dary treatment plant. He suggested that Mr. Noack contact the Committee to discuss any issue related to secondary treatment. Mayor Naughten closed the public portion of the hearing. * PRESENTATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD TO CHARLES LeWARNE, WASHINGTON STATE TEACHER OF THE YEAR &'7,4• Mayor Naughten stated that the Community Service Award is an award given to individuals or organ- izations who have made a significant contribution to the improvement of the quality of life in the community. Mayor Naughten said Charles LeWarne was selected as Washington State Teacher of the Year. Dr. LeWarne moved to Edmonds in 1958 and taught at the Junior High School for 4 years, Edmonds High See Council Minutes of July 14, 1987 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 JUNE 30, 1987 School for 1 year, and joined the Meadowdale High School faculty in 1968. Dr. LeWarne possess- es a Masters Degree, as well as a Ph.D., in history. Dr. LeWarne is currently working on a project which was commissioned by the State Centennial Commission. Mayor Naughten presented Dr. LeWarne with the Community Service Award. Councilmember Ostrom said he has known Dr. LeWarne for thirty-one years. He said it was a great pleasure for him to see Dr. LeWarne receive the award. Dr. LeWarne said he appreciated the award not only for himself but also on behalf of all teach- ers in recognition of their contribution to the community. He said although he did receive a State award, the Community Service Award was especially dear to him because it was from the commu- nity in which he lives and works in. Dr. LeWarne said he and Councilmember Ostrom worked together many years ago as school teachers in another community. Dr. LeWarne said Student Representative Scott Tracy has been a student of his for two years. He commended the Council for selecting such an outstanding student to serve on the Council. Councilmember Hall said she, also, knew Dr. and Mrs. LeWarne. She asked the family to stand up and be recognized. She noted that Dr. LeWarne's son, Charley, maintains the Library Plaza room. t�7yt•f"" j PRESENTATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD TO GWEN LEWIS, WASHINGTON STATE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST OF THE YEAR Mayor Naughten said Don and Gwen Lewis have been friends of his for eighteen years. Mayor Naughten said Dr. Gwen Lewis was designated as Washington State School Psychologist of the year by the Washington Association of School Psychologists, a group which she helped form eighteen years ago. In addition to her duty as school psychologist, Dr. Lewis is the District's early childhood specialist. She coordinates screening for early intervention for school success programs; has been a thirteen year District employees; and holds a BA, MA, and Ph.D. degree. Mayor Naughten presented Dr. Lewis with the Community Service Award. Dr. Lewis said she felt very honored to receive the award from the City. She said the City has provided her and her family with so many amenities which are conducive to the high quality of life that they have enjoyed. Mayor Naughten asked Mr. Lewis to stand for recognition. COUNCIL DELIBERATION ON PROPOSED BRACKETT'S LANDING WATERFRONT IMPROVEMENTS: JETTY CONSTRUC- TION FERR. DOCK AND BEACH EXPANSION, AND TIDELANDS EXCHANGE CONTINUED FROM JUNE 2, 1987 HEARING Atl� Mayor Naughten stated that this issue was a continuation of the public hearing held on June 2, �'Q , ,pw,•� 1987. Mayor Naughten reported that the State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (IAC) has informed the City that some form of the Brackett's Landing Project must be ready for bidding and development by the Summer of 1987. If the deadline is not met, the grant ($92,000) will be real- located to other cities in the State. Mayor Naughten said it is Staff's recommendation to authorize the Mayor to prepare all necessary documents to implement the enhanced Brackett's Landing Project which includes: final design ap- proval, land surplus actions, land acceptance, and an agreement with the State Department of Transportation (DOT). Councilmember Kasper said the Brackett's Landing improvements and ferry terminal expansion should be discussed as two separate and independent issues. Mayor Naughten inquired if the improvements to Brackett's Landing, then, would encompass only the relocation and improvement of the jetty. Councilmember Kasper replied affirmatively. Councilmember Wilson said the two issues were not separate issues at all and were critically and strategically related. He said if the City does not act swiftly with respect to the land swap, it will lose $200,000 in revenues which would be utilized to fund the improvements to Brackett's Landing., He said he did not feel the citizenry would be happy if that source of revenue was lost. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 JUNE 30, 1987 i COUNCILMEMBER WILSON MOVED TO ACT UPON THE LAND SWAP WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND UTILIZE THE FUNDS TO ENHANCE BRACKETT'S LANDING. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Councilmember Hall said as long as the City acted in good faith she was not concerned that the IAC grant may be jeopardized. Councilmember Hall requested that a comprehensive plan for the waterfront be drafted and provided to the Council. She expressed concern that: 1) expansion of the ferry terminal would impede sand accretion which may be exacerbated by the outfall from the treatment plant, 2) existence of the underwater park may be jeopardized, and 3) overdevelopment of the waterfront may lessen the quality of life in the City. Councilmember Hall recommended that a comprehensive plan of the waterfront be presented to DOT representatives and all other entities directly involved with the waterfront as the basis of a discussion. Councilmember Ostrom concurred with Councilmember Hall. He said as a former member of the Brackett's Landing Task Force, his primary concern was to attempt to create a beach that was an asset to the community. He said expansion of the ferry terminal has clouded the issue of Brackett's Landing improvements. He said the improvements should be of benefit to the citizens. He believed that the Brackett's Landing Project would stand on its own merit and should proceed independently of the ferry terminal expansion. Councilmember Jaech said the Council, as well as the public, was in favor of the Brackett's Land- ing improvements, which did not include ferry terminal improvements. She concurred that the two issues should be considered independently. Councilmember Jaech noted that Wolf Bauer had expressed concern at a Council Committee meeting that super ferries would eliminate the underwater park and could affect the entrance of the pock- et beaches. COUNCILMEMBER JAECH MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO SEGREGATE DISCUSSION OF BRACKETT'S LANDING IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE FERRY TERMINAL EXPANSION. MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCIL - MEMBER WILSON OPPOSED. Mayor Naughten clarified that the Brackett's Landing improvements encompassed relocation of the jetty one hundred and fifty feet to the north and enhancement of the jetty. Councilmember Jaech concurred. Mayor Naughten inquired how the deficit of $200,000, which would have been derived from the State, would be funded to make the improvements. Councilmember Jaech said funding could be derived from City funds, the IAC grant, and matching funds from Snohomish County. She added that bids must be solicited for only the jetty improvements because she said the bids that were received were for the entire pocket beach. She suggested that the, improvements be made on a phased -in basis, as suggested by Mr. Bauer. Mayor Naughten inquired how the project could be phased in because he said either the jetty will be relocated or it will not be relocated. Coun- cilmember Jaech said she would rephrase the motion. COUNCILMEMBER JAECH REPHRASED THE MOTION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER HALL, TO PROCEED WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE BIDDING PROCESS TO DEVELOP THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRACKETT'S LANDING SPIT IN STAGES, IF NECESSARY, IN THE PREFERRED CONFIGURATION THAT WAS PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL. Councilmember Dwyer inquired if the motion was specific enough that it would enable Staff to relay the City's intent to the State in order to receive the IAC grant. Community Services Direc- tor Peter Hahn replied affirmatively. Councilmember Dwyer inquired if the IAC grant would be received in full at the commencement of the project. Mr. Hahn replied negatively. He said those funds would be reimbursed to the City. Councilmember Dwyer inquired where the funds would be derived from in the interim. Councilmember Jaech said funds were available to accomplish 50% of the improvements and the remainder of work could be accomplished in phases. Mr. Hahn noted that final payment of the Meadowdale Playfield project is due in 1988. He said the Brackett's Landing Project could be phased in, with the second phase commencing in 1989 when the 25% excise tax/capi- tal improvements supplement is available. MOTION CARRIED. Councilmember Kasper read a memo (attached hereto) into the record prepared by him which ques- tioned the practicability of DOT's proposal to expand the ferry terminal when taking into con- sideration that several issues have yet to be resolved. Mayor Naughten applauded Councilmember Kasper for the thoroughness of the issues he raised. Mayor Naughten said the entire issue cannot be ignored, and the Council must insure that the ferry system is compatible with the community. Councilmember Nordquist stated that the intersection adjacent to the ferry terminal is a high traffic area. He recommended that the City initiate a study and then submit the criteria to DOT. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 JUNE 30, 1987 Councilmember Jaech and Councilmember Hall stated that any improvements to the ferry terminal must be done with close scrutiny of the Council and with the welfare of the citizenry in mind. Councilmember Jaech recommended that the study be conducted by a firm which is not associated with DOT at the present time in order to avoid any conflict of interest. Mr. Hahn inquired if the Council objected to participation of the Port of Edmonds, Community Transit, and Amtrack in funding the study with Edmonds as the lead agency. Councilmember Nord- . quilt and Councilmember Kasper replied negatively. HEARING ON HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION TO VACATE UNDEVELOPED PORTION OF 1ST AVE. S..,.230 FEET NORTH OF ELM ST. TO SR 104 ST-2-87/SEAWOOD HOMES HEARING ON HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION FOR PROPOSED 4 LOT SUBDIVISION AT APPROXIMATELY 1116 - 2ND AVE. S. P-1-87/SEAWOOD HOMES ,) �0,Planning Division Manager Mary Lou Block reported that Seawood Homes, Inc. has petitioned the � ,D , City to vacate a portion of the undeveloped right-of-way of 1st Ave. S. south of SR 104. The proposed right-of-way is located on the west side of the proposed four -lot subdivision of Lot 6 of the plat of Deer Park. The right-of-way is 30 feet wide. The applicant intends to incorpor- ate the right-of-way into three of the proposed lots. On May 21, 1987, the Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on Seawood Homes' application. The Hearing Examiner issued a recommendation to approve the proposed street vacation subject to com- pensation to the City of 100% of the assessed valuation of the adjacent property. Ms. Block said it is Staff's recommendation to adopt the Hearing Examiner's Findings of Fact and approve street vacation ST-2-87. The City Attorney will prepare the necessary ordinance. Ms. Block reported that on February 10, 1987, the City Council granted final approval for the six -lot subdivision of Deer Park. One of the lots, Lot 6, was oversized and had the potential to be subdivided in the future. On March 30, 1987, Seawood Homes, Inc. filed an application to subdivide Lot 6 of the plat of Deer Park into four lots ... one lot to be located on the east side of the creek that divides the property and three to be located on the west side. In addition to the subdivision, the applicant requested a street vacation of the undeveloped right-of-way (as mentioned above) of 1st Avenue South adjacent to the proposed subdivision. On May 21, 1987, the Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on the subdivision request. The Hearing Examiner issued his recommendation to approve the requested subdivision subject to the conditions listed in his report. Ms. Block said it is Staff's recommendation to adopt the Hearing Examiner's recommendation approv- ing P-1-87. Ms. Block recommended that a tree cutting plan be approved for the entire site before cutting is done. Ms. Block reviewed the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation for the proposed four -lot subdivision as follows: "Based on the preceding Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the testimony and evidence submitted at the public hearing, and upon the impressions of the Hearing Examiner at a site re- view, it is hereby recommended to the City Council of the City of Edmonds that the following permits be granted for property located at 1116 Second Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington: A) vacation of a portion of the undeveloped right-of-way of First Avenue South adjacent to Lot 6 of the Plat of Deer Park south of SR 104; B) preliminary plat approval for a four -lot subdivision at 1116 Second Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington; C) a conditional use permit for the grading of 1,906 cubic yards of earth material at 1116 Second Avenue South, Edmonds, Washington. These approvals should be granted subject to the following conditions: 1) the City of Edmonds should be paid full compensation for the right-of-way based upon the formula of 100% of the assessed value of the adjacent property. The applicant should be granted the property; 2) the applicant is to comply with the engineering requirements as set forth in Exhibit P-2; 3) the applicant is to comply with all the mitigating conditions as set forth in Exhibit P-3. However, Mitigating Condition No. 9, which requires that the stream crossing be by way of a bridge structure rather than a pipe arch, should be eliminated. The applicant should be allowed to develop the stream crossing with use of a pipe arch; 4) the restrictions against clearing shall be shown on the face of the recorded final plat. Clearing shall include grubbing 'of brush and cutting of trees. The only exception to the prohibition against clearing shall be for trees or vegetation that are dead, dying, diseased, or pose a hazard to the public. Also, the applicant should take great caution in the clearing of the area that is being vacated. The applicant should try and retain as much vegetation and trees in this vacation area as possible; 5) the City should determine the setbacks on the property at a later date. The setbacks should be identified on the final plat; EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 JUNE 30, 1987 6) the applicant shall provide a defined route for the hauling of grading and fill material into the site. Any dirt or debris must be cleaned up by the applicant. Should the City be responsi- ble for cleaning up such debris, the applicant will be responsible for compensating the City; 7) the applicant is to work during normal City of Edmonds working hours, which are Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.". Councilmember Ostrom inquired if it is anticipated that 1st Avenue South will be developed at some future date. Ms. Block replied negatively. Councilmember Nordquist noted that although it was previously the Council's intent to vacate 1st Avenue South up to Elm Street, -Staff was never instructed to proceed and lie recommended that that vacation be executed. Councilmember Kasper inquired if the application was for a short plat. Ms. Block replied nega- tively. Councilmember Kasper inquired if the application was for a long plat of four lots. Ms. Block replied affirmatively. Councilmember Kasper inquired if the ruling the Council recently made with respect to short plats precluded the applicant from short platting the property into four lots rather than six lots. City Attorney Scott Snyder replied negatively. He clarified that the ruling only applied to extensions or adding more lots to an originally short. platted project. Mayor Naughten opened the public portion of the meeting. Allan Morgan, Reid, Middleton & Associates, 121 - 5th Ave. N., representing Seawood Homes, said the applicant is in concurrence with the Hearing Examiner's Findings and Recommendation. He said the applicant desires to develop the site in a manner that is compatible with the neighbor- hood, as well as with City standards. Mr. Snyder inquired what tract of land 1st Avenue South originally belonged to. Mr. Morgan said he did not recall the name of the plat, but it was formerly part of the City of Edmonds plat. Mr. Snyder inquired if the request represented the owners of the abutting property from whom the original dedication was made. Mr. Morgan replied affirmatively. He noted that the City boundary between the town of Woodway and the City of Edmonds is common at the westerly property line of the plat. Mr. Morgan inquired if the City, then, when making assessments, would base them on the zoned parcel that would be comparable or would incorporate parcels that would incorporate the one acre plats in Woodway. Mr. Snyder said the assessment is based on the value placed on the parcel by the assessor. Councilmember Kasper inquired if a buffer will be provided on the boundary abutting the wastewater treatment plant. Mr. Morgan said he did not believe a buffer would be necessary be- cause the elevation of the site is significantly lower than SR 104. Councilmember Kasper suggest- ed that existing trees be retained, of possible. Councilmember Nordquist inquired if the 20 foot access and utility easement across Lot 3 would also serve as the one and only access for Lot 4. Ms. Block replied affirmatively. Mayor Naughten closed the public portion of the hearing. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO APPROVE THE HEARING EXAMIN- ER'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVE STREET VACATION ST-2-87 AND INSTRUCT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE THE NECESSARY ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST, TO ADOPT THE HEARING EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION APPROVING P-1-87. MOTION CARRIED. (The complete report of the Hearing Examiner is on file with the Planning Department.) Councilmember Kasper inquired if the requirement that the City be compensated at 1000 of the assessed valuation of the adjacent property should be included in the motion. Mr. Snyder said he would include that language in the ordinance. HEARING ON SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM j?' O ,,pp'ity Engineer Bob Alberts reported that RCW 35.70.010 requires each municipality in the State to submit to the Washington State Department of Transportation a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program. The program is to be updated yearly and submitted to the State in July. It is required that a public hearing be held and a Council resolution passed adopting the Six -Year Street Pro- gram each year. Mr. Alberts noted that copies of the proposed Six -Year Program for 1988 - 1994 i were included as part of the Council's packet. Engineering Coordinator Chris Beckman reviewed the proposed projects for the 1988 program and depicted the locations on a vicinity map as follows: TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND CHANNELIZATION PROJECTS - 1) SR 524 and 80th Ave. W.; 2) 212th and 76th signal upgrade carried over from 1986. UAB funds EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 7 JUNE 30, 1987 will not be held for this project. Design has been delayed due to past involvement with an adja- cent project on 208th St. S.W. The project will be implemented through local funding only; 3) Dayton Street railroad crossing improvements. Funding should be eligible through a federal pro- gram (RRP) and adjacent paving can be accomplished with street funds (FAUS). ROADWAY CON- STRUCTION/RESTORATION - 1) Olympic View Drive at Sunset Drive. The project involves widening Olympic View Drive to improve sight distance and the separation between opposing lanes of traf- fic; 2) 212th St. S.W. 76th Ave. W. to 84th Ave. W. Partial reconstruction is necessary; 3 & 4) 9th Ave. S., Main St. to Elm St. and 3rd Ave. N. from Main to Caspers. Relatively minor work could prolong their useful life; 5) 97th Ave. W. from 216th to 219th and the two cross streets adjacent to 97th(major reconstruction). STREET IMPROVEMENT/WALKWAY PROJECTS - 1) 220th, 100th to 84th. The project did not rank high enough on the UAB priority list for funding; .2) 88th Ave. W., Main St. to 204th St. S.W. The project would acquire the remainder of the right-of-way and construction of a straight access through to 196th St. to the north. Federal funding is contingent on a route reclassification request and matching local funds could be from an LID. Councilmember Ostrom inquired what the signal upgrade on 212th and 76th would accomplish. Mr. Beckman said it will provide a coordinated operation along the 76th Avenue corridor. He said the Engineering Department is hopeful that any channelization changes on 212th to the west can be coordinated with those improvements. Councilmember Jaech inquired what assistance Burlington Northern Railroad (BNRR) would provide. Mr. Beckman said BNRR would be heavily involved in the design and construction of the crossing. He noted that almost 100% of financing will be derived from RRP. Mr. Alberts added that the railroad typically does all its own design and construction, but any approach work would be done by the City with respect to design. Councilmember Jaech inquired how the secondary treatment design may affect improvements with respect to timing. Mr. Alberts said the consultant stated that an outfall line would not have to be installed along Dayton Street. Councilmember Kasper noted that the Port of Edmonds is contemplating alteration of their right- of-way. Mr. Beckman said Staff is cognizant of that issue. * Councilmember Jaech inquired if 220th Street may be widened into a four -lane road out to 9th Avenue. Mr. Beckman said a center turn lane may result in a better utilization, and a three -lane configuration is being considered. He said COG has projected that traffic will not increase significantly along that corridor. Councilmember Jaech inquired if signalization will be installed at 220th and 9th Avenue at the time that improvements are made, if made at all. Mr. Beckman said Staff does not anticipate that funding will be available during the next biennium for those street improvements, but those improvements will be designated as a high priority if funding does become available. Councilmember Jaech inquired if Staff is aware of the location and condition of the underground utilities in the event that they may need replacing at the time that improvements are made. Mr. Beckman said an extensive preliminary engineering layout of 88th Avenue from Main Street to 204th revealed that that area will need upgrading of the water mains, storm drains, and underground electrical facilities and will be factored into street im- provements. * Councilmember Kasper observed that a large percentage of the projects were carry overs from previous plans. He recommended that the dates that the projects were placed in the plan be made available to the Council in the future. Mr. Alberts said the primary reason many projects have been carried over is because Staff has been working with Federal agencies regarding the expendi- ture of the funds. He said Staff has inventoried City streets, identified the improvements that are needed, and is currently in the process of assessing the cost of those.improvements. Council - member Kasper noted that the City's street funds are very limited. He suggested that drainage projects be funded only from the Water/Sewer Fund rather than with street funds. Councilmember Hall read a letter into the record from Kathy Lewis regarding the poor state of disrepair of 9th Avenue West and requested that the roadway be placed on the Capital Street Im- provement Plan. Mr. Alberts noted that the roadway is included in the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program. Councilmember Kasper said he did not believe that improvements of the street north of 72nd should be funded by City funds. Mayor Naughten opened the public portion of the hearing. Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Dr., said he felt there was a safety problem at the intersection of SR 524 and 80th Ave. W. He recommended that signalization not be installed but that better hold- ing lanes, widening of the streets for right-hand turns, as well as other planning methods, be considered. Councilmember Wilson and Councilmember Ostrom concurred. Councilmember Ostrom said there is an urgency, however, to install a traffic light at 220th and 9th Avenue. * See Council Minutes of July 14, 1987 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 8 JUNE 30, 1987 Mr. Alberts recommended that improvements to 220th and 100th Avenue be made in 1988 rather than in 1989. Mayor Naughten closed the public portion of the hearing. COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, TO APPROVE THE SIX -YEAR TRANS- PORTATION PROGRAM WITH CHANGES AND PASS RESOLUTION 659 ADOPTING THE PROGRAM. Mayor Naughten introduced Pat Meeker, Commissioner of the Olympic View Water District.. DISCUSSION BY CWC-HDR ;GESTED PINE ST. SITE FOR SECONDARY SEWER PLANT Ale��City Engineer Bob Alberts reported that segment 1 has been completed. He noted that the Council has already authorized the appraisal portion of segment 2, which leaves a budget of $9,300 to complete the second segment. The budget for segment 1 and the appraisals were $16,300 and $6,000 respectively. Gordon Culp, CWC-HDR, stated that the Pine Street site is physically compatible for the secondary wastewater treatment plant. He introduced Bruce Wiley. Mr. Wiley reviewed an aerial photograph of the Pine Street site, as well as profiles of the treat- ment facility plant from north and south elevations. He said the next segment of the Pine Street review is to refine a layout and estimate the costs. The profile of the plant would affect the cost estimates. An optimum elevation for the plant is one where the profile looking northerly from Pine Street would have the top of the structures approximately 15 feet above the road. Since the site slopes, the top of the structures of the profile looking from the north (Harbor Square, Admiral Way), would be 20 to 35 feet above the ground. The cost of a plant will increase as the profile is lowered with respect to the lower ground elevation due to the additional excava- tion and probable need for retaining walls. The lowest profile for a plant looking from the north would have all the tank structures buried and buildings, such as the administration build- ing, exposed similarly to the model prepared for the existing site. Mr. Wiley said the Pine Street site is owned by Unocal, who indicated a willingness to sell the property to the City for the construction of a wastewater treatment plant. During a discussion of the site, the following constraints of the site were identified: any proposed facilities should be located east of the fence on the access road. Unocal's long-term plan calls for this area to be paved as their parking lot; Unocal preferred that construction of facilities to the south not be considered south of the access road. That area is steeply sloped and is not desir- able for construction or for foot traffic across the Unocal access road. Mr. Wiley noted that there is a 35 foot setback from the wetlands. At this time, the specific setback requirement for the site is not known. City Code stipulates a minimum 25 foot setback. However, a 35 foot setback was used at the Dayton Street site for mitigation purposes. Within the constraints of the setback requirement and Unocal's specification of no facilities south of the existing access road and west of the existing chain link fence, the land available for the treatment plant is 3.25 acres. The site has an irregular shape. The western portion of the site varies in width from 115 to 230 feet and has a cross slope of 16% to 2016. The site elevation drops by 30 feet from the Unocal access road to the edge of the wetlands. The east- ern portion of the site is wider and has an 8% to 10% cross slope. Except for a small fish hatchery pond and its associated building access road, the site is unde- veloped and covered with a thick growth of evergreen and deciduous trees and dense underbrush. A creek running along the west side of the fill for State Route 104 crosses the northeast portion of the site. The creek, which underwent channel relocation during construction of SR 104, exhib- its evidence of occasional flooding conditions. Mr. Wiley said with respect to the feasibility of constructing a treatment plant on the Pine Street site, Landau & Associates reached the following general conclusions: based on the results of the preliminary soils investigation and engineering evaluation, it was concluded that develop- ment of the alternate Pine Street site is feasible from a geotechnical engineering considera- tion, provided that the recommendations, as provided by Landau & Associates, are incorporated into the site development plans and implemented during construction. Excavation shoring will be necessary along the south site boundary to protect the existing storm sewer pipe and the Unocal access road. Dewatering will be necessary for any excavation more than a few feet deep in the lower portions of the site. Dewatering, excavation, shoring, and foundation construction can be accomplished using conventional and common methods. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 9 JUNE 30, 1987 Mr. Wiley said because of the narrowness of the western portion of the site and the moderately steep cross slope, access to several key facilities for maintenance and operation purposes must be provided from the Unocal access road. Access for ash hauling and chlorine delivery would also have to be accomplished via that route. Because there is inadequate room for a vehicle turnaround, permission would have to be obtained from Unocal to allow trucks to enter and turn around on their property or trucks would have to back out. Construction of the treatment plant will necessitate relocation of a 100 foot section of the creek, as well as the fish hatchery. There is no room for expanding the plant or constructing additional treatment units, such as tertiary, should the necessity arise. Mr. Wiley said most of the trees on the existing site would have to be removed to accommodate the facilities. A small percentage of screening would remain east of the site, and a number of trees could be preserved in the City property north of the site and along the edge of the wetlands. However, the plant would be visible from SR 104, Pine Street, and the hillsides to the east of the plant. Because of the 'significant cross slope, buried tanks which are constructed with their tops even with the ground surface on the south side of the site would project from the ground 20 to 25 feet on the north side, and many of the structures would be visible from the north and northeast. Some of the visual impacts could be reduced but doing so increases the construction cost and the energy cost associated with pumping the treated effluent to the Sound. If the bur- ied tanks are placed so their top is at ground level on the north side of the site, a 20 to 25 foot retaining wall would be necessary on the south elevation. Mr. Culp said construction of a treatment plant on the Pine Street site is physically feasible. Relocation of the fish hatchery, alternative approaches to minimize visual impacts, and the cost aspects of constructing a plant will be evaluated in segment 2, if authorized. Councilmember Jaech inquired if bore samples were taken near the fence line. Mr. Wiley said samples were not taken to determine whether contamination was present. Councilmember Jaech in- quired if the stream would have to be reconnected to its main channel if it was relocated. Mr. Wiley replied affirmatively. Councilmember Kasper inquired about the time frame of segment 2. Mr. Culp said segment 2 is scheduled for the month of July. He said a presentation will be made on July 26th if that segment is authorized. COUNCILMEMBER KASPER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON, TO APPROVE $9,300 FOR SEGMENT 2 OF THE PINE STREET STUDY. Councilmember Dwyer said in addition to issues that have been discussed, another reason not to continue the study was because it has no expansion potential whatsoever. Councilmember Hall said she believed the plant could be expanded to tertiary treatment on both the Pine Street site and the present site if planned correctly. She said she was not worried about delaying the project because she spoke with a State representative who indicated to her that an extension was possible and that grant monies would not necessarily be jeopardized. Coun- cilmember Hall inquired if construction of the treatment plant below the ferry terminal was feasi- ble. Mr. Culp said the questions regarding tertiary treatment depended on what type of tertiary treatment was desirable. Councilmember Hall inquired if CWC-HDR was familiar with the treatment process being tested by Tacoma. Mr. Culp replied affirmatively. He said that type of operation will work from a technical standpoint, but he cautioned the Council about the high cost of mainte- nance and operation. He said CWC-HDR could provide the Council with that data if it was interest- ed in evaluating that process. Community Services Director Peter Hahn said Staff intends to make a trip to Tacoma in the near future to investigate that city's progress. In addition, he said copies of studies that other agencies are conducting on the Dellchem process are expected to be received very shortly. Mr. Culp revealed that CWC-HDR was recently retained by Metro of Seattle to analyze that alternative. Mr. Hahn introduced the new Treatment Plant Supervisor, Bob Bower. Councilmember Jaech said in view of the report presented by CWC-HDR, she did not feel that pursu- ing the Pine Street site would be advantageous and would only add to construction costs. A ROLL CALL VOTE WAS TAKEN. MOTION CARRIED WITH COUNCILMEMBER HALL, COUNCILMEMBER KASPER, COUN- CILMEMBER NORDQUIST, AND COUNCILMEMBER WILSON IN FAVOR; COUNCILMEMBER DWYER, COUNCILMEMBER JAECH, AND COUNCILMEMBER OSTROM OPPOSED. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 10 JUNE 30, 1987 u 1 DISCUSSION BY CWC-HDR. INC. OF SLUDGE MANAGEMENT City Engineer Bob Alberts reported that as part of the predesign phase for the City's wastewater treatment plant, the City's consultant, CWC-HDR was to further study and evaluate sludge manage- ment alternatives, along with a risk analysis, and was present to discuss those findings. He noted that a more detailed discussion on sludge management is scheduled for July 7, 1987. Bud Benjes, CWC-HDR, reviewed a summary comparison of major alternatives as follows: incinera- tion, composting, digestion, and disposal on agricultural land. He noted that there was not a great difference in the cost of each alternative. Councilmember Jaech noted that the end product of incineration is ash. She inquired if any ele- ment of that ash may be hazardous which could potentially create a regulation problem. Mr. Benjes said ash contains enough toxic material which requires that the product be disposed of at a hazardous waste site. Councilmember Jaech inquired if sludge emitted methane gas.. Mr. Benjes replied affirmatively. Councilmember Jaech inquired if the emission of that gas during the treatment process could be perceived as a problem. Mr. Benjes said the emission of methane gas in itself will not pose any problems because he said that gas burns just like natural gas burns. He said the same metals and potential toxins exist in the end product of sludge as do in ash but they are more diluted. Councilmember Jaech inquired if ash would be easier to contain, if toxic, than sludge. Mr. Benjes said it was easier to dispose, of, in his opinion. Councilmember Hall expressed concern that incineration will cause air pollution. She inquired what assurances could be made if the City of Edmonds chose the most expensive form of sludge management, incineration. Mr. Benjes said although incineration is one of the more expensive alternatives, it is only approximately 10% more expensive than the least expensive alternative. He recommended that the Council peruse the study submitted by CWC-HDR. He said the firm would return at a later date to discuss the issue more fully. MAYOR Mayor Naughten reported that the teen dance at the beach was a tremendous success. COUNCIL Student Representative Scott Tracy said he attended the Boys State last week. He said because he was elected as Mayor, he better understood the duties and responsibilities of Mayor Naughten. Mr. Tracy said he has not participated in discussions during Council meetings in the past be- cause he was not fully aware of his role. He said, however, he understood the school system very well because he has attended Edmonds schools all his life. He said he felt he could represent the students very well and would be more than willing to speak on any issue of that concern. Mr. Tracy added that he would be happy to perform any duties that the Council seemed fitting for him. Council President Wilson said the Council was vitally interested in what Mr. Tracy viewed as the students' perspective regarding any aspect of the community. He said Mr. Tracy was free to voice his opinion regarding any issue the Council discussed. Councilmember Kasper recommended that the process of issuing permits for sites for the sale of fire works be moved ahead of the proposed date. Councilmember Hall said she, Mayor Naughten, and Councilmember Nordquist attended a very interest- ing AWC meeting. She noted that the new Edmonds brochure was on display at that meeting, and many people who picked up a brochure expressed a desire to visit the City. Councilmember Nordquist said the property owner at Five Corners should be notified of the reasons for extending the island in the middle of the street. City Attorney Scott Snyder reiterated that the City was reserving its right and its sole discretion to extend the island at any time. He said the Engineering Department estimated that it would cost between $500 to $1,000. Councilmem- ber Nordquist said the criteria that the Engineering Department made should be included in the record. He said he would discuss the issue further next week. Councilmember- Ostrom inquired about the status of the fire boat. Mayor Naughten said the insur- ance pool informed the City that it is insured on a stop gap basis for $1,000,000 until a new ruling is made by the Attorney General. Councilmember Kasper inquired if any additional funds have been expended since last week. Councilmember Dwyer noted that radar was purchased. Councilmember Dwyer recommended that a preliminary budget hearing be held in the summer, as was done last year. EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 11 JUNE 30, 1987 Councilmember Dwyer inquired what benefit the City derived in participating with PSCOG. He re- quested Staff to investigate the issue and submit a report to the Council. He noted that he attended a meeting and did not believe the City benefited from participation. Mayor Naughten adjourned the meeting at 10 p.m. These minutes are subject to July 7, 1987 approval. ACQL%LINE G. PARRETT, City Clerk LARRY S. i•!AUGHTEN, ,1ayor EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 12 JUNE 30, 1987 STATEMENT TO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORATION & QUESTIONS C 1 I have listened to the tapes of the June/86 and July/86 DOT meetings and reread the minutes. I have also done the same for the recent June 2nd hearing. Furthermore, I have listened to the Shoreline Permit tapes from the Hearing Examiner, of the June 18th, 1987 meeting and have read the Corp of Engineer's response. Incidently, I stated at the end of last summers hearing, that without the DOT, the Port and the City moving jointly, that this could turn into a real fiasco. LEGAL: I guess my basic question is: HOW CAN THE DOT BE DOING ALL THIS WHEN: 1. They own nothing and don't have over a month to month lease with the Port. 2. Are condemning the pier and don't know if they can prevail on the court for ownership, especially when the Port Charter specifically provides they be in the Terminal Business, which this pier is!! 3. How can DOT spend this kind of money without knowing whether they will be allowed to do the next phase (finger pier and ultimately double loading that appears apparent after reviewing 1979 model transport study). 4. How can DOT support increasing this facility traffic without a complete pedestrian and traffic study of present, Phase I and Phase II impacts and also consider the impacts of an expanded Braketts Landing, traffic crossing 104 to RailRoad Avenue. REGARDING THIS APPLICATION OF SHORELINE PERMIT: A. Beach tidal action changes because of the widening and filling under the trestle could affect the beach. B. Will the DOT guarantee to keep the beach sand drift similar to today's sand coverage, at least during daylight saving time, each year. C. Will the DOT enter into a binding futures covenant that they will not build any structures, finger pier, or float, north of the present projected sight line of the docks and bumper float. D. Will the DOT provide general public access areas along north walkway to emergency beach water access point. E. Will the DOT provide general public access to the beach on the sough side of the present and future dock modification so that the public can have stair access to the beach to the south where at least 4 feet beach rights will remain. Thus allowing public to get to high and low tide areas south of the pier, as won't be able to go under pier. F. Lastly, is the DOT willing to do a facility study of Phase I and Phase II, reflecting the pedestrian and auto traffic impact from their Phase I and Phase II changes and the interplay of the proposed expansion of Braketts Landing and the swap property. Including the affect of increasing cross traffic on RailRoad Avenue, by auto and the pedestrian traffic from Senior Center and Anderson Marina. I ask these questions because of the following; rapid increase in ferry traffic, the extensive lack of separation of train, public, CT, DOT, pedestrian and motor traffic to and from RailRoad Avenue and Braketts. I'm concerned that the Edmonds ferry traffic has increased over 1986: Jan. 14%, Feb. 28%, March 15%, April 23% and May 15%, averaging 19% for the last 5 months of 1987. In the past years, DOT has reportedly moved 1,190,600 autos through Edmonds dock, averaging 99,214 per month. In light of these increases, how can DOT justify staying at this location and spending unknown dollars and then end up with an impossible situation. Many on this council as well as the public, are concerned and feel that these areas must be more thoroughly addressed. William J. Kasper Councilman June 30, 1987 ATTACHMENT REFERENCED ON PAGE 5 OF JUNE 30, 1987 MINUTES. AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL PLAZA MEETING ROOM - LIBRARY BUILDING 7:00 - 10:00 P.M. JUNE 30, 1987 CALL TO ORDER FLAG SALUTE 1. CONSENT AGENDA (A) ROLL CALL (B) APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 9, 1987 (C) AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY FOR GIRLS/BOYS CLUB REHABILITATION --HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1986 GRANT #6 ($30,000) (0) ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM RONNY D. HOLLAND ($290.36) (E) PROPOSED RESOLUTION 658 AMENDING FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL OF LID 210 BY SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENT AGAINST PARCELS 29 AND 34 (F) AUTHORIZATION TO EXTEND LEASE WITH. UNION OIL COMPANY FOR MARINA BEACH PARCELS (G) REPORT ON BIOS OPENED JUNE 9, 1987 FOR GYM FLOOR AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO QUEEI4 CITY INDUSTRIES, INC. ($29,776) (H) APPROVAL OF FIREWORKS STAND PERMITS (I) ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT AND PROPOSED ORDINANCE 2624 APPROVING REZONE OF PROPERTY ON SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 212TH ST. S.W. AND 84TH AVE. W., FROM RM-2.4 TO BN (R-2-87/JIM GRAVES) (J) AUTHORIZATION TO USE FUND 323 TO INSTALL CORNER PARKS AND SIGNS ($10,000) (K) FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR 12-LOT SUBDIVISION AT 15720 68TH AVE. W. (P-4-86/STEELE PARK) 2. AUDIENCE 3. PRESENTATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD TO CHARLES LeWARN, WASHINGTON ( 5 MINUTES) STATE TEACHER OF THE YEAR 4. PRESENTATION OF COMMUNITY SERVICE AWARD TO GWEN LEWIS, WASHINGTON ( 5 MINUTES) STATE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST OF THE YEAR 5. COUNCIL DELIBERATION ON PROPOSED BRACKETT'S LANDING WATERFRONT IMPROVE- (45 MINUTES) MENTS: JETTY CONSTRUCTION, FERRY DOCK AND BEACH EXPANSION, AND TIDELANDS EXCHANGE (CONTINUED FROM JUNE 2, 1987 HEARING) 6. HEARING ON HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION TO VACATE UNDEVELOPED PORTION (30 MINUTES) OF 1ST AVE. S., 230' NORTH OF ELM ST. TO SR 104 (ST-2-87/SEAWOOD HOMES) 7. HEARING ON HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDATION FOR PROPOSED 4-LOT SUBDIVISION (30 MINUTES) AT APPROXIMATELY 1116 2ND AVE. S. (P-1-87/SEAW00D HOMES) 8. HEARING ON 6-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (20 MINUTES) 9. DISCUSSION BY CWC-HDR, INC., OF SUGGESTED PINE ST. SITE FOR SECONDARY (20 MINUTES) SEWER PLANT 10. DISCUSSION BY CWC-HDR, INC., OF SLUDGE MANAGEMENT (15 MINUTES) 11. MAYOR 12. COUNCIL THE PUBLIC IS.INVITED TO ATTEND PARKING AND MEETING ROOMS ARE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE