11/24/1998 City CouncilEDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
NOVEMBER 24, 1998
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Barbara Fahey in the
Library Plaza Room, 650 Main. Street, followed by the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT
Bambara Fahey, Mayor
Ga y Haakenson, Council President
Dave Earling, Councilmember
John Nordquist, Councilmember
Michael Plunkett, Councilmember
Jim White, Councilmember
Dick Van Hollebeke, Councilmember
Thomas A. Miller, Councilmember
1. I APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Art Housler, Administrative Services Director
Ron Haworth, Interim Fire Chief
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
James Walker, City Engineer
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
Mayor Fahey requested consideration of a Request to Apply for a Four -Lot Short Plat and Authorization
to Wave Application Fees be added to the agenda.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER VAN
ended HOLLEBEKE' TO ADD CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO APPLY FOR A FOUR -LOT
Benda SHORT PLAT AND AUTHORIZATION TO WAIVE APPLICATION FEES BE ADDED TO THE
AGENDA AS ITEM 7A FOR FIVE MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED.
COUNCILMEMBER. VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
NORDQUIST, FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED.
2. ' CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
NORDQUIST, FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. The
agenda items approved are as follows:
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes .
November 24, 1998
Page 1'
I.
(A)
ROLL CALL
Approved
11/14/98
(B)
APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 14, 1998
Minutes
Approved
11/17/98
(C)
APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 17, 1998
Minutes
pproved
', (D)
APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #27814 THROUGH #28908 FOR THE WEEK OF
laim
NOVEMBER 16, 1998, IN THE AMOUNT OF $496,808.21. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL
amar►ts
WARRANTS #22512 THROUGH #22628 FOR THE PERIOD NOVEMBER 1 THROUGH
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes .
November 24, 1998
Page 1'
I.
NOVEMBER 15, 1998, IN THE AMOUNT OF $428,594.43. APPROVAL OF POLICE 1998
BUY -BACK PAYROLL WARRANTS #22630 THROUGH #22689 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$113,198.79.
iv,port-on,(E) REPORT ON GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL POSITION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
neral OCTOBER 31,1998
Fund
3. HEARING ON THE 1999 BUDGET
Hearing Mayor Fahey explained anyone who requested a copy of the budget has been provided access to the
n 1999 budget and supporting materials from the Council's budget work sessions.
ud et
Council President Haakenson explained the Council has had several budget work sessions. He said
reviewing the budget consists of considering revenues and expenses. In the City, revenues are usually
static; this year they are conservative and highly dependent on property taxes unfortunately. Therefore
the Council has been closely reviewing expenses which are up $1.7 million over 1998, a 9% increase.
He said Mayor Fahey and her staff have done an exceptional job explaining the increases to the Council.
His review of the budget indicated $1.4 million or 85% of the $1.7 million increase in expenses is from
six departments - non departmental, police, fire, parks maintenance, planning, and development services.
The four large changes in non - departmental are a $232,000 increase in the Medic 7 assessment, a
$200,000 computer system upgrade, $37,000 increase in library costs, and a $213,000 transfer for salary
and contract settlements. The balance of the increases in the other five departments consists almost
entirely of salary increases, some due to union contracts and other contract settlements with non -
represented employees. The $74,000 increase in developmental services represents a new department.
He said the Council has closely reviewed the increases and expenses and understands the need for them.
He said staff has also presented a good reason for levying the 6% rate on property tax. However, at the
last work session, several proposals regarding the levy rate were discussed to balance the budget
including: (1) a 0% property tax rate with no cuts from the budget and an appropriation of $342,000 from
the City's emergency fund, and (2) a 3% property tax levy rate and a $171,000 cut in expenditures. The
Council directed him at the November 1.9 budget work session to provide his suggestions for cutting
$171,000 from the budget. He indicated he contacted each Councilmember this week to discuss the cuts
and a copy of his suggested cuts has been provided to each Councilmember.
Council President Haakenson stressed the Council has spent a lot of time and effort to date in analyzing
this budget. There have been accusations that the budget is just "rubber- stamped" by the Council, which
is untrue. He said the public hearings scheduled tonight are two important steps in the process.
Mayor Fahey reiterated the 1999 budget has a 9% increase, primarily due to the additional costs Council
President Haakenson outlined and also because this year the City is absorbing the full impact of newly
annexed areas including over 4,000 new residents and a significant geographic area. She said costs
associated with providing services in the newly annexed areas must be included in the budget. She said
staff was not budgeted for areas annexed in 1997 until a certain threshold was reached. When all the
costs specifically associated with the newly annexed areas are removed, the increase from 1998 to 1999
is approximately 1.8 %.
She clarified there are two public hearings, one for the public to provide input on anything related to the
budget (Agenda Item 3) and one for input specifically related to the proposal to increase the property tax
to 106% of the 1998 levy (Agenda Item 4)
Edmonds City Council Appioved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 2
Mayor Fahey opened the public participation portion of the hearing.
Al, Rutledge, 7101 Lake Ballinger Way, Edmonds, submitted written comments regarding his request
for 1) additional funding for a firefighter meeting/training event, and 2) suggestions to speed up the
City's budget process and to make it more responsive. He recommended the City not decrease its
reserves.
Dale Hoggins, 21826 95" Avenue W, Edmonds, Chair of the Cemetery Board, reiterated the Board's
support for the Mayor's recommendation regarding the Cemetery Board. He said four members of the
Cemetery Board were present and unanimously supported Mayor Fahey's recommendation.
Jeff Lewis, 23621 92nd Avenue W, Edmonds, expressed his appreciation for the work that has gone into
the budget. He was concerned with $74,000 for a new department that does not currently exists and
questioned the need for it. As a person with some experience with budgets, he said the first budget is
usually a "wish list" that can be reduced in some areas. He referred to the Medic 7 levy and said his
understanding was this covered Medic 7 costs.
Mayor Fahey clarified Mr. Hoggins was referring to the funding of the Cemetery Sexton position for
$53,000 this year. This allows the Cemetery Board to retain profits from the operations of the cemetery
and place them in a fund that will permanently endow the cemetery so that it will always be preserved
and stable. This has been included in the budget for 1999 and is a discretionary expenditure that the
Council has supported in the past. Council President Haakenson said the funding of the Sexton position
is not one of the budget cuts he recommended to the Council. He said the Sexton, Cliff Edwards, does a
great job and he would fight to ensure that position is retained.
Jeff Bennett, 9702 240" Place SW, Edmonds, representing Woodway Elementary, said their
community (Firdale) met with City engineers to consider safety issues for students walking to Woodway
Elementary (between the old Edmonds - Woodway and Firdale). He said it was their impression the areas
recently annexed would be a high priority for safe walkways. He requested the Council be thoughtful in
their budget allocation for safe walkways so that this could occur in the near future. He clarified
Woodway Elementary was formerly Snoline Elementary.
Greg Sarvis, 1101 12" Avenue N, Edmonds, spoke in support of realistic City government with
realistic goals, realistic needs and realistic people to implement business practices in the City. He said a
3 % -6% increase in the budget was realistic. He referred to a proposal for a 0% budget increase, pointing
out that costs, salaries and benefits continue to increase. He said 30 years in business have taught him to
develop a marketing plan to fit the climate and, most of the time, a 3 % -6% sales or revenue increase is
realistic. However a plan for a 0 % -2% increase is not responsible leadership. He said his understanding
is the Council cannot request further funding later. He said during Mayor Fahey's presentation of the
budget, it appeared she had a good command of the details to meet the needs of the community. He
hoped one Councilmember was not championing a 0% gain with the goal of gaining political attention.
He said surpluses should be maintained and the City should plan for its needs accordingly. A 0%
increase in the budget will result in loss of the quality of life the community expects. He enjoyed the
benefits Edmonds offers and wanted to continue living "Edmonds kind of days" and urged the Council to
move forward.
Councilmember Plunkett pointed out the budget has a 9% increase; the Council will be voting on a
property tax rate. Mayor Fahey clarified the budget increase and the property tax increase are different,
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 3
property taxes are one component of the revenues. The Council is considering a 0 % -6% increase in the
property tax levy rate, which would not necessarily result in any increases to the budget. She clarified a
6% increase in the property tax levy rate was recommended to balance the budget.
Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, Edmonds, said the increase in the budget was extreme and
questioned whether it could be accounted for by new annexations. He said there were other reasons for a
high budget including new departments, changing classification of department heads, and other items
that continually require more money. He felt neither Mayor Fahey nor the Council were conservative.
He said constant increases require increases in revenue such as the 106% increase in the property tax
levy. He said inflation was low and requested the City point out increases that are in addition to the cost
attributable to new annexations and how much income the City is short when these areas are annexed.
He expressed concern the Council has "gone along so easily" with Mayor Fahey's proposed budget. He
said the Council could be conservative and control the creation of departments with the budget.
Council President Haakenson pointed out he has provided the Council his suggestions to reduce the
budget by $171,000. He offered to discuss this further with Mr. Hertrich after the meeting. Mr. Hertrich
objected to providing money to the Edmonds Alliance for Economic Development when these are the
same property owners who are trying to reduce the codes in downtown and make changes for their
benefit. Council President Haakenson said one of his suggested cuts was $20,000 in funds provided to
the Alliance.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Fahey closed the public participation portion of the hearing.
Mayor Fahey observed Mr. Hertrich stated the new positions implemented were her idea and that the
Council has just accepted them. In fact, every position that has been modified or added was the result of
Council decisions, many of which were made due to recommendations from a consultant who considered
the City needs to meet a growing population and larger geographic area in the future. The changes have
been made as a team because the Council believed the recommendations from the consultant were
appropriate and it was in the best interest of the City to implement those recommendations.
4. HEARING ON PROPOSAL TO INCREASE THE CITY OF EDMONDS REGULAR PROPERTY
TAX LEVY TO 106% OF THE 1998 LEVY BASED ON A FINDING OF SPECIAL NEED
Baring on Administrative Services Director Art Housler explained the Council packet included a resolution to
Proposal to increase the property tax rate to 106 %. He said Referendum 47 requires the City to establish a need to
Increase Tax exceed the Implicit. Price Deflator (.85% for 1999) which must be adopted by a super majority of the
Levy Council. He described the needs identified, 1) a flattening of revenues expected in 2000 and 2001 (in
1999 a 14.8% decrease in sales tax revenue is expected, 2) the addition of another EMS unit to Medic 7
at a cost of approximately $110,000, 3) medical insurance premiums for 1999 have increased 13 %, and
4) a state mandate to microfilm and archive essential records as well as changes in the state financial
system require upgrades at a cost of approximately $200,000. He said City Attorney Scott Snyder agreed
these needs were adequate for the Council to adopt a property tax rate that exceeds the Implicit Price
Deflator (IPD).
Mr. Housler displayed and described how property taxes are calculated (1998 revenue $5,694,500
multiplied by 106 %), plus new construction ($26,197,000/1000 multiplied by $2.13) plus state utilities
($13,700,000 less $13,397,239 multiplied by $2.13), plus annexations ($16,552,000/1000 multiplied by
$2.13) for a total regular tax revenue of $6,426,100. Mr. Housler stressed revenues from annexed areas
exceed costs.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 4
Mr. Housler displayed a comparison of the impact a 106% increase would have on property owners
($0.126 per $1000). For a property valued at $160,000, the increase would be $20.16 per year, for a
property valued at $210,000, the increase would be $26.46, and a $31.50 increase for a property valued at
$250,000. Each 1% increase equates to $3.36 for a $160,000 property, $4.41 for a $210,000 property
an'd $5.25 for a $250,000 property.
Mr. Housler explained the 106% property tax increase was included in the budget as a result of forecast
made through 2000 at the Council retreat. This increase was proposed as a result of concern the Council
expressed due to (1) loss of sales tax due to completion of high school, elementary school, and marina
which had huge impacts on sales tax revenues as well as construction fees and building permits,
(2) fluctuation in Sales Tax Equalization (in 1995 the City received approximately $1 million in sales tax
equalization, in 1998 the City will receive $468,000 and $472,000 is projected to be received in 1999),
(3) impact of annexation revenues and expenditures ($156 million in property and 4,000 population),
(4) change in amounts transferred to other funds (revenues in other funds were used to offset or reduce
transfers), (5) implementation of Salary Study, and (6) re- instituting full equipment rental charges
(interest income was used to reduce equipment rental rates to departments in recent years). Mr. Housler
explained the Equipment Rental Fund owns all City equipment and departments rent equipment from this
fund.
Mr. Housler displayed a comparison of a tax survey done in March 1998 of 23 of the largest cities in
Washington. Edmonds is the sixth lowest in property tax rate, fifth lowest in utility tax rate, and the
lowest in utility rates. At Mayor Fahey's request, Mr.. Housler clarified the utility tax rate is 5.75%
charged on utilities; the utility rate is the rate for water and sewer.
Mr. Housler displayed a comparison schedule of population / employment ratios for cities of similar size
for 1995 -- Mountlake Terrace 158:1, Edmonds 146:1, Kirkland 138:1, Mercer Island 145:1, Lynnwood
117:1, and Bremerton 122:1, and for 1998 Mountlake Terrace 155:1, Edmonds 151:1, Kirkland 127:1,
Mercer Island 126:1, Lynnwood 107:1, and Bremerton 104:1. He pointed out Mountlake Terrace does
not have a Treatment Plant (which Edmonds does) but those employees were not deducted from the
number of employees used to compute the ratio; if this were done, Edmonds' rate would be better than
Mountlake Terrace. He pointed out Edmonds is in approximately the same ranking after four years.
Mr. Housler displayed a chart illustrating the percentage of the budget required for public safety
($10,230,700 or 49% in 1999 and $9,423,290 or 46% in 1998). He pointed out public safety comprised
43% of the City's budget in 1995.
Mr. Housler displayed a comparison of revenues and expenditure trends for 1990 through 1996. He
explained during his 21'/2 years with the City, there were two occasions when the property tax was not
raised 106 %. Both times, there was a great deal of difficulty meeting expenditures or providing services
the citizens demanded. In 1991 and 1992, the City Council made a decision not to raise the property tax
at all (0 %) and many things did not get done. As a result, in 1993, the 6% for both years was recaptured
and the property tax levy rate was increased 118 %. This resulted in a public outcry and the expressed
preference for incremental increases. In 1994 and 1995 the Council again made a decision not to raise
the property tax 106% but increased it only 103 %. However, due to sales tax from construction of the
high school, renovation of Seaview Elementary and construction of the marina, the additional percentage
has not been levied. He pointed out Edmonds is a "bedroom -type community" without manufacturing or
large commercial activity; therefore, property taxes are necessary to provide services.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 5
Councilmember Van Hollebeke asked Mr. Housler to clarify that the 106% increase did not represent a
106% increase in the property tax a citizen pays. Mr. Housler agreed the 106% increase did not equate to
a 106% increase in an individual's property taxes. He said the 106% is used to determine the increase in
property tax revenues (previous years' revenue multiplied by 106% divided by the total assessed
valuation to determine the property tax rate). He said the rate has not yet been established because the
Assessor's Office has not yet provided the City with the total assessed valuation for 1999.
For Councilmember Van Hollebeke, Mr. Housler explained sales tax equalization was established in
1982 due to the impact malls had on sales tax revenues of cities without malls. Numerous cities
requested the state approve legislation to address the lost revenues due to citizens shopping at stores
outside the City. Sales Tax Equalization was formed for distribution to cities with less sales tax
revenues. He explained sales tax revenues were not used to establish the pool for distribution; each city
was required to dedicate one -third of their Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) into this pool. Based on
sales tax revenue, a determination was made of sales tax revenue generated per capita in the state. This
is used to offset the revenues generated in the City per capita. He remarked in 1983 - 1985, the City
received approximately $1.1 million (17% of the General Fund budget) in revenue from sales tax
equalization. This amount has fluctuated in recent years; as sales taxes increase, the amount the City
receives in sales tax equalization is impacted.
Mayor Fahey opened the public participation portion of the hearing.
Warren Schweppe, 8524 215" Street SW, Edmonds, said after reading the Ewing feasibility study and
Mr. Housler's budget memo of November 7, he concluded the 6% increase Mayor Fahey requested is
related to Ewing's study. He recommended a more reasonable increase, such as 3 %, due to the surplus of
$102,600 as indicated in Mr. Housler's letter. He said there is no mention of the revenue from new
construction at Chase Lake that will take place in 1998. He recommended the Council consider a 1%
B &O tax to offset the 3% property tax increase and to allow businesses to contribute to the City. He
understood there are ordinances that prohibit growth to be removed and that there is little opportunity for
new business expansion. He questioned how the City could continue raising property taxes each year,
particularly for residents on fixed incomes.
Jeff Lewis, 23621 92 "d Avenue W, Edmonds, said his wife stays at home with their five children
because they feel that is important for their quality of life, but tax increases each year make it
increasingly difficult for one parent to remain at home. He pointed out the difficulty increasing taxes
pose for single parents and those on fixed incomes. He recalled recent defeats of the RTA's original $7
billion proposal, the convention center bond, and Propositions 1 -5 and questioned how "in touch" the
City was with the voters in view of their decisions on these issues. He said Snohomish County also
wants a 6% tax increase. He said a 6% increase is six times the inflation rate of .85 %.
Dale Hoggins, 21826 95" Avenue W, Edmonds (speaking as a resident), supported Mayor Fahey's
budget request and recommendation for a 6% property tax increase. He said, like most Edmonds
residents, he lives in the City by choice, enjoys the quality of life, and did not want the quality of life
diminished by lack of funding or the compounding results of lack of funding. He said it is better and less
costly to keep ahead rather than postponing or doing things inadequately. He said church and city
budgets are similar as they are based on common goals and complementary interests. He said the
increase is not unreasonable. He was sensitive to those on fixed incomes, noting many enjoy the benefits
of exemption from all voter approved levies, a PUD discount, and water rate discounts. He said approval
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 6
of a dollar amount is not unlike approving a special school levy, particularly the requirement for a super
majority. He complemented the Council and Mayor on their interest and dedication to the City.
David Orvis, 21118 77t1 Place W #103, Edmonds, spoke in opposition to the 6% property tax increase
as he did not believe a special need existed to justify the increase. He believed this increase, combined
with past increases and planned future increases could seriously impact those that pay property taxes. He
said four reasons have been provided to justify the special need. Although the cost of medical insurance
has increased, Attachment 11 indicated overall benefits increased by only 9 %. This combined with the
EMS increase and the new state mandates only equate to a 3.5% increase in expenditures. However, the
proposed budget includes a 9.1% increase. He said there appeared to be a $640,000 gain in sales tax last
year that would be unavailable in 1999. To fund the 9.1 % increase in expenditures, he said the $1.2
million left over from previous budgets was used in 1999, as well as property tax increases and the 2%
increase in revenues. He pointed out without the property tax increase, the budget could still be
increased by 8.1 %. He felt the 6% tax increase was being used to increase the budget by 9.1% rather
than 8.1 %, which did not represent a special need. He said taxes can impact the quality of life in
Edmonds and expressed concern that taxes will double by 2008 if this did not stop. He recommended the
Council consider voting no on the tax increase.
Carl Wiser, 746 Somerset Lane, Edmonds, referred to his tax statement for the years 1994 through
1998 pointing out the value of his property has increased 23.8% and the total tax has increased 35.8 %.
The amount assessed for the Port has increased 21.2 %, the state school increased 24.7 %, local school
increased 32.7 %, hospital increased 39.5 %, county increased 44 %, and the City increased 55.1 %. He
said it appears the City is growing as fast as others and maybe faster. He urged the Council in the future.
to be aware how the City is spending money, pointing out taxes have been raised substantially over the
past four years.
Albert Huff, 810 Hindley Lane, Edmonds, supported the 6% increase, which represents less than 1.3%
of his total property taxes. He has lived in Seattle, Shoreline, and Bellevue, and Edmonds is by far the
best community to live in. When they moved to Edmonds, they were aware this was a City that must
support itself and its schools on residential taxes (which is not the case in Bellevue or Seattle). He said
what he gets for the taxes paid to the City, a $31.50 increase was a bargain. He urged the Council to pass
the 6% increase.
Al Rutledge, 7101 Lake Ballinger Way, Edmonds, said recent bond failures for the convention center
and Ascent 21 indicate the public is tired of paying taxes. He recommended a special election be held
regarding the property tax increase. He pointed out the 6% increase represented a $65 - $125 per year
increase to property owners on Lake Ballinger. He recommended the City not rush approval of this
budget and preferred additional cuts be made to the budget.
Roger Hertrich, 1020 Puget Drive, Edmonds, said the rate of inflation was what Referendum 47 stated
should be used for property tax increases which the City and County are proposing to exceed. He
questioned what warranted this increase, and said it appears the City is not as well run as in the past yet
property taxes continue to increase. He expressed concern with consultants "doing all the work" that
management should be doing and with the lack of communication between departments. He preferred
the additional property taxes be dedicated to 800 MHz rather than a future bond issue to fund it. He .
recalled a property tax increase in the past had been dedicated to road maintenance. He stressed the
citizens were not getting their money's worth and that was the reason citizens are upset with property tax
increases.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 7
Gail Sarvis, 1101 12`h Avenue N, Edmonds, said raising property taxes was not a popular idea;
however, responsible business would plan for some type of increase. She said a 3 % -6% increase was not
unreasonable and recommended the Council make a responsible business decision to continue the quality
of life with a 3 % -6% property tax increase.
Mel Critchley, 705 Driftwood Place, Edmonds, said when he purchased his property many years ago
because Edmonds "was the best place to live," his payments including taxes were $250. He described
other residents who have lived in his neighborhood for many years and at least four of his neighbors are
selling their homes because they cannot afford the increase in taxes. He referred to the recent economic
situation and said he is preparing for an economic event as occurred years ago in the 1970's. He said
businesses could no longer survive in Edmonds because of rent increases as a result of property tax
increases.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Fahey closed the public participation portion of the hearing.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER VAN
HOLLEBEKE, TO EXTEND THE HEARING FOR 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED.
Responding to Mayor Fahey's question, Mr. Housler said there appears to be some lack of understanding
of the County Assessor's Office requirements. The information available indicated the County required
a resolution and an ordinance. The resolution before the Council tonight establishes the increase and
reserves the capacity not levied now to be levied in the future. The actual amount to be levied would be
addressed by an ordinance that would be adopted in December and would establish the rate per thousand
based on the actual total assessed valuation. He said he had hoped the City Attorney would be present to
clarify this issue. Mayor Fahey explained City Attorney Scott Snyder is unavailable until the end of the
year and Mr. Karber who has been assigned to the City, was unable to attend this evening.
Council President Haakenson said correspondence from the City Attorney's Office recommended the
Council pass the resolution by November 28 to meet the requirements. Although the City has exceeded
this date in the past, the City Attorney did not recommend that be done again. Council President
Haakenson expressed concern with determining a tax levy rate by November 28 when the budget has not
yet been completed. Mr. Housler suggested continuing the hearing to the next Council meeting and
passing the resolution at that time would satisfy the legal requirement.
Councilmember Earling said another option would be to hold a special meeting by November 28, as only
24 hours notice is required for a special meeting.
Mayor Fahey remanded the matter to Council for deliberation.
Councilmember Miller said he has asked a lot of questions of staff over the past three weeks since the
budget was presented and struggled with a 9% increase in the budget and a 6% property tax increase
request. Although he was unable to attend the November 19 budget work session, the packet provided
by staff answered all his questions. The reasons staff has provided for the increase in the budget
(annexations and assessments from outside governmental agencies) reflect the need to continue services
at the existing level and unless the current level of service is reduced, it will be difficult to provide
funding. However, he felt there were ways to reduce the requested property tax increase to less than 6 %.
He said each 1% increase in the budget represented $57,000. He said the Council has discussed areas
where expenditures could be reduced and revenues re- directed to keep the property tax increase at a more
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 8
reasonable level. He said Council President Haakenson's proposal is to reduce the property tax increase
from 6% to 3 %, although he did not agree with all the cuts Council President Haakenson suggested.
Councilmember Miller said he would be more comfortable with an increase of 2.5% to 3.5% and
suggested this be used as a basis to make reductions in expenditures that would not impact service levels.
Councilmember Nordquist said the actual amount the City will receive from Sales Tax Equalization is
unknown and there are moneys yet to be received from other sources that do not make the 106% increase
necessary. He thanked Council President Haakenson for developing suggested reductions.
COUNCILMEMBER NORDQUIST MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER, TO
APPROVE A 103% PROPERTY TAX INCREASE.
Councilmember White said he requested Mr. Housler prepare an exhibit that addresses the impact of
raising/not raising property taxes to the 106% level. He displayed a ten year (1998 - 2008) comparison
illustrating the revenue loss if a 0% levy is assessed this year and 106% assessed for the next ten years as
well as if a 103% levy is assessed this year and 106% assessed for the next ten years. Under the 0% levy
scenario, in ten years the City cannot recapture $577,300 in property taxes. Under the 103% scenario, in
ten years the City cannot recapture $289,100. He stressed the City can, within Referendum 47
guidelines, raise the property tax levy 106% and collect only 103 %. This would not result in the inability
to recapture property taxes as illustrated in the exhibit. By passing a resolution authorizing a levy of
106% but also adopting a budget that expends only a 103% increase, the City does not lose anything;
citizens benefit from a 103% levy yet the City retains the ability to recapture the funds in the future
should that become necessary. He said under Referendum 47, the City cannot recapture unlevied
property taxes in the future. He said this scenario provides the City with flexibility while meeting a
budget based on a 103% property tax levy increase.
Councilmember Plunkett said Councilmember White's exhibit shows the impact of Referendum 47; that
is, government will have less money to spend.
Council President Haakenson referred to the information from AWC regarding protection of future
property tax levy capacity and asked if it addressed the time limit for reassessing capacity not assessed
this year. He recalled in the past it was three years. Councilmember White said his understanding was
there would be no ability to recapture, the exhibit illustrated the baseline for subsequent years, not
recapturing.
Mayor Fahey recalled prior to the passage of Referendum 47, cities had three years to capture any
differential (from 1 % -6 %) that was not levied. However, Referendum 47 changed this and whatever a
jurisdiction levies is the maximum that can be captured. Referendum 47 does not address recapturing
any differential. She said available information indicates the City will not have the ability to recapture
any amount not levied this year. Councilmember White explained the City creates a baseline with the
initial levy (this year's tax plus 106 %) and next year the baseline is increased by that factor, and so on for
future years. By not assessing that factor this year and assessing it for the next ten years, the City is in a
position of not being able to recapture $577,300. He was aware amounts not levied could not be
recaptured.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke said a number of citizens urged the Council to do the responsible thing,
to consider the budget and the City's needs. He observed it may be politically expedient to suggest taxes
not be raised and pointed out the difficulty of developing a responsible budget for the citizens of
Edmonds. He recalled comments citizens made that they live here by choice and that this is the best
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 9
place to live. Citizens have chosen to live in what is essentially a bedroom community without a
commercial tax base to provide revenue. He said there is a momentum in the community to improve
neighborhoods as well as enhance the economic climate to increase revenues. He said it would be
irresponsible not to request the maximum allowed. He supported requesting a 106% property tax levy
but only budget at 103 %. He recalled the painful process in past years when the Council made the
decision to reclaim property taxes not previously levied. He did not support the motion.
Councilmember Plunkett pointed out the reason the Council is voting on the proposed 6% increase
independent of the budget is due to Referendum 47. The intent of Referendum 47 was to make it more
difficult for government to raise property taxes by requiring a separate vote to increase property taxes
above the rate of inflation which is established by the Implicit Price Deflator of .85 %. He said the
Council must have a super majority to increase property taxes above .85 %. He recalled Referendum 47
passed by 65% of the vote in Edmonds - 65% of the City's citizens supported maintaining property tax
increases to the national rate of inflation. He believed the Council would vote to increase property takes,
hopefully by less than the proposed 6% but substantially more than the public's wishes as expressed by
Referendum 47. He said Councilmembers have given numerous reasons for the need to increase
including that IPD should not be used and that it is a small property tax increase. He said any increase is
not small when added to other tax increases for other entities that make up residents' property taxes. He
pointed out even if the property tax rate is not increased, there will still be an 8% increase in the budget
.which will fund an additional $850,000 for police and fire, new administrative staff, employee benefits,
new software -- increase and upgrade all City services. He said this could be accomplished without a
property tax increase by offsetting it with $74,000 in unanticipated additional property taxes, $13,000 in
additional Sales Tax Equalization, $15,000 from refinancing bonds, and utilizing part of the $275,000 in
the financial reserve account. Further, using budget history as a guide, during the course of the year
revenues will increase $150,000 - $200,000 over current projections. Therefore, using unidentified,
unanticipated, and unallocated revenue, the Council could fund the entire budget without cutting any fire
department training, reducing funding for Edmonds Alliance for Economic Development, or affecting
the police budget. In the future, $320,000 in library bonds will become available in 2001, which could
be utilized to fund the long term needs for police communication and fire equipment. Further, state
equalization tax will become whole in 2001, providing an additional $500,000. He said he intended to
vote against the proposed 6% tax increase and the Council's proposed 3% tax increase, and adhere to the
principles of Referendum 47 by voting against any tax increase.
Council President Haakenson said the key words for him comes from Referendum 47, "substantial need"
and the need for a majority vote to raise the property taxes over .85 %. After reviewing the budget this
weekend to determine ways to reduce $171,000, he was comfortable a substantial need existed to
maintain the service levels citizens enjoy via a 3% property tax increase. He found it difficult to justify a
6% increase for 1999 and would support the motion. He referred to Councilmember Plunkett's
suggestion to use funds from the financial reserve account, which is the City's emergency fund, and said
he could not in good conscience take moneys from a financial reserve account that has been established
for emergencies and balancing the budget did not represent an emergency. He said the Council should
accept staffs revenues projections at face value and it was irresponsible to believe the revenue
projections were incorrect and would be $150,000 - $200,000 higher.
Councilmember Earling agreed the prospect of raising property taxes was a daunting task. He pointed
out each 1% property tax increase represents $57,000. This is a lot of money but is a relatively small
amount of money compared to the $20 million General Fund budget. He agreed taxpayers expect cities
to be responsible and deliberate in the amount by which property taxes are increased, as evidenced by
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 10
Referendum 47. He supported the 103% property tax levy increase. He said the Council has discussed
800 MHz, which is a $161,000 per year issue. The Council discovered today this does not have to be
addressed until next year; the Council previously believed funding needed to be created this year.
Regarding the Emergency Fund, he said Councilmember Nordquist and he were on the Council when the
following language was added to the Emergency Fund in 1993, "The City Council hereby states as its
policy, purpose, and intent, the Emergency Reserve Fund has been established to handle unanticipated
emergencies with which the City may be confronted including but not limited to declines in federal or
other revenue, unanticipated emergency costs, and emergency liabilities." Councilmember Earling said
none of those situations currently exist and he would not support utilization of funds the Council
intended to be used for true emergencies. He said the library bond funds have been referred to for
funding numerous projects. He preferred the discussion regarding how to spend those funds be avoided
until 2000 when the library building will be paid for. He agreed a substantial need existed for a 3% tax
increase.
Councilmember Plunkett clarified there is an additional $270,000 over the required amount in the
financial reserve fund. He was not projecting there would be additional revenue, that was the history of
revenues over the past three years.
Councilmember Miller clarified Councilmember White's preference would be a 106% increase in the
property tax levy but using 3% as a "credit line" and Councilmember Plunkett prefers an increase no
higher than the IPD of .85% and utilizing the emergency fund to balance the budget. He pointed out
citizens are taxed by other entities in addition to the City and the property tax needs to be assessed
clearly. Councilmember Miller did not support utilizing emergency funds to maintain existing services
whIen a true financial emergency did not exist. He urged the Council to consider supporting the 3%
in Irease.
VOTE ON MOTION: MOTION FAILED (DUE TO REQUIREMENT FOR A SUPER
MAJORITY), COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS NORDQUIST,
MILLER, AND EARLING IN FAVOR, AND COUNCILMEMBERS WHITE, VAN HOLLEBEKE,
AND PLUNKETT OPPOSED.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER VAN
HOLLEBEKE, TO EXTEND THE HEARING FOR 20 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Fahey observed some people refer to the 6% increase as the Mayor's proposal. However, the
budget was prepared based on the information Mr. Housler presented at the Council retreat. As no
objections were raised to the 6 % increase and to cover the items she perceived the Council wished to
halje included in the budget, the 106% property tax levy increase was included. She recalled at the time
the!budget was presented, she offered to work with the Council to reach a reasonable compromise and to
adhere to any recommendations the Council made for cuts in the budget. She said the budget review has
been a very open process and as much information as possible has been provided to the Council on areas
where cuts could conceivably be made. She said the suggested cuts were in areas that would not impact
services and were items the Council requested be'included in the budget in previous years; therefore, it
was not within her purview to eliminate them from the budget without Council direction. She said the
suggested revisions utilize unanticipated revenues that were unknown when the preliminary budget was
prepared as well as new items that must be included (at a cost of $40,000) that were also unknown when
the! preliminary budget was prepared. This results in approximately $60,000 in new revenues or
approximately a I% reduction in the proposed property tax increase. The Council is also discussing cuts
to the budget. She expressed concern with putting the City in a position to lose the ability to recapture
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 11
1
revenues in the future. She reiterated the 6% property tax increase was included to provide the items the
Council in the past has indicated they wanted included in the budget.
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
EARLING, TO AUTHORIZE THE AMOUNT OF 104% INCREASE ON TAXES BUT BUDGET
103 %.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke explained this would retain the 1% cushion ($57,000) if it became
necessary.
Councilmember Earling clarified the motion would authorize a 4% increase but only levy 3 %. This
would leave 1 % that the Council could choose to levy in the future if necessary.
MOTION FAILED (DUE TO REQUIREMENT FOR A SUPER MAJORITY), COUNCIL
PRESIDENT HAAKENSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS WHITE, EARLING, AND VAN
HOLLEBEKE IN FAVOR; COUNCILMEMBERS MILLER, NORDQUIST, AND PLUNKETT
OPPOSED.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER,
TO ASSESS THE TAX LEVY RATE AT THE 103% LEVEL FOR 1999. MOTION FAILED (DUE
TO REQUIREMENT FOR A SUPER MAJORITY), COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON AND
COUNCILMEMBERS EARLING, MILLER, AND NORDQUIST IN FAVOR;
COUNCILMEMBERS VAN HOLLEBEKE, PLUNKETT, AND WHITE OPPOSED.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
NORDQUIST, TO CONTINUE THE TAX LEVY RATE HEARING TO DECEMBER 8, 1998.
MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Fahey declared a brief recess.
5. ANNUAL REPORT - SISTER CITY COMMISSION
Al Huff, Chair of the Sister City Commission, referred to the Sister City Commission bi- annual report
Annual in the Council packet. He explained in 1997 the Commission set a goal of raisin community awareness
Report, p p � g g ty
Sister city of the Sister City program. The main event was Hekinan Week in August 1997, which included
Commission numerous activities. In 1997 and 1998, the Commission succeeded in recruiting 15 students and 2
teachers to go to Hekinan for a two week homestay. He explained Hekinan places an extremely high
value on the student exchange program and sends 15 students and 2 teachers to Edmonds each year. He
said the biggest testimony to the homestay program is comments from the students who participate. Due
to the generosity of Hekinan, the home stay program is one of the least expensive available at a cost of
only $800. He said the Mayoral visit a few weeks ago gave the City a book documenting the people who
have participated in the home stays in Hekinan Edmonds (over 600 people). He explained the
Commission also selects a teacher to be an Assistant English Teacher. The turning point for him in the
Sister City Commission was Hekinan's request that Edmonds join in their 50"' anniversary celebration.
He commended Mayor Fahey and Councilmember Nordquist who led the Edmonds delegation. He
remarked Hekinan's 50' anniversary festival, which included at least half their citizenry, was something
..r to behold. '
Mr. Huff said this year's 12 member Hekinan delegation required more host families and more
importantly, wonderful support from Stevens Health Care, the Edmonds Art Festival and Museum
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 12
Bo lard, as well as Mayor Fahey who hosted the delegation, much of it from her own private resources and
time. The Hekinan delegation was astounded Edmonds could reciprocate to the level it did.during their
visit because they know Edmonds Sister City Commission is a volunteer group and Hekinan provides
funding to their program. He noted Stevens Health Care also has a continuing exchange program and
Edmonds Elementary, Meadowdale and Edmonds - Woodway High Schools have Sister School
relationships with schools in Hekinan.
Mr: Huff explained there are 12 volunteers on the Commission who develop plans each year for 2000-
2500 volunteer hours, including identifying private resources to fund activities.
Mr! Huff said there has been discussion about Edmonds having a different Sister City, perhaps one in
Europe. While this may be nice if there were people interested in working on that program, he said now
is a particularly important time to have a Sister City relationship with Japan due to the United States'
relationship with Japan. While things may appear to be fairly friendly with Japan, a time is approaching
when the cultures are finding difficulties, particularly with economic situations. He commented the
delegation member who stayed at his home had open resentment of the U.S. government's trade policies.
He said Edmonds is living up to the ideal of the Sister City program as stated by President Eisenhower in
thel 1950's, building direct relationships with other countries, particularly countries the U.S. had
difficulties with in the past. He said the Sister City relationship with Hekinan is vital to understanding a
culture that is so different from our own but so important. He thanked the Council for their past support
and hoped it would continue.
Council President Haakenson thanked Mr. Huff for his efforts on the Sister City Commission,
particularly with the recent delegation. He was aware the delegation had a great time because he is still
receiving letters from them.
Co l ncilmember Van Hollebeke echoed Council President Haakenson thanks and asked that it be
extended to the other Sister City Commissioners. He commended Mayor Fahey and Councilmember
Nordquist for leading the Edmonds delegation in Hekinan and for hosting the Hekinan delegation in
wonderful style in Edmonds.
Mayor Fahey extended her appreciation to the Sister City Commission_ for their daily and ongoing efforts
to foster goodwill with Hekinan. She asked Mr. Huff to report on openings on the Sister City
Commission. Mr. Huff advised four terms would expire this year; two Commissioners have requested to
be `eappointed. Any openings will be announced in mid - December. Mayor Fahey advised in addition to
being a Commissioner, there are other opportunities for volunteers to assist in the program.
6. 1 ANNUAL REPORT - HEARING EXAMINER RONALD McCONNELL
earing Hearing Examiner Ronald McConnell said this was his fourth year as the Hearing Examiner for
xaminer Edmonds; he continues to find it a great city to work in. He reported activity this year has been similar
°ai to previous years. The average case load for the past eight years has been 49 cases; he has had 45 cases
eport
thus far this year. He said his four -year term expires at the end of 1998, and he would like to serve as the
City's Hearing Examiner for another four years. During the past year, he has tried to interpret the City
Code fairly and honestly.
Councilmember Earling said citizens may think the Hearing Examiner is an extension of what the
Council and administration want to see happen; he thanked Mr. McConnell for the independence he has
mail tained over the past years. He noted during the past year, Mr. McConnell and his associate heard
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 13
u
the same issue and had different outcomes. He said this spoke well to his independence.
Councilmember Earling indicated he would support extending his contract.
Mayor Fahey recalled she requested the Council indicate whether they wished to pursue other
alternatives for a'Hearing Examiner. As no one indicated this desire, consideration of the contract will
be placed on the December 15 agenda.
7. ANNUAL REPORT - PROSECUTOR JEFFREY GOODWIN
Prosecutor Prosecutor Jeffrey Goodwin said one of the wonderful things about loving what he does is having the
nnual opportunity to look into other areas to determine if the system can work better. These include the
Report implementation of the community service program, which is outlined in the Council packet and the
opportunity for increased revenues by restructuring fines.
Councilmember White asked why he anticipated the community service program would reduce jail costs.
Mr. Goodwin responded the primary reason is there was previously no community service option. When
an individual was sentenced to jail, the choices were 1) take the individual into custody at a rate of $65
per day, 2) work release, the cost of which is borne by the offender, and 3) home detention, the cost of
which is also borne by the offender. He said the court system has a high number of indigent individuals
who have two choices - serve the jail time voluntarily, or don't serve the jail time and be picked up on a
warrant and serve it later. Therefore, prior to the implementation of the community service program,
there were no options for indigent/low income individuals. The community service program provides an
option for these individuals to provide a benefit to the community, the court, and to the City. The
community service program will reduce the number of jail days by a minimum of 20 days per month,
which equates to approximately $15,000 in jail budget savings. He said there might be some increases in
jail bookings due to the new DUI legislation that required DUI offenders be heard the next judicial day
following their arrest. The court is considering the possibility of a no bail hold and mandatory booking
when space is available. He said this might not have as significant an impact as may be thought, as the
Lynnwood jail is now routinely full and unable to accept the City's bookings. If an individual is
apprehended who is required to be booked, they can be taken to Snohomish County, which the court is
considering for second and third offenders and subsequent DUI offenders. He said the community
service program might be expanded to other types of offenses (it is now used primarily for driving
offenses).
Councilmember White asked the cost to book an individual at the Lynnwood jail. Mr. Goodwin said it is
approximately $75 and the daily rate is $65. Councilmember White observed the community service is
to be performed at a non - profit organization located in the City of Edmonds. He inquired what type of
work would be done and for what organizations. Mr. Goodwin said the work would be done for an
agency selected by the offender. The advantage of this program is that it is done at no cost to the City;
offenders are informed of the option. Non -profit agencies would include churches, community food
banks, the Boys & Girls Club, and any other non - profit agency the individual may have an interest in.
Councilmember White asked if the court prepared a list of qualifying non - profit organizations.
Mr. Goodwin said they have not yet and were initially reluctant to in an effort to keep the City out of the
program administratively. Court staff currently only ensures the community service work is performed
by the short deadline established by the court.
Council President Haakenson said while at the SnoCom dispatch center today, he heard the Lynnwood
jail was full. He asked if the Lynnwood jail accepted bookings from other areas in the county.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 14
Mr. Goodwin answered yes; they accept bookings from Bothell, Lake Forest Park, Brier, and Mountlake
Terrace in addition to Lynnwood and Edmonds. He said this is a 45 bed facility so space is limited,
which will become an increasing problem.
Councilmember Miller asked if there was a community service assessment model that considered the
individual's total criminal history before referring them to community service. Mr. Goodwin answered
yes; it is done on an individual, case -by -case basis. When he reviews the file in preparation for
arraignment, he evaluates whether the individual is a good risk to be out in the community to perform
community service. He said individuals with any history of crimes of dishonesty or violence are not
recommended for the community service program. He said the community service is used primarily for
driving- related charges. He said there has been a huge increase in the number of license suspension
charges; a third of the arraignment calendar are license suspension charges.
For Councilmember White, Mr. Goodwin said the individuals serving DUI jail time are not in the
community service program because that is a mandatory jail sentence dictated by the Legislature, which
the court does not have the discretion to convert to community service.
Councilmember White inquired about the proposed increase in revenues by restructuring frles.
Mr. Goodwin explained traditionally when monetary penalties were imposed, a fine was imposed in
addition to a cost that equaled 90% of the fine which was passed on to the state. The fine paid by the
offender was reclassifying and categorized as probation costs. In this manner, the court is able to retain
the entire penalty. The penalty structure has been increased to bring the total up to what it was
previously including the costs and levies. He said the Office of the Administrator of the Court does not
object to this procedure. Other cities such as Lynnwood and Tacoma are using this structure. He said
revenues increased 20% in the first month following Lynnwood's implementation of this structure.
Councilmember White said costs and assessments added to the fine are generally used to pay for driver
education, L &I compensation, etc. He asked whether the Legislature would redirect these funds.
Mr. Goodwin agreed as more and more cities adopt this penalty schedule, the state will lose revenue and
make changes. He explained the Legislature increasingly dictates costs the City must bear, such, as the
cost 'of public defenders, the mandatory minimum jail sentence of 180 days of an individual driving
under an habitual license suspension for the third time, etc. He said the possibility of adding costs of
confinement for certain types of offenses is being discussed.
Councilmember White observed Mr. Goodwin reduced his appeal budget from $12,000 to $6,000 which
reflects the management of his cases and the understanding in the legal community that a plea or trail can
be expected in Edmonds. Mr. Goodwin said an appeal has not been lost under his administration.
COUNCILMEMBER VAN HOLLEBEKE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
MILLER, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 12 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Fahey stressed the court is not a profit- making venture. Moneys collected are termed revenue but
the funds collected are to offset the expenses of the court. Mr. Goodwin said the court seeks to have
individuals who have violated the laws pay for the cost of administration of the justice system.
Mayor Fahey said the Court Administrator cautioned her that while Mr. Goodwin has a wonderful record
related to appeals and the cost of appeals this last year were lower than budgeted, there is a possibility of
new appeals related to the mandatory DUI sentences, at least until the public becomes accustomed to the
new penalties. Mr. Goodwin said most of the appeal costs the City bore this year were incurred in the
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 15
first half of the year and he expected that trend to continue. Even if there are increases in appeals, he
said there has not been an appeal in the past five months and he did not foresee any cases being tried that
would be appealed before the end of the year. He said the $6,000 appeal budget takes into consideration
the possibility of increased appeals as a result of the new DUI sentencing requirements.
Mayor Fahey said unless the Council indicated otherwise, authorization for approval of Mr. Goodwin's
contract for another year would be placed on the December 15 agenda.
7A. REQUEST TO APPLY FOR A FOUR -LOT SHORT PLAT AND AUTHORIZATION TO WAIVE
APPLICATION FEES
utnorization Mayor Fahey explained the Council took additional action on the Findings of Fact related to a short plat
to Waive of property owned by Charles Warner. After the Council's action, Mr. Warner spoke during the audience
Application
Fees portion of the agenda regarding concerns he had related to interpretations made in this case that he felt
were not appropriate. After the Council meeting, she spoke with Councilmember White who indicated if
there was sufficient reason, the Council could reconsider their decision. However, legal counsel advised
her the option for Council reconsideration was eliminated by Regulatory Reform. The memo from City
Attorney Michael Karber indicates an ordinance would be required for the Council to reserve the right
for reconsideration. However, as the ordinance does not currently exist, it cannot be used to address this
situation. Further, if the Council were to reconsider the issue, it would still be a closed record and none
of the new information could be presented. Therefore, legal counsel indicates the appropriate action
would be for Mr. Warner to request reconsideration at the staff level (his other option would be to appeal
to the courts). She said the memo from Mr. Karber indicates under ECDC 20.75.170, Mr. Warner has
the right to request a revision of the short plat determination within five years of the original approval.
Mr. Warner will be starting that process and the City Attorney suggested the Council approve waiving
the fees unless additional processes are required and an apportionment of the fee would be determined.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MILLER,
TO RECOMMEND THE FEES BE WAIVED FOR THE RESUBMITTAL OF A SHORT PLAT
REQUEST BY MR. WARNER. MOTION CARRIED..
As a result of the Council's decision, Mayor Fahey provided additional information regarding this matter.
8. MAYOR'S REPORT
air Mayor Fahey reported she recently traveled to Washington DC for a 24 hour stay to participate in a
ousing committee process regarding continuing the dialogue related to amendment of the Fair Housing Act or
Act working with the service providers throughout the nation to develop local zoning to address concerns that
have been created by the abundance of group homes locating in residential neighborhoods. She said the
two hour meeting was one of the most beneficial she has attended because dialogue was opened and a lot
of people educated regarding the problems this has created.
ational Mayor Fahey reported the National League of Cities winter conference begins on December 1 and will
League of include continued dialogue. She will leave on December 1 to attend the conference and return on
,ties December 5. During her absence Council President Haakenson will be Mayor Pro Tem and Community
1:islServices Director Paul Mar will oversee administration of the City.
Mayor Fahey reported a legislative session with AWC was held on November 20 to define legislative
:ative
issues that will be addressed in January that will have significant ramifications/benefits for cities.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 16
i
rce Mayor Fahey invited citizens to the tree lighting on Saturday at 5:00 p.m. She announced an ecumenical
fighting program entitled "Edmonds Gives Back" will take place at Puget Sound Christian College on
Wednesday, November 25 at 5:00. This program will celebrate the many things in the community that
citizens have to be thankful for.
oggle Mayor Fahey advised the first Toggle Train that was built' in the Puget Sound area will make its
rain inaugural run beginning in Vancouver and pass through Edmonds for a two minute stop on November 30
at 2.00 p.m. Edmonds will be given a token of the passenger rail service. She said limited seating was
available for anyone wanting to ride into Seattle.
Mayor Fahey said an initial meeting to discuss a full visioning process is scheduled for late afternoon on
December 17 at the Edmonds Floral Hall. The specific time will be announced later.
9. I INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL REPORTS/UPDATES ON RESPECTIVE BOARD MEETINGS AND
COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council President Haakenson wished the public a Happy Thanksgiving.
COUNCILMEMBER EARLING MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER VAN
HOLLEBEKE, TO EXCUSE COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON FROM THE NOVEMBER 2
COUNCIL MEETING. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCIL PRESIDENT HAAKENSON
ABSTAINED.
FT—A---J Councilmember Earling said he will also be in Washington DC next week for the RTA to meet with
eeting Secretary Slater and Federal Transit Administrator Linton.
Councilmember Van Hollebeke wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.
RCouncilmember Plunkett provided a report on the Community Services Committee, stating the design for
en the Bracketts Landing bulkhead replacement is complete and the project. is scheduled to begin in
December. Installation of the back -up generator at the Treatment Plant has been completed and final
testing is underway. Planning, Building, and Engineering fees will be presented to the Council soon.
Lf ancellation Councilmember Nordquist observed there was little scheduled for Council Committee meetings on
1m. Mtg December 8. In view of the continuation of the property tax levy hearing to December 8, he asked if
committee meetings should be canceled? Council President Haakenson offered to check with staff and
make a determination.
Councilmembers Nordquist and Miller wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.
COUNCILMEMBER WHITE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER VAN
HOLLEBEKE, TO EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER MILLER FROM THE NOVEMBER 19
BUDGET MEETING. MOTION CARRIED, COUNCILMEMBER MILLER ABSTAINED.
Mayor Fahey wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving.
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
43ARBARA S. FAHEY, M YOR -SANDRA S.-CHASE, CITY CLERK
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 24, 1998
Page 17
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
Plaza Meeting Room - Library Building
650 Main Street
7:00 -10:00 p.m.
NOVEMBER 24, 1998
SPECIAL MEETING
7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
FLAG SALUTE
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
(A) ROLL CALL
(B) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 14, 1998
(C) APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 17, 1998
(D) APPROVAL OF CLAIM WARRANTS #27814 THROUGH #28908 FOR THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER 16, 1998,
IN THE AMOUNT OF $496,808.21. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL WARRANTS #22512 THROUGH #22628 FOR
THE PERIOD NOVEMBER 1 THROUGH NOVEMBER 15, 1998, IN THE AMOUNT OF $428,594.43.
APPROVAL OF POLICE 1998 BUY -BACK PAYROLL WARRANTS #22630 THROUGH #22689 IN THE
AMOUNT OF $113,198.79.
(E) REPORT ON GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL POSITION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998
3. (20 Min.) HEARING ON THE 1999 BUDGET
4. (20 Min.) HEARING ON PROPOSAL TO INCREASE THE CITY OF EDMONDS REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY TO
106% OF THE 1998 LEVY BASED UPON A FINDING OF SPECIAL NEED
5. (15 Min.) ANNUAL REPORT - SISTER CITY COMMISSION
6. (15 Min.) ANNUAL REPORT - HEARING EXAMINER RONALD McCONNELL
7. (15 Min.) ANNUAL REPORT - PROSECUTOR JEFFREY GOODWIN
8. (10 Min.) MAYOR'S REPORT
9. (15 Min.) INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL REPORTS /UPDATES ON RESPECTIVE BOARD MEETINGS /COUNCIL COMMITTEE
REPORTS
Parking and meeting rooms are accessible for persons with disabilities. Contact the City Clerk at (425) 771 -0245 with 24 hours advance
notice for special accommodations. The Council Agenda appears on Chambers Cable, Channel 32. Delayed telecast of this meeting appears
the following Wednesday. Friday and Monday at noon on Channel 32.