Resolution 12150006.90000
WSS/gjz
12/9/09
RESOLUTION NO. 1215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, TERMINATING A 1997
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGING
EXPIRATION OF A 1999 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, on March 25, 1997, the City of Edmonds and Edmonds School
District No. 15 entered into an interlocal agreement regarding repair, maintenance and the
scheduling of play fields at Madrona School and Old Woodway Elementary requiring the City to
provide seasonal maintenance and scheduling in exchange for access to the fields "for the use of
its citizens and its softball programs for the period specified herein", and,
WHEREAS, the 1997 ILA had an indefinite term and could be terminated by
either party upon sixty days notice, and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, the school district passed Resolution No. 06-14
which declared the Old Woodway Elementary site to be surplus property and authorized the sale
of the property, and
WHEREAS, on June 22, 1999, the City of Edmonds, Edmonds School District
No. 15 and Snohomish County entered into an ILA (1999 ILA) regarding capital improvements
at the Old Woodway Elementary site, AND
WHEREAS, the 1999 ILA was to "remain in effect for ten (10) years" and has
expired on its terms, and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Hearings Board has remanded the 2008
Parks Plan to the City of Edmonds to obtain the recommendation of its hearing examiner
{WSS753355.DOQ1\00006.900000\ } - 1 -
regarding the termination and expiration of these ILAs under the premise that they are within the
provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, page 2 Effective Plan, Section B, which requires the
recommendation and report to the City Council regarding the abandonment, construction or
authorization of any park, and
WHEREAS, the City hearing examiner has provided her advisory report to the
City Council, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, finding consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and the termination and expiration of the 1997 and 1999 ILAs respectively,
now, therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Council hereby acknowledges the expiration of the
1999 ILA, accepts the termination of the 1997 ILA by the School District's Resolution No. 06-
14 and, approves such termination by its approval of the 2008 Comprehensive Parks Plan by
contemporaneous action.
RESOLVED this 15th day of December, 2009.
APPROV D:
MA OR, RY HAAKENSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
�-- &. e4—
CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 12-11-09
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 12-15-09
RESOLUTION NO. 1215
{WSS753355.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } - 2 -
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - Edmonds, WA 98020 • (425) 771.0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221
HEARING EXAMINER
If"2C. 1g9v
In the Matter of the Application of
City of Edmonds
For Advisory Report per. Comprehensive
Plan, Effect of Plan, Section B Regarding
Termination of an Interloeal Agreement for }
Maintenance of Playfields.. )
NO. STF20090024
ADVISORY REPORT
TO CITY COUNCIL
SUMMARY OF PROCEDURE
GARY HAAKENSON
MAYOR
Re uest:
The City of Edmonds requested the following, per the project description contained in the notice
of hearing issued November 4, 2009,
Hearing Examiner review and recommendation regarding termination of an Interloeal
Agreement between the City of Edmonds, the Edmonds School District and Snohomish
County to maintain playfields at a location formerly known as Old Woodway Elementary
School which is west of and adjacent to Hickman Park' pursuant to the requirements of
the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, Effect of flan, section B.
City Exhibit 14. At the hearing, the City Attorney clarified that the City Council action required
to abandon the playfields is (1) termination of a 1997 Interloeal. Agreement between the City of
Edmonds and Edmonds School District and. (2) acknowledgment of expiration of a 1999
Interloeal Agreement between the City of Edmonds, Edmonds School District and Snohomish
County.z Argument of Ms. Zara.
Jurisdiction;
The Heat Exaxni et �s ..r ' dflc#io 1n phis matter is`based Qn the 008 City of Edmonds
Cornprelie stv Fly f' g 2 ttf t1�e Comrpreherasive Plan, urider the heading Effect of Plan;
section B, states M. reloyaht part: s t llovvs;
No ... park ... shall be abandoned, constructed or authorized until the Hearing Examiner
has reviewed and reported to the City Council on the location, extent, and consistency
1 This land is also known as and referred to in some of the exhibits as Sherwood Park.
Based on the exhibits presented at the hearing, the Hearing Examiner concurs with the City Attorney's
characterization of the issue. It should 'be noted that Ms. Lora Petso argued that the 1999 Interloeal Agreement is
still effective.
Advisory Report to City Council
City of F,dmonds Hearing Extuniner
ST1720090024
' incorporated August l i , 1890
Sister City - Flekinan, Japan
Page t cf 14
with the Comprehensive Plan. The Hearing Examiner's report shall be advisory only.
Notice of the hearing by the hearing Examiner shall be given in the manner specifiers in
each case by the City Council.
Based on the grant of jurisdiction contained in the Comprehensive Plan, the Hearing Examiner
wilt report to City Council on the location and extent of the playhelds, and whether
terminating/acknowledging expiration of the interlocal. agreements to maintain. the playhelds
would be consistent with the Comprehensive flan, but will not provide a recommendation to
City Council as to «,rhether any interlocal agreement should be terminated.
Notice/Oblectzons to Notice.
On Oetobef.6, 2009 Cry Council passed Resolution No. 1209; which established public notice
requirements for the hearing before the Hearing Examiner. In the Resolution, City Council
characteri2ed the hearingsas "regarding the termination of an interlocal agreement relati.irg to the
maintenance of playhelds at a site formerly owned by the Edmonds .School District and adjacent
to Hickman Park." The required notice included publication in the City's legal newspaper,
placing the notice on the City 's web site, posting the adjacent park site, and providing notice on
the City notice boards at least ten calendar clays before the hearing. Resolution No. 1209.
The City issued notice of the hearing Examiner hearing on November 4, 2009. The notice
described the purpose of the .hearing as follows:
Hearing Examiner review and recom;nendation regarding termination of an Interlocal.
Agreement betixreen the City .o C Edmonds, the Edmonds School District and Snohomish
County to maintain playftelds at a location. formerly known as Old Woodway Elementary
School which is west and adjacent to Hickman Park pursuant to the requirements of the
Edmonds Comprehensive Plats, Effect of Plan, section B.
City Exhibit 14. The notice was published in. Everett Herald on November 4, 2009, mailed to
properties within 300 feet of the site (this type of notice was not required by Resolution No.
1209), placed on the City's web site and on three City .bulletin boards, and posted at the site.
Consistent with Resolution No. 1:209 the notice was provided more than ten days prior to the
hearing. City exhibit 14, Testimony o, f .Mr. McIntosh.
IDS Lora Petro argued 4
haf the i tree of hearing was inaccurate and,deceptive because it
described a lzearrng on the intertcical nreement ratlxer than the abandonment of Sherwood Park;
She reg3nesie `that the Hearing Eaminr delay issuance of the advisory report pending another
hearm, g 2'estirrYOny of lvt�. Pisa; Petro Written `f'estitnony:
The Hearing.Dominer conducted the hearing and is issuing this Advisory Report over the notice
objection. The Plearxzg E_ xarn- 1her notes that the.project description contained in the notice of
hearing is generally consistent with the description contained in City Resolution No. 1209, which
established the notice procedures. Further, the hearing was ordered by the Central Puget Sound
Growth Management Hearings Board, which, in its Final Decision and Order, suggested that the
City hold the.required hearing; "at the time if votes on termination of, the .ILA or acknowledges its
expiration." City Exhibit 2; page 35.
Advisory Deport to City Council
City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner
STF20090024 Page, 2 of ' 14
It is the Hearing Examiner's opinion, based on the evidence presented and described in the
Findings that follow, that the notice was adequate even.though it did not refer to abandonment of
a park (other than the citation to the relevant Comprehensive Plan policy). The "park" status of
the playfields is based on the interlocal agreements with the former property owner, Edmonds
School. District. The land :is now privately owned and is not open to public use.
Hearing Date:
`1 he City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner conducted a hearing on the request on November 19,
2009.
Testimony:
The following individuals testified at the November 19, 2009 hearing:
1. Elana Zana, Ogden Murphy Wallace. (City Attorney)
2. Brian McIntosh, City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation. and Cultural Services Director
3. Ira Shelton
4. Evelyn Wellington
5. Lora Petso
6. Roger Hertrich
Exhibits:
City Pxhibits:
Staff;Report, with the following attached Exhibits:
I. Page 2 of Comprehensive Plan (Effect of Plan)
2. Final Decisibn and Girder dated August 17, 2009, Central Puget Sound Growth
Management Hearings Board, Case No. 09-3-0005, Petso 11 v. City�of Edmonds
3. References in the 2001 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
(hereafter"2001 Parks Plan') related. to Old Woodway Elementary School site,
with excerpts from the plan.
4. Tnterlocal Agreement between the City of Edmonds and Edmonds School District
No. 15 dated March 25, 1997
5. Interlocal Agreement.between Snohomish County, City of Edmonds, and
Edmonds School District No. 15 dated June,22, 1999.
6: Edmonds School District Resolutcon.No. 06-I4
7 Notioe,of latent to Sell Surplus Schd I Troperty" published April 15, 200E
8. .Edmonds City Council Minutes dated March 25, 2006
9. Interlocal Agreement between Snohomish County and City of Edmonds dated
December 18, 2006
10. Snolomish County Council Motion No. 06-546; and Interlocal Agreement
hetween Snohomish Cortniy, City of Edmonds, and Edmonds School District No.
15 for Termination of Previously Executed Interlocal Agreement
11. Edmonds City Council Minutes. dated March 20, 2007
12. December 2008 Parks,. Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
(%ercaiterf 42008 Par,�s Plan")
Advisory Report to City Council
City of Edmonr& mern•in)Z Examiner Norge 3 of i 4
STF20090024
13. Development/Operation Agreement Meadowdale Playfield Site dated June 5,
1985
14. City's notice documentation; including Notice of Hearing Examiner hearing, and
Hearing Examiner Agenda posted on City web site.
Exhibits submitted by Lora Petso:
Written testimorty.entitled "Park ,Abandonment Hearing" (fated November 19, 2009, with
the, following attached Exhibits,-
1 . Sno-Icing Fall 2006 Soccer Field Locations
2, Figure 4.11 from. Southwest Drainage Basin Plan
3. Letter from D.C. Miller to Tom Rosenbough dated. July 7, 1983
4. Excerpts from Southwest Drainage Basin Plan, including pages 2-2, 4-4, 4-9, 4-
1.0, 4-11, 4-12, and.443
5. Materials (2 pages) fioni Burnstead development application referencing Fish and
Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area
6. Excerpts from City Critical Areas Map showing Fish and Wildlife Habitat
Conservation Area
7. Excerpt from Comprehensive Park Plaza Map dated 1967
8. 1993 Earfing letter and 2004 Plunkett article (Edmonds Beacon)
9. Letter from Arvilla Ohlde to Edmonds City Council dated. March 24, 2006
10. Excerpts from City Council Minutes dated March 21, 2006, March 25, 2006, and
June 7, 2005
11. City Executive Session..Minutes dated April 11, 2006
12. Memo from. Brian McIntosh to Snohomish County requesting ILA termination
dated August 2, 2006
13. Documents relating to Edmonds School District request to amend Comprehensive
Plan, including:letter frolu Marla Miller dated July 16, 2005, Ms. Petso's written
comments, and notification of withdrawal of application.
14. Excerpts from Comprehensive Plan, including pages 1, 2, 3, 5, 15, 22, 61, 62, 65,
66, 67, and 88
15. Excerpts froze 2001 Parks flan, including pages 2-5, 3-7, 5-1, 4-27, 4-25, 4-24, 4-
23, 4-22, 4-21, 4-20, 4-4, Facilities Plan Map, and Needs Assessment pages 29,
M, and 36
16. 1997 and 1.9991nterlocal Agreements, with documents relating to School District
sale of.land'to Burnst6ad'Constimetion
1. Page 4-11 of 2008`Parfcs Pfan
1`8. Petso PRD appea
19. Park aerial maps
20.. Capp#al Improvement Project Description for Sportsfzeld/Playground Upgrade
In ar rXitiOn to these Exhibits, the: Hearing Examiner considered the 2001 Parks, Recreation c
Open Space Comprehensive Plan in its entirety (only excerpts were included in the above
Exhibits), the 200E City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, and City .Resolution Art). 1209.
SUMMARY OF TESTIMONY
Adviso) y R-i port to C71y Council
Ci€y Q, f Edmonds Hearing. aatniner
STF209911024
Page 4 of' 14
This summary should not be considered minutes of the hearing. Only the key Points made by the
participants are summarized here.
Brian McIntosh: Mr. McIntosh described the notice that was provided of the hearing, and
provided information on the acreage of the Old Woodway Elementary site and the extent of the
playfields.
Elana Zana: Ms. Zana summarized the relevant interlocal agreements and the status of each. She
clarified that the action required to abandon the playfields is (1) termination of a 1997 Interlocal
Agreement between'the City of Edmonds and Edmonds School District and (2) acknowledgment
of expiration of a 1999 Interlocal Agreement between the City of Edmonds, Edmonds Schoot
District and Snohomish County.
Ira Shelttrn Mr. Shelton questioned the recreational value of the amenities provided at Hickman
Park (picnic area, a field without defined borders). He argued that general open fields are not
adequate for youth;recreation needs, and that the City should provide fields designed for specific
sports.
Evetyn �Vellingtort: Ms. Wellington questioned how any of the interlocal agreements could
terminate automatically, and argued that the City needs the fields located on the subject property
Ms. Wellington supported Ms. Petso's arguments.
Lora Petso: Ms. Petso argued that neither the 1997 nor the 1999 .ILAs have been terminatecl or
have expired. In addition, she objected. to the public notice of the Hearing Examiner hearing
because it referred to termination of an interlocal agreement but not to the abandonment of
playfields. Ms. Petso submitted written. argument, with attached exhibits, which she summarized
At. the hearing. The points included:
0 A. description and plioto of the park location_3
A.. description of the size and environmental characteristics of the
property, and the characteristics of the playfields.
4 Argument on consistency witlt_the Comprel-.ensive Plati. Ms. Petso argued
that abandonment of the park is inconsistent with the 2001 Parks Plan,
which shows a shortage of ail park types, and that it had been her intent in
adopting the 200'l Parks Plan that the City acquire the entire Old
Woodway Elementary Site,(11 acres). Ms. Petso argued that abandonment
of the park is inconsistent with Comprehensive Platt Purposes C and E
(page 1), Growth. Management Goal B.2 (page 3), State Goals I,1, and L
(page S), the Opeti Space policies, including'B.2, B.2.b, IB.2.d, B.2.h (Ms.
Petso emphasized B.2.h in her oral testimony), and the. Vegetation and
Wildlife policies a Ms. Petso argued that placing homes on the site is not
i. The relevant facts regarding the location and. extent of the property are included hi the Findings that follow.
4 The text of the goals and policies is included in her written testimony and in her attached Exhibit 14.
Advisory Report to !City Counell
City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner
STF20090024 Page J of I4
consistent with the balance of land uses required by the Comprehensive
Plan. In. addition, she argued that abandoning.the park would result in
abandonment of a drainage ditch identified in the Southwest Edmonds
Drainage Basin Study, and that abandonment of the ditch would result in
flooding impacts to the surrounding neighborhood.
e A response to City arguments. Ms. Petso argued that the fact that the City
acquired and developed Hickman Park is not relevant to the issue of
whether abandonment of the playfields is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. She argued that Hickman Park does not contribute
to the City's inventory of fields for adult and upper age youth play
because the field is too small, provides only a partial backstop, and is
encumbered by a cherry tree.
Roger Hertrich: Mr. Hertrich questioned whether the hearing was for termination of an Intodocal
Agreement or for abandonment of a park,' and argued that both actions are inconsistent with the
Comprehensive Plan. He submitted that the City has argued that it is too built out to acquire now
parks, yet new development is occurring without creation of new parks.
FINDINGS
Location and Extent of Property
1. The subject proTerty is .located in southwest Edmonds, immediately south and west of
Hickman Park. The tax parcel number of the subject property is 27033600304800. Pelso
Written Testimony, page 2; City Exhibit 14.
2. The subject property and the land comprising Hickman Park were formerly owned by
Edmonds School District and were known as Old Woodway Elementary School. The
total property area was 11.22 acres. The 2001 Parks Plan identified the school site and
indicated that it provided 4.8 acres of recreation facilities. Although not identified as such
in the 2001 Parks Plan, the recreation facilities on the subject property were known as
Sherwood Park. City Exhibit 3 (2001 Parks Plan, page 3-8 and Existing Park &
Recreation Areas gap, page 3-1.1); City E, xhihit 6; Petso Written Testimony, .page 3 and
Exhibit 1.
ct solo approximately S.f aereso of the Old Woodway
Y of 1ldtnoiads rhzch, later developed the land into Hickman
;6 acres (the subjectproperty) to a private party, Burnstead
page 3; City Exhibit 2, page 29; City Exhibit 8; City Exhibit
dway Elementary Park description; Petso Exhibit 1.6.
S Ms. Zana submitted in response to this issue that while the hearing itself is a park abandonment hearing, the park
abandonment action is termination/acknowledgment of expiration of the [LAs.
`' The address of Hickman Park is 23708 104'h Avenue West. City Exhibit 12, Appendix C, Old Woodway
Elementary Park,
Advisory Report to City Council
City of Edmontir Hearing Examiner
STE2009004 Page 6 t>f 14
4. The subject property contains two playfields, including a softball/baseball field and a
soccer field. Petso Written 'Testimony, pages 2 and 3. The fields occupy approximately
four acres of the site. Testimony of Mr. McIntosh.
5. The subject property contains a drainage ditch that is identified in the City's Southwest
Edmonds Drainage Basin. Study. The ditch runs along the northern and western
boundaries of the site, and accommodates runoff from the surrounding neighborhood.
Petso Written Testimony and Exhibits 2 and 4.
6. The .northeast corner of the subject property is within a Fish and. Wildlife Habitat
Conservation Area. Petso Exhibits 3 and 6.
Interloca/ Agreements
ldmonds and Edmonds School District No. 15 entered
7. On March 25, 1997, the City of
into an interlocal agreement (1997 ILA7) regarding repairs, maintenance and scheduling
of playfields at Madrona School and Old Woodway Elementary. Under the 1997 ILA, the
City assumed responsibility for seasonal maintenance and community scheduling of the
fields, and agreed to contribute labor and up to $5,500 in materials, in exchange for City
access to the fields "for the use of its citizens and its softball and soccer programs for the
period specified herein." City Exhibit 4, page 1. The 1997 ILA had an indefinite teim,
and could be terminated by either party upon 60 days notice. City Exhibit 4, page 2.
.3
9.
On .tune 22, 1999, the City of Edmonds, Edmonds School District No. 15, and
Snohomish County entered into an ILA (1999 ILA) regarding capital improvements at
the Old Woodway Elementary site. Under. the 1999 ILA, the School District agreed to
make the premises available to City and County residents; the City agreed to matte
certain improvements to the baseball field, prov.ide.a sign identifying Snohomish County
as a.financial participant, and guarantee long-term maintenance of the ballfields and
improvements; and Snohomish County agreed to provide financial assistance.. The 1999
ILA specifies in Section 1.4 that the agreements "shall. remain in effect for ten (10) years
according to its terms", and provides that it may be terminated "only upon written
agreement of the parties, executed in the same manner as provided by law for the
execution of this agreement; provided that the County may terminate this agreement
based on lack oflegislative appropriation." The 1999 ILA acknowledges the 1997 ILA,
and provides that hoth documents should be read to fully effectuate all of their
provisions, with the 19991LA controlling in the event of irresolvable conflict. City
Exhibit 5.
On June 6,.2006, the School District passed Resolution No. 06-14, which. declared the
Old Woodway Elementary site (11.22 acres) to be surplus property, and authorized the
sale of the property. City Exhibit 6.
" In its Staff Report, the City identified the 1997 ILA as simply the "1LA" and the 1999 ILA described in the next
Finding as the "Three Party ILA." In this report the Rearing Examiner will refer to the ILAs by date so as not to
confuse them with the other ILAs in the record (there are five total).
Advisory Repot•t to City Nourish
City of Edmon4s Hearing Fa amines
:S7F2(JO�tJI)29 f'cre 7 «f 14
10. On March 25, 2006, City Council authorized, the City to make an offer to purchase 5.5
acres of the Old Woodway Elementary site, and to ask. the School District for an
extension of time to make an offer to purchase the remaining land. City Exhibit &.
l l.. On December 18, 2006, the City and Snohomish County entered into an interlocal
agreement (2006 ILA) providing for the County's financial assistance in the City's
purchase of "all or a part of the Old Wood"way Elementary site. The 2006 ILA does not
require that ballfields be provided on the land acquired by the City: City Exhibit 9;
Argument of Ms. Zana.
12. The City purchased the east 5.6 acres of the Gild Woodway Elementary site and
developed it into Rickman Park. A private developer (Burnstead Construction) purchased
the remainder., which contained the playfields described in the 1997 and 1999 IL,As. City
Staff Report, Petso Exhibit 16; 'Testimony of Mr. McIntosh.
13. The City of Edmonds never terminated the 1999 ILA, although an attempt was made in
December of 2006 (the Mayor, along with representatives of Snohomish County and the
School District, entered into an interlocal agreement to terminate the 1999 ILA, but this
action was not ratified by City Council). City Exhibits 10 and I.I.
14. Although not successfully terminated, the I999 ILA expired by its own. terms in. .tune of
2009. City Exhibit 5; Argument of.M.s. Zara; .see also City Exhibit 2, page 29.
15. The City considers the Council action required to abandon the playfields as (1)
terminating the 1997 ILA and (2) acknowledging expiration of the 1999 ILA. Argument
of Ms.. Zana; Stuff Report, page 5.
Comprehensive Plan
16. Early this year, Ives, Petso challenged the City's adoption of 2008.1'arks Plan
(Ordinance No. 3717) before the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings
Board (CPSGMHB). Ms. Petso raised numerous procedural and substantive issues,
including issues relating to the playfields on the subject property. In its final Decision
and order dated August 17, 2009, the CPSGM14B dismissed the substantive issues but
found that the City did not comply with certain notice requirements when it adopted
Ordinance No. 371`7,. and .did not dernonstrate consistency with the park abandonment
policy (Section $ ofEffect of Plan.on page 2) with respect to the layfelds. The
CPSGMHgremanded-theordinaigee to the City to correct the procedural problems, but
did not invalidate the 2008 Parks Plan pending the remand. City Exhibit 2. The Hearin
Examiner will address both the 2001 and the 2008 Parks plans in these Findings, .as well
as the 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
2001 Parks Plan
17. The 2001. Parks Plan does not specifically reference any interlocal agreement to maintain
the playfields on the subject property, but generally describes how the City partners with
schoolsto provide neighborhood or community park elements. 2001 Parks `Plan, page 3-
7; Staff'Report, page 6.
Adidsory Repart to City Council
City of Edrnazids Rearing Examiner
S.TI,200900-74 Page 8 oj`14
18. The 2001 Parks Plan contains maps that identify the Old Woodway Elementary site as
being a "School District School" (page 3-11), and identify the site as being within a
proposed neighborhood park service area (page 4-5). City Exhibit 3. Appendix B to the
2001 Parks Plan includes a detailed playfield inventory, which identifies Old Woodway
Elementary as providing one youth baseball/softball field and one soccer field (pages.29,
33, and 36). Petso Exhibit 15.
19, The 2001 Parks Plan establishes "recommended demand standards" for various types of
.park and recreation facilities and provides an analysis of the land and facilities needed to
satisfy the standards. "These are described throughout Chapter 4 of the 2001 Parks Plan
but are summarized in Table 4.14 (page 4-27). Table 4.14 shows a need for all types of
park and recreation facilities by the year 2010, including (among other things) 21.2 acres
of neighborhood parks, 29.9 acres of community parks, seven baseball fields, and four
soccer fields. With respect to existing baseball fields, the 2001 Parks Plan notes that
many are considered substandard and do not contain adequate infield conditions and
features such as fencing and dugouts. 2001 Parks .Plan, pages 4-20 and 4-27 (Petso
Exhibit 15).
2.0. The 2001 Parks Plan includes an Action. Plan (Chapter 6), which recommended that the
City acquire/develop three acres of the Old Woodway Elementary site as a neighborhood
park (page 6-6). The neighborhood park site selection criteria identified a nuniinucn land
area of two acres, and an optimum land area of four to seven acres (page 6-4). City
Exhibit 3. With respect to baseball fields, the recomn-tended action was that the City
upgrade existing multi --use fields, convert surplus softball fields to youth baseball, and
place portable toilets on site during baseball season. 2001 Parks Plan, page 6-18.
21.
The 200'1 Parks Plan includes goals and objectives relating to parks and open space
(Chapter 5). These goals and objectives are nearly identical to those contained in the
2008 Parks Plan. The goals include providing a wide range of park and recreation
services for all interests and age groups, and providing a high quality park system that
offers a wide variety of recreation opportunities (page 5-1). The relevant objectives
include developing a neighborhood park system that is conveniently located to most City
residents, developing high quality improvemIents for parks, upgrading existing parks,
work with a4ioining cities to Provide sports fields (pages 5-1 to 5�2). 2001 Parks Plan;
Chapter 5; Paso Exhibit 15,
2008 Parks Plan
22. The 2008 Parks Plan does not identify the subject property as a park, but. identifies the.
remainder d, the Old Woodivay, Elementary site as City parkland, and as -a proposed
neighborhood park.(Existing. Plan Map and Proposed Plan - Facilities Map; see also page.
4-3). City .exhibit 12.
23. The 2008 Parks Plan does not reference either of the ILAs. 5taff Report, page 6; City
h'xhibit 12.
Advisory Report to City Council
City ofT'dmonds Nearing Examiner
Page orge y (ifI4
24. The 2008 Parks Plan indicates that the City owns or controls six park -centered sports
fields and shares facilities at the Meadowdale Athletic Complex, but notes that the City
fields do not generally qualify as "regulation" fields because they are irregular in shape.
The 2008 Parks Plan indicates that through the public process the community expressed a
need for more availability of fields, especially for adults, and that many teams have to
drive a long distance for Feld availability and/or have to play at undesirable times of the
day. City Exhibit 12, page 4-11.
25. The 2008 Parks Plan does not include demand standards for the various types of athletic
fields, but states, "additional fields should be provided as new park sites are considered at
both the neighborhood and community park .levels." Cily Exhibit 12, page 4-12.
26, The'2008 Parks Plan contains goals and objectives that are nearly identical to those
contained in the 2001 Parks Plan and described above: City Exhibit 12, page 5-2.
27. The 2069 Parks flan contains an Action Plan that irioludes.recoinmendations that the City
develop the 5.6-acre park (Hickman Park) at the Old Woodway Elementary site and.
develop a multi -purpose active community park at the former Woodway High School
site, which is adjacent to Hickman Park. With respect to sports fields, the Action. Plan
identifies a.iieed for one regulation baseball field, three youth baseball/softball fields, one
regulation soccer field, and three youth soccer fields. For all of the fields, the Action Plan
recommends that they be developed as part of new or redeveloped community parks
and/or through partnerships and improvements at school sites. City Exhibit 12, page 6-
16.
28, The Proposed I°acilities chart within the action plan shows Old Woodway Elementary
Park (Hickman Park) as providing one youth soccer field and other amenities, and
identifies .a potential new community park at larmer Woodway High School containing
three; adult soccer fields and one adult baseball field and other anienities.9 The 2008
Capital Improvements Program notes that development of the community park would
depend on a successful capital campaign. City Exhibit 12, page 64 9; 2008
Comprehensive Plan, page 92 (CIP).
9. Singt. 1985 ,'there has been an interlocal agreenient i.n place (1985 ILA) allowing City use
of the iti2eado�vdale playfzelds �27 acres); which are iodated. vitliin #lie City ofLynnwoa.d
adjacent to the Edmonds; %ty, liiri is The pard.0 to the! 1985 LA are the Cities of
Lynnwood: and EdMori�j Snohomish runty, and IJd ponds School Distript No M
According to. the park desonption contained in. the M% Parks Plan , the park provides
three lighted softball fiends, two sand soccer fielris, and other amenities. The 1985 ILA.
s At the hearing, witnesses questioned the usability of the heed for soccer or any other organized sport. The field. is
open, with no defined boundaries. It includes a partial backstop, but hardball is not allowed. Petso Written
Testimony, page 11; Testimony of Mr. Shelton.
`' Based on the field inventory contained in Appendix B to the 2001 Parks flan, the improvements at fortner-
Woodway High School, if constructed, would result in two additional soccer fields., 2001 Comprehensive Plan,
Appendix 13, pages 29 and 30.
,Advisory Report to City .Council
City of Edmonds flearing Examiner
ST 20090112 Page Il) f 14
has a 40-year term unless terminated by a majority vote of the parties, terminated by the
School District with 180 days notice and compensation to the other parties, or mutually
amended by the parties. The City of Edmonds may unilaterally withdraw from the
interlocal. agreement with 180 days notice. City Exhibit 13.
2008 Comprehensive Plan
30. The 2008 Comprehensive flan containsa. growth management policy that the
"Comprehensive Plan and its implementation measures should be developed and
maintained in such a manner to guarantee that there are sufficient resources to insure
established levels of community services and that ample provisions are made for
necessary open space, parks and other reereatioa facilities." 2008 Comprehensive Plan,
page 3, Policy B.2 (Petso Exhibit 14).
31. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan contains state goals to "encourage the retention of open
space and development of recreational opportunities . and develop parks" (Goal 1),
`'protect the environment" (Goal J), and "ensure that those public facilities and services
necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time
for occupancy and use without decreasing current service
the development is available
levels below locally established minimum standards" (Goal Q. 2008 Comprehensive
Plan, page 5 (Petso Exhibit 14),
32. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan contains an open space policy to use "all feasible means"
to preserve certain types of open spaces, including "areas which have an abundance of
wildlife particularly where there are habitats of rare or endangered species", "areas which
have steep slopes or are in major steam drainage ways", and "lands which would Have
unique suitability for future recreational uses both passive and active." 2008
Comprehensive Plan, page 62, Policy B.2 (Petso Exhibit 14).
33. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan contains a goal to "continue to upgrade the public storm
drainage system", and, in the management of storm drainage, to "utilize the natural
drainage system where it is possible to do so without significantly altering the natural
drainage ways ...." 2008 Comprehensive Plan, Page 65, Goal B (Petso Exhibit 14).
34. The 2008 Comprehensive Plan acknowledgesthat as.Edmorids has urbanized, the natural
vegetation has laecome irmereasingly scarce, and-6cludds as a. goal that the: City ensure
that :its uroocllands marshes and other areas contaio%rig natiarai vegetation are preserved.
2008 Comprehensive .Plan, page 66 (Petso al0it I4).
35. The Capital Facilities Element of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan does not include a
project that is specific to the playfields on the subject property. instead, it includes a
general 5porisfielt3/Playground Upgrade project, which is described as "Partnerships with
Edmonds School District, City of LyrinwoodMAC fields. and private youth activities
.associations to create additional youth ball field and play facilities, playgrounds and
neighborhood parks at school facilities." Petso I. xhibit 20; see also 2008 Comprehensive
Plan, CIP. The photo accompanying the project description is of the baseball field on the
subject property; but none of the text refers to the subject property. Petso Exhibit 20.
Advisory Report to City COUncil
City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner
P
S:fF20.090024 age t ! of t 4
36. The Comprehensive Plait Map dated December 16, 2008 shows the designation of the
Old Woodway Elementary School site (including the subject property) as being Single
Family — Urban 1.10
37. In its Final Decision and Order, the CPSGMFIB made several substantive rulings that are
relevant to this. Advisory Report, including the following:
® The 2008 Parks Plan is not inconsistent with the GrMA, the General
Comprehensive Plan and the Capital Facilities Plan, or internally
inconsistent because it does not reference the iLAs or the Sherwood Park
playfields. "Whatever remaining effect the ILA may or may not have, the
Board finds that the City appropriately amended its Parks Plan to reflect
the actions the three ILA parties and the new private owner have taken.
The City is not required to include the ILA in its updated. Parks Plan. Nor
is it required to purchase the whole property to meet its :identified need for
youth. and adult sports fields." City Exhibit 2, page. 29 (ma pages 26 and
28-30 for full discussion):
The Parks Plan amendment is not inconsistent with the GMA, the General
Comprehensive Plan and: the Capital Facilities Plan, or internally
inconsistent because it does not include plannedacquisitions of full-size
athletic fields to address the identified need for such. -fields. "The Board
has not found, and. Petitioner has .not cited, any GMA provision or case
law requiring a city or county to serve the specific recreational preferences
of its pop ulation....Thus, whether a city provides ball fields or off -leash
dog areas, skateboard parks or swimming pools, is within the discretion of
the elected officials. _ _ . The City has chosen to address the need for youth
and adult playfields through interlocal agreements and partnerships with
other agencies. In particular, the City has identified. inter -local
development of sportsfields at the Old Woodway High School site its its
preferred strategy to meet the long term demand for more ball fields." City
Exhibit 2, pages 31-32 (internal citations omitted) (see pages 26 and 30 -
32 for full discussion).
The 2008 marks Plan does not fail to e Imply with (Goat I, page 5 of the
General Plan (see Piilding 31 for text) evert though it does not include the
ILA. City EE hibit 2, pages 38.40.
The 2008 Parks Plan does not fail to comply with Goal L (page 5) or
Policy B.2 (page 3) of the Geiaeral Plan (see. Findings 30 arid 34 for text)
even though it does not provide for sufficient land acquisitions to achieve
10 The record for this Advisory Report does not contain any information as to whether the Comprehensive flan
designation has changed since then.
A dory Report to City Council
.City of Edmonds Hearing Examiner
STF 20090024
Page 12 of 14
the level of service standards contained. in the 2001 Parks Plan. City
Exhibit 2, Rages 44-47.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The location of the property has been identified as described in Finding 1.
2. The extent of the property has been identified as described in Findings 2, 3 and 9.
3. Termination of the 1997 ILA and acknowledgment of expiration of the 1999 ILA (the
park abandonment action) would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as detailed
below:
A. It is the Hearing Examiner's opinion that State Goal r and the drainage and
vegetation/wildlife provisions of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan are not relevant to
the park abandonment issue. Although the subject property contains drainage
ways and critical areas, these features are not addressed in the relevant interlocal
agreements:, and use of the subject property for something other than playfields
would not necessarily mean that these features would be disturbed. Any future use
of the site must comply with the Comprehensive Plan as well as the C it,
drainage. and :critical area regulations. The City does not need to purchase the land
to enforce the relevant regulation-s..Findings S, 6, 31, 33, and 34.
B. Based on the analysis provided by the Central Puget Sound Growth Management
Hearings Board, which the Hearing Examiner finds persuasive, the City action
would. be consistent with Growth Management Policy B.2 and State Goals I and 1,
of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Although the Growth Management Hearings
Board did not. review the ILAs per se, it did review and approve. similar City
"abandonment" actions with respect to the playfields, including failing to identify
the ILAs in the 2008 Parks Plan and failing to purchase (or not planning to
purchase) the subject property. The City has elected to develop alternative park
facilities in the area; such as Hickman Park. Findings 12, 27, 28, 30, 31, and 37.
C . Termination of the 1997 I.LA and acknowledgement of expiration of the 1999 ILA
would be consistent with the 2008 CIP..Findng 35.
D. Although the subject, property is uniquely suitable for future recreational uses per
the open space policies of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, it is not clear that there
axe any g0asible imeatzs" to proserve the land. The land is now privately .owned.
The tatty did not purchase the subject property froth. the School Li'lstriet when
presented with the opportunity to do So in 0,0.6 (the City Council ineoting
minutes submitted into the recgr°d suggest that funding was; a significant issue), ;
and it is not clear that there are funds to do so :at present. t i Further, assuming the
land remains under private ownership, it seems improbable that the ILAs (to the
extent still effective) could be enforced such. as to allow public use of the .
E � No evidence was presented on City finances.
,4dvirory Report to Cit}, Council
City nfl dinands Clearing Excantirwr
STIT2009002�t Page t :3 of t 4
property. However, resolution of that legal issue is outside the scope of this
Advisory Report. Findings 3;. 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12.
E. Termination of the 1997 ILA and acknoNvledgernent of expiration of the 1999 ILA
would be consistent with die, 2008 Parks.PIan. The 2008 Park, s.Plan does not
identify the subject property as, a park:site and. does not include demand standards
or recommended actions that would.require City maintenance of the playfields.
The 2008 Parks Plan identifies alternative recreation facilities. Findings 22.29.
l . Termination of the 1997 ILA. and acknowledgement of expiration of the 1999 ILA
would be consistent with the 2001 Parks Plan. The 2001 Parks Plan identifies the
subject property only as a school recreation land that provides neighborhood park
facilities. The subject property is no longer under school ownership. The Action
Plan contained. within the 200I Parks Plan recommended that tiie City acquire
three acres of the Old Woodway Elementary site for development into a
neighborhood park, and -did not specify which three acres should be acquired. The
City eventually purchased 5.6 acres of the Old Woodway Elementary, site and
developed it into Hickman Park. Tliis action was consistent with the 2001 Parks
Plan objective of developing.a neighborhood park system that is conveniently
located to most City residents. Although the 2001 Parks .Plan included level of
service standards that showed a need for all types of sports fields, the Central
Puget Sound' Growth Management Hearings cgs Board has already ruled that the City
is not required. to acquire the playhelds on the subject property. Findings 17-21
and 37.
DATE this 4th day of December 2009..
l'oweill Rice Taylor LLC
City of.Ednionds Hearing Examiners
By:
LeAnna C. Toweill
Advisoty Report to City Council
City of Edmonds Hearing &aminer•
STF-20090024 Page 14 of 14