Loading...
20180807 City CouncilEDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES August 7, 2018 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Michael Nelson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember (by phone) Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Terri Arnold, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Deputy Rob English, City Engineer Brad Shipley, Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Nicholas Falk, Deputy City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder Dir. Dir. The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t' Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. Councilmember Johnson participated by phone. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 24, 2018 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 24, 2018 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 4. EMPLOYEE AGREEMENT Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 1 5. PRESENTATIONS PSRC AWARD PRESENTATION Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced Josh Brown, Executive Director, PSRC. The Edmonds Highway 99 Subarea Plan, adopted by the City Council in 2017, provided an exciting vision for increasing livability in the Highway 99 area, with more economic and housing opportunities and a multi- modal approach to improved transportation. PSRC recognized the value of the Highway 99 Subarea Plan and selected it for a Vision 2040 award. Mr. Brown congratulated the City on the Highway 99 Subarea Plan. Vision 2040 awards are PSRC's way of highlighting the amazing work happening in the region. PSRC focuses on long range regional economic development, transportation, GMA planning for Snohomish, King, Pierce and Kitsap counties but the cities, counties, ports, transit agencies are implementing those plans on the ground. He recalled talking to Ms. Hope and Mayor Earling about the plan when he started at PSRC 4'/2 years ago; 5 years later the plan is being recognized with a Vision 2040 award. A former Kitsap County Commissioner, he recognized there are corridors in all regions, Highway 303 in Bremerton, where revitalization is needed to connect transportation, and encourage economic development. The Highway 99 Subarea Plan is a model for the entire diverse region and represents incredible work. He presented the City with a Vision 2040 award. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked Mr. Brown and PSRC for the Vision 20440 award. She acknowledged the Highway 99 Subarea Plan represented a long process and she recognized the work that staff and the community put into the plan. Mayor Earling recalled from his days on the Transportation Policy Board the significance of a PSRC award, noting this was the first such award Edmonds has received. 2. VERDANT HEALTH COMMISSION PRESENTATION Mayor Earling explained he invited Dr. Robin Fenn, Superintendent, Verdant Health Commission, to make a presentation to the City Council due to the great work Verdant has done for Edmonds and other communities in their service area. He planned to have Verdant provide an update 2-3 times/year. Dr. Fenn said she has been fortunate to have had conversations with several Councilmembers and Mayor Earling over the past year. When she became the superintendent in early 2017, Verdant was in the midst of a State audit. She and the auditor had different interpretations regarding Verdant's statutory authority regarding some of the programs, such as the swimming lessons in Edmonds and in other municipalities. The State auditor argued it was recreation, she argued it was injury prevention. After discussion with the Hospital Association President and the legislature, HB 2539 was passed, effective June 2018, expanding the scope of the hospital district to include funding of programs to promote health and wellness prevention including specifically the prevention of disease and injury. The original RCW was written in the 1940s. She thanked the City for their support regarding that effort. In January 2018, Verdant hired a social worker, about the same time the City was also hiring a social worker. She met with Chief Compaan and Assistant Chief Lawless as well as Lynnwood Police Department leadership to describe their plans, ensure the positions did not overlap and to describe additional services that could be provided. She recognized there is a large population in the hospital district that needs services, case management and additional touch/wraparound to provide the services they need to people who do not come to the attention of law enforcement. Verdant's social worker works closely with the Edmonds/Lynnwood Social Worker Ashley Dawson. Verdant also expanded the hours of their community outreach person who does outreach to minority populations especially the Hispanic population, courses, classes, programs, etc. from part time to full time. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 2 Dr. Fenn relayed the Building Healthy Communities Fund; capital funding for projects in the hospital district that focus on access to care or increased physical activity, recently accepted applications. The Board is in the process of reviewing applications and she was hopeful decisions could be made by October/November. She advised of an opening on the hospital commission, created when Dr. Bruce Williams moved to Oregon. Applications are being accepted until August 17 and a selection process will follow. Dr. Fenn relayed she has a strong background in mental service and substance use services and recognizing the nexus between the health of the community and law enforcement/first responders. The City of Everett started the CHART (Chronic -Utilizer Alternative Response Team) program in 2015 as part of their Safe Streets Initiative. The program looked at frequent utilizers of the crisis system, emergency departments, Fire, EMS, law enforcement, who put a huge drain on public resources. Cities save money if wraparound services can be provided, but it also provides residents the right care at the right time. Senior leadership from Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace Police Departments, the hospital, Verdant, and South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue have been meeting to discuss a similar process and tracking outcomes. Dr. Fenn recognized Sergeant Baker and Officer Sutton who took her on an all -day ridealong. Both were very gracious, and she found it an eye-opening experience. She has been fortunate during the past 18 months to have candid, open conversation with councilmembers, staff, and the mayor about what is happening in Edmonds and what is affecting the health of the residents as well as the community's overall health. She extended an invitation to have an open dialogue with any Councilmember, commenting Councilmembers are in a unique role to hear from their constituents. She welcomed Councilmembers' thoughts and perceptions about things affecting the health of South Snohomish County and opportunities for collaboration and partnership. Councilmember Teitzel relayed his understanding that Verdant could not invest in capital projects until recently. He asked what changed to allow that to happen and what those capital project might be. Dr. Fenn answered changes in legislation allowed Verdant to expand their programs related to injury prevention and wellness. Verdant received 14 applications for capital projects that range from improving physical activity to access to care; applications were received related to clinics, trails, exercise equipment, etc. A summary of the list was included in the last board packet which is available on Verdant's website. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked what Dr. Fenn was doing differently compared to the prior administration with regard to grants, opportunities, etc., noting there seemed to have been a shift toward more social service funding. She asked if it was due to Dr. Fenn's past work experience which differed from the prior director's background. Dr. Fenn answered possibly, she is a licensed mental health clinician with a strong community health background in social services. She recognizes that healthcare expands into other areas such as behavioral health and social determinants of health. Experts say 80% of healthcare does not happen in a doctor's office; determining the health of community requires looking at what is happening in that 80% while staying within the parameters of the RCWs. Verdant is still extremely fiscally conservative. last year Verdant allocated the most non -capital operating funds to agencies and programs in the community in its history. Verdant's M&O levy in 2017 was $0.076/$1000 assessed value, compared to $0.31/$1000 AV for Cascade Valley and $0.27 for Evergreen -Monroe. Funds from the levy are a very small part of Verdant's revenue portfolio. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said Edmonds looks forward to working with Dr. Fenn and her philosophy around social services and services to citizens. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Kari Mikkelsen, Edmonds, referred to Edmonds Lutheran Church's pending sale to Compass Housing Alliance to build up to 85 Blokable units. They sold their house in Seattle after the neighborhood became unsafe due to an expansion of special abilities housing. For example, one of the tenants entered her Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 3 neighbor's house and refused to leave, requiring she call 911. The person was removed with a straightjacket and stretcher. In Maslow's hierarchy of needs, safety is a basic need; everyone wants to feel safe in their home. She highlighted misinformation that occurred by omission, not doing due diligence or by intent. For example, a comment by Planning Board Member Alicia Crank that low income was $50,000 so it would not be some derelict. That is incorrect, that is the maximum income to qualify; a person making $10,000 would pay $250/month. Ms. Crank referenced teachers in order to put a face on it; that is incorrect; the teachers' contract was approved for $61,000/year. One of the task force's recommendations is to increase the supply of income -restricted affordable housing in partnership with non -profits and regional agencies. She pointed out Bill Anderson is a member of the church, works for Compass and is a Woodway Councilmember. He was appointed by Mayor Earling to sit on Edmonds Housing Strategy Task Force which goes against Compass' articles of incorporation that state, no substantial part of the activities of this corporation shall be devoted to attempting to influence legislation by propaganda otherwise. The agent of Compass was appointed by the mayor to influence legislation. Mr. Anderson also helped Woodway acquire $3.9 million in state and county funds to keep Woodway's open space and park land; there is no affordable housing in Woodway. The church is selling property to Compass whose asset value is $41 million. Compass' CEO said it's housing for teachers, firefighter, and baristas, but that is untrue; it is transitional and permanent housing for homeless single adults and families with areas of need that include mental health and chemical dependency. The criteria is set purposefully low to allow housing for the most in need. She anticipated drug felons, burglars, car thieves and misdemeanor assailants could live in the housing. Eric Mikkelsen, Edmonds, expressed concerned with Edmonds Lutheran Church's Blokable units proposal. In studying the task force's recommendation, their intent seems to circumvent current laws to allow the Blokable housing development at Edmonds Lutheran Church. Section 1.3 recommends reducing residential parking requirements in targeted areas. This is already a bad intersection; his car was totaled when another driver ran the stop sign. Section 1.6 recommends relaxing zoning and code requirements. Section 2.1 asks the city to allow for more flexible requirements for accessory dwelling units and backyard cottages. He summarized the current code does not allow reducing requirements, relaxing zoning, and allowing more flexible requirements. This glorified tent city housing the homeless and convicts is not appropriate in this suburban neighborhood setting. Residents need to live in a safe environment. The church property is primarily zoned RS -8, residential single family 8,000 square foot lots. He urged the Council to consider Edmonds residents who have invested in the community and pay taxes. Cynthia Cooper, Edmonds, offered a perspective from a single-family resident who will be affected by the Hwy 99 subarea plan including Edmonds Lutheran Church's plans with Compass Housing. Throughout the process of meetings and media articles regarding the church's plans, the focus has been on how affordable housing villages will be good for those who are homeless, struggling or low income and that they have the right to live where they want to live. The message that sends to the surrounding single-family neighborhoods who will be negatively impacted by these affordable housing options is that the values, concerns, needs and rights of hard-working, stable, responsible homeowners are not equal to those who are struggling or less fortunate. Supporters of the church's plans support a Seattle urban development mentality that does not serve the surrounding neighborhood. She urged the Council to consider the neighborhood's perspective and concerns. Ann Winn, Edmonds, commented a lot of people in her neighborhood near the county line do not come into Edmonds. She referred to some discrepancy in the tax statements for her 3/4 acre property. The large influx of population makes it difficult for young people to afford housing, although she did not think that would continue after the election. Seniors are a huge factor in Snohomish County and they vote and pay a lot of taxes. Keeping seniors in their homes will cost money. She recommended the Council slow down and take a good look at taxes which are not fair. She also commented on houses being built on smaller and smaller lots. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 4 Ross Demmick, Edmonds, said he has provided comments on the Urban Forestry Management Plan (UFMP) at the Tree Board, Planning Board and City Council. He submitted written comments to Council on May 2, but little has been done to address the scientific deficiencies in the plan. Where changes have been made to address various comments, the changes have been haphazard, often leaving glaring inconsistencies in the remainder of the plan. For example, he previously questioned how the consultant arrived at the value of $0.028/gallon of stormwater diverted by trees. This value has no basis in scientific literature. The number is important as it is used to calculate a claim that $1.2 million annual benefit to the City from diverted stormwater. In response to comments, the consultant has now removed the $1.2 million from the text and a pie chart, but page 56 of the plan still claims a $1.5 million benefit. The $0.028/gallon value is still part of dozens of cost -benefit calculations in the plan, including tables in the introduction section. The much -commented on priority planting map has been removed but left a hole in the document as texts and tables on pages 31 and 32 describe the map and how it was derived; this is orphan text without the map. He suggested there may be the beginning of a plan somewhere in the document, but wholesale changes are necessary to even approach something useful. The plan needs to address street trees, park trees and private trees based on their different functions and management responsibility and the benefits and drawbacks of trees based on the distinct environmental character of different sectors of the City such as the bowl, Hwy 99, North Edmonds, etc. The plan needs to emphasize aesthetics as prioritized by the public in scoping meetings over factors such as stormwater diversion. He recommended the UFMP not be approved in its current form, finding the consultant unresponsive and sloppy in making even small changes, let alone the extreme changes that are needed. 7. ACTION ITEMS CREATIVE DISTRICT RESOLUTION Economic Development/Community Services Director Patrick explained: • Creative District o As follow-on from June 26, 2018 Council presentation, next step in Creative District application process is to seek Council resolution o After approval of resolution, staff will submit Letter of Intent to ARTSWA. o After approval of Letter of Intent, staff will have 60 days to submit formal application o ARTSWA will review and decide within 60 days ■ Resolution whereas clauses o Importance of arts/culture to Edmonds over time o Edmonds City government embraced arts/culture with Community Cultural Plan o Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor o Economic Impact of Arts Study o Creative businesses as adjunct to arts/culture o State created Creative District program in 2017 o Greater Downtown Edmonds is location of main concentration of arts/culture/creative o Greater Downtown Edmonds to be proposed as Creative District (see map) o Creative District designation would recognize significant achievements to date and be platform for further enhancements and growth • Map of Creative District Area o Boundaries are marsh, marina and City park on the south, north to the Edmonds Center for the Arts area, west to Puget Sound and east to the Wade James Theater During a site visit with State Program Manager, she stated the size of the proposed district was appropriate • Resolution clauses Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 5 o Section 1. The City of Edmonds intends to apply to the Washington State Arts Commission for official Creative District designation of the area of Downtown Edmonds delineated on the attached map o Section 2. If Creative District designation is approved by the State, the City of Edmonds intends to follow through with implementation of programs, activities and enhancements within the District over a five-year period focused in three principal areas: • Strengthen and expand creative identity of the Edmonds Creative District ■ Leverage and connect creative experiences in the Edmonds Creative District ■ Retain and attract creative businesses and nonprofits, and the resulting jobs, within the Edmonds Creative District o Section 3. The City Council intends to continue to fund the staff positions and related appropriations to ensure diligent execution of the programs, activities and enhancements intended to further the Edmonds Creative District over the next five years. o Section 4. The City Council requests that the necessary materials be prepared to submit the City's official application for Creative District designation by the Washington State Arts Commission. • Mayor and staff recommend Council approve the resolution Councilmember Mesaros referred to the map, recalling previous discussion about including the Willow Creek Fish Hatchery. Mr. Doherty said not including the hatchery in the district may have been an oversight or the presentation did not include the most recent map. If the Council wished, the boundary could be extended to include the hatchery at the southern edge. Councilmember Mesaros expressed support for including the hatchery. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with including the hatchery and suggested also including the learning gardens in that area. Councilmember Tibbott commented a lot of creative activity is spurred by photographers and artists who visit the marsh. He agreed with including the entire marsh in the district. Councilmember Tibbott relayed the Economic Development Commission is very supportive of the creation of a Creative District due to, 1) the opportunity for tourism and creating an attraction in a walkable area where there are a wide variety of experiences, and 2) from an economic development point of view, seeing new businesses, ideas, ventures and experiences develop. He relayed his understanding that the creative district was sponsored by a State department. Mr. Doherty responded it was sponsored by the Washington State Arts Commission (ARTSWA). Councilmember Tibbott referred to the City's study on arts that confirmed economic development occurs when art districts are established. Mr. Doherty recalled the June 26 presentation included more facts/figures. For example in Colorado, communities that instituted creative districts experienced growth in retail sales, jobs, property values, etc. Although sponsored by the Arts Commission, it is viewed as an economic development tool. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. , A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE WASHINGTON STATE ARTS COMMISSION FOR CREATIVE DISTRICT DESIGNATION, AMENDING THE MAP. Councilmember Teitzel observed the boundary extends quite a distance up Main Street to include the Wade James Theater which provides vibrancy and culture, qualities the Phoenix Theater in Firdale also provides. He asked if the district's boundaries must be contiguous or could there be a separate island. Mr. Doherty said the program manager was asked about that during the site visit and she emphasized the district Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 6 boundaries must be contiguous. She was asked about the extension to include Wade James Theater and she agreed it was appropriate because the theater is located on Main Street and has a connection to the center of activity. Councilmember Mesaros referred to the southwestern -most boundary, noting the public pathway north of Pt. Edwards is used frequently by photographers and bird watchers. He suggested the boundary include the path to Pine Street east of Pt. Edwards. Mr. Doherty offered to research the location of the path on GIS. Councilmembers agreed with proposed amendment to the map. Councilmember Johnson referred to Section 3, commenting the language was very broad but talks about the intent of the City Council to fund that position and related appropriations. She recalled Mr. Doherty stating during the presentation that there may be contract staff. She asked if this language was required by the State. Mr. Doherty answered the State requires that the City indicate which staff will be available to implement programs and activities over the five-year period. The application will state his department which includes him and Cindi Cruz, Frances Chapin and the Parks administrative assistant. The resolution states the Council is committed to continuing to fund the positions that will do the work. In the first year when new concepts/programs are being implemented, he anticipated a small amount of contracted staff and a small amount of funding will be needed. The resolution states the Council will support the minimum level necessary to implement the programs. Councilmember Johnson said she wanted to be clear that the City was not writing a blank check. Councilmember Johnson agreed with the proposed changes to the district map. She recalled raising a concern previously about including condominiums and parks in the boundary, noting the creative district is supposed to be an economic development tool. She referred to programs, activities and enhancements cited in Section 2 of the resolution, strengthen and expand creative identity of the Edmonds Creative District, leverage and connect creative experiences in the Edmonds Creative District, and said she did not see condominiums and parks fitting that description and requested the map be revised to exclude them. Mr. Doherty said that was discussed with the State program director; she encouraged the inclusion of parks as a lot of arts and cultural activity occurs in parks,. The boundary could meander around to exclude residential areas but the program director also said in other states where creative districts were implemented such as Colorado, the near -in residential areas around a commercial core that are included in a creative district also benefit. In successful creative districts, inclusion in the creative district becomes a selling point for residences and it encourages people in the creative district to have home businesses. Councilmember Johnson was glad staff had discussed this with the State program director. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. 2018 SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT CHANGE ORDER Public Works Director Phil Williams explained the Council approved a contract earlier this year to replace and realign sewers on Edmonds Street, across Civic Field to 6th Avenue and on 7' Avenue. Staff knew this would be a difficult project based on borings which was reflected in the 20% management reserve of $232,000. The first phase through Civic Field went well and is ahead of schedule which is fortunate for this weekend's Taste Edmonds. However, the thicker, sloppier peat layer on Edmonds Street made the crossing on 7th difficult and the same conditions are being encountered east of Edmonds Street. The contractor is doing a good job and doing their best to complete the project. There have been a couple change orders on the project and he anticipated a couple more sizeable change orders. City Engineer Rob English explained the scope of the project was to install over 1300 feet of 8 -inch sewer line. He displayed an aerial view, explaining the project began on 6th Avenue across Civic Field to 7" Avenue where the pipe turns north up to Sprague and 7" and continues east from 7" into Edmond Street. He displayed a photograph of Civic Field construction that required a dewatering system to lower ground Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 7 water to install the sewer pipe. That cost was anticipated but additional costs were incurred to provide temporary fencing due to activities on Civic Field and to bury the system in the street. He noted a similar project on Railroad Avenue where the dewatering system was above -grade along the gutter line. He displayed photographs of Civic Field restoration, the dewatering trench within the street covered by steel trench plates, and the 7t' Avenue pavement. The footprint of pavement restoration was much greater than anticipated due to the trench for the dewatering system and cracks that occurred around the trenches from excavation equipment on pavement that did not meet standards. Restoration to street standards required 10 inches of rock and 4 inches of hot mix asphalt. Mr. English explained the Edmonds Street sewer problems arose due to the existing sewer line as well as new problems. The existing problems are related to peat and the original sewer installed on pilings. It was assumed the pilings were steel that could be cut and removed to install the new sewer; however, when the trench was opened, it was discovered the piling system was wood that extends 14-20 feet into the ground to reach barren soil with concrete caps that support the sewer line. This was a much larger system than was anticipated, requiring the concrete be demolished and the timber piles removed. The timber piles were creosote which contaminated the soil around the piles and required removal and disposal of soils at a higher cost. He displayed a photograph of a section of creosote timber piling. He described extra work items: • Dewatering system estimate $175,000 • Pavement repairs estimate $80,000 • Contaminated materials TBD • Edmonds Street Sewer TBD With approximately 140 feet of sewer line installed in Edmonds Street, on Friday 3-4 bellies developed, likely related to the peat although the project was designed to accommodate the peat material. Staff is working with the designer and the contractor on a solution and he was hopeful an option will be identified by next week. He reviewed the original project budget: Description Amount Construction Contract $1,159,091 Management Reserve $232,000 Construction Management $174,000 Additional Manygement Reserve needed $250000 Total $1,815,091 Mr. English reviewed 2U 1 ii Project project savings m the Newer Utillt 2018 Savings 2018 Sewer Overlay $91,000 2017 Sewer Replacement $9,000 WWTP Proiects $125,000 Ending Fund Balance $25,000 Total $250,000 y Fund that could be used to fund the increase: Mr. English relayed staff's recommendation to authorize a $175,000 change order for the dewatering system and to increase the management reserve by $250,000. He cautioned the sewer line installation in Edmonds Street is not complete and the cost could increase. Mr. Williams said the peat layer where the 140 feet of sewer was laid in Edmonds Street is up to 20 feet deep at the bottom where there is a fairly sound, tight sand layer that can adequately support a sewer trench. The solution will likely be to get down to that in some way via piles or another option. Because the final option has not been identified, a definite cost is not yet known. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 8 Councilmember Mesaros asked if the recommendation was an additional $425,000. Mr. English clarified the increase is $250,000; the $175,000 will be paid from the original management reserve. Mr. Williams cautioned the $250,000 is just a guess regarding the additional costs. Councilmember Buckshnis said she has watched this daily and agreed it was a mess. She recalled a stream of water from a pipe on 7" Avenue for 2 weeks. Mr. Williams said that was ground water; the ground water is very high which is the reason for the dewatering system. The ground water likely follows the existing utility lines in the street downhill and course fill material around the pipe creates a French drain for water movement. Council President Nelson asked if the savings from other projects was accounted for in the request to increase the management reserve to $250,000. Mr. Williams explained the savings highlighted in the Sewer Fund were the result of projects that have gone well. The savings at the fund level will help dull the increase in the management reserve. Council President Nelson asked if the Chamber has been informed that Civic Field is available for Taste Edmonds. Mr. Williams assured Public Works, Parks and the Chamber have been closely watching this project. Some of the costs were associated with events on the field such as the Wenatchee Youth Circus and 4th of July. Council President Nelson commended staff and the contractor for getting the field ready for use. Councilmember Teitzel asked if the new sewer line would be in the way of ground water remediation efforts for development of Civic Field. Mr. Williams said he did not think so; Parks, the Civic Field consultant and Public Works have talked extensively about what the borings discovered. Conditions are the worst in the southeast corner of Civic Field were the design anticipates seating. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO AUTHORIZE A $175,000 CHANGE ORDER FOR DEWATERING SYSTEM AND INCREASE THE MANAGEMENT RESERVE BY $250,000. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. REVISIT SENIOR ACCOUNTANT POSITIONS VOTES Councilmember Buckshnis commented the agenda memo she prepared is very explanatory. On June 19 the City Council approved a full-time senior accountant in Public Works and .5 FTE position for Finance. She is proposing to revisit her vote; the City Attorney informed her that is permitted because she voted in the majority. By revisiting the vote, administration will have an opportunity to review the two positions and bring them back through Council committee and to Council. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL RESCIND BOTH OF THE SENIOR ACCOUNTANT POSITIONS APPROVED FOR BOTH FINANCE AND PUBLIC WORKS DURING THE JUNE 19, 2018 MEETING AND THAT BOTH FUTURE JOB POSITIONS WILL CONCURRENTLY MOVE THROUGH THE NORMAL COUNCIL PROCESS. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed her understanding that administration would return to Council to describe how they wished to spend the 1.5 FTE. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was only rescinding the approval of the positions and administration will return with what they feel is appropriate for both positions. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled the Council approved 1.0 FTE in Public Works and .5 FTE in Finance for a total of 1.5 FTE. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed, and explained the motion was to rescind that decision. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked why the approval was being rescinded. Councilmember Buckshnis explained in June 2017 the Finance Committee discovered grant reimbursements were not being done in a timely manner and a position to assist Public Works was discussed. The 1 FTE senior accountant for Finance was approved in the 2018 budget. When Public Works Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 9 and Finance attempted to fill the position, they learned the two departments had different job descriptions, qualifications and workloads. This action will allow the administration to determine what is appropriate. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled the Council's approval of 1 FTE in Finance was based on .5 FTE for Public Works to assist with grant reimbursements and .5 FTE for Finance due to increased workload. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. UPON ROLL CALL, VOTE ON THE CALL FOR THE QUESTION FAILED TO ACHIEVE A SUPER MAJORITY (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS, MESAROS AND TEITZEL VOTING NO. Councilmember Teitzel supported the motion but voted no on the call for the question to enable him to articulate his perspective as the Finance Committee Chair. This issue arose when the Finance Committee noticed Public Works grant reimbursements were not being booked in a timely manner and determined there was a need for oversight from Finance. That position was originally intended to be in Finance but assisting Public Works in that effort. A disjointed process followed where 1 FTE was expanded to 2 at a total cost of $400,000. He agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis that administration needed to revisit the job descriptions and return to Council for a review and vote to ensure the City is spending taxpayers' money appropriately. Council President Nelson said he was always wary of the Council changing its votes. He knew what he was voting on at the time the vote occurred, and he stood by that vote. He supported Public Works having an accounting person but was not convinced Finance should. Councilmember Buckshnis said the workload in Public Works did not require a senior accountant, especially at a cost of $200,000. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, BUCKSHNIS, MESAROS, TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON AND COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO. 8. STUDY ITEMS 1. 2017 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT REPORT Mr. Williams explained the Transportation Benefit District (TBD) was formed in 2008 and the City began collecting the $20 license registration fee in 2009. The fee generated $698,283 in 2017, a fairly typical annual amount. The expenses charged against that revenue source were $811,908, slightly less than half the total budget for the Street Division ($1.7 million). The ordinance establishing the TBD limited uses of the revenue. Typically, the revenue generated by the vehicle registration fee is less than the eligible expenses. Other revenue sources for the Street Division (Fund 111) include gas tax as well as supplement from the General Fund, approximately $400,000/year in the last three years. The revenue from the vehicle registration fee could be spent on other things if the ordinance were changed. For example, TBD revenue is currently not used for streetlights, the electric bill for streetlights, sidewalk maintenance, maintaining right-of-way outside the developed right-of-way areas, and other expenditures. Following a change in legislation, two years ago the Council assumed the rights, powers, functions and obligations of the TBD Board. An annual TBD report is still required and must be published in the newspaper. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 10 Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the City collected $800,000 annually. Mr. Williams said the highest collections have been was in the low $700,000. Councilmember Buckshnis asked how the eligibility of expenditures could be reconsidered. Mr. Williams said the reason to change eligible expenditures has not been compelling to date because other revenue sources fund expenditures that the TBD revenue does not cover. However, if a decision were made to take advantage of the additional $20 that is statutorily available, the ordinance would need to be changed. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested being proactive and considering a change to the eligible expenditures. Mr. Williams recalled one year the vehicle license fee revenues exceeded expenditures and the funds were carried over to the next year. He offered to bring an ordinance to Council committee to change the eligibility list. Councilmember Teitzel asked if the entire $698,000 was dedicated to streets or was it used to fund new crosswalks, sidewalks, etc. Mr. Williams said capital projects are an eligible expense under state law, but Edmonds' ordinance did not permit the use of vehicle registration fees for that purpose. Maintenance of existing sidewalks is an eligible expense under Edmonds' ordinance. 2. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS REVIEW Planner Brad Shipley reviewed: • Background o Two Comprehensive Plan map designation changes are proposed at this time: ■ Property located at 9111 and 9107 -236th St. SW. Change designation from Single Family Urban 1 to Edmonds Way Corridor (AMD20160008). ■ All property located south of 240th St. SW, between 84th Ave. W and Edmonds Way. Change designation from Edmonds Way Corridor to Corridor Development (Hwy 99) (AMD20180001). o Comprehensive Plan amendments related to the budget will occur at a later date. • Proposal: Change Comp Plan designation from Single Family Urban 1 to Edmonds Way Corridor o Map of 9111 and 9107 236" St SW and surrounding area o Planning Board reviewed the proposal and forwarded a recommendation of approval on April 26, 2017. o Aerial view of subject site ■ Current developed with a SFR and legal, non -conforming multi -family residence ■ 9107 236th St SW — developed in 1960 ■ 911123 6th St SW — developed in 1958 and 1970 • Proposal: Change Comp Plan designation from Edmonds Way Corridor to Corridor Development (Hwy 99) o Aerial image of subject site, surrounding property and roadways o Planning Board reviewed the proposal and forwarded a recommendation of approval on February 28, 2018 o Existing Uses ■ Multi -family ■ Commercial development that has existed since pre -annexation ■ Single family home built in 1948 o Issues ■ Lack of a strong connection to Edmonds Way • Stronger orientation towards Hwy 99 provides more opportunity • Next steps o City Council is scheduled to take action on August 21, 2018 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to the triangle piece and asked if it was in the Hwy 99 subarea. Mr. Shipley answered it was outside the subarea plan. If it were rezoned CG, it would have the same Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 11 development code but would be subject to SEPA and not part of planned action. Councilmember Fraley- Monillas inquired about the boundary of subarea and Mr. Shipley described it. He recalled previous discussions about vacating portions of 84" which was still an option and would provide a better connection to Hwy 99. A property owner in the area who has worked for WSDOT highway development for 25 years said there are some remnants from construction of that interchange that WSDOT does not use. Inability to contact the property owner when people are camping on the property has been an issue for the police department. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out the property to the east is owned by the Volkswagen dealership and questioned the connection to Hwy 99. Mr. Shipley said if the southern portion of 84" were ever vacated, the property would be entirely developable and there would be a better pedestrian connection to Hwy 99 than to the Edmonds Way Corridor. Councilmember Teitzel asked if there have been any complaints from neighbors regarding either site. Mr. Shipley said traffic is always concern as well as allowed uses; that would be reviewed with a rezone. RM zoning is consistently with the Edmonds Way Corridor and multi -family uses. There are a lot of undesirable activities occurring on the site and it would be preferable to have the properties developed. Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her understanding the Council has already approved these. Mr. Shipley agreed the Council had verbally approved the changes to the Comprehensive Plan map, but they had not been formally approved. This is a refresher before the ordinance is presented to Council in two weeks. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 3. DISCUSSION OF REVISED DRAFT URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced Ian Scott, Davey Resource Group and Terri Arnold, Deputy Director Parks & Recreation. She recognized this has been a long process that began many years ago with discussions about trees that led to development of a draft ordinance related to a tree code. The Planning Board recommended not moving forward with that ordinance and the City Council agreed. There was still a need to consider tree issues so the City Council approved development of an Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP). Following an RFQ process, a professional services agreement was approved by the City Council and the consultant, Davey Resources, began the process of developing the plan. The requirements of the professional services agreement have been met and the work under the current agreement is almost complete. The Council reviewed the public comment that had been received on the plan as well as reviewed the draft plan on June 19th. Additional public comments were provided at the June 19 public hearing and the Council provided input. Staff and the consultant made changes to the draft plan. Mr. Scott reviewed: UFMP Fundamentals o The Urban Forest ■ Public property trees ■ Private property trees o City Staff ■ Development Services ■ Public Works and Utilities ■ Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services o The Community • Tree Board ■ Volunteers �+ Non-profit groups Changes to the UFMP o Acknowledging the balance between views and trees. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 12 ■ Added goal related to right tree - right place o Clarifying discussion ■ Street trees and native trees ■ Public trees and private trees o Private property trees ■ Casc study on incentives for tree retention - San Antonio, Texas - includes canopy goals but acknowledges certain types of canopy are better than others and calculates it differently. - Brevard County, Florida - a person can reduce tree planting requirements if they exceed city objectives for tree density or preserve native trees - Rocklin, California - expedited services and fee discounts are offered to incentivize preservation of oaks - State of Hawaii - offers a deduction in state income tax for care of exceptional trees - Intent of case studies is to inspire creativity in the community around urban forestry actions that will pursue the goals in the plan. o Goals - Consolidated into five in response to Council input 1. Maintain citywide canopy coverage 2. Manage public trees proactively 3. Incentivize protecting and planting trees on private property 4. Provide resources to the community to educate/inform on tree planting and care 5. Promote "right tree - right place" Council President Nelson thanked the consultant for making changes related to providing incentives and examples of the incentives and for reducing the number of goals from 21 to 5. He referred to the first goal, maintain citywide canopy coverage, and a statement in the report regarding tree canopy cover, the amount and distribution of leaf surface area is the driving force behind the urban forest's ability to produce benefits for the community. As canopy cover increases, so do the benefits. The report identifies those benefits as water quality, carbon sequestration, energy savings, air quality, and socioeconomic benefits. water quality. The community survey found 74% strongly agree public trees are important to the quality of life in Edmonds, 67% agree Edmonds needs more public trees. Therefore, Council President Nelson said Goal 1 should be to grown the citywide canopy coverage, not maintain it. Maintaining the canopy coverage is status quo when it's clear the canopy coverage has been declining each decade. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked the staff and/or the consultant to address the concerns raised by Mr. Demmick such as the citation that each tree provides a value of $0.028/gallons of stormwater diversion. Ms. Hope agreed there are theoretical dollar values assigned to stormwater. That does not mean every tree exactly provides that dollar amount of stormwater benefit. It does not take into account any negative aspects of trees such as damage caused by roots, falling, etc. The intent was to provide a high-level number regarding the benefit trees provide such as related to stormwater conservation. This is not a cost benefit analysis but rather identifies the values of trees, some of which are not quantified such as the aesthetic value. Mr. Scott explained the i -Tree model is a U.S. Forest Service designed software that provides a model to express the value of trees in a monetary way. Increasingly around the country, cities are using that model to understand the value provided by trees. In the future, if City has more information about tree population beyond the canopy, those numbers can be refined and improved. Ms. Hope said it is not an exact number but a theoretical basis for the value for trees, emotional value as well as financial benefit. The number is based on a calculated model that a number of cities use; it is not intended to be a cost benefit analysis. Councilmember Tibbott said he reviewed the report again and found a lot that was very specific to Edmonds. He appreciated that the plan was attempting to draw conclusions about the canopy baseline, how to interact with the canopy and how staff is involved in maintaining it. He also appreciated the section on Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 13 citizen input, noting that information will ultimately assist with implementation. He recalled there was interest in addressing trees versus views and he recognized that was not within the scope of this report; however, the information provided via public input will be valuable to Councilmembers and others. He relayed his continued concern about moving from goals to specific actions. He understood the City will need to determine how to implement goals but there is very little in the report regarding the priority of the goals and the steps for implementation. The goals seem disconnected, there is a lack of validation on some points and he was discouraged by some of the suggestions in the plan report such as establishing a goal to plant 700 trees/year, recalling when the consultant was questioned about that, he said it was an example. He did not find it helpful to include that suggestion in the plan. Councilmember Tibbott was unsure how the plan would be useful in the City and was concerned the document provided a high-level view but was inconsistent in pointing the City in a useful direction. He suggested the consultant sharpen his pencil and provide better ideas with regard to those issues. In particular, he would like ideas on how this document would help build consensus. Observing the diversity of opinions, he suggested pursuing the low -hanging fruit, 5-6 very simple strategies. He asked what other cities have done with the information in the plan. Mr. Scott said one of the challenges he observed was there is not a defined owner of this plan, it is spread across three departments. Many cities have an urban forestry leader or a city arborist, someone who champions the plan. One of actions is for the City to appoint someone as a leader of the urban forest such as city arborist which he said would help build momentum. With regard to planting more trees, the City does not have enough information to determine how many trees need to be planted. The City does not know how many trees are lost per year other than trees removed on rights-of-way, but that information is not effectively tracked. Some of the actions associated with the goals are to track information more accurately. With new information the City can circle back to elements in the plan and develop stronger actions such as maintaining and growing canopy by planting X number of trees per year on City property to compensate for trees lost on private property. At this point, there is not enough information to develop specific, measurable action items. Ms. Hope said if the plan is adopted, the next step would be for the Council to provide direction moving forward and identify items to pursue via a budget item, code amendment, etc. in future years. Councilmember Tibbott commented this is called a plan, but it is not a plan. Ms. Hope answered there is a gray area between a plan and a strategy. Some items in the plan are strategies and others are very broad such as maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage. Other strategies include doing an inventory which would help the City accomplish its goals. Councilmember Tibbott referred to language in the plan regarding pests that could be associated with trees and asked if those pests were commonly seen in the Edmonds area. Mr. Scott answered potentially, yes. For example, the Bronze Birch Borer is affecting birch trees throughout western Washington and the Emerald Ash Borer is a concern in the eastern United States and is moving west. They are referenced in the plan because the City needs to be prepared by having knowledge of the species composition. Councilmember Tibbott said he was unfamiliar with the scope of work for the plan but anticipated the plan would identify pests commonly seen in Edmonds, not a laundry list of potential future pests. Mr. Scott said there was no information about the tree population in Edmonds; the scope of work did not include a pest analysis. There are an enormous number of pests and diseases that could impact the urban forest. The intent was to highlight there are insects that could decimate the tree population in the City and through preparation and awareness, the City can be in a position to address them. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked the consultant to adding incentives. She reiterated the Tree Board members feel very disrespected; they have provided examples of pests, trees, and reasons the plan is not Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 14 comprehensive or scientific. The only acknowledgement of their input was the addition of a few paragraphs and reference to right tree — right place. The Tree Board has already been pushing for a city arborist. She relayed the City Attorney's suggestion to make motions regarding amendments to the plan such as adding quadrants with and without views as there is plenty of places on Hwy 99 where trees could be added. She referred to the removal of the map but leaving the table and acreage even after she requested the two Snohomish County parks not be included in the tree canopy calculation. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON, TO REMOVE SOUTHWEST COUNTY PARK AND MEADOWDALE BEACH PARK FROM THE ANALYSIS OF CANOPY COVER OF EDMONDS AND RECALCULATE THE TREE CANOPY IN EDMONDS. Councilmember Buckshnis was okay with mentioning those two parks in the plan but they are not part of the City. Ms. Hope clarified those parks are within the city limits; the park property is owned by Snohomish County, but other property in the City is under by private property ownership. She agreed the City does not control those parks, but it was her understanding that Edmonds Parks & Recreation has a cooperative arrangement with Snohomish County Parks. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Council President Nelson's suggestion to improve the tree canopy rather than maintain it. The plan suggests the improved tree canopy occur from 91h Avenue westward but that obviously will not happen. She noted the picture was removed but the text remained. She said only about 15-20 pages of the plan address Edmonds and although a great deal of negative public input was provided, none of it was taken into consideration. For example, a stormwater benefit calculator definition was not included, there is no definition of aesthetics, and the survey is skewed because only 29% were outside view areas. Council President Nelson asked how much of the Snohomish County parks were in Edmonds city limits. Ms. Hope answered both are within Edmonds' city limits. Council President Nelson said then their tree canopy should be counted. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the map of land cover on page 4 of the executive summary which shows the two county parks inside the Edmonds city limits but the Esperance area, which is located within the boundaries of Edmonds, is not included. He asked if Esperance was included in the canopy coverage calculation. Ms. Hope said it was not because Esperance is not in the city limits. Councilmember Teitzel observed Esperance is also under Snohomish County jurisdiction as are the two parks; therefore, logically they should all be excluded from the calculation. Ms. Hope answered Esperance is not in the city limits; the two parks are. Esperance is an island and the City's regulations do not apply in Esperance; the City's regulations do apply to the parks because they are within city limits. Councilmember Teitzel agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis that the parks should be excluded; this is an Edmonds plan and those parks are under Snohomish County jurisdiction. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether other cities have county parks within their city limits and if so, is the canopy in those parks included in the calculation. Mr. Scott answered it is up to the City to decide what to include. If the City opts to exclude the Snohomish County parks from the canopy assessment, the City's overall canopy will be reduced. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed Esperance was not included. Ms. Hope agreed it was not because it is not in the city limits of Edmonds; the county parks are included because they are within the city limits. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested establishing a work group to work with staff and the consultant. Councilmember Mesaros commented although Meadowdale Park and Southwest County Park are owned by Snohomish County, the City has a lot of authority over those properties because they are located within the city limits. For example, he asked whether the jurisdiction for a crime that was committed in those parks Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 15 was Edmonds Police Department or the Snohomish County Sheriff. Mr. Taraday assumed the Edmonds Police Department. Councilmember Mesaros commented if a crime is committed in Esperance, it is under the jurisdiction of the Sheriffs Office, not Edmonds Police Department. Mr. Taraday agreed it should be the Snohomish County Sheriff, although he acknowledged a deputy may not be readily available and another jurisdiction may respond. Councilmember Mesaros summarized his point was the City has jurisdiction over the two county parks but did not have jurisdiction over Esperance. He supported including the two County parks in the coverage calculation because they are located in the city limits. Councilmember Buckshnis reiterated she asked for changes at the last meeting and nothing was done. She agreed with Councilmember Teitzel's concern that the plan excludes Esperance but includes the two Snohomish County parks. She said when trees fall in those parks, Snohomish County staff responds, not City staff. Ms. Hope commented that is true on private property as well, yet the tree canopy on private property is included in the calculation. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if tree canopy on private property was included in the calculation. Ms. Hope said the tree canopy includes private and public property. Public right-of-way and parks are the primary focus of the plan but there is a great deal related to private property. For example, Goal 1 refers to maintaining canopy coverage which is related to both private and public property. Updating the tree regulations, affects private and publicly owned properties. Goal 2, manage public trees proactively, is more specific to public property. Goal 3, incentivize protecting and planting trees on private property, is related to private properties, Goal 4, provide resources to the community to educate/inform on tree planting and care, is also related to private property, and Goal 5, promote "right tree - right place," affects both public and private property. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW HER MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECONDER. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Rich Lindsay, Debra Dill and Kernen Lien had reviewed the plan and provided input. Ms. Hope answered Parks and Public Works have been involved their suggestions that have been incorporated into the plan. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Tibbott's suggestion to sharpen their pencils and suggested providing methods, incentives and reasons to encourage and require right tree - right place. Ms. Hope said the intent would be to adopt an ordinance in the future related to implementation. Councilmember Buckshnis commented Edmonds could have used Shoreline or Kirkland UFMP and saved $130,000. She reiterated her concern that most of the public's comments have not been considered and the plan is not specific enough. Councilmember Johnson said she found the plan a disappointment, especially the different versions. She suggested the consultant and staff compile the comments made by citizens at the Tree Board and Planning Board as well as comments from members of those boards and provide a point -by -point response. The information in the packet leaves many unanswered questions. As Ms. Hope stated, the intent is for the UFMP to be a policy guide and if it does not provide that, it is not useful. Councilmember Johnson was particularly concerned about public trees versus private trees. She was unclear whether the 50% canopy increase was only on the 12% or whether it was calculated on the 88%. In general, Washington is the Evergreen State; trees grow naturally by themselves. The plan does not give enough attention to natural forests, cedars, big leaf maples, fir trees or hemlocks and seems to focus primarily on street trees and arborists, not a plan for increasing the canopy in the City which makes the next step of developing code difficult. One of the reasons for developing the UFMP was that people didn't like having the code developed first. She agreed the consultant needed to sharpen the pencil and provide more Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 16 information about how comments have been addressed. She suggested the Council be provided a copy of the consultant's contract so they have more information about the scope. Mayor Earling requested Councilmembers submit specific comments to staff. He recommended trees within the City, regardless of who owns the property, be included in the canopy coverage calculation. Trees in Esperance, an island surrounded by City property but located in unincorporated Snohomish County, should not be included. Councilmember Teitzel commented there is an undercurrent of dissatisfaction because the plan does not go far enough in addressing trees on private property. However, he attended the 2014 Planning Board meeting where discontent was expressed with the proposed regulations overreaching property rights. It was his understanding that this plan would not exploring way to aggressive go after private property rights related to trees. The intent of the UFMP was a general plan related to addressing the urban canopy. The City can control what it owns in parks and street trees and can incentivize and encourage tree preservation on private property. The benefits of the tree canopy are carbon sequestration, cooling, wildlife habitat and aesthetics. Determining the financial value of a tree with regard to mitigating stormwater runoff is not the primary focus of the plan. The plan provides a framework and more detail will come in the future. He recognized the consultant for doing a good job to get the plan to this point. Councilmember Buckshnis echoed Councilmember Johnson's suggestion regarding comments at the Tree Board and Planning Board and suggested tables, methods and statistics be quantified or qualified. The survey is not statically valid and the plan needs to identify quadrants with and without views. 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reminded Taste Edmonds begins on Friday. He looked forward to seeing the changes that have been made to the format. He congratulated Parks and Public Works staff and the contractor for getting the field for use, noting a marvelous transformation occurred last week. He congratulated Ms. Hope for drawing the PSRC Vision 2040 award to Edmonds. 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Mesaros acknowledged former Student Representative Noal Leonetti who was in the audience tonight and will be leaving soon to attend Bowdoin College in Brunswick, Maine. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested Ms. Hope contact Compass Housing and request they make a presentation to address misunderstandings in the community. She encouraged people to look at the Compass Housing development in Shoreline south of Fred Meyer. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported on a bipartisan needle cleanup she participated in with current and former elected officials in homeless encampments on public land on the border between Marysville and Arlington. If any Councilmembers were interested, a south Snohomish County needle cleanup is coming up, likely in a north Lynnwood park. The cleanup doesn't take long, it is very safe and it's good for the community. Councilmember Tibbott reported he was on vacation for the last two weeks; one of the weeks was in a national forest far from internet and cell phone signals. They did a 4 -wheel drive trip to see a high alpine marsh which although amazing does not have as many birds as the Edmonds Marsh. The second week of vacation they spent as tourists in Edmonds; Edmonds is a great place to visit, to live and to be a tourist. He attended the Sunday concert at City Park and was consistently amazed at the quality of musicians the City attracts and the turnout. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 17 Councilmember Teitzel reported his oldest daughter got married in Nashville, Tennessee last Saturday. He lost weight during the planning process, most of it in his wallet. Councilmember Buckshnis commented she just received an email that the City already adopted some of their stupid laws about homelessness. She noted the last Council meeting included a study item, Introduction to the Draft Housing Strategy. She agreed with Councilmember Fraley-Monillas' suggestion to have Compass make a presentation to the Council. She emphasized the Council has not passed any laws regarding homelessness and she recommended everyone calm down and allow the process to continue. She encouraged the public to attend Taste Edmonds. City Clerk Scott Passed introduced Deputy City Clerk Nicholas Falk who comes to Edmonds from Washington DC. 11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 13. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:47 p.m. w 1 moi++ DA ID O. EARLING, MAYOR PASSEY, CITY CLE Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes August 7, 2018 Page 18