Loading...
Ordinance 30740006.150.104 WSS /mis /PAO 2/13/95 R: 02/29/96 ORDINANCE NO. 3074 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, MAKING LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING A PUBLIC HEARING AND THE ENACTMENT AND REENACTMENT OF THE EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 20.15B OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF SAID CHAPTER, AND EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20.15B.120 THEREOF TO REPLACE CURRENTLY PERMITTED ALTERATIONS TO GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREA BUFFER REQUIREMENTS WITH STAFF REDUCTIONS TO TEN FEET IF JUSTIFIED BY A GEOLOGICAL REPORT, AMENDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 20.150.010 TO PROVIDE FOR APPEAL OF STAFF DECISIONS ON BUFFER REDUCTIONS, AMENDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20.15B.070(A)(3)(c) TO CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF A STEEP SLOPE HAZARD AREA FROM A 30% SLOPE TO A 40% SLOPE, AMENDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS 20.15B.120(D) AND 20.15B.120(E)(5) TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGES IN THE DEFINITION OF STEEP SLOPE HAZARD AREAS AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, it was asserted that the City of Edmonds may not have properly adopted an extension of the sunset date of Chapter 20.15B of the Edmonds Community Development Code, the Edmonds Critical Areas Ordinance, and WHEREAS, an emergency ordinance enacting and reenacting the Edmonds Interim Critical Areas Ordinance, Chapter 20.15B of the Edmonds Community Development Code, was adopted by the City Council in January, 1996, and 93945.1 -1- WHEREAS, the City Council established in accordance with provisions of state law a hearing date of March 4, 1996, such date being within 60 days of the date of the adoption or readoption of the Interim Critical Areas Ordinance, and WHEREAS, at such hearing, information was given to the Council which suggested amendment of the Critical Areas Ordinance in order assure that the provisions of the Ordinance are consistent with legislative findings, and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it appropriate to make revisions to the Interim Critical Areas Ordinance in order to provide the staff with greater discretion to grant administrative waivers based upon the objective assessment of a qualified geotechnical expert in steep slope and similar environments where no evidence of harm to the public or risk to private properties is shown, and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to adopt and incorporate by reference the legislative findings of King County from whom the original structure of the Critical Areas was derived as well as reports developed by the City's consultant in the original process in order to incorporate those legislative findings into its record to support the adoption of the staff waiver and to provide additional background for the City Council's original adoption and re- enactment of the Ordinance, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Adoption of Legislative Findings and Findings of Fact in Support of an Interim Critical Areas Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Edmonds hereby adopts and incorporates by reference certain legislative findings adopted by King County and set forth 93945.1 -2- in the adoption of the King County Critical Areas Ordinance as well as the recommendations of the City's consultant. The King County findings for the King County Critical Areas Ordinance is attached as Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full, and the following findings are specifically adopted by the City Council: Findings 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15. The recommendations of the Edmonds consultant in the Critical Areas process are hereby adopted as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. The City Council finds that the information incorporated by reference from Exhibits A and B serves as sufficient justification for the necessity of an Interim Critical Areas Ordinance adopted herein. The Council finds that the Interim Critical Areas Ordinance serves the public interest by protecting environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands and steep slopes. The Council has also determined that environmentally sensitive areas would not be adequately protected without an interim Critical Areas Ordinance. The Council also recognizes that a Critical Areas Ordinance is required by the Washington State Growth Management Act and that this mandate can only be fulfilled at this time by the reenactment of Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 20.15B. Based upon information provided by the City Attorney, the Council finds that the amendments to ECDC Chapter 20.15B provided herein are necessary to protect the due process rights of private property owners. Based upon further information provided by the City Attorney, the Council also finds that the Edmonds Planning Board has made substantial progress in formulating a final Critical Areas Ordinance and that the reenactment of ECDC Chapter 20.15B is necessary to provide the Planning Board sufficient time to make a final recommendation to the Council. 93945.1 -3- following: Section 2. 20.15B.070(A)(3)(c) is hereby repealed and replaced with the C. Steep Slope Hazard Areas. "Steep slope hazard areas" means any ground that raises at an inclination of 40% or more within a vertical elevation change of at least 10 feet (a vertical rise of 10 feet or more for every 25 feet of horizontal distance). A slope is delineated by establishing its tow and top and measured by averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of vertical relief. Section 3. Section 20.15B.120(B) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby repealed. Sections 20.15B. 120(C), (D), (E) and (F) are hereby renumbered as Sections 20.15B.120(B), (C), (D) and (E) of the Edmonds Community Development Code, respectively. 20.15B. 120(A) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby repealed and replaced with the following: A. Buffers. Buffers for geologically hazardous areas shall be 50 feet in width, they shall be maintained with their native vegetation, and where appropriate, be placed within the Critical Areas tract. This fifty foot buffer requirement may be reduced to ten feet by the Director or his /her designee upon the review of a Critical Area study prepared pursuant to Section 20.15B. 150(A) of the Edmonds Community Development Code by a licensed geologist or geotechnical engineer which clearly demonstrates that the proposed buffer alteration will have no adverse impact upon the site, the public or any private party. "Adverse impact" shall include but not be limited to a decrease in site stability as defined by Chapter 19.05 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Such report shall be certified in a form suitable for filing with the Snohomish County Recorder and generally comply with the provisions of this Chapter as well as the geotechnical report requirements of Chapter 19.05 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Staff approval or disapproval of proposed buffer reductions shall be subject to appeal pursuant to the provisions of Section 20.105.010(A)(4). 93945.1 -4- Section 4. Section 20.105.010(A)(4) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby amended to provide for appeal and review of staff decisions under the provisions of Chapter 20.15B to read as follows: 20.105.010 APPEALABLE DECISIONS A. Staff Decisions. 4. Environmental (SEPA) decisions in accordance with the provisions of ECDC Chapter 20.15A as the same as exists or is hereafter amended and staff decisions made in accordance to the provisions of Chapter 20.15B to exempt any action from erosion, landslide hazards, steep slope or seismic activity buffering requirements. Section 5. 20.15B.120(D) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby repealed and replaced by the following: D. Landslide Hazard Areas. Landslide hazard areas located on slopes less than 40% shall only be approved to be altered if both of the following provisions are met: 1. The proposed development will not decrease slope stability on any adjacent property, and 2. The landslide hazard to the project and adjacent properties is eliminated or mitigated such that the proposed development on the site is certified as stable by a licensed professional geologist or geotechnical engineer. Any landslide hazard area and its buffer combined which are greater than one acre in size, shall be placed in a Critical Area tract for any proposed Master Plan Development, subdivision, 93945.1 -5- short- subdivision, or Planned Residential Development, pursuant to Section 20.15B.170. Where alterations are authorized City staff shall determine whether the remaining portion(s) of the landslide hazard area shall be placed within a Critical Area tract. Landslide areas located on slopes greater than 40 % shall be regulated pursuant to Section 20.15B. 10(E). Section 6. 20.15B. 120(E)(5) of the Edmonds Community Development Code is hereby repealed and replaced with the following: 5. Steep slopes of 40% or greater but with a vertical change of 20 feet or less may be exempted from the provisions of this Section based on City staff review of a report prepared by a licensed geologist or a geotechnical engineer which demonstrates that no adverse impacts will result from the proposed actions. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: _�! MAYOR, BARBARA / ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED : ITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE 93945.1 -6- APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY -- FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 03/01/96 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 03/06/96 PUBLISHED: 03/10/96 EFFECTIVE DATE: 03/15/96 ORDINANCE NO. 3074 93945.1 -7- 02/29/96 THU 16:42 FAX 206 447 0215 "01W SEATTLE 85!1 ?/1995 04.03 :067710266 CITY CLERK la 012 PAGE 02 q/ /,t EXHIBIT "A" n VP . Grow, lci, i Sullivan Klegcia! 2s, 1990 2tttvadu d tterlsh .� AIM — rx ead lFO. 9614 2 ' �twtcs seistd to tesinq� •ddinp and 3 � fA4 definitions and reTaitions for 4 &*wAitw lt s, 6 alaaeedinq the WW oodQ 4WA e �aavlaiba,t to tM sensitive areas 7 coda to voAlom mawwwAnt am prwidim for d4ari�fq�a Vokoino ordinar4s 1161, $eeticn lo: 1445S S*Qtjons 7, 4. 5, 4, T, 331 asditis� 1T 11, 10 ll SecC3o , Ordin aedlnanrw d s•cti i3 12 3199. (part).* osdinan: e31LOI "i6aG6, 0' S*&Aons Los, 0031 ordinanco 14 31664, 4059, $act1O"x 1, sl OrdLnAnce 4369, 640UAMw 1, al 44d1, Sactic 2S 090AN& W id 17 2, 3, as69, section 4: dedinar► I i25eI� Section 2t ce 4730, is Oi'dinnilCe 7990, Section 1!; Ordl.,Art SeCticts 29, and LAQltltion 22744, aoctiva 46993 19 20 &11 as saatidetill eed, X.C.C. 14.30..0203 14.44.010: 14.43.3101 1a.49.090t 16.a2.OL0f 14.92.0208 9L 22 16441.0401 14.52.0501 16.43.0661 1E.4i=.1301 33 20.243140! 21.04.1250, 4.3531 21.Ga•�753 i2.o4.!P46I •6.42ot 2s.e1e_ue: 24 as 31.04.935: 27.1 =.030; 95.04.050 .6.020; 15.30.0303 40.020: addd$ Paw 26 27 22.14.010: 25. =0. soctian■ to 1t.C.0 : 73.041 11.34 seen 37.12; 2! repo&,L g GtdlnaM Utl, SeCtig" 1, a, 1, 4, i, g�etiaab 2. 23 CYdiifie+Ct 29 s, 7, at ovdinan" =a, loss, sectia ms 11, .; or 3716. sections sa 31 section �aens 1. 2. 41 GVditeatrve aoe 43$S, •3. 4• !2 33 3952. SaCt1m1 1, 9 is, 10 `41 ardinnnom �ti�,s of y, 13, 11, 12, Satrti0ef 3l sAd 181 Ctdiraacs 5061., section - 74 sS 4442, 5.ctjon Ordinanoe 7990, Section 40. All 431 and. X.c_C. 21.34.445: 21.04.420r 21- i••qi� -4199 artd 36 37esCtlbit�q pssswllie�l. 35 34 u TRZ COal=tt+ W=ay rzseaa►TI to 1. migqqq County is 0"rienoitj rapid 9Zw0b, bet]h 'n its and in CrPOrataa WL" ate- rte* 41 43 clues aevolopWt or rsside�s, �sirwssaa, eboppit4 areal and the tlearinv a! land for and otbss sttoacur4s, for a3 Iodation otaati4#tolki Y'S as a ctjft the all 45 l6 natural 19 t• Tno" activities Mve bO- � Pot —ti>1 to cause axCenaive 47 idarrtiSi�d .sw eaa�►iIV &Grasse Latpaotis particularly on ou"in tMas of As 49 and savirow"Ptal futures. 50 2, ta. ,anv "'Ontal f..Rtum idantified a taral 60, $1 e`ssine haza�rdiazsas• landplidd* hazard flaws. �,asa3N areas, vo14anie 53 selamLe haiard ars+s, tvaion l�asard .rais. *t**p slopes, lloodplains and strrass s4 ss sad vet:laeWs. ' Si 3. T!M sensitive Areas 0 &4 j"Mae „ill ispi�t tha ejcula Kin4 CMUtY ecs>perehaaaive 57 and p92toias of tha 1995 sa Plan. q/ /,t 02j29/96 THE 16:42 FAX 206 447 0215 •OMW SEATTLE CITY CLERK RAGE 6�/17�1995 84:83 2ge77i97�6 _- .:�.�-:►:•. .. r%96 1 4. Tlra 1"D WaahlnyCtln State L44121atusre 4gVcaved ENO 1 7979 {{1640 Wash- Iawe M which *&Mato& mat eartain 9 o-taties aced cities e thin those ood4tL*s addr"s the 4 psoteetiee of critical areas. Critical areas as s !armed in i" fsas aarrm2ats gaaeral2y 4ri'tA =0 icing 4 County definition& and eatagaries of ,sensitive ar■4*. 7 This Sensitive Areas Ordinance is desioned to acct the s challenges and satisfy the requirements of this act 9 vi%h regard to all critical arreas :xespt aquiror 10 --&& arq. at*ae' which vL11 r gvtro w elixf*W*n% 11 ryulatcry e�pCOach. 17 3. soquintian of the vss or senaltive areas benefits 14 VN.Cb WC4id bi badvaMiniaWactd OnvyrogartYctivibies 18 6. RWndoned ainiasg activities peas a hazard in certain . Id Uantitiod ar"o of Icing Cmxnty ao4 r g4ire specie! 17 cagaideration prior to devalbpasaat. 1e 7. MUM or building iri floadplains rodue4s tba flood 19 ataxaga capacity of a s<reas or river systee and 28 incewu ss flaodinq upst -raar any! peak Blow *seas 21 dowwt aaa. 22 e. bov*lops•nt in srvaion Davar4 acid landallde VAlard 23 24 a2en_m pr&"At a dangax C.a th& 4ay.lopta�t on tbM sits as i elgRhborinq sites aril natural msoaraes, 25 u+rl1 as and require. spadial design, eorattucctioa and sits 24 davalopsnt asaaar" to ninlmL%* risks' fl'Oa tie 21 hazazda. 24 9. Ic1hq ty is an sartxlquako prone relian scbjtct to 29 9TOWW ,s"Xiby, autwldance,l landslide 4nd 21quetaction 20 aad sp.c:al bulldinq design and canstuction aaasures 31 are 0acasaatry to nivinizo risk iron this hasazd. 32 io. same portions of ring c*Qnty have Atlea been identified 33 as bwLnq volcanic hazards associated wttft !P'. 34 IIaisiar. This hazard ro"Lros sins unique pvote4mion s9 for Cd1lla axperiencs ddurinj 4 iolcataeicc episode 37 it. DaveUgmtit on slop" 406 or greater eau result in 38 soil 4ramion and sedisantaLion. l,andsli4a, Ali a, 39 excess wateas �iatar runofc, destruction os will. 40 habitat, iii4L0ale4 costa Of btpiadln ales K Lnt UIM at roads and publia faoilitiea ap4 increaved geed for 42 eBftV@=W relief. aAd taracua opaYatiana_ *1 12. NoWaMe atbd streams are envireeawzWAlly sensitive and 44 .srva rpmecona swAu al pious w4 valltilea, vn1CZ are 45 Critical. Rata ranctiona in*Lu a vilslife -and 46 47 fisheries habitat vater gnasity grctsction, clout pt^otectian, sboralilns stabiiizatLes, stream flow, and 411 vvesnd "ter reohasge and alsmargre. In many 49 situatiocm thaws fonetiona caftnot is ad4gVataly SO replicated ar 2"Inced. si 29. The Xii1q Cmmty CoLwwil in enacting this ordinance his S7 relied an astansivs scisntLeLo A&ms rentatisa itnd 53 tastimay ceaeernirq these seasitive areas and the S4 appa"riate vd0odo and uschaniems for their 55 protection. This docum*nt.arclav is set "ic !cosec Cully 36 in &a staff reports to the King county erovth 57 Kamwa"At committee "etings, canoe ulaurly for tha 3s dateo of 7=4 26, 'uly 3 and july ia, x940 an3 in the 59 bihliegropby which was Glee prepared ter tta QaunalV* 60 Corssideratiao, entitled ganaitiv. jLr a rl<nkv 61 eLnd date4 May 1990. IZ 013 as 02/29/96 THU 16:43 FAX 206 447 0215 05/17/1995 04 :03 2067710766 • 1 . 1 � f z� s dl E sl 4' to ', 12 13 id �2g 16 17 is 1! 22 21 ZZ 23 24 25 26 27 1i 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 is 37 3s �q 40 41 OMW SEMI tLE la 0 ;4 CITY CLERK PAGE Od 961 14. the pis =or pUblu rovJA* &hd COW*"t an tats cZ#ArNaas bas b,,a extaaaiw and axhs+sstLVvO '01e ordiasanos Mao Umnasaitted to the. ceunail by Ole txMxtfva to !larch of 1999, oM vas all-ujoct t4 two fotaal p*11c hotting* in 1909, 1 public a46tINE hiid in tbo CCU W ty in 1990. in c®ittea a:st3tW• 41992 a fibsl publle l�ear3t� in axgeset of 14!0. Zits asdinanos vso rOd4.4tlted several c3 in rd*p°a1e to the aa#Asnsive tssaisony before TZe KiM Cavaty COUncit sr�Q eha Growth• tiava4emei°t t,, , itted- xs. Yt is the logislatiTi jt4gnent of the KiW County emnzil tit tho atand4rdatvat utIn this ar imnce are am Minims nlecs=KrY --po :m of the ordinanos. BE IT Op=n= wi T" cOUNCIL OF KM COUNTY: X. gVR1�pCO3 Sc�oPi, rrrsafL PROVISrONS QH� Ordinance 1327. 5sctions 1 throWh sa OvAk""a Z$24, sections 1, Is ardiaan!�r 22&S, s.eticna 11, 12: Ordinance 3714, SeatiOU 1, 2, 41 ardinnnbe 3762, Scction li o> dir.a•aras 3292, savalono 2 etisaysz► s..ordirmnc& 4345. Sectior►s a the =4: Ot=inAsvaa 4462, SfCtion 356 Oidiran a 5062, ieatian 31 CWdinanoe Tfso. "C:tians 40 kh"ngb 43t WA K.c.c. 23.04.413, X.C.C. 21.44.420 and I.C.C. 21.34.016 thr.O"ft 11.54.190 ales 04cb 2L&r4bY Yopoaled. trt� sL�rzeM_ '4?_ Share is h&reby added to X,C.C• 21.54 r nsy :action TO re" a■ s oiiwe: purpaee. The gasposs Of this ordimame is to 10antity eavlsenS4ta3Lly Knsitiva areas and to Suppleamt 'the deVelopsent X"KPii4Mnts Cvt►'tained in the various use alassilioati■a+ in t:bo XSatq +0�mnje ► Code by providim for additional eoatrOts vithosit vielarinq any eitiiteri'* asnotituti -cmd wighta. Coal Rim, *g*sLon, flood, landslide, seibaic, steep sAapa and voleanlc tW*4trd arse■, and etwoMM. valland' rind pCotaativa lftstters, 1 as dafLneA in Z;.C.c. Title 21, constitute ■rerirorts xtal3Y e■rcaa.itiw areas fetal: era of .P—W. eoycar"e to xia�q C+ritnty- Ittw tt&rdasds and ■achsnisss establish in this ordia ■roe me intended to pr'etrat that* wavirenwontally sensitive leaeuree in PA9 cwnzy. or rrgulatir.q ci *valvptieait and ;itaratiaese v*"itiv+ ar¢ae this orditur"ca ssslcs ta. swrot*s.CC • .Wr4+•4 r. five -3- ( „2/20/06 THU 16:44 PAX 206 447 0216 omw SEATTLE (it i)is 25/17/1995 04:23 2067717266 C17Y CLFRK PAS 05 EXHIBIT "B” VSM pAM R2 CI'T'Y OF =MOMS RCMWM C'It>t'I'YCAL b,RMS t RMITANCE nis rssue pVer provides all overview of the fits: draft (f AUM 2. 1992) of tile, Edmonds Inwim Critical Arms OrdL%� (ea)- Zee ovcmcw is intruded t+o provide insight W some oP the Y issues whbin ft CAOO and to point out whcrer true drr dti%ts slightly from the guidatsee providOd within tide GM A. Nom sitar this Isere papa is rfie2At a$ a very quick overview of some O: Wuestdiffemerdde ails provided in this dealt. It is not intardt:d as a dCUROd aiscass On to iliumimte the ratiozrsdle of langwge Of "Ces within this draft, but mare✓ to provide a quick in4& into wit is cortWnod withun the drA CAO. The Draft CAO 'Covers all the Critical AatatS In the Cdty of Tdmooft- the proposed language may be moot resMktavc than SOMC of ft crcistint t'eVjhdotlS and/or goUdes now in place. at the City- Time prVosad draft =eadpa to sddx% di the, CrWcal Antos in Me pace and in a way thnt is c0n6stt t with odor swh rcgdxfi= in tt d. ThIs f M draft CAO is modelod ma the foiloWurLo° gkdapW or draft ordiaa : Xing County Sensitive Areas Ordinate #%14 lio Snohomish emnty Aquatic Besot= PMtc=On Fwd Po City of North Bend Drift Wethind Orrdinw= City of Snaqualnoie Sensitive Areas Ordi"nos City of W' rWow''s Draft )E nviraumcatally Sensitive Areas 1. Brief Sumtmary of the Ordittanoe section 1: "a lrindiaga: the 8 and objectives are outlined: Secdon 2: de witions are provided; Section 3: d%*ibes WtM 1'110 re�Sation is applicalsie and ; Section 4.: outlines aei= or activities which we exempt frflrn the orz#itd dr Section S: provides a sogvaaee of actions whi& bosh an apPhcant artd by staff are required to ProcMd through; See60n b: requires a pfe.applicatiou me+clitg between staff and the applicants und=zwA the: iatiplications of the'Nukements of the chapter befog nmldn,Z a permit tWlicatian; Section 7: ptovideS the Cie -%df1 &tion of tiro critical a-rras as is required by the GMA; Section g; activities which are =gutat d arc dct�ed; sa&ion 9: outlines general standards or conditions of development WMcb wilt be cpplicable w every critical 3M; I 02/22/96 THU 16:44 FAT 206 447 021S 05/17/2995 64:63 28677M266 OMW SEATTLE C,TV CLERK PACEf 06 Sottiost 10: provides d=IW oonditioas of dCYCIdpnaent fvr flood zones; Secdw 11:' provides debUad aondldons of devdWU=t far goologx hmrds; $exist 12: ptovides M40d 00nd:tsons of development for streams; Section !3: provides detuW (*editions of tt pme nt for wetlands; S e ion 14: pt+avw, detailed conditions of &-yrJ pt mt for wildlife habitats; Soe ion 1S: i,dquirements for de=Uad sidles, timing, � crosultants; Sidon 18: �q+,dtocne rats for mit'aggtian, timing, aM wqumIdrZ; Sectiost 17: autwi y to muim critical area t -acts; and Sdc em i8: genial adadnikM6a6+ aPPCWS, vgtiances" eta. Stafl shmId Iook at the derma fM far "developtttent proposal" and make S= all. the appiic .W4, permits ftt�m 'the Cjty are listed_ 'Phis is ft list of tk ddelopmentIP it alrplication prate which will "taiga" tM *ffyI=mIt2J= of ttse CAO_ 3. How Otis CAO Ekafi Diffm from tht GMA Gex4eral Gutdrlines: a, Ad&ti*nW deAAWons tm a bees pmvidetd on multiple specific topics including, but not liWted to: best UWM&CnMt pmcdeas; a ooffipei+ory .—don; a entml tetras: his been da*tged to toatze Sara= and trnvw WfiAxxiczo fit m file am kko frcd in the GMA as: Hell and wildlife habitat conservadon apaoificzit}' include pologicaliy It=rdous areas has l� cxpwAead too caeca ex4Si4M haz W* SdZmie harand, landslide bazrd, and 35XP sksPai • quaf led Ct Cod &M • tGacra ion; s WIM of local importance; • =rfm= wam design inanual; and • WCdwids tanCdom. b_ Rather' tW just classifying and desig aat mg critical arcs, this draft goes the next ste.p d �t�Y language for file eifecdvc implesue m6on of land Ib=foms ths draft e rextsiodom adjaoet to nd witn edue arem- anguag incladm rcoornrnatdatiens fot bafffts, minirs>tun for when alteration of T=u= salt as MrCams or wcd#ntda will bo o iowcd, and WE= Ompemfim will bC Tcquimd if alwwn to cermin capital arias is authorized. C. F'>she e= hgs bells removed front the. catch-all phaw of '.fish aW wildlife habitat aonwvadan areas". Instead, st mms have beers rleady called out and added to the list of cdOx l arms, and dwvefbfG fisherics issues ale addrene d under sire "IS WW wexlauds Haden. d. Vildlife tiabitat conservation areas, therefore, deal only with trnlad habitat gr=, as non - upland habitat is addressed uradcs WeUands and streams (riparian zones). a Ole 02/29!96 THti 16:45 FAX 206 447 0215 05117!1995 04:03 2067710266 OMW SEATTLE Clry CLOZ< PAGE 07 t. V�itdlife habitat am vadon VW are subdjvidod into cxidW habitats: those for t etidast, et-- awes and w1m,d&; andst Wtats: habitats for species of local *"== == airh as cnigmtory waterfowl. 4, Naturd i rce Ams h e bem Mnoved cntirdy from the Dtaft as it %ut determined that the City does rat have any tends, nor do you intend to annex any lands, whioh would qualify for that designidea. - 5. Aquifer Rmharge Ar*M lave bears removed from the list of Cidczl. Are U 35 the City does not get any potable water from aquifers, rtae err there asty Imown aquifers within the city's pbDril s em- 6. �M V H=1T- QQu.5.Ar18S- Detailed c and sM dA for ti�sse areas has boc.� t*M out of the Icing Coonty SAO as the starciards and conditions wem provided in more detail and arty to pcvvitde direction for staff and applicants dike. 7. c:<„ r,.Lt The CAC? has bier:► sets to Pe,nrride an much guidaitce as feasible within the oi'armaae format. Xou'll r�atc that tjX= is a aequenmS soctic,n {5.0.4) xnd trie ingttitetnettt for a Pea- applicatux� muting bemlecu the aFP�t and Citx staff. 'this requirft the City to Sit wish an applieat and explain the deters of ttlC t..AO In relation to the sKrI nts pmposat prior to the aWlimret wbraitft detailed Plots. 8. Adrd'�e Rules. The CAO gents the «ty the authority to draf! Adnrinistrati•►e Mules to provide furgw deWls and direction for staff and applicants regarding the implemeMadcd of"otdbmncc. The Rules prOvide a format fOr details and specifics wh,ch ue Wo deW-W to be appWpn�ft VAthin an OWWX= fit, but wtliCh Can De arousal to surfs aced applicaants to �Y &A the ordinUM in a emsistetrt and dirtact,°tl Mannar. The Adininest a Rules will contain C._.ritiml Atm studies contents requireaMM, mitlgadon plan c Wt=ts, and procedural directl*AS for ttaff. g. �. Suggested buffer dimensions etc prnvidod for strums and geologically h=rdous aims. Until fuither deter are poovidai for habitat arms, buffers Itaw not bcon dmfrod. 10. Wi life ]iAbita This aria is the most ambiguous of alt the critical for deveto t. is far lam cWlonging. staff arras, tharf'or�e catablisli'ugg std I� � ulam �� arms, will neod to d'ss+c M the gaals and intent of the City in attennpt� and ptovide soma p4anc a for proposed reStrecdonS if MY- of t. This CAt� eef>rx s the X nS County �'�e 1�� fig state of the art drainage engineering sgocifkations. Staff Should dtxxmift wl,Othei dW rafe=c`e is appropriate. 12. The staff should look at Section 9.6.4 teprding Density Credits and deteminc if the City wants to conslacr this 009n, and whWw it belongs in the CAa or in the Zoning code. 3 lanKw7 2, IM EM 02/29/96 THU 16:45 FAI 206 447 0215 -OMW SEATTLE ,65/17/1995 04:03 206771826.6 CITY 'ARK Critical Areag Ordha m PAGE 08 �l %ues Sun=ary Prom staff mykw and tesantoay px+ovidcd during die &A M 80 oe the ord!Aa we have summaiizod th4 following Major issue for disa113icll: The term "Ad*W" $2.t).0 This Gam is defined a$ "widit 5W fact of a Critical Area' ItA term is Owd to de&4 within what An= the ttaff may apply this oMnx= 1�stat Is a diss=m thraahhrld apPmp'ate? if so, is 500 feet the appcop;ate distattbe. Buffers find Bucilditag SdibaMs 69.1.0119.2.0 • Buffers sm sea in tite atdba= fee diffea mt critical areas: $12.2.0 GoologimUy hazardous arw 50 fact $13.7.0 Sums 101 25, and 50 feet 414.3.0 Wedastds 50.100 and 150 feet • Build& 5etbacb lire 15 fea ( §9.10) and am in addidm to the Muirad buffer. Issues: 1s the buffer siw dale? is the building setbuk appropriate? rwMity Credits . • A stilling s of &ensity credits for un&- Vrlapod land is'OdUdW in the draft ,Oeu uWxe. Mw section alk"s for the transfer of density within a sU (m a AW ttg awls, with the additioW provWOA that single family tot si= my be redhead below the minimum for dilt Mnc to accommodate die transfer (similar to a PRD). • Issue: Ts iectar-W density on the dmlooped portion of the site zwq tahie to the communitj or noo=ary to allow reLu)=hle usz � the praptettyl Is the surfing scale in the draft too much of a credit? Consultant Sdectlao & Review §15.4.0. §13.5.0 Similar to SEPA and Meadowdale Mvkws, tfiese seattans sIlow the City to approve av4 parddpatc in the coasultemt golly of s prejaet site- Lte: What is the best way to assure the accm=y and objectivity of conswwt studies? cols SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 3074 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 6th day of March , 199 6 , the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 3074 A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, MAKING LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING A PUBLIC HEARING AND THE ENACTMENT AND REENACTMENT OF THE EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 20.15B OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF SAID CHAPTER, AND EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20.15B.120 THEREOF TO REPLACE CURRENTLY PERMITTED ALTERATIONS TO GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREA BUFFER REQUIREMENTS WITH STAFF REDUCTIONS TO TEN FEET IF JUSTIFIED BY A GEOLOGICAL REPORT, AMENDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE 20.150.010 TO PROVIDE FOR APPEAL OF STAFF DECISIONS ON BUFFER REDUCTIONS, AMENDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20.15B.070(A)(3)(c) TO CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF A STEEP SLOPE HAZARD AREA FROM A 30% SLOPE TO A 40% SLOPE, AMENDING EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTIONS 20.15B.120(D) AND 20.15B. 120(E)(5) TO ACCOMMODATE CHANGES IN THE DEFINITION OF STEEP SLOPE HAZARD AREAS AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 7th day of March , 1996. .P ige W. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF SNOHOD&ISH, SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 3074 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 61h day of March, 1996 the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance tdo. 3074. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 7th day of March 1996. SANDhA S. CHASE, City Clerk Published: March 10,.1996. B -2 -1 ss. Affidavit of Publication RECEIVED MAR 14 ft EDMONDS CITY CLEW. The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Clerk of THE HERALD, a daily newspaper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of Snohomish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County and that the notice ......... ............................... Summary of Ordinance No. 3074 ................... ........... ................ . . .. ..................... .......................... . . . .. ........................ . . . . .. a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in. said newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: March 10, 1996 • .....................................................................................•--.............. ..........----- •-- •----- ....... ................. . . . . .. and that sai during " ...... ....................................... •-------- ....--- ........ - -• -- ............................. ewsuaner was reEularlvl dstributed to its subscribers Clerk 12th Subscribed and sworn to before me this........ day o .....:.."Evenoh ............... - --- --........., 19....9.6 i •... ......... . .... ...... ... ..ota for the tat residSnoho sh ounty. a r -1 `1 �4C)T AR ), 5 -19 -98 � � WA����