The URL can be used to link to this page

2017-01-18 Economic Development Commission PacketOr E1)Alo I89a AGENDA Edmonds Economic Development Commission Edmonds City Hall Brackett Meeting Room, 121 5 h Ave N Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6-8PM 6:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Agenda (2.5 minutes) 3. Approval of December 14, 2016 Meeting Summary (2.5 minutes) 4. Audience Comments (5 minutes) 5. Presentation — 5-Corners Planning, Rob Chave, Planning Mgr (30 minutes) 6. Subgroup Reports: a. Highway 99 (30 minutes) b. Signs (15 minutes) c. Parking (5 minutes) 7. Old Business: a. Solidify Future Priorities (10 minutes) Motion to create 5-Corners Subgroup and appoint subgroup members. 8. New Business 9. Roundtable Discussion (Council, Commissioners, City, Liaisons) (15 minutes) 10. Ideas for February Agenda (5 minutes) 11. Adjourn Next regular meeting: February 15, 2017, 6 PM DRAFT CITY OF EDMONDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION December 14, 2016 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Jamie Reece Darrol Haug Matthew Waldron Mary Monroe left meeting at 7:00 Stephen Clifton left meeting at 6:30 George Bennett Greg Urban, Edmonds Chamber, ex officio Neil Tibbott, Councilmember, ex officio COMMISSIONERS ABSENT Michael Schindler Nicole Hughes Aseem Prakash Nathan Monroe, Planning Board, ex officio Bruce Faires, Port Commissioner, ex-officio STAFF PRESENT Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Cindi Cruz, Program Coordinator 1. Economic Development Commission meeting called to order at 6:01 p.m. 2. Approval of Agenda. Approved as submitted. 3. Approval of 11/16/16 EDC Minutes: Mary moved to approve minutes as written, Stephen seconded; motion passed. 4. Audience Comments No comments. 5. Subgroup Reports: a. Civic Field The proposed project will go to council for approval after first of year, the remaining few issues that were raised at the last meeting will be incorporated or resolved. Will let the commission know if there are any significant changes; otherwise the plan should go for approval. Stephen moved to temporarily suspend the Civic Field sub -group; George seconded: motion passed. b. Downtown parking. Darrol discussed the residential permits that are issued over the counter on a regular basis. There is no way to know how many are actually used. Patrick, Chief Compaan, Shane Hope, Pam Stuller, Darrol, and Phil Williams are part of an interdepartmental, City parking team formed to discuss solutions to City/downtown parking issues. There are currently two staff for enforcement— 30/70 split for parking/animal control — one position is filled, they are working on filling other position, and Council has approved in the budget a half time enforcement staff person starting in 2017. Currently Debbie Dawson has been working 20 hours a week and issuing 15 tickets a day but that number is coming down as there appears to be more compliance. Tick marks could be added to existing on -street parking to designate the parking spaces more specifically to encourage more efficient parking. Will review and make recommendations. Question raised about the parking lot on 4`h. The property has been sold by auction as of last week. There are 24 spaces — 14 are leased out monthly and other 10 are 3 hour limit spaces. Could it be opened up to more than just monthly spaces? Issues coming out of parking team: new enforcement and/or softer version of enforcement, research residential parking and employee parking zones. Within 1st quarter go back to Council on these first four issues and present recommendations. In addition, recommendations on good neighbor parking program could be a BID project to help owners of private parking lots provide off -hour parking to the public. Signage Draft Meeting Summary Economic Development Commission December 14, 2016 Page 1 DRAFT is critical to indicate where parking is located. Value of space is a topic of discussion with interdepartmental parking group. Darrol moved to temporarily suspend the parking subgroup until needed further, Mary seconded, motion passed. c. Highway 99: Mary and Stephen will be going to Planning Board hearing tonight. Mary quoted some statistics from report. Stephen suggested that Mary could report on behalf of EDC and provide input. The EDC will be providing input in the future after reviewing report and any outcome from tonight's Planning Board meeting. Schedule sub -group to meet first part of the year and meet after the Planning Board provides recommendation as a result of the hearings and will provide additional comments from EDC to Council regarding Highway 99 project. Darrol moved to authorize Mary Monroe to speak for the commission, Stephen seconded, motion passed. d. Future Priorities (memo attached). George discussed conference call that he participated in with sub -group and which future topics could be worked on and which should be moved to the backburner. Areas/districts to review: Firdale, 5-Corners, and International District. What can enhance development opportunities, downtown development regulations for hotel and/or 3-story, mixed -use development? Height limits in different zones could be a discussion item for the future and what could entice development within existing height limits. Old studies should be updated regarding height and economics. Education sessions on different regulations and subjects that are difficult to understand such as GMA,. Port of Edmonds role in economic development for the City, etc., should be scheduled for up to 45 minutes. Could height discussion be more effective if it is geared to what it means to the City regarding revenue and economic impacts?. Suggested that 5-Corners be the first educational subject and use it in relation to the zoning limits regarding height. Darrol moved to review 5-Corners as the first educational opportunity, George seconded, motion passed. Request that planning department come and give an update on the 5- Corners project in January, 2017. 6. Old Business: a. Sign Code: City Council passed a suspension of enforcement at the end of November for 120 days, this suspension will be up in March. There probably won't be much happening until next year. Edmonds Downtown Alliance is very interested in outcome and what will happen. Right-of- way signage is an issue for A -boards and enforcement. Directional signage would be optimum for businesses on side streets. George read comments from BID: Is A -board signage really a problem? Mary moved that there should be a sign sub -group, Matt seconded, discussion EDC can bring a slightly different slant to the discussion of sign code. Motion passed. Mary, Jamie, Matt, Greg have volunteered for sub -group. Patrick will convene a meeting. 7. New Business: none 8. Roundtable Discussion (Council, Commissioners, City, Liaisons): Mary encouraged rest of commission to review Highway 99 recommendations. 9. Ideas for January Agenda 10. Adjourn: Meeting adjourned at 7 p.m. due to loss of quorum. Next regular meeting: January 18, 2017, 6 PM Draft Minutes Economic Development Commission December 14, 2016 Page 2 DRAFT MEMORANDUM ,11c. 189v TO: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FROM: GEORGE BENNETT, STEPHEN CLIFTON, DARROL HAUG & NICOLE HUGHES SUBJECT: PROPOSED NEXT WORK ITEMS FOR EDC DATE: DECEMBER 6, 2016 At the November EDC meeting a subgroup was established to convene and discuss next work items for the full EDC to take up. The subgroup met on 11/22/16 and studied the priorities established by the EDC earlier this year, proposing the following: Continuing Education As a way of providing a continuing source of education, familiarization, etc., to members on important topics, the group recommends that presentations, updates, and other forms of "continuing education" be made at each/most EDC meetings moving forward, possibly starting at the next available meeting with a primer on GMA and its status. After that we could hear from the Port about its role in economic development and its plans, etc. (probably hold off until things settle on the SMP issues). Another topic would be to have a presentation about the development regulations in different districts. Possible Subgroup Topics After reviewing the short-term (urgent and non -urgent) and long-term (urgent and non -urgent) priorities offered by the full EDC earlier this year, the group recommends that the following topics be considered for subgroups moving forward: Five Corners planning and development. This may include a study of the current development standards and how they might be discouraging appropriate redevelopment. Identify and study redevelopment sites. Instead of the 50 sites suggested in the EDC's original memo, the thought was to identify two or three key sites in one or two commercial districts, study them and identify what the potential is and barriers are to redevelopment, reporting back after each study, and then move onto another area(s) and two or three sites. Downtown development regulations that might be barriers to redevelopment, especially for a hotel and/or for 3-story, mixed -use development. The EDC memo offered the issue of the ground -floor retail requirements perhaps needing another study and reconsideration at this point (especially the 15' required ground -floor ceiling height). Draft Minutes Economic Development Commission December 14, 2016 Page 3 EDMONDS HIGHWAY99 Highway 99 Subarea Planning Project Edmonds, WA November 10, 2016 Agenda 1. Overview of Highway 99 Subarea Planning project 2. Review Plan Outline 3. Present Implementation Strategies, Policy Recommendations 4. Present Transportation Infrastructure Recommendations 5. Questions 6. Wrap-up and next steps EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY r'pr • � I x3 �� I� r r,4k 1 i*�r�,� �� } .� rrl!�y.myy•�4•. •. `'�� ram. r-� 'd1� •�. � av - _ 5- ti . •r. FREGONESE _ SWIOREWNE ;Q-)T1 3r u.u. u W :1 C aF l, Distinct Subdistricts Ed �� n 1H �',V IFk-. ).,LTH N d ".5T- 7T 5W High School -L SIN I�A 0 Major local and IIE-M Kr Sv Hospital regional destinations on Hwy 99 winCo Foods s • International District :��-H S7 Z-4 r F. Diverse restaurants-L r,, grocers and shops; major Korean rn Tree PluPlaza business cluster r U1 • 99 FMI 0 T Hark, �e Health District to -age 8 0 Man Swedish Hospital and airkL)l medical offices r, B 1004 • Gateway District kL2 EJ — Identified by the T. ST community during workshop — Desire for "gateway" L, and distinct transition point in and out of AufOFA Edmonds aAetplace r 4 f"Wqft EDMONDSO HIGHWAY 19 Health District International District Gateway.' D Mall istrict -1 4% Urban Form "Heat Map" • 3 spots with reasonably good urban form — Crossings — Transit service — Block size — Employment activity • Zoning changes to enhance these nodes further • New connections to improve the "in between areas" EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY EDWCh n wJJ��lly C,d hfJS Esri. HERE. Deionne. :':ap.-n .r con,,1butors. ana the user ci: Ma pm}India. +� per treetkla.p us=_r nommLnity Urban Form —mw-- High: 10 Low : 0.6 Long Segments Without Crossings • Central area requires 10 minute walk to find safe crossing • Green-1 minute • Yellow —10minutes • Red — 20 minutes -'I% —Z� qft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY ECk'Ch:3 � wo�r�uV i 3�4 EOIEH `�WxCS C,dhPJS ff Esri, HERE. De,_onne, co n,.d>utors. a 7i- the G Me r noIndi144 ti u5�r comr- �'n� 212th 22oth 228th Lighted Crossings March 2016 Public Workshop ® Identified opportunities for new housing and business, community centers and services, and infrastructure upgrades ® What did the public want? 1 « y .§§*W yy . EDMONDS�� HIGHWAY ` .e �w_�� Housing Development • Widespread desire for housing • Particularly in south —jL14.Nqft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY I � 212th 220th i �J I 228th T J Mo t� D-Lormp, IW-'REMENT P. NGA. Usa ig FREGONESE Mixed Use Development • Widespread desire for • Particularly in south and central —jL14.Nqft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY 212th 220th - 228th ir I 1 r. 1 ,� NfthD-Lorme. IN'F2EM1 NT P. NGA. USGS Pedestrian Crossing • More mid -block crossings throughout _jL14.Nqft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY New Crossing at 228th — Now Open 212th I I R I ° 22oth 228th r I 1 — I— Health ! . Center I I r J � . r UfthUeLorme. IT P. NGA. USGS FREGONESE Community Values Connectivity Destinations Beautification ea o, �0V Safety EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Walkability O) 1 Affordable Housing Healthy Businesses FF E o 1E E A 5 5 0 C; I A T [ S Draft Plan Outline 1. Introduction 2. Community Values 3. Background and Existing Conditions 4. Public Engagement and Process 5. Constraints & Challenges 6. Alternative Scenarios 7. Planned Action EIS Overview 8. Implementation Strategies, Policy Recommendations & Actions 9. Appendix EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY PFMFREOEE Imo-■ A 5 5 0 C; I AT [ S Draft Implementation Strategies, Policy Recommendations & Actions 1. Zoning and Development Recommendations 2. Affordable Housing Recommendations 3. Signage and Wayfinding Recommendations 4. Transit Recommendations 5. Transportation Infrastructure Recommendations EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FREoEE I�-■ AS SOC I AT IS Draft Zoning and Development Recommendations • Comprehensive Map modifications to identify districts • Consolidate CG-1 and CG-2 into a single CG Zone • Modify current design standards • Transit supportive parking standards Focus Areas along the Corridor tWs.. 1'cln lr�::46 arrc halrarmd Mlle .e� HwFi+l ti�n,ntYy �_ y.l�ur'�Jul}inxulii�Jn:e.:� wylwn!•lfr/a' - rxridcr Gxhamoflhexa�eAo- rww.r nili u >ua �•>4,n xid ��QX �I'fK. df:Se S,L6d ]4�=LIii4i:fu uiC i�:i:i fG wC u ��.rluamn� rani �i��rw�lrr Fin the nayh l0'_,4 �Ih'nv -Ah ,wiau'L•s+,W .rr ode OF fnllo- h.A 0.u: • 71c Hwpiml CDibmAdEn ON k—lly • ':r "I MrdUh,—E bislri:l' x H{lall{'fml Ff�uMtL�.I•w t�•i�` [I IN14'! YRYL• • __.. {3ni Sri ti31 1l i4,vL) rmMr.' 1101 N1 3i�el ___-Q0.nrrOVC4 3111yl 0,t 614. 41. Qi•1�Mh`$,P0.i LS/C,G.} 24, S' "6mowl J6Lz -'I% —Z� qft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY iPMkIrN . �le�x�axt �Y•x.mrcwiN •.fir ;Q-)T1 3r u. 4dC� Ili C W aF l, Distinct Subdistricts Ed �� n 1H �',V�;.�i.IF k-. ).,LTH N d ".5T- 7T 5W High School -L SIN • Health District I� 11E-TH KT Sv A Hospital — Swedish Hospital and medical offices winC Foods o s • International :r�-H S7 Z-4 r -L F.r, District Diverse Plum Tree resta u ra nts, Plaza r 9i grocers and shops; ul I9 Ma U!13 1 k12 Mark, �t Z MI -3!!alu major Korean-7, 8 0 Man airkL)l • Gateway District B 1004 — Identified by the )EIdD community during workshop — Desire for r gateway" and L,- +; + Health District International District H L. transition point in and out of AufOFA arwtplace Edmonds r 4 EDMONDSO HIGHWAY 19 Gateway District Mall 4% 224th M sw 1 Ir 212th St SW 1 � Proposed --,°� � .1+_� Health District Update to41 -_ 2.2cgh St swl . �. Comp Plan 1 - - -. Designations 224th st SW .. �. 1 International District 22;Rt h S# SW x i 234th C,L SW i 232n<1 St SW 234tF75tiSri'■— � 236th St SW 1 3 2uth St 5Y.' 1 Gateway 4 rt District 2400h Sk SW 1 = ` Maj onspwtabon 242nd5t8+N 40 40r�``! `_ Gakewav� EDM' • 1 4 0.1 132 4 ON DJ I .4 Miles 1R t7 244thSt SW1�`� ' I I N HIGHWAY19 ---__�_�� Draft Zoning and Development Recommendations • Comprehensive Map modifications to identify districts • Consolidate CG-1 and CG-2 into a single CG Zone • Modify current design standards • Transit supportive parking standards EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Consolidate CG1 and CG2 into a single CG Zone • The only difference between CG1 and CG2 is the height limit (CG1 = 60' and CG2 = 75') • The proposal is to use the height limit of CG2 at 75 feet • Many of the current zones are remnants from the counties antiquated zoning (Example: Neighborhood Business "BN" and Community Business "BC") • Many of the zones don't match with the parcel boundaries, so several have more than one zone • The proposal is to change these zones to the consolidated CG zone 4fj L kqft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Current Zoning Map 212-h 6t S1.1.1 Lh S. 'I'Al _J L-L-1 L — ` LU L.: ir r-0 Ir 01 Ath X h - -- W-f-k Ir 40th v�t Tj A_ 4mlLrLst;jw r1V HWY POZONING.- DUSTING cm. x ra cmm ,dmlz GG BN -hglgl'iO MadEusnG . PC - Ca munky P. hms RG2 - VL4111 Fsn F. SOX sq. k, FW-3 - -OjHi FaMI,.. a= eq. 41. RIV-2 4 - lJLHI R.WF. _"AW aq. fL Wd-1 D - Wili, sm he. I 5CO oq III ■ MLI Ika P Rimicuse Ike L amp.VAR ;. Proposed Zoning ..n�l Map R� ��., it 2201 i I 1:J i , I I II _ ! 1i r •aww ♦r oaf 1✓ LI li i ' r i r� err f7 i I•. -I 7_�'-'I �_. ALL+ i.-r� I xa•- TLH ��I l y'. r ,? •' I �111 "'S'��,' �k� �I F " Fnrr 99u ihG - Pao�osED . ''I �' •I 236M,�! — CGC�xiers� Conuiroxl x'A — 9H -Nclp. lwo] 9�s ncr. 7—JL i - ■ DC - Cbrrmunry b-mi� . w.:`a3tF�•,; ti• J _ T� _ RRS-hiJll%nmlj,8{{G sq.t }� FUA -S-S.43hMmh', �l{lY}eq.'I. LL � � FUA-1.5-LUli=aml�.lSMegfl 'r I � MU-rxdk:al {= r--ll Laf�g `T� �—----„----+}iJl Draft Zoning and Development Recommendations • Comprehensive Map modifications to identify districts • Consolidate CG-1 and CG-2 into a single CG Zone • Modify current design standards • Transit supportive parking standards EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Existing District -based Design Standards (Chapter 16.60) HWY 99 Corridor CG/CG2 — Criteria • Screening and Buffering — Parking lots — Type IV landscaping, minimum four feet wide, is required along all street frontages. • Access and Parking — Not more than 50 percent of total project parking spaces may be located between the building's front facade and the primary street. Parking lots may not be located on corner locations adjacent to public streets. EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FF E o 1E E I�-■ AS SOC I AT IS Pedestrian Activity Zone • Current requirement of Type IV Landscaping on all frontages — Minimum 4-foot landscaped front setback EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY ■ Pedestrian Activity Zone • Replace with required 10-foot Pedestrian Activity Zone — Allows for a range of active uses like sidewalk cafes and amenities such as public art, street furniture, street trees, bus shelters, pavement patterns, lighting, etc. r. *qft EDMONDSO HIGHWAY 19 Pe Proposed Expanded Sidewalk Width 4� fj L *qft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Recommended Design Standards for Urban Areas • Buildings on the Street Frontage — Primary Frontage —min. 50% of primary street frontage should have buildings within 10feet of front property line (at the edge of Pedestrian Activity Zone) — All Other Frontages — 50% of side and rear street frontages to have buildings, walls, or hedges at least 4 feet in height, within 10 ft of property line EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FEFREIOEE ASSOCIATIS Recommended Design Standards for Urban Areas • Ground Floor Transparency — 50% of Primary Frontage building fagade within 10 feet of frontage lot line be made of transparent windows and doors. All other building frontages require 30% transparency. TrA�paftt ground —level windows and doors -------- 10- ---- Recommended Design Standards for Urban Areas Parking comprises less than 40% of • Parking Predominately - __ street frontage on Side or Rear -------------- ---- :..�.. — Parking areas may comprise 40% or less of street frontage. — Better design than current standard: no more than 50% of total project parking spaces may be located between building's front fagade and the primary street 4 f"Wqft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY More parking in rear Bulk Plane Setback Regulation PM MEOW Ofpff dn_ � • __ar z_,_.�M@m_«_ tea, L , qft 4.N EDMONDS�� HIGHWAY e IT # ii liki FREOEE A 5 5 0 C; I A T [ S Stepback and Setback Changes • Purpose: • Ensure a transition in height and bulk between multifamily/mixed-use buildings in commercial zones and adjacent single family zones • While enabling more housing options to be built adjacent to Hwy 99 EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Rezoning these properties to CG/CG2 would require this type of design guideline to ensure proper transition into the single family neighborhoods Recommended Front Setback for Multifamily • Setback adjacent to Single Family Zones — Property line adjacent and/or across street • Reduce front setback to 5 foot and encourage enhanced pedestrian realm (ie- larger sidewalks, useable landscaping etc.) • 15' setback and dense 10' landscaping buffer is already required where commercial uses are adjacent to residential zones — no proposed change • Increase density allowances in multifamily zones around Hwy 99 4 f"Wqft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FEE OrEE I�-■ A S S .. I A T [ S Recommended Stepback/Setback Changes for Mixed -Use Buildings Adjacent to Single Family • Recommended beginning stepback only above 25 feet (current height allowance in RM-1.5) • Keep current setback and landscaping requirements for lot - line adjacency: 15' setback and dense 10' landscaping buffer is already required where commercial uses are adjacent to residential zones 4fJ L *qft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Recommended Front Setback and Stepback for CG adjacent to RM-1.5 EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FF E O NESE A S S C7 C; I A T [ S Draft Zoning and Development Recommendations • Comprehensive Map modifications to identify districts • Consolidate CG-1 and CG-2 into a single CG Zone • Modify current design standards • Transit supportive parking standards EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY IF1 FREoEE Imo-■ AS SOC I AT IS Recommended Parking Reductions • Transit supportive parking standards • Reduce minimums; follow market demand for parking — Residential • Current: Studio: 1.2 / 1-Bedroom: 1.5 / 2-Bedroom: 1.8 / 3-Bedroom: 2 • Recommended: Minimum average of 0.75 per unit for residential portion — Commercial • Current: 2.5 per 1,000 square feet (1 per 400 sq ft) • Recommended: 2 per 1,000 square feet — Exempt retail bays of 3,000 sq ft within mixed -use buildings that have a shared parking plan (parking study and management plan) • Reduces cost burden for small, local entrepreneurs • Staff decision on compliance 4 qft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FREOEE AS SOC I AT IS Draft Affordable Housing Recommendations • Multifamily Tax Abatement/Exemption Program —All residential -portion of building value tax exempt with 20% affordable units • Mixed -Use, Mixed -Income Demonstration Project —Identify site with willing owner or City purchase/transferrable option —Actively recruit developers (non-profit; public -private) —Cultivate a champion EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY PPMFREOEE Imo-■ A 5 5 0 C; I AT [ S Other Affordable Housing and Infrastructure Finance Recommendations • Potential Strategies — Community Renewal Area (CRA) — used in Shoreline — Hospital Benefit Zone (HBZ) Financing Program — Local Infrastructure Project Area (LIPA) Financing — Landscape Conservation and Local Improvement Program (LCLIP) — Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) — HUD HOME Program — HUD CDBG Program — Redevelopment and Affordable Housing City Fund —Affordable Housing Fee Waiver Program 4fJ L kqft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FREGO 1E E I�-■ ASSOCIATIS Draft Signage and Wayfinding Recommendations • Gateway Signage at Hwy 99/Hwy 104 interchange • Transit Gateway Signage/Station at Hwy 99/228th • Improve wayfinding signage along corridor — Identify downtown, Lake Ballinger, multiuse path (Interurban Trail), new regional rail, International District, Health District, other activity nodes • Unique District Design Identity — Branding, public/local art, street furniture, unique bus shelter designs, pavement patterns, special lighting fixtures, colored crosswalks, banners, etc. • Prohibit new pole signs 4fj L *qft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FFEo1EE AS SOC I AT IS Draft Transportation Recommendations • Improve Transit Transfers: —Unify/consolidate BRT and local transit stops to reduce walking distance for transfers • Hwy 99 and 228th will be Key Intersection —228th will connect Edmonds to regional rail in Mountlake Terrace. —Shuttle/transit service from Hwy 99 to regional rail station —Consolidated transit stop at 228th —New BRT station —Clear signage —High quality bike connection on 228th EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FF E ONESE I�-■ ASSOCIATIS Draft Transportation Recommendations • Incentivize Alternative Transportation Options: —Car Share/Bike Share —On-site bike parking —Ride sharing services (Uber, Lyft) —Electric car charging stations —Incentives: Impact fee reductions and parking requirement offsets for providing dedicated on -site parking stalls EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY r FREOEE I�-■ A 5 5 0 C; I A T [ S PROPOSED SHORT & LONG-TERM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS • Improve pedestrian safety and access to/from Hwy 99 corridor • Improve pedestrian environment along Hwy 99 corridor • Safe pedestrian crossing of Hwy 99 and access to transit • Improved transit mobility and transit stop environment • Improved traffic flow and general safety with access management EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FREoEE I�-■ ASSOCIATIS Draft Transportation Infrastructure Recommendations EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY SXX IMPROVEMENT INDEX NUMBER (REFER TO TABLE OF IMPROVEMENTS) EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AND PIED KING PROPOSED NEW TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ❑ INTERSECTION SAFETY&CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS I ■ ■ ■ 5 NEW BIKE ROUTE DESIGNATION MINIM NEW CLASS II BICYCLE LANES STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR PEDESTRIANS ACCESS MANAGEMENT (RAISED MEDIANS) s ra x STOP PEDESTRIAN HYBRID SIGNAL (HAWK) OX�Ek Draft Transportation Infrastructure Recommendations Sxx IMPROVEMENT INDEX NUMBER (REFER TOTABLE OF IIAPROVEMENT{�1 EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AND PED XING PROPOSID NEWTRAFFIC 5IGNAI AND PEDESTRIAN CRO55ING INTERSECTION SAFETY&CAPACITY ❑ IMPROVEMENTS ■ ■ ■ ■ 2 NEW RiKE ROUTE DESIGNATION MENEM NEW CLASS II BICYCLE LAN Fr. STREET IM PROVEM ENTS :::OR PEDESTRIANS ACCESS MANAGEMENT (RAISED MEDIANS) E NY V<* PEDESTRIAN HYBRID SIGNAL (HAVVK; -jL EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Sid 514: ■ a 1 � i 21 Y S['ee� ■ ■ W 22CN �tr.tl■ � 514: ro i SIUE47JLS SIGHf>}ISihN�V1iIBILITI, ■ ■ ABA, AND LIGHTIVMIR IMIEWS L" T w b10 2u,u13� v.■ r 7■I■■ �41 FSFaUv=4 9i1i■■■■ II■■■■1 ■ 1 ■ ■■■■■I■II■\■■■� ■ aSiTF IE � S92 �Si7 t NTERSU-10 nplmv gr ? r- kSAFETI'IMPR'J15AEMTS p I FEGREF4�E1'lIeG61S1s1 s . III EHHAKEEp L(,r,A 1, _y. TPANifiSrORif1, ��IYIEHS=.T ON [APAI7RYS S■fkTr E Ll7PdaVFAkEXT3-PEDSIFUG[ J; ' LpfLS'US{pYiTA4lOh;5f•� . -... IYILME-O4YLAPJJJI T�k VIt1Y 6TPhD7FASEhTS-P[aFITUG[ lSl ANpS;�.�.1, t Y SIGNAL OOOHLA YSn9N ISKI AUESSliAXdS[WENT{3 r■■ S10 ■ h[{C53MdHlGTA1FHT;3'+G:I 510 F-1■■■■I■E■N■I■I ■■■■■■NIFI■■ ■■t■■■■■ ■■� lir■■ ��■� SIOLWA._F'Su, UIiTAYLEYBIEIINn, AnOhl LIGIITIELGIMPAUMNUGS�33j 6WMTn5tAEEr ■ 2mm Stre im"HIMENP54S8i r ■ aLWUNrc}{}UH ■ SIME tpxhL?{nON r' MGXfeGIMFJR {$2 ,1.0€ESS FUFERORE FO3 URIL �4TLR Y 'j - y,,,,pp,,''PA' M2WH 133) IWPAoksLU[iLEIISSTBFi r µp.RLUIKPEOPSTRIIINFYNFIr'Mk- EO SERA EY{pM 4�1,31 dEdLTH�X1Et;33aj { � OX-561NGIROS ETWEERSMA �QMUXLTTHEALTH (EHTMIS2140 ■ w AMSS.YdNWWWfS261 i 6gdl sucr' HLWTPJFFK5UdL QMRREHf a - WHOFLELBPMENT677) ,qlA # t • a[{r�d W Ow;F48 MS25) ifnh V`r�nd- #u■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r + r - SIDMALKmHSI!RUCTIpNI SIGN# p6TANCEU5101LITti11M NALIGHiLRr■■■■■e■■■■a IYPR0kE4IErFr51 %-.3j 7T.h glc.k S13 St3 51P1WJUQH5TWA-IlUN.5IfHT ■■■ase ■■■■■■I■I■I■I■■■■ 1DWRYIE11316ILI?V. ADA ANDIIGHHNG �MPFk7kf,TTXISIB} {OMPLETESIFEET PkHrrE#OGfELgNOS{523j LYPRUISMFXTSf37j '_ ��A.[E49WapIGL�1ENI�S24) smkvuiF.31�IITdLS1dNE)E �xh�"as -� -- 'AS�W.RY,dpIIAHpiIGdTlhd Hlw;k'ASIIILI140gUl91fhLN I IASPFaITFh�XT515i} MiANIN6IGNAE00fISFdUREp �yy I' REGUXFIGUPESHIWUPFANDUFF4KIMPi15 TIFF nFFUW:tiE>19} C?TL'FUUMINTERSEETIONSTa ELLNINM LEHISiI MEO SUMMAND IMA47EFENSTpM ~' I U001CUESGFM(SM FROPOSEO SHORT-TERMTRAN5PORTATION IMPROVEMENTS 16 i < r 1 ■ i 212th street■ ■ ■■■■■■■■1■■i■i*IIEo■■1 i : i' r ■ IN i 216th Street i #, i * ' ■ E Sic S ■ IN ■ ■ ■ a IN i ■I ■ i ■ 0 M 220th StreetM ■ e ■ ■ S'1 4 ■ i SIDEWALK, SIGHT DISTANCE YIS!$ILIiY, ■ ADA, AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS (S2) IN ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ SIG 224th 5tree:: ■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■i■■■■!■■■ ■ r■■■■■■■■■■■■ram N 16 N ■ ■ ■ 15 Oil r � r — a fl■#■INN ate. ,' ■ 17 INTERSECTION (APAC ITY & SAF ETY IM PROVEM E NITS + PEO REFUGE ISLANDS j'o) ■■■OSE& ■■l ENHANCED LOCAL TRAN SITSTOPS (3 J —�v r 7 y 4-■ INTERSECTION CAPACITY&SAFETY I �Y IM PROVEMENTS + P ED RE F UGE ' r , ISLANDS ( 35) i SIDEWALK (ONSTR U CT I ON ('a1) NWT' INTERSECTION CAPACITY&SAFETY IMPROVEM4 NTS+ PEID NEFUGE ISLANDS ( ti 4) SIGNPVLCOURDINATION (536) ACCESS MANAGEMENT( 28) 10 A(CBSNIARAUMENT( 2) S'i 1 228th 5trtm CBMPLETE STREET IMPROVEMENTS ( ) 230th Sbe?kAt■ ■ CUMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ■ IMPROVE LOCAL BUS STOPS SERVING COMMUNITY HEALlHCENTtR(530) i r ■ ■i T>N■ ■ ■ " ■ ■ ■ SIDEWALK, SIGHT WSIAN(EVISIBILM, A-DA AND LIGHTING IMPROVEME915 (S3) ■ A BICYCLE CONNECTION ACCESS MANAGEMENT (S2 TO FUTURE REGIONAL ■ FAIL VIA 228TH (S 31 MID -BLACK PEDESTRIAN HYPR G ALIZED CROSSING BETWEEN BUS ST0 1E COMMUNITY HEALTH CENT ER(S21 l -`� ACCESS MANAGEMENT (S ) 0 234th Street- NEW TRAFFIC 5I6NAL CONCURRENT � i WITit DEVELOPMINT(S 2) 0 S14. ■ i ACCESS MANAGEM ENT {S 5) i 23-6th Street ■ _ 0 ■ ■ ■ i ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION, SIGH F DISTANCE VISIBILITY, ADA AND 1.160% ■ ■ ■ i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ .3. , --,► IMP ROVEIAE NIS (5) 238th Street CDMPLETE STREET _. , I✓~hPIROVEMENTS(S7) ti r 240t h St reet HIGH -VISIBILITY CROSSWALK MARKINGS ON RECONFIGURED SR104ONAND F � OFF• RAMPS (S 19) 244th Street D REFUGE ISLANDS () A(CESS. MANAG EMENT ( 4) SIDEWALK{ONSTRUCTION, SIGHT DISTANCE VISIBILITY,ADA AND LIGHTING IMPROVEMMENTS (S6) SIDEWALK, SIG H 7 DISTA N CE VISIBILITY, ADA AND LIGHTING IMPRDVEMEHTS(S1) RECONFIGURE SR 104 ON AND OFT -RAMPS AS (ONVE N 110 NA L. INIEB5ECIIO45TO ELIMINATE HIGH SPEED SLIP RAMPS AND IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN AND 810CLE SAFETY (S 4) PROPOSED SHORT-TERM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED SHORT & LONG-TERM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS 9 n SR 99 00RRIDOR SUBAREA PLAN - PROPOSED SHORT-TERM TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS wp Irrp.k Tya. Fb p.o..mwlL 11u1.x Soars. I11rrlxir' 1 B94MXTPEUESTRIMWElYAND ACCESBT01FROM9R39COFFA OR 31 P.3ihi.n4L,hi 6prw.a i,r,.iJx dWk.ua.mYil}.bwk.rd.Y.hl pgN.q on2.dhfrorr. W.aiilvp SkM li.l'.i lo- [d.1rM I/ nil iki CB.IrM1Ydi1 r6d, SII!rrasa 1wIr.p1wLks b Ew:] z fey JYhlllmlL h15drr WllllLW P.h.M_3.k Ill Fta 1.;"a".pn.or.amF.ul L1—,.NW S2 CiliilYlOn r.irYbahoodrikdirio 2211h.rr k ni,wwo akww wk— dk.., a...J [.allhw ipplwr#i1pT9N A. ra,dSR ft almnilw 1p'jtilirlliYG Yd M PAI:; s. Nia SR W lbl l"I sliirikrO O p M I IN 0lk3 W Iht SIYet. M-11 el Ittwrf..hepp.11.ip;r&c n nariri.nLhr L"a.ar k9W] lhr.ie N an :ar din ..pr.Fd.q 5391.31.N1W1tirc0diti,cth.I iurrin wr+wx.[Ien No-r Shorrh Gr mal E,In! 13 rvw IM1 !fci:i irif-0i11rr1 Fphdlporr Y'JY7rn411'JPf 'JInC IiVSMEL vain; Alpapi6;6dir671p4.9*311dWoINS:.wdprogigrlh9(gwlydailhlldro wo1k5" M9 1k*9tr-Ka14104MI"!% 1 Iht 511rtr)1.d I.rjyn r Nil prSMlAlie lai .A. bk'. NII..IxhYc.,rdW E"5:'.ulr[ bgprdbl.ra. rtlhy[Y.1.it r�rl .11 w¢., i.l" i11 l.lb...i wig d. i e. WCOY kW W."1I3:NrNNId0" W ehl. rn, Af'MIk50n Fr thSl o15R MAlhcugl Ihrn.lu.4 n.ztiv11•illmtc prdr.11u1 a idiri•d.l aJm&. 1r1}ir4 oXca&4d ih.IrNiI rA111GY„55 jJJWd0Fii✓fofdli WY ifl g"it. F? h91Nit$Siii IXN BI UN illr�iV iY9hy C571rlY pk 34Wli.11 i•]ffNili b,4 £R Fkdtailina+lrNtlr:lr k[a1 V17r I d Jt%,*.s h:h7 nSt E07�Rld arN71rldwdr'Jh Lno WON H 0" 01 WdvommT.dx Ij RRfr Z11. 11.un,Iln I rt: M, 91rN :,.ih ,nrN hwr'M hw wl[ rl.r b`a4 Fa Il—II »AnmY Lrilr�xtl Mr=,,IL Txrx.�Tlvn1 S7 Pxioh_s.6WPd mrdYv[lxlurlhn F.Firgl.rax 1nk..22Wh1.. Y:ry 6olo[1. Dux ingrlr lar.. corer. SS1.1h. 22 VulLslw.y Cilrilildn 2I C3 iwi ipp1i0.11d819FIipFIv6L�Y+0+6LrIr�.I Hrip i1 km:tol . bw"mu;A ThPCkI ilti 111 i+i"isdilG &rc;ionoFUE-h AZ 2prhAZ LIW al Ernst aTttr Iligj �l l.hrKSMl.r5d71h#34tr1 11lri�.ilY e+lpW r-0RQkit kM ntrllonr SF8i S17 NAr apboKh 5W d Hrt"1l nri. ir• : l an ltclbd a.— ldi.atl ldr Ytrr.xJlon. tiyhnWwi lk..ho 51w: nxdh� irnmrlo[.c.Ihwl•.ni ranP s aYul .— rtvrx.lcurd hu.a.I.I, fohYrq l.ni.i mr h xd of [Io.,w�,.. cub �. rrpr. -0I r61i1 bw r rN10111 it IoaY lrx 5{-0plvi li PPF51 Orrrg 'rflgl l rig., 0 'A kgrrp�Inri !rk11ll.osr 4116{.hrf.9r,Sr6l W AOIK 94 YxY.I....MYrYolr 3dr..leo..nuclim pmjm I.:2111h$ W Ilan idldir[.. IxmSi 99 F[I ikrJ&Jmah ghmmiiq i1Ih.C.rtyrAmrm.. 291i Ti—parmi—E.nnt � Lsrr�.,x.o[.rindrEllr.rpaG.,orhYmxl- S4*I P.dric Ir on Fhcom kdRwd. C.ri.d Flci.d. 29 P.drxl..r.rd'i.YivJa Sidl.ikCohiuuodxl piokii:'2:Erh1k MomFhll$8 i' 7$h e.,� W Pioki;dilii�i, i Agh Nikikj i11FGConpi*hQr&6, b71lnYr BRiIdnE7ininl ram.,. mFimM'ST1..upoltiYnrEhm.ri.- 2afa%rNd C"Mw BommrarkdRhiBri! Gipkil Pf*ok; 55 PAk 19Yr ir.dyQkW 1 ldr Saih.apv-z9w Dn cHis:2[6h iC 5VA,:mF"W iD 7*h WM W 3S Fp*aiHeukld ah g1111CIII h lhtCarVthrr#Iri)3m nawpimiLmMemm CoIrpwORiipr.IwFtm b}A TiargWoFEkmw �fFM FdCkouMm Rror.n.erkdFivi" Capkkl PhokdS 87 Conpkm liii i Frpw 2191k 511wk3W bww.n3R'04dnd 3R99.Mckpn in lhw... aih imh ULklLw. liiir ohrt.rxonrrw.d.dfn i.[i..ionlrvHw f511. TI.�ot.lorvingo[wrw,1 CbrrQ.Ywoa.PIn 87F; T1ar�oki5o.E),m hkrlaw- ud Adp%ai. Plan"" f{19627.9Wf. RwDfnnadidRoz&A Cipkil Pf*DL; 'A ConpYk. 911..kx krpA. Mlh Shrrk SM. btmrnSR M tnd Wh 51 V\Ydlh l4 lhrtt Lkr Y%ft Vlb. gwr. 6,.1.r.. xd.dr..k+a .ri.r Il cbo.:n.lo.x..n I. t2i$h@ TMr7lohckl.reconrtardrtlrul.[W.IonInX.OI�. Tru�ovinnlnpoNrrM,1 CarrgrYx.o[.Pr�r�ETlr.�vGno.cYm.rl- PI..FFl lot bi2Mam. FYcomn kdFio.d.q C.pkd Pr*. IN ENEWNCLECIRCILANA"D99AWPMALLELTOM99ODOR 5T lmp+rts LT Irnpvts EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY GpIOFEbnondcE3k+�dr F#vcr Plink Caogral,inAir Health District Gateway - Today 4 EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Health District Gateway — with initial public investments EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY Health District Gateway — with corresponding private investment EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY SW 2341h — Today EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY v SW 234 TH —with initial public investments EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY 1 FREOEE PFr=I. A 5 5 0 C; I A T [ S SW 234 TH — with corresponding private investment I._ -jLll%qft EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY gin EDMONDS HIGHWAY99 Next Steps: • Refinements to the Draft Sub -Area Plan • New policies or policy changes • Capital projects list (short term and long term) • Prepare Planned Action EIS • Public Hearing and recommendation by Planning Board — December 14, 7pm, Council Chambers • City Council review and possible action/adoption — early 2017 • Any code change or other implementation — starting 2017 W�=� FRIGONIE ke 10 A S S 0 C I A40 Questions? Visit www.EdmondsHWY99.or for more information such as project updates, workshop results, upcoming events and more. EDM4ND599 HIGHWAY FF E ONESE I�-■ AS SOC I AT IS REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Edmonds Special District Plan Presentation to �F EbA�r�f �r J City of Edmonds Edmonds City Council .n,aga Green Futures Lab, June 21, 2011 University of Washington G�'SCA�F Cascade Land Conservancy e yr �'ONS6R REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Acknowledgements Team 1 — Fall Quarter Undergrad Class — Elizabeth Abrahamson, Cristina Haworth, Brad Shipley Team 2 — January -June Student Internships — Betsy Jacobson —Masters in Urban Planning and Landsc — Tom Jamieson — Masters in Landscape Architecture — Julie Kreigh — PhD in Built Environment — Jeanine Matthews — Masters in Landscape Architecture — Eric Scharnhorst — Masters in Landscape Architecture — Brad Shipley —B.S Degree in Community, Environment and Planning Faculty: Jill Sterrett, FAICP - Urban Design and Planning — Nancy Rottle, ASLA - Landscape Architecture ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate 0� Agenda � Wit 1. Public Process 2. Connections and Green Features 3. Five Corners Plan 4. Westgate Plan 5. Overview of Form Based Code 6. Questions and Discussion REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Phase 1 Report Site Analysis Form -Based + Surveys Code Research I I I FALL 2010 WINTER 2011 NEXT STEPS - SHORT TERM YOU ARE HERE VISIONING WORKSHOP PUBLIC 1EDC Selects Council Meetin MEETING Alternative LISTENING] Westgate + SESSION I Five Corners Public Special District Workshops Plans Initial Development of a Few Properties SPRING 2011 Other Properties Develop, Possibly up to 50% of the Neighborhood SUMMER 2011 Draft Plan and Form -Based Building Codes Planning Community Board Meeting Full Build Out FALL 2011 2010 2015 2020 2030 NEXT STEPS - LONG TERM In the future, new developments will use form -based building codes REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Phase One: Site Analysis and Online Survey • Prepared a citizen survey • Site surveys of land uses & amenities. • Parking counts • Walking distance & conditions • Mapping study results • Analysis of user friendliness r 4F c ap a� F �q . Baca �a xae% REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Phase One: Research on Exemplary Commercial Centers in the PNW The Three Cs: COMPLETE COMPACT wrr-', 1 Fir CONNECTED r 4F c ap a� F �q . Baca �a xae% REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Phase Two: Listening Session and Audience Response Surveys U) Brown University • Listening sessions for each site • Audience response survey • Synthesis of survey results • Form -based code case studies �Hsc ae }a� z ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate Phase Three: Design Workshop and Draft Plans • Public design workshop with local professionals • Review of what we had heard from the public • Draft site design: Life, Space, Buildings • 6 teams Five Corners, 3 teams Westgate �Hsc ae }a� z ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate Phase Three Five Corners' Design Workshop Green street features Alley Parkway M Additional building height ��. Pedestrian path Amenities O Commercial Existing building footprint Mixed use Gateway GEED Open space • Transit hub Mixed use with O court- yard and -open spaces O + - One storX artisb lofts withl open space at dornel❑ I I` •• /• V I Retail cluster with — A pocket park at cornery I i� Retail surrounding public art I I 1 I Retail cluster �0 I interspersed with I open space Fcb: Five Corners Circle a� F �q . Baca �a xae% ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate uesign Workshop Westgate Plazas and open space throughout the site r \ 1 din `7 ' r ate to t o ra by Acc t `cha stru 0 pa rkt �% • Retain existing _% — businesses on south quadrant I' I I Opp - I N a I WG3: Westgate Create I Continue to: I I add green features I I I nto existing Ferry Reservation Center at I buildings I— — _ _ — .nQW "entrance to -Ea onds° Buildings along 5R-104�visually �O / block site lines to su parkin9 ' I s Alley — L _ _ — — — —I Green street features Parkway . Pedestrian path Commercial Mixed use — — I Open space M Additional building height i Amenities Existing building footprint Gateway 49 Transit hub AAL4F c ap �q . L, a� F REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Life S 1111104% 0% Oft OW& Five Corners "Garden" Icon Buildin Loft Apartments; Young Adults'Housing Affordable Housing ` _J6, FC1:Garden Gateway South Plaza Movies Farmers' Market Roof Top Restaurant Fountain v *W� �O YB is REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate public Sentiment Main Topics Five Corners Westgate Building Scale 2-3 stories w/ housing 3-4 stories w/ housing Increasing public space was the most popular recommendation for Public Space improvement (all ages). Examples suggested were plazas, sitting space, green space. Walking/Biking Improve walkability by creating safe environment for people of all ages. Roundabout has general public No prominent issues with Traffic support. Concerns about increased automobile traffic c congestion noted. Services Community desires better restaurants, street cafes, and a bakery. Business fronts should be at the sidewalk. Amenities Landscaping on sidewalks, street trees, and use of native plant species �Hsc ae }a xao z %� REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate phase 4� Refining and Selecting Preferred Alternative - Five Corners AdLw4F c ap �q . ', a� F REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate phase 4� Refining and Selecting Preferred Alternative - Westgate • ftff-//rr w.-'%..- •44 . y � R )Fitt C 4H L a ` Iy �8qp �O Y8 E4 � ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate 'edestrian Connections Five Corners 204th D w rn a o- a — 204th 204th 203rd Edg—d 9aptst Chu rch r 0 ; Access v i � Q r Access ` � 204th [ollege Place Elemenn- m5th L � m� ♦ °` m 205th T Edmonds , 6th 20X Access � L Free Ridge Park 206th � ♦ �•♦ r '� L S $ JAccessHigh m ♦ U 9c' 07th 207[h 206ti1 ♦ fnllege Plare Junior Schoul ` Ap 207th I 207th •j Main�� / x � ` Access t 9 208th a 7 / +'� '—+ •208th ♦ a ♦ m ZOgth %s t 1 Z8 20� I' i ♦ 1 ! • 209th , V s[M2mprial Park 210th a 211th { -216th r�z 1 { { wamrT�� 1r\ 212th t Park 1 a` / r 213th / ! r 2141h zlatll , 214th r Access 1 ♦ Edmoeaa waadwav rogn s�aael � o ♦ ♦ 215th 215th" / r / 215th 215th ` rn ♦ L �' / / Grarechurch m r 215th / .� 216th \ ♦♦ m L r �� r se lake schoo€�^ —217thSteven's HpapgW. � � f 217th % 1, 217th ♦ 21 ih N m °spKal ur, � H L rn 217th ♦ ♦ L m �^ V � , 218th v ♦ m ry a 4P — I 218th ` r L Olympic A Bapl3t y,uVh_ cess r r r r r 121111 219th 220th d �kVISIONING Five Corners Movement Opportunities: Sidewalks Potential: lifjy-,, Opportunity/Need for betterwalking conditions Existing: y Transit Stops _ — Sidewalks i Alleys L Wetlands a Streams `m >8%Slopes E Parks LPublic Use -- Walking Radius: 5 + 10 min. W Feet 0 250 500 1,000 •*...� ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate Cycling Connections Westgate L� r. ❑ � Vrse6ea t:i.mrnwry Birch ~ _ o• Ai[zss � � • I+r Cf1 • 13th 7311i 14rh I P • . • 741h Ia ■■ 14th t25rh •♦ 2261h t5th Ed—naa vrmra-un C—m ♦' �r ` ■ z • 2G:h 326t1. 22613t 16 ~ • 1' ■ � •Yr'�yEdmonds MemoAa' Ce ♦ 2271h I • ♦ 1 r :llrh I f ! 228[h We.ypet. Gindet ■ O r.n6rvcw V.'vlrnhed f 229t, o5herxnad Ecmena� ! 1 I 1 1 I 1 Fp, 1 o l ! � S 1 �P 1 L ► o Access 231st I ' � ACCCSS � T ■ ! I 232nd i_ ■ + Robin HoM 7 % Ito t♦ sa wLh7a y 1 1 / • 233rd I w Rr FN, • 1 � � I ►. � � I341h s z3aln .I Nottingham ti 23-0th �. 4f ti 235th / _ $. c jj + 236[n 235th■ f a • 235th r I ;gym 23%[h • + _ Hick— pars • _ e u � C ✓ i p .. _ v + �- L Z37ry� • w°cdxay E'emenlary Madonna khed ti =371h Fail, CI—h REVISIQNING Westgate Movement Opportunities: Cycling Connections -- Bike Connections - Potential r Existing: Wetlands 2 Streams y >8% Slopes aParks LPublic Use — -- Walking Radius: S + 10lnin. Feet0 250 501) 1,000 ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate Green Connections Five Corners � � �' � 2❑9th a �_ ar i❑irfi Ede -A Sn ut 0—d. ~ � Access � � r r • Access ' 2{]ath cw•eer w—Eleme,ne-r 0 ► 2t75M v T$� ti r Edmonds 2❑6th ti Access _ rc-lrbeac, '"�20ut1,V x f °c ♦ '' ��I�' �e Access Z7th 206th I- ♦ llr-is—. S e r r4 •207th z❑nn � . A9am 2❑8th 2a7i1i ■ �c Y •208th ^ 1 ■■ 1■ 20th ■� *--w. \\ 'ray Mrnorial Pei k \, 1 ! ! c { r f r W m i 1 L 1 � 1 �'^valr•,r I 'a :IZ:n I 1 v ! a t � a a ►�rr0 ■ mr- 2151h 21Gth 21 ith { �n ■ 214[s W \ \ 217th 21701 r . z Olrrnpic BapEt Lh:�mr x 220111 r a r r r 213th ! [h + r ■ f 214Ut Umxdi W"Pw.r lrgn 5rW6 Acczs • ■ 215th� ► ''s'I• � � ■ 21rtr 21 Sth or ■ 2 i(th SI-4u 14nylwl r l,lx scrod ■ p • >Q4 Ucs'ry � tiiosP` eo � ■ , • • 21etn • r � �219th 279rh a l r REVISIQNING Five Corners Green Connections Opportunities Potential: Green Connections Movement Connections r Existing: Wetlands Streams y >8% Slopes aParks LPublic Use — — Walking Radius: 5 + 10 min. Feet ❑ 250 5❑❑ 1X0 REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Stormwater Management REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate GREEN FEATURES living walls bioswales/rain gardens green roofs permeable paving iiti F A � v � r4F c dp a� F �q . Baca �a xae% REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate GR F F n street trees I green street edges I green roofs I, FEATURES stormwatertreatment I bioswales I rainwater harvesting � rain gardens I permeable paving I pocket parks I courtyards pocket parks courtyards 4F c ap �q . Baca a� F �a xae% REVIsIONII Illu ;trative Plan Five Corners 4F c ap �q . Baca a� F �a xae% REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate BuOdinqs f Five Corners f r 40 Wa Z - pr F W, tit A6 Sorvkn Mm Pb-, APO k,steps/ Fo(mors Ak rkol 46� ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate Illu itrative plan Westgate ♦ • 22 th ❑ �I s AD 00 I r • w � - • 7— x� vuowbsta«nn o- i I � _ 1 955 •y. J m LI ❑ �i - _. 232nd SMW Salem Lutheran 4hurd� � — i — � .,, ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate Buildings Westgate l iia 61 OF M,LNX, ReVISIONING Five Corners &Westgate Contents of the Plan/Form-Based Code 1. Introduction Intent and Goals Summary of the Public Process How to Use this Code 2. The Regulating Framework — Understanding the Regulating Framework — Street Types — Frontage Types — Building Types — Public Space and Green Feature Types 3. Building Standards 4. Civic Investment: Streetscape and Public Space Standards 5. Private Investment: Gathering Spaces and Green Features S 6. Administration and Implementation Standards Oa rn, .W 'aAA z Iy �8qp CO xao REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Building Types 1. Rowhouse - Townhome apartments or condominiums 2. Live Work - Townhome apartments or condominiums 3. Courtyard Residential - Apartment or condominium flats 4. Side Court - Office only, Retail Mixed Use with office or residential above, or Community Service Mixed Use with office or residential above 5. Commercial Block - Retail only, Office only, Retail Mixed Use with office or residential above, or Community Service Mixed Use with office or residential above r r i ir. 4F c ap a� F �q . race �a xae% m "Mom 0 A. a 411-ilri-inn -uvr 0 REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Commercial Building Types Side Court Commercial Block REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Streetscape Standards Westgate ThoraughfareType! commerrialstreet with pedestrianenhanrements IGOth Ave. Mavement slaw FLO.W Width: 7Q' wl amenities 2-way cycle path Resign Speed: 25 mpn sta rmwater swa I e Landscape! west side - street trees planted no less than 30'. east side - swa le and planted buffer TrafftLanes_ 11: one each way; 11'o2nterturn lane Bike Lane! $'two-way cycle path Parki ng2 rkarke Pedestnan Crossing RIstame_ 33' Sidewalks! d' sethad sdewat ; supr trail Iran lane UE'NN SYlal! Rdi ' buKef sidejalk srt6a�k r 'T11'Tl rT 11'T 7' a' S'T8'T rck KUt6 S0 curb 33' I KaW 7Cr Section View: lookinP north from intersection of IOCth Ave. and Proposed internal street REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Streetscape Standards Five Comers Main Street & baseline Thoroughfare Type: Movement R.O.W Width: Design Speed: Landscape: Traffic Lanes: Bike Lane: Parking: Pedestrian Crossing Distance: Sidewa I ks_ commercial street free 60, 30 mph street trees planted in bul Trouts between parki ng 11; one each way 4' both sides of street 8' parallel parking bath sides of street 46` l' eke ke setback sidewalk parking lane !ravel travel ne parking sidewalk setback curb to curb p.D.W 60' ar rny. ,+f °Fscaae Section View: Main S#.:looking northeast from proposed rolandalSout crt�sswalk ��; 21 2th St. SW: looking east toward proposed rondabout sqe a�axae%� REVISIONING Five Corners & Westgate Next Steps Tonight: Summer: Fall: Year end: City Council Presentation Planning Board to review & refine Plan and FBC Public meeting City Council decision .`FITNESS