2017-02-15 Economic Development Commission MinutesCITY OF EDMONDS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
February 15, 2017
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
Darrol Haug, Vice -Chair
Matthew Waldron
Stephen Clifton
George Bennett
Michael Schindler
Nicole Hughes
Aseem Prakash
Nathan Monroe, Planning Board, ex officio
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember, ex officio
Jamie Reece, Chair
Mary Monroe
Greg Urban, Edmonds Chamber, ex officio
Bruce Faires, Port Commissioner, ex-officio
STAFF PRESENT
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir.
Cindi Cruz, Program Coordinator
1. Economic Development Commission meeting called to order by Vice -Chair Haug at 6:00
p.m.
2. Approval of Agenda: Approved as submitted. Audience can speak at a later time.
3. Approval of 01/18/17 EDC Minutes: After minutes amended as stated, Matt moved to approve
minutes as written, Nicole seconded; motion passed.
4. Audience Comments No comments.
5. Subgroup Reports:
a. Highway 99: George discussed draft memo revised after sub -group met two weeks ago. Topics
addressed are infrastructure, parking locations, compiling list of potential developments and
developers who could have projects ready to go, potential location of city services on Hwy 99.
Could a catalyst project be identified and seek a partner for such a project? Focus on sense of
place in International District (ID). How do you develop the ID into more of a "place" rather than
just strip malls? City Council will have a public hearing on the Hwy 99 sub -area plan on 2/21.
Could draft memo be finalized and send to CC in time for the meeting on 2/21? Is the focus on
too much housing/residential zoning? Does that focus impact existing commercial businesses
negatively? Outcome of planning process led to perception that it is residential focused. Zoning
changes could affect the ability to add housing. Commercial uses are not impacted because most
of them are already allowed. Not as much to do to encourage commercial uses. Possibility for a
catalyst project near new intersection which has direct route to transit/light rail project on I-5. The
City could take active role in catalyst project as part of Hwy 99 sub -area planning project. There
are some zoning changes that will need to take place before full implementation. March is the
tentative timeframe to pass the plan. The planning recommendations will need to be incorporated
into ordinance changes and hopefully those can be passed in June. Are there any actual proposals
or projects? Bothell was referenced as an example. Weird shapes for properties, reluctant
property owners not eager to do anything create a barrier to change and/or creating something
new. Plan has its own momentum and will go forward to completion. Encourage council to take
away uncertainty for developers interested in Hwy 99 projects. Pass plan and get zoning in place.
Focus on specific areas along Hwy 99. Important to get something in front of CC before public
hearing and then work on ideas with sub -group for catalyst project recommendations. Encourage
bold recommendation for catalyst project — such as movement of City Hall, Pw, Police
Approved Meeting Summary
Economic Development Commission
February 15, 2017
Page 1
Department, to Hwy 99. Mike moved, Matt seconded to forward memo to CC and continue
work on comments in sub -group passed unanimous.
b. Signs: Patrick discussed draft memo regarding downtown pedestrian signage — enforcement
moratorium extended to April 30 by CC. Many issues still need to be worked out. Concern about
multiple signs at corners; could they be replaced with monument signs or something else; how to
keep the cost down for sign permit fees; differences in costs of types of sign permits; costs for
blade signs and pedestrian signs could be the same; encourage blade signs on building to get signs
off sidewalks; accessibility issues are important must maintain minimum clearance on sidewalks;
blade signs and fagade signs count in the square footage; a -frames can be more temporary such as
advertising daily specials, etc. Regarding memo, add in modification about fees. Planning Board
on 2/23/17 memo should go to PB. Mike moved, George seconded to send memo with
corrections on to PB, motion passed unanimous.
c. Five -Corners: George discussed draft memo: request Planning Division to conduct feasibility
study for options at Five -Corners. Need to find out what is feasible for the area. Roundabout was
a good catalyst but what is preventing redevelopment by other landowners/developers?
Encourage City to adopt incentives for redevelopment. Remove uncertainty of developing.
Planning is exploring feasibility study and encourages support of EDC for study. Need to know
what market will support in the area before changing zoning requirements. Do encourage mixed -
use development. Encourage citizen input but concentrate on direct impacts to residents in that
area. Hold open house for the area. Should feasibility study be done first vs getting citizen input?
Could past input be used for guidelines in feasibility study? Framework of feasibility include
various scenarios — housing, mixed -use, commercial, different uses. Increase public space and
walkability. Add — UW study info on public input. Matt moved, Asseem seconded
(incorporating amendment to motion) passed unanimous.
d. Parking: Darrol discussed sub -committee meeting. Committee made recommendation and
forwarded to Mayor: push permit parking for employees about'h block out, gaining 35 stalls; no
recommendation to change pricing; parking could be more efficient on streets near downtown.
Public Works (PW) can start pilot project to mark 20-foot intervals for parking spaces, Main from
fountain east, 5th in both directions, and potentially on 2nd; could gain between 10 - 15 stalls if
everyone complies; there will not be enforcement during the pilot period; PW will measure
process and parking enforcement staff will also observe. The results will be anecdotal information
on compliance from PW staff and enforcement staff. Will put out some PR and advance notice
regarding changes. Regarding residential permits, nothing is being planned to change on pricing
and moving out. Police Department will be hiring a new enforcement officer. Continued work
with private parking lots to see if something could be agreed on to allow use after hours. These
are private parking lots that could be made available after normal hours the BID is working on
arrangements with private parking lot ownerships. Aseem recommended that more specific data
collection be made regarding the pilot project for designated on -street parking, not just anecdotal
information.
6. Old Business:
Metrics for Economic Development: How to measure success? Number of times we send
information to CC. Question asked if there has been anything that has made a difference to the
CC? Parking pushing out employee parking, Hwy 99 value of commercial, don't know till there
is issue to be voted on. Civic Playfield project hybrid recommendation and encouragement of
active/passive uses. CC is customer do they get feedback on how commission is perceived,
having sent several memos directly to CC, could ask Council President if it is meaningful. Report
card on input from CC. One year mark — ask for input. This item was put on by Jamie and since
he was unable to attend this meeting bring back to next meeting.
Approved Minutes
Economic Development Commission
February 15, 2017
Page 2
7. New Business:
a. Future Leadership: Jamie and Darrol will be chair and vice chair thru the month of April.
What is role of chair and vice chair — set agenda for meetings, work with staff to create materials
to support agenda, official communications come from chair, work with sub -groups, annual
report delivered to CC by chair, vice -chair fills in as needed and works to make decisions.
Attempt to make decision on chair and vice -chair at March meeting, allowing for continuation to
April meeting if necessary.
b. Broader Economic Development Strategy: What did commission want to accomplish
moving forward. Working on things and pass on ideas, fresh notions, how can we educate the
public? Is the EDC a think tank of ideas to advise the Council and is that the view the Council has
of the EDC? Is role to generate ideas or to debate ideas? Need robust discussion around new
strategies and thinking outside the box. Idea -generating commission. Provides collective body of
thinkers to provide ideas and information regarding initiatives to CC, PB, etc. PB viewpoint of
EDC: provides economic development feedback, impacts, talk about opportunities such as
parking initiatives. Memo from December representing next work items for EDC and refer to
these items to consider for future discussions.
Comment from Natalie Shippen: Encourages EDC to engage Arts Commission, other art groups,
etc. to promote something new every weekend, music, ballet, dance, symphony. More
performances will have something to bring in wider audiences.
Sub -group on downtown development recommendations needs commissioners and Mike Shindler
volunteered. Patrick discussed interviews for a consultant to review and produce an economic
impact study on arts and culture in Edmonds and what it means to the economic development of
Edmonds. Referred to arts and culture calendar on VisitEdmonds.com. 4th avenue corridor WWU
Sustainable City's student study to look at next steps on arts cultural corridor. Observation is
noted of an increase in youth and young families in and around downtown. Enhance and make
stronger the connection to arts and culture events. Outreach to arts and culture community and
organizations and have them come to meeting to discuss.
8. Roundtable Discussion (Council, Commissioners, City, Liaisons): Nate, PB: hearing on sign
code next week and discuss housing at PB, detached housing. Neil: referred to sales tax handout
and graph included interesting information on economic changes, SAP was discussed at CC
retreat and suggested a joint meeting with PB, CC, & EDC to revisit the SAP. Mike: Lake
Stevens has created a City veterans commission and would hope that Edmonds could follow with
the creation of same. Patrick: discussed sales tax graph stating this is only indicative of Edmonds
and not the overall regional economy — not much single-family land left in Edmonds so lower SF
development numbers in Edmonds do not imply that the economy of the region is going down; in
fact throughout thecounty it is a more robust picture.
10. Ideas for March (or future) Agenda: George discuss having follow-up from CC on memos and
response/reactions on presentation on downtown building codes, invite arts community, and
invite officials from surrounding cities/communities to advise on what they have done well.
11. Adjourned at 8 p.m.
Next regular meeting: March 15, 2017, 6 PM
Approved Minutes
Economic Development Commission
February 15, 2017
Page 3