2016-05-12 Historic Preservation Commission PacketUp LD,�
°mod Agenda
Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission
h, FOURTNER ROOM
121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020
MAY 12, 2016, 5:30 P M
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of Minutes: April 14, 2016
III. AGENDA ADDITIONS / CHANGES
IV. REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
V. NEW BUSINESS
1. Presentation on Edmonds Museum Maintenance Project
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
VII. ACTION ITEMS
1. Status on updated applications
2. Press Release and Plaque ceremony for North Sound Church
VIII. COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS
IX. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
X. ADJOURNMENT
Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Agenda
May 12, 2016
Page 1
2.1
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 05/12/2016
Approval of Minutes: April 14, 2016
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Approve the draft minutes
Narrative
Draft minutes are attached
Attachments:
HPC160414d
Packet Pg. 2
2.1.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Summary Minutes of Regular Meeting
April 14, 2016
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Scott called the meeting of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:37 p.m. in the 3rd Floor
Conference Room of City Hall, 121 — 5"' Avenue North.
Emily Scott, Chair
Larry Vogel, Vice Chair (arrived at 5:35 p.m.)
Sandra Allbery
Chris Deiner-Karr
Tim Raetzloff
Steve Waite
Dave Teitzel, City Council Member
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
Eric Livingston
AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES
STAFF PRESENT
Kemen Lien, Senior Planner
Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant
OTHERS PRESENT
David Peterson
Margaret Peterson
r
r
N
r
The agenda was modified to place the Action Item (820 Maple Street) first on the agenda.
ACTION ITEMS
Certificate of Appropriateness or Removal from Historic Register for Dr. Palmer House at 820 Maple Street
Mr. Lien advised that 820 Maple Street was placed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places in 2010, and is one of the few
properties the BOLA Report listed as qualifying for the National Register. The current owners have applied for a building
permit for a garage addition, a porch addition, and replacement of four windows on the third floor.
David and Margaret Peterson provided an overview of the proposed changes to both the inside and outside of the structure.
Mr. Peterson explained that, in addition to replacing four windows on the third floor, they are proposing to remove the
asbestos siding to reveal the home's original wood siding. The proposed garage will have a similar architectural detail as the
home.
Mr. Lien reminded the Board that the proposed modifications will require a Certificate of Appropriateness from the
Commission. He referred to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures. He
summarized that both the garage and porch additions appear to be consistent with the standards, but he has concerns about
the windows. He specifically pointed out that:
Packet Pg. 3
2.1.a
Windows comprise a considerable amount of the historic fabric and wall plain, and thus, deserve special
consideration in a rehabilitation project. The windows were identified in the BOLA Report as part of the
defining historic character of the house.
The standards do not allow property owners to remove or radically alter the windows, which are important in
defining the historic character of the building, in such a way that diminishes the character. That is the big
question the Commission must answer. The applicant is proposing to change both the size of the window openings
and the style of the windows. Based on precedence set by the Schumacher Building, the Commission could approve
the Certificate of Appropriateness as long as the size of the openings is not changed.
The standards also recommend against adding false historic character to the building. In addition to changing the
size and style of the window, the applicant is proposing to add a design element to the top of the windows.
Mr. Lien advised that small additions that do not change the defining character of the building can be allowed. The porch
addition will be located at the back corner of the building under the existing eaves, and the shed type roof will differentiate
the addition from the sweeping eaves.
The Commissioners all voiced support for the applicant's proposal to remove the asbestos siding and restore the original
siding and shingles that lie underneath. They also voiced general support for the proposed changes to the south side of the
structure (porch and garage), which will not be visible from the street. However, Commissioner Waite voiced concern that
the proposed garage design is too much like the historic structure. He explained that the design is supposed to be influenced
by the historic structure, but not replicated. Regarding the windows, the Commission discussed the following:
Are the Secretary of the Interior's Standards recommendations or mandates? Some Commissioners felt that if the
structure was being considered for the State or National Registers, the criteria should be interpreted strictly.
However, there is more flexibility for local registers. On the other hand, Commissioner Waite pointed out that the
Department of the Interior's Standards are clear and have been in place for a number of years. Disregarding the
standards could raise questions about the credibility of the Edmonds Register of Historic Places. While he
applauded the Petersons for restoring the original siding, which is an important characteristic of the building, he
questioned if that should warrant the Commission's decision to disregard the criteria relative to windows.
It was discussed that, although the proposed window alterations are inconsistent with some of the criteria, they r
would not prevent a future owner from changing the size and style back to the original design at some point in the 04
future. Some felt that the proposed change would not irreparably change the structure and character of the building.
The Petersons pointed out that the larger windows are needed to improve the lighting for the living space and to take
advantage of the fabulous views. Commissioner Waite explained that the idea of reversibility is generally related to
repair, and it is not likely that the original window style and size will be replaced at a future time. He suggested that
a skylight could be an alternative to provide additional light.
The Commissioners agreed that the structure is very important to the Edmonds Register and it is currently eligible to
be included on the National Register, as well. Chair Scott suggested that the Commission consider whether or not
the building would have still been added to the Register if the window modifications had occurred prior to listing it
on the Register. It was discussed that retaining the structure on the Register would allow the Commission to work
with the property owners to maintain the integrity of the building going forward. Commissioner Raetzloff said he
believes the Commission would have approved the structure for the Register if the windows had already been
changed, but he is still hesitant to support the application as proposed.
Some Commissioners felt the preponderance of historic characteristics and attributes for keeping the structure on the
Register far outweigh the windows. Commissioner Deiner-Karr said she does not believe that changing just four
windows would have a significant impact on the historic integrity of the building, particularly in light of the
applicant's proposal to restore the original siding. Commissioner Waite commented that although the window
alterations may not be noticeable to those walking by, the Commission's responsibility is to maintain the historic
integrity of structures.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
April 14, 2016 Page 2
Packet Pg. 4
2.1.a
• The Commissioners referred to their earlier action relative to the Schumacher Building. It was pointed out that the
current proposal is different in that it would replace iconic windows and the Schumacher Building windows were
not original. It was also pointed out that the window openings on the Schumacher Building were not altered.
• There was concern expressed that the proposed window design provides too much detail that does not match the
windows below. If the details were eliminated, the windows would look more authentic.
• The Commission discussed that fire safety requirements may need to be addressed if the upper story is used as
bedroom space. It was noted that the windows would need to open, and they can be no higher than 48 inches from
the floor.
• Chair Scott pointed out that if the applicant replaces the four windows on the upper story as proposed, it is likely the
home would no longer be eligible for the State and National Registers. It was explained that because the City is a
Certified Local Government, it must follow the State's standards, which are based on the Department of the
Interior's Standards. Again, it was suggested that the Department of the Interior's Standards could be interpreted to
be recommendations and not mandates.
VICE CHAIR VOGEL MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
FOR REMOVAL OF THE ASBESTOS SIDING TO REVEAL AND RESTORE THE ORIGINAL FIR SIDING AND
CEDAR SHINGLES. COMMISSIONER ALLBERY SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
VICE CHAIR VOGEL MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
FOR THE PORCH ADDITION. COMMISSIONER ALLBERY SECONDED THE MOTION.
Commissioner Waite pointed out that no design has been proposed for the porch addition. Mr. Lien said the porch will have
a shed roof, which is different than the existing roof. The porch will be located under the eaves, and will not alter any of the
significant features of the home.
VICE CHAIR VOGEL MOVED TO AMEND HIS MOTION TO CLARIFY THAT THE PORCH ADDITION r
WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE DESIGN WOULD N
BE CONSISTENT WITH STAFF'S DESCRIPTION. COMMISSIONER DEINER-KARR SECONDED THE
AMENDMENT. THE MOTION TO AMEND WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 'a
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.
VICE CHAIR VOGEL MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
FOR THE GARAGE ADDITION AS DESCRIBED IN THE DRAWINGS. COMMISSIONER WAITE SECONDED
THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Commissioner Deiner-Karr pointed out that the applicant has not finalized the window design. She suggested that the
Commission could approve the window modifications based on specific recommendations. For example, the upper windows
could be redesigned to remove the embellishments and reflect the design of the existing first and second floor windows.
VICE CHAIR VOGEL MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
FOR THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE THIRD FLOOR WINDOWS, WITH THE PROVISO THAT
EVERY EFFORT BE MADE FOR THE WINDOWS TO REFLECT THE DESIGN AND CHARACTER OF THE
EXISTING WINDOWS ON THE FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS. COMMISSIONER DEINER-KARR
SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION FAILED 4-2, WITH COMMISSIONERS VOGEL AND DEINER-
KARR VOTING IN FAVOR AND COMMISSIONERS RAETZLOFF, ALLBERY, SCOTT AND WAITE VOTING
IN OPPOSITION.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
April 14, 2016 Page 3
Packet Pg. 5
2.1.a
Mr. Lien agreed to notify the Peterson's of the Commission's decision and offer direction for how they can modify the
proposed window alterations or request that the property be taken off the Register. After speaking with the Petersons, Mr.
Lien would send an update to the Commissioners.
Commissioner Raetzloff inquired if allowances could be made to accommodate the changing uses of a structure. Mr. Lien
answered affirmatively and reviewed the Department of the Interior's Standards that apply to "Alterations and Additions for
the New Use." The installation of additional windows on rear or other non -character -defining elevations would be allowed if
required by the new use. While the design should be compatible with the overall design of the building, it should not
duplicate the fenestration, pattern, detail or character of the defining elevation.
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
COMMISSIONER RAETZLOFF MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 11, 2016 AS
SUBMITTED. COMMISSIONER DEINER-KARR SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
There were no audience comments.
NEW BUSINESS
Discussion and Recommendation on New HPC Schedule
Ms. Cunningham suggested that this item be postponed until the Commission's May meeting. She explained that because the
City must pay overtime for a staff person to monitor the door during Commission meetings, the City Council has proposed
that the Commission change its meeting location and/or time. Staff is still working out the details and will report back to the
Commission. Vice Chair Vogel voiced opposition to changing the meeting date to the third Thursday of each month, since
that is the day the Arts Commission conducts the monthly Art Walk, which is a major event in Edmonds.
Discussion on 2017 Calendar r
This item was postponed to the next meeting. N
Preservationist Update 'D
Chair Scott reported that Commissioner Raetzloff wrote some great copy that features the First Baptist Church, and she is
working to get some different photographs. c
Civic Playteld
Council Member Teitzel reported that the City recently purchased the Civic Playfield and the master plan process will start
soon. There has been a lot of discussion about potentially demolishing the grandstands, which are not currently listed on the
Register. Chair Scott clarified that the grandstands have been infested with worms, and restoration may no longer be
possible. The Commission agreed to recommend that a structural assessment of the structure be done before a final decision
is made.
Property at 232 Sunset Avenue
Commissioner Allbery reported that the home at 232 Sunset Avenue has been sold. She agreed to contact the new owner to
discuss adding the property to the Register.
Changes to the Library
Commissioners Waite and Allbery agreed to review the assessment of repairs and alterations that need to be done at the
Library facility. The consultant who completed the assessment is interested in ensuring that the modifications are done in a
way that preserves the historic quality and character of the building. Because the City owns the building, the Commission
agreed that the City has a responsibility to take care of many of the items. Commissioner Waite suggested that the
Commission should advise the City relative to the proposed changes to make sure the work is done correctly. The
Commission concurred and agreed to review the list in more detail at their next meeting.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
April 14, 2016 Page 4
Packet Pg. 6
2.1.a
Geo Caching Program
Commissioner Deiner-Karr said she has collected all of the information needed to create a geo-caching program for 2017.
The Commission agreed to discuss the concept again in June, and Commissioner Deiner-Karr agreed to send a rough draft of
her plan to Chair Scott prior to the next meeting.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Scott suggested that the Commission continue to explore avenues for establishing a historic district so the Commission
can have some oversight on changes that are made to historic structures.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Commissioner Raetzloff suggested that when reporting back to the Petersons, Mr. Lien should make them aware that
although the Certificate of Appropriateness was voted down, not all of the votes were in strong opposition.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
r
r
N
r
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
April 14, 2016 Page 5
Packet Pg. 7
5.1
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 05/12/2016
Presentation on Edmonds Museum Maintenance Project
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Development Services
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
The Carnegie Library is listed on the Edmonds Historic Register
Staff Recommendation
Consider and ask any questions
Narrative
Sandra Allbery and Steve Waite will present the project
Packet Pg. 8
7.1
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 05/12/2016
Status on updated applications
Staff Lead: {enter Staff Lead or "N/A" here}
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
The HPC commissioners were tasked with updating information on eight older applications for Historic
Register: Mowatt/Wells House, Bettinger House, McEachron House, Powers House, Princess Theater,
Gerdon House, Tommy Hall / Deiner House, Edmonds Opera House.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
What is the status and the next step in the process.
Packet Pg. 9
7.2
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 05/12/2016
Press Release and Plaque ceremony for North Sound Church
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
City Council approve the First Baptist Church of Edmonds listing on Edmonds Register of Historic Places
on April 5, 2016. Ordinance # 4023 is attached.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Discussion on preparing a press release and organizing a plaque ceremony.
Attachments:
Ordinance 4023 First Baptist Church
Packet Pg. 10
7.2.a
ORDINANCE NO. 4023
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE EXTERIOR OF THE
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF EDMONDS LOCATED AT 404
BELL STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION
ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, AND
DIRECTING THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR
OR DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN "HR" DESIGNATION.,
AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, the First Baptist Church of Edmonds located at 404 Bell Street,
Edmonds, Washington, is included on the Historic Survey of Downtown Edmonds prepared by
BOLA Architecture in conjunction with the Washington State Office of Archaeology and
Historic Preservation in October, 2004, as a property that could potentially contribute a historic
disctrict; and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission held a public
hearing on February 11, 2016, to consider the eligibility of the First Baptist Church of Edmonds
for listing on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places; and
WHEREAS, after consideration of the staff recommendation the Commission
voted to recommend to the City Council that the First Baptist Church of Edmonds be listed on
the Edmonds Register of Historic Places; and
and
WHEREAS, the owner(s) have given their written consent for such designation;
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the recommendation of the Historic
Preservation Commission regarding the features of the site which contribute to its designation
-1-
Packet Pg. 11
7.2.a
and finds that the application meets the criteria of the ordinance as contained in Chapter 20.45 of
the ECDC; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 5, 2016, to consider
the Historic Preservation Commission's recommendation; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The building located at 404 Bell Street Edmonds, Washington 98020,
known as the First Baptist Church of Edmonds, is hereby approved for designation to the
Edmonds Historic Register. The exterior of the building is hereby designated as significant.
Section 2. The Development Services Director, or her designee, is hereby
authorized to designate the listed site on the Edmonds zoning map with an "HR" designation.
This designation does not change or modify the underlying zone classification.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect
five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the
title.
1i
EAVIVOW
10 O. I. OXEN W.111 .
ATT , UT 1 GATED:
7! -4
CITY CLE , SC TT SEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY r; e"—�
JEFFREY B. TARAD Y, CITY ATTORNEY
-2-
Packet Pg. 12
7.2.a
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: April 1, 2016
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: April 5, 2016
PUBLISHED: April 10, 2016
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 15, 2016
ORDINANCE NO. 4023
-3-
Packet Pg. 13
7.2.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4023
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the 5th day of April, 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. 4023. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE EXTERIOR OF THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF
EDMONDS LOCATED AT 404 BELL STREET, EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR
INCLUSION ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, AND DIRECTING
THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR OR DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE
ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH AN "HR" DESIGNATION., AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this 61h day of April, 2016.
CIT LERK, SCO PA
Packet Pg. 14
7.2.a
Everett Daily Herald
Affidavit of Publication
State of Washington)
County of Snohomish } ss RECEIVED
Kathleen Landis being first duly sworn, upon APR 18 2016
oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal
representative of the Everett Daily Herald a
daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal EDMONDS CITY CLERK
newspaper by order of the superior court in the
county in which it is published and is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the
date of the first publication of the Notice
hereinafter referred to, published in the English
language continually as a daily newspaper in
Snohomish County, Washington and is and
always has been printed in whole or part in the
Everett Daily Herald and is of general
circulation in said County, and is a legal
newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99
of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter
213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal
newspaper by order of the Superior Court of
Snohomish County, State of Washington, by
order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed
is a true copy of EDH693077 ORDINANCE
NO. 4023 as it was published in the regular and
entire issue of said paper and not as a
supplement form thereof for a period of 1
issue(s), such publication commencing on
04/10/2016 and ending on 04/10/2016 and that
said newspaper was regularly distributed to its
subscribers during all of said period.
The , amount of the fee for such publication is
$29.24.
C�
Subscribed and sworn before me on this
IrZ day of Aar I'
— 0 AUBREY KNAPP
Notary Public
State of Washington
My Corr�MISS€ori Expires
/ -btl� //ktV0V July 30, 2018
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington.
City of Edmonds - LEGAL ADS 114101416
SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 15
7.2.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4023
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
❑n the 5th day of April, 2016, the Clty Council of the City of
Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 4023. A summary of the content
of said ordinance, conslslog of the fi6o, provides ss follows:
AN ORDINANCE 0EStGNATING THE EXTERIOR OF THE FIRST
BAPTIST CHURCH OF EDMONDS LOCATED AT 4D4 BELL
STREET EDMONDS. WASHINGTON FOR INCLUSION ON THE
EDMND5 REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES. AND
DIRECTING THE DEVELOPMENT SERVSCES DIRECTOR OR
DESIGNEE TO DESIGNATE THE SITE ON THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP WITH AN Hn' DESIGNATION„ AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full loaf of Oils Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this ffth day of April, 2016.
�,PPuu CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
blished: April 10, 201 S. EDH693077
Packet Pg. 16