2016-08-11 Historic Preservation Commission PacketAgenda
Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission
y FOURTNER ROOM
121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020
AUGUST 11, 2016, 5:30 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of Draft Minutes: May 12 + June 9, 2016
III. AGENDA ADDITIONS / CHANGES
IV. REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
V. NEW BUSINESS
1. Discussion on "Gerdon House" at 209 Caspers Street for inclusion on Edmonds Historic Register
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Update on Preservationist
2. Update on 2017 Historic Calendars
VII. ACTION ITEMS
VIII. COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS
IX. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
X. ADJOURNMENT
XI. CALL TO ORDER
Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission Agenda
August 11, 2016
Page 1
2.1
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/11/2016
Approval of Draft Minutes: May 12 +June 9, 2016
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Development Services
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and recommend approval of draft minutes
Narrative
Draft minutes are attached
Attachments:
HPC160512d
HPC160629d
Packet Pg. 2
2.1.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SUMMARY MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
May 12, 2016
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Scott called the meeting of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:30 p.m. in the 3rd Floor
Conference Room of City Hall, 121 — 5d' Avenue North.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
Emily Scott, Chair
Eric Livingston
Tim Raetzloff
Steve Waite
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
Larry Vogel, Vice Chair (excused)
Sandra Allbery (excused)
Chris Deiner-Karr (excused)
Dave Teitzel, City Council Member (excused)
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
STAFF PRESENT
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant
OTHERS PRESENT
Barb Fahey, Edmonds Museum
Dean Averill
COMMISSIONER RAETZLOFF MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF APRIL 14, 2016 AS SUBMITTED.
COMMISSIONER LIVINGSTON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/CHANGES
The agenda was amended to add a discussion about the Revitalize Washington Conference, an update on Civic Field, and a
discussion about the next edition of THE PRESERVATIONIST. The remainder of the agenda was accepted as presented.
REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
No one in the audience indicated a desire to address the Commission.
NEW BUSINESS
Presentation on Edmonds Museum Maintenance Proiect
Barbara Fahey, Edmonds, presented the Museum's proposed list of maintenance projects as follows:
• Although the replacement windows that were installed in 2000 looked like the original widows, they were different
and could no longer be opened and closed to let air through. The unintended consequences of the new windows is
that the building gets extremely hot in the summer and water builds up under the elevator shaft. This results in
0
N
a
N
d
C
N
M
2
Packet Pg. 3
2.1.a
humidity, which is not good for the artifacts that are located in the building. The Museum attempted to remedy the
problem in 2014 by taking two of the stationary windows out of their frames and rehanging them on hinges so they
could open and close. However, the windows are heavy and the hinges were not strong enough to support the
weight. The Museum is considering replacing these two windows with windows that are historically accurate.
However, this raises questions about whether the other windows will need to be replaced, as well. They are in the
process of deciding whether to replace the two windows this year with windows that are historically accurate, or
putting the project off for a time in hopes of obtaining grand funding.
• Long term, the Museum is looking to install a new air -flow system that keeps the humidity constant in the building
year-round. This upgrade is needed to receive national accreditation for the museum to give it more stature and
make it more of an asset to the City. They are currently researching grant opportunities, working with people who
can advise on the best approach, and considering fundraising opportunities for the project to move forward. W
0
N
• There is a laundry list of maintenance projects that have been postponed. For example, the frames around the o;
windows she previously mentioned have some dry rot and need to be repaired before new windows can be installed. m
It is not likely that the smaller maintenance projects will have implications from a historic preservation standpoint.
Ms. Fahey agreed to provide an electronic version of the maintenance projects. She invited the Commissioners to review the +
04
list and notify the Museum of any issues of concern. They are seeking as much information as possible as they build the
projects to ensure that its historic integrity is maintained and even corrected. She announced that representatives from the M
Museum will meet with City's Facilities Manager on May 16th to discuss the laundry list of maintenance projects. Mr. Chave 2
advised the he and Mr. Lien are scheduled to meet with the Facilities Manager on May 13th to inform him of the City N
facilities that are listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places.
Dean Averill, Edmonds, also encouraged the Commissioners to review the list of projects and provide feedback as
appropriate. He thanked Commissioner Waite for the guidance he has provided to date.
Chair Scott encouraged the Museum to look beyond the cost of projects, and keep in mind the long-term goal of preserving
the building forever. It is always a smart decision to make the proper upgrades instead of the cheaper, faster upgrades. She
reminded her that the Commissioners, and particularly Commissioner Waite, are available to provide input and support as the
projects move forward. There was some discussion about the how the City and the Museum could work together to apply for
grant funding.
Revitalize Washington Conference
Update on Civic Field
The Preservationist
ACTION ITEMS
Status on Updated Applications
Press Release and Plaque Ceremony for North Sound Church
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
May 12, 2016 Page 2
Packet Pg. 4
2.1.a
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Scott
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
El
a
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
May 12, 2016 Page 3
Packet Pg. 5
2.1.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SUMMARY MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
June 29, 2016
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Chair Scott called the meeting of the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to order at 5:30 p.m. in the 3rd Floor
Conference Room of City Hall, 121 — 5d' Avenue North.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
Emily Scott, Chair
Larry Vogel, Vice Chair (arrived at 5:35 p.m.)
Sandra Allbery
Chris Definer -Karr
Eric Livingston
Tim Raetzloff
Dave Teitzel, City Council Member
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
Steve Waite (excused)
REQUESTS FROM THE AUDIENCE
STAFF PRESENT
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Kernen Lien, Senior Planner
Diane Cunningham, Administrative Assistant
OTHERS PRESENT
Barry Ehrlich
Bruce Witenberg
Alex Witenberg
Kristiana Johnson
Pat Woodell
Barry Ehrlich, Edmonds, said he lives across the street from the Civic Field, and he believes the grandstands are unsightly.
Rather than designating the structure as historic, he would like it to be removed and the space could be used for a better
purpose.
City Council Member Johnson said she was present because she is very interested in the master planning process for Civic
Field, and she wants to make sure there is a thorough evaluation of the historical attributes of the property. The property has
significance to people of her age who grew up in Edmonds.
Pat Woodell, Edmonds, observed that the grandstand structure is quite old. She questioned what impact the renovations that
were done in 1983 would have on the Commission's review of the property as historic.
NEW BUSINESS: CIVIC FIELD (field house and Grandstands)
Mr. Lien presented the Staff Report, reviewing that the City recently purchased Civic Field from the Edmonds School
District and has begun the process of developing a master plan. He explained that the master plan will require State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) evaluation, and one of the questions on the checklist is whether any structures on the site
are eligible for the national, state or local preservation registers. The purpose of the special meeting is for the Commission to
evaluate and make a recommendation as to whether the field house (Boys and Girls Club) or grandstands qualify for listing
on the local register. The Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) has issued
detailed guidelines for historic mitigation and documentation standards, which were attached to the Staff Report. If the
0
N
cr
N
d
C
N
M
2
Packet Pg. 6
2.1.b
DAHP determines that a more detailed Level II Historic Mitigation Rcport is desired, staff recommends that the work be
done by a professional in the historic preservation field.
Council Member Teitzel asked if any evaluation was done regarding the site's historic significance when it was initially
developed. Chair Scott answered that no regulations were in place at the time of initial construction, and no subsurface
investigation has occurred to date. It was noted that the site's significance to Native American history is outside of the
Commission's purview.
Mr. Lien advised that the City is conducting a structural analysis of the grandstands, and the preliminary report is that they
have one to two years of life remaining before significant funding would be needed for restoration. Chair Scott explained
that, regardless of the Commission's recommendation relative to the two structures, the DAHP will automatically require an
updated inventory for each one because they are more than 50 years old. The field house inventory was updated in 2004, but
the grandstands have never been inventoried on DAHP's database. While the Commission can help in the process,
professional assistance will likely be required as part of the mitigation process.
Ms. Cunningham reminded the Commission that an application for inclusion on the Register has already been prepared for
the field house structure, but the Edmonds School District declined to pursue the application.
There was a lot of discussion about whether or not the changes that have occurred to the field house structure over the years
would disqualify it for the Register. It was noted that some of the changes could be considered significant. While some
commented that community sentiment should not play a role in the Commission's recommendation relative to the structure's
eligibility on the Register, others felt the Commission's recommendation should consider the building's importance to the
community. It was part of the school at one time and has served a variety of other uses, and people who grew up in Edmonds
spent a lot of time there. Concern was expressed about what would be developed on the property if the grandstands and field
house were removed.
The Commissioners agreed that additional photographs are needed to determine the significance of the changes made to the
field house over time, particularly the windows and porch. Commissioner Deiner-Karr agreed to take on this task and report
back to the Commission. They discussed that regardless of whether the building meets the eligibility requirements for the
local Register, the Commission could make a recommendation that the building be retained because it represents the history
of the area. Mr. Chave agreed and added that whether or not the building is eligible for the Register is a different question
than whether or not it is valuable to the history of the community.
The Commission had a discussion about whether or not changes that were made more than 50 years ago would render the
building ineligible for the Register. Mr. Lien recalled Commissioner Waite's guidance that each change that has occurred
over time must stand on its own.
The majority of the Commissioners voiced support for retaining the field house structure due to its significance to the
community and because it echoes what Edmonds used to look like in the 1920s and 1930s. However, a number of changes
have occurred to the grandstands and a significant investment would be required to bring them up to code and make them
ADA compliant. Also, the grandstand structure does not have the same architectural merit as the field house. They agreed
that the park is hugely important to Edmonds and it has always been so. Retaining some of the historic awareness and flavor
is important for the community as the master plan moves forward. Even if the field house does not qualify for the local, state
or national registers, the entire site has historic interest and there would be value in rehabilitating the structure for future use
as a preservation of how Edmonds looked in the 1930s.
Chair Scott recommended that a full assessment of the field house should be done to determine its condition and pinpoint the
changes that have occurred over time. Perhaps the City can obtain grant funding to rehabilitate the building and make it
eligible for the Register. The property is a cornerstone in downtown Edmonds. It should be maintained as a historic
playfield for the community, and the building should remain integral to the space.
CHAIR SCOTT MOVED THAT THE COMMISSION PURSUE AN ASSESSMENT RELATIVE TO THE
POTENTIAL OF LISTING THE ENTIRE CIVIC FIELD AS A HISTORIC SITE AND THE FIELD HOUSE AS A
HISTORIC STRUCTURE ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES. SHE FURTHER MOVED
co
0
N
a
N
d
c
N
M
2
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
June 29, 2016 Page 2
Packet Pg. 7
2.1.b
THAT THE COMMISSION ENCOURAGE THE CITY TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND ENSURE THAT THE
HISTORY OF THE SITE IS PROMINENT IN THE MASTER PLAN. VICE CHAIR VOGEL SECONDED THE
MOTION.
Although the Commission has done so in the past, Mr. Chave cautioned against designating sites on the Register. It is
basically designating a historic fact rather than a structure. While it may be appropriate to place a plaque on the site to
recognize the historic location, it should not be placed on the Register. This type of site acknowledgement is better suited to
the Museum, and the Commission's role is more related to designating structures for inclusion on the Register.
THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Chair Scott was not present in the room when the motion was
approved).
co
The Commission discussed that the master plan could include a display showing what the site looked like in the 1930's. N
Another idea was to repurpose materials from the grand stand structure into the new restroom facility. They agreed to cr
continue their discussion at the next meeting. Commissioner Deiner-Karr was tasked with finding more photographs and N
information, as well. a)
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION CHAIR COMMENTS +
N
Chair Scott did not have any additional comments.
2
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONER COMMENTS i�
Vice Chair Vogel announced that a video recording of the recent public meeting on the Civic Field Master Plan is available
on line at www.myedmondsnews.com.
Commissioner Raetzloff recalled that he was asked to write an article about the history of Civic Field, and he invited
Commissioners to forward useful information to him.
Council Member Johnson requested that Mr. Lien and Chair Scott meet with her and Council Member Teitzel after the
meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
June 29, 2016 Page 3
Packet Pg. 8
5.1
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/11/2016
Discussion on "Gerdon House" at 209 Caspers Street for inclusion on Edmonds Historic Register
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
This house was built in 1921 for Ira Gerdon, who lived here with his family until 1948. The house is
associated with the residential development of Edmonds and is a largely intact example of the Dutch
Colonial Revival style.
Staff Recommendation
Discuss the site and recommendations
Narrative
The Gerdon house sits far back from Caspers St., on a large lot and accessed by a circular driveway.
There is an enclosed room with rooftop porch, off the eastern -most, short side. The Mueller's
purchased the home in the 1940's and at that time the home was outside the city limits and Caspers
Street was unpaved.
The Campbell family purchased the home in 2015 from the Mueller's, and is committed to maintaining
the historic appearance of the home.
Attached is the application form.
Attachments:
209 Caspers St. —Historic Register Nomination Form
Packet Pg. 9
A
F5.Ta771
Edmonds
B&nan& Register of
Etxu-ta Historic Places
amundMAM Nomination Form
Type or print all entries — Please complete all applicable sections.
Historic Name (if applicable): Gerdon House
Common (or Current) Name (if applicable): Cam bell Residence
Site Address / Location
Street Address or Location Description: 209 Caspers Street
City / ZIP Code: Tax / Parcel Number: 27032400215300
Name: Kurt Campbell
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received: 3.13.09
Updated: 3.08.16
File #: HPC-09-12
Survey/Site #: 12
Street Address: 209 Caspers Street _
City / State / ZIP Code: Edmonds WA 98020 Phone #: 206.546.4269
Name (say "Owner" if same as owner listed above): Susan Bauer, Historic Preservation Commissioner _
Contact Address: 216 4th Avenue North City / ZIP: Edmonds, WA, 98020
Contact Phone #: 206.240.5345 Date Form Completed: Originally Jan. 30, 2009 & Updated 3.08.16_
I / WE the undersigned certify that we are the owners of the property identified on this form and hereby give our
consent to having the property listed on the Edmonds Register of Historic Places.
Name (Please Print)
Signature
Name (Please Print)
Signature
Date
Date
Revised on 9114110 209 Caspers St. Historic Register Nomination Form. doc
Packet Pg. 10
5.1.a
Site is listed on the National Register of Historic Places (If checked, skip to Section F)
Site is listed on the State Register of Historic Places (If checked, skip to Section F)
Historical Significance — Please check all that apply:
Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of national, state or local
history.
2. X Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style or method of design or construction, or
represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.
3. Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder or architect who has made a substantial contribution to the art.
4. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's cultural, special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering or
architectural history.
5. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state or local history.
6. Has yielded or may be likely to yield important archaeological information related to history or prehistory.
7. Is a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily for architectural value,
or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with a historic person or event.
8. Is a birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only surviving structure or site
associated with that person.
9. Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, from distinctive design features, or from association
with historic events or cultural patterns.
10. _ Is a reconstructed building that has been executed in a historically accurate manner on the original site.
11. _ Is a creative and unique example of folk architecture and design created by persons not formally trained in the
architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal architectural or historical categories; the
designation shall include description of the boundaries.
Historical Description
In the space below, describe the history and significance of the site to Edmonds' heritage. You may elect to
describe the site's significance in your own words, attach copies of other documents or photographs, and/or make
reference to other materials (noting where those materials are available to be reviewed). For example, you may
simply note that the site is on an historical survey, noting the survey name and site number. (Please feel free to
attach any additional continuation sheets if you need more space.)
Revised on 9114110 209 Caspers St. Historic Register Nomination Form. doc Page 2 of 5
Packet Pg. 11
5.1.a
This section must be completed if the site is not on the State or National Register, or it is not on an approved historic survey.
Please provide as much information as you can.
Year Built: 1922 Architect:
Builder or Engineer (specify):
Architectural Style(s)*: Colonia, Dutch Building Form*: Single Family — Side Gable
Roof Type*: Gambrel Cladding*: Lap — siding, wood clapboard
* Note: See later reference sheets for list of choices for these items.
Overall
Changes from
Condition:
Original:
Excellent
Plan:
Cladding:
Windows:
Other: Site:
X _Good
Intact
Intact
Intact
Intact X _Original
Site
Fair
Slight
Slight
Slight
Slight
Moved
Deteriorated
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Date Moved:
Ruins
Extensive
Extensive
X Extensive
Extensive
Unexposed
X Unknown
X Unknown
Unknown
X Unknown
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan Type:
Structural System:
Foundation:
Roof Material:
Apsidal
Pavilion
Balloon/Platform
Brick
X Asphalt Comp
Metal — Tile
Center Space/
Polygonal
Braced Frame
Concrete block A. Comp - built up
None
Courtyard
X Rectangle
Brick
Concrete poured A. Comp - shingle
Other
Cross/Cruciform
Round
Clay Tile
Log
A. Comp — rolled
Slate
E-Shape
_Semi -circular
_Concrete block
None
_Tile
Unknown
Hexagonal
Square
Concrete poured
Other
Tile - clay
Wood
H-Shape
Triangular
Log
Parged
Tile - concrete
Wood plank
Irregular
T-Shape
Mixed
Post & Pier
Metal
Wood shake
L-Shape
Unknown
None
Stone
Metal - corrugated
Wood shingle
None
U-Shape
_Other
Unknown
Metal - standing seam
Octagonal
Y-Shape
Plank
Other
Post & Beam
_Steel
Stone - cut
2 Number of Stories
Stone - uncut
Unknown
Revised on 9114110 209 Caspers St. Historic Register Nomination Form. doc Page 3 of 5
Packet Pg. 12
5.1.a
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance:
(Use continuation sheets if necessary, and for any photographs or copies you are providing.)
The Gerdon house sits far back from Caspers St., on a large lot and accessed by a circular driveway. There is an enclosed
room with rooftop porch, off the eatern-most, short side. The Mueller's purchased the home in the 1940's and at that time
the home was outside the city limits and Caspers was unpaved.
The Campbell family purchased the home in 2015 from the Mueller's, and is committed to maintaining the historic
appearance of the home. They plan to add an unattached two car garage in 2016, and the garage will be constructed in a style
complimentary to the house.
(Please list and reference any sources which help document the historical value of the site)
Snohomish City Assessor site, on-line
HP Survey site list 2004 (City of Edmonds)
Location Detail
Parcel # 27032400215300
UTM Reference:
Zone 10 Easting 1261808
Northing 302214.4375
Township 27_
Range 03E Section 24
'/a Section NW
'/a'/a Section
Category
Ownership
Resource Status
Usage
District
Public
X Survey/Inventory
Current:
X Building(s)
X Private
National Register
Domestic — SF
Structure
Both
National Landmark
Site
Object
Within a District?
Yes
X No
Contributing?
Yes
No
X Unknown
State Register Historic:
Determined Eligible
Other:
Local District:
National or State Register / District:
Revised on 9114110
209 Caspers St. Historic Register Nomination Form.doc
Page 4 of 5
Packet Pg. 13
5.1.a
Edmonds
Wouzub Register of
Etxutn Historic Places
Nomination Form
Continuation Sheet for Item #
Revised on 3108116 209 Caspers St. —Historic Register Nomination Form.doc Page 5 of 5
Packet Pg. 14
6.1
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/11/2016
Update on Preservationist
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Development Services
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
Tim Raetzloff and Emily Scott have been working on the latest edition.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
N/A
Packet Pg. 15
6.2
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 08/11/2016
Update on 2017 Historic Calendars
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Development Services
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
Update by Emily Scott, Chairman on HPC 2017 Calendar
Staff Recommendation
Narrative
Packet Pg. 16