2017-02-08 Planning Board Packet�1 o� NJI Agenda
Edmonds Planning Board
"" Ixyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
1. CALL TO ORDER
%4
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
FEBRUARY 8, 2017, 7:00 PM
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Approval of Draft Minutes of Jan. 25, 2017
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
A. Development Services Director Report
PUBLIC HEARINGS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Discussion of minor adjustments to the sign code
NEW BUSINESS
A. AHA Work Plan and Budget
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
A. Review of Extended Agenda
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
Edmonds Planning Board Agenda
February 8, 2017
Page 1
2.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/8/2017
Approval of Draft Minutes of Jan. 25, 2017
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Approve the draft minutes
Narrative
Draft minutes are attached
Attachments:
PB170125d
Packet Pg. 2
2.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
January 25, 2017
Chair Rubenkonig called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public
Safety Complex, 250 — 5"b Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Carreen Rubenkonig, Chair
Nathan Monroe, Vice Chair
Matthew Cheung
Todd Cloutier
Alicia Crank
Phil Lovell
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Daniel Robles (excused)
Malia Clark, Student Representative (excused)
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
STAFF PRESENT
Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager
Jerry Bevington, Video Recorder
Karin Noyes, Recorder
BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JANUARY 11, 2017 BE APPROVED AS
SUBMITTED. VICE CHAIR MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
The agenda was revised to place New Business (Item 8) before Unfinished Business (Item 7). The remainder of the agenda
was accepted as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
No one in the audience indicated a desire to comment during this portion of the meeting.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD
Chair Rubenkonig referred the Board to the written report that was provided by the Development Services Director. Board
Member Lovell requested more information about the Economic Development Commission's (EDC) recent action to form a
Five -Corner Subgroup. Vice Chair Monroe, the Planning Board's liaison to the EDC, said the EDC discussed that the
subgroup could meet with developers and existing property owners to discuss the ideal configuration for Five Corners. There
was no indication about how and when the subgroup would share its findings with the Planning Board and/or City Council.
Chair Rubenkonig asked if any of the Board Members attended the recent presentation from Western Washington University
students about restoration and other issues for the Edmonds Marsh area as part of the 2016-2017 Sustainable Cities
Partnership. None of the Board Members indicated that they attended the event.
Packet Pg. 3
2.A.a
SOUND TRANSIT PRESENTATION ON ST3 (WITH EMPHASIS ON THE EDMONDS AREA)
Kathy Leotta, Sound Transit, Senior Transportation Planner, said she was present to provide an overview of the projects
that will be implemented over the next few decades, including those in Snohomish County and Edmonds. She reviewed that,
last year, the region grew by an average of 1,000 new residents every week, and another 800,000 people are expected to
move to Puget Sound by 2040. Congestion in the region's freeways increased over 95% from 2010 to 2015. As a result of
increased traffic, the average commuter in the Seattle area traveling during peak hours experienced 63 hours of traffic delay
in 2014.
Ms. Leotta advised that the Sound Transit District falls within the congested urban areas of Snohomish, Pierce and King
Counties. It includes 53 cities and more than 3 million people. Sound transit provides a variety of transportation alternatives,
including link light rail, expanded regional express bus service, and Sounder commuter rail service. Ridership has been
continually growing each year as they have opened new extensions and lines of service. Ridership is about 154,000 people
on an average week day, and they expect to see 47 million annual riders this year.
Ms. Leotta reminded the Board that ST3 was recently approved by voters. As proposed, the ST3 Plan will add a total of 62
new miles of light rail with stations serving 37 additional areas for a system reaching 116 miles throughout the region.
Adopted projects also include Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on I-405 and SR 522; investments to expand capacity of the Sounder
South rail line, Sound Transit express bus service, increased parking and other investments to improve access to stations for
bicyclists, pedestrians, drivers and pick-up and drop-off services. Sound Transit is working to develop an implementation
plan to present to the Board of Directors for final adoption in the spring. The goal is to complete the projects as soon as
possible. To facilitate project delivery, they will need help from local governments to speed up permitting, right-of-way
acquisition, etc.
Ms. Leotta reported that, last year, three important new stations opened: University of Washington, Capitol Hill and Angle
Lake (south of SeaTac Airport). The plan is to extend the University of Washington link further north to Northgate by 2021,
with three new lines opening in 2023. The Lynnwood line will connect the Lynnwood Transit Center to Northgate, and the
Eastlake Line will connect downtown Seattle to Mercer Island, Bellevue, Overlake and Redmond. The Tacoma link will
expand to connect to the Hill Top facility.
Michelle Ginder, Sound Transit, Light Rail Development Manager for the Lynnwood Link, explained that the
Lynnwood link will best serve Edmonds residents. It includes an 8.5-mile extension from Northgate to the Lynnwood
Transit Center, running primarily along the east side of I-5 to the Mountlake Terrace Transit Center and then crossing over to
the west side to get to the Lynnwood Transit Center. In addition to the two transit centers, stations are planned at 145th and
185th Streets in Shoreline. The project also calls for additional parking along the corridor, with approximately 500 more
spaces each added at the Lynnwood, 145th and 185th Street Stations. Planning for the project started in 2010 and the
environmental review process and preliminary engineering work have already been completed. Preliminary design work
started in April of 2016, and the project is now at 30% design completion. They are hoping to reach 100% design towards
the end of 2018, and construction is expected to start shortly thereafter. It is anticipated that construction will take about five
years to complete and the project will open sometime in 2023. She summarized that, during peak travel times, there will be a
train every four minutes, and it will take 28 minutes to get from Lynnwood to downtown Seattle. They are expecting about
74,000 riders each weekday by 2035.
Ms. Ginder shared conceptual designs for the Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood Stations, noting that the Mountlake Terrace
station will be right at the existing transit center on 236th Street, just east of I-5. Currently, the site is developed with a bus
station and a large parking garage. The new station will be elevated to straddle the interstate, and no additional parking is
planned at this time. Sound Transit is working with Community Transit to integrate the services. The Lynnwood Transit
Center is large now, with about 1,400 parking spaces. The proposed station would be elevated, and parking would be
consolidated into a garage.
Ms. Leotta said another major project for Snohomish County is the light rail line from the Lynnwood Transit Center to
Everett by way of Paine Field and the Southwest Everett Industrial Center and from the Lynnwood Transit Center to I-405
Planning Board Minutes
January 25, 2017 Page 2
Packet Pg. 4
0
and points further south. In addition, ST3 calls for a study of a potential light rail cxtcnsion to North Everett. She reviewed
what citizens can expect to occur year to year as follows:
• In 2024, a light rail extension line will open from the Overlake Transit Center to downtown Redmond, and another
from the Angle Lake Station south to the Federal Way Transit Center.
• Two more light rail lines will open in 2030. One will connect West Seattle to downtown Seattle, and another will
connect the Federal Way Transit Center to the Tacoma Dome.
• Three infill station will be added to existing lines at South Graham Street in the Rainier Valley, the Boeing Access
Road, and NE 130th Street on the North Seattle line.
• In 2035, it is anticipated that the Ballard to downtown Seattle route will include a new subway through downtown.
• Light rail service from Lynnwood to Everett is anticipated in 2036. And light rail service to Kirkland and Issaquah is
anticipated in 2041.
In addition to the projects listed above, Ms. Leotta advised that ST3 also includes plans to improve access to stations with
expanded parking and improved walking and bicycle routes and bus connections. $40 million has been earmarked for
parking improvements at the Edmonds and Mukilteo stations. These projects are expected to go out for procurement by the
end of the year. At that point, Sound Transit will work with the local jurisdictions to identify a location and design.
Ms. Leotta said that, as ridership increases, it will be important for customers to access systems by means other than driving.
Sound Transit is working with King County Metro, Community Transit and others in an effort to integrate light rail service
with other modes of transit. Alternate modes of transportation will be a key focus in the future station plans. She explained
that not only does Sound Transit have a funding mechanism for existing and planned new projects, they also partner with
jurisdictions and provide some funding to help improve non -motorized access to and from the stations.
Ms. Leotta advised that Transit Oriented Development (TOD) is very important to the Sound Transit Board Members, and
new legislation actually requires Sound Transit to make the majority of its surplus land available for affordable housing. The
agency cannot purchase property for TOD, but oftentimes, Sound Transit must acquire property for construction staging and
it is surplus when the project is finished. The law requires that the majority of the surplus property be made available for
potential affordable housing opportunities.
Board Member Lovell asked if Ms. Leotta or Ms. Ginder have any idea when Sound Transit will make a decision relative to
the potential 2201h Street Station. Ms. Leotta answered that, at this time, there is no funding for a station in this location. Ms.
Ginder added that the station could be included as part of a future ballot measure, and it will remain as a potential site on the
plan in case there is money left over from ST3. She explained that Sound Transit will purchase the property for use as a
staging area for the Lynnwood link construction. At the request of Chair Rubenkonig, Ms. Ginder explained that the Sound
Transit will acquire the southwest corner of 2201h Street for construction staging. At this time, the property is owned by the
Edmonds School District.
Board Member Lovell commented that there is currently a BRT median at the Mountlake Terrace Transit Facility. He asked
if Sound Transit has considered how this facility would be used when the light rail line is in place and it is no longer needed.
Ms. Ginder answered that there is still intent to continue using the facility for bus service, and King County Metro and
Community Transit are discussing different ideas for alternative types of service that might be able to utilize the existing
facility.
Board Member Lovell asked if Sound Transit has any idea where the parking facility in Edmonds might be located. Ms.
Leotta answered that no location has been selected yet. As Sound Transit goes through its environmental design study, they
will consider potential option. Board Member Lovell asked if there is a rough target as to the number of cars the parking
facility will accommodate. Ms. Leotta answered that no decision has been made as to whether the parking facility will be
structured or surface parking, but Sound Transit anticipates that several hundred parking spaces would be provided.
Board Member Crank asked if there has been any discussion about acquiring land in Edmonds for TOD purposes. Ms. Leotta
explained that Sound Transit is not legally allowed to acquire land for TOD, but they can acquire land for construction
staging. When the project is done, the property can be turned over and/or sold at a discount for affordable housing.
Planning Board Minutes
January 25, 2017 Page 3
Packet Pg. 5
2.A.a
Board Member Crank said she was surprised that the Sounder Train did not provide additional service to transport people to
and from the Mariner and Seahawk games. Ms. Ginder said there was special service to and from weekend Seahawk games,
as well as other special events. However, Sound Transit does not have any plans in place to increase the frequency of the
trains on a regular basis.
Board Member Cheung referred to the graphic illustration of the transit times from the Lynnwood Transit Station to various
other locations. He said he has used the train to get from Westlake Center to SeaTac Airport, and it took him roughly an hour
because of the frequent stops. He questioned if it would really be possible to get from the Lynnwood Transit Center all the
way to the airport in an hour. Mr. Chave said he frequently uses the train from Westlake to the airport, and it typically takes
him about a half hour. Ms. Leotta explained that, in the future, there will not be any busses in the downtown tunnel, and this
should improve transit times.
Vice Chair Monroe asked for more information about the timeline for the new Sounder Station in Edmonds. He also asked if
the At -Grade Crossing Study was coordinated with the new station project. Board Member Lovell said his understanding is
that the crossing proposal, as endorsed by the City Council, is independent of Sound Transit's plan for a new station. As
currently proposed, the crossing would not impact the planned station or parking facility because it would be located
considerably further north.
Chair Rubenkonig asked if Sound Transit has identified potential sites for the new station in Edmonds. She recalled that,
years ago, there were plans for a multimodal station near Marina Beach. Ms. Leotta said Sound Transit has not identified any
potential sites yet. She reviewed that when the ST2 Plan was adopted, the Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) was planning to relocate the ferry terminal, and the ST2 Plan included funding to move the Sounder station to the
same general area as the relocated ferry terminal. The ferry project was subsequently postponed and Sound Transit had to go
through a process of determining how to deliver as much of the ST2 program as possible given the impact of the recession.
The project to relocate the station was removed from the program because WSDOT was no longer moving forward with their
project. If WSDOT decides at some future point to relocate the ferry terminal, there may be an opportunity to move the
Sounder station consistent with it. The current station project identified in ST3 assumes that both the ferry and the Sounder
station will stay in their current locations.
Vice Chair Monroe asked if the $40 million earmarked for parking facilities in Edmonds and Mukilteo would be split equally
between the two projects, and Ms. Leotta answered that it is likely that the projects would be equitable and implemented at
the same time.
Vice Chair Monroe asked when Sound Transit would make a decision on whether to sell or hold the 220th Street property.
Ms. Ginder said this decision would not be made until the Lynnwood link has been completed. At this time, it is too early to
say what will happen to the property. Vice Chair Monroe expressed concern that the decision relative to 220th Street should
be made sooner rather than later. Board Member Lovell summarized that the right-of-way would be acquired for the track
and the construction staging area. It could be decided at the completion of the track that a portion of the property should be
retained for an additional station area to serve the medical district. The rest would be surplussed. He noted that the site is
quite large.
Board Member Lovell encouraged Board Members to visit Sound Transit's website where they can view a marvelous video
that provides an aerial view of riding the train from Mountlake Terrace to Lynnwood. The video gives an idea of the route
and how the trains will enter the Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood Transit Centers.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND PLANNING BOARD RETREAT
Chair Rubenkonig recalled that the Board has discussed the concept of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) as an allowed use
in the residential zones. The topic was initially raised as a concept to consider when addressing affordable housing options as
a way for citizens to "age in place." The idea was that existing homeowners could construct ADUs to provide extra income
that allows them to remain in their current homes or in the ADU as they age.
Board Member Cheung said his understanding is that the current code allows attached ADUs, but not detached ADUs. He
said he would like to know the process for moving forward with code amendments that would allow both detached and
Planning Board Minutes
January 25, 2017 Page 4
Packet Pg. 6
attached ADUs in single-family zones. It would be helpful to hear from the public about whether or not they would support
the concept.
Board Member Lovell commented that if detached and attached ADUs are allowed or even encouraged in single-family
zones as an option for affordable housing, it would be appropriate and necessary to have provisions in place to address
parking requirements, setback requirements, etc.
The Board discussed possible dates for a retreat and agreed it would be helpful to have it sometime in early spring. They also
discussed potential topics for the agenda:
• Chair Rubenkonig agreed to review the minutes from the 2016 retreat and identify discussions items that need to be
revisited by the Board.
• Board Member Lovell recalled that, in the past, the Board has invited the City's legal counsel to provide an update
on ethics and/or public meeting procedures.
• Given the Board's future focus on affordable housing, Board Member Lovell suggested it might be helpful to invite
developers of for -profit and non-profit affordable housing to share insight on what needs to happen in order for them
to look more favorably at developing a project in Edmonds. Chair Rubenkonig said it would also be helpful for
them to share examples of projects that have been completed.
• Board Member Cheung said it could also be insightful to invite commercial developers to share their thoughts on
why they would or would not choose to develop in Edmonds. He noted that there are quite a few commercial
properties in Edmonds that are ripe for redevelopment, and it would be helpful to have information about potential
changes that would make the properties more attractive to developers.
REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA
Chair Rubenkonig reported that she had a brief discussion with the Development Services Director regarding the Board's
extended agenda and learned that much of their work in 2017 will involve development code work, including potential
amendments to the sign code, Shoreline Management Program, Critical Area Ordinance and Highway 99 Subarea Plan. The
Board will also return to their work on the Edmonds Housing Strategy based on the findings of a housing specialist
consultant.
Mr. Chave clarified that it is not likely that the Shoreline Management Program will come back before the Board in 2017. He
reminded them that they previously forwarded their recommendation to the City Council. He also noted that the Board has
completed its work on the Highway 99 Subarea Plan and a recommendation was forwarded to the City Council. Additional
Planning Board work relative to Highway 99 will be the code amendments needed to implement the subarea plan once it is
adopted by the City Council.
Chair Rubenkonig reviewed that, following the staff presentation on January 11", the Board is now familiar with the Five
Corners Planning Study of 2011. Under Director Shane Hope's purview, the feasibility of the plan will be reviewed with a
consultant before any further action is taken by the Planning Board. The Board may want to consider another topic to review
in a joint meeting with the Architectural Design Board (ADB).
Mr. Chave explained that, at the recent City Council retreat, Ms. Hope advised that it would be wise to do a feasibility study
of the Five Corners area before proceeding with implementation of the University of Washington study. The intent of the
study is to take a step back and study the feasibility of a range of options that might be appropriate for Five Corners. The
City Council agreed that this work should be done as a precursor to diving into the Five Corners Subarea Plan and
implementing zoning. The first step to move the plan forward is to hire a consultant to do the feasibility study. However, the
work will not likely be done before the Board's retreat in early spring.
Board Member Crank noted that, over the course of several meetings, there have been discussions about the potential of
having joint meetings with the City Council, Architectural Design Board and Economic Development Commission. She
asked when these joint meetings would be reflected on the extended agenda. Chair Rubenkonig explained that it is typical
for the Board's extended agenda to be skeletal at the beginning of the year. However, meeting agenda are quickly filled in
after the City Council's retreat when the priorities become more clear. Mr. Chave suggested that Chair Rubenkonig and
Planning Board Minutes
January 25, 2017 Page 5
Packet Pg. 7
2.A.a
Vice Chair Monroe could discuss the possibility of meeting jointly with the City Council when they meet next with Mayor
Earling. Board Member Crank suggested that joint meetings be added to the list of pending agenda items so that the concept
is not lost as the year progresses.
Vice Chair Monroe observed that the recurring topics have been listed for several years, yet none of the items have been on
the agenda while he has served on the Board. Mr. Chave answered that the Board does receive periodic updates from the
Parks and Recreation Department, and staff typically provides an update on Adult Entertainment every other year.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Rubenkonig did not provide any additional comments.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Board Member Crank announced that she was recently contacted by Francis Chapin, Cultural Services Manager, with a
request that she serve on the Advisory Group for the Economic Impact of Arts and Culture Study. A Request for
Qualifications was sent out in December, and the group would be responsible for reviewing the proposals, meeting with
consultants, and making a recommendation to the City Council. She agreed to participate as a representative of both the
Planning Board and the Chamber.
ADJOURNMENT
The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
Planning Board Minutes
January 25, 2017 Page 6
Packet Pg. 8
5.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/8/2017
Development Services Director Report
Staff Lead: Shane Hope, Director
Department: Development Services
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and discuss
Narrative
Report is attached
Attachments:
Director. Report.02.03.17
Packet Pg. 9
5.A.a
of r��s
a
Date:
To:
From:
Subject
February 3, 2017
Planning Board Members
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Director Report
Happy Valentine's Day!
Next Planning Board Meeting
The next Planning Board meeting on February 8 will feature a discussion of potential new sign code
amendments related to pedestrian signs.
REGIONAL NEWS
Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC)
❑ The Regional Centers Update Project continues to wind its way through consideration and
refinements. After approval of a draft report by the Stakeholder Working Group in late
January, the Growth Management Policy Board received the report at its February 2 meeting
and will be getting more public input and discussing the report at next month's meeting. The
report includes recommendations for updating definitions and criteria for regional growth
centers and for manufacturing/industrial centers.
❑ The Transportation Policy Board's meeting on February 9 meeting will include authorizing
changes in status for certain projects in the Transportation 2040 Plan and discussing
coordination with the Puget Sound Clear Air Agency on gas emission reduction targets.
Snohomish County Tomorrow (SCT)
❑ The SCT Steering Committee (composed primarily of elected officials) met last on January 25.
Its agenda featured an update on the PSRC Regional Centers Framework.
❑ The SCT Planning Advisory Committee (composed primarily of department directors) will meet
on February 9 to discuss subjects such as the 2016 Growth Monitoring Report, Alliance for
Housing Affordability, and the PSRC Regional Centers Framework.
Alliance for Housing Affordability (AHA)
❑ The AHA Board (of which Edmonds is a member) last met on January 25. Agenda items
included: budget and work plan; "source of income discrimination" report, Highway 99
report, and an initial report from the Collaborative Funding subcommittee.
1 1 P a g e
Packet Pg. 10
5.A.a
❑ The policy coordinator for AHA will make a presentation to the Edmonds City Council on
February 14. This is part of a series of briefings for the Snohomish County area. This will also
be an opportunity for Edmonds to consider approving AHA's work program and budget. (Each
local government pays a portion, based on population, of the basic costs to operate AHA.)
LOCAL NEWS
Architectural Design Board
The Architectural Design Board met on February 1. The agenda included a request from the Everett
Clinic for an additional wall sign area for three open signs adjacent to the existing wall signs.
Economic Development Commission
The Economic Development Commission's next meeting is February 15. An agenda will be ready
before then and posted online.
Hearing Examiner
The Hearing Examiner's next meeting is February 9. QFC is proposing to construct a new canopy to
cover an existing trash compactor located within the minimum required street setback. The site is
located in the Westgate Mixed -Use (WMU) zone. The existing trash compactor is within the required
16-foot setback from Edmonds Way (SR-104), and the proposed canopy would cover the trash
compactor in its current location.
Historic Preservation
The Historic Preservation Commission's next meeting will be on February 9. Items for discussion are:
Commissioner Roles; and assessment of current procedures.
Tree Board
The Tree Board met on February 2. It agenda included: establishing a 2017 events calendar,
developing a presentation for the March 14 City Council Meeting, and introduction of new Tree Board
members.
City Council
The Council's February 7 meeting will include topics such as:
❑ Process for Amending Sign Code
❑ Shoreline Master Program Options
❑ Francis Anderson Center Band shell Project Budget Authorization
❑ City Council Meeting Format
COMMUNITY CALENDAR
❑ Feb. 7: Public Restroom ribbon cutting, next to city hall, 11 am
❑ Feb. 7: Starlight Beach Walk, Olympic Beach Visitor Station, 7 — 8:30 pm
❑ Feb. 9: 2017 State of the City Address, Edmonds Theater, beginning at 8:30 am
❑ Feb. 16: Edmonds Art Walk, 5 — 8 pm
❑ Feb. 25: Edmonds Clam Chowder Cook -Off, Edmonds Yacht Club, 11 am — 4 pm.
21Pane
Packet Pg. 11
7.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/8/2017
Discussion of minor adjustments to the sign code
Staff Lead: Rob Chave
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Rob Chave
Background/History
The City Council approved amendments to the sign code on August 2, 2016.
Staff Recommendation
Prepare for public hearing on February 22, 2017.
Narrative
The Council adopted amendments to the Edmonds sign code (ECDC 20.60) on August 2, 2016. The
amendments covered a variety of minor code adjustments, with the most substantial changes dealing
with "pedestrian signs" (e.g. A -frames and sandwich boards). The business community has provided
feedback since the code was amended, and staff is suggesting a few modifications. The issues are
summarized in Attachment 1. Attachment 2 contains an interpretation issued by the Development
Services Director dealing with pre-existing pedestrian signs and allowed sign area. Attachment 3 shows
how potential amendments could be included in an updated sign code dealing with the issues identified
in Attachment 1.
Attachments:
Attachment 1: Summary of Potential Sign Code Issues
Attachment 2: Sign Code Interpretation 2016-1
Attachment 3: Draft Sign Code amendments
Packet Pg. 12
7.A.a
Potential Sign Code Issues / Changes
Cost
Current. Current fees for blade signs (all proposed blade signs) are $75. Current fees for pedestrian signs
(all proposed pedestrian signs) are $125. These are one-time fees and do not require renewal. Note that
$35 technology fee also applies, so the total fees are $110 and $160, respectively.
Options. (1) Reduce pedestrian sign fee to match blade sign fee ($75).
(2) Reduce fees for blade/pedestrian signs to $50 (+ $35 = $85).
* Note that fees are set by Council resolution and do not require a code change
Sign Area
Current. Pedestrian signs, because they are now considered "permanent" signage, count against overall
business sign area. A Director's Interpretation enables pre-existing signs to be 'grandfathered' so that
they do not count against allowed sign area. Note that blade signs do not count against sign area — an
incentive encouraging these types of signs.
Options. (1) Retain the current situation with the grandfathering of pre-existing signs.
(2) Memorialize the 'interpretation' in code.
(3) Amend the code so that pedestrian signs do not count against sign area (the same as
the old code)
Location
Current. Pedestrian signs must be located within 10 feet of the building entrance and within 2 feet of
the building fagade. Deviation from the 2-feet-from-fagade requirement must be reviewed by the ADB,
with a high fee ($915). The old code allowed pedestrian signs on the lot rather than being tied to the
business location. Off -site pedestrian signs were never allowed.
Options. (1) Allow for variation from the 2-feet-from-fagade requirement to be approved by staff
($285), or establish a special specific fee for this type of review commensurate with the
reduced fee for these types of signs (e.g. $50).
(2) Expand the allowed variation to include locations on the business property (tied to
the building or lot the business is located on).
Out -of -Sight Businesses
Current. All commercial signage is tied to the business location. This means off -site commercial signage
is not permitted. This has always been the case, for legal reasons.
Options. (1) Clearly provide for public directional signage in the code for purposes of tourism and
public information. This would need to be provided and/or sponsored by a public
agency (e.g. BID).
Packet Pg. 13
7.A.b
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 1, 2016
To: Interpretations File No. 2016-1
From: Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Subject: Total Size of Existing Wall Signs and Pedestrian Signs in
Downtown/Waterfront Area
Date Issued/Posted: SEPTEMBER 5, 2016
Effective Date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 (unless appealed in a timely manner)
ISSUE OUTLINE:
A sign code amendment (Ordinance # 4039) was adopted on August 2 and became effective on August
12, 2106. It is codified in Chapter 20.60 ECDC. The code change requires a permit for pedestrian signs,
which are defined to include A -frames and similar portable signage, in the downtown/ waterfront area.
It also adds limitations on number, size, and location of such signs. However, as business owners have
begun coming in to obtain their permits, the new requirement for pedestrian signs to count in the total
allowed signage for the frontage has become problematic for those existing businesses that already had
a permitted wall sign of maximum allowed size and a pedestrian sign that, of itself, meets the new size
and location requirements except that, when counted together with the existing wall sign, exceeds the
total signage size limit.
ANALYSIS:
Businesses that previously installed wall signage to the allowed size and also used a pedestrian sign did
so under existing regulations at the time. To now remove and replace the existing wall signage with new
smaller wall signage, so that an existing pedestrian sign can be retained, would be costly. A question has
arisen whether businesses may obtain a pedestrian sign permit if they have an existing pedestrian sign
that meets all requirements for pedestrian signs, except that the combined size of the pedestrian sign
and the existing permitted wall signage would exceed the total allowed size by six square feet or less.
The nonconformance provisions of the Edmonds Community Development Code (Chapter 17.40 ECDC)
allow certain uses that were once allowed but are no longer allowed, due to a later code change, to
continue under limited conditions. ECDC 17.40.040 (Nonconforming Signs) has particular relevance.
This provision is not intended to allow wholesale continuation of uses once legal but later prohibited or
restricted. However, the nonconformance provision (sometimes known as "grandfathering") may be
Packet Pg. 14
7.A.b
interpreted to apply in the narrow context of the new limit on the combined total size of an existing wall
sign (permitted prior to August 12, 2016) and a pedestrian sign (allowed prior to August 12, 2016), when
a pedestrian sign meets all other requirements of ECDC 20.60.055, as amended.
At the same time, it is recognized that the sign code is undergoing further review and the City Council
has requested that the Development Services Department report back on this topic, including
implementation of Ordinance No. 4039, in 2017. The sign code may be amended by the City Council at
any time and additional restrictions added. Any interpretation now regarding pedestrian signage should
not be viewed as continuing long-term.
THEREFORE, THE FOLLOWING INTERPRETATION IS HEREBY ISSUED:
In the downtown/waterfront area, where a wall sign exists that was legally permitted prior to August
12, 2016, and a pedestrian sign has been in place during some or all of the period between June 12,
2016 and August 12, 2016, the pedestrian sign need not be counted in the total square footage of the
allowed size for permanent signage for purposes of obtaining a permit for the pedestrian sign,
provided that a complete permit application is received within 45 days of the effective date of this
interpretation.
This interpretation does not apply to any other aspects of the sign code. To wit, the number,
size, and location of individual pedestrian signs and any other applicable code restrictions
must otherwise be fully met.
❑ This interpretation does not apply to pedestrian signs when a wall sign is applied for after
August 12, 2016.
❑ This interpretation does not apply if:
o A complete application for a pedestrian sign permit is not received by the City within
45 days of the effective date of this interpretation; or
o The City's sign code is amended after August 12, 2016 to further restrict or prohibit
pedestrian signs in a manner that would conflict with this interpretation.
APPEAL PROCDURES:
Pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Section 20.01.003(A), formal
interpretations of the text of the ECDC by the director or designated staff are appealable as Type II
decisions.
Should anyone wish to appeal this interpretation, a written appeal, accompanied by the required appeal
fee (see Planning Division fee handout) must be submitted within 14 calendar days of the date of
issuance/posting of this interpretation.
The deadline for filing an appeal of this interpretation is: 4:30 P.M. ON SEPT. 19, 2016.
A written appeal must contain the following:
1. The appellant's name, address and phone number;
2. A statement describing the appellant's standing to appeal;
3. Identification of the application which is the subject of the appeal;
4. The appellant's statement of grounds for appeal and the facts upon which the appeal is based
with specific references to the facts in the record;
5. The specific relief sought;
Packet Pg. 15
7.A.b
6. A statement that the appellant has read the appeal and believes the contents to be true,
followed by the appellant's signature.
Notice: 1) Published in the Everett Herald
2) Posted at Edmonds City Hall, 2nd Floor— Development Services Department
3) Posted at Public Safety Complex, 121 5t" Ave N
4) Posted at Edmonds Library
Packet Pg. 16
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Chapter 20.60
SIGN CODE
Sections:
20.60.000
Purpose.
20.60.005
Definitions.
20.60.010
Permit required.
20.60.015
Design review procedures.
20.60.020
General regulations for permanent signs.
20.60.025
Total maximum permanent sign area.
20.60.030
Wall signs — Maximum area and height.
20.60.035
Window signs — Maximum area.
20.60.040
Projecting signs — Maximum area and height restrictions.
20.60.045
Freestanding signs — Regulations.
20.60.050
Wall graphic and identification structures.
20.60.055
Pedestrian signs.
20.60.060
Campaign signs.
20.60.065
Real estate signs.
20.60.070
Construction signs.
20.60.080
Temporary signs.
20.60.090
Prohibited signs.
20.60.095
Exempt signs.
20.60.100
Administration.
Page 1/18
20.60.000 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to enact regulatory measures to implement those goals and policies stated in the
Edmonds Comprehensive Policy Plan and to achieve the following objectives:
A. Protect the public right-of-way from obstructions which would impair the public's use of their right-of-way.
B. Minimize the hazard to the public represented by distractions to drivers from moving, blinking, or other similar
forms of signage or visual clutter.
C. Provide for distinct signage for each distinct property.
D. Encourage the use of graphics/symbols to reduce the visual clutter associated with overly large letters or
extensive use of lettering.
E. Minimize potential for view blockage and visual clutter along public rights -of -way. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A),
2016; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.005 Definitions.
For the purposes of the enforcement of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
"Attached sign" is any sign attached or affixed to a building. Attached signs include wall signs, projecting signs, and
window signs.
"Boxed cabinet sign" is a permanent sign that is mounted on the face of a building that is roughly rectangular in
shape and provides for internal illumination and changing the message of the sign by replacing a single transparent
or translucent material such as a Plexiglass/Lexan face. This definition is meant to distinguish between a cabinet
sign that is essentially a rectangular box and one that follows the outlines of the letters of the sign, or an "outline
cabinet sign."
"Building ID/historic sign" is a permanent sign that identifies or names a building and assists in creating landmarks
in the city. Examples include dates, "1890"; names, "Beeson Building"; or addresses.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 17
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 2/18
"Campaign sign" is a temporary sign displaying a message relating to a candidate, political party, or issue that is
registered or certified for an upcoming election.
"Commercial sign" is a sign displayed for the purpose of identifying a commercial use, or advertising a service,
product, business or venture that is offered for trade or sale.
"Community event banner" is a noncommercial sign composed of cloth, fabric, canvas or similarly flexible material
that promotes a temporary community event endorsed, operated or sponsored wholly or in part by a local public
entity the jurisdiction of which includes the city of Edmonds. "Community events" are nonprofit, governmental or
charitable festivals, contests, programs, fairs, carnivals or recreational contests conducted within the city.
"Construction sign" is a permanent or temporary sign displayed on premises where any physical excavation,
construction, demolition, rehabilitation, structural alteration or related work is currently occurring, pursuant to a
valid building permit.
"Directional symbols" are small in size (two square feet or less) and intended to provide on -site directions to
specific locations or areas (such as parking areas, drive -through facilities, ATMs and entries and/or exits), hours of
operation, parking limitations, warnings of hazards, prohibition of activities (such as "no parking"), historical
markers and similar public information. Directional symbols are not considered to be signage as regulated in this
chapter.
"Fixed sign" is any sign attached or affixed to the ground or any structure in such a manner so as to provide for
continuous display for an extended or indeterminable period of time. Fixed signs include, but are not limited to,
freestanding signs and wall signs.
"Freestanding sign" is any sign that is not attached or affixed to a building. Freestanding signs can be further
described as "monument signs" or "pole signs."
"Governmental sign" is a sign owned, operated or sponsored by a governmental entity, and which promotes the
public health, safety or welfare. Governmental signs include, but are not limited to, traffic signs, directional and
informational signs for public f ci , publicly sponsored warning or hazard signs, and community event banners
displayed by a governmental entity on public property.
"Group sign" is a sign or signs on one sign structure serving two or more businesses sharing a parking facility.
"Halo sign" is a sign where the light source is concealed behind an opaque face and the rays of illumination are
projected outward around the edges of the sign or directed against the surface behind the sign forming a silhouette or
halo effect. Halo signs are not considered to be internally illuminated signs for the purposes of this chapter.
"Identification structure" is a structure intended to attract the attention of the public to a site, without the use of
words or symbols identifying the businesses. Examples include fountains, sculptures, awnings, and totem poles.
"Internally illuminated signs" include any sign where light shines through a transparent or semi -transparent sign face
to illuminate the sign's message. Exposed neon is considered to be a form of internal illumination.
"Marquee" or "canopy" is a permanent roofed structure attached and supported by the building.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 18
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 3/18
Z
r
"Marquee sign" is any sign attached to or made a part of a building marquee. A marquee sign is a form of projecting
sign.
"Monument signs" are freestanding signs that have integrated the structural component of the sign into the design of
the sign and sign base.
"Noncommercial sign" is a sign that is intended to display a religious, charitable, cultural, governmental,
informational, political, educational, or artistic message, that is not primarily associated with a good, product, or
service offered for sale or trade. Noncommercial signs include signs advertising incidental and temporary
commercial activities conducted by churches and nonprofit businesses, clubs, groups, associations or organizations.
"Off -premises sign" is any sign that advertises or relates to a good, product, service, event, or meeting, that is
offered, sold, traded, provided, or conducted at some location or premises other than that upon which the sign is
posted or displayed. Off -premises signs include all signs posted or displayed in the public right-of-way.
"On -premises sign" is any sign that advertises or relates to a good, product, service, event, or meeting that is
lawfully permitted to be offered, sold, traded, provided, or conducted at the location or premises upon which the
sign is posted or displayed. On -premises signs also include signs not related to any particular location or premises,
such as signs displaying religious, charitable, cultural, governmental, informational, political, educational, or artistic
messages that are intentionally displayed by the owner of the property or premises upon which the sign is displayed.
"Outline cabinet sign" is a permanent sign that is mounted on the face of a building that roughly follows the shape of
the text or symbology of the sign and provides for internal illumination. This definition is meant to distinguish
between a cabinet sign that follows the outlines of the letters of the sign and one that is essentially a rectangular box
or a "boxed cabinet sign." An "outlined cabinet sign" will be treated more like an "individual letter sign" where the
area of the sign is calculated based on the actual outlined shape of the sign.
"Permanent sign" is a fixed or portable sign intended for continuous or intermittent display for periods exceeding 60
days in any calendar year.
"Pole signs" are freestanding signs where the structural support for the sign is one or more exposed pole(s). Pole
signs may include community event banners where the banner is supported by at least two poles that are
permanently attached to the ground ("pole -mounted community event banners"). However, pole signs with two
poles that are not more than six feet in height are considered to be monument signs.
"Portable sign" is any sign that is readily capable of being moved or removed, whether attached or affixed to the
ground, or any structure that is typically intended for temporary display. Portable signs include, but are not limited
to:
1. Signs designed and constructed with a chassis or support with or without wheels;
2. Pedestrian signs, including signs such as A -frame (sandwich board), stanchion, easel, or post -style signs
intended as freestanding signs in pedestrian environments;
Left: Stanchion sign
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 19
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 4/18
3. Wooden, metal, or plastic "stake" or "yard" signs;
4. Posters or banners affixed to windows, railings, overhangs, trees, hedges, or other structures or vegetation,
except for pole -mounted community event banners;
5. Signs mounted upon vehicles parked and visible from the public right-of-way, except signs identifying the
related business when the vehicle is being used in the normal day-to-day operation of the business, and except
for signs advertising for sale the vehicle upon which the sign is mounted;
6. Searchlights;
7. Inflatables.
"Premises" is the actual physical area of the lot upon which a sign is posted or displayed.
"Projecting sign" is any sign attached or affixed to a building or wall in such a manner that its leading edge extends
more than 12 inches beyond the surface of such building or wall.
"Reader board sign" is a sign that is designed to allow for a change in the message, either by adding or removing
plastic letters, or by means of electronics and lights. Reader boards do not include signs which have a changeable
message where the sign does not change more than once per day and where the changeable features are integrated
with the background and overall design of the sign, including the sign's typefaces, colors and symbology. Individual
letters or numbers placed on a solid colored background is considered to be a reader board.
Two signs at left: Acceptable changeable message sign;
Two signs at right: A reader board.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 20
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
OPEN HOUSE
NOVEMBER E
ra-4
Page 5/18
SOULAR POWERED
BY THE SON
EGME IN AND WORSHIP
PASTOR REV HARRY H JOHNS 11I
"Real estate sign" is a sign displaying a message relating to the sale or rent of real property
"Sign" is any structure, device or fixture that is visible from a public place, that incorporates graphics, symbols, or
written copy for the purposes of conveying a particular message to public observers, including wall graphics or
identification structures.
"Sign area" is the area of a sign on which copy is to be placed, as set forth in ECDC 20.60.020(A).
"Temporary sign" is a sign intended for short-term display, not to exceed 60 calendar days in any calendar year.
Window signs meeting the requirements of ECDC 20.60.035 are not regulated as temporary signs.
"Wall graphic" is a wall sign, including murals, in which color and form, and primarily without the use of words, are
a part of the overall design on the building(s) where the wall graphic is proposed. A wall graphic may be painted or
applied (not to exceed one-half inch in thickness) to a building as a part of its overall color and design, but may not
be internally lighted. Internally lighted assemblies, including those which project from the wall of the structure, or
which are located on any accessory structure on the site, shall be considered wall signs and comply with the
requirements of this chapter.
"Wall sign" is a sign that is attached or affixed to a wall and that is parallel to and not projecting more than 12
inches at any angle from such wall. Wall signs include signs that are painted directly upon a wall.
"Window sign" is a sign that is attached or affixed to a window, or a sign displayed within 24 inches of the inside of
a window in such a manner as to be visible from any public place. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3800 § 1,
2010; Ord. 3631 § 1, 2007; Ord. 3628 § 8, 2007; Ord. 3561 § 1, 2005; Ord. 3514 § 1, 2004; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.010 Permit required.
A. Except as provided in this chapter, no permanent sign may be constructed, installed, posted, displayed or
modified without first obtaining a sign permit approving the proposed sign's size, design, location, and display as
provided for in this chapter.
B. Design approval is not required for the posting of permanent signs in residential zones; provided, that the
restrictions and standards of this chapter are met. If additional signage is requested for conditional or nonconforming
uses in residential zones, the property owner shall apply for design review. Design review is not required for any
sign which does not require a building permit.
C. A sign modification shall include, but is not limited to, relocations, modifications to size, design, height or color
scheme, or the replacement of 25 percent or more of the structural material in the sign area. Normal and ordinary
maintenance and repair, and changes to the graphics, symbols, or copy of a sign, without affecting the size,
structural design, height, or color scheme, shall not constitute modifications for purposes of this section. [Ord. 4039
§ 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3514 § 2, 2004; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 21
7.A.c
Edmonds Page 6/18
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
20.60.015 Design review procedures.
A. Staff Approval. Except as referred to the architectural design board pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section,
and except as provided in subsection (B) of this section, the planning manager, or designee, shall review all
applications for design review under this chapter, and shall approve, conditionally approve or deny the application in
accordance with the policies of ECDC 20.10.000 and the standards and requirements of this chapter; provided, that
for murals and artwork the planning manager or designee shall review the application in accordance with the criteria
set forth in subsection (C) of this section. The decision of the planning manager on any sign permit application shall
be final except that signs reviewed by the architectural design board are appealable to the hearing examiner.
1. The planning manager or designee may refer design review applications to the architectural design board for
the types of signs listed below, where the planning manager determines that the proposed sign has the potential
for significant adverse impacts on community aesthetics or traffic safety:
a. Any sign application for an identification structure as defined by this chapter;
b. Any sign application for a wall graphic as defined by this chapter;
c. Any proposed sign that the planning manager determines to be obtrusive, garish or otherwise not
consistent with the architectural features of the surrounding neighborhood.
B. Review by Architectural Design Board. The architectural design board shall review those signs listed in
subsection (B)(1) of this section and any sign permit referred by the planning manager pursuant to subsection (A)(1)
of this section.
1. The ADB shall review any sign permit application that requests a modification to any of the standards
prescribed by this chapter. The ADB shall only approve modification requests that arise from one of the
following two situations:
a. The request is for signage on a site that has a unique configuration, such as frontage on more than two
streets, or has an unusual geometric shape or topography;
b. The request is for signage on a building that has unique architectural elements or features or details that
substantially restrict the placement or size of signage relative to other buildings in the vicinity.
2. The ADB may approve the requested modification only if it meets the following criteria:
a. The design of the proposed signage must be compatible in its use of materials, colors, design and
proportions with development throughout the site and with similar signage in the vicinity;
b. In no event shall the modification result in signage which exceeds the maximum normally allowed by
more than 50 percent.
C. Staff Review of Murals and Artwork. When a proposed wall graphic is proposed as a mural or artwork, the
planning manager or designee shall review and approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application in
accordance with the following criteria. While a separate sign permit is required for each wall graphic, the staff may
make a single design review decision on wall graphics that consist of related murals or artwork. Related murals or
artwork may include multiple proposals for sites within reasonable proximity to each other that are related by theme,
style, materials used, and/or context. The decision of the staff on any design review application containing a mural
or art as a wall graphic may be appealed to the city council pursuant to the procedure established in Chapter 20.06
ECDC.
1. Art, like other exercises of First Amendment rights, may be limited by reasonable time, place, and manner
restrictions. In this case, these criteria will be utilized to enhance the aesthetics of the city and to ensure quality
and maintenance standards are observed. No recommendation shall be based upon the content or message
expressed by an artist or in a work of art. Applicants are encouraged to coordinate their artwork with the design
or architectural elements of the building and the historic and pedestrian -oriented character of the downtown
area.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 22
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
2. Specific submission requirements for design review include, but are not limited to:
a. Site sketch showing locations of artwork;
b. Minimum one -fourth -inch scale color drawings of the art concept or art component;
c. Material/color samples;
Page 7/18
d. Written Proposal. A written proposal in eight -and -one -half -inch -by- 11 -inch format to include a
description and summary of a final design proposal for the artwork; detailed maintenance requirements; a
schedule for development, fabrication, and completion; artist's resume; and evidence of assumption of
liability by applicant or designee; and
e. When required pursuant to ECDC 20.45.050, a certificate of appropriateness shall be obtained from the
historic preservation commission for murals on designated historic structures or within a designated
historic district.
3. Review Criteria. Review criteria for the design review include:
a. Quality of the materials used to create the artwork. Materials should be resistant to fading; no
fluorescent paints;
b. Durability and permanence, including ability to withstand age, vandalism, and weathering.
Consideration should be given to anti -graffiti coating; and
c. Compatibility of the artwork with architectural elements, other elements of the street, and adjacent
structures. Compatibility shall be determined by relationships of the elements of form, proportion, scale,
color, materials, surface treatment, and size and style of lettering. Lettering shall be minimized, but may
be considered for inclusion when necessary to the artistic content.
D. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (A), (B), and (C) of this section, sign permit applications shall not
be referred to or reviewed by the architectural design board if the proposed sign constitutes a modification to an
existing sign and involves no significant alteration or modification to the size, height, design, lighting or color of the
existing sign. Sign permit applications for such sign modifications shall be processed and subject to review in the
same manner as provided for staff review in subsection (A) of this section. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3800
§ 1, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 60, 2009; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.020 General regulations for permanent signs.
A. Sign Area. The area of a sign shall be calculated as follows:
1. The area of a sign is maximum actual area of a sign that is visible from any single point of observation from
any public vantage point. The sign area is normally the smallest rectangle that encloses the entire copy area of
the sign.
2. Individual letters, numbers or symbols applied directly to a wall or structure and used to form the sign shall
be calculated individually.
3. Supporting structures which are part of a sign display shall be included in the calculation of the sign area,
except that the supporting structure of a monument sign or pole sign shall not be included when calculating the
sign area.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 23
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
14 : X 0 W
STORE fi OSo
NAME_ 1
Page 8/18
Left: Sign area = X * Y Right: Applied individual letters are calculated separately.
Monument sign: The base is not included in the calculation of sign area (dashed rectangle).
B. When located on a wall or mansard roof, no sign may extend above the highest point of the wall or mansard roof
when the mansard roof is on a one-story building. Other than a mansard roof on a one-story building, a sign may not
be attached above the eave or drip line on a pitched roof.
C. Except for pole -mounted community event banners, no sign or any part of a sign may be designed or constructed
to be moving by any means and shall not contain items such as banners, ribbons, streamers and spinners. Signs with
type that is movable to change the message (reader boards) are allowed, subject to the specific requirements detailed
elsewhere in this chapter.
D. Signs that extend into or over a public right-of-way shall comply with Chapter 18.70 ECDC.
E. Exposed braces and angle irons are prohibited unless they are part of a decorative design that is integral to the
design of the sign. Guywires are prohibited unless there are no other practical means of supporting the sign.
F. No sign shall have blinking, flashing, fluttering or moving lights or other illuminating device which has a
changing light density or color; provided, however, temperature and/or time signs that conform in all other respects
to this chapter are allowed. Electronic reader boards may have messages that change; however, moving messages
are not allowed. Messages that change at intervals less than 20 seconds will be considered blinking or flashing and
not allowed.
G. No light source which exceeds 20 watts shall be directly exposed to any public street or adjacent property.
H. No illumination source of fluorescent light shall exceed 425 milliamps or be spaced closer than eight inches on
center.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 24
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 9/18
I. No commercial sign shall be illuminated after 11:00 p.m. unless the commercial enterprise is open for business
and then may remain on only as long as the enterprise is open.
J. No window signs above the first floor shall be illuminated.
K. Sign height shall be determined as follows:
1. For attached signs, sign height is the vertical distance from the highest point on the sign to the average
finished grade.
2. For freestanding signs, sign height is the vertical distance from the highest point of the sign area or its
support to the average elevation of the finished grade at the base of the supports.
L. Portable signs may not be used as permanent signage; only fixed signs are permitted.
M. The following matrix summarizes the types of signs permitted in each neighborhood/district within the city:
Sign Type
Downtown'
SR-99'
Westgate/SR-1043
Neighborhood
Commercial (BN,
BP and FVMU
Zones)
Business Uses in
RM Zones
Wall -Mounted
P
P
P
P
P
Monument
C
P
P
C
C
Pole
N
P
N
N
N
Projecting
P
P
P
P
P
Internal Illumination
C
P
P
C
N
Reader Boards
C
C
C
C
C
Individual Letters
P
P
P
P
P
Boxed Cabinet
N
P
C
C
N
Building ID
P
P
P
P
P
Pedestrian
P
N
N
N
N
Wall Graphics
C
C
C
C
C
Downtown includes all properties within the Downtown Activity Center defined in the comprehensive plan.
1 SR-99 includes all properties within the Medical -Highway 99 Activity Center and the Highway 99 Corridor defined in the comprehensive
plan.
3 Westgate/SR-104 includes all properties within the Westgate Corridor, the Edmonds Way Corridor, and within the Westgate Community
Commercial area, as defined in the Comprehensive Plan.
Note: In the above table, P = Permitted; N = Not permitted; C = Conditionally permitted through design review if consistent with the standards
itemized in subsection N of this section.
N. The following standards clarify how some signs identified as "conditionally permitted" must be installed to be
permitted in the city of Edmonds:
1. Monument signs over six feet in height must be reviewed to ensure that the materials, colors, design and
proportions proposed are consistent with those used throughout the site.
2. Internally illuminated signs in the downtown area and neighborhood commercial areas may only light the
letters or logos/symbols. The background of a sign face may not be illuminated.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 25
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 10/18
3. Internally illuminated signs in the downtown area and the neighborhood commercial areas must be mounted
on the wall of the building. They may not be mounted on or under an attached awning.
4. Internally illuminated signs that use exposed neon may only be located in the interior of buildings in the
downtown area and the neighborhood commercial areas.
5. Internally illuminated signs in the downtown area shall not be permitted to be higher than 14 feet in height.
6. Reader board messages are limited to alphanumeric messages only.
7. Reader boards are only permitted for public uses or places of public assembly. Public uses and places of
assembly include, but are not limited to, schools and churches as well as local and regional public facilities.
8. The background color of a boxed cabinet sign face must be coordinated with and complement the colors used
on the building.
9. The background color of a boxed cabinet sign face must be opaque and not allow any internal illumination to
shine through. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3631 § 2, 2007; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.025 Total maximum permanent sign area.
A. Business and Commercial Zone Districts (BN, BP, BC, BD, WMU, CW and CG).
1. The maximum total permanent sign area for allowed or permitted uses in the BN, BC, BD and CW zones
shall be one square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of wall containing the main public entrance to the
primary building or structure located upon a separate legal lot.
2. The maximum total permanent sign area for allowed or permitted uses in the CG zone shall be one square
foot of sign area for each lineal foot of building frontage along a public street and/or along a side of the
building containing the primary public entrance to a maximum of 200 square feet. The allowable sign area shall
be computed separately for each qualifying building frontage, and only the sign area derived from that frontage
may be oriented along that frontage. Sign areas for wall -mounted signs may not be accumulated to yield a total
allowable sign area greater than that permitted upon such frontage, except that businesses choosing not to erect
a freestanding sign may use up to 50 percent of their allowable freestanding sign area for additional attached
sign area. Use of the additional area shall be subject to the review of the architectural design board.
3. The maximum total permanent sign area may be divided between wall, projecting, and freestanding signs, in
accordance with regulations and maximum sign area and height for each type of sign, as provided in ECDC
20.60.030 through 20.60.050. Projecting signs (including blade signs) of four square feet or less and window
signs meeting the requirements of ECDC 20.60.035 do not count against the total permanent sign area
permitted.
4. The maximum number of permitted permanent signs is three per site, or three per physically enclosed
business space on commercial sites with multiple business tenants. A site with more than one street frontage is
allowed a maximum of five signs. Projecting (including blade) signs of four square feet or less and window
signs meeting the requirements of ECDC 20.60.035 do not count against the total number of permitted
permanent signs. Multi -tenant sites are allowed one additional group sign per street frontage identifying the
individual subtenants at the site. The total sign area of all signs permitted on site must also comply with the
maximum total permanent sign area specified in this chapter.
5. Where permitted, pedestrian signs do count against the permanent sign area and the number of signs
permitted.
Option 1: Modify (5) to state that pedestrian signs do not count against the permanent sign area, or,
Option 2: Add to (5) to memorialize Interpretation #2016-1 in the code (see attachment).
B. Residential Zone Districts (RS, RM).
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 26
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 11/18
1. The maximum allowable signage area for individual residential lots shall be four square feet per street
frontage, except as provided in subsection (13)(2) of this section.
2. The maximum allowable signage area for formal residential subdivisions, planned residential developments
(PRD), or multifamily structures containing at least 10 dwelling units shall be 10 square feet per main street
entrance into the subdivision or PRD. Only one sign may be provided at each main entrance.
3. The maximum total permanent sign area may be divided between wall and freestanding signs, in accordance
with regulations and maximum sign area and height for each type of sign, as provided in ECDC 20.60.030
through 20.60.050. Window signs meeting the requirements of ECDC 20.60.035 do not count against the total
permanent sign area permitted.
4. Signage in excess of that provided in subsections (13)(1) and (2) of this section for lawful nonconforming or
conditional nonresidential uses in residential zones may be approved through the issuance of a sign permit
pursuant to ECDC 20.60.010, subject to the maximum area and height limitations established for signs in the
BN zone.
5. The maximum number of permitted permanent signs is one, except that multifamily sites with more than one
vehicular entrance may have one permanent sign per entrance. The total sign area of all signs (excluding
incidental signs) permitted on site must also comply with the maximum total permanent sign area specified in
this chapter. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3805 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3628 § 9, 2007; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.030 Wall signs — Maximum area and height.
A. The maximum area of any wall sign shall be as follows:
Zone
Maximum Area of Sign
RS, RM
4 square feet
BN, BP, BC, BD, CW,
CG, WMU, FVMU
1 square foot per lineal foot of attached
wall
B. The maximum height of any attached sign shall be as follows:
Zone
Maximum Height of Sign
RS, RM
6 feet
BN, BP, BC, BD, CW,
14 feet or the height of the face of the
CG, WMU, FVMU
building on which the sign is located,
consistent with ECDC 20.60.020(B)
[Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3628 § 10, 2007; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.035 Window signs — Maximum area.
The maximum area of any window sign shall be as follows:
Zone
Maximum Area of Sign
RS, RM
4 square feet
BN, BP, BC, BD, CW,
CG, WMU, FVMU
1 square foot per each lineal foot of
window frontage
[Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3628 § 11, 2007; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.040 Projecting signs — Maximum area and height restrictions.
A. The maximum area of any projecting sign shall be as follows:
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 27
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 12/18
Zone
Maximum Area of Sign
RS, RM
Not permitted
BN, BP, BC, BD, CW,
WMU, FVMU
16 square feet
CG
32 square feet
B. The maximum height of any projecting sign shall be as follows:
Zone
Maximum Height of Sign
RS, RM
Not permitted
BN, BP, BC, BD, CW,
CG, WMU, FVMU
Height of the wall to which the sign is
attached
C. The sign area of a marquee sign may not exceed two feet in vertical dimension. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016;
Ord. 3628 § 12, 2007; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.045 Freestanding signs — Regulations.
A. Regulation. Permanent freestanding signs are discouraged. Freestanding signs shall be approved only where the
applicant demonstrates by substantial evidence that there are no reasonable and feasible alternative signage methods
to provide for adequate identification and/or advertisement.
B. Maximum Area. The maximum area of a freestanding sign shall be as follows:
Zone
Maximum Area of Sign
RS, RM
10 square feet (subdivision, PRD,
multifamily)
4 square feet (individual residence sign)
BN, BP
24 square feet (single)
48 square feet (group)
BC, BD, WMU,
32 square feet (single)
FVMU
48 square feet (group)
CW
32 square feet (single)
48 square feet (group)
CG
Sign area shall be governed by subsection (C)
of this section
C. Allowable Sign Area for Freestanding Signs — CG Zone. The total allowable sign area for freestanding signs on
general commercial sites shall be 56 square feet or one-half square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of street
frontage, whichever is greater, up to a maximum of 160 square feet of freestanding sign area. Multiple business or
tenant sites shall further be allowed an additional 24 square feet of freestanding sign area for each commercial tenant
or occupant in excess of one up to a maximum sign area of 160 square feet. Corner lots choosing to accumulate sign
area under the provisions of subsection (E) of this section shall be limited to 160 square feet.
D. Maximum Height. The maximum sign height of freestanding signs shall be as follows:
Zone
Maximum Height of Sign
RS, RM
6 feet
BN, BP, BC, BD, CW,
WMU, FVMU
14 feet
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 28
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Zone Maximum Height of Sign
CG 25 feet
Page 13/18
E. Location. Freestanding signs shall be located as close as possible to the center of the street frontage on which they
are located. Except for pole -mounted community event banners, freestanding signs may not be located on public
property. Sites on a corner of two public streets may have one sign on the corner instead of a sign for each frontage.
Monument signs not more than six feet in height may be located in a zoning setback, but not less than five feet from
a property line.
F. Number. In all zones, each lot or building site shall be permitted no more than one freestanding sign, except in the
business and commercial zones where a lot or site has frontage on two arterial streets, in which case there may be
permitted one sign per street frontage subject to the restrictions on area contained within this chapter.
G. Landscaping.
1. Each freestanding sign shall have a landscaped area twice the size of the sign area at the base of the sign. The
landscaping and sign base shall be protected from vehicles by substantial curbing.
2. The applicant shall provide a landscape performance bond in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated
costs of the landscaping, or $1,000, whichever is more. The bond shall be processed in accordance with
Chapter 17.10 ECDC. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3631 § 3, 2007; Ord. 3628 § 13, 2007; Ord. 3461 §
2, 2003].
20.60.050 Wall graphic and identification structures.
There are no area restrictions on wall graphics or identification structures. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3461
§ 2, 2003].
20.60.055 Pedestrian signs.
Pedestrian signs are only permitted on private property and in the adjacent right-of-way in the BC, BD, CW, and CG
zones located within the Downtown Waterfront Activity Center, as defined in the comprehensive plan. Pedestrian
signs are only permitted if they meet the following requirements:
A. Pedestrian signs may be permitted to be located either (1) between the business storefront and the public
right-of-way, or (2) on the sidewalk in front of the business storefront if the pedestrian sign meets the following
standards:
1. Only one pedestrian sign is permitted per ground floor storefront;
2. Businesses may make arrangements to rotate their pedestrian signs provided they meet the one
sign -per -storefront standard;
3. The sign shall be located within 10 feet of the building entry, unless it is plaeed in a 166mieff that better
„blie pedestrian and • ehie l . aeeess, and must be placed within two feet of the building. Any
deviations from this standard ffvast be submitted to the ar-ehitee.uFal desig,. board f r r-eview and aa 3o
ECDC 20 "per may be approved by the Development Services Director if the Director finds that:
(a) an alternative location in front of the building occupied by the business is less restrictive to pedestrian
movement or accessibility, or,
(b) strict adherence to the locational standards of this section afford significant limitations on the ability of
the sign to provide information to the public, and placement on a sidewalk or paved surface elsewhere on
the business property can be accomplished without hindering public movement or accessibility.
4. A business located on a corner property shall have no more than one pedestrian sign, regardless of the
number of streets the business fronts on;
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 29
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 14/18
5. If located on or near a sidewalk, building entry or pedestrian way, the sign shall be located to provide a
minimum of five feet44 inches of clearance for pedestrians to pass;
6. Pedestrian signs cannot be left outside during hours that the business is closed to the public;
7. Pedestrian signs are limited to:
a. Six square feet in area, two and one-half feet in width, and three and one-half feet in height for A -frame
or sandwich board signs; and
b. Six square feet in area, two and one-half feet in width, and four and one-half feet in height for
stanchion, easel or other types of pedestrian signs. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016].
20.60.060 Campaign signs.
A. On -premises campaign signs are permitted as a form of temporary signage in all zones, subject to the maximum
sign size limitations set forth in ECDC 20.60.080.
B. Off -premises campaign signs are permitted as a form of temporary signage in the public right-of-way; provided,
that the following requirements are met:
1. All campaign signs shall be posted in accordance with the regulations set forth in ECDC 20.60.080(B)
2. All off -premises campaign signs shall be removed within 10 days after the primary, general, or special
election to which they pertain.
3. Off -premises campaign signs shall be posted and displayed no earlier than upon declaration of candidacy in
accordance with Chapter 29.15 RCW, or other formal registration or certification of the candidate, party,
initiative, referendum or other ballot issue for an upcoming election, or 60 days prior to the election, whichever
time period is greater.
C. There is no maximum number of off -premises campaign signs that may be posted. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016;
Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.065 Real estate signs.
A. On -premises real estate signs are permitted as a form of temporary signage in residential and commercial zones,
subject to the maximum signage area and sign number limitations set forth in ECDC 20.60.080.
B. Off -premises real estate signs are permitted as a form of temporary signage, subject to the following
requirements:
1. Two and only two types of off -premises real estate signs shall be permitted:
a. An off -premises real estate directional sign is a sign displaying a directional arrow and either a company
or logo, or an indication that the property is for sale by its owner, and installed for the purpose of directing
the public to the property.
b. An off -premises open house sign is a form of temporary off -premises sign indicating the property is
currently open for viewing.
2. All off -premises real estate signs shall be posted in accordance with the regulations set forth in ECDC
20.60.080(B).
3. The maximum number of off -premises real estate signs allowed per property shall only be the number
reasonably necessary to direct people to the premises. An agent or owner shall be permitted no more than one
off -premises real estate directional sign per intersection and five in total. No more than one off -premises open
house sign shall be displayed per intersection and no more than five in total.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 30
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 15/18
a. Each off -premises real estate directional sign shall bear a legible tag located on the sign or supporting
post indicating the date of posting and the address of the property to which it pertains.
b. Off -premises real estate open house signs shall only be posted during daylight hours when the real
estate agent or owner is in attendance at the property for sale or rent, and shall be removed immediately
upon the termination of an "open house" or other similar property display event.
4. No off -premises real estate signs shall be fastened to any traffic control device, public structure, fence, rock,
tree or shrub.
C. All on -premises and all off -premises real estate directional signs shall be removed within seven days after the
closing of the sale or lease of real property to which the sign pertains. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3461 § 2,
2003].
20.60.070 Construction signs.
Construction signs shall, irrespective of their duration, conform to the general regulations for permanent signs
specified under ECDC 20.60.020. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the maximum area of a
construction sign in any zone shall be 32 square feet. No sign permit is required for the posting of construction
signs; provided, that all construction signs shall be removed from the premises within 10 days of the cessation of the
excavation, construction, demolition, rehabilitation, structural alteration or related work on site.
Zone
Maximum Area of Signage (per Street
Frontage)
RS
16 square feet, or 32 square feet if one sign is
displayed for a project consisting of building
permits issued for four lots or more. Only one sign
may be displayed per project.
All other
32 square feet
zones
The preceding square footages shall be in addition to any other temporary signage permitted by ECDC 20.60.080
[Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3514 § 3, 2004].
20.60.075 Governmental Suns
Governmental signs, while exempt from the processes and development regulations required by this Chapter, shall
be erected and maintained subject to rules and procedures established by the Development Services Director. In all
cases, the City retains the right to remove any governmental sign at its sole discretion.
20.60.080 Temporary signs.
A. On -Premises Temporary Signs. On -premises temporary signs are permitted in residential and commercial zones,
in addition to any allowed or permitted permanent signage, subject to the following restrictions and standards:
1. Residential Zones (RS, RM).
a. Only portable, freestanding or attached signs may be used as temporary signage.
b. Commercial on -premises temporary signage is not permitted, except for real estate signs as defined by
ECDC 20.60.065.
c. Maximum number is one attached or freestanding sign.
2. Commercial Zones (BN, BP, BC, BD, WMU, FVW, CW, CG).
a. Only attached signs may be used for temporary signage. Attached signs may be affixed to any existing
building or sign structure that is permitted as a permanent structure on the property. New temporary
structures whose sole purpose is to display the temporary sign are not otherwise permitted.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 31
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 16/18
b. Maximum duration of display is 60 days in any calendar year for the cumulative posting of all
temporary commercial signage upon each commercial location or premises. A pe ff' it is ,.o,.. i fed,
specifying the duration and location of displa�-
c. Maximum number of temporary signs is one freestanding sign per property street frontage, and one
attached sign per building.
3. The total maximum area of on -premises temporary signage shall be as follows:
Zone
Maximum Area of Temporary Sign
RS, RM
6 square feet
BN, BP, BC, BD, CW,
WMU, FVMU
20 square feet
CG
30 square feet
4. The total maximum area for each allowed on -premises temporary sign shall be as follows:
Zone
Maximum Area of Temporary Sign
RS, RM
6 square feet (freestanding and
attached)
BN, BP, BC, BD, CW,
WMU, FVMU
20 square feet (attached)
CG
30 square feet (attached)
5. The maximum height of any allowed on -premises temporary sign shall be as follows:
Zone
Maximum Height of Sign
RS, RM
6 feet (freestanding and attached)
BN, BP, BC, BD, CW,
CG, WMU, FVMU
14 feet (attached)
6. In no case shall temporary signage be posted, located, or displayed in violation of the regulations for
permanent signs set forth in ECDC 20.60.020 through 20.60.050.
B. Off -Premises Temporary Signage. Off -premises temporary signs are allowed in residential and commercial
zones, in accordance with the restrictions and standards set forth below:
1. Commercial off -premises temporary signage is prohibited, except for real estate signs as permitted by ECDC
20.60.065; provided, that such off -premises real estate signs shall be posted, displayed, and removed as
provided for in that section, in addition to the provisions of subsections (B)(5) through (9) of this section.
2. Noncommercial off -premises signs are permitted in the public right-of-way; provided, that the posting and
display of off -premises signs in the public right-of-way shall require a street use permit where required
pursuant to Chapter 18.70 ECDC.
3. Maximum duration of display for all temporary off -premises signs is a cumulative of 60 days in any calendar
year, except as otherwise provided in ECDC 20.60.060 for campaign signs. Display may be continuous or
intermittent, except as otherwise provided in this section.
4. Except for campaign signs as provided in ECDC 20.60.060, all off -premises noncommercial signs relating to
a specific meeting, event, or occurrence shall be removed within 48 hours following the conclusion of the
meeting, event, or occurrence to which they relate.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 32
7.A.c
Edmonds
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
Page 17/18
5. Only portable freestanding signs may be used as temporary off -premises signage; provided, that the
following types of portable freestanding signs are prohibited from use as an off -premises sign:
a. Signs with a vehicular chassis or support with or without wheels;
b. Posters and banners;
c. Signs mounted upon vehicles;
d. Searchlights;
e. Inflatables.
6. Maximum number of allowed off -premises signs to be displayed simultaneously shall be one sign per sign
poster except as provided in ECDC 20.60.060 for campaign signs and in ECDC 20.60.065 for real estate signs.
7. Maximum allowable sign area for all temporary off -premises freestanding signs is six square feet.
8. Maximum allowable sign height for all permitted off -premises signs is three feet.
9. All off -premises temporary signage shall be posted and displayed in accordance with the following
restrictions:
a. Off -premises signs may not be placed in any portion of the public right-of-way typically used by motor
vehicles in a lawful manner.
b. Off -premises signs shall be placed so as not to impede pedestrian, bicycle, or handicapped travel or
access.
c. Off -premises signs shall not be posted in a manner or location which impairs traffic safety by
unreasonably blocking line of sight at intersections.
d. Off -premises signs shall be constructed of suitable material and design to adequately withstand the
reasonably expected normal or average weather conditions during the intended display period of the sign.
e. Off -premises signs shall be regularly inspected to ensure that they have not been damaged or destroyed
by natural forces or vandalism. Damaged and destroyed signs shall be immediately removed or repaired so
as to avoid threats to public health and safety or the accumulation of unclaimed refuse upon the public
rights -of -way.
f. Off -premises signs shall not be posted upon public property other than the public right-of-way, and shall
further not be posted within or upon planter boxes and flower beds within the publicly maintained
landscaped portions of the public right-of-way. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3628 § 14, 2007; Ord.
3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.090 Prohibited signs.
A. General. All signs not expressly permitted by this chapter are prohibited.
B. Hazards. Signs which the director of public works determines to be a hazard to vehicle or water traffic because
they resemble or obscure a traffic control device, or because they obscure visibility needed for safe traffic passage,
are prohibited. These signs shall be removed if they already exist.
C. Confiscation of Prohibited Signs in Public Rights -of -Way. All signs which are located within a public
right-of-way and that have been improperly posted or displayed are hereby declared to be a public nuisance and
shall be subject to immediate removal and confiscation.
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 33
Edmonds Page 18/18
Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE
D. Any signs confiscated by the city shall be held for 10 working days after which such signs may be destroyed or
otherwise disposed of. The owner of any confiscated signs may recover the same upon payment of a $25.00 fee to
cover the cost of confiscation and storage. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
20.60.095 Exempt signs.
The following types of signs are exempted from regulations of this chapter, except that the dimensional and -0)
placement standards shall apply unless variance is required by other provisions of local, state or federal law: 0
n r_,,.,o..,,, en4 i signs.
c
0
9A. Signs required by provision of local, state, or federal law.
GN
Z
0
EB. Official public notices required by provision of local, state, or federal law.
13C. Signs not visible from a public location.
c
m
E
ED. Seasonal and holiday displays not incorporating the use of written copy or graphics to convey a message.
N
M
FE. Gravestones. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
`o
c
20.60.100 Administration.
E
A. General. The community development director is responsible for administering and enforcing the provisions of
c
this chapter. He or she shall adopt application requirements for sign permits. Fees shall be as stated in Chapter 15.00
0
ECDC.
N
B. Installation Permits. Many signs require installation permits under Chapter 19.45 ECDC and may require plan
0
A
checking fees as well.
C. Notice of Violation. Whenever the planning director becomes aware of a violation of the provisions of this
N
w
chapter, the planning director shall cause a notice to be sent to the alleged violator informing him or her of the
violation, the applicable code section, and a time within which to remedy the violation. The notice shall also advise
of the penalties for continued violation of the code as specified in this chapter. If the violation has not been corrected
m
within the time limit specified, the planning director shall refer the matter to the city attorney's office for institution
E
of appropriate legal action.
d
D. Penalty. Any person violating any provision of this code shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
M
thereof shall be punished by a fine of $25.00 for each day of continued violation. [Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord.
)
13
3461 § 2, 20031.
0
V
c
a�
M
L
Q
The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code are current through Ordinance 4056, passed December 6, 2016.
Packet Pg. 34
8.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/8/2017
AHA Work Plan and Budget
Staff Lead: Shane Hope
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Rob Chave
Background/History
The Alliance for Housing Affordability (AHA) was created in 2013 through an Inter Local Agreement (ILA)
signed by the City of (CITY), Snohomish County, 10 other cities in the County, and the Housing Authority
of Snohomish County.
Staff Recommendation
N/A - this is for information and no action is required.
Narrative
[The following summary has been provided by AHA staff]
Through the Alliance for Housing Affordability (AHA) Snohomish County cities work together to address
affordable housing issues on a regional basis. Each year the AHA board recommends a budget. City
Councils then approve that budget.
The Alliance for Housing Affordability (AHA) was created in 2013 through an Inter Local Agreement (ILA)
signed by the City of (CITY), Snohomish County, 10 other cities in the County, and the Housing Authority
of Snohomish County. The mission of AHA is to increase the supply of affordable housing in Snohomish
County by addressing the issue on a regional basis through interjurisdictional cooperation and
collaboration. Still in its early years, AHA is doing this by providing its members technical expertise
related to housing, by gathering and analyzing housing data and by providing education and outreach to
the public and to elected officials.
The ILA created a Board to manage AHA. The Board consists of representatives from each member of
the Alliance. The Board establishes an annual work plan and recommends an annual budget for
approval by the governing body of each of its members. In the case of (CITY) that would be the City
Council. The ILA also provides for a fiscal year that runs July 1-June 30. In order for each member to
provide for its AHA contribution in their respective budgets, the Board works on and approves a
recommended budget about one year before the budget goes into effect.
AHA has a single staff member, Chris Collier, who is the AHA program manager.
Since its inception, the expertise provided to city staff by AHA has assisted staff to ensure the City is
meeting the Growth Management Act and Countywide Planning Policies requirements related to
housing and affordable housing. This was especially evident in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update,
which included an update of the Housing Element.
Packet Pg. 35
8.A
Recently, an AHA subcommittee has started preliminary discussions to strategize how to establish a
funding source to assist with the construction of new affordable housing. This is one of the long-term
goals for AHA.
In addition to providing much needed housing expertise to the City, AHA also provides a forum for the
City to collaborate with other municipalities in the County to address the regional problem of the lack of
affordable housing in Snohomish County.
The AHA FY2018 budget establishes the City of Edmonds contribution at $3,841, a 9% increase over last
year's amount. The adopted 2017 City budget anticipated this contribution.
Attachments:
Attachment 1: AHA FY2018 Budget
Attachment 2: AHA FY2018 Work Plan
Packet Pg. 36
8.A.a
ALLIANCE FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
PROPOSED FY2018 OPERATING BUDGET
Jurisdictions
HASCO
Total
Revenues
FY18 Revenue
$71,752
$53,505
$125,257
Total FY18 Revenue
$71,752
$53,505
$125,257
Expenses
1.0 FTE Program Manager
$37,301
$30,834
$68,135
Fringe Benefits @ 39%
$26,572
$26,572
Local Travel / Mileage
$1,407
$1,407
Audit
$1,000
$1,000
Software, Data, and Consulting
$5,472
$5,472
Total FY18 Expenses
$71,752
$30,834
$102,586
HASCO Staff Time (In Kind)
$12,000
$12,000
Overhead @ 10% (In Kind)
$10,671
$10,671
Total FY18 Expenses and In Kind
$71,752
$53,505
$125,257
PROPOSED FY2018 MEMBER CONTRIBUTIONS
Joint Board Members
2015
Population
% of Subtotal
FY2018
Contribution
% Increase
from FY2017
SMALL JURISDICTIONS
Granite Falls
3,390
-
$1,639
3%
Snohomish
9,270
-
$1,639
3%
Stanwood
6,530
-
$1,639
3%
Woodway
1,310
-
$1,639
3%
Small Jurisdictions Subtotal
20,500
-
$6,556
LARGE JURISDICTIONS
Arlington
18,490
2.69%
$1,754
8%
County (Unincorporated)
330,260
48.06%
$31,330
11%
Edmonds
40,490
5.89%
$3,841
9%
Everett
105,800
15.39%
$10,037
9%
Lake Stevens
29,900
4.35%
$2,836
10%
Lynnwood
36,420
5.30%
$3,455
9%
Marysville
64,140
9.33%
$6,085
10%
Mill Creek
19,760
2.88%
$1,875
13%
Mountlake Terrace
21,090
3.07%
$2,001
11%
Mukilteo
20,900
3.04%
$1,983
10%
Large Jurisdictions Subtotal
687,250
100.00%
$65,196
HOUSING AUTHORITY
HASCO
$53,505
1. FY2018 is July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018. The AHA Joint Board accepted this budget in May 2016 for councils'
review and appropriation by 2/28/2017. The AHA Joint Board must adopt this final budget by 3/31/2017.
Packet Pg. 37
8.A.b
FY2O18 Draft Work Plan (July 2017 — June 2018)
I. Synthesize/Analyze Data
a. Continue to identify data gaps and develop strategies for resolving them, including updating the
Affordable Housing Rental Inventory of Snohomish County
b. Track market and demographic changes over time, including information on new and expiring
affordable housing, funding sources, income restrictions, condition, and surrounding public
infrastructure
c. Prepare housing profiles for new members
2. Provide Technical Expertise
a. Respond to research requests from Joint Board members, actively seek out new projects
b. Support jurisdictions in the development and implementation of new housing strategies and
performance evaluation of existing strategies
a. Develop model dedicated housing strategy
c. Develop and expand range of educational materials, including working definitions of housing
concepts and programs, best practices, case studies, and visual aids
3. Education and Outreach
a. Develop a strategy and tools to educate elected officials about affordable housing and the roles
they can play in educating others about their jurisdictions' affordable housing needs and in
obtaining funding for housing
• Research legislative changes, legislative agendas, and funded projects
• Design workshop for elected officials to better inform them of housing issues and funding
opportunities/challenges/processes
• Present regularly to participant city councils on affordable housing issues in the context of
their city
• Identify elected officials who could serve as primary contact points for federal/state elected
officials and federal/state agencies that provide housing funding
b. Facilitate collaboration on housing policies and priorities, including connecting Alliance members
with relevant state and federal elected officials and agencies
• Collaborate with Housing Consortium of Everett and Snohomish County on housing
advocacy
c. Assure that the community and stakeholders are aware of the Alliance's mission, resources, and
accomplishments
4. Grants and Financial
a. Track upcoming funding opportunities and newly funded projects
b. Research strategies for leveraging CDBG and other funds
c. Explore common strategies to pursue funding to be used by cities individually or collectively
d. Study potential new revenue generation tools that can be used to fund projects
a. Identify specific locations for potential affordable housing development, including
preservation of existing affordable housing
Packet Pg. 38
9.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 02/8/2017
Review of Extended Agenda
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review Extended Agenda
Narrative
Extended Agenda is attached
Packet Pg. 39
OV FDM
pLAMPMR BOARD
Extended Agenda
February 8, 2017
Meeting Item
FEBRUARY 2017
9.A.a
Items and Dates are subject to change
Feb. 8 1. Discussion on Sign Code amendments for pedestrian signs
2. Discussion on AHA work plan and budget
Feb. 22 1. Comprehensive Plan Performance Report
2. Public Hearing on amendments to sign code on pedestrian signs
(tentatively)
3. Review of Five Corners code work
MARCH 2O17
March 8
March 22 1. Parks & Rec Quarterly Update
WRIL 2017
April 12
April 26
MAY 2017
May 10
May 24
1 U N E 2017
June 14
June 28
r
Q
items ana liates are
9.A.a
to change
Pending 1. Community Development Code Re -Organization
2017 2. Neighborhood Center Plans and zoning implementation, including:
✓ Five Corners
3. Further Highway 99 Implementation, including:
✓ Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented design/development
strategies
✓ Parking standards
4. Exploration of incentive zoning and incentives for sustainable
development
Current Priorities
1. Neighborhood Center Plans & implementation.
2. Highway 99 Implementation.
Recurring 1. Annual Adult Entertainment Report (January -February as necessary)
Topics 2. Election of Officers (Vt meeting in December)
3. Parks & Recreation Department Quarterly Report (January, April, July,
October)
4. Quarterly report on wireless facilities code updates (as necessary)
Packet Pg. 41