2018-10-24 Planning Board Packeto Agenda
Edmonds Planning Board
snl. ynyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
OCTOBER 24, 2018, 7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Approval of Draft Minutes of September 12 & October 10, 2018
3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Public Hearing on the Proposed 2019 - 2024 Capital Facilities Plan / Capital Improvement Plans
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
8. NEW BUSINESS
9. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
A. Review Planning Board Extended Agenda
10. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
12. ADJOURNMENT
Edmonds Planning Board Agenda
October 24, 2018
Page 1
2.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/24/2018
Approval of Draft Minutes of September 12 & October 10, 2018
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve draft minutes.
Narrative
Draft minutes are attached.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: PB180912d
Exhibit 2: PB181010d
Packet Pg. 2
2.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
September 12, 2018
Chair Monroe called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public
Safety Complex, 250 — 5th Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Nathan Monroe, Chair
Matthew Cheung, Vice Chair
Alicia Crank
Phil Lovell
Daniel Robles
Mike Rosen
Carreen Nordling Rubenkonig
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Todd Cloutier (excused)
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
STAFF PRESENT
Carrie Hite, Director, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Terri Arnold, Deputy Director, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services
Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager
Jerrie Bevington, Video Recorder
Karin Noyes, Recorder
BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 22, 2018 BE APPROVED AS
PRESENTED. BOARD MEMBER ROSEN SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
The agenda was accepted as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
No one in the audience indicated a desire to comment during this portion of the meeting.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD
Board Member Lovell asked if any agencies have submitted applications for the $500,000 that is available from the Alliance
for Housing Affordability for qualified housing projects. Mr. Chave said he does not have that information, but he would
assume so.
Board Member Lovell advised that he would be unable to attend the Economic Development Commission meeting on
September 19th as the Board's liaison. Chair Monroe agreed to attend on behalf of the Board.
PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVICES UPDATE
Ms. Hite introduced Terri Arnold, the City's new Deputy Director of Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services. She explained
that the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Update is typically provided on a biannual basis. She also comes before the
Packet Pg. 3
Board to discuss projected -related concerns and to present the yearly Capital Improvement Plan Update. She presented her
report, highlighting the following:
• Civic Field Design Development. They are moving full speed ahead on the design development of Civic Field. The
City purchased the property from the Edmonds School District and a master plan was adopted last year. The City
Council awarded the design contract to Walker Macy to continue their work with the community. A schematic design
should be ready for review in the next few weeks. All of the stakeholder groups have been engaged in the process, and
their input was incorporated into the design. The stadium was taken down earlier in the year to open up the field.
However, the back portion remains, as it was found to be holding up the alley. They are working to shore up the wall
and then address the issue as part of the park construction project. The estimated cost of the project is $12 million, and
the goal is to put the site plan and bid documents together for construction in 2020. Mayor Earling has set aside $2
million from the general fund in 2018, and the City received a $1.5 million grant from the Hazel Miller Foundation that
will be paid out incrementally over three years. The City has also applied for three different grants from the State of
Washington, which have scored high. If awarded, these grants will provide an additional $1.35 million. She and Mayor
Earling have also approached the County for financial support. In addition, some park impact fees can be used for the
project, as it will help fulfill the growing needs associated with growth. All of these sources combined will provide
about $7 to $8 million, which is still short of the estimated $12 million cost, and staff is working on a plan for the
remaining funds.
Board Member Lovell asked if the City has contemplated asking the public for help. Ms. Hite answered that the City
does have a desire to go out for some public donations. However, it is important that they coordinate their efforts with
the Boys and Girls Club, which is part of the development. Following the grant award from the Hazel Miller
Foundation, a local family has submitted several checks for the Civic Field Project, and the intent is to establish a
program that would facilitate public donations.
Board Member Robles asked if naming rights are protected. Ms. Hite said the City has a Park Naming Policy that allows
them to name a park after someone if they donate more than 50% of the total cost of the project. She noted that the
Hazel Miller Foundation has asked that at least a portion of the park (perhaps the north meadow) be named after her.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the City has had dialogue with the public to clarify the limitations placed upon the
park design by the grant. Ms. Hite answered that the adopted Civic Field Master Plan is the product of a robust public
process and successfully address the restricted and non -restricted areas. The decision to reopen the master plan at this
time would have to come from the City Council. She would not recommend doing so, since the current design reflects
an extensive community effort. She explained that the area where the tennis courts are located all the way to the Boys
and Girls Club and the public plaza area represent the two acres that are not restricted. The remaining 6 acres are
restricted based on the Snohomish County Futures Grant criteria. This area must be park space without buildings,
parking, etc.
Vice Chair Cheung asked if there will be areas in the park where citizens can purchase bricks or stones with their names
on them as a way to raise funding for construction. Ms. Hite answered affirmatively and added that one area could be
the entry plaza that will have individual pavers.
Chair Monroe asked if the $12 million cost estimate includes the street promenade, and Ms. Hite answered no. Street
improvements will cost an additional $3 to $4 million.
Board Member Robles asked how many Petanque courts would be provided at the park, and Ms. Hite answered six. The
Petanque Club has requested that the courts be designed to allow flexibility to fit 12 to 16 courts during tournaments.
However, this will be difficult given the desire to add some soft features at the main entrance of the park.
Board Member Robles asked if parking is still a concern. Ms. Hite said that a clear decision was made in the master plan
process that the park would not be used to solve a downtown parking problem. The park would be used similar as today,
without any off-street parking. There are three Rublic lots that surround the area that can be used for event parking, and
there will be some street parking when 6"h and 7 Avenues have been upgraded as part of Phase 2.
Planning Board Minutes
September 12, 2018 Page 2
11 Packet Pg. 4
• Fishing Pier. The City received $1.9 million from the State to rehabilitate the Fishing Pier and the project is nearly
done. The contractor will be back on site to repair some of the center joints. The City has some concerns about the repair
work, and they are not making progress with the contractor to resolve the issue. The project is in a holding pattern while
the City figures out the best step forward. Right now, the center joints do not impact the safety of the structure, but they
will impact its longevity.
Chair Monroe sked if the contractor is still solvent in business and if a bond was required for the project. He also asked
if the City has the ability to assess damages. Ms. Hite said the City Attorney is pursuing the situation and potential
damages, but she cannot discuss details of the case at this time.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked about the maintenance costs of this well -used facility. Ms. Hite answered that during
the busy fishing season there are often 300 people on the pier at night between 10:00 and 1:00 p.m., and the area gets
pretty messy by morning. The City sends crews out to the pier daily during the busy time to clean up. The pier doesn't
require as much maintenance during the summer. Crews check it every day, but only do a thorough cleaning a few times
a week. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the City receives any revenue from the fishing licenses that are required.
Ms. Hite answered no, the licenses are issued by the State. However, it is important to note that the rehabilitation work
was funded primarily by the State via grants from the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and the
Recreation and Conservation Office. She pointed out that the fishing pier is actually owned by the Department of Fish
and Wildlife, and the City is under contract with them to maintain the facility. Once the rehabilitation project is
completed, the City will work with the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife to transfer ownership of the
pier to the City.
Edmonds Marsh. The City is continuing to contract with Keeley O'Connell to project manage the phases of the
Edmonds Marsh rehabilitation efforts. This is a joint effort of the Public Works and Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services Departments. The goal is twofold to address stormwater issues on SR-104 and Harbor Square and to bring back
the salmon habitat into the marsh to rear their young. The feasibility study has been completed, and the project is
currently at 30% design. They anticipate the project will reach 60% design soon. Ms. O'Connell continues to apply for
grant funding to move the required studies and design work forward. Actual construction is anticipated to begin in four
or five years, depending on funding.
Ms. Hite reported that the rehabilitation project on the northwest portion of the marsh walkway should be completed in
the next few weeks. The City is also working on the boardwalk that is located on Port property. The City currently has a
maintenance and operations agreement with the Port of Edmonds that allows them an access easement to the eastern
portion of this walkway, and they are working to obtain an easement for the other portion, as well.
• Frances Anderson Center Playground. The playground equipment at the Frances Anderson Center was replaced in
2018. Whenever the City replaces playground equipment, they work to solicit public input regarding the design and type
of equipment. The new playground includes specific elements that provide more accessibility.
Board Member Robles asked if older children are allowed to play on the new equipment even though it is signed for
children under 12. Ms. Hite answered affirmatively and explained that the sign posts the National Playground Safety
Standards. The Recreational Immunity Law requires that cities do due diligence to make sure the safety standards are
posted in a visible location.
• Memorial Bench Program. The City is in the process of replacing the benches at Brackett's Landing North, which has
prompted staff to review and revise the City's Memorial Bench Program. Currently, the memorial benches expire after
20 years, and staff has been working to contact donors to see if they want to purchase the benches for another 20 years.
For those that do not, they solicit donors from the waiting list of approximately 200 names. At this point, all of the
benches at Brackett's Landing North have been sold and staff will now start working on bench replacement at Brackett's
Landing South.
• Security/Safety. This year, they have focused some effort on security and safety at the Frances Anderson Center and
park maintenance shop where several break ins have occurred. Cameras with motion sensors have been installed and
staff has received de-escalation training and tools for dealing with customers.
Planning Board Minutes
September 12, 2018 Page 3
11 Packet Pg. 5
2.A.a
• Cemetery Mapping. They are in the process of updating the cemetery records to bring everything online. There have
been some issues with the software, but the City's IT staff is working with the cemetery personnel to get the project up
and running.
Outdoor Fitness Zones. The Capital Facility Plan identified an outdoor fitness equipment installation project in 2018.
However, the City is still waiting on a grant application from Verdant Health. If funding is received, it is likely that
Mathay Ballinger Park will be the first location. A second installation could be done at Civic Field in 2019 or 2020. In
addition to equipment installation, the intent is to provide programs such as instruction on how to use the equipment,
fitness classes, etc. to help activate the facility. In 2018, the City worked in cooperation with CrossFit Industries to
present a free community fitness class at Hickman Park, which had more than 100 participants.
Chair Monroe asked how much capital the City has set aside for the fitness zones, and Ms. Hite answered that the City
has set aside $75,000 and submitted a grant application to Verdant Health for an additional $100,000. Staff is also
working on a grant application submittal to the International Fitness Campaign, which could provide up to $30,000.
• Meadowdale Playfields. The playfields were redone in partnership with Lynnwood and the Edmonds School District.
The fields opened earlier in 2018 and have been heavily used. Where there were previously three softball fields and two
dirt fields, there are now three softball fields and two multi -use fields. The multi -use fields have synthetic turf, and the
softball fields have synthetic turf on the infields. The City's softball program has tripled, and staff will request
additional funding in 2019 to accommodate more teams.
Board Member Lovell asked if the City has plans to monitor the performance of the crumb rubber fields given recent
public concern and the City's current moratorium. Ms. Hite summarized that, although the City currently has a
moratorium on crumb rubber, the fields are actually located in Lynnwood. At this time, the City does not have plans to
monitor the fields, but they will continue to keep their eyes on the extensive study that is currently being done by the
Federal Government. They anticipate the results of this study in the fall of 2018. So far, there have been no complaints,
and the fields are wildly popular.
Chair Monroe asked if more money is needed to fund the softball program operations or to build more fields. Ms. Hite
clarified that the additional funding would be used to support additional teams, but not add more fields.
Board Member Robles said he lives near the park and finds the "no parking" signs that are placed in numerous locations
along the roadway to be unsightly. Ms. Hite explained that no additional parking was provided as part of the project.
However, a partnership with the Edmonds School District allows patrons of the field to park in the school parking lots
when school is not in session.
• City Storage Building. The replacement shed should be completed by the end of 2018. The area has been graded to
accommodate a larger building than the previous one that burnt down. The building will serve both the park and facility
needs.
• Community Garden. A community garden has been identified in the capital budget for a number of years, but the City
has struggled to find an appropriate location. The City had negotiated an agreement with Snohomish County to locate
the garden at Esperance Park, but the Council did not approve the Interlocal Agreement pending a future discussion
about annexation. More recently, the City was contacted by an Edmonds resident who expressed a desire to do a type of
sale that would allow her to live on her property in perpetuity but allow the rest of the property to be used for a
community garden. This property would be an excellent location, and staff is currently pursuing the option.
• Veteran's Plaza. This project was completed earlier in the year after a very large community effort. The community
did a heavy lift for this project and it turned out gorgeous.
• Waterfront Redevelopment and Walkway Completion. The City has been working parallel with the Senior Center's
effort to rebuild the center. The City's interest is to pull back the creosote pier from the Sound and introduce a filtration
system from the parking lot to the Sound. In addition, the City plans to complete the walkway south of the Senior
Planning Board Minutes
September 12, 2018 Page 4
11 Packet Pg. 6
2.A.a
Center. The City owns an easement in front of the Ebbtide Condominiums and is working with a designer to figure out
the best option for connecting the walkway. The City recently received a request from the Senior Center that the City
consider paying the full cost of the parking lot and frontage improvements, and the request will be discussed at a special
Council meeting on September 20th. The Senior Center plans to submit permit applications in October or November,
with the goal of starting construction sometime between April and June 2019. The City's project is bound by the fish
window (July through September) because it requires in -water work. That means the project will need to be started by
June of 2019. The walkway connection between the Senior Center and Olympic Beach Park will be Phase II of the
project. They anticipate an elevated walkway that goes in front of the Ebbtide Condominiums. The City is working to
design a walkway that fits within the easement it currently owns. The Ebbtide has filed a lawsuit challenging the
easement, and it is anticipated a decision will be issued in October or November. She emphasized that Phase I of the
City's project will move forward in 2018, but they still need to find funding for Phase II and design work will not
continue until the lawsuit has been decided.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the parking spaces would be signed to limit the length of time. Ms. Hite said time
limits have not been discussed as an option. All of the waterfront parks are extremely popular and parking is not
currently limited. Board Member Rubenkonig suggested the City should discuss this option at some point.
• Marina Beach Park. The Marina Beach Park project will be implemented in conjunction with the Edmonds Marsh
Project. A master plan is in place and construction is estimated to cost $3 million. It is too early to apply for grant
funding as the marsh improvements and daylighting Willow Creek will not be ready to move forward for about four
more years. As the project gets closer, the City will apply for grant funding.
• Student Conservation Association. The City has collaborated with the Student Conservation Association to bring a
youth work/education program to the City to help in the parks over the summer. The program has been very successful,
and the City plans to continue this partnership.
• Willow Creek Fish Hatchery. Sound Salmon Solutions has now completed the transition to operate the hatchery, and
the transition has been very smooth. They are currently raising funds to help with some building upgrades and continued
salmon education for the community.
• Urban Forest Management Plan. The Parks Department is working with the Development Services Department to
bring to completion the Urban Forest Management Plan before the end of 2018. Staff is working to complete the final
edits and bring it back for final Council adoption. The intent is to insert more language relative to the local situation.
• Edmonds Arts Commission Programs. The 33rd Annual Writer on the Sound Conference will take place the first
weekend in October and is again sold out. About 275 to 300 people attend each year, including a number of attendees
from out of state and even out of the country. A new public art installation called "Sunrise Run" was installed on the
breakwater in May. In addition, a new artist -made sculpture (Bookworm) was added on top of a flower basket outside of
the library. This summer's Concerts in the Park Series was very successful. Lastly, the Cultural Services and Economic
Development staff have been partnering on an application to the new Washington State Arts Commission Program to
become a Certified Creative District. The application included a robust public process, and there is good indication that
it will be competitive.
Gateway Sign. In late 2017, the City undertook a design process for a replacement sign for the SR-104 and 51h Avenue
South site. A committee was formed, including one member each from the Planning Board, Arts Commission, and
Economic Development Commission, and a proposal was presented to the City Council in July. The process was sent
back to the drawing board after some public comment indicated a desire to have the replacement design have more of a
look and feel of the existing signage or to have public involvement in the design process. In addition, the staff and
Council agreed that taking a look at all the potential gateway signage sites would be prudent before creating a new sign
for the SR-104 site. The Committee has been enlarged to include several other members of the community, and the
process moving forward will include community open houses. The intent is to start the process in late fall, with an
anticipated recommendation to the City Council in late spring of 2019.
Planning Board Minutes
September 12, 2018 Page 5
11 Packet Pg. 7
Board Member Crank asked if City staff has been in contact with the person who created the smaller sign design. Ms.
Hite answered no, but that doesn't mean it won't happen at some point. Board Member Crank suggested the City should
publish a follow-up story or press release about the new process, emphasizing that the discussion would include all
gateway signs and not just the sign on SR-104.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked what people like about the old sign. Ms. Hite said her understanding is that the sign is
quaint and people are attached to it. People like the ferry aspect of the sign, and they prefer the wood sign over the
proposed more modern metal sign. There has been some discussion about relocating the existing sign to somewhere else
in the City that is assessible to the public to take pictures, etc.
Board Member Crank left the meeting at 8:00 p.m.
Ms. Arnold provided an update on the City's recreational programs, highlighting the following:
• Yost Pool. The YMCA operated Yost Pool again in 2018, and they had a safe and successful summer. The City
received a number of compliments about the cleanliness and orderliness of the facility, which is now closed. The City
completed renovation of the locker rooms in 2018 prior to the summer season.
• CRAZE. The City continues to offer a wide array of recreational programs for all ages. The summer camps were
particularly successful this year and about 90% full. The pickleball courts are becoming wildly popular, with 76 people
signing up for Tuesday evening leagues. On Labor Day, all 8 courts were full and there were 20 people waiting.
• Special Events. Special events for 2018 included Outdoor Movies, Sand Sculpting Contest, Health and Fitness Expo,
Puget Sound Bird Fest, Watershed Fund Fair, Moonlight Beach Adventure, Starlight Beach Walk, Earth Day Ivy Pull
and the Marina Beach Summer Cleanup.
• Beach Ranger Program. The Ranger -Naturalists provided about 130 two-part marine education programs, as well as
classroom fieldtrips and a variety of camps and other outdoor educational programming for all ages. The Rangers
patrolled the waterfront every day from Memorial Day through Labor Day, and the Visitor Station was open every
weekend and some weekdays during the patrol season. More than 7,300 visitors came through the station in 2018.
Board Member Lovell asked Ms. Hite to answered the following questions:
• How is the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department relative to the budget? Ms. Hite advised that the budget
requires a balancing act. Some of the recreational programs are provided by the City directly and others are run by hired
contractors. They have a professional services and contractor budget for this purpose. Revenues are down this year, but
expenses are also lower. They will plan the 2019 budget based on this information. She explained that some programs
fill up, but others do not and have to be cancelled. When programs are cancelled, both the expense and revenue
associated with them are eliminated from the budget. Overall, the budget is in great shape.
Board Member Lovell asked if the 2018 budget included funding to replace a component at Yost Pool. Ms. Hite said the
locker rooms were renovated this year. Every year they try to do a capital project at Yost Pool. The City has invested
quite a bit of money into the facility, and most of the major systems have been replaced in recent years.
• What is the cost recovery ratio for the various programs? Ms. Hite responded that all of the adult programs cover their
own costs, but that is not always the case for the youth and children's programs. Because they want them to be available
to all children, some of the programs are subsidized and the City also offers some scholarship to low-income
participants. Overall, the cost recovery is good.
• Has there been in changes in program participation due to changing demographics? Ms. Hite answered that there are
definitely more young people participating in the programs now, as demographics have changed over the past three to
four years. They try to balance the programs to provide opportunities for all ages.
Planning Board Minutes
September 12, 2018 Page 6
11 Packet Pg. 8
• What percentage of the park visitors and program participants come from outside of Edmonds? Ms. Hite commented
that there is really no way to measure how many park visitors come from outside the City. However, they do know
where the program participants come from, and the City offers a 10% discount to Edmonds residents. Typically, people
come from Mountlake Terrace, Shoreline and Lynnwood. As traffic worsens in the region, people are less willing to
drive to recreate.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the City has experienced homeless people sleeping in the parks. Ms. Hite answered that
there have only been a few situations of people sleeping in the parks over the past two years. When it happens, staff simply
asks them to move on and provides a list of potential resources of where they can get help.
Chair Monroe asked if the City offers a place for homeless people to shower. Ms. Hite said the City allows people to shower
at the Frances Anderson Center for a $3 charge, and there are usually punch cards purchased by others that allow those who
are unable to pay to shower for free. However, the Frances Anderson Center is not set up to be a hygiene center.
Vice Chair Cheung recalled that the City previously had discussions about a potential aquatics center. Ms. Hite explained
that a feasibility study was done in 2008 for an indoor aquatics center in conjunction with Yost Pool. However, the cost was
estimated to be between $16 and $20 million. The City Council removed the project from the Capital Facilities Plan in 2017.
Unless someone from the community expresses renewed interest in the proposal, she does not anticipate it moving forward
any time in the foreseeable future. She noted that in addition to Yost Pool, there are indoor facilities in both Lynnwood and
Mountlake Terrace that are available for Edmonds residents to use.
Board Member Robles asked if park maintenance staff have noticed an increase in wild animals (rabbits, coyotes, etc.) this
year. Ms. Hite said she has not heard any complaints, but she would check with staff. Board Member Robles noted that the
issue has been discussed on a number of community online forums.
REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA
Chair Monroe announced that the Planning Board Retreat is scheduled for September 26th starting at 6:30 p.m. Topics of
discussion will include a briefing by the City Attorney, a presentation of upcoming issues and the work program, and an
update on the Housing Strategy. It was noted that the meeting would be open to the public, but no formal minutes would be
prepared. Chair Monroe agreed to email Board Members regarding food assignments.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Monroe did not provide any additional comments.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Board Member Lovell announced that the City Council will conduct a public hearing of the preferred alternative for the
waterfront connector street on September 18th. He urged Board Members to attend the meeting and share their thoughts
during the public hearing.
Board Member Rubenkonig reported that she attended the Housing Strategy Workshop on August 27th. She said she was
uncomfortable with the handout that was provided to participants to explain the objectives of the strategy. A graphic was
provided to illustrate for each of the objectives, which she felt sent a different message than what was contained in the report.
The graphics ended up confusing the participants further and did not really convey the report goals. She expressed her belief
that the Housing Strategy needs to be rewritten, removing the confusing graphics and limiting the objectives to one. At this
point in time, the report appears to be overreaching. There is a mistrust of the data provided which must be addressed, and it
needs to be more readable for the non -housing professional.
Board Member Rubenkonig further expressed her belief that the overreaching nature of the Housing Strategy reflects the
needs identified by the housing professionals on the Task Force, was supported by the Planning Board, and represents
authentic issues that need resolution. However, the resolution of most of the issues is not going to be on a City level. Low-
income tenant protection requires enforcement, which must be addressed. Increasing supply of income -restricted affordable
Planning Board Minutes
September 12, 2018 Page 7
11 Packet Pg. 9
2.A.a
housing can be done using existing housing stock or the expansion of housing diversity through vouchers and subsidies of a
federal/state/county/private nature. Supporting the needs of an aging population is a social component, but the expansion of
housing diversity can meet the issue of house rich/income poor seniors who desire to stay in their community. She recalled
that, early on, the Planning Board verbalized that the Housing Strategy is the means to "take care of our own." Providing
housing alternatives which allow people to stay in their neighborhoods may be a community value. Many have experienced
the difficulties of parents trying to find downsizing housing options.
Board Member Rubenkonig continued that some in the community are expressing strongly that not all who want to live in
Edmonds should be able to. Legally, there are limits to that kind of thinking. However, there was a strong verbal opposition
to subsidizing someone to live in Edmonds. There may be exceptions to attitude as it pertains to the seniors and physically
and mentally challenged. Recognizing the fact that current homeless people are already a part of our community appears
hard for many to accept. The model provided elsewhere of the local hospital providing housing stability which increases
health stability may be what Verdant needs to pursue for our community. She concluded that the Housing Strategy needs to
center on encouraging multi -family housing and expanding housing diversity. Many of the objectives in the report can be
met within housing diversity. She observed that the public workshop was not meant to be a community forum on how things
would be handled differently. Many issues are already handled on a Federal level and it is not up to the City of Edmonds to
do different than what has already been put in place. She felt the Housing Strategy Task Force has a clear understanding of
what is taking place and the issues of concern, but there is a carefulness in terms of making it seems as though they are trying
to take a temperature reading on how amenable the public is to various concepts and ideas when, in fact, many of the ideas
have already been decided by City regulations (i.e. protecting tenant rights).
Board Member Rosen said he also attended the Housing Strategy Workshop where passions and emotions continued to be
strong. There was a police presence that added to the dynamics and raised passions, as well. He thanked the City Council for
its responsive, strong recommendation that more effort was needed to solicit public feedback. The workshop is a testimony
that they listened to the community. He referred to a memorandum from the Development Services Director that provided a
good representation of the frustrations that were expressed. The public comments at the workshop were insightful and
echoed the comments made on social media. About half of those in attendance had not attended any of the previous meetings
regarding the Housing Strategy. There appeared to be a strong lack of satisfaction in the format of the meeting, which
included a presentation, but no open public forum for people to ask questions and probe further into the presentation. That
lead to an overall dissatisfaction because people were unable to talk about their concerns.
Board Member Rosen recalled that questions were raised about the profile of the Housing Strategy Task Force participants,
and it was suggested that the Housing Strategy was set up to reflect their own self-serving interest. There continues to be a
lack of belief that people have had a meaningful opportunity to have input and that the input was, in fact, heard and
understood. Participants also voiced a lack of trust in the data, which has led to a misunderstanding as to why the City is
having this conversation and writing the Housing Strategy. He expressed his belief that there are major philosophical
differences within the community about what the community should be. He summarized that the community would be
helped by allowing more people to be heard and taking steps to respond to the concerns.
ADJOURNMENT
The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
Planning Board Minutes
September 12, 2018 Page 8
Packet Pg. 10
2.A.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
October 10, 2018
Chair Monroe called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public
Safety Complex, 250 — 5' Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Nathan Monroe, Chair
Matthew Cheung, Vice Chair
Todd Cloutier
Phil Lovell
Daniel Robles
Carreen Nordling Rubenkonig
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Alicia Crank
Mike Rosen
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
STAFF PRESENT
Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager
Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Jerrie Bevington, Video Recorder
Karin Noyes, Recorder
Approval of the September 12' minutes was postponed to the October 20 meeting.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
The agenda was accepted as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
No one in the audience indicated a desire to comment during this portion of the meeting.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD
Board Member Lovell asked if the draft Regional Transportation Improvement Program includes any projects in Edmonds.
Mr. English answered that several City projects are included in the plan. They include the improvements recently completed
at the 761 Avenue/212th Street intersection, an overlay project on SR-524 north of 761 Avenue, and design work for the right-
of-way improvements at the intersection of 761 Avenue and 220th Street.
PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED 2019-2024 CAPITAL FACILITIES/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS
Mr. English explained that the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is required by the Growth Management Act and covers a
planning horizon of 6 to 20 years. It is intended to identify longer term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to the
City's Level of Service (LOS) Standards. The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a budgeting tool that includes capital and
maintenance projects, and it ties the projects to the various City funds and revenues. The CFP is required to be consistent
with the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are restrictions on how often it can be amended. There are no
Packet Pg. 11
restrictions tied to the CIP. The two plans intersect when identifying 6-year capital projects with funding sources. The CIP is
organized based on the City's financial funds and provides a description of each of the capital projects identified for the six -
year period.
Mr. English explained that projects are added to the CFP and CIP based on adopted elements of the City's Comprehensive
Plan. The Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan, the Transportation Plan and Utilities Plans all go through
extensive public processes of updating and establishing policies and goals. The PROS Plan was last updated in 2016. The
Transportation Plan was updated in 2015 and includes the Walkway Plan, Bicycle Plan, Americans with Disabilities (ADA)
Plan, Pavement Preservation Rating Study, List of Priority Projects, and Financial Plan. The Comprehensive Water Plan was
updated in 2017 and the Comprehensive Sewer Plan in 2013. The Storm and Surface Water Management Plan is an older
version adopted in 2010, and funding is identified in the 2019 budget to start a major update.
Mr. English advised that a number of factors are considered when selecting projects for the CIP and CFP, including input
from the City Council, available funding, concurrency, safety, project delivery capacity, Comprehensive Plan priority, grant
sources and competitiveness, and maintenance issues. The CIP is tied to the City's budget and several funds make up the
overall document:
• Fund 112 is a Transportation Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department. It is funded via grants and the
gas tax.
• Fund 125 is a Capital Projects Fund that is managed by both the Public Works and Parks, Recreation and Cultural
Services Departments. It is funded by the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET).
• Fund 126 is a Special Capital Project and Parks Acquisition Fund that is managed by both the Public Works and
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Departments. It is also funded by REET.
• Fund 332 is a Parks Construction Fund that is managed by the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department.
It is funded by grants.
• Fund 421 is the Water Utility Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 422 is the Stormwater Utility Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department.
• Fund 423 is the Sewer and Wastewater Treatment Fund that is managed by the Public Works Department.
Mr. English shared highlights of 2018 Projects:
• The Pavement Preservation Program is a key part of the program for maintaining City streets. In 2018, the City
overlaid 8.22 lane miles using funding from both the Street Overlay Program and the Utility Programs.
• The 2381 Street Walkway Project was completed in early summer and provides a continuous sidewalk on the north
side of 2381 Street between SR-104 and Highway 99. It also provides a mid -block crossing near the bus stop on the
east side of the street.
• The Highway 99 Revitalization/Corridor Study is wrapping up. It provides a footprint and plan for the City's
improvements on Highway 99, using a concept similar to the City of Shoreline to the south.
Mr. English also shared highlights of 2019 Projects:
The Highway 99 Revitalization effort will continue with design work in 2019 for the first phase of the project,
which will focus on the segment between 2201 and 224r' Streets to primarily address the accident history of the area.
A grant request has been submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for $2 million
to help fund construction. The City received $10 million from the State Legislature for this project, and $1 million
was advanced to fund the Corridor Study and design. The balance of the grant will be used for construction, which
is expected to start in 2021.
The Waterfront Connector Project continues to move forward, and Mayor Earling will make a recommendation to
the City Council on October 16t1i regarding the preferred alternative. Final design and permitting are expected to
move forward in 2019 based on the preferred alternative, but additional funding will be needed for construction.
The Dayton Street Walkway Project between 3rd and 9t1i Avenues will be done as part of the Dayton Street Utility
Project. This project was identified in the Walkway Plan as a top priority.
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2018 Page 2
Packet Pg. 12
2.A.b
• The Citywide Pedestrian Crosswalk Project will continue using REED contributions. The intent is to improve nine
intersection crossings to make them safer by installing rapid flashing beacons or High -intensity Activated
crossWalK (Hawk) Signals. For example, a HAWK Signal is planned at the intersection of SR-524 and 8t1i Avenue,
similar to the HAWK signal on SR-104 near City Park.
• REET funds would also be used for the 84r' Street Overlay Project between 220' and 212' Streets. The City
received a Federal grant for the project, which will also include some stormwater improvements to correct
deficiencies.
• The 238t1i Street Island and ADA Ramp Upgrades will also use REET funding, as well as funding from a
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). The City was able to remove the paved area on the north side and
provide an ADA walkway through the island and landscaping to improve its appearance. The intent is to do the
same on the south side.
• The Pavement Preservation Program would continue in 2019 with a budget of $1.5 million.
• The annual Pedestrian Safety Program would continue in 2019 to help solve traffic calming concerns, provide
crosswalks, etc.
• Traffic signal upgrades would be done at several intersections. Currently, a lot of left turns are permissible and
some of these would be changed to flashing arrow movements. Advance signal systems would be installed at some
intersections, as well, to be more reliable and provide signals to the control.
• Audible pedestrian signals would be installed at some intersections to help people with vision impairments.
• Guardrails will be installed to address geographic situations and existing guardrails that are at the end of their useful
life will be upgraded.
• A crosswalk will be installed at the intersection of Admiral Way and Dayton Street, west of the railroad tracks.
• The Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Project will continue in 2019, and the intent is to upgrade 9 pedestrian crossings.
• Construction of the 841 Avenue Overlay Project will move forward in 2019.
• The City has incurred challenges with peat and the underlying soils with the sewer replacement project on Edmonds
Street. A new approach will be used next week in an effort to solve the problem.
• The Five Corners Reservoir Project is well underway. The smaller reservoir should be completed within the next
month and work on the larger one will start soon after.
• The Water Utility will replace 2,400 feet of watermain, recoat the Five Corners Reservoir and overlay 1.6 lane miles
of street affected by waterline replacement.
• The Stormwater Utility will replace 3,200 feet of pipe, complete the Dayton Street Pump Project, do pre -design
work for the Ballinger Regional Facility, overlay 0.3 lane miles of street affected by stormwater replacement, and
update the Storm and Surface Water Management Plan. The Dayton Street Pump Station Project was delayed
waiting for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds. The City received an email indicating that the
grant will go forward in 2019, and they have a decision package before the City Council for the same amount. The
City Council could decide not to wait for FEMA funding and use money from the Stormwater Utility Fund to go
forward with the project.
• The Sewer Utility will replace 1,260 feet of sewer main and rehabilitate 6,500 feet of sewer pipe using the cured -in -
place method, overlay 0.5 lane miles of street affected by sewer main replacement, and complete the Lake Ballinger
Sewer Trunk Study.
Vice Chair Cheung asked how the City determines which street projects to work on and how a private citizen can make
recommendations to the City. Mr. English answered that projects in the CIP and CFP are also identified in the Transportation
Plan, PROS Plan and utility plans, which are all elements of the Comprehensive Plan and were adopted following a robust
public outreach program that solicited input from citizens. In addition, issues such as concurrency, available funding, safety
and grant funding are all considered. Private citizens can submit their suggestions and concerns to the Engineering Division
or the Public Works Department.
Board Member Lovell asked if the crosswalk project at the corner of Dayton Street and Admiral Way would be coordinated
with the installation of warning signals for the railroad tracks. Mr. English answered that the projects are entirely separate.
The City has been waiting for BNSF to complete its improvements before installing the wayside warning signals on Main
Street and Dayton Street. Board Member Lovell asked if the permit work has been completed. Mr. English answered yes,
except for the contractor permit, which should only take three or four weeks.
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2018 Page 3
Packet Pg. 13
Vice Chair Cheung said he likes the rapid flashing beacons that are used at some intersections, especially near schools. He
suggested that beacons should be added on 761 Avenue near Woodway Edmonds High School and College Place Elementary
School where the crosswalks are heavily used. Mr. English agreed that beacons are good improvements around schools.
Ms. Hite advised that, in addition to the project selection criteria described earlier by Mr. English, the Parks, Recreation and
Cultural Services Department uses additional criteria when selecting parks projects for the CIP and CFP. These include and
assessment of resources and acknowledging opportunities to connect and expand, enhance identity, advance big ideas and
leverage funding to maximize grants.
Ms. Hite shared highlights of 2018 projects:
• The consultant recently submitted schematic designs for Civic Park, and these will be reviewed internally and by
stakeholder groups for feedback.
• The City partnered with the City of Lynnwood on the Meadowdale Playfeld Project. The fields are owned by the
Edmonds School District and operated and maintained by the City of Lynnwood. The City of Edmonds pays half
the maintenance costs and put capital dollars into the project, as well. There are now three softball fields and two
multi -use fields, all with synthetic turf that allows for year-round play. The fields have been used heavily and are
booked through July of 2019.
• The City is still working to address concerns with the contractor relative to the center joints on the Fishing Pier.
While the final solution is still unclear, it is important to note that the facility is safe for people to use.
• The City's Waterfront Redevelopment and Walkway Project has been moving forward parallel with the Senior
Center's effort to rebuild the center. The City's plan is to pull back the creosote pier and introduce beach habitat
and a filtration system from the parking lot to the Sound. Phase 2 of the project would be a walkway south of the
Senior Center. The City owns an easement in front of the Ebbtide Condominiums and is working with a designer to
figure out the best option for connecting the walkway all the way from the Senior Center to Olympic Beach Park.
Currently, the City is in litigation with the Ebbtide property owners, so design work has been paused until the legal
issues have been resolved.
• The City continues to work with the Engineering and Public Works Departments on a project to daylight Willow
Creek. The goal is to rehabilitate the marsh and reintroduce salmon habitat and to improve stormwater retention.
Grant funding was used to complete the required feasibility studies and early design work.
• The City Park Storage Building should be completed in the next month or two.
• City staff is currently working with a citizen who is interested in donating a plot of land that could be used to host a
community garden. The hope is to have an agreement in place by the end of the year so that the community garden
can be started in 2019.
• The playfield at the Frances Anderson Center was replaced and is well loved by the community.
• Other projects funded by the 2018 CIP include the fishing pier restrooms, Mathay Ballinger Trail, Seaview Park
improvements, Yost Pool locker room updates, Hickman Park hill erosion, and rehabilitation of the Marsh
Walkway.
Next, Ms. Hite shared highlights of the proposed 2019 projects:
• Design of Civic Park will continue to move forward, with the goal of construction starting in 2020. Staff is working
to put together a $12 million funding package. They have $6 to $7 million secured or pending so far, and they are
hoping to reach a place where the City can bond several million dollars on the back end so that construction can start
in 2020.
• Design and Permitting for the Waterfront Development and Walkway Project will continue to move forward. The
intent is to have the project ready to start in April so that the in -water work can be done during the fish window (July
and August).
• Consistent with the City's goal of replacing at least one play area per year, a new play area will be installed at
Seaview Park in 2019.
• Again, the City's hope is to acquire land to establish a community garden in 2019.
• Money has been set aside in the 2019 budget to take the Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor Plan off the shelf and start
mapping out its implementation.
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2018 Page 4
Packet Pg. 14
2.A.b
• The City recently received a grant from Verdant Health Care to install two outdoor fitness zones. The first will be
installed at Mathay Ballinger Park in 2019 and the second at Civic Park in 2020.
Board Member Lovell asked if implementation of the Marina Beach Master Plan is tied to the Willow Creek Project. Ms.
Hite answered affirmatively. However, she emphasized that the daylighting project is still three to five years out. As they
get closer to 60% design for the marsh and Willow Creek, the City will start design work for implementing the Marina Beach
Master Plan. At this time, further study is being done before starting design work for the marsh project. One hold up is that
the grant agency, the Salmon Recovery Board, and design team have decided the best solution is to have more of a broad
channel that goes through the culvert and out into the marina as opposed to a long -linear channel. However, this option is
currently restricted by the ownership of the UNOCAL property. It is hoped that the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) will take ownership of the property next year. WSDOT has indicated it is amenable to
participating in a collaborative approach to making Willow Creek a salmon -bearing stream.
Mr. English summarized that staff started development of the capital budgets in July and proposals were submitted to the
Finance Department in August and September so that the draft CIP and CFP could be prepared. A public hearing before the
Planning Board is scheduled for October 241. Following the hearing, the Board will be asked to forward a recommendation
to the City Council. The plans will be presented to the City Council on November 51, and the Council will hold a public
hearing on November 19th. It is anticipated the City Council will adopt the plans in late November or early December.
Board Member Rubenkonig complimented staff on a great presentation. Being able to see all of the sources helped her
understand how all of the components fit together. She particularly liked the map that was provided to identify exactly where
each project would be located. She recalled that when the CIP and CFP was last presented to the Board in October of 2017,
there was concern about 881 Avenue and Maplewood School. She asked if a sidewalk in this location was moved up on the
priority list. Mr. English explained that the City works hard to find funding for all sidewalk projects. However, it is
challenging because the need is much greater than the funding sources available. At this point, they do not have funding
designated for the project, and it will remain on the list with no forward progress.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the City is on track with the 220' Street improvements that will assist commuters to use
the improved Mountlake Terrace Park -and -Ride in the coming years. Mr. English responded that the City is hoping to work
in partnership with Mountlake Terrace to complete improvements from the east side of Interstate 5 to the signal at 220'
Street to help peak period commuters get through the corridor easier. In addition, the City completed improvements on 228'
Street and added a signal where it intersects with Highway 99.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the traffic numbers have increased since the 2281 Street improvements were completed,
and Mr. English answered affirmatively. He added that, at last check, they were very close to the growth that was
anticipated.
Board Member Rubenkonig said she lives close to the intersection of 76' Avenue and 212' Street where work was just
completed. She commented that when she reviewed the project during the design phase, she did not anticipate there would
be such wide-open spaces. She asked if the City has any plans to add vegetation and other elements that would soften the
appearance. While the intersection improvements function well, she felt that more urban design elements could have been
added such as landscaping, trees, flower baskets, memorial signs, and pedestrian graphics.
Mr. English responded that said the City considers the project complete and does not have any plans to add landscaping or
other elements as mentioned above. However, the historic street sign would be reinstalled soon. He explained that the intent
of the project was to provide the capacity needed to meet the level of service needs of that intersection. One option was to
create two lanes in both directions, but they backed off this approach and eventually decided on a three -lane solution that
would result in a smaller footprint and less impact yet still provide the level of service needed. One significant element of the
project was the underground utilities that improved the appearance of the intersection.
Board Member Rubenkonig commented that eliminating the utility poles created a larger expanse of space. She pointed out
that there is no room for landscaping at the corner of the Dairy Queen property, and the landscaping that was there prior to
the improvements has been removed. One option would be to use hanging flower baskets at the intersection to soften the
hardscape and add more interest. She summarized that this is an important intersection that matters to the community and it
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2018 Page 5
Packet Pg. 15
2.A.b
lost something in the redesign. Ms. Hite said she gets at least ten requests each summer for flower baskets in different
locations of the City. Unless the City adds more money to the flower program, it cannot be expanded beyond its current
level. This expansion would have to be balanced against the other needs and priorities in the City.
Vice Chair Cheung asked if the City has ever considered providing some type of cover at the intersection of 212t' Street and
76r' Avenue for weather protection for the students who are waiting. Mr. English agreed that is a good idea and said he
would give it some thought, but there are no plans to do so at this time. Board Member Rubenkonig pointed out that it would
be a wonderful pedestrian amenity and add urban design to the intersection.
Board Member Robles commented that staff did a great job with the CIP and CFP proposals. He said he enjoys seeing
projects move from concepts to design and then to construction. He said he appreciates how the City has done a great job of
grinding and marking places where sidewalks are heaving. He asked if the proposed CIP identifies funding to fix these
situations. Mr. English answered that these situations are more operational issues. The proposed 2019 budget includes
funding for two new concrete crew positions, and their focus would be on solving existing problems such as heaving
sidewalks, as well as installing curbs and ramps to make sidewalks ADA compliant and filling in small gaps of sidewalks
within the City. Board Member Robles asked about the City's plan for dealing with the beautiful trees that have grown large
and are causing the sidewalks to heave. Mr. English said this was a topic of discussion at the recent City Manager's meeting.
It requires a balance between retaining the beautiful trees and keeping the infrastructure safe.
Board Member Robles commented that the Meadow Playfields are incredible. He noted that there are several informal
entries, as well as an informal pathway behind the baseball fields. He asked if there are plans to maintain these locations.
Ms. Hite said the City of Lynnwood is responsible for managing this park. She suggested that these informal spaces are more
of a convenience and are not intended to be access points and trails. They are not part of the current maintenance plan, but
she agreed to bring up the issue with the City of Lynnwood to see what their plans are for them. Board Member Robles
suggested that these areas could be dressed up or, at the very least, lighting could be added to make them safer.
Board Member Robles recalled that when the CIP and CFP were last discussed in October of 2017, concerns were raised
about Meadowdale Beach Road being wet and slippery, with no sidewalks. Mr. English reported that the street was overlaid,
but no sidewalk was added.
Board Member Lovell commented that, collectively, the City does a very good job of managing its facilities and projects, as
well as going after grant funding for future projects. Regarding Board Member Rubenkonig's comments about the
intersection improvements at 212' Street and 76r' Avenue, he said he drives through the intersection nearly every day and
finds it to be absolutely fabulous. Any landscaping that is needed should be the responsibility of the property owners at the
four corners. He summarized that, overall, the draft CIP and CFP appear viable. He said it is good to see the plan work not
only to the infrastructure, but the parks, as well. He commented that the City is in the midst of a major growth pattern, with a
lot of people and traffic being added. The City needs to be proactive to deal with these changes.
Chair Monroe asked if City staff tracks the actual cost of projects compared to budgeted costs. Mr. English described some
recent projects where change orders were required and project costs escalated. He said the City tracks the changes and uses
the information to manage future cost estimates. Chair Monroe asked if the information was factored into the proposed CIP
and CFP. Mr. English answered affirmatively and explained that not only does the City monitor City project costs, but they
also seek information from WSDOT and other sources. They try to provide heavy management research on projects when
they know there will be problems. Staff does its best to estimate and plan for unforeseen issues, as well.
Chair Monroe requested clarification about why funding for projects would increase dramatically in 2021. Mr. English
explained that the first three years are treated as a constrained list of the projects for which there is either secure funding or
they feel secure funding will be available. Funding for projects identified in the last three years of the CIP is unconstrained.
This is where they place all of the projects they would like to do but do not have funding for. It is important to include these
projects and costs estimates so they are eligible if and when grant funding becomes available at some point in the future.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked if it was a mistake for her to assume that trees would be planted on the high school and
Burger King sites as part of the 212' Street and 76t' Avenue intersection improvements. Mr. English pointed out that there is
no room to plant trees on the Burger King property given that there is limited space for right-of-way and parking. However,
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2018 Page 6
Packet Pg. 16
he agreed to follow up with the school district to find out if trees should be planted on the Edmonds Woodway High School
corner of the intersection.
Board Member Rubenkonig commented that there are tree -planting techniques that direct root growth downwards so as to
avoid interference with the hardscape. She suggested the City seek input from landscape architects regarding these
opportunities so that street trees are planted in ways that encourage root growth to grow deeper rather than branching out and
remaining closer to the surface. This will help minimize the conflict between trees and hardscape.
DISCUSSION ON MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHOUT PARKING IN
THE DOWNTOWN BUSINESS (BD) ZONES.
Mr. Chave reviewed that, in the interest of encouraging smaller buildings in the BD zone, a previous City Council decided
not to require parking for residential development in buildings with a total footprint of less than 4,800. At the time, there was
already no parking requirement for commercial uses in the BD zones. Until recently, there had been no projects to take
advantage of this residential parking incentive. However, an application for a 9-unit apartment building was recently
approved that will have no on -site vehicle parking, which is consistent with the existing code for the BD2 zone. Other
property owners on the street raised concern that no on -site parking would be provided and how this would impact the
available on -street parking. In response to these concerns, the Council adopted a moratorium on August 21" to give the
Planning Board time to study the issue and forward a recommendation to the Council on any potential code amendments
regarding this code provision.
Mr. Chave referred to Attachment 3 of the Staff Report, which contains the general downtown parking provisions. He
highlighted that ECDC 17.50.010.0 normally requires one parking space for each residential unit, but the language in ECDC
16.43.D.3 specifies an exemption to the parking requirement for residential uses in buildings with a total footprint of less than
4,800. The easiest approach to reinstate a minimum residential parking standard for downtown development in small
buildings would be to simply delete this section so the exemption no longer exists and then default to ECDC 17.50.010.C.
Chair Monroe pointed out that ECDC 17.50.010.0 speaks to the parking requirement for residential uses associated with
mixed -use development, but it does not specifically speak to buildings with only residential units. Mr. Chave agreed that the
language in ECDC 17.50.010.0 could be amended to clarify that it would apply to buildings that are entirely residential, too.
Mr. Chave advised that the City Council is seeking feedback and a recommendation from the Board so that code amendments
can be in place before the moratorium expires in February. That means the Board needs to conduct a public hearing and
make a recommendation by December. Again, he said staff is recommending that the residential parking exemption for
small buildings (ECDC 16.43.D.3) should be eliminated. That would mean that the parking requirement for all residential
units in the BD zone would be the same (one space per unit). If that is the direction the Board wants to go, staff would
review the remainder of the BD zoning standards to make sure the parking requirements are consistent throughout. For
example, it may be necessary to add additional language to ECDC 17.50.010.0 to make it clear that all residential units in the
BD zone must provide one parking space per unit.
Vice Chair Cheung asked how "dwelling unit" is defined in the City's code. Mr. Chave said it is defined as a place where
one family resides. "Family" is defined as related individuals or up to five unrelated individuals. Board Member
Rubenkonig pointed out that although there is an opportunity for several unrelated individuals to live in a single dwelling
unit, only one parking space would be required in the BD zone.
Vice Chair Cheung said the proposed change to require one parking space per dwelling unit seems to make sense, but
perhaps there could be some exceptions to the requirement to accommodate units that are occupied by people who do not
own vehicles. Mr. Chave explained that parking spaces in a multifamily building are not typically assigned to individual
units. They are generally provided for the residential property, and it is up to the property owner and residents to parcel them
out. The City does not enforce having one space per unit whether or not you have a car.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the City has provisions that would allow an exception for a multifamily project that is
located close to a bus stop and other public transportation. Mr. Chave said there is no exception in the BD zone, but this
option does exist on Highway 99 if a proponent can produce a study that supports the lower parking standard.
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2018 Page 7
Packet Pg. 17
2.A.b
Board Member Robles asked if there are size requirements for the parking spaces. Mr. Chave said there are depth and width
requirements, but not height requirements.
Board Member Robles asked if there are other options for incentivizing affordable housing. He is concerned about requiring
large parking areas for residential units that do not necessarily need the space. Mr. Chave said some jurisdictions have taken
the approach of eliminating the parking requirement altogether for properties located near transit. He agreed that the parking
requirement has an impact on the ability to develop affordable housing, but it also impacts lenders when determining whether
or not a project is viable. He pointed out that a 1 parking space per unit requirement would still be less than the City's
requirement for multifamily development in other zones. Elsewhere, the lowest parking requirement is 1.2 spaces for a
studio apartment.
Board Member Robles asked if allowing residential development without any parking could result in any externalized risks.
Chair Monroe answered that it could tax the public good by reducing costs to developers and putting the costs on the public
instead. While it would allow a developer to maximize the building area, it would push cars out onto the streets.
Vice Chair Cheung pointed out that almost all on -street parking in the BD zone is restricted to a certain number of hours. He
asked if it would be possible for residents to purchase permits that allow them to park on the street for longer periods of time.
Mr. Chave said the City already offers permits for commercial employee parking, but it is fairly limited. Vice Chair Cheung
suggested that perhaps the program could be expanded to accommodate residential parking, as well. This would help limit
the residual affect of having no parking requirement, and having no parking requirement could result in more opportunities
for affordable housing.
Vice Chair Cheung suggested that before making a blanket requirement of one parking space per unit, the Board should
consider other options further. Chair Monroe said he would not feel comfortable reducing the parking requirement to less
than one stall per unit. There is a race to eliminate single -occupancy vehicles, but it is not yet a reality. Vice Chair Cheung
summarized that the point of the proposed amendment is to avoid driving multiple cars into the streets where there are
already parking issues. However, it may be possible to address the issue better by providing flexibility for less parking so
that units can be more affordable.
For the purpose of the discussion at hand, Chair Monroe suggested that the best solution would be to require one parking
space per unit, which is consistent with all other residential development in the BD zones. The Board could then discuss a
more comprehensive approach to address parking and affordable housing in the BD zones at some point in the future. Board
Member Robles observed that the City Council has debated this issue, and they will make the ultimate decision. Getting their
input on the record is the most important thing the Board can do.
Board Member Rubenkonig asked how stakeholders and property owners who would be most impacted by the proposed
change could be notified of the public hearing. Vice Chair Cheung suggested it would be helpful to hear from the developer
of the apartment complex that caused the issue to come to the forefront, as well.
Mr. Chave advised that the public hearings regarding the proposed amendments will be published in the local newspapers,
posted on the City's website, and posted in various locations throughout the City. A public hearing before the Planning
Board is set for November 141. At that time, staff will present proposed language that would reflect a requirement of one
parking space per unit.
Board Member Cloutier advised that a quick search of the issue reveled that a parking requirement of one space per unit is
actually quite low compared to other jurisdictions. Many require one space per bedroom.
REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA
Chair Monroe reviewed that the October 24' agenda will include a public hearing on the 2019-2023 CIP and CFP. The
November 14t1i agenda will include a public hearing on the proposed amendment to the BD zone parking requirement and a
public hearing on the Shoreline Master Program Update. The November 28t1i meeting was cancelled.
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2018 Page 8
Packet Pg. 18
2.A.b
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Monroe commented that he enjoyed the presentation on the CIP and CFP. It is a lot of fun watching projects go from
conception to design and then development.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Board Member Rubenkonig thanked the City for putting on the Volunteer Recognition Event on October 9t1i in the Brackett
Meeting Room at City Hall. Not only was there good food, but those in attendance were able to meet others who serve on
boards and other City groups. There are excellent people involved as volunteers in the City. She reported that some concern
was raised that perhaps people didn't see the invitation because it was sent out via the City's email system. It was suggested
that it should have been sent out to private email accounts, as well. Chair Monroe reminded the Board of the City Attorney's
counsel that all City business should be done on the City's account rather than personal accounts.
�I111117W1u_1.0401"
The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
Planning Board Minutes
October 10, 2018 Page 9
Packet Pg. 19
6.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/24/2018
Public Hearing on the Proposed 2019 - 2024 Capital Facilities Plan / Capital Improvement Plans
Staff Lead: Rob English, City Engineer
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
See Narrative below.
Staff Recommendation
Recommend approval to City Council.
Narrative
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital
projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a
list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the
City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital
projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects
are identified within the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan
projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects.
The 2019-2024 CIP has been updated from the previous Planning Board meeting to include a 6-year list
of Building Maintenance projects.
CIP vs. CFP
The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to
different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying
those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital
needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City level of service standards. The CFP is also required to be
consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc.) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there
are restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP.
The proposed 2019-2024 CFP is attached as Exhibit 1. The CFP has four project sections comprised of
General, Transportation and Stormwater. The proposed 2019-2024 CIP is attached as Exhibit 2. The CIP
has two sections related to general and parks projects and each project list is organized by the City's
financial fund numbers.
Following the Planning Board's public hearing and recommendation the City Council will also hold a
public hearing prior to final approval.
Packet Pg. 20
6.A
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: CFP Draft 10.24.18
Exhibit 2: CIP Draft 10.24.18
Exhibit 3: Comparison Matrix 10.24.18
Packet Pg. 21
6.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
U~�
2019-2024
�F� - EDP
St. 0
DRAFT
n,o
►Wi
Packet Pg. 22
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 23
6.A.a
CFP
GENERAL
Packet Pg. 24
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 25
6.A.a
N
U
N
.O
LL a
U m
a M o
o a 143),'N
E c
N
v m N
w:-rd>
T lL m
U � d
r C
'Q d
{fl
U
a
W
N
^
m
�
NO
O
N
N
�
lv+!
f9
m
N
N
N
N
N
N
oo
a N
O W O O ^
0 O V O
M M O M O
p
OI
N
OM
W
w
N
m
aroi >
`o
ro =
_
E
> o
Go
w
itl w
E 0 o f
O¢
U w
¢ o
s CO!9
LL
a' (7
a O
vi
C1
^
N 0
o
O W O O W
o W o 0
N
at ro
� O O M C
fA fR fA fR fA N
fR fA fR N
d N N
0
V y ILM
d o
U
�j
_ c
�3
a
b
O
C) O
f
Y
O
p
R
7
'm
N
o' c
o
>
9
a
a o O`
W
y
—
0
o
o>
N
N
C
E y
ro C n o m
w 9
a
Y o d
L m
d x
m ro
L
a
Y
n
A
roco
t�
c
a E
n E d
d W
0 0 c n E
E n
0E
m a
n—
> of
N ro a U
0
aHro ro
Sro
¢n'
Cp
m
d
n
O
M
v
ro
N
dy
E
oa
m
`
z
�o
O
N
0
E
d
m
`
ro
o
a
>
Y =
N
�
>
a m
C
o
O
E 3
W
a
E
U
U O
CO
COI
Ci
N
O
W O l•l
O O
W n 0
O O O O b
M O O N
C09 N O M NN n
aroi w
LL
W m n a o
¢ (ry m
s m
`m ?
a a`
O O O OI
fA fA M � N
W o_
rn z
o E w
a (coo
3
3 �
O Q
Q
N O - z L
> ro d C U 0
U O ro ro o fa
N W O w w itl N m U O
E 2 E-.
��yEoE._E
mEU >.p o
d m o ro _
U on o ^s ^ oao
nEtdroomt E'o
in W�rocg W3 oo �c
o ro �'roc�a
w
a
ro
Y
m
3
0
d
E
o
U
^ O
� n
m
E
3 coy
Packet Pg. 26
6.A.a
Packet Pg. 27
6.A.a
This page intentionally left blank
Packet Pg. 28
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $11,750,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
Develop the recently adopted master plan for Civic Park, including demolition of the stadium.
Develop plan adding amenities and recreation components, restrooms to accommodate
increased growth.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Civic Center Development.
The acquisition and development of Civic Center is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2018 - 2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Design
$1,000,000
Construction
$10,000,000
TOTAL
$11,000,000
00
r
Packet Pg. 29
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6-8 M
Complex at the Former Woodway High School
ra CIA HOGAN
HQm
t
rt II
y I —
w -
rC)R lER wOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL
ATHLETIC FIELD IMPROVEMENTS
PRE PAnto fOR THE E DMON DS SCHOOL DISH ICT
MAY FOV
6.A.a
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted
or unlighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District,
community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon
successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project for all 3 phases.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and under maintained
facility with great potential as community multi -use active park. Site has existing controlled
access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized
area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees.
Phase 1 was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phases 2 & 3 will be completed in the future for an
additional $6-8M.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2038
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-
COST
2038
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$6-8M
" all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
9
a
Packet Pg. 30
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million
Maintenance & Operations Building
Building Outline
Perimeter zone — 4,200 sf
Existing Fence Line
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the
end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this
existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City
parks and Capital facilities for the long term.
SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real
estate taxes.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2038
Planning/Stud
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3m - $4m
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
10
Packet Pg. 31
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,595,000
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion
•...•�q� .1iC R�.�
� � _
� � o _
tAAOG�pi1� �.
.
�.
�"
rxFp11KAV
y ....
t rre.w x•,.
Ae,...e, R..., y
�
d"
o.ern+aor�.a
�whcwo-e.e►ro-ra
Pra00$44 FdrrrO+rti5
W nufront Gan[er
�1
r�
r �Mw ww
. -:• .rx. �.� .ra+ nsr sc.ac..o.�wrr rr w n.
r
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. Connect waterfront walkway from
Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide
condominiums.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and
provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up
beach -front access.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,170,000
0
0
0
0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
11
Packet Pg. 32
6.A.a
12
Packet Pg. 33
6.A.a
CFP
TRANSPORTATION
13
Packet Pg. 34
6.A.a
LL u1
y C N
m
C S a N
y e o
a m o N
W o6
> ° N
r LL a"
U c
m
m ~
U
o°s
N
N�y
O
N vi
g Y3 YI Yt YI S g
N g
-
« Q Q 2 Q
g 3 Lq N S g S g g
�_
g 5 .9 5 .9 o S gaQ 1. o aQ o$ $
-
N
3
2 x 2 x
g o S
N - - c - 9
o g U U
N
y - q cli
N
N_ _ _-6 log _ _ _
f9 w 0 (/1 w 0 f9 w 0 N w 0 f9 m 3 O N w 0 (q w 0 N w 0 (n m 0 N w 0 (q w 0 N w 0
8 y F � rq F U1 H Z5 y F f/1 F N F o U1 H y F y� F Z N S F
9 N J N J m J N J m J N J N J m J N J
p 0 g o S o g S
- - - - - -16 1. Ro-
d a �
c c c c c c c
U U U U (J U (5J U (J U (5J
p a ¢ a a a a a a a I
m_3 o y m N `° _ .9c o i m c o a E.
v
�¢ o� o y v as o.--'ryi�-8i of o�o� minm�
O mn� o E� 3�a 3'= 3mm� _o c oo `�� ..gym. �E E. mod yJ�E
a mEm' Q"w msm init vi' in mod' -oft �nz� �y a.^=sE Q€v¢i� a-$d
o
m12 e N-oc .L"o `09 .0 oc$ nm �.a coat m 00
E N^ c N d t .4m �'3 m== E w a¢_
$ c g o.� a o c o' W 8 g� c in 9_ �+'c E^`� �' v E
4E pa T' 4'o in9L 'Sv�o a m�'m 'S mzm c ci
W$ n w E 'n E U U
m am E Eo
y y 2 ¢ N Q E a
qq N Q
° V (djE t7 5 E 11E -
a�E E @l m.4 `m 3 4 @1C uE
s� Q Q Q & ¢ Q
N3 Y xE xE xE x .n5 yy yE
14
Packet Pg. 35
6.A.a
LL u1
y C N
0 EL
y e o
'a W O N
W = 'm Am C N
r LL a"
U c
y
•� f
U
o
N
«i
C
O
N
_ g
_
N
t�
N�
N
O
N
N g
�
�
N
N
O
O
N
y
O
N
8y
anyy
L 8
g
S&yy
U
N '✓i
m
$&8
O
N
LL O
3
C
8
F
_
_
N O
ck lk
I
w
'o t
U
(J
U
(J
U
(J
m
O
-
10
�
A
O
a
a
omN
a
o
oa
So
365s
3
m
E
a
m
m
3
_E
;
y
3
-`
Z
ui
m
E
o
¢
¢
o
N
O
a
N
� E
3
0
�
� E
E
E
> .4
m
E
v ?
E
o
> .4
E.
OE _
�ti
°� n
yE
m
yE
OE_
's
8
8
0$
g
g
o g
iN
wH
u0i g
o Qu
m t�9
t
t O
H
� N .Z H
� y H
IS
w
N S
wy g
m
o g
a
U
a
(J
a
U
a
(J
a
U
O
(7
O
(7
�m
E
m0at
�T4 �
u�iy
uitli Et
y
.6
'id'cE�iN
3
N
n
of
nN CW
a0
Lei E'.
_
n';T
Nc
oao
Qt a
o33
y
2 00
.w
N
E"w
EN n2
E¢y
Ea3
a`E
3
y
3
y
0
a
m
c
E
�¢
N
N
k
o�
E
E
a
E
ai,
y z
3�
Q
3 r3ii
y
m o
c in
4t
¢t
3
15
Packet Pg. 36
6.A.a
LL H
d
y C'
y
C S a N
y eO o
'a W N
W = , AW o N
LL CL
f1 c
y
W ~
U
c
m
a
r
o 's
as
O
/
N
0
L
N
H
H Y
H
�I
S 8
S S
8
8
S 8 8
S. 8
N
S 8
aQ
V
S
S 8
S S
8
8
S 8
0 8
N
FL
N
N
N
N
11,�,
LL
N
NH
IV
N
N
^
°
8
s
8
9 ^
^
'o
m
'
n
(nN O
O.m
11
CDy
° H
- m
HG
o
Cm-
N
0
p O
L
-
-
-
8�
- -
- -
- -
- - -
HH
a
NF
H
H
H
H
H H
H
H
H
H H
H
0
a a
l
�L
c j
C5
(7
(7
f7
(7
0
0
f7
O
a
a
a
a
0
a
a
a
IL
a
E
c
N y
�3
-�_
-
:yr
cNw
1
V
4¢
mQ�c
Co
om
xNy�E
Nm
m
�
1
¢
Ea
N
Sao
3ro
O
m O1¢
v
166
�i
vfno
mQ
m�
_Si EE
NE4
m�o
'^�
'no��
mt
y+
a`Er
5
a
'S c
N¢
.5
aN
'5
a3
'S y
amain
E ,F
Uin
'S "
aay
3m
a['m
c m a
who
5
ate¢
L
Ct
3
E
w
ti
3
0
3
a
LL
E
¢
w
E
o
N
E
z c
¢
V
2
y
E
M
-
E
LL
m
N
g
¢ n
E
r
'o
E
33
E
o
E
Q�
3y
.
S c
E
y3
�+
N
N a
in
3
3
65
a
E
a
h
F
o
t
3y
wy
��
o
a8
w�E
W
E
s
U
Q
16
Packet Pg. 37
6.A.a
ps
's
ps
's
ps
ps
O
N
C
O
N
N
O
N
o S
-
o S
N
N
W e9 Ss
N
N
O
O
N
y
O
N
2
L
O
N
y 9 w 0
N w 0
in m— O
N w 0
in
a N w 0
in }3 w 0
C
8
rn F
U1 F
� y F
y F
� N F
y F
U J
N- J
� N
O
N ii
p S
N H
H pH
�
H H pH
w
o t
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
U
(J
U
(J
U
(J
U
m t
�
O
a
c
p t3i1E
4
4m
:ymy
TS
4 i
6
O
-.05
o
o
j
op N o
c t a
x ro
t
x�
0 E
0 E
a
;�3
Eo
mE
y
y
n
3
:4 i i
.98
p o
s
y
3
p y
03:3:
i
53
t3
o3 d
to
a`N¢
E
E
m
z
It
65
x
x
N
¢ a
E
E
o
E
E
E
a
�y
3r3n
3v3i
ran
y
3�
y3
¢t
at
y3
y3
a'o.
rla
55
-I IN
N¢
N¢
.10
° L
17
Packet Pg. 38
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,421,000
to 95th PI. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W to three lanes
with two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety and traffic
flow along this corridor.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2023 (pending funding). These
project costs would be split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since half the project is
within Esperance.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering,
Administration, &
ROW
$75,000
$300,000
$1,200,000
Construction
$8,846,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$300,000
$10,046,000
18
Packet Pg. 39
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 761h Ave W @ 2121h St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $7,700,000
Intersection Improvements
1
i
i
0
tUMUNUb-VVUUUVVHY
HIGH SCHOOL
I
OFFICE
W
a
R
F
1301
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a northbound and southbound left -turn lane to convert the signal
operation for those approaches from split phasing to protected -permissive phasing. Add a right -turn
lane for the westbound, southbound, and northbound movements. The project also consists of
various utility upgrades and conversion of overhead utilities to underground.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the existing level
of service to LOS C.
SCHEDULE: Substantial completion will be reached in October 2018 and the remaining Federal
documentation will be completed in 2019. Federal and State transportation grants were secured to
complete the different project phases (through CMAQ and TIB secured grants).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
Construction
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$10,000
r
a
19
Packet Pg. 40
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Highway 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000,000
Gateway/Revitalization
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would include, among other features, wider replacement
sidewalks or new sidewalk where none exist today, new street lighting, center medians for access contro
and turning movements, etc., attractive and safe crosswalks, better stormwater management, targeted
a
utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape
treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
L
x
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve aesthetics, safety, user experience, and access
•2
management along this corridor. In addition, economic development would be improved.
a
SCHEDULE: The conceptual phase began in September 2017 and should be completed by November
00
2018. The design phase for the stretch from 224t" St SW to 220t" St. SW is scheduled to begin in 2019
N
(pending additional funding). A HSIP grant application was submitted to fund a portion of the design /
ROW phases (pending response). $10M from Connecting Washington allocation has been secured, of
which $91VI isn't available until 2021.
o
COST BREAKDOWN
U-
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-203�
U
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$437,376
$1,540,000
$3,750,000
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
$16,000,OC
w
Administration
& ROW
E
Construction
$15,000,000
$13,000,000
$121,000,OC
1 % for Art
a
TOTAL
1 $437,376
$1,540,000
$3,750,000
$15,000,000
$15,000,000
$2,000,000
$137,000,0(
20
Packet Pg. 41
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212t" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,806,000
intersection improvements
Paul
I
21 5T
7 P—.—C
a
z
7313
n
3
Edmonds
Edmonds
Family Clinic
=`
Public 17-ks
Q
Hoot
KENNEL
m
Nlla
212TH
::�T 212th St
W Plaxa
7307,.5• CUPIC
a
7303 T' ^
n
n Pool
7-4 "1 7M2 "2"
PARK & RIDE
W
215TH
U
W
0
a
PJqT
—EN
WUW AEGIS
.,DISH
EDMDNNS CRM
shop
/
Shop
P.11.6 /
7 /
21114 /
7 /
109 /
ck /
g
/
ALLIED /
ROOFING /
/
/
B&M /
CON ST
21414 /
21448 /
/
/
NCOONALP
/
1ALUE /
PILLAGE /
16TH ST/SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 21211 St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200'
storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300' storage length. Provide protected left
turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in
2015 Transportation Plan: #4). The cost for the intersection improvements are included within
the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding).The
project cost is split between Lynnwood and Edmonds since half the project is within Lynnwood.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering,
$175,000
$1,091,000
ROW, &
Administration
Construction
$1,540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,091,000
$1,540,000
21
Packet Pg. 42
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,335,000
intersection improvements
21d1.02!1
13�d08w
214021d12
{
21405
04
LU
N
U>
2120L<
2i431MC�UHA6'
un
O
anz
150
�
r
2150021558EGIS
VALUE � #
VILLAGE
ST
SVU
—
21BTlM
21600 {� 21619
KRUGER
CLINIC f
21632 � � -
��I16e
2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 216th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane and an
eastbound left turn lane. Provide protected -permissive left turn phases for eastbound and
westbound movements. This project ranked #3 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015
Transportation Plan. The cost for the intersection improvements are included within the Hwy.
99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
ROW &
Administration
$204,000
$334,000
Construction
$1,837,000
1 %for Art
TOTAL
$204,000
$334,000
$1,837,000
r
a
22
Packet Pg. 43
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,215,000
intersection improvements
TOP FOODS v �,
19TH sr SW /
21919 STARBU S /
/
220TH ST SW
I
I
I
I
1221
I
I
I
I
I
13
_I �
� l4
n
III
•0. 7301 W
U
O
e S
C m
.M.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325'
storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275' storage length.
(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #2). The cost for the
intersection improvements are included within the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project
costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce intersection delay and improve traffic flow and
safety.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
COST
-Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
& ROW
$175,000
$1,085,000
Construction
$1,955,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$1,085,000
$1,955,000
co
r
23
Packet Pg. 44
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 234th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,300,000
intersection improvements
ESPE&ANCE
' I3IiN �
FS
1 i711
21202
17
S-IMO PL W
ircn
�• �I 21]31
�33Rf1 Pt
] S'e 1'i L M1
1,03
1312 812: �
•71J7C'. _ — : i31'• !911 ]y0! 7731 !$
ff
-- �34TFS ST.SW _.—.
} 23 a'•• 3]406■�� 1 DIM ]l1 1 1712
1�
2341�
wul
_ Y3U] € 7i.ti11'
131*1 ;salt nb
tit � �77
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of Hwy. 99 @ 234t" St.
SW to provide safer crossing of Hwy. 99 for vehicles and non -motorized transportation
(project identified in Hwy. 99 Sub Area Plan). These intersection improvements are included
as part of the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project. The cost for the intersection
improvements are included within the Hwy. 99 Revitalization / Gateway project costs.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety and pedestrian conditions
along the corridor.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$300,000
$300,000
Construction
$1,200,000
$1,500,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$300,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
00
r
N
0
r
0
a
w
U
x
w
c
as
E
c�
a
24
Packet Pg. 45
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 196th St. SW (SR-524) @ ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $903,000
88th Ave. W Intersection Improvements
1em
3
ILU
_
a_
.~a
I
m
:VEN DAY
WENTIST
:HURCH
4
1e6TM sr sw
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection
of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that
restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through
movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is
same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City
Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until
traffic signal warrants are met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project
was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the
intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St.
SW.
SCHEDULE: All project phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2024 (unsecured funding).
In order to allow the installation of a traffic signal, the MUTCD traffic signal warrants must be
met and the installation must be approved by WSDOT (since 196th St. SW is a State Route /
SR-524).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$193,000
$175,000
Administration
Construction
$535,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$193,000
$175,000
$535,000
25
Packet Pg. 46
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9t" Ave. S ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $896,000
N
Q
x
J __J1 MH__JI __�,
BELL ST
UJ
a
I - �
P
MAIN ST
WADE JAMES
0, 1:
THEATER
— _P1 i - -----
� W�a
r
H
oavraN n
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a traffic signal or mini -roundabout.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all
approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's
concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the
intersection delay to LOS B. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015
Transportation Plan. In Fall 2018, turn lanes will be added to the intersection to improve safety
and traffic flow through the intersection.
SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2022 and construction in 2023.
unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering,
$120,000
Administration
& ROW
Construction
$776,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$120,000
$776,000
26
Packet Pg. 47
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 7611 Ave. W @ 22011 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
Intersection Improvements $8,125,000
2,9rH sr sw
J
21919
J
J JI
3 14
IW
,a
r—i
i
J � �
2215TPLSW
ll!�U QIM
TOP FOODS
IsTARBILIll KS
J
220TH ST SW -
1
r
LYNWOOD
HONDA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right
turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected -permitted phase for
eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during
southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The
projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D.
SCHEDULE: A STP Federal grant was secured in 2018 for the Design Phase (funds not
available until 2021). The ROW phase is scheduled to be completed in 2022 and construction
in 2024 (pending additional funds).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering & ROW
$533,000
$892,000
Administration
Construction
$3,000,000
$3,700,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$533,000
$892,000
$3,000,000
$3,700,000
"All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts
27
Packet Pg. 48
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 22611 St. SW / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $194,000
15' St. SW Intersection Improvements
14TH WAY SW
226TH ST SW
uJ 226TH PL SW
M
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend the left turn lane for the westbound movement on SR-104.
Complete various pedestrian and bicycle intersection improvements. This project was
identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety at the
intersection and improve traffic flow along the SR-104 corridor.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$30,000
Construction
$164,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
$164,000
2s
Packet Pg. 49
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 95t" PI. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $495,000
Intersection Improvements
W
H
r
ST S
a
CC
rn
cl
WESTGATE
CHAPEL
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access
management. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis
completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 unsecured funding
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$75,000
Construction
$420,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$420,000
29
Packet Pg. 50
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 238t" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,338,000
Intersection Improvements
Ll
i
10
■
To Hwy 99
41�
239TH ST SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The warrants are met for such an installation.
This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in
2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,138,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,138,000
a
30
Packet Pg. 51
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
W Intersection Improvements $1,183,000
N
SEAVIEW
PARK
3
PLSW
186TH ST SW
ml I m—I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for
all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The
projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards
(LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2025 and 2039
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering,
Administration,
& ROW
$200,000
Construction
$983,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,183,000
co
r
31
Packet Pg. 52
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,441,000
to 238th St. SW)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and
sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of
the 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along this
collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with their own
facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any back-up to the
through lane when insufficient gaps are provided.
SCHEDULE: All project phases are scheduled between 2025 and 2039 (unsecured funding).
The project costs would be split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since half the project
is located within Esperance.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering,
$2,000,000
Administration,
& ROW
Construction
$13,441,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$15,441,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
00
r
32
Packet Pg. 53
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 100t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,017,468
Intersection Improvements / Access
Management
I
EDMONDS WAY
�% � MMI -a 0L I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block
pedestrian crossing along 100t" Ave. W, improve safety to access the driveways within
proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100t" Ave. W with the potential addition of bike
lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis
completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2022 and 2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$867,468
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$150,000
$867,468
r
a
33
Packet Pg. 54
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76t" Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,017,000
Intersection Improvements
240iA PL SYY. 'l o'ISI S1 sw
LT
II11!!w'1l�iil� �
I ietluvnLsw
�y LY4Y
ai F J
tp,J,ON05
LAKE BALLINGEA HAY— - — - —. — MP EMA(MI)S WAY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a 2nd left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified
in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and
improve non -motorized transportation safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039. The project costs would be split between Shoreline and Edmonds
since half the intersection is located within Shoreline.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$453,000
Construction
$2,564,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3,017,000
co
r
34
Packet Pg. 55
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 17411 St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $610,000
SW Intersection Improvements
L+ 4 + — Meadowdale Middle School — — —
J-/, Parking L_
b 6WI St. Thomas Moore
—� a e
I Catholic School
B Ilfield
y
/ SanctuarY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50'
storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for
eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay.
(ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13)
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers
accessing either street.
SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2025 and 2039
(unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$100,000
Construction
$510,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$610,000
r
a
35
Packet Pg. 56
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,050,000
from Bell St to Caspers St.
s UHDVIEwavrs
♦ ♦ �� I■� 11111■0 I
��' IIIIIII :M1■S■1 ■
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a walkway on the west side of the street, facing
waterfront (— 112 mile / more recent project).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Temporary improvements were installed in 2017 through striping, in order to
evaluate the alignment of the proposed walkway and parking alternatives The design phase
is scheduled to be completed in 2022. Construction isn't scheduled to occur until 2023 when
utility improvements are scheduled to be completed along this stretch. No grant funding has
been secured for the construction phase.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$295,000
Administration
Construction
$2,595,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$295,000
$2,595,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
r
a
36
Packet Pg. 57
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 23211d St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 100th Ave. W to SR-104
EDMONDS WAY
W SAME
iwnRs
LLI
L !
Ell
2 .
■ ■ Qy -
1
�i
IF Al. 10
UUT H '
CHURCH, (jr
■ ■
■ , Uj
7 , ■
AW �I
o
�0 c� 2
ODW' ' I ESTATES AY OLy I _ PR
RK
\29 9 Dorn 98 7 6 5
' 30 2 15
3 14 7•
J \32 45 32
■ r
�jr
7 1 i
nm (0)
1 � ■ � e
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104.
This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2024 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
37
Packet Pg. 58
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 2361" St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,395,000
from Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W
M
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from
Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$213,000
Construction
$1,182,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$213,000
$1,182,000
r
a
38
Packet Pg. 59
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
From 238th St. SW to 234th ST. SW
L
PARK
LL
EonnoNos SALGALL
APTS m
w
w LL
CH RIST LNTH E RAN CH N RCH O
PARK
& RIDE
OFFICE
236:1 4SUHSET
23603 SAFEWAY $23605 WH L KJIHG R23607 23619 0
P
���R AURORAS MARKETPLACET
N
239TH ST SW
W SEOUL
23821 PLAZA
2
23827
TRAVEL LODGE
0"
NORTH
ry HAVEN z
n MANOR w
a �
R p
r~ }
n•1L LO'N
13ROCK
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 238th St .SW to 234th St.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Begin design in 2024 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$495,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$90,000
$495,000
39
Packet Pg. 60
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,199,000
from 206th St. SW to 212th ST. SW
I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St.
SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve non -motorized
transportation safety including for school kids due to proximity of several schools).
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (funding unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$333,000
Construction
$1,663,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$333,000
$1,663,000
40
Packet Pg. 61
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 2nd Ave. S Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
James St. to Main St.
4t
3�
<1 NG
4
►.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 100') on
2nd Ave. S between Main St. and James St. (Ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in
2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: 2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
-Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
30,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$30,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
41
Packet Pg. 62
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 21811 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000
from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
■■■■N� ���■■
mom
r-
�A ■■
oil
OENT ER
Ira&,
U1
E
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave.
W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The improvements will improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2023-2024 unsecured funding
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$200,000
Construction
$1,105,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$200,000
$1,105,000
42
Packet Pg. 63
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. Walkway from 3rd ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $105,000
Ave. S to 4t" Ave. S
ARTS
W ENTER
a
Z UNDOW NEI
N
ALDER
ALDER ST
346
414 412 410
arking
5
5
LA
UJ
o SOUND VIEW
o:
HOWELL WAY
W
a
x
v
DAYTON ST
tMILLTOWN
MAPLE ST
RICC
ALDER ST
N
W
a BECK'S
z
BAN K
T-
409 530Pancak
407 540 Hau s
4003 546 0
401 w
a
WALNUT Sr
--F
GREGORY
e
H
525
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 350') on
Walnut St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4t" Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2022 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$10,000
Construction
$95,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$105,000
all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
43
Packet Pg. 64
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 216th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $157,000
Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W
21400
7200 B&M
PARK & RIDE CONS
E ar- w 21410 21408 0.
MAN J � o � 21401 21412 � v
M1 2140
214G7 W
�507 w � W /
21511 j
y 21431 M DONAL6' {
` o J'
ILN 0 21521 N I
M STEVEN 21500
E
T AEGIS 215587 VALUE
VILLAGE
2167H $T $IW
120
215T11
:VEN5 21600 { 2,619 ci
tILIDN KRUGER *Aq
CLINIC , �'+
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to
72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of stretch). This project ranked #3 in the
Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2022 (unsecured funding).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$30,000
Construction
$127,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$157,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
44
Packet Pg. 65
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $712,000
Hwy. 99 to SR-104
i
1
L
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #10 in Long Walkway list from 2015
Transportation Plan. Install 7' sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch
and creating safe pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76th Ave. W.
SCHEDULE: The construction phase began in May'18 and was completed in
August '18. Documentation will be completed in 2019. A TIB grant was secured to
fund the design and construction phases.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$5,750
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$5,750
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
45
Packet Pg. 66
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Elm Way Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $830,000
8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S
4
�^
I
1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S. This
project ranked #6 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (funding unsecured). A Safe Routes to School grant was submitted
in April 2018 to fund the design and construction phases (pending response).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$175,000
Construction
$655,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$175,000
$655,000
r
a
46
Packet Pg. 67
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,330,000
from Main St. to 2001h St. SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St.
SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W,
adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood
Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized
transportation to walk to / from school.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2022 and construction in 2023 / 2024 (funding
unsecured). A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program grant application was submitted in 2018 to fund
the design phase (response pending).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$436,000
Administration
Construction
$947,000
$947,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$436,000
$947,000
$947,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
47
Packet Pg. 68
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $252,500
between 7t" Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S
FMONM 5 f i iiM+]SIDS S2 �
_-
�`res�
r USr= — -
}. •l��l III IYI . .
-----------------------
MAIM S7
�: • -- .T �-ice � �I '���11 I�,�
--------------------- _ ki INN d Fr
��-_a■: ii�I1�lEl�ipi��Asi�l
a
AMOSi�
011' I01t0141
WALNuT SI
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk Dayton St. between 7tn
Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S and additional sidewalk improvements along the rest of the stretch
(ranked #1 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015 Transportation Plan).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled for 2019 (as part of the Dayton St. Utility
Improvements project). A Complete Streets grant is reasonably expected to be secured in
2019 to fund the construction of this project.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$252,500
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$252,500
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
00
r
N
0
r
0
a
LL
U
r
x
w
c
as
E
c�
a
48
Packet Pg. 69
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 951h PI. W Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
224th ST. SW to 220th St. SW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th ST. SW to 220th ST.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2022 and construction in 2023 (funding unsecured).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$100,000
Construction
$485,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$100,000
$485,000
co
r
49
Packet Pg. 70
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Railroad Ave. Sidewalk from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $862,000
Dayton St. to SR-104
bt.
4� fi
�tio-P W NAYTON 5T
P❑
a
? Fo
�ONn.
ea a
4k
DAYTON ST
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new and wider sidewalk along Railroad St. from
Dayton St. to SR-104.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along
Railroad St. from Dayton St. to SR-104, key stretch since connects to various destination
points such as Senior Center, Port of Edmonds, Downtown Edmonds... .
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2022 and 2023 (unsecured funding for all
phases).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$160,000
Construction
$702,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$160,000
$702,000
r
a
50
Packet Pg. 71
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W non- I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST:
motorized transportation safety improvements $1,210,000
mr—
Ra In a.
IqN r� w
MS.
-V
��19 ka,jdN95 WAraFFRq .. _ �
LAKE BA LINGER WAY ----- - Tm0F 0N0S WAY
PLO
a
,.fir
r s� sw
zr
Nla
V
--�dND5
RFLIIVF
LAKi iiAL1.IN
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in
northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb ramps.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety along this
section of the Interurban Trail.
SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled in 2022 and 2023 (unsecured funding for all
phases). This intersection is shared with Shoreline and they own the traffic signal.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration &
ROW
$224,000
Construction
$986,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$224,000
$986,000
r
a
51
Packet Pg. 72
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 191th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $630,000
from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W
1�
192ND PL 5W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave.,
with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation
Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$90,000
Construction
$540,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$630,000
52
Packet Pg. 73
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 10411 Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $990,000
from 238th St. SW to 106th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th
Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$150,000
Construction
$840,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$990,000
53
Packet Pg. 74
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 218th St. SW to 220th St. SW
----- 77T---------------220THSTSW—
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST.
SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$55,000
Construction
$260,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
54
Packet Pg. 75
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000
from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW
r`T r
5■■
i r
.}
K, r '■
F i L
■
r r r
ri
186TH ST W
m
w
i-�
--. r
■
■
18 TH 5 5W
■
L a
- IF
1 'r - ■�
188TH 5T 5W
LE
. P ram
■
L
7
W ,
a
III•
.; _ L
r
■
r As or I
,
r
SFASAF W
-
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St.
SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$60,000
Construction
$255,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$315,000
a
55
Packet Pg. 76
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 23611 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $765,000
from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
■
PARK
& RIDE
236TH ST
SN
2367
2303 SAFEN
235 JI
23607 NON
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W.
This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$650,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$765,000
56
Packet Pg. 77
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 23811 St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,170,000
from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W
1
PARK
r
.•nrIRL
NA LN
'
, ■ '
EOMONOs
APTS
BALL
' •
•
1
��r�
W
w
Ov
NORTH
m
CH RIST LH THE RAN CHURCH
S
N
PARK
& RIDE
R
n -
2
TH T
OFFICE
■
d `�
,4
,
W
r
SAFEWAY
�
L KJIHG
FC,�
I
'
L • .
SUNSET
'•n•1L LO•n:
CEj
BROOK
■
AURORA-
MARKETPLACE
FAMILYPANCAKEr
j7'
�
1 ■
238TH ST SW
"'
■
■
■
23827
seouL
PLAZA
'
■ ►
1
23827,
TRAVEL
LODGE
2397 ■
-MISISON TACO TIM
■
ST. FRA NCIS
MOTEL
WHSE ■ME
. .
.
- ■
■ ■
_+
K&EMOTEL
1
1
■
■
� I,
1:11 RIl RIl III F
1 ■
■ ■
■♦
,
IN
■
■
:yA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$175,000
Construction
$995,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,170,000
57
Packet Pg. 78
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 801" Ave. W / 180t" St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,135,000
SW Walkway from 188t" St. SW to OVD
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80t" Ave. W from 188t" St. SW to OVD. This
project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2022-2023 (unsecured funding). A Safe Routes to School grant application was
submitted in April 2018 to fund the design and construction phases (pending response).
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering, ROW,
& Administration
$440,000
Construction
$1,695,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$440,000
$1,695,000
58
Packet Pg. 79
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: 189th PI. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000
from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 189th PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave.
W. This project ranked #14 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety.
SCHEDULE: 2025-2039
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-2039
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$115,000
Construction
$470,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$585,000
59
Packet Pg. 80
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Ferry Storage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $357,000
Improvements from Pine St. Dayton St.
5�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle
storage for ferry users.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to
local driveways.
SCHEDULE: 2022 (unsecured funding)
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
$50,000
Construction
$307,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$357,000
60
Packet Pg. 81
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Street Waterfront ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $29,885,000
Connector
.{
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project builds a grade -separated overcrossing over the railroad
tracks as an extension of Edmonds Street connecting to Brackett's Landing north park (project
identified in Edmonds Waterfront Alternatives Access Study completed in 2016).
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide access for emergency vehicles, pedestrians, and
bicycles. The overpass could be utilized to offload passenger vehicles from a ferry during an
extended closure of the railroad track crossings.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2022. A State Appropriation for $700,000 was secured in 2017. In 2018, an
additional State Appropriation for $6,000,000 was secured. BUILD, FMSIB, TIGER, FASTLANE,
and Pedestrian and Bicycle Program grants were submitted in 2018 to fund the remaining costs to
complete the project (pending response). In 2019, RCO and Ecology grants will be submitted.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025-203f
COST
Planning/Study
Engineering &
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
Administration
Right of Way /
$12,500,000
$9,000,00
Environment
Mitigation
Construction
TOTAL
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
$12,500,00
$9,000,000
r
a
61
Packet Pg. 82
6.A.a
62
Packet Pg. 83
6.A.a
CFP
STORMWATER
00
r
N
O
r
a+
L
IL
LL
U
r
t
x
w
c
as
E
c�
a
63
Packet Pg. 84
G
e: a
Packet Pg. 85
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Dayton St and Hwy 104 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2.41VI
Drainage Improvements
184 /X
/ \170 _
GJ �200 200
_Qqp
Egmo w�Sl —?q�,l 146� Qcw
a -W3
r H n
z a
LULU c
F N
f!3 3 a r
JA �LL
R _P30
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add lift station in the Beach Place parking lot and other new
stormwater infrastructure.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To reduce flooding at the intersection of Dayton St and
State Hwy 104.
SCHEDULE: Construction scheduled for 2019.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$23,000
Construction
$1,884,000
1 % for Art
$15,000
TOTAL
$1,922,000
r
a
65
Packet Pg. 86
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Willow Creek Daylighting ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5M to $10M
Edmonds Marsh as seen from the viewing platform.
Previously restored section of Willow Creek. Source:
www.unocaledmonds.info/clean-up/gallery.php
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Building on the studies completed in 2013 and 2015 that assessed the
feasibility of daylighting the Willow Creek channel, this project will likely construct a new tide gate and
1,100 linear ft of new creek channel lined with an impermeable membrane. Funds will be used for
design and construction but exact breakdown cannot be assessed at this time.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The daylighting of Willow Creek will help reverse the negative
impacts to Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped in the early
1960s. This project will provide habitat for salmonids, including rearing of juvenile Chinook. This project,
along with its companion CIP projects "Edmonds Marsh Channel Improvements" and "Dayton Street
Pump Station," will also help reduce the flooding problem at the intersection of SR-104 and Dayton
Street.
SCHEDULE: Actual schedule dependent on available funding.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$75,000
$940,000
$675,000
$75,000
$75,000
$75,000
Construction
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$75,000
$940,000
$675,000
$75,000
$75,000
$75,000
66
Packet Pg. 87
6.A.a
PROJECT NAME: Perrinville Creek High Flow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $21VI to $10M
Reduction/Management Project
ue �d
172 n
y 4
°' 173 d
T31t]Ot
PerrinvilleN„
Frederick
Creek
th
ti
M
77t 1 7 h
78th
79th
a
Z
H
180
1 Oth c°7o
h `m
181s
2nd
18 nd 4`
c
a4t
1
00
a�' a
Q�r
at
,
185th °O
85th
o
u* N
87th 4 Q,.,
18 h
1-- t
r
f.
c i
Pcrrinville Creek Channel illustrating the channel incision
that will be addressed by restoration.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A flow reduction study for the Perrinville Creek basin was
completed in 2014. This study recommended a number of flow control and water quality
projects to improve the conditions in Perrinville Creek. The City applied for and won a grant
from the Department of Ecology for $633,750 to design and construct a stormwater infiltration
facility in Seaview Park. This facility is being constructed and will be completed by the end of
2018. The dollars allocated in the out years are to implement additional water quality and flow
control projects in the Perrinville Creek basin as recommended by the Flow Reduction Study.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Urbanization of the Perrinville Creek Basin has increased
flows in the creek, incision of the creek, and sedimentation in the low -gradient downstream
reaches of the creek. Before any habitat improvements can be implemented, the flows must be
controlled or these improvements will be washed away.
SCHEDULE: Construction at Seaview park taking place in 2018. Other open sites to be
determined in the future.
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
COST
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
$10,000
$125,000
$125,000
$12,500
$12,500
$12,500
Construction
$65,000
$510,450
1% for Art
$1,125
TOTAL
$76,125
$126,250
$126,250
$12,500
$12,500
$12,500
r
a
67
Packet Pg. 88
6.A.a
68
Packet Pg. 89
6.A.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2019-2024
� OF EDP
KWA
Packet Pg. 90
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 91
6.A.b
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2019-2024)
Table of Contents
GENERAL
Building
Maintenance
Public Works
7
112
Transportation
Public Works
9
125
Capital
Projects Fund
Parks & Recreation/
Public Works
12
126
Special Capital /
Parks Acquisition
Parks & Recreation/
Public Works
14
332
Parks Construction
Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
15
421
Water Projects
Public Works
17
422
Storm Projects
Public Works
18
423
Sewer Projects
Public Works
20
423.76
Waste Water
Treatment Plant
Public Works
21
PARKS — PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Capital
Parks & Recreation/
125
Projects Fund
Public Works
24
Special Capital /
Parks & Recreation/
126
Parks Acquisition
Public Works
52
Parks Construction
332
Grant Funding)
Parks & Recreation
57
Packet Pg. 92
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 93
6.A.b
CIP
GENERAL
Packet Pg. 94
6.A.b
Packet Pg. 95
6.A.b
R
N
O
N
O
O
N
O
N
U
07
O
a
G
R
oOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
oo(fr0000000000000000000000000(fr00000(froo(fr(fr00000000000(fro
N
O O
O
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C
C C
V C
C
V
C
C C
C C
C C
C O
C C
C
@ O
N
Cl Lj
a) N
O
0)
V) O
(O m
V) O
N m
LU) LU)O
co N
LU)
6a
Cl Cl
N I�
LU) OO
� 7
O
L2
LD V)
N I-
ON
7
V)OO
N
OO
I:
V)
O 6s
OO
O
LD
N m
N L[)
fA r
OI,
L2
V)
OO
O
OO
00
Ln
0 V}
Ln OO
co m
00
LOL[)
of
m
O
0
H
H) 6s
6s
L() V
V} 6a
fii
fA
fi) fi)
fiJ
fi) fi)
Pi) 03)
fiJ
fA
N 03)
fi}
V fR
fi}
r fR
fi}
di r
fi}
fA
L()
Eli
6s
di
fA
Hi
N
fA
1 i di
1 i
1 i di
6 EA
fA
EA EA
fA
fA
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
Uf
C)O
Uf
Uf
L!7
fi}
6s7
0
LL
ER
613
V}
fii
fA
_
fA
cc
O
Coco
O
O O
O
O
O O
Coco
O
O
O O
C C
O
C
O O
C C
O O
C C
O
C
O O
C C
O
O
O
C
O O
C C
O O
C C
O O
L[) C
O
C
O
C
Ln L()
O
O O
L() L()
O
Ln Cl
O
L()
L() O
O LU)
N LU)
L()
L()
fi} to
N
ffi
7 V)
fi) fi)
6a 6a
N
fiJ
r N
fiJ fiJ
m
fiJ
6s
6s r
fiJ
N 6s
fiJ
6s fA
fA
6a
O
O
O
O
O
O
C)O
O
C
CD
O
O
C)O
C
Ln
O
O
N
Lnr
�
��
N
O
N
�
�
N
O
61)
N
C) O
O
o
C)
0 00
O O
O
O O
O O
CD CD
O
O
CD
CD
0 0
0
0 0
CD
O O
)O
O
O
o
a
O
O
O O
O O
cc:,)
C) C)
C C
C)
C
C) C)
C C
C) C)O
C C
O
0 0
C) CD
C C
C)
O
C)
O
Cl
O
C) C)
C O
C)
O
C) C)
O O
C)
O
L[)O
C5
Ln
OLn
Ln
000
OOm
Ln
M O
Ln0
O
«i
O
000
OU
O
N
ff3 N
O
00
co 6a
6a
M
(O
M
N I-
6') (D
cm
't
O
M
M
M r
M
C
fR
Ki
U3
EH
di di
di
di di
N KJ
fA di
di
Efl
N
Hi di
fA
(A U3
di
fA
ER
ER
O
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl
O
00
O
O
0
C
0
O
0
O
o
C
O
C
o
Ln
0
O
0
O
0
C
0
O
CDV)
m
m
LP)
O
T
V)
C)
N
C)
C)
C)T
N
EA
fA
fA
fA
N
fA
N
oa
00
(O
N
O
d}
V}
d3
fA
fA
d3
fA
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
o
C
C
o
C
V
00
O
O
0
LO
617
O
O
OT
O
O
r
N
d3
m
r
O
N
H-)
00)
fA
fA
co
63
00
N
O
O
O
0 0
0 0
0
O
O
W Cc
O
O
C
O O
O O
O
C
C
rE
O
N
ER
0)
6a N
co
N
6s
CM 'y
En
CQ
eDJ
eDJ EFJ
lfi
EiJ
W
a
LL
U
c
N
a)
(pc
c
�
y
—
C.
E
C
�
U
a
a)
ro
C.
C
U
�
N
m
O
_
07
N
-
N
U
C
.y-
O
C
E
C
C 0
E
C U
NC.
C
C
O
O
LL
V) U
O
07
O
a
N
E
-
(0
C
N p
0)
U
O y
O-
N 07
E-+
N
C OJ
N
C
ro
y
0)
(D +2
U
1
N
N
m E
LL E
0) a)
0 E
E U
C
7 N
N
0
c
C
5 i
o C
-0
C
a)
.0 E
p m
N
p'
o"m
N
��
(`cr,
c
C7 W
C
E
o
c ccy,—
co
o
NQ
EOC
o (oi
aa) �_m
C,
a)
a)
N
c
a 0
E LL
c
0
0
CF.
N
a) N
a-C
O
E N
OL
U�
a)
O y
a 'O
U
N
O
c C
ca
o
¢
0m
0
oar
cY
+! C
co
a)
a)
O C
2 y
pU
�•S-5
oo
O
a)
o
a)
as
a
., ry
N
O p
0
O
O
y
y
N
i)
c
O LL'r
a)
-
C
y O
N
O
O
m L
N
N
O
N
U U
y U
C
C N
C
N Q
++
X
- N
-O ++
O) X
L N
N a...
O X-
O Q
C
t0
N
O 7
O O
H>``
N-
0
0 0
0 7
0 C3
a)
'C -_
.ro
(0
a) N.
V)
.N
C
C O
0
ELL
0 ca
N
N 0)
0 0
c c
L
;
N
C C
U
Q
C
-_
C
N
C
N
W
Q�—W2LLWJWm2(gQLL000WLLLL
c
LL�U
LL
a)—U
Oa2roro—
m
�roa)m>mm;(�m;(
a
U x
U U
W—
U W
2
d N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N C
1 ?+
O l0
m
U
CrLL
C) «(D
c
N
5
_
p U
pro
L L
U
Q
E C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C=
N 'Q
L
U
C
.` '-
U
W
C C
C a)
4) 2
5 O
0 O
0 0
r r
r n
O O
N N
c>a)`oQ��QQ�v'rororoo0oa)¢xtxtxtxtxtai
(a '-
a' x
o>
H
oUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUm
i
U
W W
LL=
7>
W m=
pLL
J
mgggaa`a`w
L.L U
C C
C C
0 0
C C
0 0
C C
0 0
C C
0 0
U
C
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo==I
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C
==______—
Y Y
Y=
� �-0
o a
o 0
W
i"
m m
(e
(e m
m m
m m
m m
ro ro
ro--
ro"misioioioioioio
ro
°'
o a)
a) a)
a) a)
a) a)
a) a)
a) a)
a) a)
a) a)
a) 0
o a�x12========aaaOOO�
O
Q
C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
C C
E
C N
!" !"
" !"
!" !"QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQU
U
U U
L
a) a)
a) a)
a) a)
a) a)
a) a)
U U
U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U U
U W
W W
U L. L
L. L L. L
L. L L. L
L. L L. L
L. L L. L
L. L L. L
Packet Pg. 96
6.A.b
000000000000000000000000000000000
OIq
H300000H30000H30000000
OOOOOOH3
H3 H30
o
C
o
00000
0000
oa�op000000000
0
O
N 0
LO
N
L O
a)
O L O
GLOM
O L O
00
6,
L O O
6,M
L O
LO
L O cM
W 1�6,
L O N
L O O
It
L O O
h ONLO�
L O O
L O
MN
O
Lr
H3
Efl Yi
ER
M
fR
Efl r
fA
Efl EH
663
EA
fA ER
EA
N EA
fA
EH �
fA
Qfl fA
Efl EH
Vf
O
O
O
O
O
LOO
O
f
�
6
N
O
�
EA
fA
H3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
�
�
EFJ
EH
O
p
C. O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
00
O O
0000
O O
p
O O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
U3
ffl ER
LO
t2
t2
O
YJ
K3 ER
fA
H3
K3
r fA
H3
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
O
Co
LO
CO
00
LO
LO
O
LO O
O
LO
63
LO
63
� �
�
M
(f3
Efl
�
�
Ui
C.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�
N
000
L0O
c0M
c0M
6C3
H3
K3
H3
H3
H3
O
O
O
O
O
W
O
O
O
O
P')
LO
Cl)
O
fR
�
�
N
O
LO
C.O
O
O
O
H3
C.
1`
LO
N
LO
t`
EA
U3
Efl
Hill
Hill
Hill
Hill
ti
Co
N
Ca CL
5
r
tU
N
LO
C
U
C
C
p
E
0
E
6
C
LU Co
U
a) (O
U
N
U
U
0
E
U U
Cz
LO
Co
LU
C
l0
11
C C
U
U O
Co
d U
N
LO N
E
C
O
LO t+
N
U
,�
U
E
N C
.Co N
C
N
E
0
N
C
U LC
N
CO C
Co
N
N
•�
U
ra
p
N
Er E
lU
O
lU Cn
C
•C Q
C N
U
O—
o t0
N
U
cz
LU
a'S
Cn
U
U
C O
N
pO —
.-
C Q
LU
0
`
.�
0
O—
,.;
7 X—
N
N
E
Co
LO
C r
�k
y
E y
3
O
O>
'� C
y=
LO 'O
aC
O
oCEv
"O
N
oC
lU
C3wLLLL0
uw"
N
u—�
•� 00
O�LLOO
O LC
m Q
Co
Co N
LO
°N
LOO V
N LO
DLO
N
i°�m>>>>
lU
lU lU
lU lU
ti
3`o
Z5(1)m.m�a—pC
U
C
2��W—ro��
E
Y l0
C
O LO
IL
O C
0 0
0 0
0
0
O C
N
'O «-
N (/�
O O
'C
U
L U
N
C
Y
C
Cn�
U
r UL
L .0
OQQQQY
O_>_>_>_>
L L
L L
E
Eo LO
o
0
o
iC N
O O
Oa
CoO
l0
LU
U O
NUS
N N
_
X Q
L Co~
�_�
D
U LL
U U
U U
C
C
.—•
U L L
W W
U S
LL U
U O
Lu
y
�#
W Co
._ CO
U F'
LU LU
LU LU
LU N
` N
Y L
.2 N
"' \
N N
N N
Y Y
L6
L.�
L6
O y
0 N
L0 L0
L0 L0
L0 L0
U LO
W
X ._
W
X U
W
tC N
N N
N N
Y Y
Y Y
C C L
O O
C
Nacna33
Y
3 3
3 3
3 3
E
J
E E
Ea�cnv�v�v�v�����UU
C
0 0
0 0
0 0
$
��
C Co
LO Co
LO Co
m m
ti
ti ti
ti�
ci cv
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
mmLa�-0-
-0LULULULULULU>>>>.=wZ>>>>>>>>a�ia�io
Co Co
Co Co
ci
LL LLC}JJJJJ�����������CU�dd
CL
CL
acn
cnr
0
a
Co
Cl)
Cl)
r
E9
O CD
Ln
Co
N
N N
fA
O 60
LO
Cl) Cl)
Cl) p
N
O CD
Ln
Co
N
N
Hi O
N
O 6e,
O
Co
LO C
� N
O �
to
O
Cli
HT O
N
O O O
R O OI
Cl) Cl)
M
Cl)E � R fR
O
6e, N
LO
Cm
LL7
CM O
f0O O
fA N
MI6
C
O
O
O
fA
Packet Pg. 97
6.A.b
_ N
O N
F T
O
N
a
N
O
N
Co
Cli
O
N
R
N N
C6 O
N
0
N
O
N
V
a)
•p N
O
d N
O
N
O
N
01
O
N
d
Co a7
O
N N
W
a
LL
U
(a0EE --
e7�6 0 o Colb o m
W = a) N N U O C Q
a g a " > j)
OOU-pa /�)as
w(n>>o��
a) C . O C O
C L C 7 (D O) 7 (a m)
IL a000na(A� to
0000
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
LO
01,
m(D
oar
000
Cl)M
EA
fHa
^
M
H3
W 00
K) v)
�Oa
H3
fH
Ln
"fA '
H3 H3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl)
O
O
O
Co
619.
0
�
If)
�
rl
m
ur w
N N
O O
D U
w w
N N
O OOOOO
U U
0000(D
000
00
O
O
O
O
C
C
U U
U U
O O
O O
a O O
r
O
O O
0 0
O O
0 0�1�O�00a�
r r
O f�D
f^D N 00)
H3
0
L
`
`H3
H3M
d3
V3
fH H3�
C C
.7�6 .7�5
C C
.7�5 .7�6
N N
p O
N N
O O
O
q>>>>
O O
00
O O
0 0
O O O
0 0 0
o
0
a) a)
CCmmm
a) a)
M O
ON
N O
D)M
O If) O
Lor-O
0
W 64
�
EfiN
L
3 3
CD Cl)
3 3
Cl) Cl)
is is
is is
o0000
0
O
O O
O O
O
O
M
n
Cl)
2222
C C
C C
in
fA
._ .
0-0-0-0
a) a)
a) a)
O
O._
C C
. C C
64444
N N
N N
LO
N
O O
O O
N N
L Q
N m
Q Q
O O
O OMM
O I-
r M
W
CC)O
CO
M
H3
I" O
V V
VEiT VEiT
Co
�
EA
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X Ix
ll
c
E
m
c
ci
CO
CD
aa)
)
a£)
CD
w
O
u O
U
u
c
a
aa) a
Q
a)
E
Uwww
c
c c
E
C
E E
W
> C
u u
tIDa)
o0
"UoOO
O
pE
i
a
cp
oOO
a
a a
o£>O
p
o
a
E E
E E-'o
c p
c
a> a
QE
aE
�—
E
> a
p
5
p
c _
_ _
� C,
E
E2
a�
g—0
i
.2.0.0.0
I.
EL
u)pc�a(ia(ia(i>c5(A�oapi
O
C
i
l i
a O
L
>. p-
is
i
i U i
d O
N
a C
C C
Co N
U r
s i C
�0��3333�2
p
(n >
m
(�! (n
(n (n
C
-
75 3:
L U
c3:
-
U
L
U O
.
O
� ,
E
U p�N1
a5
"'fDOaUL
fN�1 (D
v
L"'d 00
v N
w
N N
N N
(p rn
N
3
M N
U)U)3
L L
Q N
N O
O O
N U
Q O
0 0 0
LO
Cli
N N
�22222(A�
O O
O O
O O
fH 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
0��
O M
1�
O 0
O O
0 0
O O
0 0
EfJ 0
0 0 0
0 0 fA
O LO
a 0
0
MMMOM0006A000
O M
(D 0
0 0
1� 0
r
r O
MMO0D
(D
N 0
N
(Dr
OON
O O
LO
OM
N
K) H3
MfHr
H3
H3
0K)Mr
H3
d3
H3
fA
N r
H3
H3
MN
fA N
H3
0
d3 fA
H3
N
- H3
H3
O
O
O
O O
O O
N M
O
O
O
O
O
7
O O
O O
O C,O
66
O
C
N
O
C
O
O
O
C
O
r
O
C
O
O
O O
0 0
O O
O r t
O
O
O
L6
O
O
O
N
O O
C C
O O
fD O
NM
fH
EA
fA
N
fA
H3
N
H3
MW
d3 H3
a
Q9
r
H3
NW
W
H3 H3
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O O
00
O O
O
00
O
O
O
f
Cl O
O O
O O
MO(0NCl)0LM
O
O
O
O
000
O
(0
O O
O O
U,
H3
N
EA
M
2
di
di
�
EA di
di
r
di
NA
di
Ipf)
f
Efl
Ipf) n
r
O 00
O
1f)
N
0
EA
W
M)
m
M
LO
N
�
OD
R
a0
O
C
V
(C
H3
LO
O
V
(R
X Ix
1111XInx
X I
Immix
11
ur
c
a)
E
a)
E
o
p
W
0
a
E
Co
C
Co
U
-a
— ul
O_
°ai
3
3
U0E
Co Q
a)
Co
U
a3 O
ID
CD
OL
N
O
m
(n
�
Co
3
NC
(n O
u v0$U)U)
_ _
Y
Q�¢>
a
0
g
C
°o
aso�
U r
iLL
i Co
fD
E
T•
L
p
W
E
N UUL
in
0~7
NU)
oof,
�NNO
W a)rn
°'
CC
a)O
a)�
�
N(n
U)0CoE000�oa�
9
�a¢NQ(n
o
�c
75
r
"O
NU> NNN
'5
O
£
m
Q
Qo
EO
Ea5o
o
U
c
Ea
£z
p7�
CO
Co
EY
nW2
CQ
Y
E E
E'
O M
N Q
(a
.L.
M 3
Q a5
Cow
O O
2 0
2 E
E
CO CO
00
E Y
p m
L y
U)
£00
-00
p?>L�
�-O.L-.
.
>
U U
U
U;
U UUa
:�`C��
W.
a) a3
D 'O
U U
Qi
>
(n ?
(n (n
(n 'OO
Co
C
O
0 0
w C
.L.. .L..
Q Q
Q Q
L C
.L.. .L..
.L.. •z5-.
O d
O
CV
M
M M
C
00 O
M
M
E
N
'
D
WN
N N
4 0
0000
0
aDN
N�
N N
NU
W �o
rn2�(A
200
Packet Pg. 98
6.A.b
c^y oNo o v N
p aO M c0
Ho(D M
m
o O
o of
O
O
ss
W W CDM CO
b' ^ NO
M Co a
V3
p N 7 I- M
CO
ap 06 M M
h � 64
N O (D T
p M O W r
N M M
h �646 r
O O OC') N
CO
y" oo v v
N e3� C') �
u3
y orn
y in Cb N
to W N M a
N (fi 03 (fi r
M n
O N
N L, " M r-
oo - v cc
�C,C
N
N
o m
U N
2
v y o
a o Cr
U m
to 05 ¢
L L L
N N O
N N
N M
J J J
y o o O
Q V U U U
o` O00 0 d
y 0
ID
anon
F 0 F
vo
00
N O
h m
O O
L2 a
O
EA
EA
N
Cl)O
n O
O O
o
O C
In O
LO
N
0)
6s
N
N
TO
O
00
m m
O O
O O
00
u2
N
O
cnr
r
�r
EA
N
coo
W 0
r m
00
O o
U2
N
LQ
Lao
O
O
O
r 7
00
00
Lo O
N
CO OLO
N
r
r 0
lnO
m o
mv0
n
0
O
o
0
0 0
OO
O O
uio
N
T
�
EA N
�
a)r`oor�oowoo
000
I, O
V
O M
00c000
0 0
7 0 0
CO %
c0 117
O N
CT In
(O I2 In
C En
0)
007"LO
(O
Ef3 H3 N
N
H3 H3
EH
H3 H3
H3
W
IL
LL
U
c
E
Cu
O
N =
O
O RC
` o
5
O ._
0 O
a N
o0
c 0dU
o
_
C
R
E
c
O
u
N
t:
CUrn
E
R
O
O N
O
Y y
CL
v
y
d 3
U c
COc
C11O
N
��
>
y
E�
E
Cat
°o
o
a
C `r°
O W.'oo_U
-E0s
y
EQ
O
W y
i
�a
caa
COLL
EtLQLLtL
L
CCC
-aU
N
N
UC�oaciaciCOacaca°
ayLLC7�CS>:7:7U-
p
RU
R N
c aci
c c
c c
y
L
O E
O O
O O
m
OCm2U¢UUUUH
v
N
M
C09
O
T
CD
IZ
ai
07
Vk
CO1
Cl)
Cell
O
OF
N
O
N
CM
N
O
N
N
N
a
O
oo
L
So
O O
O O
a
N
o
EA
O M
66,3
61)
6'3
0
Cb
'7
00
O O
oo
O
N
O
N
c
a
N
O
64
N
O O
M
O
W
0
N o
O)
��a
O
O
N
c0
H3
4a
�N
4a
o
M
H3
d
0
W
0 0
0
OD
M N
M
a
R I-
O
^
--a--�M
�MMCMO
N S.
63 d3m
1*
64�Zo
V3
�613,
W
IL
LL
U
L
N
N
=
R
O
N
E
R
N
N
y
W
C m
Nca
Up
C)
E c
W
L 3
> a)
>.
oU
a
N>
O.Q
a N
E O
E
c5
C)
OQ
7
C
N
C OQ
of
O
QaE
ECCru
a)
u)>,
C
U
N C
t5U
N
i
O
R u)
CC
cis
u) o
L
a)
E 4
�.
(D U
a�
C
u) of
9 >.
R
c
W o
o
N�
> o
c y
a�3�m2Qa
cU
O
c
in
o E�
c
o
¢
c
o
EcnE
o.
L
=co
>
o
Qv)�'m0-OaE
—
N.
o
0 U
o
E.L.
U'=
L
>O
>.
R�
ca0
co
c O
> E
0 OO
N L
N
Y
a
O �U
@J�
�@J�
E
o
� m
��U)
33i�
>
��
)
7
N N.:�
�N1
C)v
� aj
u)(n
.
O Y�
OQ
Q
L �Q
�Q
N.j(nL
a)
NLL
'L
CO (�
>
>
W
CCnL
= L
fD
= o
p
C
a�O�N
L_rQ
MNm
E
N---
y
E (6
W
(y N
=L
2==
N.-.--Y
W
@aaaC^paC^p
Yaa
RmaaCp
Y
LL H
LL H
(n LL
LL (n
U LL
LL H (n
tn
CO
O
(f3
0
W
N
Cl)
0
61)
O
CO
6-1
to
61)
a
Oo00
Oo00
O
O O
O
O
O
O O
O O
L O
CO
N
O
O
N
�
N
-,
O O
00000
O O
0 C
00
O
000
O O
L O 0
M
O In
In
r�r�O
In O
11 (O
CO r�
NLON
O
I- 7
6s
6s O
ER I,
N
H3 ER
2
EA
EA
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
N
N
f-
e-,
u i
n
O
O
N N
r r
O
EA
Q
EA EA
N
EA
0
O
N
�
N
C
O
N
0
O
N
N
H3
01
N
d
Wcc
O .-
N N
W
a
LL
U
w
to
CO
N
Cn
O
U
L
U
R
o
N
CO
E m
C
M
O E
'a
i
E y
R a)-RO
N Cn
d O
L OCL
y>
i
O CC
> tl
> `
O N
5 E
D
N
a
Cl
Q D
O '-
o m
o
O
N
0)>
N U
Z>
C
c
L C
o
C>
N
Q i
o C/)
_
N.
N
` >
N
fC
CD
C0
N Q
E
R
>
6 QCli
V
-:
0)_
z
0,C
Ud
R
C R
C
L
ao
L C
c0 -
lS¢a
NM:
-
10
Packet Pg. 99
6.A.b
0
0
0
0
Da)
0�
0
o
0
0
0
n
Co
KJ
0
EA
a)a)
�
69
v>
000000000
O O
O O
fD O
a C
O O
C C
O O
C C
000
000
O
O O
00
00
C C
0000
0000
O
O O
O
64
O fD(DN
n 0
00 0
Mn
0 N
o0D
O
O
� O
W O
O
Oa n
0
L 000000
0 0 (D
O
0
M d3
EA
00 a
fA d3
OD
EA EA
N
H3
fA
N
H3
H3
H3
LO 0)
d3 H3
a
H3
(D 0)
fA fA
N
613
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
120
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
0
O O
O O
7 0
O O O
O O O
0 0 0
n 20O
20M
(D
O
27
0n
OMM
n (D
00070m0
M2
M ze��261li
di
di
di
64
M
Hi
64 64
64 Hi
64
64 64
0
EA Oj
fA
O
O
O
O
N
EA
O
IA
N
O
N
EH
E
v�
6s
3
c
E
U
a.
L
m
a >
O
Q
aci
Q
rn
�
�
Q
OC E
OTC
E
v
v
O
3
(n
>
m
a
m v
E c
m
E in
m
c
�
>
Q
CO
L
Cl)°
L
(A m
O
a
E
m m
p
m
ai o
N
N
o
6 Q7
0
C O
Q>
`Q IL
O N
L L
7`
N
L O
YO
C
Ir
° a
5 E
E °
QC
E m
U
ai w
Q wCq
M fO
N
L
QCC0
n
rn
j�
o m
•F
(�
p
V1 C
c
0 E
0 YO
C
YO YO
O
L O
O�
Q
CO-p
Y
C U
O 0
U
U C
y 0
U
N M
O 'O
O N
L L
aD N
L
U) (O
7
O
- L
O N
S•. O
O C
d
>>C
> N
U
OCO
EMNN
n'O2¢
YO
E
ONQ
O
O
> y<i
Co a?
y
E
O E
E E=
E
M E
L o
N
?
2 c
c
(pL25�
.2
E
,P O
D D
L o
Co >.o>.E
o
m¢
ai
o
E c
° D
Q m O
E Er
L
(n
N
T T
OD N
N
O 3
Z
CD N
O
d
N Y
T N
CoN
R>
N t66
N L
�(O
L
O.L.•
L Y`>°
OD>�>>
ICo
Co
Oi >m
Y_ >m
E Y
O N
O a
05 .L.•
V1 E>
a) N
N
O In
M >
�_ 2i
(n (/n�0�
a N (n
aj V
V V
V Q
min
O O
N
>in
T O
U) -3
M V
0
O O Vl
>aaav
Q O
O O
O N
.0 L
> >
Q Q
a L_
in
C L_
6 3
N
c
O d
O7
55 c
O
L
7
J
N p
L L
L O
R p
E N
N L(0
E
Cl)
Cl) Cl)
Cl) (n
Cl) Cl)
0000 w
00 N�
N
W 2
�
Cr Cl)
2 LL W
Co to
D1 D1
O O
N N
M M
HJ HJ
O LO
O m
O) O
R
N �11
n n
00
N N
fA Kf
O O
O O
O O
O Co
LO lD
n N
N lD
fA Kf
O O
O O
C C
O O
Ln Ln
N N
7
HJ EH
o n
O N
N lD
O Co
N l0
6f1 LO
N
11
Packet Pg. 100
6.A.b
R
N
O
N
O
N
i
_O
N
V
42)
O
i
a
E
L a
tm C
O IL
a y
rty+ V
E a
d
O +.
L m
Q
E U
Cl
� Cl
=- c
U U.
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O 0613.0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O O
V3 V3
V30
O
CmU-,
000
00000000000�000
00
O
l2 O
O
O ll1
O O
O ll1
O O
lf7 lC1
7 lC1
O In
O
LO
jp N
CO
V3
LO
V3 V3
f�
EA
rm
V3
OMV3
Ef3 Lo
V3
Mr�m
Ef3
V3—
N wmM
M
EA
Ors
Co3
V
O
-
-
-
en,
EA
V)
O
N
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
LO
Vi
In
V3
O
O
O
In
V3
In LO
V3 Vi
LO
Cli
NLO
V9
to�
O
N
0
0 0
0
O
0
o
0 o
O
M
LO
V9
o
uS o
613
ui
�
N
O
LO
u07
N
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
LO
V9
LOCD
V
0
O
CD
M
N
L
O
N
0
0
0
0
0
00
00
0
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
CliO
LO
Vi
O
�
In
V3
In
V3
In LO
63 Vi
LO
lof
O
0
i
CD69.
0
O
61,
N
00
0
0
0
000
O
O
O
O
O
0 C
C
O
N
ui
Vt
uS
V3
o
'7
ui
Vt
uS
n�
0 0
io �
0
O
O
V3
N
00
Vi CD
O
CDO
O O
CDO
O
O
CD
00000
CDO
CDO
CDO
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
aD O
00
O
CD
CDO
LO
O
O
L
V O
O L
In
��
C11r
�
OND V3
LoM
c
V3
V3
Vt
63
N
y
0
O
0 0
Vi V3
w 0
w O
0 0
O 63
O
V)
O
O
O Il
0 7
0 0
V) O
0 0
O O
0 0
O O
m
O
ao00
O
On
00000
E
o
uS o
uS
o
o Co
ui
0 ui
ui
y
In
rVJ
7 Co
V) -q
h
Vi
In
fH
O Co
Cm61� V!
Vi
Co7
64
N
63 V!
Zi
O
O
N
IL
X
X
X
U
0
z
a
d
E
�
o
c
o
Y_�
g
Cm
C
N
Y
C
N
m
N
a
O
al
o
c
w
r O
E
E
N,
O
a)Y
CL
O'
a)Y
0
a)U >O
w
N O
i3
N O
C>
U1 N
N C
i a
o—
o
0 o
N
o m
m oo
E 'o
o E
Y a
y
W
a m
E m>
O
a�
O
a>
E ro
E—
o c
O_'c
a o—
N
o
C
rt
C ii
rn m
0
aci
E Y
t6
a a
O
E Q>_>
N
`m
E
O
o f°
m
Q
m
c_
a O
E Y
N td
o
2
Co
d
E
o
O. C
00 O
U a
d d
m
Lu`1 N
N
N0
N
Z
O N
Cr-,, O-
E a
any C7
(3
d U
a) U
C N
t6
d �'
E VCr
a
Y
m >a
<C=Co
—
m a
a
to
U N
N
ul C
LL
lyJ
7
Qg�1� p
❑
N N
�'U
a C
O CO
mao[.d
-p
O
O�
>(�
1
co
8
0
a)Yd
c E
D
N'Ctd
O d
i E
O
a
aam000LL0202�2'a
>=o
C0
m
O
0
O
O Cl)
o Cc
N R
EH Co
O
N
Cr
Vl
12
Packet Pg. 101
k k6�1 to
C\l
m
co
co
L coa
\
°
k
a
n
�2 _
2§
J
\
°
_
2
- -
9
/\
_
�
° k
§
LO
-
y
_
�
\ k
2
2r
§®-
_
cli
r
r§
eG
° k
]
�C\l-
\k
_
G
0
5
4§
)
@
Ln
%]
cli b
§
#
°
# rl
_ 7
§z
n
69
Cj
00Cj
CIL�kk
LQ
#
co—
_
A/22
2
n
3ci
k
-
■
2
a
A\
)
a ®
/ /
�R
k k
§erg
R
£
M()
t
a
Ct5
2
2.
IL
§
-
2
cc IL
�j)\\
_/
k k
k
)k
1a
Packet Pg. 102
6.A.b
O Iq O
C (n (C (h
N O N
R N 7 c')C E9- EA 69.
O
N
(D �O O
O O O
N W LO N
O U) « &D
N
C9
N
O
N
CD
aD
R
N N N C.
of
O Ea
an N
O
N
_O O
dm
lCO
N
O Ea
O N
O
N
O
N
T
O
N
O w w 00 LO
co 11N N
W
C
O
:y
U
i u
tm O Y
` a
a
(n R L
d R
E U m
CV W c
d
Cl
Q N Z
E a
U
_ O i
!0
r a)
O_
m cc
U ui a o
O
co
O
O
0
R
F
Cl)
00
R
O
O
N
M
O
O
O
O
N
ER
O
O
O
O
N
fA
O
O
O
O
N
ER
O
O
O
O
N
ER
CO00
M
rn
a0
EA
00
O)
LO
rn
M
M
O
EA
0 0
0 0
0 0
7 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
O O
C W
O 63
C
613 613
07 O
0c Ln
63 63
O O
C C
O O
C C
O O O
C C C
Cl Cl)
O
N
O O
O O
O O O
LO LLiCY)
of r
N
EiJ&D
C, N
m -
N m
EA E&
r- C,
E& r of
EA
EA
E& E&
6s E&
Ef)
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
C.
C
O
O
69
O
O
O
O
O
Cl)
O
C.
C.
O
O
69
O
O
O
O
O
Cl)
C.
C.
C
O
O
6s
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
C
O
O
LO
C.
C.
C
O
O
N
69
EA
6s
O
O
O
O
O
C.
O
C
O
rn
Cl)
6s
O C.
C.
O
O O
O O
00
000
070
00 Ln
00000
00000
O M
r N
OC\J
O OC\J LO
6161
di
I
Efl
00
N
CD 00
LO OO
Oo
0 0
00
(O
IBC
O Ce)
�,I:
)OI
CD -
h
c0
CD I-
CDI-
Or
O fA
64641
7Nr
7N1-
K3 K3
K3 07
69
1
x
xx
x
U
a)
V)
LC
�
�
c
C
N
00-
L
U
a)
>
Q
(n
O
Ui
o
U
L6
u
r
>
Q
CO
al
>
c
>L
O
00)
O
-N
(�O
O O
N
r
.�
0
U
o
$
_
_ a
0
os
o'-
cn
E
OQ
aria
m
N
N `�
O M
C
O C
O
C
O N
(O N
c
o
r
O
R
U N
Oi
a
Id p
-� F
—_
N
a7
a a
m
@)oU
Nw
c
.N
U CO.N
'6
2O R
O
N as
O
�cc��
oc
a>
3
U
La m
� aN
a0cj
c
�o
Co
W-E:
e
a
7
U o-o
a
m a)cq—
Urn
rn
U —�
a
o
C°
c-
`o0
c
�
vis
CD
s
co
Y
i6
rn
'- o
7
O
N m
L6
L6
-6 '=
O
-O 7
Q W=
a
N W
N D
F F
W U
C 3 N
F 0 0 0
M �
O)
Cl Cl
O O
O O
O O
O O
LO O
EV)
O O
O O
O O
Lo O
EV)
O O
O O
O O
N rl
ER ER
O O
O O
O O
� O
EA
fA
0 Ln
O 00
O
O Ln
CD
Lnv
ER
M
M Cl)
co
co 0
Cl f00
R V
N Cl
00 00
Efl Efl
O O O
O N O V
O m
rLn(D
T ^ 6G,
CD.-
N N N r
W
N
O
N
0 y
or
N
y � o
C1 C i
C N
R �
m U N
s m o
N m 7
U m r y
R U ~ E
NC,a)as
N M W
c
c c n
l
LN
co
co
c')
Ln
N
Cl)
MCl
O
00
Cl)
Cl
O
(fl
co
(O
Q1
00
M
00
N
M
N
M
B'7
M
O
Cl)
w
cM
ER
14
Packet Pg. 103
6.A.b
C
`u
C
C
C
u
R
a
Cl.
'C
C
LL
O O
O C D
O 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
N
o
Di 00
O
C
N
�
O N
(�
N
G
M M
to
N
O
0
�
o
N
O
O
LQ
N
fR
O
O
Cn
N
O
O
o
N
"?
H3
O
0
0
N
N
O
LQ
N
ER
N
O
O
O
O
00
00
0
0
c
0�
N
N
0 K3
_o
K3
ER
O
CD
(OD
O o0
O
O
CD Co
N
LO
M
to
_0
N
�2 H3
f!3
O N
E
CO
000 �
N
W
eD
e3
W
C
N
IL
LL
x
X
U
C
O
N
=
O.
E
(oa
O
�N
o
m
C
O
o
Y
._
o
C
�
U
Co
O
U
3
0
lL
N
O
7
Co
Cz
O
c
C
C
3
O
0
E
o
Cl o
O
c C
N
W
�
o am
y c[]�
3 O
o
QO
01
N U
0 f6
N N�
y
Y Co
Z
-S—
(5
LM
(o 0C
d c
^(�
F
U
o any?.
U2
" I
m _�Y—ga
oLLY
i0
aCi o-E-olwa
U .�
E c
c O
o
y
(O
0
Q
o
o
E—Erb-a>m
o c
2 O
(Ca
LL
IL
45 (.5
tU �
w LL
ICL I
>
00
00
n
O
dT
Co
W
CO
nCli
Cm
N
N
4
N
m
N
N
O M
N C\j
7
(ND
M N
N N
O C'
N Cm
N
m
N
N N
N ch
N 69
V
(NCm
N
Cl
O
N C\l
N
m
O N
N N
°7-
O
N
N
(DN
(ZDO
C
ONr
DOD
(n
NCm
(n l 0
r
61)
61)
N CD
Co((DD
A O
O O
£07
(ND
O
N Nff)
W y3
z;
ao
O
N
C
c
O
H
_�
g
C
O
H 0
y
C
N
E
O
E
N O.
NC
UaaC
'
N
o o
a)
O
CL
O
Na�
O
EO
a)
c
Cm
N
(0
cO
�o
>
c
o
Co
>
O
N
=
i0
=N
Cl)
i0
NN
O (C
NO
o
>
_
O
6
c't
C0
EaU
4.
O o0
E
'tQ�r
Cn
N
Off^
.'O-'
O N
,t i6
N
E p
Y
�'
O (�6
O
j
> o
i6 >_
Co
C
y
O
o�
OpUUo�i
O>UU
�i U
i.LL
N
C
O
O O
N
O O
C:,
N
-Ow
� 7
C
(n
N
OYu'1
w�
(D-O^Ou7
N N
w w
N N
—
f�Ou7
N N
——
u7
N N
— —
u7 u7
N N
— —
u7 (D
N N
C((�«)
O N
w
N
moo
=�rr�rrrrrrrrrrrErr
l6
f0
LL
U
U
-O -O
C C
O -O
i C
-O -O
C C
-O -O
C C
-O -O
C C
-O -O
C C
-O -O
C C
-O -O
W C
'O
C
N
m
a
O O
�LLLL,O.LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
7 7
7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7 7
7
OLLLL
7
t o
o o
E E
(° E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E
E
lN6 0
U m
Y N
0 0
m Co
0 0
w
0
y
O O
w w
O O
w w
O O
O O
O O
O O
E w
O y
w y
a y
a y
y y
c c
y c
c c
c c
c c
c c
c a
O a
a o
c (p
o U
LL
o o
U U
N N
E E
LL N
.- E
N N
E EEEEE
N N
N N
N N
E E
N N
E E
N
c E
N C
E—
N
C
a
N N
O N
a—
N N
N N
N N
C)")
N
N N
O N
Nt
G1 c'
c'E
c0
(° E'E'ECO
c' c'
��
EDaaaaaaaDaa�aa
a�
> au
Y
O O
E E
Y E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E E
E
E
ccccmma_mmacaca_ccCcCcCccccco[o[o[o[o[Uoror
0
0
0
fA
O O
O
O O
CD
LO
O
CD r
H3
O
H3
CD
O
CD
O O
O
0(OD
U-)O
fH
C,
U
a)
V1
Co
a
O
N
Z
C
N
E
N
EE
Cl
O
N
C
O
N
>
a)
C
LL
w
N
Na)
c
2a`
Co
�
o
(
a
C 76
CD
3
F
y
E
N
Co
N LaL
'O
CL C
O CoO
7
N
m
o
>F
c
`mLL
2
"
(id '—
m
a C
c
C O
o
N
(�
U
aci coi
y,
>
o
� U
>
0 o
U
y L
ID a
o
�xC70���
.
Yc
o
o
In
o LL
> a
Q g
a c
g o0
o
a
-a0
vU(5LE
c
C<UU3:O
c o=
U
Cr
15
Packet Pg. 104
6.A.b
Vy
O
O
O
N
O
61)
O
O
O
O
O
N
Co
a
N
7
N
R
C
v
N
r
a
R
C7
0
3
O
eu
N
N
N
U
w
W
c
RO
c
a
J
U!
m 5
L .O
N
T
N
R
16 d
U r
-a o
0 a
0
U
m d
F
a
> 0
m
N
U N
T /
cc U
C W
F
w a
im
Packet Pg. 105
6.A.b
E
v
N
O
N
O
0
O
N
O
d
N
v
a
C
7
U-
O
O O
O O
O O
O CO
LO CA
n M
0
0
O
0
OH3
0
fA EAr
OU3M
l! 7 C
C A
ll77
M 7
O n
L P) M
C
OER
O
C
OER
O
Oh
CO C)
CO
N Cfl
r(D
V)
C
Cn0
N
r CoCoO
CnO
O V) Cq
r
CMO
N
�
N
M Cl)7�
r
U3
fA
EA
H3 6F1
U3
H3
rr,
M OO
N N
M
aS �
V3,
OMO
n
N
r
CA
O
COCo
0
Ln
C'
U)
6s
N r
C)
7 w
O
O
LU
��
LO
N fn
f13�
U3
LOn
om
7
0
O
ai
Co
CD
ItFH
�
N
fA
CD
Co
CD
C.
V)
rn
o
C6
m
0
o
v
fA
U}
O
O
O CD
O
O
O
O
00
O O
O
O
O
n
LU O
Ln
n
n
o
fA M
a)CO
n
fA
r
O
O
C2U)000r
rOn00
0
O
N0
Lq0
le
n
O
w CO
M O
Qi
N
CA w
r
6%(D Ln
V)N
N
��
EA
EA
_7 K)
6%
16J
N
fA
fA
n
Co
Co
d
W
C
N
E
N
>
C
O
O r
`Cl
N M
M
C) do
W
r
N
N
N
£ N
N N
N N
L
L
L
L
L L
L L
p
�aaaaaC
o
C-
16
CU
CO CU
CO CU
C
-—
O
`
O y
O y
E O
O O
O O
N
C
oDa
IL
nsa
dadad
(
o E
Co
C>
o
0
d
CS
E
E
E O
E O
o E
E E
E E
N`
3
Y m
�-oco0
O
M Co
0
CY
Co
IL0)ivcoivcoi�EcO`�
CS
CY CS
CY CS
Cn
Co L
>�
US
> C)
N
N
N C)
N 0
N 0
C r
E
�<Ccm
y
a
C CS
O
C3M
CS
CS
CS
(n�mmmm
CS CS
CS CS
CS CS
O
U
Q CS
�+
U
C
C�
C O
C C
C C
C C�
(V
C�
CO
0 0
0 N
Q N
Q Q
Q Q
Q Q
L.L N
Cn N
� 6
01
07
LC
LO
Co
0
N
N
ER
EA
N
O N
n
6G, to
O
O
v
a
O
ID
O
6G,
Q7
L71
L
0
C(
Cl)
Cl)
4f1
fA
n
� n
O
O
LL/
LO
a
n
v
n
Cl)
Cl)
Q!k
W
a
O a
am
rn
v3 rn
a
C
a
O
M
N
N
fR
W
O
O LO
,It
6G, a
Co
Cl)
L
L
N
N
4f1
fA
O
O O
O
O
ff7 O
O
n
n
to
lc
a
a
4�1
6G,
Ln
CD
O In
6G,
a
n
n
�
r
LO
ER
Ln
W
O
a N
LL N
V
U)
o y m
rn
E
FA
a a
Q E
E d L
OL N
N E r
CL
R
m E
E Lo Lo
17
Packet Pg. 106
/
6�
\
d
d
k §
a Cm
§
)
A
ƒ CD
§
a
�$64
§g
OD
69
w
\
x
/
EE
0
a
ƒ)
f
§
�k
�\
0
E
§
�\
rL
E
°
Cn
k
'�
§
Q
0j
3
u
j
\Lo
0.
(D f !
wo
R �
Iq
2 2
Cli
m �
§
>
_ 0
�
Co
0.
k �
Co
k
\ a
k
k U.
Cq
a g
U
CD
m04
at I
# ■
k
�
§
0
�
_ 0
IL
/ k
Co 0
# @
§
m
■§,
�
Q
0.E
1e
Packet Pg. 107
6.A.b
N
O
N
H p
O
N
N
O
N
m
N
O
N
V
N N
O N
N p
W N
O
N
O
N
V
d N
p CD
N
a`
O
N
O
N
O1
O
N
m
� m
O
N N
W
O O
O
�' o
C
LO
N
V3
V?
V►
R
N
O
N
6a
C9
N
O
N
V�
N
N
O
N
6a
N
N
O
N
O
N
CD
O
O
O
O
O
O
In
In
Q1
LO
V>
Vt
O
LO
N
N
m61)
� � N
?�O C
O T df
= ma 7
E Co U Caw ¢ (D -E
> C �
E�
2FD H CL H
CD
69.
O
V)
CD
V! CD
O
O
N
EO9
O
n
LO
rn
03.
O
V►
19
Packet Pg. 108
6.A.b
C
C6
0
a
y
C
E
d
0
CQ
C
CO
Q
m
U
R
N
O
N
m
r
O
N
O
m
3
d
N
Co
N
a
C
7
LL
a
d
U
a
ro
N
a)
a
Q
N
O
3
N
0O
OO
OO
O
m m
w CD
I-, w
ON
O OEACA
OOOr
m Co
m O
Co
Cl)
0C
OOOO'CD
NN'CDM
O I"
Cn Cn
O O
m (n
7 M
CD
m
00
IlH)0r
00 N
r CD
Or
NICT
M
EA
Il O
N
m N
r N
Cl) Cl)
N 64
Il
64
N
CA
fA
64 fA
Y3
CA
00
CoC m
� �
O
't Co
(D CD
m Co
N
(n
r EA
Cf)
U3
N
L
(n
m
00
m
It
O
00
r
m
(f?
(n
CA
O
O
O V
00
O
LO n
LO Co
LO
N
0
C2
(D (D
N
(D Co
(1Z Co
00
It
O
0
Co
0000
O
O
O
Cf)
N
0)
(D
M
(MD
Nt
r
ffJ
CA
H3
0
O
O
O
Co
O
O
Cb "
LO CO
N
0
(D M
7
CR
C/} EA
Ei)
O
O O
O
00
O
O O
O
CD
O
r, �
59
�
O
N
Cf3
In
0�0
(n
00
I� N
O CM
Co
CD
C
(N
r
O
co
'It
�m
Or
(MD
N
0
EA
E!)
T
6q
Ei)
CA
K
N
CoL
0
0 0
L L
0 0
L L
0 0
L L
a
aaaaaaa
C
C
C C
C C
C C
E
E
E E
E E
E
>
>
> >
> >
> >
N
m
O
OQ
O
O.
O O
OQ O.
O O
OQ O.
O O
la O_
y
L
E
E
E E
E E
E E
a
4
Q
Q Q
Q Q
Q Q
C
C
Cu
as
(a as
(a as
(a as
o
0
y
c
c
c c
c c
c c
N
Cu
a)E>O
O> E
E E
E E
E E
0
0
E
a, Cu
Co a>
a1 a>
a1 a)
(D a)
o[
o[
>
N
N
N
(Oa
(Ua
(Oa (Va
(Oa (Va
(Oa (Va
m
3
N
3
Q
O_
Y L
a>>
m 0
a
0 0
a a
0 N
0 a
m N
a a
m N
N
N
E
(a m
a�
m OC
OC Cr
OC Cr
OC OC
(n
(n
—
�
=E
as
Laio
w>-2°�33a)0a)0a)0woo
--3333333aa
Q Co
(n
U)
(n in
Cn Cn
(n U)
otf
C
CD
Cn
()
Cn (a
(a
(a
(a
m
U
N
U
L
y 0
7 (D
m 7
(a
7 7
(a
7 7
(a
7 7
(V
C
7 (a
C
C r0
C
p.—
C C
C C
C C
N(n�QNNQQQQQQQUU
O Co
O O
Co N
Co
� n
3 Co
LL
_
C �
(D 2
m F
r z3
C
O z
Ya Co
U a)
Cf)
m
Co
CO
Cn
IT
(D
N
EA
64 00
O
r
N
n
O m
CA 00
m
R
W
N
Cfi)
n 64 CD r-
N N
O O
n n
N N
CA tq
N O N
Co O ER OD
Cb
s R
(MD lMD
C%l CM
6 v
(n (n
cl M
N Cl)
N N
H) fH
Co 6 00
n �
m m
LO
� R
N N
ff) CA
0 CD CD
O CA M
lc� O
Co
(n M
C m
Cl) Cl)
M n 4) 00
� E 6% N
Ol CM
0).64
y
C
d
E
d
y
7
a
E
Ca
y
y a)
N C
E
N
a d
N O
of IL
H F
20
Packet Pg. 109
6.A.b
E
R
m
O
a
C
m
E
0
CL
E
!0
.Q
m
U
N N
R N N
O O N N
N N yg
0 0 cc O
O O O O Co O M
O O C C Lr 0 N
M lO lLO O O M � O lLO
N Co N C1 C1 N N O M
O V3 V3 V) V) O V3 64
N N �
o't �rvrn rno Co
C oc 0o Pl �n r-� 613 C (c
M
O N r, O IL n
O N 04 M N N N N N LO V 3 N.
w
N O V3 V3 V) V) O r V3 64
ro N N y3
O
N
O O N N N O r Cl Cl Cl
O O O l A O N Uf O O I,
N O O a O O M 6300 M
C) fD CD Cl(.1 T O N N r Lo N O O
N N N N fo w CMLn 00 V3 N o O r� rr O �L6 es CD
N V3 V3 613 N 60 613
O In Cl Cl wO I� N N LO O N
O M M M r, Co (O
O 00 1� N O O lA
N N N P. P. Cl (O r- V3
O r� rr O "r (O
N V3 V) V3 N V3 V)
I-O fR w O 000
a0N rO ONl17OO I�
r0 r0 OMV300 M
T MINn 001 fN0 O O(00 NO ONO
r V N cc (O r N OO V3 V3 C
O NV3 Cm O V360
N V3 V! V) N yg
(MO I� M W 0 0000 (LO C O M
N 00 M N r R O r 6F3 O O N
Co R OLo NN 00 R ON rN N
(0 N CO CO N Co V3 V3 C
V) V3 VJ VJ O .— UA 6
3
N y N y VJ
W W
a
LL
U
U
O)
Q O
s a
R N
v
C N CY
cc N G. N U N
E O) Co N N C
�r y -O W N O
y N R 7 41 tC 0 O
U O O) 7 C O)
N O (y a £ C R C R
3 o R w m o v
N N N ,U
41 Co y R
W d N > V m N O to
2 0 0S>
n Z cCo �w m�E'c�ay�
H 0 0 U N y N U C m V
N U U U Q y OJ C N W C
v W i N a V OO y lo
0
m OC O O a O 4) (1)lL d UU0 Fa mM S2N
m
m
n
0
R
a
N
E
E
y o M (1rn
m 00 R n�Mr
V3
m O g Ufl V3 V)
Cm
m W
m
0 0 0 0
rnLOrn
rll�rNv
o Cl) (D of
In N r
�-, �
R �C`l
`I
Packet Pg. 110
6.A.b
CIP
PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
22
Packet Pg. 111
6.A.b
23
Packet Pg. 112
6.A.b
CIP PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
FUND 125 - CAPITAL PROJECTS
24
Packet Pg. 113
6.A.b
25
Packet Pg. 114
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Sierra Park Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000
LACE LEA F JAPAN ESh XIAPLE
{Aaer polma,um dhrccmm]
ihIkdc0d.... shrub or t—h --tire to Japan and Korea, 1,
Is mfe q-liv many -mme and Is the moss akn' and dell,-,, oS
all mapl,s. Its l,-rn are 2 fp a inrpes in I,n1;lh prc fl Delp cu,
Inrn threadlike -eel Wo . 1.to( e-lor r-rFts by %orksy hul the
meet common colors are hrEphr V,--- and red. 'I hcse ,r
hart a mvunded form with weepkpµ branch,,. The.' cat bt
Rlo,.n In labs and are ta[eileal for bamal.
8011 Street West and 19111 Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Playground replacement.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children's play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, portable restroom facilities,
basketball hoops, parking and Braille interpretive trail for the blind.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
0
$75,000
$0
0
$0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
0
$75,000
$0
0
$0
0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
26
Packet Pg. 115
6.A.b
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Final design and construction of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor. Starting
from 2009 public process and concept design, develop site design and construction documents for a
safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong
visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts.
Interim work on this project since the concept was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork
"Luminous Forest", installed to draw attention and interest to the corridor and enhance the visual
connection between Main Street and the Edmonds Center for the Arts. The Cultural Heritage Walking
Tour project, funded in part with a matching grant from the National Park Service Preserve America
rant program, was implemented in 2011-2014 with 8 artist made historic plaques on 4th Avenue.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will
encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown
retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the
economic vitality in the downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014
Community Cultural Plan and in the recently established goals and priorities for the State certified
Creative District application.
Timing for final design development is crucial as the City begins to address utility projects in the area.
Design completion will assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the
total project implementation phase.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
50,000
Engineering & Administration
Construction
100,000
1,000,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
27
Packet Pg. 116
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Anderson Center ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $35,000
Field/Court/Stage
700 Main Street, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
2.3 acres; zoned public neighborhood park/openspace field
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrades to youth sports field, picnic and playground amenities
and children's play equipment.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: As a neighborhood park, the Frances Anderson Center
serves the community with various sports, playground and field activities including various
special events. Upgrade and additions essential to meet demand for use.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Professional
services
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$
$5,000
$20000
$5,000
$5000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$5,000
$20000
$5,000
$5000
* all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
2s
Packet Pg. 117
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Beautification I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $126,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Beautification citywide to include Library, Senior Center, outdoor
plazas, City Park, corner parks, irrigation, planting, mulch, FAC Center, vegetation, tree
plantings, streetscape/gateways/street tree planting, flower basket poles.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve beautification citywide and provide
comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21000
$21,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21,000
$21000
$21,000
29
Packet Pg. 118
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 30,000
Trail / Bike Path Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the
goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the
comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to
meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path
improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with
engineering funding.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
$10,000
* all or part of these projects may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
30
Packet Pg. 119
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Brackett's Landing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,000
Improvements
South: Main Street and Railroad Avenue south of Edmonds Ferry Terminal on Puget Sound
North: 2.7 acres with tidelands and adjacent to Department of Natural Resources public tidelands with Underwater Park
South: 2.0 acres with tidelands south of ferry terminal. Regional park/Zoned commercial waterfront. Protected as public park
through Deed -of -Right; partnership funding IAC/WWRC/LWCF /DNR-ALEA & Snohomish Conservation Futures
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape beautification, irrigation, furnishings/bench
maintenance, exterior painting, repairs, jetty improvements/repair, north cove sand, habitat
improvement, fences, interpretive signs, structure repairs, sidewalk improvements, restroom
upgrades.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of infrastructure for major waterfront park,
regional park that serves as the gateway to Edmonds from the Kitsap Peninsula.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$5000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$5,000
$0
$5,000
$5000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
31
Packet Pg. 120
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh Feasibility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $150,000
& Restoration / Walkway
South of Dayton Street and Harbor Square, east of BSNF railroad, west of SR 104, north of UNOCAL
23.2 acres; Natural Open Space / Zoned Open Space
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the
comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water
impacts. Continue to support daylighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Continue to
maintain current sidewalk / pathway/boardwalk. For 2018, a section of the boardwalk will be
replaced. Continue to work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, Earthcorps and others in the
rejuvenation and management of the marsh.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh
water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird
sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of design of daylighting Willow Creek
using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management
Plan, as well as grant funds available through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
COST
Professional
$25000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25000
$25,000
Services
Construction
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL
$25000
$25000
$25000
$25000
$25000
$25,000
32
Packet Pg. 121
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Flower Pole Replacement I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $120,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed
throughout City.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Replacement of Flower Poles in various places as needed
throughout City.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Construction
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
TOTAL
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
$20000
33
Packet Pg. 122
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: City Park Improvements I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Continued pathway, access improvements and ongoing upgrades to
City Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Make ongoing upgrades to City Park as referenced in the
PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$40,000
$5,000
$
$5,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$40,000
$5,000
$
$5,000
*all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts
34
Packet Pg. 123
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Citywide Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $300,000
Improvements / Misc Small Projects
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Citywide park facility and public landscaping improvements
including signage, interpretive signs, buoys, tables, benches, trash containers, drinking
fountains, backstops, bike racks, lighting, small landscaping projects, play areas and
equipment. Landscape improvements at beautification areas and corner parks, public gateway
entrances into the city and 4t" Avenue Corridor from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the
Arts, SR 104, street tree and streetscape improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for citywide park facilities
and streetscape improvements in public areas.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering / Administration
Construction
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
35
Packet Pg. 124
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Park
".} r..�-= `�
M -'
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $12,170,000
B..
J
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Improvements / Stadium Demolition As part of the
master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the stadium, it
is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some grant funds
available to assist with this. In addition, the City will begin the design development process for
the completion of the master plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE:
The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds applied for
in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning and
Study
$70,000
$1,930,000
Construction
$10,000,170
TOTAL
36
Packet Pg. 125
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Sports Field Upgrade / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000
Playground Partnerships
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with local schools, organizations, or neighboring
jurisdictions to upgrade additional youth ball field or play facilities or playgrounds to create
neighborhood park facilities at non -City facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Annual partnerships with matching funds to create
additional facilities.
SCHEDULE: 2018-2023
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$25,000
$0
$25000
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$25,000
$0
$25000
0
0
37
Packet Pg. 126
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Fishing Pier & Restrooms I ESTIMATED COST: $70,000
LWCF/IAC Acquisition and Development Project
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fishing pier parking lot landscape improvements. Re -tile and
renovate restroom facilities.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Capital improvements to retain capital assets and
enhance western gateway to the Puget Sound.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$20,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10000
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$20,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10000
$10,000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
38
Packet Pg. 127
CITY OF EDMONDS
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Community Garden ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $155,000
1 !,]Lamm
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Locate and develop a community garden site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This was formerly planned for the Former Woodway HS
site. This is adopted as part of the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
1$155,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1$155,000
all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts
39
Packet Pg. 128
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Park ESTIMATED COST: $10,000
Improvements
89t" Place West and 197t" Street SW, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
12.7 acres (10.7 acres Open Space & 2 acres Neighborhood Park) Zoned Public
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the picnic, roadway, parking, play area and
natural trail system to Maplewood Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
0
$
$5,000
$0
$5000
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
0
$
$5,000
$0
$5000
0
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
40
Packet Pg. 129
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park ESTIMATED COST: $8-10M
Improvements
F
1
AL ` -44�-O� ---
South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County
4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with
federal transportation funds.
WWRC / IAC Acquisition Proiect; Protected through Deed -of -Right RCW
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Begin development of Master plan, daylighting Willow Creek.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the regional
waterfront park system.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
x all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts.
41
Packet Pg. 130
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Mathay Ballinger Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000
781h Place W. & 241" St. at Edmonds City Limits. 1.5 acres/Neighborhood Park/Zoned Public.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park. This next year the City will be creating a pathway
from the park to the Interurban trail to promote both pedestrian and bicycle access to/from the
park and neighborhood.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset in the
neighborhood park system.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$20,000
$0
$5,000
$0
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$20,000
$0
$5,000
$0
0
$5000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
42
Packet Pg. 131
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Clubhouse ESTIMATED COST: $5,000
Grounds
6801 N. Meadowdale Road, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County
1.3 acres / Neighborhood Park / Zoned RS20
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the parking area, wooded area, trail system and
landscaping of exterior clubhouse at Meadowdale Clubhouse site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset with installation
that provides community use of the facility and north Edmonds programming for day care,
recreation classes and preschool activities.
SCHEDULE: 2017-2022
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$5,000
$0
$0
0
0
. all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts
43
Packet Pg. 132
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000
Improvements
83" Avenue West and 204" St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County
22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife
habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street
connecting to Yost Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional
trail connections.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$0
$0
$5,000
$0
$5000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$0
$5,000
$0
$5,000
New additions meet the 1 % for the Arts Ordinance requirements
44
Packet Pg. 133
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park ESTIMATED COST: $130,000
Improvements
8011 Street West and 18611 Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits
5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public; Purchased and developed with LWCF funds through IAC; protected with Deed -
Of -Right
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annual repair and upgrade to facilities and fields. Maintenance of
tennis courts, pathway improvements, and play area. Replace roof on restrooms.
Replacement of play equipment in 2019.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children's play
area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, restroom facilities, basketball court,
parking and tennis courts.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
$120,000
$0
$5,000
$0
$5000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
1 $120,000
1 $0
1 $5,000
1 $0
$5000
* all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
45
Packet Pg. 134
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,889,299
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion - Fund 125
��
F4opra.�pa.ya,
ka=q -- - - -tl
__.__..__�f.-
1 ^"'i' -'•
4 '. i� `
o"
&ra.P.
�H.4•tl laws
Iurulle Rv.p
C.xbp SewuF bllp^r•
-
�1�
CNN
l+,rdhM.y
4 FbStivawnAem f
•
L hYad - --- - i F,_.
��
!»�61FY ]:
goedn W ran pusn c
PP"
Propmod EdmW ds
Wam(from Gan[er
;rrurs;
s+�• w isr�wr arw .s,r,� ,ura.
sr-v. - yu •ar
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. Connect waterfront walkway from
Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide
condominiums. This project includes the City's support for the parking lot and frontage
improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound. Provide a new Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway.
One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beachfront access.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
624,800
500,000
$0
$0
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,019,800
$500,000
$0
$0
0
0
'all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
46
Packet Pg. 135
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Yost Park / Pool ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $165,000
Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pool replastering, tile work, and annual anticipated and
unanticipated repairs. Add in -pool play amenities. Park site improvements and repairs to trails
and bridges, picnicking facilities, landscaping, parking, tennis/pickleball courts and erosion
control. ADA improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Beautiful natural area serves as upland area for
environmental education programs as well as enjoyable setting for seasonal Yost Pool users.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$10,000
$50,000
$25,000
$30,000
$25000
$25,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$10,000
$50,000
$25,000
$30,000
$25000
$25,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
47
Packet Pg. 136
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: City Gateway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $35,000
Replacements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Design and construct new gateway elements at SR 104 and 5`
Ave. S and at Sunset and Main St. to replace aging and deteriorated signage. In addition, find a
new location on the north entrance to Edmonds.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The PROS Plan, Community Cultural Plan and Streetscape
Plan all refer to the importance of these visual "gateways" to the City of Edmonds. New signage
with artistic elements will enhance the gateways and reinforce Edmonds reputation as a cultural
destination for visitors.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Repairs &
Maintenance
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
0
Construction
$35,000
TOTAL
$35000
$0
$0
$0
0
0
48
Packet Pg. 137
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Hickman Park I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $300,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install new restrooms at park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE:
and is identified in the PROS plan.
This project seeks to enhance one of our busiest parks
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Construction
$0
$0
$300000
$0
0
0
TOTAL
$0
$0
$300000
$0
0
0
49
Packet Pg. 138
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within
the park system.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health
and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while
their children play. This is a priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Professional
Services
Construction
$75,000
$0
$0
$0
0
0
TOTAL
$75,000
$0
$0
$0
0
0
50
Packet Pg. 139
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 20,000
Trail / Bike Path Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the
goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the
comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to
meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path
improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with
engineering funding.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000
* all or part of these projects may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
51
Packet Pg. 140
6.A.b
CIP PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
FUND 126 - SPECIAL CAPITAL/ PARKS
ACQUISITION
52
Packet Pg. 141
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Debt Service on Approved ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $988,118
Capital Projects and Acquisitions
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Approximate annual debt service payments on:
Marina Beach / Library Roof: $80,830
PSCC (Edmonds Center for the Arts): $54,300
Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit: $26,850
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Debt service to pay for approved capitol projects
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST
BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Eng. & Admin.
Construction
1 % for Art
Principal &
Interest
$159,868
$163,120
$165,820
$167,250
$170,080
TOTAL
$159,868
$163,120
$165,820
$167,250
$170,080
" all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
53
Packet Pg. 142
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Open ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,000,000
Space / Land
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquisition of properties when feasible that will benefit citizens that
fit the definitions and needs identified in the Parks Comprehensive Plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Fulfills needs of citizens for parks, recreation and open
space.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT
COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Land
$0
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$0
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
54
Packet Pg. 143
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,889,299
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion — Fund 126
�Y
4��v.•rr�}�r��.
PFWDFjpd ci�wE"ma�yy_�-���
VNIe�Moel C�rrA�
4
i
l•Ylr
rYe�r • Syr it -
r
4+wr•'�V�
{% T
� �RHi44rya
�r�c�r Rt
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. Connect waterfront walkway from
Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide
condominiums. This project includes the City's support for the parking lot and frontage
improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound. Provide a new Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway.
One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beachfront access.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/StudyPlanning/Study
$239,598
Eng. & Admin.
$130,000
Construction
$0
$0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$369,598
$0
$0
55
Packet Pg. 144
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $510,000
/ Stadium Demolition
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition
of the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has
some grant funds available to assist with this. In addition, develop a signature downtown park
at this site.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition.
The Civic Master plan will be complete by early 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant
funds applied for in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning
Construction
$0
$0
$
$
TOTAL
$0
$0
$
$
56
Packet Pg. 145
6.A.b
CIP PARKS
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
FUND 332 - PARKS CONSTRUCTION
57
Packet Pg. 146
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development
ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $12,170,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Improvements / Stadium Demolition As part of the
master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the stadium, it
is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some grant funds
available to assist with this. In addition, the City will begin the design development process for
the completion of the master plan.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE:
The Civic Master plan was adopted in 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds applied for
in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019 - 2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning and
Stud
2,000,000
Construction
$
10,000,170
TOTAL
58
Packet Pg. 147
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh / Willow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6-8M
Creek Daylighting
sue}. � ' .� r :�� .... .. s.i � - �• `^- � •'
�y F
•� i
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive
management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to
support day -lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation
of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Work with Friends of the
Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the
marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh water
marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary.
Protection is vital. Co -fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as
defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available
through various agencies and foundations.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
Engineering &
Administration
Construction
0
0
0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
* all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts.
59
Packet Pg. 148
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,889,299
/ Waterfront Walkway Completion — Fund 332
•J `Y •5
ka++q
r
• 1hY�d - -- --
AccvM•ov R..p
lA�6Ui.»l 2o�
Propmod Edmwids
Wam(from Garver
;r�urs;
s+�• w isr�wr ww ..s.o� .+.ra.
sr-v. - yu •al
Isw45m0,: .—
r .•
r
ti.V
bn b •..
•Y.grOn JN�
yyetln W ran p•ur� o
.
PMcFW.4 P-�
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot
and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access
to the waterfront to accommodate increased growth. Connect waterfront walkway from
Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide
condominiums. This project includes the City's support for the parking lot and frontage
improvements.
PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Public access of waterfront and tidelands on Puget
Sound. Provide a new Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway.
One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beachfront access.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Planning/Study
150000
Eng. & Admin.
70000
Construction
3,158,868
$1,371,033
$0
$0
0
0
1 % for Art
TOTAL
$3,158,868
$1,591,033
$0
$0
0
0
all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts
60
Packet Pg. 149
6.A.b
PROJECT NAME: Outdoor Fitness Zones I ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create outdoor fitness zones by adding fitness equipment within
the park system.
PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Provide outdoor places to exercise to improve the health
and wellness of citizens and park users, which provides adults the opportunity to exercise while
their children play. This is a priority in the PROS plan.
SCHEDULE: 2019-2024
COST BREAKDOWN
PROJECT COST
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Professional
Services
Construction
$100000
$100000
$0
$0
0
0
TOTAL
$100000
$100000
$0
$0
0
0
61
Packet Pg. 150
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2018 TO 2019)
6.A.c
ADDED PROJECTS
FUND
PROJECT NAME
CFP
DESCRIPTION
112
76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
Overlay along 76th Ave. W from 196th St. SW to Olympic View Dr., with
stormwater improvements, ADA curb ramp upgrades, and addition of flashing
beacons at existing crosswalk.
112
80th Ave. Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
Install walkway along 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View
X
Dr. (also funded by Fund 422 / pending grant application response).
112
238th St. SW Island and ADA Curb Ramps
Reconstruct existing island on west side of Hwy. 99 @ 238th St. SW and upgrade
various curb ramps throughout the City (also funded by Fund 125).
112
Pavement Rating Study
Evaluation of the pavement condition of every City street , in order to determine
the future priority overlay stretches (to be completed every 3 years).
125
Frances Anderson Center Playground Replacement
lCompleted
125
Hickman Park, hillside erosion mitigation
lCompleted
125
126
Civic Park design
x
Ongoing, anticipated completion in 2020/2021
126
Waterfront Redevelopment/Ebb tide walkway design
x
Ongoing, anticipated completion in 2019/2020
126
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Project
Complete pedestrian crossing enhancements at (9) locations throughout the City,
through the installation of flashing beacons, fully -actuated traffic signal, or HAWK
signal.
126
Guardrail installations
Install new guardrails at various locations throughout the City, since the existing
one needs to be upgraded or none currently exists.
126
2019 Pedestrian Safety Program
Complete various pedestrian improvements throughout the City.
126
Traffic Signal Upgrades
Complete traffic signal upgrades at various intersections (such as new detection
and / or new cabinets)
126
Admiral Way Crossing
Install new pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Dayton St. @ Admiral Way
with flashing beacons, bub-outs, and lighting improvements.
.Q
U
Iq
N
0
N
CD
0
N
m
0
a
0
L
d
m
t
r
Q
Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 151
421 1 Annual Replacement Program (Phase 14
421 I Swedish & 76th Waterline Replacement
Estimated future costs for waterline replacements. 6.A.c
Estimated future costs for waterline replacements and replacement of existing
water meter service Swedish Edmonds.
I 421 I 2019 Waterline Overlays I I Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements.
Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design
422
Preliminary Data gathering for determining feasibility for regional drainage
facility in the Lake Ballinger Basin.
Phase 1 Annual Storm Replacement Project
422
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
422
Phase 2 Annual Storm Replacement Project
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
422
Phase 3 Annual Storm Replacement Project
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
Phase 4 Annual Storm Replacement Project
422
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
Phase 5 Annual Storm Replacement Project
422
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
422
Phase 6 Annual Storm Replacement Project
Estimated future cost for Storm pipe replacements
84th Ave. W Overlay from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
Complete stormwater improvements as part of the 84th Ave. W Overlay from
422
220th St. SW to 212th St. SW
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S and 9th Ave. S
Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S. (pending grant
422
X
application response)
80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW (pending
422
X
grant application response).
423
Phase 12 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Improvements
Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements/rehab/impr.
423
2019 Sewerline Overlays
Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewerline repl/rehab/impr.
Q.
U
Iq
N
O
N
6D
0
N
N
N
0
0-
0
L_
d
m
t
r
c
0
c
M
2
v
d
co
r
N
0
r
K
.L
++
CU
c
0
N
•L
c�
a
E
0
U
ni
r
x
w
c
a�
E
ca
Q
Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 152
6.A.c
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2018 TO 2019)
DELETED PROJECTS
FUND
I PROJECT NAME
CFP
I
DESCRIPTION
112
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
X
Completed in 2018
112
236th St. SW Walkway from Edmonds Way to Madrona Elementary
X
Completed in 2018 (removed from Fund 126 as well)
112
Bike-2 Health
Completed in 2018
112
Trackside Warning System
I
lAnticipated completion in 2018
125
Anderson Center playground
Completed
125
Civic Stadium removal
Completed
125
Veterans Plaza
Completed
125
Civic Park Storage
Anticipate completion
125
ADA Curb Ramp Improvements
Two new employees are proposed in the 2019 budget to create a concrete crew
that will construct new pedestrian curb ramps compliant with ADA standards.
This new program will replace the ADA Curb Ramp Improvements.
125
Minor Sidewalk Program
Two new employees are proposed in the 2019 budget to create a oncrete crew
that will construct short sections of missing sidewalk throughout the City. This
new program will replace the Minor Sidewalk Program.
126
Citywide Protective / Permissive Traffic Signal conversion
Completed in 2018 at (3) signalized intersections (SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W, SR-10
@ 95th PI. W, and 100th Ave. W @ 238th St. SW)
126
220th St. SW Signal Coordination from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W
Anticipated completion in 2018
126
Trackside Warning System
Anticipated completion in 2018
421 2016 Replacement Program I lCompleted in 2017.
421 2017 Waterline Overlays I lCompleted in 2017.
422 Edmonds Marsh Channel Improvements I lCombined into Willow Creek Feasibility Study/Design/Construction
422 Willow Creek Pipe Rehab I lCombined into Willow Creek Feasibility Study/Design/Construction
423 1 2017 Sewerline Overlays I lCompleted in 2017.
U
Iq
N
O
N
CD
0
N
(D
U)
0
a
0
L
m
t
r
c
0
c
a�
2
d
co
r
Iq
N
O
T-
x
Ca
c
0
N
�L
Q
E
0
V
ri
r
t
K
LU
c
a�
E
t
v
ca
Q
Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 153
9.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/24/2018
Review Planning Board Extended Agenda
Staff Lead: N/A
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Diane Cunningham
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The Board's current extended agenda is attached.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: 10-24-2018 PB Extended Agenda
Packet Pg. 154
Items and Dates are subject to change
pLAKN�Ng BOARD
�R90 Extended Agenda
October 24, 2018
Meeting Item
OCTOBER 2018
October 24 1. Public Hearing on CIP / CFP 2019 — 2023
NOVEMBER 2018
November 1. Public Hearing on proposed Amendment to BD parking
14 requirements
2. Public Hearing on Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update
November CANCELLED DUE TO HOLIDAY
28
DECEMBER 2018
December 1. Finalization of Recommendation on SMP Update
12 (if necessary)
December CANCELLED DUE TO HOLIDAY
26
. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
2019
Packet Pg. 155
9.A.a
Items and Dates are subject to change
Pending 1. Community Development Code Re -Organization
2018 2. Neighborhood Center Plans and zoning implementation, including:
✓ Five Corners
3. Further Highway 99 Implementation, including:
✓ Potential for "urban center" or transit -oriented design/development
strategies
✓ Parking standards
4. Exploration of incentive zoning and incentives for sustainable
development
Current Priorities
1. Neighborhood Center Plans & implementation.
2. Highway 99 Implementation.
Recurring 1. Annual Adult Entertainment Report (January -February as necessary)
Topics 2. Election of Officers (Vt meeting in December)
3. Parks & Recreation Department Quarterly Report (January, April, July,
October)
4. Quarterly report on wireless facilities code updates (as necessary)
Packet Pg. 156