Loading...
19740226 City Council Minutesa community park will be honored. All that needs to be done now is to decide which corner, and which 10 acres we want. This matter will come before the Park Board for discussion, and then a date will be set for.a public hearing. Persons living in that area will then be able to voice opinions as to whether or not they want a park. Following that, the people would then be approached for funds to develop and equip the park. Mayor Harrison asked if it would be possible to get the entire high ground. Mr. Weaver said this has not been considered, but is something to think about. REPORT ON BIDS OPENED FEBRUARY 12 ON VEHICLES Herb Gilbo, Director of Public Works, reported that the City clerk opened bids for the sale of vehicles on the 12th of February. He presented a breakdown of the bid results to the council members for their perusal. A motion was made by Councilman Gellert and seconded by Councilman Nelson to accept all high bid offers. Motion carried. Three units were not sold as they did not receive any bids. Mr. Gilbo said that he would like to request permission to re -bid those items with a revised minimum bid. He also added three other items to the list; a utility box, a pickup and a one -ton flatbed -truck. A motion was made by Councilman Welling and seconded by Councilman Anderson to set March 11th as the bid date for these items. Motion carried. Mr. Gilbo reported further that no bid was received for the purchase of a one -ton dump truck on February 12th, and that he would like to re -bid this item. A motion was made by Councilman Nordquist and seconded by Councilman Nelson.that the city call for bids for a one -ton flatbed dump truck on March 11th. Motion carried. SET DATE FOR HEARING ON PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 430 - RECOMMENDING TOWNHOUSES AS A PERMITTED USE IN DUPLEX, MULT-FAMILY, AND PRD ZONES • A motion wa-ssmade by Councilman Nordquist and seconded by Councilman Nelson to set March 5th as the hearing date on Planning Commission Resolution 430. Motion carried. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO DOG LICENSING ORDINANCE (SECOND READING) Councilman Nelson moved, seconded by Councilman Nordquist to pass Ordinance #1699 amending section 4 of Ordinance 1663 and Sec. 5.04.060 of the Edmonds City Code relating to requirements for licenses for dogs; Motion carried. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO MASSAGE PARLOR ORDINANCE Police Chief, Marlo.Foster, reported that when the original ordinance was written, massages given in private homes by the owner -proprietor -had been excluded. This amendment deals with that. Following a brief discussion, Councilman Nelson moved, seconded.by Councilman Nordquist that Ordinance #1700 be passed amending Section 3 of Ordinance #1684 and Section 4.05.020 of the City Code exempting certain persons from the provisions of said regulation. Motion carried. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON ANNEXATION - WESTGATE AREA City'Engineer., Leif Larson, explained that the original ordinance had a short form for the legal description of the property; and that this amendment sets forth a metes and bounds description. Councilman Nelson then moved, seconded by Councilman Nordquist to pass Ordinance #1701, amending Section 3 of Ordinance 41691. Motion carried. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION • John Rabine, Secretary -Treasurer of Teamsters Local Union #763, stated that he is chief executive officer of thdt Local, and that they represent the Edmonds Public Works employees. He passed out copies of his presentation to the members of the council, a copy of which is on file. He then proceeded to read from this report. Ron Whaley, M.A.A.,commented on the remarks made by Mr. Rabine. Following some discussion, a motion was made by Councilman Gellert and seconded by Councilman Welling that the council reaffirm their faith and confidence in the existing city negotiating team. Following some comments, the motion was voted upon and carried unanimously. Mr. Whaley is to call Mr. Rabine to arrange a meeting with the people Mr. Rabine represents. ---There was no further business, and the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 PM. ,4A Eleanor Quea y, Depu ity Clerk Harve H. Harrison, Mayor February 26, 1974 ROLL.CALL Regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at <7:30 P.M. by Mayor Harve Harrison. All council members were present. is 3 • APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of the council meeting -of February 19 had been posted, mailed and dis- tributed, and with no omissions nor corrections, they were approved as written.. COUNCIL PARTICIPATION Councilwoman Shippen, as ex officio member,of the Park Board, asked to delegate some of the responsibility in regard to the Brookacres property to Councilman Welling. She -felt he would be in a better position to discuss the matter, and Councilman Welling agreed that he would be glad to talk with the owner. IT WAS THEREFORE MOVED BY COUNCILWOMAN SHIPPEN, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT THAT COUNCILMAN WELLING BE AUTHORIZED TO UNDERTAKE A DISCUSSION WITH THE OWNER OF THE BROOKACRES PROPERTY REGARDING THE VARIOUS WAYS OF ACQUIRING THE PROPERTY, AND TO FIND ANY ALTERNATIVES FOR ACQUISITION, AND TO PRESENT THESE TO THE PARK BOARD AND COUNCIL. Councilman Nelson stated that he was against acquiring property without knowing a specific plan or what is going to be done with the property; he did not recall council having made any committments to acquire this particular property; and he would have no qualms if Councilman Welling was just advised to have a fact finding discussion and not represent city interests to convey and. false hopes for purchase. Councilwoman Shippen agreed that she meant for Council- man Welling to express interest only. COUNCILMAN NELSON THEN MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE THAT THIS BE -A FACT FINDING DISCUSSION ONLY. SECONDED BY COUN- CILWOMAN SHIPPEN. THE AMENDMENT CARRIED, AND THE MOTION AS AMENDED ALSO CARRIED'. Councilman Nordquist reported that the Blue Ribbon Committee had held its first meeting with•all but one member in attendance, as well as all but one council • member in attendance. He stated that the Committee was -,a fine group, and the study would prove to be a very exciting and interesting one. No chairman had as yet been chosen, but this would no doubt be done after a couple of meetings. Mayor Harrison advised that a spokesman for the Service Stations in the area had met with the City staff at a CDC meeting. He noted that 8 stations had closed, .cutting the allocation of gasoline coming into the area. The Mayor stated that the stations would like to be given permission to use sandwich boards in order to inform the public of their operations. Attorney John Wallace advised that in order to waive the requirements regarding sandwich boards in the city, it would take an amendment to the ordinance. He noted that the stations could make application for street use permits for signs on the sidewalk, as invasion of R/W. The Mayor said about 14 stations would be affected, and perhaps they could all apply for a permit as soon as possible, with a time limit of approximately 3 months placed on it, and this limit could then be extended, if necessary. Councilman Gellert moved that the Mayor be authorized to write letters to the Governor and the.Federal Energy Office in Seattle, appraising them of the situation, but Mayor Harrison answered that he had already sent a letter to the Department of Emergency Services in - Olympia. There followed some discussion on a meeting of service station operators to come to an agreement on procedures to solve their problems. Councilman Winters said he felt any application fee for street use permits should be waived in these' cases. .Attorney Wallace answered that there was no fee set by ordinance, but further discussion resulted in a MOTION BEING MADE BY COUNCILMAN ANDERSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT THAT THE CITY WAIVE ANY FEES CONNECTED WITH THESE EMERGENCY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS FOR THE GASOLINE STATIONS. THE MOTION CARRIED. Discussion was held on the group favoring a golf course on the University of Washington property, and following this, a MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN SHIPPEN,- SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT THAT REGARDLESS OF WHAT ACTION THE CITY MAY TAKE IN • THE FUTURE ON THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PROPERTY, THAT THE CITY SUGGEST THAT THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REQUEST THE EDMONDS GOLF AND RECREATION COMMITTEE TO PROVIDE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ON THE PROPERTY, AND THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT OUT- LINE THE TYPES OF INFORMATION WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE INCLUDED IN THIS STATEMENT. Council then discussed this matter further, and it was MOVED BY COUNCILMAN NELSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN WINTERS TO TABLE THIS MOTION, A ROLL CALL VOTE SHOWED GELLERT, NELSON, NORDQUIST AND WINTERS IN FAVOR; WELLING, SHIPPEN AND ANDERSON AGAINST. Attorney Wallace advised that it takes a majority plus one to table, and the motion therefore failed to carry. Following some further discussion on the motion, COUNCILMAN ANDERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST TO AMEND THE MOTION TO STATE THAT WE NOTIFY THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO INCLUDE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AS PART OF THE PROCESS AT SOMETIME DURING DEVELOPMENT FROM THE PRELIMINARY TO THE FINAL PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PROPERTY. THIS AMENDMENT CARRIED. Ward Phillips, in the audience, told council that he felt it was not fair to require environmental impact statements in all cases; that this could be a very expensive item since it involved a great deal. Further discussion followed, and COUNCILMAN NELSON MOVED TO AMEND, SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN SHIPPEN, THAT THE MAIN MOTION BE CHANGED TO REPLACE THE WORDS "ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT" WITH THE WORDS "ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT". VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT CARRIED, AND VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, ALSO CARRIED. At this point, Ward Phillips inquired about an agenda item concerning the consoli- dation study being made in south county, and the City Clerk advised that Wayne . Cobbs, speaker regarding the consolidation issue, was: -on the March 5 city council agenda. Discussion was held on the Amenities Design Board fees. They were $20.00 for O 0 LJ structural and for non-structural. It was noted that the $20.00 fee was being charged in all cases, and it was not the intent of the ad hoc committee that a charge be made in this manner. City Planner Wallis stated that the fee was in the ordinance. Councilman Anderson brought to council attention page 14 in the ordinance which notes fees. Mayor Harrison stated that society, not the applicant, is benefitting from this appearance before the Design Board. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN NELSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN WINTERS THAT THE PERMIT APPLICATION FEES ALREADY CHARGED BE RETURNED. Councilwoman Shippen felt the city should return the non-structural monies,,but not the structural. Further discussion, and a ROLL CALL VOTE SHOWED COUNCILMEN NELSON, NORDQUIST AND WINTERS IN FAVOR: WELLING, GELLERT, SHIPPEN AND ANDERSON AGAINST,AND THE MOTION FAILED. IT WAS THEN MOVED BY COUNCIL- MAN ANDERSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILWOMAN SHIPPEN TO RETURN $18 OF THE $20 FEE TO THE THREE NON-STRUCTURAL APPLICANTS WHO HAD PAID THIS AMOUNT TO'DATE. THIS MOTION CARRIED.Following further comments regarding fees, A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL- MAN GELLERT, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN WINTERS THAT THE AMENITIES DESIGN BOARD ORDI- NANCE' SECTION 12.20.080 BE AMENDED TO READ THAT APPLICATION FEES FOR ANY ACTION REQUIRING STRUCTURAL REVIEW BE $20 AND ALL OTHERS BE $2.00 MOTION CARRIED. HEARING ON UNDERGROUNDING FORMULA FOR BN, BC, CW, AND ARTERIALS Councilwoman Shippen stated that in 1969 the 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 formula was started for undergrounding, with the city, utilities, and adjacent property owners sharing equally in the costs on the R/W. Since then, Sunset Avenue and a short section of 9th Avenue have been the only places using these monies and this system. The city now has $90,000 in this fund, but the cost to the average property owner, plus the hook-up fee, is costly. The present formula does not encourage undergrounding except on a piecemeal basis. Therefore, Councilwoman Shippen said she felt more cooperation would be forthcoming if the formula was amended to a 50% city share, 50% Utilities share, (for the R/W) and the property owners charged the hook-up fee • in the BN, BC, CW zones and arterials. She felt the first step would be for the city to increase its obligation. Hearing was then opened. Dave Larson said he had become very aware of the visual effect of the overhead wires in the city, and he would strongly endorse Councilwoman Shippen's :proposal, also feeling that the business community would support this. He thought under - grounding the wires would substantially increase the pleasurable pedestrian ex- perience in Edmonds. Frank Reis, representing the PUD, advised council that the PUD policy could only be made by the Commissioners of the District. He stated that a survey by the PUD of customers in Snohomish County showed that the people agreed that they would like to have undergrounding, but the question on their willingness to pay showed an extremely low yes vote. He said that undergrounding was a -strictly cosmetic or aesthetic value and does not affect the quality -of service. The PUD could support the 1/3 share of the cost, but their personnel had tried to sell undergrounding to the property owners when 9th Avenue was improved in Edmonds, and as council knew, they sold only a small section north of Main. Mr. Reis said that it was his personal feeling that the Commissioners and Adminis- tration of PUD would not wish to go over the 1/3 share, as the customers were not interested in higher utility costs that may result. Councilwoman Shippen said she felt the PUD should have separated the areas in their questionnaire on underground- ing, as they might find a difference in cities that would benefit greatly,. and those that would not. Councilman Gellert asked if the PUD had ever considered budgeting undergrounding monies via a formula with a certain amount for Edmonds, for example, etc. Mr. Reis answered that they would have real problems in this manner, and cannot discriminate between customers and areas. Al Kincaid said he as an individual felt that the greatest benefit would be to underground the wires in downtown Edmonds. A change in policy would take a selling job to the PUD Com- missioners, Telephone Company, and Cable TV. He said he would like to see a meet- • ing between the council, PUD Commissioners, and the people interested in the town to explore this. Bill Brill, District Engineer of Construction for the Telephone Company, reminded council of a letter written in 1967 outlining the policy and practices of the company, which have not changed. He said that extra costs would go into the rates charged the customers, and Arlington, for example, wouldn't want undergrounding as much as Edmonds would, but all customers would pay with any re- sulting increase in rates from undergrounding. Dave Larson suggested that as Councilman Gellert had stated, if PUD and Telephone Company allocate fixed amounts in their budgets with a workable formula, it would seem to be in the best interest of all people in the service area. Ward Phillips stressed that Edmonds has the desire to have undergrounding now, and council should decide first on the formula. He stated that the downtown community has an absolute committment on the part of the NB of C bank to help the property owners to finance the fees to hookup to the undergrounding; they are 100% behind this effort; that it would be a home improvement concept regarding the loan; that they are ready, able, and -willing to go ahead; and that there are favorable terms of up to 7 years to pay. Mr. Phillips added that if the council goes along with the formula, the mer- chants have agreed to participate, and this would leaye only the Utility companies. Councilman Anderson had a question regarding maintenance cost.on poles versus the underground system, and was told that there was no great difference or advantage. Mayor Harrison asked Mr. Reis if the PUD had experienced problems with the under- ground wires in plats and commercial areas. Mr. Reis answered that the underground- ing cost was two and a half times over the cost of overhead wires, and some prob- lems had plaqued them in these areas. There was discussion on costs, and the plan of the PUD to use alleys for the poles where reasonable. Councilman Nelson stated 0 • that under.the 50%.formula, the.city was still spending the people's money; the 50% from the Utilities would increase rates which would.be the people's money; and the people would be paying, regardless of the original 1/3 being deleted from their direct cost. He also wondered why only the BN, BC, CW zones; why not all zones under this formula? Councilwoman Shippen answered that it was more appropriate to participate heavily on the business areas where all people would benefit. Al Kincaid stated that the merchants were ready.to go if the city funded on a first come,.first served basis, and the council should give some thought to that fact. He added that the 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 basis had not been discussed when.the bank agreed to handle the hookup fees. Bill Shaw, PUD, answered questions from council on power poles to be placed in the alleys downtown. Councilman Nordquist inquired about the area contemplating.undergrounding downtown. Ward Phillips said the CBD..` Mayor Harrison said it.was hoped that this summer the city could have old-time type light fixtures installed from 6th to the Ferry Dock and from City Hall to Mill- town. He said the Planning and Engineering Departments were looking into costs for this, and they were hopeful.the council would approve when it is presented. There was some further discussion, and a MOTION WAS THEN .MADE BY COUNCILWOMAN SHIPPEN, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT THAT THE CITY AMEND THE EXISTING UNDER - GROUNDING FORMULA, FOR THE UTILITY COMPANIES AND THE CITY OF EDMONDS TO SHARE 50% - 50% UNDERGROUNDING COST WITHIN THE R/W IN THE.CW, BC,_BN ZONES, PLUS THE ARTERIALS, CONTINGENT UPON THE UTILITIES' ACCEPTANCE OF THE FORMULA. Councilman Nelson stated that he felt it was unfair to limit the zones and he could not support this motion to establish a policy without an in-depth study. Ward Phillips noted that with the'1/3, 1/4 1/34 formula, nothing has happened, and he said he was against further study and wanted action. He added that the money was budgeted, so now use it. Councilwoman Shippen replied that if Councilman Nelson was concerned • with the other zones being omitted, he could amend the motion and include them. Councilman Nelson declined to do this. Al Kincaid told council that if the $90,000 was available now for undergrounding, let's use it on the project wanted by the business community now. Mayor Harrison said that every property in Edmonds is increased in value when you beautify your downtown area. Councilman Gellert said that in the downtown area there is no -relief from the starkness of the utility poles, and it is therefore more in need of undergrounding than residential areas where trees tend to soften the unsightly poles. There was some further discussion, and it was then MOVED BY COUNCILMAN ANDERSON, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE THE 50% - 50% FORMULA FOR THE ENTIRE CITY RATHER THAN LIMITING THE ZONES ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS. (THIS WOULD ELIMINATE ANY REFERENCE TO ZONES.) COUNCILMAN NELSON THEN MOVED TO AMEND TO EXCLUDE ANY REFER- ENCE TO ANY ZONING AND LEAVE IT ON THE ARTERIALS CITYWIDE. THIS DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Councilman Gellert stated that he was against Councilman Anderson's - amendment, because he felt this should be attempted first on a 50-50 basis in the original stated zones. ROLL CALL VOTE.ON COUNCILMAN ANDERSON'S AMENDMENT CARRIED, WITH COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, NORDQUIST, ANDERSON AND WINTERS -IN FAVOR: WELLING, GELLERT, AND SHIPPEN AGAINST. COUNCILMAN GELLERT THEN MOVED TO AMEND TO STATE THAT SAID POLICY BE APPLIED IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS SHALL PETITION ON THE BASIS OF PAYMENT OF THE HOOKUP CHARGES. THIS MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Dewey Leyda, in the audience, told council that no one had contacted him regarding the undergrounding downtown. Councilman Gellert.urged a vote for consideration of the original motion. He noted that Councilwoman Shippen's motion was intended to be a vehicle wherein the council, administration, and business community could approach the PUD, Telephone Co., etc. to try to get them to accept the 50% - 50% formula. Following discussion, a ROLL • CALL VOTE ON THE MOTION AS AMENDED SHOWED GELLERT, NELSON, SHIPPEN, NORDQUIST, AND ANDERSON IN FAVOR: WELLING AND WINTERS AGAINST, AND THE MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED. PRELIMINARY PLAT - L.E. NESS ADDITION City.Planner Joe Wallis presented the preliminary plat of L.E. Ness Addition, at 7700-206th S.W. Planner Wallis explained the six hearings pertaining to this plat, and gave a rundown on the dates and circumstances. He projected slides showing the comprehensive plan, zoning map,.and views of the area. There was discussion on the intersection at 206th. Councilman Nordquist said he ways concerned about the: -.driveways, and asked assurance from Reid, Middleton & Associates, Inc. that this would take place as shown. It was noted that the plat met with all the re- quirements of the city, and it was now up to the staff to see that these were carried out. City Planner Wallis stated that all lots either conform or have been granted a variance. He recommended acceptance, subject to structures near the lot line on both lots 6 and 7 being removed, and that dedications on 206th and 77th W. be made within 90 days. Engineer Leif Larson also asked that council make this subject to engineering requirements. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ANDERSON THAT THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF L. E. NESS ADDITION BE ACCEPTED, SUBJECT TO STRUCTURES NEAR THE LOT LINE ON BOTH LOTS 6 AND 7 BEING REMOVED, DEDICA- TIONS ON 206TH AND 77TH W. BEING MADE WITHIN.90 DAYS, AND ALSO.SUBJECT TO ALL EN- GINEERING REQUIREMENTS. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED EXTENSION OF 196TH BETWEEN 81ST AND 88TH City Engineer Leif Larson reported on a letter received from the State Highway 0 too • District No. 1 Engineer, Wes' -Bogart, indicating that the State will provide for the total cost of construction of SR 524, 196th S.W: from 81st to 88th Ave. W., with the provision that the City provide for design, plans, specifications, and contract administration including inspection. Also, to acquire R/W if necessary. Preliminary evaluation and design of the intersection of 88th indicates that the present R/W is -adequate. Estimated construction cost is from $250,000 - $27590009 and it is estimated that the City's participation would amount to 10 to 15% of the construction cost. City tention -'-.to proceed with Engineer Larson recommended that the City confirm the in- the project based on the estimate in order that a formal agreement can be prepared for review and execution by the City and the State. Councilwoman Shippen asked for deferment until April for citizen participation at the beginning. Engineer Larson stated that it was a question of timing regarding available UAB funds for these purposes. Councilwoman Shippen said she would like to have hearings held with information gathered prior to these hearings. She stated that she would want the State Highway Dept. to supply traffic counts on -a sectional basis, from 76th to 81st; 81st to 84th; 84th to 88th to Olympic Avenue at the Gulch; Olympic Avenue to 9th; to Casper; and Casper to Main. She would like to mail or send out notices to all interested parties; have Mr. Vic Sood provide council with prospective bus routes along the area; and defer any action until all this adequate information is received; then hold hearings in order to involve the people. COUNCILWOMAN SHIPPEN THEREFORE MADE A MOTION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN ANDERSON TO DEFER ACTION ON THE PROPOSED EXTENSION OF 196TH BETWEEN 81ST AND 88TH UNTIL ADEQUATE INFORMATION IS RECEIVED AS STATED ABOVE, AND HEARINGS BE SET FOR MARCH 26, AND APRIL 21 IF NECESSARY. Councilman Gellert said he was con- cerned with the validity of traffic counts from now until April 2; that -they would probably be abnormal due.to the energy crisis. Engineer Larson said he saw no • reason why they could not proceed simultaneously and go ahead subject to the out- come of the hearings and the information to be gathered. IT WAS MOVED BY COUNCIL- WOMAN SHIPPEN, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN GELLERT THAT IT WAS THE CITY'S INTENTION TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT SUBJECT TO ACCUMULATING THE INFORMATION ASKED FOR BEFORE FORMAL AGREEMENT IS MADE, AND THE HEARINGS STAND. MOTION CARRIED. COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTRUCTION OF 1.5 MG RESERVOIR IN YOST PARK City Engineer Leif Larson requested continuance of: -:this acceptance for one week, due to some financial aspects that would be completed by that time. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN WINTERS TO CONTINUE THIS AND PLACE THE ITEM ON THE MARCH 5 COUNCIL AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED. PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR ACCEPTANCE OF REVISED COPY OF COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN Replacement pages showing corrections and additions to the Comprehensive Park Plan had been distributed. COUNCILMAN GELLERT MADE A MOTION, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN NORDQUIST THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE 41702 BE PASSED, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE PARKS AND RECREATION PLAN AND SETTING FORTH THE LAND DESIGNATIONS AS PROPOSED PARKS AND AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE NO..1147. MOTION CARRIED. CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES A claim for damages from.Kerry Rouse, wherein asphalt from a Public Works truck fell from the truck and bounced on his windshield, was acknowledged and referred to the City Clerk for processing. ADJOURNMENT There was no further business to come before council, and the meeting::was adjourned at 11:10 P.M. Irene Varney.Moran City Clerk Harve H. Harrison, Mayor March 5, 1974 ROLL CALL Regular meeting of the Edmonds City Council was called to order at 7:30;PM. by Mayor Harve Harrison. All council members were present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES City Engineer, Leif Larson, noted a correction to be made on page 5, third line down in the second paragraph under the item regarding extension of 196th. It should say State funds rather than UAB funds. Mayor Harrison had a correction on page 4, second motion on the page, which he thought should read"... rather than limiting it to the zones as listed above...". The minutes were then approved as amended. • 1 1 is