Resolution 7920006.010.050
WSS/are
04/07/94
Rev: 04/12/94
RESOLUTION NO. 792
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, TO THE SNOHOMISH
COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD REQUESTING THAT
THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD AUTHORIZE ANNEXATION
OF A PORTION OF UNINCORPORATED SNOHOMISH
COUNTY ORIGINALLY CONTAINED IN PETITIONS FOR
THE AURORA MARKETPLACE ANNEXATION AREA.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds reduced
the annexation boundaries for the Aurora Marketplace annexation
area in order to comply with the requirements of RCW 35A.14.120
that the owners of property equaling at least 60 percent of the
assessed valuation of the area execute the petition, and
WHEREAS, such reduction was based upon a change in
assessed valuation occurring during the course of the petition
drive and submittal to the City, and
WHEREAS, the original petition area best represents the
factors required to be considered by the Boundary Review Board
under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.200, specifically that the area
is better configured in terms of logical boundaries, adjacent
incorporated and unincorporated areas, topography, natural
boundaries and service areas and is therefore the most logical
alternative annexation proposal for such area, now, therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
71741.1 -1-
Section 1. The Snohomish County Boundary Review Board is
hereby requested to consider as an alternative to the proposed
annexation area, the original area circulated by petition for
annexation. The original area is described on the attached
Exhibits A and B, incorporated herein by this reference as if set
forth in full and representing legal descriptions and maps provided
in accordance with the requirements of RCW Chapter 35A.14.
Section 2. The Boundary Review Board is requested to
consider the factors set forth in RCW 35A.14.200. The original
annexation area is a logical boundary whose assessed valuation
closely approximates the 60 percent required and, in fact,
represented the required assessed valuation at the dates the
petitions began circulation. Reassessment of a portion of the
properties in the area, but not all, caused the assessed valuation
represented by the signatures to decline below the 60 percent level
following the gathering and submittal of the petitions for
certification. The boundaries also represent the most logical
configuration for the boundaries of the City in respect to the
boundaries of adjacent incorporated and unincorporated areas,
topographical features, drainage basins and the sense of community
presented by the area.
RESOLVED this3rd day of Mav , 1994.
APPROVED:
MAYOR-,--LAS]RA M . ` HALL
71741.1 - 2 -
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
C TV CLERK, DAF�A J . MARCH
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 04/12/94
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 05/03/94
RESOLUTION NO. 792
71741.1 - 3 -
EXHIBI T A
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 27
NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF EDMONDS,
BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF
EDMONDS WAY (SR 104) AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF
240TH ST.. S.W.; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-
OF-WAY MARGIN OF EDMONDS WAY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF 236TH ST. S.W.; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN TO ITS
INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF 88TH
AVE. W., THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT -OF WAY
MARGIN TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
MARGIN OF 233RD PL. S.W.; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN OF 84TH AVE. W., THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG
SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE
WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 234TH
ST. S.W.; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID PROLONGATION AND SAID
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE
CENTERLINE OF SR 99, BEING A POINT ON THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS OF
EDMONDS, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CITY LIMITS AND SAID
CENTERLINE TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
MARGIN OF 240TH ST. S.W.; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY MARGIN TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
- H1B1 T B
Legend
Current Snohomish County
Zoning
R-8400
(Residential - Mininunn Lot Size
8400 Square Feet)
MR
(Multi -Family Residential, I Unit for
every 2000 Square Feet of Lot Area)
PRD-MR
(Planned Residential Development -
Multi -Family Residential)
NB
(Neighborhood Business)
CB
(Community Business)
GC
(General Commercial)
Comparable Zoning
for Annexation Area
/j
WI. .
d G 19'4 9
Comparable City of Edmonds
Zoning
RS-8 (Single Family Residential, Minimum
Lot Size of 8000 Square Feet)
RM-1.5 (Multi -Family Residential, I Unit for
every 1500 Square Feet of Lot Area)
Same as above
BN (Neighborhood Business)
BC (Community Business)
CG (General Commercial)