The URL can be used to link to this page

2019-09-24 City Council - Full Agenda-2449o Agenda Edmonds City Council snl. ,nyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEPTEMBER 24, 2019, 7:00 PM "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER." - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 5. JOINT DISCUSSION 1. Discussion with the Edmonds Planning Board (45 min) 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes 2. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 3. Authorization of Participation in Appeal of FCC Order 4. Accept a Public Pedestrian and Utility easement on 215th PI 8. STUDY ITEMS 1. City Attorney Evaluation Summary Review (30 min) 9. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS 12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(1). 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. Edmonds City Council Agenda September 24, 2019 Page 1 ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda September 24, 2019 Page 2 5.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/24/2019 Discussion with the Edmonds Planning Board Staff Lead: Rob Chave Department: Planning Division Preparer: Diane Cunningham Background/History The City Council meets periodically with the Planning Board in a joint meeting. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative The Planning Board will be meeting with the Council in a joint meeting. The Board will provide a brief update on its activities and future work. Packet Pg. 3 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/24/2019 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Nicholas Falk Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 09-17-2019 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 4 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES September 17, 2019 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Dave Teitzel, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief Phil Williams, Public Works Director Brian Tuley, IT Manager Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Carolyn LaFave, Executive Assistant Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder ALSO PRESENT Zach Bauder, Student Representative The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Mesaros read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmember Teitzel. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS ABSTAINED. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. PRESENTATIONS DEAFTHRIVE DAY PROCLAMATION Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 5 7.1.a Mayor Earling read a proclamation declaring September 21, 2019 as DeafThrive Day in Edmonds and urging all citizens to recognize and honor our commitment toward full inclusion of people who are deaf. Several members of the deaf community were present to accept the proclamation. 2. CHILDHOOD CANCER AWARENESS MONTH PROCLAMATION Mayor Earling read a proclamation declaring September 2019 as Childhood Cancer Awareness Month in Edmonds and encouraging all community members to recognize the serious impact of childhood cancer and to support and embrace the significant role each of us can play in the awareness of childhood cancer. Emily Hood and Jura McAfree accepted the proclamation. 3. OUTSTANDING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT AWARD FOR 2018 Mayor Earling relayed the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) has been acknowledged by Washington State Department of Ecology NW Region for the outstanding work they do maintaining the WWTP. Ecology's announcement noted "The Edmonds WWTP has an outstanding record among the top municipal wastewater treatment plants in Washington based on effluent submittals and overall plant compliance. The Edmonds WWTP team should be commended for their perseverance, dedication, and award -winning efforts. It is a great endeavor to operate and maintain a wastewater treatment plant in top -running order 24- hours a day, 365 days a year." Public Works Director Phil Williams introduced WWTP Manager Pamela Randolph, Mike VanPelt who has been employed at the WWTP for 41 years and Michael Derrick, the WWTP's newest employee. He explained the award is given out each year and treatment plants must essentially have a perfect compliance record on all discharge monitoring reports and other requirements of the permit throughout the 12 month period. The WWTP has received this award six of the eight years he has been with the City. Ms. Randolph thanked the City Council for their support, relaying as a result of that support, the WWTP has achieved phenomenal things over the years in energy savings, improvements to the environment and the condition of the WWTP. Most of the WWTP employees are busy this week due to a shutdown. Mr. Williams clarified it was a shutdown of the City's incinerator; the WWTP works 24/7 365 days/year. Mr. Williams also recognized Mike's wife Jill in the audience. 4. SALARY COMMISSION LETTER ESTABLISHING ELECTED OFFICIALS' COMPENSATION FOR 2020 AND 2021 Salary Commissioner Chair Jay Grant reviewed: • Background o Established in Accordance to ECC 10.80.030 o Under the requirements of RCW of 35.21.015 o The Commission is required to meet between July 1st and deliver findings by September 30th o We deliver our findings in accordance with that requirement tonight, September 17, 2019. o The Commission's binding decision has been delivered to the City Clerk as required 2019 Commissioners o Commissioner Ava Dubno, Vice Chair o Commissioner Don Hall o Commissioner Jeff Hodson o Commissioner Carl Zapora o Consultant: Marilynne Beard, MMB Consulting o Staff Liaison: Emily Wagener, HR Analyst How we did our work o Looked at historical compensation data Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 6 7.1.a o Considered comparable cities (salaries, benefits, form of gov't., population, tax base, # of FTEs) o Examined COLAs and cost -of -living trends o Reviewed city budget o Conducted public outreach and surveys (2 public hearings + 8 public meetings) Other approached we considered o Could we link pay: - To accountability for job responsibilities? (ex. Attendance) - To a formula? o We also looked at compensation for special district CEOs and elected officials (port, school and hospital districts) One neighbor's method o Lynnwood has "City Council Member Responsibilities" that lays out duties, from policy making to land -use planning. ■ It ties compensation to meetings: ■ Full salary paid if all meetings attended. ■ Deducts $150 per unexcused meeting missed. We asked for input o Surveys were made available: ■ To council members ■ To members of city boards and commissions ■ To service clubs (Rotary, Kiwanis, Lions) ■ To business groups (Chamber of Commerce, Edmonds downtown Merchants Assn., etc.) ■ The public via the Beacon, My Edmonds News, The Herald, social media (including Edmonds Moms' FB page, city FB page), and on Nextdoor.com listservs. Public Survey (100+ Responses) o Do you agree or disagree with linking Council compensation to some measure of accountability such as consistent meeting attendance? ■ Agree - 72 ■ Neither agree or disagree - 11 ■ Disagree - 17 o The Council President has additional responsibilities such as working with the Mayor and staff to set the meeting agendas and chairing the weekly Council meetings. Currently, the Council President receives $200 per month over the Council's base pay. Would you agree that this amount is commensurate with their added responsibilities? ■ Agree - 58 ■ Disagree - 40 Council feedback (6 responses) o Do you agree or disagree with linking Council compensation to some measure of accountability such as consistent meeting attendance? ■ Agree - 3 ■ Neither agree or disagree - 1 ■ Disagree - 2 o The Council President has additional responsibilities such as working with the Mayor and staff to set the meeting agendas and chairing the weekly Council meetings. Currently, the Council President receives $200 per month over the Council's base pay. Would you agree that this amount is commensurate with their added responsibilities? ■ Agree - 1 ■ Disagree - 5 What the public says ... (selected comments) o These people are making multimillion dollar decisions for our community and we pay them $1 k or so a month." Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 7 7.1.a o "They should be paid as professionals and their salary should reflect more respect by the City. They do a lot of research, spend a lot of time meeting and communicating with citizens and care about their representation. It is demeaning and inappropriate to pay them so little." o Council should be paid at least 75 to 80 percent of what the mayor is paid. Pay well and we can attract the best people for the job." o "The voters decide in the long-term. In the short-term, why not consider an ongoing report card or dashboard of publicly available 'performance metrics' for each council member that are developed by council, the Mayor and some commission -representation of neutrals?" o "Setting up a minimum number of required hours for coffee talks, town halls, or other outreach with the community. If this requirement is instituted, the monthly compensation rate should be increased." o "Serving the city should be its own compensation. Council salaries are fine where they are." Salary Commission Chair Grant explained the Commission's determinations included considerable research and discussion; by their actions, they are ensuring that the Mayor and Council are fairly compensated for their duties. They understand the amount of the salaries is not the reason for their service to the community; however, it is important that reasonable compensation is reflected for that service. He reviewed the Commission's determinations: • Mayor o Graph comparing 2019 mayoral salaries and population for strong mayor cities 30,000 to 100,000 (Wenatchee, Mt. Vernon, Issaquah, Lynnwood, Bremerton, Edmonds, Redmond, Marysville, Auburn and Federal Way) o Edmonds Mayoral ay vs. the Average in Washington Cities with Strong Mayors Edmonds Mayor Average ma oral a $10,495/month ($125,940/year) $11,995/month ($143,950/year) * 16 strong mayor cities in Washington state (including Kent, Renton and Everett) o Determination of mayoral pay ■ Effective January 1, 2020, the Mayor's salary shall be increased by four percent (4%) of the current salary to $130,972; ■ Additionally, effective January 1, 2021, the Mayors' salary shall be increased by four percent (4%) of the current salary to $136,211; and ■ Also, the Commission determines the benefits package for the position of Mayor shall remain unchanged and shall change in the future only if the benefits package for non - represented employees' changes. The benefits package for Mayor currently mirrors the benefits package for non -represented employees. Councilmember o Graph comparing Councilmember and Council President pay for cities 30,000 to 50,000 (Lake Steven, Mt. Vernon, Burien, Lynnwood, Edmonds, Bothell, Issaquah, University Place and Lacey) o Edmonds Council Pay vs. Comparable Cities Edmonds Council Average all Councils pay* $1,250/month ($15,000/year) $1,888/month ($14,256/year) * based on data from 23 cities in Washington state o Other factors we took into consideration in our determination: ■ Some cities have not raised their Councils salaries in some time ■ Some cities do not have a salary commission, so Council has to raise their own salary and we understand this is a challenge o Determination for Councilmember pay ■ Council Members base salary for 2020 shall be increased by $1,000 a year over their current salary to $16,000 annually; Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 8 7.1.a ■ Additionally, Council Members base salary for 2021 shall be increased by $1,000 a year over their current salary to $17,000 annually; and ■ Also, the Commission determines that the current health benefits package shall remain the same and shall change in the future only if the benefits package offered to non -represented employees changes (either plan, or any contribution rate). o Determination for Council President pay ■ Effective January 1, 2020, the Council President's additional compensation shall be increased by $100 a month, for a total of $300 additional per month, which is $1,200 a year more than a Council Member's pay. Annual Fiscal Impact (in addition to current salaries and benefits) 2020 2021 Mayor $5,037 $5,239 Councilmembers $7,000 $7,000 Council President $1,200 $1,200 Total $13,237 $13,439 Council President Fraley-Monillas thanked the commission for their work, noting she had had multiple conversations with Mr. Grant and Ms. Beard. This has been the most thorough process since she has been on the Council and it has taken the commission countless hours. Councilmember Mesaros thanked the commission for their work, noting it was very thorough and supported by facts. He asked if the commission took into consideration vacation for Councilmembers compared to vacation the Mayor takes and whether Councilmembers salaries should be docked for vacation. Chair Grant said vacation for elected officials is typically not considered. The commission considered accountability in many ways but did not consider vacation. If a Councilmember takes too much vacation, the press and other Councilmembers would certainly bring that up and State law requires they attend a certain number of meetings. Councilmember Mesaros asked if commission had extrapolated what the annual salary of a Councilmember might be if they were full-time rather than part-time. Chair Grant said that was part of the commission's discussions including whether the Council's pay could be based on a percentage of the mayor's salary. The commission looked at the City's current job openings which range from $4,000-$11,000/month for full- time employees as well as part-time positions which are minimum wage. The only place where the amount of work done by a Councilmember is documented is in the budget which mentions 25-32 hours/week. There was concern with how the hours would be tracked. The commission and the feedback from the public was they want to pay Councilmembers fairly for the amount of time but that it was difficult to track. Lynnwood was the closest to that but the commission did not want to count meetings. Councilmember Mesaros commented 32 hours is 8 hours/day 4 days/week which is considerably more than part-time and nearly full-time. Chair Grant said that could not be documented. The commission also looked at the state retirement system; under state law, Councilmembers are entitled to retirement benefits which must be documented. Councilmember Mesaros said one aspect that the presentation did not mention was the role Councilmembers play in representing the City in regional meetings that are crucial to the City. For example, Council President Fraley-Monillas spends an extraordinary amount of time on the Health District and he spends a lot of time on SN0911. Chair Grant said the commission did consider that and he spoke with Council President Fraley-Monillas about it. The commission was limited in what they could consider based on what was documented. Councilmember Mesaros clarified his comments were inquiries and were not intended to be critical. Chair Grant said a lot of the same comments are reflect in the commission's minutes. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 9 7.1.a Councilmember Buckshnis expressed her appreciation for the work the commission did and thanked them for the very complete packet. She thanked the public for their input, noting it was very informative to read their comments. In reading some of the comments, she realized there was confusion about the legislative versus the administrative role. Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to her conversation with Chair Grant about the number of meetings Councilmembers attend, commenting fortunately she is retired and has more time to serve on multiple boards and commissions by choice. It is difficult to determine an appropriate level or compare because some Councilmembers have the time because they are retired and others may not due to their employment. The City does not pay enough so Councilmembers either have to work or be retired with some source of income. Chair Grant said they looked at the offices of Mayor, Council President and Councilmembers and were not trying to identify who goes to what meetings but look collectively as a group at the amount of overall time. The commission understands some meetings are very intense and long and others are shorter and perhaps less intense. Mayor Earling thanked the Salary Commission for their great work noting they did even more research than they did two years ago. It has been a pleasure to work with the same group of people again and that helped clarify their work and the questions they asked. He also thanked Ms. Beard for coordinating the commission's work. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Susan Paine, Edmonds, referred to the comparative study for City Attorney service and suggested the Council also consider expenditures on claims and other litigation costs, where they are coming from within City, and whether there were things that could be done internally to relieve attorney costs. In her experience with the school board, they cleared up a lot of litigation and claims using a different HR director as well as reduced some of their insurance costs. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, said while researching City Council conduct requiring fee title property owners to grant easements to third parties during street vacations, he attended the June 17, 2019 regular business meeting of the Olympic View Water & Sewer District (OVWSD). He asked about the franchise agreement between the District and the City of Edmonds and was told that the District has an operating agreement with the City but not a franchise agreement at this time. The City's franchise agreement with OVWSD expired in July 2014, over 5 years ago. Despite that, there is mention in tonight's agenda packet of $180,000 of franchise related compensation received from OVWSD which he said may be a mistake and it may have been paid under the operating agreement. The now expired franchise was documented in Ordinance 3506, a franchise that granted OVWSD rights that include the right to use public streets. OVWSD's June 2015 amendment to their 2017 comprehensive sewer plan, Appendix H, states, "also in 2004 the District and the City of Edmonds signed an interlocal operating agreement and franchise agreement relating to water and sewer service within Edmonds. The District is currently in negotiations to renew the franchise agreement which expired in 2014." He emailed all seven Councilmembers on two occasions; on July 20 he asked each Councilmember to notify the public that the franchise agreement had expired in July 2014 and to make a full and transparent disclosure of how this happened and the plan to address it. As his July emails did not produce any results, he was here in person to ask the City Council to notify the public. 7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 3, 2019 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 10 7.1.a 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 3, 2019 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS 4. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 5. ORDINANCE AMENDING ECC 5.38 (OFFENSES RELATED TO LEWD CONDUCT) 6. JULY 2019 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT 7. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH BERGERABAM TO ASSIGN THE FISHING PIER REHABILITATION PROJECT TO WSP USA 8. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH TETRA TECH FOR THE 84TH AVE OVERLAY PROJECT 8. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. MONTHLY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS AND MINUTES Finance Committee Councilmember Buckshnis reported on items the committee discussed: • Quarterly Report from the Edmonds Public Facilities District o Finances are improving o The recent audit did not result in a management letter • FTP Usage and Procedures — on tonight's agenda • July 2019 Finance Reports • Future Agenda Items Parks & Public Works Committee Councilmember Johnson reported on items the committee discussed: • City Hall Elevator — on tonight's agenda • Supplemental Agreement with BergerABM for the fishing pier • Acceptance of a pedestrian and utility easement for 215t1i Place SW • Supplemental agreement with Tetra Tech for 84t' Ave overlay project • Utility rate analysis and future adoption of utility rate ordinance — future presentation to Council Public Safety, Planning & Personnel Committee Councilmember Nelson reported on items the committee discussed: • Edmonds School District Security Camera MOU — on tonight's agenda • Ordinance amending ECC 5.38 (Offenses related to lewd contact) — approved on Consent Agenda o Allows criminal charges to be filed in municipal court instead of district court against individuals who share intimate images of others in certain situations 9. ACTION ITEMS 1. EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT SECURITY CAMERA MOU Assistant Chief of Police Jim Lawless reported an interlocal agreement was negotiated with the Edmonds School District to allow the Police Department to access live feed video at Edmonds-Woodway High School. The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) has stringent regulations related to the ability to access information for students from PreK to University. The interlocal agreement is an option Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 11 under FERPA and public disclosure laws to have that access. Access would be limited to emergency situations whether in real time or following an incident to provide further evidence of a crime. The Police Department will have limited access to the video via a log -in that will be tracked and audited by the school district. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE MOU AS PRESENTED. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT -ELEVATOR MODERNIZATION FOR CITY HALL Public Works Director Phil Williams explained the elevator was installed as part of the building's original equipment in 1979, 41 years ago. In 2016 staff realized the elevator needed some major capital infusion to continue to meet the requirements of state law and health and safety inspections. Most of the maintenance has been done under contract with Thyssenkrupp and Krupp who provided an estimate in 2016 of $200,000 although the complete scope was unknown and further research resulted in the addition of several new scope items. The scope is not just safety related items that the state requires but also ADA requirements for the operation of an elevator that did not exist when the elevator was installed. In addition, the state requires the machine room be air conditioned. He summarized several new elements arose that increased the price. Mr. Williams explained the project was put out to bid and only two bids were submitted; with all five alternates including a new hydraulic cylinder, the bids received were $347,000 and $374,000. The hydraulic cylinder is a large project and requires removing the car, removing the existing cylinder, and excavating for the new cylinder. It was unknown whether the cylinder casing had a welded hard bottom; without that, if the cylinder leaks oil, it enters the soil. Replacing the cylinder costs $70,000 - $100,000. Fortunately, it was confirmed the cylinder casing has a welded hard bottom so that element of the scope is not necessary. The low bid had to be rejected because one of the forms was not signed. The engineer's estimate without the hydraulic cylinder was $297,000, the qualifying bid was $298,860, plus $45,000 for management reserve for a total of $343,860. The 2019 budget includes $190,000 for this project which will be supplemented by savings from the Frances Anderson Center painting and another delayed project. He recommended awarding the bid to RC Zeigler Company. Mr. Williams commented the elevator will be down for approximately six calendar weeks as a result of this project. Staff will do their best to schedule around events and plans to staff a desk on the first floor for people unable to access the second floor via the stairs. Consideration is also being given to installing a motorized chair on the stairs on the north side of the building. He assured staff will do their best to accommodate special needs customers. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO AWARD THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO RC ZEIGLER COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $298,680.00 AND AUTHORIZE A MANAGEMENT RESERVE OF $45,000.00 FOR CHANGES OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 10. STUDY ITEMS 1. WEBSITE AND FTP PROCEDURES AND USAGE IT Manager Brian Tuley explained the City uses a tool named "Wing FTP Server" to facilitate efficient transfer of large files. Edmonds implementation of this product utilizes standard web HTTPS protocol and a web interface for operations. The Edmonds email server limits message sizes to a maximum of 40 megabytes per message. When transferring files exceeding the maximum, an FTP server is faster and more efficient. Conceptually, Edmonds uses Wing FTP as a City managed "drop box." He reviewed: • Benefits Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 12 7.1.a o Files and access credentials are transferred using an encrypted format, not "in the clear" o Intuitive web based interface o Browser agnostic o Fast and efficient o Direct end user to server connection o Segregated off the internal network for security Limitations o Access to FTP requires account credentials o Not searchable across accounts - Individuals performing public records requests are unable to search across all accounts o Not publicly indexed or viewable — not available to search engines (i.e. Google) o Does not "click and display" only transfers files. o Staff and external users operate through the web interface. There is no direct "drag and drop" access to the internal City network. Recommended Best Practices for FTP o Use the Wing FTP file transfer system as a transitory platform o Primary files should be maintained on city network storage for organization and public records request (PRR) retrieval o Remove files from FTP server when no longer needed o Do not share passwords unless account and purpose is designed for a specific reason o Files to share with citizens should be placed on City website. ■ Single point of access ■ Searchable Mr. Tuley explained the Council approved a 2019 decision package to renovate the website. He provided an update on the website upgrade, explaining the new website will address issues including incorrect search responses, broken links, software updates. He reviewed: • New site will be hosted by Vendor • Cross departmental City staff Web team of 15 • Process 1. Vendor develops template based on Web teams 2. Web team designs new menu structure based on a. City objectives b. Best practices c. Existing metrics 3. Staff map existing live pages to new site 4. Vendor pulls pages to new template 5. When approved, template goes live 6. Total time 4 to 6 months Councilmember Buckshnis inquired about the cost. Mr. Tuley said there is a one-time cost of approximately $40,000 for design, development and migration and the ongoing cost is $4,100/year. Councilmember Buckshnis commented that will save the City money. Mr. Tuley agreed, noting in the event of a failure whether network, power or fiber, the website is in the Cloud and will still be operational. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the City of Mukilteo had a website crash. Mr. Tuley said Mukilteo had a complete hardware failure where they lost everything and had to rebuild from paper. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the Edmonds Center for the Arts also had a hardware failure and lost everything. She noted this was an improvement to the City's current system. Mr. Tuley agreed moving some things to the Cloud was beneficial. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if it was hackable. Mr. Tuley said everything is hackable but it is better against hacking because a big company is supporting the operating system and Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 13 7.1.a programs and they are able to maintain and patch it quickly versus City staff who does web development and may not be the best about patching or being aware of vulnerabilities when they arise. Councilmember Tibbott asked whether the FTP server would be available for public information disclosures. Mr. Tuley answered it is subject to public information requests. If best practices are followed and information is stored there temporarily, there should not be anything of consequence on the FTP server. One of the difficulties with the FTP server is an entity like the Clerk's Office does not have access to all the individual accounts on the server. When information is moved from FTP to the network storage, departments doing records requests can access it. Councilmember Tibbott asked if staff had consulted with the City Attorney regarding public information requests that may be directed to the FTP server. Mr. Tuley said he spoke with the Clerk's Office about it. Their suggestion was to implement best practices where information is not stored on the FTP other than temporarily. For example, a staff member develops a presentation and emails the link to the file and log -in credentials to someone. A public records request may identify the link but since it has been moved to permanent storage, the link is invalid. Councilmember Tibbott summarized the FTP site was filled and emptied on a regular basis. Mr. Tuley agreed it was a dynamic storage repository. Councilmember Tibbott asked whether with these upgrades it would be possible for a citizen to search for building codes related to a deck. Mr. Tuley answered yes, that is also available now; all the codes are online and citizens can do text searches. Councilmember Tibbott asked if the upgrades would improve searches for that information. Mr. Tuley answered yes, due to the technology the website currently uses, the top 4-5 searches are relevant and there will be a lot of inaccurate sub -searches. Councilmember Tibbott relayed citizens' frustration with being unable to find regularly accessed document on the City's website. He anticipated the new search capability would improve service to citizens. Mr. Tuley said IT regularly receives reports of broken links, bad searches, etc. Under the current system, when someone publishes an updated article and disables the old one, the old one is still resident in Google's search index with results in citizens obtaining obsolete information. That situation will be fixed with this new system. Councilmember Buckshnis said one of the reason for training on the FTP server is information such as the Windward report was placed on the FTP server and not moved to the website and the Clerk's Office was unable to locate it. Training will address using the FTP server for temporary storage. The Department of Ecology is also updating their website which has a lot of broken links, recalling the Tree Board encountered a number of broken links. Mr. Tuley said once the new site is up, it will have tools that continuously fix broken links. 2. INTRODUCTION TO THE COMPARATIVE STUDY ON CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES Councilmember Mesaros said the packet includes a brief outline of information for Council consideration and input. With regard to the selection of ten cities, he explained the intent is to select five cities with in- house counsel and five that use external legal services and use those as comparators. The 18 cities listed are part of the AWC actuarial group that is comparable to Edmonds. Of the 18 cities, 12 are in the Puget Sound region. Councilmember Mesaros relayed Mr. Taraday's comment that there may not be five cities with in-house services and five that use external legal services from this list. Councilmember Mesaros invited Council input on other cities that could be used as comparators and he will affirm at next week's meeting which ten cities had been selected. He relayed a request from Councilmember Teitzel to add a letter "e" question under In -House Legal Services and External Legal Services regarding the total hours of services. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 14 7.1.a Council President Fraley-Monillas commented she was used to working with the L5 list of cities that are similar to Edmonds. She suggested including Lynnwood, Mukilteo and Shoreline as comparator cities. She noted this was a good list of cities but Moses Lake, Port Angeles, Walla Walla, Pasco, Longview, and Kennewick may not have same cost of living. She suggested considering that when selecting comparator cities. Councilmember Mesaros said that was the reason for his comment that 12 of the 18 were Puget Sound cities. Council President Fraley-Monillas inquired about the L5 list of cities. Councilmember Mesaros said it includes Bothell, Burien, Des Moines, Issaquah, Lacey, Lynnwood, Puyallup and Sammamish; Mukilteo and Shoreline are not on the L5 list. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested another thing to consider is the asset size of the city; the more assets a city has, the more trouble they may have. With regard to in-house legal services, she was interested in the evaluation procedures and the independence of the attorney since he/she can be fired at will by the mayor. She suggested researching how that is handled by other cities with in-house attorneys. Councilmember Tibbott asked whether cities with in-house attorneys have a hybrid approach that includes external legal services. The current City Attorney provides a full range of attorney services with different levels of expertise which is an advantage that would not be available with an in-house attorney. Councilmember Mesaros said Question lb, What are your additional costs for hiring legal services for lawsuits or special projects? was intended to discover that. Councilmember Nelson referred to the statement in the opening paragraph, In addition there will be data gathered to assess the opportunity to provide prosecutor services through the same law firm. This was the first he had heard about the law firm also providing prosecutor services. Councilmember Mesaros referred Council discussion in July 2019 about the process which included evaluating whether to include prosecutor services. That question was included in this survey so that other cities' procedures could be considered in the evaluation. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if Councilmembers Mesaros and Teitzel were aware the HR Department was currently working on the prosecutor's contract and interviewing. She suggested asking the number of hours the in-house and external attorneys are present in the city. Councilmember Mesaros said that was addressed by Councilmember Teitzel's suggestion for an additional question. Council President Fraley-Monillas was specifically interested in the hours they spend in the city. Councilmember Mesaros said when the ten cities are determined, Council/Legislative Assistant Maureen Judge will conduct six surveys and as he and Councilmember Teitzel will each conduct two. Review of the data is tentatively scheduled for review at the November 4 Council meeting. He hoped to present a summary of the evaluations received at next week's meeting. Once that is presented, Council President Fraley- Monillas requested a copy of the evaluations be retained in the Council office. 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling referred to the fine art community in Edmonds, noting the opportunity to tour artists' studios this Saturday and Sunday. The tours are a fabulous opportunity to see a lot of great art and talk to the artists. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Tibbott reported the studio tour is one of his favorites. He agreed it was a great opportunity to see art up close and learn how creative people develop their ideas. While on a hike at Meadowdale Beach recently, he picked up guides on Snohomish County trails for Councilmembers which are available in the Council office. The guide includes a great description of Meadowdale Beach and other hikes in Snohomish County. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 11 Packet Pg. 15 7.1.a Councilmember Buckshnis reminded of Paws in the Pool this weekend at Yost Pool sponsored by the Edmonds Parks & Recreation. The pool will be closed for the season after this event. Dogs under 50 pounds are welcome from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. for dogs over 50 pounds. A number of sponsors are also participating. Councilmember Buckshnis displayed an Edmonds Tribute Review newspaper dated December 9, 1954 given to her by a friend, noting there were problems with Esperance even then. The newspaper is an interesting read including Snake Road becoming Olympic View Drive. She hoped the newspaper could be given to the historic museum. Councilmember Buckshnis reported she will be calling into the Council meeting next week from Wisconsin. Councilmember Johnson reported in addition to studio tour, this weekend is the first Edmonds Oktober Fest at the Frances Anderson Center field sponsored by the Rotary Club. Council President Fraley-Monillas invited any Councilmember interested in the Scarecrow Festival to put together a scarecrow for display in front of City Hall. She encouraged the public to attend the Friendship Festival at Harvey Airfield in Snohomish County on Saturday from 1-4 p.m., a free event that includes rides, food, activities and a live band. She thanked Councilmembers Nelson and Johnson and Student Representative Bauder for volunteering for the Indigenous People Outreach Task Force. Councilmember Nelson will chair the task force and the members will determine meeting times. She looked forward to future discussions. Councilmember Mesaros reported two years ago when his wife and he went on the studio tour, his wife won a door prize provided by one of the artists. He agreed the studio tour was a fun day. Councilmember Nelson referred to the weight classifications for the Paws in Pool, noting he probably won't bring his 165 pound dog. 13. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) At 8:37 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 10 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. Action may occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers Johnson, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Tibbott, Mesaros and Nelson. City Attorney Jeff Taraday was also present. The executive session concluded at 8:50 p.m. 14. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 8:51 p.m. There was no decision as a result of meeting in executive session. 15. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:52 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 17, 2019 Page 12 Packet Pg. 16 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/24/2019 Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #238661 through #238767 dated September 19, 2019 for $627,346.01. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #63915 through #63921 for $580,566.84, benefit checks #63922 through #63926 and wire payments of $592,646.69 for the pay period September 1, 2019 through September 15, 2019. Approval of replacement payroll check #63927. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 09-19-19 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 09-19-19 payroll summary 09-20-19 payroll benefits 09-19-19 Packet Pg. 17 7.2.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM City of Edmonds aD L 3 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account .y Amoun 0 a aD 238661 9/19/2019 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 78789 INV 78789 - EDMONDS PD - M.BOW BLAUER PANTS r y 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 89.9£ 2 BLAUER S/S SHIRTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 ui 129.9£ 2 NAME TAPES 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 t 16.0( u 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 23.6( r- Total: 259.5, -0 238662 9/19/2019 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 25032 W WTP: 9/5/19 PEST CONTROL SEF Pest Control Service mm o 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 73.0( `>, 10.4% Sales Tax a 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 7.5£ E Total : 80.55 'Fu 238663 9/19/2019 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 919603 YOUTH COMMISSION VESTS SCRE p YOUTH COMMISSION VESTS SCRE 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 50.9E o 10.4% Sales Tax L a 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 a 5.3( Q Total : 56.2E 238664 9/19/2019 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 10506 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- o6 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CF 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 221,016.6( N Total: 221,016.6( E .ii 238665 9/19/2019 076696 ALLPLAY SYSTEMS LLC 2019-102 SEAVIEW PARK PLAYGROUND EO( U SEAVIEW PARK PLAYGROUND EO( 125.000.64.594.76.65.00 85,352.6E E 10.4% Sales Tax 125.000.64.594.76.65.00 U 19,791.9E Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 18 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238665 9/19/2019 076696 076696 ALLPLAY SYSTEMS LLC 238666 9/19/2019 071634 ALLSTREAM Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 16376305 PO # Description/Account Total C/A 768328 PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929; 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 Total 238667 9/19/2019 065568 ALLWATER INC 082819042 FINANCE DEPT WATER Finance dept water 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 090519041 WWTP: 9/12/19 DRINK WATER SER 9/12/19 DRINK WATER SERVICE 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 090519052 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT W, PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT W, 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT W, 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 091019027 FINANCE DEPT WATER Finance dept water 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 Total: 238668 9/19/2019 074488 ALPHA COURIER INC 20204 WWTP: 8/16/19 R/T COURIER SER\ 7.2.a Page: 2 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 105,144.6: 0 U d L_ 975.1 , N 10.5E t U 10.5E 996.2' c c �a 47.6( — 0 4.9E a E 70.5( 0 7.3< 0 0 L a 40.2E Q 30.0( r' o6 4.1 � c6 0 E 53.1E 2 U 5.5< 263.5( E t U �a Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 19 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 3 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 238668 9/19/2019 074488 ALPHA COURIER INC (Continued) 0 8/16/19 R/T COURIER SERVICE TO 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 29.7( u Total: 29.7( •`- 238669 9/19/2019 001528 AM TEST INC 111909 WWTP: 503 METALS - SAMPLE #19 N 503 METALS - SAMPLE #19-A01140I 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 110.0( r 111924 WWTP: AMMONIA,TOTAL&NITRATE SAMPLE 19-A012249: AMMONIA, T, c 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 115.0( Total: 225.0( c 238670 9/19/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1991368499 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE �a PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 2.3- a PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 8.7; •E PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 8.7; p PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS �a 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 8.7, p PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE a 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 8.7, Q PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 8.7z 10.4% Sales Tax C6 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.2z c6 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.9- E 10.4% Sales Tax f° 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 U 0.9- ; 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.9" E 10.4% Sales Tax U 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.9" Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 20 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 4 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 238670 9/19/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 0 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.91 U 1991402233 WWTP: 9/4/19 UNIFORMSJOWELS L Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 47.8E 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 4.9E v 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.3E c Uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 3.5( 1991412165 WWTP: 9/11/19 UNIFORMSJOWEL Mats/Towels o 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 47.8E >+ Uniforms a 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 3.5( 10.4% Sales Tax ca 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 4.9E u 10.4% Sales Tax 0 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.3E > 1991412166 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 0 L PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE a a 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 57.41 Q 10.4% Sales Tax rn 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.9E , 1991412167 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS T- FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS c 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 29.1 , E 10.4% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.0' Z 1991417765 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE a� 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6( t PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE U Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 21 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238670 9/19/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 238671 9/19/2019 075061 ARTSITE LTD LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1991417766 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 Total 1695 PA MAINT: VISION AND BEACH LAI. PA MAINT: VISION AND BEACH LAL 7.2.a Page: 5 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a (D 6.1- 'D U d 6.1- 13 6.1- m 6.1- v 6.0� c a� 0.1 �a 0.6z o L �a 0.6z E 0.6z 0.6z 0 0.6- o a a Q 9.2� c) o6 19.1( rn 0 0.9, M 1.9£ 326.7F aD E t U �a Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 22 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238671 9/19/2019 075061 ARTSITE LTD LLC 238672 9/19/2019 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 238673 9/19/2019 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 238674 9/19/2019 075342 BORUCHOW ITZ, ROBERT Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 117.200.64.575.50.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 117.200.64.575.50.41.00 Tota I : 0105483-IN WWTP: DIESEL FUEL ULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel (include 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 Tota I : 110610 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area Printing 438 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 438 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Printing 438 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 438 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area Postage 438 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.1 % Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 Total 06190819 LEGAL SERVICES JUNE THRU AUC PUBLIC DEFENSE SERVICES 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 7.2.a Page: 6 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 1,612.8( 'D r U d 167.7< .L 1,780.5: N m 1,993.4( m c 207.3, 2,200.7, c �a 0 28.1 � a 28.1 � E U 29.0 c �a 109.5( p L a 109.5( Q 2.8E rn o6 2.8E c6 0 2.9, E 313.0' c a� E 1,933.3 U �a Q Page: 6 Packet Pg. 23 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 7 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 238674 9/19/2019 075342 075342 BORUCHOWITZ, ROBERT (Continued) Total : 0 1,933.X as 238675 9/19/2019 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 333252 PW YARD - GRAVEL PW YARD - GRAVEL 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 1,159.3E PW YARD - GRAVEL 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 1,159.3E PW YARD - GRAVEL 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1,159.3E PW YARD - GRAVEL c 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1,159.3E � 10.4% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 120.5E 10.4% Sales Tax o 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 120.5E 10.4% Sales Tax a 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 120.5E 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 120.5 1 u Total: 5,119.& o 238676 9/19/2019 076378 CAMFIL USA INC 30111965 WWTP: 30/30 24X24X2 7a 0 30/30 24X24X2 a 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 234.4E Q 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 24.3E Total : 258.8E 238677 9/19/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 20546999 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091/0521 Finance dept copier contract charge E 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 209.6- .m 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 21.7� c 20547001 PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON' E PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON' M 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 231.4( Q Page: 7 Packet Pg. 24 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 238677 9/19/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 20547002 20547004 20547007 20547008 20547011 20550963 238678 9/19/2019 064592 CASCADE COLUMBIA DIST CO 722112 PO # Description/Account CANON 5250 contract charge September 2019 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 contract charge September 2019 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 contract charge September 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 CANON 2501F contract charge September 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 PARK MAINT IRC2501F COPIER COI PARKS IRC2501F COPIER CONTRAi 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 COUNCIL CANON COPIER Monthly copier lease for September 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 ENG COPIER SEPTEMBER 2019 Eng Copier September 2019 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 Total WWTP: 5/15/18 DRUM RETURN CR 7.2.a Page: 8 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m r U d 167.6E 13 20.9( m t 20.9( u 17.4< c a� 2.1f �a 2.1f o L �a a 26.4, 2.7E u 0 Ta 35.7( o a a Q 29.1E o6 Tmm 26.4z c 2.7E E c 308.8- aD 1,126.2E E U �a Q Page: 8 Packet Pg. 25 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 9 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 238678 9/19/2019 064592 CASCADE COLUMBIA DIST CO (Continued) 0 5/15/18 DRUM RETURN CREDIT (DI 423.000.76.535.80.31.50 -200.0( u 757711 WWTP: CALCIUM NITRATE SOLN. L CALCIUM NITRATE SOLN.: $1200 + 423.000.76.535.80.31.50 1,225.0( Container Deposit 423.000.76.535.80.31.50 200.0( u 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.50 127.4( (D Total : 1,352.4( M 238679 9/19/2019 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN08190996 GYMNASTICS HELIUM TANK RENT) GYMNASTICS HELIUM TANK RENT) o 001.000.64.571.28.31.00 16.4E ">, 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.571.28.31.00 1.7' RN08190997 WWTP: 8/2019 CYLINDER RENTAL- 8/2019 nitrogen, oxygen, carbon U 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 147.9( o 10.4% Sales Tax �a 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 15.3E 0- Total: 181.4' a Q 238680 9/19/2019 063902 CITY OF EVERETT 119002909 WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS r' 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 1,759.4( Total : 1,759.4( o� 0 238681 9/19/2019 022200 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 3622 INV 3622 CUST 21999 EDMONDS P TASTE OF EDMONDS SECURITY R 001.000.41.521.10.41.50 2,335.0z Total: 2,335.0' c a� 238682 9/19/2019 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE 9056920000 WWTP: 7/10-9/9/19 FLOWMETER 8' 7/10-9/9/19 FLOW METER #879026 U Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 26 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 238682 9/19/2019 035160 CITY OF SEATTLE (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 Tota I : 238683 9/19/2019 075837 CLEVELAND, PATRICK 091819 MILEAGE REIMB FOR BOC CLASS MILEAGE REIMB FOR BOC CLASS 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 Total 238684 9/19/2019 077219 COLLARD, SNEED 092019-BF-Collard BIRD FEST PRESENTATION SNEEE Bird Fest Presentation Father Son 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Tota I : 238685 9/19/2019 070753 CREAAFFILIATES LLC 190220-4 4TH AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDO 4TH AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDO 125.000.64.594.76.65.41 Tota I : 238686 9/19/2019 074444 DATAQUEST LLC 9836 BACKGROUND CHECKS - AUGUST AUGUST BACKGROUND CHECKS 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 AUGUST BACKGROUND CHECKS 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 Tota I : 238687 9/19/2019 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2020WA0024058#1 W WTP: 1 ST HALF 2020 WASTEWA7 1 ST HALF 2020 WASTEWATER PEF 423.000.76.535.80.41.50 Total 238688 9/19/2019 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY SLONG-SCOTT3 WWTP: SLONG-SCOTT WW OPER. SHANE LONG-SCOTT WW OPER. 3 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 Tota I : 238689 9/19/2019 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 19-3956 9/10/19 COMMITTEE MEETING 7.2.a Page: 10 Page: 10 Packet Pg. 27 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 238689 9/19/2019 064531 DINES, JEANNIE (Continued) 9/10/19 PPW, Finance, PSPP Comm 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 Tota I : 238690 9/19/2019 077201 DRUMCO 223055 WWTP: CHARGE TO P/U EMPTYTC Freight 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 Total 238691 9/19/2019 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 19-2915.3 TO 19-02.SERVICES THRU 9/1/19 TO 19-02.Services thru 9/1/19 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Tota I : 238692 9/19/2019 076517 DUENAS, ERIC ED-PNCWA9819 WWTP: EDUENAS: PER DIEM MEAI PER DIEM MEALS FOR 9/8-9/11/19 423.000.76.535.80.43.00 Tota I : 238693 9/19/2019 068292 EDGE ANALYTICAL 19-30578 WATER QUALITY - WATER SAMPLE WATER QUALITY - WATER SAMPLE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 Total 238694 9/19/2019 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 1-98909 PM SUPPLIES: WIXAIR AND FUEL I PM: 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1-99620 WWTP: 10W/30 4-STROKE OIL 10W/30 4-STROKE OIL 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Tota I : 7.2.a Page: 11 Page: 11 Packet Pg. 28 7.2.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 12 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM City of Edmonds a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 238695 9/19/2019 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 1444 TRAFFIC - SCREWS 0 m TRAFFIC - SCREWS 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 2.5( u 10.4% Sales Tax L 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 0.2E 1449 PM SUPPLIES: WRENCH, SOCKET PM SUPPLIES: WRENCH, SOCKET 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 41.5 � v 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.3, c 1453 PS SUPPLIES - NUTS, BOLTS, SCRI 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.0£ PS SUPPLIES - NUTS, BOLTS, SCRI 0 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4( >+ Total: 60.1: a E 238696 9/19/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 8100 L ZAKHARY 8100 L ZAKHARY YOUTH SCHOLAF 8100 L ZAKHARY YOUTH SCHOLAF U 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 66.0( o Total: 66.0( Ii 0 238697 9/19/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 5-00080 IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE a IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE Q' Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 51.2� v 5-10351 INTERURBAN TRAIL r' INTERURBAN TRAIL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 139.5( o� Total: 190.7: N E 238698 9/19/2019 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP SIP-E101477 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT AGREEME 2 Radix Monthly Maint Agreement - U 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 152.0( SIP-E104000 RADIX MONTHLY MAINTAGREEME Radix Monthly Maint Agreement - 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 152.0( Q Page: 12 Packet Pg. 29 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 238698 9/19/2019 031060 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP (Continued) 238699 9/19/2019 077217 ERGOFIT CONSULTING INC 2019-277 Description/Account Total LAURIE ROSE ERGO EVAL ERGO EVAL FOR LAURIE ROSE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total ; 238700 9/19/2019 077158 ERIKS NORTH AMERICA INC SE030902 WWTP: EXP. JOINT & NEO COVER EXP. JOINT & NEO COVER W/BUN/ 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 Total 238701 9/19/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH872452 LEGAL AD PLN20190036 Legal Ad: PLN20190036 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 EDH872460 LEGAL NOTICE PLN20190039 Legal Ad: PLN20190039 David Orvis 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 EDH872631 CITY ORDINANCE 4159 CITY ORDINANCE 4159 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 EDH873187 LEGAL AD PLN20190041 Legal Ad: David Muresan PLN20190i 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 EDH873208 LEGAL AD PLN20190035 Legal Ad: Mariah Sebastien PLN201! 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 Total 238702 9/19/2019 011900 FRONTIER 253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 7.2.a Page: 13 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 304.0( 0 U d L_ 417.5( 417.5( Y m 7,196.7, c d 748.4E -a 7,945.Z 0 L �a 79.6, a E U 61.5z c �a 50.4( a a Q 120.4( rn C6 109.2( c 421.11 E c 6.4< t 24.4< Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 30 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238702 9/19/2019 011900 FRONTIER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE' 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE' 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE' 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE' 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 425-712-8251 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC ALARM, FAX, PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 425-745-4313 CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 425-775-1344 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 425-775-7865 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI' 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Total: 7.2.a Page: 14 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 24.4' u L 24.4< N 24.4< v 24.4< m c a� 36.1- �a 36.1- o L �a a 17.2E E 86.2, u 0 72.4 > 0 L 72.4 a Q 96.6- cn o6 140.3< o E M 73.7( Z c (D 72.0z t 831.9' L) co Q Page: 14 Packet Pg. 31 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 15 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 238703 9/19/2019 077215 GOLD PICTURES INC 082319 DIVERSITY COMMISSION FILM 10/1 0 Diversity Commission film screening 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 99.0( U Total: 99.0( .` 238704 9/19/2019 076434 GOVANTES, JULIE GOVANTES 9/19 GOVANTES EXPENSE CLAIM - MAL N PER DIEM - MAUI, HI 9/8-9/12/19 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 546.0E r HOTEL - MAUI - 9/8-9/11/19 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 1,200.0( LYFT TO AIRPORT 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 35.7' FLIGHT TO/FM MAUI 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 570.9" o RENTAL CAR 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 123.81 a HOTEL PARKING 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 131.1 E 'ji FUEL FOR RENTAL CAR 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 31.5E 0 LYFT FROM AIRPORT 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 45.9 , o Total : 2,685.111, a Q 238705 9/19/2019 076542 GRANICUS 117167 LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT - AGE LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT - AGE rn 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 1,417.5" 10.4% Sales Tax o� 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 0 147.4' Total : 1,564.91 .E 238706 9/19/2019 012560 HACH COMPANY 11618975 WWTP: PIPPETTES 2ML _R U PIPPETTES 2ML c 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 140.1( E Freight U 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 53.5( Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 32 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 16 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 238706 9/19/2019 012560 HACH COMPANY (Continued) 0 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 20.1 z u 11621870 WWTP: FILTER FOR DQ3 WATER S L FILTER FOR DQ3 WATER SYSTEM 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 200.0( 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 20.8( v 11624978 WWTP: COD STD SOLN,BUFFER P' COD STD SOLN, BUFFER PWD PLV 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 2,423.6z Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 85.3E 10.4% Sales Tax o 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 260.9E >+ Total: 3,204.45 m ff 238707 9/19/2019 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 007K4235 WWTP: PIPE CPVC SCH80 PIPE CPVC SCH80 U 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 1,247.2( o Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 25.0( o 10.4% Sales Tax a 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 132.3, Q Total: 1,404.5, 238708 9/19/2019 076333 HASA INC 654542 WWTP: SOD. HYPOCHLORITE o6 SOD. HYPOCHLORITE o� 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 3,965.5, N 10.4% Sales Tax E 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 412.4- fd Total: 4,377.9: U c 238709 9/19/2019 065764 HASNER, THOMAS W 62 REIMBURSEMENT aD E REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 525.9, Q Page: 16 Packet Pg. 33 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.2.a Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 238709 9/19/2019 065764 065764 HASNER, THOMAS W (Continued) Total : 0 525.9: as 238710 9/19/2019 077171 HISTORICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 1908104 E4FE.TO 19-01.SERVICES THRU 8/; E4FE.TO 19-01.Services thru 8/31/1 p 422.000.72.594.31.65.41 538.5( Total : 538.5( Y 238711 9/19/2019 060165 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC 29453-R EBFC.SERVICES THRU 9/6/19 EBFC.Services thru 9/6/19 422.000.72.594.31.65.41 8,269.3� m 29601 175TH ST. SW SLOPE.SERVICES T 175th St. SW Slope.Services thru 8/2 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 720.0( r- Total : 8,989.31, 0 238712 9/19/2019 070250 IRON MOUNTAIN 201958304 08-19 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE L �a Aug-2019 Off site data storage servic a 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 228.7E E Total: 228.7E fd U 238713 9/19/2019 073780 KAMINS CONSTRUCTION INC E7CD.Ret Release E7CD.RETAINAGE RELEASE 4- 0 E7CD.Retainage Release > 126.000.223.400 5,357.6( o Total: 5,357.6( a Q 238714 9/19/2019 071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER 7704 7706 SOCCER 7704 7706 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INS 7704 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU( 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 594.0( 7706 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU( c 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 475.2( 7708 7710 SOCCER 7708 7710 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INS E 7708 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU( fd 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 792.0( }; 7710 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU( a� 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 831.6( t 7712 SOCCER 7712 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU( U 7712 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRU( Q Page: 17 Packet Pg. 34 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238714 9/19/2019 071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER 238715 9/19/2019 074184 KRESTEL, LES 238716 9/19/2019 073950 KUBWATER RESOURCES 238717 9/19/2019 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 238718 9/19/2019 065791 LEIRA Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Tota I : PNSCTA-LK-9-2019 WWTP: LKRESTEL-9/8-9/11/19 PNE LKRESTEL-9/8-9/11/19 PNSCTA WV 423.000.76.535.80.43.00 Total 08908 WWTP: POLYMER Polymer 423.000.76.535.80.31.51 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.51 Total INV-054812 ORANGE PAINT & MEASURING TAF Orange Paint 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 25' Measuring Tape 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 Total 1457 INV 1457 FALL CONF - EDMONDS F CONF REGISTRATION - KERN 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 CONF REGISTRATION - SCHEELE 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 CONF REGISTRATION - MANDEVILI 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 CONF REGISTRATION - BURKLANE 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 Total 7.2.a Page: 18 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 158.4( 'D 2,851.2( m L_ N 107.2E y 107.2E m c d 11,372.2E c �a 1,182.7, — 12,555.01 �a a E 5.7z 16.2( o �a 2.2£ a 24.2: Q rn o6 275.0( rn 0 275.0( 275.0( c 275.0( E 1,100.0( t U �a Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 35 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238719 9/19/2019 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC 238720 9/19/2019 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account Sept-19 09-19 LEGALS FEES 09-19 Legal fees 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 Total E0111959 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES INCORREC- CITY HALL - SUPPLIES INCORREC- 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 E0112012 FAC MAINT SUPPLIES - INCORREC FAC MAINT SUPPLIES - INCORREC 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 E0113586 FAC MAINT - UNIT# 5 - SUPPLIES C FAC MAINT - UNIT# 5 - SUPPLIES C 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 E0113587 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES CREDIT FOI CITY HALL - SUPPLIES CREDIT FOI 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 E0113590 FAC MAINT - UNIT# 5 - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - UNIT# 5 - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 E0113591 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES CITY HALL - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.2.a Page: 19 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a m 47,964.0( u 47,964.0( N m 137.9' v 13.7� a� 23.2' 0 2.3, �a a -23.2' -2.3, o �a 0 L -137.9< a- -1 Q 3.7� rn 23.2' c 2.3 .E ca U 137.9< y E t 14.0-, u Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 36 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 238720 9/19/2019 075716 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC (Continued) 238721 9/19/2019 067235 MARYS TOWING INC 79298 81082 238722 9/19/2019 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 14303059 14972261 15008608 Description/Account Total INV 79298 - EDMONDS PD TOW TOYOTA CAMRY -CS 19-2289� 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 INV 80092 - EDMONDS PD TOW CELICA -CASE 19-22379 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 INV 81082 - EDMONDS PD TOW HYUNDAI - CASE 19-22745 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total WWTP: L-KEY SET, SAW BLADES, L-KEY SET, SAW BLADES, SEALAN 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 WWTP: WEB SLINGS WEB SLINGS 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 WWTP: SAFETY GLASSES, LEATHE SAFETY GLASSES, LEATHER WK C 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 7.2.a Page: 20 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 177.51 0 U d L_ 189.0( N 19.6E 189.0( c 19.6E c �a 0 189.0( �a a 19.6E 625.9F 0 Ii 1,474.2E o L a 31.6-, Q 156.6- r' o6 704.2z N E 17.7, 2 U 75.0E E t U 730.8, +° Q Page: 20 Packet Pg. 37 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238722 9/19/2019 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 238723 9/19/2019 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 15520217 WWTP: PIPE SUPPLIES, ROPE PIPE NIPPLES, ROPE 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total 309902 WWTP: 8/1/19 PROPANE 8/1/19 PROPANE 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 312770 PM SUPPLIES: AIR FILTER KIT, SPA PM SUPPLIES: AIR FILTER KIT, SPA 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 312777 WWTP:9/10/19 PROPANE Propane 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 312785 PM SUPPLIES: CONCRETE EQUIPK PM SUPPLIES: CONCRETE EQUIPK 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total: 7.2.a Page: 21 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 23.5E u L 78.4E N m 330.6z v 17.71 c a� 36.2< 3,677.1; 0 �a a 28.9E 3.0- u 4- 0 �a 20.4E o a a 2.1< Q rn 35.1E C6 3.6E E 2 U 46.2( c a� 4.8( E 144.4° u Q Page: 21 Packet Pg. 38 7.2.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 22 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM City of Edmonds a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 238724 9/19/2019 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC WA33-797455 WWTP: F48 100-RM MOUNTED UNI 0 m F48 100-RM MOUNTED UNIT 4-13OL 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 176.2z u Freight L 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 147.7' 10.4% Sales Tax Y 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 33.6E WA33-798124 WWTP: HYD FILTERS v HYD FILTERS 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 1,025.9, c Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 85.2E 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 115.5E o Total: L 1,584.4( a 238725 9/19/2019 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0543120-IN WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 60.8' u WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES o 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 60.8, > 10.4% Sales Tax o 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 6.3' a 10.4% Sales Tax Q 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 6.3, 0548483-IN WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES °6 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 481.1 E c WATER/ SEWER - SUPPLIES 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 481.1 .E 10.4% Sales Tax f° U 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 50.0z +: 10.4% Sales Tax (D 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 50.0z t Total: 1,196.7: u Q Page: 22 Packet Pg. 39 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238726 9/19/2019 070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 10208310 238727 9/19/2019 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S9467409.001 238728 9/19/2019 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 337 000 00 338 238729 9/19/2019 076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA 65325711 238730 9/19/2019 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 3685-377772 3685-377819 3685-390069 PO # Description/Account FSA FEES - AUGUST FSA FEES - AUGUST 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 Total : WWTP: HUBBELL LIGHTING FIXTUI HUBBELL LIGHTING FIXTURES 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total PLANNING BOARD MINUTES Planning Board Minutes (8.28.19) 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 ADB MEETING MINUTES ADB Meeting Minutes (9.4.19) 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total HEP B VACCINE HEP B VACCINE - ENGINEERING 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 Total FLEET RETURN - INVOICE# 3685-4; FLEET RETURN - INVOICE# 36854 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 FLEET RETURN ORIGINAL FLEET RETURN ORIGINAL 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 FLEET RETURNED ITEM - CREDIT I 7.2.a Page: 23 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 161.0( u 161.0( •` N m 7,424.0, 772.1( 8,196.1i c �a 370.0( �a a 499.5( •E 869.5( U 4- 0 Ta 94.0( a 94.0( Q rn o6 86.2E rn 0 8.8E E M -86.2£ -8.9 t U co Q Page: 23 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238730 9/19/2019 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) FLEET RETURNED ITEM - CREDIT 1 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3685-399973 FLEET - PARTS RETURNED ON INV FLEET - PARTS RETURNED ON INV 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3685-400053 FLEET - PARTS RETURNED ORIW FLEET - PARTS RETURNED ORIW 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3685-409535 FLEET - EAR MUFFS FLEET - EAR MUFFS 511.000.77.548.68.35.00 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.35.00 3685-418416 UNIT 136 - PARTS UNIT 136 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3685-427724 FLEET - PARTS RETURN ORIGINAL FLEET - PARTS RETURN ORIGINAL 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3685-427727 FLEET - PARTS- FLEET-PARTS- 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 7.2.a Page: 24 W L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 79.7z u L_ 8.2- N m 1.3z u 0.1z c c -1.3z 0 -0.1 z `>+ M a E 99.9E .� 10.4( 0 �a 0 L 214.3( a Q 22.2� o6 -10.0( c -1.OE •� c 10.0( t 1.0E Q Page: 24 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 238730 9/19/2019 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS (Continued) 3685-429257 3685-429800 3685-429803 3685-430453 238731 9/19/2019 069633 PET PROS 0017288-IN 238732 9/19/2019 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 238733 9/19/2019 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS PO # Description/Account UNIT 89 - PARTS UNIT 89 - PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 FLEET RETURN - CREDIT INVOICE; FLEET RETURN - CREDIT INVOICE; 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 FLEET RETURN - ORIGINAL INVOIC FLEET RETURN - ORIGINAL INVOIC 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.0% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 FLEET RETURNED PARTS ORIGIN/ FLEET RETURNED PARTS ORIGIN/ 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total INV 0017288-IN - EDMONDS PD 2 BAGS OF DOG FOOD- ACE 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 Total V891619 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9/12/19 Total ACCT 4371 EDMONDS PD 9/12/19 7.2.a Page: 25 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 21.7, 13 2.2( m z U 86.2E m c 8.9 1 M c �a -86.5, o L -8.6E a E -87.9E v 45 371.0( 0 �a 0 L a a 134.3E Q rn 14.1- 148A4 rn 0 E 594.3, T U 61.8- 656.1: E t U co Q Page: 25 Packet Pg. 42 7.2.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 26 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 238733 9/19/2019 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS (Continued) FUEL - TOP OFF BEFORE DNDO E? 001.000.41.521.22.43.00 26.0E u FUEL - AFTER DNDO EXERCISE L 001.000.41.521.22.43.00 96.8, Total: 122.9, m 238734 9/19/2019 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL v ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 122 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 129.0E 31146525 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL Fire Inspection CITY HALL 121 5TH F 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 84.8E 730531 ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF o 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 50.9, a ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 50.9z ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 45.8z o ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF is 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 58.5E o ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF a 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 25.4, Q ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF rn 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 22.9, "" 730531 ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF °- ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF c 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 32.9' ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF E 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 32.9 u ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF }; 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 29.6z W ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF E 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 37.8, U Q Page: 26 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238734 9/19/2019 064088 PROTECTION ONE 238735 238736 238737 238738 9/19/2019 068697 PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 2019-0555 9/19/2019 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 19-037S 9/19/2019 073885 RANDOLPH, PAMELA 9/19/2019 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 PR-PNCWA9719 3-0197-0800478 3-0197-0800897 PO # Description/Account ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 Total AGENCY ADD -ON FEE AUGUST AGENCY ADD -ON 001.000.22.521.10.41.00 Total : 04-2019 CLEAN AIR ASSESSMENT 04-19 Clean Air Assessment per RC\ 001.000.39.553.70.41.50 Total WWTP: PRANDOLPH PER DIEM+E; PAMELA RANDOLPH PER DIEM+EX 423.000.76.535.80.43.00 Total FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 7.2.a Page: 27 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 16.4E u 14.8- 633.2 , m z 130.0( 130.0( c �a 9,153.2E 9,153.2E a E U 206.2, o 206.2 , 0 a a 203.4' Q rn o6 34.3( rn 0 130.3< 130.3' u c 130.3' E t 130.3' Q Page: 27 Packet Pg. 44 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238738 9/19/2019 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 238739 9/19/2019 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 238740 9/19/2019 071660 SARVEY WILDLIFE CENTER 238741 9/19/2019 065001 SCHIRMAN, RON 238742 9/19/2019 072733 SCHWING BIOSET INC 238743 9/19/2019 036955 SKY NURSERY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 3-0197-0801132 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 3-0197-0829729 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 Total 5-024410 UNIT 454, G12 - BATTERIES UNIT 454, G12 - BATTERIES 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.4% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Total 092019-BF-Sarvey BIRD FEST PRESENTATION SARVE Bird Fest Presentation Raptor Educat 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Tota I : 63 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 Tota I : 61422627 WWTP: 9/2019 RENTAL CHG FOR F 9/2019 RENTAL CHG FOR HYDRAU 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total T-1443403/T-1441752 PM CREDIT FOR OVERPAID TAX Rf PM CREDIT FOR OVERPAID TAX R� 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 T-1443409/T-1441754 PM CREDIT FOR OVERPAID TAX R� 7.2.a Page: 28 Page: 28 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238743 9/19/2019 036955 SKY NURSERY 238744 9/19/2019 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) PM CREDIT FOR OVERPAID TAX Rf 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 T-1451383/T-1451097 PM CREDIT FOR OVERPAID TAX R� PM CREDIT FOR OVERPAID TAX R� 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 T-1463196 PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS PM: FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 10.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 Total 7654 SKYHAWKS 7654 SKYHAWKS CREDIT: REGISTI 7654 SKYHAWKS CREDIT: REGISTI 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 7655 SKYHAWKS 7655 SKYHAWKS CREDIT: REGISTI 7655 SKYHAWKS CREDIT: REGISTI 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 7657 SKYHAWKS 7657 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 7657 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 7659 SKYHAWKS 7659 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 7659 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 7661 SKYHAWKS 7661 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 7661 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 7664 SKYHAWKS 7664 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 7664 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 7665 SKYHAWKS 7665 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 7665 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 7668 SKYHAWKS 7668 SKYHAWKS CREDIT: REGISTI 7668 SKYHAWKS CREDIT: REGISTI 7.2.a Page: 29 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U L_ -0.1 < m 239.1 m c 24.4( M 263.01 �a 0 -217.0( a E -353.7E U 4- 0 1,575.0( o a a Q 1,901.2E rn Tmm 2,070.5( c E 560.0( 12 c aD 1,349.2E E t U �a Q Page: 29 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 238744 9/19/2019 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY (Continued) 7873 SKYHAWKS 238745 9/19/2019 071502 SLENKER, ROBERT RS-PNCWA9819 238746 9/19/2019 075628 SNO CO DEPT OF EMERG MGMT 1000510353 238747 9/19/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200202554 200650851 200651644 200723021 201383270 202114484 202540647 PO # Description/Account 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 7873 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 7873 SKYHAWKS BASKETBALL CAI 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total WWTP: RSLENKER-PER DIEM+EXF RSLENKER-PER DIEM+EXPENSES 423.000.76.535.80.43.00 Total 03-2019 EMERGENCY COMM & DIc Q3-2019 Emergency Communication 001.000.39.525.60.41.50 Total WWTP: 8/3-9/3/19 FLOWMETER 101 8/3-9/3/19 FLOW METER 2400 HIGI- 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 CITY PARK RESTROOMS CITY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 CITY PARK GAZEBO CITY PARK GAZEBO 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 7.2.a Page: 30 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m -42.2E 'D U m 1,394.2E 8,237.21 m z 97.01 c 97.0 , c �a 13,273.7E 13,273.7E a E U 18.3, o �a 20.4( a a Q 758.6( 0) rn T- C6 27.8( c E 20.0' c aD 76.7, t U �a Q Page: 30 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238747 9/19/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 205184385 220547574 238748 9/19/2019 037521 SNO CO TREASURER 00479000100302 238749 9/19/2019 072776 SNOHOMISH CONSERVATION DIST 4083 238750 9/19/2019 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 75511 SOW 5101 238751 9/19/2019 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103584 PO # Description/Account SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 191 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 Total 2019 SECOND HALF SURFACE W4 2019 Surface Water Charges - 23009 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 Total SURFACE WATER SERVICES 2019 Surface Water Services 2019 422.000.72.531.40.48.00 Surface Water Services 2019 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 Total PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 ILLEGAL DUMP FEES 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 WWTP: 8/31/19 SOLID WASTE CHA 8/31/19 HAZARDOUS WASTE DROF 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 Total WWTP: RECYCLING Recycling + taxes 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 7.2.a Page: 31 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 17.1 u 26.0( m t v 70.6' 1,035.9( c d c �a 199.0E o 199.0f �a a E 1,444.0, a 0 910.3E ii 2,354.4( p L Q a Q 1,361.0( r' rn 15.0( , 0 E 43.0( 'R 1,419.0( c aD E t 38.7E Q Page: 31 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 238751 9/19/2019 038300 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO (Continued) 238752 9/19/2019 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L132588 238753 9/19/2019 072790 TCC PRINTING & IMAGING 2481 238754 9/19/2019 071666 TETRATECH INC 51455311 238755 9/19/2019 075587 THE UPS STORE #6392 0004 PO # Description/Account 08-19 AUDIT FEES 08-19 Audit Fees 001.000.39.514.20.41.50 08-19 Audit Fees 111.000.68.543.30.41.50 08-19 Audit Fees 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 08-19 Audit Fees 422.000.72.531.90.41.50 08-19 Audit Fees 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 08-19 Audit Fees 423.000.76.535.80.41.50 08-19 Audit Fees 511.000.77.548.68.41.50 08-19 Audit Fees 512.000.31.518.87.41.00 Total Total ; EAC: WOTS CONFERENCE MATER EAC: WOTS CONFERENCE MATER 117.100.64.573.20.49.00 10.4% Sales Tax 117.100.64.573.20.49.00 Total ESDB.SERVICES THRU 6/14/19 ESDB.Services thru 6/14/19 112.000.68.595.33.65.41 Total WWTP: 8/6, 8/22 & 8/27/19 SHIP CH S8/6, 8/22 & 8/27/19 SHIP CHGS 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 7.2.a Page: 32 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 38.7E 0 U d L_ 3,336.5< N 119.7E y U 1,358.5E m c 717.0, 1,741.1( 0 361.5� ">, M a 220.7E 75.5, U 7,930.8E o 0 0 L a 305.3� Q 31.7E 337.1E rn 0 E 990.8< .� 990.& c a� E t 33.3E M Q Page: 32 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 238755 9/19/2019 075587 075587 THE UPS STORE #6392 (Continued) 238756 9/19/2019 073749 THE WATERSHED COMPANY 2019-1215 238757 9/19/2019 068105 THORSON BARNETT & MCDONALD PC 82651 238758 238759 238760 238761 9/19/2019 077214 TIM BOYER PHOTOGRAPHY LLC 9/19/2019 074494 UK SOCCER ELITE 9/19/2019 073310 UNISAFE INC 092019-BF-Boyer 7683 SOCCER ►Li1.9711r1 9/19/2019 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER 81796 82281 PO # Description/Account Total PROF CONSULTANT TREE BOARD Prof Services - Tree Board Consultan 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES - DOMESTIC REL 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 Total BIRD FEST PRESENTATION TIM BC Bird Fest keynote presentation 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total 7683 UK ELITE SUMMER SOCCER 1 7683 UK ELITE SUMMER SOCCER 1 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total WWTP: NITRILE HD EXAM GLOVE NITRILE HD EXAM GLOVES 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total ROADWAY MATERIALS & PARKS M, ROADWAY - MATERIALS 3- WAY TC 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 PARK MAINTENANCE - DUMP FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 ROADWAY MATERIALS & PARKS M, ROADWAY - MATERIALS 3- WAY TC 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 PARKS MAINTENANCE - DUMP FEE 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 7.2.a Page: 33 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 33.3E 0 U d L_ 472.5( T3 472.5( Y m 238.0( m 238.0( a0i c �a 500.0( o 500.0( a E 3,508.8( 3,508.8( 0 7i 0 L a a 1,078.8( Q 1,078.8( o6 rn 194.0z E 315.0( c aD 161.7( E t U 1,170.0( Q Page: 33 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 238761 9/19/2019 077070 077070 UNITED RECYCLING & CONTAINER (Continued) 238762 9/19/2019 071549 UNIVAR USA INC KT579899 238763 9/19/2019 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 9060152 238764 9/19/2019 077216 WACKER, DOUGLAS W 9070154 Z1H.11M 092019-BR-Wacker PO # Description/Account WWTP: SOD. BISULFITE SOD. BISULFITE 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 10.4% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 Total Total ; UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 Total BIRD FEST PRESENTATION DOUG[ Bird Fest presentation Crows of Both( 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 7.2.a Page: 34 (D L 3 c (a Amoun y 0 1,840.7' 0 U d L_ 1,904.4, N 198.0E 2,102.41 v m c d 134.9E -a c (a 134.9E — 0 139.0' a E 139.6' 0 139.6< 0 0 143.8E a a Q 123.4E o6 123.4E c6 0 127.2( E 1,206.1E c (D E 50.0( (a Q Page: 34 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 238764 9/19/2019 077216 077216 WACKER, DOUGLAS W 238765 9/19/2019 075155 WALKER MACY LLC 238766 9/19/2019 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Total P3282.04-16 CIVIC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CIVIC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 126.000.64.594.76.65.41 Total 11380932 PARK MAINT: SUPPLIES PARK MAINT: SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 11383242 RECYCLE - SUPPLIES RECYCLE - SUPPLIES 421.000.74.537.90.49.00 10.4% Sales Tax 421.000.74.537.90.49.00 11383243 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 238767 9/19/2019 076625 WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 16792 107 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 107 Vouchers in this report Total : WINDWARD JULY 19 TASK 4 WILLC Last invoice before Open House - TaE 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 Total Bank total Total vouchers 7.2.a Page: 35 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 50.0( 0 U d L_ 42,164.4- 42,164.41 m 979.5( m c d 101.8-, c �a 495.2( �a a 51.5( U 28.8( o 1i 3.0( c 1,659.8, a a Q rn 5,618.7E o6 5,618.7° C6 0 627,346.01 627,346.01 u c aD E t U �a Q Page: 35 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 09/19/2019 1:52:35PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 7.2.a Page: 36 Amoun Page: 36 Packet Pg. 53 7.2.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Proiect Engineering Accounting Proiect vi Funding Proiect Title Number Number STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB E STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE Q. SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 ESGA SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB c tv STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA r U) STIR2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 EBDA m STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 EBCB SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 EBCE = SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GClid ui STIR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 EBAA v O t WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 EBCD r WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC m c STIR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC m STIR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB c tv STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA — O STIR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB tv SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 EBGA Q- STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 EBJA O STIR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STIR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD > O L UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 EBJB Q- WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB Q WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA STIR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA rn STIR 220th Adaptive i028 EBAB c N STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB m STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC E O STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD ? O STIR238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC a STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB d rn STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA r m STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 EBCC Li STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD m STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 EBDB E STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing i040 E9DA r r Q STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E9FA Revised 9/18/2019 Packet Pg. 54 7.2.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Proiect Engineering Accounting Proiect Funding Proiect Title Number Number STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 E5DB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA PRK Frances Anderson Center Bandshell Replacement c477 E6MB STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol l E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 EYE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c540 E9MA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA STR Walnut St. Walkway (6th-7th) i044 E9DC PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 9/18/2019 Packet Pg. 55 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) 7.2.b Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number ProiectTitle i042 2020 Overlay Program STIR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STIR nset Walkway Improvements STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c380 monds Marsh Feasibility Study STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkwav (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STIR E3DD STM EYE c410 STM E4FD c436 SWR E4GB c456 SWR WWTP E4HA c446 STIR E5AA c470 STIR E5DB c478 c479 SWR E5GA c469 s011 WWTP E5HA c481 c482 WTR E51KA c473 UTILITIES E5NA solo STIR E6AA s014 STIR E6AB i015 STIR E6DA c485 STIR E6DB s016 STIR E6DD i017 h STM E6FA i011 STM E6FB c486 E6FD s017 STM E6FE c491 i013 SWR E6GB c488 UTILITIES E6JA s013 WTR E6JC c493 PRK E6MB c477 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Lake Ballinger Associated Projects Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab Trackside Warning System Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Seaview Park Infiltration Facility 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating Standard Details Updates Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) ADA Transition Plan Minor Sidewalk Program Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements Stormwater Comp Plan Update 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project Utility Rate Update 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects 2018 Waterline Replacement Project Veteran's Plaza Frances Anderson Center Bandshell Replacement ■ ■ Ed Revised 9/18/2019 Packet Pg. 56 7.2.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number ProiectTitle udible Pedestrian Signals STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) STR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming i028 220th Adaptive STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i030 2018 Overlay Program STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps ■ E8DC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study c521 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Updat PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor 9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming STR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study STR HAD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i036 2019 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program E9DC Walnut St. Walkway (6th-7th) STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Revised 9/18/2019 Packet Pg. 57 7.2.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1 DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR ElCA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects STIR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating STIR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project PRK E6MB c477 Frances Anderson Center Bandshell Replacement STIR E5DB c478 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR E5,113 c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II STM E6FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW PRK E7MA c496 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71 st Ave Storm Improvements WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project FAC E9MA c540 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South PRK E7MA c544 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive Revised 9/18/2019 Packet Pg. 58 7.2.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects STIR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STIR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STIR EBAA i027 2018 Traffic Calming STIR EBAB i028 220th Adaptive STIR EBCA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STIR EBCB i030 2018 Overlay Program STIR EBCC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STIR EBDA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project STIR EBDB i033 ADA Curb Ramps WTR EBCD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR EBCE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STIR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program STIR EBDC i037 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps STIR E9AA i038 2019 Traffic Calming STIR E9AB i039 2019 Guardrail Install STIR E9DA i040 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing STIR E9DB i041 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program STIR EOCA i042 2020 Overlay Program WTR E9CB i043 2019 Waterline Overlay STIR E9DC i044 Walnut St. Walkway (6th-7th) STIR E9AD i045 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization UTILITIES ESNA solo Standard Details Updates SWR ESGB s0l l Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update STIR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STIR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM EBFA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study UTILITIES EBJB s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update STIR E9AC s021 2019 Downtown Parking Study STM E9FA s022 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design Revised 9/18/2019 Packet Pg. 59 7.2.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South c540 E9MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PRK Frances Anderson Center Bandshell Replacement c477 E6MB PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) c544 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 E7MA PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) m103 E7MA STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 EBFB STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 EBFA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 EBFC STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB STM Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design s022 E91FA STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E41FE STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E61FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 EYE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 ESFD STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 EBDA STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 EBCB STR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 EBAA STR 2019 Downtown Parking Study s021 E9AC STR 2019 Guardrail Install i039 E9AB STR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA STR 2019 Pedestrian Safety Program i041 E9DB STR 2019 Traffic Calming i038 E9AA STR 2019 Traffic Signal Upgrades i045 E9AD STR 2020 Overlay Program i042 EOCA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD STR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 EBDC STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 EBCA Revised 9/18/2019 Packet Pg. 60 7.2.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1 CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STIR Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing iO4o E9DA STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STIR Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector c478 E5DB STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STIR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STIR Walnut St. Walkway (6th-7th) i044 E9DC STIR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 E8GA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study sol l E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s02o E8JB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 E8JA WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay i043 E9CB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 9/18/2019 Packet Pg. 61 7.2.c Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 929 (09/01/2019 to 09/15/2019) c Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount -ed2 REGULAR HOURS Educational Pav Correction 0.00 -156.28 112 ABSENT NO PAY NON HIRED 56.00 0.00 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 534.00 22,024.10 122 VACATION VACATION 1,311.00 56,521.85 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 81.00 3,448.29 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 17.00 682.31 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 208.00 8,540.50 141 BEREAVEMENT BEREAVEMENT 27.00 1,194.93 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Dav Used 52.00 2,198.63 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 341.55 15,196.01 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 50.00 3,603.79 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 15,263.25 628,567.33 196 REGULAR HOURS LIGHT DUTY 8.00 574.50 205 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME .5 6.00 100.84 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 160.50 6,839.02 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 36.00 1,969.44 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 14.00 1,262.09 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 342.75 22,740.36 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 9.25 606.51 405 ACTING PAY OUT OF CLASS - POLICE 0.00 667.05 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 355.92 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 1,177.37 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 965.61 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 84.00 0.00 603 COMP HOURS Holidav Comp 1.0 18.00 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 467.25 0.00 606 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 2.0 14.00 0.00 901 SICK ACCRUED SICK LEAVE 22.39 0.00 902 MISCELLANEOUS BOOT ALLOWANCE 0.00 175.00 acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 78.66 acp MISCELLANEOUS Accreditation 1 % Part Time 0.00 9.67 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 172.80 boc MISCELLANEOUS BOC II Certification 0.00 91.74 09/19/2019 Packet Pg. 62 7.2.c Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 929 (09/01/2019 to 09/15/2019) c Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstruction ist 0.00 37.07 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 160.86 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 564.90 ctr MISCELLANEOUS CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM 0.00 160.00 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 111.20 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 914.78 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 575.65 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 837.62 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 4,839.12 hol HOLIDAY HOLIDAY 1,276.70 54,575.72 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 217.06 Ig1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 833.85 Ig10 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 5.5% 0.00 148.17 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 890.86 Ig12 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 9% 0.00 5,417.68 Ig13 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 7% 0.00 1,703.22 Ig14 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 5% 0.00 935.92 Ig15 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 7.5% 0.00 381.68 Igo LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1 % 0.00 373.60 Ig5 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3% 0.00 444.80 Iq6 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv .5% 0.00 272.75 Iq7 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1.5% 0.00 468.85 Iq9 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3.5% 0.00 104.93 mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 111.20 pds MISCELLANEOUS Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 101.78 phv MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,031.14 prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS 0.00 173.48 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 0.00 287.66 sgt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 173.48 sro MISCELLANEOUS School Resource Officer 0.00 111.20 str MISCELLANEOUS STREET CRIMES 0.00 462.88 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 111.20 09/19/2019 Packet Pg. 63 7.2.c Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 929 (09/01/2019 to 09/15/2019) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours 20,399.64 Total Net Pay: Amount $858,142.35 $580,566.84 09/19/2019 Packet Pg. 64 7.2.d Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 929 - 09/01/2019 to 09/15/2019 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 63922 09/20/2019 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 5,883.00 0.00 63923 09/20/2019 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 681.64 0.00 63924 09/20/2019 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 1,947.35 0.00 63925 09/20/2019 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 4,732.00 0.00 63926 09/20/2019 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 3,726.06 0.00 16,970.05 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 2932 09/20/2019 awc AWC 332,200.16 0.00 2935 09/20/2019 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 27,689.52 0.00 2936 09/20/2019 us US BANK 104,295.18 0.00 2937 09/20/2019 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 104,704.21 0.00 2940 09/20/2019 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,529.07 0.00 2941 09/20/2019 edm CITY OF EDMONDS 120.00 0.00 2942 09/20/2019 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 1,138.50 0.00 0.00 575,676.64 Grand Totals: 592,646.69 0.00 9/19/2019 Packet Pg. 65 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/24/2019 Authorization of Participation in Appeal of FCC Order Staff Lead: Jeff Taraday Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Nicholas Falk Background/History Appeal of FCC's August 2, 2019 cable franchising order. Staff Recommendation Authorize the mayor to execute the Request to Participate form contained in the attached materials so that the City can participate in the appeal of the FCC's August 2, 2019 Third Report and Order related to cable franchising. Narrative The attached memo from Bradley Law, LLC provides the background of the FCC's cable franchising order and the proposed coalition appeal of that order. Mike Bradley provides legal services to the City of Edmonds pursuant to the Lighthouse Law Group PLLC contract. So, while most appeal participants will be required to pay Bradley Law, LLC to participate in the appeal according to the fee schedule in the attached memo. The City of Edmonds' participation is covered by its payments to Lighthouse under the flat fee contract. Accordingly, there will be no additional cost to participate. Attachments: September 19, 2019 memorandum from Bradley Law, LLC and attachment A thereto. Packet Pg. 66 7.3.a Bradley MEMORANDUM To: Municipalities, Local Franchising Authorities and Municipal Attorneys From: Bradley Law, LLC Re: Appeal of the FCC's Cable Franchising and Mixed Use Order Date: September 19, 2019 Background of Cable Franchising Order and Coalition Appeal On August 2, 2019, the FCC released the Third Report and Order in its cable franchising docket (MB Docket No. 05-311), which negatively impacts franchise fees paid to local franchising authorities (LFAs) by defining nearly all in -kind goods and services provided under a cable franchise as "franchise fees" subject to the Cable Act's 5 percent cap.' Additionally, the Order preempts virtually all local authority to regulate cable operators' provision of wireless communications and other non -cable services (e.g., internet services) over the cable system, including ROW regulatory authority. A more detailed summary of the Order is attached to this document as Attachment A. We previously filed Comments and Reply Comments with the FCC opposing the FCC's proposal to enact these rules on behalf of a large number of local franchising authorities. In those filings, we argued that the FCC lacked legal authority to enact these new rules and asked the FCC to consider the negative financial and other impacts they will have on franchising authorities.2 The Order becomes effective thirty days' after it is published in the Federal Register. We expect that it will be published in the next two weeks. Once effective, franchising authorities can expect to have their franchise fees substantially reduced. The Order's broad preemption of municipal regulatory authority means LFAs cannot regulate cable operators' provision of internet service, wireless broadband internet access, and other non -cable services provided using the cable system, including authority to regulate their use of the ROW, charge fees for that use, or even to recover the costs of regulation. Importantly, the FCC did not decide whether the value of PEG channel capacity could also be offset against franchise fees, but we expect the FCC will initiate a new proceeding on this matter within a year, with significant likelihood of a negative outcome if this Order stands. We are working with other municipal attorneys to form a Coalition of franchising authorities and organizations representing local governments to appeal the Third Report and Order to a federal court of appeals and to seek other appropriate relief, including a stay of the Order pending the outcome of the appeal. While no legal result can ever be guaranteed, we believe the FCC's new rules are contrary to the plain language of the Cable Act, that its broad preemption of local authority over the ROW is outside the FCC's authority, and that we have strong arguments for overturning the Order or, in the alternative, for substantially modifying it. It is clear that if the Order is not challenged, it 1 In the Matter of Implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as Amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Third Report and Order, MB Docket No. 05-311 (Rel. Aug. 2, 2019). 2 Initial Comments of the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania et al., MB Docket No. 05-311 (Nov. 14, 2018); Reply Comments of the City of Philadelphia et al., MB Docket No. 05-311 (Dec. 14, 2018). Bradley Law, LLC 2145 Woodlane Drive I Suite 106 I Woodbury, MN 55125 I (651) 379-0900 I BradleyLawMN.com Packet Pg. 67 7.3.a will have permanent severely negative impacts, financial and regulatory, on all franchising authorities. Elements of the Appeal These are the principal elements of the appeal, all covered by the applicable fixed fee shown below: Prepare and File Petition for Stay, Pending Appeal, with the FCC Prepare, Serve, and File Notice of Appeal(s) (Circuit(s) TBD). Petition to Intervene (if necessary) and Participate in Multi -Jurisdiction Panel Selection _ Prepare, Serve, and File Motion to Stay, Pending Appeal, with Federal Court of Appeals Prepare, Serve, and File Brief in Chief Prepare, Serve, and File Reply Brief Oral Argument Fee Schedule August/September 2019 September/October, 2019 September/October, 2019 September/October, 2019 TBD 2020 M TBD 2020 TBD 2020 We will invoice each participating franchising authority a fixed fee in accordance with the table below. We will invoice the total amount shown over a period of time: One-third in September, 2019; one-third in November, 2019; and one-third in January, 2020. We can be flexible about when payments are due to meet your budgetary requirements. Only in the unlikely event that there are materially more tasks than anticipated would we seek any additional funding. Greater than 500,000 100,000 - 500,000 F750p7VT00,000 Less than 50,000 Conflict of Interest Agreement $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 68 7.3.a Under the Rules of Professional Conduct for most jurisdictions where we practice, without informed written consent from the affected clients, we have a conflict of interest if we represent one client adverse or potentially adverse to another client in the same or a separate matter. Without informed written consent, we cannot represent a client if there is a significant risk our representation of the client will be materially limited by our responsibilities to or relationships with another client. In order for us to represent you in the Coalition of appellants described in the above Memorandum (the Coalition) while continuing to represent other clients who are also part of the Coalition and in other unrelated matters, we must obtain written informed consent from you and the other members of the Coalition. Our representation of the Coalition is not prohibited but requires your consent. We do not believe our representation of the other members of the Coalition will impair our competency, diligence, or loyalty to you nor will it otherwise materially limit our representation of you or impair our independent professional judgment in any way. We do not believe the circumstances of this representation will lead us to favor the interests of one client over the other, nor will we do so, nor do we think the relationship will create any appearance of impropriety. Furthermore, because the work will be for a coalition, there are some unique elements to our representation to which we ask that you agree and would represent that all the other members of the Coalition already have. First, the filings we make must be acceptable to all the members of the Coalition, and this may affect what issues are addressed and what positions we take. By requesting participation in the Coalition through the above signature of your authorized representative, you agree to this arrangement and agree that we may represent you and other participants as a part of the Coalition. We will consult with you and other members of the Coalition as the filings are prepared. You waive any objections that you may have to this joint representation; agree that we may represent each member of the Coalition individually and jointly; and agree that you have joint interests with the other Coalition members that will permit us to communicate information about this matter to you and other members of the Coalition without waiving privileges that may apply. Second, the Coalition is not a fixed group but is instead an evolving group; communities or organizations may join or leave the Coalition during the course of our representation. It may be that your community is adverse to one or more of the other members of the Coalition in another, unrelated matter. By requesting participation in the Coalition, you agree that we may represent these additional members as part of the Coalition. Likewise, except to the extent there is a conflict that is not waivable, you agree that our representation of you as part of the Coalition will not disqualify the Firm or any of its members from representing another client in an unrelated proceeding where the client's interest is adverse to yours. We will keep you apprised of the Coalition members and we ask that you advise us immediately if you believe that there is a conflict that is not waivable. Third, we will not represent any entity in this matter that takes a position adverse to yours. We may be asked by some clients to make individual filings in this proceeding in addition to the Coalition's. You and each member of the Coalition may decide at any time to withdraw from participation in the matter or the Coalition. Should you do so, you also agree that we may continue to represent the other members of the Coalition in this matter. Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 69 7.3.a Request to Participate We urge you to join this effort of local governments and franchising authorities to overturn the FCC's Third Report and Order on appeal. We are happy to enter into a contract or engagement letter with individual jurisdictions, as they may require or prefer, or alternatively, your jurisdiction may participate by having an authorized representative sign the Request to Participate form at the end of this Memorandum. Please contact Mike Bradley, Michael Athay or Vince Rotty if you have questions or wish to discuss the appeal or your participation in our Coalition. REQUEST TO PARTICIPATE Our franchising authority or municipality wishes to participate in the appeal of the FCC's Third Report and Order as described in the above Memorandum. By signing below, through our authorized representative, we agree to the applicable flat fee listed above and to the Conflict of Interest Agreement set forth above. City/Franchising Authority: Address: By: Name: Title: Date: E-Mail: Phone Number: (signature) Please return this executed request to Mike Bradley at mikekbradlalawmn.com, or by fax to (651) 379-0999. Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 70 Attachment A 7.3.a Bradley MEMORANDUM To: Bradley Law, LLC Clients and Other Interested Parties From: Mike Bradley, Michael Athay, and Vince Rotty Re: FCC Cable Franchising Third Report and Order Summary Date: August 5, 2019 On Friday, August 2, 2019, the FCC released the attached Third Report and Order (the "Order") on the cable franchising docket. As we mentioned previously, the Order was passed by the FCC on a 3-2 vote on August 1, 2019. The Order will become effective 30 days following publication in the Federal Register. We expect publication to occur in the next 10 to 30 days, which means the Order could be effective as early as mid -September. The Order largely follows the draft Order that the FCC released in July. References to City of Philadelphia et al. in the Order are references to our municipal coalition. The following is a high-level summary of the Order. Most "In -Kind" Non -Monetary Provisions are now Considered Franchise Fees You will recall that the FCC had tentatively concluded that all "in -kind exactions" are franchise fees subject to the franchise fee cap. We argued that non -monetary franchise provisions are not exactions and could not be considered a "tax, fee or assessment" (as required by the Cable Act) and therefore not a franchise fee. Even though the FCC has still provided no basis for calling these non -monetary franchise provisions an exaction, the FCC in the Order still classifies non - monetary franchise provisions as franchise fees. The FCC did not reach a conclusion with respect to the treatment of PEG channel capacity. The order states that while "we find that the costs associated with the provision of PEG channel capacity are cable -related, in -kind costs that fall within the definition of `franchise fee,' we find the record insufficiently developed to determine whether such costs should be excluded from the franchise fee as a capital cost..." As a result, the FCC deferred on this issue related to PEG channel capacity for a subsequent rulemaking. The attached chart illustrates the impact of the Order on existing cable franchise fees. Exclusions from Franchise Fees - Capital Costs Defined We opposed the FCC's tentative conclusion that PEG capital expenses excluded from franchise fees was limited to construction of PEG facilities. The Order ruled that "capital costs" "generally encompasses costs incurred in acquiring or improving capital assets for PEG access facilities," which is much closer to common practice and much better than initially proposed in the FNPRM. The definition of capital costs is important because PEG capital costs can be excluded from the franchise fee. The attached chart shows certain PEG capital costs that continue to be excluded from franchise fees. Bradley Law, LLC 2145 Woodlane Drive, Suite 106 1 Woodbury, MN 55125 1 (651) 379-0900 1 BradleyLawMN.com Packet Pg. 71 7.3.a Fair Market Valuation of Non -Monetary Provisions We had argued that if non -monetary franchise provisions were included in the franchise fee, the value of these provisions should be at the operator's cost, rather than fair market value as proposed by the FCC. The FCC disagreed and left it at fair market value. The cable industry argued that the cable operator should be allowed to determine fair market value. The FCC ruled it "believe[s] that fair market value, where there is a product in the market, is the most reasonable valuation for in -kind contributions because it is easy to ascertain — cable operators have rate cards to set the rates that they charge customers for the services that they offer" (footnote omitted). Modification of Cable Franchises to Comply with Order The draft order had required a cable operator and local franchising authority to use the modification process pursuant to Section 625 of the Cable Act to accomplish any necessary cable franchise modifications caused by the Order. The modification would be done at the local level and if dissatisfied, the cable operator could seek judicial review. The Order deviated from that approach and instead ruled that to "the extent a franchise agreement that is currently in place conflicts with this Order, we encourage the parties to negotiate franchise modifications within a reasonable time (footnote omitted). If a franchising authority refuses to modify any provision of a franchise agreement that is inconsistent with this Order, that provision is subject to preemption under section 636(c)." Order Is Prospective Only - Not Retroactive We had argued that there should be no retroactive application of the FCC's new rule about franchise fee calculation. The FCC ruled that the "franchise fee rulings we adopt in this Order are prospective (footnote omitted). Thus, cable operators may count only ongoing and future in - kind contributions toward the five percent franchise fee cap after the Order is effective." Settlement Agreements We also asked the FCC to clarify that provisions in Settlement Agreements are not part of franchise fees. The FCC did not address Settlement Agreements in the Order. Statutory Franchise Fee Cap may be Different from Franchise Fee in Cable Franchise Franchising authorities should consider that there should be no franchise fee off set unless and until the value of the non -monetary franchise provisions exceed the Cable Act's cap of 5% of the cable operator's gross revenues. Even if a franchising authority is receiving a franchise fee per a cable franchise, if there are exclusions in the definition of gross revenues in the cable franchise it may actually be less than the Cable Act's statutory franchise fee cap. Mixed Use Networks The Order preempts state and local governments from requiring any franchise or license for the provision of other services over a cable system, such as internet services. This will not have an immediate fiscal impact on most state and local governments short term, but state and local governments may have authority now or in the future to require franchises or licenses of internet providers separate from cable franchises and receive a gross revenue fee. This could be a significant loss of revenue and authority long term for state and local government as most expect internet revenues to continue to rise in the foreseeable future. Packet Pg. 72 7.3.a Recommendations • Review your cable franchise to determine the potential impact from the Order. You may need to seek modifications to your existing cable franchise. We are ready to assist in these negotiations. • Keep a close watch of franchise fee payments received after the Third Report and Order's effective date to identify whether a cable operator has unilaterally identified in - kind contributions it claims are subject to offset, unilaterally determined the fair market value of those contributions, and begun offsetting its calculation of fair market value against its franchise fee obligations. Nothing in the Order excuses operators from stating and justifying the basis for reduced cash payments, and LFAs should be prepared to challenge cable operators on this issue. We are ready to assist in challenging unilateral fee reductions allegedly based on the Order. • If you haven't done so already, share this information with key municipal stakeholders. These rule changes are likely to affect municipal budgets in a way that reaches beyond PEG operations and access channels. We're happy to help with this process any way we can. • Consider participating in the appeal of the Order. We will be recommending a direct appeal to the United States Court of Appeals and seeking an immediate stay of the Order pending the final decision in the appeal. We will be providing more information on the appeal project in the coming days. • Be prepared for another Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking related to whether PEG channel capacity should also be excluded from the cable franchise fee. Packet Pg. 73 7.3.a Impact of FCC's Cable Franchising Third Report and Order on Non -Monetary "In -Kind" Cable Franchise Provisions PEG -Related Contributions Fall under Franchise Fee unless specifically exempt PEG Transport • Use of transport lines for "Episodic" or "Short -Term" PEG programming is an operating cost that is subject to the franchise fee cap. • The ongoing costs associated with the maintenance or operation of PEG Transport would not qualify as a capital expenditure. PEG Channel Capacity • Deferred action for further rulemaking to determine whether PEG channel capacity should be excluded as a capital cost. Institutional Networks (I -Nets) Costs associated with the construction, maintenance, and service of an institutional network (i.e., all costs associated with an institutional network) Free and Discounted Cable Service to Public Buildings Capital Cost Exception for PEG Access Facilities • Capital Costs "generally encompasses costs incurred in acquiring or improving capital assets for PEG access facilities." • Capital Costs "should be interpreted in a manner consistent with its ordinary meaning." • "Could encompass the acquisition of a non -construction -related capital asset — such as a van or camera." • The installation of transport facilities dedicated for long-term use by a PEG provider for the transmittal of recurring programming to a cable headend or other point in the cable system. Build -Out Requirements Customer Service Requirements Bradley Law, LLC Summary of FCC's Cable Franchising Third Report and Order Bradley Packet Pg. 74 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/24/2019 Accept a Public Pedestrian and Utility easement on 215th PI Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Rob English Background/History On September 10, 2019, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works committee and it was forwarded for approval. Staff Recommendation Accept the public pedestrian and utility easement. Narrative The City of Edmonds is currently reviewing a proposed development project, Westhaven 10 Lot Subdivision on 215th PI W. The project proposes a cul-de-sac at the end of 215th PI W where 6 of the 10 Lots will be accessed. Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.90.030 requires sidewalks for this location. The sidewalk and the city water and sewer utility services will be located within the pedestrian and utility easement. During the discussion at the Public Works and Parks Committee meeting, a question was raised about why 215th PI was a cul-de-sac and not a continuous street. Staff followed -up on the question and provided the history regarding the Hearing Examiner's approval of an Official Street Map Amendment and City Council's approval of Ordinance 3459, which removed the west half of the planned lined right of way of 215th PI (between 96th Ave and 981h Ave) from the City's Official Street Map. Both documents are attached for review. Attachments: Vicinity Map Westhaven Ordinance 3459 215th PL Hearing Examiner Report Packet Pg. 75 7.4.a �'City of Edmonds neap Title 9813 21416 rn L r"1 OLIl N N .-- O O O N a a s LY, -� Lci - - 214TH_ PL SW _- 11 9801 N ,o 00 l o O co 1Z I'D rn rn rn ON a` 10 2-15TH. ST -S_W Ln 0\ r) O co 9804 21428 21415 21425 0� 00 � - rn o� rn 0, 21509 LU _ 21.5 T_H� PL S.W d 21522 = Lr,OD o 2151 `� 21525 �} f- rn Ln ON 21524 0 ,D I� Q, Ln M Os r Ln 0\ 0\ 0% O` 0\ (ON ON ON 00 21607 � 21606 _ 2116TH PL SW w 21628 9730 9704 Q 9626 9610 - _ .D - i- 1: 2,257 111z-In 21629 21626 _ 21627 21628 94.04 188.1 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and i reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accu S_1984_Web _Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reli; ity of Edmonds `, &5' -� OAUV N P `,—A THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCT Legend [Notes Lyn—.d I Packet Pg. 76 7.4.b DECLARATION OF PLAT WOW ALL LIEN BY TESE PAE5EiB5: RASAf M Ut A Nt9I MN MPP5ft1X L RE MOM OP AE HERB fDWO1ES. Olr TK LL, PIF a� 7C1Z. LWEGI ME WTF Br Comm FILE N0. JlgpfppW AS L/L9[ FREE AIO ACT ANO !YID N AROAAI[f AMH NO WLAEi1 N WTfFYSS WIEREW, WE HERMr SET OIF WAW AM SEALS MM IL DAY O Sfpkt. l mow, TE WROEPSWID OWNER OR OWTERR OF HE NIOEA N THE REAL ESTATE DESQRM HERDII HERE. OEO MS NAP AND OEO IE ?HE SUE FEW THIS MAT OF W ESRNWE t AS TNT TFIN S DEFIED N RE MSHINGTN LNROEA GOWIOW WEREST OWIERLM ACT. SOLLY ro MEET RE REgMElENHS OF TIE WAAEx M LWW COIWON WEREST OWMRSHP AC! AND NOT FOR ANY M PLIMSE R NAP AND ANY PORIION ROW S RESPELLED w LAW AND THE OEOAR.ATKMI FOR WESMiVM REL 106 IIOFR SNOOWBI DDIFPIY RECOROW MM19ER E� VP(tf0 BY (31 SEE= HONES W. A MLSWFDTOV CORRRM W DEDICATION KNOW ALL RRSOS w REST PIESENIS MAY SaW HOE$ EC. A WASFW6TW CONO MK TIE LWDERST"NLD ONNER(S). W FEE SEMNF OF ME' LAND HEREBY RATIFD, FIVE MIMffR PLX N WO1134 OOPS HEREBY OCLARE MS PUT AND ODCATE TO THE USE OF ME PUMC POFEAE R ALL STREETS EASOOIIS OR IWNIEVER MRBIG PROPERTY THERE S SHOWN OV LIE PLAT. ANO ME USE FOR ANY AND AIL PLDUC PURPOSES ALSO, ME RUM TO MOT AL AECESARY ROPES FOR CUTS AND FWLS WON LOWS; O HART, 9How OR T�s RAT W THE REl9NMMf ORUWWA Gwm OF ALL m SIRES NPRON9ENIS ALSO RE R O OF ACCESS OVER RE LOTS OR TACT ro iK MRRY EASEMENT AT ANY THE FOR RE STATED PMHPOSE N omm now.. WE SET oW WAGS AND SFAS TOPS it my OP Selp{{mqw . 2DT9. SFIECI HOLES 0.C, A WASIMORW CORi57R11UN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS SAT DF WASWNOTON )ra m%Nv PI MOONS- ) I CERTIFY TAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATSEATOAY EWMrE HATE a[sayMNS NIO APPEARED BEHYE WE. AND SW PR60N ACITOWFD6ED iNV 7E EiCY a FHE ✓r.P'OW SLYLT E4 AWSTp.,AENY d OmR NWT S,E NWS AFJ� ro 014Rr 111E NAb.W[VE Alp ApWTNj_'1YD AAS W r [ — pF XLIC7 LOES EC, A MRAORK ro BE DOE FREE AV V0.L7FOVSY AG V SWI PARR FGI DE USES 00 am= WIE mwIld N RG &51 EENr LNIEO_ 4-Ii.�1Ili ..L'%Ram B7ALAr£,' _Y ��- fARM10 N�/'^TA'�St 1{L� MRARY PL.59C N AM) FOE( ,F STARE O' IGOOlGILW FESOWMG Ar Lyrvwco: vim. �R L W N'PONTERT DVVYS 1.30-xeZ7 >R;JWa HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT OW+ERS. Am ALL PERSONS N/VAG ANY PRESENT OR sudismUFNT oITERAiP NTEIEST N M6'E UMS AND /ILEA sTGrasoa AW A9iA5 OP OIWIERS OR OTER PATE HAWxC NJY SW NTEAESR, HIDEHY FORE HALT RE OIIV O' m REM' AWL ff MID WARES N ALL RESPECTS FU' Aw ND ALL LA FOR MAAf.ES fOR TT RSA 4 REWF NO1%LLAY ff d 9Wm AND W N THE FlOF M TO AONCEN! HMO OR mi Ado) OET5 w AELSO/ OF RE SE ME G7NWO LNINNERM AND JANY N D AI OF ME ONAELM.E 5151EY. ,G IENEw WARE Arm IEIF, A 1AC Of OF EnwNvs SAW) ANY ND ALL LEANS FOF DALMH M OWNERS, S, OR T ENS U CSoon,ESSOR BY AN ACT W dYTw O' SW CRY, AND RW PC IEL6. NRdCH OF OIIfFRS WREN SUCCESSORS OTMIDON WV NIEYEFIVES HUE MOW OR W RE FI/RARE w REASON OF cD•aTRTRGTON MANRHAAEE AM OEROTW! of SAID oWIIAGE ssrBL STORMWATER ACCESS EASEMENT A POWAIEH7 AC= EASDEITT 6 IIERfBY GRANRD ro RE CITY OF EAIOES FOR ACAS AW NSPELTON OF ANY AND ALL AREAS WIIHIP LOTS i RIOON 10 OF MS PLAT RAT WY NOW. W N ME FAME COJAN ANY STOBOWTER WVLCEIWIT 0)CIIIES AND/OR SYSMOS). NASIAMIO ALL APPLRIDAACES MERW AND MEIETO. SW AUCES EAMWERT SHALL LIE FOR NSPEOUN PLRPO.SES TO ENSWE HALT 111E SIORNMTER FAWRES AN)/OR w EANS) ARE PROPERLY OPf1EATERF AND WNTAWn N ADLOROWCE WON ON OF EDWM CEDE CITY OF EDMONDS FINAL PLAT PROJECT NO. PLN2o18o034 EASEMENT PROVISIONS AND MAINTENANCE APPROVALS MR or r�,N; DWEE'RiND�WgL2MaBara wn;Tlmm i � ";"00�n, vtff'L�x„um Mama W7H ME DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS A;Pff W 0D¢SS ANp BRCSY FOR ART %WORM ALL WIM NOM RUM /FAM/CSIS MO/Pp RMUILO C OF SO L� Sx41 BE DC THE RRVEY OQ& LAYOUT OF STREETS ALLEYS A•A OILER RPOS CF WYx OEM of CFS BHD, ONAW R' AAD AfVViSdtWT Or DE PN OU ADADW CbFOYC R7a006 W GAO L= AND NEIR V=ESSORS HEBW ASSIGNS S NNM AND WATER SYSIEN AM OMER STA M RES ARE APPROVED AV THE SUBIECT FI1ML PUT S ALMOR® FOR IELORDWC BY THE CHY OF EDIO W PUEL C NORKS ORECRNT BO ME IF NPMJ�= NO VW7r 0=dE ' PEA LWODA MIR AMM LW B AB 511OAW nil 6 IESW VED FOP AND E.WM TO LOTS E N0 9 LyR TW FLMOY OT AA EdAWI, IUW ARGA* AdE)WQ % Or AWL' U)VjV SEMM ND ✓1PWWF Np AAPLWTL qm RY(OMRWAIN 7W — - A)w 6, M.E"r. ND Earls PON BROI � Aii AWAbwg mnfs, aft -DE" MES/AR A[BLWDNC w SW mew 2KL K ME M,GEL]V AAL0 pEgw - OT w O m AI4AY COI %.v AjKHAS '. OF SNp Lm AM F amtiror c rt OR 41 /MS LNY OP . 20/9 11E B' FN CMW DESK PFOESTRAN EL4IENT ACROSS ME FRONTAGE O LOTS 5. 7, A AHD 10. AS SHOWN IEREOµ S RESERVED FOR AND GRATED M W COY OF EOYOWS R) PROVEE FOR FOBC SDEIN.K ARD PIFBLO SEWER .VD M7ER UfM14 WCLOVG ME RW OF NO CSS AM EGRESS FOR ME PURPOSE OF M RIMMOf. RUM AND/OR ffCOpTW,GTOP OF SWO PANIC UNR1' SSIENS NO APPLRIDANfiS W RESPONSN9M ANO OUIY ro REPAIR MIIRIAN AND REOWSTNC7 SW SORwUR SHAIL ff RNT OF TE ASURAS FFOPEFFY ONNEFS N AODDTDVEE RIM CITY OF EDYONOS (M WENOUICE, REMW AWO/OR RELOISTM.COAI OF SAD PUBM SEWER AFD MOER (LWJIY SSTAS AND APPURENWCES AWL SE ME RESPJNSWBIT! OF ME COY OF FOUNDS. W PRFMFE SE1ER WENEM OVER, OWYER AND A[NO.SS LOS 2 AAD 3 AS SHOWN HEREON S RMFRM FOR AND CANNED TO LOTS 2 TRO GH A. FOR RE RDR15E W MWMAHCF REAMER AM)/OR RElONSTRUCWN W ANY uLLH' 5)S7W ND APMAOEMIRC , RICEMER WITH RE WIT OF INGRESS AND EGRES FOR SULTI PURPOSES ALL MWRENWTE REPAYLS. NPRJYEMFMS ARO/OR AMONG ONG OF SAID EASEWFM SHALL H BORNE JOINTLY AND EOALLY BY RE OWNERS W LOTS 2 MARCH A, FACERS HO OWNER SNAIL Or IESPOA'BNF FOR THE MARENIRCL REPAML AWAR RECONSTLOTNN OF RAT POMUH O THE C1'NWOEV USEO S E S LOCAM UPSREMI FRON ME PONT OF WWECOON ff THAT RESPECTIVE LOT OWNER. mdE PRRNT DANCE EAALMDe Orct mm AAa A FOPS S Aa A AS v 1O 6 SHAKO !v AMR mfflm 10 A@S N Rasa LA. mr W P.WWL54 � MLW%WM'L Rf * 4%WM AEGW4RNKMN OP Addy URIIY SYSTAS Np IPPUW.9WME% TOGETHER NTH ME RUNE OF W04E5S NAD EaEEtS PDR $WPVNIPOSM ALL FM1LnWW- AC°WAS. IWPAOYUMOS 4b,.NR 8'9LI W, Lr S Effim 74WL K MW .OW v AV EOUWIr RY bi( OWn Of CM I TMKw Q pRIIRT AO OWNER a JE AES-Usvt $CR RE IANEF>1XCL RUM. MJO/OR RECOSTNCTON O RAT PORnoW W TA[ VOWWMT LM SYBE16 LO'WM IPMR(AI IA W DE PGFR P' COEEGIWY OF MAT RESPECTER£ LOT OWNR. DN AS NOM N THE STOFNWRR PROVISIONS PC 10' PRWTE STORY EAU" OVER. UYLIR AND AMM LOT 2 AS SHOWN HEREON IS RESERVED FOR AND CRNEED TO LOTS I ARE) 2, FOR THE PLPoOSE OF JAWWDAWCC MRUR AID/W ffCOAGTRUC110N OF ANYUINIIY SYSIE/S AND APPLMEFMW.'F$ T)GEDER WON ME ROE OF VO w AND LCRES FOR SLUR PURPOSES. ALL YUVIEN111LE REPAIR. IHPRM,EWIEHFIS MO/OR RE9ALBWFC OP 5U0 EASELEM Sl 4 ff BORNE JONRY AND E"Ur BY RE OWNERS OF LOTS 1 ND 2 E:K2PT NO OWNER &W BE RESPONME FOR ME MWTVANCE REPAIR MID/OR RECOSTUCT'RN OF THAT PORTION OF ME DDWOLY USM SYSIFK LOCATED UPSTREAM FROM ME POPIT OF CONRRON OF HAT RESPEC7W LOT D .. HALE 15' PRMIE SM9I EARAGff OVEA UNDER ANO ACROSS LOTS 7 AND B AS SNOWP HEREON S RESERVID FOR AND MARRED TO LOTS 7 WOUMF 10 FOR THE MXECSE OP LWDEFWCE, REPAW AND/OR FERNS A C1lON OF ANY UMLTY SYSTEMS NO APPLAIDNNCES TOGEREER WR THE RIGHT OF RCAES AID EERES FOR SUCH PLOWER ALL MWOENNCE RD'NRS. NPROKIENIS AND/OR FMWDW OF SAID FASBIENT SHWL W BORNE JOMLY AID EUM LY BY RE OWNERS OF LOTS T RROCH 10 EXCEPT NO OWNER 571ALL W RM-CHSOIE FOR THE YAWFTTIwH'a REPAIR, ANDIM RECOSN1C OF LINT POPOEN OF TE LONMONLY USED SYSTEMS LOCATED LPSO0wl FRW TIE POWT OF CONNECTION 01' THAT RESPECTIVE LOT TE 10' PLAT UTRIIY EASFLENT WDEP OVER AND ACROSS LOTS U 7 B AND 10 51NLL O RESERVED FOR ALD OWNIED TO ALL UCONST CT, RE ONE SIIBECT RAT AND TER RESPECTIVE SUCCESORS RL ASSIGNS UNDER AND L AF ES S4o1M NEREDN N MER TO WSTALI, LAY, ON5INCT, RENEW, SQPMTEMW AND NNEBNS CAMERGRMWOTHER PROPERTY, CABLES, PEE MID WIRES - A fECESSWY FXE TO ETH OTNR EARPM K FOR THE PURPOSE OF AT ALL NES FOR ME AND ORES NPROPERTYMITIL WON ELFLiM[, TLEPHA'NER MO UMOY SERAE TOGETHER NfiH iNE OGIII TO ENTER WON THE LOTS AT NL ONES FOR TE PURPOSE HEREIN SAIFO STORMWATER PROVISION A STORMWAIER NWMONEHT FACILITY S TO BE CON7RUCTEO ON LOTS 3 AND A FOR ME BDOUT OF LOTS I THROUGH 10, AS APPROVED w TIE CRY OF E pNERW THE APPNOVED PLANS ARE ON FU WHIN ME C OF EDW WS UNDER FEE NU ES PL 42VISCON COSSTNT JWTH MIS APPROVAL LOT 1 RAO GH 10 MW BEEN ALLOTTED A FROMBRED TOTAL OF 51,"0 V OP IYPEIdYNLB SWEACE AREA FOR RMWE SITE WAROEYRTS. AL MWFTRWCL ROAM NNROvflENS ANO/OR RETIL M OF SVO FAOLIY SHUL M IFOORNE AOdRRY AND EOWLY BY LOTS I iNR011G1 to NOTES L IXMI a APenow Aw K NET ANT+ CAN ff FLAAC N ME A-PoAK TOR HE ALBUN>9O. N DE M or fwo Ax RNWMIG oY" 2 RSnT TO AN EASEMENT FOR RIER AS RELOROED UNDER REWRONG MAW 9SOT1DDW32 3 51DEC/ TO AN 154SFI IT UDR SEWER AS ffORUED UNDER IECOROWO NOENR 13073211 (IAEADTABE DESMPRON NOT AVAOAENE). A 'JO TD A L pr Sid! AG AEL>7M JEEP Aq%bG .ON A11O.LWIOM io FOOT FRONTAGE UTILITY EASEMENT AA EASE W BILL BE AMM .EOM AAD GFAOW ro ALE REMISES Z*a6 1 SEJ"ff FW AID T FF RES-1- M � NC AS94S OWNER AM) UPON RE EXTFROR (10) FEET PARALLEL WHIN AND AOAWNG THE STREET F AGE` OF LOIS r-d N WMCN ro NSFALL LAY, DDW .. RERETA OPERATE AND MINOAN UMERMW COLONS CABS, PPE A•D WRES WITH NEC65M' FACIUMS AND OTHER EdRPWENT FOR THE PUROSE OF SERNM MS S081M118IX1 AND OTHER PROPERTY WON EIECTU. TELEAOE, AND UTUTY SERVICE W.E THER WITH ME RICM TO EMER UPON THE LOTS M AL LINES FOR TIE PURPOSE HERON 5ATO. ENCROACHMENT NOTES: EVDEWE OF LAND OOCWAON SUCH AS FENCES Sn CRRES PAYED OR CRAMPED SOEAq LADSCAPM ETC. WY NOT CONCISE NOW THE ORDER BOIRIDARY LIVE$ AS SHOWN OR TLS OIgNNC. MERE ARE AREAS W MS SURVEY APPEWRO TO HAVE 06CREPNFCES WTNEETI THE DEMM BIND LEES AHD fFRTAN EVWEME w W W WAYL ME OILER OR POTEWML RMCHtSER SHORD OIHSIAT WM LEG WLHS¢ Wd RDER LNSOiEPAAOES EAST TO UEIEAANE LOW BEST TO NTEAPAET NEI PROPERTY RUNTS AND ADDRESS POTMW BORDARY DSRBFT RAS SURVEY DOCYOSES FACIORI OP RECORD AND ON THE WOM PFFEL/NG ME: SUBRECT PROPEBH' BOWIOIRY. OB R DOS HOT PUMORT TO LEOVLY RESOLVE MATE, PROPERTY WE DSPOTS WHERE AANORES ARE NOTED. ME M" OR POTENTIAL PUBOASEA SHOULD COSUL7 WON A LEGAL LOLWSEL TO OET RNK HOW MT TO NTLRPRET TER PROPERTY NOBS AND ADDRESS MY POTRONL PROPERTY LAVE USPUTM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR THE RGECT FWML PUT DDMORLS M ME APPROAD PRFLWHARY PLAT AND ALL CMO17015 OF ME PRELWVWY APPROM ANIO a APPROVED AMO AUROWED FOR RECORIYNIC BY DE CRY OF ETLIY w DMNW+w S.mm Awrw A'P :HMS OIY Ut , TRT9 COUNTY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CM" TMT ALL SATE AND COIMY TAXES hERE10FORE LEVED AiARST THE PROPERLY DESL'RE D FERENR AECORDNC TO iNE F5 MD RECORDS OF w OFFICE MW FiNLY PAD AND OSCHANED, NCUDWO �r� rAIES. DIRGE srEVt-" TREASURER, SNOUN91 L'OINIY w & a� 11u11 OEP✓M 000 MEASURER DLL' WAXI AWNS 2F032YArMW 27OT250 loam 27O OOIOB500 AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE PLED FOR REWRT MMS _ NY OP 20_ AT Y. N BOOM OF SII ,, AT PALE AT ME REQUEST OF PACIFIC OAST SLWYEYS, NG CWMY AUOTOR OEPW CORKY AUOIIOR LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I HERESY CERrrFY HINT THE PLAT OF WSWYEN S BASED UPON AN ACRAL SURREY AND SII110.M1L9ON OF SECTION 2S TOW SHIP 27 NORTH. W XC 3 FAST, W.H. AS REQUIRED BY STATE STATUTES; THAT ME DSTAN^ES COURSES AND ANOES ARE SOM)H IMEREM CORRECTLY, THAT 111E WOFIPFENIS SHLL BE SET ANO THE LOT AND BLOCK CORNERS SHAII ff STARED CDRRECRY M THE CROIND. THAT H FUELY COMPLIED NTH 11E PROYL9DA6 OF THE STATE AW LOOTL STATUTES AND REOAATYAIS DDVERxNG PLATOVC. 41A— LIVREN J. RIDDLE PROFESSIONAL LAW SURVEYOR CERRFTCATE NO 37536 R �. A.F. NO. wu Ef Packet Pg. 77 7.4.b CITY OF EDMONDS FINAL PLAT PROJECT NO. PLN20180034 EXCEEDS -� 27C32500107900 I 270325C'C107700 ?7i3i5'1!67500 27C.'%2500107500 7'032500'G7�OC 27032.�i001G7100 27032500;07300L25OGi0720015 I I5' DPAWUOE �t k IMAM 2fa1' FurI -- - — — LINE TABLE � I r J I ,« 5 $ 6 ! u[ wc1W LI ►n . I�Iv W q l 4 I I a, ff I 96,9 z15TH PL SW 8,00 si W. g 2,5TH PL SW ,ip• 6B• z15O9 9BTH AVENUE) B 9617 I A r IIW9Y' v ' • Ipyq ^ IYACatss: unun 27732soanEloo 27032500715000 �' 27032500115900 2703250011590C CURVE TABLE BFNEFO I 1 1 i plrse Ndc m7A f �( ATE DRAIN40E t —OSDIENTM u� 8 I 3 I le ❑ sssi nor +a w I r." -,. I B4O80 SF I 7 • AENUEIW. 8 y i r'P7L�K �. r �J.1BtW, 3 i I I J jTn- 9.Oo .IrAo31 a xu !xW W I r,Sv 9aTH R 8,011 (NEYA e. £� �� born oe � � i a 1z+r r¢m xx - B I I�,�lRiAW •%�1W I I 961t 2t5TH PL 5W ,A7 sfoeo--t1 E $ hi Ioww °I W AM71AW ff 11 BCBryY W ion, 1 10'PR YA Er_—_____— PRfVAVA R zt TH PL W S _—_—___ NBB'S1_I] W J2].la'--___!/i}E .nW+B cvEa cac raxi W/ i1{5] 0524 i O Il terIs• Ft'j", Az T Ma4z srAwmW WE I EASEMENT Z $ _ B,9�S \ a 024 SF (NE) V \ I 961E 215TH PL SW-- I 9.OJ0 SF ` W I I 10' +71M UnNY 2IS13 987H AENUE 18' ACCESS ! Urttf1Y r-�� i0 BENEFli�I ELSE IENi 10' PRAf11E SnMiW i�n11� LOTS 8- EiAEFR LOi I L075 8-9 W nJ AI N �yi • It, 1' N BB'S1'2T W 1rpp1' er W 'Z Wi t 270325U0109100 27112511110500 27032500113300 Z > ffi 10 I W Q =I 1 I a0J2 SF I iH A W. 9 TH PL SW > ♦-' ENUE I n515 9B= k E,0.TJ SF 96t4 zt 5 ' Col PL SW j $ 9616 z15TH zt6TH ST S. W. — N ST51'27 W i ROSERT THOVAii!iCHA` i A00,7 NO , G I A0017ION NO 15 VOL 16, FIG. 34 i 'OL. ' a. PG 34 li 3 � I � � i � i - - - • --• ..i.-••-- I FOUND CLSEO COVC. kON. W/2- Da s a�Lv mr r Y•. DDwN � or, valor r-tt9 � N aasl•B7-W 3ss.ez' 216TH PL. S. W ____—___-----_---Y97.09' _____F---_—___—___--- I �jw I '" EQUIPMENT & PROCEDURES Qi$ p=� LEGEND SET 1/2• X 24' REBAR W/CAP SEANPED i5. J75]6• IElllm OF SLI q IkD BY EiF1A TRAVERSE 2 'S 3755a• .. Su NNL W/WASNEA STAW W • O FOUND MWICAP A5 NOTED LE)CATORP 12�0E1 ROaDnC FLELTRONIC IUTAL SfAMAV Sh � `� ® Fd1ND LIONIIWEA'i AS NOTED E� + A. F. NO. 3 L �I ATE STMONM WAC OJ2-130-090 SET CONC, "/f STAWPEO WS - ]J53E uaF OR s a pp-� Pacific Coast Surveys inc. PLAT MAP OF: 4 RIOM OF WAY CENRAUNE TWEE CENIERIINE OF 98TH AVENUE W. 'Vb � . THE ,.„* d PARCEL AS ,NEB OF ND "°°"'"-E WESTHAVEN �`�� ❑ 7 '^ LAND SURVEYING &MAPPING vem 0409M at " Y P.O. BOX 1361g MILL CREEK, WA 98082 NW 4 NEr 4, SEC. , T.27N_. R [ FOUND ChSED COW NON. W/2' 4ba tooe PH. 425.508.495i FAX 425.3573577 wuwN aw OATE onALnHc AEE rrA iGt[E BONED BRA55 " k 7C. DOWN D.] VISITED 7-9-19 _ www.PCSurveys.net MAIWCF R2ari 1Q Jre(♦lr11. 7 Packet Pg. 78 7.4.c 0006.90000 WSS/gjz 6/18/03 ORDINANCE NO.3459 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL STREET MAP TO ELIMINATE THE PLANNED LINED RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 215TH PLACE SW, FROM 215TH PLACE SW TO 98TH AVENUE W, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner has recommended that the official street map be amended to remove planned lined right-of-way shown as the West half of 215th Place SW between 96th Avenue West and 98th Avenue West, and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on June 3, 2003, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Hearing Examiner should be adopted and that said amendment of the official street map is in the public interest and complies with the criteria established by the Edmonds Community Development Code, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.- The official street map is hereby amended to delete certain planned lined right-of-way consisting of the western half of 215th Place SW between 96th Avenue West and 98th Avenue West in accordance with the attached Exhibit A. Section 2. The Community Services Director's designee is hereby authorized to effectuate such amendment of the official street map. {WSS546547.DOC;1/00006.900000/} Packet Pg. 79 7.4.c Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: .d (! • ITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF H Y Y: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 06/20/2003 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 06/24/2003 PUBLISHED: 06/29/2003 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/04/2003 ORDINANCE NO.3459 {WSS546547.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Pg. 80 7.4.c l i 3 4 EXHIBIT A f +5 •:.: :;� •• SPAU� NAY 8 DSO _J 3 �PRUCE_�� og , 33 L0 - : • .• cri 1 2 . . • a LEAN E 7 •"' g " ••'• °� 14 w a r 6 5 4 3 -95Tj - 8 r'• i,.= 7 LAUREL')_ANE i _ iT 10 12 GLEN— ,Ln DA a- _ _ Lo . ► ] g 9 10 11 55 �'i 16 �• .++. 3 1 1 N --— LANE so I)c. i 60 8 I 15 a 1 1n 90 0 9 so _ ,' 2 g 8 ACRE a w 40 214TH PL. S Lo 3 0` .Wul 5 6 7 X r�215T� .. �' ... f AREA TO BE DELETED 215 ST. 14 lu \ 215 TH PL. S.W. 13 1`2 1 1 10 0 1 EL c� . D£D. S-r--61 20 FROM STREET MAP _�_-. � � , <_ 216TH S T. S .W. 60 13 on 216TH PL. S.W..(p M - - -- 60 so --... I 17 - t - _ i ! -I _ = 5-57-76J c C •. y tp o 6D C 6 25 I R f 3 24 . 2 3 > II ".•. .. 2. _ Q ..l - -- .,. lC- 2i8TH� 8 9 ` Q 19 1 % 2 � 9 �'`• l8'•'� f S_ 84 I I 12 Packet Pg. 81 k21a' 60 7.4.c SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.3459 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 24th day of June, 2003, the City Council of the City, of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 3459. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL STREET MAP TO ELIMINATE THE PLANNED LINED RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 215TH PLACE SW, FROM 215TH PLACE SW TO 98TH PLACE W, AND FD(ING A TIME WHEi�T THE SAivii SMALL EECOP,1E EFFECTl v'E. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 25th day of June, 2003. C FY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE {WSS546547.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Pg. 82 7.4.c Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH S.S. SUMMARY -OF -OEIO tAkC�90-3459 On the 241h daynr,yi n1e, 2 03 lh. ,1yy ,I n ar the city,The of Edmonds, assed C nan. No, 3459. undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that she is Principal Clerk A summary of the content 0 said ordinance, consfstlng of 1fl 11110, provides ae - of THE HERALD, a daily newspaper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of follows: . AN ORDINANCE of the City of Edmonds, weshin Snohomish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper of general on, amend fn the Official street Map to eliminate the gplen• ned line right-of-way for 2151h Place SW, from circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper has been approved as a legal 2151h Place SW 10 S81h Place W, and fixing a tlme. when the newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County and that the notice Sarre Shell become effective. The full text of This Ordinance Wtif be mailed upon requesf. OATF0 this 251h day o1 June, 2003- City of Edmonds CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE Published: June 29, 2003. Summary of Ordinance No. 3459 RECEIVED J U L 0 i 2003 EDMONDS (77v ^! c-P•K Account Name: City Of Edmonds Edmonds, City Of a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and entire edition of said paper on the following days and times, namely: June 29, 2003 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. Principal CICA. Subscribed an a'w, to before me this 30th day of June 2003 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, County. Account Number: 101416 rn . ' tt+ttit��ASHING�=� Order Number. 0001054277 Packet Pg. 83 7.4.d • • • �fjzc.1 8911 CITY OF EDMONDS GARYHAAKENSON 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 MAYOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT I.,7 Planning • Building • Engineering tcel Nk FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION P�� , � 2 �� OF THE HEARING EXA HNIER j C IT OF EDMONDS P APPLICANT: Tom Sawteli CASE NO.; ST-03-29 LOCATION: 215'h Place SW APPLICATION: A request to remove the west half of 215* P1 SW from the Official Street Map. REVIEW PROCESS: Hearing Examiner conducts a public hearing and - makes a recommendation to the City Council who makes the final decision. MAJOR ISSUES: Compliance with the following ECDC chapters: 1) 15.05 Comprehensive Plan - Purposes 2) 15.40 Comprehensive Street Plan 3) 18.50 Official Street Map 4) 20.65 Street Map Changes 5) 20.100 Hearing Examiner and City Council Review SUAZI.ARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS: StaffRecommendation: Deny Hearing Examiner Recommendation: Approve PUBLIC HEARING: .After reviewing the official file, which included the Planning Division Staff Advisory Report; and after visiting the site, the Hearing Examiner conducted a public hearing on the application. The hearing on the 215th P1 SW street map amendment application was opened at 9:33 a.m_, May 1, 2003, in the City Hall, Edmonds, Washington, and closed at 11:31 a.m. Participants at the public hearing and the exhibits offered and entered are listed in this report. A verbatim recording ofthe hearing is available in the Planning Division. HEARING COMMENTS: The following is a summary of the comments offered at the public hearing. 003 i. Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan. Japan EXHIBIT 1 Packet Pg. 84 14W '�W, 7.4.d From the City: Meg Gruwell, Senior Planner: Summarized the details of the request, noting the approval criteria and staffs recommendation Lyle Chrisman, Engineering: Discussed the probable rationale for why 21 Vh Place SW was originally designated on the Official Street Map in 1960's. He noted that since there is still potential for development on this block, the Engineering Department felt that 215'h Place should continue to provide for the potential of a through street from 96'h Avenue W to 98th Avenue W. From the Applicant: Toro Sawtell, applicant: Clarified that the request was for the removal of the west half of 215'h Place SW from the Off vial Street Map. Mr. Sawtell provided an in depth discussion of the merits of removing 2&h PI from the street map and introduced Exhibits B through K in support of the map amendment. Mr. Sawtell noted that all surrounding property owners supported the proposed amendment, that removing the through street status of215'h Place furthered the goals of the Comprehensive Plan regarding neighborhood protection and quality of life, and that there did not seem to be need for providing a street connection through this block. W. Sawtell raised concerns regarding safety of neighborhood children and the loss of significant trees and open space. From the Community: The following individuals offered testimony at the hearing: ]im Bartlet Tim & Donna Fish John & Janice Kolstad Alfred & Mary Pease All those offering comment spoke in support of the Official Street Map amendment, noting the same reasons and issues offered by Mr. Sawtell. Several provided brief histories of development in the vicinity. FWJDINGS OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS 1) Neither the Fire Department nor Police Department offered comment on this application. CONCLUSION: There would be no life safety issues resulting from the proposed street map amendment. 2) Public Works also did not offer comment except to note no storm drainage easement would be required through this block. CONCLUSION: There would be no public health issues resulting front the proposed street map amendment. 3) A short subdivision consisting of four lots was given preliminary approval on the parcel noted as the Davis property on Exhibit I. A requirement of the approval is the. dedication of tsG iia7i -st rirEC-gijiucr of 21 S' DI S`+r as a public nghtof way. Aa this has r;,sd y had. 2 044 Packet Pg. 85 7.4.d 'low %W preliminary approval, only the west half of 21 P P1 SW can legitimately be the subject of this application. The applicant has also stated he is only interested in eliminating 2151h P1 SW as a through street. CoNuusim The application is for the removal of only the west half of 215' Pl SW from the Official Street Map. 4) , a) The development potential on this block would consist of four lots or. the parcel noted as the Hillis property on Exhibit I, and an additional two properties if the Sawtell and Jacobsen properties were first combined and then short platted. Engineering notes this development potential as the reason for maintaining 215'h PI SW as a through street. b) 215a' P1 SW does not lineup with through streets on the adjacent blocks, and as such does not provide for the continuation of a City thoroughfare that might be used by the larger population of the City. c) East -west connections between 98'h Ave W and 96* Ave W are provided by 214a' P1 SW and 216'h PL SW, which are separated by a distance of approximately 600 feet. These streets appear to provide adequate circulation both through and around the immediate neighborhood. CONCLUSION: Maintaining 215a' PI SW as a through street would provide a minimal benefit to the transportation system and, general public. 5) a) One of the criteria for approval is compliance with the Purposes of the Comprehensive Plan (see page 3, item B.2 in Exhibit A). These Purposes are further articulated in detail in the various goals and policies contained in the Plan, Many of these goals and policies (acid those of GMA) speak to preservation of neighborhood character and quality of life. b) Opening 2.15a' PI SW as a through street will introduce new traffic impacts to an established neighborhood. Impacts will include an increase in vehicular noise, loss of some open space, and introduction of safety issues. c) Because of the nature ofthe many issues that are dealt with in a Comprehensive Plan some goals and policies may at times conflict. in this case the goal of maintaining a proposed element of the street system conflicts with maintaining the character of a particular neighborhood. In such instances it is necessary to weigh the benefit to the general public against the resulting impacts to the local residents. d) As noted in #4 above the benefit to the general public would be minimal. In contrast, the relative quiet, pedestrian safety, and character of the immediate neighborhood would be negatively impacted. it is significant that virtually all of the property owners potentially impacted by the development of 215"' PL SW have signed petitions in support of the amendment; all noting their desire to maintain the quality and character of their neighborhood. CONCLUSION: The proposed street map amendment would comply with the Purposes of the Comprehensive Plan. 6) Another issue is compliance with the Comprehensive Street PIan (see page 4, item 3.a, Exhibit A), As noted earlier Public Works has no need for 215t' PI SW for their purposes. Public utilities are already available and 215'h P1 SW is not necessary for their extension. 005 Packet Pg. 86 7.4.d Existing developed streets appear to provide adequate circulation and amass and have the capacity to -accommodate future in fill development. CoNcwsiom The proposed street map amendment would not conflict with the purposes of the Comprehensive Street Plan 7) Finally, is the issue of compliance with the Official Street Map. In as much as the request is for a change in the Official Street Map compliance needs to be viewed broadly. The purpose of the Map is to implement the Comprehensive Street Plan and regulate development that would prevent implementation of the Street Plan. 2150 PI SW is a minor element of the City's street system. Its removal would not materially impact the overall implementation of the City's Street Plan. CUNuusiom Removal of 215a' Pl SW as a through street would not conflict with the purposes of the Official Street Map. RECOMMENDATION Eased upon the foregoing findings and conclusions, it is recommended that the request for an vit:cial Streei . xp a neruu,enxt to remove the cst half of 215 b Pl SW should ble approved. Entered this 8th day of May, 2003, pursuant to the authority granted the Hearings Examiner is under Chapter 20.100 of the Community Development Code of the City of Edmonds. RECONSIDERATION AND APPEALS The following is a suinmary of the deadlines and procedures for filing reconsideration's and appeals. Any person wishing to isle or respond to a recommendation or appeal should comact the Planning Department for further procedural information. Request for Reconsideration Section 20.100.010.G allows for the Hearing Examiner to reconsider his decision or .,ecommandation if a written request is filed within ten (10) working days of the date of the initiml decision by any person who attends the public hearing and signs the attendance register and/or presents testimony or by any pemn holding an ownembip interest in a tract of land which is the subject of such decision or recommendation. The reconsideration request must ate specific referenoes to the findings and/or the criteria contained in the ondwanws governing the type of application being reviewed. Appeals 006 4 Packet Pg. 87 7.4.d Section 20.105.020.A & B describe how appeals of a Hearing Examiner decision or recommendation shall be made. The appeal shall be made m writing, and shall include the decision being appealed along with the name of the project and the date of the decision, the name of the individual or getup appwhug the decision, their interest in the matter, and reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appeal must be filed with the Community Development Director within ten (10) working days after the date of the decision being appealed Time Limits for Reconsideration and Appeals The time limits for Reconsideration and Appeals nun concurrently. If a request for a reconsideration is filed before the time limit for filing an appeal has expired, the time clock for filing an appeal is stopped until a decision on the reconsideration request is completed. Once the Hearing Examiner has issued his ddcision on the reconsideration request, the time clock for filing an appeal continues from the pout it was stopped. For example, if a reconsideration request is filed on day 5 of the appeal period, an indMdual would have 9 mom days in which to Me an appeal after the Hearing Examiner issues his decision on the mconsideration request. LAPSE OF APPROVAL Section 20.05.020.0 states 'Unless the owner obtains a building permit, or if no building is required, sobstamtially, commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the variance shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of the time before the expiration date.' N013CE TO COUNTY ASSESSOR The property owner may as a result of the decision rendered by the HearirngExaminer request a change in the valuation of the property by the Snohomish County Assessor's Moe. r EXMMITS A, Planning Division Advisory Report dated April 24, 2003. B. Packet of 37 signed petitions supporting the application and a Position Statement. C. Citizens Group Letter dated April 26, 2003. D. Chronology of the current application process dated April 30, 2003. E. Discussion of approval criteria dated April 30, 2003. F. A listing of relevant comprehensive plan policies dated April 30, 2003. G. Rebuttal to Exhibit A, Attachment 5 dated April 30, 2003. H. Videotape of the January 21, 2003 City Council hearing. I. Map locating 215a' PI SW and adjacent landowners, Jr. Map showing the extent of dead streets and eul de sacs in the vicinity. K. Map showing locations of vehicular vandalism. PARTIES OF RECORD Tom Sawtell 21535 9e Ave W Alfred & May Pease 21526 966 Ave W Jimmie R_ Bartlet 21420 96a' Ave W Edmonds, WA 99020 Edmonds WA 98020 Edmonds, WA 99020 John & Janice Kolstad 21524 W Ave W Jim & Donna Fish 9801 21P St SW Planning Division Ean&eer ng Division Edmonds, WA 98020 Edmonds WA 98020 Jack Paxson 938 Pine St Edmonds, WA 98020 0 Packet Pg. 88 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/24/2019 City Attorney Evaluation Summary Review Staff Lead: Tom Mesaros/Dave Teitzel Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative At the meeting Council and the Mayor will receive an evaluation summary based on responses from City Council Members, the Mayor, the Directors and any other personnel Directors felt might offer input into the evaluation process. Attachments: City Attorney Performance Evaluation Summary Packet Pg. 89 8.1.a City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary For City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Performance Evaluation: Each item was rated on a scale of 1 to 7 with 1 being low and 7 being high. Respondents were asked to write "N/A" if a particular question is not applicable to their own interaction with the City Attorney. References herein to "City Attorney" include all attorneys associated with Lighthouse Law Group PLLC, not a particular attorney. Please note that there are two columns with scores. Three of the respondents did not follow the instructions and, for the most part, did not utilize a numerical rating. The first column represents an attempt to apply a numerical rating to their answers on the questionnaire. The second column represents the elimination of their answers except when a numerical number was used or N/A was indicated. 1) Trustworthiness / Integrity / Ethical Compliance: a. Does the City Attorney seem to understand that its client is the municipal corporation and not any particular constituent that is authorized to act on behalf of the municipal corporation? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 5 5 Average Score: 6.6 6.4 b. Does the City Attorney execute its role in a manner that is fair to the various duly authorized constituents of the City of Edmonds (as opposed to taking a result - oriented approach where one constituent or set of constituents is favored over another constituent regardless of the law)? (7 for high levels of fairness; 1 for high levels of result -oriented approach) Respondents: 13 13 Not Applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 3 3 Average Score: 5.5 5.5 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 90 8.1.a c. In general, has the City Attorney acted in the best interests of the municipal corporation? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 2 - - - Average Score: 6.1 5.8 d. When presented with knowledge that an officer or employee intends to act in a manner that is in violation of a legal obligation to the municipal corporation, has the City Attorney appropriately referred the matter to a higher authority in the organization? Respondents: 13 11 Not Applicable: 9 9 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 4 5 Average Score: 5.5 6.0 e. Would you trust the City Attorney to refer matters of the type mentioned in "item d", above, to a higher authority if they were to arise in the future? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 5 5 Average Score: 6.7 6.5 f. If and when the City Attorney itself has made an error or an incorrect statement, has the City Attorney made a timely and appropriate disclosure of that error? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 1 1 Average Score: 5.6 5.4 g. Would you trust the City Attorney to make a timely and appropriate disclosure of its own future errors? Respondents: Not Applicable: Highest Score: 13 10 1 1 7 7 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 91 8.1.a Lowest Score: Average Score: 2) Legal Consultation: 1 1 5.7 5.2 a. Has legal advice provided by the City Attorney proven to be accurate and technically correct? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 2 Average Score: 5.8 5.0 b. Does the City Attorney provide its best and honest recommendations given all existing legal issues and ramifications? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 1 1 Average Score: 6.1 5.9 c. Does the City Attorney possess and provide an efficient and effective knowledge of the City's Municipal Code and regulations? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 4 4 Average Score: 5.6 5.2 d. Does the City Attorney possess and provide an efficient and effective knowledge of other government regulations and case law regarding municipal government regulations and case law regarding municipal government and issues facing the City? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 3 3 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 5 5 Average Score: 6.3 6.0 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 92 8.1.a e. Does advice provided by the City Attorney regularly take into account and balance the overall goals and objectives of the City? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 ---L-owest-Score: --- — -2 - --- � — -- — - 3 a� Average Score: 5.8 4.6 m f. Does the City Attorney regularly provide the scope of legal expertise necessary to E meet the City's needs on issues that arise? in Respondents: 13 10 c 0 Not Applicable: 0 0 ' Highest Score: 7 7 w Lowest Score: 4 4 Average Score: 5.8 5.4 0 Q g. Does the City Attorney proactively identify potential issues when it is aware of them to avoid problems from occurring? Respondents: 13 10 0 E Not Applicable: 0 0 in Highest Score: 7 7 c Lowest Score: 4 4 Average Score: 5.8 5.6 h. Are alternative and innovative solutions provided rather than just raising problems? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 2 Average Score: 5.5 4.9 i. Is the City Attorney able to maintain the City Council's and City Staffs confidence while informing them of the different legal risks that proposed actions might generate? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 2 Average Score: 5.5 4.9 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 93 8.1.a j. Are city staff and the City Council advised on key changes in municipal law as it pertains to the City's activities? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 - 2 Average Score: 5.4 4.9 3) Litigation: a. Does the City Attorney zealously advocate for the interests of the City? Respondents: 13 .10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 1 4 Average Score: 5.4 4.8 b. Is the City Attorney's approach effective in achieving the best possible legal outcomes for the City's interest given the issues that arise? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 3 3 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 4 4 Average Score: 6.2 6.0 c. Does the City Attorney represent the City in a professional and ethical manner? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 5 5 Average Score: 6.6 6.5 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 94 3 d. Does the City Attorney make effective use of executive session to advise the City Council on the status and risks associated with pending or potential litigation? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 4 4 Highest Score: 7 7 3 Lowest Score: — 6 — -6---- Average Score: 6.7 6.7 e. Are the City Attorney's estimates of legal impacts reasonably accurate on a regular E basis? in c 0 Respondents: 13 10 a Not Applicable: 4 4 Highest Score: 7 7 w Lowest Score: 4 4 Average Score: 6.2 6.7 0 f. Has the City Attorney been successful in accomplishing the City's litigation U objectives? ?I Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 3 3 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 3 3 Average Score: 5.8 5.4 4) Document Review and Preparation: a. Does the City Attorney prepare ordinances, resolutions, contracts, correspondence and other legal work accurately and consistent with the direction and objectives communicated by the City Council, Mayor and/or department directors? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 3 3 Average Score: 5.6 4.8 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 PaRe 6 Packet Pg. 95 8.1.a b. Does the City Attorney make beneficial suggestions about how the city code should be updated or revised? Does the City Attorney accurately identify and address all legal issues within documents and items that it reviews? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 3 3 - High-est Scare: - 6- - - - 6- - - - — — - Lowest Score: 3 5 Average Score: 4.8 5.1 5) Cost/Fiscal Accountability and Control: a. Are regular legal activities achieved within budgetary goals and limits? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 5 5 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 5 7 Average Score: 6.8 7 b. Has the City Attorney been effective in minimizing legal costs by limiting tasks to those regarding legal issues and utilizing City in-house staff when possible to perform administrative and other functions? Respondents: 13 11 Not Applicable: 9 9 Highest Score: 7 6 Lowest Score: 6 6 Average Score: 6.2 6.0 c. Are standard forms developed and used where possible to minimize preparation of legal documentation? Respondents: 13 11 Not Applicable: 4 4 Highest Score: 5 5 Lowest Score: 1 1 Average Score: 2.6 2.3 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 96 3 d. Are legal tasks performed with appropriate authorization according to established procedures and contract requirements? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: ---4 - -a - Average Score: 6.3 5.6 e. Do invoices accurately identify tasks and expenses in sufficient detail to provide accountability? Respondents: 13 11 Not Applicable: 10 10 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 4 7 Average Score: 6.0 7.0 £ Does the City Attorney display the ability and knowledge to research issues in a minimum amount of time? Respondents: 13 10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 1 1 Average Score: 4.2 3.6 g. Have legal costs been effectively managed and controlled given the issues, assignments and requests made to the City Attorney? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 6 6 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 4 4 Average Score: 6.5 6.2 h. Do you feel that the City has benefitted from the flat fee arrangement with the City Attorney? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 3 3 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 4 4 Average Score: 6.0 5.9 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 97 i. Do you believe that the City would have incurred more legal expenses than it has actually incurred if the City Attorney was compensated on an hourly basis? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 3 3 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Sicote:- -3-- ------3 - -- - - - - - Average Score: 6.0 5.7 6) Responsiveness/Timeliness of Actions: a. Are requested legal work and assignments completed within a clearly established time frame? Respondents: 12 11 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 1 1 Average Score: 3.9 3.7 b. Is the City Attorney accessible by email when needed to respond to requests for legal information and assistance? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 2 Average Score: 5.8 5.5 C. Is the City Attorney accessible by telephone when needed to respond to requests for legal information and assistance? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 2 Average Score: 5.2 5.3 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 98 3 d. Is the City Attorney accessible in person when needed to respond to requests for legal information and assistance? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 -� Average Score: 5.1 5.4 0 C. Are legal review and requests for information completed in time to avoid delays to City E projects, programs and other tasks? in c 0 Respondents: 12 10 0 Not Applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 w Lowest Score: 2 2 Average Score: 4.6 4.2 c 0 Q £ Does the City Attorney follow up efficiently to requests that are made? �? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 1 1 E Highest Score: 7 7 W Lowest Score: 1 1 0 Average Score: 4.2 3.7 w g. Does the City Attorney accurately interpret and clarify City Council and Mayor direction? E L Respondents: 12 10 O 0 Not Applicable: 2 2 a, Highest Score: 7 7 c Lowest Score: 5 5 0 Average Score: 6.2 6.1 W Q t� h. Has the City Attorney provided an appropriate level of service considering the amount E of the City's flat fee arrangement with the City Attorney? z 0 Respondents: 12 10 Q Not Applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 1 1 Average Score: 5.2 4.8 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 PaW 10 Packet Pg. 99 8.1.a i. Has the City Attorney appropriately prioritized the various projects needing attention when considering the best interests of the municipal corporation? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 - — - - -Lowest Score- 2-- _ - -2- - - - - Average Score: 5.0 4.6 7) Communications and Interpersonal Relations: a. Does the City Attorney communicate effectively with the City Council, the Mayor, city staff and community? Respondents: 12 10 Not applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 5 5 Average Score: 6.1 5.9 b. Are answers provided in an understandable manner? Respondents: 12 10 Not applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 2 Average Score: 5.9 5.7 C. Are timelines for follow up to requests clearly communicated? Respondents: 12 10 Not applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 2 Average Score: 4.5 4.2 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 11 Packet Pg. 100 3 8.1.a d. Does the City Attorney maintain appropriate confidentiality with regard to all matters discussed with the Mayor, City Council, department directors and city staff? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: — - 2 - - -2 Average Score: 5.9 5.6 e. Does the City Attorney effectively report to the City Council and/or Mayor communications by project attorneys of a substantive nature regarding significant or sensitive matters? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 5 5 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 5 5 Average Score: 6.1 5.8 f, Does the City Attorney maintain good working relationships and serve as an effective member of the management team? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 3 3 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 2 2 Average Score: 5.0 4.4 g. Does the City Attorney display a positive attitude in carrying out its responsibilities and responding to requests? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 4 4 Average Score: 6.2 6.1 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 12 Packet Pg. 101 8.1.a h. When asked to do so, has the City Attorney effectively mediated disputes among various constituents within the organization? Respondents: 12 11 Not Applicable: 7 7 Highest Score: 7 6 - —Lowest Score: i 1 Average Score: 4.4 3.8 Is the City Attorney tactful and diplomatic in its communication? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 0 0 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 1 1 Average Score: 6.2 6.1 k. Is the City Attorneys oral communication during council meetings clear and direct? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 1 1 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 1 1 Average Score: 6.5 6.3 1. Has the City Attorney been a positive force toward improving and/or maintaining a positive relationship between the City Council and the Administration? Respondents: 12 10 Not Applicable: 2 2 Highest Score: 7 7 Lowest Score: 1 1 Average Score: 5.0 4.6 City of Edmonds Performance Evaluation Summary for City Attorney Services September 24, 2019 Page 13 Packet Pg. 102 8.1.a General Comments Regarding the City Attorney's Performance: Overall, Lighthouse Law Group's depth of knowledge is still not what we would expect from a firm providing legal counsel for the City. There have been too many times when research has to have been done by the firm to answer what really should have been routine questions on employment law, disclosure, and personnel matters. There have been a number of times when we have had to actually -correct--the-City-Attorneys-Off ice -responses by -asking -further questions -of-tflem-,pushing-baack based-onr- - our training and experience, only then to have the City Attorney provide a different response. Reliance on legal staff from WCIA has been far greater than what it was previously with Ogden, Murphy & Wallace. Attorneys from OMW would have the answers and would not deflect to WCIA. This has been particularly true with employment law matters wherein Mr. Taraday declines to engage with city staff, instead pointing to availability of the WCIA's legal team pre -defense resources. This reliance on WCIA legal resources had undoubtedly had an impact on the city's premiums and has required departments to seek outside legal counsel at significant expense. In general, Mr. Taraday seems to better represent the interests of City Council than he does to represent the interests of staff, at times even appearing uninterested or dismissive of staff. This has resulted in diminished confidence in our experience with the City Attorney's Office. The City Attorney has also had a laisse faire, hands -off approach with City Council when it has come to individual council members making repeated personal and negative comments aimed at staff. Those comments have had a very deleterious effect on council — staff relations. If nothing else, the City Attorney should have cautioned Council from a risk management standpoint, reminding Council of their own Code of Conduct. This hands -off approach has reinforced the belief that the City Attorney represents the Council rather than the City as a whole. Mr. Taraday's lack of timeliness with responses to staff has been a consistent problem, with answers to legal questions delayed or even falling off his radar entirely. There has also been a lack of information provided proactively to staff regarding legislative changes that impact day to day departmental operations. On the other hand, Ms. Cates has been very timely and thorough with her responses. She has been a pleasure to work with and is also good about looking for the big picture in issues and how certain resolutions might impact other elements of a work environment. She is good about drafting and reviewing ILAs and contracts; helping with occasional employment law issues or CBA application issues; and she has been involved with labor negotiations. \Mrs. Taraday has been reasonably responsive, although her responses can lack timeliness, may not be complete, or may need to be sent back for further work or clarification. Overall, Lighthouse Law Group's performance has been disappointing. We encourage a RFP process. Packet Pg. 103