The URL can be used to link to this page

2007.02.13 CC Committee Meetings Agenda PacketAGENDA City Council Committee Meetings Council Chambers 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds February 13, 2007 6:00 p.m. The City Council Committee meetings are work sessions for the City Council and staff only. The meetings are open to the public but are not public hearings. The Committees will meet in the following rooms: Community/Development Services (Council Chambers), Finance (Jury Room), Public Safety (Police Training Room) 1• Communi , /Development Services Committee A. (30 Presentation of 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Min) B. (20 Discussion on draft Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 dealing with the permit development Min) requirements of the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area of North Edmonds including proposed Landslide Hazard map. C. (15 Discussion on Shell Valley emergency access. Min) D. (20 Discussion on Historic Preservation Commission recommendation on Design Guidelines for downtown. Min) 2. Finance Committee A. (10 Fourth Quarter Budget Report. Min) B. (10 2007 Limited Obligation Bond Sale. Min) 3. Public Safety Committee A. (30 Discussion regarding graffiti in the city and enacting an anti -graffiti ordinance. Min) B. (5 Review of 2007 Addendum to Prisoner Detention Agreement with City of Lynnwood. Min) AgendaQuick©2005 - 2007 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved Packet Page 1 of 88 AM-835 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) City Council Committee Meetings Date: 02/13/2007 Submitted By: Conni Curtis, Engineering Submitted For: Don Fiene Time: 30 Minutes Department: Engineering Type: Action Committee: Community/Development Services Agenda Memo Subiect Title Presentation of 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Recommendation from Mayor and Staff CS/DS Committee endorse the proposed CIP for presentation at a Public Hearing before the full Council. Previous Council Action N/A 1.A. Narrative The Engineering Division has completed the proposed 2007-2013 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). It was compiled with input from the Parks and Recreation Department, Public Works Department, Community Services Department, Wastewater Treatment Plant Division and Administrative Services Department. This Plan shows projected projects and revenues for the six years for funds shown in the attached Exhibit 1. The proposed 2007-2013 CIP is attached as Exhibit 2. The Engineering Division is in the process of developing a booklet containing descriptions of the 2007-2013 Capital Projects for the funds listed on Exhibit 1. Staff will present an overview of the Plan, and would like comments and feedback from the Committee. A briefing will also be held on February 14, 2007 with the Planning Board. A Public Hearing is planned before the Planning Board on March 7, 2007 and before Council on March 20, 2007 for final adoption of the CIP. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: CIP Funds List Link: 2007-2013 CIP Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Development Services Duane Bowman 02/08/2007 02:53 PM APRV 2 Engineering Dave Gebert 02/08/2007 03:11 PM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 03:14 PM APRV 4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/08/2007 03:17 PM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 03:19 PM APRV Form Started By: Conni Curtis Started On: 02/08/2007 01:40 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2007 Packet Page 2 of 88 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUNDS 2007 - 2013 Fund Description/Purpose Division Manager Comprehensive Plan Source of Funds 112 Combined Street Engineering Transportation Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax, Construction Comprehensive Plan Federal & State Transp. Improvement — (2002) Grants, Utility Transfers, Arterial Projects Traffic Impact Fees 113 Multimodal Community Federal & State Transportation Services Appropriations and Grants, 116 Buildings Public Works General Fund Maintenance 125 Parks, Open Space, Parks & Parks, Recreation & Real Estate Excise Tax, Recreation, Recreation Open Space Plan Contributions from Beautification Developers 125 Transportation Engineering Transportation Real Estate Excise Tax (REET 2) Comprehensive Plan 2002 126 Special Capital Parks & Parks, Recreation & Real Estate Excise Tax (Purchases & Recreation Open Space Plan Acquisitions) 129 SR99 — International Parks & Economic Grants District Recreation Development Comprehensive Plan 132 Parks Construction Parks & Parks, Recreation & Grants Recreation Open Space Plan 412- Combined Utility Engineering Water Comprehensive Combined Utility 100 Construction Plan Update (1995), Improvement — Comprehensive Plan Water Projects 2002 412- Combined Utility Engineering Stormwater Combined Utility 200 Construction Comprehensive Plan Improvement — (2003) Drainage Projects 412- Combined Utility Engineering Sanitary Sewer Combined Utility 300 Construction Comprehensive Plan Improvement — 2006 Sewer Projects 414 Wastewater Wastewater Secondary Wastewater Combined Utility Treatment Plant Treatment Plant Treatment Facility Plan (Approx. 50% from Other Municipalities) Packet Page 3 of 88 Capital Improvements Program Transportation Projects- Fund 112 Projects for2007-2013 PROJECT NAME 2007 2 008 2009 2010 2 111 2 112 2 113 100th Ave W Road Stabilization Project $1,000.000 238th St Improvements 84th to SR 104) $2,100,000 212th & 84th Ave Intersection Improvements $100,000 $600,000 220th Street Improvements (Construction) $100,000 92nd Ave W/ 234th St SW Safety improvements Nonmotorized Trans- Main Street Pedestrian Lighting $0 $75,000 Nonmotorized- Walkway & Bikeway Projects- Citywide $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Nonmotorized Trans- Caspers/ 9th/Puget Drive Walkway $590 000 Nonmotorized Trans.- 96th Ave W Pedestrian Improvements $17:0002 Nonmotorized Trans.- Interurban Trail $125,000 $125,000 Nonmotorized Trans.- Olympic View Dr. Ped Improvements $250,000 Nonmotorized Trans. -School Zone Improve $10,000 $10.000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10.000 Nonmotorized Trans.- 72nd Ave W Ped Improvements $360.000 Nonmotorized Trans- 76th Ave W & 206th St Traffic Calming Nonmotorized Trans- 80th Ave W / 180th St SW Walkway$390,000 Overlay -Citywide $50,000 Overlay -Utilities $320,000 $215,000 $210,000 $210,000 $220,000 $220,000 $220,000 Signal Improvements - Citywide $5.000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Intersection Improvements- Seth Ave & 196th St $10,006 Sight Distance Improvements- 80th Ave W $150,000 Signal Upgrades- 238th St & 100th Ave $115,000 Signal Upgrade Main & 3rd $125,000 Signal Improvements SR 104 & 238th $240,000 Intersection Improvements 9th & Main $260,000 Intersection Improvement- 9th & Cas ers $270,000 Signal Rebuild - Puget & Olympic View Dr $180,000 Intersection Improvements - Walnut St 9th Ave $245,000 SR 99/ 76th Ave W SafetyImprovements $75,000 $1,450,000 Stabilization Projects- Citywide $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $0 Street Improvements- Citywide $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Traffic Calming- Citywide $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Transportation Plan $5,000 $200,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5.000 $5,000 Total Construction Projects $2,262,000 $1,160,000 $445,000 $2,750,000 $1,510,000 $2,610,000 $1,155,000 Revenues and Cash Balances 2007-2013 Beginning Cash Balance $600106 $727,962 $228.014 $308,553 $201,106 $185,972 $15,460 Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax $116.000 $116,000 $266,000 $266,000 $266,000 $266,000 $266,000 New Gas Tax Revenues $56,000 $56,000 $56,000 $56,000 $56,000 $56,000 $56,000 Transfer in Olympic View Water/ Sewer 220th St) $10,000 Transfer in Fund 125-(REET 2 Trans. for 100th Ave W Slope $500,200 Transfer in Fund 125-(REET 2 Trans. for Caspers Walkway$152,000 Transfer in Fund 125-(REET 2 Trans.) for 72nd Ave W Ped Imp$180.000 Transfer in Fund 125-(REET 2 Trans.) for 76th/206th Traffic Calm $35,000 Transfer in Fund 125- REET 2 Trans. for 80th/206th Walk $110,000 Transfer in Fund 125-(REET 2 Trans for 216th St Walkway$45,000 Transfer in Fund 125- REET 2 Trans for 80th /180th Walkway$390,000 Transfer in Fund 125-(REET 2 Trans for Signal Im r. Puget & Olympic $90,000 Transfer in Fund 125-(REET 2 Trans.) for Intersection Impr. Walnut St &9th $122,500 Transfer in General Fund for Main Street Pedestrian Lighting $75,000 Investment Interest $15,003 $18,199 $5,700 $7,714 $5,028 $4,649 $387 Traffic Impact Fees $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 Transfer in- Fund 412-100 $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 $115,005 Transfer in- Fund 412-200 $50,000 $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 Transfer in- Fund 412-300 $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Contributions to sidewalk fund $2,500 $2,500 $2.500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 Grants/ Loans Secured Grant- State for 220th St Im rovements $138,000 Grant (State Caspers/Pu et Drive Walkwa $438,000 Additional Public orks Trust Fund Loan- 220th 2 $20,000 Grant- (Federal) for Interurban Trai $125,000 $125,000 Public ors Trust Fund- 100t Ave- Road Stabilization 499,800 early Sub Totalrants Loans ecured= 1,220,800 $ 25,000 0 $0 0 0 $0 Grants/ Loans ought not Secured) Grant- (State) for Transportation Plan 0,000 Grant -(State for i nal grade 238th & 100th 45,000 rant -(Fe for SR 99/76th Ave W SafetyImprovements 160,000 rant- Fed tale for R 104 & 238th i na 200,000 PE Fe / State)for 9th & Main Intersection improvements 200,000 Grant Fed tate for 9th & aspers Intersection Improvements $185,000 rant (State)for 72nd Ave W Pedestrian Improvements $180,000 Grant (Federal) for 76th Ave W/ 206th St Ped Improvements $35,000 Grant (State) 80th Ave W from 206th St to 21116 $110,000 Grant (State) 216th St SW Walkwa $45,000 Grant (State far 212th & 84th apacity m rovmeents 75,000 450,000 Grant- (Fed/State) for Cit ide Walkway& BikewayProjects $0 $0 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500 Grant- (Fed/ late) for chooI Zone im rovements $5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 $5,000 $5,000 5,000 Grant (Fed/State for 238th St Im rovements $1,800,000 Grant (Fed) for Puget & m is Signal Improvements Grant (Fed) for Walnut & 9th Intersection Improvements $ 22, 00 Yearly Sub Total rants Loans Sought (not secured)= 5,000 100,000 $12, 00 1,862, 00 $802,500 812,500 35,000 Grant Subtotal 1,225,800 $225,000 12,500 $1,862,500 $802.500 1,812,500 $135,000 interfund Transfers Out Debt Service on Loan (1 220th t Design 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20, 000 20,000 Debt ervice on Loan (2 220th t onstruction 22,647 22,647 - 22,6 -$22,647 22,647 22,647 22,647 Debt Service on Loan 3 100th Ave Road Stabilization -$34, 14 34,5 4 34,514 -$34, 34,514 Total Revenues &Cash Balances 2,989,962 $1,388.014 753 553 2,951,106 $1,695,972 $2,62 ,460 $1,195,686 Total Construction Pro ects 2,262,0'0 a1,160,000 $445 000 $2,750,000 $1,510,000 $2 610,000 $1,155,000 Endin ash Ba ante 727,962 $228,014 308,553 201,106 $185,972 $15,460 $40,686 Note., Council reiterates its goals and policies as stated in the Comprehensive Plan and acknowledges that the six -year CIP as proposed does not have adequate funding to accomplish all the goals and objectives as stated in the Comprehensive Nonmotorized Nonmotorized Nonmotorized $70,000 Trans- Meadowdale Beach Rd $30,000 Trans- 80th Ave W from 206th to 21116 80th $220,000 Trans- 216th Street SW Walkway $90,000 Packet Page 4 of 88 0 00 0 0 0 0� Cl) r (D (00 to LO N 0 (00 ((00 CD " to 0 N N N h CM N N � 6� � N- 611+ O O 0.O O 006% O O O O O O N M M O M M r CD CO N N N O N N N 00 CO (0 N CO CO � � �� 000 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0H}- 0 000 O 00 0 0 r O CO O N CD CD O 0 NOtn W to O 00 CO N ��N N� M CO CO EA 64 64 69 64 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0� O to r if � CO � O I CV EA lA 669 61)- 69 613, 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0601, O O O 0 O O to CO 00 0 0 Ld n m 00 CO C M q O 00 O O N �� V; �� N 6" OO O 000 O 0� 00 O 000 O O DO ' 00t- W 00 00 0 (O li (DOV O O N �� q �� CO � O O 00 O O O 00 O O 0 0 O 0 6`i N N 00 (0 N N CO N N N N N N 64 � � It m U O J i N J �' O G O M r M r ` CO r y O N UO j V rs V n V m V a C o .2 O o N N CY 0 LL f° n 0) 0 '- Q a p � rn"= .°� O v is t V ui E 'i � N �' 0) 0 0 E 00 d m U O'N d d � Q N ~ ID ID V•� ' > OM _ N Ca ¢ W > QQ t1 C w Cl. Cr (a m 0~ Lp (06 N Q N _ -O Cm G m m E F- _ i Z la � ` p _ Cu Q O O O C fC O U O N 'D '� C d Ri F- O U 0 U R N 7 tL m W t3 w w w3'.. V 0 C. C > 07 @ -Op 'O p p y ate+ N U a. a w a- Of m (n u Q c F- F- w Packet Page 5 of 88 Capital Improvements Program Buildings Maintenance- Fund 116 Projects for 2007-2013 PROJECT NAME 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ADA Improvements- City Wide $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Anderson Center Seismic Reforcement $959,600 $472,600 Anderson Center Interior Painting $15,000 Anderson Center Exterior Painting $30,000 Anderson Center Carpets $17,000 Anderson Center Radiators $25,000 $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 Anderson Center Exterior Repairs $25,000 Anderson Center Blinds $20,000 Anderson Center Asbestos Abatement $35,000 Anderson Center Vinyl Tile $12,000 Anderson Center Flooring $75,000 Anderson Center Counter Tops $12,000 Anderson Center Oil Tank Replacement $40,000 Anderson Center Elevator Replacement $150,000 Anderson Center Sprinkler Head Replacement $10,000 $15,000 Anderson Center Roof Replacement $15,000 Cemetery Building Gutter Replacement $3,000 City Hall Entrance Doors $18,000 City Hall Elevator $125,000 City Hall Exterior Cleaning/RepaintingCleaning/Repainting $50,000 City Hall Security Measures $10,000 $10,000 Grandstand Exterior and Roof $45,000 ESCO Project Phase II $472,600 Fire Station #16 Painting $5,000 Fire Station #16 Heating Unit Replacement $20,000 Fire Station #17 Stove Hood Exhaust $1,000 Fire Station #17 Carpet $12,000 Fire Station#20 Stairs and Deck $35,000 Library Carpets $50,000 Library Fire Alarm System Replacement $25,000 Library Plaza Appliance Replacement $4,500 Library Plaza Room Carpet $20,000 Library Plaza Brick Painting $65,000 Library Wood Trim $12,000 Log Cabin Lighting Replacement $3,000 Meadowdale Clubhouse Roof $16,000 Meadowdale Flooring Replacement $20,000 Meadowdale Clubhouse Gutter Replacement $5,000 Meadowdale Clubhouse Exterior Painting $3,000 $15,000 Museum Step Replacement $50,000 Museum Brick Pointing & Grouting $40,000 Museum Brick Sealing $20,000 Park Maintenance Bldg Renovation Study $15,000 Park Maintenance Bldg Paint Booth Installation $40,000 Public Safety/Fire Station #17 Soffit Installation $3,000 Public Safety Exterior Painting $8,000 Public Safety Council Chamber Carpet $15,000 Senior Center Misc Repairs & Maint. $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Senior Center Kitchen Remodel (CDBG Funding) $90,000 Senior Center Entry/Vestibule CDBG Funding $15,000 $135,000 Senior Center Roofing CTED Funding $85,000 Senior Center Foundation Structural Study $35,000 Senior Center CMU Elastomeric Sealing (CDBG) $148,000 Senior Center Siding (CTED) $60,000 Wade James Theater Gutter Replacement $5,000 Wade James Theater Roof Replacement $30,000 Wade James Theater Exterior Painting $4,000 Total Facilities Projects $1,694,200 $1 041,600 $251,000 $247,000 $236,500 $251,000 $255,000 Revenues and Cash Balances 2007-2013 Beginning Cash Balance $261,753 $281,153 $76,253 $29,853 $53 $3 $3 Interest Earnings $7,500 $7,500 Transfer from Gen Fund #001 $56,600 $56,6001 $56,600 $157,200 $236,450 $251,000 $255,000 Bank Financing for ESCO Project $408,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sno. Co. CDBG Grant (Secured) $97,500 $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Senior Center Funding $35,000 CTED Grants $85,000 $115,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bond Funding for FAG Seismic Project $435,500 $214,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 FEMA Grant (Secured) $524,100 $258,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sno. Co. CDBG Grant (Not Secured) $0 $0 $148,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Grant Funding (Not Secured) $0 $50,000 $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 ESCO Utility Rebates (Not Secured) 64,200 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 Total Revenues $1,975,353 $1,117,853 $280,853 $247,053 $236,503 $251,003 $255,003 Total Facilities Projects $1,694,200 $1,041,600 $251,000 $247,000 $236,500 $251,000 $255,000 Endin Cash Balance $281 153 $76 253 $29 853 $53 $3 $3 $3 Packet Page 6 of 88 Capital Improvements Program Parks Improvement - Fund 125 Projects for 2007-2013 PROJECT NAME 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Park Development ProJmts 162nd Street Park 1% $300,000 $25,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 76th Ave/75th PI West Walkway 1% $945,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Anderson Center Field/Court 1% $5,000 $40,000 $40,000 $20 000 $100,000 $10,000 $10,000 Brackett's Landing 1% $0 $10,000 $100,000 $10,000 $50,000 $5,000 $5,000 City Park 1% $100,000 $120 000 $50,000 $25 000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Civic Center Complex 1% $75,000 $40,000 $30,000 $30,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Edmonds Marsh/Hatchery 1% $0 $40,000 $40,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Fishing Pier/Olympic Beach 1% $20,000 $50,000 $35 000 $25,000 $25,000 $10,000 $10,000 Former Woodway HS (development dependent upon successful capital campaign) 1% $0 $1,000,000 $850,000 $25,000 $25,000 $5,000 $5,000 Maplewood Park 1% $40,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Marina Beach Park 1% $0 $10,000 $10,000 $70 000 $200,000 $10,000 $10,000 Mathay Ballinger Park 1% $60,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Meadowdale Clubhouse Grounds 1% $0 $10,000 $5,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 Old Woodway Elementary Park 07-'08 to Fund 132) 19/6 $0 $0 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Pine Ridge Park 1% $0 $5,000 $45 000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 $0 Pine Street Park 1 % $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Seaview Park 1% $0 $15,000 $50.000 $60,000 $10,000 $0 $0 Sr. Center & 144 RR Waterfront Walkway Fund 132 1% $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 Sierra Park 1% $0 $80 000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Underwater Park 1% $2,000 $2,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Waterfront Walkway/Olympic Beach 1% $20,000 $50,000 $100,000 $5,000 $0 $0 Yost Park/Pool 1% $25,000 $65,000 $10,000 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Citywide Park Improvements Citywide Beautification 1% $20,000 $60,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,0001 $40,000 ADA 1% $0 $5 000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Centralized Irrigation 1% $0 $0 $5,000 $5 000 $5,000 $0 $0 Misc Paving 1% $10,000 $50,000 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Citywide Park Improvements/Misc Small Projects 1% $145,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,060 $50,000 $50,000 Sports Fields Upgrade/Playground Partnership 1% $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 Specialized Projects Skateboard Park 1 %e $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 Trail Development Interurban Trail (07-08to Fund 132) 1% $0 $0 $10,000 $5 000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Misc Unpaved Trail/Bike Path 1% $10 000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Planning 4th Avenue Arts Corridor $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cultural Arts $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Comprehensive Plan $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $50,000 $0 Edmonds Marsh Environmental Plan $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Yost Pool Feasibilty Study $40,000 $10 000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Park Projects $1,932,000 $1,782,000 $1,655,000 $630,000 $870,000 $315,000 $265,000 Revenues and Cash Balances 2007-2013 Beginning Cash Balance $5,397,997 $2,731,997 $869,997 $9,997 $154 997 $69,997 $539,997 Real Estate Tax 1/4% $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 Interest Earnings $90,000 $85,000 $50,000 $30,000 $40 000 $35,000 $45 000 Total Revenues $6,237,997 $3,566,997 $1.669, 997 IZOL9 997 JR44 997 85$ 4,997 JLaI4 997 Expenditures Supplies $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Professional Services $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 Transfer out to Fund 132 $1,569,000 $910,000 Total Park Projects $1,932,000 $1,782,000 $1,655,000 $630,000 $870,000 $315,000 $265,000 Total Expenditures $3,506.000 $2,697,000 $1,660,000 $635,000 $875,000 $315,000 $265,000 ,Ending Cash Balance $2,731,9971 $869,9971 $9,9971 $154 997 $69,997 $539 997 $1,069 997 Packet Page 7 of 88 REET 2- Transportation Fund125 Projects for 2007-2013 PROJECT NAME 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Nonmotorized Trans: Downtown Crosswalk Rehab $125,000 Nonmotorized Trans: ADA Curb Ramp Impr $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 1 $20,000 $20,000 Nonmotorized Trans: Pedestrian Lighting- Citywide $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Nonmotorized Trans -Shell Valley-Bike/Walk/Emer. Access $390,000 Overlay -Citywide $550,000 $550,000 $350,000 $350,000 $450,000 $450,000 $500,000 Total Construction Projects $575,000 $700,000 $765,000 $375,000 $475,000 $475,000 $520,000 Revenues and Cash Balances 2007-2013 Beginning Cash Balance $680,111 $119,914 $72,912 $9,734 $119,978 $192,977 $332,802 REET 2 Revenues $650,000 $650,000 $700,000 $700,000 $700,0001 $700,000 $700,000 Investment Interest $17,003 $2,998 $1,823 $243 $2,999 $4,824 $8,320 Transfer to Fund 112 for 100th Ave W Road Stabilization Project -$500,200 Transfer to Fund 112 for Nonmotorized Trans- Caspers/ 9th/Puget Drive -$152,000 Transfer to Fund 112 for Nonmotorized Trans- 72nd Ave W Ped -$180,000 Transfer to Fund 112 for Nonmotorized Trans- 76th Ave & 206th St -$35,000 Transfer to Fund 112 for Nonmotorized Trans- 80th/206th Walk -$110,000 Transfer to Fund 112 for 216th St Walkway -$45,000 Transfer to Fund 112 for Nonmotorized Trans- 80th/180th Walkway -$390,000 Transfer to Fund 112 for Puget & Oym is View Signal -$90,000 Transfer to Fund 112 for Walnut @ 9th Ave Signal -$122,500 Total Revenues & Cash Balances $694,914 $772,912 $774,734 $494,978 $667,977 $807,802 $528,622 Total Construction Projects $575,000 $700,000 $765,000 $375,000 $476,000 $475,000 $520,000 Ending Cash Balance $119,914 $72,912 $9,734 $119,978 $192,977 $332,802 $8,622 Note: Council reiterates its goals and policies as stated in the Comprehensive Plan and acknowledges that the six -year CIP as proposed does not have adequate funding to accomplish all the goals and objectives as stated in the Comprehensive Plan. Packet Page 8 of 88 Capital Improvements Program Parks Acquisition - Fund 126 (Special Capital) Projects for 2007-2013 PROJECT NAME 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Debt Service on City Hall $415,502 $415,500 $415,500 $415,500 $415,500 $415,500 $415,500 Debt Service on Library Roof $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 Debt Service on Marina Beach $151,835 $151,835 $151,835 $151,836 $151,835 $151,835 $151,835 Debt Service on PSCC Purchase $73,823 $73,823 $73,823 $73,823 $73,823 $73,823 $73,823 Dept Service on FAC Seismic retrofit $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 Total Debt Service J§E 660 19E 558 697 558 697 158 IQE 558 JUL158 JNZ 558 Misc. O ens ace/Land $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Waterfront Acquisition $500,000 $600,000 Tideland/Beach Acquisition $10,000 $10,000 $100,000 Total Park Projects 210 000 210 000 30$ -000 700 000 LmQQO 000 $100,0001 1q9LO 000 Beginning Cash Balance $289,457 $852,297 $1,115,139 $1,287,981 $1,560,823 $2,033,665 $2,436,507 Real estate Tax 1/4%/1st Qtr % $1,400,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Interest Earnings $70,0001 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $100,000 $120,000 Projected Grants: State/Federal Waterfront Acquisition) $500,000 $500,000 Private Donations Misc O en Space) Total Revenues $1,759,457 $2,022,297 $2,285,139 $2,957,981 $2,730,823 $3,233,665 $4,156,507 Expenditures Total Debt Service $697,160 $697,158 $697,158 $697,158 $697,158 $697,158 $697,158 Total Parks Projects $210,000 $210,000 $300,000 $700,000 $100,000 $100,000 $600,000 Total Expenditures $907,160 $907,158 $997,158 $1,397,158 $797,158 $797,158 $1,297,158 Ending Cash Balance $852,297 $1,115,139 $1,287,981 $1,560,823 $1,933,665 $2,436,507 $2,859,349 Packet Page 9 of 88 Capital Improvements Program Special Projects- Fund 129 Projects for 2007-2013 PROJECT NAME 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 State Route SR 99 International District Enhancements Total Projects Beginning Cash Balance $11,000 Projected Grants: PSRC Transportation Enhancement Grant Secured $316,000 Total Revenues $327,000 Expenditures Total Projects Total Expenditures $327,000 Ending Cash Balance $0 Packet Page 10 of 88 Capital improvements Program Parks Construction - Fund 132 Projects for 2007-2013 PROJECT NAME 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 164th Street Walkway 1% $0 $270,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Dayton Street Plaza 1% $50,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Interurban Trail 1%0 $40,000 $660,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Old Woodway Elementary Park 1% $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Senior Center & 144 RR Waterfront Walkway 1 % $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Skateboard Park - Civic 1% $339,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Total Projects $1,569,000 AL20 000 0 0 N 0 0 Revenue& Cash Balances beginning cash balance $0 $174,600 Transfer in from Fund 125 for 164th Street Walkway $0 $70,000 Transfer in from Fund 125 for Dayton St. Plaza $50,000 $30,000 Transfer in from Fund 125 for Interurban Trail $40,000 $160,000 Transfer in from Fund 125 for Old Woodway Elem Park $1,000,000 $400,000 Transfer in from Fund 125 for Senior Center $140,000 $0 Transfer in from Fund 125 for Skateboard Park $339,000 $0 Total Cash Transfer from Fund 125 $1,569,000 $910,000 Projected Grants(secured): Dayton Street Plaza Arts Festival Foundation $25,000 Skateboard Park(Community Partners $24,600 subtotal grants secured= 49 600 0 Projected Grants not secured): 164th Street Walkway Federal $200,000 Interurban Trail Federal $125,000 $125,000 Interurban Trail State $250,000 Old Woodway Elementary State $300,000 Senior Center & 144 RR Avenue CDBG - HUD $194,000 subtotal grants not secured= JI2L5 000 IMN 000 Total Revenues 1 743 000 11,q 79 000 Expenditures Total Projects $1,569,000 $1,960,000 Total Expenditures 1 569 000 lilqqo 000 ,Ending Cash Balance $174 600 $19 000 Packet Page 11 of 88 Capital Improvements Program Combined Utility Construction Improvement- Fund 412-100 Water Projects Projects for 2007-2013 Water Projects PROJECT NAME 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Citywide Water Improvements $25,000 $25,000 $26,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Replacement Program- 2005 Program $1,525,000 Replacement Program- 2006 Program $1,100,000 Replacement Program- 2007 Program $555,000 Replacement Program $1,460,000 $1.200,000 $1,250,000 $1,150,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 South Perrinville Waterline Replacement (OVD) $675,000 Five Corners Pump Station Improvements $400,000 Seismic Improvements $150,000 Reservoir Security $90,000 Chlorine Residual Analyzers $15,000 Automated Meter Evaluation Study $10,000 Automated Meter Constrruction $100,000 $100,000 PRV Replacements 1 $100,000 Total Water Projects $3,960,000 $2,160,000 $1,226,000 $1,275,000 $1,185,000 $1,325,000 $1.325,000 Revenues 2007-2013 Beginning Balance $1,379,936 $190,834 $45,605 $231,745 $72,539 -$647 $84,336 Transfer from Combined Utility Fund #411 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Works Trust Fund Loan -Five Corners - Transfer in (Secured) $326,400 Connection Fee Proceeds $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 Bond Proceeds, Transfer in $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,400,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $1,400,000 $1,300,000 Interest Earnings $34,498 $4,771 $1,140 $5,794 $1,813 -$16 $2,108 Transfer to Const Improv Fund #112 -$115,000 -$115,000 -$115,000 -$115,000 -$115,000 -$115,000 -$115,000 Total Revenues $4,150,834 $2,205,606 $1,466,746 $1,347,639 $1,184,363 $1,409,336 $1,396,446 Total Water Projects $3,960,000 $2,160,000 $1,225,000 $1,276,000 $1,185,000 $1,325,090 $1,326,000 Endin Cash Balance $190 834 $45 605 $231 745 $72 539 $647 $84 336 $71 446 Packet Page 12 of 88 Capital Improvements Program Combined Utility Construction Improvement - Fund 412-200 Drainage Projects Projects for 2007-2013 PROJECT NAME 220th St Storm Improvements 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 232nd St Storm Improvements $150,000 96th Ave West Storm/ 93rd Ave West Storm $860,000 Citywide Drainage Replacement, Extension $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 $300,000 $315,000 $330,000 $350,000 Lake Ballinger Monitoring $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Lake Ballinger Lake Level & Outlet Study $40,000 Meadowdale-Drainage $70,000 Northstream 30" Storm Repair/ Improvements $575,000 Olympic Ave. Phase 2 $350,000 $50,000 Olympic Ave. Phase 1 $35,000 Perrinville Creek Diversion $150,000 $1,500,000 Public Involvement Projects $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Shell Creek $30,000 Shoreline Regulation Revisions Shoreline Regulation Revisions, Monitoring & Public Education $30,000 Southwest Edmonds Basin Study, Projects $250,000 Talbot Road $300.000 Edmonds Marsh Channel Improvements $50,000 $250,000 Vehicle Wash Station $100,000 Willow Creek Outfall Ext. & Marina Beach Emer. Repair Total Drainage System Projects $2,036.000 $791,000 $1.611,000 $696,000 $376,000 $491.000 $361,006 Revenues and Cash Balances 2007-2013 Beginning Balance $0 $45,268 $780,399 $339,959 $138,682 $201,149 $150,178 Transfer from Fund 411 $100,000 $66,050 $451,224 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 Transfer from Fund 411-Bond Proceeds $2,200.000 $1,300,000 Public Works Trust Fund Proceeds (Secured) $30,281 Grant for Perrinville Diversion (Sought, not Secured) $700,000 CZM Grant for Edmonds Marsh (Sought, not Secured) $150,000 FCAAP Grant for Talbot Road (Sought, not Secured) $40,000 Lynnwood Cost Share, Perrinville Diversion (Sought, not Secured) $350,000 Contributions to Perrinville Diversion Project (Sought, not secured) $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,0001 $50,000 $50,000 Storm System Development Charge Fees $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 Investment Interest $0 $1,132 $19,510 $8,499 $3,467 $5,029 $3,754 Public Works Trust Fund Loan- Northstream Storm (not secured) Public Works Trust Fund Loan- 93rd/96th Storm not secured Interfund Loan Payback Interfund Loan (Fund 411) -$239,013 Transfer to Const. Improvement Fund 112 -$50,000 -$55,000 -$55,000 -$55,000 -$55,000 -$55,000 -$55,000 Total Revenues $2,081,268 $1,571,399 $1,950,959 $834,682 $677,149 $641,178 $588,933 Total Drainage Projects $2,036,000 $791,000 $1,611,000 $696,000 $376,000 $491,00. $361,000 Endin Cash Balance $45 268 780 399 $339 959 $138 682 $201 149 $150178 $227 933 Packet Page 13 of 88 O 0 O O O O O LO O O O M O M CDO O O O O O V)OO 00 000 O O O O C C 00 O OO NO N 0 LO O O O LO V 6131 O O (O Q LO O M CO O (O O N 00 O r N (- N d' V) Cl) Cl) V M V) N V) Cl) ( 1 el. O N V3 V) 69 0 0 00 O O (O.O(OO 00 O O O 00 O CDV'V)LO0 00 000 O C C C O O N (O O C 0 00 O 00 (O 0 0 O 0 )O N N O O_ LO D CCO LO It N N N N N N Cl V) O r V3 N Cl N CO V) r 64 V) V) (A _ _ O N 69 V) V} V} O O O O 0 0 0 <t O O O LO 0 LO 00 00 O O COV>OQO 00 V O V 00 00 O O CO 00O 00 NON O (o O V)O CD)O r 0 O LL) N CD 00 CO O 0 (O I- V) O r N (O (O 0 r r N V3 V) N V3 It V) )O V) V* V) V r V) LO IT O N tf V) V) V) OO OOO O (- OMO O0 O 00 000 O N V)MO 00 (OO(O C O O C O O M O O O O M O M O(O (000 O V O O_O to a O N O r N V) V) V) CO V) CO(O V) - 64 O r V) V) V) O N V) V) V) V) O 00 O 00 00 O vO V*O 00 I-O 1" O 00 O 00 00 O �'V)00O 00 NON O OC O OC OO O M O)O OO MOM O 00 LO LO O O O O O) 0 O O r O r N (O N a0 O to 00 M ( V) O O r O M (O W O M V) N V) 69 V) (O V) m V) v V) CO V) (O N V) O _ )O _6-� r (O N (O N r V) O N V) V) V) 00000 00 0 O O O (-_O(-O 00 vC, V OC) 0C, 00 O O O O hO(OO 00 vO V 00 00 00 O O O O MO(OC OO MOM O O O O O O O O O O (O 0 (1- 0 O (O 0 0 0 O V'h N CD CD CO 0) (0 n OONM rN V [,- Ih N r V) N V It 613, V) V) (O r <t V) r r V) rl - (O - V) O N <» O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 h O CO N O 0 0 C. 0 0 O 0 0 O CO N 0 0 (l- O l h O OO OOO O OO LO a LO OO (OO(O O 00 OQ LO OLO to O� M OL to (0 I+ V3 0 0 112 V) O O V) I: 0 t0 0 O) 0 m 0� O V) I. m r r N V) 0 0 O 0 r CDV) V) N V) N _ _ W. V) nj. _ N 'Y3 N U r' (D M � - � e- ot$ 0 E O r 00 (O N ^ V L.0 O U) M yy O U C c C N c C V w N oc O LL O lL J J N _ ayi cc _ N N N a. otS In U C (0 _ w 0 J 0 J d: a eM- N N -O W J (6 N '0 '0 U yN (A 3 �p 3 �� <na m a c N u a� 3ti (D a�Q o3N a)30M 0 -0 �tLtL 4� °)�- chic CD W o`Nc 833)E m°�3 -c�!/jZo aOiaEi � ENS -in in dm o 3 3= N a3i(n w� o CO `- r Y v m �` y U o = �oN Q 3 3 my a� m -U(na a) o c 06 m= 3 �(n c �U S (D t 3a.mc M p Z N N 3 3>Inm W a 3 lA N_ONMNM r r r nO)Ld (` 3a N N QN O m E- 0) L N .O ci u_ C L N w N H in O U)U) O> N f6Umv N �` N !A c c c c c c c c N c rn> N > Q 7 (/i a) 3 ur 0 �- c (� 0 "� 0 c o o 0) > d (6 <�v r to v U W o >> i v n N o 0Q > 0 c o. o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a� v� w Z a) y 0 � d 0.0 E �� 4 us 'C d O _c .c r s< Q Q (/). t v; ;a O. w 0 m m m io m m f0 % L .Q R c E 7 C in rn o U c'i U O 0) y c O o (flvo c � 0 m 5 3t E,,,050MlM665rn f E a) > a) m .0 j a) cZ� C137 L O r N � N (O CO S O. N ._ a) v '' �'' �'' "' ''. �'' O— C N N O N 0) > O O 3 O O O C U LL d d NNNNr- F- F- CO 51 W =SJ_).JJJJJJJZpa(At-��H mI- Emma=()I- HH W Packet Page 14 of 88 M O r 0000 OV0N OD OD M OOCO �O 0M 00 Cl) r M CO Cfl Cl) N Cl) 00 0 O) O e-- CA O N 0 — C\lN�CON• Oj CV O 0 N V (O O C7 - CV 00 M 6s 63 CLO 64 CCON�N 69 64 61) 00 61) U') ffi 6'> M O 0 �0�0NLLO CO (0 CO C C COCOON r Cl) 0) oMNCn d' O) NO(OO OOO O) N - MW (` N N N ffi -MMu7 64 64 64 V) MN6F)N VO' C,- m CO ITa) toM y� 69, 69 63 ffl Cf) 61) 61) 63 69 IT 2 �Nd' Cn M 0 CO 0 r O m NV00O CO0 N Or- (O()ITC`COO CO OhN S N ' r Nr N- N_ d' CO N M V 0 00 0 CO N � O 00 N m .0 rT C w N Cj 04 N �CON•LO O O — CO N c7 O— m Cl) CO M L N 64 CA Efi LO Cf3 V K3 6•i 609N Efl fi-1 69 69 O m U) C O ` N m Cu E N M U t? (n n Q ,� N. O ` N E E O O Ca O U) ` O O 0000 O o 00 O 11-00 N O p C( (D COMNi n IT 0000O 00 00 - MItC a) NO O 0 0— CO0( N cA OA — CO CO Cn N n 64 N '1- 69 0) A CO (a O C\l0NCC)0 C CO 6 N 64 E OE3 a) a)O jON T C) Cu O N N N O N v t(y M O `O O N O w a) 3 0 0 0 0000 0 O O OO O t-00 (V C C\ Ca (0 U) N a) C� C� M (0 O C V M ao N 00 M d7 Cl) M V' Oct T� O (0. �. M O) O c Ca o 0 � Ca 3 N 0) Q O O �' OCMM(C') r- CP CV O 'D CO O C0 o) lc M 00 M W) 0\ 0 j, 0 0 0 o N N 64 EPr 64 64 Cn C) ti'N N NOS' 0� 0 '� O 64 ffl 64 EA 64 0. O 0 16 C U 0 00 N 0tz- u) N 00 C Ca N CO CO ... (O N .� In ... M ..� Cn m -0 — O — O N U O N a) C)... N U w- Ca -0 0 U)C "O 0 Cu = 00 O Q. CO 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 C) 0 M 0 Ih O O Cl)O CCU 0 O 0 M C Ca y -0 y ..O ..O C 0 O 0 C0MNN ? N o(0.LOM O NM O O J C O O O a) (a O O (a O N O N O O O O O O_ CO Oj M C,.j Cn O C0 Cn O O) tt).� N (() N C5 N 0 O O Cr) Ce) 0 O O M CL CO U) 3 C 7 Q U y; a- 64 T 64 64 (A 64 b9 69 64 69 6F3 V! V' 6A 64 � to � © N a) N. a) > C •C C rr R »d d Q O o a) CL a)N vC0 w c 0 0 O 00 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 Cl OI- N M Cl) ti. N�� M r E L O O00 O OOOO Cl)_N N. LOOT M0 CV �O o N a)0 O H O N CtOO � O 00 CO � —7O)CV CO Cl) � O �n(0 � 0) (D LO N d � 6) � 6q � r- � � N - t» c C- C 64 69 to 0 L Oo N ai V (D 7 a) w 69 0 0 U) °� n �o�� CD a) Ez V.N U Imo CO ,E iii C° r a) 0 U m U) m Y� LL 3 0 i w Ca `m LLt_Ua (D a °� s? , aCi U a Cl) a a) o .N c O o c� '� .Z o M = 20 v m 2 a N _ � aa)) ` LL o aoi a) (D a G a) V o > c a o d f ti O aci Cu(a U C o E rn aci v ° n Z (D U) U) C N m c n o U c O o 3 c > c a C ro o Cu U U 0 C ` v 3 U Cn c 3 0.2 'N o o Q- H a) c c N� C a) o) V m Cn a) m —_ N rn N rn� = O �. �. (n W = as a) ('ci c a) 3 U) .� a a .•-• c ` m coi w. p o o N E'E E . c C t (a o o o. �a E Ca CO C O O N E O V s2 C Y OO rn C m m Ca d V E (a O w o fl O O p U Cn a) CO a) O_ a) C,1 a) Z) �- U C 0 3 o N O C O C O a) N rn > O a) 3 a) E ~ =- C a) >, W (V O 'L 0)) �a� a. �,EEEA a)�wt'm°-OoatUU��ww�gm� c '� � o `o a '� � (.g d crn�(a�� '0) v�i of ai = O c U n. a O C .o p > > d o a) N > ° UQQQV d Sc�9U2w COXWOOOwaU�aC�� i-° �m �HitQ i-°Hw Packet Page 15 of 88 AM-825 Discussion on Draft Revision to Chapter 19.10 City Council Committee Meetings 1.B. Date: 02/ 13/ 2007 Submitted By: Duane Bowman, Development Services Time: 20 Minutes Department: Development Services Type: Committee: Community/Development Services Agenda Memo Subiect Title Discussion on draft Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 19.10 dealing with the permit development requirements of the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area of North Edmonds including proposed Landslide Hazard map. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Recommend the draft Ordinance and proposed map be forwarded to Council for a public hearing on March 20, 2007. Previous Council Action The process of updating Chapter 19.10 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) started back in 2004. The goal was to clean-up the regulations and adopt a better map for use in the Earth Subsidence Landslide Area in north Edmonds. A series of action took place in 2004 including: March 23, 2004 Council Work Session April 20, 2004 Public Hearing May 19, 2004 Community Meeting at the Meadowdale Clubhouse July 27, 2004 Council Work Session (power -point presentation) September 13, 2004 CS/DS Committee meeting to review draft Ordinance September 21, 2004 Public Hearing on draft ordinance. Because the City was undertaking new LIDAR aerial mapping for the entire city, the project was delayed to allow more accurate data to be collected. Landau and Associates was hired to study the new data and prepare a new map based upon the more accurate information. On October 9, 2006, staff conducted a community meeting at the Meadowdale Clubhouse to discuss LIDAR Findings and introduce the new draft Landslide Hazard Map. Narrative At the September 21, 2004 Council Meeting , staff was directed to utilize best available science to produce a more accurate Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area Map. The City's consultant utilized LIDAR based technology to refine the boundaries of the landslide hazard area of North Edmonds. The purpose of this meeting is to introduce the new map and the proposed ECDC 19.10 draft ordinance. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Exhibit 1 - Draft Ordinance ECDC 19.10 Link: Exhibit 2 - Proposed new ESLHA Map for North Edmonds Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 02:15 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/08/2007 03:07 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 03:19 PM APRV Form Started By: Duane Bowman Started On: 02/05/2007 11:02 AM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2007 Packet Page 16 of 88 0006,900000 WSS/gjz 4/26/04 R;9/8/04gjz W *Significant changes are underlined. ORDINANCE NO. E WHEREAS, the Earth Subsidence `ac Edmonds that has been geologically active for thousands Hazard Area it an area of and WHEREAS, although publifqPimprovements have e l fed the overall stability of property in the area, there remains both an a4erlylr ` i e pf seated earth movement and a potential for earth movementfased on other factors such das inclement weather, steep slopes, seismic events, acts of an, failures,,;of utility lines ##many other factors, and WHE §REAS, tCity s policy Mike 1983 has been to permit development of Ma property, in the area co%s"sent ".the full extent of the property rights and obligations of its r citizens, so' long as t?elopmerit shoulders all costs and liabilities, both current and potential, rela rig Yo develop�%ent of the property, including full investigation of site conditions by competent professiral's, design for conditions and notification to the City and the Building Department, neighboring property owners and future purchasers of the property of all risks associated with development and the measures taken to mitigate such risks, NOW, THEREFORE, {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/1 Packet Page 17 of 88 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Chapter 19.05 Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas is hereby repealed, provided, however, that in the event that a court of competent jurisdiction should strike down the enactment of Chapter 19 below, or any portion thereof, Chapter 19.05 Areas or any part thereof parallel to the effect to the extent necessary to prevent any g in regulation. Section 2. The amended by the addition of a new Chapter 1 Hazard Areas to read as follows: Necrtons• 9"10.000' 19`0 020 19.1O 19.10.Q;40 191U050 19.10.060 19.10.070 19.10.080 provided in Section 2 and - E�4RTH SUBSIDENCE AND HAZARD AREAS be and remain in Statemerit`of purpose and application. Section amendments. Definitions. Minimum required application submissions. Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers. Site bonds, contractor general public liability insurance. Review to determine compliance with engineering practice and best available science. Issuance and denial of permits. Site access, profession allspecial inspection monitoring during construction and final geotechnical report. is hereby { WSs580435.DOC;1 /00006.90000011 Packet Page 18 of 88 -2- 19.10.000 Statement of purpose and application. A. This chapter has been enacted in order to provide both substantive and procedural provisions relating to the issuance of permits within designated earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas of the city. It shall be the policy of the city that no permit shall be issued for any site which is found to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, instability or unsuitable topograr, for the vftN [�,,, particular permit requested for issuance. Whegjdevelbpment E fly. occurs on an unstable site, an unreasonable risk@ ip'E,danger may exist to the public, to public improvements or t6Tddjd&ht, property s. owners. If such a site can be stabilized through the construction of on -site improvements, that risk may be redA `t ec. " 3 B. The construction of professfc addressing the risks of earth movers attendant measures (including but improvements, specially designed # removal of over burdeiti,�az?d other minimize the risk of earth 11o�veMI 110 structures, safeguard adj acent propi1. and to stabilize the structure, in th mitigate and reduce the risk 4,0f og' the S p$a Building U nd nra�,'cal measures the risk and eplovin2 feasib ounddi;oAs, retaining walls, improvnents designed to prevent av A le damage to es, limit nsle��inhabitants, ��..< [ : e t, o f n vement) may el 1h mouexi eiit on individual ie an owz 'er of any obligation or City ordinance to take all filable to reduce or eliminate C :'The ARCIIB`C; 4s promu7ated by the state of Washington and required to be ad' p ed by the city, does not specify a standard regarding`lot`stability'=`Si`e the city's request for an interpretation of the uniform<<buildin', code by the state building code council to designate an �acEceptable level of lot stability was denied, and because the is es to comply with state law requiring that the xssua4e „ ofE,,bui1 ing permits be a ministerial and not a discl"tdo ar act, the provisions of this chapter have been adopted in order;tti provide reasonable certainty in the permit issuance process' The purpose of these provisions is not to lessen the minimum requirements of the current adopted building code, but rather to define its requirements for city implementation. D. These provisions have been adopted in order to establish a policy that permits shall not be issued for any site where a substantial. risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard exist unless: (W5S580435.DOC;1 /00006.9000001) Packet Page 19 of 88 -3- 1. The risk can be defined with reasonable scientific certainty and found to be within acceptable limits as determined in accordance with this chapter. 2. Any hazard associated with the site is scientifically ascertained and fully disclosed through the permit process. 3. Notice is given of any risk through the land records of Snohomish County to future purchasers., 4. Any risks associated with construction an q pbitation are N'Q1 ° assumed by the builder and future owners of the 1111111[hll 5. Adequate indemnification is provided,ly° the builde'r'g?3d the owner of, the site in order that the general ptiblic not assumeor bear any portion of the costs or ,l ability associated witlf"'die builder's investigation, design ail, �g4, structi�i as well as t9 continuing maintenance of the siteb.� t�pxop(erty owner. zg � Yf e - IIDV E. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of fhs ordinance or the rt N. IRC/IBC, all applications fox permits recei ""V Ug any site, any t portion of which lies within an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area, shall be governedxby the -prof q#s{ions of h'`s` chapter. In 2 i� i t tilt# a addition to all other requirements o t ese s, the restrictions and provisions 'of this chapter §h' , T apply to ail building, grading, f�� fill and c�cavation permits (hereil erinits"} � Minor porm is such as DII!MinLy. meet anical. re-.. and interior alterations are F All a phca drys for 1T91V0 ECDC permits shall disclose within the' exrt whether or not any part of the site lies within, or, .cent tdl,an earth subsidence and landslide hazard area or within d�,, cal area,oas defined by the cit 's environmentally critical areas,,' 11c. Tl `e building official may require preliminary -riyestigation by,f a geotechnical engineer for any applicant whose property lies within or lies adjacent to a known earth subsidence landslide, hazard area, or within a known hazard area, or areas with steep slopes or unusual topography or which has a history of earth movement in order to assist the building official in determining whether these provisions should be applied. G. Nothing in this chapter should or shall be interpreted to guarantee issuance of a permit with respect to any property unless the requirements of the IRC/IBC as amended and interpreted by this chapter have been met. { WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.9000001) Packet Page 20 of 88 M 19.10.010 Section amendments. The provisions of this section amend the 2003 edition of the 1RC/IBC and all subsequent revisions adopted by RCW 19.27.031 as the state building code as previously amended by Chapter 19.05 ECDC. All prior substantive amendments have received the approval of the state building code council. All provisions of the 1RC/1BC which conflict with this chapter shall be deemed amended hereby, and any ambiguity created, shall be�tbsolved in favor of the specific provision or general intent of s.jj � chap 'ter. In addition to the amendments of the 1RC/IBC h 'ts alteration, improvement and correction to incorporate;: the "T ter, the following specific code provisions are amended and the substantive and procedural requirements�of �lGhapter 19 10 ECDC are amended by the correction and Aeration of the following sections of the 1RC/IBC: jl OR", 'I"_>. A. Chapter 1 Administration. 1. Section R105.1.1 M pit Review Applicability. Any permit requested for a site lying `fin whole or in part within, an earth subsidence and landslide 'hazard area as defined', by ECDC 19.10.020{F} shall be processed and actedupon m accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.10 "ECDC IN 2. Section R10`5 2 Work exempt from a permit. ECDC 19,00,010 exempiiofis. A, B, D£, , F, G, J, K 'rM, and P and ECDC 19.05.010 exemption NA. C, ci D shall not ap�pfy in any area designated as an earth subsx'denc'earid'landslide,.haaard area as defined in ECDC 3. Section RL05 3 2,iTirneiJimitation of permit application. a. Applications, for;which no permit is issued within one (1) year foljpwing`` the date of application, shall expire by limitatrari, and plans and other data submitted for review € may thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by 4` 'the biding official. Prior to expiration, the applicant may request a seven 7 month a lication extension if the .royal ofthe a lication is affected b the wet weather a season. froin October l." to April 30"'. The application may only be extended once. b. The building official may not extend the time for action by the applicant on an expired application. In order to renew action on an expired application, the applicant shall submit a new application, revised plans based on current adopted codes and pay new plan review fees as well as any outstanding peer review fees incurred to date. {WSS580435.DOC; V00006.90000011 Packet Page 21 of 88 -5- 4. Section R105.5 Permit expiration and extension. a. Every permit issued under the provisions and development standards of Chapter 19.10 ECDC shall expire by limitation two 2 years afler issuance, except as provided in ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)(b). b. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in writing an extension for a third and final year. If the plans and specifications for the permit extension application are the same as the plans and spo'cifications submitted for the original permit applicatiorl. pf6vided there has been at least one (1) required progr�Ps inspection conducted by the city building inspector `prlor to the extension, the permit shall be extended : Permlt fees shall be charged at a rate of one half the original building -permit fee to extend the permit. c. The maximum amount of time any building permit may extended shall be a total of three(3) years'.-,. At the end of any three (3) year period startmgfromthe original date of permit issuance,the permit shall becorc null and void and a new building p6fmit, shall be required � rith full fees, in order for the apphcar t to complete work.11 e issuance of a s °lE?t il�gg i8€s ' ..;g new permit shall negate ala 'ous vestin�of zoning or building codes. W eve �Ia'�.'p eat ins filed and a necesa>Gy development approval is #yed in accordance with tie Land Use PC gn Act, th`e' time limit periods unposed une this sectron';shall also be stayed until final d The buikifzczal shall "reject requests for permit extensfps, if` `modifications or amendments to the 4plicable boning and building codes have occurred since the;orlginal issuance of the permit, and modifications or amendments vvouldsignificantly promote public health and safetz };F applied to the project through the issuance of a new uermit. 5. =S'eetion R105.5.1 Recommence work on an expired permit. a 1&:rder to recommence work on an expired permit, a new permit application with full fees shall be submitted to the `building official. b. New permit applications shall be reviewed under current zoning and building codes in effect at the time of complete application submittal. If a new permit is sought to recommence work on an expired permit, the new permit shall be vested under the codes in effect at the time of complete application for the new permit, not the expired permit. When additional plan review is required, plan {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/) - 6 - Packet Page 22 of 88 review fees shall be charged. When applicable peer review and peer review fees shall be assessed. 6. Section R106.3.3.1 Phased approval. a. The building official may require sequencing of construction phases or activities such as the installation of shoring or temporary erosion control remedies and/or drainage systems, well in advance of grading or foundation construction on a time frame consistent with g6btechnical recommendations and peer review. As;`'part `'of the sequencing process, the building offic•�'1�E=;'°may impose permit conditions that address site I 9911 fencing to .,.include but not limited to: limiting,,llcavatio�I-',Wxamage systems and foundation installs 1R . 'the dryer ''season rg'between May lst and Septembe`:0'. � b. When perntit conditian.s such as groundwork is limited' €E the building official on a i3artrcular prOIJ t,'the applicants'4' eotechnical engineer in gy sixhm,it:,,",a letter detailing :.;€,i: geotechnical :recommendations that�� p ions of work may a�b�:, nro2ress. The lei :shall include a defu d work schedule to -'e co-ntbest available science and bwith standard ueoteen ineerintactice Tle building official likovides c6h6urrence reaWfiaLy at least the followina to provisions required, and ility of snec.ial insnecti issues. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction before the entire plans and specifications for tYie whole building or structure have been approved provided peer review approval has been granted. Phased approval means separate permits for grading, shoring, and foundation may be issued separately, provided concurrent approval is granted by the planning manager, city engineer, and city public works director, when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be issued unless approved civil plans detailing the construction of all site improvements including, but not limited to; curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines, sewer lines, and storm drainage have been signed as approved by the city {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - % - Packet Page 23 of 88 engineer. With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the city pursuant to Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to cover the estimated cost of construction to city standards for the improvements. B. Chapter 2 Definitions. 1. Section R 202 and IBC 202, are hereby amended to include the definitions set forth in ECDC 19.10.020, incorporato,)d by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. C. Chapter 4 Foundations. 1. Section R 401.1 General Exception 3€i3 Any.permlt re 'ested for a site lying in whole or in part within `a `earth subsidel��;� H� qpd landslide hazard area shall be processed and acted upor ITIpy3 accordance with the provisions o£ h pt,er 19.1O!ECDC. d[ �iJie � D. IBC Chapter 16 Structural design. 1. Section IBC 1601.1 1 Scope. Setting fortli�eequirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC, incorporated by this re£erexzeafully as if herein set forth. E. IBC Appendix J Grading. fs6E{E€„E€yf[E P 1Z�. 1. Section IBC `''�pendix J 10Iy,1.2 Scope. Setting forth the requireftAtsof ,%Iapter 19.10 `4,,Q C, incorporated by this reference a9314i1y as f:herein set fort 1910 020. Definitions. The followingjerms,'vcThen, used within this chapter, shall have the following defy ti ls: < `' "Architect's'I` shall mean a person licensed to practice #wture by the state of Washington. "B6st '`available science" shall b C. "Blufl" shall mead any slope ten (10) feet in height or greater inclined at greater than I unit vertical in 1 unit horizontal or 100% slope. D. "Building Official" shall mean the building official of the city of Edmonds. tWSS580435.D0C;1/00006X0000/} - - Packet Page 24 of 88 E. "Director" shall mean the director of development services as well as any authorized representative of the director. F. "Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area" shall mean any area of the city which, by reason of excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, stability or topography has a risk of earth subsidence and landslide hazard in excess of normal allowances. The earth subsidence and landslide hazard area is a subcategory of landslide hazard area (a geologicalld ardour area.) as defined in city of Edmonds en.vironmen.tallvri.tica7 areas Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area in the 200.7 t.enoitf of Landau earth. this reference and made a tart of this dlianter as fully as if fibib'ii r adopted landslide hazard maps upon adoption by ordinance. Areas designated on the by orth Edmd Earth Subsidence an(t taanQSII.cle tiazara Areas: ivia or any future adopted. landslide hazard map as having a risk of; earth subsidence or landslide hazard, areas with slopes as d signatcc , rt ECDC 23.80.020, areas which exhibit geologic charactbrtst�es� of era 'ovement, or any s s � , �P sty other area iden iedz as having a 7�Story of earth movement shall be presumedlo have%,1such risk and s T I be considered to be an earth subsidesi ce:;;,and lanfftlide hazard a'f'e to 1i.cants for permits in +a. : such area s'ih ll subtr : t,;a ecotechni6 reno.rt and comi)lete ol.an. set The presurr'pfon of kl=;shall be rebuttable and the decision of the director orb' ding official that any area lies within, or adjacent to, such earth subAdence and landslide hazard area shall be appealable as a_ staff decision to superior court in accordance with the Land Use R'etition Apt. Copies fthe reports and maps shall be maintained in the offices of the bt ilc ina official and shall be available for inspection during all normal working hours. Individual copies of the reports and reap may be obtained by the public upon the payment of the cost of reproduction. G. "General Contractor" shall mean a bonded insured and registered contractor in the state of Washington. A general contractor shall maintain state required bonding and shall cM general public liability insurance in the minimum amount of one (WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/) - 9 - Packet Page 25 of 88 ini.11..ion dollars. The general. contractor shall have a current valid state contractor's license with the state of Washington and a city of Edmonds resident or non-resident business license whichever is applicable. H. "Geologist"'" means a practicing geologist licensed 111 the state of Washington. with at least four (4) years experience as a licensed geologist_ in responsible charge including experience with landslide evaluation. -.jgfjh ,,, =.z'7 I. "Geotechnical Engineer" means a practicing,rg-gchnical/civil engineer licensed as a professional civil engineer I i� e state of Washington who has at least four (4) ,years of pro` essional employment as a geotechnical engineer n re'spons' le ;charge, including experience with landslide evaluation: J. "Landslide Hazard Area" a�1 ,eas ma6pcd or othexwls defined by the city of Edmonds as en Wb meri al critical areas o geologically hazardous areas. z3, 4; 6. Architectural and structural plans with design. calculations submitted :for permit, stamped and signed by licensed design. professionals of the state of Washington. N. "Site" means the entire area within the boundaries, as described in a legal description, of the property that is to be developed under the permit for which the applicant has applied. {WSS580435.DOC;1100006.900000/1 - 10 - Packet Page 26 of 88 O. "Stable" shall mean that the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability is minimal subject to the conditions set forth in the reports developed under the requirements of ECDC 19.10.030 and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. In the event that any site has an underlying risk of movement based upon deep-seated earth movement or large-scale earth failure which is not susceptible of correction by on -site im2_01yements, such hazard shall not render a site proposed folinsingle=family residences to be presumed unstable for the �1;,,ose of this provision if the g,eotechnical en ineer44,111 11 �' lIsh rd and recornn iendation of any Meer reviewer e w"'fi` rni fRl' 'sk of F � � �'° � aEi ; 3 probability of earth movement is thirty (3,CE�pce`nt or less., n a twenty-five (25) year period. 1111, In order to meet the definition of stable the �e'otechnical rgporl shall include identified hazards for the pro ert. ;and' the miti ati.ori` measures proposed to reduce or correct the 1hazards along with measures taken to mitigiftnotcritial im acts 'from the remaining, hazards, inchiding, all on {a i'sc i� Iisite measures taken to correct or reduce the risk. These shalli'be t1closed to theapplicant and R1 future owners, heirs and ass%ns in t,�{'covenant Ji6quired to be executed in accordance with p�ovjginns of this ,`chapter, in which NR� s case the definednsk may be appraoved as an acceptable condition. Oceanic "Structura��,,'Engineer" means a person licensed to practice ctural en ieerin b the state of Washington. g1:> g Y g S. "S`lructura1` Fill" shall mean any fill placed below strictures, includifa <; si l6bs where the fill soils are intended to su ort loads witboutvanacce table deflections or shearing. Structural fill should be clean. and free draining and should be placed above unyielding, native site soils corn acted in accordance with an approved eotechnical Mort pre aced utilizing, best engineering science. (wss580435.Doc;1/00006.900000/)- Packet Page 27 of 88 19.10.030 Minimum required application submissions. A. The applicant shall submit a complete plan set submittal and permit application and specifications for the proposed development as defined in ECDC 19..1.0.020(M).and this chapter. B. An Eai.-th Subsidence and Landslide Hazard area permit submittal checklist shall be adopted at the direction of the director and shall be provided to all persons inquiring regardig ,building permit applications or development permits in the de.``"ad earth subsidence and landslide hazard area of North..,, ponds. The submittal checklist shall include but not ;be" li YlfgO to the requirements contained in city public handb`dtis written' policies, adopted maps, reference maps, su_ :reports, nuiumum geotechnical report guidelines, and the,10 lowing. 1. 2. Vicinity map. 3. Topographic map 4. Civil plans (i.e., gradin drainage, utilities and situ S. Tree.:sU. t;d clearing 0 a Bonds, the det; Sion , iid sediment control, storm structural plan with structural calculations and contractor public liability insurance in accordance with ats stated below. If aril 'tem;iri the checklist is inapplicable to a particular project, a letter or "report shall be provided to the director stamped by the appropi fate licensed design professional, with sufficient information or data to demonstrate why the item is inapplicable. The director may utilize appropriate licensed consultants to deter nine if gcnerall accepted engineering practice requires submission of an application requirement. When consultants are used to deten-nine if generally accepted engineering practice requires submission of an a lication rec uircment the cost of review shall be paid by the gpplicant. {WSS580435.DOC;I100006.900000/} - 12 - Packet Page 28 of 88 C. A copy of the North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard map shall be included in the submittal checklist materials. D. The vicinit 7 m.a shall be suitable for locating the site and include information related to existing conditions on or near the site, based on the topographic map and survey and shall desigiate all known landslide masses or debris flows or mud flows on or near the site which could threaten proposed structures within 100 feet as referenced, noted described or discussed: in the geotechnical report. E. The applicant shall submit a topographi �,amap� ;and survey prepared and stamped by a licensed land surv,or pno`i,studies and evaluations b the eotechnical en in er,,, ands shall sYio'sld i Y g g, 1. Map scale, north arrow, kg numbers. easements, lot property 2. Existing grade contour lines, 3. All distances between; e'x s-ting structuresI",o the site and approximate distances of etsti rtable structn adjacent sites within 50 feet of proper;°„ line(al'ladjacent sitwhich could affect or be affected by the prop eve, shall be shown). f 3 ii 1� g €€ 4 } 4. Lowest foot�tgj#!!pr basement�Islab elevation of existing and proposed'structures the property and on adjacent properties to the extent that sued information j easonably available and, e location of existing sanitary sewers, storm water drainage facilities',septic tanks,,,,drain fields, wells, piezometers, private draina e s sth1s un round storage taiaks subsurface drains and other sewed/drainage facility components on, and adjacent to, the site to the extent such information is reasonably available. 6. `T;he,., locat `an of all existing underground utilities on, and adjacent„ 6t "",'the site including, but not limited to; telephone, cable television gas, electric and water utilities, vaults, fire hydrants and ev other cables, wires, meters and drainage pipes to the extent that such information is available. 7. A separate topographical drawing shall be submitted showing proposed grade contours at two (2) foot intervals (grades by the veotechnical engineer. or civil eneineer of record). This drawing shall include bottom of proposed footing elevations including all stepped footing elevations. {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 13 - Packet Page 29 of 88 F. Civil engineered „plans shall be prepared and stamped by a state of Washington licensed civil engineer pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.30 ECDC and current adopted. Stormwater Manuals. Geotechnical report recoan.mendations affecting civil playas shall be incorporated into the deli n and detailed on the lans and shall 1. Storm drainage plan with storm drainage calculations. isions for building bad and foundation and sediment control ,e. '!MfiainaRe and 4. Per►'nanent erosion control with Affdinai 6 and mai provisions, _ 5. Fill/soil. stockTile limitation — height, �t, protection and maintenaii.ce. block walls. sol walls. 7. i ,In lieu oFArocedural<�e Uif6ments of Chafer 18.45 ECDC e E. tttfn laz d, cleari.n&` 'plan shall be submitted when 'NIU.t o.-ound. No sfaii scan "'tree shall be removed until the ne.rn-lit is A`deWled landscape plan may also be required in order for the city to evaluate; long-term erosion control measures. The plan shall comply ith all requirements of the ECDC relating to tree clearing and critical areas review, if applicable. The director n.►ay .require the proiecteotcchnical engineer's concurrence regarding an anDroval of a tree cutting/land. clearinfa elan when slope stability is at .issue. H. Included in the erm.it submittal checklist shall be general and specific soils _ and geotecbn cal information, details or analysis required ursuant to IBC 1802. The applicant shall retain a {WSS580435.DOC;1/00006.9000001} - l4 - Packet Page 30 of 88 geotechnical engineer to prepare a report and evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions on the site to include: 1. The geotechnical report shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices, under the supervision of, and signed and stamped by, the geotechnical engineer. A geologist may be required to be part of the geotechnical consulting staff. The report shall reference the and discuss all items listed in the permit submit t'.41,• ecklist and R I,l :�fd� shall make specific recommendations conce 7n deVe ment of the site. 2. The opinions and recommendat bns contained iff11111 geotechnical report shall be suppo ed by field, observations a where appropriate or applicable, b hte�ture red ew, conducted the geotechnical engineer. T11e repoWiM§ ail4be 'based on L available science. 3. The report shall inclue �an anal sis of" material gathered through, Appropriate cxpjoratio ch as borings or :test pi suts to a minimum depth of 6 feet the p� oposed lowest footing or pile an analysis of soil.characie tzcs�tonductedby or under thee, n! �Ision of the engineer in accordance with the standards'='adapte ASTM or" er applicable standards. The 4 ° if the `W tion s geologic evaluations or interpret atians, tlii r'i✓ ort shall be reviewed and approved by a geologist:' 1IIIt. responsibility of the geotechnical engineer to aaS'Ure that >rhe geologist meets the qualifications listed in the defimttoxi section. A letter of concurrence from the the North Stun»naty Deport f20071_ anv lot which contains anv portion ol: anv hazard zone or is adjacent thereto (regardless of whether the proposed building pad is located within any hazard area) shall specifically consider within the geotechnical report, the following types of typical hazard zones and shall specifically note if the hazard_ is, or is not, present on the site. The report shall address hazards from encroaching landslide materials hazards from ground failure in material that has not previogsly failed, and hazards from ground failure inpreviously...failed material. For each landslide { WSS580435.DOC;1 /00006.900000/} Packet Page 31 of 88 -15- hazard identified on a property, the geotechnical -engineer shall identif the he types of specific processes associated with the hazard and include design features to reduce such hazards and mitigate innpacts. 6. For pMperties containing or adjacent to bluffs the eotechn.ical. engineer shall. as a part of the building permit process for an. work on the site provide analysis of the rate of retreat of the bluff prepared by a acoloQist and estimate the bluff retreat .at aunt and regression rate for periods of twenty -tine(25) and s ''yea The geotechnical engineer shall address bluff retreat o 11ilhFFe stability of P�d� abAbe� structures anal/or im rovernents. Structures arefe efin:iged,as,: a. A building intended for human hahitAffi.n. 11111ht%, or wei ht would slope failure and, ideate dancer to shows bluff is such or reasonabl could be antici gated toMKi Wered€b landslide or earth subsidence during its norrtzal,usefuI I'i e, a n olication shall 7. GO'c ECDC. lslon.S Of lmo-€' The appliaaY K; hall subs lt,1c6`iisistent with the findings of the geotechnical rep , #hdetailed structural plans with corresponding calculations which ``re prepared and stamped by the structural engineer of record. ien architectural plans incorporate such structural detarls said�'plans shall be stamped and signed by the structural engfti er of record. All other architectural plans may be prepared by are architect. designer. builder or lav person. J. Tle=appiicant shall submit required bonds, frozen funds or adequatle"instrument of credit and a copy of the contractor general public liability insurance pursuant to ECDC 19.10.050. K. The applicant shall submit declarations, disclosures, covenants and waivers as required by ECDC 19.10.040. 19.10.040 Site posting notice, disclosures, declarations, covenants and waivers. {WSS580435.DOC;1100006.9000001) - 16 - Packet Page 32 of 88 A. Notices of permit submittal application with the city shall be posted pursuant to ECDC 20.91.010B(b). Such notice shall be conspicuously posted and maintained at each street frontage at the applicant's expense and direction. Notice of permit issuance or denial shall be conspicuously posted as required above. Upon each posting a ten (10) day appeal period shall commence. Appeals shall be heard at Snohomish County Superior Court in accordance with the Land Use Petition Act and no other appeal shall be permitted. B. At permit application submittal, the applica={shall submit a written declaration with the permit applicatioh'Pthat; �i. cludes the statement that the accuracy of all information�ts warranted�,by the owner/applicant in a form which relieves..the city�and its staff from any liability associated with reliance on such submittals. The declaration shall also sfai &JN1 g at the? 1E ;owner/applicaO understands and accepts the risk of developrrig in'=. -an area with'` potential unstable soils and that the ownerlaplicant will advise in writing any prospective purchasers of the site, orany prospective purchasers or residential seeof structures ogag� laort-ions of a structure on the site of the stifle n 66txal of the area �� The owner annli file an application may reference the reports nts to the,city, all conclusions shall be those andQll-or'`her professionals. C. The plan set subinitt,a4ss°hall include a disclosure letter from the t�£ geotechnical e gineerYF`and civil. en ineer who prepared the geotechnicaI report aricj civil plans, stating that in his judgment the plans and specifications submitted for the project conform to the recoamendatois in the geotechnical report and that the risk of damagelfto =tke proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soo nstability will be minimized subject to the conditions set forth irf,"the report; and the proposed development will not 'increase the potential for soil movement. Minimized shall mean that the applicant has utilized best available science and coinnionly accepted engineering and architectural practice to minimize, to the extent possible, the risks associated with development of theXgperty. The geotechnical engineer shall review the erosion and sediment control plan and provide a statement about the adequqgy.. of the {WSS580435.DOC;1100006.90000011 - 17 - Packet Page 33 of 88 plan with respect to site conditions and report findings. The geotechnical engineer's statement shall also include an identi:('ication of landslide liazards a licable to the site the on -site measures taken to correct or reduce the hazards, as applicable, and measures taken to mitigate potential impacts from the remaining hazards. For sites where the hazards are not mitigated or where the risks from deep-seated or lame -scale earth movement cannot be d measures will be taken to mitigate the risk to sfriOffiies. adiacent Uroperties. and inhabitants in the event of deeb-seated .o.r larac- movement that are not fullyiniti ated =-b "design reasures,.. and render an opinion as to whether thc.eite will be stable within"=ie==, of all The owners what measures were installed Wited'ce risks and what indivi D. Further recommendaiior `s? geotechnical engineer shall Vie, l or exceptions to the original rec site conditioti§i=jijor other supp engineer ;who reviews the plans engmeer`;who prepared the 2eo the director the tried and sealed;01' by the 3 '111ishould there be additions e`ntlatzonsbased on the plans, data` the geotechnical specifications is not the same ical report, the new engineer accompanying the plans and or disagreement with the ;al report and state that the specifications conform to the new E. The play;set submittal shall include a disclosure letter or notation on the; design drawings by the structural engineer of y. recmrd stating'at; he has reviewed the geotechnical report(s), that he `undOr alids its recommendations, has explained or has had explained, do the owner/applicant, the risk of loss due to slides on the site"', and that he has incorporated into the design the recommendations of the report and established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage that might be caused by any risk of earth movement referenced in the report. The statement shall note any risks hazards potential problems from earth movement that are not fully.mitigated by design measures. F. The owner shall execute a covenant, (in a form provided by the city) to be submitted with the application (with necessary fee) to be { WSS580435.DOC;1100006.9000001} Packet Page 34 of 88 MEN filed with the Snohomish County Auditor. The director shall cause such completed covenant to be so filed. A copy of the recorded covenant shall be forwarded to the owner. This covenant shall be a covenant running with the land, which shall at a minimum include: 1. A legal description of the property. 2. A statement; explaining that the site is in a potential earth subsidence and landslide hazard area, that the risk associated with the development of the site is set forth in permit with the city of Edmonds building department, thai=�cConditions or prohibitions on development may have been impo'sedb , F;3fhe city in the course of permit issuance, and referencing ;any featurE in the design which will require maintenance or modification to address anticipated soil changes. The coy cant may incorporate by reference the statements and conditi °` ` to be obperved in the f6ft b the owner/a hcan f` proposed y pp `i, fYgeoteancal engineer; geologist, architect and/or structural engi;fir 4asfapproved after the review set forth in ECDC 19.10.060. 3. A statement waiving and prop harmless the city of Edmonds, its,o1 claims the owner/applicant and,, hisi have for any loss or damage toped,] the site resulting from soil move&, r issuances of any'permit(s) author j well as due to any atr'i or failure to as or successors in intdtest under or fo sing to indbihnify_ and hold cers and employees' from any irgtsItecessors,o!f assigns may e or�ro , either on or off and arisg from or out of the development on the site, as by. the indemnitor , its agents ng issuance of the permit. permit number authorizing the 19.1.0.050 ``�i3>H'Site boiidg and contractor general public liability requirements. 1. A'sur ty" bond, in an amount to be determined by the director, executee "by a surety company authorized to do business in the state of Washington shall be posted by the owner/applicant or general contractor to assure the restoration of any areas on the site, or in the surrounding area, disturbed or damaged by slides during construction, and to ensure completion of the work authorized by the permit, or, if the work is not completed, to assure that the site will be restored to a safe and stable condition at least equal to the safety and stability of the site prior to coinmen.cement of work { W SS580435.DOC;1 /00006.400000/} Packet Page 35 of 88 ME under the permit. The bond will be exonerated upon occupancy approval of the building permit by the building official. 2. In lieu of the surety bond, the owner/applicant or general contractor may propose to file a cash deposit or an instrument of credit with the director in an amount equal to that which would be required in the surety bond, and similarly conditioned. B. Public liability insurance. The general contracto�`af record shall carry general public liability insurance effectivg4b rough final occupancy in the minimum amount of one milli` $=dollars, and which shall name the city as an additional n Lured, against the injury, death, property damage and/or loss : rlsi from. or out of the city's involvement in the permitting poces5 for the project. C. Homeowner insurance. The ci l strongly__ recommends th� =M each property owner maintain 0p'blicres of lability insurance; adequate to provide sufficient funds'Q .'',to, indemnify and hold- harmless third parties in the event of earth"'WWgidence or landslides emanatingfrom or across' e owner s roe az> ,, , P p 19.10.060 Review to and bestavailable science. A. Tshe eity shall f6,§Yuire professj' al peer review of the plan set subniittal5 accomp'anymg the perf� application by a civil engineer, geotecluii'cal engineer,=; geologist, architect, and/or structural engineer, as maybe necessary and determined by the buildiiRI=&fjc1al or director, in order to determine whether the plan set submittals were p d ared in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice or kY'e practice of the particular engineering or design sPccialt and are based upon best available science. The fill cost of IMch peer review shall be paid in full by the o ''g/ pplcad within of iling3 b the city. B. This requirement may be selectively waived at the discretion of the director provided applicable project engineers provide written concurrence, determination, details, facts and/or data that individual site conditions warrant an exemption from outside peer review. Once waived, the building official shall not be required to inquire further into the adequacy of any report, plans, or data, but rather may rely upon the submittals as warranted by the owner/applicant as reviewed by the city's consultant. Nothing {WSS580435.DQC;1/00006M0000/} - 20 - Packet Page 36 of 88 herein shall relieve the owner/applicant of the obligation to submit a complete application fulfilling all the requirements of this chapter and the IRC/IBC. C. The final recommendation of the peer review regardin whether a submittal complies with generally accepted practice and/or is based on best available science shall be bindii.-ig u on. t11e building official. Such recommmendation may be appealed to Superior Court under the Land Use Petition Act. 19.10.070 Issuance and denial of p A. Permit Issuance. The following regd3rem'ents must be s`adQ"ed before a permit will be issued:£gt{t:' 1. An approved geotechnical repoifi h4as be6' VM[oubmitted and approved. F �€, 2. Plans and specificationshaye been submitt� corporating the recommendations of the gib Ted gut` 1 report and sai Mans have been approved. 3. The required declarations disc nsures chants and waivers have been submrttd& and aD-Droved. 4. Regii2red bonds; cash deposits and, public liability insurance z have been `n'asted wi�Ch=the.city. accepted has been' required, all submittals have been en prepared in accordance with generally Teti ' concrtrrence for pen -nit issuance has been received sions of ECDC Titles 16, 1 aved by the aunrouriate cit B. Permit denial. The following criteria shall result in the denial of issuance of permit: 1. Building, grading and excavation permits for construction on land which the director finds to be unsuitable for improvement due to excessively steep slopes, unsatisfactory foundation support, instability or unsuitable topography, or { WSs580435. DOC;1/00006.9000001) Packet Page 37 of 88 -21- 2. The resulting development would increase the potential of soil movement resulting in an unacceptable risk of damage to adjacent properties or an unreasonable risk of damage to the proposed development, or 3. Excessive flooding,... seepage, high water table or inadequate drainage, or 4 the b bluff is such that anv structure or inmrovemen't"'\ %d be RM b. A buildi.n.g uerjht would failure and, c. An i.morc 5. ndsli.de or earth. subsidenceA_ rin,- hits normal 3lication shall be denied. S `� 1ctures"''�'�"defined intended for Duman h- itatio'n, structure or p.rovement, whose stressor endall.Rer public safy in the.,_event of slope F� vernent on the site whi.cl s;riecessa7. to .mitigate or 6. Where the- doted site dance ts' or geologic 1-ialards are not minimiZ to tlxc rextent nos4ic., by the use of best available a greater landslide s geote`clrilcl engineer determines that there is thirty (30) percent in a 25 year period that C. In makin !A",j determination of permit denial, the director shall 1,86nsider not only the land which is the subject of the application, btt addihon' the surrounding area which would be adversely e affecte'el;,if tle'permit were granted. Permit denial shall be made in writin` `to='>thowner/a licant when the site cannot be rendered g 5 s� pp stable ''defined in ECDC 19.10.020(0). This decision and other preli.m.,inary determinations as referenced herein shall be appealable to Snohomish County Superior Court in accordance with the Land Use Petition. Act. No other appeal shall be permitted. The appeal period shall commence upon the date of mailing of any preliminary or final decision, or upon posting, if posting is the only notice a party with standing receives under the terms of this chapter. (WSS580435.DOC;1 /00006.9000001) Packet Page 38 of 88 -22- D. Prohibitions. .Because of the relationship of groundwater to stability, the discharge of collected surface water or storm water to the round surface or subsurface is prohibited on sites within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area. In add.itiozz. the following construction, buildings, or improvements are hereby prohibited.within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area: 1. Swimming pools or hot tubs. 5. 2. Ponds or other artificial irn oundments of wafer. 3. Watering or irrigation systems. 4. Tern orar or.. stock ile of fill l"' to ° b,ottom of slopes. 5. Rockeries. E. Waiver. The prohibitions established in i agz_aph D above shall anoly unless the nronerty owner recr tests a5 `a Ver based unoif. that the hazard _ or earth subszdenc:`iieither on the .sa{`e 'or in the neisihborinL, earth subsidence%br lar '&"T d&hazard area: In any review I peal of the dzred'tors or building official's denial of a wazN%er to coftet an otherwise prohibited ianprovement. the burden of proof sha [ lways be upar tlrcl? ap , licant to establish by a ,m....,,. „ clear pre ondexance.:of.�the evidence' that no such risk will be created by the xtn&oengineering report roV,eI'd 16 1n ar " <review shall `V ider not only the risk incurred due to�`.o =„durnr ? ozastruction of the otherwise prohibited improveni6abut also t`wie potential, impacts duc to failure to maintain the n rovemeiit, damage through reasonably foreseeable events such asE��arth udkes or other acts of God or the reasonabl for eseeable net 12ence of the owner or future owners. The director 19.10.080 Site access, professional/special inspection monitoring during construction and final geotechnical report. A. Site clearing and grading. The owner/applicant or contractor shall secure the building official's approval before entering an earth subsidence and. landslide hazard area site with excavating or other grading and clearing equipment to clear, remove trees or grade for any purpose including the creation of access to the site. {wss580435.z]oc;1/00006.900000/) - 23 - Packet Page 39 of 88 The building official may condition such access approval if site conditions are warranted and when discretionary approval permits are required. As part of the approval process the building official may impose conditions that address site work issues; such measures could include but are not limited to limiting all excavation and drainage installation to the dryer season between May and the end of September, or sequencing activities such as the installation of drainage systems well in advance of construction. al or in the time an geotechnical engineer of record. offi.ci.al. .mav utili consultants eng gineering. practice and is reasonable r1ei tcitime-frame to' complete the work, types of equipment f�ti&sed to perform the work, length of expogte.. of slopes, and adequacy of site monitoring and tem horn control measure ; When such. peer review is utilized thell, resI the peer review fee. € g 1!�]I��:�36!%" Ap 'dk�i q `£i��£ r B. Repogjng authority. The owncr/appli'cant shall retain a geotechn7cal engineer to monitor the site during construction. The awnerlap}ilrcant shah' preferably retain''the geotechnical engineer who prepare tl e �nN Seotechnical;report in the plan set submittal anal y!ho has revved the approved plans and specifications. If a diff&f filk1geotectilkaj, engineering consultant is retained by the owner/appH6- t the evV geotechnical engineer shall submit a :letter to the' director" 'stating that he has read all reports and r&cemmenda6d: and reviews to date and state whether or not he agrees„ with the opinions and recommendations of the original geotechnical '-''report and peer review comments. Further recommendations, dations, signed and sealed by the new geotechnical engineer; and supporting data, shall be provided should there be exceptions or changes to the original recommendations that would effect the approved plans. C. Construction monitoring, special inspections. 1. Inspection requirements. During the period from October 1st to April 30`�'. when. on site, the owner/applicant or desiw ated erasion sedimentation control (ESC) site supervisor shall erform erosion { W SS580435.DOC;1100006,900000/1 Packet Page 40 of 88 -24- and sedimentation control inspections. Records of installed ESC facilities shall be in by the erosion and sedimentation control supervisor and copies of all ESC records shall be provided to City inspectors upon request. ESC facilities on. inactive sites (sites where no work will be performed .for more than three (3) consecutive days) shall be inspected weekly by the erosion and sedimentation control. supervisor. .DwInQ all. other times of the -year, weel-4 inspections 2. Weekly field reports. The geotechnical engineer shall monitor, during construction, compliance with the recozninendatlons in the geotechnical report including; site excavat, shoring, teriporary erosion control, soil support for found `.on, tpif es, sub e installation, soil compaction and other geotechnical aspects of , e _: construction. Unless otherwiseg; ap� pyed byythe director, thei specific recommendations contained It} the ge6technical report shall be implemented by the owner/apphcait. Omissions or deviations from the app oved geoteehnical' port and civil plans shall be highlighted to the 'F ty an a separate r� qqq o[;,j All reports shall be submitted to the ciona weekly basis forreev. Failure >s> :k t t�tj3 Pt to subri it required re orts naaa,' result to ahe. issuanee,af a sto n work order. ons shall events D-sz�ii.aal construction report: I,The geotechnical engineer of record shall 'emf 'Ea final .iratten report to be submitted to the building official, �t fffig that based' upon his professional opinion, site observations, rl final Ot!6 grading that the completed development substantially `;'complies with the recommendations of the icotechnical report and with all geotechnical related permit N,a reg gypinents a shown on the approved plans. .3 Substar trally complies means that the completed development of ailileast the level of stability and safety, on and off site, as was afforded by the original recommendations and report. Recommendations to the owner/applicant shall be included in the report for future monitoring and maintenance of the p.ronerty includin r drainage tightlines catch basins berms,...retailling wall drainage hazard rniti atiou irn rovernents slopes, bluffs ve,getation, and Permanent erosion control that effect slope stability over time. Occupancy of the residence shall not be granted until the report has been reviewed and accepted by the building official. { WSS580435. noC; € /00006.900000/} Packet Page 41 of 88 -25- Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or Section 4. Effective Date. This specifically delegated to the City legislative body take effect five (5) days after passage and consisting of the title. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. phras6bf this ordinance. `e° bung an exercise of a power subjectatoreferendum, and shall of an thereof { W S8 580435.DOC;1100006.906006/} Packet Page 42 of 88 -26- SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2004, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: 5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, W EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, EARTH SUBSIDENCE AND LANDSLIDE HAZARD.,,A PLACE CHAPTER 19.10 EARTH SUBSII PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE, AND BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be DATED this day A TIME WHEN �, AMENDING THE G CHAPTER 19.05 11E,ENACTING IN ITS S. CHASE SHALL Packet Page 43 of 88 (wss580435.Doc;1/00006.900000/)- 27 - r, T' n a 4'0C. 1 S9" North Edmonds — - - , r. ,ter � �: ='I� <:.r..•.--:�.�; ..�, r I rx_1 rc J_ i I Earth Subsidence and. Landslide Hazard r. iSRRIaI. J- r I } Areas Map Legend North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (See ECDC 23.80.020 B.1 and ECDC 19.10) » �; Note: Boundaries are the approximate extent of previous landsliding; hazards are present adjacent to the landslide boundaries) I Steep Slope Areas: Slope of 40% or steeper and with a vertical relief of ten (10) ft or more (See ECDC 23.80.020 B.2) Minimum buffer equal to the height of the steep slope or 50 feet, whichever is greater (see ECDC 23.80.070 A.1) L'000001 (The buffer shown is the minimum buffer adjacent to the North Edmonds Subsidei and Landslide Hazard Area; a similar buffer would apply to steep slope areas, but is not shown on this map for clarity) 2 ft Topographic Contour Vertical datum: NAVD88 ❑ Parcel 0 100 200 Scale® in Feet Map created by Landau Associates, Inc. (May 2006) Aerial photo: City of Edmonds Topographic contours and steep slopes data derived from LiDAR data: City of Edmonds (February 27, 2005) -�' M-RV24-1"Q;"'r Packet Page 44 of 88 AM-827 Emergency Access for Shell Valley City Council Committee Meetings Date: 02/ 13/ 2007 Submitted By: Duane Bowman, Development Services Department: Development Services Committee: Community/Development Services Time: 15 Minutes Type: Action I.C. Agenda Memo Subiect Title Discussion on Shell Valley emergency access. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Recommend that the Shell Valley emergency access road be added to the 2007-2013 CIP and the 2007-2008 capital budget, with design in 2007and construction in 2008. Previous Council Action The Shell Valley Planned Residential Development was originally approved by the City in 1975. Narrative The Shell Valley area is accessed only by way of Pioneer Way which is a very steep and curvy road. There are 90 dwelling units which utilize Pioneer Way as their access out to Bowdoin Way. During periods of ice and snow, Pioneer Way becomes impassable forcing residents to park on Bowdoin Way and walk down the steep road. This also makes it hard for emergency responders to handle calls for assistance. There is an unimproved dirt road which runs through Yost Park below the pool which also accesses the Shell Valley area. It is however unsafe to use. Pioneer Way has continued over the years to be extended northward toward Main Street. There is now only one parcel of land that separates Pioneer Way from Main Street and it is owned by the City. Staff has been looking into the potential costs for making the final connection. The emergency access connection would be 15 feet of paved access with a 5 foot gravel shoulder ( for a total width of 20 feet) that would double as a pedestrian/bicycle path. It could also serve as access to any future residential lots on the City property. It is estimated that the total project cost would be $390,000, which includes $50,000 for design. Design should include a preliminary short subdivision design on the City property. This project is not included in the 2006-2011 CIP adopted by Council in may of 2006. Staff is in the presently updating the CIP for presentation to the Planning Board and the City Council. This is a needed project and the recent inclement weather has further illustrated the need. The question is how to fund the project and where should the funds come from. The City could potentially be reimbursed some of the project costs by sale of the City's parcel. If the Council agrees with staff that the project should be pushed up in priority, here are some potential funding options: 2007 Design Funding Options • Use the $75,000 transferred from the general fund to the Fund 112 for the Main St pedestrian lighting. Don't do the Main St pedestrian lighting in 2007 or 2008. • Use the $50,000 in the capital budget for ROW stabilization projects. If any requirements come up for ROW stabilization, then Council will have to find money for the stabilization project. • Use $50,000 of the $550,000 budgeted in Fund 125 (Transportation projects) for street overlays, and reduce the amount of overlays done in 2007. • Use $50,000 of cash balance in Fund 125 (Parks projects). This will be difficult due to construction of the old Woodway Elementary school site into a neighborhood park. • Transfer $50,000 from general fund to Fund 112. 2008 Construction • The 2008 capital budget includes $550,000 in Fund 125 (Transp) for overlays. Reduce overlays by $340,000. • Use the $125,000 in the Fund 125 (Transp) budget for the downtown crosswalk repairs to fund part of it. • Use some of Fund 125 (Parks) to fund some or all of it. This will be difficult due to construction of the old Woodway Elementary school site into a neighborhood park. • The City has $1,000,000 budgeted in 2007 in Fund 112 for the 100th Ave slope stabilization. If bids come in low, there might be some money available, but we shouldn't count on it based upon the way bids have gone up recently. _ Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Packet Page 45 of 88 Link: Exhibit 1 - Aerial Map of Shell Valley Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/07/2007 04:50 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/07/2007 04:55 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 08:18 AM APRV Form Started By: Duane Bowman Started On: 02/05/2007 01:26 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2007 Packet Page 46 of 88 Packet Page 47 of 88 AM-837 Historic Preservation Commission/Design Guidelines City Council Committee Meetings Date: 02/13/2007 Submitted By: Rob Chave, Planning Submitted For: Rob Chave Time: 20 Minutes Department: Planning Type: Information Committee: Community/Development Services Agenda Memo Subiect Title Discussion on Historic Preservation Commission recommendation on Design Guidelines for downtown. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff No action is required. 1. D. Previous Council Action On December 12, 2006, the City Council voted unanimously to "direct the Historic Preservation Commission to come back to the Council with a recommendation regarding how they would proceed with historic preservation in the BD 1 zone." Narrative The Historic Preservation Commission has been working on ideas for how to preserve the historic character of the downtown commercial core. Members of the Commission will discuss their progress and ideas with the Committee. No file(s) attached. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2007 10:12 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/09/2007 10:30 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2007 11:04 AM APRV Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 02/09/2007 09:35 AM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2007 Packet Page 48 of 88 AM-832 Fourth Quarter Budget Report City Council Committee Meetings 2.A. Date: 02/ 13/ 2007 Submitted By: Kathleen Junglov, Administrative Services Time: 10 Minutes Department: Administrative Services Type: Information Committee: Finance Agenda Memo Subiect Title Fourth Quarter Budget Report. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff For information only, no action required. Previous Council Action None. Narrative This item transmits the Fourth Quarter Budget Report. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Fourth Ouarter Budget Report Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 09:38 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/08/2007 09:47 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 09:49 AM APRV Form Started By: Kathleen Junglov Started On: 02/08/2007 09:29 AM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2007 Packet Page 49 of 88 CITY OF EDMONDS DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS (February 7, 2007) Overview Summary ..........................2 Parks Construction ..........17 Revenues ..........................2 Combined Utility .............18 Expenditures ....................2 Equipment Rental ............. 19 On the Horizon ................3 Expenditure Detail by Department Major Revenue Projections ........ 4 City Council .....................20 Mayor...............................20 General Fund Revenue Detail ... 7 Human Resources ............20 Municipal Court ...............21 Expenditure Summary Economic Development ... 21 Status by Fund .................12 City Clerk ......................... 21 Status by Department ....... 12 Administrative Services ...22 City Attorney ...................22 Expenditure Detail by Fund Non -Departmental ............ 22 General Fund ...................13 Police Department ............ 23 Street Fund.......................14 Fire Department ...............24 Street Construction ..........14 Community Services ........ 24 Multi-Modal.....................14 Development Services .....25 Building Maintenance ...... 15 Parks & Recreation ..........25 Municipal Arts .................15 Public Works .................... 26 Hotel/Motel......................15 Facilities ...........................26 Employee Parking ............ 15 Storm Drainage ................27 Tourism Promotion .......... 16 Water................................28 Park Improve (REST 2).......16 Sewer................................29 Park Capital (REST 1) .......16 Treatment Plant................30 Gifts Catalog ....................17 Cemetery Maintenance ....17 Capital Improvement Project Status 31 L:\Productiondb\CCOLTNCIL\0012_832_2006 Q4 Report.doc Packet Page 50 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT CITY OF EDMONDS 2006 FINAL BUDGET REPORT This report will provide preliminary information regarding the City of Edmonds' financial operations for the year ended December 31, 2006. Overview From an overall perspective, revenues received in 2006 exceeded budget and year end forecasts, and expenditures incurred came in under budget and year end forecasts. The combined result provides an additional $727,000 to be carried forward and added to the 2007 Beginning Fund Balance. Revenue Variances Sales tax revenue for the year totaled $5.2M, and as anticipated, exceeded the budget by $320,000. Our top three sources of sales tax revenue contributed to this total as follows: Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers (29.8% - $1,569,096), Construction of Buildings (10.1% - $529,928) and Food and Beverage Services (9.5%-$498,334). Combined, utility taxes as a category exceeded budget by $292,000. Leading the way were the gas utility tax, and the telephone utility tax at $150,000 and $77,000, respectively. Building permit fees along with plan check fees once again finished the year significantly ahead of budget estimates. Annual receipts for building permit fees totaled $807,000, which was 129.1% of budget, and annual receipts for plan check fees totaled $490,000 which amazingly was also 129.1% of budget. Court revenue, specifically Adult Probation Services revenue continues to bounce back. At of the close of 2006, the City received $145,000 from Adult Probation and Electronic Monitoring charges for services, $35,000 above budget. Combining this revenue stream with revenues received for fines and forfeitures, Court revenue exceeded budget estimates by $130,000. Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) receipts through December 31 were $1,430,000. At one point during 2006, forecasts pointed toward REET receipts in excess of $1.6M. Year end results again remind us of the volatility of REET revenues and to use caution when committing these funds to ongoing expenditures. Departmental and Fund Variances At this time there are no Funds with expenditures that have exceeded appropriations. There are three Departments, however, which have expenditures in excess of their budget appropriation. In the General Fund these Departments are Human Resources ($1,036) and the Municipal Court ($324). Finance feels these amounts are immaterial and no corrective action needs to be taken. In the Utility Fund, the Treatment Plant Department's expenditures exceeded budget by $35,482. This amount resulted from a transfer for biosolids handling between the Utility fund and the Page 2 Packet Page 51 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT Treatment Plant Capital Fund. At this time Finance is researching this transfer. On the Horizon The City finished the year in a stronger position than anticipated with revenues exceeding forecasts and expenditures coming in below budget. However, Finance still remains cautious about the City's financial future and remains committed to working on long term permanent solutions to address its budget challenges. - February 7, 2007 Page 3 Packet Page 52 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2006 BUDGET i,000,000 Monthly Fomcast $1 65,746 1 50,528 1 65,049 1 81,270 1 82,461 1 93,283 1 120,120 93,048 1 106,173 1 100,151 1 75,050 167,121 Cumulative Forecast $1 65,746 1 116,274 1 181,322 1 262,593 1 345,053 1 438,337 1 558,456 1 651,504 1 757,677 1 857,829 1 932,879 1 1,000,000 Actual Collected $1 99,814 1 78,369 1 105,890 1 136,645 1 119,735 1 193,959 1 142,127 1 109,996 1 125,084 1 118,867 1 87,952 1 111 673 Cumulative Collection $1 99,814 1 178,183 1 284,074 1 420,719 1 540,453 1 734,412 1 876,539 1 986,535 1 1,111,619 1 1,230,487 1 1,318,439 1 1,43Q,111 YEAR END FORECASTI 1,518,174 1 1,532,447 1,566,678 1,602,173 1,566,289 1,675,451 1,569,575 1,514,243 1 1,467,140 1,434 420 1 1,413,301 1,430 111 Projected YE Varimcel 518,174 1 532,447 1 566,678 1 602,173 1 566,289 1 675,451 1 569,575 514,243 1 467,140 1 434,420 1 413,301 1430,111 Budget Varmce %1 51.82%1 53.24%1 56.67%1 60.22%1 56.63%1 67.55%1 56.96% 51.42% 46.71%1 43.44%1 41.33%1 43.01% 2006 CUMULATIVE COLLECTIONS 1,500,000 1,250,000 1,000,000 750,000 500,000 : 250,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t 2006 Aetual -2006 Budget Packet Page 53 of 88 Page 4 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT SALES AND USE TAX 2006 BUDGET 4,950,000 Monthly Fortcast $1 399,049 1 491,227 1 359,938 1 333,335 1 432,703 1 380,241 1 400,371 1 454,517 411,688 1 422,870 1 459,270 1 405,790 Cumulative Forecast $ 399,049 890,277 1,249,215 1,582,550 2,015,253 2,395,494 2,795,865 3,250,382 1 3,662,070 4,084,940 4,544,210 4,950,000 Actual Collected $1 401,171 1 545,757 1 357,585 1 362,431 1 456,253 1 392,303 1 448,417 1 474,842 1 462,833 1 448,040 1 502,716 1 417,437 Cumulative Collection $ 401,171 946,929 1,304,514 1,666,945 2,123,198 2,515,501 2,963,918 3,438,760 3,901,593 4,349,633 4,852,349 5,269,786 YEAR END FORECASTI 4,976,321 1 5,264,9901 5,169,121 1 5,213,976 1 5,215,140 1 5,197,980 1 5,247,532 1 5,236,880 1 5,273,761 1 5,270,746 1 5,285,655 1 5,269,786 Projected YE Variancel 26,321 1 314,990 1 219,121 1 263,976 1 265,140 1 247,980 1 297,532 1 286,880 1 323,761 1 320,746 1 335,655 1 319,786 Budget Variance %1 0.53%1 6.36%1 4.43%1 5.33%1 5.36%1 5.01%1 6.01 % 5.80%1 6.54%1 6.48 % 6.78%1 6.46% 2006 CUMULATIVE COLLECTIONS 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 I,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -+--2006 Actual -2006 Budget GAS UTILITY TAX 2006 BUDGET 618,000 Monthly Foweast $1 83,699 1 86,744 1 79,930 1 68,165 1 53,735 1 36,244 1 28,575 21,036 19,622 1 24,643 1 38,379 77,228 Cumulative Forecast $1 83,699 1 170,442 1 250,372 1 318,538 1 372,272 1 408,517 1 437,092 1 458,128 1 1 477,750 1 1 502,393 1 540,772 618,000 Actual Collected $1 115,247 1 98,479 1 103,017 1 95,043 1 66,653 1 46,806 1 32,742 24,455 1 24,158 1 29,500 1 47,278 85,333 Cumulative Collection $1 115,247 1 213,726 1 316,743 1 411,785 1 478,439 1 525,245 1 557,986 1 582,441 1 1 606,600 1 636,099 1 683,377 768,710 YEAR END FORECASTI 850,942 1 774,939 1 781,823 1 798,912 1 794,244 1 794,585 1 788,931 1 785,694 1 784,675 1 782,473 1 780,970 1 768 710 Projected YE Variancel 232,942 1 156,939 1 163,823 1 180,912 1 176,244 1 176,585 1 170,931 167,694 166,675 1 164,473 1 162,970 1 150,710 Budget Variance %1 37.69%1 25.39%1 26.51%1 29.27%1 28.52%1 28.57%1 27.66%il 27.13%1 1 26,97%1 26.61% 26.37%1 24.39% 2006 CUMULATIVE COLLECTIONS 800,000 .................................... .................................... .................................. ................................. . ................................. . .............................. . ... 600,000 400,000 200,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +2006 Actual -2006 Budget Page 5 Packet Page 54 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 2006 BUDGET 1,237,200 Monthly Fomeast $1 96,789 1 81,562 1 122,358 1 105,741 1 102,338 1 101,370 1 106,252 102,620 103,265 97,707 99,191 118,009 Cumulative Forecast $1 96,789 1 178,351 1 300,709 1 406,449 1 508,787 1 610,157 1 716,409 1 819,029 922,294 1,020,000 1,119,191 1,237,200 Actual Collected $1 108,934 1 48,527 1 158,003 1 122,729 1 106,890 1 104,691 1 116,394 1 105,463 105,507 116,580 110,101 110 286 Cumulative Collection $1 108,934 1 157,461 1 315,464 1 438,193 1 545,084 1 649,774 1 766,168 1 871,631 977,138 1,093,717 1,203,819 1 314 105 YEAR END FORECASTI 1,392,451 1,092,289 1,297,907 1,333,826 1,325,461 1,317,531 1,323,1321 1,316,6591 1,310,7701 1,326,6151 1,330,751 1 314 105 Projected YE Variance 155,251 1 (144,911)1 60,707 1 96,626 1 88,261 1 90,331 1 85,932 79,459 1 73,570 1 89,415 1 93,551 1 76,905 Budget Variance %1 12.55% -11.71%1 4.91%1 7.81%1 7.13%1 6.49%1 6.95%1 1 6.42%1 5.95%j 7.23%1 7,56%1 6.22% 2006 BUDGET 1,365,000 2006 CUMULATIVE COLLECTIONS 1,500,000 1,250,000 1,000,000 750,000 500,000 250,000 :. . JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +2006 Actual -2006 Budget ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX Monthly Forecast $1 102,235 1 114,071 1 97,648 1 108,758 1 91,454 1 77,811 1 69,285 66,940 1 62,675 1 65,028 1 70,501 1 73,595 Cumulative Forccast $1 102,235 1 216,306 1 313,954 1 422,7i1 1 514,166 1 591,976 1 661,261 1 728,201 1 1 790,876 1 855,904 1 926,405 1,000,000 Actual Collected $1 138,670 1 155,010 1 134,545 1 152,999 1 123,759 1 108,098 1 102,580 1 86,265 1 93,279 1 78,986 1 102,245 1 993 20 Cumulative Collection $ 138,670 293,680 428,225 581,224 704,983 813,081 915,661 1,001,926 1,095,205 1,174,190 1,276,4351 1 375 755 YEAR END FORECASTI 1,356,386 1,357,708 1 1,363,975 1374 991 1 1,371,121 1 1,373,503 1,384,7191 1,375,8921 1,384,800 1,371,871 1,377,837 1 375,755 Projected YE Variance (8,614) (7,292) (1,025)1 9,991 1 6,121 1 8,503 19,719 10,8921 19,800 1 6,871 1 12,8371 10,755 Budget Variance % -0.63 % -0.53 % -0.08%1 0.73%1 0.45%1 0.62%1 1 1.44%1 0.80 % 1.45%1 0.50%1 0.94%1 0.79% 2006 CUMULATIVE COLLECTIONS 1,500,000 I,250 000 1,000,000 750,000 500,000 250,000 ................... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... . .. ... JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC +2006 Actual -2006 Budget Page 6 Packet Page 55 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT GENERAL FUND REVENUES 12/31/2006 Title Budget Revenues Balance % Received BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 3,273,822 4,142,275 (868,453) 126.5% REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 8,530,240 8,417,533 112,707 98.7% EMS PROPERTY TAX 2,318,000 2,314,881 3,119 99.9% VOTED PROPERTY TAX 764,248 755,518 8,730 98.9% LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 4,950,000 5,269,753 (319,753) 106.5% NATURAL GAS USE TAX 10,500 19,121 (8,621) 182.1% 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 547,000 620,778 (73,778) 113.5% GAS UTILITY TAX 618,000 768,710 (150,710) 124.4% TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 1,237,200 1,314,086 (76,886) 106.2% ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 1,365,000 1,375,755 (10,755) 100.8% SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 250,000 265,602 (15,602) 106.2% WATER UTILITY TAX 185,000 212,712 (27,712) 115.0% SEWER UTILITY TAX 265,000 276,254 (11,254) 104.2% LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX 175,000 212,385 (37,385) 121.4% PULLTABS TAX 54,000 51,874 2,126 96.1% AMUSEMENT GAMES 500 418 82 83.7% PENALTIES ON GAMBLING TAXES 500 0 500 0.0% TOTAL TAXES 21,270,188 21,875,381 (605,193) 102.85% FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE 4,890 4,895 (5) 100.1% PROF AND OCCUPATION LICENSE 1,200 915 285 76.3% AMUSEMENTS 7,100 2,425 4,675 34.2% BUS. LICENCE PERMIT PENALTY 1,800 2,085 (285) 115.8% GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 56,000 61,051 (5,051) 109.0% FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS 415,000 456,050 (41,050) 109.9% OLY VIEW WATER DIST FRANCHISE 110,000 121,875 (11,875) 110.8% DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 20,000 21,650 (1,650) 108.3% NON RESIDENT BUS LICENSE 13,700 23,250 (9,550) 169.7% RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 5,000 0 5,000 0.0% BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 625,000 807,053 (182,053) 129.1% ANIMAL LICENSES 11,000 14,623 (3,623) 132.9% STREET AND CURB PERMIT 88,100 29,290 58,810 33.2% OTHER/NON-BUS/LIC/PERMIT 5,000 5,890 (890) 117.8% TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS 1,363,790 1,551,051 (187,261) 113.73% Page 7 Packet Page 56 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT GENERAL FUND REVENUES 12/31/2006 Title Budget Revenues Balance % Received FEMAEMW-2005-FG-03795 SCBA 195,152 195,152 0 100.0% US Dept of Justice Grant 1,994 1,993 1 100.0% WA ASSOC OF SHERRIFFS TRAFFIC GRANT 1,500 0 1,500 0.0% WTSC-CLICK IT OR TICKET 3,939 0 3,939 0.0% WTSC-DUI TRAFFIC SAFETY 3,204 0 3,204 0.0% WTSC-HIGHWAY SAFETY 0 5,423 (5,423) - Federal WA State Traffic Comm Grant 10,000 4,374 5,626 43.7% DHS - TECH TRAINING GRANTS 3,023 3,138 (115) 103.8% SHSGP #E05-071 FIRE RESCUE BOAT 200,000 200,000 0 100.0% DHS-SNO CO MASS DECON EQUIP TRNG 0 829 (829) - ENVIRONMNTL/BCH RANGER GRANT 1,000 0 1,000 0.0% CIG GRANT - EDMONDS HISTORIC SURVEY 0 0 0 - WSP - Fire Dept Grant 0 0 0 - WA STATE ADMIN OFFICE COURTS GRANT 0 0 0 - WSP DRUG RECOGNITION 486 51 435 10.5% WA STATE ADMIN OFFICE COURTS GRANT 0 4,631 (4,631) - DOE RECYCLING GRANT 0 0 0 - WSDOE SMA GRANT G0600108 100,000 91,284 8,716 91.3% WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT 1,958 5,162 (3,204) 263.6% WSDOT GCA4234 0 0 0 - EMS FIRE DEPARTMENT GRANT 1,463 1,463 0 100.0% WA STATE TRAUMA GRANT 1,290 0 1,290 0.0% WA STATE ART COMMISSION GRANT 0 0 0 - FIRE DEPARTMENT GRANTS 0 0 0 - PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 180,000 170,119 9,881 94.5% JUDICIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTION -STATE 0 2,713 (2,713) - MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION 7,200 7,595 (395) 105.5% CRIMINAL JUSTICE - SPECIAL PROGRAMS 30,000 33,457 (3,457) 111.5% DUI - CITIES 8,750 6,624 2,126 75.7% LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 156,650 170,939 (14,289) 109.1% LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 295,360 258,615 36,745 87.6% INTERLOCAL REVENUE 0 12,446 (12,446) - INTERLOCAL REVENUE 0 0 0 - COMMUTE TRIP 0 2,820 (2,820) - SHARED COURT COSTS 0 6,861 (6,861) - HOSPITAL SECURITY PROTECTION 126,000 125,956 44 100.0% POLICE FBI CONTRACTS 14,480 14,243 237 98.4% FIRE PROTECTION - WOODWAY 309,163 309,163 0 100.0% FIRE PROTECTION - DISTRICT #1 244,273 244,273 0 100.0% CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. 38,711 31,035 7,676 80.2% WOODWAY - LAW PROTECTION 8,000 6,500 1,500 81.3% CITY OF MTLK TERR-ANIMAL CONTR 29,750 29,508 242 99.2% SNOCOM/DIRECTOR SERVICES 135,840 134,909 931 99.3% PFD SERVICES 20,000 15,000 5,000 75.0% OTHER BEACH RANGER SUBSIDY 1,000 1,000 0 100.0% SNO-ISLE 80,000 40,400 39,600 50.5% TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,210,186 2,137,678 72,508 96.72% Page 8 Packet Page 57 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT GENERAL FUND REVENUES 12/31/2006 Title Budget Revenues Balance % Received MUNI CT CIVIL FILINGS 0 47 (47) - RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMTS 1,000 1,943 (943) 194.3% COURT RECORD SERVICES 1,000 301 699 30.1% WARRANT FEES 0 93 (93) - SALE MAPS & BOOKS 1,000 2,067 (1,067) 206.7% MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 0 69 (69) - PHOTOCOPIES 0 605 (605) - POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 0 1,369 (1,369) - ASSESSMENT SEARCH 0 25 (25) - BIRD FEST MERCHANDISE SALES 0 129 (129) - PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 45,000 26,250 18,750 58.3% POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 23,650 17,708 5,942 74.9% ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 100,000 118,409 (18,409) 118.4% ELECTRONIC MONITORING 10,000 26,260 (16,260) 262.6% ELECTRONIC MONITOR DUI 10,000 7,495 2,505 75.0% BOOKING FEES 4,000 5,682 (1,682) 142.1% FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 12,845 11,600 1,245 90.3% EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 5,439 4,861 578 89.4% EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES-HAZMAT 1,244 0 1,244 0.0% DUI EMERGENCY AID 0 63 (63) - POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 500 431 69 86.2% CRIM CONV FEES DUI 0 14 (14) - CRIM CONV FEES CT 0 3,674 (3,674) - CRIM CONV FEES CN 0 2,461 (2,461) - POLICE TRAINING CLASSES 0 670 (670) - ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 135,300 132,877 2,423 98.2% STORM DRAINAGE FEES 800 0 800 0.0% AMIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 7,500 8,943 (1,443) 119.2% ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 125,000 97,544 27,456 78.0% FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 8,735 6,383 2,353 73.1% PLAN CHECKING FEES 380,000 490,509 (110,509) 129.1% PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 500 1,698 (1,198) 339.6% CERT/PHOTO/RECORD SEARCH FEE 10,000 11,724 (1,724) 117.2% S.E.P.A. REVIEW 9,500 11,760 (2,260) 123.8% SHORELINE PERMIT 300 0 300 0.0% CRITICAL AREA STUDY 20,000 21,675 (1,675) 108.4% BUILDING COMPLAINT REVIEW 0 0 0 - SWIM POOL ENTRANCE FEES 58,500 53,551 4,949 91.5% LOCKER FEES 1,000 705 295 70.5% SWIM CLASS FEES 53,000 60,014 (7,014) 113.2% PROGRAM FEES 675,000 725,824 (50,824) 107.5% TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 0 2,877 (2,877) - INTERFUND REIMB. CONTRACT SVCS 1,105,000 1,078,645 26,355 97.6% GROUNDS MAINT. INTERFD SERVICE 15,000 0 15,000 0.0% MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 5,684 51 5,633 0.9% TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,826,497 2,937,004 (110,507) 103.91% Page 9 Packet Page 58 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT GENERAL FUND REVENUES 12/31/2006 Title Budget Revenues Balance % Received OTHER SUPERIOR CT PEN 0 33 (33) - PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 4,000 4,101 (101) 102.5% TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 60,000 38,639 21,361 64.4% BC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 150,000 184,071 (34,071) 122.7% NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 6,000 25,943 (19,943) 432.4% PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 20,000 40,734 (20,734) 203.7% PR - HANDICAPPED 5,000 2,345 2,655 46.9% PARKING INFRACTION LC 0 390 (390) - DWI PENALTIES 10,000 3,729 6,271 37.3% OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN 20,000 3,588 16,412 17.9% CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 17,000 13,204 3,796 77.7% OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 3,000 7,287 (4,287) 242.9% OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 8,000 6,901 1,099 86.3% COURT DV PENALTY ASSMT 0 370 (370) - CRIMINAL COSTS-RECOUPMENTS 90,000 122,900 (32,900) 136.6% PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 10,000 23,758 (13,758) 237.6% COURT INTERPRETER COST 2,000 937 1,063 46.9% MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 5,000 26,378 (21,378) 527.6% TOTAL FINES AND FORFEITURES 410,000 505,310 (95,310) 123.25% INVESTMENT INTEREST 150,000 277,296 (127,296) 184.9% INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 25,000 44,338 (19,338) 177.4% INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 2,000 2,116 (116) 105.8% PARKING 4,000 3,975 25 99.4% SPACE & FACILITIES RENTALS 92,000 148,707 (56,707) 161.6% GYM & WEIGHTROOM FEES 12,700 13,150 (450) 103.5% LEASES LONG-TERM 120,270 122,071 (1,801) 101.5% VENDING MACHINE CONCESSION 2,100 2,000 100 95.2% OTHER RENTS & USE CHARGES 9,500 14,788 (5,288) 155.7% DONATION / CONTRIBUTION 0 100 (100) - PARKS DONATIONS 12,070 10,200 1,870 84.5% Fire Gifts, Pledges, Grants from Private 2,125 0 2,125 0.0% POLICE CONT FROM PRIVATE SOURCES 11,005 11,004 1 100.0% ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTION 2,100 4,281 (2,181) 203.9% CONTRIBUTIONS - HISTORIC PRESERVATION 0 1,050 (1,050) - SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 400 656 (256) 163.9% SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 4,000 1,917 2,083 47.9% CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 0 1,800 (1,800) - OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT 10,000 24,557 (14,557) 245.6% POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION 1,000 100 900 10.0% CASHIER OVERAGE/SHORTAGE 0 77 (77) - OTHER MISC REVENUES 7,000 11,929 (4,929) 170.4% SMALL OVERPAYMENT 100 110 (10) 109.8% NSF FEES - PARKS 200 210 (10) 105.0% NSF FEES - MUNI CT 200 344 (144) 172.1% NSF FEES - DEVEL SVCS DEPT 0 120 (120) PLANNING SIGNAGE REVENUE 8,000 5,408 2,592 67.6% TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 475,770 702,303 (226,533) 147.61% Page 10 Packet Page 59 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT GENERAL FUND REVENUES 12/31/2006 Title Budget Revenues Balance % Received PROCEEDS FROM LONG TERM DEBT 0 0 0 - SALE OF FIXED ASSETS 0 500 (500) - INSURANCE PROCEEDS 100,000 56,642 43,358 56.6% TRANSFER FROM FUND 121 19,000 16,500 2,500 86.8% TRANSFER FROM FUND 213 100,000 100,000 0 100.0% TRANSFER FROM FUND 411 0 0 0 - TOTAL TRANSFERS 219,000 173,642 45,358 79.29% TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 32,049,253 34,024,645 (1,975,392) 106.16% Page 11 Packet Page 60 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE SUMMARIES BUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND # Title Appropriation 12/31/06 Expenditures Balance % Used All Funds 74,629,962 62,707,929 11,922,033 84.0% 001 General Fund 30,752,456 29,746,395 1,006,061 96.7% 111 Street Fund 1,350,966 1,272,578 78,388 94.2% 112 Street Const./Imprv. 4,133,419 3,866,819 266,600 93.6% 113 Multimodal Transportation 1,250,000 2,737 1,247,263 0.2% 116 Building Maintenance 2,326,510 1,090,385 1,236,125 46.9% 117 Municipal Arts Acquisition Fund 101,420 33,251 68,169 32.8% 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 68,700 32,863 35,837 47.8% 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 17,500 17,486 14 99.9% 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 21,200 16,632 4,568 78.5% 125 Real Estate Excise Tax 2 4,342,000 316,844 4,025,156 7.3% 126 Park Acquisition (REET 1) 2,710,948 2,697,373 13,575 99.5% 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 5,320 3,705 1,615 69.6% 130 Cemetery Maintenance 942,885 939,566 3,319 99.6% 132 Park Construction Fund 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 100.0% 411 Combined Utility Operation 12,508,483 11,851,882 656,601 94.8% 511 Equipment Rental Fund 2,083,356 2,024,267 59,089 97.2% BUDGET SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 City Council 235,185 185,228 49,957 78.8% 210 Office of Mayor 211,304 211,083 221 99.9% 220 Human Resources 216,756 217,792 (1,036) 100.5% 230 Municipal Court 615,035 615,359 (324) 100.1% 240 Economic Development 184,817 113,615 71,202 61.5% 250 City Clerk 499,680 472,857 26,823 94.6% 310 Administrative Services 1,272,389 1,202,195 70,194 94.5% 360 City Attorney 478,300 437,950 40,350 91.6% 390 Non -Departmental Expenses 3,864,544 3,695,473 169,071 95.6% 410 Police Services 8,533,981 8,493,446 40,535 99.5% 510 Fire Services 6,909,638 6,781,603 128,035 98.1% 610 Community Services 307,004 281,403 25,601 91.7% 620 Development Services 3,130,497 2,823,362 307,136 90.2% 640 Parks & Recreation 2,783,768 2,731,141 52,627 98.1% 650 Public Works 249,374 249,207 168 99.9% 651 Facilities Maintenance 1,260,184 1,234,676 25,508 98.0% 652 Storm Drainage 1,766,787 1,525,664 241,123 86.4% 654 Water 4,342,888 4,305,725 37,163 99.1% 655 Sewer 2,621,401 2,207,603 413,798 84.2% 656 Treatment Plant 3,777,407 3,812,889 (35,482) 100.9% Page 12 Packet Page 61 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY FUND 001 GENERAL FUND 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 14,888,439 14,650,699 237,740 98.4% 120 OVERTIME 817,494 962,194 (144,700) 117.7% 150 HOLIDAY BUY BACK 326,761 292,030 34,731 89.4% 190 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 1,784 1,783 1 99.9% 230 BENEFITS 4,765,701 4,677,818 87,883 98.2% 240 UNIFORMS 120,422 107,797 12,625 89.5% 250 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 17,290 11,773 5,517 68.1% 310 SUPPLIES 486,003 422,303 63,700 86.9% 320 FUEL CONSUMED 1,700 302 1,398 17.8% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 446,236 465,949 (19,713) 104.4% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,985,387 1,576,060 409,327 79.4% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 239,442 241,122 (1,680) 100.7% 430 TRAVEL 83,395 57,135 26,260 68.5% 440 ADVERTISING 44,590 52,890 (8,300) 118.6% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 138,800 124,003 14,797 89.3% 460 INSURANCE 400,364 381,479 18,885 95.3% 470 UTILITIES 432,650 421,615 11,035 97.4% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 267,110 265,045 2,065 99.2% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 429,948 344,606 85,342 80.2% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 1,686,794 1,568,113 118,681 93.0% 530 EXCISE TAXES 5,000 8,123 (3,123) 162.5% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 927,202 927,202 0 100.0% 630 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 3,000 0 3,000 0.0% 640 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 36,946 19,396 17,550 52.5% 710 BOND PRINCIPAL 720,003 727,176 (7,173) 101.0% 750 BOND PRINCIPAL 79,246 79,245 1 100.0% 830 BOND INTEREST 507,018 487,373 19,645 96.1% 840 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 1,625 5,399 (3,774) 332.2% 890 FISCAL AGENT FEES 1,500 463 1,037 30.9% 910 INTERFUND SERVICES 0 292 (292) - 920 INTERFUND FUEL 32,731 21,845 10,886 66.7% 930 INTERFUND SUPPLIES 41,384 38,138 3,246 92.2% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 724,860 703,311 21,549 97.0% 980 INTERFUND REPAIRS 91,631 103,717 (12,086) 113.2% TOTAL GENERAL FUND 30,752,456 29,746,395 1,006,061 96.7% Page 13 Packet Page 62 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY FUND 111 STREET FUND 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 402,371 393,979 8,392 97.9% 120 OVERTIME 9,789 4,948 4,841 50.5% 230 BENEFITS 141,816 125,858 15,958 88.7% 240 UNIFORMS 6,900 4,260 2,640 61.7% 310 SUPPLIES 155,900 128,176 27,724 82.2% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,400 13,907 (10,507) 409.0% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,000 14,690 (5,690) 163.2% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 3,500 3,111 389 88.9% 430 TRAVEL 3,380 462 2,918 13.7% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 2,500 646 1,854 25.8% 460 INSURANCE 32,230 33,033 (803) 102.5% 470 UTILITIES 254,250 271,880 (17,630) 106.9% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 92,300 87,256 5,044 94.5% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 12,660 3,548 9,112 28.0% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 16,000 2,834 13,166 17.7% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 12,500 12,500 0 100.0% 620 BUILDINGS 21,000 0 21,000 0.0% 710 BOND PRINCIPAL 28,259 28,259 0 100.0% 830 BOND INTEREST 11,739 11,739 0 100.0% 830 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0 21 (21) - 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 131,472 131,472 (0) 100.0% TOTAL STREET FUND 1,350,966 1,272,578 78,388 94.2% 112 STREET CONST/IMPRV FD 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 650 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 790 LOAN PRINCIPAL 830 LOAN INTEREST 950 INTERFUND RENTAL TOTAL STREET CONST/IMPRV FD 0 170,665 (170,665) - 4,111,500 3,652,114 459,386 88.8% 17,632 38,143 (20,511) 216.3% 1,520 3,130 (1,610) 205.9% 2,767 2,767 0 100.0% 4,133,419 3,866,819 266,600 93.6% 113 MULTIMODAL TRANS FD 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,250,000 2,737 1,247,263 0.2% TOTAL MULTIMODAL TRANS FD 1,250,000 2,737 1,247,263 0.2% Page 14 Packet Page 63 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY FUND 116 BUILDING MAINT FUND 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 310 SUPPLIES 0 15,036 (15,036) - 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 18,050 (18,050) - 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 80,000 93,894 (13,894) 117.4% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 0 0 0 - 650 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,246,510 963,406 1,283,104 42.9% TOTAL BUILDING MAINT FUND 2,326,510 1,090,385 1,236,125 46.9% 117 MUNI ARTS ACQ FUND 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 310 SUPPLIES 2,400 2,884 (484) 120.2% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 300 56 244 18.8% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 85,200 19,368 65,832 22.7% 430 TRAVEL 0 5 (5) - 440 ADVERTISING 4,000 4,000 0 100.0% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 1,000 60 940 6.0% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 270 0 270 0.0% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 5,250 3,877 1,373 73.8% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 3,000 3,000 0 100.0% TOTAL MUNI ARTS ACQ FUND 101,420 33,251 68,169 32.8% 120 HOTELIMOTEL TAX FUND 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 49,700 1,500 48,200 3.0% 440 ADVERTISING 0 5,434 (5,434) - 490 MISCELLANEOUS 0 4,200 (4,200) - 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 19,000 21,730 (2,730) 114.4% TOTAL HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND 68,700 32,863 35,837 47.8% 121 EMPLOYEE PKG PERMIT FD 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 310 SUPPLIES 1,000 986 14 98.6% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 16,500 16,500 0 100.0% TOTAL EMPLOYEE PKG PERMIT FD 17,500 17,486 14 99.9% Page 15 Packet Page 64 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY FUND 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 310 SUPPLIES 300 0 300 0.0% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,500 8,460 2,040 80.6% 440 ADVERTISING 1,900 1,861 39 98.0% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 8,500 6,311 2,189 74.2% TOTAL TOURISM PROMOTIONAL 21,200 16,632 4,568 78.5% 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 310 SUPPLIES 0 2,419 (2,419) - 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 125,000 125 124,875 0.1% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 0 1,634 (1,634) - 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 76,000 77,313 (1,313) 101.7% 650 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 4,141,000 235,354 3,905,646 5.7% TOTAL REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 4,342,000 316,844 4,025,156 7.3% 126 PARKS ACQUISITION (REET 1) 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 2,795 (2,795) - 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 69,811 69,811 0 100.0% 610 LAND 2,024,167 2,024,167 0 100.0% 710 BOND PRINCIPAL 379,080 379,080 0 100.0% 830 BOND INTEREST 236,690 220,690 16,000 93.2% 940 FISCAL AGENT FEES 1,200 830 370 69.2% TOTAL PARKS ACQUISITION (REET 1) 2,710,948 2,697,373 13,575 99.5% Page 16 Packet Page 65 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY FUND 127 GIFTS CATALOG 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 310 SUPPLIES 1,820 1,205 615 66.2% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,000 2,500 500 83.3% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 0 0 0 - 490 MISCELLANEOUS 500 0 500 0.0% TOTAL GIFTS CATALOG 5,320 3,705 1,615 69.6% 130 CEMETARY MAINTENANCE 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 57,708 56,553 1,155 98.0% 120 OVERTIME 2,050 2,108 (58) 102.8% 230 BENEFITS 20,524 20,937 (413) 102.0% 240 UNIFORMS 200 0 200 0.0% 310 SUPPLIES 7,000 6,013 987 85.9% 340 RESALE ITEMS 20,000 15,674 4,326 78.4% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,500 1,197 1,303 47.9% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,000 238 4,762 4.8% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 1,200 1,239 (39) 103.2% 430 TRAVEL 200 1,008 (808) 503.9% 440 ADVERTISING 400 2,048 (1,648) 512.0% 470 UTILITIES 2,700 4,960 (2,260) 183.7% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 500 517 (17) 103.5% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 372 628 37.2% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 2,500 0 2,500 0.0% 650 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 810,371 815,296 (4,925) 100.6% 830 INTERFUND INTEREST 0 4,375 (4,375) - 910 INTERFUND SERVICES 2,000 0 2,000 0.0% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 7,032 7,032 0 100.0% TOTAL CEMETARY MAINTENANCE 942,885 939,566 3,319 99.6% 132 PARK CONSTRUCTION FUND 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 610 LAND 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 100.0% TOTAL PARK CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,200,000 1,200,000 0 100.0% Page 17 Packet Page 66 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY FUND 411 COMBINED UTILITY 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 2,427,642 2,418,512 9,130 99.6% 120 OVERTIME 92,100 62,340 29,760 67.7% 230 BENEFITS 742,168 762,714 (20,546) 102.8% 240 UNIFORMS 27,150 25,244 1,906 93.0% 310 SUPPLIES 473,750 535,690 (61,940) 113.1% 320 FUEL CONSUMED 59,970 63,331 (3,361) 105.6% 340 RESALE ITEMS 1,400,000 1,340,265 59,735 95.7% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 7,800 32,546 (24,746) 417.3% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 268,940 247,492 21,448 92.0% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 89,740 58,949 30,791 65.7% 430 TRAVEL 17,170 4,263 12,907 24.8% 440 ADVERTISING 2,120 813 1,307 38.3% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 23,020 6,123 16,897 26.6% 460 INSURANCE 354,230 290,375 63,855 82.0% 470 UTILITIES 931,870 713,824 218,046 76.6% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 141,266 57,301 83,965 40.6% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 470,660 410,731 59,929 87.3% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 261,554 252,807 8,747 96.7% 540 EXCISE TAXES 471,123 488,966 (17,843) 103.8% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 1,307,280 1,029,699 277,581 78.8% 620 BUILDINGS 25,000 0 25,000 0.0% 640 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 19,626 9,932 9,694 50.6% 650 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 5,000 5,578 (578) 111.6% 710 BOND PRINCIPAL 1,169,098 1,169,097 1 100.0% 830 BOND INTEREST 237,201 364,305 (127,104) 153.6% 890 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0 292 (292) - 910 INTERFUND SERVICES 1,069,445 1,088,632 (19,187) 101.8% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 412,060 412,060 0 100.0% 980 INTERFUND REPAIRS 1,500 0 1,500 0.0% TOTAL COMBINED UTILITY 12,508,483 11,851,882 656,601 94.8% Page 18 Packet Page 67 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY FUND 511 EQUIP RENTAL/REPAIR FUND 12/31/06 # Title Appropriation Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 252,162 240,357 11,805 95.3% 120 OVERTIME 2,000 38 1,962 1.9% 230 BENEFITS 85,930 85,255 675 99.2% 240 UNIFORMS 2,000 1,814 186 90.7% 310 SUPPLIES 120,000 145,420 (25,420) 121.2% 320 FUEL CONSUMED 175,000 269,314 (94,314) 153.9% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 40,000 19,110 20,890 47.8% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 800 1,573 (773) 196.7% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 4,000 2,845 1,155 71.1% 430 TRAVEL 1,040 173 867 16.7% 440 ADVERTISING 500 0 500 0.0% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 135,840 81,399 54,441 59.9% 460 INSURANCE 27,000 28,219 (1,219) 104.5% 470 UTILITIES 13,000 14,216 (1,216) 109.4% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 35,000 35,274 (274) 100.8% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 5,922 (1,922) 148.0% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 4,000 2,709 1,291 67.7% 640 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 1,175,058 1,065,140 109,918 90.6% 910 INTERFUND SERVICES 0 19,462 (19,462) - 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 6,026 6,026 0 100.0% TOTAL EQUIP RENTAL/REPAIR FUND 2,083,356 2,024,267 59,089 97.2% Page 19 Packet Page 68 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 110 CITY COUNCIL 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 120 OVERTIME 230 BENEFITS 310 SUPPLIES 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 430 TRAVEL 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 490 MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL CITY COUNCIL 107,370 98,606 8,764 91.8% 5,590 4,200 1,390 75.1% 83,675 71,320 12,355 85.2% 1,000 1,004 (4) 100.4% 0 273 (273) - 3,000 639 2,361 21.3% 4,100 4,189 (89) 102.2% 1,500 1,281 219 85.4% 28,950 3,718 25,232 12.8% 235,185 185,228 49,957 78.8% 210 OFFICE OF MAYOR 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 230 BENEFITS 310 SUPPLIES 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 420 COMMUNICATIONS 430 TRAVEL 450 RENTAL/LEASE 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 490 MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL OFFICE OF MAYOR 160,936 160,626 310 99.8% 39,268 38,699 569 98.5% 3,000 3,730 (730) 124.3% 1,500 228 1,272 15.2% 1,200 1,679 (479) 140.0% 2,000 828 1,172 41.4% 1,400 1,381 19 98.6% 0 362 (362) - 2,000 3,550 (1,550) 177.5% 211,304 211,083 221 99.9% 220 HUMAN RESOURCES 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 230 BENEFITS 310 SUPPLIES 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 430 TRAVEL 440 ADVERTISING 450 RENTAL/LEASE 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 490 MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES 126,741 129,705 (2,964) 102.3% 45,295 37,251 8,044 82.2% 2,000 2,581 (581) 129.0% 3,000 3,032 (32) 101.1% 18,300 21,128 (2,828) 115.5% 500 327 173 65.4% 5,000 6,775 (1,775) 135.5% 1,320 1,262 58 95.6% 3,420 4,037 (617) 118.0% 11,180 11,694 (514) 104.6% 216,756 217,792 (1,036) 100.5% Packet Page 69 of 88 Page 20 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 230 MUNICIPAL COURT 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 407,256 408,517 (1,261) 120 OVERTIME 0 707 (707) 230 BENEFITS 112,923 110,618 2,305 310 SUPPLIES 14,500 13,325 1,175 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,800 1,214 586 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 22,656 24,036 (1,380) 420 COMMUNICATIONS 0 280 (280) 430 TRAVEL 3,000 2,672 328 450 RENTAL/LEASE 2,100 1,744 356 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 100 1,232 (1,132) 490 MISCELLANEOUS 26,700 26,765 (65) 510 INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 15,000 15,859 (859) 640 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 9,000 8,391 609 TOTAL MUNICIPAL COURT 100.3% 98.0% 91.9% 67.5% 106.1 % 89.1 % 83.0% 1232.2% 100.2% 105.7% 93.2% 615,035 615,359 (324) 100.1% 240 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 98,898 53,748 45,150 54.3% 230 BENEFITS 16,449 8,244 8,205 50.1% 310 SUPPLIES 2,500 369 2,131 14.7% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 800 44 756 5.6% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 49,000 16,056 32,944 32.8% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 0 5,389 (5,389) - 430 TRAVEL 4,470 96 4,375 2.1% 440 ADVERTISING 7,700 20,370 (12,670) 264.5% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 0 650 (650) - 490 MISCELLANEOUS 5,000 8,651 (3,651) 173.0% TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 184,817 113,615 71,202 61.5% 250 CITY CLERK 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 276,341 271,598 4,743 98.3% 120 OVERTIME 410 0 410 0.0% 230 BENEFITS 73,934 72,532 1,402 98.1% 310 SUPPLIES 16,260 13,503 2,757 83.0% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17,250 15,644 1,606 90.7% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 59,050 52,097 6,954 88.2% 430 TRAVEL 2,080 0 2,080 0.0% 440 ADVERTISING 20,420 18,521 1,899 90.7% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 23,070 17,447 5,623 75.6% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 6,365 6,763 (398) 106.2% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 4,500 4,752 (252) 105.6% TOTAL CITY CLERK 499,680 472,857 26,823 94.6% Page 21 Packet Page 70 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 310 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 731,004 710,367 20,637 97.2% 120 OVERTIME 6,100 4,979 1,121 81.6% 230 BENEFITS 175,473 165,929 9,544 94.6% 310 SUPPLIES 16,850 11,331 5,519 67.2% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 120,000 115,891 4,109 96.6% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 125,900 79,795 46,105 63.4% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 26,800 30,343 (3,543) 113.2% 430 TRAVEL 5,240 1,226 4,014 23.4% 440 ADVERTISING 0 94 (94) - 450 RENTAL/LEASE 8,400 9,845 (1,445) 117.2% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 37,522 45,591 (8,069) 121.5% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 19,100 26,802 (7,702) 140.3% TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1,272,389 1,202,195 70,194 94.5% 360 CITY ATTORNEY 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 475,300 437,312 37,988 92.0% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000 638 2,363 21.3% TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY 478,300 437,950 40,350 91.6% 390 NON -DEPARTMENTAL 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 113,350 111,003 2,347 97.9% 230 BENEFITS 447,860 428,660 19,200 95.7% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 156,000 148,805 7,195 95.4% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 65,000 24,351 40,649 37.5% 430 TRAVEL 0 438 (438) - 450 RENTAL/LEASE 3,600 3,600 0 100.0% 460 INSURANCE 400,364 381,479 18,885 95.3% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 100,000 88,610 11,390 88.6% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 136,373 124,999 11,374 91.7% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 208,403 156,551 51,852 75.1% 540 EXCISE TAXES 5,000 8,123 (3,123) 162.5% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 919,202 919,202 0 100.0% 700 BOND PRINCIPAL 799,249 806,419 (7,170) 100.9% 800 BOND INTEREST 507,018 487,373 19,645 96.1% 840 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 1,625 5,399 (3,774) 332.2% 890 FISCAL AGENT FEES 1,500 463 1,037 30.9% TOTAL NON -DEPARTMENTAL 3,864,544 3,695,473 169,071 95.6% Page 22 Packet Page 71 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 410 POLICE 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 4,501,218 4,428,511 72,707 98.4% 120 OVERTIME 254,740 466,136 (211,396) 183.0% 150 HOLIDAY BUYBACK 165,288 159,836 5,452 96.7% 190 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 1,784 1,783 1 99.9% 230 BENEFITS 1,403,139 1,400,037 3,102 99.8% 240 UNIFORMS 61,372 53,303 8,069 86.9% 310 SUPPLIES 83,655 86,857 (3,202) 103.8% 320 FUEL CONSUMED 0 287 (287) - 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 40,674 67,896 (27,222) 166.9% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140,565 70,748 69,817 50.3% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 21,700 20,348 1,352 93.8% 430 TRAVEL 28,520 26,164 2,356 91.7% 440 ADVERTISING 2,500 559 1,941 22.4% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 12,000 10,811 1,189 90.1% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 21,930 16,981 4,949 77.4% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 43,299 20,420 22,879 47.2% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 1,193,618 1,133,749 59,869 95.0% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 8,000 8,000 0 100.0% 640 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 19,246 11,004 8,242 57.2% 910 INTERFUND SERVICES 0 292 (292) - 930 INTERFUND SUPPLIES 1,200 0 1,200 0.0% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 528,533 509,722 18,811 96.4% 980 INTERFUND REPAIRS 1,000 0 1,000 0.0% TOTAL POLICE 8,533,981 8,493,446 40,535 99.5% Page 23 Packet Page 72 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 510 FIRE 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 3,903,788 3,933,186 (29,398) 100.8% 120 OVERTIME 520,644 464,006 56,638 89.1% 150 HOLIDAY BUYBACK 161,473 132,194 29,279 81.9% 230 BENEFITS 1,301,954 1,262,731 39,223 97.0% 240 UNIFORMS 46,730 46,411 319 99.3% 250 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 17,290 11,773 5,517 68.1% 310 SUPPLIES 104,768 79,014 25,754 75.4% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 252,652 234,761 17,891 92.9% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 71,171 65,973 5,198 92.7% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 36,052 62,555 (26,503) 173.5% 430 TRAVEL 19,590 14,669 4,921 74.9% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 1,800 2,537 (737) 140.9% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 17,640 8,224 9,416 46.6% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 36,511 40,653 (4,142) 111.3% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 202,523 207,709 (5,186) 102.6% 920 INTERFUND FUEL 32,731 21,845 10,886 66.7% 930 INTERFUND SUPPLIES 40,184 38,138 2,046 94.9% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 51,506 51,506 0 100.0% 980 INTERFUND REPAIRS 90,631 103,717 (13,086) 114.4% TOTAL FIRE 6,909,638 6,781,603 128,035 98.1% 610 COMMUNITY SERVICES 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 175,239 177,721 (2,482) 101.4% 120 OVERTIME 1,600 973 627 60.8% 230 BENEFITS 36,262 35,105 1,157 96.8% 310 SUPPLIES 3,000 1,081 1,919 36.0% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 0 1,411 (1,411) - 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 80,000 60,290 19,710 75.4% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 690 0 690 0.0% 430 TRAVEL 2,000 709 1,291 35.4% 440 ADVERTISING 2,060 0 2,060 0.0% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 1,320 1,262 58 95.6% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 0 363 (363) - 490 MISCELLANEOUS 3,000 655 2,345 21.8% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 1,833 1,833 0 100.0% TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 307,004 281,403 25,601 91.7% Page 24 Packet Page 73 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 620 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 120 OVERTIME 230 BENEFITS 240 UNIFORMS 310 SUPPLIES 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 420 COMMUNICATIONS 430 TRAVEL 440 ADVERTISING 450 RENTAL/LEASE 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 490 MISCELLANEOUS 950 INTERFUND RENTAL TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1,904,197 1,799,385 104,812 94.5% 15,635 10,499 5,136 67.2% 439,313 452,664 (13,351) 103.0% 2,570 1,488 1,082 57.9% 31,200 24,487 6,713 78.5% 2,120 11,892 (9,772) 561.0% 594,995 404,970 190,025 68.1% 13,000 8,997 4,003 69.2% 6,070 1,931 4,139 31.8% 3,910 2,632 1,278 67.3% 27,590 23,423 4,167 84.9% 14,596 29,777 (15,181) 204.0% 44,405 23,088 21,317 52.0% 30,896 28,129 2,767 91.0% 3,130,497 2,823,362 307,136 90.2% 640 PARKS & RECREATION 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 120 OVERTIME 230 BENEFITS 240 UNIFORMS 310 SUPPLIES 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 420 COMMUNICATIONS 430 TRAVEL 440 ADVERTISING 450 RENTAL/LEASE 470 UTILITIES 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 490 MISCELLANEOUS 910 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 950 INTERFUND RENTAL TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 1,647,206 1,616,334 30,872 98.1% 4,075 4,527 (452) 111.1% 369,558 387,772 (18,214) 104.9% 2,540 2,247 293 88.5% 119,910 102,835 17,075 85.8% 21,510 18,844 2,667 87.6% 229,750 227,375 2,375 99.0% 8,520 21,031 (12,511) 246.8% 4,865 3,361 1,504 69.1% 3,000 3,939 (939) 131.3% 52,950 46,345 6,605 87.5% 105,750 114,713 (8,963) 108.5% 16,257 16,133 124 99.2% 60,360 40,445 19,915 67.0% 64,250 51,944 12,306 80.8% 73,267 73,296 (29) 100.0% 2,783,768 2,731,141 52,627 98.1% Packet Page 74 of 88 Page 25 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 650 PUBLIC WORKS # Title Budget 12/31/06 Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 191,466 192,897 (1,431) 100.7% 120 OVERTIME 200 46 154 23.0% 230 BENEFITS 39,242 40,042 (800) 102.0% 310 SUPPLIES 5,360 4,013 1,347 74.9% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 88 (88) - 420 COMMUNICATIONS 480 477 3 99.4% 430 TRAVEL 960 388 572 40.4% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 3,250 3,175 75 97.7% 470 UTILITIES 1,900 2,417 (517) 127.2% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 1,580 1,954 (374) 123.7% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 2,790 1,564 1,226 56.0% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 2,146 2,146 0 100.0% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 249,374 249,207 168 99.9% 651 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 543,429 558,492 (15,063) 102.8% 120 OVERTIME 8,500 6,120 2,380 72.0% 230 BENEFITS 181,356 166,215 15,141 91.7% 240 UNIFORMS 7,210 4,533 2,677 62.9% 310 SUPPLIES 82,000 77,991 4,009 95.1% 320 FUEL CONSUMED 1,700 0 1,700 0.0% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,680 10,705 (7,025) 290.9% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0 2,973 (2,973) - 420 COMMUNICATIONS 6,950 13,573 (6,623) 195.3% 430 TRAVEL 0 138 (138) - 450 RENTAL/LEASE 0 521 (521) - 470 UTILITIES 325,000 304,484 20,516 93.7% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 46,200 44,797 1,403 97.0% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 2,780 5,154 (2,374) 185.4% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 3,000 2,301 699 76.7% 630 OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 3,000 0 3,000 0.0% 640 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 8,700 0 8,700 0.0% 650 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 0 0 0 - 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 36,679 36,679 (0) 100.0% TOTAL FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,260,184 1,234,676 25,508 98.0% Page 26 Packet Page 75 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 652 STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 411,101 427,537 (16,436) 104.0% 120 OVERTIME 5,080 268 4,812 5.3% 230 BENEFITS 123,875 140,605 (16,730) 113.5% 240 UNIFORMS 6,100 4,575 1,525 75.0% 310 SUPPLIES 49,500 27,433 22,067 55.4% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,800 7,735 (4,935) 276.2% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32,320 28,322 3,998 87.6% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 2,500 1,729 771 69.1% 430 TRAVEL 3,330 0 3,330 0.0% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 4,000 40 3,960 1.0% 460 INSURANCE 91,710 33,281 58,429 36.3% 470 UTILITIES 4,500 1,767 2,733 39.3% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 3,820 6,352 (2,532) 166.3% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 63,540 60,683 2,857 95.5% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 14,070 14,708 (638) 104.5% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 232,280 112,500 119,780 48.4% 620 BUILDINGS 0 0 0 - 640 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 1,925 0 1,925 0.0% 710 BOND PRINCIPAL 28,259 28,259 0 100.0% 830 BOND INTEREST 73,076 108,092 (35,016) 147.9% 840 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 0 0 0 - 890 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0 61 (61) - 910 INTERFUND SERVICES 436,105 344,824 91,281 79.1% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 176,896 176,896 0 100.0% TOTAL STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY 1,766,787 1,525,664 241,123 86.4% Page 27 Packet Page 76 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 654 WATER UTILITY 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 585,047 610,180 (25,133) 104.3% 120 OVERTIME 24,180 16,563 7,617 68.5% 230 BENEFITS 178,009 177,219 790 99.6% 240 UNIFORMS 6,880 5,662 1,218 82.3% 310 SUPPLIES 85,000 84,273 727 99.1% 340 RESALE ITEMS 1,400,000 1,340,265 59,735 95.7% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 0 5,909 (5,909) - 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112,040 101,820 10,220 90.9% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 56,710 23,487 33,223 41.4% 430 TRAVEL 6,850 286 6,564 4.2% 440 ADVERTISING 560 84 476 15.0% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 11,370 174 11,196 1.5% 460 INSURANCE 82,180 76,533 5,647 93.1% 470 UTILITIES 28,000 21,297 6,703 76.1% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 40,200 12,830 27,370 31.9% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 194,990 217,467 (22,477) 111.5% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 22,492 27,251 (4,759) 121.2% 540 EXCISE TAXES 196,336 212,712 (16,376) 108.3% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 700,000 700,000 0 100.0% 620 BUILDINGS 20,000 0 20,000 0.0% 640 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 4,813 0 4,813 0.0% 650 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 0 0 0 - 710 BOND PRINCIPAL 156,191 156,191 1 100.0% 830 BOND INTEREST 73,238 83,331 (10,093) 113.8% 840 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 0 16,542 (16,542) - 890 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0 82 (82) - 910 INTERFUND SERVICES 260,193 317,959 (57,766) 122.2% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 97,609 97,609 (0) 100.0% 980 INTERFUND REPAIRS 0 0 0 - TOTAL WATER UTILITY 4,342,888 4,305,725 37,163 99.1% Page 28 Packet Page 77 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 655 SEWER 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 357,863 348,849 9,014 97.5% 120 OVERTTME 17,330 18,036 (706) 104.1% 230 BENEFITS 132,307 127,062 5,245 96.0% 240 UNIFORMS 5,170 5,275 (105) 102.0% 310 SUPPLIES 25,850 62,913 (37,063) 243.4% 340 FUEL CONSUMED 0 291 (291) - 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 0 13,008 (13,008) - 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 71,580 57,653 13,927 80.5% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 22,530 24,323 (1,793) 108.0% 430 TRAVEL 3,490 185 3,305 5.3% 440 ADVERTISING 560 144 416 25.7% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 1,870 128 1,742 6.8% 460 INSURANCE 108,860 101,891 6,969 93.6% 470 UTILITIES 461,110 302,661 158,449 65.6% 480 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 34,120 20,562 13,558 60.3% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 126,330 71,851 54,479 56.9% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 163,992 140,438 23,554 85.6% 540 EXCISE TAXES 274,787 276,254 (1,467) 100.5% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 375,000 100,000 275,000 26.7% 610 BUILDINGS 5,000 0 5,000 0.0% 640 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 2,888 0 2,888 0.0% 780 BOND PRINCIPAL 59,595 59,595 0 100.0% 830 BOND INTEREST 34,327 78,408 (44,081) 228.4% 840 DEBT ISSUE COSTS 0 16,542 (16,542) - 910 INTERFUND SERVICES 204,097 250,287 (46,190) 122.6% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 131,245 131,245 0 100.0% 980 INTERFUND REPAIRS 1,500 0 1,500 0.0% TOTAL SEWER 2,621,401 2,207,603 413,798 84.2% Page 29 Packet Page 78 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURE DETAIL BY DEPARTMENT 656 TREATMENT PLANT 12/31/06 # Title Budget Expenditures Balance % Used 110 SALARIES AND WAGES 1,073,631 1,031,947 41,684 96.1% 120 OVERTIME 45,510 27,474 18,036 60.4% 230 BENEFITS 307,977 317,829 (9,852) 103.2% 240 UNIFORMS 9,000 9,731 (731) 108.1% 310 SUPPLIES 313,400 361,071 (47,671) 115.2% 320 FUEL CONSUMED 59,970 63,040 (3,070) 105.1% 350 SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,000 5,894 (894) 117.9% 410 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 53,000 59,697 (6,697) 112.6% 420 COMMUNICATIONS 8,000 9,410 (1,410) 117.6% 430 TRAVEL 3,500 3,793 (293) 108.4% 440 ADVERTISING 1,000 585 415 58.5% 450 RENTAL/LEASE 5,780 5,781 (1) 100.0% 460 INSURANCE 71,480 78,670 (7,190) 110.1% 470 UTILITIES 438,260 388,099 50,161 88.6% 480 REPAIRS &MAINTENANCE 63,126 17,556 45,570 27.8% 490 MISCELLANEOUS 85,800 60,731 25,069 70.8% 510 INTERGOVTL SERVICES 61,000 70,410 (9,410) 115.4% 550 INTERFUND TRANSFER 0 117,199 (117,199) - 640 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 10,000 9,932 68 99.3% 650 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 5,000 5,578 (578) 111.6% 710 BOND PRINCIPAL 891,715 891,715 1 100.0% 830 BOND INTEREST 89,898 94,727 (4,829) 105.4% 890 FISCAL AGENT FEES 0 149 (149) - 910 INTERFUND SERVICES 169,050 175,562 (6,512) 103.9% 950 INTERFUND RENTAL 6,310 6,310 0 100.0% TOTAL TREATMENT PLANT 3,777,407 3,812,889 (35,482) 100.9% Page 30 Packet Page 79 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STATUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - 2006 UPDATE Fund 2006 2006 No. BUDGET ACTUAL COMMENTS TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS 112 1 100th Ave Road Stabilization 60,000 14,858 Design Complete. ROW acquisition complete. Construction in 2007. 112 220th St Improvements 2,234,000 3,333,968 Construction completed. Closing out contract. Final payments to be made in 2007. 112 76th Avenue Road Restoration (SR99 to 220th St) 32,000 0 Completed in 2005. 112 Downtown Parking Improvements 40,000 0 No action in 2006. 112 92nd Ave W/ 234th St SW Safety Improvements 75,000 1,737 Construction in progress. 112 Nonmotorized Trans- ADA Curb Ramp Improvements 5,000 0 No action in 2006. 112 Nonmotorized Trans- Interurban Trail 125,000 0 Design and ROW acquisition in progress. 112 Overlay -Waterline Streets 320,000 290,984 Construction completed. Closing out contract. Final payment to be made in 2007. 112 Downtown Crosswalk Renovation-5th/Main, 5th/Da ton 0 14,586 Construction completed. Closing out contract. 112 Transportation Plan 5,000 0 No action in 2006. 112 96th Ave W. Pedestrian Improvements 0 878 Construction completed in 2005. Closing out contract. 112 Citywide Stabilization Projects 0 7,616 PW completed one project in-house, 175th St SW. 112 Cas ers/9th/Puget Walkway 0 268 Consultant selected for design. TRANSPORTATION TOTAL 2,896,000 3,664,895 Page 31 Packet Page 80 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STATUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - 2006 UPDATE Fund 2006 2006 No. BUDGET ACTUAL COMMENTS BUILDINGS MAINTENANCE 116 ADA Improvements- City Wide 5,000 Carryover to 2007 116 Anderson Center Exterior Painting 26,000 Delayed until seismic work is completed 116 Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit 1,042,920 22,900 Construct in 2007 116 City Hall Generator (see below) 132,900 0 2005 carry-over project (see below 116 City Hall HVAC Upgrades (see below) 209,000 0 2005 carry-over project (see below) 116 Library Central HVAC (see below) 378,000 0 2005 carry-over project (see below) 116 Public Safety HVAC (see below) 85,000 0 2005 carry-over project (see below) N/A Total Aggregated ESCO (HVAC/Generator) - $804,900 756,500 ESCO Phase I Project 116 Fire Station #17 Stove Hood Exhaust 1,000 Carryover to 2007 116 Fire Station #17 Replace Weight Room Windows that Open 1,500 1,200 Completed 116 Fire Station #20 HVAC 30,000 Carryover to 2007 Energy Improvements 116 Fire Station #20 Roof Replacement 30,000 21,300 Completed 116 Library Plaza Brick Painting 21,000 Combine with FAC painting project 116 Log Cabin Lighting Replacement 3,000 Carryover to 2007 Energy Improvements 116 Park Maintenance Building Lighting Upgrade 9,000 Carryover to 2007 Energy Improvements 116 Public Safety Soffit Installation 5,000 3,400 116 Senior Center Elevator Replacement 0 71,900 2005 carry-over project 116 Senior Center Misc Repairs & Improvements 10,000 300 116 Senior Center Roofing 65,000 22,900 Project completed 116 Senior Center Remodel Kitchen 87,000 Construct in 2007 116 Senior Center Fire Alarm 45,000 13,700 Project completed 116 Senior Center HVAC Replacement 20,000 Project deferred 116 Senior Center Vestibule/Front Entry 19,000 17,500 Feasibility study completed 116 Senior Center Ballroom Stage 9,000 Project deferred 116 Senior Center Restroom Flooring 13,000 Project deferred 116 Senior Center Fire Repairs 80,000 79,300 Paid by Senior Center 116 Museum Glass Replacement Unbud eted expense) 0 3,700 Completed 116 Fire Station #17 Awning Replacement (Unbudgeted expense) 0 1,100 Completed TOTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,327,320 1,015,700 Page 32 Packet Page 81 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STATUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - 2006 UPDATE Fund 2006 2006 No. BUDGET ACTUAL COMMENTS PARKS IMPROVEMENT FUND 125 76th Ave. / 75th Pl. Walkway (budget adj. 8/17/06) 125,000 25,117 engineeing studues/design 125 264 Beach Place 30,000 1,766 completed late 2005 125 Anderson Center Field / Court/Plaza 30,000 7,304 infield renovation 125 Anderson Center Seismic Improvements Grant Match 250,000 125 Brackett's Landing Improvements 15,000 481 125 Chase Lake Park 40,000 no annexation, no longer under consideration 125 City Park Improvements 90,000 23,960 bandshell drainage project complete 125 Civic Center Complex Improvements 86,000 125 Edmonds Marsh 60,000 125 Esperance Neighborhood Park 110,000 no annexation, no longer under consideration 125 Fishing Pier/Olympic Beach/Parking Lot 65,000 28,460 pavers inst., int. panel design, coed. Survey 125 Hummingbird Park 20,000 42,183 2005 project moved forward - complete 125 Maplewood Park Playground 60,000 125 Marina Beach Park hnprovements 95,000 2,899 125 Meadowdale Clubhouse 50,000 125 Old Woodway Elementary 60,000 19,679 hazmat survey, pre. demo specs 125 Pine Ridge Park Improvements 10,000 125 Pine Street Park Improvements 10,000 125 Seaview Park hnprovements 50,000 586 125 Senior Center & 144 RR Waterfront Walkway 40,000 125 Sierra Park Improvements 65,000 125 Underwater Park Improvements 5,000 356 125 Waterfront Walkway/Olympic Beach 50,000 125 Yost Park/Pool Improvement 45,000 11,075 Shell Creek bridge complete 125 Old Woodway High School Athletic Complex 1,500,000 BEAUTIFICATION 125 Beautification Citywide/Sr. Cit. Treescape 100,000 3,547 CITY-WIDE PARK IMPROVEMENTS 125 ADA Improvements 20,000 125 Centralized Irrigation 10,000 125 Citywide Park hmprovements 35,000 5,416 125 IMisc Paving 25,000 7,180 marsh asphalt path repair 125 Sports Fields Upgrade/Playground Partnership 90,000 Edmonds Elementary parnership project SPECIALIZED PARK DEVELOPMENT 125 Skateboard Park 200,000 814 ads, building permit 125 Aquatic Recreation Complex Note #1 Note #1 TRAIL DEVELOPMENT 125 jbiterurban Trail Development 700,000 24,653 KPPF consulting 125 Misc. Unpaved Trail / Bike Path/Improvements 25,000 10,859 PLANNING 125 Comp Plan 60,000 7,834 125 Cultural Arts Center 40,000 22,582 TOTAL PARKS IMPROVEMENT FUND 4,141,000 246,751 PARKS ACQUISITION FUND 126 Misc. Open space/Land 200,000 2,072 Shell Creek appraisal review 126 Old Woodway Elementary School Acquisition 1,000,000 2,027,095 appr. review; cone. draw, title, escrow, purchase 126 Tideland Acquisitions 100,000 0 TOTAL PARKS ACQUISITION FUND 1,300,000 2,029,167 Note #1: $10 - $15 Million General Obligation Bond Issue Page 33 Packet Page 82 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STATUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - 2006 UPDATE Fund 2006 2006 No. BUDGET ACTUAL COMMENTS WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (Fd 412.100) 412 2004 Replacement Program 475,000 827,424 Construction completed. Closing out contract. 412 2004 Replacement Program- South Perrinville (OVD) 50,000 14,252 Design 95% complete. Construction pending Lynnwood OVD street improvement project. 412 2005 Replacement Program- College Place 645,000 4,012 Construction contract awarded in December 2006. 412 2006 Replacement Program- Edmonds Elem/North Bowl 500,000 20,670 Design in progress. Construction 2007. 412 2007 Replacement Program 0 28,684 Design in progress. Construction 2007. 412 220th St Waterline Relocation/Upgrade 0 34,635 Construction completed. Closing out contract. 412 PRV Replacement 150,000 0 Construction deferred to 2007. 412 Citywide Improvements 25,000 0 No action in 2006. 412 Five Comers Pump Station Improvements 500,000 69,853 1 Design in progress (90%). Construction in 2007. 412 Seismic Improvements 170,000 met. above Design in progress. Construction in 2007. 412 Reservoir Security 45,000 incl. above Design in progress. Construction in 2007. 412 Chlorine Residual Analyzers 25,000 0 Public Works in-house. Construct in 2007. 412 Transfer (112)* 110,000* 51,951 $51,951 transferred by Finance. SUB -TOTAL 2,585,000 999,530 DRAINAGE SYSTEM PROJECTS (Fd 412.200) 412 City Wide Drainage Replacement/ Extension 50,000 274,933 Several projects completed by PW. Construction contract completed for several others. 412 L. Ballinger Monitoring 10,000 4,853 Catch basin stenciling materials purchased. Stenciling performed. 412 Meadowdale 70,000 45,049 Two projects constructed. Includes 157th St Storm. 412 Meadowdale Beach Storm 75,000 90,383 Construction completed. Closing out contract. 412 Shoreline Regulation Revisions 30,000 0 In progress. 412 Public Involvement (Student Project) 1,000 393 Purchased community car wash CB pump unit. 412 Southwest Edmonds Basin Study, Projects 75,000 0 No action in 2006. 412 220th St Improvements 210,000 270,733 Construction completed. Closing out contract. 412 242nd Street Storm Improvements 180,000 126,010 Construction completed. Closing out contract. 412 Vehicle Wash Station 150,000 0 Project deferred to 2007. 412 93rd Ave West/ 96th Ave W 625,000 0 Partially completed in 2005 with 96th walkway. Remainder in 2007. 412 Northstream 30" Storm Repair/ Improvements 575,000 64,423 Design in progress. Construction in 2007. 412 Dayton Storm Outfall Repair 0 7,019 Construction completed in 2005. Closing out contract. 412 Willow Creek Stormwater Outfall 0 33,914 Construction completed in 2005. Closing out contract. 412 Marina Beach Emergency Storm Repair 0 35,494 Construction completed in 2005. Closing out contract. 412 Glen -Daley Alley Drainage Improvements 0 92,854 Construction completed. Closing out contract. 412 Transfer(112)* 50,000* 12,854 $12,854transferred by Finance. SUB -TOTAL 2,051,000 1,046,058 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS (Fd 412.300) 412 220th Street Side Sewers 15,000 17,297 Construction completed. Closing out contract. 412 Citywide Sewer Improvements 10,000 15,120 Several small works projects completed by PW. 412 Lift Station #13 275,000 91,248 Design in progress (30%). Construction in 2007. 412 Lift Station #2 500,000 met. above Design in progress (30%) with lift station 13. Construction in 2007. 412 Lift Station #7 & 8 Integration 1,200,000 30,185 Design in progress (90%). Construction in 2007. 412 Olympic View Drive Sewer Improvements 6,000 2,135 Design 95% complete. Construction pending Lynnwood OVD street improvement project. 412 Telemetry Upgrade all Lift Stations 200,000 164,428 Installation is 80% complete. 412 Glen -Daley Alley 0 11,672 Construction completed. Closing out contract. 412 Transfer(112)* 0 SUB -TOTAL 2,206,000 332,085 *Not included in sub -total or total TOTAL FUND 412 6,842,000 2,377,673 Page 34 Packet Page 83 of 88 DECEMBER 31, 2006 BUDGET REPORT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT STATUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - 2006 UPDATE Fund 2006 2006 No. BUDGET ACTUAL COMMENTS TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS 414 General 25,000 23,000 One clarifier tank steel repaired and recoated. 414 Mechanical Equipment Replacement 75,000 0 All equipment replacement is listed individually below. 414 Screenings system improvement 1,100,000 804,000 Project approximately 60% complete 414 Concrete 25,000 18,620 Two small areas completed. Two large areas due next year. 414 Installation of Gate Actuators 100,000 0 Will not have time to perform this work this year 414 Electronics Upgrade 40,000 0 Will not have time to perform this work this year 414 Odor Control Study 25,000 7,080 Preliminary work and study complete 414 Replace Odor Control Fans 10,000 0 Will wait until odor control study is completed. 414 Field Flowmeter Rehabilitation 95,790 Projects completed. 414 Outfall Repair 155,480 2005 project completed, final expenses paid 414 SR 104 Trunkline Rehabilitation 46,930 2005 project completed, final expenses paid 414 Influent & Effluent Pump VFD replacement 21,220 2005 project completed, final expenses paid 414 Incinerator improvements 52,740 Most improvements completed. 414 Process control improvements 24,920 Project underway - roughly half completed. 414 Electrical improvements project 31,360 Design begun, some equipment urchased. TOTAL TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS 1,400,000 1,281,140 Page 35 Packet Page 84 of 88 AM-833 2.B. 2007 Limited Obligation Bond Sale City Council Committee Meetings Date: 02/13/2007 Submitted By: Kathleen Junglov, Administrative Services Submitted For: Dan Clements Time: 10 Minutes Department: Administrative Services Type: Information Committee: Finance Agenda Memo Subiect Title 2007 Limited Obligation Bond Sale. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff No action required, for information only. Previous Council Action January 9, 2007 Finance Committee. Narrative This item will update committee members on status of 2007 Limited Obligation Bond Issue. Items to be discussed are: Preliminary Official Statement Moody's Bond Rating February 27 as date of sale No file(s) attached. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Admin Services Sandy Chase 02/09/2007 08:10 AM APRV 2 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/09/2007 08:11 AM APRV 3 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/09/2007 09:23 AM APRV 4 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/09/2007 09:37 AM APRV Form Started By: Kathleen Junglov Started On: 02/08/2007 09:48 AM Final Approval Date: 02/09/2007 Packet Page 85 of 88 AM-836 Discussion Regarding Graffiti City Council Committee Meetings 3.A. Date: 02/ 13/ 2007 Submitted By: Sandy Chase, City Clerk's Office Time: 30 Minutes Department: City Clerk's Office Type: Information Committee: Public Safety Agenda Memo Subiect Title Discussion regarding graffiti in the city and enacting an anti -graffiti ordinance. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Previous Council Action Narrative A discussion will be held on the topic of graffiti in the city and enacting an anti -graffiti ordinance. No file(s) attached. Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 03:14 PM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/08/2007 03:17 PM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 03:19 PM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 02/08/2007 03:11 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2007 Packet Page 86 of 88 AM-831 Prisoner Detention Agreement Addendum City Council Committee Meetings Date: 02/ 13/ 2007 Submitted By: Al Compaan, Police Department Time: 5 Minutes Department: Police Department Type: Action Committee: Public Safety Agenda Memo Subiect Title Review of 2007 Addendum to Prisoner Detention Agreement with City of Lynnwood. Recommendation from Mayor and Staff Approve for Consent Agenda, authorizing the Mayor to sign the contract addendum. Previous Council Action 3.B. Narrative The City of Lynnwood and the City of Edmonds originally signed a Prisoner Detention Agreement on May 2, 1994. The agreement sets forth the terms and conditions of our utilization of Lynnwood Jail services. Since that time, there have been several addenda to the agreement regarding remuneration issues. Lynnwood has presented us with an addendum, effective January 1, 2007, covering our portion of the Whatcom County cooperative prisoner transport service. Our share of the fee for 2007 is $13,067.67. Our fee for 2006 was $10,845.00. Whatcom County provides daily prisoner transportation service along the I-5 corridor from Bellingham to Seattle. The total costs of Whatcom County's NW Minichain are divided proportionately among participating agencies based on the number of prisoners transported. This is a "pass through" amount charged to Lynnwood and then billed to us by Lynnwood. Funds are already allocated in the approved 2007-2008 budget in Police (general Fund) Prisoner Care. All other terms and conditions of the Prisoner Detection Agreement with the City of Lynnwood remain unchanged Revenue & Expenditures Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Prisoner Detention Addendum Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 08:18 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 02/08/2007 08:44 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 02/08/2007 09:38 AM APRV Form Started By: Al Compaan Started On: 02/07/2007 06:03 PM Final Approval Date: 02/08/2007 Packet Page 87 of 88 CITY OF LYNNWOOD Contract Title: Contract Number: 533 Addendum The following amends the original Interlocal Contract between the City of Lynnwood and the City of Edmonds, originally dated, January 1998. This Addendum extends the Contract duration and becomes a part of the Contract documents. The items below clarify or modify the original Contract as follows: 1. TERM OF CONTRACT: This modifies section 3, Term of Contract, in the originating Contract. This extends the duration of the Contract until December 31, 2007, unless otherwise terminated in writing by either party. 2. COMPENSATION: Annual compensation increases from $32,535.00 to $39,203.00. The Edmonds portion of this divided interlocal agreement with Whatcom County will be $13,067.67 3. All remaining Contract terms and conditions remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Contractor have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written CITY OF LYNNWOOD W B) ,a - L-O'j Date ATTEST: C.1 Vicki Heilman, AssistAnt Finance Director hate: / "fC' -d r APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mike Ruark, City Attorney Date: CONTRACTOR: Please fill in the spaces and sign in the box appropriate for your business entity. Other Agency [City of Edmonds] By --- - TypedlPrnted Name: Its Date: Packet Page 88 of 88