The URL can be used to link to this page

2010.03.23 Transportation Benefit District Board A AGENDA City of Edmonds Transportation Benefit District Board Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex 250 5th Ave. North, Edmonds ______________________________________________________________ MARCH 23, 2010 9:00 p.m.* *(Approximate Time ~ Following the City Council Meeting) Call to Order 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of Consent Agenda Items A. Roll Call B. AM-2914 Approval of Transportation Benefit District Meeting Minutes of June 2, 2009. 3. AM-2913 (15 Minutes) Transportation Benefit District - Annual Report for Year 2009. 4. AM-2909 (20 Minutes) Review of transportation capital project funding options. 5.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person) 6. (15 Minutes)Board Comments ADJOURN Packet Page 1 of 41 AM-2914 2.B. Approve 06-02-09 TBD Minutes Transportation Benefit District Board Date:03/23/2010 Submitted By:Sandy Chase Time: Department:City Clerk's Office Type:Action Information Subject Title Approval of Transportation Benefit District Meeting Minutes of June 2, 2009. Recommendation It is recommended that the Board review and approve the draft minutes. Previous TBD Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft minutes. Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: 06-02-09 Draft TBD Minutes Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/18/2010 08:57 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/18/2010 08:59 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/18/2010 10:03 AM APRV Form Started By: Sandy Chase Started On: 03/18/2010 08:54 AM Final Approval Date: 03/18/2010 Packet Page 2 of 41 Edmonds TBD Draft Minutes June 2, 2009 Page 1 CITY OF EDMONDS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT BOARD DRAFT MINUTES June 2, 2009 The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District meeting was called to order at 9:52 p.m. by Board President D. J. Wilson in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. OFFICIALS PRESENT D. J. Wilson, Board President Ron Wambolt, Board Vice President Michael Plunkett, Board Member Peggy Pritchard Olson, Board Member Dave Orvis, Board Member Strom Peterson, Board Member OFFICIALS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic Development Director Kathleen Junglov, Finance Director Scott Snyder, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder Steve Bernheim, Board Member 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Board President Wilson advised Audience Comments would be moved from Item 6 to Item 3. BOARD VICE PRESIDENT WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS BOARD VICE PRESIDENT WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 17, 2009. 3. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Al Rutledge, Edmonds, commented the TBD Board was doing a good job. He suggested moving the Council meeting to 6:00 p.m. so that the TBD Board meeting could begin earlier. Packet Page 3 of 41 Edmonds TBD Draft Minutes June 2, 2009 Page 2 3A. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE EDMONDS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT. Community Services/Economic Development Director Stephen Clifton explained the draft Interlocal Agreement between the City and the Edmonds Transportation Benefit (TBD) was on the February 17, 2009 agenda as a discussion item with the intent it would be presented to the TBD Board at a future meeting as an action item. No changes have been made to the Interlocal Agreement presented to the Council on February 17. If adopted, the Interlocal Agreement will help coordinate efforts to maintain and preserve streets and related transportation infrastructure within the City. Sections 1 and 2 of the Interlocal Agreement define the obligations of both the Edmonds TBD and the City. City Attorney Scott Snyder explained under Washington law one public entity could not make a gift to another and all costs must be accounted for. Because the TBD had no employees, the draft Interlocal Agreement was a mechanism to provide for the costs of operating the TBD. BOARD MEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD VICE PRESIDENT WAMBOLT, TO APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE EDMONDS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, AND EDMONDS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT. Mr. Clifton expressed his appreciation to City Attorney Scott Snyder and Finance Director Kathleen Junglov as well as representatives from the cities of Olympia and Des Moines for their assistance in negotiating the contract with the Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL). He acknowledged it had taken some time for the entities to reach agreement. If adopted, the Agreement would be submitted to the Department of Licensing who would begin collecting revenue on behalf of the Edmonds TBD. The purpose of the Interlocal Agreement is to provide terms and conditions under which the DOL will administer and collect an annual vehicle license fee on behalf of the Edmonds TBD. The cities of Edmonds, Des Moines and Olympia worked with DOL to develop the Interlocal Agreement which contains a statement of work, period of performance, terms of the agreement, fee collection methodology, billing cycles, payments and reimbursement and the overall governance as well as records and documentation. Since preparing the packet, DOL provided the City with a reformatted agreement which he provided to Board Members this evening. The reformatted agreement contains Attachments B and C which clarify the type of vehicles subject to and those that are exempt from the annual vehicle license fee. Also provided is a disclosure agreement application that the City must complete assuring DOL that released vehicle information will remain confidential. Staff will complete the updated agreement application. Mr. Snyder commented during the first meeting between the City, Lake Forest Park and DOL, the DOL was attempting to charge the first TBDs $300,000 to set up their system, 1% for collections and an additional charge for data. After months of discussion, the charge is now within the statutorily allowed 1%. The Interlocal Agreement in the Board’s packet was developed in conjunction with Olympia and Des Moines. DOL reformatted the document to eliminate the numbering on the paragraphs. Due to a concern that the first three cities would sign agreements and as other cities were added, DOL might charge less than 1%, the initial draft required if DOL signed another contract for less, they would reduce the amount charged to the initial cities to that level. In this version that language was removed. Packet Page 4 of 41 Edmonds TBD Draft Minutes June 2, 2009 Page 3 He advised the Interlocal Agreement was subject to renegotiation within two years. DOL inserted language that the full 1% was charged due to startup costs, raising the question if startup costs have been covered the percentage should be lowered. The estimated revenue for the City is $750,000; 1% for collecting that money is $7,500. Even if negotiations could bring the 1% charge down to 0.9% which would save the City $700, further delays may result in the loss of a quarter of revenue collection or $170,000. The City of Olympia’s attorney and he recommend approval of the Interlocal Agreement not as a perfect document but recognizing that this is a new project. Mr. Snyder commented the state would be responsible for all costs associated with collecting and processing exemptions. If the error is where a person’s home is located, that will be the City’s responsibility. Mr. Clifton pointed out the phone number and fax number would be corrected on page 8. Board Vice President Wambolt asked when collections would begin. Mr. Clifton answered this fall. Mr. Snyder advised once the contracts were signed, DOL is required to begin collection in not less than six months. The cities have provided DOL their information and the State is confident they can meet the fall deadline. BOARD VICE PRESIDENT WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PETERSON, FOR APPROVAL OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING, AND EDMONDS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH WASHINGTON CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY. Finance Director Kathleen Junglov explained the TBD is a separate corporate entity and can sue or be sued in that capacity. Board Members serve on the TBD in an ex officio capacity. Since the TBD essentially has no assets, it is likely that any suit against the TBD could name the individual Board Members. The primary duty of the TBD will be street maintenance and lawsuits based on negligent design or improvements are a possibility. Insurance provides a safety net both for defense costs and any liability that may accrue to the TBD. She recommended the Board authorize the TBD President to sign the Interlocal Agreement between the TBD and WCIA as well as appoint a delegate. Board President Wilson asked if the Interlocal Agreement provided indemnity for individual Board Members as well as the TBD. Mr. Snyder answered Board Members would be covered within the scope of their duties. Board President Wilson observed the delegate’s duties were to attend at least one meeting. He asked if the TBD was in jeopardy if the delegate did not attend at least one meeting. Ms. Junglov answered yes because it was a contract requirement. She affirmed with the WCIA representative that her attendance as the City’s delegate could double for the TBD if she were appointed. Mr. Snyder’s attendance at required WCIA legal sessions would also cover the TBD’s obligation. Board President Wilson asked whether the TBD would have a WCIA Board membership. Ms. Junglov responded the delegate would represent the TBD at WCIA. Board President Wilson asked whether other cities had a staff person as their delegate. Ms. Junglov answered yes. Mr. Snyder explained the delegates elect Board Members. The delegates’ function is educational rather than a governance function. Board President Wilson observed with a delegate but not a Board position, the TBD was bound by the Board’s decisions. Mr. Snyder responded there were 12 Board seats on WCIA. The TBD’s delegate would have a vote regarding selection of a Board seat but would not have a seat on the Board. Packet Page 5 of 41 Edmonds TBD Draft Minutes June 2, 2009 Page 4 Board Member Plunkett asked whether the delegate would vote. Mr. Snyder answered it was primarily an educational function. The delegates vote on Board Members but not on a specific Board seat. Board President Wilson referred to Items 1 and 4 in the delegate job description that require the appointed delegate to be in a position of authority to implement policies and procedures requested by WCIA. Ms. Junglov explained the delegate served as a liaison and channeled information such as she monitors claims that the City receives. There are also training requirements for delegates, one annual board meeting, delegate attentiveness training, etc. Board President Wilson commented #4 in the delegate job description states the delegates were to come informed regarding issues and to vote appropriately. Mr. Snyder suggested staff provide Board Members a copy of the WCIA procedures. He compared the WCIA meetings to a shareholder meeting where there was discussions but votes that set policy were done by the Board. Mr. Snyder suggested the Board approve the Interlocal Agreement and delay appointment of the delegate until additional information was provided. He noted the Interlocal Agreement required the signature of the Board President as well as the delegate. He advised this Interlocal Agreement incorporated by reference the document that created the WCIA. Board Member Peterson asked how difficult it would be to change the delegate in the future if that became necessary. Ms. Junglov responded the appointment could be easily changed. Board Member Peterson suggested appointing Ms. Junglov and changing the appointment in the future if necessary. Board Vice President Wambolt asked who would be the alternate delegate. Ms. Junglov advised the City’s alternate was Accountant Deb Sharp. BOARD VICE PRESIDENT WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH WASHINGTON CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. BOARD VICE PRESIDENT WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PETERSON TO APPOINT KATHLEEN JUNGLOV AS THE EDMONDS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT’S DELEGATE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. BOARD VICE PRESIDENT WAMBOLT MOVED, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER PETERSON, TO APPOINT DEB SHARP AS THE ALTERNATE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. BOARD COMMENTS Board Members made no comments. 7. ADJOURN With no further business, the TBD meeting was adjourned at 10:23 p.m. Packet Page 6 of 41 AM-2913 3. Transportation Benefit District - Annual Report for Year 2009 Transportation Benefit District Board Date:03/23/2010 Submitted By:Stephen Clifton Submitted For:Noel Miller Time:15 Minutes Department:Community Services Type:Information Information Subject Title Transportation Benefit District - Annual Report for Year 2009. Recommendation Previous TBD Action February 3, 2009 – The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District Board conducted its first public meeting during which it adopted the City of Edmonds TBD Charter and Bylaws. NOTE: A charter is a document incorporating an institution and specifying its rights while bylaws are essentially rules made by a local authority to regulate its own affairs. February 17, 2009 - The Edmonds Transportation Benefit Board adopted Ordinance 1 authorizing an annual $20 vehicle license fee, and fixing a time when the same shall become effective. February 17, 2009 – The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District reviewed and discussed a draft Interlocal Agreement between the City of Edmonds, Washington, and the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District (TBD). See June 2, 2009 for additional information. June 2, 2009 – The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District approved an Interlocal Agreement (first reviewed on February 17, 2009) between the City of Edmonds, Washington, and the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District. The agreement serves to help coordinate efforts to pursue individual, joint and mutual rights and obligations to maintain and preserve streets and related transportation infrastructure within the City of Edmonds. Sections 1 and 2 of the Agreement define the obligations of the Edmonds TBD and undertakings of the City. The Agreement also contains sections related to ownership, indemnification, termination, and effective date of the Agreement. June 2, 2009 - The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District approved Appendix 79-09 to Interlocal Agreement Creating Washington Cities Insurance Authority. The interlocal contains an indemnity from the city to the TBD for liability arising from the services provided by city employees and that liability is covered by the city's underlying pool agreement. June 2, 2009 - The Edmonds Transportation Benefit District approved an Interlocal Agreement between the Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL) and Edmonds Transportation Benefit District. The Interlocal Agreement provides terms and conditions under which the Washington State Department of Licensing shall administer and collect fees, on behalf of the Packet Page 7 of 41 Washington State Department of Licensing shall administer and collect fees, on behalf of the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District, as provided by contract according to RCW 82.80.140, RCW 36.73.065, RCW 46.12, WAC 308-10, Chapter 18 USC Sec. 2721 -2725 Driver Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), and Executive Order 97-01, as currently written or hereafter amended, and according to the Vehicle/Vessel Disclosure Agreement Application submitted by the TBD. Narrative On behalf of the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District (TBD), the Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL) is currently collecting a $20 fee at the time a registered vehicle renewal notice is renewed within the City of Edmonds. The fee took effect on license tabs that expire on or after September 1, 2009. According to City of Edmonds Ordinance 3707, the funds generated by the TBD shall be used for transportation improvements that preserve, maintain and operate the existing transportation infrastructure of the City, consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.73 RCW. As such, funds expended by the District are being used to preserve, maintain and operate the City's previous investments in the transportation infrastructure, reduce the risk of transportation facility failure, improve safety, continue the cost-effectiveness of the City’s infrastructure investments, and continue the optimal performance of the transportation system. The attached table, provided by the City of Edmonds Finance Department, in collaboration with the Public Works Department, contains information related to the amount of revenue collected on behalf of the Edmonds TBD, and the amount available to pay for Street Operations. Through December of 2009, the amount collected by the Department of Licensing and forwarded to the City of Edmonds TBD was $168,498. Although the amounts collected each month are increasing, albeit slowly, they have not been at levels estimated prior to establishment of an Edmonds TBD in early 2009. At that time, using formulas provided by the Association of Washington Cities, the estimated monthly funds generated from annual TBD $20 vehicle license fee renewals ranged from $58,847 - $59,583. The following include payments made to the Edmonds TDB for year 2009: 1 - $1,643.40 2 - $7,306.20 3 - $74,269.80 (includes reimbursement due to coding error. See response to question 2 below) 4 - $37,659.60 5 - $47,619.00 During the first few months of collections, cities with established TBDs had all received revenue below what was estimated by each city prior to establishing a TBD. Although the Department of Licensing (DOL) acknowledged in December of 2009 that they discovered an internal coding error, the City of Edmonds and other cities are concerned there may be additional problems related to address matching. The Association of Washington Cities has asked that the Department of Licensing review options to find an approach to resolving the DOL to Department of Revenue (DOR) address matching problem. They also asked DOL to provide a data run based on the Department of Revenue nexus on a monthly and annual basis that shows anticipated collections for each city. Packet Page 8 of 41 While there could be additional circumstances causing the shorter than expected revenues (late renewals, fluctuation of renewal numbers, apartment and single family dwellers moving, new vehicles purchased, etc....), City of Edmonds staff believe it’s important to make sure DOL is applying the fee accurately. To date we have not seen evidence to have the confidence that the fee is being correctly applied. An ongoing conversation has been taking place between representatives from City established TBDs and the Department of Licensing over the past few months. In December of 2009, three questions were posed to DOL on behalf of all City TBDs; responses from DOL follow each question. What cities have learned, and what has been acknowledged by DOL, is that a primary reason for shorter than expected revenue could be related to question #3. 1) For jurisdictions that have created TBDs and have imposed the vehicle license fee, has DOL been collecting the correct amount of fee revenue on their behalf? Why or why not? DOL Response: DOL has and is collecting fees for all Transportation Benefit Districts (TBDs) that have imposed a vehicle license fee. We discovered that the fee collected from internet renewals (known as IPOs) were not being distributed to the TBDs correctly. Only the over the counter transactions (cash and checks) were processed during the July 27 to Oct 10, 2009 timeframe. We conducted a thorough review of data processing from each collection point to ensure the correct revenue posting occurred for TBD account codes. DOL’s Accounting Department has reviewed the data, made corrections, and has sent updated reports to the State Treasurer. DOL is testing software system changes. We expect to implement the final changes no later than December 4, 2009. 2) Have there been issues distributing the correct amounts of fee revenue to jurisdictions imposing the Vehicle License Fee? If so, what have these been and why have they arisen? DOL Response: During the research of the IPO issue, we learned that two of the TBDs (Lake Forrest Park and Edmonds) had account codes reversed. This caused the fees for cash and checks to be distributed to the wrong TBD. No data was lost and each TBD now has the correct distribution. This issue is resolved. 3) Some collection issues may pertain to difficulty matching DOR-generated boundary data with DOL vehicle licensing systems. What is the agency doing to address collection/distribution issues in the short run? DOL Response: DOL continues to work with Department of Revenue (DOR) on data format and boundary standards for Cities and Counties. When we find Zip code-city mismatches, DOL manually reviews GIS data to determine which jurisdiction should receive a distribution. This process is time-consuming and we are researching and partnering with DOR to find a more automated solution. Cities with established TBDs are expecting a more formal response from DOL in the near future as to what is currently being done to address this issue. Representatives from all City established TBDs have been invited to participate in a meeting with the Departments of Licensing and Revenue on March 26, 2010. City staff will update the Edmonds Transportation Benefit District Board on the outcome of this meeting. Fiscal Impact Packet Page 9 of 41 Attachments Link: Attachment 1 - TBD Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/19/2010 07:15 AM APRV 2 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/19/2010 07:24 AM APRV 3 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/19/2010 07:25 AM APRV Form Started By: Stephen Clifton Started On: 03/18/2010 08:16 AM Final Approval Date: 03/19/2010 Packet Page 10 of 41 (Unaudited) $168,498 - 168,498 Labor & Benefits 26,612 Supplies 4,867 Labor & Benefits 62,381 Supplies 18,130 56,508 168,498 - - - - $0 Annual Vehicle Fee Other revenues (2) Program activity began in July 2009 (1) An additional $120,247 in expenditures were eligible for reimbursement from this funding source, however, due to funding constraints, these expenditures were absorbed by Fund 111 -Street Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Transportation Benefit District For the year Ended December 31, 2009 OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES Total other financing sources (uses) Net changes in fund balances Fund balances - beginning FUND BALANCES - ENDING Road Maintenance (includes repairs, patching, crack sealing) Total Revenues EXPENDITURES (1) Total Expenditures EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES) Traffic Control Vehicle Charges REVENUES Packet Page 11 of 41 AM-2909 4. Review of Transportation Capital Project Funding Options Transportation Benefit District Board Date:03/23/2010 Submitted By:Megan Cruz Submitted For:Bertrand Hauss Time:20 Minutes Department:Engineering Type:Information Information Subject Title Review of transportation capital project funding options. Recommendation Review and discuss TBD funding options to fund transportation projects. Previous TBD Action On March 9, 2010, the CSDS committee recommended that the Transportation Funding item be forwarded to the next TBD board meeting. Narrative In 2009, City Council approved the Transportation Plan Update which identified transportation projects to create a safer and improved system over the next 16 years, such as (34) walkway projects, (13) concurrency projects, (7) roadway safety projects, maintenance and operation projects, and bikeway projects. The total cost of all improvements is approximately $105M and the estimated budget shortfall is $64M. The City Council approved the 2009 Transportation Plan Update with a provision to investigate increasing the Transportation Benefit District (TBD) revenue in 2010. A preliminary assessment of potential TBD revenue and projects that could be funded was developed by the Consultant during the Transportation Plan Update. This assessment (Attachment 1) was presented to Council in fall 2009 to provide a preliminary concept on what could be accomplished if the TBD revenue was increased. A copy of the City’s current 6-year Transportation Improvement Program is also attached (Attachment 2) for your reference. In 2008, City Council dedicated the revenue from the current $20 vehicle license fee to fund the City’s street operation and maintenance costs. An increase in TBD revenue beyond the current $20 vehicle license fee would require voter approval to fund specific capital improvement and preservation projects. The Transportation Citizens Advisory Committee also made a presentation to City Council in fall 2009 on their position that additional funding is needed for capital projects to preserve and improve the City’s transportation system. The Citizens Committee also requested an opportunity to review and discuss possible options for transportation funding. Attachment 3 is a memo from the Chairman of the Transportation Citizens Advisory Committee. Fiscal Impact Packet Page 12 of 41 Fiscal Impact Attachments Link: Attachment 1 Link: Attachment 2 Link: Attachment 3 Link: Attachment 4 Form Routing/Status Route Seq Inbox Approved By Date Status 1 Engineering Robert English 03/17/2010 09:27 AM APRV 2 Public Works Sandy Chase 03/18/2010 08:35 AM APRV 3 City Clerk Sandy Chase 03/18/2010 08:36 AM APRV 4 Mayor Gary Haakenson 03/18/2010 08:43 AM APRV 5 Final Approval Sandy Chase 03/18/2010 08:48 AM APRV Form Started By: Megan Cruz Started On: 03/16/2010 10:00 AM Final Approval Date: 03/18/2010 Packet Page 13 of 41 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025 Current Projection Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600 Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000 Maintenance & Preservation 238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000 Annual Street Overlays 80 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 25% $ 6,800,000 Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 25% $ 60,000 Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 25% $ 40,000 Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 0% $ - Programs Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000 ADA Transition Plan 75 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 20% $ 837,900 Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 0% $ - Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 0% $ - Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000 Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000 Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 20% $ 2,939,800 Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 20% $ 24,000 Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 20% $ 12,000 Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 0% $ - 4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 0% $ - Road Projects s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200 c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800 s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000 s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 0% $ - c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100 c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000 c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 0% $ - c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 0% $ - c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 0% $ - c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 0% $ - c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 0% $ - s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 0% $ - hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5 444 600 0% $ Funding Level hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ - s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ - c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ - s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ - Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ - hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ - TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 24,549,200 *Type: s = safety c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded Summary of Funding Scenario Cost Amount Percent Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 7,018,000$ 25% Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 2,939,800$ 14% Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,596,000$ 92% Road Projects 49,469,200$ 10,937,900$ 22% ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 837,900$ 20% Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ -$ 0% Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,219,600$ 84% Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 24,549,200$ 23% *includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project Projected Revenue Unspent 3,788,441$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance 8,000,000$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance 4,819,641$ grant - no city matching funds 16,608,082$ total Funded Updated 6‐26‐2009 1 Packet Page 14 of 41 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025 Current + $20 TBD Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600 Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000 Maintenance & Preservation 238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000 Annual Street Overlays 50 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 40% $ 10,880,000 Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 40% $ 96,000 Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 40% $ 64,000 Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 0% $ - Programs Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000 ADA Transition Plan 38 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 40% $ 1,675,800 Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 50% $ 80,000 Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 0% $ - Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000 Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000 4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 100% $ 5,500,000 Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 30% $ 4,409,700 Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 50% $ 60,000 Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 50% $ 30,000 Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 0% $ - Road Projects s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200 c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800 s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000 s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 0% $ - c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100 c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000 c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 100% $ 1,146,800 c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 100% $ 3,147,300 c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 100% $ 138,300 c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 100% $ 818,000 c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 0% $ - s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 0% $ - hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5 444 600 0% $ Funding Level hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ - s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ - c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ - s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ - Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ - hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ - TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 41,881,400 *Type: s = safety c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded Summary of Funding Scenario Cost Amount Percent Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 11,158,000$ 40% Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 9,909,700$ 49% Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,650,000$ 95% Road Projects 49,469,200$ 16,188,300$ 33% ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 1,675,800$ 40% Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ 80,000$ 50% Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,219,600$ 84% Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 41,881,400$ 40% *includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project Projected Revenue Unspent 1,635,777$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance 8,000,000$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance 1,235,521$ grant - no city matching funds 10,871,298$ total Funded Updated 6‐26‐2009 2 Packet Page 15 of 41 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025 Current + $40 TBD Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600 Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000 Maintenance & Preservation 238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000 Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 100% $ 198,000 Annual Street Overlays 50 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 50% $ 13,600,000 Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 50% $ 120,000 Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 50% $ 80,000 Programs Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000 ADA Transition Plan 38 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 50% $ 2,094,750 Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 50% $ 80,000 Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 0% $ - Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000 Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000 4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 100% $ 5,500,000 Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 100% $ 80,000 Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 40% $ 5,879,600 Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 75% $ 90,000 Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 75% $ 45,000 Road Projects s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200 c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800 s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000 s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 100% $ 16,355,500 c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100 c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000 c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 100% $ 1,146,800 c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 0% $ - c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 0% $ - c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 0% $ - c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 0% $ - s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 0% $ - hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ - s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ - c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ - s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ - Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ - hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ - TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 59,105,150 *Type: s = safety c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded Summary of Funding Scenario Cost Amount Percent Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 14,116,000$ 51% Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 11,459,600$ 60% Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,695,000$ 97% Road Projects 49,469,200$ 28,440,200$ 57% ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 2,094,750$ 50% Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ 80,000$ 100% Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,219,600$ 100% Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 59,105,150$ 57% *includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project Projected Revenue Unspent 3,318,253$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance -$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance 240,256$ grant - no city matching funds 3,558,509$ total Funding Level Funded Updated 6‐26‐2009 2 Packet Page 16 of 41 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025 Current + $60 TBD Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600 Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000 Maintenance & Preservation 238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000 Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 100% $ 198,000 Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 100% $ 240,000 Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 100% $ 160,000 Annual Street Overlays 27 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 80% $ 21,760,000 Programs Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000 Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 100% $ 160,000 Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 100% $ 240,000 ADA Transition Plan 25 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 75% $ 3,142,125 Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000 Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000 4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 100% $ 5,500,000 Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 100% $ 80,000 Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 100% $ 120,000 Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 100% $ 60,000 Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 50% $ 7,349,500 Road Projects s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200 c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800 s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000 s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 100% $ 16,355,500 c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100 c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000 c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 100% $ 1,146,800 c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 100% $ 3,147,300 c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 100% $ 138,300 c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 100% $ 818,000 c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 0% $ - s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 0% $ - hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ - s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ - c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ - s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ - Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ - hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ - TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 74,451,025 *Type: s = safety c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded Summary of Funding Scenario Cost Amount Percent Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 22,476,000$ 81% Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 12,929,500$ 64% Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,740,000$ 100% Road Projects 49,469,200$ 32,543,800$ 66% ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 3,142,125$ 75% Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ 160,000$ 100% Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,459,600$ 100% Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 74,451,025$ 71% *includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project Projected Revenue Unspent 1,635,777$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance -$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance 13,169$ grant - no city matching funds 1,648,946$ total Funding Level Funded Updated 6‐26‐2009 3 Packet Page 17 of 41 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Transportation Plan Example Funding Scenarios, 2010‐2025 Current + $80 TBD Type* Project / Program Total Cost percent amount Debt Service on 220th Street SW Project $ 616,600 100% $ 616,600 Future Transportation Plan Updates $ 600,000 100% $ 600,000 Maintenance & Preservation 238th / 100th Avenue Signal Upgrades Signal rebuild $ 118,000 100% $ 118,000 Puget & Olympic View Drive Signal rebuild $ 198,000 100% $ 198,000 Citywide Street Improvements $ 240,000 100% $ 240,000 Citywide Signal Improvements $ 160,000 100% $ 160,000 Annual Street Overlays 22 year maintenance cycle $ 27,200,000 90% $ 24,480,000 Programs Mini Transportation Management Center $ 3,000 100% $ 3,000 Citywide Traffic Calming Program $ 160,000 100% $ 160,000 Operational Enhancements $ 240,000 100% $ 240,000 ADA Transition Plan 19 years to complete curb ramp retrofits $ 4,189,500 80% $ 3,351,600 Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs/Projects Bicycle Loop Signing Signage for three bicycle loops $ 25,000 100% $ 25,000 Interurban Trail Complete trail between Shoreline and MLT $ 1,535,000 100% $ 1,535,000 4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement Pedestrian improvements and amenities $ 5,500,000 100% $ 5,500,000 Citywide Pedestrian Lighting $ 80,000 100% $ 80,000 Citywide Bikeway Projects Projects developed by bike committee $ 120,000 100% $ 120,000 Downtown Bicycle Parking Install bicycle racks and lockers downtown $ 60,000 100% $ 60,000 Citywide Walkway Projects 34 projects developed by walkway committee $ 14,699,000 80% $ 11,759,200 Road Projects s 228th Street SW, SR99 - 76th Avenue W Road connection, sidewalk, bike lanes, signal $ 3,948,200 100% $ 3,948,200 c09 Main Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c15 212th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Widen NB, SB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 2,313,800 100% $ 2,313,800 s Main St / 3rd Ave signal upgrade Traffic signal upgrade $ 138,000 100% $ 138,000 s 84th Avenue W, 212th Street SW - 238th Street SW Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 16,355,500 100% $ 16,355,500 c09 212th Street SW / 84th Avenue W Install roundabout $ 1,910,100 100% $ 1,910,100 c09 Walnut Street / 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal $ 874,400 100% $ 874,400 c09 Puget Drive / 196th St SW / 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal $ 879,000 100% $ 879,000 c15 Olympic View Drive / 76th Avenue W Install traffic signal, widen WB approach $ 1,146,800 100% $ 1,146,800 c25 220th Street SW / SR 99 Widen WB, SB approaches $ 3,147,300 100% $ 3,147,300 c15 220th Street SW / 76th Avenue W Reconfigure EB approach, change phasing $ 138,300 100% $ 138,300 c15 Caspers Street / 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal $ 818,000 100% $ 818,000 c25 212th Street SW / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches, change phasing $ 3,265,500 100% $ 3,265,500 s SR 99 Illumination Upgrade roadway illumination $ 400,000 100% $ 400,000 hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5 444 600 0% $ Funding Level hss 238th Street SW / Edmonds Way (SR 104) Install traffic signal and correct road skew $ 5,444,600 0% $ - s 216th Street / SR 99 Widen EB, WB approaches $ 719,800 0% $ - c25 174th Street SW / Olympic View Drive Widen NB approach $ 724,200 0% $ - s 238th Street SW, SR104 - 84th Avenue W Widen to 3 lanes, sidewalk $ 2,519,700 0% $ - Shell Valley New access road $ 530,000 0% $ - hss 244th Street SW (SR 104) / 76th Avenue W Widen WB approach, change phasing $ 3,321,600 0% $ - TOTAL $ 105,213,300 $ 85,455,700 *Type: s = safety c09 = concurrency by 2009 Key c15 = concurrency by 2015 fully funded c25 = concurrency by 2025 partially funded hss = highway of statewide signficance not funded Summary of Funding Scenario Cost Amount Percent Preservation and Maintenance 27,916,000$ 25,196,000$ 90% Pedestrian Projects 20,279,000$ 17,339,200$ 86% Bicycle Projects*1,740,000$ 1,740,000$ 100% Road Projects 49,469,200$ 36,209,300$ 77% ADA Transition Plan 4,189,500$ 3,351,600$ 80% Traffic Calming Program 160,000$ 160,000$ 100% Other Programs/Projects 1,459,600$ 1,459,600$ 100% Overall Plan 105,213,300$ 85,455,700$ 83% *includes Interurban Trail, which is also a pedestrian project Projected Revenue Unspent -$ impact fee - no city funding available to cover balance -$ joint agency - no city funding available to cover balance -$ grant - no city matching funds -$ total Funded Updated 6‐26‐2009 4 Packet Page 18 of 41 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s Si x - Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 5 ) Gr a n t O p p o r t u n i t y P r o j e c t (2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 5 ) Pr o j e c t N a m e P u r p o s e G r a n t / D a t e P h a s e T o t a l C o s t S o u r c e 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 Pr e s e r v a t i o n / M a i n t e n a n c e P r o j e c t s : Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y E n g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) $0 (S t a t e ) An n u a l S t r e e t O v e r l a y s Gr i n d p a v e m e n t , o v e r l a y $1 8 0 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l F u n d 4 1 2 ) $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 Lo c a l F u n d s C o n s t r u c t i o n $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) & $ 0 (S t a t e ) Po s s i b l e T B D $1 , 0 9 0 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l F u n d 4 1 2 ) $ 1 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 6 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 $2 , 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) $750,000 $ 7 5 0 , 0 0 0 Re c o n s t r u c t i o n o f D a y t o n S t . a n d Re s u r f a c i n g o r r e c o n s t r u c t i o n w i t h c u r b r a m p A D A Po s s i b l e Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l , U n s e c u r e d ) $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 re s u r f a c i n g o f 2 2 0 t h S t . S W $0 (S t a t e ) up g r a d e s , c u r b g u t t e r s , a n d s t r i p i n g . Gr a n t $0 (L o c a l ) Ci t y W i d e Pa v e m e n t m a i n t e n a n c e t o Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y E n g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) St r e e t i m p r o v e m e n t s in c r e a s e r o a d w a y l i f e & $0 (S t a t e ) C o n s t r u c t i o n $ 2 2 , 5 0 0 (L o c a l ) $7,500 $ 7 , 5 0 0 Ci t y w i d e Up g r a d e s t o e x i s t i n g s i g n a l s , f o r Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y E n g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Si g n a l I m p r o v e m e n t s ma i n t e n a n c e & t e c h n o l o g y , u p d a t e e x i s t i n g t r a f f i c s i g n a l c a b i n e t & $0 (S t a t e ) el e m e n t s f o r m a i n t e n a n c e a n d t e c h n o l o g y Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $5,000 $ 5 , 0 0 0 Do w n t o w n P a r k i n g Ad d b i c y c l e p a r k i n g a t d i f f e r e n t l o c a t i o n s Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Ci t y w i d e Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y $0 (S t a t e ) No n m o t o r i z e d th r o u g h o u t t h e c i t y w h e r e h i g h b i k e t r a f f i c i s n o t i c e d $9 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $3,000 $ 3 , 0 0 0 23 8 t h @ 1 0 0 t h A v . S i g n a l U p g r a d e s Re b u i l d s i g n a l s y s t e m TB D Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) an d i n s t a l l v i d e o d e t e c t i o n & & $1 6 5 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e U n s e c u r e d ) $165,000 Po s s i b l e G r a n t E n g i n e e r i n g $ 7 1 , 0 0 0 ( T B D u n s e c u r e d ) $71,000 Sa f e t y / C a p a c i t y A n a l y s i s : 80 t h A v e n u e W e s t An a l y z e 8 0 t h A v e n u e W e s t f o r v e h i c l e , b i c y c l e En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Si g h t D i s t a n c e I m p r o v e m e n t s a n d p e d e s t r i a n s a f e t y . Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y & $0 (S t a t e ) $2 2 0 , 0 0 0 ( S i t e D e v e l o p e r ) $220,000 Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 7 2 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $72,000 SR 5 2 4 ( 1 9 6 t h S t . S W ) / De s i g n i n t e r s e c t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t Po s s i b l e G r a n t De s i g n $0 (F e d e r a l ) 88 t h A v e W . I n t e r s e c t i o n & $7 5 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e , u n s e c u r e d ) $75,000 Im p r o v e m e n t s Lo c a l F u n d s $8 0 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l , T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e s ) $80,000 Co n s t r u c t i n t e r s e c t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Po s s i b l e G r a n t $5 3 6 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e , u n s e c u r e d ) $536,000 & T B D $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l , T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e s ) $100,000 $8 8 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) $88,000 Pa g e 1 Pa c k e t Pa g e 19 of 41 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s Si x - Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 5 ) Gr a n t O p p o r t u n i t y P r o j e c t (2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 5 ) Pr o j e c t N a m e P u r p o s e G r a n t / D a t e P h a s e T o t a l C o s t S o u r c e 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 21 2 t h / 8 4 t h ( 5 C o r n e r s ) De s i g n i n t e r s e c t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t En g i n e e r i n g $ 2 7 0 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l , u n s e c u r e d ) $270,000 In t e r s e c t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t s Po s s i b l e G r a n t $0 (S t a t e ) $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l , T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e s ) $100,000 Co n s t r u c t i n t e r s e c t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l , u n s e c u r e d ) Po s s i b l e G r a n t $0 (S t a t e ) & $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l , T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e s ) TB D $4 4 0 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) 76 t h A v . W @ 2 1 2 t h S t . S W I n t e r s e c t i o n R e - d e s i g n i n t e r s e c t i o n t o m a k e t r a f f i c s i g n a l w o r k $0 (F e d e r a l ) Im p r o v e m e n t s mo r e e f f i c i e n t l y a n d i m p r o v e t h e c a p a c i t y / l e v e l Po s s i b l e G r a n t E n g i n e e r i n g $ 1 8 9 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e , u n s e c u r e d ) of s e r v i c e o f t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n . $8 1 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) Po s s i b l e En g i n e e r i n g $ 2 4 5 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l , u n s e c u r e d ) $245,000 22 8 t h S t . S W . C o r r i d o r S a f e t y Re a l i g n h i g h l y s k e w e d i n t e r s e c t i o n Gr a n t $0 (S t a t e ) to a d d r e s s s a f e t y a n d i m p r o v e o p e r a t i o n s ; $1 4 1 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $3 1 , 0 0 0 $110,000 in c l u d e s n e w s i g n a l @ S R 9 9 / 2 2 8 t h Po s s i b l e G r a n t & RO W $ 1 8 5 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l , u n s e c u r e d ) $185,000 TB D $8 5 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) $85,000 Im p r o v e m e n t s Po s s i b l e G r a n t C o n s t r u c t i o n $ 3 , 1 0 7 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l , u n s e c u r e d ) & $0 (S t a t e ) TB D $0 (L o c a l ) $3 4 5 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) Wa l n u t S t . @ 9 t h A v . S Tr a f f i c S i g n a l I n s t a l l a t i o n Po s s i b l e G r a n t E n g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) & & $3 9 0 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e , un s e c u r e d ) $75,000 TB D $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l , T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e s ) Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 3 8 5 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) $75,000 Ma i n S t . @ 3 r d S i g n a l U p g r a d e Up g r a d e t r a f f i c s i g n a l a n d l e s s e n l i k e h o o d t o b e h i t En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) by t r u c k s Lo c a l F u n d s & $0 (S t a t e , u n s e c u r e d ) Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 3 8 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $138,000 Ma i n S t . @ 9 t h A v . In s t a l l s i g n a l a t i n t e r s e c t i o n t o r e d u c e i n j u r y a n d En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) pr o p e r t y d a m a g e a c c i d e n t s Po s s i b l e G r a n t , L o c a l & $5 8 2 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e u n s e c u r e d ) $75,000 & T B D $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l , T r a f f i c I m p a c t F e e s ) Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 9 3 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) $75,000 Ar t e r i a l S t r e e t S i g n a l C o o r d i n a t i o n Co o r d i n a t e t h e t r a f f i c s i g n a l s w i t h i n 1 / 2 m i l e o f e a c h o t h e r En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Im p r o v e m e n t s al o n g 7 6 t h A v . W , 2 1 2 t h S t . S W , a n d 2 2 0 t h S t . S W Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y & $0 (S t a t e ) Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $50,000 No n - m o t o r i z e d P e d e s t r i a n / B i c y c l e P r o j e c t s : $0 (F e d e r a l ) Bi c y c l e R o u t e S i g n i n g In s t a l l s i g n a t e i n d i c a t e ( 3 ) d i f f e r e n t b i k e C i t y l o o p s . Lo c a l F u n d s C o n s t r u c t i o n $ 0 (S t a t e ) & T B D $5 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $5,000 $4 , 5 0 0 (T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) $1,500 $ 1 , 5 0 0 In t e r u r b a n T r a i l Pa v e , s i g n , a n d c o n n e c t r e g i o n a l s e g m e n t f r o m RC O $7 5 0 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l s e c u r e d ) $ 7 5 0 , 0 0 0 24 4 t h t o 2 2 8 t h & C o n s t r u c t i o n $ 4 7 1 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e , se c u r e d ) $ 4 7 1 , 0 0 0 Sh o r e l i n e t o M o u n t l a k e T e r r a c e CM A Q g r a n t s $3 1 4 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l F u n d 1 3 2 ) $ 3 1 4 , 0 0 0 Ma i n S t . P e d e s t r i a n L i g h t i n g Im p r o v e s t r e e t l i g h t i n g f o r p e d e s t r i a n s a f e t y o n Po s s i b l e G r a n t E n g i n e e r i n g $ 3 7 3 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l , u n s e c u r e d ) $373,000 Ma i n S t . b e t w e e n 5 t h A v . a n d 6 t h A v . & & $0 (S t a t e ) TB D Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 6 0 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) $160,000 AD A C u r b R a m p s I m p r o v . Co n s t r u c t A D A c o m p l i a n t c u r b r a m p s w h e r e En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Ci t y w i d e ( T r a n s i t i o n P l a n ) Lo c a l F u n d s & $0 (S t a t e ) & $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $75,000 fa c i l i t i e s d o n o t e x i s t o r d o n ' t m e e t c u r r e n t s t a n d a r d s TB D Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) $150,000 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 Bi k e w a y P r o j e c t s En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Ci t y w i d e Mi n o r b i k e w a y i m p r o v e m e n t s Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y & $0 (S t a t e ) Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 Wa l k w a y I m p r o v e m e n t s En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Ci t y w i d e Mi n o r w a l k w a y i m p r o v e m e n t s Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y $0 (S t a t e ) $2 2 , 5 0 0 (L o c a l ) $7,500 $ 7 , 5 0 0 Pa g e 2 Pa c k e t Pa g e 20 of 41 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s Si x - Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 5 ) Gr a n t O p p o r t u n i t y P r o j e c t (2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 5 ) Pr o j e c t N a m e P u r p o s e G r a n t / D a t e P h a s e T o t a l C o s t S o u r c e 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 Pe d e s t r i a n L i g h t i n g Im p r o v e l i g h t i n g a t c r o s s w a l k s a n d i n t e r s e c t i o n s Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Ci t y w i d e Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y $0 (S t a t e ) to i m p r o v e p e d e s t r i a n s a f e t y $1 5 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $5,000 $ 5 , 0 0 0 Ma d r o n a E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Im p r o v e p e d e s t r i a n s a f e t y w i t h i n s t a l l a t i o n o f n e w P o s s i b l e P e d e s t r i a n a n d E n g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) an d B i c y c l e & $1 9 6 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e , u n s e c u r e d ) si d e w a l k t o g a i n e a s y a c c e s s t o s c h o o l . Sa f e t y G r a n t C o n s t r u c t i o n $ 8 4 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) 80 t h A v . W f r o m 1 8 8 t h S t . S W t o Pr o v i d e s a f e a n d d e s i r a b l e r o u t e t o Po s s i b l e S a f e E n g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Ol y m p i c V i e w D r . Ro u t e s t o & $1 2 0 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e , u n s e c u r e d ) Sc h o o l G r a n t & C o n s t r u c t i o n $ 0 (L o c a l ) Se a v i e w E l e m e n t a r y a n d p a r k s . TB D $3 0 , 0 0 0 ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) 2n d A v . S f r o m J a m e s S t . t o M a i n S t . En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Pr o v i d e s a f e s i d e w a l k a l o n g s h o r t m i s s i n g l i n k Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y & $0 (S t a t e ) Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $25,000 Da y t o n S t . f r o m 7 t h A v . S t o 8 t h A v . S En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) Pr o v i d e s a f e s i d e w a l k a l o n g s h o r t m i s s i n g l i n k Po s s i b l e G r a n t & $3 2 , 0 0 0 ( S t a t e , u n s e c u r e d ) Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 4 1 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $10,000 22 6 t h S t . S W W a l k w a y Pr o v i d e s a f e p e d e s t r i a n m i s s i n g l i n k b e t w e e n S R - 1 0 4 a n d Fe d e r a l $1 5 0 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l , s e c u r e d ) $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 10 5 t h P l . W , c r e a t i n g s a f e r a c c e s s t o Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 0 (S t a t e ) Sh e r w o o d E l e m e n t a r y a n d r e s i d e n t i a l n e i g h b h o o d s . Sa f e t y G r a n t $0 (L o c a l ) In s t a l l P e d e s t r i a n C o u n t d o w n S i g n a l I n s t a l l f l a s h i n g c o u n t d o w n i n d i c a t i n g t h e n u m b e r o f s e c o n d s En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 (F e d e r a l ) at a l l p e d e s t r i a n h e a d s re m a i n i n g i n F l a s h i n g D o n ' t W a l k d u r i n g Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y & $0 (S t a t e ) Pe d e s t r i a n P h a s e a t s i g n a l i z e d i n t e r s e c t i o n Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 4 3 , 5 0 0 (L o c a l ) $1 4 , 5 0 0 $ 1 4 , 5 0 0 $ 1 4 , 5 0 0 4t h A v e n u e C o r r i d o r E n h a n c e m e n t Po s s i b l e G r a n t E n g i n e e r i n g $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 ( F e d e r a l , u n s e c u r e d ) Cr e a t e m o r e a t t r a c t i v e a n d s a f e r c o r r i d o r a l o n g 4 t h A v . S & & $0 (S t a t e ) Lo c a l Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $100,000 Tr a f f i c C a l m i n g P r o j e c t s : Re s i d e n t i a l N e i g h b o r h o o d Tr a f f i c c i r l c e s , s p e e d h u m p s , De s i g n $0 (F e d e r a l ) Tr a f f i c C a l m i n g "Y o u r S p e e d " s i g n s , e t c . Lo c a l F u n d s O n l y & $0 (S t a t e ) Co n s t r u c t i o n $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 (L o c a l ) $5,000 $ 5 , 0 0 0 Tr a f f i c P l a n n i n g P r o j e c t s : Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n U p d a t e En g i n e e r i n g $ 0 ( F e d e r a l ) Up d a t e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n i n 2 0 1 1 , a s r e q u i r e d b y G M A L o c a l F u n d s O n l y & $ 0 ( S t a t e ) Pl a n n i n g $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 ( L o c a l ) $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 To t a l $1 8 , 6 4 6 , 0 0 0 $2 , 9 1 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 3 9 , 5 0 0 $ 7 4 9 , 5 0 0 $ 3 , 4 4 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 9 3 9 , 5 0 0 To t a l F e d e r a l ( S e c u r e d ) $9 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $0 $0 $0 To t a l F e d e r a l ( U n s e c u r e d ) $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 2 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 5 8 , 0 0 0 $ 2 7 0 , 0 0 0 To t a l S t a t e ( S e c u r e d ) $4 7 1 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $0 $0 $0 To t a l S t a t e ( U n s e c u r e d ) $0 $0 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 $ 7 0 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 To t a l ( T B D , u n s e c u r e d ) $0 $0 $0 $ 1 , 3 0 5 , 5 0 0 $ 9 7 6 , 5 0 0 To t a l ( D e v e l o p e r , u n s e c u r e d ) $0 $0 $0 $ 2 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 To t a l L o c a l F u n d $5 4 0 , 0 0 0 $2 3 9 , 5 0 0 $429,500 $728,500 $543,000 Pa g e 3 Pa c k e t Pa g e 21 of 41 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s Si x - Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 5 ) 20 1 5 $3 0 , 0 0 0 $1 9 0 , 0 0 0 $7 5 0 , 0 0 0 $7 , 5 0 0 $5 , 0 0 0 $3 , 0 0 0 Pa g e 4 Pa c k e t Pa g e 22 of 41 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s Si x - Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 5 ) 20 1 5 $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $4 4 0 , 0 0 0 $1 8 9 , 0 0 0 $8 1 , 0 0 0 $3 , 1 0 7 , 0 0 0 $3 4 5 , 0 0 0 $3 1 5 , 0 0 0 $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $3 1 0 , 0 0 0 $5 0 7 , 0 0 0 $1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $1 1 8 , 0 0 0 $1 , 5 0 0 $7 5 , 0 0 0 $7 5 , 0 0 0 $5 , 0 0 0 $7 , 5 0 0 Pa g e 5 Pa c k e t Pa g e 23 of 41 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s Si x - Y e a r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o g r a m ( 2 0 1 0 - 2 0 1 5 ) 20 1 5 $5 , 0 0 0 $1 9 6 , 0 0 0 $8 4 , 0 0 0 $1 2 0 , 0 0 0 $3 0 , 0 0 0 $3 2 , 0 0 0 $3 1 , 0 0 0 $1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $5 , 0 0 0 $9 , 3 6 4 , 5 0 0 $0 $5 , 1 0 7 , 0 0 0 $0 $1 , 3 5 9 , 0 0 0 $2 , 0 6 9 , 5 0 0 $0 $8 2 9 , 0 0 0 Pa g e 6 Pa c k e t Pa g e 24 of 41 Pa c k e t Pa g e 25 of 41 TR A N S P O R T A T I O N F U N D I N G OP T I O N S TB D B o a r d M e e t i n g Ma r c h 2 3 , 2 0 1 0 Be r t r a n d H a u s s , T ra n s p o r t a t i o n E n g i n e e r Pa c k e t Pa g e 26 of 41 • T h e 2 0 0 9 T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n i d e n t i f i e d t h e fo l l o w i n g p r o j e c t s o v e r t h e n e x t 1 6 y e a r s : – ( 3 4 ) W a l k w a y p r o j e c t s – ( 1 3 ) C o n c u r r e n c y p r o j e c t s – ( 7 ) R o a d w a y S a f e t y p r o j e c t s – B i k e w a y p r o j e c t s – M a i n t e n a n c e a n d P r e s e r v a t i o n p r o j e c t s In t r o d u c t i o n Pa c k e t Pa g e 27 of 41 96 th Av . W n e a r M a d r o n a E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l Wa l k w a y p r o j e c t s Pa c k e t Pa g e 28 of 41 80 th / 1 8 0 th Pa c k e t Pa g e 29 of 41 Ov e r l a y p r o j e c t s Me a d o w d a l e B e a c h R d . / c o l l e c t o r s t r e e t Pa c k e t Pa g e 30 of 41 88 th Av . W Pa c k e t Pa g e 31 of 41 Ol y m p i c V i e w D r i v e Pa c k e t Pa g e 32 of 41 Fi v e C o r n e r s Pa c k e t Pa g e 33 of 41 Fu n d i n g S t a t u s • T o t a l c o s t : $ 1 0 5 M i l l i o n • I d e n t i f i e d F u n d i n g : $ 4 1 M i l l i o n – T r a f f i c i m p a c t f e e s – R e a l E s t a t e E x c i s e T a x – M o t o r V e h i c l e F u e l T a x – J o i n t A g e n c y ( C o u n t y p o r t i o n f o r 8 4 th Av . W i m p r o v e m e n t pr o j e c t ) – U t i l i t y F u n d f o r r e s u r f a c i n g – P a r k s F u n d i n g ( I n t e r u r b a n T r a i l a n d 4 th Av . C o r r i d o r ) – G r a n t s • F u n d i n g s h o r t f a l l : $6 5 M i l l i o n Pa c k e t Pa g e 34 of 41 Fu n d i n g O p t i o n s • T r a n s p o r t a t i o n B e n e f i t D i s t r i c t – I n i t i a l $ 2 0 a n n u a l f e e p e r r e g i s t e r e d v e h i c l e • A p p r o v e d i n 2 0 0 8 b y C i t y C o u n c i l • O n l y a v a i l a b l e f o r Op e r a t i o n s a n d M a i n t e n a n c e pr o j e c t s – A d d i t i o n a l T B D f u n d i n g o p t i o n s • N e e d v o t e r a p p r o v a l • U p t o a d d i t i o n a l $ 8 0 • P r o j e c t s p e c i f i c – C i t y C o u n c i l a p p r o v e d a p r o v i s i o n t o i n v e s t i g a t e i n c r e a s i n g t h e TB D r e v e n u e i n 2 0 1 0 ( a s p a r t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n p l a n a d o p t i o n i n 20 0 9 ) Pa c k e t Pa g e 35 of 41 Pa c k e t Pa g e 36 of 41 Pa c k e t Pa g e 37 of 41 Pa c k e t Pa g e 38 of 41 Pa c k e t Pa g e 39 of 41 Pa c k e t Pa g e 40 of 41 TB D O p t i o n s S u m m a r y Cu r r e n t + $2 0 T B D + $4 0 T B D + $6 0 T B D +$80 TBD Pr o j e c t e d R e v e n u e $4 0 . 9 M $5 2 . 6 M $6 4 . 2 M $7 5 . 9 M $87.5M Av g . R e v e n u e / Y e a r $2 . 6 M $3 . 3 M $4 . 0 M $4 . 7 M $5.5M % o f P l a n F u n d e d 23 % 40 % 57 % 71 % 83% Ro a d P r o j e c t s 22 % 33 % 57 % 66 % 77% No n - M o t o r i z e d 21 % 52 % 60 % 67 % 87% St r e e t O v e r l a y s 80 - y r 50 - y r 40 - y r 25 - y r 22-yr AD A T r a n s i t i o n 75 - y r 38 - y r 30 - y r 20 - y r 19-yr Tr a f f i c C a l m i n g 0% 50 % 10 0 % 10 0 % 100% Le f t o n T a b l e $1 6 . 6 M $1 0 . 9 M $3 . 6 M $1 . 6 M $0 Pa c k e t Pa g e 41 of 41