20160412 City Council
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES
April 12, 2016
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Kristiana Johnson, Council President (arrived 7:01 p.m.)
Michael Nelson, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
STAFF PRESENT
P. Clark, Police Officer
Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir.
Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir.
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Scott James, Finance Director
Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Kernen Lien, Senior Planner
Beth Ford, City Attorney’s Office
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
Mayor Earling explained a new audio visual system was recently installed in Council Chambers. Many of
the technical issues that were experienced last week have been solved but the Council is still getting used
to the new system.
1. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present.
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda
items approved are as follows:
A. APPROVAL OF DRAFT CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF APRIL 5, 2016
B. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #219315 THROUGH #219440 DATED APRIL 7, 2016
FOR $2,282,730.71. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS
#62119 THROUGH #62128, #62137 THROUGH #62138 FOR $506,173.73, BENEFIT
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 2
CHECKS #62129 THROUGH #62136 AND WIRE PAYMENTS OF $473,209.56 FOR THE
PAY PERIOD MARCH 16, 2016 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2016
C. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM SUZANNE O.
MEAGHER ($1,161.41)
D. RESOLUTION IMPLEMENTING THE CIVIC FIELD STREET VACATIONS PROCESS
4. PRESENTATIONS/REPORTS
A. EDMONDS MEMORIAL CEMETERY BOARD ANNUAL REPORT
Jerry Janacek, Chair, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Board, thanked Program Manger Cindi Cruz and
Parks Manager Rich Lindsay for their assistance. He relayed the Board’s responsibility to report annually
to the Council concerning the operation of the cemetery, the short and long term goals of the board
concerning the cemetery and the activities of the Board (Ordinance 2306, dated 1982). He provided a
brief history of the cemetery:
Land donated in 1893 to the International Order of Oddfellows, an active fraternal organization in
Edmonds
Additional land donated to the organization in 1894
First cemetery created due to the donation of property by Thomas H. White, his great grandfather,
who came to Edmonds in 1887
Cemetery operated by International Order of Oddfellows until 1946 when it was sold to
succession of private owners
Many of the private owners did not keep good records and the cemetery fell into serious neglect
Edmonds Memorial Cemetery was placed on the Washington State Register of Historic Places in
1972
In 1982 longtime resident Larry Hubbard purchased the cemetery and willed it to the City of
Edmonds.
Edmonds Cemetery and Columbarium is operated by the City’s Parks & Recreation Department
City’s Parks & Recreation Department works with the Cemetery Board who makes
recommendations for improvement and maintenance of the cemetery
The Cemetery Board is comprised of up to seven members appointed by the Mayor and
confirmed by City Council
Cemetery is 6.5 acres
Approximately 7,000 people buried in cemetery including 14 former Edmonds mayors, 400
veterans of 6 different wars and many Edmonds pioneers
Mr. Janacek described current events
Memorial Day Observance and Ceremony: May 30, 2016
o Mayor Earling, a regular participant, will be a speaker this year
Walk Back in Time – July 21, 2016
o Will feature backgrounds of several Civil War Veterans
o Last year several board members and other shared facts regarding former Edmonds mayors
His research in the book “Edmonds, Gem of Puget Sound” discovered a discussion about
the Dayton Street sewer in December 1938 led to a bri ef but spirited encounter between
the Mayor and a Councilmember
The Edmonds Memorial Cemetery enjoys the participation of various individuals and organizations who
volunteer as board members and at events such as Memorial Day including scout troops, school bands,
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 3
American Legion Post 66, VFW Post 8870, Washington National Guard and many others. Mr. Janacek
reported on tasks the Cemetery Board would like to undertake in the future:
Develop a list of closely related relatives to those who are buried in the cemetery
o Damage to a 100-year old grave maker last year led to a lengthy search for the family to
repair the marker.
Ordinance 3596, October 1986 states, the City Council wishes to establishing a non-expenditure
trust fund for the purpose of accumulating principle in order that future maintenance of the
cemetery may be accomplished with a minimum expenditure of public revenues.
o Limited space for burials and decreased income
o Construction of the columbarium has been well received by the community
o Board is exploring how best to utilize space and provide funds so less can be spent from
general public funds and more from future trust funds.
Begin cemetery mapping project
o Due to various private owners in the 1960s and 1970s until the City became the owner, there
is a lack of records and mapping of some burial sites
o Hopefully funds for this project will be authorized in 2017
He encouraged the Council and the public to attend the Memorial Day Event and Walk Back in Time.
Council President Johnson thanked Mr. Janacek for the informative and colorful history of the cemetery
and requested a copy of his presentation. She inquired about the funding request for the mapping project.
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite answered $100,000 is included in the CIP for 2017. Council
President Johnson said she has attended many of the 34 Memorial Day events as well as the Walk Back in
Time a few years ago and appreciated both events.
Councilmember Mesaros thanked Mr. Janacek and the Cemetery Board for their service, relaying his in-
laws were laid to rest in the cemetery’s columbarium during the last four years. He was pleased that new
facility was available; his father-in-law was a veteran of WWII. The family enjoys frequent visits to the
well-cared-for cemetery.
Councilmember Buckshnis looked forward to the mapping project. She often visits other cities’
cemeteries such as in Charlotte, North Carolina’s where the cemetery has been mapped. She and her
husband also enjoys the Memorial Day service.
B. CITIZENS' TREE BOARD ANNUAL REPORT AND 2016 WORK PLAN
Steve Hatzenbeler, Chair, Citizens' Tree Board, introduced Tree Board Members Barbara Durr and
Barbara Chase and the two newest members, Doug Peterson and Vivian Olsen. He displayed a picture of
several stumps, which he (tongue-in-cheek) labeled as 2015 Edmonds trees.
Chair Hatzenbeler presented the Tree Board’s Mission Statement: The City of Edmonds Tree Board will
engage, encourage, and educate both the City government and residents to protect our current canopy
resource and plant new trees appropriately for the long term benefit of our community. He reviewed:
Tree Board Goals:
o Advise and assist city officials in development of a tree ordinance designed to preserve and
protect existing trees, encourage additional trees, and appropriately safeguard trees in
construction areas
o Advocate for the enforcement of the tree and critical areas ordinance in order to protect trees
in our wetlands, steep slopes, and watersheds
o Increase community outreach and education regarding the value of trees, proper selection of
trees, and correct methods for planting of and caring for trees
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 4
o Encourage active stewardship of the urban forest through partnering with community
organizations, to include arboriculture in multiple aspects of the city
o Work to develop funding sources to expand tree related programs
o Sponsor an annual Arbor Day event
2015 Year in Review
o Tree City USA – 5th year renewal recently received•
o Tree and Shrub Planting in Yost Park in October
o Planting event in unimproved right-of-way at 8th and Daly where utility work done
o Tree Code Rewrite Draft Review and Public Process
Lessons learned
Chair Hatzenbeler reviewed the following:
Thank you to the City Council and Mayor for this year's Tree Board budget
What’s the value of Tree City USA?
o Shows the City’s commitment to environmental stewardship – marketing tool!
o Helps track tree-related expenditures, which can be used to improve efficiency in City
spending
o Funding for Washington State DNR Urban Forestry program comes from federal
government, and is tied to the number of Tree Cities the State has. More funding will lead to
improvements in DNR’s ability to spend more time in communities educating citizens and
staff
Consider reassigning the Tree Board from a City Council board to staff/executive in
Development Services or maybe Parks?
Recommend changing annual Tree Board presentation to March or April, rather than December
(per ECC 10.95.030 B)
Staff/contractor support: prefer to have an internal staff person, not a contractor, because of the
improved efficiency (e.g., no travel time; better access “inside”)
Urban Forestry Management Plan
o $130,000 is slated to be spent in 2016 and ‘17 on the Urban Forestry Management Plan
(UFMP)
o Strongly believe it needs to include policies regarding trees on private property, possibly
include districting to establish different goals and standards for different areas in the city
o We have heard that the preliminary discussions are to not include any private property tree
policies in the UFMP
o A major opportunity will be lost if private properties are left out, as they are where most tree
removal is taking place in the city (not public right-of-way or parks)
Barbara Chase, Tree Board Member, reviewed:
2106 Work Plan/Events
o Cass Turnbull Presentation – May 5: The Seven Myths of Site Selection and Care of Trees
o Arbor Day Planting event – October 15
o Edmonds Summer Market table – summer 2016
o Assist Parks Department with replacement of street trees on 5th Ave
o Starting work partnering w/ Edmonds School District for on-campus planting
o Urban community tree program planning w/ Washington Department of Natural Resources
Council President Johnson recalled Washington State’s slogan, the Evergreen State, and suggested the
City needed to its part to embrace that. She appreciated the Tree Board’s efforts and welcomed the new
members. She offered to work with Councilmember Buckshnis, Council liaison to the Tree Board, to
address administrative issues Chair Hatzenbeler raised such as the timing of their report to the Council.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 5
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed she had not heard anything about a desire to exclude private
property from the City’s tree code. She recalled the public was upset about codes affecting private
property that was not in a critical area, and requiring property owners to hire an arborist and pay fees to
remove a diseased tree on their property. Chair Hatzenbeler recalled the public raised issue with private
property rights. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed there was concern with private property rights
but it was more the need to hire an arborist and the fees required to remove a tree on private property. She
thanked Chair Hatzenbeler for his efforts on the Tree Board.
Councilmember Buckshnis advised she has already prepared an agenda memo proposing to move the
Tree Board’s report to the first quarter of the year and to specify Tree Board meetings are held the first
Thursday of month.
Councilmember Nelson commented he was put off by the picture of tree stumps labeled as Edmonds trees
and was glad for the clarification that it was tongue-in-cheek. He looked forward to an opportunity via the
UFMP to be collaborative with private property owners, anticipating an inventory will reveal the majority
of trees are on private property and the City will need their partnership/collaboration for a successful
UFMP. Chair Hatzenbeler recalled Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Nelson’s preference
last year for a carrot rather than a stick approach. That was important to the Tree Board; ways to
incentivize planting of trees also arose in the discussions with DNR, for example a reduction in in
stormwater fees in exchange for a percentage of canopy cover on a property. Councilmember Nelson said
in reviewing other cities’ UFMP, there are a litany of incentives; development of an UFMP will be a great
opportunity to consider what fits Edmonds.
Councilmember Teitzel thanked Chair Hatzenbeler for his presentation and the work the Tree Board does.
He referred to the term, right tree, right place, asking whether that included encouraging people to plant
trees that may not grow as tall on west facing slopes in Edmonds where property owners pay a premium
for their views. Chair Hatzenbeler answered absolutely, the intent is to encourage a recognition that urban
trees are appropriate for urban places and generally grow smaller but that does not necessarily eliminate
all their benefits. He did not to discourage the planting of smaller trees where appropriate; the slogan
means find the right tree instead of no tree.
Council President Johnson shared a personal, cautionary story that echoes some of the concerns previous
Councilmembers have raised. Last year the Tree Board proposed strong regulations in the Tree Code that
resulted in unintended consequences; her 89-year old father’s property had several mature 150-foot
Douglas firs. Due to the threat of the ordinance, he removed eight mature trees; a loss to t he City and to
her personally. She cautioned the Tree Board to ensure proposed ordinances do not have unintended
consequences.
Councilmember Mesaros echoed comments of other Councilmembers. He agreed there was a place for
input and discussion regarding private property owners’ use of trees and incentives such as education,
process, inclusion in discussion, setting up forums for discussion of common goals, and how canopy can
benefit private property owners. Rather than cautioning the Tree Board to step lightly, he encouraged
them go forth boldly but with the inclusion of the private property owners.
Councilmember Tibbott relayed when he visited the Tree Board earlier this year, he learned Tree City
USA requires auditing the way the City cares for trees and the City’s investment in trees. He asked how
that information is collected and the role the consultant plays in compiling and reporting the data to Tree
City USA. Chair Hatzenbeler explained the Tree City USA application requires the City spend a
minimum of $2/capita ($80,000/year for Edmonds) on tree -related expenses such as tree cleanup,
development of the proposed ordinance, tree planting, any tree-related expenses. The consultant took over
that task last year, contacting departments to request review of timesheets; it was previously done by a
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 6
Tree Board Member. Parks has done a good job tracking that information but some other departments
have not.
Councilmember Tibbott asked if whether that data collection process could be streamlined so that a report
could be generated at year end rather than paying a consultant to gather the information. Chair
Hatzenbeler agreed it could be streamlined but was not certain how to accomplish that other than asking
the directors to track expenditures more efficiently.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled Mr. Lindsay reporting at the last meeting that the Parks & Recreation
Department has streamlined their timesheets to track the hours that staff spend on tree-related activities.
Public Works Director Phil Williams advised Public Works is also tracking tree-related expenditures.
Councilmember Tibbott assumed the Tree Board was close to not needing to pay a consultant to
accumulate that information. Chair Hatzenbeler said he needed to talk to the consultant regarding about
how she spent her time last year and how to better utilize her time. By the time the Tree City USA
application was submitted, her contract ended and that discussion was not possible. He commented on
improved efficiency via having a staff person assigned to the Tree Board rather than an outside
consultant. He believed the same consultant would be working with the Tree Board this year but the
contract has not yet been finalized. He preferred to use the funded budgeted for a consultant on other
things such as planting trees or education outreach. He agreed Tree City USA designation was important
but questioned the need to spend that much on it. A Tree Board Member collected that information in the
past but he was not able to take that on and there was not enough expertise on the board due to the amount
of turnover.
C. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE
Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty introduced Lobbyist Jennifer
Ziegler. She reviewed:
Background:
o The Legislature convened on January 11, 2016.
o The Senate Majority Caucus Coalition retained the majority in the 2015 elections.
Republicans, joined by Senator Tim Sheldon, have a 26-23 majority in the Senate.
o The previous House Democratic majority decreased from 51-47 to 50-48.
o Although it was a 60-day legislative session, one special session was required to reach final
budget agreements.
Overall challenges:
o Although the Legislature started the 2016 session with increases in overall state revenue
projections, those projections were offset by caseload increases and wildfire costs.
o The Governor’s budget release prior to the start of the legislative session also highlighted the
need to address teacher shortages and mental health issues.
o Passage of Initiative 1366 raised questions regarding whether the Legislature would send a
constitutional amendment to the voters regarding the Legislature’s taxing authority.
o Major policy issues for the 2016 legislative session included charter schools, carbon pricing
and a state minimum wage rate increase.
2016 General Fund results:
o The 2016 supplemental general fund operating budget increases spending by a net of $191
million from the 2015-17 enacted spending level of $38.2 billion.
o The budget appropriates $190 million from the Budget Stabilization Account for wildfire
costs in the 2015-17 biennium.
o The budget is projected to leave $578 million in unrestricted reserves and $701 million in the
Budget Stabilization Account at the end of the 2015-17 biennium.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 7
o Based on the four-year outlook, the proposed final supplemental budget proposal is projected
to leave an unrestricted ending fund balance of $1.1 billion in the Budget Stabilization
Account at the end of the 2017-19 biennium
2016 General Fund local government impacts:
o All of the major state-shared revenues (liquor excise tax, liquor profits distribution) are
preserved. We were not successful in eliminating the cap on liquor profits, but the Legislature
did not further erode that revenue.
o Although previous versions of the budget cut funding for Basic Law Enforcement Academy
training classes and increased the local government contribution for training, the agreed upon
budget does not make those cuts. The budget does provide $677,000 for two additional
training classes in FY 2016.
o The Legislature ultimately provided full funding for MRSC.
o The agreed upon budget does sweep $154 million in loan repayments in the Public Works
Trust Fund in the 2017-19 biennium. This is an addition to the $73 million swept in the
current biennium. The budget provides $50,000 for the Office of Financial Management to
convene a work group to develop a local government infrastructure investment strategy. The
group must provide a report outlining the local government investment strategy to the
Governor and the Legislature by October 31, 2016, along with draft legislation for the 2017
legislative session.
Additional local government impacts:
o The agreed upon budget does not include a merger of the LEOFF 1 and TRS 1 retirement
systems. The budget does direct the Joint Select Committee on Pension Policy to study the
implications of combining these two systems and report to the Legislature by January 9,
2017.
o The budget changes the existing approach to the Fire Insurance Premium Tax Distributions.
The proposal limits the amount a city may receive to $2,000 per pre-LEOFF and LEOFF 1
retiree or the amount received in 2016, whichever is less. Additionally, cities are only eligible
to receive a distribution if they are levying the 22.5 cents property tax for the Firefighters’
Pension Fund and can demonstrate the levy is not sufficient to meet the estimated demands
on the fund or maintain the actuarial soundness of the fund.
AWC and number of cities wrote veto request letter. Governor on track to sign budget
Monday, will learn decision that issue.
2016 Capital Budget results:
o The supplemental capital budget makes new appropriations of $95.4 million.
o The budget includes $7.9 million for Mental Health Facilities, $11.4 million for local
community projects and $34.8 million for K-12 School Construction Assistance grants.
o The Edmonds Veterans Plaza received $77,000.
o Significant decreases in the revenue from the Hazardous Substance Tax resulted in decreased
funding for projects receiving funding from the Model Toxics Control Account (MTCA).
o The Capital Budget does include a legislative commitment to restore MTCA funding in future
biennia.
2016 Supplemental Transportation Budget:
o The Legislature made minimal changes to the funding provided in the 2015 Connecting
Washington Package.
o WSDOT must update the freight mobility plan to comply with the FAST Act. The freight
plan update must involve freight stakeholders, including local governments. WSDOT must
provide a prioritized list of projects for consideration for funding in the 17-19 biennium.
o The budget provides $500,000 of federal funding for the Commission to advance the road
user charge work to a stage that would enable Washington to implement a pilot project. The
Commission must report to the Governor’s office and the Legislature by November 1, 2016.
2016 legislative progress on policy items:
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 8
o Public Records
Ultimately died
o Body Cameras
Does not require body cameras, provides some protections
Task Force to work on long term plan for body cameras
o Public Facilities District Extension
Ultimately died
o Homelessness and Housing
Major policy bills did not pass
o School Siting outside UGB
Likely will return next year
o Electronic Signatures
Legislation passed
Next Steps:
o Monitor interim studies on local government infrastructure, LEOFF/TRF merger and MTCA
stability.
o Monitor and participate in interim legislative discussions on public records and the Growth
Management Act.
o Continue to monitor WSDOT work on transportation projects and practical design efforts.
o Participate in discussions regarding the allocation of federal funding to local governments
under the FAST Act.
o Meet with City staff to develop 2017 legislative priorities to bring to Council.
Councilmember Nelson referred to the legislature’s ongoing push to begin defunding the Public Works
Trust Fund and lack of funding for local infrastructure and asked whether the legislature was trying to
move funds from one to place to another or were those who were not yelling the loudest not getting funds.
Ms. Ziegler answered the legislature is grabbling with basic education obligation funding which is the
reason several of things that did not pass are targets for the next session as 2017 is the deadline for
complying with McCleary. Depending on majorities next session and their interest in discussing new
revenue, she recommended the City work with its legislators to ensure they know the value of these
programs. With regard to the Public Works Trust Fund, there is a perception that larger cities use that
source of funding as a way to keep utility rates lower; there was a philosophy, particularly on the Senate
side, that that was not an appropriate State investment tool. That tool was used by small and medium size
cities to provide an affordable financing tool that does not exist elsewhere.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to next steps and, pointing out that Council are the policy
makers, expressed interested in having Ms. Ziegler meet with a group from Council to discuss Council
legislative priorities. Ms. Ziegler relayed the Council can choose how to make that happen. With the
legislature adjourning close to on time this year, there is a long interim before the next session to be
strategic about next steps.
Council President Johnson thanked Mr. Doherty for distributing the weekly legislative updates which she
finds fascinating. She asked what the legislature did, if anything, about crumb rubber. Ms. Ziegler
responded there were two legislative proposals, Representative Pollet released the first proposal in the
House which received a hearing. There was a focus on additional analysis regarding the potential health
impacts and notice requirements on facilities that have crumb rubber regarding potential health impacts.
Outdoor recreation advocates expressed concern with implications of the legislation. Senator Chase
introduced a bill in the Senate but it did not receive a public hearing. She summarized the furthest any
proposal went was a hearing in the House Environment Committee.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 9
Council President Johnson commented Mayor Earling was the former President Snohomish County Cities
Association; Ms. Ziegler has attended those meetings to discuss legislation. She asked how Snohomish
County Cities did as a group to advance their legislative agenda. Ms. Ziegler answered well but it was
hard to compare to the success of the last session; the success of Snohomish County Cities on the
Connecting Washington package was a tribute to that effort. Cities did pull together to find common areas
and advocate together on issues. She anticipated 2017 will be a very long and challenging legislative
session and it will be important to be as united as possible on issues of concern.
Council President Johnson express concern no progress would be made in 2017 due to the McCleary
decision and the funds that need to be dedicated to that. She was very pleased with the progress made on
transportation last year and looked forward to work closely with Ms. Ziegler regarding the approach to
2017 with regard to expectations and incremental improvements for the future. Ms. Ziegler commented it
will be worthwhile thinking through some of the straight up policy issues such as public records;
identifying some purely policy issue that are priorities is also an opportunity.
D. PRESENTATION ON SUSTAINABLE CITIES PARTNERSHIP (SCP)
Planning Manager Rob Chave introduced David Davidson, Sustainable Cities Partnership, explaining
SCP is a new WWU program, modeled after program in Oregon, where the university partners with a city
during in a year to develop a program of mutual benefit whereby the resources of the university work
together with city staff to develop a list of projects that benefit both.
Mr. Davidson reviewed:
Premise – Cities are at the crux of the effort to transition to a more sustainable future
o City issues WWU courses
o Students and faculty want to (and can!) make a difference
A year of partnership:
o Match city’s needs to service-learning courses
o Engage faculty/students on city’s issues
On site, in field, and in classroom/studio/lab
Thousands of person-hours
Cutting edge, “outside the box”
o Produce deliverables (reports, videos, software, GIS datasets)
o Advance city’s sustainability goals
What SCP can do:
o Urban planning / Environmental science
o Spatial Analysis – GIS/GPS
o Marketing / Financial analysis
o Communications / Journalism / Design
o Computer Science
o Sociology / Anthropology
o Community Health / Recreation
Cost to Partner City
o Fee
Solely direct cost – no overhead/indirect
- Transportation, supplies, SCP coordinator
Avg. $7K per course, at other programs
Staff time
o Champion
o Overall coordinator–Per-project liaison
Partnership schedule
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 10
o March & April, discussions & match-making
o April 29 application due date
o May 16 partner announcement
o By end of July, master contract & SOW appendices
o By mid-September, liaison & data provision
o Sep June work!
o May 2017 event in town
Mr. Chave clarified staff was not requesting formal action tonight. This is a very compressed timeframe;
staff learned about this last month and has been brainstorming a wide range of projects and forwarding
them to WWU for reaction. The City needs to decide by the end of the month whether to pursue an
application. He requested the Council indicate whether they wanted staff to continue working with WWU
to formulate an application. Following that effort, staff would return to Council in a couple weeks to
request a final decision. Once the City’s application is submitted, WWU will select one city. Assuming
the program continues, there may be an opportunity in a future year.
Mayor Earling explained when this opportunity was provided to the directors, over 40 potential projects
were identified. Staff is excited about the potential and eager to move forward. If the City submitted an
application, staff wants to win.
Councilmember Nelson asked how may projects the City can apply for. Mr. Davidson answered WWU
has asked for a minimum of nine to make it work financially for WWU. Edmonds has identified 20+
projects and 14 faculty members are considering those; each faculty member will select a preferred
project and inform the City. Councilmember Nelson asked how one city could be more competitive than
another. Mr. Davidson answered partly finances; for instance, one city he is working with likely will only
be able to identify seven projects instead of nine. Another factor is the driving distance, the driving
distance to Edmonds is 1.5 hours; faculty members have to consider how to accommodate that with a
class that schedules field work once a week for 4 hours. That time period would work fine for Mt. Vernon
but was not enough time to come to Edmonds. He summarized distance and budget are factors.
Councilmember Nelson asked for an example of a successful project. Mr. Davidson responded although
WWU is new to the attempt for multiple classes to work with a city, their winter -spring Urban Transition
Studio has worked with Bellingham for the past 5-6 years on a neighborhood subarea plan. That effort
includes citizen engagement, visioning, developing language for subarea plan, etc. Councilmember
Nelson expressed support for moving forward.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented this is a great idea, recalling the City’s previous work with the
UW Green Futures Lab had great results. She asked how the number of projects would be reduced,
commenting the list is wonderful and wished some Council items could be added. Mr. Davidson
explained he is forwarding all the projects he views as a possibility to faculty members. The original 46
projects have been reduced to 20, the ones eliminated were ones no facility member was interested in.
Faculty are now in direct contact with City staff members such as the treatment plant operator, public
works director, and a person in the building department so both understand what the project is, what the
class could do, etc. He anticipated ultimately returning with a list of professors’ preferred projects and a
second choice if that project was a bigger preference for the City.
For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Davidson advised there would be a mixture of undergraduate and
graduate students.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked how the distance would be handled if Edmonds were chosen, whether
some of the work could be done via skype. Mr. Davidson answered they have considered skype,
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 11
teleconferencing, having City staff come to a WWU class to describe a project, or changing the class
schedule.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked about compensation for travel. Mr. Davidson receives compensation for
travel but he will not be doing work. Transportation costs such as rental vans to transport students would
be charged to the City and included in the cost. Mr. Chave said that was factored into the average $7,000
cost of each course.
Council President Johnson commented she learned all about sustainability from Mr. Chave when she was
on the Planning Board, he authored the Sustainability chapter of the City Comprehensive Plan, he is an
advocate for sustainability and no one better could be selected to with application process. She supported
Edmonds being a strong candidate for this program. She pointed out Edmonds is accessible by train from
Fairhaven as well as by bus. Edmonds has been known as the friendliest city in Western Washington for
so many years that the category was retired. Edmonds was the first city in the State to ban plastic bags, is
a strong advocate for environmentally sensitive areas and sustainability. She would be honored and happy
to work with Mr. Davidson and WWU. She observed there are a number of satellite WWU branches
including Seattle, Everett and Mt. Vernon, and asked if those students and faculty would be involved. Mr.
Davidson answered he is in discussion with them. Council President Johnson summarized if the directors
can develop 46 proposals, WWU can be sure Edmonds is serious.
Councilmember Teitzel commented the City has a lot of time and money on the Strategic Action Plan
(SAP) and the Comprehensive Plan and feared this might be a distraction from pursuing those items,
some of which include sustainability. He needed more time t o think about the proposal before he was
ready to make a decision but could see the merits of such a program.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented many of the items on the list are part of the SAP. With
regard to concern about there being enough staff time, she assured the directors’ interest in this program
indicates they are willing to allocate the necessary staff time to assist in this endeavor.
Mr. Davidson relayed he worked with Andy Meyer, AWC Special Projects Coordinator, earlier this year
to develop a group of cities to target this program; Edmonds was at the top of the list. Mr. Meyer was well
aware Edmonds has been a leader in sustainability for decades. Mr. Meyer and WWU are thrilled that
Edmonds is interested.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Farrell Fleming, Executive Director, Edmonds Senior Center, relayed he and Phil Lovell have spoken
previously and made several relevant points with regard to the CAO and the new Edmonds Waterfront
Center, which is what the new senior/community center will called. With regard to Amendment 6 related
to frequently flooded areas, he pointed out the importance of considering when to deal with this, now or
later. Now seems like a good time to start as the City and the Center as both will be dealing with the same
issues in the coming years. The waterfront is already a frequently flooded area; if sea level rises, it is
highly likely it will become an even more frequently flooded area. The Ebbtide has sump pumps and the
senior center has sandbags which the City provides to protect its building. In the Thanksgiving 2014
storm, the sandbags worked well, the sump pumps did not. He encouraged the Council to think of the
CAO not as specific portion of code but as a process for addressing all the issues defined as critical area.
When the Planning Board considered the issue last year, they recommended two changes, 1) change
19.00.025 requiring structures to be built 2 feet above base flood elevation, and 2) change the definition
of height in 21.40.030 to allow for the height of structure within the coastal high hazard areas to be
measured from 2 feet above the base flood elevation, thus compensating for the impact of new
requirement. He assumed this definition of height was causing the Council concern; however, as often
pointed out, frequently flooded areas are critical areas by definition. Further, with the growing attention
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 12
paid to the threat of sea level rise, it would be odd for an environmentally progressive community such as
Edmonds with considerable stake in its waterfront to leave frequently flooded areas out of its 2016
process to update the CAO. He urged the Council to leave the frequently flooded areas in the updated
CAO and to adopt the recommendation of the Planning Board and staff.
Mayor Earling declared a brief recess.
Mayor Earling relayed due to length of presentations, the following adjustments would be made to the
agenda:
Proceed with 6A and B
Postpone 6C
Proceed with 6D
Postpone 6E
Proceed with 6F and G
Proceed with as much of 6H as time allows until 9:50 p.m.
6. STUDY ITEMS
A. CONTRACT WITH PROGRESSIVE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY (PAWS) FOR
KENNELING SERVICE
Assistant Police Chief Lawless explained after a long standing relationship with Adix’s and Ginger’s Pet
Paradise for animal care and kenneling services, the relationship was terminated on December 18, 2015.
The City had already been exploring other options for myriad reasons; the City is limited to service
providers in the area. The City entered into an interim emergency agreement with PAWS and have been
negotiating a contract with PAWS which is included in the Council packet.
COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONTRACT WITH PROGRESSIVE ANIMAL WELFARE
SOCIETY (PAWS) FOR KENNELING SERVICE.
Council President Johnson questioned whether the intent was to take action to approve the contract
tonight or forward it for approval on next week’s Consent Agenda. Mayor Earling advised it is time
sensitive. ACOP Lawless said he would appreciate action tonight; there will be no changes to the contract
between now and next week. The City is operating under an emergency services agreement which is
basically the same as the contract.
MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS ABSTAINING.
B. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT - ANIMAL CONTROL
OFFICER
Assistant Police Chief Lawless explained Senior Animal Control Officer Debbie Dawson recently retired
after 30 years of service. She was the City’s designated individual for emergency euthanasia of animals
utilizing drugs regulated by the U.S. DEA. With the retirement of Officer Dawson, Animal Control
Officer Tabatha Shoemake has been designated as the primary registrant and as such a new
indemnification and hold harmless needs to be authorized and executed for her.
Councilmember Teitzel asked under what circumstances an animal control officer would euthanize an
animal rather than taking it to a veterinarian or PAWS. ACOP Lawless answered if it is an emergency on-
site euthanasia; the preference in the City’s internal policy for dispatching of animals is not to use
firearms but to humanely end an animal suffering. There have also been occasions when a rabid animal
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 13
has been taken into custody; it is safer and easier to euthanize the animal on scene. The animal control
officer has been trained in both the administration and the maintenance of the drugs.
ACOP Lawless advised this is time sensitive as Officer Dawson’s retirement was effective last week.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL,
TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND EXECUTE THE INDEMNIFICATION AND
HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
C. 2016 1ST QUARTER BUDGET AMENDMENT
This item was postponed to a future meeting.
D. NATIONAL CITIZEN SURVEY UPDATE
Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty recalled last year the Council
approved up to $19,000 to engage in the National Citizen Survey (NSC). The survey, conducted by the
National Research Center (NRC), is a statistically significant, scientific survey that has been conducted in
over 350 jurisdictions in 44 states. This citizen survey tool is endorsed by the International City/County
Management Association (ICMA). In addition to a set of categorized, standard questions that enable
benchmarking and comparison with other cities or areas, the survey allows for the addition of questions
customized for each specific community. As he was NRC’s customer in another city, their prior customer
discount of 25% is being extended to Edmonds.
The “basic service” randomly selects 1500 households. An introductory postcard is mailed to each
household, alerting them to the survey that will follow soon in the mail. The following week the paper
survey is mailed with a postage-paid envelope for easy return. Survey respondents may also opt to take
the survey online following easy instructions. A reminder postcard is sent after a couple weeks. The
national average is approximately 20-40% response rate. As Edmonds has a high percentage of
participation in elections, activities and civic affairs, he anticipated a high response rate. At 1 500
households the survey results have a 95% confidence level with a margin of error +/- 5%. A final report is
delivered with the raw data, data summaries, benchmarking against nationwide survey results, and
specific results from the customized questions. The $19,000 budget allows for this basic service plus
some add-ons:
An additional 700 households (total 2,200) - increasing confidence level and decreasing margin
of error further
Additional benchmarking against communities meeting specific criteria
Additional comparison of results by population demographics and/or specific geographic areas
The timeline for conducting the NCS is a start date of mid -May, with a completion date of by the end of
August. This timeline will allow for information gleaned from the survey to be considered during the
budgeting process for 2017. The packet includes the standard questionnaire and a draft of customized
questions submitted by the department directors for inclusion at the end of the standard questionnaire with
input from the NRC staff.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the NCS, anticipating it will dovetail into the Strategic
Action Plan (SAP). Mr. Doherty recalled last year when the City Council approved an update to the SAP,
the consultant suggested engaging the public in an update. He suggested scheduling open houses in
September/October to share the survey information and tie the survey results into the SAP to see where
additional updates may be appropriate.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 14
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed extreme concern with Question 14 (In order to maintain the paved
surfaces of our City streets, how much would you support or oppose use of the following potential
funding sources: Increase in City vehicle license fees, vote to increase local property tax levy for streets)
and 15 (In order to enhance the service level for Parks and Recreation, how much would you support or
oppose use of the following potential funding sources: Vote to form a Metropolitan Park District as a
dedicated taxing authority vote to increase property tax levy for maintenance and operations, vote to
increase property tax levy for capital needs, including acquisition, park development, bonding for specific
parks projects and infrastructure). She recalled the failure of the TBD and tax levy and some people may
not know what a Metropolitan Park District (MPD) is. She preferred to have Council discussion before
including those questions in a survey. She recalled many Councilmembers were split on the TBD issue.
She preferred to gauge the public’s opinion regarding budgeting by priorities which was in the SAP. She
was opposed to loaded questions like 14 and 15 because no one wants their taxes increased. She preferred
to map it out properly like the School District does and seek consensus from Council before including it
in a survey of the public.
Mayor Earling pointed out the last time the City went to the public for a tax increase, there were three
issues on the ballot at the same time. When multiple issues are including on a ballot, some people favor
some and not others and all three tend to fail. Mr. Doherty commented the customized questions are draft;
the NRC staff offered to work with staff to craft the wording of the question related to the MPD.
Councilmember Teitzel asked whether adding 700 households to the survey would also have the 20-40%
response rate. Mr. Doherty answered yes.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis’ comments but potentially for a
different reason. She preferred to determine the Council’s support for a tax increase before asking the
citizens about raising their taxes. She recalled with the three issues were on the ballot previously, some
Councilmembers actively worked against the ballot measures. She liked Question 17 (How likely or
unlikely would you be to support increased funding to enhance the following Police-related services).
In response to Councilmember Teitzel’s earlier question, Mr. Doherty said the cost of the survey with the
add-ons would be under the $19,000 budget, primarily due to the discount.
Mayor Earling commented this is somewhat time sensitive if the Council and staff want to utilize the
results in the budget process. If it is Council consensus to withdraw the questions that Councilmember
Buckshnis raised issues with, he suggested staff propose 1-2 addition questions. If the Council began to
massage the survey, it could be delayed considerably which would not allow the results to be used in
preparing the 2017 budget.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested addressing the topics in Questions 14 and 15 in Question 17. She
felt a MPD was too confusing for the public. Mr. Doherty advised staff has been counseled not to mix
subject matters. He suggested Questions 14 and 15 included too much information regarding the
mechanism for raising tax revenue whereas Question 17 simply asked the likelihood of support of
increased funding. He suggested Questions 14 and 15 be more generic, inquiring about support for
maintaining the paved surfaces of City streets and enhancing service level for Parks and Recreation. If
there was strong support for increased funding, a second phase could include more information regarding
the mechanism.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed with asking whether citizens whether they would be willing to
support increased funding to pave roads rather than asking if they were interested in a property tax
increase or an increase in the TBD.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 15
Council President Johnson concurred with the previous comments. She asked what information is needed
from the Council and when in order to begin the survey in mid-May. The agenda memo states this is for
information only. Mr. Doherty explained the Council approved the survey process by budgeting for it;
this agenda item is to inform the Council that the survey will be done and offering an opportunity for
input into the questions. Given the Council’s input regarding the questions, he would be ready to proceed
with the contract tomorrow. Council President Johnson did not support that as she would like to see the
revised questions before contracting with NRC. Mr. Doherty said the Council will not able to see the final
questions because they are mutually written with NRC but NRC will not do that work until they are under
contract. Council President Johnson asked to see Mr. Doherty’s version of the customized questions
added to the NCS and the Council take action next week. Instead of inquiring about support for increased
funding for roads, Council President Johnson suggested inquiring about support for increased funding for
transportation which could include fixing potholes, sidewalks, bike lanes, traffic calming, etc. She
suggested a similarly more detailed list with regard to parks.
It was the consensus of Council for staff to return with the draft questions next week.
Councilmember Nelson thanked Councilmember Buckshnis for her suggestion to model Questions 14 and
15 similar to Question 17.
E. DOWNTOWN RESTROOM BUDGET AUTHORIZATION
This item was postponed to a future meeting.
F. RECREATION & CONSERVATION OFFICE (RCO) GRANT RESOLUTIONS
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite explained RCO is the main granting agency for local park
projects. RCO’s grant cycle is open every even year, grants are due by May 1. Staff received approval
May 1 to submit the grants and are in the process of writing the grants. She met with the grant officer in
Olympia to discuss the project, waterfront redevelopment associated with the senior center. If the grant is
approved, the funds are allocated by the legislature in 2017 for funding in 2018 and that project should be
cued up in two years.
The grant officer recommended the City apply for two different grants for same project, 1) Aquatic Lands
and Enhancement Act (ALEA) to increase waterfront access and to enhance the aquatic lands
environment, and 2) Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP) for water access. The City
has less chance to receive the WWRP grant; it depends on the number of applications. There are $7-8
million available; 75% allocated to acquisition and 25% to development projects. There is $500,000
budgeted in the CIP for park impact fees for this project.
The resolution stating the City is aware of the project and there are matching funds available is required
by RCO for staff to submit the grant. She was hopeful the ALEA grant could be matched with the WWRP
funds. She requested Council authorization to schedule approval of the resolution on the Consent Agenda.
It was the consensus of Council to schedule this item on next week’s Consent Agenda.
G. SNOHOMISH COUNTY ILA AMENDMENT NO 3
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite explained this amendment to the Snohomish County
Conservation Futures grant is related to the Civic Field street vacations and deed restrictions. The Council
authorized signing of the original ILA with Snohomish County Amendment No. 1 which authorized funds
to be used for the purchase of Civic Field instead of the beachfront property, and Amendment No. 2
which authorized the conservation easement language and contract. Amendment No. 3 pr ovides a revised
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 16
legal description and includes the acreage from the streets and alley into the area that is not restricted. She
requested authorization to schedule approval on next week’s Consent Agenda as Snohomish County
needs to expend the funds by April 22.
It was the consensus of Council to schedule this item for approval on next week’s Consent Agenda.
H. CRITICAL AREA ORDINANCE UPDATE
Senior Planner Kernen Lien said with the limited amount of time for review of the remaining
amendments, the revised CAO would not be read for adoption next week. He reviewed potential
amendments:
Appendices
8.A – Insert new Appendix A: Map of Critical Areas in Edmonds
o Not regulatory ‐ used for reference purposes only
o Maps do not show the exact locations of all critical areas
o Subject to change
Many referenced maps in the code are controlled by other agencies
Critical area code references that maps should be continuously updated as new critical
areas are discovered (ECDC 23.50.010.D, 23.70.010.B, 23.80.040.B, and 23.90.010)
8.B – Insert new Appendix B: Listing of critical areas in Edmonds with buffer widths and
category/classification designations
o Cost prohibitive
o Would have to visit every property in Edmonds
o Critical areas not fixed in time or place
o Per updated code, critical area determinations and reports only valid for five years (ECDC
23.40.080 and 23.40.090.F)
Suggest making existing critical area information available on City of Edmonds web map with
disclaimer
He displayed the City of Edmonds web maps available at Maps.Edmondswa.gov, explaining he has been
working with the City’s GIS Analyst Dave Rohde to add the critical area layers to the map.
Councilmember Nelson thanked Mr. Lien for developing this compromise. This is a great opportunity to
inform citizens of critical areas in their neighborhoods and/or in their backyards. He asked how the public
would access the maps. Mr. Lien said there is a link to the maps on the City’s website available by
searching maps. The maps currently include layers for storm water, water and sewer, as-builts, etc.;
critical areas would be a new layer.
Councilmember Nelson asked whether citizens could access the maps from a computer at City Hall. Mr.
Lien answered the plan is to have computers available for citizens’ use in the Green Resources Room; any
computer with internet access can access the maps.
COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
SUPPORT AMENDMENT 8B.
Councilmember Tibbott commented the maps are a great educational opportunity. He expressed concern
the GIS maps raise an issue of privacy and asked if there had been concerns with displaying critical areas
that exist on private property. Mr. Lien answered any information the City has is a public record. With
regard to privacy related to aerial photographs, he suggested Dave Rohde may be able to answer that. He
noted Google Earth allows anyone to look at basically anything anywhere in the world. He recalled in the
past the State restricted the priority habitat species layer due to concern with identifying the location of
endangered species. That layer is now publicly available on their website. With regard to critical areas, he
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 17
did not find a privacy issue as most information can be accessed via public records. Councilmember
Tibbott asked if there was a way to prevent access to map layers that might be considered private
information. Mr. Lien said none of the critical area layers would be considered private.
COUNCILMEMBER NELSON WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE
SECOND.
COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
APPROVE AMENDMENT 8A.
Mr. Lien said Amendment 8A was to include the maps as appendices to the CAO which make them static.
His proposal was to make the information publicly available which is neither Amendment A or B.
COUNCILMEMBER NELSON WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE
SEDOND.
COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE AMENDMENT 8C, TO HAVE THE DIGITAL MAPS PUBLICLY
ACCESSIBLE AND TO INCLUDE A DISCLAIMER.
Councilmember Buckshnis clarified Amendment 8C was adding the GIS map and asked if it will also
include critical area buffers. Mr. Lien explained determining buffers for critical areas requires a site visit
and a critical areas determination. For example, wetland buffers are based on habitat score. The critical
area layer would show the potential presence of critical areas on or adjacent to a site.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested using standardized buffer widths because citizens will want to
know what buffer width is required. She referred to the buffer required for an anadromous fish bearing
stream as an example. Mr. Lien advised the buffer width determination is made when a qualified
professional makes a determination regarding the stream category. As an example, he noted the wetland
buffer for a Category 3 wetland ranges from 60 to 165 feet depending on habitat score. Councilmember
Buckshnis suggested including a minimum buffer. Mr. Lien said including the minimum buffer of 60 feet
would be misleading when the buffer could be 165 feet.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether consideration had been given to including an address
layer. Mr. Lien demonstrated typing in the address, advising there are many tools and information in the
mapping program including critical areas, stormwater lines, sewers, zoning, easements, deeds, street
maps, and links to the permitting system, the Snohomish County assessor, etc. He said Dave Rhode
developed this program.
Councilmember Teitzel asked how steep slopes were identified on the map. Mr. Lien pointed out areas
identified on the map as potential erosion hazard 15-40% slope, slopes greater than 40% and the
liquefaction hazard zone.
Mr. Lien clarified the motion was to make the City’s critical area information available to citizens on the
City’s website without a login and to include a disclaimer regarding the accuracy of the information.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Lien displayed Amendment 10:
ECDC 23.40.040.C – Areas subject to the provision of the CAO
10 – Replace to refer to new appendices if appendices are adopted
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 18
ECDC 23.40.040.C notes that the critical area regulations apply regardless of any formal
identification
As Amendment 10 was tied to Amendment 8, he suggested the previous motion takes care of Amendment
10.
7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling reminded of the Creative Age Festival of Edmonds (CAFE) on Friday and Saturday, an
opportunity to learn how to become more involved in the community. He invited the Council to attend the
ribbon cutting ceremony on Sunday for the Lutheran Church’s new solar panels. He reported tomorrow he
will be attending a cub scout meeting to talk about good government.
8. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Tibbott reported over the past several weeks he has meet with citizen in regard to the
CAO. This week he will have the opportunity to do a water quality check with Joe Scordino and students
from Students Saving Salmon. He looked forward to seeing what the students are doing as well as the
implications it has for the City.
Councilmember Mesaros announced the Edmonds Veterans Plaza is fully funded. The next step is linking
information available at the Veterans Plaza to programs at Edmonds Community College which provides
an opportunity for anyone who has not made a donation to do so.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported the World Health Organization declared the Ebola situation in
West Africa no longer constitutes a public health emergency of international concern and the temporary
recommendations adopted in response should be terminated.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed a Snohomish County Health Districts’ report regarding the Zika
virus: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued a detailed recommendation for
preventing transmission to women who are pregnant or likely to become pregnant in the near future.
Beyond avoiding mosquito bites, the CDC recommends abstaining from sex or practicing safe sex and
delaying conception for at least eight weeks after possible Zika virus illness or exposure. More
information is available at the Snohomish Health District website.
Councilmember Buckshnis announced the K-9 statute at the Veterans Plaza is also fully funded. A
committee will be reviewing designs on Thursday night.
Councilmember Buckshnis commended Keely O’Connell, Carrie Hite and Rob English for their fabulous
presentation to the Salmon Recovery Funding Board regarding final design of Willow Creek daylighting
project.
9. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION
PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
This item was not needed.
10. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION
This item was not needed.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
April 12, 2016
Page 19
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:58 p.m.