Loading...
2019-02-19 City Council Packeto Agenda Edmonds City Council snl. ,nyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 FEBRUARY 19, 2019, 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of February 12, 2019 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of February 12, 2019 3. Approval of claim checks and wire payments. 5. PRESENTATION 1. Marsh Study Update from Windward Environmental (30 min) 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Crumb Rubber Moratorium Extension Public Hearing (10 min) 8. STUDY ITEMS 1. WWTP Phase 6 Energy Conservation Project - Carbon Recovery Full Design (15 min) 2. Potential Process Change to Enhance Council Committee Meeting Transparency (20 min) 3. Affordable Housing: Next steps (60 min) 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS 11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(1). 12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda February 19, 2019 Page 1 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/19/2019 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of February 12, 2019 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 02-12-2019 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 2 4.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES FEBRUARY 12, 2019 Elected Officials Present Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Mike Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Dave Earling, Mayor Elected Officials Absent Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Councilmember Staff Present Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Carrie Hite, PRCS Director Kernen Lien, Environmental Program Manager 1. CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM At 6:01 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION: PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION The City Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room in closed session to discuss pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). ADJOURN At 6:58 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 3 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/19/2019 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of February 12, 2019 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 02-12-2019 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 4 4.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES February 12, 2019 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Jason Robinson, Police Officer Phil Williams, Public Works Director Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Kernen Lien, Environmental Program Mgr. Jeanie McConnell Development Program Mgr. Rob English, City Engineer Mike Clugston, Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmembers Mesaros and Johnson. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 22, 2019 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JANUARY 22, 2019 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS 4. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENT Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 5 4.2.a 5. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR AN UNDETERMINED AMOUNT 6. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT - SUMMIT LAW 7. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE DEFENSE OF COURT ADMINISTRATOR SHARON WHITTAKER PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 2.06 ECC 8. SURPLUS CITY COMPUTERS 5. PRESENTATION 2. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM PERIODIC REVIEW Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien explained • Purpose of this agenda item: o Reintroduction to SMP periodic review o Scope of periodic review o Proposed code amendments • Comprehensive Update vs. Periodic Review o Completed Comprehensive Update June 2017 ■ State adopted comprehensive guidelines for Shoreline Master Programs in 2003 under WAC 173- 26 ■ Jurisdictions across the state were required to update their SMP's ■ Edmonds' SMP adopted in June 2017 was a complete rewrite of the SMP to be consistent with WAC 173-26 o Periodic Review ■ SMA requires each city and county to review, and, if necessary, revise their SMP at least once every eight years. The City's periodic review is due June 30, 2019 ■ State filed WAC 173-26-090 in August 2017, which became effective September 2017 ■ Provides guidance on the periodic update ■ Periodic review ensures SMP stays current with changes in laws and rules, remains consistent with other City of Edmonds Plans and regulations, and is responsive to changed circumstances, new information and improved data. • Periodic Review Checklist o Summarizes amendments to state law, rules and applicable guidance between 2007 and 2017 that may trigger the need for SMP amendments during periodic reviews o City's SMP comprehensive updated lasted from 2009 — 2017 o Completed checklist identifies items that should be updated in the City's SMP for consistency with state laws and rules o Identified amendments would not result in substantive changes to the SMP Other review elements o Edmonds Marsh Study ■ Update Shoreline Inventory and Characterization o ECDC 24.80.100 — Public Hearings ■ Shoreline substantial development permit may begin as a Type II staff decision, and change to a Type III decision before the hearing examiner by a written request during comment period ■ Clarification on this process should be added ■ Staff is recommending something similar to the Critical Area Contingent review process detailed in ECDC 23.40.195 ■ Critical Area Wetland Regulations SMP Periodic Review Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 6 4.2.a o May 2018 Council adopted Resolution No. 1411 ■ Initiating Periodic Review ■ SMP Periodic Review Work Program ■ Public Participation Plan o Planning Board Review and Recommendation o Must be completed by June 30, 2019 Code changes in response to SMP Periodic Review Checklist 0 2017a. Cost Threshold for substantial development ($7,047) ■ Amended language in ECDC 24.80.010.B.1 0 2016a. Americans with Disabilities Act Permit Exemption ■ Added ECDC 24.80.010.13.16 —Exemptions 0 2017g. Nonconforming uses and development ■ Amended language in ECDC 24.70.020.D ■ Amended language in ECDC 24.70.010.D.2 —Nonconforming Uses ■ Amended language in ECDC 24.70.020.G.2 — Nonconforming Structure o Other Amendments ■ ECDC 24.80.100 —public hearings ■ ECDC 24.40.020 — Critical Areas Edmonds Marsh Study o Baseline of existing conditions of the Edmonds Marsh o An addendum to the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization o No recommendations regarding buffers/setbacks for the UMU IV shoreline environment Next steps o Public hearing at City Council ■ City has not received any comments o Once amendments approved by City Council, submit to Ecology for review Councilmember Buckshnis expressed concern with removing the entire wetland section, acknowledging that the code will refer to Ordinances 4106 and 4127. She asked if there was any disadvantage to leaving the wetland section in the code so people did not have to refer to other documents. Mr. Lien said the wetland section is not the most up-to-date guidance from the Department Ecology which is contained in Ordinance 4127. All the other critical area sections also refer to the CAO. From an administration standpoint, it is more confusing to have two sets of regulations and it is clearer to rely on the CAO for wetlands. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested including the CAO in the packet next time. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed concern with approving something that has draft written on it such as Windward's description of the Edmonds Marsh. If the Council approves this tonight, she asked whether that draft would be included. Mr. Lien said he is not seeking Council approval tonight; a public hearing needs to be held first. It will say draft until the Council approves it. Once the Council holds a public hearing and is agreeable to the update, when he presents a resolution of intent to adopt or an ordinance, the indication of "draft" will be removed. Windward may update the marsh vegetation before City Council adoption later this year. He summarized it is a draft until the Council adopts it. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the change to 18 months in ECDC 24.40.010.D.2 — Nonconforming Uses and 24.0.020.G.2 — Nonconforming Structure, and asked why 18 months was selected instead of 2 years. Mr. Lien said the intent was for the code to be consistent with the SMP. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the new section, Special Procedures for WSDOT Projects 24.80.105. Mr. Lien referred to 2015a. 90 day target for local review for WSDOT projects in the SMP Periodic Review Checklist, explaining the legislature adopted a 90-day target for local review of WSDOT projects. The proposed code language in 24.80.105 is the model language Ecology proposed. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 7 Councilmember Teitzel posed a hypothetical; assuming after the Unocal property transitions to WSDOT and at some point becomes owned by the City of Edmonds via a donation or sale, and asked what changes to the SMP would be needed to reflect that. Mr. Lien answered none. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mindy Woods, Edmonds, explained when leaving a Diversity Commission meeting at the senior center last Wednesday about 8:20 p.m., two people who are experiencing homelessness approached the senior center hoping to find the cold weather shelter. There was no sign on the door and both walked away. The news announced this morning that four people passed away in King County over the pasts week during the cold weather. It was 28 degrees last Wednesday night and she was not aware of the cold weather shelter in Lynnwood. If she, a person with access to the internet and a working cell phone didn't know that, how was an unhoused person supposed to know. It would also be challenging for a person on foot in the Edmonds bowl to reach a shelter in Lynnwood. Ahmed Amr, Edmonds, recalled about a year ago he expressed concern with the excessive expenditure of a $30,000/month legal retainer for Mr. Taraday, and he has not responded to hundreds of emails he has sent him. He referred to his case that went to court, his arrest for trespass that resulted in a trial by jury that was shut down without a 90 day trial. He alleged the police have come to his home and insulted him, calling him mentally ill in front of his dying wife. The City has spent a lot of money putting him down, hurting him and his wife. He referred to shredding of documents and a suit he filed in the U.S. District Court of Western Washington and the City hiring a lawyer for the person. He explained when a clerk of the court tampers with records, they should be arrested and reported to the FBI. He objected to the legal advice Mr. Taraday has given officers and felt Judge Coburn was a judicial atrocity and that Mayor Earling was a monster. He alleged harassment, abuse of police power, brutality, and the waste of resources financing the defense of a court clerk shredding documents. Laura Johnson, Edmonds, commented it had been a long week with three restless teens at home, but they were lucky to have a warm home and a 4-wheel drive vehicle. Many are not so lucky; there are a number of homeless residents in Snohomish County including some who live in Edmonds. Those individuals are served by a team of incredible volunteers who dedicate their time to open an emergency cold weather shelter when the temperatures drop. Edmonds used to be a location for a shelter at the senior center but she learned that has closed. She was concerned some homeless individuals who relied on that service were left out in the recent extreme cold. Some of them showed up last Wednesday only to find out that service was no longer available. She questioned why at least a warming station was not opened, transportation provided from the senior center to Lynnwood or at least a notice posted on the door that the senior center was no longer an emergency shelter and how they could reach someone for transportation to the shelter in Lynnwood. She summarized we can and should do better in Edmonds. Mr. Amr continued his comments and Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE THAT WILL SET A MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARD FOR SMALL -FOOTPRINT BUILDINGS (4,800 SO. FT. OR LESS) LOCATED IN BD -ZONED PROPERTIES IN DOWNTOWN EDMONDS. THESE SMALL -FOOTPRINT BUILDINGS HAVE PREVIOUSLY NOT HAD ANY PARKING REQUIRED Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 8 4.2.a Development Services Director Shane Hope recalled staff discovered a building permit was submitted and approved that allowed for 90 units/3 stories to be built in a downtown zone with no onsite parking. The building is adjacent to a bus stop and some bicycle parking was provided. The City code allowed for this as long as the building footprint did not exceed 4800 square feet, a code that had been in place at least 10 years. That issue had not been raised before and no one else had submitted a permit utilizing that provision. That building permit raised the issue and staff proposed a moratorium that was adopted by the City Council to halt the development of any further residential units in that area without onsite parking while the issue was studied. The Planning Board held two public meetings, the first in October and a public hearing in December on a proposed code change to remedy the situation. The proposed code change eliminates the 4800 square foot footprint exemption, the existing commercial code applies to commercial buildings and requires residential buildings to provide at least one onsite space per unit. The Planning Board discussed alternatives and concluded this was the most reasonable approach. Other regulations apply in other areas. Councilmember Buckshnis questioned why a staff person did not say wait when this application was submitted, why the code did not differentiate between residential and commercial, and why this building was approved. Ms. Hope said if a person applies for a building permit and the application meets code, it cannot be denied based on what someone would rather the code said. She does not always hear about all the permits that are submitted and staff did not approach her about this one. Even if she had learned about it immediately, once an application is submitted, it is vested. Councilmember Buckshnis said the BD zone is a business district and one would not expect a small residential building in a business district. Ms. Hope assured this change would address the issue. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There was no one present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked where the tenants of this building were parking. Ms. Hope answered she did not know. Some tenants may not have a car; those with a car will either have to find street parking or someplace else to park. Council President Fraley-Monillas said with this provision, a developer was not obligated to inform the City where tenants would park. Ms. Hope agreed, the proposed ordinance would require one onsite parking space per unit. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if there were alternatives to this proposal. Ms. Hope said there could have been alternatives such as a parking pass program, one space for every two units, exceptions due to proximity to a bus stop, etc. The Planning Board preferred this proposal and possibly consider something different in the future. This is a straightforward requirement and fits with the general market. Council President Fraley-Monillas expressed concern with having additional cars parked downtown when there are already issues with parking. Ms. Hope agreed downtown parking is at a premium. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 4140, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE BD ZONES, PERMANENTLY ELIMINATING AN EXEMPTION FROM PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS WITH A FOOTPRINT OF LESS THAN 4800 SF. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE INTEGRATION OF SMALL CELL STANDARDS INTO THE CITY'S WIRELESS CODE (ECDC 20.50) AND ADOPTION OF INTERIM ORD NANCE, Mike Clugston explained staff has been working with City Attorney Jeff Taraday to develop regulations for a new type of wireless facility, small cell wireless. The packet contains the draft interim ordinance. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 9 4.2.a Mr. Taraday explained: • Telecommunications Act of 1996 gives the FCC the authority to interpret the Act • FCC Ruling (the "Order") released on September 27, 2018, titled Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment o The Order adopted new rules limiting how state and local governments may treat applications for the installation of small wireless facilities o January 14, 2019 — The Order goes into effect o April 14, 2019 — Local jurisdiction to have aesthetic rules in place o Packet contains interim ordinance. Reason for interim ordinance 1. Allow applications to be processed 2. Clarifies that City requires franchises prior to allowing applications to be processed 3. While expect permanent ordinance for consideration/action by April 14, unexpected things happen. Mr. Clugston reviewed: • What are small cell deployments? o Complementary to towers, adding much needed coverage and capacity to urban and residential areas, venues, and anywhere large crowds gather o Streetlights, utility poles and slimline poles ■ Antennas connected to nodes receive and transmit wireless signals to and from mobile devices ■ Optical fiber connects to other nodes and carries data to and from communication hubs operated by wireless carriers ■ The cabinet holds equipment that process wireless signal for multiple wireless carries Facility Types o Macro Cell o Small Cell ■ FCC defines small wireless facilities as meeting each of the following conditions: 1. Height — 50 feet +/- 2. Each antenna — 3 cubic feet 3. Equipment — 28 cubic feet Map of wireless facilities in Edmonds o Current Macro sites: 24 o Future Macro sites: dozens more? o Future small cell sites: 1000s? Ms. McConnell reviewed a hierarchy of location preferences for small cell antennas, noting locations outside of the right-of-way are preferred over locations within the right-of-way: Locate Outside the Right-of-WaX 1. Existing building 2. Freestanding small cell pole located Locate Within the Right-of-WaX 3. Existing street light pole or utility pole (hollow poles) 4. New freestanding small cell pole or street light 5. Existing PUD single-phase pole (installation on top of pole) 6. Existing PUD transmission pole (installation in communication space) 7. Strand -mounted (installation in communication space) She displayed photographic examples of the proposed location preferences: Installations Outside of the Right -of -Way Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 10 4.2.a 1. Locate on existing structures (example at 4' & Main) 2. Zoned property • Freestanding small cell pole within 5 feet of street and side property lines; o Locate on same side of street as power lines; o Height limit 30 feet Right -of -Way Installations 3. Existing hollow streetlight pole or traffic signal light 4. New freestanding cell pole or new street light • Custom designs — Sternberg model streetlights currently used in downtown Edmonds do not have sufficient space • Sternberg makes a model specific for wireless facilities 5. Installation on single phase power pole • Cantenna in line with pole • External conduit — color matched to pole • External equipment — color matched to pole 6. Installation on transmission pole • Antenna in communications space • External conduit • External equipment 7. Strand -mounted facilities • Installation on an existing pole • Antenna in the communication space • External equipment Considerations in Developing code: o Equipment and Wires: Internal vs. External o Clutter on existing wood poles Mr. Clugston reviewed • Changes to ECDC 20.50 o Small cell location preferences and design standards — NEW o Eligible facility requests — Codify existing reference o Permit and review timelines (`Shot Clocks') — Update o New macro monopoles — Update o Clean up • Project timeline: o January 8: Introduction to Council PPW Committee o January 9: Introduction to Planning Board o January 14: FCC Order goes into effect o January 15: Introduction to full Council o February 12: Public hearing and adoption of interim ordinance o February -March: Discussions at Planning Board, review interim ordinance and discuss refinements for small cell aesthetic regulations and bring back to Council o April 2 or sooner: Hearing before City Council o April 14: Local jurisdictions to have aesthetic rules in place Mr. Taraday relayed staff is hoping to meet with industry representatives later this week. He anticipated they would provide testimony during the public hearing as well as at that meeting regarding changes they would like. Staff will be open minded to their input but will also be looking out for the City's best interests. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the photograph in Preference 6 and asked whether that would be a typical installation. Mr. Clugston answered it was difficult to say which was the reason for a range of Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 11 4.2.a preferences. From an industry standpoint, he anticipated Preference 6 would be the easiest to attach and to get permitted. Through the preferences, the goal is to have antennas moved out of right-of-way onto zoned property on buildings or freestanding poles near the right-of-way that do not impact other utilities. Staff does not have a perfect understanding so are providing a range of options to work with the City's preferences for aesthetic appearance and technology feasibility for the industry. Councilmember Tibbott said he was interested in hearing from the public, but personally would rather see installations on existing poles rather than new poles. The top two preferences are outside the right-of-way, which in some cases will be on new poles. If there were a perfectly good wood pole 10 feet away, he asked whether that location would be encouraged. Mr. Taraday said Preference 6 does not illustrate the conduit which is of considerable concern to staff. One of the problems with wood utility poles is that everything is mounted on the outside of the pole. He referred to another photograph illustrating several conduits on the exterior of the pole and several antennas which he noted begins to look unsightly. He acknowledged staff is somewhat guessing what the industry will install; the industry has a better sense of what they will be installing. Councilmember Tibbott referred to a photograph with exterior conduit mounted close to the pole and that matched the pole color, noting he preferred that to additional poles. With regard to Sternberg poles, Councilmember Tibbott preferred to have an exact replica versus an approximate match. He was uncertain how that could be required via the code, noting he found it unacceptable to have a row of Sternberg poles and one that was a different style. Ms. McConnell said she will be checking with the Sternberg representative to see what options are available. Her understanding was it would not be an exact replica of what currently exists because those are not designed for small cell installations. She assumed the new Sternberg pole would have a similar look. Councilmember Tibbott inquired about staff time to process permits, relaying his understanding there may be an opportunity to batch installations. Mr. Clugston offered to research. Councilmember Tibbott assumed permit fees would be collected and asked if the fees would cover the cost of the review process. Mr. Clugston advised it would cover the review time. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the desire to remove clutter from poles and assumed some equipment would be obsolete by the time new equipment is installed. He asked if obsolete equipment, conduit, wires, etc. could be required to be removed before installation of new equipment. Mr. Taraday said staff is also working on a companion piece of legislation that includes revisions to another chapter of the code related to other overhead utilities, but that applies more broadly than just to small cell installations. Councilmember Tibbott said he was referring to 3G versus 5G equipment and whether the older equipment on a building could be removed. Ms. McConnell said the code requires obsolete equipment be removed. Councilmember Tibbott asked if that has been discussed with industry representatives. Ms. McConnell said a meeting is scheduled later this week to discuss the interim ordinance with industry representatives and assumed that would be discussed if it was a concern to the industry. Councilmember Tibbott asked if macro towers were becoming obsolete and would go away and be replaced with 5G equipment or would the macro towers remain and more installed. Mr. Clugston said it was his understanding that macro towers will still be used but he was unsure if more macro sites would be required. Councilmember Tibbott recognized this technology would citizens to enjoy better cell service. However, it was also an opportunity to clean up clutter from previous installation and improve aesthetics. Ms. McConnell referred to Section 20.50.140 that addresses abandonment and discontinuation of use. Councilmember Nelson commented there is nothing small about 1000 cell towers in the city. It was his understanding there was a distance of 150 feet between towers. Ms. McConnell answered the code proposes Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 12 4.2.a 300 feet between freestanding small cell facilities but if a specific location on private property does not work, the carrier is asked to talk to adjacent property owners within 150 feet about locating. Councilmember Nelson asked if there was a maximum distance between towers to limit the number. Mr. Taraday said one of the reasons they are referred to as small cell is because the range is small. They are not very powerful antennas and do not cover a large area which is why there need to be so many. Trying to balance the dispersion requirement prompted a great deal of discussion between staff and he anticipated that discussion would continue both with the Council and the industry. The goal is to strike the right balance where there is not too much impact in one place and yet recognize the need to provide working technology and the industry's need to deploy in a functional manner. He was uncertain that 300 feet, the minimum spacing in the interim ordinance, was the right number and whether that would be in the final draft. Councilmember Nelson commented this is an FCC regulation written by the wireless communication industry, federal law that severely limits what the City can do. He asked about the existing fee charged to a wireless company for a macro tower. Mr. Clugston offered to research, noting no new macro towers have recently been permitted on zoned property or in the right-of-way. Councilmember Nelson said the proposed fee is standard fee throughout the country. Mr. Clugston said the fees in the Order are acceptable fees from the FCC's viewpoint; jurisdictions can charge different fees if they can be justified. Councilmember Nelson said a lot of cities are frustrated by the lack of flexibility in fees due to the FCC's nationwide standardization. Councilmember Nelson said public rights -of -way are one of the most valuable public assets and these low fee rules deprive jurisdictions from potential revenue -generating opportunities on City -owned infrastructure that would benefit and improve citizens' lives. He was frustrated with the limitations the FCC imposed, independent of the fact that health implications are not on the table. He was also frustrated with holding a public hearing following the worst snow storm in 70 years. He was concern with the FCC's shot clock to fast track the process when it has profound implications for the City. He was interested in slowing down the process not speeding it up. Councilmember Teitzel recalled one of main comment from the wireless industry is the requirements in the proposed ordinance are more onerous than they would like and they increase the cost and time to obtain permits. He asked how Edmonds' requirements compared with other cities. Mr. Clugston said other jurisdictions who have recently adopted regulations have concealment/camouflage requirements but do not have the requirement to look on private property first. The industry is asked to do that research as part of their siting process before submitting an application and to describe on the application how the location was determined. He was uncertain if other jurisdictions have required that, but staff felt it was a reasonable request in siting deliberations. t Councilmember Buckshnis feared there would be more than 1000 small cell facilities. She agreed with Councilmember Nelson's comment that the right-of-way is very important. She asked the cost of a master permit agreement, commenting if 1000 small cell facilities are allowed, the City should get some money. Mr. Taraday said the state legislature does not allow jurisdictions to charge for use of right-of-way if the user is a telecommunications company. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if there was a fee for the master permit agreement if it was located in the public right-of-way. Mr. Taraday answered the City can charge direct reasonable costs for processing an application such as staff time to review the application, but use of the public right-of-way is free. For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Taraday explained the state legislature made a distinction between pole owners and right-of-way owners. Pole owner can charge a small amount for pole rental space but the City as the owner of the right-of-way is not allowed to charge for right-of-way rental. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 13 4.2.a Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if the City had to allow poles in the right-of-way. Mr. Taraday said the City has to allow them to deploy. The FCC has stated thou shalt allow small cell deployment in your jurisdiction. Ultimately the City needs to allow the industry to create a feasible pathway for small cell deployment. The FCC's guidance is not so specific as to state exactly what the City can and cannot do which is the reason there is some disagreement, and he expected industry representatives to state during the public hearing that some of the things in the ordinance are illegal. Staff is looking out for the City's best interest given the guidance policy makers have provided but it is not clear exactly what the City can and cannot do so there will be differences of opinion. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if the Council could make a decision that there could be no more than X number of small cell towers total in the right-of-way. Mr. Taraday did not think so, anticipating that would be considered an impermissible prohibition of their right to deploy. Council President Fraley- Monillas said it would not hold up their right to deploy as they could deploy on private property and negotiate the cost. Mr. Taraday did not disagree from a policy standpoint, but he was predicting the outcome if it were challenged. He acknowledged he could be wrong and the courts could be more generous than he expected but he was not optimistic. Council President Fraley-Monillas understood better cell reception was important to a lot of people, but she was not happy that they can install in the right-of-way and do not have provide compensation for using City property. She suggested the City could assist the industry with contracting with private property owners to use their property. She envisioned these facilities would be located on new buildings in the future which would require compensating the private property owner. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if there was an existing requirement to remove old equipment. Mr. Taraday said that is in the existing code. Mr. Clugston agreed. Mr. Taraday did not think there had been a major problem with the wireless industry leaving old equipment. The clutter concern is bigger than the wireless industry which is why it is being addressed more broadly. The code is designed to allow the wireless industry to easily take down an old antenna and replace it with a new antenna in exactly the same place. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked about the shot clock. Mr. Clugston said the FCC allows a specific amount of time to review these permits, for example an eligible facilities request, if it is not reviewed within 60 days, it is automatically deemed approved and the industry could challenge that in court. For small cell, the shot clock is also 60 days and if the City misses that deadline, it is not automatically deemed approved yet, but the industry could challenge to have the review done. A shot clock is the amount of time given by the FCC to review permits. Council President Fraley-Monillas commented additional staff may be required if there were 1000+ requests, recalling it was difficult in a good economy to get permitting done quickly. She was concerned there may not be adequate staff to handle the permits and that the fees would not be adequate for staff time, benefits, etc. without hiring additional staff. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Gregory Bush, Wireless Policy Group, consultant representing AT&T, expressed AT&T's support for the City's efforts to update its code and reiterated AT&T commitment to working with staff to develop workable policies for all carriers to provide high quality service as technology continues to evolve. AT&T has significant concerns with the current draft of the wireless code update. The seven step hierarchy requires carriers to locate small cells on private property unless the applicant can demonstrate justification for locating in the right-of-way. The main issue with this is it is complex, not in line with what other jurisdictions in Washington are doing, it will lead to more poles and clutter in the right-of-way due to the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 14 4.2.a requirement to put a new pole within 5 feet of an existing pole, and it makes it more difficult to comply with shot clocks because of the two week period to check with other private landowners. They prefer to locate on utility poles because they have only one pole owner to talk to and it prevents long, extended negotiation for each pole. He was concerned the draft code may conflict with the recent FCC order, both the shot clock deadlines and imposing burdens not applied to other types of infrastructure deployments. The FCC requires jurisdictions' aesthetic regulations be reasonable, technically feasible, objective, no more burdensome than other applied to other types of infrastructure deployments, and to be published in advance. If the City requires carriers talk to private property owners, a step not required for power, utilities, Comcast, internet, etc., it does not comply with the FCC order. AT&T strongly urges the City to work with the wireless industry to develop reasonable standards and work with other stakeholders such as Snohomish County PUD to reach a workable policy. Kari Marino, Bellevue, representing Verizon Wireless, referred to the letter submitted last week by Kim Allen, Wireless Policy Group representing Verizon, that states the urgency and the reason to deploy, outlining the FCC requirements and asking the City to delay adopting this emergency ordinance until there is an opportunity to ensure it is feasible. There needs to be a path forward for wireless providers that protects the City's best interests especially aesthetic standards. She highlighted the four main issues in the letter: 1. Seven -step preference hierarchy. Small cell technology is designed to radiate RF out; a location on a building does not serve the building well. A property owner has to pull a separate power feed and fiber optic connection which makes it unworkable for the property owner. Another concern is proving they have checked with all property owners within 150 feet. 2. Requesting proprietary coverage maps. She assured they would not provide their strategy plan. The City will know what they want when they submit a permit. 3. Concern the shot clock timeframe will not be met 4. Size restrictions are too limiting. A meeting is scheduled on Thursday with staff, AT&T and Verizon and possibly other carriers. She looked forward to continuing to work with the City to ensure the end product serves everyone. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Councilmember Teitzel commented if a small cell wireless facility is mounted to the side of an apartment building, it could be close to a bedroom. He asked if there were any health issues with radiation, cell transmissions, etc. that have been studied at a national level and if so, what were the findings. Mr. Clugston said the FCC provides guidance for RF emissions exposure. It was his understanding that if the industry states they meet those standards, there is assumed there will no health impacts. Small cell are smaller antennas and less powerful; what may have been a larger concern with macro antennas may be less with these smaller antennas. If the industry can meet the RF criteria provided by the FCC, the City cannot not further regulate health impacts. Councilmember Teitzel observed two of the major carriers were represented at the public hearing. He asked how many carriers could potentially put up small cell facilities in Edmonds. Mr. Clugston anticipated Verizon AT&T and T-Mobile and Sprint. If a carrier puts up a standalone wireless only pole, Councilmember Teitzel asked if the carrier was obligated to share the pole with other carriers to co -locate equipment. Mr. Clugston answered co -location is encouraged but it is not required. Council President Fraley-Monillas referred to the AT&T's representatives statement that the City's regulations would require more work and asked if any study had been done regarding the amount of time it would take a wireless company to talk to private property owners and the cost. Mr. Clugston answered not that he was aware of. Carriers have sited macro towers on the sides of buildings so there may be a precedent Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 11 Packet Pg. 15 4.2.a for small cell. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she was concerned about the cost to citizens versus the cost to a private company as her obligation was to the City's 42,000 citizens, not the wireless companies. Councilmember Buckshnis said the master permit agreement refers to maps, yet the Verizon representative stated their maps are proprietary. She asked how the City could determine how many small cell facilities there would be without those maps. Mr. Taraday said propriety maps will be discussed with the industry. He was not yet convinced that the City could not require that as part of its franchising authority. Councilmember Buckshnis observed if 4-5 carriers are going to put up freestanding poles, as many as possible should be located on each pole. Mr. Taraday said one of the reasons the City is asking for that information is to see areas in the City where there are gaps and direct deployment into areas that are underserved, get more than one provider to coordinate if there is a need in an area, etc. There is a good public interest basis for seeking those propriety maps. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 4141, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING AN INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 20.50 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, ENTITLED "WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES." UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (3-2), COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS AND COUNCILMEMBER NELSON VOTING NO. Mr. Taraday said the emergency clause in the ordinance will not be effective due to the 3-2 vote; a majority plus one was required for the emergency clause to be effective. Therefore, the ordinance will not be effective until five days after publication. 8. ACTION ITEMS 1. CRUMB RUBBER MORATORIUM EXTENSION Council President Fraley-Monillas explained the moratorium will expire soon and she requested the moratorium be continued through August 31, 2019 pending a response from the EPA and other entities regarding crumb rubber. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 4142, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION OF THE INSTALLATION OF STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER (ALSO KNOWN AS SBR OR "CRUMB RUBBER" ON PUBLICLY -OWNED ATHLETIC FIELDS WITHIN THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR AN ADDITIONAL SIX MONTHS. Councilmember Teitzel commented the moratorium has been extended a number of times and asked whether there was any legal limit on the number of extensions. City Attorney Jeff Taraday answered no, 1) this is not within the framework of GMA, and 2) there are good reasons for continuing the moratorium as ongoing human health impact studies are still occurring at the federal level and in California. Both studies are making progress and there will eventually be a conclusion reached at which time there may be a more permanent ordinance. He summarized he was not aware of any limitation to continuing the moratorium until the studies were completed. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF EXCELSIOR PLACE STREET Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 12 Packet Pg. 16 4.2.a Environmental Programs Manager Kernen Lien advised the City Council held a public hearing on October 2, 2018 and adopted a resolution of intent to vacate a portion of Excelsior Place north of the property addressed 19511 94t' Place West. The resolution of intent contained four conditions: 1. The retention of a public utilities easement 2. Construction of a utility access and emergency vehicle turnaround 3. A private access easement for all properties with frontage on the vacated portion of Excelsior Place and; 4. A utility and emergency vehicle access easement and covenant requiring construction of additional access road width to meet South County Fire lane standards with future single family development The applicant had 90 days to meet those conditions and staff feels have the applicant has met the conditions. With regard to construction of the turnaround, given that the winter months are not construction season, the applicant has submitted a bond that would ensure construct of the turnaround by June. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 4143, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, VACATING A PORTION OF EXCELSIOR PLACE ABUT AND LIES NORTH OF THE PROPERTY ADDRESSED AT 19511 94T11 PLACE WEST AS SET FORTH IN THE RESOLUTION OF INTENT NO.141, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. RENEWAL OF CITY COUNCIL EMPLOYEE CONTRACTS Councilmember Nelson said this item is employment agreements for Jerrie Bevington and Maureen Judge, both of which have expired. Ms. Judge's previous employment agreement was for one year, $31/hour for the first 6 months and $32 hours for the second 6 months. She also receives City benefits. Ms. Bevington's employment agreement was for 2 years at $33/hour and is not eligible for employee benefits. Ms. Judge's agreement includes a 3% COLA increase or $34/hour and a request for an increase in vacation from 7.33 hours/month to 10 hours/month. HR Director Mary Ann Hardie indicated the City's current policy is 11 days of vacation/year for employees with 2-5 years of service. Ms. Judge received six days for the first six months and five days for the second six months. Ms. Judge's request also includes some comparables. Councilmember Teitzel did not recall completing a performance evaluation for Ms. Judge and asked why that was not done or discussed in executive session versus discussion in an open meeting. Mr. Taraday answered the Council is entitled to review performance of an employee in executive session and could do that now if the Council wished. The Council cannot take action regarding the employee's contract in executive session. Councilmember Teitzel suggested recessing to executive session to have a brief discussion about performance before making a decision. Although he personally had no concern about her performance, he was unaware if other Councilmembers did. He was concerned with increasing the vacation accrual from 7.33 hours/month to 10 hours/month, a 36% increase that he found excessive. He supported having a frank discussion about performance before making a final decision. Councilmember Nelson said a survey was distributed to all Councilmembers regarding Ms. Judge's performance. Council President Fraley-Monillas said in most years, the Council President has evaluated the administrative staff with input from the City Council; it had never been a joint process where the Council met in executive session unless there were performance issues. Councilmember Buckshnis said she completed the survey and Ms. Judge requested an evaluation. She agreed with recessing to executive session because she had no idea what others have said. The Council had the same administrative assistance for many years and the update was status quo. Ms. Judge is asking for a Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 13 Packet Pg. 17 4.2.a 36% increase in vacation and she would like to talk about that in executive session. Mr. Taraday said the Council can discuss performance of an employee in executive session, but not the terms of compensation. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO MOVE INTO AN EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR NO MORE THAN 10 MINUTES FOR A BRIEF DISCUSSION ABOUT MAUREEN JUDGE'S PERFORMANCE AND RECONVENE TO DISCUSS THE SPECIFICS OF THE COMPENSATION PACKAGE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Convene in Executive Session RegardinE Performance of a Public Emplovee Per RCW 42.30.110(2). At 8:54 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session to discuss performance of a public employee per RCW 42.30.110(g). He stated the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 10 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Teitzel, Tibbott and Nelson. City Attorney Jeff Taraday was also present. The executive session concluded at 8:59 p.m. Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 9:04 p.m. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE JERRIE BEVINGTON'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE ADJUSTED SALARY AND CONTRACT DATE. Councilmember Buckshnis inquired about Ms. Bevington's rate. Councilmember Nelson advised it was $33/hour. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Teitzel observed Ms. Judge's current contract expired January 22, 2019. Mr. Taraday suggested the contract be retroactive to the day after it expired. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, APPROVE MAUREEN JUDGE'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THAT REFLECTS AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JANUARY 23, 2019 AND EXPIRES JANUARY 22, 2020 AND INCREASE THE SALARY TO REFLECT 3% COLA OR $33/11OUR AND INCREASE THE VACATION ACCRUAL RATE FROM 7.33/MONTH TO 8.33/MONTH, A 13% INCREASE IN THE ACCRUAL RATE. Mr. Taraday said the 7.33 hours/month was intended to match the table in City code, 11 days/year of vacation. He asked if the intent was to provide more than 11 day/year of vacation. Councilmember Teitzel said based on the Council's assessment of her performance, this is an appropriate level, appropriately 100 hours/year. Mr. Taraday said the existing language in the contract is consistent with City code. Councilmember Teitzel said this is a contract employee. Council President Fraley-Monillas encouraged Council not to support 8.33 hours/month for Ms. Judge which equals 94 hours/year and she requested 10 hours/month. Her duties as a contract employee are at a higher level than most other similar jobs and although she is paid by the City, she is the Council's contract employee. Directors all receive a higher level of vacation and she supported a higher level for Ms. Judge who has many years of experience. She noted the majority of Ms. Judge's work is legislative research and only 25% administrative. Her request for 10 hour/month is only 3 weeks/year which she felt was not too much to provide for an employee of her ability. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 14 Packet Pg. 18 COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NELSON, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO CHANGE 8.33 10 HOURS/MONTH TO 10 HOURS/MONTH. Councilmember Tibbott agreed with Council President Fraley-Monillas. Ms. Judge has a higher level of responsibility than an entry level employee and certainly demonstrates efficiency in her role. He supported the amendment to 10 hours/month of vacation accrual. Council President Fraley-Monillas said 8.33 hours/month equates to100 hours/year, slightly over 2 weeks; 10 hours month is 3 weeks/year, a difference of only 20 hours. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed Ms. Judge is doing a very good job. She preferred an increase from 7.33 to 8.33 or 9 rather than 10. AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-1), COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. 2019 CARRYFORWARD BUDGET AMENDMENT Finance Director Scott James reviewed: • The 2019 Carryforward Budget Amendment begins on Page 642 in the Council Packet • 2019 Carryforward Budget Amendment is for Items Not Completed in 2018 • There are 57 Carryforward Requests • All Items were Previously Approved by Council • The Carryforward Budget Amendment Will Roll the Unexpended 2018 Budget into the 2019 Budget • Exhibit D (Change n Fund Balance) o Summary: ■ Proposed Amendment Change in Beginning Fund Balance: $3,963,174 ■ Proposed Amendment Change in Revenue: $384,166 ■ Proposed Amendment Change in Expense: $4,347,340 ■ Proposed Amendment Change in Ending Fund Balance: $0 • Exhibit A (packet page 649) o Illustrates each fund's Beginning Fund Balances, Anticipated Revenues, Budgeted Expenditures and Ending Fund Balance • Summary of the 2019 Carryforward Budget Amendment o Beginning Fund Balance is Increased by $3,963,174 o Expenditures are Increased by $4,347,340 o Revenues are Increased by $384,166 o Ending Fund Will Remain Unchanged Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the completion of the UFMP with Davies Tree Resource Group, relaying her understanding the City no longer planned to utilize this consultant due to the poor document produced, yet the carryforward includes $5,644. Ms. Hope answered the intent is for them to fold in the new information and other corrections; they will not do any new work. Councilmember Buckshnis hoped to give them a poor report card, noting some people will be very upset to know the City paid $130,000 for that document. Councilmember Buckshnis asked about the $200,000 carryforward for the community garden, recalling the carryforward was $100,000 and there was $100,000 in this year's budget. Mr. James said $200,000 is for land acquisition. The 2019 budget includes $155,000 for the community garden. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 15 Packet Pg. 19 4.2.a COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE 2019 CARRYFORWARD BUDGET AMENDMENT AS PRESENTED AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON FEBRUARY 12, 2019 ORDINANCE NO. 4144. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. PRESENTATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE OF EDMONDS RECOVERY CENTER AT 7416 212TH ST SW City Engineer Rob English relayed the building is currently undergoing tenant improvements and a change of occupancy. One of the permitting requirements is a fire sprinkler system in the remodeled building which required a water connection and new meter. The proposal is authorization to approve a 10' by 10' water utility easement on the property for that connection. Staff recommends approval. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO APPROVE RECORDING OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE OF THE EDMONDS RECOVERY CENTER AT 7416 212TH ST SW. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there was any expense associated with the easement. Mr. English answered they are dedicating the easement to the City. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling commended Public Works, Parks and Police Department staff for their extraordinary work during the recent snow storm. They have been working 12 hour shifts which continue tonight and likely for days. He offered special thanks for the quality work they have done. Mayor Earling said City Hall and other facilities have been open Monday and Tuesday, opening at 10 a.m. and closing yesterday at 3:00 p.m. and at 5:00 p.m. today. The City has been staffed with enough people to operate both days. City Hall will open at 9 a.m. tomorrow and likely be back to 8 a.m. by Friday. 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Teitzel echoed the comments about the great work Public Works has done keeping streets safe. He recognized not all streets could be plowed but all the major thoroughfares have been passable and sanded. He reported on the Port of Edmonds Commission meeting, recalling the boat shed collapse in 1996 under the weight of heavy snow. The Commission reported the boat sheds weathered the snow well and there were no collapses. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked the Public Works crew who finally sanded her street. She urged everyone to be careful and stay in if possible, commenting a woman fell on her street and broke her femur. Council President Fraley-Monillas thanked everyone for the flexibility to cancel last week's City Council meeting and reschedule items, noting the priority should always be staff and citizens' safety and she believed it was not safe last Tuesday night. Council President Fraley-Monillas gave a shout out to WSDOT who have been working 12-16 hour days to keep the freeways fairly clear which allows staff to reach the City. She still has 2 feet of snow in yard and driveway and will be glad when the snow goes away. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 16 Packet Pg. 20 4.2.a Councilmember Tibbott gave a shout out to the Police Department, especially Officer Wang, who helped his son who skidded out on 196' on Friday and totaled his car. He echoed Councilmember Buckshnis' suggestion for people to drive carefully and to stay off the roads if possible. Mayor Earling added although Councilmember Tibbott's son was in a car accident, he was okay. 11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 13. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:27 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 12, 2019 Page 17 Packet Pg. 21 4.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/19/2019 Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #235443 through #235511 dated February 14, 2019 for $404,852.68 and wire payments of $417.67 and $24,952.88. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 02-14-19 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 02-14-19 wire 02-08-19 wire 02-14-19 Packet Pg. 22 4.3.a vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235443 2/14/2019 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 15-67383 235444 2/14/2019 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 115730-1916 235445 2/14/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 235446 2/14/2019 064341 AT&T MOBILITY 138087-1916 264703-1916 328906-1916 1991102483 235447 2/14/2019 061659 BAILEY'S TRADITIONAL TAEKWON 7303 TAEKWON-DO Page PO # Description/Account Amoun vi RUSSIAN INTERPRETER COURT 0" RUSSIAN INTERPRETER COURT 0- E 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 161.6( a Total: 161.6( a) L HOPE: 2019 APA MEMBERSHIP 3 Hope: 2019 APA Membership �a 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 818.0( CLUGSTON: 2019 APA MEMBERSH Y Clugston: 2019 APA Membership t 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 514.0( E APA MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR DIRE American Planning Association dues 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 469.0( o BRADLEY 2019 MEMBERSHIP Bradley 2019 Membership o 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 400.0( 0- Total : 2,201.0( Q PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE r' PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 4 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 51.5E N 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.3" N E Total : 56.8E n U WIRELESS SERVICE FOR AlRCARE Mobile Aircards 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 46.7E t Total: 46.7' M .r Q 7303 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTION 7303 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 1,174.0( Page: 1 Packet Pg. 23 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code : usbank Voucher 235447 235448 235449 235450 Voucher List City of Edmonds Date Vendor Invoice 2/14/2019 061659 061659 BAILEY'S TRADITIONAL TAEKWON (Continued) 2/14/2019 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY 34485 2/14/2019 076931 BATTERY MART OF W INCHESTER 2/14/2019 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 35344 35345 35769 1901814500 PO # Description/Account Total ; SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 82 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 82 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 02 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 02 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 02 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 02 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 02 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 02 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 Total INV 1901814500 EDMONDS PD 2-WAY RAPID CHARGERS MOTOR( 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 BATTERIES MOTOROLA XTS3000 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 NiMH BATTIERIES FOR MOTOROLP 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 Total 7257 YOGA 7257 YOGA INSTRUCTION 7257 YOGA MON W/ KERRY CLAS; 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7261 7265 YOGA 7261 7265 YOGA INSTRUCTION 7261 YOGA GENTLE CLASS INSTRI 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7265 YOGA MON W/KERRY CLASS 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7269 YOGA 7269 YOGA INSTRUCTION 4.3.a Page: 2 Amoun 1,174.0( r- m E �a 106.4� 3 106.4� c �a Y 131.4£ E 106.4� 450.9E o �a 0 a 320.2( Q 388.6( a) 4 446.0( N 0 76.1 £ E 1,230.9E '� c a� 438.9( t �a a 361.3E 431.7E Page: 2 Packet Pg. 24 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 3 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 235450 2/14/2019 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY (Continued) 7269 YOGA WED W/ KERRY CLASS 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 785.4( 7273 YOGA 7273 YOGA INSTRUCTION 7273 YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 501.6( 7277 YOGA 7277 YOGA INSTRUCTION 7277 YOGA INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 440.9( 7281 PILATES 7281 PILATES CLASS INSTRUCTIOI 7281 PILATES INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 293.1 Total: 3,253.05 235451 2/14/2019 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 7156 DRAWING 7156 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP 7156 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 167.2( Total : 167.2( 235452 2/14/2019 075994 CARTER, ERIC Carter, Eric CARTER TRAINING KIRKLAND - MII Carter training Kirkland - mileage 001.000.62.524.20.43.00 23.2( Total: 23.2( 235453 2/14/2019 076928 CARTWRIGHT, SHARMONE 2001556.09 REFUND: SOCCER CLASS REFUND: SOCCER CLASS 001.000.239.200 39.0( Tota I : 39.0( 235454 2/14/2019 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN01191017 PM SUPPLIES: HELIUM PM SUPPLIES: HELIUM 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 16.0( 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 1.6E Total: 17.6E 235455 2/14/2019 076852 CULTURES CONNECTING LLC 2677 CONSULTING Page: 3 Packet Pg. 25 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 235455 2/14/2019 076852 CULTURES CONNECTING LLC (Continued) CONSULTATION WITH MAYOR AND 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 500.0( Tota I : 500.0( 235456 2/14/2019 076577 CWT LLC 34590 CESCL RECERT - RICHARDSON CESCL Recert - Richardson 001.000.67.518.21.49.00 170.0( Total : 170.0( 235457 2/14/2019 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 01312019 BUSINESS RECRUITMENT ADS FOI Business recruitment ads for January 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 500.0( Tota I : 500.0( 235458 2/14/2019 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2019010037 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 SWV#0098 Scan Services for January 2019 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 285.0( Tota I : 285.0( 235459 2/14/2019 066079 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES BD50770 L&I OVERPAYMENT OVERPAYMENT FOR CLAIM BD507' 001.000.62.524.20.11.00 1,106.2z Total : 1,106.2' 235460 2/14/2019 076929 DIBBLE, PAULINE 2001557.09 REFUND FUN FACTORY CLASS REFUND: FUN FACTORY CLASS 001.000.239.200 12.1 E Total : 12.1E 235461 2/14/2019 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 19-3909 INV 19-3909 EDMONDS PD 3 TRANSCRIPTIONS SMART 2018-E 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 266.0( TRANSCRIPTION SMART 2018-8 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 84.0( 4 TRANSCRIPTIONS 18-032286 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 231.0( Page: 4 Packet Pg. 26 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235461 2/14/2019 064531 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 235462 2/14/2019 063037 EARLING, DAVE 235463 2/14/2019 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 235464 2/14/2019 065789 ESTES, KEN 235465 2/14/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 01312019 1223 1224 1225 PO # Description/Account Total LEGISLATIVE MEETINGS lunch while in Olympia for leg mtgs 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 mileage to Olympia for leg mtgs 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 Total PM SUPPLIES: FOOT WARMERS PM SUPPLIES: FOOT WARMERS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: MARKER, CLEANEF PM: MARKER, CLEANER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM: WATER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM: WASTEBASKET PM: WASTEBASKET 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 19 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 Total EDH842073 LEGAL DESC.: PLN 2018.0069 Legal Desc.: PLN 2018.0069 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 4.3.a Page: 5 Amoun 581.0( r- m E �a 4.3E 93.3E 97.7; c �a N Y V a� t 19.9E E 2.0E 0 M 7.5E o a 1.3� Q 0.7E 4 N 14.9� o N E 1.5z 48.21 c a� E t 2,038.7, 2,038.7"� Q 101.4E Page: 5 Packet Pg. 27 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235465 2/14/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 235466 2/14/2019 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY 235467 2/14/2019 011900 FRONTIER 235468 2/14/2019 013140 HENDERSON, BRIAN 235469 2/14/2019 074746 HIGUCHI, ROD Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) EDH843365 LEGAL DESC. PLN2018.0071 Legal Desc. PLN2018.0071 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 Total WAMOU52709 PM: SUPPLIES: TAP & DIE SET PM: SUPPLIES: TAP' DIE SET 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 WAMOU52710 PM: SUPPLIES: SCREWS PM: SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 425-771-4741 425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/II 425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/Il 130.000.64.536.20.42.00 425-775-1344 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 425-776-5316 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 425-776-5316 PARKS MAINT FAX LII 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 Total 16 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 Total 7059 UKULELE CLASS 7059 UKULELE CLASS INSTRUCTIC 7059 UKULELE ACQUIRING THE BP 4.3.a Page: 6 Page: 6 Packet Pg. 28 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 235469 2/14/2019 074746 HIGUCHI, ROD (Continued) 235470 2/14/2019 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3206034 3206042 235471 2/14/2019 070250 IRON MOUNTAIN 201806705 235472 2/14/2019 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 300363895 235473 2/14/2019 074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH 164 235474 2/14/2019 074099 MARTIN, GARY 1/24/19 YOGA SUB PO # Description/Account 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total : CARDSTOCK FOR BUDGET BOOK Cardstock for budget books 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 COPY PAPER Copy Paper - 6 cs 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 Total 01-19 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE Jan-2019 Off site data storage servic( 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 Total INV 300363895 EDMONDS PD ORDI 10 CASES COPY PAPER 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 HANDLING FEE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 Total CONFLICT COUNSEL 8Z1028276 CONFLICT COUNSEL 8Z1028276 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total 1/24/19 YOGA SUBSTITUTE CLASS 4.3.a Page: 7 Page: 7 Packet Pg. 29 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 8 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 235474 2/14/2019 074099 MARTIN, GARY (Continued) 1/24/19 YOGA SUBSTITUTE CLASS 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 75.0( E, Total: 75.0( a 235475 2/14/2019 019940 MC COMAS, GARY 15 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 3 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 2,156.4E Total: 2,156.4E N U 235476 2/14/2019 019920 MCCANN, MARIN 18 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 9,330.0( . Total: 9,330.0( 235477 2/14/2019 072223 MILLER, DOUG 1/9-1/30 GYM MONITO 1/9/19-1/30/19 BASKETBALL GYM M _0 1 /9/19-1 /30/19 BASKETBALL GYM M > 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 122.0( o Total: CL 122.0( a Q 235478 2/14/2019 075590 MOBILE GUARD INV00458100 01-19 NETGUARD MONTHLY SERVI NetGuard Monthly Service Building 4 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 39.0( - NetGuard Monthly Service City Clerk c 001.000.25.514.30.42.00 6.5( NetGuard Monthly Service Communit E 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 E 6.5( U NetGuard Monthly Service City Coun( 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 13.0( NetGuard Monthly Service Court E 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 6.5( NetGuard Monthly Service Developm, Q 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 13.0( NetGuard Monthly Service Engineerir 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 97.5( NetGuard Monthly Service Facilities Page: 8 Packet Pg. 30 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235478 2/14/2019 075590 MOBILE GUARD Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 9 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) N 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 58.5( 5D NetGuard Monthly Service Finance E 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 6.5( a NetGuard Monthly Service Human RE 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 6.5( .3 NetGuard Monthly Service Informatioi 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 19.5( NetGuard Monthly Service Mayor's O Y 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 6.5( NetGuard Monthly Service Parks 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 6.5( E NetGuard Monthly Service Parks 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 13.0( _M NetGuard Monthly Service Parks o 001.000.64.571.22.42.00 6.5( NetGuard Monthly Service Police o 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 312.0( a NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water Q 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 39.0( m NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 3.2f NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water c 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 3.2.' NetGuard Monthly Service PW Sewei E E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 32.5( U NetGuard Monthly Service PW Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 6.5( NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street E 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 19.5( NetGuard Monthly Service PW Fleet Q 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 6.5( NetGuard Monthly Service PW 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 2.2£ NetGuard Monthly Service PW Page: 9 Packet Pg. 31 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235478 2/14/2019 075590 MOBILE GUARD 235479 235480 235481 2/14/2019 070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 10179646 2/14/2019 076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA 63684976 63713263 2/14/2019 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER January, 2019 4.3.a Page: 10 PO # Description/Account Amoun 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 0.6E NetGuard Monthly Service PW E 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 2.2E Q NetGuard Monthly Service PW 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 0.6E .3 NetGuard Monthly Service PW 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 0.6, NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street Y 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 6.5( u NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 6.5( E NetGuard Monthly Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 78.0( _M Total: 825.5( O FSA FEES - JANUARY M 0 ANNUAL FEE + MONTHLY FEE a 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 900.0( Q Total : 900.0( _. rn HEP B VACCINE 4 HEP B VACCINE N 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 94.0( N DOT RECERT E DOT TESTING M 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 99.0( Total: 193.0( c a) COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI` Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 947.0� Q PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 22,433.2z Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 285.5( Page: 10 Packet Pg. 32 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 235481 2/14/2019 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued) 235482 2/14/2019 075735 PACIFIC SECURITY 235483 2/14/2019 069633 PET PROS 26729 0016686-IN 4.3.a Page: 11 PO # Description/Account Amoun State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 67.7E E Judicial Information Systems Account a 001.000.237.180 4,677.2E School Zone Safety Account 3 001.000.237.200 75.2z Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 1,895.7E Y Traumatic Brain Injury 001.000.237.260 398.7' Accessible Communities Acct E 001.000.237.290 42.7( 'sa Multi -Model Transportation 001.000.237.300 42.7� O Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 258.0� o Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis a 001.000.237.170 1.8" Q WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 385.2E 4 Domestic Violence Prevention 001.000.237.370 1.8E c DNA Database Acct y 001.000.237.400 4.6E Total : 31,517.9( Z COURT SECURITY 01/04/2019 a� COURT SECURITY 01/04/2019 E 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 78.7E Total : 78.7E a INV 0016686-IN EDMONDS PD - JAP DOG FOOD FOR HOBBS - JAN 201 � 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 128.2, 10.4% Sales Tax Page: 11 Packet Pg. 33 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235483 2/14/2019 069633 PET PROS 235484 2/14/2019 074793 PETDATA INC 235485 2/14/2019 029800 PRINZ, DANIEL 235486 2/14/2019 064088 PROTECTION ONE Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 12 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) N 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 13.3< Total: 141.5E E 7353 INV 7353 EDMONDS AC LICENSING R °- ISSUE 249 1 YEAR LICENSES 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 1,045.8( ISSUE 1 REPLACEMENT TAG 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 4.2( N Total: 1,050.0( 17 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT E 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 2,314.1( n Total : 2,314.1( o 2445047 ALARM MONITORING SENIOR CEN > ALARM MONITORING SENIOR CEN o 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 371.1E a FIRE INSPECTION/LABOR CHARGE Q 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 219.0( a) SC-890271031 CITY HALL - DEPOSIT FOR INSTALL 4 City Hall - Deposit for Install 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,594.0( o SC-890304895 PW - DEPOSIT FOR INSTALL PW - Deposit for Install 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,359.0( SC-890312642 LIBRARY - DEPOSIT FOR INSTALL Library - Deposit for Install 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,185.5( SC-890312867 FAC DEPOSIT FOR INSTALL FAC Deposit for Install Q 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 1,215.0( SC-890313033 PS - DEPOSIT FOR INSTALL PS - Deposit for Install 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 22,239.5( Page: 12 Packet Pg. 34 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 13 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 235486 2/14/2019 064088 PROTECTION ONE (Continued) SC-89040085 MUSEUM - DEPOSIT FOR INSTALL (D Museum - Deposit for Install E 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 6,661.0( a SC-890420089 FS 17 - DEPOSIT FOR INSTALL FS 17 - Deposit for Install 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 6,204.5( SC-890508232 WASTEWATER - DEPOSIT FOR INS WasteWater - Deposit for Installation v, 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 11125.0( u Total : 42,173.6! 235487 2/14/2019 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 19-0151 COURT SECURITY 01/28/2019-01/3( E COURT SECURITY 01/28/2019-01/3( 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 687.5( p PROBATION MRT SECURITY 01/30/; '@ 001.000.23.523.30.41.00 110.0( o Total: 797.5( a a 235488 2/14/2019 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC INV190328 MARKER/INSCRIPTION-STORM Q MARKER/INSCRIPTION-STORM 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 140.0( 4 Total: 140.0( N 0 235489 2/14/2019 067447 RILEY, CHARLES H. 14 REIMBURSEMENT E REIMBURSEMENT M 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,608.0( Z Total: 1,608.0( a� 235490 2/14/2019 072725 SAGACITY CUSTOM PUBLISHING 2019-19153 - LTAC TOURISM PROMOTION AD IN WASI E Tourism Promotion ad in WA State t 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 6,535.0( Total : 6,535.0( Q 235491 2/14/2019 074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 47355 ONSITE AND REMOTE COMPUTER Remote computer support for WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 487.5( Page: 13 Packet Pg. 35 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235491 2/14/2019 074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 235492 2/14/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 14 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi Onsite computer support 1/29/19 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 637.5( E Total: 1,125.0( a 200326460 HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON HUMMINGBIRD PARK 1000 EDMON 3 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 16.0E 200650851 CITY PARK RESTROOMS y CITY PARK RESTROOMS U 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 19.3E 200651644 PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 742.4( 201383270 CITY PARK GAZEBO p CITY PARK GAZEBO '@ 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 15.4.E o 202114484 CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL a CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL Q- Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 202250635 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 9TH/GASPER LANDSCAPE BED / M 4 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 16.0< N 202576153 STREET LIGHTING (2095 LIGHTS C o STREET LIGHTING (2095 LIGHTS C N E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 15,905.5( 2 204714950 STREET LIGHTING (12 LIGHTS @ 2 U STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 2 c 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 95.5E E 100% RENEWABLE STREET LIGHT 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 2,687.4� *3 205184385 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV Q LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 20.0E Total : 19,556.01 Page: 14 Packet Pg. 36 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235493 2/14/2019 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 235494 235495 Q&TWI: 235497 2/14/2019 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice 74228 1134 1183 2/14/2019 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER January 2019 2/14/2019 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 2/14/2019 076324 SUPERION LLC 103587 PO # Description/Account PARKS MAINT 5005 DUMP FEES PARKS MAINT DUMP FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total : FEB-19 COMMUNICATION DISPATC FEB-19 COMMUNICATION DISPATC 001.000.39.528.00.41.50 FEB-19 COMMUNICATION DISPATC 421.000.74.534.80.41.50 FEB-19 COMMUNICATION DISPATC 423.000.75.535.80.41.50 2019 ANNUAL EMERGENCY RADIO 2019 Annual Emergency Radio Syste 001.000.39.525.60.41.50 Total Crime Victims Court Remittance Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 Total PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND REC 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total 224019 PROF. SERV. TRAKIT Prof. Serv. TRAKIT 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 224799 PROF. SERV. TRAKIT Prof. Serv. TRAKIT 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 225404 PROF. SERV. TRAKIT Prof. Serv. TRAKIT 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 4.3.a Page: 15 Amoun m 428.0( E 428.0( a a� 3 70,111.5( 1,845.0z U a� t 1,845.0z E 121,110.0E o 194,911.6' 0 a a Q 534.2 � " 534.2 , 4 N 0 1,022.9z N 1,022.9z c a� 4,715.3< E �a 1,560.0( Q 10,718.0( Page: 15 Packet Pg. 37 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 16 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 235497 2/14/2019 076324 SUPERION LLC (Continued) 225890 PROF. SERV. TRAKIT Prof. Serv. TRAKIT E 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 440.0( a Total: 17,433.1 L 235498 2/14/2019 064493 SUTTON, ROSS E 1522 SICK LEAVE BUYBACK 3 OVERTIME REFUND c 001.000.41.521.22.11.00 �a 83.7( N Total: 83.7( a� 235499 2/14/2019 076516 THOMPSON, MILTON BD50770 SICK LEAVE BUY BACK REFUND FOR HOLIDAY 1/1/19 E 001.000.62.524.20.11.00 138.2E Total: 138.21 o 235500 2/14/2019 070744 TIGER OAK MEDIA 2019-210776 BUSINESS RECRUITMENT ADS FOI > Business recruitment ads for January 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 1,750.0( a Total: 1,750.0( Q am 235501 2/14/2019 076927 TRI-TECH FORENSICS INC 168102 INV 168102 EDMONDS PD - NIK TE; T" 5 BOXES NIK-6075 - E - MARIJUAN/ 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 102.5( c 1 BOX NIK-6089 I - CLUB DRUG N 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 20.5( 5 BOXES NIK-6079 - J PCP U 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 102.5( 5 BOXES NIK-6080 - K - OPIATES 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 102.5( E 5 BOXES NIK-6081 - L- BROWN HE 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 102.5( Q 8 BOXES NIK-6083 - N - PENTAZOC 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 164.0( 5 BOXES NIK-6090 - O - GHB 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 102.5( Page: 16 Packet Pg. 38 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 17 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 235501 2/14/2019 076927 TRI-TECH FORENSICS INC (Continued) 1 BOX NIK-6091 - T - KETAMINE (D 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 20.5( E 10 BOXES - NIK-6087 - U METH & X' a 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 205.0( Freight 3 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 21.0( Total: 943.5( 235502 2/14/2019 044300 US POSTAL SERVICE PO Box 2008 2019 ANNUAL RENTAL FEE FOR EC N U 2019 Annual Rental Fee for Edmond: 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 503.3' 2019 Annual Rental Fee for Edmond: •@ 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 503.3< U 2019 Annual Rental Fee for Edmond: o 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 503.31 Ta Total: 1,510.0( o L Q 235503 2/14/2019 076821 VAN HOLLEBEKE, TENILLE 7144 CAKE CLASS 7144 CAKE DECORATING CLASS II` a Q 7144 CAKE DECORATING CLASS II` 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 57.6( ' Total: 57.6( 4 T- 235504 2/14/2019 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9823278936 C/A 442201730-00001 0 iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office y E 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 Total: 35.1: 235505 2/14/2019 047200 WA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 4160 WRPA ANNUAL CONFERENCE: HIT WRPA ANNUAL CONFERENCE: HIT E t 001.000.64.571.21.49.00 309.0( WRPA ANNUAL CONFERENCE: HIT Q 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 927.0( Total : 1,236.0( 235506 2/14/2019 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 62096 INV 62096 EDMONDS PD CASE 19-; Page: 17 Packet Pg. 39 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 18 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 235506 2/14/2019 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC (Continued) 2 HR CLASS B TOW - B24937W 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 456.0( E 10.4% Sales Tax a 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 47.4, 62126 INV 62126 EDMONDS PD CASE 19-; 3 TOW HONDA CIVIC ATE8171 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 189.0( 10.4% Sales Tax N 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Y 19.6E Total: 712.01 235507 2/14/2019 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 119005173 INV 119005173 EDM301 BACKGROL E BACKGROUND CHECKS - 01/19 E U 001.000.237.100 344.5E o Total: 344.5( 235508 2/14/2019 072627 WEST SAFETY SERVICES INC 7009444 MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINT a Monthly 911 database maint Q- Q 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 200.0( Total: 200.0( r' 4 235509 2/14/2019 075122 YAKIMA CO DEPT OF CORR 2/10/19 YAKIMA EDMONDS INMATE HOUSING - JAN 62 HOUSING DAYS @ $63.65 0 001.000.39.523.60.41.50 3,946.3( E INMATE PHARMACEUTICALS 12/18 001.000.39.523.60.31.00 32.9E Total: 3,979.2E a� 235510 2/14/2019 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 19-EDM0001 JAN-19 RETAINER & 2018 FORFEIT E t Monthly Retainer 001.000.36.515.33.41.00 23,870.1( Q 2018 Forfeiture Prosecution Services 001.000.36.515.33.41.00 6,880.3, Total : 30,750.41 Page: 18 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 02/14/2019 9:13:25AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235511 2/14/2019 071604 ZOHO CORPORATION #4926 69 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 69 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 19 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 2216817 HELP DESK, DESKTOP, MOBILE & ! Annual Subscription fees for (D 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 10,201.5( E 10.3% Sales Tax a 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 1,050.7E L Total : 11,252.2E .3 Bank total : 404,852.61 N Total vouchers : 404,852.61 0 t E 0 Page: 19 Packet Pg. 41 0 L Q 0. 21 rn r 4 r N O 0 E 2 V C E t V a 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Proiect Title Number Number STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E51FE STIR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 E8FB STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB c SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA E STIR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E41FA d L_ STIR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA 3 WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E51FA rn STIR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA c� SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC U E SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA co v STIR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5C13 WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4J1B 0 STIR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC Q STIR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC r N 0 WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC i WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB E WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA Z STIR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 E7DA O STIR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB STIR 2017 Overlay Program i018 E7CA rn SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA r c SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays i020 E7CC a STIR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA m u_ WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays i019 E7CB ; c WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 E81FA STIR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA v r Q STIR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC STIR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 E8GA Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 42 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Proiect Title Number Number STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 E8FC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 E8JA UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 E8JB WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA STIR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB +N. c STIR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB >' tv WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3JB m L_ STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC $ STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD r_ STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 E8DC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB t STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA U E STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC ca STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 E8CA v STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC 0 STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD Q STIR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB FAC AN Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA STIR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE r N 0 STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB i STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB Z STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA p L PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA a� SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB rn SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB r c STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC 3 STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB m WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5JB u_ STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1 FM CD PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 E5FC r Q STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E41FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA STIR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 43 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E21FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E61FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E31FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E41LA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E51FD WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA STIR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STIR SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STIR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STIR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STIR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC ZA Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 44 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) 4.3.b Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) E3DC W c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c430 SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)� FAC EXB c419 ESCO III Project 2014 Overlay Program . STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STR c453 Train Trench - Concept STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin ItS c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring 2015 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 45 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title ontrols System Upgrades PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STIR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System 2015 Traffic Calming _ N c STIR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program 2015 Waterline Overlays SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays L 3 General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects N Y STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects V Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) v E STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements v C SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study 0 WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Ouffall Pipe Modifications =- Q c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating N 0 FAC E5LA c476 AN Upgrades - Council Chambers L solo Standard Details Updates M M STIRE6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Z i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion o STIRE6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program 'a d 2016 Waterline Overlays N SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays c E61 c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) 3 STIR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan d STIR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades u_ STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program c STM E6FA iol l Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements a STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM E6FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project UTILITIES s013 Utility Rate Update WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 46 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza FAC Band Shell Replacement PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa 2017 Traffic Calming _ N i021 c STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals E i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements > STIR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program L 2017 Waterline Overlays 3 SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall N Y STIR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades V 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program v E STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements v m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization C STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW WDES m013 (Students Saving Salmon) 0 WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement =- Q c276 Dayton Street Plaza as PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration T i027 2018 Traffic Calming N 0 STIR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive L 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements E STIR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program Z 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212thIL o WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays d i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays N STIR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project c i033 ADA Curb Ramps STIR E8DC i037 238th St. Island & Misc Ramps a L u_ s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71stAve Storm Improvements c E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project s t� SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project a E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement UTILITIES E8J13 s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 47 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STIR E1 DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1 FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation STIR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STIR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park WTR E3J13 c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STIR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STIR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STIR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STIR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STIR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STIR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STIR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station ZA Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 48 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study STIR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project c STIR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program E STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects m L_ WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects 3 SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects STIR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System rn STIR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming c� STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) U E WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating co v STIR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project o WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays FAC E5LA c476 AN Upgrades - Council Chambers 0 PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement = Q General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza r N 0 WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications i WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) E STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements Z STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) o STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements IL CD SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II rn STM E6FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs r c SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project a WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project m u_ PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c CD WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement v SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project Q STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays STIR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 49 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project WTR E6J13 i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects STIR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion c STIR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades E STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STIR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program L WTR E7CB i019 2017 Waterline Overlays 3 SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays STIR E7AA i021 2017 Traffic Calming c� STIR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades STIR E7DB i023 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program U E STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals co C� STIR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STIR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming Q STIR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive Q STIR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STIR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program r STIR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th N 0 STIR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i d STIR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays Z SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays o STIRE9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program M 4) STIR E8DC i037 238th St.lsland & Misc. Ramps rn STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration 3 a STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization u_ UTILITIES E5NA solo Standard Details Updates c SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study CD UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update v STIR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Q STIR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study UTILITIES E8J13 s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 50 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC ESCO III Projec FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA FAC Band Shell Replacement MB PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA PRK Waterfront Restoration IFF- WF m103 E7MA PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC wTM1r12th Ave Improvements E51FE & Sierra Stormwater System c484 STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 E8FB STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E61FE STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E51FA STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 E8FA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 E8FC STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1 FM STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 _ E5FC. STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD MTNKLID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salm MMlF7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA �TM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement E1 FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facilit c479 E5FD STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects w E5FB Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 51 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoratio c435 E4FC STIR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC STIR 2014 Chip Seal c451 E4CB STIR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA N c STIR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA E STIR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB STIR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC L STIR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA 3 STIR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 E7DA to STIR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB Y c� STIR 2017 Overlay Program i018 E7CA t STIR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA v E STIR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA v STIR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB C STIR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA STIR2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA Q. STIR220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD Q' Q STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD T STIR 238th St. Island & Misc Ramps i037 E8DC o STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th AveAL 423 _ E3DB ■ i d STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA M �76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 E8CA ■ Z STIR76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA .F o �84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th E8CC aaa STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD STIR 9th Avenue Improvement Project E392 E2AB STIR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE 3 STIR ADA Curb Ramps E8DB L u_ STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB c Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB d E STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA s t� STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancement i026 E7DC tC a STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD MTR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STIR SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB MTR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 52 4.3.b PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STR Train 10 oncept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB c SWR 2013 Sewerline Replac ojec c398 E3GA E SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Projec c441 E4GA m L SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA 3 SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC c to SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA Y SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays i02o E7CC t SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE v E SWR 2018 Sewerline Replaceme c492 E6GC SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 E8GA C ErWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Reha 56 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB 0 _ Q SWR Lake BallingerTrun s011 E5GB C SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC v UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s02o E8JB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA N UTILITIES Utility Rate Update N L WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC WTR 2015 Waterline Overlay M Z WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4J13 o L WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC a WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB t°n WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA 2' WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays iol9 E7CB r 3 WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB y L WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD u_ WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Projec c493 E6JC WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 E8JA s t� WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA Q WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3J13 WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E51KA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 1/30/2019 Packet Pg. 53 4.3.c vchlist 02/08/2019 11:29:32AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2082019 2/8/2019 076380 BETTER PROPERTIES METRO 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun . . ui Feb 2019 ACCT #00397358 4TH AVE PARKIN( c 4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent - FebruE E E 001.000.39.542.64.45.00 417.E Total: 417.6 a a� L Bank total : 417.6� 3 Total vouchers : 417.6 M U a� t U E 2 U 4- 0 �a 0 L Q a r Ob O N O L 3 r c m E U �a a Page: 1 Packet Pg. 54 4.3.d vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun . . ui 0091 US BANK - JANUARY c WELLNESS APPRECIATION LUNCF E 001.000.22.518.10.31.10 288.2( JOB POSTING SUBSCRIPTION a 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 50.0( .(D OFFICE SUPPLIES - INK REFILL 3 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 25.5z c 0091 REFUND FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES MESH MONITOR STAND Y U 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 -44.1- t S MESH MONITOR STAND #2 U 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 -44.1- . 0846 US BANK - JANUARY CRAIGSLIST- JOB POSTINGS - POL c 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 90.0( -@ 1558 NUCS, MONITORS, HARD DRIVES, o Newegg.com - ORICO 7 port USB 3.( a 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 151.7E Q Amazon - ASUS VE228H 21.5" HDMI 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 772.0E Amazon - APC AP9630 UPS Network 4 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 223.3- N Newegg.com - Intel Compute Stick C; c 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 m 579.7E .3 Newegg.com - Intel NUC Barebone S 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 2,213.6z Newegg.com - Samsung 970EVO M., E 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 785.8� u BulkRegister - Domain Name Registn 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 47.0" Q FactoryOutletStore LLC - Jabra PROS 512.000.31.594.18.64.00 314.0, N6P06 Original Dell 6TB 7.2K 3.5" Sf 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 1,060.0( Page: 1 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.d Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) y BulkRegister - Domain Name Registn 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 16.1 E E Intel NUC Barebone System - Qty 5, 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 2,363.1 E a Samsung 970EVO M.2 500GB Intern, 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 822.5E 3 Integrity Global Solution - Cisco 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 155.1( N ACCIS Membership for B Tuley & M C Y U 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 75.0( t SystemTools Software - 1 yr maintem U 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 315.0( . Cisco ASA5505 Power Supply U 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 396.3' c Amazon - Apricorn Aegis Secure Key 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 299.9E o 1683 PASSPORT MAILING LABELS a PASSPORT MAILING LABELS Q- Q 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 127.1( COURT FRONT COUNTER COPY M r' 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 12.5E 4 PROBATION COPY MACHINE B&W N 001.000.23.523.30.45.00 6.2, " 10.3% Sales Tax L 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 1.2E 3 10.3% Sales Tax c 001.000.23.523.30.45.00 0.6z E 1885 POLICE DEPT 2 -1885 2/6/19 U 12 CR123A LITHIUM BATTERIES R 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 52.4E Q MOUTHGUARD FOR MITSUI BLEA 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 33.0, BLEA WRESTLING SHOES - MITSU 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 99.2E Page: 2 Packet Pg. 56 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.d Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) -71 ui 2519 POLICE DEPT CARD 1 -2519 2/6/19 PRA WEBINAR - BROMAN & COLLII E 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 70.0( FED EX -6977 TO WSP CRIME LAB a 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 18.0( FED EX -0429 TO WSP PRINT LAB 3 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 9.1( FED EX -8266 SORENSON FORENc `6 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 95.4� FED EX -9640 TO WSP TOXICOLOC 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 18.2( u FED EX -4725 TO WSP TOXICOLOC E 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 17.2; u FED EX -5250 TO WSP TOXICOLOC o 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 17.2, 'R FED EX -6872 TO WSP PRINT LAB o 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 13.5" a FED EX -0006 TO WSP CRIME LAB Q- 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 2519 CREDIT EDMONDS HARBOR INN C r' Credit for Edmonds Harbor Inn charge 4 001.000.41.521.22.43.00 -3.0( N 3048 THOMPSON CARD -3048 2/6/19 STERICYCLE MONTHLY MINIMUM L 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 10.3E 3 LEMAY MOBILE SHREDDING c 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 14.7E E NYLON SACKS FOR NEW LIFEVES 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 204.2(° SPEER DUTY BOOTS Q 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 209.5" 100 CR123A LITHIUM BATTERIES 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 104.5( NAGARA CONF REG - BROMAN Page: 3 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.d Page: 4 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ui 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 149.0( NAGARA CONF REG - COLLINS E 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 149.0( KC COURT RECORDS a 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 12.4� STERICYCLE PICK UP/DISPOSAL 1 3 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 53.4, KC COURT RECORDS 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 4.9� PAPER, PENS, ENVELOPES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 104.2 � u LEMAY MONTHLY SHREDDING E 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 14.7� E 3048 THOMPSON CARD -3048 01/07/19 E LEMAY SHREDDING - 3 TOTES o 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 �a 14.7� STERICYCLE MIN. MONTHLY FEE o a 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 10.3E Q 3048 CREDIT MEMO -3048 12/06/18 THOI BEACH CAMERA - CAMERA RETUR r' 001.000.41.521.71.35.00 -991.6( 4 BEACH CAMERA - EQUIPT RETURN N 001.000.41.521.71.35.00 -660.7( 3048 THOMPSON CC -3048 12/06/18 L PIXMA PRINTER - ORDERED IN ERI 3 001.000.41.521.71.35.00 660.7( c DURACELL 3V LITHIUM BATTERIES E 001.000.41.521.71.31.00 12.4- 10 16GB USB FLASH DRIVES +a, 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 31.9E Q NEW BALANCE SHOES - BARD 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 143.3' FRANKLIN COVEY PLANNER -MACH 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 27.9E Page: 4 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.d Page: 5 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) -71 ui 3215 COMPAAN CARD -3215 2/6/19 GREAT CONVERSATION EVENT E 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 375.0( 3314 LAWLESS -3314 02/06/19 SHELVES FOR SALLY PORT 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 143.5- 3 FBI-NAA MEMBERSHIP - LAWLESS 001.000.41.521.10.49.00 110.0( `6 WSTOA TEAM DUES Y 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 U 100.0( t CANVA GRAPHICS U 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 1.0( ,E GUN SAFE - STREET CRIMES 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 U 214.9E WSHNA TRAINING - VABLAIS o 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 �a 240.0( IACP MEMBERSHIP - LAWLESS o a 001.000.41.521.10.49.00 210.0( Q CANVA MONTHLY FEE �- 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 12.9,1 r' FIRST RESPONDER WELLNESS -VA 4 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 134.7z N BUSHNELL TRAILCAM DATA PLAN 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 m 9.9� .L 3915 HOPE: NO SMALL PLANS: GRAPHI 3 Hope: No Small Plans: Graphic NOVE c 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 33.0� E Parking Fees - Seattle and Sno Cour 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 36.1 E° 4474 COUNCIL US BANK VISA SUPPLIES Q Office Depot - Staplers for Council 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 40.7� Best Buy Folio for iPad 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 88.2' Page: 5 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.d Page: 6 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) y AWC - Annual Action Days for Neil 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 200.0( E Best Buy Folio and keyboard for iPad 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 142.6( Apple Store - iPad charger _(D 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 20.9E 3 4675 FULL SOURCE: DISCOVERY PROG c FULL SOURCE: DISCOVERY PROG `6 001.000.64.571.23.24.00 302.4- AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: BATTERI 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 19.7� U AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: BINDER! E 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 22.9E u PICKLEBALL CENTRAL: PICKLEBAI o 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 76.0E '@ PUGET SOUND PLANTS: PM PLAN- o 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 183.0E a BAKER CREEK HEIRLOOM SEEDS: Q- Q 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 90.0( PAYPAL: DIANE'S SEEDS: PM FLOV r' 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 8.4E 4 BURPEE SEED CO: PM FLOWER SI N 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 63.0E " AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: COPY PE L 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 9.9E 3 JP PARK SEED: PM FLOWER SEED c 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 150.6" E SELECT SEEDS: PM FLOWER SEEI 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 U 41.4E +° AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: MARKER; Q 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.1( AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: LAPTOP 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 7.6( AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: BINOCULj Page: 6 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.d Page: 7 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 ui 103.8, AMAZON: GYMNASTICS SUPPLIES E 001.000.64.571.28.31.00 18.01 AMAZON: GYMNASTICS: PARTY SL a 001.000.64.571.28.31.00 45.9( AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GLOVES 3 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 41.8E AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GLOVES, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 363.4- AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: CABLE TII 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 116.1- u PAYPAL: INSIDE PASSAGE: PM FLC E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 178.1 u STAPLES: FITNESS SUPPLIES: DIS o 001.000.64.571.27.31.00 121.0E —@ EVENTBRITE: DISCOVERY: STORK/ o 001.000.64.571.23.49.00 10.0( a ZORO: FITNESS SUPPLIES: GYM V\ Q- Q 001.000.64.571.27.31.00 165.1 SNOCO SOLID WASTE: PM MATERI a) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 415.0( 4 OFFICE DEPOT: PM SUPPLIES: HAI N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 23.7( " OFFICE DEPOT: PM OFFICE SUPPI L 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 101.7E 3 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: RECEIP- c 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 16.4, E ISSUU: DIGITAL CRAZE SUBSCRIP- U 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 38.9E +° AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: PENS, C Q 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 107.0 AMAZON: DISCOVERY PROGRAM: 001.000.64.571.23.24.00 289.7, 4787 DAWSON -4787 02/06/19 Page: 7 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.d Page: 8 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ui EDMONDS MUNI COURT DV TEXTE 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 28.0( E LOCKBOX- SOBER HOUS. MED ST( 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 14.8E BUS PASS FOR CLIENT WORK/TRE 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 126.0( 3 GENOA HEALTHCARE - RX FOR CL c 001.000.39.565.40.41.00 17.8, N 4929 DSD SUPPLIES DSD supplies 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 317.4- u Johns - Certificate Renewal- E 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 189.0( u Sit -stand desk - Planning c 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 545.0( '@ Creative Cloud Adobe - Shipley c 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 58.4E a 5923 NATLN MAIN STREET CONF, FACE[ Q- Q National Main Street Conference 001.000.61.558.70.49.00 125.0( r' Diversity Commission Film Series 4 001.000.61.557.20.41.40 60.0( N OfficeSpace content for website Janu c 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 m 100.0( .L Chamber lunch for annual membersh 3 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 15.0( c Diversity Commission Film Series mo E E 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 224.1 u Copying of legislative agenda docum� R 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 90.2( Q 7081 DUAL MONITOR ARMS Dual Monitor Arms 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 110.9� 7483 LEGISLATIVE MEETINGS Page: 8 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.d Page: 9 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ui parking at WA State Capitol 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 14.0( E 8349 ANDERSON CARD -8349 02/06/19 S BACKGROUND INVEST CLASS-SPE a 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 365.0( IAPE MEMBERSHIPS (3) 3 001.000.41.521.11.49.00 150.0( 8349 CREDIT -8349 02/06/19 ANDERSON `6 CREDIT -BACKGROUND INVEST CL Y 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 U -365.0( t 9821 GREENMUN -9821 02/06/19 U COMBAT FIRST AID SUPPLIES E 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 356.5< 2 SD CARDS FOR CAMERAS 4- 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 384.3( o PELICAN 1150 CASES FOR CAMER > 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 969.4< a CAMTASIA SOFTWARE UPGRADE/f Q- Q 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 134.2E TRAVEL INS-GREENMUN TO AZ r' 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 23.6' 4 PELICAN CASES FOR CAMERAS N 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 396.5, c DELTA- GREENMUN - RTARIZONA L 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 334.6( 3 IPHONE CASES/SCREEN PROTEC- c 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 193.7, E FIRST RESPONDER WELLNESS(3) 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 404.2, AIRFARE RT DALLAS - TRYKAR Q 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 432.6- AIRFARE RT ESCONDIDO - MACHA 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 291.1- MRSC - PRA FROM A TO Z - BROMF Page: 9 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 2142019 2/14/2019 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.d Page: 10 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ui 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 125.0( MOTOR LEARNING TEXTOOK - GRI E 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 108.6� BISON LIFE SAFETY GLASSES a 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 42.3< CAR RENTAL - GREENMUN - AZ _(D 3 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 470.1 < MIC & TRIPOD FOR VIDEO RECORI `6 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 198.0E CREATIVE LIGHTING KIT 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 174.2- U HANDCUFF ENGRAVING E 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 59.8� 2 TLO MONTLY CHARGES o 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 61.2, '@ BOSE CONTROL POD o 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 77.1E a ALCOHOL PADS/BANDAIDS - TASEI Q- Q 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 13.4E PELICAN MICROCASES - TASER FI r' 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 164.9( 4 MUSTANG PFD RECHARGE KITS N 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 143.0( " HARDW ICK BOOTS L 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 102.7( Total: 24,952.8E m Bank total : 24,952.8E t U fC Total vouchers : 24,952.8E Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 64 vchlist 02/14/2019 11:13:16AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account Page Amoun Page: 11 Packet Pg. 65 5.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/19/2019 Marsh Study Update from Windward Environmental Staff Lead: Maureen Judge/ Diane Buckshnis Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History The Edmonds Marsh is of considerable pride to the community and is an ecologically unique saltwater marsh, hydrologically connected to the uplands and Puget Sound and is part of many of the City's planning documents, Shoreline Master Program and Critical Area Ordinance. Restoration of the Edmonds Marsh, which includes the Daylighting of Willow Creek, will assist in potential impacts of climate change and sea level rise, as well as stormwater management, educational and scientific education value and should be considered a high priority for completion. From 2011-2016, the City of Edmonds Parks and Recreation Department began a feasibility and then design for the Daylighting of Willow Creek which would assist in restoring the Edmonds Marsh and over $500,000 has been received from federal and local grant dollars for this effort. In 2012 the City Council set aside $200,000 showing a dedication to this environmental asset and in 2017, an additional $100,000 was set aside to further start the funding of this complex project. An ordinance was established creating Fund 017 for the restoration and preservation of the Edmonds Marsh; this will allow citizens to donate funds to be part of the effort of showing ownership in saving our marsh. Funds donated will be tax deductible and will be solely dedicated to our Edmonds Marsh restoration and preservation. In 2017, Council approved the process of obtaining an independent contractor to provide a scientific study as part of the SMP process of understanding this native wildlife preserve and providing information regarding wildlife habitat, vegetation and a variety of other issues. Windward Environmental LLC (Windward) was selected and they began an 18-month scientific study in April 2018. The tasks were not meant to be done in the sequential process and a copy of the schedule is found in attachment A: Final Project Schedule Table Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Windward is presenting a Marsh Study field update to the Council as a whole for review and comment. Attachments: Attachment A_FINAL project sched table_3_21_18 Packet Pg. 66 5.1 Edmonds Marsh Presentation Feb 192019 Packet Pg. 67 5.1.a ,Table 2. Project schedule Project Task/Milestone Estimated Initiation Date Estimated Completion Date Kick-off Meeting with City Council January 1, 2018 February 27, 2018 Contract Approval by City Council March 27, 2018 Task 1: Baseline Analysis - develop monitoring study work plan Prepare draft work plan May 7, 2018 June 1, 2018 City review of work plan June 4, 2018 June 15, 2018 Revise work plan per City comments June 18, 2018 June 29, 2018 Task 1: Baseline Analysis - field effort one field event per quarter for a year July 2018 June 2019 Task 1: Baseline Analysis - data report Prepare draft data report July 1, 2019 August 2, 2019 City review of data report August 5, 2019 August 16, 2019 Revise data report per City comments August 19, 2019 August 30, 2019 Task 2: Evaluation of Wetland Buffers Prepare draft deliverables April 9, 2018 May 4, 2018 City review of deliverables May 7, 2018 May 18, 2018 Revise deliverables per City comments May 21, 2018 June 1, 2018 Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information Meet with City and prepare draft deliverables (text and map) October 1, 2018 October 19, 2018 City review of draft deliverables October 22, 2018 November 2, 2018 Revise deliverables per City comments November 5, 2018 November 16, 2018 Task 4: Analyze Impacts from Daylighting Willow Creek using REA/HEA model Develop model and draft tech memo March 4, 2019 March 29, 2019 City review of draft tech memo April 1, 2019 April 12, 2019 Revise tech memo per City comments April 15, 2019 April 26, 2019 Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project Impacts Draft tech memo July 30, 2018 August 24, 2018 City review of draft tech memo August 27, 2018 September 14, 201 Revise tech memo per City comments September 17, 2018 September 28, 2018 Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed Management Study Meet with City and draft tech memo May 1, 2019 May 31, 2019 City review of draft tech memo June 3, 2019 June 14, 2019 Revise tech memo per City comments June17, 2019 June 28, 2019 Final meetings, presentation, document revisions August 1, 2019 August 30, 2019 Project completion September 13, 2019 Q Packet Pg. 68 WMnaar,d „ environmen Edmonds Marsh Study Project Update Presented by Windward Environmental LLC to the Edmonds City Council / February 19, 2019 5.1.b Packet Pg. 69 5.1.b Status of Study Tasks Cn L Evaluation of Buffer Widths and Ecological Functions: A Review ` to Support the Edmonds Marsh Study (completed) Initial Evaluation of Edmonds Marsh and Shellabarger Marsh Buffer Zones (completed) 2019 Shoreline Master Program update (mostly complete) Edmonds Marsh Baseline Monitoring Study (underway) Willow Creek Daylighting project impacts (to be initiated) Vegetation enhancement project impacts and opportunities (not yet initiated) Long-term watershed management study planning/preparation (to be initiated) Packet Pg. 70 5.1.b Purpose of Baseline Monitoring Study Document current conditions within the Marsh and its buffer areas. Evaluate the ecological functions being provided by these habitats. Help identify restoration opportunities, such as vegetation enhancements. Coordinate with stakeholders and provide overview of data and information being collected by other groups. Packet Pg. 71 5.1.b Baseline Monitoring Study - a year of data collection Soil and sediment characteristics Water quality and depths Vegetation surveys Invertebrate surveys Wildlife surveys Photographic surveys Packet Pg. 72 Soil and Sediment Characteristics I 1'0 r P rolecr. 3mpl erg j Packet Pg. 73 O N d LL C O Cu C d W a Q T v .... . . . . . . . . Salinity and Depth Measurements with Deployed Data Loggers cn N L C� C r O 1.6 r 0 N rn I N LL I C O t+ d N P L a t N L CM C N C O W C d L v R Q Packet Pg. 75 5.1.b 2 s L 3 � • fV , IO1 � .'��5 ii ai C ,ors '+,. • ac r � t T �i J 9. Packet Pg. -I " tr y= .. OP � Al: « �u-.> Bushuell) -d r p IA I ere Bushuell Im 12.34 PM 08/18/18 87F P STEAL Photographic Surveys - Photo Stations All a� Cn L C� G r O .N NN� r 0 N m I a� LL I C O R C d N d d L N L C C O E W ■ V Packet Pg. 80 Baseline Monitoring Study Community Involvement ;;iirp 10 Members - 55 Pholos - 4 Discussions Overview Discussions Photos Members Map Photo pool View 55 photos Q I?�7� 4[) Packet Pg. 81 Q 5.1.b 1.111e1section with the Edmonds Marsh �storation/Willow Creek Daylighting Project Packet Pg. 82 Conceptual Designs Provide the General in... 25 f;x• ii 12 5 24 B 13 5 r. 15"1 fA 22 " if} Kle 2D ig & hand Isu aching 26 ft r # 21 cn From: Marina Beach Park Master Plan, Walker I Macy 2015 C 0 M Packet Pg. 83 0 N d LL C 0 Cu C m a t a C 0 W E r Q ... Later Engineering Design Details swan a: w b 1 c t o-M o•so I � itlF !� Q 'ry - 0 E-C b L-`an Ln� fm ,I OHL.e-Lb41ti< - b � 1� 0 o o :u •o FIGURE 1.6 - WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING STREAM BEACH From: Marina Beach Park Master Plan, Walker I Macy 2015 s Provide mf�r. cCsn.. +.rl- oo-ll. M'-' IFO iIL IY�Ll RYI' CF .LLIOI.ENT CMTMS 5.1.b the Packet Pg. 84 Cn r O N O� N LL C O E w C d E t V R a+ a+ Q 5.1.b Questions? Packet Pg. 85 r Q 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/19/2019 Crumb Rubber Moratorium Extension Public Hearing Staff Lead: Maureen Judge/Adrienne Fraley-Monillas Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History At the Council meeting on 2/12/19, the Council voted to extend the crumb rubber moratorium; this required public hearing will allow for more discussion on the moratorium. The City Council adopted the first ordinance 4013 on December 8th, 2015 prohibiting certain installations of SBR until July 11, 2017. The City Council extended this prohibition of SBR installations on April 11, 2017; this extension expired on February 28, 2018. The City Council extended this prohibition of SBR (styrene-butadiene rubber) installations on February 20, 2018; this extension expired on August 15, 2018. The City Council extended this prohibition of SBR (styrene-butadiene rubber) installations on August 21, 2018; this extension expires on February 21, 2019. Staff Recommendation Council to discuss and give staff their recommendation. Narrative The Council's intent has been to extend this prohibition of SBR (styrene-butadiene rubber) until the Federal study was completed and a report issued. On February 12, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) launched a multi - agency Federal Research Action Plan on Recycled Tire Crumb Used on Playing Fields and Playgrounds to study key environmental and human health questions. The draft report on the Federal Research Action Pan on Recycled Tire Crumb Used on Playing Fields and Playgrounds (FRAP) was sent for external peer - review in May 2018; the US EPA and CDC/ATSDR are currently working to address peer review comments. The first part summarizing the Tire Crumb Rubber Characterization Study will be released for public comment in early 2019. In addition, the Council was monitoring the OEHHA Synthetic Turf Study from California. An overview of the study contained in the May 25, 2018 meeting materials, and attached hereto as Exhibit A, indicates that the final task, entitled "Task 7. Human Health Risk Assessment," is expected to be completed in mid-2019. Attachments: Ordinance 4142 Exhibit A - CA overview Packet Pg. 86 7.1.a and ORDINANCE NO.4142 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION OF THE INSTALLATION OF STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER (ALSO KNOWN AS SBR OR "CRUMB RUBBER") ON PUBLICLY - OWNED ATHLETIC FIELDS WITHIN THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR AN ADDITIONAL SIX MONTHS. WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4013 on December 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 4013 prohibited certain installations of SBR until July 11, 2017; WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4065.1 on April 11, 2017, which extended the sunset date of the prohibitions set forth in Ordinance 4013 until February 28, 2018; and WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4097 on February 20, 2018, which extended the sunset date of the prohibition set forth in Ordinance 4013 until August 15, 2018; and WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4125 on August 21, 2018, which extended the sunset date of the prohibition set forth in Ordinance 4013 another six months until February 21, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council intended for additional analysis to be done during the prohibition period to determine whether the duration of the prohibition should be extended; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) launched a multi - agency Federal Research Action Plan on Recycled Tire Crumb Used on Playing Fields and Playgrounds to study key environmental and human health questions; and WHEREAS, the draft report on the Federal Research Action Pan on Recycled Tire Crumb Used on Playing Fields and Playgrounds (FRAP) was sent for external peer -review in May 2018; and 1 Packet Pg. 87 7.1.a WHEREAS, the US EPA and CDC/ATSDR are currently working to address peer review comments; and WHEREAS, the agencies plan to release the report in two parts; and WHEREAS, the first part summarizing the Tire Crumb Rubber Characterization Study will be released for public comment in early 2019; WHEREAS, currently, CDC/ATSDR is initiating a full biomonitoring study to investigate potential exposure to constituents in tire crumb rubber infill. The information from the biomonitoring study will be released for public comment, along with information collected as part of the FRAP Exposure Characterization Study, at a later date; and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) is also conducting a study on synthetic turf and potential human health impacts; and WHEREAS, the Synthetic Turf Scientific Advisory Panel is a group of expert scientists that the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has convened to provide scientific advice on its Synthetic Turf Study; and WHEREAS, the Panel advises OEHHA on study plans, data interpretation, and reporting of study results; and WHEREAS, the goal of the OEHHA study is to assess the potential health impact associated with the use of synthetic turf and playground mats made of crumb rubber; and WHEREAS, the Panel met on May 25, 2018; and WHEREAS, an overview of the study contained in the May 25, 2018 meeting materials, and attached hereto as Exhibit A, indicates that the final task, entitled "Task 7. Human Health Risk Assessment," is expected to be completed in mid-2019; and WHEREAS, given the ongoing nature of this significant research effort, the city council would like to extend the prohibition originally adopted in Ordinance 4013 for an additional six months; and 2 Packet Pg. 88 7.1.a WHEREAS, it is possible that the city council will want to extend the prohibition again depending on the status of these ongoing research efforts and the findings that they might generate; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of Ordinance 4013, the City of Seattle, as a pilot project, has replaced the SBR material at its Bobby Morris Playfield with an infill made from cork; and WHEREAS, Seattle's pilot project will test the durability, safety, playability, maintainability and environmental health of the cork turf infill material; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds School District has a pending building permit application before the City related to a project known as the Edmonds-Woodway High School Synthetic Turf Conversion; and WHEREAS, the field infill material is not part of the building permit review nor any of the associated land use permits, which were previously approved; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds School District has obtained alternative bids related to the infill material for this project so that it would be able to evaluate the price difference between an SBR infill and a cork infill; and WHEREAS, news reports indicate that the Edmonds School District intends to await the conclusion of the 2019 baseball season to start its construction of this project; and WHEREAS, the safety of SBR is still be studied by and is of great concern to the Edmonds City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to Section 2 of this ordinance: A. SBR. "SBR" is an athletic field material consisting of recycled tires consisting of styrene-butadiene rubber. It is commonly known as "crumb rubber." It is used as an infill material and/or as a base layer under the infill. 3 Packet Pg. 89 7.1.a B. Publicly -owned athletic fields. A "publicly -owned athletic field" is an athletic field owned by a city, county, school district, port district, hospital district, other special purpose district or government entity. Section 2. SBR Prohibition. For as long as this ordinance remains in effect, it shall be unlawful to: A. Install SBR on publicly -owned athletic fields already existing within the City of Edmonds if those fields have not already been converted to an SBR composition; B. Install SBR on new public -owned athletic fields within the City of Edmonds; C. Install SBR on existing publicly -owned SBR athletic fields within the City of Edmonds as part of a substantial renovation of such existing SBR fields, PROVIDED THAT, for maintenance purposes, infill top dressing of existing SBR fields shall be allowed as needed to keep an appropriate amount of the fiber exposed and to maintain proper infill depth. Section 3. Additional Analysis. During the above -described prohibition, city council intends to: A. Monitor the status of ongoing and new research into the health effects of SBR, including but not limited to the significant studies being performed by the federal government and the state of California; B. Conduct a public hearing to determine whether this ordinance should be extended when there is sufficient new information to warrant a public hearing. Section 4. Sunset. Unless the effective duration of this ordinance is shortened or extended by a subsequently adopted ordinance, the provisions of this ordinance shall be null, void, and of no force and effect after August 21, 2019. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 6. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published by an approved summary consisting of the title. 2 Packet Pg. 90 7.1.a Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance. APPROVED: - P, - . MA OR DAVE hARLING ATTESPAUTHENTICATED: Z5; " C CLE K. StOfThASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: February 8, 2019 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: February 12, 2019 PUBLISHED: February 15, 2019 EFFECTIVE DATE: March 14, 2019 ORDINANCE NO.: 4142 5 Packet Pg. 91 7.1.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4142 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 12th day of February, 2019, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 4142. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, EXTENDING THE PROHIBITION OF THE INSTALLATION OF STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBER (ALSO KNOWN AS SBR OR "CRUMB RUBBER") ON PUBLICLY -OWNED ATHLETIC FIELDS WITHIN THE CITY OF EDMONDS FOR AN ADDITIONAL SIX MONTHS. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 13t" day of February, 2019. CI CLERK, SCOMT-T�ASSEY R Packet Pg. 92 Office of Environmental Health Hazar nt California Environmental Prot 7.1.b y 0 Jun 2015 Task 2. Chemicals of Potential Concern Identification Synthetic Turf Study Overview Task 1. Expert, Public, and Interagency Consultation and Input I Chemical Properties & Toxicity Literature Review I Task 3. Exposure Scenario Development Study I Task 4. Field and Playground Sample Collection and Analysis I Task 5. Biomonitoring/Personal Monitoring Prdtocol Development Task 7. Human Health Risk Assessment Jan Jan Jan Jun Jan Mid 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 2019 Today May 25, 2018 Synthetic Turf Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting Packet Pg. 93 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/19/2019 WWTP Phase 6 Energy Conservation Project - Carbon Recovery Full Design Staff Lead: Phil Williams, Public Works Director Department: Public Works & Utilities Preparer: Pamela Randolph Background/History On April 10th, 2018, the Parks and Public Works Committee reviewed the project and recommended it be placed on the April 17th City Council agenda for presentation, discussion, and action. On April 17th, 2018, the City Council approved the predesign effort. The work was completed on time and within budget during 2018. City Council authorized funding for the design of the WWTP Phase 6 Energy Conservation Project - Carbon Recovery in the 2019 budget. Staff Recommendation For City Council to authorize the Mayor to sign the funding agreement with the Washington State Department of Enterprise Services for $2,126,352. Narrative The Wastewater Treatment Plant currently utilizes a Sanitary Sewage Sludge Incinerator (SSI) to combust solids before final disposal to the landfill. The SSI and all of its support equipment were originally installed 30 years ago and will need to be replaced in approximately 5-7 years due to current federal air quality regulations. In addition, several major components of this system are no longer supported, which makes repairs very costly. The current system is inefficient in terms of electrical usage and requires additional supplemental fuel oil daily to begin the combustion process. It does not recover any usable byproducts, thus increasing the City's carbon footprint. In addition, EPA has imposed new, very stringent regulatory requirements which makes compliance virtually impossible. The increased cost for regulatory compliance alone (sampling, testing and reporting) exceeds $125,000 per year. City Council Resolution No. 1389, which commits to achieving or exceeding, at the local level, the goals established in the Paris Climate Accord, adds additional motivation to begin development of the next generation biosolids processing and disposal system for our regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Initial research, technical information requests and evaluation (established via an RFQ process which included proposers from across the USA) have lead us to a new technology that we are confident will meet the goal and intent of Resolution No. 1389. It will significantly reduce operating, regulatory and disposal expense to Wastewater Treatment rate payers. Equipment must fit within the existing footprint of the Plant and allow for full redundancy and reliability. Packet Pg. 94 8.1 The best available and most energy -efficient technology we have found involves a two-step process - sludge drying and pyrolysis. This two-step process creates a Class A dried product and a "biochar," which are well established green renewable products that negate the "cradle to grave" risks associated with biosolids. The process is considered "net zero" or energy neutral, and the biochar byproduct can be used in City parks and/or marketed as a soil conditioner or amendment. To reduce financial and operational risks and build upon the recent success of prior energy -related projects, we are proposing use of an Energy Savings Performance (ESP) contract through the State Energy Program to develop this project. ESP projects are delivered with guaranteed not -to -exceed pricing, guaranteed performance of the new systems and guaranteed energy savings that are measured and verified. This approach has demonstrated a significant impact on our efficiency, resulting in a declining trend in energy use at the Plant and reduction of our carbon footprint, despite growing connected population and demands on our Wastewater system. City staff have applied for grant funding from the Department of Commerce Clean Energy Fund 3 (CEF 3) for new technologies, innovative approach and advancing bioenergy. Our request for $2,000,000 toward project costs has advanced to the second round of technical evaluation. Award decisions are expected by April 30t", 2019. With the completion of the scope of work and contract with the Department of Enterprise Services (DES), the City will be presented with a final design package and the guaranteed "not -to -exceed" construction cost. This cost includes regulatory permit (PSCAA, Ecology) applications, building permit applications and a detailed cost-effectiveness evaluation (detailed within the scope of work). The final design package and guaranteed not -to -exceed cost would be the basis for the City Council's decision on implementation. The 2019 budget authorization of $2,434,187 was requested and approved for this continuing effort. The contract with DES is based on the attached Scope of Work developed by Ameresco, which is proposed for $2,126,352. DES, while providing oversight of the contract, will not charge a fee for their services during design. If the fully designed construction project is authorized, an agreement for construction services with DES will be included in the final construction proposal. Attachments: 2019178Afndcp 2019178Aagrcp Edmonds WWTP_Carbon Recovery_Audit Proposal —Rev A.2 Packet Pg. 95 8.1.a v'J, `2ti STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ENTERPRISE SERVICES 1500 Jefferson Si. SE, Olympia, WA 98501 PO Box 41476, Olympia, WA 98504-1476 January 29, 2019 TO: Pamela Randolph, Manager, Wastewater Treatment Plant City of Edmonds FROM: Curtis Pate, Contracts Specialist, (360) 407-7913 Engineering & Architectural Services RE Agreement No. 2019-178 A (1) Phase 6B, Wastewater Treatment Plant Carbon Recovery IAA No. K5211 Ameresco Incorporated SUBJECT: Funding Approval The Dept. of Enterprise Services (DES), Energy Program, requires funding approval for the above referenced contract documents. The amount required is as follows; ESCO Audit Phase 6 — Carbon Recovery $2,126,352.00 Total Funding $2,126,352.00 In accordance with the provisions of RCW 43.88, the signature affixed below certifies to the DES Energy Program that the above identified funds are appropriated, allotted or that funding will be obtained from other sources available to the using client/agency. The using/client agency bears the liability for any issues related to the funding for this project By Name / Title Date Please sign and return this form to E&AS. If you have any questions, please call me. 2019178Afndcp Packet Pg. 96 8.1.b ENERGY SERVICES AUTHORIZATION NO. 2019-178 A (1) Detailed Investment Grade Energy Audit & Energy Services Proposal Agreement City of Edmonds Phase 613 Wastewater Treatment Plant — Carbon Recovery January 29, 2019 MASTER ENERGY SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. 2017-193 A (1) The Owner and the Energy Services Company (ESCO) named below do hereby enter into this Authorization under terms described in the following sections: Authorization to Proceed Compensation for Energy Services I. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED: Energy Services Company: Ameresco Incorporated 222 Williams Avenue South, Suite 100 Renton, Washington 98057-2154 Telephone No. (206) 522-4270 Fax No. (425) 687-3173 E-Mail Address emartino(kameresco.com Project Conditions Owner: lq�\ City of Edmond acting through th Departure,^f Enterprise Services, Engineers Architectural Services PO kx 41476 Ol i Washington 98504-1476 Telep ne No. (360) 902-7272 By <<e Name Title Date State of Washington tor's License No. State of WashingWn Rev nue Registration No. Federal Tax Ide ti i ation No. MWBE Gertificati No. LO-Z Name William J. Frare, PE. Title Assistant Director Date AMEREI*004PZ 602 062 980 04-3512838 II. COMPENSATION FOR ENERGY SERVICES: Basic Services COMPENSATION Energy Audit and Energy Services Proposal $ 2,126,352.00 Grand Total (plus WSST as applicable) $ 2,126,352.00 Authorization No. 2019-178 A (1) Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 97 8.1.b III. PROJECT CONDITIONS: The Project Conditions contained in the Master Energy Services Agreement will be used unless specifically changed herein. The cost effectiveness criteria for this project are per the Ameresco Incorporated proposal dated January 24, 2019. IV. SCOPE OF WORK: Per the ESCO proposal dated January 24, 2019, conduct a Detailed Investment Grade Energy Audit of City of Edmonds, Wastewater Treatment Plant, to identify cost effective energy conservation measures and present a written Energy Services Proposal, i luding all energy audit documentation. The ESCO shall prepare the final Energy Sery Proposal, detailing the actual energy services and ESCO equipment to be vide , energy savings and cost guarantees, measurement and verification plans, and co is 'oning plans for the proposed measures. Measures will include items that save en rgy, er and other resources. The Cost Effectiveness Criteria for this project shall be ablished in the Master Energy Services Agreement or as modified in Section III abo V. SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION N'%'/ Final completion of the Energy Audit and Energy Sery s roposal within 241 calendar days after Authorization to Proceed. 2019178Aagrcp ,R-- '�/ 1� IL041 Authorization No. 2019-178 A (1) Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 98 8.1.c AMERESCO Green • Clean • Sustainable (41 222 Williams Avenue South, Suite 100 Renton, WA 98057 P: 206 522 4270 F: 425 687 3171 ameresco.com January 24, 2019 Mr. Butch Boles Department of Enterprise Services 1500 Jefferson Street SE PO Box 41012 Olympia, WA 98504-1401 SUBJECT: Energy Audit Fee Proposal City of Edmonds — Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 6B - Carbon Recovery Project Final Design Documents, Regulatory Agencies Review and Permitting Applications Dear Butch: The previous Phase 6A Audit included a "request for qualifications (RFQ) for equipment and technologies for the processing of biosolids" with an owner evaluation and selection process facilitated by Ameresco. It also included the preparation of the project Engineering Report in conformance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) requirements. The Engineering Report was submitted to Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) on December 21st, 2018. The Engineering Report is currently in review at Ecology. The Engineering Report included Preliminary Design Drawings, preliminary equipment selection and cutsheets, basis of design (BOD), code and permitting requirements, and the temporary solids handling review. The result of those efforts also produced the budgetary costs for engineering, regulatory, permitting and construction of the selected equipment and systems. We are pleased to submit this proposal for the audit and design phase of the City of Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 6B — Carbon Recovery Project Energy Efficiency Upgrades. Ameresco will provide engineering services for the subject project in accordance with the following: Engineering Services A. Phase B Audit Services will include: Ameresco will undertake an Energy Audit of the Facilities. The Energy Audit will identify cost effective Energy Conservation Measures (ECM's). Ameresco will present to the Owner a written Energy Services Proposal, including the Energy Audit Documentation. The Energy Services Proposal will set forth at least the following: 1) A description of the systems which will receive ESCO Equipment and ESCO Services; 2) The Cost -Effective ECM's to be installed or caused to be installed by Ameresco and a description of the ECM's analyzed but disqualified under the cost effectiveness criteria; 3) The services that Ameresco will perform on or in the Facility, including but not limited to engineering, construction management, the operations and maintenance procedures for use on ESCO Equipment, training for Facility personnel, providing warranty service, and equipment maintenance; Edmonds WWTP Phase 6B ESCO - Carbon Recovery — Final Design Page 2 of 8 4) The Maximum Allowable Project Cost, itemized in detail; 5) Recommendations for replacement of Existing Equipment, along with recommendations for improvements to Existing Equipment and Operating Conditions; 6) The Baseline Energy Consumption for the identified systems, computed from monitoring building systems for 2-4 weeks and annualizing with historical data and including the data, methodology and variables used to compute the Baseline, and the Baseline calendar period which will not be less than twelve (12) months; 7) The estimated Energy Savings and Energy Cost Savings that are expected to result from the installation of Ameresco Equipment and from Ameresco Service, and an explanation of the method used to make the estimate; 8) The method by which Energy Savings and Energy Cost Savings will be calculated during the term of the Energy Services Agreement; 9) A description of how Ameresco will finance its acquisition of Equipment and when title to the Equipment will pass to the Owner; 10) A description of how the Energy Cost Savings will be guaranteed by Ameresco; 11) A description of how Ameresco proposes to be compensated; 12) The term of the Energy Services Agreement; 13) The Termination Value for each year during the term of the Energy Services Agreement; 14) The schedule for project completion; 15) The nature and extent of work and equipment that Ameresco anticipates it will receive from other firms under sub -contract; 16) Preliminary measurement & verification (M&V) plan: Ameresco will provide on -going measurement and verification to help ensure the predicted savings are achieved throughout the first 1 year of the agreement. Post installation Measurement and Verification (M&V) will be performed based on the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) — Option A (Retrofit Isolation -Key Parameter Measurement), and on Section IX — Method of Calculating Energy Savings and Energy Cost Savings. Ameresco will attend one annual meeting to review the Measurement & Verification results and reconcile energy savings. 17) Final Design Documents: Ameresco proposes to provide fully developed and customer - reviewed 100% design drawings to obtain contractor cost estimates, for permitting application and to develop project costs that would be used in the Energy Services Proposal. This would provide funding to perform in-house design as well as hire design sub -consultants for wastewater, mechanical, electrical, structural, architectural, controls, process design and regulatory research such as Department of Ecology and PSCAA air permitting. The Design package becomes the property of the client regardless of the decision to proceed with the construction project. (Identified as item B in fee schedule below.) a) Phase B design includes the detailed design for the installation of the selected process equipment and its integration into the existing WWTP process, building mechanical systems and WWTP building electrical systems. The design will place the new equipment in the existing incinerator building structure and a new "pyrolysis" building. b) Phase B design efforts will produce 100% design drawings for the installation of the (3) P- 5 pyrolysis units, (1) biosolids belt dryer, and ancillary equipment and its integration into the existing WWTP process; as well as the code review, permit feasibility analysis, and construction sequencing analysis. Packet Pg. 100 Edmonds WWTP Phase 6B ESCO - Carbon Recovery — Final Design Page 3 of 8 c) Our primary design consultant (BHC Consultants) will provide engineering design services as well as project management and design team coordination. During the project, the BHC Project Manager will supervise and coordinate the design team, coordinate with Ameresco and the City, communicate project status and prepare monthly invoices; BHC will subcontract with: i) FSi Consulting Engineers (FSi) for HVAC, plumbing, fire suppression, and emission stack design; ii) Coal Creek Environmental Associates, LLC (CCEA) for technical support during permitting and for the preparation of the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) permit application with associated supporting technical documentation; iii) Parametrix for controls design, supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) design, controls integration and programming, input/output (10) design and 10 demolition design iv) KPG for the architectural design of the new Pyrolysis Building and for architectural modifications to the existing Headworks and Solids Processing Building. d) 30% Design Engineering - includes the development of 30% Design Drawings for the installation of selected equipment from Phase 6A. The 30% Design Drawings will show equipment sizing, layout, and configuration. i) Design drawings review workshop with Owner/DES/Ameresco/Design Team. ii) Four design team workshops on -site at the WWTP. iii) City review comments on the 30% Design Drawings. iv) Site Survey engineering support. Deliverables: v) Dept. of Ecology Draft Engineering Report comment response letter. vi) 30% Design Drawings in PDF format (half and full-size). vii) 30% Design Drawing Review Workshop meeting minutes. viii) Design Workshop(s) meeting minutes. ix) Draft and Final site survey request. e) 60% Design Engineering - includes the development of 60% Design Drawings for the installation of selected equipment from Phase 6A. The 60% Design Drawings will show equipment sizing, layout, and configuration. i) Design drawings review workshop with Owner/DES/Ameresco/Design Team. ii) Four design team workshops on -site at the WWTP. iii) City review comments on the 60% Design Drawings. Deliverables: iv) 60% Design Drawings in PDF format (half and full-size). v) 60% Design Drawing Review Workshop meeting minutes. vi) Design Workshop(s) meeting minutes. vii) Contractor Site Walk and Constructability Review meeting minutes. f) 75% Design Engineering - includes the development of 75% Design Drawings for the installation of selected equipment from Phase 6A. The 75% Design Drawings will show general equipment sizing, layout, and configuration within the Incinerator Room. The 75% Design Drawings will include general, demolition, process mechanical, structural, electrical, plumbing, fire suppression, HVAC, and instrumentation drawings. 75% Design Drawings will be prepared to the level of detail required for the Contractor and Ameresco to prepare a reasonably accurate total maximum guaranteed project cost. i) Design drawings review workshop with Owner/DES/Ameresco/Design Team. ii) City review comments on the 75% Design Drawings. Deliverables: iii) 75% Design Drawings in PDF format (half and full-size). iv) 75% Design Drawing Review Workshop meeting minutes. Packet Pg. 101 0 Edmonds WWTP Phase 6B ESCO - Carbon Recovery — Final Design Page 4 of 8 g) Permit Set and Final Design Drawings - includes the development of Permit Set Drawings and Final Design Drawings for the installation of selected equipment and systems. Development of Permit Set Drawings incorporating Ameresco, City, and Contractor comments on the 75% Design Drawings. BHC will finalize equipment sizing and layouts with equipment manufacturers. BHC and its subconsultants will prepare general (G), demolition (D), civil (C), architectural (A), structural (S), process mechanical (M), HVAC (H), plumbing (PL), fire suppression (F), electrical (E), and instrumentation (1) drawings as part of this task. A total of up to 157 drawings will be provided as part of this task. The Permit Set Drawings will be prepared to a level sufficient for the City's Building Department code review. Development of Final Design Drawings incorporating City Building Department review comments. BHC and its subconsultants will prepare general (G), demolition (D), civil (C), architectural (A), structural (s), process mechanical (M), HVAC (H), plumbing (PL), fire suppression (F), electrical (E), and instrumentation (1) drawings as part of this task. i) Design drawings review workshop with Owner/DES/Ameresco/Design Team. ii) City review comments on the 60% Design Drawings. Deliverables: iii) Permit Set Design Drawings in PDF format (half and full-size). iv) Final (100%) Design Drawings in PDF format (half and full-size). h) Permitting and Engineering Support - includes engineering support for permitting required by the project. i) Regulatory Agency Planning Meetings. Attendance for two (2) engineers at up to four (4) regulatory agency meetings to be located at the City WWTP. ii) PSCAA Permitting Engineering Support. Provide engineering support including equipment layout and sizing criteria for the successful application of the amended WWTP air permit through PSCAA. BHC will coordinate and support CCEA as the lead in this effort. iii) City Permits Engineering Support. Provide engineering support for the preparation of applicable City -required permits for approval to construct the project herein. iv) SEPA Engineering Support. Provide engineering support for the preparation of the final SEPA checklist. Provide engineering support to address public comments. Attendance for two (2) engineers at one public meeting for up to six (6) hours. Deliverables: v) PSCAA Permit application figures and drawings derived from the deliverables in Tasks d), e), f) and g) above. Conservation measures will include items that save energy, water or other resources (including various operational cost savings measures associated with operating the existing biosolids incinerator). The Energy Audit will provide detailed documentation of fieldwork for the audit, calculation input and output in support of the recommendations made in the Energy Services Proposal, economic and engineering assumptions, sketches, floor plans and any other information developed in the course of the Audit. Cost Effectiveness Criteria It is understood that the cost effectiveness criteria for this project is as follows: Future post -project cash flow, including utility bill savings, maintenance and operational savings, and financing costs will be neutral or positive with respect to pre -project cash flow, assuming a finance term of no more than 25 years and an annual energy cost escalation of 1.5%. Packet Pg. 1 2 8.1.c Edmonds WWTP Phase 6B ESCO - Carbon Recovery — Final Design Page 5 of 8 2. The selected Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) will be evaluated as a bundle in determining whether or not they meet the cost-effectiveness criteria. 3. The total cost of implementing the ECMs will include the cost of the investment grade audit, design, labor and materials, construction management, DES fees, ESCO fees, bonding, permits, taxes, and other costs that may be agreed to. 4. All utility rebates, State grants, or other rebates and grants associated with the proposed bundle of ECMs will be deducted from the cost of implementing them before determining their cost-effectiveness. No more than 90% of the energy cost savings and 100% of the maintenance and operational cost savings (purchased parts and service contracts, but not internal labor costs) will be used for the purpose of determining cost-effectiveness. Ameresco does not guarantee the maintenance cost savings. The finance period for the proposed bundle of ECMs may not exceed their average useful life. If Ameresco develops a project that meets the cost effectiveness criteria, the client is responsible for the full amount of the audit; the item A "Energy Audit" fee can either be rolled into the construction contract or be paid in full by the client. Should the developed project not meet the cost effectiveness criteria, the City would still be responsible for the costs of the detailed design, item B) below. Fee for Engineering Services: A. Basis and amount: Fixed Fee for Services A) Energy Audit: $191,032 B) Final Design & Regulatory Permitting Support: i. BHC Consultants $1,547,300 ii. Equipment Team Support / Constructability $363,020 C) Permit Fee Estimate $25,000 D) TOTAL: $2,126,352 It is understood by Ameresco that payment and terms are contingent upon the requirements set forth in the Energy Services Proposal. Furthermore, it is understood by Ameresco that item B "Final Design" is a deliverable that becomes the property of the City and that Ameresco shall be paid $1,910,320 upon delivery of the Final Design package. Schedule for Engineering Services: The Energy Audit will be complete by September 15th, 2019. Construction cost estimating results of the audit are intended to be provided to Edmonds in mid -July so that scope and costs can be evaluated and adjusted as necessary by early August. To meet this schedule, Ameresco would use '60-75% working drawings' created by BHC to develop cost estimates. Completion of the final design drawings by BHC for "Phase 2 Design" is projected for December 15th, 2019, but will depend on timely review by the City at various stages along the design schedule. Invoicing: Invoicing for item A (should the project meet the cost effectiveness criteria) would depend upon the client's choice whether to pay as services are delivered or defer the audit fee to the construction contract. Packet Pg. 103 Edmonds WWTP Phase 6B ESCO - Carbon Recovery — Final Design Page 6 of 8 Invoicing for items B and C would be on a progress basis as costs are incurred by the ESCO. We at Ameresco, Inc. appreciate the opportunity to provide these services. If this proposal for Audit Services is satisfactory, please forward contract documents. Sincerely, Ame sco, Inc. L Grant A. Thorsland Regional Manager - Northwest Attachments: Fee Proposal, Conservation Measure Lists Exhibit A — BHC Consultants Scope of Work Exhibit B — BHC Consultants Design Budget Calculation Packet Pg. 104 8.1.c Edmonds WWTP Phase 613 ESCO - Carbon Recovery — Final Design Page 7of8 Project: Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 6B - Carbon Recovery Project - 2019 Design & Permitting Date: 1/23/2019 Hourly Summary: TASK Field/Audit Analysis/Calculations Evaluation of ECMs Report Write-up Customer Presentation Travel Total Hours: Hourly Rate: Estimated Fee for Services Field Audit Project Construction Project Technician / Admin. Manager Manager Engineer TAB / Cx Assistant Total Hours 170 189 104 55 0 518 170 40 165 0 14 389 82 27 82 0 0 191 75 15 27 0 0 117 55 55 24 0 14 147 68 82 34 14 0 198 621 407 436 68 27 1559 $ 130 $ 120 $ 120 $ 105 $ 75 $ 80,669 $ 48,882 $ 52,275 $ 7,160 $ 2,046 $ 191,032 Item A - Energy Audit Fee $ 191,032 Item B - Preliminary Design Services (sub -consultants) $ 1,910,320 Item C - Permit Fee Estimate (reimbursable) —$ 25,000 Total Audit Fee -Energy Project: $ 2,126,352 Phase 613 Design Fees from ESCO, Sub -consultants, MFR's & Parametrix a. BHC design documents, permitting assistance and sub -consultants $ 1,547,300 BHC Labor $ 983,588 BHC travel, printing, misc. $ 9,800 Sub - FSI (piping and sheet metal) $ 59,156 Sub - KPG (architect) includes site surveying $ 89,918 Sub - Coal Creek Environmental (PSCAA air permitting) $ 77,000 Sub - Parametrix (controls sub) support of design/permitting phase $ 327,800 $38 discrepancy $ 38 b. Major equipment MFR team support of design/permitting phase $ 308,020 Centrisys/BFT/TEC (5% of equipment package price) c. Constructability, safety and construction phasing review (prime contractor) $ 553000 d. Ameresco support of design/permitting phase (includes permit fee) $ 2163032 Subtotal - Design Phase Cost: $ 2,1263352 Packet Pg. 105 8.1.c Edmonds WWTP Phase 613 ESCO - Carbon Recovery — Final Design Page 8 of 8 Project: Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 6B - Carbon Recovery Project - 2019 Design & Permitting Date: 1/23/2019 Waste Water Treatment Plant Mechanical Conservation Measures Rank Centrisys-Bioforcetech - Evaluate replacement of existing fluidized bed incineratorwith a gas -fired dryer and Bioforcetech Pyrolysis system for decomposition of biosolids through a non -incineration process which yields a "green" renewable biproduct known as Biochar. - The measure will include the dewatered sludge hopper, "schwing" pump, odor control SOLIDS -MI modification, new conveyors, biochar product conveyance to haul -away bin, 3 Controls and control strategy development and integration to SCADA, and staff training. - New Pyrolysis Building and new combined exhaust stack - The measure will save energy and offset operating costs associated with the current incinerator which is aged and increasingly more costly to operate. PAYBACK RANK NOTES: 1) Measures that are likely to pay for themselves through energy savings and utility incentives. 2) Measures that may pay for themselves, or may require some capital infusion 3) Measures that will require significant ( >50%) capital infusion Packet Pg. 106 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/19/2019 Potential Process Change to Enhance Council Committee Meeting Transparency Staff Lead: Scott Passey/Dave Teitzel Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History City Council regular meetings are broadcast live on our government access channels (GAC), live - streamed online and available for web -streaming later. The monthly City Council committee meetings are audio recorded for the purpose of transcribing meeting minutes and these recordings are retained in the City's digital archives. The written committee minutes are later made public online. The audio recordings are retained and are available to the public upon request, typically through the public records request process. There is no live video streaming or video recording of the committee meetings. On October 2, 2018, Councilmember Nelson introduced a discussion regarding the need for video streaming and recording of Council committee meetings to improve transparency of the legislative process. Michele Earl -Hubbard, Board Vice President of the Washington Coalition for Open Government, attended the meeting and provided her perspective in favor of video -recorded Council meetings as a means of enhancing transparency of the committee meeting process. On January 2, 2019, the Council debated the question of whether the current system of audio recording was sufficient since the committee meetings are public, minutes are taken and audio recordings of the meetings are currently available to public, or if the City could achieve greater transparency by appropriating additional funds to install video equipment. Responding to a question about whether audio recordings could be made available for on -demand access, the City Clerk replied that he wasn't certain the City's agenda portal would allow for such function. He did say, however, that he could make recordings of committee meetings available to those who requested them, by the next day without the need for additional funding. In the end, a Council motion to appropriate funds for video equipment failed on a 2-3 vote and Council determined a means should be pursued to cause the existing audio recording process to be made more user-friendly and accessible to citizens in the interest of greater transparency. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Council further discuss this issue and consider a motion to direct the City Attorney to draft a code amendment reflecting Council's preferences. Narrative At the January 2 meeting, staff explained that audio recordings could not be made available on the City's agenda portal due to the way agendas are currently configured. Only one file, either video or audio, may be uploaded for each Council meeting. Because committee meetings are usually preceded by a meeting Packet Pg. 107 8.2 of the full Council (per ECC 1.04), and this is the only meeting that is video recorded, only this video appears on the web agenda portal. However, it would be possible to upload the committee audio files if changes were made to the Council meeting rules, codified in Edmonds City Code (ECC) Chapter 1.04. If the Council adopted such changes, the Clerk's Office could then produce the Council committee agendas as separate and distinct meetings, each with its own agenda and audio file. Audio could be uploaded to the appropriate committee meeting for on -demand listening the next day, similar to the manner in which video recordings of Council meetings are currently posted. Currently, the code provides for a starting time of 7:00 p.m. for committees on the second Tuesday of the month. However, the code also states that committee meetings "may convene, as necessary, following adjournment of the council's regular meetings on the second Tuesday of the month," and, "if necessary, after the adjournment of the city council's regular meeting, whichever comes last." Below are the relevant sections of the City code, with the relevant portions underlined: ECC 1.04.010(A) and (B): A. Full Council. Regular meetings of the city council shall be held on every Tuesday of every month, except for the fifth Tuesday of a month, at 7:00 p.m. Regular meetings of the city council shall be held in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 Fifth Avenue N., Edmonds, Washington. Council meetings shall adjourn no later than 10:00 p.m. on the day initiated unless such adjournment is extended by an affirmative vote of a majority of the council as a whole plus one. The council committees may convene, as necessary, following adjournment of the council's regular meetings on the second Tuesday of the month. (8). Council Committees. The city council shall have the following standing committees: finance; parks and public works ("PPW"); public safety, planning and personnel ("PSPP"). Regular meetings of the city council committees shall be held on the second Tuesday of every month at 7:00 p.m., and, if necessary, after the adjournment of the city council's regular meeting, whichever comes last. Regular meetings of the city council committees shall be held concurrently in the following three rooms of the Public Safety Complex, 250 Fifth Avenue N., Edmonds, Washington: (1) the Council Chambers, (2) the Jury Meeting Room; and (3) the Police Training Room. Council committee meetings shall adjourn no later than 10:00 p.m. on the day initiated unless both members of the committee vote to extend the meeting. The Council has at least two options for accomplishing its goals concerning publication of meeting audio recordings, as follows: OPTION A: Amend the code to reflect a different starting time for committee meetings. For example, the full Council meeting could remain as commencing at 7:00 p.m., and committees could be scheduled for whatever time the Council deems appropriate, such as 7:15. Normally, the full Council meeting on Committee meeting nights is brief and a 7:15 Committee start time is not an issue, except that on many nights, the committee members might have a ten minute wait Packet Pg. 108 8.2 before being able to start the committee meeting. Also, in the unusual circumstance a critical issue must be addressed by Council on these evenings, a motion can be made to extend the Council meeting which must be passed by a majority plus one. Under this option, four agendas will be published: one for the brief Council meeting and one for each of the three Committees. OPTION B: Amend the code to remove provisions for a full Council meeting prior to committees. This would result in committees only on the second Tuesday of the month, each committee having a unique published agenda. Under this option, if a full council meeting was necessary on the second Tuesday, it would need to be noticed by the clerk as a special meeting. City staff has expressed a strong preference for Option A because it preserves the opportunity for action on consent agenda items and/or issues of a time -sensitive or special nature, without requiring preparation and publication of a special meeting notice. Whichever option is preferred, staff also recommends a code amendment to update the committee names, which have changed since the code was last adopted. Costs These changes would not result in additional equipment costs. However, producing three or four separate agendas as opposed to a single agenda will increase the City Clerk workload cost by approximately 3-4 hours per month. Attachments: Council Meeting Minutes 10_2_18 Council Meeting Minutes 1_2_19 Packet Pg. 109 8.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES October 2, 2018 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Michael Nelson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Shane Hope, Development Services Director Rob English, City Engineer Frances Chapin, Arts & Culture Program Mgr, Kernen Lien, Environmental Program Mgr. Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Mgr. Carolyn LaFave, Executive Assistant Steve Fisher, Recycling Coordinator Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmember Mesaros. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT 3. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES TOTALING $919.14 AND AMOUNTS UNDETERMINED 4. INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH SOURCEWELL (MINNESOTA) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 1 Packet Pg. 110 8.2.a 5. PRESENTATIONS 1. FIRE PREVENTION WEEK PROCLAMATION Mayor Earling read a proclamation proclaiming October 7-13, 2018 as Fire Prevention Week and urged everyone to be aware of their surroundings, look for available ways out in the event of a fire or other emergency, respond when the smoke alarm sounds by exiting the building immediately, and to support the many public safety activities and efforts of South County Fire during Fire Prevention Week 2018. He presented the proclamation to Karl Fitterer, Assistant Fire Marshal, South County Fire. Assistant Fire Marshall Fitterer thanked the Council for the proclamation and for the City's support. He invited the public to an open house at Martha Lake Fire Station 21 on October 13 from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. that will include activities for all ages. 2. NATIONAL ARTS & HUMANITIES MONTH PROCLAMATION Mayor Earling read a proclamation declaring October as National Arts & Humanities Month in Edmonds and called upon citizens to celebrate and promote arts and culture in the nation and support the many cultural activities which flourish in Edmonds. Arts Commission Chair Lesley Kaplan accepted the proclamation on behalf of the Edmonds Arts Commission. Chair Kaplan referred to a handout from Americans for Arts that includes thoughtful points about what Americans say about the arts in 2018. Americans are highly engaged in the arts and believe more strongly than ever that arts promote personal wellbeing, help us understand other cultures in our community, are essential to a well-rounded K-12 education and the government has an important role in funding the arts. The Arts Commission was pleased to be part of the Economic Impact Survey and the results are so rewarding, recognizing art in many forms, not only enhancing the quality of life but creating a lively economic base for the community. The added value of arts and humanity deeply contributes to the feel of Edmonds. Chair Kaplan invited the public to enjoy all the varied offerings in the community and the wealth of activities this month, visual arts such as a selection of the City art collection of items from Hekinan currently exhibited at the Frances Anderson Center, music, dance, film and literary arts. This week culminates in the sold out Write on the Sound Writers Conference, a 3-day conference that focuses on the craft of writing. She invited the public to meet authors and writers at a reception on Saturday from 5:15 to 6:30 p.m. in the Plaza Room. 3. SISTER CITY COMMISSION 30TH ANNIVERSARY DELEGATION TO HEKINAN Mayor Earling said the Hekinan delegation will return to Edmonds in late October. David Huneke said on April 1-6, 2018, Mayor Earling led a delegation of eight Edmonds residents including himself, Susan Earling, Michele Fellows, Teresa Lawson, Emily Scott, Caitlin Kelly, Margaret Safford, and Iyoko Okano. The purpose of the trip was to commemorate the 30t' anniversary of Edmonds and Hekinan's Sister City relationship and to celebrate the 70t' anniversary of Hekinan's founding on April 5' Michele Fellows, Emily Scott and Theresa Lawson presented a slideshow of the delegations experiences in Hekinan that included a visit to City Hall, meeting Hekinan's civic leaders, Udon (noodles) for lunch, the Cherry Blossom Festival, the Okazaki Castle, the Samurai Museum, Kiyomizu-dera Temple, Fushimi Inari Temple, power station tour, tour of the Toyota factory floor, Sister City reception, exchange of gifts, Sumo Caf6, many other sights and a final dinner with friends from Japan and Croatia. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 2 Packet Pg. 111 8.2.a Ms. Scott commented an Edmonds delegation visits Hekinan every five years and she encouraged everyone to apply to participate, commenting it was so much fun and they saw many things that tourists would not see. Mr. Huneke reported a typhoon hit Japan this past week; he contacted people in the area and learned there was no major damage. Ms. Fellows said the delegation had 10 days of touring packed into 4 days. Hekinan has another Sister City in Croatia, Pula, who had a delegation in Hekinan at the same time. Mr. Huneke advised the Hekinan delegation will be handing out candy at Edmonds City Hall on Halloween. Ms. Lawson commented on festivities at the 70' anniversary celebration and the graciousness and hospitality of Hekinan. The Hekinan delegation will be in Edmonds beginning on October 29; events include Halloween and a celebration of the 30' anniversary of being sister cities. Mayor Earling commented the experience of going to Hekinan twice has been life changing for him due to the beauty and the outgoing friendliness of the people. When the Hekinan delegation visits Edmonds, they are very engaging and truly have fun. They bring costumes for Halloween. He hoped the public would have an opportunity to spend time with the delegation. Mr. Huneke announced on October 31 at 11:45 a.m. in Centennial Plaza a bench will be dedicated to Keiko Sakakibara, a woman instrumental in the Sister City program who passed away just prior to the delegation's arrival. Mayor Earling commented Ms. Sakakibara was a truly wonderful person and integral in setting up the experience for the past 30 years. 4. PRESENTATION FROM SNOHOMISH PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT ON RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDITS PILOT Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced Brian Booth, Senior Manager of Rates, Economics and Energy Risk, and Jessica Matlock, Director, Government & External Affairs, Strategic Accounts and New Energy Initiatives, SnoPUD. She explained this a follow-up to work the City has been doing on sustainability, environmentally friendly attitudes and actions, and Resolution 1389's climate goals and renewable energy opportunities. Ms. Matlock said staff has working on this for approximately a year and have developed a workable solution for Edmonds to consider. She thanked Edmonds staff who have been phenomenal to work with. She reviewed: • Background o June 6, 2017: City of Edmonds Mayor signs the U.S. Mayors National Climate Action Agenda. o June 27, 2017: Edmonds City Council signs amended Resolution 1389: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Edmonds committing to achieve or exceed at the local level the goals established in the Paris Climate Accord." ■ "WHEREAS, it is imperative that energy consumers and the utilities serving them take early action to reduce carbon emissions given the accelerating rate climate change the planet is experiencing, and shifting to 100% of electricity from renewable sources by 2025 is within reach; and......" ■ Section 6: The City establishes the following renewable energy goals for both municipal facilities and for the City at large: i. 100% renewable energy for municipal facilities by 2019; and, ii. 100% renewable energy for the City's community electricity supply by 2025. o Edmonds is the first city in Washington state to commit to the Sierra Club's Ready For 100 Initiative. The City is 37th city in the country. o Renewable under the 100% Renewable Energy Initiative is defined as: ■ Energy derived from hydrogen, wind power sited in ecologically responsible ways, solar, existing and low -impact hydroelectric, geothermal, biogas (including biogas produced from biomass), and ocean/wave technology sources. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 3 Packet Pg. 112 8.2.a ■ "Renewable Energy" specifically excludes energy derived from fossil fuels, nuclear, biomass feedstocks sourced from state and federal lands, hydrogen produced from fossil fuels, and incineration of municipal and medical waste. City of Edmonds' Request of Snohomish PUD o To help them meet their goal of achieving 100% renewable energy for municipal facilities by 2019 ■ Hydro Okay ■ Nuclear Not Okay ■ Unbundled RECs Not Okay o Just over 8,000 MWh per Year for City -Owned Buildings Mr. Booth reviewed: Federal Trade Commission Green Guides o A marketer should not make unqualified renewable energy claims, directly or by implication, if fossil fuel, or electricity derived from fossil fuel, is used to manufacture any part of the advertised item or is used to power any part of the advertised service, unless the marketer has matched such non-renewable energy use with renewable energy certificates. o If a marketer generates renewable electricity but sells renewable energy certificates for all of that electricity, it would be deceptive for the marketer to represent, directly or by implication, that it uses renewable energy. o ...marketers may minimize the risk of deception by specifying the source of the renewable energy (e.g., wind or solar energy). Strategy o Set a baseline fuel mix ■ Start with the State's Fuel Mix for Snohomish PUD ■ Match Non -Renewable Fuel Sources with Existing, Bundled RPS Resources (Wind, Biomass, etc.) o Match Remaining Non -Renewable Portion of Fuel Mix with Bundled Renewable (REC- Producing) Energy Sources ■ Generation Scheduled to SnoPUD ■ Not Necessarily Washington I-937 Qualified Renewables ■ Pricing based on incremental cost of these projects above costs embedded in current rates ■ Hancock, Calligan, and Youngs Creek small hydro projects in the Puget Sound area The Fuel Mix o State Calculated SnoPUD Fuel Mix (2016) ■ 87% Hydro ■ 11 % Nuclear (non-renewable) ■ 2% Fossil Fuels (non-renewable o Fuel Mix with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) Accounting ■ 87% Hydro ■ 9% RPS Renewables ■ 3% Nuclear (non-renewable) ■ 1 % Fossil Fuels (non-renewable) o State of Washington Department of Commerce and NW Energy Coalition approve of this methodology Mr. Booth reviewed the proposed methodology: • Pricing Details o Diagram of Pricing Components ■ Incremental cost of small hydro - $37.15 ■ Capacity and shaping credit for small hydro - $13.82 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 4 Packet Pg. 113 8.2.a ■ Embedded cost of all SnoPUD energy - $31.41 ■ Average Cost of Youngs, Hancock, Calligan Creek projects ($82.38) ■ Credited Based on embedded value provided by these resources ($45.23) ■ Net Cost of $37.15 Ms. Matlock explained energy is the electrons flowing; capacity is the ability to turn it on and off quickly and there is a different cost component to each. Young, Hancock and Calligan Creek are low impact hydro projects that were built above fish -bearing streams and have been State certified. Mr. Booth continued his presentation: • Product Details o PUD Matches Non- Renewable Portion of Customer's Electricity Consumption with Bundled Renewables o Generated 2018 — 2020 o Additional to RPS Resources o .145 cents per kWh • 2019 Pilot Renewable Rate Estimated Fuel Mix 0 87% Hydro 0 8% Wind 0 4% Certified Low Impact Hydro 0 1% Solar, Biomass, Biogas • Risks o Fuel Mix methodology could change o Hydro, wind volatility could make for volatile program costs ■ Risk is limited by current Fuel Mix methodology o Pricing based on forecasted small hydro costs; new resources have no operating history • Risks for 2020 and Beyond 0 15% RPS Compliance will make SnoPUD 100% Renewable ■ If SnoPUD uses some unbundled RECs for RPS compliance, Edmonds might want bundled alternative o Somewhat limited availability. Hancock & Calligan, Youngs Creek can clean up about 220 average megawatts of load if only 4% of mix is non-renewable ■ The potentially high cost of integrating new resources should be borne by participants ■ Increasingly complicated rate design if the PUD must acquire more new resources, sell existing supplies. • Recommendation 0 1-Year Pilot Program for 2019 o Work with stakeholders for long-term solution for 2020 and beyond Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Options 1 and 2 that were described in the packet. Mr. Booth responded that is a detail that will be worked out with staff. Ms. Matlock said that was omitted from the presentation because their billing department had questions. The end result will be what works best for the City and what the City prefers — one bill for 2019 for $12,000 or a monthly bill of $1000. For Councilmember Tibbott, Mr. Booth explained the total municipal load is 40-50 average megawatts for all buildings with an Edmonds address including commercial, residential, etc. The 2025 target would be approximately 40-50 average megawatts. For 2019 it is slightly less than an average of 1 megawatts for municipal buildings. Councilmember Tibbott commented the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) runs on electricity and asked if they had suggestions for its energy usage. Ms. Matlock explained SnoPUD's new CEO was confirmed yesterday and they have already been talking with him about new demand response programs Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 5 Packet Pg. 114 8.2.a for WWTP and other industrial users in Snohomish County. SnoPUD will be developing new programs and offerings; one of their biggest pushes will be working with those entities to help them lower their energy consumption while helping reduce peak demand. SnoPUD's biggest threat now is the peak energy need when there is not enough energy for that need during certain times of the year which requires purchasing that peak. If that peak can be shaved, it saves customers money as well as lowers the carbon content. Doug O'Donnell, Executive Account Manager, SnoPUD, said Edmonds' staff has been engaged with SnoPUD's energy efficient program for many years and have upgraded lighting, pumps, added variable frequency drives, etc. to make the WWTP more efficient. SnoPUD considers the Edmonds WWTP a very mature operation in terms of energy efficiency. The WWTP is engaged in a strategic energy management system, a program that moves beyond technical capital -based installations and looks at operational and maintenance activities — how the plant can run the equipment more efficiently. This is a two-year program, the Edmonds WWTP has completed year one and he anticipated the plant will reenroll. He thanked staff for running a forward -looking, very efficient operation. Councilmember Tibbott commented the WWTP uses natural gas to burn solids. Mr. O'Donnell said SnoPUD is only electricity. Councilmember Tibbott commented the good news is with efforts and investment, the electricity usage at WWTP has been lowered. Mr. O'Donnell agreed, commenting another program that the WWTP participated in was the EPA Bonneville Power Administration pilot program. Capacity is constrained in the Pacific Northwest in the winter months Monday through Thursday mornings and evenings. The EPA program allows calling on specific loads in the service area such as the WWTP during peak periods to reduce the capacity demand on the utility and help out the region. Councilmember Johnson referred to the definition of renewable energy which includes the incineration of municipal and medical waste. As the WWTP incinerates waste, she asked how that fits into the 100% renwable energy initiative. Mr. O'Donnell answered that is excluded from the definition of renewable energy. Councilmember Teitzel commented a number of City facilities have rooftop solar panels; as technology improves, and the costs is reduced, potentially more solar panels could be installed which means the City could be generating its own renewable energy on municipal buildings. He asked if that was considered in the calculation of the $12,000 flat amount. Mr. Booth answered the $12,000 is based on net energy use of City buildings; any rooftop solar would reduce the net. Councilmember Teitzel relayed his understanding if the City had more solar panels in the future, that energy reduction would be included in the calculation. Mr. Booth answered yes. Council President Nelson thanked SnoPUD, Ms. Matlock and her staff and City staff for making the Council's 2019 100% renewable energy goal a reality. He was excited to implement this pilot program and expressed interest in tour of the small hydro projects. Mayor Earling advised the budget will include a decision package for this program. He suggested discussing the payment structure at that time. Councilmember Johnson asked where the three small hydro projects were located. Mr. Booth answered Youngs Creek is located in eastern Snohomish County near Sultan, Hancock and Calligan are located in King County, but SnoPUD purchases transmission from Puget Sound Energy to be delivered to SnoPUD. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There were no members of the public present who wished to provide comment. 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 6 Packet Pg. 115 8.2.a 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR EXCELSIOR PLACE STREET VACATION Mayor Earling recalled due to information submitted prior to the public hearing last week, at staff s request, the public hearing was continued. Environmental Programs Manager Kernen Lien displayed a map of the proposed street vacation, a portion north of 19511 94t' Place West, just above Puget Drive. He reviewed: • Initiation of proceedings: o ECDC 20.70.050.B - Petition of owners of more than two-thirds of property abutting the portion of street or alley to be vacated o Resolution No. 1417 set public hearing September 25, 2018 o Continued public hearing to October 2" a • ECDC 20.70.020 - Criteria for Vacation o The vacation is in the public interest o No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation Applicant submitted a statement in support of the public interest criteria o Proposed street vacation would vacate a substandard road and revert the road back to private ownership ■ Street proposed to be vacated was created in 1906 via the Edmonds Seaview Tracts ■ Since 1906 the right-of-way has not been widened or improved to City standards o Vacating will relieve the City of any financial burden or liability associated with the public right-of-way Vacation request an outgrowth of a lot line adjustment application the City received o One of proposed lots, Parcel A, extended across the Excelsior Place right-of-way and City could not approve a lot that extends over a right-of-way o Applicants then applied for a street vacation o Map of five existing lots of record and critical areas ■ Lot line adjustment allows more developable area outside the critical areas, minimizing impacts to critical area o Map of location of the five proposed lots ■ Vacation allows lot line adjustment to proceed and minimizes potential impacts to critical Issues staff considered related to the street vacation o Traffic Flow ■ Portion of Excelsior Place that is the subject of the vacation is not directly connected to a right-of-way - Private road to Puget Drive - Excelsior Place right-of-way open in small area off Olympic Avenue but is not connected - City received comment that some residents use the private road to access Puget Drive instead of using 94t' Place ■ Aerial map of access based on Easements of Record identifying: - Properties that have rights to use 94t' Place W - Properties that have rights to use private drive that connects to Puget Drive - Properties that have legal rights to use both - Although some residents state they historically used the private drive, it may not be a permissible action - Private drive signage on both ends of the private drive - Applicants have frequently stopped drivers using their private drive o Safety issues with access from 94t' Place West to Puget Drive ■ Required sight distance is 300 feet; actual sight distance is 200 feet Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 7 Packet Pg. 116 8.2.a - Long standing issue, first noted with a 4-lot subdivision approved in 1982 - At that time, City Engineer required access onto Puget Drive from 94th Place W be right in/out only - Existing signage: right turn only on 94' Place W, no left turn from Puget Drive and Hidden Driveway Ahead sign on Puget Drive o Staff determined the street vacation has little or no effect on existing traffic flow or sight distance conditions • Other issues City staff considered o Utilities ■ Water and sewer mains exist in the right-of-way ■ Operation and maintenance of utilities typically more efficient when utilities located in public right-of-way versus private easement ■ Existing water and sewer mains located mostly within paved driveway areas which helps prevent overgrowth and backyard improvements ■ Applicant has offered to provide public safety and utility easement turnaround as a condition of the subject street vacation. Turnaround would be a public benefit as it improves existing access conditions ECDC 20.70.140 Final Decision o Following the public hearing, the City Council shall 1. Adopt an ordinance granted the vacation; or 1. Adopt an ordinance granted the vacation; or 2. Adopt a motion denying the vacation; or 3. Adopt a resolution of intent were specific conditions must be met within 90 days a. Either i. Monetary compensation up to one-half fair market value ii. Grant of substitute public right-of-way iii. Any combination of a.i or a.ii Or b. Grant of an easement to the City in exchange for easement vacated o Monetary compensation cannot be required if the City receives a utility easement within the right-of-way ■ The appraised value of the Excelsior vacation area is $10,500; per City Code, if monetary compensation could be accepted, it would be half the appraised value or approximately $5,000. Staff Recommendation o Staff has found the proposed street vacation to be in accordance with the criteria in ECDC 20.70.020 and recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. A public utility easement shall be provided to the City of Edmonds for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, reconstruction and/or replacement of the water and sewer systems and necessary appurtenances, over, across, through and below the subject Excelsior Place vacation. 2. A utility access and emergency vehicle turn -around shall be constructed to City standards and easement shall be provided in a location agreed upon by the property owners and the City Engineering Division and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. 3. A private access easement shall be provided to all lots with frontage on the vacated portion of Excelsior Place. 4. If the property in the area of vacation is developed and the vacation area will serve three or more lots, an emergency access road consistent with Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 Fire Lane Standards will be required. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 8 Packet Pg. 117 8.2.a Mr. Lien said if the Council agrees with staff s recommendation, the Council should direct staff to prepare a resolution of intent for approval at a future Council meeting. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked for clarification that the turning directions onto and from 94' would not change. Mr. Lien agreed they would not change. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to page 117 of the packet that states as of the writing of this staff report the City had not received any written objections to the proposed street vacation, however, page 215 of the packet is a letter from John and Shirley Vicklund stating they hope the City will reject the proposal. Mr. Lien said the comment referenced on page 117 is in response to ECDC 20.040.13 that the states, "The city shall not proceed with the vacation if the owners of 50 percent or more of the property abutting the street or alley or part thereof, or underlying the easement or part thereof, to be vacated file a written objection in the planning division prior to the time of the hearing." The Vicklund's property does not directly abut the street. The packet includes comments from Vicklund, Janacek and Reidy but none of them directly abut the street. Councilmember Teitzel recalled in last week's agenda memo, staff recommended denial; he asked what had changed. Mr. Lien answered what changed was the additional information received, particularly with regard to access and utilities which were staff s primary concerns when reviewing the street vacation request. The applicant submitted additional information about the history of people driving through the property, both sides are marked private drive, the applicant stated over the years they have stopped people driving through the private drive. Since the original staff report, the applicant also proposed a turnaround for emergency vehicles and utility maintenance. The history of the access and the fact that that will not change with the vacation and the additional public benefit provided by the turnaround were the primary reasons for the change in staff s recommendation. Since Excelsior place has been a public right-of-way for all these years, Councilmember Teitzel asked how the property owners could legally post that portion of Excelsior Place as a private driveway. Engineering Program Manager Jeanie McConnell explained it is currently considered a driveway that meanders through the right-of-way, partially on private property and partially within the Excelsior Place right-of-way. Due to its meandering onto private property, it is not a completely accessible public right-of-way. Councilmember Johnson asked for an explanation of the fourth recommendation. Mr. Lien explained that was a comment from Snohomish County Fire when they reviewed the street vacation; they require emergency access up to fire standards at the time of development of three or more lots. Councilmember Johnson asked the standard requirement for a fire road. Mr. Lien answered they are included in the packet. Councilmember Johnson asked if this is considered three or more because of the two existing lots. Mr. Lien answered there are only two now. Councilmember Johnson asked if two more buildable lots would count as four. Mr. Lien said if additional single-family residences are built after the lot line adjustment, it would serve three or more lots and that is when Snohomish County Fire would require the road be brought up to their standards. Councilmember Johnson asked what Snohomish County Fire's standards were compared to the City's standards. Ms. McConnell said access via driveway with 1-2 lots would require a 15-foot wide access easement with 12-feet paved. If that is increased to three or more lots, the Fire Department would require 20 feet be paved. The lots currently exist but if they are developed, Fire would require the road be improved to their standards. Councilmember Johnson asked how the right-of-way be can vacated if the current Excelsior place right-of-way width is 20 feet and the Fire Department asks for 20 feet. Ms. McConnell answered Excelsior place right-of-way is 20 feet, but the paved area may not be 20 feet in that area. Regardless of whether it is a public right-of-way or an access easement, there are standards for pavement Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 9 Packet Pg. 118 8.2.a width. With the development of additional lots, the Fire Department has the authority within the City Code to require the pavement area be widen. Councilmember Johnson reiterated if the current easement is 20 feet and the Fire Department requires 20 feet, why would the City choose to vacate Excelsior Place. Mr. Lien displayed a survey of the property, pointing out the existing driveway that zigzags through Excelsior Place and is not completely contained within the 20-foot right-of-way. If Excelsior Place were vacated and Fire required the paved are be expanded, it would not necessarily be within the existing Excelsior Place right-of-way. Considering that the City wants to maintain the sewer and water in the roadway, Councilmember Johnson asked if staff could forecast the right-of-way location if a road had to be built to Fire's standards. Ms. McConnell said it potentially still could be provided in a similar alignment as the existing driveway but widened as needed to meet Fire Department requirements. Given there are existing paved areas, it could follow the same alignment and simply be wider. It would not necessarily need to fall within the exact Excelsior Place right-of-way as it currently exists. Councilmember Johnson relayed her understanding that that determination would be made in the future. Ms. McConnell said the existing conditions meet the requirement of the City and the Fire Department. If additional building permits are issued for single family residences, the Fire Department has stated they will require the road meet Fire Department standards. Councilmember Johnson observed the purpose of the lot line adjustment was to build new homes. Mr. Lien answered yes and the applicant has proposed to install a turnaround for utility maintenance and emergency vehicles. If additional lots are developed, per this condition, the road would need to be brought up to Fire standards and the turnaround provided. Even with the vacation, the access currently meets City and Fire standards. Councilmember Johnson said it potentially may not meet future Fire standards. Mr. Lien explained the lot line adjustment does not create additional buildable lots. There are currently five lots of record and with the lot line adjustment, there will still be five lots of record. Even with the current layout, if development were proposed, Fire would still require the existing driveway to be brought up to Fire standards, whether it is in the Excelsior Place right-of-way or other right-of-way. That will be part of development permit review when single family residences are proposed. Councilmember Johnson asked for clarification regarding the nature of the road itself and asked staff to explain how private driveways are determined, whether they could serve nine single family lots. Ms. McConnell answered there are variations. In general, 1-4 lots would be accessed from a private road. Five lots or more there is potential for the City to require a dedication of public right-of-way; it is somewhat dependent on the utilities, ability to access, etc. Generally with 10 lots or more there is a guarantee of dedication of public right-of-way. Between five to nine lots, there are variations, sometimes the access is via a private access road and sometimes it is a public road. Councilmember Johnson asked how many lots would have access if the lot line adjustment were made. Mr. Lien answered with the lot line adjustment, there is no change to the number of lots that have access in this area now because there are five lots of record now and there would still be five lots of record after the lot line adjustment. Councilmember Johnson asked if the four lots to the west were counted. Mr. Lien identified the five existing lots of record. Councilmember Johnson asked if the lot to the west was accessed via a private drive or public street. Mr. Lien identified the private drives. Councilmember Johnson said four lots plus five makes nine lots. She was having difficulty with the definition of private drive because if the entire extent was private, it served ten or more even though they were built at different times. Ms. McConnell said in the development review process, staff considers existing conditions as well as access easement or right-of-way that the lots to be developed abut. During the development process, existing Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 10 Packet Pg. 119 8.2.a private driveways would not be required to be converted to public right-of-way, only the portion where additional homes are being constructed would be considered. Due to existing conditions and the nature of the development in the area with private drives on either end of Excelsior Place, the portion of Excelsior Place would not be required to be converted to public right-of-way. She clarified if Councilmember Johnson's question was if Excelsior Place is vacated now, would it later be required to be public right-of- way and if so, the answer was no. The lot currently exist so there would not be additional development conditions to create public right-of-way when homes are built on those lots. The Fire Department has the authority via the code to require additional paved area with the construction of single-family residences. Councilmember Johnson commented there are different requirements and different definitions and it was difficult for her to understand how it added up to a street vacation. She felt she was missing a vital piece of information but was unsure what that was. Lee Michaelis, Puget Sound Planning, representing the applicants and the adjacent property owners, displayed the proposed Boundary Line Adjustment, explaining the north two lots are on the north side of the ravine. The best way to develop those is via a lot line adjustment to reconfigure the lots to avoid crossing the stream or impacting the wetland or steep slopes. He displayed a drawing of the five buildable areas via the reconfiguration. As the lot on the far left crosses the right-of-way, staff suggested a street vacation. He summarized the lot line adjustment to create five suitable areas for development rather than the five legal lots was the reason for the street vacation request. Councilmember Tibbott asked for clarification, when the street is vacated it is no longer City right-of-way, but the City retains an easement. Ms. McConnell answered because of the water and sewer utilities, the City would retain an easement for utilities through the vacated portion of right-of-way. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there would be any language that the easement would be paved and maintained in a manner so as to provide access to those utilities. Ms. McConnell assured there would be language in the easement document specific to access and maintenance. Councilmember Tibbott said the expectation was that the meandering driveway would be maintained for easement purposes. Ms. McConnell answered yes. Applicant Mr. Michaelis reviewed: 1) Vacation is in the public interest: • Preservation/reduced impact to critical area. The proposed boundary line adjustment, which triggered the need for the street vacation, allows construction to take place on more suitable areas of the property rather than on or close to critical areas. • Provide a much -needed vehicle turnaround that will be used by emergency and maintenance vehicles. The location of the turnaround will be agreed upon by the property owners, City Engineering Division, and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. 2) No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation • All five reconfigured lots will have direct access to the new private access easement, with continued access to 196' St SW and Puget Drive. • Public Comments o Comment #1 (Vicklund) ■ City has implemented right in / right out at the intersection of 94th PI W and Puget Drive. ■ There is no public connection from the properties west of the proposed vacation to 194th St SW. ■ The subsequent lot line adjustment will not increase traffic from what can be allowed today. o Comment #2 (Janacek) ■ The purpose of the street vacation is to allow the reconfiguration of 5 lots of record, to reduce the impacts to the critical areas (wetlands, streams, steep slopes) and wildlife habitat associated with the critical areas. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 11 Packet Pg. 120 8.2.a ■ In general, future construction will take place in the shaded area previously shown, reducing the impact to properties to the north. o Comment #3(Reidy) ■ We concur with the city staff s conclusion that under current regulations, the appraisal was required and submitted. Proposed Option C does not require the need for an appraisal and the clarification requested by Mr. Reidy should not hold up the decision on the proposed street vacation • Applicant agrees with staffs conditions of approval. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to the applicant's proposed Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) map illustrating the new configuration of the five lots, observing Excelsior extends through the middle of the lot to the west. Mr. Michaelis said if Excelsior Place remained, it would go through that lot. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether they could build on that area if the street vacation is granted. Mr. Michaelis answered it would depend on the utility and access easements which cannot be built on. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if they were contemplating moving the right-of-way to create a buildable area. Mr. Michaels said the right-of-way would be replaced with an easement for City services and a private access easement. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked where the easement would be. Mr. Michaelis answered it would generally be along the current meandering driveway; the utility easement would be over the existing water and sewer lines. For Councilmember Buckshnis, Mr. Lien identified the existing lots of record and the new configuration. Councilmember Buckshnis commented basically the vacation is being done to provide buildable lots and stay out of the critical areas. Mr. Michaelis agreed, noting that is the primary public interest. Councilmember Teitzel said he drove the property, trespassing on the private driveway and found exiting 94' Place onto Puget Drive very disconcerting because drivers cannot see very far and that was exacerbated if a driver was speeding around the corner. Observing this is not a safe intersection, he asked if there was a way to improve the safety, particularly since more drivers would be using it and potentially turning left even though that was not allowed. Ms. McConnell said there are no projects planned for that intersection; that could be discussed with the Transportation Engineer. The street vacation will not change that condition. Councilmember Teitzel said westbound on Puget Drive there is a limited sight distance sign on the bank that is not easily visible. He suggested making the signage regarding the dangerous intersection ahead more apparent. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Shirley Vicklund, Edmonds, said the Puget Drive hillside is unstable and the retaining wall has slid 4 feet, making it difficult to see to the east. When the wall was first built, drivers could see up the road. Emergency vehicles leaving Fire Station 16 stop traffic which results in 10-15 vehicles coming down the road, causing a 3-5 minute delay to exit their driveway. Drivers speed on Puget Drive; a nearby speed camera often registers 36 mph. She relayed their desire to have the neighborhood remain as it is. The Tuttles use the driveway to the east, her landscaper was given permission to use the east driveway, the applicant's mother who lives at 19518 and her two renters use that driveway and other neighbors occasionally use the driveway. In 1989 they did a lot line adjustment on their property at the request of Lois Vineyard; the lot line adjustment included several conditions on developing Lot 1 and Lot 4 (the applicant's) and giving the City the right to deny any more development on 94t' Place West. The vacation is purely for the applicant's personal gain to build houses and it impacts the critical area. Last week staff recommended denial and she hoped the Council would support denying the vacation. They were told by Duane Bowman in 1989 that only 7 houses could be on a private road; there are 6 lots on this road now and 1 owned by the Tuttles. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 12 Packet Pg. 121 8.2.a Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, said he has observed this hill many times as he lives down the street and has always wondered how drivers exit that road because it is a very dangerous intersection. He has also seen the changes in the hillside when the trees were cut. He objected to turning City streets into private streets because the restrictions go away and the property owners can do whatever they want. He has enjoyed visiting that neighborhood to see the view but would not be welcome if it were a private road. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the public hearing. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the lots could be developed if they remained in the original configuration. Mr. Lien answered to build on the back two lots would require a critical area economic reasonable use variance, so they could potentially build on them via that process. Councilmember Buckshnis observed that was Lots 54 and 55. Councilmember Tibbott said he did not have a problem with the street vacation and was supportive of the proposal as it makes sense to adjust the lots as proposed so that development would occur away from the critical areas. It is currently a private drive and it is his understanding the lots to the west do not have an easement to use the private drive; that condition would not change with the street vacation. He did not see that the street vacation changed the use of the existing street and he found benefit in the environmental improvement and the turnaround. He supported the street vacation as long as the City retained a utility easement. Councilmember Johnson said in theory she had no problem with the lot line adjustment. She asked why the lot line adjustment was bundled with the street vacation. Mr. Lien explained when the applicant applied for the lot line adjustment, one of the lots would straddle Excelsior Place. The City would not approve the lot line adjustment that is bisected by right-of-way. Although the City's code does not specifically address that, other jurisdictions and possibly state law indicate a lot bisected by right-of-way essentially creates two lots. One of the criteria for a lot line adjustment is it cannot create a new lot. The proposed configuration which included one lot bisected by Excelsior Place resulted in six lots which could not be approved. The applicants were given the option to adjust via a lot line adjustment or put the lot line adjustment on hold and apply for the street vacation; the applicant chose the street vacation. Councilmember Johnson observed the applicant could have chosen the lot line adjustment which would not create two lots. Mr. Lien answered they could have; he referred to the applicants BLA map, that results in more buildable area. The proposed configuration is a better layout which is why they chose the vacation process versus adjusting the lots. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she has heard from multiple sources that this is a private driveway, but her understanding is it is a City street. She asked if the property owners built on City land. Ms. McConnell explained Excelsior Place is a public right-of-way. The driveway was constructed when one of the lots was developed and served only one home. The property owner chose to meander that driveway within the public right-of-way and on private property, something the City found acceptable at that time. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed it is a public right-of-way, not a private driveway, but the City was aware the driveway was built on the public right-of-way. Ms. McConnell explained access to that portion of Excelsior Place is via existing private roads; the driveway that was constructed does not fall entirely or solely within Excelsior Place and meanders both within the right-of-way and onto private property which is what makes it inaccessible to some of the other properties. Councilmember Fraley- Monillas reiterated part of the driveway was built on Excelsior Place with the City's knowledge and permission. Ms. McConnell agreed, referring to a map of the east end of Excelsior where the private driveway was not built within the right-of-way; that portion does not have public access. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 13 Packet Pg. 122 8.2.a Council President Nelson relayed his understanding that if the Council did nothing and the applicant was interested in developing the top two properties, they would need to obtain a critical areas variance. Mr. Lien explained a critical area variance is a reasonable economic use variance. The process is a variance via the Hearing Examiner with specific criteria that needs to be met. One of the major criteria is minimum necessary development so the property owner can achieve reasonable economic use from the property. A reasonable economic use variance was recently approved where the minimum necessary was a house with an approximately 300 square foot footprint. There can still be impacts to the critical area as a result; the development could be in the wetland or the road could go through the wetland and/or stream provided it is the minimum necessary and it meets all the criteria. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said the recent approval of a home constructed pursuant to this standard established a ceiling above which single family homes were not likely to be approved under the minimum economic use variance. That square footage is probably the ceiling of what could be approved under that standards. Council President Nelson said he asked that question because he found it interesting one could enhance a critical areas by developing property. He was trying to understand the logic, one way or another the property would be developed; the question was which way had the least impact to the critical area. Mr. Lien said the configuration after the lot line adjustment has less impact to the critical areas. Councilmember Tibbott asked the difference between a public street, a City right-of-way and an easement and whether this would be considered a public street. Ms. McConnell answered Excelsior place is public right-of-way which would allow for the construction of a public street within the right-of-way. The right- of-way establishes the limits in which the public road could be built. An easement for the utility would give the City the right to operate, own, maintain, construct and reconstruct utilities within that easement area. The underlying ownership of the property would belong to the property owner, but the easement gives the City rights with regard to the utilities. Councilmember Tibbott said the right-of-way is not currently a public street; it is a private driveway that allows adjoining properties easement to the east but properties to the west do not have an easement to use the private driveway. Ms. McConnell answered the Excelsior Place public right-of-way has not been developed to public street standards. Councilmember Teitzel observed if the City chosen to vacate, there are two choices, retain an easement or not. If the City does not retain an easement, water meters would need to be installed at the border of City property. Ms. McConnell agreed, explaining in addition to water meters, the portion of the water main that becomes private would be considered a fire line and other backflow devices would need to be installed to provide water quality protection between that fire line and the City system. An extensive amount of work would need to be done to covert that system from a public utility to a private system. Councilmember Teitzel asked who bore the cost of that conversation. Ms. McConnell answered it would not be borne by the City. Councilmember Teitzel asked if the sewer line served the five homes in the area or other homes uphill. Ms. McConnell answered there is potential for an additional lot on the eastern end that is currently on septic to tie into the sewer main. In addition, when the existing lots of record or as they are configured via the lot line adjustment are developed with single family residences, they would also connect to that sewer main. Councilmember Teitzel observed if the City vacated with no easement, the property owner was responsible for all costs associated with connection to that existing main. Ms. McConnell answered in a development process, even if a sewer is located in a public right-of-way versus an easement, the cost to connect to the City's sewer system is borne by the property owner. Councilmember Teitzel said in effect if the right-of- way is vacated without retaining an easement, the existing water line and sewer main become private property. Ms. McConnell said if the City does not retain easements, it would be relinquished as privately - owned utility systems. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 14 Packet Pg. 123 8.2.a Councilmember Buckshnis referred to staff s recommendation, pointing out having the utilities become private was not one of the options. She asked if privatization of water and sewer was common in a city like Edmonds. Ms. McConnell answered it is not common. With a new subdivision with a private road where there is not a need for the City to own and maintain the utility system, a private sewer main may be installed via the development process. The water main would be in the City street and water service lines to individual properties. Councilmember Buckshnis asked for confirmation that staff was not recommending privatization. Ms. McConnell agreed staff was not. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the City needed to protect environment. Councilmember Johnson referred to the applicant's BLA map, relaying her understanding there were two issues, first the lot line adjustment. It would be possible to create the amber and green lots in such a way that they could be built upon by allocating the northern portion of the amber lot to a different lot. If the intent was two building sites, one south of Excelsior Place and another north of Excelsior Place, both would be outside the critical areas and it would be possible build there. The second issue is the vacation of Excelsior Place. Although Excelsior Place serves as a private driveway, it is serving more than what a normal private driveway would serve, especially due to the northern, western and eastern sections. An improvement would be appropriate notwithstanding the current meandering onto private property. Since the Fire Department may require a 20-foot wide right-of-way, she concluded it did not make sense to abandon the public right-of-way so she will vote no. Duane Landsverk, applicant, asked Councilmember Johnson if she felt it was appropriate for the additional lots to the east, for them to suggest that they open the public right-of-way of Excelsior. First it would need to be constructed and then people would be sent to the end of Excelsior where they would trespass across neighboring lots to the east where there is no public access. Excelsior dead -ends and is only 20 feet wide. Councilmember Johnson said testimony has stated one can travel Excelsior Place and exit to the east. Mr. Landsverk said his private driveway meanders in and out of Excelsior; it is marked private and anyone using it is on private property. The public portion of Excelsior is 100% cut off. Councilmember Johnson asked if it was physically possible to drive to the east. Mr. Landsverk answered not without trespassing. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE A RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO VACATE WITH THE CONDITIONS IN THE STAFF REPORT IN EXHIBIT 1. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON VOTING NO. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON PERMIT DECISION MAKING AND QUASI-JUDICIAL PRnC'F,ggF,C Mayor Earling announced the Council would not discuss Agenda Items 8.1 and 8.2 tonight. Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien reviewed: • Resolution No. 1367 o Council discussions in 2016 regarding the City Council sitting in a quasi-judicial capacity ■ Frustrations with ex-parte contact prohibitions ■ Liability issues for councilmembers o Resolution No. 1367 ■ Requests city staff and Planning Board to prepare and forward to the City Council revisions to the ECDC modifying the City Council's role in quasi -decision making processes o Code amendments since adoption of Resolution No. 1367 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 15 Packet Pg. 124 8.2.a Council Quasi-judicial Decisions o Appeals (Type III-B): Essential public facilities; Design review (where a public hearing by the architectural design board is required); Conditional use permits (where a public hearing by the hearing examiner is required); Zoning Variances; Home occupation permit (where a public hearing by the hearing examiner is required); Preliminary formal plat; and Preliminary planned residential development. o Applications (Type IV -A and IV-B): Final formal plats; Final planned residential development; and site specific rezone. o ECDC 17.00.030.C: The City Council also sits in a quasi-judicial role for variance applications from public agencies. Potential Code Amendments o Type III-B o Type IV -A o ECDC 17.00.030 - Public agency variances o ECDC 20.100.040 - Review of Approved Permits o ECDC 20.06 (Open Record Public Hearings) and ECDC 20.07 (Closed Record Public Hearings) o Development Agreements ECDC 20.01.003 - Type III-B o Revisions to the table of land use decisions o Removing the City Council from appeal of quasi-judicial decisions could allow the Council to appeal on the behalf of citizens ■ Council would be provided notice of Type III decisions Type IV -A: Subdivisions and PRDS o City Council approves final formal subdivisions and Planned Residential Developments o All requirements of preliminary approval of been met o Often all of the subdivision improvements are installed prior to application for final approval o Senate Bill 5674 allows legislative authority to be delegated to administrative personnel o Amendments to ECDC 20.75 and ECDC 20.35 would delegate City Council's role in review of final formal plats and PRDs to staff ECDC 17.00.030 - Public Agency Variance o C. Public Structures and Uses. All public structures and uses built or altered by the city or any other public agency shall comply with this zoning ordinance. Where it is a public necessity to build, or alter, a structure or use in a location or in a manner not complying with this zoning ordinance, a variance may be considered. In this case, the action of the hearing examiner shall be a recommendation to the city council ECDC 20.100.040 Review of Approved Permits o Conflicts with state law ■ Regulatory Reform Act, Chapter 36.70B RCW - One open record public hearing - ECDC 20.100.040 could result in endless public hearings ■ Land Use Petition Act, Chapter 36.70C RCW - "Finality" - Once a land use permit has been approved and no appeal has been timely filed, the land use permit can no longer by judicially appealed even if it did not comply with permitting criteria when approved (Chelan County v. Nykreim) - Habitat Watch v. Skagit County - Projects cannot be collaterally attacked through another administrative permit review process o New section ECDC 20.110.045 added to code enforcement chapter that all the City to suspend or revoke a permit that fails to comply with conditions of approval or which operates in a manner inconsistent with the representations made in the application ECDC 20.06 Open Record Public Hearings and 20.07 Closed Record Public hearings Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 16 Packet Pg. 125 8.2.a o Confusing cross references regarding appeals o Combine into a single chapter o Added some language for prehearing conferences o Added some details regarding briefing order, rebuttals and questions during hearings Development Agreements o Change Development Agreement from Type V legislative decision to a Type IV quasi-judicial decision with recommendation from the Planning Board to City Council o Council considers development agreement in closed record review o Likely process in conjunction with site specific rezone Mr. Lien said staff is seeking direction from Council regarding the proposed code amendments. Councilmember Teitzel commented there has been some incomplete information shared with the City Council from outside sources. There was an assertion that other City Councils have not gotten out of the quasi-judicial process. Mr. Lien displayed a survey of appeals to City Council from Municipal Research Center (MSRC) and City Attorney Jeff Taraday's list serve poll: No appeals to City Council Appeals to City Council • Bainbridge Is • Lynnwood • Bellevue • Bremerton • Marysville • Bellingham • Buckley • MLT o Only premilitary plats and variances related to plats • Clyde Hill • Mukilteo o All other decisions are Court appeals • Duvall • Snohomish • Ellensburg • Everett • Shoreline • Kirkland • Federal Way • Spokane Vly • SeaTac (considering getting out) • Lakewood • • Snoqualmie • Sumner Under review: Renton Councilmember Teitzel recalled there was a point made that Snohomish County Council had ballot measure Prop 4 several years ago that was similar to what the Council is considering. In reading the voters pamphlet and arguments for and against, he saw nothing about the Snohomish County Council having the ability to consider an objection by a citizen and potentially taking appeals to Superior Court on behalf of the citizen which is something the City Council is considering. He asked if Snohomish County Council had the option to appeal on behalf of citizens. Mr. Taraday relayed his understanding of 2016 Snohomish County Prop 4 was what he forward to Councilmembers from the voters pamphlet. He did not have any information that the Snohomish County was considering the process staff has suggested where the City Council could appeal the Hearing Examiner decision. There were similarities between this proposal and Prop 4 but they are not identical. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether any of the cities had gone from quasi-judicial to non -quasi- judicial. Mr. Lien said that would have taken a lot of research. Councilmember Buckshnis said this information only identifies cities that have appeals to City Council and cities that do not. It does not address other cities such as Edmonds that have changed. She hoped Edmonds would continue to have appeals to City Council. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas referred to the cities that still have appeals to City Council and believed there were more. With regard to Councilmember Buckshnis' question, Mr. Taraday explained cities have only had Hearing Examiner authority since approximately 1977; most of those cities preexisted that date. One could assume most Council's had quasi-judicial capacity before 1977. Some cities may have abandoned quasi-judicial a Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 17 Packet Pg. 126 8.2.a long time ago or more recently, but it would be a time-consuming exercise to determine who abandoned it and when. Councilmember Buckshnis commented politics were way different in 1977. What is going on now is relevant including that some large cities still use a quasi-judicial system. Mr. Lien said Edmonds switched to the Hearing Examiner process in1980 and appeals went to City Council. Prior to that, the City had a Board of Adjustment that heard variances and that was a quasi-judicial decision process. Board of Adjustment decisions were appealable to Superior Court. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. Rebecca Anderson, Edmonds, said the quasi-judicial issue is important because, 1) it impacts more residents, 2) the action the Council takes will maintain the path of working together or begin to drive a wedge between certain groups, and 3) people outside Edmonds will make decisions about the community and how it develops instead of local officials. After researching this issue, she was opposed to the effort remove this from the Council. The main reason this issue was being brought up was lability concerns raised by some Councilmembers; by eliminating the quasi-judicial process from the Council, the risk to the City will be greatly reduced. This seems to be a weak reason because the Council has extensive legal representation as well as liability insurance that could be used to defend any decision reached by the Council that ends up in litigation. She pointed out the recent action taken by the Council to pass the safe storage gun ordinance and assumed legal counsel cautioned that passing such an ordinance might result in litigation. The Council did it anyway and now the City is being sued. She asked whether removing this process from the Council would benefit residents today or in the future, make it easier for residents to resolve disagreements or issues or make it more complicated, and whether it will keep the Council directly involved in Edmonds issues. She concluded abdicating this vital function would place a barrier between the elected officials and the citizens and will result in entities outside Edmonds making important decisions for Edmonds instead of local elected officials. She urged the Council to retain the Council in this process. John Reed, Edmonds, explained when making improvements to their home on 6' Avenue South in 1990, an issue arose regarding access to a deck they planned to add on the west side of their home. Their side setback was 5 feet but there was a 3'/2 wide deck stairway that extended part of the length of the house. They applied for a variance to extend the deck to the end of the home and then cut over to the required 5- foot setback. The Hearing Examiner denied their request so they appealed to the City Council under the quasi-judicial process in place at that time. They and their neighbors represented themselves at the City Council. One of the neighbors 25 feet away told the Council they had wild, late night parties and the deck would infringe on their privacy and ability to sleep and the Council denied their request for a variance by a 3-4 vote. They subsequently designed access to their deck from inside the home. They undoubtedly would not have paid a large fee, traveled to Everett and presented their request to Snohomish County Superior Court. Since 1990 the process was changed to require appeals to Superior Court and then in 2009 changed back to appeals to Council. He urged the Council to retain the current process because he believed it was what the citizens who elected them expect. Speaking on behalf of the Alliance of Citizens for Edmonds (ACE), Mr. Reed referred to a letter, Exhibit 21 in the packet, highlighting ACE's support for retaining the quasi-judicial process at the City Council level because Edmonds citizens elect Councilmembers to represent them and the existing process retains that representation. It provides a less costly way for citizens to have their voices heard by the local residents they elect. While the basis for this change is the risk involved in quasi-judicial hearings, in fact all City Council decisions carry a degree of risk which is the reason for the City Attorney and why the City carries liability insurance. Very few land use matters are currently appealed beyond the Hearing Examiner and the Council spends little time on appeals. Councilmembers are familiar with Edmonds issues, but Snohomish County Superior Court and land use staff are not. ACE urged the Council to vote to retain the current process for quasi-judicial appeals. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 18 Packet Pg. 127 8.2.a Gary Nelson, Edmonds, referred to his correspondence to the City Council and that Planning Board describing his opposition to moving from a citizen -friend approach to quasi-judicial matters to an unfriendly approach that requires an appeal to Snohomish County Superior Court. When the Council passed Resolution 1367 in 2016, the Charter Review Commission put Prop 4 on the ballot which essentially addressed the same idea of moving to a court appeal. There was little public discussion prior to the election; however, 57.7% of Edmonds voters voted no. His philosophy is the best government is the one closest to the people which is the City Council. The City Council acts as a jury on many of the appeals that would come to the Council under the Land Use Petition Act (LUPA). It does not require any specialized training; jurists do not have any training when they make a decision. Citizens rely on the City Council's judgment; the Council is presented material on the record and citizens expect the Council to use that judgment in the best interest of the City. He asked the Council to oppose this change and continue the process that has been successful for many years. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, said he participated in appeals while on the City Council; those decisions are important to people making the appeal. He felt privileged to serve the citizens as a judge and current Councilmembers should feel the same, that they are looking out for the citizens. This system has worked for a long time because the Council follows strict rules of behavior and have not gotten themselves into a lawsuit. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, strongly opposed these changes and feared this was another piecemeal amendment to the code. In March 2015 the City launched a major update of the development code including hiring Makers to assist with that process. He met with Makes and the City to describe his issues with the code; the code has been highly flawed for a long time. He recalled Duane Bowman saying in 2005 that the code needed to be updated. Consideration of this change should be done as part of a comprehensive, major update of the code. The City's webpage regarding the code update has not been updated since March 2016 so he had no idea where that update stands. He did not have faith in the City's Hearing Examiner system and if anything, the City Council should hear more appeals, not less. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of public hearing. Councilmember Tibbott referred to four cases brought to City Council prior to his being on the Council, two related to larger developers, one of which was Building 10. He asked how long it took for the Council to hear that appeal. Mr. Lien answered the Building 10 appeals took place over four Council meetings. There was one closed record review before the Council for the first set of appeals; that was cut short and remanded back to the Architectural Design Board (ADB) to issue findings. The ADB issued findings, it was appealed again and the City considered the appeals over three meetings. Councilmember Tibbott said he was present for one of those and recalled the presentation to Council took over an hour. One of his concerns is the actual process the Council could look forward to. To him, there was a big difference between hearing a review for a neighbor adding on to their deck versus a large project like Building 10 or the Burnstead subdivision. He asked how long the Burnstead appeal took. Mr. Lien recalled it took at least 2-3 Council meetings. Mr. Taraday said Burnstead originated at City Council before he was City Attorney, went to the courts, the Court of Appeals remanded to the Hearing Examiner and then it came to the City Council on another administrative appeal. Councilmember Tibbott said he was sympathetic to the idea of listening to appeals from neighbors on personal issues but those cannot be separated from the larger appeals that take many days, have a great deal of detailed information and require a courtroom -like setting for presenting information. He recalled presentations to the Council from citizen groups and others presenting information with no opportunity to cross-examine and verify facts. The larger and more complex the issue, the greater the need for the Council to have the ability to cross-examine and verify information which requires more than a closed record review. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 19 Packet Pg. 128 8.2.a Councilmember Tibbott explained when the Council is asked to review an appeal, the Council is asked to judge the Hearing Examiner's decision -making process, not the validity of the project. Mr. Taraday agreed, explaining the Council does not have any decisions where the Council holds the open record hearing. If the Council were holding the open record hearing, Councilmembers could cross-examine witnesses. The Council is not a jury, juries hear original testimony. The Hearing Examiner hears witnesses speak and has the opportunity to ask questions and play a fact-finding role. When appeals come to the Council, it is on record and the Council only hears what was already provided to the Hearing Examiner and no new information can be provided. Councilmember Tibbott asked what it would be like for a citizen to take a request for an appeal to Superior Court. Mr. Taraday recalled a couple citizens have filed their own LUPA appeals and represented themselves pro se. LUPA appeals are on the record, there are no witnesses, no new evidence, basically the petitioner writes a brief explaining to the court why the decision was erroneous. The City responds to that brief with an explanation of why the decision was correct and the petitioner is provided an opportunity for rebuttal to explain why the City's argument is wrong and there is some time for oral argument in front of the judge. Councilmember Tibbott asked how long reviews in front of a judge usually last. Mr. Taraday answered the oral argument in front of the court includes an initial hearing which is usually 10 minutes and the hearing on the merits lasts 20-60 minutes depending on the generosity of the judge. Councilmember Tibbott asked whether it would possible to retain a review process that is not a quasi- judicial review. For example, a citizen does not agree with a Hearing Examiner decision and wants to appeal it to Superior Court but has an opportunity to bring it to the City Council first. The City Council could hear the arguments and chose to appeal on the citizen behalf. Mr. Taraday said that is one of the ideas he and Mr. Lien are considering; that is the suggestion about providing notice of hearings to the City Council. The City Council would receive a notice of application whenever there was a Type III proposal and would have the opportunity to attend the hearing. Once the decision is issued and there is an aggrieved constituent who feels justice was not done, the system being contemplated would allow the City Council to appeal the Hearing Examiner's decision in the name of the City on behalf of a constituent who feel it was unjustly decided. That decision could be discussed with legal counsel in executive session as potential litigation and Council could get a candid sense from the City Attorney on the merits of the Hearing Examiner's decision and the Council would decide in open session whether to appeal. That is a way of representing constituents in a manner that allow Councilmembers to talk to them and in a manner that was truly responsive to their concerns without being bound by the decision criteria when the Council sits in a quasi-judicial capacity. Councilmember Tibbott commented under that scenario, Councilmembers could walk a property, ask questions, etc. Mr. Taraday agreed, there would be no restriction on ex parte communication in that scenario; Councilmembers could talk with constituents, conduct site visits, etc. Councilmember Tibbott asked if the Council could request an open meeting with citizens to address the issue with Council. Mr. Taraday said there are only 21 days to file a LUPA appeal. For example, if the Hearing Examiner's decision is issued on a Friday, constituents could come to the next Council meeting to ask the Council to appeal or one or more Councilmembers could inquire about it offline and/or discuss it in executive session. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the process whereby a citizen who felt aggrieved by a Hearing Decision could ask the Council to consider it and asked how a citizen would know that avenue is available to them. Mr. Taraday said the code language has not yet not finalized. If the City Council directed, staff could to develop that process. Councilmember Teitzel was not interested in forcing citizens to go to Superior Court without having that course available. If there was a less formal process whereby citizens could approach the Council to say the Hearing Examiner erred, the Council could consider it and determine if it had merit and appeal to Superior Court on the citizen's behalf. If that avenue did not exist, he supported retaining Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 20 Packet Pg. 129 8.2.a quasi-judicial authority. If that avenue exists, he was leaning away from the Council retaining quasi-judicial authority as long he was convinced that avenue was available and reasonable for citizens. Mayor Earling advised Agenda Item 9.1 would be moved to a future meeting. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:15 PM. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Johnson pointed out staff s research included two appeals that required counsel for the City Council, Carol Morris. She asked how much was spent on the Burnstead and Pt. Edwards projects. Mr. Lien said he could research cost. The City utilized Carol Morris on three appeals; the only one where she was not hired was the fence appeal. Councilmember Johnson recalled there was advice two years ago from WCIA, MSRC and the City Attorney to move away from the quasi-judicial review. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was interested in seeing in writing what has been discussed behind the scenes. She was not seeing much difference between the quasi-judicial process and that process which would still take time, Council involvement, attorneys and staff. She asked staff to return with that process in writing. Councilmember Tibbott raised a point of order that Councilmember Fraley-Monillas was insinuating there have been private discussions on these matters. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas clarified her request was for staff to return with a proposal for the Council to appeal decisions to Superior Court on a citizen's behalf. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to an email stating the City has had four closed record reviews since 2009. Mr. Lien said there have been four closed record reviews on appeals since 2009, there have been other closed record reviews such as the public agency variance. Councilmember Buckshnis said those closed record review appeals were Pt. Edwards, Willowdale, Hillman and Burnstead. Mr. Lien agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis said those were part of the normal part of a Councilmember's job. Councilmembers are not scientists, yet they make important decisions about the Shoreline Master Program. She did not see any reason to change the current process. Councilmember Tibbott said one of the things he was trying to understand was changes in state law related to the review process such as only one closed record review and one appeal is allowed. He asked if there was a further process if those two are exhausted. Mr. Taraday answered administratively there is not, administratively the State allows one open record hearing and one closed record review. Councilmember Tibbott asked if a citizen could appeal the Council's decision on a Hearing Examiner's to Superior Court. Mr. Taraday explained the open record hearing takes place at the Hearing Examiner, the closed record review takes place at the City Council which is the end of the administrative work and there is either a final decision that no one appeals or there is a subsequent appeal that goes to Court. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON, TO FORWARD THIS TO A FUTURE AGENDA WITH A LONGER TIME FOR DISCUSSION AND QUESTIONS. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented the Council has been discussing this for a while tonight and there still seems to be a lot of questions. She would like to have time to discuss it so she recommended moving it to another meeting. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO AMEND TO INCLUDE WHEN THIS COMES BACK, DETAILS ABOUT THE PROCESS WHEREBY A CITIZEN COULD COME TO COUNCIL, PRESENT THE FACTS Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 21 Packet Pg. 130 8.2.a ABOUT THEIR CONCERN ABOUT A HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION AND THE COUNCIL COULD APPEAL ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZEN. Mr. Lien said staff would return with code language regarding how the Council could appeal the Hearing Examiner or ADB decision on the citizen's behalf. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. STUDY ITEMS 1. CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE REPORT Due to the late hour, this item was omitted from the agenda. 2. DISCUSSION ON PROHIBITING EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE (EPS OR "STYROFOAM") IN FOOD PACKAGING Due to the late hour, this item was moved to a future agenda. 3. VIDEO STREAMING OF COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS Council President Nelson commented this issue has been raised in a variety of ways. Previously all Council meetings were televised. Then the Council changed to a committee structure, committees meet in separate meetings and there is only an audio recording. Anyone wanting a copy of the audio recording must make a submit a request. What is accessible to citizens online with regard to committee meetings is minutes. He wanted the Council to do better job in terms of transparency; as Gary Council President Nelson said, the best government is one that is closest to the people. If the public is unable to attend a meeting, the next best thing is to watch it live. An op ed by Teresa Whipple on September 9t'', Let's Talk about Transparency, relayed her frustration in trying to cover Council committee meetings when she cannot be in three places at the same time. To that end, he invited a subject matter expert, Michelle Earl -Hubbard, Vice President of the Board of Washington Coalition for Open Government, a non-profit organization dedicated to ensuring transparency and open government to speak to the Council. She is also a media law attorney. Ms. Earl -Hubbard introduced her daughter, a youth outreach ambassador, also interested in open government. Council President Nelson originally asked Toby Nixon, President of Washington Coalition for Open Government but he is a member of the Kirkland City Council which also meets on Tuesdays. She is an open government and media law attorney representing news organizations through Washington and in five other states and for the past 22+ years she has handled litigation involving open government laws. She urged the City to consider doing in committees what they already do in Council meetings. It is wonderful there are cameras in Council Chambers livestreaming the meeting and that there is downloadable, click on demand video available online. However, because committee meetings are held simultaneously in separate rooms, the public cannot watch them. She recognized the challenge for the press, they cannot be in all the places they need to be. In places like Edmonds that do not have large newspapers, television stations or media outlets, what happens does not get covered unless there are citizens like My Edmonds News. Ms. Earl -Hubbard urged the Council to add what they already do in Council meetings to their committee meetings because seeing is believing. A citizen could record a meeting themselves and put it on You Tube or their Facebook page, but it would be their version and may not be authentic or gavel -to -gavel and may be taken out of context. Therefore, it is always wiser for the government to control the mic and put it all out Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 22 Packet Pg. 131 8.2.a there gavel -to -gavel and more importantly, tell their constituents they want them in the room, that they have nothing to hide, that everything factoring into their decision is proper and they want them to understand it. If the public is not allowed in the room, they will think whatever the Council is doing is wrong, is bad and is much more important than it is and may sue to get into that room. Since the Council has already taken the step to wire Council Chambers and livestream Council meetings and make them available on demand, it is not that much more expensive to do the same for the three committee meetings. It can be run on the existing system and although she understood there may be some challenges living streaming all three at once, she believed it could be done and the viewer could choose which one to watch. The video could certainly be available on the website so a person unable to attend could watch the committee meetings. Any City Council that is proud of the work they are doing, needs to make their work accessible to the citizens. A number of cities are doing this, small and large. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT NELSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 10 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Ms. Earl -Hubbard said for example Issaquah, Kent and Redmond video record all their Council committee meetings. In Redmond, all Councilmember are on all committees. Seattle also video records their committee meetings. Federal Way and Des Moines audio record their Council committees. Many cities are livestreaming their Council meetings and there are many vendors that would be happy to help. The City already has a system, it only needs a few more cameras in other rooms. This is what the public expects, to be able to see committee meetings, not just the minutes. They do not want someone to tell them what happened; they want to see and hear it and if not, they won't believe it. She concluded there were so many advantages to agencies from video recordings, 1) it ensures a record of what happens, 2) it will make preparing minutes much easier, and 3) if there isn't a video, it is subject to other people's impressions. Councilmember Buckshnis said she is all for open transparency and she has participated in thousands of hours of committee meetings. The meetings are audio recorded and she asked if audio was considered non - transparent. Ms. Earl -Hubbard answered audio is helpful but is not sufficient. The audio is not available on demand, accessible, or livestreamed and requires a person to request it and a staff person to create a copy. Councilmember Buckshnis commented Edmonds' committee meetings are not as exciting as Seattle; she could recall possibly three instances in the past nine years that could be considered exciting. Ms. Earl - Hubbard said it was not whether the meeting is exciting, if people are not able to view it, they will think it was exciting. Councilmember Buckshnis said audio is as legal as video from a liability standpoint. Ms. Earl -Hubbard clarified there is no obligation to record anything. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was making it sound like because the Council did not video record committee meetings, they were being non - transparent. There was nothing wrong with an audio recording. Ms. Earl -Hubbard said the Council has chosen to video record Council meetings. When they do not video record committee meetings, it makes the public wonder why. For example, are topics moved to a committee because the cameras aren't there? Because the public is so used to seeing, then they are told they can only listen, they think they are missing something. Councilmember Buckshnis said decisions are not made in committees; all decisions are made at Council meetings. Committees review things, ensure the packet is complete and refer it to the Consent Agenda or to full Council. When she joined the Council, committee meetings were not even audio recorded. Ms. Earl - Hubbard said RCW 42.30.010, the preamble to the Open Public Meetings Act states, "The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created." Ms. Earl -Hubbard summarized the public gets to decides what's important Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 23 Packet Pg. 132 8.2.a and what it is interested in, if the Council chooses not to make something available to their public, they will doubt the motives. Councilmember Buckshnis said there have not been any complaints until just recently. She pointed out it took the Council two years to decide to video record Planning Board meetings. She felt Ms. Earl -Hubbard was trying to say what the Council was doing was bad; it was not bad, it was still an open public meeting. On behalf of Washington Coalition for Open Government Ms. Earl -Hubbard urged elected officials to do a greater service to the constituency they serve as well as send a message to other citizens in Washington that Edmonds wants the public to see what they are doing and there is no reason they cannot do their job in the public's view and video is better than audio. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas expressed appreciation for the Washington Coalition for Open Government. She agreed with Ms. Earl -Hubbard, for $300/month, it would be a good service if the cost could be kept down. The video did not have to be streamed or looped, it could just be available on the City's website. She assumed few people would actually be interested, most of the topics are dry and slightly boring but there are topics that people are interested in. Mayor Earling suggest scheduling another discussion and he will discuss the logistics with staff. Councilmember Teitzel suggested other options be presented when this comes back to Council such as the cost to post the audio recordings online and make them available on demand. 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORT 1. SPECIAL FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING REPORT AND MINUTES Due to the late hour, this item was moved to the next meeting. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS - None 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR FIVE MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Johnson reminded Councilmembers and the viewing of the public of the reception for volunteers and boards and commissions on Tuesday, October 9 at 5:30 p.m. in the Brackett Room. She encouraged Councilmembers to invite the members of committees they serve on. 12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 14. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:27 p.m. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 2, 2018 Page 24 Packet Pg. 133 8.2.b EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL APPROVED MINUTES January 2, 2019 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Mayor Pro Tem Diane Buckshnis, Council President Pro Tem Michael Nelson, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Dave Earling, Mayor Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Steve Fisher, Recycling Coordinator Tom Brubaker, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Mayor Earling and Councilmembers Johnson and Tibbott. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 11, 2018 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 11, 2018 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS. 4. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR THE AMOUNT OF $4,392.30 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 134 8.2.b 5. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR SERVICE AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT - MIKE NELSON 6. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT UPDATED CAPITAL ASSET POLICY 7. RESOLUTION TO ADOPT NEW SMALL AND ATTRACTIVE ASSETS POLICY 8. CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENT OF MINDY WOODS TO DIVERSITY COMMISSION 5. PRESENTATION 1. PRESENTATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR SERVICE AS COUNCIL PRESIDENT - MIKE NELSON Mayor Pro Tem Fraley-Monillas read a resolution of appreciation for Councilmember Mike Nelson's service as Council President during 2018. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Farrell Fleming, Shoreline, Executive Director, Edmonds Senior Center, expressed his profound gratitude for the work of City staff following the tragic shooting in December at the Senior Center, particularly the Police Department who were remarkable, mature, restrained, and strategic in their thinking about how to handle the subsequent vigil to ensure it was a peaceful event and to convince the people attending the vigil that the police were present to keep everyone safe. The Police Department exemplified their motto of service over self. Several officers were on scene for approximately 18 hours after the incident; he was present from approximately 1 p.m. to 1:30 a.m. when the biohazard cleanup was complete. Edmonds has a remarkable Police Department; good people who are mature and use force when necessary but are enormously restrained. The Police Department did a remarkable job as did staff from Public Works and Parks who assisted in the days that followed. Royce Napolitino, Edmonds, on behalf of resound, a Northwest Chamber Ensemble, a small, non-profit vocal chamber group that has acquired residence at Lynnwood's Trinity Lutheran Church, thanked the Edmonds Diversity Commission and the City of Edmonds for supporting their upcoming performance at Trinity Lutheran Church on January 27t'', the second performance of this piece, with the first performance held on January 13t' at All Pilgrims Christian Church in Seattle. The work titled, "Let Justice Roll Down," is a multimedia musical journey to Selma and back. He provided background on the work, in April 2017 Plymouth Congregational Church's youth forum took a life -changing trip, retracing the steps of the American Civil Rights Movement. Upon their return, ten of the high school youth and their leaders compiled their experiences into a book, "Our Faith Journey through the American Civil Rights Movement." This performance features an original musical composition, a 20-minute work, composed using selected text from the book, interviews with the youth and adult participants, and contributions from local civil rights leaders. The performance is important for the community because recent occurrences of racially motivated violence and other hateful acts remind of the work to be done and the 2010 census estimates Edmonds as more than 80% white. The goal of this project is for audience members to gain an understanding of how white privilege and institutionalized racism can be identified in communities. It will encourage people to think and act differently and be willing to enter into similar conversations and further the message. If attendees go on to lead more self -aware lives and are able to articulate what institutionalized racism is, then evolution has happened, and change is possible. He provided a quote from one of the youth trip coordinators, "I think one thing that is really crucial in the work of racial justice, specifically for white people, is to understand that this work cannot be done on the backs of people of color. That our education and our awakening and our understanding cannot be something that we are relying on folks of color to teach us." As they prepare for two performances this month, resound is using some of the Diversity Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 135 8.2.b Commission's grant funds to engage the communities of Lynnwood and Edmonds to deliver their message. He invited the public to join them in a moving journey toward openness, understanding and path toward dismantling racism through understanding white supremacy and privilege. 7. REPORTS ON COUNCIL COMMITTEES COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MINUTES Public Safety, Planning & Personnel Committee Councilmember Mesaros reported the committee reviewed the salary schedule for directors. Committee members asked questions of staff and committee members planned to talk with staff between that meeting and next week's Council meeting when it will be on the Council's agenda for action. The total amount was approved in the 2019 budget, but Council action is required to approve the salary schedule. Finance Committee Councilmember Teitzel reported the committee discussed: • Small and Attractive Assets Policy and Revised Capital Asset Policy - approved on Consent Agenda. o Polices were separated in response to auditor comments o Spending threshold for WWTP increased from $75,000 to $100,000 • October Financial Report • Fund Balance and Reserve Policy Planning o A matrix with information from 15 neighboring cities is being created o Goal is to have good policies in place to guide budget planning o Plan to present to Council in February ACTION ITEMS APPOINTMENT OF BOARD AND COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES FOR 2019 Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas announced the following appointments: Committee Representative Affordable Housing Alliance Councilmember Tibbott Community Transit Mayor Earling & Councilmember Johnson (Alt) Disability Board Councilmembers Buckshnis & Teitzel Diversity Commission Council President Fraley-Monillas Economic Development Committee Councilmember Tibbott Historic Preservation Advisory Commission Councilmember Johnson Lake Ballinger Work Group Councilmembers Teitzel and Buckshnis (Alt) Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Councilmember Nelson Mayor's Climate Protection Committee Councilmember Buckshnis PFD Oversight Councilmember Mesaros Port of Edmonds Councilmember Teitzel Seashore Transportation Forum Councilmember Mesaros Salmon Recovery — WRIA 8 Councilmember Buckshnis SN0911 Councilmember Mesaros Snohomish County Tomorrow Councilmember Johnson Snohomish Health District Council President Fraley-Monillas Tree Board Liaison Councilmember Buckshnis Youth Commission Councilmember Nelson Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 136 8.2.b Public Safety, Planning and Personnel Comm. Councilmembers Nelson (Chair) & Tibbott Parks & Public Works Committee Councilmembers Johnson (Chair) & Teitzel Finance Committee Councilmembers Buckshnis (Chair) & Mesaros 2. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION APPOINTING A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT BOARD COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION APPOINT MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS TO THE SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT BOARD. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION APPOINTING A COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE TO THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT AREA CORPORATION (COMMUNITY TRANSIT) COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPOINT MAYOR EARLING AS THE COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE AND COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON AS THE ALTERNATE TO THE SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT AREA CORPORATION (COMMUNITY TRANSIT). MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. STUDY ITEMS 1. CLIMATE GOALS PROJECT UPDATE Development Services Director Shane Hope introduced Mark Johnson, ESA, noting that Councilmember Nelson has been active in moving this process forward. This effort began with the Council's adoption of a resolution with climate goals and ways to reduce Greenhouse Gases (GHG) and make improvements in the City while supporting the work of others. This effort began with a GHG Inventory; work was done previously on GHG emissions and climate actions the City could take. Mr. Johnson reviewed: Background o Edmonds 2009 GHG Inventory and 2010 Climate Action Plan o Graphic of the Greenhouse Effect Overview o What are greenhouse gases (GHGs)? ■ Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere: - Carbon Dioxide - Methane - Nitrous Oxide - Fluorinated hydrocarbons o What does MT CO2e mean? ■ Metric tons of CO2 equivalent GHG Inventory o Fossil fuel inventory ■ Local fuel combustion o "Local" inventory ■ Fossil fuel emissions ■ Imported electricity ■ Waste emissions ■ Fugitive emissions (refrigerant gases, local natural gas loss) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 137 8.2.b o Local + Household Consumption (local + imported) ■ Local emissions ■ Emissions from imported food, goods and use of services (fertilizers, production, transportation) ■ Upstream fuel production What GHG emissions were measured? o Emissions from sources located within the city boundary o Emissions from grid- supplied electricity consumed within the city limits o Emissions that occur outside the city boundary as a result of activities taking places within the City's geographic boundary Local emissions o Buildings (residential) 35% o Buildings (commercial) 15% o Buildings Industrial 2% o Transportation 40% o Waste 2% o Refrigerant Loss 6% Graph of local emissions + household consumption -related emissions (imported) Graph of GHG from Energy Consumed in Buildings (electricity, natural gas, other fuels) o Note share of GHG from Electricity vs Natural Gas o Inventory uses a "location -based" approach for GHG from electricity Electricity o Graph of Electricity Emissions (MT CO2e) for Northwest Power Pool (local based emissions) and Snohomish County PUD (market -based emissions) o Location -based emissions are calculated using the regional electricity grid's GHG intensity and represent the average impacts of electricity use and efficiency efforts. o Market -based emissions are based on the GHG intensity of electricity contracts with local utilities. Snohomish PUD's electricity generation from Bonneville Power Administration are largely served by low-GHG hydroelectric and nuclear power. Targets o Setting a Target o Rates of GHG reduction Needed o How Urgent is our Situation? Setting a Science -Based Target Science -based Targets Celsius 1° 1.50 2° Fahrenheit 1.8° 2.70 3.60 o A science -based climate target sets a rate of climate action that is aligned with keeping average global temperature increases below a specified level of increase compared to pre -industrial temperatures. o Keeping global temperature increases below 2°C will allow the majority, but not all, of the global population to avoid the worst social and economic effects of climate change (Paris Agreement) o The average temperature of the earth is approximately 1.2°C higher today than at the beginning of the industrial revolution. • What are the options? What rates of GHG reduction are required: Target +1.0°C 350 ppm +1.5°C 400 ppm +2.0°C 450 ppm Average Annual Rate of Reduction to Meet Target (rounded) 8% 1 5% 1 2% Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 138 8.2.b Annual Reduction compared to 2010 (values are rounded for simplicity) By 2020: 15% 13% 10% By 2030: 70% 50% 35% By 2050: 100% 100% 80% • How urgent is our situation and what can we expect moving forward? o Graph of global GHG emissions 2000, 2050, 2100 for Reference Scenario, National Plans, <2°C Path, and 1.5°C Path o Existing international and domestic activities and policies remain inadequate to prevent a 2°C warming Physical Conditions o By 2100, summers in Edmonds WA 70.66°F will be like summers now in Laguna Niguel, CA 81.48°F +1°C I +1.5°C I +2.0°C 7-ft sea level rise globally 1 9.4-ft sea level rise globally 1 15-ft sea level rise globally o Images of sea level rise in Port of Edmonds Marina, Edmonds Way, 5' Avenue South area ■ Figure 3.5: Differences in sea level rise due to global temperature increases. Note how the sea level creeps up the hillside and gradually covers more of the low-lying areas. Other areas in Edmonds are also affected. Physical 1.5°C 2.0°C Conditions CO2 Ocean acidity increase 9% Ocean acidity increase 24% Frequency of warm extremes over Frequency of warm extremes over land land (PNW) increase 131% (PNW) increase 350%) Temperature Extreme heat: 14% of global Extreme heat: 37% of global population exposed to severe heat at population exposed to severe heat at least once every 5 years least once every 5 years Water Population exposed to water scarcity Population exposed to water scarcity worldwide: 271 million worldwide: 388 million Ice Sea -ice -free artic: at least 1 summer Sea -ice -free artic: at least 10 summer every 100 years every 100 years Species loss: 4% of vertebrates lose Species loss: 8% of vertebrates lose at at least half of their range least half of their range Vegetation Species loss: 8% of plants lose at Species loss: 16% of plants lose at least half of their range least half of their range Species loss: 6% of insects lose at Species loss: 18% of insects lose at least half of their range least half of their range • What does daily life look like by 2050? Sample Communi Changes Change to: Through: 0 100% renewable electricity and large- • No fossil fuel combustion scale energy storage o Electrified transport o Reduced consumption of goods, use of o Purchase of durable goods with a focus on disposables and subsequent waste reuse and repair o Reduction of waste in processing and o Reduce food waste sales (pre -consumer o Buying just what you need o Composting (post -consumer Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 139 8.2.b o More vegetables fruits, legumes, grains o Reduction in GHG-intensive foods and fish o Reduced meat and dairy o Decreased household consumption of goods and o Family education energy o Negative emissions actions o Mass sequestration via forests and technology Strategies and Policy Gaps o Reviewed City planning and policy documents o Found over 300 measures that pertain to climate action o Recommended adding 6 measures under existing categories (Transportation, Land Use, and Buildings) o Recommended a new category — Wastewater with 4 new measures Next Steps o Present Targets and Policy Gaps info to Climate Protection Committee o Hold a public open house Inventory and Targets o Develop a custom tool to assist in setting goals for specific measures Ms. Hope advised staff and the consultant will provide periodic updates to Council as well as seek Council input on the policy implications. The documents are being finetuned and made more user friendly for the public, particularly for the January 17th open house. The point of this is not just research/study for the sake of research/study but to determine what can be done. Councilmember Mesaros observed the targets looked at the beginning of the industrial revolution; he asked what year was used as the starting point. Mr. Johnson answered mid- 19th century. Councilmember Mesaros said the opportunity to reverse culture is a challenge. He referred to Figure 2, How Urgent Is Our Situation and What Can We Expect Moving Forward and asked if there was somewhere between the National Plans and the reduction of 2°, noting there was a large gap between those two. Mr. Johnson answered the <2°C Path represents how much how much GHG would be necessary to reach that target. It would be possible to set a higher target and still have a reduction. He referred to the Physical Conditions table, pointing out the consequences of a 2° increase. Councilmember Mesaros summarized even if there is a reduction, there are still problems. Mr. Johnson commented the effort is applying the brakes to something very large. Councilmember Mesaros noted it has been growing for over 100 years. Ms. Hope said the resolution the Council adopted supported the goals of the Paris Accord. Councilmember Mesaros said last Sunday's "Meet the Press" was devoted entirely to climate change and included stories from communities around the United States. The panel analyzing the information included Representative Carlos Curbelo, a republican in Florida who is an advocate for climate change which does not fit the profile of his political party. Representative Curbelo said Florida anticipates Miami may not be livable by the turn of the next century which will result in declining property values. During King Tides most of the Florida Keys have a foot of water on their main streets due to tidal change. The program also interviewed a republican mayor in Texas whose town has gone entirely solar and has fields with solar panels. This is not a partisan issue, it is a community issue that needs to be tackled. He encouraged the Council and the public to watch that episode of "Meet the Press." The Texas mayor said they cannot wait for people at the national level to act; they decided they were going to take charge themselves to see what they could do to solve the problem. Councilmember Mesaros noted that is an important message for Edmonds, particularly due to sea level. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis referred to the Physical Conditions table and asked what formulas were used to determine the percentages. Mr. Johnson answered it was information summarized by the ECC; the reports include the sources. He assured the information was sourced from published studies, not his own Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 140 8.2.b calculations. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis referred to the sea level rise graphic, commenting Puget Sound is not the actual coastline. She commented on the impact that restoration of the Edmonds Marsh would have on carbon sequestering and asked if consideration had been given to more forestation. Mr. Johnson said some kind of sequestration will be necessary to reach a net zero state, 1-1.5° by 2050 or 2° by 2060. One of his colleagues works on blue carbon, related to how salt marshes can sequester, and he has talked to her about considering how the marsh project might contribute to offsetting Edmonds' carbon footprint. The inventory gives a sense of scale; to completely offset Edmonds' carbon footprint with an average American forest would take an area 122 times the size of the City. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis commented mediation farms are being done, Redmond is doing one. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis referred to the City's local Taming Bigfoot effort. She asked if that educational information could be incorporated or could be a step in educating the public. Mr. Johnson agreed education was an important component. They try to give metrics so the public can see how they are doing, but the measures in the plans are ways in which the City is already engaged. This will help show which of those provide the biggest bang for the buck in the near future. Part of the process is looking where the biggest return can be realized; for example, electric vehicles are a magnificent way to get to a nearly carbon free footprint. Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis commented on planes and cruise ships and educating the tourist industry such as carbon offsets. For example, when she flies to Wisconsin, she pays $8 for a carbon offset. Mr. Johnson agreed that was important; he applauded companies like Boeing who is by far one of the best at reducing its carbon footprint relative to other industries. A recent presentation stated Boeing's production was up by 73% and its total carbon footprint was down by 20%. Ms. Hope agreed education will be something the Council will want to focus on; the first opportunity for the public is the January 17t' open house. Councilmember Teitzel commented the material is sobering, especially for the waterfront community. He referred to Resolution 1389, expressing concern there may be conflicting agendas. It seems GHG control is the priority to arrest global warming, however, the goal in Resolution 1389 is to get to 100% renewal energy for municipal facilities by 2019. He was uncertain renewable energy equates to arresting global warming. In fact the definition of renewable energy in Resolution 1389 specifically excludes energy derived from fossil fuel, nuclear and biomass feedstocks. Recalling Mr. Johnson's statement that nuclear energy is a low GHG emitting energy source, he asked if the Council should consider revising the resolution to include nuclear power as a device for reducing GHG. Ms. Hope answered the resolution addresses a number of things that can be done and does not indicate that one is more important than the other. For example, the Council made a decision to work with PUD to do offsets with the BPA mix of electricity for City facilities. A big part of the resolution is taking action and identifying things that could be done over a period of time to reduce GHG but other things that affect climate change. The Council could update list if they wished. If nuclear energy is a source of clean power that does not contribute to global warming, Councilmember Teitzel question whether that should that be identified as something to move away from in the near term. In the long term, he agreed with moving away from nuclear energy, but it could be considered as a reasonable energy source in the near term to create power without warming the atmosphere. Mr. Johnson commented on looking at all the options and where to get the most bang for the buck noting there may be other concerns with nuclear energy. He noted nuclear energy is not completely without a carbon footprint; there is carbon footprint associated with extraction, storing and creating nuclear power, but it is much lower than coal fire plants. That is the reason the mix in the NW of nuclear and hydro that BPA administers is so low. It is important for that discussion to occur and to consider other values. He agreed nuclear power has a smaller carbon footprint than fossil fuel -based sources. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 141 8.2.b In considering what could be done locally from a policy standpoint to address global warming, Councilmember Teitzel asked whether wood burning fireplaces/stoves were better or worse for global warming than gas fireplaces. Mr. Johnson answered that is complicated. His understanding is woodburning fireplaces are generally not counted as contributing to global warming because the carbon is already in circulation in the air, it is renewable resource, taking carbon from trees, the wood is burned, it returns to the air and back into the tree. Another argument is that anything that adds carbon dioxide to the air needs to be offset and if the trees were not cut down, they would be pulling carbon out of the air. This inventory does not include a number for woodburning fireplaces because it has been the industry practice not to count it in the local emission source. Councilmember Teitzel questioned whether the City could have policies that incentivize woodburning or gas fireplaces depending on which is better for the environment. Councilmember Teitzel said as a pet owner, he is concerned about the effects of pet waste on GHG which equates to methane. He recalled a statement in the presentation that methane more impactful to GHG than CO2. He wondered if the City should consider policies related to how dog waste is handled. Mr. Johnson said contained landfills do a pretty good job of containing methane. Even though dog waste generates methane, that methane is generally captured and often converted to energy via landfill gas -to -energy plants. In a sense that methane may displace fossil fuel. Open agriculture is one of the biggest issues particularly the meat and dairy industry that accounts for one third of the overall household consumption. Councilmember Nelson offered context, commenting this is data that can be used as a starting point and a comparison with the previous Climate Action Plan to see what has changed. He highlighted the increase in natural gas use and transportation emissions. The intent would be for future goals and policies to address what is producing the most emissions and how to reduce it. The City has policies that are reducing emissions and it is apparent it will take more than education, it will also require changes in lifestyle. He commended the consultant for incorporating how households consume goods which not typically measured. He noted when people shop online, they may not think about the amount of emissions they are producing; creating that awareness is an important first step. With regard to online ordering, Mr. Johnson said a recent study looked at instantaneous delivery that consumers have come to expect compared to whether someone would have driven to the store for one small item although GHG is expended either way. Those industries are looking at improving their footprint but that is an area that consumers do have some control such as being disciplined about how many times they order a week. 2. VIDEO STREAMING OF COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS Councilmember Nelson said the packet contains a comparison of costs. Since then, the IT department researched using the City's existing camera company. Those numbers are not included in the packet but the highest was $8,100 one time per camera and installation, a total of $16,200 for two cameras (one already exists in Council Chambers), plus maintenance costs of 17-22%/year (approximately $3,000)/year. He asked whether the updated costs changed Councilmembers' interest in moving forward. Councilmember Mesaros inquired about the personnel cost of running system such as turning it on, maintaining it, record keeping, etc. City Clerk Scott Passey said it would increase his workload slightly as he would need to create three more meetings on the second Tuesday. It would also require at least one staff person per committee to operate the cameras/encoders. Councilmember Mesaros commented it was an addition of two staff because there is already one camera person. Councilmember Mesaros asked whether Councilmembers could be trained to start the cameras to minimize the cost. Mr. Passey answered that would be possible. Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis said she had no interest in pursuing videotaping of committee meetings because audio was just as efficient as video. She pointed out what happened with Watergate which Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 142 8.2.b was audio. She noted there was little interest in listening to the audio of committee meetings and this was much ado about nothing. She believed people act differently when they are on camera, for example little kids act very different when they are filmed. Audio allows discussions and not worrying about the camera and audio is just as transparent as video. There have been no complaints or lawsuits and nothing that requires committee meetings to be videotaped. She preferred to continue audio recording committee meetings and allow people to request the audio. Councilmember Teitzel said he supports transparency and open government and wants to make it as easy as possible for citizens to hear Council discussions, noting there are no votes taken during committee meetings. As Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis mentioned, every committee meeting is digitally audio recorded and they are archived and available upon request. Since the audio already exists, he asked if the digital audio recordings of committee meetings could be posted to the City's website. Mr. Passey said IT indicated the current website does not support that type of upload. Councilmember Teitzel asked how the recordings could be saved so citizens would have access. Mr. Passey said they are saved on the network server and he provides the recordings upon request. Councilmember Teitzel asked if that required a public records request. Mr. Passey answered it was done on a request basis because they cannot be posted on the City's website or the hosted website where other Council meetings are posted which only accommodates one record per meeting. Councilmember Teitzel said the only complaints he has heard about lack of access to committee meetings has been from local media, it is difficult for Beacon and My Edmonds News to report on meetings without hearing the discussion or having access to the summary minutes. If the digital audio were posted, he asked if it could be available the next day for the media. Mr. Passey said the issue is where they would be posted; he could send the recording to them after meeting. Councilmember Teitzel asked if the recordings could be available the next day. Mr. Passey answered yes. Councilmember Teitzel said that could be no -cost way to proceed and staff could track the number of requests for the recordings. If there was a high demand, the Council could invest in video recording equipment in the future. He concurred with Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis that audio recording was sufficient especially if it was available to the public within 24 hours. Councilmember Nelson pointed out decisions are made at the committee level to put items on Consent the Agenda such as the Transportation Safety Plan, continuing the City Attorney contract, fund policies, fiscal policies, and other substantive issues. Cursory minutes are not sufficient and when there is confusion about what transpires at committee meetings, the audio recording must be reviewed. Study sessions used to be videoed; when the Council began holding committee meetings in separate rooms, there was a downgrade to audio. For less than the cost of wayfinding sign, there can be cameras in committee rooms to the allow the public and the Council to be informed. The Council should be encouraging videotaping; it is good for democracy to allow the public to see and hear the Council, who is in the room, whispering, etc., full transparency at a minimal cost. COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO FUND HAVING COUNCIL COMMITTEES VIDEOTAPED. Council President Pro Tem Buckshnis said she has watched committee videos in other cities, many do not have discussions and appear to do things behind closed doors which is even less transparent. She reiterated audio is just as transparent as video. The Council is not doing anything wrong; there are only two Councilmembers in each committee, there is not a quorum and there are no votes taken. Although items are forwarded to the Consent Agenda, Councilmember can pull items from the Consent Agenda. She suggested seeing how it goes with Mr. Passey providing the committee meeting audio to the media and see how many people are interested in listening to committee meetings. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 143 8.2.b Councilmember Teitzel, Chair of the Finance Committee in 2018, disagreed wholeheartedly with Councilmember Nelson's comment that decisions are made in committee meetings. The only decisions are whether an item is forwarded to full Council for discussion and/or action or to the Consent Agenda. He agreed all voices including whispering are picked by the audio recordings. He concurred with Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis' comments. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas commented on the ability to watch legislative committees on TVW, noting several other cities also video their committee meetings. She noted it was not that long ago, 10-12 years, that Council meetings begin being videotaped. This an opportunity to provide more transparency for anyone who wishes to tune in particularly if there is no cost to operate the cameras once the system is in place. She has heard from at least two media sources about the difficulty they have in determining what is occurring at committee meetings. She expressed support for the motion. Councilmember Teitzel said prior to returning to separate committee meetings, the Council addressed items during a monthly Council study session; the Council could return to that process instead of holding committee meetings. He summarized to limit use of taxpayer money, the Council could consider, 1) return to study sessions which utilizes the existing video equipment, or 2) make digital audio recordings of committee meetings available. Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis said the City has had videotaped its meetings for at least 20 years. The Council changed from committee meetings to a study session in the past due to an issue with diplomacy and has since returned to committee meetings. Audio recording committee meetings did not start until a former staff member refused to take notes. She pointed out what happened with Watergate which was audio. She preferred to continue audio recording and see if people complain about wanting to have committee meetings videotaped. Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas clarified videotaping of Council meetings has only been done for a short amount of time, the room previously did not have the capacity. One of the reasons the Council changed from committees of the whole or study sessions was those meetings were watered down by topics that were not study session items. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-3), COUNCILMEMBER NELSON AND MAYOR PRO TEM FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCILMEMBERS MESAROS AND TEITZEL VOTING NO. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Pro Tern Fraley-Monillas reread the appointment of board and committee representatives for 2019 (see Agenda Item 8.1 above). 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Pro Tern Buckshnis wished everyone Happy New Year. She acknowledged the Packers did not have a very good season and hoped for a better season next year. She displayed free glasses that were distributed at a Packers game. She looked forward to an exciting year and urged everyone to spread kindness. Councilmember Teitzel wished everyone a Happy and Prosperous New Year. As a Cougar's fan, he enjoyed Alamo Bowl and the Rose Bowl. Councilmember Nelson wished everyone Happy New Year. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 11 Packet Pg. 144 8.2.b Councilmember Mesaros wished everyone Happy New Year. 12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 14. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes January 2, 2019 Page 12 Packet Pg. 145 8.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 02/19/2019 Affordable Housing: Next steps Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History: In 2018 the City of Edmonds began the process of developing a Housing Strategy to fulfill a stated objective of the Housing Element of the city's Comprehensive Plan at P. 96, which states: "Implementation Action: Develop a strategy by 2019 for increasing the supply of affordable housing and meeting diverse housing needs." A Housing Task Force was formed to work with Berk Consulting and city staff to develop a rough draft of the strategy document, and the draft was subsequently submitted for feedback from the public, the Planning Board, and Council. During public hearings, both formal and informal, it became clear in feedback from constituents that the citizens were concerned about recommendations put forth in the draft and the potential for public comment to be fully considered in the process. Efforts to redraft a housing options plan have been placed on hold while Council and staff refocus on the task definition and next steps for moving forward. Staff Recommendation: It is recommended that Council further discuss this issue and consider a series of motions to clearly identify the task and next steps to develop housing options recommendations to be brought to Council that will enhance Edmonds' supply of housing for residents of all income levels. Narrative: In public comments at various open houses to review the draft housing strategy as well as in public comment before City Council, several common concerns were voiced. First, concern was expressed that the 2019 timeline called out in the Comprehensive Plan for development of an affordable housing strategy is too aggressive and that more time is required to consider all feedback and to develop a plan that preserves Edmonds' character and quality of life. Second, many commenters felt the task force should include Edmonds residents that applied for inclusion on the task force and not be limited to members selected by Edmonds city staff. Finally, many commenters expressed concern the task force members did not fully represent the various areas of Edmonds (e.g., too many were residents of the Edmonds Bowl). In recognition of these Concerns, Council should address the following key questions as study items and establish direction: 1) Should the Comprehensive Plan be amended to extend the due date for development of a housing strategy, and if so, what should be the target due date? 2) Should the Comprehensive Plan be amended to revise the stated objective at P. 96 to be "development of a housing options plan" rather than "develop a strategy for increasing the Packet Pg. 146 8.3 supply of affordable housing," since the housing element of the Comprehensive Plan already contains strategic direction? 3) Should a citizen Housing Commission be established to work with Staff in developing affordable housing options recommendations to bring before Council? If Council determines, based on prior citizen feedback and its own discretion, a Housing Commission should be created, the following process proposal may be considered: This proposed process builds on the substantial work completed by staff and in no way minimizes the valuable work already done by staff and citizen volunteers up to this point. Forming a Citizens Housing Commission seeks to build on the substantial input received by groups and individual citizens of Edmonds. Without their valuable input a plan to establish a robust range of housing options in Edmonds would be incomplete. It is further recognized that Council may at its discretion hold public meetings and/or hearings on this topic in addition to regularly scheduled Commission meetings in order to engage in meaningful public dialog. The Commission will consist of citizens of Edmonds who are able to incorporate views from across the entire city and are willing to serve in public engagement in an open-minded and respectful manner. Further, this commission will serve under the guidance of the Council and city staff to give substantial direction to future decisions regarding development of a range of housing options for the City of Edmonds. The mission of the new Housing Commission is proposed to be: develop housing policy options for Council consideration designed to expand the range of housing available to Edmonds residents of varying income levels; options that are irrespective of age, gender, race, religious affiliation or sexual orientation. The Commission will consist of Edmonds residents representing the full geographic scope of the city. Citizens will be encouraged to submit applications to serve on the Commission, and the city will proactively communicate the application process (likely via post card mailer to all Edmonds residents as well as traditional methods typically used by the city to publicize Commission formation/staffing) to ensure full citizen awareness of the process and that all citizens are provided a fair opportunity to apply. The Commission will be constituted in the following manner: one appointment per Council Member and Mayor, plus one ad hoc member to be approved by majority vote of Council for a total of nine voting members. The application and selection process will be determined by the Council. The Commission should consist of citizens representing seven identified zones within Edmonds (see attached selection criteria matrix and Edmonds geographic zone map), citizens with varying lengths of time living in Edmonds and should also reflect, to the extent possible, the diverse nature of its population. The Council should appoint two Councilmembers to be Council liaisons to the Commission. These members will participate in discussions and provide guidance but will not be voting members. Other ex officio members could be added as non -voting members to the Commission at Council's discretion. Substantial work in defining housing policy recommendations should be completed by the end of 2020 The Commission will have a Sunset date of 1/1/2021. Audience comments will be welcomed and will be moderated by a meeting facilitator. Coordination with the Administration on various responsibilities of processes may include: legal advice, code and ordinance reviews and potential revisions (etc.) Packet Pg. 147 8.3 Staff will assume the lead role in drafting the housing options policy document consistent with recommendations from the Commission. Staff will also ensure details of the housing policy development process are updated regularly on the city's housing web site. Questions regarding the Housing Commission process: Should the Council obtain the services of a community engagement/process facilitator for the duration of the Housing Commission's efforts to develop housing options recommendations? Is Council willing to appropriate funds to engage a community engagement/process facilitator? Is Council willing to appropriate funds to underwrite a post card mailer to alert residents of the Housing Commission application process? How should robust communication to citizens regarding the Commission's focus on key issues and development of potential housing options be managed to ensure strong public awareness and engagement? How often should public open houses occur to ensure the public is afforded full opportunity to provide feedback regarding progress of the housing options development? Attachments: Housing Commission Selection Criteria Edmonds Geographic Zone Map Packet Pg. 148 8.3.a CANDIDATE ATTRIBUTES NUMBER OF YEARS LIVING IN EDMONDS KNOWLEDGE OF HOUSING ISSUES IN PUGET SOUND REGION DEMONSTRATED ABILITY TO COLLABORATE WITH OTHERS EXPERIENCE ON OTHER BOARDS/COMMISSIONS/ COMMITTEES? RENT OR OWN HOME ? OCCUPATIONAL STATUS/BACKGROUND WHY ARE YOU SEEKING THIS APPOINTMENT? EDMONDS HOUSING COMMISSION SELECTION CRITERIA SEVEN SECTORS OF EDMONDS Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 Zone 7 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX THE SEVEN GEOGRAPHIC ZONES EACH CONTAIN A ROUGHLY EQUAL NUMBER OF RESIDENCES TO ENSURE EACH AREA OF EDMONDS IS FAIRLY REPRESENTED ON THE HOUSING COMMISSION Packet Pg. 149 OF ED4�� City of Edmonds Census -based Area Map Igo. lggo 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet Sooth-Coo Park QC N O\y�,pCC�Ce�N W E S BeaNew Pak Hutt ve�k fia 0�? � see�lew '�,� Ekmentay Blerre PeM SoM1utM1 ' rls Park PeeeM1 Main St. Trek v .......... ,......................................... 196th St. SW M klePlewootl lull K� ­e eel 651 220th St. SW 212th St. SW v t 01 Z Pe* Mettmee KA SCM1ooI U Wootlway Elementay leke Bellinger Perk Eamo�w: Community College CP Eleme MO,l Place 'Etlle S-1 City of Edmonds 121 5th Ave N o Edmonds, WA 98202 h 1 inch = 2,000 feet February 201 Edmonds Housing Strateg Packet Pg. 150