2019-03-26 City Council Packeto Agenda
Edmonds City Council
snl. ,nyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
MARCH 26, 2019, 7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
4. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2019
2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2019
3. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
4. Windward Environmental - Request to hire a surveyor
5. Inter -local Agreement w/Edmonds School District for School Resource Officer (Scriber Lake HS)
5. PRESENTATIONS
1. Hearing Examiner Annual Report (10 min)
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON
THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
1. Council Subcommittee Reports and Minutes (10 min)
8. ACTION ITEM
1. Resolution Requesting that the FCC Study Health Impacts of 5G Wireless Technology (5 min)
9. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Public Hearing on Small Cell Update to the Wireless Regulations in Chapter 20.50 of the
Edmonds Community Development Code. (45 min)
10. STUDY ITEMS
1. Discussion on updates proposed for Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.05 —
Utility Wires (20 min)
11. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
12. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
13. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Edmonds City Council Agenda
March 26, 2019
Page 1
14. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(1).
1S. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION.
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
March 26, 2019
Page 2
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2019
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
03-19-2019 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 3
4.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
MARCH 19, 2019
Elected Officials Present Staff Present
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Frances Chapin, Arts & Culture Manager
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Tom Mesaros, Councilmember
Dave Earling, Mayor
Elected Officials Absent
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Mike Nelson, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM
At 6:45 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5"' Avenue North, Edmonds.
2. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The City Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room to interview Ashley Song, a candidate
for appointment to the Edmonds Arts Commission.
ADJOURN
At 6:54 p.m., the meeting was adjourned.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 1
Packet Pg. 4
4.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2019
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
03-19-2019 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 5
4.2.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
March 19, 2019
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Michael Nelson, Council President
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember (by phone)
Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Linda Coburn, Municipal Court Judge
Sharon Whittaker, Court Administrator
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir.
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks Director
Jeanie McConnell, Development Program Mgr
Rob English, City Engineer
Mike Clugston, Planner
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
Mayor Earling read the following statement: The Mayor and City Council and the Diversity Commission
along with the citizens of Edmonds stand with our Muslim brothers and sisters in this time of grief and
sorrow. Hate has no place in civilized society. We mourn for the lives lost in Christchurch, New Zealand
and wish to be of service in any way possible.
2. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. Councilmember Johnson
participated by phone.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA, MOVING ITEM 5.2, E. WORKS/BARKER
LANDSCAPE AMENDMENT #2, TO ACTION ITEMS AND 5.3, REPORT ON BIDS FOR THE
DAYTON STREET UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT, TO STUDY ITEMS. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The
agenda items approved are as follows:
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 1
Packet Pg. 6
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2019
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2019
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS
4. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES
5. ILA VERDANT HEALTH COMMISSION
6. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH
MURRAYSMITH FOR FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR PROJECT
7. REPORT ON BIDS FOR THE 89TH PL W RETAINING WALL
8. URBAN FORESTER JOB DESCRIPTION APPROVAL
9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS
10. ARTS FESTIVAL AND MARKET EVENT CONTRACTS
11. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT TO ARTS COMMISSION
5. PRESENTATIONS
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
REORDER THE AGENDA TO MOVE UP THE TREE BOARD REPORT. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
1. EDMONDS CITIZENS' TREE BOARD PRESENTATION
Tree Board Co -Chair Vivian Olson introduced the members of the Tree Board:
• Bill Phipps, Co -Chair
• Frank Caruso, Vice Chair
• Steve Hatzenbeler
• Barbara Chase
• Doug Petersen
• Gail Lovell
• Suzanne Juergensen (Alt)
• Diane Buckshnis (City Council Rep.)
• Leslie Smith (Student Rep)
Co -Chair Olson reviewed:
• Main Mission
o The City of Edmonds Tree Board actively encourages the planting, protecting and maintaining
of trees for the long term benefit to our community
• Year in Review - 2018
o Edmonds is now in its 8th year as a Tree City USA
o Our 3rd Growth Award (meaning we worked hard!)
o Earth Day - Yost Park Ivy pull: partnered with City Parks Dept.
o Trees in downtown Edmonds identified with temporary name tags
o Partnered with Edmonds in Bloom on their Garden Tour — 2nd time trees identified
o Improved and expanded on the Tree Board website
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 2
Packet Pg. 7
4.2.a
o Created a Trees for Small Spaces brochure and completed final draft of Before You Grab the
Chainsaw trifold brochure
o Arbor Day Planting Celebration at Meadowdale Park
o Saturday Market Info Booth and Tree Raffle
o Participated with the City on the formulation of an Urban Forest Management Plan
o Initiated coordination with the Climate Protection Committee
o Appointed a Student Representative
o Rebranded the Tree Board, including development of a new logo
Tree Board Vice Chair Frank Caruso reviewed:
• Photographs of Tree Board activities
o Tree tagging
o Farmers Market booth
o Meadowdale Arbor Day event
• Tree Board Current Work
o Finalize and distribute Small Trees brochure
o Continue to provide input on the Urban Forest Management Program
o Continue education and stewardship — Earth Day, Farmer's Market, Arbor Day
o Continue to partner with Students Saving Salmon
o Partner with Parks and Recreation Department on a workshop for tree choice (right tree, right
place) and tree care
Before You Grab that Chainsaw brochure
2019 Plans in Summary
o Educate and assist through various activities and events including:
■ Earth Day event (City Park Clean-up)
■ Summer market
■ Downtown educational tree tags
■ Edmonds in Bloom garden tour with tree identification (again)
■ Arbor Day Tree planting with Parks Department
■ Workshop on tree choice and maintenance
■ Working with Parks on trees recommended for street trees
Councilmember Tibbott asked how the information related to Tree City USA was collected. It was his
understanding from previous years that it was Tree Board activities as well as other City activities. Co -
Chair Olson relayed it was her understanding most of the information was collected by the Parks
Department and it was related to per capita spending on trees, tree maintenance, outreach, etc. Edmonds
achieved the Tree City USA designation again this year.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented the Tree Board is a very fun, educated group who are trying to push
right tree right place. The small tree brochure will be very helpful. She expressed her appreciation for the
Tree Board and other volunteers.
Councilmember Teitzel commented there was a hodgepodge of trees in the rights -of -way an asked what
trees did well in an urban environment, did not raise the sidewalk, etc. Co -Chair Olson said there are experts
on the Tree Board; Co -Chair Caruso and Board Members Peterson and Chase are Master Gardeners and
they are working with Parks and Public Works to update the street tree list. Co -Chair Caruso said in addition
to being a Master Gardner, he is also a plant pathologist so he is knowledgeable about tree diseases.
2. MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL REPORT
Judge Linda Coburn reviewed:
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 3
Packet Pg. 8
4.2.a
Courts are an important part of our community because:
o They protect our constitutional rights and due process under the law
o They provide access to justice
o They keep us safe and help us maintain civility
o Everyone benefits from courts
New mission statement
o "Providing the community access to justice with respect and integrity."
2018 investments and improvements
o Probation
■ Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT)
- Of the 10 defendants who started in 2017:
5 graduated
• 4 terminated
• 1 still in the program
- Of the 15 who started in 2018 early enough to have completed the six month program:
• 6 graduated
• 0 terminated
• 8 still in the program
- Of the 11 graduates:
• 0 have had new convictions
• 0 have had new charges
■ Introduced Probation Officer Omar Gamez
o Pretrial services
■ Supervision before found guilty
■ Ensures community safe and avoids jail costs
■ Washington State auditor's office: "Reforming a bail practices in Washington"
- On a typical day
• 6,500 confined in jail statewide who have not been convicted of a crime and are in
jail awaiting trial
• Almost 3/4 of those awaiting trial were charged with non-violent crimes while 'h
charged with only misdemeanors
- After analyzing the risk, auditors concluded
• 4,700 would be good candidates for pretrial services
About 2,300 had a lower risk of reoffending and failing to appear in court; 2400
were higher risk defendants
• Pretrial services offer an effective alternative to money bail
■ Edmonds Municipal Courts pretrial services
- Regular office check -in
- Monitoring abstinence
- Service or treatment referrals
- Court date reminders
■ One example
- Strict conditions and daily reporting
- Evaluation and treatment
- No new charges since being released
- Avoided more than 211 days in jail = $20,832 jail costs
Expenditures
Year
Appropriation
Expended
Balance
Percent Used
2018
$1,035,031
$995,469
$39,562
96%
2017
$1,016,040
$984,203
$31,837
97%
• Filings
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 4
Packet Pg. 9
4.2.a
Filings
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Total Filings
7,763
7,919
6,325
7,809
5,826
6,294
6,097
6,967
9,931
Civil Filings
6,152
6,401
5,034
6,494
4,795
5,387
5,171
6,119
8,992
Criminal Filings
1,611
1,518
1,291
1,315
1,031
907
923
840
939
o Increase in filings primarily due to:
Type
2017
2018
Difference
% Change
DUI*
99
145
46
+46%
Parking
2,113
4,486
2,373
+112%
*Second highest number of DUI filings in the past eight years
Law enforcement staffing make big difference in DUI filings
Intake
o Criminal Intake
Criminal Intake
2015 Actual
2016 Actual
2017 Actual
2018 Actual
Traffic
$33,916
$35,464
$37,741
$36,683
DUI
$9,194
$22,452*
$10,452
$10,205
Non -Traffic
$15,876
$11,061
$11,044
$16,135
TOTAL
$58,986
$68,977
$59,237
$63,023
Adult Probation
Service Charge
$64,528
$66,778
$49,585
$55,140
*Note: The court received a $15,000 bail forfeiture payment in 2016, a significant portion of
which was retained by the City
o Infraction Intake
Infraction Intake
2015 Actual
2016 Actual
2017 Actual
2018 Actual
Non -Criminal Traffic
$296,350
$267,506
$250,162
$299,607
Non -Traffic Infractions
$1,130
$1,761
$2,544
$970
Parking
$40,860
$46,129
$73,563
$162,287
TOTAL
$338,340
$315,396
$326,269
$462,864
* Note: Historically the Court has inadvertently included a line item named "NON -TRAFFIC
INFRACTION PENALTIES" in the budget reports. This line item is actually civic building
code violation penalties. The line item that is the Court's non -traffic infractions, is named "
OTHER INFRACTIONS" in the accounting system
o Other Intake
Other Intake
2017
12018
1 Difference
I Percent Change
Passports
$21,950
1 $21,570
1 -$380
2 %
Note: While there was some increase, as expected in 2017 because of the 10 -year expiration
of passports and a great number i n 2007, the increase was not as significant as anticipated.
This is likely because there are now many other nearby c ties that also process passports
o Overall Intake
Annual Intake
2017
2018
Difference
Percent Chan e
Gross Total
$973,227
$1,237,510
$264,283
+27%
Net Total
$589,988
$766,200
$176,212
+30%
• Courts are not revenue centers
o By statute, '[t]he court shall not order a defendant to pay costs unless the defendant is or will
be able to pay them.' RCW 10.0 1. 160(3). To determine the amount and method for paying the
costs, 'the court shall take account of the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of
the burden that payment of costs will impose.'
-- State v. Blazina, 182 Wn..2d 827, 838, 344 P.3d 680, 685 (2015)
• E2SHB 1783
o Passed and became effect June 7, 2018
o Prohibits courts from imposing conviction fees and costs on indigents
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 5
Packet Pg. 10
4.2.a
o Removed the 12% interest except restitution
o Courts can still impose fines on indigents
Statutory authority
o "The legislature shall prescribe by law the jurisdiction and power of any of the inferior courts
which may be established in pursuance of this constitution."
-Article IV, Section 12 of the Washington State Constitution
Credit Cards
Annual
12015
12016
12017
12018
Service Fee
1$8,092
1$8,606
1$9,617
1$16,050
Recouped service fee
10
1$7,532
1$8,996
$12,877*
*The increased $1 per transaction fee ( from $2 to $3) did not occur until Sept. 1, 2018
Paperless court
Court Improvement fund Balance
Balance
End of 2017
63,029
2018 Contributions: $16,531
79,560
2018 Pa erless court expenditures $18,250
61,310
2019 Contributions to date $4,061
65,371
NOTE: The original decision package for the paperless court project was $70,821. The court has
spent $43,779 thus far, leaving a balance of $27,042 the court anticipates spending in 2019
Separation of powers: Checks and balances
o Executive
o Judicial
o Legislative
Councilmember Tibbott referred to pretrial services, commenting he assumed that allowing someone to
remain employed would assist them in avoiding criminal behavior later. Judge Coburn said Edmonds books
its defendants into the Snohomish County Jail which previously had a work release program. Pretrial
services may allow a defendant to remain employed and it is in everyone's best interest for people to have
a paying job. The pretrial option allows supervision, ensuring they remain sober, as well as allows them to
go to work and come to court until their case is resolved.
Councilmember Tibbott asked how people responded to the flexibility of pretrial services. Judge Coburn
said they are very appreciative of the opportunity to be released from jail and keep their job. It does not
work for everyone, some people are released on pretrial services and if they do not report as required, a
hearing is set and if they do not show up, a warrant is issued and they will spend time in jail with a bail
amount. Pretrial services are a good option and she was hopeful it could be expanded.
Council President Fraley-Monillas commended Judge Coburn for her passion for justice. She asked if there
were any bills in the legislature this year related to the court. Judge Coburn said one of the bills is related
to a uniform payment plan. Washington does not currently have a uniform court system; they are all separate
jurisdictions and every court has its legal financial obligation and defendants must pay or be sent to a
collection agency. It is often difficult for people who make payments to various courts and unless they make
all the payments, they may not be able to get their license back. A unified payment system would also them
to make one payment which would be distributed to jurisdictions, making it easier for defendants to manage
and establish an amount and increasing the likelihood of collecting some money versus no money. There
are also bills related to Driving with License Suspended 3, one version decriminalizes it only in certain
circumstances. Similar bills have been proposed for several years. Council President Fraley-Monillas
agreed the legislature has been discussing criminal justice reform during at least the past two sessions.
Councilmember Teitzel commented in some instances community service may be deemed an appropriate
restitution for minor crimes. He asked what proportion of defendants who are sentenced to community
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 6
Packet Pg. 11
4.2.a
service do not complete it. Judge Coburn said a significant number complete it but the alternative if they
don't depends on how it was imposed. For example if jail time was converted to community service, they
go to jail if they do not complete their community service. Councilmember Teitzel assumed it was a fairly
small percentage of defendants that do not complete community service. Mr. Gamez said most defendants
complete community service.
Councilmember Nelson asked about the concept of mobile court. Judge Coburn explained Edmonds'
courthouse is located in downtown which is great except it is not close to a major transportation hub and
there is only one bus route down Main Street. That is significant because a high percentage of those in the
criminal justice system are poor/indigent and a high percentage do not have a car or a driver's license. The
more difficult it is to get to court, the more often they miss court and the more often they miss court, the
more bench warrants are issued, the more bench warrants there are, the more people there are in jail and
the more money the City spends to keep people in jail. Some of that could have been avoided if coming to
court were easier. Another issue is the underlying issues of people involved in the criminal justice —
addiction, mental health, requirements for tests, etc. When those conditions are not followed, a review
hearing is held which requires them to come to downtown Edmonds. If they do not appear, the same cycle
occurs.
Judge Coburn explained the idea of community court is having court at least once in a while in a place that
is easily accessible to the people who are involved in the criminal justice system. Edmonds encompasses a
large area and extends beyond Hwy 9. A concept is being investigated whereby review hearings would be
held on or near Hwy 99, making it easily accessible due to the numerous bus routes on Hwy 99. Such a
location would also be closer to social service providers, substance abuse counselors, mental health
counselors, testing, other agencies, etc. If all those services were available nearby the mobile court, it is a
possibility when people come to the review hearing, all their issues could be addressed at that time and it
would advance the reason why they are on probation. She summarized the hope was mobile court would,
1) address issues, 2) reduce the likelihood of them committing new crimes, and 3) reduce the need for them
to spend time in jail. With the technology available today and efforts being tried in other jurisdictions, it is
worthwhile investigating whether it would be beneficial to the City.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Judge Coburn's report and the statement, "According to the
auditor's report, if local authorities across the state released all 2,300 lower -risk defendants through pretrial
services, savings would total more than $6.1 million annually. If they also released the 2,400 higher -risk
defendants through pretrial services, taxpayers would save an additional $6.4 million annually. She
recognized Edmonds did not have a formal process but the Court currently squeezed pretrial services out
of the existing one probation officer position. She asked if another probation officer was needed to assist in
providing those services. Judge Coburn said she could always use a second probation officer. As the Court
transitions to paperless and as staff s duties change, that is the time to analyze tasks and possibly devote
more time to pretrial services. She will always do the maximum with what she has. The jail budget is not
in the Court's budget. Although she does not consider jail costs in sentencing, the reality is those are costs,
and the Court needs to be thoughtful in making decisions that are practical, beneficial and the most cost
effective.
Councilmember Mesaros commented pretrial services have economic benefits for the City as well as society
at large. Keeping someone in their job benefits that individual as well as their employer as training someone
to do their work is a cost to employer, a cost to the employee, a cost to the City which in total is a large
societal cost. Investing in more staff support for the Court could be beneficial to the City.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Kari Marino, Bellevue, representing Verizon Wireless, commented getting this right is critical for citizens
and businesses. Small wireless facilities are the basis for allowing wireless data service to expand where
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 7
Packet Pg. 12
4.2.a
and when it's needed. Wireless data service is the way Smartphones provides critical services such as
Goggle Maps navigation, video doorbell applications, wireless credit card payments, and personal
conveniences such as fast video downloads, medical monitoring and ready access to the internet. It is also
the foundation for 5G technology as it evolves and is deployed. She appreciated the Planning Board's
careful deliberation and clear guidance to mitigate the risk related to the hierarchy suggested for small
wireless facilities deployment locations. Small wireless facilities are generally designed to be deployed in
the right-of-way and other locations are generally not feasible. Verizon will never consider installation of
small wireless facilities on single family homes for both safety and logistical reasons. The Planning Board
brought a common sense perspective to the possible negative community reaction to new poles in residential
front yards. Staff has done extensive investigation on many aspects of small wireless facilities. Verizon is
ready to work together to finalize a code that allows a clear path forward that's FCC compliant and that
reflects the aesthetic values of Edmonds. She looked forward to collaborating on a deployment plan that
serves citizens and businesses. She was available to staff for any necessary support to ensure a mutually
beneficial outcome.
Richard Bologna, Edmonds, commented Edmonds' population is approximately 41,500 with an average
household size of 2.25, and the median annual household income is $76,000. Edmonds needs more low
income housing as evidenced by the homeless, mentally ill, drug addicts and others that can be seen on the
Hwy 99 corridor. In Edmonds, it is a supply and demand issue. Many people are moving into Snohomish
County, but the number of housing units is not increasing which has led to steep hikes in rental prices. The
rent for a 2 bedroom 1 bathroom apartment in Edmonds increased from $975/month in 2017 to
$1225/month. The solution is to increase low income housing. The cost of housing in Edmonds has
outpaced wages; to afford the rent on an average 2 bedroom apartment in Edmonds, one needs to earn at
least $29/hour. The frail, disabled, elderly, drug addicts and chronic alcoholics will never get back into or
compete in this workforce. People without housing are more likely to commit crimes, which requires the
City to invest more in the criminal justice and hospitals.
Wendy Shaw, Edmonds, read a letter sent to the Council yesterday regarding the proposed Citizen
Housing Commission that was signed by 30 residents. As residents of Edmonds we are encouraged by the
Council's current intent to create a Citizens Housing Commission as outlined in the agenda packet for the
March 19' City Council meeting agenda packet. We request that the Council make creating this
commission one of its top priority this spring with a goal of having it in place by June. Do not delay
establishing this commission in order to capitalize on the momentum, public interest and input that has been
generated by this important citywide issue. It is clear many Edmonds residents are interested and willing to
participate in developing housing policy options for Council consideration. By including more residents in
the process, it is our hope the commission will include a comprehensive cross section of Edmonds residents
including a ratio of owners to renters which reflects the current mix in the City. Hopefully this will result
in providing the Council with realistic housing policy options that will expand the supply of housing options
while maintaining Edmonds' character and quality of life. We also encourage Council to direct the
commission to consider all the infrastructure and needed service implications of any housing policy
recommendation it creates in addition to being informed of current housing stock. We are encouraged by
the City's intent to have the commission report progress to Council quarterly and host regular public
outreach sessions. In order to broaden the pool of participants in the commission, we recommend those
selected be residents not currently serve on any City boards or commissions and have not for the last two
years. We also recommend the Council select alternates from each zone in case those selected are not able
to complete their term of service. Regarding the outstanding questions of whether to use an outside
facilitator, we recommend the Council first try to recruit a local, experienced person who is committed to
an unbiased process. We also encourage the Council and Mayor to underwrite the postcard mailer to all
households in Edmonds. The mailer should be unbiased and encourage open, thoughtful and original
responses.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 8
Packet Pg. 13
4.2.a
Dawn McCluskey, Edmonds, thanked the Tree Board for their presentation. In addition to new trees, she
recommended consideration be given to old growth trees in the City. She was concern with new
development where old homes are torn down and all the trees on the property, including 40-60 foot tall
trees, are leveled. A prime example is the property at 9' & Pine where the entire lot was cleared. She
assumed 4 lots planned on property at 7' & Spruce would be zero lot line and result in removal of all the
trees including at least 5 that are over 50 feet tall. She suggested the Tree Board meet with the builder
during the planning stage and request some of the trees be retained if possible.
7. ACTION ITEM
1. SEAVIEW PARK PLAYGROUND BID
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite introduced Deputy Parks Director Shannon Burley, advising this
is her first project. Ms. Burley reviewed:
• Background
o Seaview Playground is 18 years old and was slated for replacement in 2019. Council adopted
the replacement of the Seaview Park playground in the 2019 CIP and authorized a budget of
$120,000
o Councilmember Nelson sought feedback on Parks and met with The Kuehn Family (Seaview
residents) about the need for inclusive playgrounds in Edmonds
o Following his research, Councilmember Nelson spearheaded a budget amendment to increase
accessibility in our playgrounds
o Council awarded this budget amendment of $200,000 to support development of inclusive
playgrounds
• Inclusive Play
o Addressing the diverse developmental needs of children in our community by ensuring children
of all abilities can interact, learn and play while nurturing physical, social -emotional, sensory,
cognitive and communicative skill development
• Process
o Parks Department toured inclusive playgrounds January 16, 2019
o Issues the RFP on 1/22/19
o Received 11 submissions for review from 6 different manufacturers
o Consulted Parks Department and two families that have children that would benefit from this
playground
■ Narrowed to 3 options
o Public vote on top 3 options
■ February 27 — March 1, 2019
■ 899 unique respondents (in person and online
■ 349 from Seaview neighborhood
■ 397 comments
• Winning Playground: AllPlay Systems
o Cozy spots
■ Offering quiet or semi -enclosed places such as the crawl tube and SpinMAX pod provide
areas where children can seek sensory relief
o Social activities
■ Encouraging cooperation, the activity panels create social dialog through fantasy play.
■ These custom inclusive play panels offer a large variety of play opportunities while
providing space for adaptive devices
o Swinging
■ The Adaptive Swing features a molded seat, high back, adjustable harness and neutral body
position
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 9
Packet Pg. 14
4.2.a
■ The Disk Swing allows multiple users and/or care givers to have fun and develop while
body awareness
o No fault safety surface
■ Latex free, non -toxic, no loose rubber specs
■ Porous & slip resistant, seamless & ADA accessible
■ Recycled / environmentally friendly, LEED compliant
■ 6-8' fall protection based on location
■ IPEMA certified and ASTM, CPSC compliant
■ Low maintenance, proven durability
■ Synthetic rubber top, bound by polyurethane
o Climbing
■ Provides necessary development benefits such as balance, agility, upper and lower body
strength and decision making skills
■ When children climb they develop confidence ad take age appropriate risk that help build
skills to help them throughout their lives
o Swinging
■ 4 belt swings will be added near the playground to serve the older children
■ In total the park will have the following swings
- 4 belt swings
- 1 toddler bucket swing
- 1 ADA swing
- 1 multi -purpose disc swing
■ The previous design had 3 belt swings and 1 toddler swing
Finances
o $209,908.62 for the project
o Utilizing $90,000 of the $200,000 set aside to ensure fall surface is inclusive
o Fall surface material and playground equipment cost about the same amount
o Reminder is freight, tax, demo and installation
• Additional upgrades
o Planning improvements to the path from parking to the playground
o Removal of trees that are damaging the sewer line and sidewalk. Replanting with the right trees
in the right place.
o Additional striping / marking of ADA parking spaces
o Seaview restrooms were refurbished in 2018
o Seaview tennis courts will be resurfaced in 2019
• Timeline
0 8 weeks to manufacture equipment
o Goal to install late May, prior to summer
o Request bid be moved to consent agenda at the next meeting authorizing the Mayor to sign
Council President Fraley-Monillas thanked staff for their efforts and Councilmember Nelson for his
suggestions. As a Councilmember with a child with intellectual disabilities, she noted it can be difficult
sometimes to have a child with intellectual or physical disabilities and even more challenging to normalize
their world. She asked if the cozy spot could be bigger so parents could use them. She recognized the cozy
spot would be great for those on the autism spectrum or who need relief from the noise.
Councilmember Nelson commented every child should have an opportunity to play on a playground and it
warmed his heart to see this come to life. He thanked Ms. Burley for her work.
Councilmember Tibbott commented the playground design looks like fun and he anticipated the kids would
enjoy it. He asked if the intent was to have the patterns on the surface that are shown in the illustration. Ms.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 10
Packet Pg. 15
4.2.a
Burley said once the bid is approved, there will be an opportunity to look at the colors of the play structure
and the fall materials. At this point there is some natural design that includes a stream and natural colors.
Councilmember Tibbott observed the design on the surface could add to play dimension of playground and
suggested adding hopscotch or foursquare to the graphic. He summarized the playground was a good idea
and adds another dimension to play capabilities. He lives near Seaview Park and looked forward to seeing
the playground installed.
Councilmember Mesaros commented Seaview is a neighborhood park and it would be nice to see this
inclusive approach in the City's destination parks as well. He asked how destination parks could be
revamped to be inclusive and available to all residents and businesses. Ms. Hite said the Council included
$200,000 in the 2019 budget; $90,000 of that was used for Seaview, leaving $110,000. Consideration will
be given to other playgrounds as well as including an inclusive playground in Civic Park which will be a
regional destination. One playground is replaced each year; funding in the CIP can include inclusive
playground materials. Councilmember Mesaros realized it would take time to make the City's playground
inclusive but it would be nice to include it in the CIP to illustrate the progress of improving parks.
Councilmember Nelson said his intent was for this to be the start. Seaview was selected because it was the
next playground to be upgraded. As playgrounds are upgraded each year, they could include inclusive
playground materials.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO FORWARD THIS TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.
Councilmember Teitzel relayed the presentation is very complete, he loved the design, and the financing
package was complete. He was prepared to approve the proposal and bid as presented.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
APPROVE THE PROPOSAL AND BID AS PRESENTED AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO
SING THE CONTRACT.
Ms. Hite thanked Council President Fraley-Monillas for allowing staff to bring this to full Council when
they missed the Council committee meeting. Staff wanted to get the order placed so it can be installed this
summer. Knowing the Council likes to have two touches before approving an item, it was planned to go to
the Consent Agenda next week.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.'
VOTE ON MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. E. WORKS/BARKER LANDSCAPE AMENDMENT #2
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite explained this is an amendment to the contract for design services
for the Waterfront Redevelopment in front of the Senior Center. The City hired Barker Landscape who has
since merged with Environmental Works. The amendments change the name to Environmental
Works/Barker Landscape and add $108,000 to their contract for design of the frontage improvements and
the parking lot as approved by the Council in fall 2018. There is also an enhanced electrical design package
due to interest from Parks and the Senior Center to add lighting to the parking lot to avoid any pedestrian
safety issues in the parking lot with increased use of the Waterfront Center in the evening. There is budget
authority within the current budget for the amendment based on Council action in fall 2018 and the 2019
budget.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 11
Packet Pg. 16
4.2.a
Councilmember Teitzel clarified this proposal was decoupled from the Ebbtide walkway project. Ms. Hite
agreed it does not include funds for the Ebbtide walkway.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE AMENDMENT #2 WITH ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS/BARKER
LANDSCAPE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. STUDY ITEMS
3. REPORT ON BIDS FOR THE DAYTON STREET UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Public Works Director Phil Williams relayed this was intended to be an action item.
City Engineer Rob English explained this project includes rehabilitating and replacing water, sewer and
storm utilities in the corridor. The project was initiated in August 2013 when a storm event caused a great
deal of flooding downtown. That led to a study where evaluation of the storm drain system found several
sections were under capacity and in need of replacement. In addition, the water and sewer pipes were
installed in the 1920s — 1940s. That work was coupled with replacement of the storm drain to create one
utility replacement project along the Dayton Street corridor. He reviewed:
• Scope
o Replace storm and water between 3rd & 9t'
■ 3800 feet water main
■ 3200 feet storm lines
o Replace sewer between 3rd & 5th.
o Rehabilitate sewer between 5th & 9th with trenchless cured -in place pipe process.
o ADA Ramps at intersections of 6th, 7th, 8th & 9th.
o Add sidewalk to the gap between 7th & 8th (450 feet)
o Reconfigure intersection of 8th & Dayton
■ Bulb outs to house ADA ramps
■ Rebuild traffic circle
o Full street reconstruction between 3rd & 6th
o Pavement overlay between 6th & 9th
Construction Schedule
o Phase 1 (2019 Spring to Fall)
■ Construction between 3rd (west of) and 5th
■ Contractor Option Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) work east of 5th.
o Phase 2 (2020 Spring to Fall)
■ Between 5th & 9th
• Bid results
Contractor Bid Results
Amount
Shoreline Construction
$6,141,084
Karvel Construction
$7,204,417
Engineers Estimate
$6,777,231
• Construction Budget
Description
Amount
Contract Award
$6,141,084
Management Reserve (15%)*
$921 200
Construction Mgmt, Inspection & Testing (15%)
$92,200
Total
$7,983,484
*Due to age of corridor
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 12
Packet Pg. 17
4.2.a
• Construction Funding
Funding
Amount
Water Utility Fund
$2,741,035
Storm Utility Fund
$2,734,890
Sewer Utility Fund
$3,414,805
REET*
*$160,000
TIB Complete Streets Grant**
**$250,000
Total
$9,300,730
*Street reconstruction between 5` & 6th
**The range TIB has provided for the City's grant amount is $150,000 to $250,000. TIB is expected
to announce the final amount in late March
• Staff recommendation
o Award a Contract to Shoreline Construction for $6,141,084
o Authorize a 15% Management Reserve of $921,200
Mr. Williams said the project will not include the following because there is no funding:
• Replace the existing sidewalks on both sides of Dayton
• Undergrounding utilities
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the REET funds were from REET 126. Mr. English answered it would
be programmed from next year's overlay; there is $450,000 in REET 125 or $300,000 in REET 126.
Councilmember Buckshnis said it was her understanding only REET 126 could be used for streets. Mr.
English answered it could be funded from either.
Councilmember Teitzel said this project was presented to the Parks & Public Works Committee last week;
he and Councilmember Johnson had an opportunity to ask a number of technical and funding related
questions and concluded the proposal was well put together and the funding appropriate. It is a major project
so they directed it be presented to full Council. He relayed his support for the project.
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if a 15% management reserve was typical. Mr. Williams answered
it varies depending on the scope. This project includes unbuttoning the street from 3' to 9t1i; it is an old
street with a lot of old utilities and may have abandoned utilities. Potholing was done to investigate but
once the pavement is opened, some unexpected things may be discovered. He concluded the recommended
15% was reasonable. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked why the management reserve wasn't
included in the contract. Mr. Williams said the intent was not to give the money to the contractor. This was
basically the City's change purse so if unexpected costs arise, a change order can be executed and funds
are available up to the limits in the purchasing policy. Council President Fraley-Monillas summarized 15%
for this size project was normal. Mr. Williams said yes for this type of construction and the amount of
underground risk.
Councilmember Tibbott commented on the potential impact on businesses when the street is closed. He
appreciated that the construction was being phased and asked if any of the management reserve could be
used to keep access to businesses open. Mr. Williams said the intent is to have one lane of traffic open
throughout construction although there could be an occasional day when that is not possible. If there is a
need to deviate from that, the Council will be informed. They will also inform the public that businesses
are open particularly during the first phase from 3' to 6t''. Several meetings have been held with businesses
in the area to explain.
Councilmember Tibbott asked if there was any intent to add vaults to capture water and allow it to percolate
or would the water go straight into Puget Sound. Mr. Williams answered it will go the same place it goes
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 13
Packet Pg. 18
4.2.a
now but via larger pipes and conveyance structures so it does not stay on the streets. The project does not
include any infiltration galleries in the street.
Councilmember Mesaros asked if the Council was authorizing the 15% Construction Management,
Inspection and Testing tonight. Mr. English answered it is part of the budget; awarding the contract tonight
includes construction management.
Councilmember Mesaros asked what the scope of the budget would be if sidewalks and underground wiring
were included. Mr. Williams answered it would be a very sizeable amount. Undergrounding of
approximately 100 feet on each leg of the intersection at 76t' and 212" 100 feet cost approximately
$750,000. Sidewalks cost at least $300/foot; the length of the project is 3,800 feet x $300 x 2.
Councilmember Mesaros summarized it would more than double the budget.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO
APPROVE DAYTON STREET UTILITY PROJECT AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. Councilmember Johnson discontinued her participation by phone.
1. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE PLANNING BOARD'S
RECOMMENDATION FOR THE SMALL CELL UPDATE TO THE WIRELESS
REGULATIONS IN CHAPTER 20.50 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT CODE
Planner Mike Clugston reviewed:
Project timeline:
o January 15' — Council introduction
o February 12' — Public hearing, approved interim ordinance
o February 13' — Planning Board reviewed interim ordinance
o February 27t' — Public hearing at Planning Board, forwarded recommendation to Council
o March 19t' — Council discussion of Planning Board recommendation
o March 26t' — Council public hearing on updated regulations
o April 2" d — Updated ordinance on Consent for approval or sooner: Hearing before City Council
o April 14t' — Local jurisdictions to have small cell aesthetic rules in place
Small Cell is ... Antennas, Equipment & Support Structure
o What?
■ Height — 50 ft +/-
■ Each antenna — 3 ft3 max
■ Equipment — 28 ft3 max
■ 4G now, 5G in future
o Why, Where, How?
■ Off load macro service (capacity) & provide new coverage in some areas
■ Need to provide siting options across the City
■ Minimize visual impact
- Appearance (camouflage, concealment)
- Location (ROW, zoned)
How to do Small Cell in Edmonds...?
o Residential Areas with underground utilities
o Commercial areas with underground utilities
o Areas with existing air space clutter
Interim Ordinance Location Priorities (Ord. 4141, February 12, 2019)
Locate Outside the Right -of -Way
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 14
Packet Pg. 19
4.2.a
1. Existing building
2. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole (not on BD -zoned property)
Locate Within the Right -of -Way
3. Existing or replaced Street Light Pole or Utility Pole (hollow poles)
4. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole or Street Light
5. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation on top of pole)
6. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation in communication space)
7. Strand -mounted (installation in communication space)
Staff Recommendation at Planning Board (February 27, 2019)
Locate Outside the Right -of -Way
— locations are generally not technologically feasible
2. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole (not on BD -zoned property)
Locate Within the Ri t-of-Way
3. Existing or replaced Street Light Pole or Utility Pole (hollow poles)
4. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole or Street Light
5. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation on top of pole)
6. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation in communication space)
7. Strand -mounted (installation in communication space)
Planning Board Recommendation (February 27, 2019)
Locate Outside the Right -of -Way Optional
1. Existing building
2. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole (not o BD zoned p pefty)
Locate Within the Right -of -Way
3. Existing or replaced Street Light Pole or Utility Pole (hollow poles)
5. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation on top of pole)
4. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole or Street Light
6. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation in communication space)
7. Strand -mounted (installation in communication space)
Planning Board Recommendation — February 27, 2019
o Locate small cell on zoned properties as an optional choice
o Install antennas on top of wood poles prior to installing new freestanding small cell poles
o Incorporate a public notification process if possible
o Incorporate additional discretion for Director to approve innovative solutions of a similar scale
and character
Public Input Received
o Two 5G-health comments at Planning Board public hearing
o No studies have been done by FCC or other agencies on 5G-health
o City of Portland passed resolution on March 13, 2019 asking FCC to consider 5G-health
impacts
o Existing FCC guidance applies and prohibits jurisdictions from regulating based on health if
wireless providers comply with the guidance — staff verifies compliance during permit review
New Information from Wireless Providers and Concealment Vendors
o Preferred small cell height is 20' - 40'
o Locating on SF residential structures is technologically impractical
o Small cell on zoned property can be effective where buildings are close to ROW
o Technology exists and/or is being developed to fully conceal 4G and 5G small cell installations
(multiple providers and technologies in one structure)
Development Program Manager Jeanie McConnell explained in addition to meeting with wireless providers
and concealment vendors, staff also met with PUD. The preferred location for wireless vendors is to locate
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 15
Packet Pg. 20
on existing PUD poles. PUD has received applications and has developed policies. Ms. McConnell
reviewed:
• New information from PUD
o Currently allow only one wireless provider to attach to a wood utility pole
o Many wood poles in Edmonds are `full' and prevent installation of a wireless facility
o Replacement of a wood pole with a new hollow pole (allowing for full concealment) could
open up opportunities for small cell installations
o Only qualified PUD line workers can perform work in supply space
o PUD work on poles requires de-energization of cell equipment
o Power shut down required for some work on cell facilities
o PUD Engineering working on street light/small cell design
• Wood Pole Replacement Option
o Photograph - existing wood pole on Main Street
o Photo simulation - Replacement with Steel pole (photo simulation)
• Wood Power Pole vs Hollow Power Pole
o Photograph - Small cell on wood power pole
o Photo simulation - Small cell within a hollow power pole
• Light Pole - Full Concealed
o Photograph of small cell fully enclosed in a street light pole (Market Street in Kirkland)
o Photograph of standard light pole (no small cell)
• Camouflage on Existing Wood Utility Pole
o Photographs of existing site and proposed site
o Antennas visible on pole, conduit running up the side, equipment box on exterior
o Painted brown to match wood pole
• Small Cell Facility Options
1. Hollow Power Pole - full concealment
2. Freestanding Small cell - full concealment
3. Wood Power Pole - installation on top of pole
4. Wood Power Pole - installation in communication space
5. Stand Mount - attachment to wires
Mr. Clugston reviewed:
• Next Steps
o Council to provide guidance on Location Priorities
■ Follow Planning Board guidance?
- Remove Zoned Properties from the priority list and establish as Optional Only?
- Swap #4 (freestanding small cell) and 45 (install on top of PUD wood power pole)?
■ Provide new ranking for location priorities?
o Staff to update Interim Ordinance 4141 based on Council guidance
o Council Public Hearing on March 26
o Local Jurisdictions to have aesthetic regulations in place by April 14, 2019
City Attorney Jeff Taraday emphasized the Council giving direction regarding their aesthetic preferences
does not mean they are a fan of small cell. Councilmembers can be concerned about certain aspects of small
cell, but an aesthetic choice needs to be made tonight. If the Council does not make the aesthetic choice, it
will be made by the industry. The Council can give staff direction for drafting an ordinance the Council is
comfortable with aesthetically; absent an ordinance, the industry will decide what the City looks like with
regard to small cell.
Councilmember Nelson referred to the FCC's aesthetic requirements: reasonable, no more burdensome than
those applied to other types of infrastructure deployments, and published in advance. With that in mind, the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 16
Packet Pg. 21
4.2.a
options are not as crucial compared to how many small cell facilities there will be and how big they will
be. He referred to page 35 of the interim ordinance, Location Preference #2, Dimensional Requirements, a)
a free-standing small cell may not exceed 30 feet in height from the top of foundation to top of the cantenna.
The presentation indicated the preferred height was 20-40 feet. He asked if 30 feet was selected as an
average. Mr. Clugston agreed it was at that time. Councilmember Nelson said if the industry's preferred
height is 20-40 feet, he recommended 20 feet.
Councilmember Nelson referred to placement requirements. Freestanding small cells shall be located as
follows: Item I states no two freestanding small cell poles may be located within 300 lineal feet of each
other as measured along the right-of-way line. He asked how that differed from the City of Denver that has
a radius requirement versus the proposed lineal requirement. If two streets were parallel or crossing each
other, he asked if there was a possibility they would be within 300 feet of each other. Mr. Taraday explained
that placement requirement was drafted that way because it was staff's understanding small cell signals are
weak enough they will not wrap around corners. To the extent a provider is trying to provide coverage
within a right-of-way corridor, the relevant spacing is within that corridor. Whether it was possible at an
intersection that one pole would go one way and another the other way, he agreed that was true and staff
could tweak that in the code. Councilmember Nelson relayed Denver has a 250 foot radius requirement.
Councilmember Nelson hoped in exchange for the use of the public right-of-way, the City was considering
negotiating free or discounted service for schools, library, the ECA and other public entities that benefit the
community.
Councilmember Buckshnis preferred the free-standing small cell full concealment because it looks better.
She recalled an issue with the master service agreement that allowed only one wireless provider per pole.
She asked if it had been determined that all wireless providers could be located in one hollow pole. Mr.
Clugston said in speaking with concealment providers, multiple providers can fit in some of concealment
solutions and multiple 4G and 5G technology.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled Verizon stated they would not share their siting information. She asked
if master agreements and mapping would be provided by all providers in order to determine how many
poles will be deployed. She anticipated it would be more than 1,000. Mr. Taraday said no applications have
been submitted and none of the three carriers have asked for a master use permit for the entire City; he
suspected they were waiting until the ordinance is final. With regard to the number of poles, it depends on
the timeline. In 50 years, the number could be huge.
Councilmember Buckshnis said the current timeline is the next 3-5 years. Mr. Taraday said there was not a
good way to estimate the number poles but no applications have been submitted. He approached this from
the assumption that someday there would be small cell facilities on every block; 5G technology will be
used to power self -driving cars; that will not work unless the service is everywhere. He said it should be
assumed at some point they will be everywhere.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why rooftop pods or cupolas or wall mounted galleries have not been
considered, noting the discussion has primarily been about hollow poles other than building near the post
office with multiple antennas. Mr. Clugston agreed the Harbor Building was not a good look. The Planning
Board's recommendation is to remove zoned property from the first choice, but it is still an option. Where
buildings are close to the right-of-way, mounting antennas close to the roof edge or the side of building
may be option in some areas.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the reason the Planning Board recommended removing locations
outside of the right-of-way was because wireless providers would have to pay a fee to the property owner.
Mr. Taraday said the pole owner will still be able to charge a modest fee. With regard to eliminating the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 17
Packet Pg. 22
4.2.a
on -the -building option, the City hired its own RF engineer and learned that because of the way antennas
transmit, if an antenna is mounted on a building, the residents of the building would not benefit from the
signal. The assumption in the interim ordinance was property owners may be interested in hosting an
antenna to have better access/coverage. That still could be true with the free standing pole in a front yard
but the more staff talked to the RF engineer, they realized the people inside the building where an antenna
is mounted will not benefit from it and the amount of money they can charge is probably very insignificant.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked who will pay for the pole, whether it would be PUD and passed on to the
ratepayer. Mr. Taraday said that is between PUD and the carriers to figure out but it won't be the City.
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked for clarification why the Planning Board recommended removing
locating on an existing building on private property. Mr. Clugston said staff learned from the City's wireless
consultant that that was not feasible given the technology and strength of wireless signal in areas where
there are setbacks. Where buildings are closer to the right-of-way, that could still be an option.
Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed questions at the Planning Board such as what happened if there
was an antenna on a building and the property was sold. She summarized not all the answers are available.
Mr. Clugston agreed not all the questions have been answered, but with the information available, having
zoned property as an option would work in some instances but would not be appropriate for all. That was
why the Planning Board moved it out of the "required to look at places." The Planning Board's focus was
on solutions within the right-of-way. Council President Fraley-Monillas preferred carriers be required to
first look at private property. She agreed in many instances, that would not be an option. If she had to choose
between the freestanding small cell facility options, she preferred 1 and 3. She found it presumptuous of
the Planning Board to assume the facilities would be located in the public right-of-way considering there
could be thousands of poles.
Councilmember Teitzel said as an elected official, one of his primary responsibilities was the safety and
well-being of his constituents in Edmonds. That is not necessarily the FCC's responsibility; they regulate
communication technologies.. He asked the legal effects of the resolution that Portland passed regarding
the potential health effects of small cell and whether Portland halted any deployments until that was
resolved. Mr. Taraday explained Portland's resolution (8.1.k in the Council packet) is basically asking the
FCC to update studies on potential health concerns arising from RF wireless emissions and to make their
findings publicly available and to send the resolution Oregon's congressional delegation. Edmonds could
adopt a similar resolution. There is nothing illegal about the resolution but it does not change the way small
cell is regulated. It would just express concern about the health impacts and ask the FCC to pay attention
and study it further.
Councilmember Teitzel summarized Portland's resolution had no immediate effect relative to the April
deadline to enact code changes. Mr. Taraday agreed it did not. Councilmember Teitzel asked if any other
cities in Washington had raised the same health issue. Mr. Taraday said a number of cities in the United
States have sued the FCC to challenge the order; some of those petitions raised health as basis for the
concern. That lawsuit is pending in the 9t1i Circuit. There is some potential the court could order some relief.
He was uncertain if any other Washington cities had adopted a resolution similar to Portland's.
Hypothetically if the FCC paid attention to Portland's resolution and commissioned a study that determined
5G technology has a human health risk, Councilmember Teitzel asked if the FCC would halt further
deployments or reverse those that had been installed. Mr. Taraday said what the FCC would do with that
type of information would be speculation. He would like to think they would act responsibly and regulate
in a way that's appropriate given whatever the health impact might be because they are statutorily charged
with protecting the public from RF emission, but it does not appear they are that concerned about public
interest.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 18
Packet Pg. 23
4.2.a
Councilmember Teitzel was interested in at least making an attempt to raise that issue and get on record
that Edmonds has a concern.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
DEVELOP A RESOLUTION SIMILAR TO PORTLAND'S EXPRESSING EDMONDS' CONCERN
WITH HEALTH EFFECTS OF 5G WIRELESS AND ASK THE FCC TO COMMISSION STUDIES
TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS HARM. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Mesaros asked how many existing power and street light poles there were in the City.
Public Works Director Phil Williams said there are approximately 6,000 poles. Councilmember Mesaros
asked how many existing cell towers there are. Mr. Clugston said there are 24 cell sites. Councilmember
Mesaros referred to the freestanding small cell facility options, commenting there was one that looked like
#2 in his neighborhood in Arizona. Scottsdale will be one of the pioneer cities for 5G for Verizon; option
2 is the primary one they use. His neighborhood in Scottsdale is newer and has underground wiring and the
only poles are street lights which makes it easier to erect freestanding small cell poles because there is not
the clutter of utility poles. He preferred options 1 and 2. Although many are interested in undergrounding
utilities, the cost is prohibitive.
With regard to Councilmember Nelson's suggestion to limit poles to 20 feet, Councilmember Mesaros
preferred the flexibility of 20-25 feet. In a particular location with an obstructive view, 25 feet may be the
appropriate height. Mr. Taraday assumed the height limit was related to free standing small cell poles.
Councilmember Mesaros agreed. Mr. Taraday said part of the thinking of the 20-40 foot height limit was a
pole at 30 feet would likely be tall enough to contain two carriers. When carriers share poles, they share it
vertically; the taller a pole is, the more carriers can share one pole. A 20-foot pole would likely be a one
carrier pole. He was not certain how tall a pole for two or three carriers would need to be but there is a
relationship between height and the potential to share.
Councilmember Mesaros summarized the shorter the pole, the more poles there would be. Mr. Taraday said
that would be his assumption. Councilmember Mesaros asked if there was a way to get that data in order to
make a good choice about pole height. Mr. Taraday said the more carriers that locate in one pole, the wider
the pole also needs to be. Councilmember Mesaros asked if was two inches or two feet wider. Mr. Clugston
did not know. He pointed out the FCC has said small cell could be up to 50 feet.
Councilmember Mesaros asked the typical height of a utility pole in Edmonds. Ms. McConnell said an
average of 45 feet. Councilmember Mesaros asked the approximate height of the poles in option 1 and 2.
Ms. McConnell said while graphically they look about the same height, option 1, the hollow power pole, is
approximately 40-45 and the free standing small cell is approximately 25-30 feet. Councilmember Mesaros
observed the freestanding small cell is being used as a street light as well as a utility pole and the light
shouldn't be at 20 feet. He summarized there are too many unknowns.
Councilmember Tibbott said he and Councilmember Teitzel took a field trip to Seattle to look at
installations and found it very instructive to see how they are set up. Of the three sites they visited, two had
new poles, in one case there was a new pole next to an existing pole and both were full of utility equipment.
One of the conclusions he reached was whenever utility companies are putting up new poles, the City should
require it be a hollow pole. He liked the order of the poles on the small cell facilities options slide. The
illustration with a cantenna on the top is better than what they saw in Seattle which looked more like option
4. He was not certain what language to include in the ordinance to require a hollow pole when a pole is
replaced.
Councilmember Tibbott relayed he also noticed 3-5 different strands of conduit on a single pole such as is
illustrated on option 3 and actually option 3 is a minimalistic compared to what they saw in Seattle. He
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 19
Packet Pg. 24
4.2.a
summarized if there was conduit, he preferred it be in one bunch versus individual strands. Councilmember
Tibbott asked if the five photos on the Small Cell Facility Options page was the proposed order in the
ordinance. Ms. McConnell answered yes, and those are focused on installations within the right-of-way and
as recommended by Planning Board locations outside the right-of-way would only be an option. Mr.
Taraday said staff s current recommendation is the order shown on the Small Cell Facility Options page in
the presentation. The order in the Planning Board's recommendation, 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, is slightly different.
Councilmember Tibbott said option 2 could potentially be on private property. He noted there are examples
in the Pt. Edwards neighborhood where there are free standing poles and underground utilities. With regard
to the Sternberg lighting on Main Street, Councilmember Tibbott was adamantly opposed to adding
anything to those whether it was a cantenna on top or a box the outside. He did not see that restriction in
the ordinance. The exception would be if all the Sternberg were replaced with a new standard that facilitated
5G installations and all were identical.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to option 2 and asked if that was for a single small cell carrier. Ms.
McConnel assumed the graphic was only one but that did not mean a freestanding small cell would be
limited to one carrier. Councilmember Teitzel asked how it would look if two other carriers wanted to share
that freestanding small cell, whether there would be boxes on the pole. Ms. McConnel said the intent for a
free standing small cell, whether one carrier or multiple, would be concealment within pole.
Councilmember Teitzel asked how the cantenna worked with more than one carrier using the freestanding
pole. Ms. McConnell said vertical height is critical to allow stacking of multiple antennas on top.
Councilmember Teitzel asked where the small cell equipment box was in option 2, noting he and
Councilmember Tibbott saw rectangular small cell equipment boxes approximately 1 % x 3 feet on the poles
in Seattle. Ms. McConnell did not know where it was located in that graphic; that is an image found on the
web. It was her understanding freestanding small cells can be designed to house the equipment on the
interior of the pole.
Councilmember Nelson was reminded of a Donald Rumsfeld press briefing where he talked about known
unknowns. He noted there was nothing in the materials about fees and he hoped there would be a cost study
that included the City's costs for reviewing applications, field inspections, installations, repair,
administration, public notification, etc. especially when there was a very limited timeframe to comply and
it was unknown/unclear how many applications there would be and whether the City would need to hire
additional staff. He said Denver's guidelines were very helpful in that they included a lot of visual
explanations versus Edmonds' written explanation in the ordinance. He suggested having more visuals so
it is clear what the City's wants esthetically.
Council President Fraley-Monillas summarized there did not seem to be resolution among Councilmembers
and there were still a lot of questions. She asked what staff planned to return with next week. Mr. Clugston
said staff will try to incorporate the guidance Council provided into an updated ordinance for public hearing
next week. Mr. Taraday invited the Council to make motions to clarify the drafting of an ordinance, noting
the Planning Board's recommendation is different than the Small Cell Facility Options slide. His request
for a motion was not to bind the Council to ultimately adopt that ordinance but to provide staff some
direction regarding drafting the ordinance.
Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested staff return with answers to the Council's questions next week
and the Council could make motions then. Mr. Taraday said there are several questions staff is unable to
answer, such as how many poles there will be. With regard to aesthetics, the Council can choose the ranking
on the Small Cell Facility Options page or the Planning Board ranking. What staff learned from the
concealment vendor is that most of the facilities will be designed to the City's standards not vice versa;
there is not a pole manufacture that has just what the City is looking for. The City is giving the providers
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 20
Packet Pg. 25
4.2.a
an idea of what they want to see and they will design a pole that works for that. For example, the wood
replacement pole in option 1 does not exist now but can be designed and manufactured. He summarized it
is a complex ordnance and needs to be adopted by April 2' to have any validity. He was not happy to put
the Council in this position but it is the FCC's order. He wanted to put the City in a position to actually
regulate small cell instead of allowing small cell to regulate itself.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS,
TO ACCEPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION AS OUTLINED ON THIS PAGE (SMALL CELL
FACILITY OPTIONS) FOR THE AESTHETIC ELEMENT IN THE CURRENT ORDINANCE.
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked for clarification. Councilmember Buckshnis said there are so
many unknowns but she wanted the best aesthetics for the City and felt the order on the Small Cell Facility
Option page was better than the Planning Board's recommendation.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
THAT FOR FREE STANDING SINGLE CELL TOWERS WHICH MAY HAVE MULTIPLE
ANTENNAS (FREESTANDING MEANS DO NOT HAVE STREET LIGHTS AND ARE NOT
UTILITY POLES) BE LIMITED IN HEIGHT FROM 20 TO 25 FEET UNTIL MORE SPECIFIC
INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ABOUT MULTIPLE TOWERS. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED TO INCLUDE IN THE ORDINANCE
THAT PROVIDERS LOOK AT USING PRIVATE PROPERTY AND IF THAT IS NOT
WORKABLE, GO TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING: ESTABLISHMENT OF A CITIZENS' HOUSING
Councilmember Teitzel asked whether the formation of a Citizens Housing Commission should be done
via ordinance or resolution, noting the intent is for a temporary commission that has a sunset date. It was
drafted as a resolution but he was open to an ordinance if that was preferable. Development Services
Director Shane Hope said either an ordinance or resolution was workable given that it is intended to be a
short term commission. The advantage of an ordinance is it is codified; the advantage of a resolution is it
provides more flexibility. Councilmember Teitzel asked if there was any legal reason for an ordinance to
establish the commission. Mr. Taraday did not think so; it has been the City's norm, but this could be
distinguished on the basis of it being temporary.
Councilmember Teitzel read the following statement:
"Council has heard significant input from our constituents over the past year —in town halls, workshops,
public hearings, task force working sessions and via e mail and telephone calls —that the process for
establishing an expanded array of housing options should include direct public input from across Edmonds.
Our citizens have demanded to be directly involved in city decisions regarding how best to reasonably
accommodate expected growth while preserving the charm and character of Edmonds. Three recurring
themes have been clearly heard: 1) a Citizens' Housing Commission should be formed via an application
process to allow interested citizens an opportunity to participate, 2) enough time should be allowed for the
Commission to thoughtfully work through the process of developing housing policy recommendations for
Council to consider (completing this process by the end of 2019 is not viewed as attainable) and 3) the
Commission should consist of resident representatives from across Edmonds and that residents of the
Edmonds Bowl should not be over -represented.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 21
Packet Pg. 26
4.2.a
On February 19, Council considered a proposed process to establish a Citizens' Housing Commission to
address these three themes. Based on input from Council on February 19, subsequent individual input from
Councilmembers and additional input from citizens, the process to establish the Commission has been
further refined for discussion and action this evening.
Tonight, we have the opportunity to demonstrate we have incorporated public input concerning this issue
in a meaningful way as we consider finalizing the process for establishing the new Citizens' Housing
Commission. We have several things to accomplish this evening:
First, we need to reach agreement on the elements of the resolution that will define the process for
establishment of the Commission. These elements are shown at page 727 of our Council packet, and reflect
Council input from the February 19 Council meeting. For instance, instead of one Commissioner being
selected from each of the seven identified Edmonds zones, that number has been increased to two. Once
Council votes to approve these elements, they will be forwarded to our city attorney to draft a resolution
for final Council approval.
Second, we need to reach agreement on the questions to be asked Commission applicants. Five of the
application questions are standard questions asked of applicants for any Edmonds Commission, and two
additional questions have been added that relate specifically to the Housing Commission. Based on Council
input in the February 19 meeting, the additional questions initially proposed were pared back to these two.
Third, Council should reach agreement regarding issuing a post card mailer to all Edmonds households to
alert them to the Citizens' Housing Commission application process and deadlines. This process is intended
to ensure all Edmonds citizens are made aware of the opportunity to apply for this important role. The cost
of this mailer is anticipated to be less than $10,000 and will be paid from available Council contingency
funds.
Finally, Council should reach agreement to investigate retaining the services of a community engagement
and process facilitator to assist the Commission with ensuring the community is kept fully apprised of the
Commission's progress, with providing ample opportunity for direct public input, facilitating public open
houses about this issue and to guide the Commission's efforts around development of housing policy
options for Council consideration. With Council approval, requests for bids by interested and qualified
parties will be issued.
With that background, I ask the Council to take action on each of these items in order, beginning with the
first item: discussion and finalization of the elements of the Citizens' Housing Commission resolution."
Council President Fraley-Monillas said she had a number of revisions. First, she requested "affordable
housing" be removed from the title as the intent was all housing to include low income housing, veterans
housing, disabled housing, and at -market housing. Councilmember Teitzel said the intent of the commission
was to focus on housing options across the spectrum in Edmonds and he preferred not to get into specifics
in the title and simply call it the Citizens Housing Commission.
Councilmember Buckshnis was satisfied with the document, felt a Citizens Housing Commission was
needed, and people are motivated. She liked the mission statement which does not even mention affordable
housing, she was satisfied with the objectives, with adding the two questions to the application (how long
have you lived in Edmonds and do you rent or own your home), agreed with doing a postcard, and suggested
wait until the commission is established and gelled before determining whether a facilitator is needed.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Mesaros referred to the suggestion during Audience Comments to appoint alternates and
suggested having one alternate for each zone to replace a commissioner unable to attend a meeting. Most
commissions with alternates expect them to attend meetings so they are up-to-date on discussions. He
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 22
Packet Pg. 27
4.2.a
suggested each Councilmember appoint two members and one alternate from their zone The Mayor would
appoint one member and an alternate.
Council President Fraley-Monillas identified several amendments:
• Remove "affordable housing" from the title
• First paragraph, "Increase the supply of a€€ord-abl-housing to meet a diverse housing need
• Bullet 4, rather than state the commission will meet the third Thursday of each month, state the
commission will meet once per month and leave the meeting date up to the commission
• Add "are you a landlord in Edmonds" to the information requested from applicants
Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested public outreach sessions be held in each zone. She asked the
cost of sending a postcard and for a facilitator. Development Services Director Shane Hope said the cost of
sending a postcard to every address in the City is about $10,000. The cost of a facilitator depends on how
much work they do, the community engagement process, etc. so it could range from $30,000 to $100,000.
Councilmember Tibbott said theoretically an RFQ for a facilitator could attract someone from Edmonds
who might choose to volunteer their time and the cost would be their expenses for conducting meetings.
Ms. Hope assumed the Council was interested in a facilitator as well as a community engagement specialist
who would work on web information and a variety of technical things in addition to setting up meetings,
coordinating with staff on data collection, public outreach, etc.
Councilmember Tibbott asked if there could be a separate facilitator and a public engagement person. Ms.
Hope answered yes, they could be separate although they would need to coordinate. Councilmember
Tibbott anticipated the public engagement process could be much shorter than the duration of the
commission. He recommended separating those two roles and having a facilitator from the beginning to
assist with formulating a work plan. He agreed with appointing alternates and recommended they receive
meeting materials but not be seated at the table with commissioners.
With regard to meeting on the third Thursday, it was Councilmember Tibbott's understanding City meeting
rooms are full most nights and space was available on the third Thursday. Ms. Hope suggested the meeting
date did not need to be included in the resolution but the notification could state the third Thursday would
be the likely meeting date. Councilmember Tibbott asked who would assign Councilmembers to zones.
Council President Fraley-Monillas said she will make those assignments.
Councilmember Nelson was interested in having someone help with community engagement but did not
see a facilitator as a value -add, commenting the commissioners will be able to proceed with Council
direction. With regard to appointing alternates, he was skeptical about having 21 people at every meeting
and suggested having a couple of alternates at large who can fill in as needed.
Councilmember Mesaros commented on the importance of having a facilitator. He recalled during the
merger of the two 911 boards, they tried to do it without a facilitator. Multiple meetings were held where
there was a lot of discussion but they were unable to reach resolution. Once a facilitator was hired, the
group was able to make decisions. A facilitator need not offer recommendations but helps the group move
forward. The Snohomish County 911 Board has 15 members and 30 alternates (1st and 2nd alternates). The
alternates sit on the outside and do not participate in discussion unless called upon. Only the board members
participate in the meeting but having the alternates present allows them to step in if a board member is
absent. He envisioned a commission with 15 members and alternates could function well.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Mesaros about alternates, noting the Salmon
Recovery Council has several alternates. She recalled the first EDC had 21-22 members. She asked whether
Ms. Hope could be the facilitator. Ms. Hope envision her role would be to show what information is
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 23
Packet Pg. 28
4.2.a
available, make presentations about GMA, etc. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Ms. Hope thought the
commission should have a facilitator. Ms. Hope answered yes, explaining she can provide expertise but it
would be helpful to have a facilitator to run the meeting, keep them on track, etc. She recommended having
a facilitator from the beginning. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed.
Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed with having a professional facilitator who does not have any
connection to Edmonds, noting after the last two groups, there was a lack of trust in the process. She
suggested perhaps having a public hearing so all citizens have an opportunity for input into the process.
Councilmember Teitzel summarized the changes the Council requested:
• First three bullets remain unchanged
• 4' bullet: "Commission will meet at least once per month at a time and day agreeable to the
Commission"
• 5t' bullet: "The Commission shall host public outreach session (open houses, town halls, etc.) once
per quarter to provide updates on its process on developing housing policy options and
recommendations. The Commission will define locations in Edmonds for these meeting, focusing
on moving to various locations."
9t' bullet: The Commission will consist of 15 voting members and each Councilmember will select
two appointees and one alternate per zone and the Mayor will select one appointee and one
alternate. The Mayor's selection will be from the remaining pool of applicants after
Councilmembers have made their decisions. Ex-officio members may be added at Council's
discretion."
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO
SEND THE RESOLUTION AS REVISED TO MR. TARADAY TO DEVELOP INTO A
RESOLUTION TO BRING BACK TO THE COUNCIL.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
TEITZEL, TO ADD TO THE COMMISSION APPLICATION, A QUESTION "ARE YOU A
LANDLORD IN EDMONDS?" MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
TIBBOTT, TO REMOVE THE WORDS "AFFORDABLE HOUSING" FROM THE TITLE AND
ANY PLACE ELSE IN THE DOCUMENT AND REPLACE IT WITH "DIVERSE HOUSING"
WHICH COULD BE INTERPRETED FROM MARKET RATE TO VETERAN OR LOW INCOME
HOUSING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
THAT THE COUNCIL DIRECT STAFF TO ISSUE AN RFP FOR A FACILITATOR FOR THE
CITIZENS HOUSING COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER NELSON
VOTING NO.
Councilmember Teitzel asked if the intent was a separate facilitator and person to focus on community
engagement. Councilmember Mesaros recognized both skill sets were needed and suggested not deciding
now whether that that was one person or two.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
APPROVE DEVELOPMENT OF A POSTCARD MAILER PAID FOR WITH COUNCIL
CONTINGENCY FUNDS TO APPRISE ALL EDMONDS CITIZENS OF THE AVAILABILITY OF
THE APPLICATION PROCESS FOR THE CITIZENS HOUSING COMMISSION. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 24
Packet Pg. 29
4.2.a
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked about having a public hearing on the document. Councilmember
Teitzel said he has attended a number of meetings over the past year and a half and has heard a lot of public
input, received a lot of phone calls and emails, heard public testimony during Council meetings, etc. It is
time to move ahead and he was uncertain a public hearing was necessary at this point.
UQlei IW4111UM01101DIDo49DI01:71R
1. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MINUTES
This item was postponed to beginning of Council agenda next week.
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling reported he attended the Lynnwood City Council meeting last night along with most of the
entities working on the purchase of the Rodeo Inn property including Verdant and Edmonds School District.
Lynnwood is doing a series of inspections on the property and hope to reach a conclusion in the next few
weeks. The group is committed to moving ahead provided the property reports are satisfactory.
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Buckshnis reappointed Nichol Hughes to the Economic Development Commission. She
reminded of the public event, meeting at Holy Rosary, on Saturday at 10 a.m. to plant 150 native plants
along Shell Creek with the Tree Board and Students Saving Salmon.
Councilmember Mesaros reappointed Kevin Harris to the Economic Development Commission.
Council President Fraley-Monillas thanked the City Council for reading their packets and for asking
questions of staff in advance.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:35 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Nelson announced he will be submitting a budget request next week for additional police
overtime up to $50,000 for targeted traffic enforcement along Hwy 99 and other pedestrian vulnerable areas
for the next 6 months to prevent further loss of life and injury. He believed the City needed to move urgently
on this issue. The City's 2018 Transportation Safety Plan lists engineering, education and enforcement
actions needed to reach the goal of providing a safer transportation system. That plan reviews collision data
from 2012-2016; over half the collisions have occurred on Hwy 99. In the section of Hwy 99 in Edmonds,
there are four times more crashes than the average arterial roadway in the State of Washington. Of these
crashes, eight involved pedestrians, four were jaywalkers and four were drivers failing to yield to
pedestrians in crosswalks at intersections. Citywide, 40% of all collisions involve pedestrians; 60% occur
during the daytime, 68% occur during clear days with dry conditions and 90% involve non -impaired driver
or pedestrian. Since 2017 on Hwy 99, 12 pedestrians have been hit and 2 have been killed. Engineering is
only one measure to improve traffic safety. He understood there were projects planned for Hwy 99 but
enforcement was something that could be done now.
Councilmember Teitzel reappointed Jamie Reece to the Economic Development Commission and thanked
him for his continued service. Councilmember Teitzel reported on the Booker T Jones performance at the
Edmonds Center for the Arts. He recognized the ECA staff and the over 125 volunteers who contribute
their time at events.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 25
Packet Pg. 30
4.2.a
12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION
PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
This item was not needed.
13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION
This item was not needed.
14. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:32 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 19, 2019
Page 26
Packet Pg. 31
4.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #235949 through #236049 dated March 21, 2019 for $489,234.12 and wire
payment of $12,175.62.
Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #63687 through #63692 for $571,197.35 and benefit
checks #63693 through #63697 and wire payments of $581,182.16 for the pay period March 1, 2019
through March 15, 2019.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claims 03-21-19
wire 03-21-19
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-21-19
payroll summary 03-15-19
payroll summary 03-20-19
payroll benefit 03-21-19
Packet Pg. 32
4.3.a
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
235949
3/21/2019
076040 911 SUPPLY INC
71517
INV 71517 EDMONDS PD - RADIO L
BIANCHI RADIO HOLDERS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
TIE FOR CEBAN
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
Tota I :
235950
3/21/2019
070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC
15-69326
PUNJABI INTERPRETER PUBLIC DI
PUNJABI INTERPRETER PUBLIC DI
001.000.23.523.30.41.01
15-69563
KOREAN INTERPRETER COURT 03
KOREAN INTERPRETER COURT 03
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
15-69594
SPANISH INTERPRETER JAIL 03/15
SPANISH INTERPRETER JAIL 03/15
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
Total
235951
3/21/2019
069798 A.M. LEONARD INC
CI19026669
PM: HOSE REEL WALL MOUNT
PM: HOSE REEL WALL MOUNT
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
CI19028732
PM: HOSE REEL FREE STANDING,(
PM: HOSE REEL FREE STANDING
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Total
235952
3/21/2019
065052 AARD PEST CONTROL
19052
WWTP: 3/7/19 PEST CONTROL SEF
3/7/19 Pest Control Service
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total
Page: 1
aD
L
3
c
�a
.y
Amoun 0
a
aD
r
CU
d
199.9E
N
9.9�
m
21.0( U
230.9°
c
c
162.7E sa
0
L
187.1, a
E
181.3, U
4" 531.2( 0
0
0
L
a
104.5( Q
rn
271.0( N
375.5( A
0
E
M
73.0(
c
7.5, E
80.5: U
�a
Q
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 33
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 2
a�
L
3
Bank code :
usbank
c
�a
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amoun N
235953
3/21/2019
071634 ALLSTREAM
16000868
C/A 768328
0
m
PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
960.1( u
Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929-1
L
001.000.61.558.70.42.00
10.2�
Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines
001.000.61.558.70.42.00
10.2�
Total:
980.6f u
235954
3/21/2019
065568 ALLWATER INC
030719059
FINANCE DEPT WATER
c
Finance dept water
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
79.4( -a
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.31.00
8.1 f o
Total:
87.5f j,
M
235955
3/21/2019
065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE
19-0216
HICKMAN PARK TREE SERVICE AN
a
HICKMAN PARK TREE SERVICE AN
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
1,175.0( U
10.3% Sales Tax
c
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
121.0 70
19-0313
SHELL PARK II TREE REMOVAL
0
SHELL PARK II TREE REMOVAL
a
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
350.0( Q
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
36.0E
19-3619
BALLINGER PARK TREE REMOVAL
N
BALLINGER PARK TREE REMOVAL
A
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
935.0( N
10.3% Sales Tax
E
001.000.64.576.80.48.00
96.3- fd
Total:
2,711%
}U,
c
235956
3/21/2019
069667 AMERICAN MARKETING
25215
BRONZE PLAQUE: SHANAFELT
aD
E
BRONZE PLAQUE: SHANAFELT ME
127.000.64.575.50.35.00
520.0(
Q
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 34
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235956 3/21/2019 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING
235957 3/21/2019 076987 ANG, HUAY SIN
235958 3/21/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
(Continued)
10.3% Sales Tax
127.000.64.575.50.35.00
Tota I :
7341 ART CLASS
7341 PRESCHOOL ART CLASS INS-
7341 PRESCHOOL ART: WINTER W
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
7345 ART CLASS
7345 PRESCHOOL ART CLASS INS-
7345 PRESCHOOL ART: BLENDING
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Tota I :
1991143183
WWTP: 3/6/19 UNIFORMS,TOWELS
Mats/Towels
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Uniforms
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
1991143185
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
1991153217
WWTP: 3/13/19 UNIFORMS,TOWEL
Mats/Towels
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Uniforms
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00
4.3.a
Page: 3
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
53.5E u
573.5E .L
N
m
242.0( v
m
c
189.0E
431.0E
c
�a
0
47.8E a
3.5( •�
U
4.9 c
Ta
0.3E p
L
a
a
Q
31.4, "
rn
3.2z N
M
O
V)
47.8E E
3.5( U
c
aD
4.9< E
t
U
0.3E
Q
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 35
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235958 3/21/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
1991153218
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
1991153219
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00
1991158957
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE:
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE:
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE:
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE:
4.3.a
Page: 4
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
U
m
51.5E
5.3
m
31.41
m
c
3.2z
c
�a
6.1- o
L
6.1- a
E
6.1-
6.1- 0
�a
6.0£ o
a
a
0.1 m, Q
rn
0.6<
N
0.6< o
0.6< M
0.6'
0.6, t
U
�a
Q
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 36
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 5
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
235958
3/21/2019
069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
(Continued)
as
001.000.65.518.20.41.00
1.6- -0
1991158958
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT
FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS
L
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
5.0E
FLEET DIVISION MATS
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
17.3z
10.3% Sales Tax
U
511.000.77.548.68.24.00
0.5,
10.3% Sales Tax
c
511.000.77.548.68.41.00
1.7E
Total:
299.7E
�a
235959
3/21/2019
001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC
16858
RANGER UNIFORM BADGES
RANGER UNIFORM BADGES
o
001.000.64.571.23.24.00
20.0( a
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.23.24.00
2.0£
Total:
22.01
0
235960
3/21/2019
075217 BASLER, ANTHONY
35347
SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01
SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 0"
0
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
106.41 a
36038
SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT Al•
Q'
Q
SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT Al`
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
106.4E r'
36176
SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT/PI
N
SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT/PI
M
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
218.9E N
36715
SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT PP
E
SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT Pl'
001.000.23.512.50.41.01
106.4�
Total:
538.4E
aD
t
235961
3/21/2019
073834 BATTERIES PLUS
P11899365
WWTP: 12V LEAD BATTERIES
12V LEAD BATTERIES
Q
Page: 5
Packet Pg. 37
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
235961 3/21/2019 073834 BATTERIES PLUS (Continued)
235962 3/21/2019 002300 BEAVER EQUIPMENT SPECALITY CO 19014i
235963 3/21/2019 073062 BLUE FLAME
235964 3/21/2019 076986 BOWHEY, JENNIFER
235965 3/21/2019 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
BLD20190252
7335 ART CLASS
7258 7266 YOGA
7274 7270 YOGA
7278 YOGA CLASS
PO # Description/Account
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total :
WWTP: ROTORK REPLACEMENT N
ROTORK REPLACEMENT MOTOR
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
REFUND: PERMIT WITHDRAWN
Refund: Mechanical Permit WithdraN
001.000.257.620
Total
7335 ART CLASS INSTRUCTION
7335 SLIME EXTRAVAGANZA ART C
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total
7258 7266 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCT
7258 YOGA MON W/ KERRY CLASS
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7266 YOGA MON W/ KERRY CLASS
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7274 7270 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCT
7274 YOGA IGENTLE WED CLASS I
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7270 YOGA WED W/ KERRY CLASS
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7278 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTION
4.3.a
Page: 6
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
439.0( 'D
r
U
d
45.2, .L
484.2,
N
V
m
373.0(
m
c
76.0(
46.2E
495.2° o
0
�a
a
48.0( •E
48.0( U
4-
0
�a
78.0( a
78.0( Q
rn
462.0( N
M
0
368.5(
516.7E
aD
731.5( t
U
�a
Q
Page: 6
Packet Pg. 38
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235965 3/21/2019 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
7282 7262 CLASS
235966 3/21/2019 069295 BROWN, CANDY 7329 BIRD CLASS
235967 3/21/2019 067947 BROWNELLS INC 16603252.01
235968 3/21/2019 076972 BUEHLMAIER, KAREN BLD20190236
235969 3/21/2019 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE 1061705
PO # Description/Account
7278 YOGA TH W/ KERRY CLASS II`
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7282 7262 PILATES AND YOGA CLA
7282 PILATES CLASS INSTRUCTIOI
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
7262 YOGA GENTLE MON CLASS IP
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
Total
7329 BIRD CLASS INSTRUCTION
7329 MORE AMAZING BIRDS! CLAS
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total
INV 16603252.01 ACCT 00557761 EI
SILI KROIL - 10 OZ
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
Total
REFUND: APPLICATION ACCEPTEE
Refund: application accepted in error.
001.000.257.620
Total
PUBLISH PROJECT ONLINE FOR B
ESJB.Publish Project Online for Bids
421.000.74.594.34.65.41
ESJB.Publish Project Online for Bids
422.000.72.594.31.65.41
ESJB.Publish Project Online for Bids
423.000.75.594.35.65.41
ESJB.Publish Project Online for Bids
126.000.68.595.33.65.41
4.3.a
Page: 7
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
408.1( u
346.5( Y
m
t
372.4� u
3,205.8, 5
c
a�
65.4E
65.4.' o
0
�a
a
16.9E •�
U
1.7E 0
18.7'
0
a
a
95.0( Q
95.0( r'
N
ch
0
40.7E
40.7E
c
40.7; E
t
40.7
Q
Page: 7
Packet Pg. 39
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235969 3/21/2019 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE
235970 3/21/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
FAC Roof Repair.Publish Project Onli
001.000.66.518.30.48.00
E7CD.Publish Project Online for Bids
126.000.68.595.33.65.41
Tota I :
19878578
COURT COPY MACHINE CONTRAC
COURT COPY MACHINE CONTRAC
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
COURT COPY MACHINE BW METEI
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.45.00
19878579
C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091 /0521
Finance dept copier contract charge
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
B&W Meter usage IRC5250 2/1/19
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
Color Meter usage IRC5250 2/1/19 -
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.45.00
19878581
PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON
PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON
001.000.64.571.21.45.00
19878582
CANON 5250
Contract charge March 2019
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
Contract charge March 2019
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
Contract charge March 2019
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
BW meter usage 2/2019
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
4.3.a
Page: 8
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
0.3( u
45.0(
208.4(
m
v
59.5,
a�
77.9'
c
�a
14.1; o
L
�a
a
209.6"
74.0z u
4-
0
111.7E
0
L
40.7' a
Q
rn
373.2(
N
M
0
167.6E E
20.9E u
20.9E W
E
t
21.2< U
M
Q
Page: 8
Packet Pg. 40
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235970 3/21/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
BW meter usage 2/2019
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
BW meter usage 2/2019
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
CLR meter usage 2/2019
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
CLR meter usage 2/2019
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
CLR meter usage 2/2019
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.22.518.10.45.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.61.557.20.45.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
19878583
WWTP: 3/2019 MO CHG+2-2019 ME
3/2019 Monthly Chg/ 2/2019 Meter U
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
19878584
CANON 2501F
March 2019 contract charges
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
BW meter usage Feb 2019
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
CLR meter usage Feb 2019
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00
19878585
DSD BLDG LARGE COPIER CONTR
DSD (Building) Large copier monthly
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
19878586
DSD (PLANNING) COPIER CONTRA
DSD (Planning) Large Copier Montly
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
4.3.a
Page: 9
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
2.6E u
2.6E
N
v
88.4(
v
11.0E 4-
m
c
11.0E
c
28.51 f°
0
L
3.51
a
3.5,
U
4-
174.1( 0
Ta
0
26.4z a
Q
2.1- c�
30.3E N
M
0
6.0,
M
44.6(
a�
E
t
48.9 -
Q
Page: 9
Packet Pg. 41
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235970 3/21/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
235971
235972
235973
235974
3/21/2019 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA
3/21/2019 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
3/21/2019 035160 CITY OFSEATTLE
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
19878587
19878588
19882579
7147 DRAWING
7154 DRAWING
7157 DRAWING
RN22191020
9056920000
3/21/2019 074255 COALCREEK ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOC 120902-26
PO # Description/Account
P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC'
P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC'
001.000.64.571.21.45.00
PARKS IRC2501F COPIER CONTRAi
PARKS IRC2501F COPIER CONTRAi
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
DSD (DEV SVCS) COPIER MONTHL
DSD (Dev Svcs) Copier monthly conti
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
Total
7147 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP
7147 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
7154 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING C
7154 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
7157 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP
7157 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total
WWTP: CYLINDER RENTAL+HAZM)
nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
Total
WWTP: 1/9-3/13/19 FLOWMETER 8'
1/9-3/13/19 FLOW METER #879026
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
Total
WWTP: 1/1 -2/24/19 TO 6.2018 & 7.2
4.3.a
Page: 10
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
U
m
94.8E
N
83.2�
814.71
2,668.8E
c
�a
0
418.0(
�a
a
61.0E
0
150.4E 0
629.5: c
L
Q
Q
Q
124.0( TT
N
12.71 M
136.7 , N
E
2
U
24.5
24.5, E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 10
Packet Pg. 42
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 11
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
235974
3/21/2019
074255 COAL CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOC
(Continued)
0
1/1 -2/24/19 TO 6.2018: $2100 & 7.20
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
6,000.0( u
Total:
6,000.0( P
235975
3/21/2019
073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC
MAR-19
C/A CITYOFED00001
N
Mar-19 Fiber Optics Internet Connect
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
408.4( r
Jan-19 Fiber Optics Internet Overage
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
150.7E
Total :
559.11
235976
3/21/2019
070753 CREAAFFILIATES LLC
190220-1
4TH AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDO
4TH AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDO
—
125.000.64.594.76.65.41
1,521.2E
Total:
1,521.2E a
235977
3/21/2019
074444 DATAQUEST LLC
8116
FEBRUARY BACKGROUND CHECK
E
FEB BACKGROUND CHECKS
fd
U
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
305.0( o
Total:
305.0(
235978
3/21/2019
073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC
439100
TO 19-011ARSEN SHORT PLAT RE
0 L
TO 19-01.1-arsen Short Plat Retaininc
a
001.000.245.963
2,611.1 ' Q
Total:
2,611.1: cn
235979
3/21/2019
061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03
483533
INV 483533 CUSTOMER 3 26891 EE
04
CALIBRATE FH10284
c
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
70.0(
CALIBRATE GHD-15003
E
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
70.0( U
CALIBRATE GHD-20076
+:
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
70.0( a0i
CALIBRATE GHD-20126
E
t
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
70.0( um
Q
Page: 11
Packet Pg. 43
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 12
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
235979
3/21/2019
061570
DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03
(Continued)
CALIBRATE SHED-04163
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
70.0( u
FUEL SURCHARGE
L
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
10.0(
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
37.0E
Total:
397.0f u
235980
3/21/2019
068871
DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA
PLN20180066
REFUND: HEARING EXAMINER FEE
c
Refund: Hearing examiner fees less
001.000.257.620
20.0(
Total:
20.0(
235981
3/21/2019
069523
EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
7299 R RALPH
7299 R RALPH YOUTH SCHOLARSI
7299 R RALPH YOUTH SCHOLARSI
a
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
66.0(
Total :
66.0( •�
235982
3/21/2019
069523
EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
7115 N WUBNEH
7115 N WUBNEH YOUTH SCHOLAR
7115 N WUBNEH YOUTH SCHOLAR
c
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
1i
75.0( o
Total:
75.0( a
a
235983
3/21/2019
069523
EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
7121 M RALPH
7121 M RALPH YOUTH SCHOLARSI
Q
7121 M RALPH YOUTH SCHOLARSI
c�
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
75.0(
Total:
75.0( N
M
O
235984
3/21/2019
069523
EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
7121 T CORDOVA
7121 T CORDOVA YOUTH SCHOLAI
7121 T CORDOVA YOUTH SCHOLAI
E
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
2
75.0( U
Total :
75.0(
c
a�
235985
3/21/2019
069523
EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
7122 A NASSIRI
7122 A NASSIRI YOUTH SCHOLAR
E
7122 A NASSIRI YOUTH SCHOLAR
U
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
75.0(
Q
Page: 12
Packet Pg. 44
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
235985 3/21/2019 069523 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARS (Continued)
235986 3/21/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7123 S RAFIPOUR
235987 3/21/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
235988 3/21/2019 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES
5-00080
5-10351
7047 DANCE
235989 3/21/2019 075136 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 144208
235990 3/21/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD
235991 3/21/2019 067042 FINAL TOUCH FINISHING
235992 3/21/2019 011900 FRONTIER
Description/Account
Total :
7123 S RAFIPOUR YOUTH SCHOLA
7123 S RAFIPOUR YOUTH SCHOLA
122.000.64.571.20.49.00
Total
IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE
IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
INTERURBAN TRAIL
INTERURBAN TRAIL
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
Total
7047 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE INSTRI
7047 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE INSTRI
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total
PROFESSIONAL SVCS: CLIMATE G
Professional Services: Climate Goal:
001.000.62.524.10.41.00
Total
EDH847704 CITY ORDINANCE 4145
CITY ORDINANCE 4145
001.000.25.514.30.41.40
Total
7166 ETIQUETTE 7166 ETIQUETTE CLASS INSTRUC-
7166 ETIQUETTE YOUNG LADIES 8
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total
253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE
4.3.a
Page: 13
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
75.0( 0
U
d
L_
75.0(
75.0(
m
z
51.2, m
c
51.2, r-
102.4' —
0
L
�a
a
204.6( E
204.6( fd
U
4-
0
�a
1,150.0(
1,150.0( a
Q
rn
29.2z N
29.2' c
E
275.0(
275.0(
E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 13
Packet Pg. 45
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235992 3/21/2019 011900 FRONTIER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
425-712-0417
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
425-712-8251
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC ALARM, FAX,
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN'
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN'
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN'
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN'
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN'
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
425-745-4313
CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M
CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
425-775-1344
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
001.000.64.571.23.42.00
425-775-2455
CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5
4.3.a
Page: 14
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
aD
6.4', 'D
r
U
d
24.4-
24.4- 19
m
24.4- v
24.4- c
a�
24.4-
�a
0
35.8( `>%
M
a
35.7E
U
4-
17.2( 0
0
86.0', o
a
a
72.2E Q
rn
72.2E
N
96.3< o
E
M
139.0E Z
c
aD
73.0E t
U
�a
Q
Page: 14
Packet Pg. 46
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
235992 3/21/2019 011900 FRONTIER (Continued)
425-775-7865
235993 3/21/2019 076188 GARCIA, HELENA 7186 DRAWING CLASS
235994 3/21/2019 062383 HEPBURN SUPERIOR IN120154
235995 3/21/2019 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 44103
235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1021448
1024602
1071938
PO # Description/Account
CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
Total
7186 INTRO TO DRAWING CLASS II
7186 INTRO TO DRAWING CLASS II
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
Total
URN VAULT EXPANDABLE SAND
URN VAULT EXPANDABLE SAND
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
Total
EDMONDS WATERFRONT PARK RE
EDMONDS WATERFRONT PARK RE
125.000.64.594.76.65.41
Total
CITY PARK SHED - SUPPLIES
City Park Shed - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
STORM - TV TRUCK SUPPLIES
Storm - TV Truck Supplies
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.3.a
Page: 15
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
68.5f u
71.4- Y
896.2f
v
m
c
361.9(
361.9(
c
�a
0
547.3� a
547.35
E
U
842.8E o
842.8E c
0
Q
a
Q
169.6E c�
16.9, N
M
0
8.21 M
0.8'
aD
E
t
238.0(
Q
Page: 15
Packet Pg. 47
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 16
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued)
0
m
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
23.8( u
1095225
OLYMPIC BEACH - PROJECT
L
Olympic Beach - Project
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
39.9 , Y
10.0% Sales Tax
4)
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
t
4.0( v
12130
CITY HALL - CAMERA PROJECT SU
City Hall - Camera Project Supplies
c
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
112.0E
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
11.2'
2021254
CITY HALL - SUPPLIES
0
City Hall - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
141.5" a
10.0% Sales Tax
E
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
14.1E 'ca
2024500
FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Shop Supplies
0
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
45.9
10.0% Sales Tax
0-
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.6( a
21586
FAC - SUPPLIES
Q
FAC - Supplies
rn
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
29.9E
10.0% Sales Tax
N
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
3.0( c
3021090
CITY HALL - SUPPLIES
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
1.6E U
City Hall - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
16.6z w
3024343
CITY PARK STORAGE BLDG SUPF
E
t
City Park Storage Bldg - Supplies
U
�a
Q
Page: 16
Packet Pg. 48
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 17
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued)
0
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
49.7, -0
10.0% Sales Tax
U
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
m
4.9 � .L
3024376
CITY PARK STORAGE SHED - SUPF
City Park Storage Shed - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
79.5 �
10.0% Sales Tax
U
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
7.9E
3071291
CITY PARK BLDG - SUPPLIES
c
City Park Bldg - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
153.7E c
10.1 % Sales Tax
sa
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
15.51, 0
3071645
PLAZA RM - SUPPLIES
Plaza Rm - Supplies
a
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
39.91
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
3.9� u
4010892
CITY PARK SHED BLDG SUPPLIES
0
City Park Shed Bldg Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
224.0, o
10.0% Sales Tax
a
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
22.4( Q
4010894
SEWER - SUPPLIES
Sewer - Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
18.3 � N
10.0% Sales Tax
c
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
1.8Z
4014961
CITY PARK STORAGE SHED - SUPF
City Park Storage Shed - Supplies
U
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
162.3E
10.0% Sales Tax
(D
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
16.21 E
4093667
LIBRARY - SUPPLIES
U
co
Q
Page: 17
Packet Pg. 49
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
Library - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
5022231
FAC MAINT - UNIT 42 SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Unit 42 Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
5024064
CITY PARK BLDG - SUPPLIES
City Park Bldg - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
5024098
STORM - SUPPLIES
Storm - Supplies
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
5024099
FAC MAINT - UNIT 95 SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Unit 95 Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
5064565
FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
5072936
CITY HALL - KEY CARD CARMERAc
City Hall - Key Card Carmeras Wirein
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.3.a
Page: 18
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
160.7< u
L
16.0-,
N
m
171.9, u
17.2( c
a�
c
22.1 <
0
L
2.2-
a
E
44.9 -, .�
4.5( 0
0
0
L
20.5- a
Q
2.0E
N
90.4E c
9.0f
c
224.1 , E
t
23.0E L)
Q
Page: 18
Packet Pg. 50
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
5082192
CITY HALL - PROJECT
City Hall - Project
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
5161700
CITY HALL - SUPPLIES
City Hall - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
5461634
CITY HALL - SINK
City Hall - Sink
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
6025081
FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
6063905
SEWER - SUPPLIES
Sewer - Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00
6085663
WATER - SUPPLIES
Water - Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00
7020611
CITY HALL - SUPPLIES
City Hall - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
4.3.a
Page: 19
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
U
m
33.1,
3.3,
m
16.3E
m
c
1.6z
c
�a
445.2; 0
L
44.5, a
E
106.81 u
0
10.6� >
0
L
Q
a
21.9-, Q
rn
2.2(
N
M
0
39.9z E
2
3.9� U
c
58.0z E
U
�a
Q
Page: 19
Packet Pg. 51
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued)
7021964
7024906
7024952
7094543
7525352
7625216
81510
PO # Description/Account
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
CEMETERY - SUPPLIES
Cemetery - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
FAC MAINT - ICE MELT
Fac Maint - Ice Melt
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
LIBRARY - SUPPLIES
Library - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
MCH - SUPPLIES
MCH - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
ROADWAY - SUPPLIES
Roadway - Supplies
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00
OLYMPIC BEACH PROJECT SUPPL
Olympic Beach Project Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
OLYMPIC BEACH PROJECT
Olympic Beach Project
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
4.3.a
Page: 20
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
5.8( 'D
r
U
d
60.3E
N
6.0z
v
120.61 c
a�
12.01
�a
0
35.3: `>,
M
a
3.5: E
U
45 49.8E 0
Ta
4.9� o
a
a
Q
50.4E rn
5.0E N
M
0
40.2- .
�a
4.0,
aD
E
t
469.2< u
Q
Page: 20
Packet Pg. 52
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
235998 3/21/2019 061013 HONEY BUCKET
235999 3/21/2019 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE
236000 3/21/2019 060165 HWAGEOSCIENCES INC
236001 3/21/2019 076069 ICOR TECHNOLOGY INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9020395
FAC MAINT UNIT 42 - SUPPLIES
Fac Maint Unit 42 - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
9623585
FAC MAINT - TRUCK SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Truck Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00
Total :
0550633432 HUTT PARK HONEY BUCKET
HUTT PARK HONEY BUCKET
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
Total
BID-4089A BID/ED! REIMBURSEMENT FOR PR
BID/Ed! reimbursement for prepayme
140.000.61.558.70.49.00
Tota I :
29121 ESKA.SERVICES THRU 2/28/19
ESKA.Services thru 2/28/19
421.000.74.594.34.65.41
Tota I :
2019232 INV 2019232 EDMONDS PD
MINI DRIVE BELT/RUBBER CLEATS
628.000.41.521.23.31.00
Freight
628.000.41.521.23.31.00
Total
4.3.a
Page: 21
Page: 21
Packet Pg. 53
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
236002 3/21/2019 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED
236003 3/21/2019 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS
236004 3/21/2019 070250 IRON MOUNTAIN
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
3223051 P&R SUPPLIES: COPY PAPER
P&R SUPPLIES: COPY PAPER
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
Total
1905701049777 INV 1905701049777 EDMONDS PD
DRY0070 24 PACK OF AA BATTERIE
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
Total
201313189
05-17 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE
05-2017 Balance owing Off site data
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
201668280
07-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE
Jul-2018 Off site data storage service
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
201686994
08-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE
Aug-2018 Off site data storage servic
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
201719801
09-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE
Sept-2018 Off site data storage servi(
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
201727677
10-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE
Oct-2018 Off site data storage servic(
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
201755464
11-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE
Nov-2018 Off site data storage servic
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
201792501
12-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE
Dec-2018 Off site data storage servic
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
201839340
02-19 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE
4.3.a
Page: 22
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
79.9E u
L
8.2L
88.2,
m
v
57.0(
d
5.8 ,
62.8 ,
0
�a
a
3.0'
U
210.0� c
�a
0
247.9E a
a
Q
314.1E
N
A
224.6E N
E
2
273.4E U
c
(D
E
165.0E
Q
Page: 22
Packet Pg. 54
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 23
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun
236004
3/21/2019
070250
IRON MOUNTAIN
(Continued)
Feb-2019 Off site data storage service
512.000.31.518.88.41.00
230.9z
Total:
1,669.4:
236005
3/21/2019
075062
JAMESTOWN NETWORKS
5294
FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC
Mar-19 Fiber Optics Internet Connect
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
500.0(
10.3% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.87.42.00
51.5(
Total:
551.5(
236006
3/21/2019
076970
JOHNSON INDUSTRIES INC
24568
STORM - PARTS
Storm - Parts
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
392.0(
Freight
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
17.7(
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00
42.2(
Total:
451.9(
236007
3/21/2019
074417
LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH
165
CONFLICT COUNSEL 8Z0551883
CONFLICT COUNSEL 8Z0551883
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
300.0(
Total :
300.0(
236008
3/21/2019
073603
LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC
20383 expenses
01-2019 REIMBURSEMENT FOR EX
01-19 reimbursement for expenses - 1
001.000.36.515.31.41.00
300.0(
Mar-19
03-19 LEGALS FEES
03-19 Legal fees
001.000.36.515.31.41.00
47,964.0(
Total :
48,264.0(
236009
3/21/2019
076908
LONG-SCOTT, SHANE T
SLS3/4-3/6/19
WWTP: SHANE LONG-SCOTT MILE
SHANE LONG-SCOTT 3/4-3/6/19 MII
Page: 23
Packet Pg. 55
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 24
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
236009
3/21/2019
076908 LONG-SCOTT, SHANE T
(Continued)
0
423.000.76.535.80.49.71
as
143.0( _0
Total:
143.0: m
L_
236010
3/21/2019
068443 MAIL N' STUFF SERVICES
BID-4089
BID/ED! PRINTING AND DELIVERY
BID/Ed! printing, address verification
140.000.61.558.70.49.00
234.2(
Total :
234.Z
236011
3/21/2019
067235 MARYS TOWING INC
72729
INV 72729 EDMONDS PD CASE 19-1
m
TOW BNY7548 BLACK AUDI-
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
189.0(
10.3% Sales Tax
�a
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
19.4E _
Total:
208.4E
�a
236012
3/21/2019
020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
299716
PM SUPPLIES: SOD CUTTER
a
PM SUPPLIES: SOD CUTTER
E
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
57.2( 2
10.3% Sales Tax
4-
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
5.8� o
Total:
63.05
0
236013
3/21/2019
075590 MOBILE GUARD
INV00470388
02-19 NETGUARD MONTHLY SERVI
a
NetGuard Monthly Service Building
Q
001.000.62.524.20.42.00
39.0( c)
NetGuard Monthly Service City Clerk
001.000.25.514.30.42.00
6.5( N
NetGuard Monthly Service Communit
o
001.000.61.557.20.42.00
6.5( E
NetGuard Monthly Service City Counc
M
001.000.11.511.60.42.00
19.5(
NetGuard Monthly Service Court
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
6.5( E
NetGuard Monthly Service Developm,
001.000.62.524.10.42.00
13.0(
Q
Page: 24
Packet Pg. 56
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
236013 3/21/2019 075590 MOBILE GUARD
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
NetGuard Monthly Service Engineerir
001.000.67.518.21.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service Facilities
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service Finance
001.000.31.514.23.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service Human RE
001.000.22.518.10.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service Informatioi
512.000.31.518.88.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service Mayor's O
001.000.21.513.10.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service Parks
001.000.64.571.21.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service Parks
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service Parks
001.000.64.571.22.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service Police
001.000.41.521.22.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW Sewei
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW Storm
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW Fleet
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
4.3.a
Page: 25
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
97.5( u
58.5(
N
6.5(
v
6.5( 4-
m
c
19.5( m
c
6.5( f°
0
L
6.5(
a
13.0( E
6.5( ,-
0
312.0( >
0
39.0( a
Q
3.2. rn
3.2.'
0
32.5(
6.5(
c
19.5(
t
6.5(
Q
Page: 25
Packet Pg. 57
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
236013 3/21/2019 075590 MOBILE GUARD
236014 3/21/2019 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
NetGuard Monthly Service PW
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
NetGuard Monthly Service WWTP
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
Total:
WA33-781908
WWTP: EM3559 3HP ELECTRIC MC
EM3559 3HP ELECTRIC MOTOR, FF
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
WA33-781938
WWTP: STD SMALL SPHER.ROL.BF
STD SMALL SPHER.ROL.BRGS
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
WA33-781946
WWTP: SCJ 1-3/8 4-BOLT FLGS
SCJ 1-3/8 4-BOLT FLGS - SHIPPED
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
4.3.a
Page: 26
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
2.2f u
0.6E
N
2.2E
v
0.6E 4-
m
c
0.6z m
c
6.5( f°
0
L
6.5(
a
78.0( E
832.0(
0
�a
703.7( o
a
a
25.9E Q
rn
75.1 E
N
M
0
220.6E E
22.7 U
c
a�
233.4z E
U
�a
Q
Page: 26
Packet Pg. 58
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
236014 3/21/2019 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC
236015
236016
236017
3/21/2019 075539 NATURE INSIGHT CONSULTING
3/21/2019 025690 NOYES, KARIN
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
WA33-781974
000 00 897
3/21/2019 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER February, 2019
PO # Description/Account
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
W WTP: SCJ 1-3/8 4 BOLT FLG
SCJ 1-3/8 4 BOLT FLG - SHIPPED G
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
Total
WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PRi
Tasks 1 - 4: Parks Project Mgmt and
125.000.64.576.80.41.00
Task 5: Engineering Dept Tasks
422.000.72.594.31.65.41
Total
PRO SVCS - PLANNING BOARD MY
Planning Board Minues
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
PROF SVCS: PLANNING BOARD M
Professional Services: Planning Boai
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
PROF SVCS - HISTORIC PRESERVI
Prof Svcs - Historic Preservation
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
Total
COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI`
Emergency Medical Services & Traun
001.000.237.120
PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
001.000.237.130
4.3.a
Page: 27
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
195.5, 'D
U
m
44.1 E
N
233.4z
z
U
26.51
m
c
26.7E
1,808.1 f
�a
0
1,187.5( a
250.0(
1,437.5(
0
7a
0
370.0( a
a
Q
333.0( r'
N
A
185.0( N
888.0( E
2
U
c
860.7-
t
U
15,192.8E
Q
Page: 27
Packet Pg. 59
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
236017 3/21/2019 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued)
236018 3/21/2019 076988 PACIFIC FLOWER FARMS
236019 3/21/2019 075183 PETERSON FRUIT CO
Bus License refund
390698
PO # Description/Account
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.237.150
State Patrol Death Investigation
001.000.237.330
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.237.180
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.237.200
Washington Auto Theft Prevention
001.000.237.250
Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.237.260
Accessible Communities Acct
001.000.237.290
Multi -Model Transportation
001.000.237.300
Hwy Safety Acct
001.000.237.320
Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis
001.000.237.170
WSP Hwy Acct
001.000.237.340
Domestic Violence Prevention
001.000.237.370
DNA Database Acct
001.000.237.400
Total
LI Refund Cst #00006598
LI Refund Cst #00006598
001.000.257.310
MARCH FRUIT PICKUP
FRUIT PICKUP FOR MARCH
Total
4.3.a
Page: 28
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
253.0( u
92.3E
N
4,056.5E
U
205.0E
m
c
1,723.8, m
c
339.4z f°
0
L
126.0E
a
126.1-
393.7E ,-
0
1.8( >
0
524.3 a
Q
1.9( 0)
4.6 , M
23,902.5, c
V)
E
2
U
50.0(
50.0( a0i
E
s
U
Q
Page: 28
Packet Pg. 60
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 29
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
236019 3/21/2019 075183 PETERSON FRUIT CO
(Continued)
0
001.000.22.518.10.31.10
as
135.0f -0
Total:
135.0: m
L_
236020 3/21/2019 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
U578690
WWTP: HOFAHC110E CORROSION
HOF AHCII OE CORROSION INHIB
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
508.5 1
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
52.3£
Total:
560.9! c
236021 3/21/2019 064088 PROTECTION ONE
2422756
ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE
ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
549.2, _
2422756
ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE
ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE
ca
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
a
-135.3'
291104
ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAIL
E
ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I
fd
U
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
22.2' o
ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I
1i
001.000.64.576.80.42.00
22.2' o
ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST
a
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
83.1( Q
Fire Inspection FS 20
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
57.4( r'
Fire Inspection Old Public Works
N
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
44.2' c;
Fire Inspection Yost Pool
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
48.4E E
31146525
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL
is
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12'
U
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
155.& r-
730531
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
E
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
51.5(
Q
Page: 29
Packet Pg. 61
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 30
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
236021
3/21/2019
064088
PROTECTION ONE
(Continued)
0
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
51.5( u
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
L
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
46.3E
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
Y
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
59.2,
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
v
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
25.7E
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF
c
001.000.65.518.20.42.00
23.1 � m
Total:
1,104.81, c
�a
236022
3/21/2019
070809
PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE
19-0426
COURT SECURITY 03/01/2019-03/0£
o
COURT SECURITY 03/01/2019-03/0£
L_,
001.000.23.512.50.41.00
1,746.2E a
Total:
1,746.2°
236023
3/21/2019
076973
PYLES, GREGORY
GPyles1-7-19
WWTP: AIRFARE/BAGGAGE FEES
U
AIRFARE $256.40 & BAGGAGE FEE
c
423.000.76.535.80.49.00
316.4( 70
Total:
316.4( c
L
Q
236024
3/21/2019
076493
BEDSIDE CONSTRUCTION LLC
ESKA.Pmt 11
ESKA.PMT 11 THRU 2/28/19
Q-
Q
E5KA.Pmt 11 thru 2/28/19
421.000.74.594.34.65.10
184,065.4'
Total :
184,065.41 N
236025
3/21/2019
072733
SCHWING BIOSET INC
61421427
WWTP: 3-2019 RENTAL-HYDRAULI1
o
3-2019 RENTAL -HYDRAULIC POWE
E
423.000.76.535.80.45.00
5,000.0( 'M
Total:
5,000.0(
236026
3/21/2019
073574
SERVICE PLUMBING & HEATING
BLD20190264
REFUND: PLUMBING PERMIT NOT
Refund: Plumbing permit not needed
E
001.000.257.620
148.0( um
Q
Page: 30
Packet Pg. 62
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #
236026 3/21/2019 073574 073574 SERVICE PLUMBING & HEATING (Continued)
236027 3/21/2019 075628 SNO CO DEPT OF EMERG MGMT 1000495748
236028
236029
3/21/2019 075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC 2603
3/21/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
200202554
200496834
200650851
200651644
201184538
201383270
201431236
201441755
Description/Account
Total ;
01-2019 EMERGENCY COMM & DIE
01-2019 Emergency Communication
001.000.39.525.60.41.50
Total
PUBLIC DEFENDER CONTRACT - F
FEB PUBLIC DEFENDER COSTS
001.000.39.512.52.41.00
Total
WWTP: 2/6-3/6/19 FLOWMETER 10(
2/6-3/6/19 FLOW METER 2400 HIGI
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
HICKMAN PARK
HICKMAN PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
CITY PARK GAZEBO
CITY PARK GAZEBO
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
4.3.a
Page: 31
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
148.0( 0
U
d
L_
13,273.7E
13,273.7E
m
v
26,265.2, m
26,265.2,
c
�a
16.6( o
�a
a
96.2- E
U
19.6, c
�a
0
a
1,017.6� Q
rn
28.&
N
ch
0
17.1
18.3,
aD
E
t
239.4E
Q
Page: 31
Packet Pg. 63
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
236029 3/21/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
236030 3/21/2019 037521 SNO CO TREASURER
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
201453057
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
201790003
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
202114484
CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL
CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
202289450
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
204425847
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
205184385
LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV
LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
220547574
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1
111.000.68.542.63.47.00
221732084
VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597
VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
Total
00479000100302 2019 FIRST HALF SURFACE WATEI
2019 Surface Water Charges - 23009
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
27043200300100 PARCEL 27043200300100 LAKE BAI
Parcel 27043200300100 Lake Manac
001.000.39.576.90.41.50
27043200300200 PARCEL 27043200300200 LAKE BAI
Parcel 27043200300200 Lake Manac
001.000.39.576.90.41.50
4.3.a
Page: 32
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun N
0
a
m
U
m
61.6:
N
20.2�
229.3f
a�
83.9z
0
L
93.6� a
E
26.1 ' u
0
�a
104.1E 0
a
a
Q
139.5(
2,212.6z
N
M
O
199.0 -, E
U
13.0z
E
t
U
13.0z
Q
Page: 32
Packet Pg. 64
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
236030 3/21/2019 037521 037521 SNO CO TREASURER
236031 3/21/2019 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER
236032
236033
3/21/2019 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
February 2019
SHD-01 JAN-DEC 2019
3/21/2019 075875 SOUND CLEANING RESOURCES INC 17979
3/21/2019 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 263924/1
263930/1
67391/4
67461/4
PO # Description/Account
Total
Crime Victims Court Remittance
Crime Victims Court Remittance
001.000.237.140
Total
HEALTH DISTRICT INTERLOCALAC
Per Capita contribution per Interlocal
001.000.39.562.00.41.50
Total
WWTP: 3/9/19 AIR DUCT CLEANINC
3/9/19 AIR DUCT CLEANING
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
Total
STORM - WORK WEAR - M JOHNS(
Storm - Work Wear - M Johnson
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
STREET - WORK WEAR - B SANDE
Street - Work Wear - B Sanders
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
9.7% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
STREET - WORK WEAR - C HIATT
Street - Work Wear - C Hiatt
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
STREET - WORK WEAR - T HANSO
Street - Work Wear - T Hanson
4.3.a
Page: 33
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
225.1E 0
U
d
L_
361.5,
361.5'
m
v
41,820.0( m
41,820.0(
c
�a
1,379.0( o
�a
142.01 a
1,521.0' E
U
4-
0
257.2' >
0
L
24.9E a
Q
rn
197.7,
N
19.1E o
E
M
396.5' Z
c
40.8z E
t
U
�a
Q
Page: 33
Packet Pg. 65
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 34
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
236034
3/21/2019 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
(Continued)
0
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
as
101.2z -0
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
m
10.4< .L
68091/4
WATER - WORK JEANS (5) K KUHN
Water - Work Jeans (5) K KUhnhaUSE
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
249.7E
10.3% Sales Tax
U
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
25.7,
68229/4
STORM - WORK WEAR - K HARRIS
c
Storm - Work Wear - K Harris
°D
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
311.3(
10.3% Sales Tax
sa
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
32.0E 0
68394/4
STREET - WORK WEAR - D BROWI
Street - Work Wear - D Browning
a
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
371.8(
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
38.3( u
68648/4
STORM - WRORK WEAR - T MOLE
0
Storm - Wrork Wear - T Moles
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
105.7E o
10.3% Sales Tax
a
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
10.9( Q
Total:
2,193.7: m
236035
3/21/2019 075009 SOUNDVIEW DESIGN STUDIO
00010902
SUMMER 2019 CRAZE DESIGN
N
SUMMER 2019 CRAZE DESIGN
M
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
0
1,288.5( N
Total :
1,288.5( .E
236036
3/21/2019 076974 STALBANS PARISH
PLN20190001
REFUND: HEARING EXAMINER FEE
U
Refund: Hearing examiner fees less
001.000.257.620
35.0( E
Total:
35.0( U
�a
Q
Page: 34
Packet Pg. 66
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 35
a�
L
3
Bank code :
usbank
c
�a
Voucher
Date
Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amoun N
236037
3/21/2019
076474 STROMME, JOANNE
7252 7249 YOGA
7252 7249 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCT
0
m
7252 YOGA TH W/ JOANNE CLASS
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
431.2( u
7249 YOGA TU W/ JOANNE CLASS
L
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
392.7(
7255 YOGA CLASS
7255 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTION
Y
7255 YOGA FRI W/ JOANNE CLASS
001.000.64.571.27.41.00
z
485.1( v
Total :
1,309.0( m
c
236038
3/21/2019
068360 SUMMIT LAW GROUP
100723
INV 100723 EDMONDS PD 20119-1E
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2.2 HR!
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
693.0(
Total:
693.0( o
0
236039
3/21/2019
076975 TECH POWER SOLUTIONS
55453
HP NIMBLE STORAGE EQUIPMENTCL
ca
HP Nimble Storage equipment
512.100.31.594.18.64.10
52,195.0' •E
10.3% Sales Tax
512.100.31.594.18.64.10
5,376.0� c
Total:
57,571.1,
236040
3/21/2019
075139 THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP INC
200603
E4FE.SERVICES THRU 3/1/19
0
a
E4FE.Services thru 3/1/19
Q-
Q
422.000.72.594.31.65.41
1,652.0(
Total :
1,652.0( r'
236041
3/21/2019
076853 TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORP
346433
WWTP: AIR MEASUREMENT TESTI
N
AIR MEASUREMENT TESTING SVC
o
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
6,933.0(
Total:
6,933.0(
z
236042
3/21/2019
062949 UNIT PROCESS COMPANY
220/55011851
WWTP: AIR VALVES,MUFFLER PLA
};
VALVES,MUFFLER PLATES,CTR
(D
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
1,676.9 � E
Freight
U
�a
Q
Page: 35
Packet Pg. 67
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4.3.a
Page: 36
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date
Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
236042
3/21/2019
062949 UNIT PROCESS COMPANY
(Continued)
0
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
as
45.9( -0
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00
m
177.41 .L
Total:
1,900.31 y
236043
3/21/2019
075155 WALKER MACY LLC
P3282.04-10
CIVIC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
m
CIVIC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
125.000.64.594.76.65.41
3,234.9E
Total:
3,234.95 c
236044
3/21/2019
067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC
62329
INV 62329 EDMONDS PD CASE 19-1
TOW CHEVY IMPALAAZM8736-
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
189.0( _
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.41.00
19.6E a
Total:
208.6E
E
236045
3/21/2019
073552 WELCO SALES LLC
7623
INV 7623 EDMONDS PD - BUSINES,
fd
SET UP 4 NEW BUSINESS CARDS
-
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
60.0( o
PRINT 6 BUSINESS CARDS - 250 Ej
>
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
0
125.1 E a
PRINT 3 BUSINESS CARDS - 500 Ej
Q-
Q
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
62.5E
10.3% Sales Tax
r'
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
25.5,
Total:
273.2E M
0
236046
3/21/2019
072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR
TR-448636
WATER - WORK PANTS (5) - T NEL;
Water - Work Pants (5) - T Nelson
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
215.9E
9.7% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.24.00
20.9E E
TR-448748
STREET - WORK WEAR - T HANSO
t
Street - Work Wear - T Hanson
Q
Page: 36
Packet Pg. 68
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
236046 3/21/2019 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
(Continued)
TR-448792
TR-450057
TR-451943
TR-451956
TR-452357
236047 3/21/2019 076625 WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 16340
16341
PO # Description/Account
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
9.7% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
STORM - WORK WEAR - B CLEMEI`
Storm - Work Wear - B Clemens
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
STORM - WORK WEAR - J WHATM(
Storm - Work Wear - J Whatmore
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
STORM - WORK WEAR - J WARD
Storm - Work Wear - J Ward
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
STORM - WORK WEAR - T JUSTICE
Storm - Work Wear - T Justice
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00
STREET - WORK WEAR - S MERBA
Street - Work Wear - S Merback
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
9.7% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00
Total
WINDWARD JAN. 2019 TASK 1 MAF
Windward field work for Marsh study
001.000.11.511.60.41.00
WINDWARD JAN 2019 TASK 2 SITE
Windward Marsh Study field work for
4.3.a
Page: 37
a�
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
242.9', 'D
r
U
d
23.5(
N
404.9(
t
U
39.2E
m
c
a�
355.3�
�a
34.4, 0
L
�a
a
310.4-
30.1- u
4-
0
7a
304.1- o
a
a
29.5( Q
rn
323.9( N
M
0
31.4, N
2,366.8, •�
c
aD
6,781.2E E
v
�a
Q
Page: 37
Packet Pg. 69
vchlist
03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
236047 3/21/2019 076625 WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC (Continued)
236048 3/21/2019 073018 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC
236049 3/21/2019 051050 W YATT, ARTH U R D
100 Vouchers for bank code: usbank
100 Vouchers in this report
000062932772
27
PO # Description/Account
001.000.11.511.60.41.00
Tota
PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER
PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER
PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
Tota
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
009.000.39.517.20.23.00
4.3.a
Page: 38
aD
L
3
c
�a
Amoun y
0
a
aD
620.0( -0
1 : 7,401.2: m
L_
N
522.9,
z
U
53.8E
m
c
d
97.5(
c
�a
10.0' o
1 : 684.3,
�a
a
E
2,499.9E U
Total: 2,499.91 c
Bank total : 489,234.1 c
L
Total vouchers : 489,234.1 a
Q
Page: 38
Packet Pg. 70
4.3.b
vchlist
03/21 /2019 10:06:14AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
3212019 3/21/2019 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice PO # Description/Account
1558 BLUEBEAM MAINT, SERVER SWIT(
BulkRegister.com - Domain Name
512.000.31.518.88.49.00
Bluebeam - Revu Standard maintena
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Amazon - Comtrend Power over Ethe
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
ACCIS - 2019 Spring Conference for
512.000.31.518.88.49.00
CDW-G - Microsoft Surface Go w/cov
001.000.23.523.30.35.00
Newegg.com - Intel Compute Stick C;
512.100.31.518.88.35.00
Amazon - Jabra Pro 930 Wireless He
001.000.41.521.11.35.00
CDW-G - Microsoft Surface Go warra
001.000.23.523.30.48.00
Newegg.com - Microsoft Surface USE
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
BulkRegister.com - Domain Name
512.000.31.518.88.49.00
Amazon - Mitel Bluetooth handset
512.000.31.518.88.31.00
Amazon - Bluetooth handset - Qty 2
001.000.25.514.30.31.00
BulkRegister.com - Domain Name
512.000.31.518.88.49.00
ServerSupply.com - Cisco
512.100.31.518.88.35.00
2985 WWTP: SLNG-SCTT+JCASTRO TR/
Amazon: Visitor Sign In Book, Page
423.000.76.535.80.31.00
PSI: $100 fee for Johnathan Castro's
423.000.76.535.80.49.71
Page: 1
m
L
3
c
ea
Amoun 00
0
a
d
0
18.0( m
=a
2,402.3' Y
m
330.8( u
425.0(
aD
701.5E
c
�a
583.1 ' o
139.41 a
156.1' M
Z
49.6, IS
R
30.1 - o
L
a
a
131.2( Q
rn
262.5,
N
30.1' c
m
L
1,656.2( '3
c
146.8< E
t
200.0(
Q
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 71
vchlist
03/21 /2019 10:06:14AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
3212019 3/21/2019 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
Green River: Shane Long -Scott - WV\
423.000.76.535.80.49.71
2985
WWTP: CREDIT FOR 1 PSI CHG AC
PSI Website charged twice for Johna
423.000.76.535.80.49.71
4675
4675 PARKS CREDIT CARD
AMAZON: DISCOVERY SUPPLIES: 1
001.000.64.571.23.24.00
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: HERBICIE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
INTERNATIONAL NW PARKS & REC
001.000.64.576.80.49.00
OFFICE DEPOT: PM SUPPLES: LAN
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
AMAZON: WOTS SUPPLIES: ACRYL
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GARMEW
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
AMAZON: DADDY DAUGHTER DAN,
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
AMAZON: WOTS SUPPLIES: SPEAK
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
AMAZON: DADDY DAUGHTER DAN,
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
OTC BRANDS: DADDY DAUGHTER
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: COLOR 1
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: PACKIN(
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: ENVELC
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: DRY ER)
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
4.3.b
Page: 2
m
L
3
c
Amoun
.y
0
a
m
400.0(
m
L
-100.0( ui
Y
m
t
132.3(
w
m
165.2,
1,335.0(
89.3<
�a
a
28.6< E
61.6, U
0
65.3'
0
35.2£ a
a
Q
109.4E
M
67.7, N
M
9.6< m
L
37.2E 3
c
a�
32.9, E
t
10.9-
Q
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 72
vchlist
03/21 /2019 10:06:14AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
3212019 3/21/2019 062693 US BANK
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
(Continued)
SURVEY MONKEY: MONTHLY PLAN
001.000.64.571.21.49.00
PCC: DISCOVERY SUPPLIES: CUP;
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
ISSUU: DIGITAL CRAZE SUBSCRIP-
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
AMAZON: DISCOVERY SUPPLIES:
001.000.64.571.23.31.00
BROWN PAPER TICKETS: LEACH N
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: FRIDGE
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: LAWN & F
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: WEED KIL
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GLOVES,
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: HAND WA
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
VERDANT: HEALTHIER COMMUNIT
001.000.64.571.22.49.00
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: USB CAB[
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: DIVIDER
001.000.64.571.22.31.00
4675
CREDIT FOR RETURNED ITEMS: Al
AMAZON: RANGER UNIFORM RAIN
001.000.64.571.23.24.00
AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: FRIDGE
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
5639
UPS FREIGHT CHARGES - PD CAST
UPS Freight charges - PD Case #18-1
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
4.3.b
Page: 3
m
L
3
c
Amoun
.y
0
a
m
40.8,
m
L
4.7< `a
N
Y
38.9E
t
49.4,
m
c
73.4z
193.4(
44.9z Lm
�a
a
423.5, E
160.4z U
0
87.0�
0
L
98.0( a
Q
16.5E M
46.2E N
M
O
m
-289.7, 3
-193.4(
E
t
76.0E
Q
Page: 3
Packet Pg. 73
vchlist
03/21 /2019 10:06:14AM
Bank code : usbank
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Voucher Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
3212019 3/21/2019 062693 US BANK
(Continued)
6254
6254 HITE CREDIT CARD
CAPITAL CAMPUS PARKING: OLYM
001.000.64.571.21.49.00
WRPA 2019 ANNUAL CONFERENCE
001.000.64.571.21.43.00
WRPA 2019 ANNUAL CONFERENCE
001.000.64.571.22.43.00
8296
WPTA CONFERENCE AND MEMBEF
WPTA 2019 membership dues for S
001.000.31.514.20.49.00
WPTA conference registration for S
001.000.31.514.20.49.00
9573
GFOA CONFERENCE REGISTRATIC
GFOA - Introduction to Governmental
001.000.31.514.23.49.00
Alaska Air - Air travel to GFOA
001.000.31.514.23.43.00
Total
1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank
Bank total
1 Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers
4.3.b
Page: 4
m
L
3
c
Amoun
.y
0
a
m
14.0(
=a
290.3, ui
Y
m
576.3<
w
m
40.0( W
275.0(
0
L
85.0( sa
a
280.6( .E
12,175.6: u
4-
12,175.6, o
R
12,175.6: o
a
a
Q
M
N
M
O
d
L
3
c
as
E
a
Page: 4
Packet Pg. 74
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
vi
Funding
Proiect Title
Number
Number
a�
STM
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
c484
E51FE
E
STIR
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
c424
E3DC
Q.
STM
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
E8FB
STM
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
c491
E6FE
SWR
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
c390
E2GB
c
tv
SWR
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
c398
E3GA
r
U)
STIR2014
Chip Seals
c451
E4CB
y
STM
2014 Drainage Improvements
c433
E41FA
v
STIR
2014 Overlay Program
c438
E4CA
=
WTR
2014 Waterline Overlays
c452
E4CC
ui
Y
STM
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
c466
E51FA
U
STIR
2015 Overlay Program
c463
E5CA
t
r
SWR
2015 Sewerline Overlays
i007
E5CC
c
SWR
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
c441
E4GA
STIR
2015 Traffic Calming
c471
E5AB
WTR
2015 Waterline Overlays
c475
E5C13
tv
—
0
WTR
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
c440
E4J1B
tv
STIR
2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
i016
E6DC
Q-
STIR
2016 Overlay Program
i008
E6CA
E
SWR
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
c469
E5GA
SWR
2016 Sewerline Overlays
i010
E6CC
WTR
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
c460
E4JC
p
L
WTR
2016 Waterline Overlays
i009
E6CB
Q
Q
WTR
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
c468
E5JA
STIR
2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades
i022
E7DA
rn
r
STIR
2017 Minor Sidewalk Program
i023
E7DB
r
N
M
STIR
2017 Overlay Program
i018
E7CA
N
SWR
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
i013
E6GA
L
�
SWR
2017 Sewerline Overlays
i020
E7CC
E
STIR
2017 Traffic Calming
i021
E7AA
Z
0
WTR
2017 Waterline Overlays
i019
E7CB
L
IL
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
i014
E6J13
y
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
E81FA
>+
STIR
2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
i032
E8DA
r
y
STIR
2018 Overlay Program
i030
E8CB
m
L
SWR
2018 Sewerline Overlays
i035
E8CE
u_
SWR
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
c492
E6GC
m
STIR
2018 Traffic Calming
i027
E8AA
E
WTR
2018 Waterline Overlays
i034
E8CD
v
coo
r
Q
WTR
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
c493
E6JC
STIR
2019 Overlay Program
i036
E9CA
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
c516
E8GA
Revised 3/20/2019
Packet Pg. 75
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
vi
Funding
Proiect Title
Number
Number
a�
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
E8FC
E
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
c523
E8JA
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
s020
E8JB
3
WTR
2019 Waterline Replacement
c498
E7JA
STIR
220th Adaptive
i028
E8AB
STIR
220th Street Overlay Project
c462
E4CD
r
o
STM
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
c486
E6FB
y
WTR
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
c418
E3JB
STIR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STIR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD
ui
Y
STIR
238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps
i037
E8DC
v
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
r
c
STM
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
i012
E6FC
STIR
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
E8CA
c
STIR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
0
STIR
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
i031
E8CC
tv
STIR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
Q-
STIR
9th Avenue Improvement Project
c392
E2AB
E
FAC
AN Upgrades - Council Chambers
c476
E5LA
C
STIR
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
c426
E3DE
STIR
ADA Curb Ramps
i033
E8DB
o
L
STIR
ADA Transition Plan
s016
E6DB
°-
CL
STIR
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i024
E7AB
Q
STIR
Bikelink Project
c474
E5DA
PRK
City Spray Park
c417
E4MA
r
N
M
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
c456
E4GB
N
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
c488
E6GB
STIR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
i026
E7DC
E
STIR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
Z
0
WTR
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c482
E5JB
a
STM
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
c374
E1 FM
rn
PM
Dayton Street Plaza
c276
E7MA
>,
STM
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
c472
E5FC
r
y
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E41FE
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
L
u_
STM
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
c380
E2FC
General
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
c478
E5DB
E
FAC
ESCO III Project
c419
E3LB
cvo
PRK
FAC Band Shell Replacement
c477
E6MB
r
r
Q
WTR
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
c473
E5KA
STIR
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
c342
E1AA
Revised 3/20/2019
Packet Pg. 76
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
E8MA
STIR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
STIR
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
SWR
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
s011
E5GB
STM
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
c434
E4FB
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
c461
E4GC
STIR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
STM
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
c378
E21FA
STM
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
i011
E61FA
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
c410
E31FE
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E71FA
STM
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
c376
E1 FN
STM
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
c408
E3FC
FAC
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
c444
E41LA
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
c479
E51FD
WWTP
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
c446
E4HA
STIR
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
c427
E3AB
STIR
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
c454
E4DB
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
solo
E5NA
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
c429
E3FG
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STIR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STM
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
c379
E2FB
STM
SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements
c430
E3FH
STIR
Trackside Warning System
c470
E5AA
STIR
Train Trench - Concept
c453
E4DA
STIR
Transportation Plan Update
c391
E2AA
STM
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
c467
E5FB
UTILITIES
Utility Rate Update
s013
E6JA
PRK
Veteran's Plaza
c480
E6MA
STM
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
c459
E4FF
PRK
Waterfront Restoration
m103
E7MA
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
c435
E4FC
WWTP
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
c481
E5HA
PRK
Yost Park Spa
c494
E6MC
Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 77
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR
E1CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STM
E1 FM
c374
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STR
E2AA
c391
Transportation Plan Update
c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project
STR
E2AD
c405
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c378
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM
E2FB
c379
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
SWR
E2GB
c390
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
c427
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
E3DC
W c424
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STR
E3DD
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STM
E3FC
c408
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
c410
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
STM
E3FG
c429
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
c430
SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements
SWR
E3GA
c398
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
c418
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)�
FAC
EXB
c419
ESCO III Project
2014 Overlay Program .
STR
E4CB
c451
2014 Chip Seals
WTR
c452
2014 Waterline Overlays
STR
E4CD
c462
220th Street Overlay Project
STR
c453
Train Trench - Concept
STR
E4DB
c454
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
STM
c433
2014 Drainage Improvements
STM
E4FB
c434
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
ItS
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
STM
E4FF
c459
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
SWR
E4GB
c456
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR
E4JC
c460
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 78
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Project
Accounting
N
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
d
ontrols System Upgrades
j=
PRK
E4MA
c417
City Spray Park
Q.
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
3
STIR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
2015 Traffic Calming
t=c
STIR
E5CA
c463
2015 Overlay Program
r
o
CL
2015 Waterline Overlays
SWR
E5CC
i007
2015 Sewerline Overlays
General
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
y
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
a�
STM
E5FB
c467
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
s
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
d
c
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
d
12th Ave &Sierra Stormwater System Improvements NNEV
c
SWR
E5GA
c469
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
—
0
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Ouffall Pipe Modifications
Q-
c468
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
E
WTR
E5JB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
C
FAC
E5LA
c476
AN Upgrades - Council Chambers
C
solo
Standard Details Updates
Q
STIR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
Q
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STIR
E6CA
i008
2016 Overlay Program
N
M
2016 Waterline Overlays
N
SWR
E6CC
i010
2016 Sewerline Overlays
E
E61
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STIR
E6DB
s016
ADA Transition Plan
Z
O
STIRE6DC
i016
2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
a
STIR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
N
STM
E6FA
iol l
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
>,
STM
E6FB
c486
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
STM
E6FC
i012
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
�
L
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
li
STM
E6FE
c491
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
SWR
E6GA
i013
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
E
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
SWR
E6GC
c492
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
Q
UTILITIES
s013
Utility Rate Update
WTR
E6JB
i014
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
Revised 3/20/2019
Packet Pg. 79
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Project
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Project Title
E6JC
c493
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
PRK
E6MA
c480
Veteran's Plaza
FAC Band Shell Replacement
PRK
E6MC
c494
Yost Park Spa
2017 Traffic Calming
i021
STIR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STIR
E7CA
i018
2017 Overlay Program
2017 Waterline Overlays _
SWR
E7CC
i020
2017 Sewerline Overlays
IF i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STIR
E7DA
i022
2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades
2017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STIR
E7DC
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
m013
IFDES (Students Saving Salmonl
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
c276
Dayton Street Plaza
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Restoration
i027
2018 Traffic Calming
STIR
E8AB
i028
220th Adaptive
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STIR
E8CB
i030
2018 Overlay Program
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
WTR
E8CD
i034
2018 Waterline Overlays
i035
2018 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E8DA
i032
2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
STIR
E8DC
i037
238th St. Island & Misc Ramps
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
STM
E8FB
c521
174th St. & 71stAve Storm Improvements
E8FC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
SWR
E8GA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
E8JA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
UTILITIES
E8J13
s020
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STIR
E9CA
i036
2019 Overlay Program
Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 80
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
PM
E7MA
c276
Dayton Street Plaza
PM
E8MA
c282
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STIR
E1AA
c342
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STIR
E1 DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
STIR
E1 CA
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STM
E1 FM
c374
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM
E1 FN
c376
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STM
E2FA
c378
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM
E2FB
c379
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM
E2FC
c380
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
SWR
E2GB
c390
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
STIR
E2AA
c391
Transportation Plan Update
STIR
E2AB
c392
9th Avenue Improvement Project
SWR
E3GA
c398
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
STIR
E2AD
c405
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM
E3FC
c408
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM
E3FE
c410
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
PRK
E4MA
c417
City Spray Park
WTR
E3J13
c418
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
FAC
E3LB
c419
ESCO III Project
STIR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STIR
E3DC
c424
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STIR
E3DD
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STIR
E3DE
c426
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STIR
E3AB
c427
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STM
E3FG
c429
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM
E3FH
c430
SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM
E4FA
c433
2014 Drainage Improvements
STM
E4FB
c434
LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM
E4FC
c435
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM
E4FD
c436
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STIR
E4CA
c438
2014 Overlay Program
WTR
E4JB
c440
2015 Waterline Replacement Program
SWR
E4GA
c441
2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
FAC
E4MB
c443
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
FAC
E4LA
c444
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
WWTP
E4HA
c446
Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STIR
E4CB
c451
2014 Chip Seals
WTR
E4CC
c452
2014 Waterline Overlays
STIR
E4DA
c453
Train Trench - Concept
STIR
E4DB
c454
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
STM
E4FE
c455
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 81
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
SWR
E4GB
c456
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
STM
E4FF
c459
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
WTR
E4JC
c460
2016 Water Comp Plan Update
SWR
E4GC
c461
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
STIR
E4CD
c462
220th Street Overlay Project
STIR
E5CA
c463
2015 Overlay Program
STM
E5FA
c466
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
STM
E5FB
c467
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
WTR
E5JA
c468
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
SWR
E5GA
c469
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
STIR
E5AA
c470
Trackside Warning System
STIR
E5AB
c471
2015 Traffic Calming
STM
E5FC
c472
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
WTR
E5KA
c473
Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
STIR
E5DA
c474
Bikelink Project
WTR
E5CB
c475
2015 Waterline Overlays
FAC
E5LA
c476
AN Upgrades - Council Chambers
PRK
E6MB
c477
FAC Band Shell Replacement
General
E5DB
c478
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
STM
E5FD
c479
Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
PRK
E6MA
c480
Veteran's Plaza
WWTP
E5HA
c481
WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR
E5JB
c482
Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STM
E5FE
c484
12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
STIR
E6DA
c485
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STM
E6FB
c486
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
SWR
E6GB
c488
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
STM
E6FE
c491
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
SWR
E6GC
c492
2018 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR
E6JC
c493
2018 Waterline Replacement Project
PRK
E6MC
c494
Yost Park Spa
STM
E7FB
c495
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
WTR
E7JA
c498
2019 Waterline Replacement
SWR
E8GA
c516
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
STM
E8FB
c521
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
WTR
E8JA
c523
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
STM
E8FC
c525
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
STIR
E7AC
i005
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
SWR
E5CC
i007
2015 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E6CA
i008
2016 Overlay Program
WTR
E6CB
i009
2016 Waterline Overlays
SWR
E6CC
i010
2016 Sewerline Overlays
Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 82
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Engineering
Project
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
STM
E6FA
i011
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
STM
E6FC
i012
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
SWR
E6GA
i013
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
WTR
E6J13
i014
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
STIR
E6AB
i015
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STIR
E6DC
i016
2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STIR
E6DD
i017
Minor Sidewalk Program
STIR
E7CA
i018
2017 Overlay Program
WTR
E7CB
i019
2017 Waterline Overlays
SWR
E7CC
i020
2017 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E7AA
i021
2017 Traffic Calming
STIR
E7DA
i022
2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STIR
E7DB
i023
2017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STIR
E7AB
i024
Audible Pedestrian Signals
STIR
E7CD
i025
89th PI W Retaining Wall
STIR
E7DC
i026
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STIR
E8AA
i027
2018 Traffic Calming
STIR
E8AB
i028
220th Adaptive
STIR
E8CA
i029
76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STIR
E8CB
i030
2018 Overlay Program
STIR
E8CC
i031
84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STIR
E8DA
i032
2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
STIR
E8DB
i033
ADA Curb Ramps
WTR
E8CD
i034
2018 Waterline Overlays
SWR
E8CE
i035
2018 Sewerline Overlays
STIR
E9CA
i036
2019 Overlay Program
STIR
E8DC
i037
238th St.lsland & Misc. Ramps
STM
E7FG
m013
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PRK
E7MA
m103
Waterfront Restoration
STM
E7FA
m105
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
UTILITIES
E5NA
solo
Standard Details Updates
SWR
E5GB
s011
Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
UTILITIES
E6JA
s013
Utility Rate Update
STIR
E6AA
s014
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STIR
E6DB
s016
ADA Transition Plan
STM
E6FD
s017
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
STM
E8FA
s018
2018 Lorian Woods Study
UTILITIES
E8J13
s020
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 83
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Protect
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Project Title
Number
Number
FAC
AN Upgrades - Council Chambers
c476
E51-A
FAC
Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
c443
E4MB
FAC
ESCO III Proje
c419
E3LB
FAC
Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
c444
E41-A
General
Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
c478
E5DB
PM
Dayton Street Plaza
c276
E7MA
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282 � E8MA 0
PRK
City Spray Park
c417
E4MA
FAC Band Shell Replacement
_ E6MB 0
c477
PRK
Veteran's Plaza
c480
E6MA
PRK
Waterfront Restoration
m103=E7MA'
PRK
Yost Park Spa
c494
E6MC
WTMT12th
Ave Improvements
& Sierra Stormwater System
c484
STM
174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements
c521
E8FB
STM
183rd PI SW Storm Repairs
c491
E61FE
STM
2014 Drainage Improvements
c433
E4FA
STM
2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
c466
E5FA ■
STM
2018 Lorian Woods Study
s018
E8FA
STM
2019 Storm Maintenance Project
c525
E8FC.
STM
224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
c486
E6FB
STM
3rd Ave Rain Gardens
i012
I E6FC.
STM
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
c374
E1 FM
STM
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
c472
E5FC.
STM
Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
c455
E4FE
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility
_ E2FC.
STM
Study
c380
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
c436
E4FD
MTNKLID
Retrofits Perrinville Basin
E4FB
Creek
c434
STM
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
c378
E2FA
STM
Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
i011
E6FA
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
c410
E3FE
STM
NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
m013
E7FG
STM
OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
m105
E7FA
�TM
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
E1 FN
STM
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
c408
E3FC
STM
Seaview Park Infiltration Facilit
79
E5FD
STM
Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
c495
E7FB
STM
Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
c429
E3FG
STM
Stormwater Comp Plan Update
s017
E6FD
STM
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
c379
E2FB
STM
SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements
c430
E3FH
STM
Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
w
E5FB
Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 84
4.3.c
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Protect
Engineering
Accounting
Project
N
Funding
Protect Title
Number
Number
d
STM
Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
c459
E4FF
j_
STM
Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoratio
c435
E4FC
Q.
STIR
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
c424
E3DC
i
STIR
2014 Chip Seal
c451
E4CB
STIR
2014 Overlay Program
c438
E4CA
c
to
STIR
2015 Overlay Program
c463
E5CA
r
C
STIR2015
Traffic Calming
c471
E5AB
d
STIR
2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
i016
E6DC.
j
d
STIR
2016 Overlay Program
i008
E6CA
L
STIR
2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades
i022 _ E7DA.
y
A9
STIR
2017 Minor Sidewalk Program
i023
E7DB
s
STIR
2017 Overlay Program
= i018
v
STIR
2017 Traffic Calming
i021
E7AA
d
—
c
STIR
2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
i032
E8DA
CD
STIR
2018 Overlay Program
i030
E8CB
to
STIR
2018 Traffic Calming
i027
E8AA
—
O
STIR2019
Overlay Program
i036
E9CA
>,
tv
='
STIR
220th Street Overlay Project
c462
E4CD.
STIR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
E
v
STIR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD.
O
STIR
238th St. Island & Misc Ramps
i037
E8DC
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th AveAL
E3DB.
-
O
STIR
238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
c485
E6DA
Q
�76th
Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
i029
■ E8CA.
Q
STIR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
�84th
Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
N
M
STIR
89th PI W Retaining Wall
i025
E7CD
L
STIR
9th Avenue Improvement Project
d
STIR
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
c426
E3DE
E
STIR
ADA Curb Ramps
L
STIR
ADA Transition Plan
s016
E6DB
IL
Audible Pedestrian Signals
E7AB
N
STIR
Bikelink Project
c474
E5DA
>+
STIR
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancement
i026
E7DC
m
STIR
Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
i015
E6AB
ss
i
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
c342
E1AA
LL
STIR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
=
Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
s014
E6AA
d
E
STIR
Minor Sidewalk Program
i017
E6DD
MTR
SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
c427
E3AB
Q
STIR
SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing
c454
E4DB
MTR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1DA
Revised 3/20/2019
Packet Pg. 85
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
4.3.c
Funding
Protect Title
STR
Trackside Warning System
STR
Train 10 oncept
STR
Transportation Plan Update
STR
220th Adaptive
SWR
2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
SWR
2013 Sewerline Replac ojec
SWR
2015 Sewerline Overlays
SWR
2015 Sewerline Replacement Projec
SWR
2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
SWR
2016 Sewerline Overlays
SWR
2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
SWR
2017 Sewerline Overlays
SWR
2018 Sewerline Overlays
SWR
2018 Sewerline Replacemer�
SWR
2019 Sewerline Replacement Project
ErWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Reha
SWR
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
SWR
Lake BallingerTrun
SWR
Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
UTILITIES
2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update
UTILITIES
Standard Details Updates
UTILITIES Utility Rate Update
WTR 2014 Waterline Ov
WTR 2015 Waterline
WTR 2015 Waterline
WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update
WTR
2016 Waterline Overlays
WTR
2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
WTR
2017 Waterline Overlays
WTR
2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
WTR
2018 Waterline Overlays
WTR
2018 Waterline Replacement Projec
WTR
2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement
WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement =
WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating
WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
Protect
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Number
Number
c470
E5AA
c453
E4DA
c391
E2AA
i028
E8AB
c390
E2GB
c398
E3GA
i007
E5CC
c441
E4GA.
c469
E5GA
i01 o =M E6CC.
i013
E6GA
r i020
i035
E8CE
F c492
_ _
E6GC
c516
E8GA
E4GB
c488
E6GB
c461
E4GC
020
E8JB
solo
E5NA
E013
E6JA
c452
E4CC
O475
E5CB
c440
E4JB
c460
E4JC
i009
E6CB
c468
E5JA
i019
E7CB
i014
E6JB
i034
E8CD
c493
E6JC
c523
E8JA
c498
E7JA
c418
E3,113
c482
E5,113
c473
E5KA
c446
E4HA
c481
E5HA
Revised 3/20/2019
Packet Pg. 86
4.3.d
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 917 (03/01/2019 to 03/15/2019) c
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
-ed2
REGULAR HOURS
Educational Pav Correction
0.00
-156.28
111
ABSENT
NO PAY LEAVE
56.00
0.00
120
SICK
SICK LEAVE - L & 1
78.00
2,840.17
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
749.00
29,075.96
122
VACATION
VACATION
867.49
35,235.36
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
117.00
4,756.49
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
33.00
1,128.95
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
226.76
8,554.57
129
SICK
Police Sick Leave L & 1
24.00
926.62
130
COMP HOURS
Holidav Compensation Used
10.25
359.43
131
MILITARY
MILITARY LEAVE
36.00
1,508.06
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kellv Dav Used
105.00
4,359.61
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
325.77
14,902.59
160
VACATION
MANAGEMENT LEAVE
37.00
2,435.16
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
17,372.70
679,002.53
195
REGULAR HOURS
ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE
176.00
7,728.00
205
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME .5
19.00
314.37
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
7.00
253.76
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
24.00
1,289.31
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
16.00
1,505.42
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
194.00
14,251.38
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
26.25
1,913.35
400
MISCELLANEOUS
MISC PAY
0.00
170.00
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
132.04
275.39
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
1,422.11
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
664.48
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 1.0
39.25
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5
358.00
0.00
606
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 2.0
6.50
0.00
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
78.66
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
172.00
boc
MISCELLANEOUS
BOC 11 Certification
0.00
91.74
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstruction ist
0.00
117.51
03/21 /2019
Packet Pg. 87
4.3.d
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 917 (03/01/2019 to 03/15/2019)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
160.86
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
481.80
ctr
MISCELLANEOUS
CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM
0.00
160.00
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
111.20
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
1,075.64
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
723.91
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
829.56
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
5,166.66
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
217.06
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
709.37
Ig10
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY 5.5%
0.00
148.17
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
958.20
Ig12
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 9%
0.00
5,734.58
Ig13
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 7%
0.00
1,733.25
Ig14
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 5%
0.00
1,322.33
Ig15
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY 7.5%
0.00
381.68
Igo
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1 %
0.00
405.89
Iq5
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 3%
0.00
556.00
Ig6
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv .5%
0.00
273.76
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1.5%
0.00
489.49
Iq9
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 3.5%
0.00
104.93
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
222.40
pds
MISCELLANEOUS
Public Disclosure Specialist
0.00
101.78
phv
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
2,216.06
prof
MISCELLANEOUS
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS ;
0.00
173.48
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5%
0.00
287.66
sgt
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
173.48
sro
MISCELLANEOUS
School Resource Officer
0.00
111.20
str
MISCELLANEOUS
STREET CRIMES
0.00
462.88
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
352.51
03/21 /2019
Packet Pg. 88
4.3.d
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 917 (03/01/2019 to 03/15/2019)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours
21,036.01
Total Net Pay:
Amount
$841,022.49
$568,629.48
03/21 /2019
Packet Pg. 89
4.3.e
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 953 (03/20/2019 to 03/20/2019)
Hour Type
Hour Class
Description
Hours
Amount
122
VACATION
VACATION
36.00
1,251.00
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
52.00
1,807.00
400
MISCELLANEOUS
MISC PAY
0.00
200.00
88.00 $3,258.00
Total Net Pay: $2,567.87
03/21 /2019
Packet Pg. 90
4.3.f
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 917 - 03/01/2019 to 03/15/2019
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
63693
03/20/2019
epoa2
EPOA-POLICE
5,883.00
0.00
63694
03/20/2019
epoa3
EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT
615.14
0.00
63695
03/20/2019
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
2,337.07
0.00
63696
03/20/2019
teams
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763
4,316.75
0.00
63697
03/20/2019
icma
VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884
4,582.81
0.00
17,734.77 0.00
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
2851
03/20/2019
awc
AWC
319,489.56
0.00
2854
03/20/2019
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
29,504.01
0.00
2855
03/20/2019
us
US BANK
102,320.65
0.00
2856
03/20/2019
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N3177B1
104,887.35
0.00
2859
03/20/2019
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
6,497.32
0.00
2860
03/20/2019
edm
CITY OF EDMONDS
120.00
0.00
2861
03/20/2019
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
628.50
0.00
0.00
563,447.39
Grand Totals:
581,182.16
0.00
3/21 /2019
Packet Pg. 91
4.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Windward Environmental - Request to hire a surveyor
Staff Lead: Maureen Judge
Department: City Council
Preparer: Maureen Judge
Background/History
Windward Environmental began a study of the Edmonds Marsh in the spring of 2018. When the
schedule and scope of work was determined, the consultants did not include surveyors in their project
budget. Precise height measurements of the marsh are needed to get accurate information from the
installed data loggers, such as salinity, and a professional surveyor is required for this work
The contract between the City of Edmonds and Windward contains the following language: Non -
assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be assigned or subcontracted without
the express written consent of the City.
In order for Windward to complete one of the project tasks, they are requesting permission to hire, at
their expense, professional surveyors.
Staff Recommendation
Agree to allow Windward Environmental to subcontract surveyors of its chosing to get accurate
measurements in the Marsh.
Narrative
Windward Environmental is requesting that Council allow them to subcontract the survey work in the
field to a firm that specializes in surveying.
Packet Pg. 92
4.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Inter -local Agreement w/Edmonds School District for School Resource Officer (Scriber Lake HS)
Staff Lead: Jim Lawless
Department: Police Services
Preparer: James Lawless
Background/History
The Edmonds School District and the City have previously entered into inter -local agreements for the
placement of a School Resource Officer within Edmonds Woodway High School. Budget authorization
was given during the 2019 budgetary process for a second School Resource Officer to be assigned to
Scriber Lake High School.
Staff Recommendation
It is the recommendation and request of staff that this inter -local agreement be approved by full Council
via Consent Agenda, authorizing the Mayor's signature.
Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed to this item being placed directly on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
In 2018, the School Resource Officer position at Edmonds Woodway High School was re-established.
Prior to the beginning of 2019 budgetary process, the Edmonds School District approached the
department about establishing an SRO position at Scriber Lake High School. A decision package
requesting an additional officer for reassignment was submitted and approved as part of the 2019
budget process.
An inter -local agreement was prepared, mirroring the terms of the one authorized by the Council
between the Edmonds School District and the City for the EWHS SRO position. The new agreement was
approved as to form by the City Attorney and the agreement has also been approved and signed by the
Edmonds School District. The agreement is attached.
Attachments:
ILA SRO Scriber Lake HS 20190321113521
Packet Pg. 93
4.5.a
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT
And
CITY OF EDMONDS
For
SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER
THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the Edmonds School
District, hereafter referred to as "District", and the City of Edmonds, a
Washington State municipal corporation, hereafter referred to as "Edmonds."
RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, the District and Edmonds desire to cooperate pursuant
to Chapter 39.34 RCW, Interlocal Cooperation Act, in order to make
the most efficient use of their respective governmental powers
within their jurisdictions; and
B. WHEREAS, Edmonds and the District desire to re-establish a
School Resource Officer Program (hereafter referred to as
"Program,") to provide security, promote safety and serve as a
positive resource to the District, the participating High School that is
named in this Agreement and the surrounding neighborhood; and
C. WHEREAS, Edmonds is willing to assign a uniformed Police Officer
to serve as a School Resource Officer (hereafter referred to as
"Officer") to be assigned to the High School location(s) specified
herein in order to provide safety, patrol, and assist with certain
related duties, in return for a rate of compensation to Edmonds that
is agreed upon by the parties hereto.
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the mutual representations and covenants contained herein,
the parties agree as follows:
1. Purpose. This Agreement is intended to increase security and safety
for students, staff and property at Scriber Lake High School (the High
School) located in the District through the assignment by Edmonds of
one (1) experienced commissioned Edmonds Officer to service the
location at the specified rate of compensation herein;
2. Term. This Agreement shall commence on August 16, 2019 and shall
expire on June 30, 2022, unless otherwise terminated under the
provisions of this Agreement. Two additional one-year extensions are
allowed. Such extensions shall occur automatically and shall not
require written notice of such extension. Should either party desire not
to renew for the upcoming school year, such party must provide written
notice by April 1 to the other of its intent not to renew. Upon expiration
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS
1
Packet Pg. 94
4.5.a
of this Agreement and any extensions, all equipment furnished by
Edmonds shall remain the sole property of Edmonds and any facilities,
office equipment or other material support provided by the District shall
remain the sole property of the District.
3. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any
reason upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. This
Agreement is subject to funding, and either party may terminate with
ten (10) days written notice due to lack of funding. If this Agreement is
terminated prior to completion of the school year by either party, it shall
reimburse the other, on a prorated basis, the compensation paid for
services not received or for services rendered and not yet
compensated.
4. Duties of Officer. Edmonds shall assign the Officer to the High School
to promote safety and serve as a positive resource to the District and
the surrounding neighborhood. The duties and responsibilities of the
Officer include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Perform the duties enumerated in the Edmonds Puiice
Officer Job Description;
b_ Patrol the High School and surrounding areas to identify,
investigate, deter and prevent crimes, especially those
incidents involving weapons, youth violence, harassment,
gang involvement, drugs, or similar activities;
C. Act as a liaison between the High School Administrators
and Edmonds;
d. Establish and maintain a working rapport with the High
School administration, staff, and students;
e. Provide school -based security during the regular school
day and assist in the promotion of a safe and orderly
environment at the High School. The Officer, however,
shall not act as a disciplinarian. If the Officer is
confronted with a non -criminal violation, such as a school
rule violation, the Officer will inform the High School
Administrators of the same and assist only for the
purposes of providing security for school staff member(s)
charged with enforcing school rules and providing
testimony in a due process hearing. In the absence of a
High School Administrator, the Officer may refer the
matter to District administration;
Assist in mediating disputes on campus, including
working with students to help solve disputes in a non-
violent manner;
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS
2
Packet Pg. 95
4.5.a
g, Participate in the District multi -disciplinary threat
assessment team;
h. Act as a resource person in the area of law enforcement
education at the request of staff, speak to classes on the
law, search and seizure, drugs, motor vehicle laws, etc.;
and,
Perform other duties as mutually agreed upon by the
Principal of the High School and the Officer, provided that
the duty is legitimately and reasonably related to the
Program as described in this Agreement and is
consistent with federal and state law, local ordinances,
and District and Edmonds policies, procedures, rules,
and regulations.
5. Office Space and Supplies. District shall provide the following for the
Officer's use at the High School, all at the District's cost:
a. Private space with sufficient lighting and heat at the High
School to be used by the Officer for general office
purposes.
b. Necessary office equipment and supplies, including but
not limited to a locking cabinet, a desk, a telephone, and
a computer.
C. A portable radio for communication with High School
personnel.
6. Independent Contractor. Edmonds and District understand and agree
that Edmonds is acting as an independent contractor under the terms
of this Agreement, with the following intended results:
a. Control of personnel, standards of performance,
discipline, and other aspects of performance of the
Officer shall be governed solely by Edmonds;
b. All persons rendering services hereunder shall be for all
purposes employees of Edmonds;
C. All liabilities for salaries, wages or any other
compensation for the assigned Officer shall be the
responsibility of Edmonds.
7. Supervision of Officer. The Officer shall remain an employee of
Edmonds and is not an employee of the District. The Officer shall
remain responsive to the supervision and chain of command of
Edmonds. Edmonds shall be solely responsible for Officer's training,
discipline, or dismissal. Any allegation of improper conduct shall be
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS
3
Packet Pg. 96
4.5.a
referred by High School or District Administration to the Officer's
immediate supervisor or directly to the Edmonds Chief of Police.
8. Scheduling of Officer. Edmonds agrees to assign an Officer to Scriber
Lake High School during the regularly scheduled school year, for the
term of this Agreement. The Officer will work at his/her assigned High
School throughout the regularly scheduled school day, Monday
through Friday, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., less any scheduled vacation time, sick
time, training time, court time, or any other police -related emergencies,
such as civil disasters. When the Officer will not be on campus during
his/her regular work hours during the school year, the Officer will
advise the High School Principal in advance of the Officer's absence
and a phone number where the Officer can be reached. On scheduled
workdays when school is not in session, the Officer will work as
assigned by Edmonds.
a. Once assigned, the Officer should be available during
normally scheduled work hours to attend District provided
training which assists the officer in understanding safety and
U I&dPIInaly f. rocedufes LillllLeU uy Me VIstrict o III elude;
Right Response Training, District disciplinary, emergency
preparedness, suicide prevention responsibilities, and threat
assessment teams.
b. The Officer should be available to attend a monthly District
or regional SRO meeting to coordinate with other District
SRO personnel.
9. Overtime. Officer shall not work any overtime without the prior
approval of Edmonds. Overtime will be paid by Edmonds in
accordance with Edmonds policies. The District is not responsible for
any overtime cost unless requested by the District for special events or
security. Overtime not related to the District incidents/activities shall
not be billed to the District.
10. Selection. Edmonds and the District will cooperate in the selection of
an Edmonds uniformed Officer to perform the services under this
Agreement. Officer assignment vacancies likewise will be filled in
accordance with this section. During the selection process Edmonds
may use the following non-exclusive factors:
a. Officer should be considered capable of conveying a positive
police presence on the High School campus and in the
community.
b. Officer should have the ability to be a positive resource to
the school, staff, students, parents, and residents in the
surrounding neighborhood.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS
4
Packet Pg. 97
4.5.a
c. Prior to appointment, the Officer shall complete the Basic
SRO training course. The Officer should also attend the WA
CJTC School Safety Officer Course #6216 as scheduling is
available through the state. Both the District and Edmonds
are committed to continual professional development training
for the Officer.
11. Removal. If the District has cause to believe that a particular officer is
not effectively performing in accordance with this Agreement, the
Superintendent or designee may recommend in writing to Edmonds
that the Officer be removed from the Program. Within ten business
days after receiving the recommendation, the Superintendent or
designee will meet with the Edmonds Chief of Police or designee to
discuss the recommendation. If in the opinion of the Chief or the
Superintendent, or their designees, the problem cannot be resolved,
then the Officer shall be removed from the Program.
Edmonds retains the right to remove or re -assign the appointed Officer
as needed. Replacement of the Officer is subject to the above
described Selection process.
12.Compensation. In consideration of Edmonds's assignment of the
Officer to the Program, the District agrees to pay 50% of the salary and
benefits of the actual assigned officer for the school year, for the term
of this Agreement, as determined by Edmonds. The costs are the
responsibility of the District to Edmonds. The parties understand and
acknowledge that the sums provided under this Agreement only
partially fund the position of one fulltime Officer to the High School and
that Edmonds reserves the right to assign the Officer outside of regular
school hours to other police duties as determined in the sole discretion
of Edmonds. In addition, Edmonds reserves the right to assign the
Officer to other police functions in the event of an emergent need,
including but not limited to civil unrest or a natural disaster. The
District and Edmonds agree to negotiate compensation and costs
under the Agreement for any extension beyond the original Agreement
term. All additional salary, wages, benefits, or other compensation of
the Officer under this Agreement shall be the responsibility of
Edmonds.
In addition, the District agrees to pay Edmonds an annual police
vehicle operation and maintenance fee of $2,000. This is 50% of the
estimated cost to operate the vehicle for the school year.
13. Billing Period. Edmonds shall invoice the District twice a year.
Invoices shall be delivered to the District on or before September 1 for
the upcoming four months of service; and shall bill on or before
January 1 for the remaining work to be completed during the final six
months of service during that school year. Invoices shall be submitted
in a form approved by the District, and shall specify the services to be
performed, period of service and amount due.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS
5
Packet Pg. 98
4.5.a
14. Payment. District shall pay Edmonds within 30 days from the date of
receipt of a proper invoice. Payments to Edmonds later than 30 days
following the receipt of a proper invoice shall accrue interest at the rate
of 12% per annum on the balance due. All payments shall first be
applied to accrued interest.
15.No Third -Party Rights. The establishment of this Program and
execution of this Agreement shall create no third -party rights. In
particular, the parties agree by establishing this Program that no past
practice has been created with respect to duty assignment, the
maintenance of the Program, or to otherwise limit the management
discretion of Edmonds under its Collective Bargaining Agreement.
This Agreement further shall not create any third -party rights to the
Officer or any other Officer of Edmonds, or to any other person.
16.Insurance and Indemnification. The parties shall separately maintain
their own appropriate liability and casualty insurance policies as they,
in their sole discretion, deem appropriate. The parties further agree
that r_-_._•r:__aion h1a:1 b.. 'd„d for .o „♦• •'dial ly ern+
LIICIL IIIJ IIIUCII7I IIIIGd IIVII J11'Q 11 A/b t.11 VVil.YGIA 1V1, Gn�,G f..r� as .i�i7viliNp ny :�c.a
forth below, and that the respective liability of the parties to each other
and to third persons shall be deemed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Washington. The District will protect, defend, indemnify,
and hold harmless Edmonds, its officers, employees, or agents from
any and all costs, claims, judgments or awards of damages arising out
of, or in any way resulting from, negligent acts or omissions of the
District, its officers, employees, or agents. Edmonds will protect,
defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the District, its officers,
employees, or agents from any and all costs, claims, judgments or
awards of damages arising out of, or in any way resulting from,
negligent acts or omissions of Edmonds, its officers, employees, or
agents. In the event of concurrent liability, the parties shall have the
right of contribution in proportion to the respective liability of each
party. Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to waive
immunities established pursuant to state statutes or to create third
party rights or immunities.
17. District Responsibility for Safety and Security. The parties understand
and agree that the District retains its legal responsibility for the safety
and security of the District, its employees, students and property, and
this Agreement does not alter that responsibility.
18. Interview and Arrest Procedures. If the Officer plans to interview
suspects or victims of crime, the Officer, to the extent practicable, will
advise and work with the Principal to minimize disruption to the High
School and other students. District employees will make parental
notification of such interviews in accordance with District policies and
procedures and applicable laws. The Principal or designee may
request that she/he or a designee be present during the interview of a
student. The presence of a District employee at an interview of a
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS
6
Packet Pg. 99
4.5.a
student regarding a criminal matter shall make said employee subject
to subpoena as a witness thereto. In the event the Officer arrests a
student at the High School, the Officer shall notify the Principal or the
Principal's designee as soon thereafter as practical. In the event that
the arrested student is a juvenile, Edmonds will notify the parent or
legal guardian pursuant to Edmonds policies and procedures. The
District may also make notification as necessary under its own policies
and procedures.
19. Release of Student Information. Upon request by Edmonds, the
District will provide directory information relating to its students, to the
extent permitted under District policy and state and federal law.
Student information and databases will not be utilized by the Officer or
by Edmonds for the enforcement of immigration laws or to obtain
family data for the purposes of immigration enforcement.
20. Police Reports. The Officer shall provide the District with police
reports to the extent permitted by state law and Edmonds policies and
procedures.
21.Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Washington.
22. Recording. This Agreement shall be filed with the Snohomish County
Auditor, or alternatively as provided by RCW 39.34 shall be posted on
the District's or Edmonds' Website.
23. Notice. Notices under this Agreement shall be sent to the following:
Edmonds Chief of Police
PO Box 5008
Edmonds, WA 98046-5008
Superintendent
Edmonds School District
20420 68th Ave. West
Edmonds, WA 98036
24.Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire agreement between
parties and supersedes and merges with any prior agreements of the
parties, written or oral, with respect to the Program. This Agreement
shall be amended only in writing with the written consent of the parties.
This Agreement shall be interpreted in order to implement its central
purpose, which is the creation of the Program and the underlying
understanding that only Edmonds shall direct the police functions of
the Officer.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS
7
Packet Pg. 100
4.5.a
EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Kristine McDuffy, SLt6elKendent
Dated:. 3 ! ] 4
CITY OF EDMONDS
David O. Earling, Mayor
Dated:
Attest/Authenticated:
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Office of the City Attorney
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS
8
Packet Pg. 101
5.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Hearing Examiner Annual Report
Staff Lead: Shane Hope
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Rob Chave
Background/History
The City's Hearing Examiner provides an annual report on his activity.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The Hearing Examiner is Phil Olbrechts. His annual report is attached.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: 2018 Hearing Examiner Annual Report
Packet Pg. 102
5.1.a
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 20, 2019
TO: Edmonds City Council
FROM: Phil A. Olbrechts — Hearing Examiner
RE: Annual Report
SUMMARY: Five hearing examiner decisions have been issued since the last annual report to
the City Council dated February 15, 2018. One of the projects, a 13 lot preliminary plat, drew
some public opposition based upon concerns typically associated with plats. No other project
raised any public concern. Each decision is addressed in reverse chronological order below:
Doug's Lynnwood Mazda (3/4/19): Approved design review and a design review exception to
pedestrian/walkable design standards for an addition to Doug's Lynnwood Mazda located at
22130 Highway 99. The Applicant proposed an addition to the existing Mazda service building
at 22133 Highway 99 together with an addition and remodel of the existing Mazda showroom to
convert it into a Hyundai sales and service building. The requested design review exception was
to ECDC 16.60.030(C)(1) and (2), which only authorizes a maximum of 60 foot separation from
50% of a building's fagade facing a street and its accompanying street frontage. The Applicant
proposed to use this space for auto sales, which necessitated more than 60 foot separation from
project buildings and street frontage.
In order to qualify for the design review exception, the Applicant had to incorporate numerous
pedestrian design features to compensate for the lack of building proximity to street frontage.
These features included placing the active portions of the building, comprised of a glass encased
showroom with a prominent bronze clad entry way, closest to the street frontage. These active
portions were then connected to the street frontage via a well-defined walkway that was
augmented with landscaping and seating areas. Overall, the City's efforts at encouraging
pedestrian connectivity in its GC zone were highly successful for this project.
St. Alban's Episcopal Church Conditional Use (3/4/19): Approved conditional use permit for
pre-school use of the Sunday school wing of St. Alban's Episcopal Church, located at 21405
82nd Place West. Testimony was limited to staff, applicant and property owner (church). No
more than 18 students would be present at church site at any one time. Surrounding uses are
single-family residential, but church property is 2.5 acres in size with a significant amount of
trees buffering the classroom site from adjoining residences.
Westhaven Preliminary Plat (12/28/18): Approved preliminary plat division of 1.99 acre
parcel into ten single-family lots. This was the only project of the last year that attracted any
project opposition. Concerns included tree removal, habitat loss, drainage, traffic safety and
noise. A couple conditions of approval were crafted to protect both on -site trees and the root
system of off -site trees. Given the legal ambiguity of protecting off -site trees, the conditions of
approval gave staff the option of either requiring protection of the tree roots from off -site trees or
Packet Pg. 103
5.1.a
Examiner Annual Report - 2
requiring notice to property owners of potential damage, allowing flexibility as necessary to
address conditions during construction and associated legal rights and responsibilities.
244' Street Unit Lot Subdivision (10/25/18): Approved 11 lot unit subdivision. This was the
City's second application of its unit lot subdivision ordinance to a preliminary plat. The project
was already under review as an 11 unit detached single family dwelling complex on one lot in a
multifamily zone. Building permits for the homes had already been filed as required by the unit
lot subdivision ordinance and the purpose of the proposed unit lot subdivision was to create
single lot ownership for each separate dwelling unit. No one other than staff testified at the
hearing.
Edmonds Woodway Hi!h School Athletic Field Improvements (9/11/18): Recommended
approval to City Council of conditional use permit, two variances and design review for
improvements to the athletic fields of Edmonds-Woodway High School at 7600 212th St. SW.
Improvements included a synthetic turf multipurpose baseball field with football/soccer field and
associated lighting and bleachers. Four tennis courts and associated lighting were proposed east
of the athletic fields. Three batting cages are proposed south of the tennis courts. The conditional
use application covered the proposed bleachers, playfield lighting and structures 25 to 60 feet in
height (eight 50-foot lights around the tennis courts and 40-foot ball control fencing and netting
around the baseball field). The height variance was for eight proposed 70-90 foot light poles
surrounding the baseball/football/soccer fields (six 70-foot poles and two 90-foot poles). The
setback variance was to reduce the street setback variance along 216th Street from 20 feet to 4
feet to accommodate the proposed batting cages. All public testimony was in support of the
application.
Packet Pg. 104
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Council Subcommittee Reports and Minutes
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
N/A. For information only.
Narrative
This is an opportunity for Councilmembers to report on items discussed at their subcommittee meetings
held the previous week. The committee meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
FC031219
PPW031219
PSPP031219
Packet Pg. 105
7.1.a
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
March 12, 2019
Elected Officials Present
Councilmember Diane Buckshnis (Chair)
Councilmember Neil Tibbott*
Council President Fraley-Monillas*
Mayor Dave Earling*
Councilmember Dave Teitzel*
* attended a portion of the meeting
Staff Present
Scott James, Finance Director
Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
Guests
Ferrell Fleming, Executive Dir., Senior Center
Daniel Johnson, Capital Project Manager
Chris Wolfe, Accounting Mgr., Senior Center
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Council Chambers. The agenda was amended as
reflected below.
3. New Budget in Brief
Mr. James relayed the Finance Department created a new report, Budget in Brief. The intent was to
increase financial transparency and awareness. He highlighted sections of the report: Message from
the Mayor, Overview of the City, City Officials, Developing the City's Budget, Revenues and Expenses,
Major Capital Projects, Comparison to Neighboring Cities (municipal property tax and general fund
expenditures per capita) and Economic Impacts. A brief discussion followed regarding distribution of
the Budget in Brief at the Mayor's State of the City and staff responsible for developing the it.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
5. Waterfront Center Financial Update
Ms. Hite explained the City has a long term land lease with the Senior Center; the Center's goal is to
raise enough money to demolish the current building and build the new Waterfront Center. The Senior
Center has submitted for permits and wants to go to bid soon. The goal is to present the remaining
decision points to Council in the next 1-2 months. Staff's recommendation is to forward financial update
to full Council for discussion and approval. Remaining decision points for Council are:
• Review and acceptance of the development and construction documents
Final decision to give consent to demolish, construct, alter or change the property
Farrell Fleming introduced Daniel Johnson and Chris Wolfe.
Mr. Johnson reviewed fundraising:
$2.43M has been raised since the last meeting for a total of $12,483,000:
$1 M
Rick Steves (total of $4M)
$1 M
John Osberg
$200,000
Hazel Miller Foundation total of $500,000
$130,000
Local Rotary Clubs
$100,000
Zevenbergen Foundation
$2,430,000
Plans to reach $16M include:
Packet Pg. 106
7.1.a
03/12/19 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2
Amount
Source
$1 M+
Individuals
$500,000
Naming "Veterans Health & Wellness Center" (verbal offer)
Interested in using H&W Center for veterans programs during City programmed hours
$500,000
Local family interested in arts (pending)
TBD
Senior Center Board Members
$2M
Appropriation pending in State legislature
$200,000
Application to Verdant
TBD
Snohomish Count
TBD
Foundations
TBD
Community Campaign
Chris Wolfe reviewed the Edmonds Waterfront Center Cash Flow Projection, highlighting the following:
• $142,000 Contingency added to Other Development Cost
• Cash received has been detailed by source and quarter
• Cash Flow projection assumes all known pledges and grants
• State funds cannot be accessed until demonstrate have all funds available from gifts, pledges
and/or financing to finish the project
Senior Center representatives responded to questions regarding sources of the remaining $3.5M to be
raised, flow of expenditures once the project starts, whether $113,000 for project management will be
enough, the projected cost of furniture and equipment, and the 5% contingency.
Mr. Wolfe reviewed revenues and expenses in the proforma, advising one of the key revisions was the
addition of food service income. The feasibility report suggests a model where a caterer would do
events, a cafe style lunch, and perhaps breakfast to dramatically increase the appeal and quality of food
and still serve low income seniors.
Senior Center representatives responded to questions regarding the subsidy for senior lunches, 7.5%
commission on catering, the kitchen design, the budget for repairs and maintenance and for wages and
benefits, new positions added, percentage of pledges that are uncollectible, flood insurance, the term
of the $2M Semble loan, rental income during 2019 (first half of year in existing building) and 2020
(second half of year in new building), contingency if contaminants are found on the site.
Mr. Johnson described Semble who facilitates financing for non -profits. In addition to donors, there are
individuals/families who are supporters but may be more inclined to make a loan versus a contribution.
As a project delivers on their promise, those lenders may waive interest or forgive a portion of the
principal. He described the process for lenders and offered to provide a link to the Waterfront Center
prospectus on Semble's website. Ideally there would be $1.5-$2M in interested lenders; those funds
would not be used unless needed. Semble services the loans, monthly reporting, etc.
Committee members requested the following for the presentation to full Council:
• Add footnote regarding Other Resources on Cash Flow Projection regarding pending funding
requests
• Add footnote regarding the cost of financing
• Provide documentation from WG Clark regarding expected cash requirements
• For large contracts, Council would like to see signed contracts
• Provide assumptions used in the proforma
• Confirm insurance cost includes flood insurance
• Provide link to Semble for the Waterfront Center
a�
r
N
M
O
U
U_
c
a�
E
U
a
r
a
Packet Pg. 107
7.1.a
03/12/19 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3
Rick Steves commented on the goal to develop the Waterfront Center free and clear as a gift to the
community. He has donated $4M and is concerned about the momentum and the potentially of losing
State funds.
Mr. Hite described next steps; the state funding expires at the end of June 2019, permits have not
issued yet but are expected soon, the financial update along with design development document
approval will be presented to full Council; approval of consent to demo and construct will occur at a
separate meeting. Discussion followed regarding the cost of the design contract and obtaining a
guaranteed maximum cost.
Action: Schedule for full Council on March 26th or April 2na
1. November, December, and January Monthly/Quarterly Financial Reports
Mr. Turley and Mr. James highlighted Fund 112 interfund loans, REET revenues versus expenses,
investment portfolio summary, construction sales tax, and regional economics. They responded to
questions regarding the OVWD franchise, funds moved from the Opioid Response Fund to the
Edmonds Marsh, and funds in the Homelessness Fund.
Mr. James relayed plans to develop a Capital Projects Report with revenues, expenses, and a summary
by fund and by project for consideration at a future Finance Committee meeting.
Action: Present 2018 Year -End Report to full City Council
2. Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Discussion
Mr. James provided background regarding the decision making behind the amended fund
balance/reserve policy related to GASB 54, RCW 35A.33.145, GFOA's Fund Balance Best Practice cn
guidelines and an article by Mike Bailey, "Which Financial Policies Work Best? It Depends." He also
reviewed the City's past experience and other cities' fund balance targets. He reviewed amendments
to the proposed Fund Balance Reserve Policy which calls for a total of 20% with 16% coming from the L)
General Fund and the remaining coming from the Contingency Reserve; the current reserve totals 18%.
He distributed a comparison of current Fund Balance Reserve 2007-2018. N
r
M
Discussion included the current percentage in the reserve policy, reserve fund versus ending fund
balance, information to include in a presentation to the Council, limit on contingency reserve per RCW ``
35A.33.145, limitations on reserve fund use, and eliminating the Risk Management Reserve.
E
Action: Schedule for full Council on March 26th
r
r
Q
4. Parks Impact Fee Annual Financial Report
Mr. James responded to questions regarding how park impact fees can be spent, projects that are
budgeted to use park impact fees, and who decides which projects are funded with impact fees.
Action: Schedule for full Council
The meeting was adjourned at 9:34 p.m.
Packet Pg. 108
PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
March 12, 2019
Elected Officials Present
Councilmember Kristiana Johnson (by phone)
Councilmember Dave Teitzel
Staff Present
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director
Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks Director
Jerrie Bevington, Recorder
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Jury Meeting Room. The agenda was amended to
move Items 2 and 3 following Item 7.
Arts Festival and Market Event Contracts
Ms. Burley presented contracts for the Market and the Arts Festival; contracts will be forthcoming for
three more events later this year. The language in both contracts has been updated to reflect Resolution
No. 1412, "Pursuant to the City's Resolution 1412 which prohibits the use of plastic straws, stirrers and
cutlery at public events requiring a contract with the City, beginning in 2019 food vendors at this public
event shall provide only certifiable compostable straws, stirrers and cutlery to event participants."
Although the resolution states the ban will take effect in early 2020, the resolution also states single use
plastic straws, plastic stirrers and plastic cutlery will not be allowed to be provided by vendors in 2019
and beyond at public events requiring a contract with the City. Other changes in the contracts are
primarily dates.
Councilmember Johnson proposed if vendors do not have compostable items, the City provide them as
a courtesy, funded from the Council Contingency fund.
Action: Presentation to full Council and potential action
4. Presentation of Supplemental Agreement with Murraysmith for Five Corners Reservoir
Project
Mr. English explained work has begun the 3MG tank; at this point the pit repairs and roof repairs that
were occurred on the 1.5MG tank have not been necessary. Murraysmith did the design and has been
providing construction support to staff; Supplemental Agreement 6 provides additional budget for:
$ 6,500 RFIs and response to change order support
$21,000 Construction observation (increased from 35 days to 50 days)
$ 4,700 Construction Management (extended to 18 months)
$33,201 Total
$37,701 Supplemental Agreement 6
Mr. English explained a $4500 error was discovered in the fee matrix. He recommended it be placed in
a management reserve in the event any issues arise; it will not be used if it is not needed. The cost is
funded by the Water Utility Fund. Discussion followed regarding the number of supplements this large
project has required.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
Packet Pg. 109
7.1.b
03/12/19 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2
5. Report on Bids for the 89th PI W Retaining Wall
Mr. English displayed a photograph and described the location of the failing retaining wall at the end of
the cul-de-sac on 89th Place. The adjacent pavement is failing due to the failure of the existing rockery
and has been coned off to prohibit driving or parking. The City received 11 construction bids on February
28, 2019. The low bid was provided by Kamins Construction ($112,386); the engineers estimate was
$125,386. The overall construction budget of $157,000 includes 20% construction management,
inspection, testing, markup and a 20% management reserve. There was. $118,000 in REET funds
originally budgeted for this project. The area includes a catch basin and discharge pipe into a creek so
$31,400 in Citywide Drainage Improvements funds budgeted in 2019 can be transferred to this project.
He recommended the remaining $600 be funded by REET via a First Quarter Budget Amendment.
Staff responded to questions regarding staff's experience with Kamins Construction, access to the
slope, replacing the rockery with a concrete block wall, and the status of the City's concrete crew. Mr.
Williams advised this project would not be appropriate for the City's concrete crew.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
6. Report on Bids for the 238th St. SW Island Improvements & Pedestrian Curb Ramp
Barrier Removals Project
Mr. English explained the project scope is to reconstruct the traffic island and install landscaping on the
south side of SR 104 on 238th St SW, an ADA walkway and curb ramps. The base bid includes the
island and four pedestrian curb ramps at 71h & Alder. The engineer's estimate for the base bid is
$199,214; the alternate bid is three additional ramps, two at 7th & Walnut and one at 6th & Walnut. The
available construction budget is $252,000 of which $201,000 are CDBG funds and $50,000 REET
funds. Bids are due March 21 It. If bids are within the construction budget, staff recommends award of
the construction contract be placed on the April 2nd Consent Agenda. If bids are outside the construction
budget, a presentation will be made to Council on April 9th. Discussion followed regarding a suggestion
to include landscaping similar to the north side and the inability for the City's concrete crew to do this
project due to CDBG funds.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
7. Report on Bids for the Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project
Mr. English advised this is a water, stormwater and sewer utility replacement project on Dayton between
3rd and 9th Avenue and constructs a missing 450-foot section of sidewalk on Dayton west of 8th Avenue,
the number one short sidewalk section in the 2015 Transportation Plan. The sidewalk is funded by a
TIB Complete Streets Grant. Bids were opened today; two bids were received. The low bid was $6.14M
by Shoreline Construction, the second bid was $7.16M by Kar-Vel Construction; the engineer's estimate
was $6.77M. If the low bidder's document can be verified, he recommended a presentation to Council
on March 191h. This project will be constructed over two years, west of 31 Ave to 5th Ave in 2019 and 511
Ave to 9th Ave in 2020. The project also includes reconstructing the road from 3rd to 6th
Action: Presentation to full Council and potential action on March 19tn
A brief recess was taken.
2. ILA Verdant Health Commission
Ms. Hite relayed the City applied to Verdant and was awarded funding support for outdoor fitness zones
in Mathay Ballinger Park in 2019 and in Civic Park in 2020. Snohomish County Health District identified
Packet Pg. 110
03/12/19 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3
Mathay Ballinger Park as one of the higher health risk areas of Edmonds. The initial payment of $49,500
will be added to $75,000 in the capital fund to construct the zone in Mathay Ballinger. A second payment
of $12,750 in July 2020 will be used to activate that zone (fund an instructor and free drop -in Saturday
classes and orientations). A third payment of $107,750 in July 2021 will fund the full cost of the fitness
zone in Civic Park. The ILA has been reviewed by the City Attorney.
Discussion followed regarding equipment in the zone, indemnification against injury, and how the
locations were selected.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda
3. Environmental Works/Barker Landscape Amendment #2
Ms. Hite explained Barker Landscape was hired to do design development of the Waterfront
Redevelopment project. Their original scope of work included the parking lot but did not include frontage
improvements or lighting design plan. This amendment adds authority for design development of
frontage improvements (Council approved design and construction of parking lot and frontage
improvements in November 2018 and included funds in the 2019 budget). Barker Landscape merged
with Environmental Works in October 2018; the City Attorney amended the contract to "Barker
Landscape DBA Environmental Works."
Ms. Hite advised another contract amendment will be presented in the future for Environmental
Works/Barker Landscape to provide construction support.
Action: Presentation to full Council for potential action
The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
Packet Pg. 111
7.1.c
PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING
March 12, 2019
Elected Officials Present
Councilmember Mike Nelson (Chair)
Councilmember Neil Tibbott
Staff Present
Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director
Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director
The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Police Training Room.
1. Urban Forester Job Description Approval
Ms. Hite reviewed the Urban Forester job description and she and Ms. Hardie responded to Council
questions.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
Packet Pg. 112
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Resolution Requesting that the FCC Study Health Impacts of 5G Wireless Technology
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Michael Clugston
Background/History
This is a new item.
Staff Recommendation
None.
Narrative
As part of the larger small cell wireless code update, potential health impacts of radio frequency (RF)
emissions from future 5G wireless technology were raised. No studies on the relationship have been
done to date. At the same time, the FCC preempts local governments from regulating wireless
deployments on the basis of RF emissions and potential health impacts.
On March 13, 2019, the City of Portland passed a resolution requesting that the federal government
update older studies to address potential health risks of 5G radio frequency emissions and publish those
findings. On March 19, Council requested a similar resolution be drafted for consideration. Two options
are attached.
Attachments:
Resolution Version 1- 5G health federal preemption
Resolution Version 2 - 5G health federal preemption
Packet Pg. 113
8.1.a
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, Requesting the FCC to perform and update studies on the
potential health risks of 5G radio frequency emissions and publish such findings, as
federal guidelines push for more rapid deployment of 5G within municipal
boundaries.
WHEREAS, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has jurisdiction over non-federal
wireless facilities, authorizing and licensing all non-federal devices, transmitters, and facilities that
generate Radio Frequency ("RF") radiation; and
WHEREAS federal law preempts state and local governments, including the City of Edmonds, from
considering health concerns in the regulation and placement of wireless facilities, so long as such
facilities otherwise comply with applicable federal law, and
WHEREAS the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is required by the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to evaluate the effects of emissions from FCC -regulated
transmitters on the quality of the human environment; and
WHEREAS on August 1, 1996, the FCC adopted the National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements' recommended Maximum Permissible Exposure limits for field strength and power
density for the transmitters operating at frequencies of 300 kHz to 100 GHz; and
WHEREAS the FCC in 2015 last updated guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency (RF)
electromagnetic fields from wireless facilities, based primarily on recommendations of other federal
agencies after reviews of prior scientific literature related to RF biological effects, primarily from the
1990's; and
WHEREAS currently no federally -mandated RF exposure standards exist; and
WHEREAS the FCC relies upon federal agencies with health and safety expertise, such as the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration which have
assigned roles in federal law for monitoring and investigating issues related to RF exposure; and
WHEREAS the Government Accounting Office in 2001 prepared a report of its investigation into
safety concerns related to mobile phones, and concluded that further research into wireless
technology is needed, recommending the FDA take the lead in monitoring research results; and
WHEREAS, in September 2017, 180 scientists and doctors from 36 countries sent an appeal to the
European Commission recommending a moratorium on the roll out of 5G until potential hazards
for human health and the environment had been fully investigated by scientists independent from
industry; and
WHEREAS, the results of the world's largest study on the link between RF radiation associated with
2G and 3G cell phones and cancer were released on November 1, 2018, by the National Toxicology
Packet Pg. 114
8.1.a
Program, an inter -agency program within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
found evidence of cancerous heart tumors, as well as some evidence of cancerous brain tumors, in
male rats exposed to high levels of RF radiation like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones. However,
researchers have cautioned that findings "do not apply to 4G or 5G technologies;" and
WHEREAS on December 3, 2018, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal and Congresswoman Anna G.
Eshoo co-authored a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr requesting the FCC and relevant
health agencies provide them studies informing the FCC's 5F safety determination, and while they
did receive a letter from the FCC on December 17, 2018, it had no mention of 5G safety testing;
and
WHEREAS the City of Edmonds recognizes broadband networks, both wired and wireless, as
essential infrastructure fundamental to the future of Edmond's community members and businesses;
and
WHEREAS this Resolution of the City would permit the City to 1) advocate for updated studies on
RF Exposure Limits, and (2) potentially influence the outcome of the proceeding for the benefit of
Edmonds community members; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Council requests of the FCC that it work in cooperation with the
FDA and other relevant federal agencies to revisit and update studies on potential health concerns
arising from RF wireless emissions and in particular addressing emissions from 5G technology; and
Section 2. The Edmonds City Council requests the FCC make the findings from such studies
publicly available in a timely manner; and
Section 3. The Mayor's Office shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be sent to all members of the
FCC, to the FDA Commissioner, and to all members of the Washington Congressional Delegation.
RESOLVED this day of March, 2019.
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAYOR, DAVE EARLING
ATTEST:
Packet Pg. 115
8.1.a
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
Packet Pg. 116
8.1.b
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, (1) Requesting the FCC to perform and update studies on the
potential health risks of 5G radio frequency emissions and publish such findings, and
(2) Requesting Congress to determine the FCC has overstepped its bounds in its
order titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to
Infrastructure Investment" effective January 14, 2019, and to adopt legislation
clarifying that state or local laws are only preempted when they "essentially
guarantee" rejection of all wireless applications or create an actual inability to provide
service.
WHEREAS, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has jurisdiction over non-federal
wireless facilities, authorizing and licensing all non-federal devices, transmitters, and facilities that
generate Radio Frequency ("RF") radiation; and
WHEREAS federal law preempts state and local governments, including the City of Edmonds, from
considering health concerns in the regulation and placement of wireless facilities, so long as such
facilities otherwise comply with applicable federal law, and
WHEREAS the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is required by the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to evaluate the effects of emissions from FCC -regulated
transmitters on the quality of the human environment; and
WHEREAS on August 1, 1996, the FCC adopted the National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements' recommended Maximum Permissible Exposure limits for field strength and power
density for the transmitters operating at frequencies of 300 kHz to 100 GHz; and
WHEREAS the FCC in 2015 last updated guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency (RF)
electromagnetic fields from wireless facilities, based primarily on recommendations of other federal
agencies after reviews of prior scientific literature related to RF biological effects, primarily from the
1990's; and
WHEREAS currently no federally -mandated RF exposure standards exist; and
WHEREAS the FCC relies upon federal agencies with health and safety expertise, such as the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration which have
assigned roles in federal law for monitoring and investigating issues related to RF exposure; and
WHEREAS the Government Accounting Office in 2001 prepared a report of its investigation into
safety concerns related to mobile phones, and concluded that further research into wireless
technology is needed, recommending the FDA take the lead in monitoring research results; and
WHEREAS, in September 2017, 180 scientists and doctors from 36 countries sent an appeal to the
European Commission recommending a moratorium on the roll out of 5G until potential hazards
Packet Pg. 117
8.1.b
for human health and the environment had been fully investigated by scientists independent from
industry; and
WHEREAS, the results of the world's largest study on the link between RF radiation associated with
2G and 3G cell phones and cancer were released on November 1, 2018, by the National Toxicology
Program, an inter -agency program within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
found evidence of cancerous heart tumors, as well as some evidence of cancerous brain tumors, in
male rats exposed to high levels of RF radiation like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones. However,
researchers have cautioned that findings "do not apply to 4G or 5G technologies;" and
WHEREAS on December 3, 2018, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal and Congresswoman Anna G.
Eshoo co-authored a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr requesting the FCC and relevant
health agencies provide them studies informing the FCC's 5F safety determination, and while they
did receive a letter from the FCC on December 17, 2018, it had no mention of 5G safety testing;
and
WHEREAS the City of Edmonds recognizes broadband networks, both wired and wireless, as
essential infrastructure fundamental to the future of Edmond's community members and businesses;
and
WHEREAS, the FCC recently issued an Order titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband
Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment" effective January 14, 2019,
wherein it clarified when the Telecommunications Act of 1996 preempts state and local regulations
that may inhibit a mobile service provider's ability to provide a service to an area, adopting a
"material inhibition" standard and applying it to limit fees a municipality can impose for use of its
rights of way and limiting non -fee requirements such as undergrounding, aesthetics, and minimum
spacing requirements; and
WHEREAS, a number of municipalities have filed petitions for review in the Ninth Circuit, alleging
the Order exceeds the FCC's statutory authority, is arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of
discretion, and is otherwise contrary to law; and
WHEREAS this Resolution of the City would permit the City to 1) advocate for updated studies on
RF Exposure Limits, and (2) potentially influence the outcome of the proceeding for the benefit of
Edmonds community members; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Council requests of the FCC that it work in cooperation with the
FDA and other relevant federal agencies to revisit and update studies on potential health concerns
arising from RF wireless emissions and in particular addressing emissions from 5G technology; and
Section 2. The Edmonds City Council requests the FCC make the findings from such studies
publicly available in a timely manner; and
Section 3. The Edmonds City Council requests Congress determine the FCC has overstepped its
bounds in its order titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to
Infrastructure Investment" effective January 14, 2019; and
Packet Pg. 118
8.1.b
Section 4. The Edmonds City Council requests Congress adopt legislation clarifying that
state or local laws are only preempted when they "essentially guarantee" rejection of all
wireless applications or create an actual inability to provide service.
Section 5. The Mayor's Office shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be sent to all members of the
FCC, to the FDA Commissioner, and to all members of the Washington Congressional Delegation.
RESOLVED this day of March, 2019.
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAYOR, DAVE EARLING
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
Packet Pg. 119
9.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Public Hearing on Small Cell Update to the Wireless Regulations in Chapter 20.50 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code.
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Michael Clugston
Background/History
This topic was introduced to Council on January 15, 2019. Following a public hearing on February 12,
Council adopted an interim wireless ordinance which included aesthetic standards and location
preferences for small cell projects. The Planning Board reviewed the interim ordinance on February 13
and held a public hearing on February 27. After taking comment from the wireless industry and the
public, the Board made a recommendation to Council for completion of a more long-term ordinance.
On March 19, Council discussed the Planning Board's recommendation and directed staff to prepare an
updated draft ordinance that reflected those discussions.
Staff Recommendation
Take testimony on the updated draft wireless ordinance (redline version attached). Direct staff to
prepare a final ordinance for approval on April 2.
Narrative
On September 27, 2018 the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) issued a ruling (Order) titled
"Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment". The
Order adopted broad new rules limiting how state and local governments may treat applications for the
installation of small cell wireless facilities to ensure deployment is not only allowed, but permitted
within specific 'shot clocks'. The Order went into effect on January 14, 2019 and jurisdictions have a
deadline of April 14, 2019 to adopt aesthetic standards for small cell installations.
Given the very short time frame provided by the FCC, staff completed initial research about small cell
technology and compiled a range of aesthetic standards for location and appearance, which the City
Council approved in the form of an interim wireless ordinance on February 12, 2019 (Ord. 4141). The
interim ordinance had the following features:
1) Location. A seven -step preference hierarchy was established where a wireless provider would
have to analyze the use of each location in descending order and justify why the higher location
could not be used:
Locate Outside of the Right -of -Way
1. Existing Building
2. Freestanding Small Cell Pole
Packet Pg. 120
9.1
Locate Within the Right -of -Way
3. Existing Street Light Pole or Utility Pole (hollow poles)
4. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole or Street Light
5. Existing PUD Single -Phase Pole (installation on top of pole)
6. Existing PUD Transmission Pole (installation in communication space)
7. Strand -mounted (installation in communication space)
2) Appearance. A range of concealment and camouflaging strategies were included with the intent
of minimizing negative visual impacts, including air space clutter.
The approved interim ordinance was forwarded to the Planning Board for its review. After a public
hearing on February 27, the Board forwarded the following recommendation to Council:
1) Eliminate location priorities #1 and #2 (locating on zoned property). The use of zoned property
would remain an option but it would not be required to step through the location list. Where
buildings are close to the right-of-way, such as in the downtown area, zoned property may work for
a small cell node just as it has for some macro cell sites. Full concealment options are available to
closely match virtually any building material.
2) Place priority #5 (installation on the top of a PUD power pole) before priority #4 (freestanding
small cell) in the preference hierarchy. The Board wanted to use existing infrastructure sites and see
fewer purpose-built small cell poles.
3) If possible, incorporate a public notification process to let property owners in the vicinity know
when a new small cell installation will be installed close by. With priority locations #1 and #2
becoming optional only, the wireless provider would no longer have to reach out to property
owners to inquire about possible siting options. While siting on zoned property was not seen as a
priority to the Board, neighborhood awareness remained a concern. The Board would like to see a
requirement for wireless providers to give notice of upcoming deployments incorporated into the
code. Given the short review timelines (shot clocks) required by the FCC, permitting will be
managed through building and engineering permits and notice for ministerial permits would not
otherwise be provided. All active permits, both applied and issued, can be viewed by the public on
the City's permitting web page (Citizens Connect).
4) Add language that gives additional discretion to the Director to approve alternative design or
measure outside of the proposed regulations. Assuming that wireless antennas and equipment will
continue to evolve quickly, some flexibility would be useful.
Public Input Received
Two public comments were submitted at the Planning Board public hearing on February 27. Both
comments were regarding the potential health impacts of small cell wireless and specifically 5G
technology. Council members had also inquired about this.
No studies specific to 5G and health impacts have been done by the FCC or other federal agencies. On
March 13, 2019, the City of Portland passed a resolution requesting the FCC study 5G and health
impacts - it is unknown whether any other jurisdictions have made such a request.
Packet Pg. 121
9.1
The FCC provides health and safety guidance for radiofrequency (RF) emissions. As long as the wireless
carriers meet that guidance, local jurisdictions cannot further regulate based on health impacts. As part
of the application process for wireless installations, City code requires that carriers document
compliance with the FCC standards, which staff verifies during permit review.
Updated Information from the Council's 3/19 Meeti
Since Council's approval of the interim wireless ordinance, staff was in discussion with professionals
from the wireless industry, concealment technology providers, Snohomish County PUD, and the City's
own wireless consultant to gain a better understanding of small cell technology and how each of the
partners contributes to small cell deployment. For example, prior to the Planning Board hearing, it was
learned that locating small cell on most single-family residential structures is technologically impractical.
For that reason, staff recommended that the Planning Board consider removing Location #1 from the
priority list.
Other takeaways from these discussions included:
1) The preferred height for small cell is 20 - 40 feet.
2) Small cell can be located outside the right-of-way when buildings are close to it.
3) Technology exists and/or is being developed to fully conceal 4G and 5G small cell antennas and
equipment.
4) PUD currently allows only one wireless provider to attach to a wood pole.
5) PUD indicates many utility poles in Edmonds are 'full'. Replacing a wood pole with a new hollow
pole (allowing for full concealment) could open up opportunities for small cell installations.
6) PUD engineering staff is currently working on street light/small cell design.
Council discussed this information along with the Planning Board's recommendation and provided staff
with the following direction on what to include in an updated wireless ordinance:
1) Priority options 1 & 2 requiring small cell to be located outside of the right-of-way should be
optional. Wireless providers will not need to analyze zoned parcels for small cell locations
before analyzing locations in the right-of-way.
2) The code should reflect a preference for complete concealment over simple camouflage for
installations in the right-of-way by recommending the following location preference order:
hollow utility pole, freestanding small cell pole, on top of an existing wood pole; in the
communication space on an existing wood pole; strand -mounted cells attached to wires.
3) Include provisions for collocation of carriers and technologies in order to minimize the overall
number of small cell locations.
4) Bring back a resolution asking the FCC to study the health impacts of 5G technology.
5) Establish a 25-foot height limit for those freestanding small cell poles that do not include street
lights.
Several other matters were raised including: adding more graphics and pictures to the ordinance; fees
and administration; using a radial rather than lineal dispersion requirement; and, not attaching to
existing Sternberg lights and possibly developing a new lighting standard which would allow for
concealed small cells.
Using this guidance, staff prepared the attached draft updates to the wireless regulations (in redline
Packet Pg. 122
9.1
format). The City Attorney also prepared a resolution regarding 5G and health impacts, which is
included as a separate Action item on the Council's agenda. Staff will prepare a presentation for the
March 26 public hearing summarizing this information and the changes to the draft ordinance.
Attachments:
Redlined updates to interim wireless ordinance (Ord. 4141)
Packet Pg. 123
9.1.a
ATTACHMENT A
Chapter 20.50
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
Sections:
20.50.010
Purpose.
20.50.020
Applicability.
20.50.030
Exemptions.
20.50.040 Prohibitions.
20.50.050 General macro facility siting criteria and design considerations.
20.50.060 Permits and shot clocks.
20.50.070 Application requirements.
20.50.080 Eligible facilities requests.
20.50.090 New building -mounted macro wireless communication facility standards.
20.50.100 New structure -mounted macro wireless communication facilities standards.
20.50.110 New monopole -Me --- P+^^' m. @ e r AG vog i r ^'^« faeolity standards.
20.50.120 Temporary facilities.
20.50.130 Small wireless facility standards (small cell).
20.50.140 Abandonment or discontinuation of use.
20.50.150 Maintenance.
20.50.160 Definitions.
20.50.010 Purpose.
A. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate the placement, construction, modification and
appearance of wireless communication facilities, in order to protect the health, safety and
welfare of the public, while not unreasonably interfering with the deployment of competitive
wireless communication facilities throughout the city. The purpose of this chapter may be
achieved through adherence to the following objectives:
1. Protect residential areas and land uses from potential adverse impacts that wireless
communication facilities might create, including but not limited to negative impacts on
aesthetics, environmentally sensitive areas, historically significant locations, flight
corridors, and health and safety of persons and property;
2. Establishment of clear and nondiscriminatory local regulations concerning wireless
communication facilities and services that are consistent with federal and state laws and
regulations;
3. Encourage providers of wireless communication facilities to locate facilities, to the
extent feasi ble, in areas where the adverse impact on the public health, safety and
Packet Pg. 124
1
9.1.a
welfare is minimal;
4. For macro facilities, encourage the location of those facilities in nonresidential areas
and allow m a c r o facilities in residential areas only when necessary to meet functional
requirements of the communications industry as defined by the Federal Communications
Commission;
5. Minimize the total number of macro facilities in residential areas;
6. Encourage and, where legally permissible, require cooperation between competitors
and, as a primary option, joint use of new and existing towers, tower sites and suitable
structures to the greatest extent possible, where doing so would significantly reduce or
eliminate additional negative impact on the city;
7. Ensure wireless communication facilities are configured in a way that minimizes the
adverse visual impact of the facilities, as viewed from different vantage points, through
careful design, landscape screening, minimal impact siting options and camouflaging
techniques, dispersion of unscreened features to lessen the visual impact upon any
one location, and through assessment of teGhReleg .A+eptieRS SitiRg
innovative siting techniques and sitiR . ^ sibilities beyeRd the
71
8. Enable wireless communication companies to enter into lease agreements with the city
to use city property for the placement of wireless facilities, where consistent with other
public needs, as a means to generate revenue for the city;
9. Balance the City's intent to minimize the adverse impacts of wireless communication
facilities with the ability of the providers of communications services to deploy such
services to the community quickly, effectively and efficiently;
10. Provide for the prompt removal of wireless communication facilities that are
abandoned or no longer inspected for safety concerns and building code compliance, and
provide a mechanism for the city to cause these abandoned wireless communication
facilities to be removed as necessary to protect the citizens from imminent harm and
danger;
11. Avoid potential damage to people and adjacent properties from tower failure and
falling equipment, through strict compliance with state building and electrical codes; and
12. Disperse the adverse impacts of small rr-ellsmall wireless facility facilities as evenly as
possible throughout the community, especially when joint use does not eliminate additional
visual impact.
B. In furtherance of these objectives, the city shall give due consideration to the zoning code,
existing land uses, and environmentally sensitive areas when approving sites for the location of
wireless communication facilities.
C. These objectives were developed to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to
protect property values, and to minimize and disperse visual impact, while furthering the
Packet Pg. 125
2
9.1.a
development of enhanced co m m u n i ca t ions services in the city. These objectives were
designed to comply with the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and its implementing
regulations. The provisions of this chapter are not intended to and any ambiguities herein
shall not be interpreted in such a manner that would materially inhibit the deployment of
wireless communication facilities. This chapter shall not be applied in such a manner as to
unreasonably discriminate between providers of functionally equivalent wireless facilities.
D. To the extent that any provision of this chapter or conflicts with any other city ordinance,
this chapter shall control. Otherwise, this chapter shall be construed consistently with the
other provisions and regulations of the city.
E. In reviewing any application to place, construct or modify wireless communication facilities,
the city shall act within federally required time periods. Any decision to deny an application
shall be in writing, supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record. The city
shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application in accordance with this title,
this chapter, the adopted Edmonds comprehensive plan, and other applicable ordinances and
regulations.
F. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 20111.
20.50.020 Applicability.
A. Except as provided herein, all wireless communication facilities shall comply with the
provisions of this chapter. The standards and process requirements of this chapter supersede
all other review process, setback, height or landscaping requirements of the Edmonds
Community Development Code (ECDC).
B. Environmental. All proposed installations are subject to a threshold determination under
the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) according to Chapter 20.15A ECDC unless
categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800. All proposals are subject to the critical
areas requirements in Title 23 ECDC and the shoreline master program in Title 24 ECDC
C. Master Permit Agreement Needed.
1. Consistent with chapter 35.99 RCW, any person, corporation or entity that proposes to
locate any portion of a wireless communication facility within the city right-of-way must
have a valid fully executed master permit with the city before submitting applications for
right-of-way construction permits.
2. Wireless providers interested in obtaining a master permit must apply as follows to have a
complete application:
a. make application in writing to the city attorney c/o the city clerk's office;
b. submit a proposed master permit form, PROVIDED THAT, this requirement shall no
longer apply in the event that the city council has adopted a standard master permit
template;
c. submit three valid fully executed master permits that the provider has with other
cities in Washington state, PROVIDED THAT, this requirement shall be excused to the
Packet Pg. 126
3
9.1.a
extent that the provider does not have sufficient valid master permits in other
jurisdictions to meet that requirement;
. .........
M11, MINIM.
3. After receipt of a complete application, the city attorney and wireless provider shall
negotiate the terms of the master permit until they have agreed on terms that can be
recommended to the city council for final approval. If the city attorney and wireless provider
have not been able to reach agreement on the recommended terms of a master permit
within 120 days of the date the complete application was submitted, the wireless provider
may submit the provider's proposed master permit form to the council president directly
and request that the provider's proposed master permit be added to a forthcoming city
council agenda for consideration. The city council shall conduct a public hearing on the
proposed master permit, including any renewal.
4. The final decision on any proposed master permit shall be subject to legislative discretion
of the city council and the ordinance authorizing the master permit must be approved by a
majority of the full council. Any denial of a proposed master permit must be supported by
substantial evidence contained in a written record.
5. Any prior adoption by the city council of a master permit template, as contemplated in
subsection C.2.b, above, is merely intended to facilitate future master permit negotiations
and should in no way be seen as limiting the city council's legislative discretion to approve or
reject a similar master permit that has come before the city council for action.
6. Master permit terms shall not exceed five years. Master permits shall require the City to
be indemnified by the provider and that indemnification shall be support by insurance that
names the City as an additional insured.
D. Right -of -Way Construction Permit. A right-of-way construction permit is required prior to
performing any work within the city right-of-way pursuant to ECDC Title 18.[Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014;
Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
Packet Pg. 127
4
9.1.a
20.50.030 Exemptions.
The following are exemptions from the provisions of this chapter:
A. Radar systems for military and civilian communication and navigation.
B. Handheld, mobile, marine and portable radio transmitters and/or receivers.
C. Satellite antennas, including direct to home satellite services, and those regulated in ECDC
16.20.050(D).
D. Licensed amateur (ham) radio stations and citizen band stations as regulated in ECDC
16.20.050 (E).
E. Earth station antenna(s) one meter or less in diameter and located in any zone.
F. Earth station antenna(s) two meters or less in diameter and located in the business and
commercial zones.
G. Routine maintenance or repair of wireless communication facilities.
H. Emergency communications equipment or a COW or other temporary WCF during a
declared public emergency.
I. A temporary wireless communication facility or COW for providing coverage during a special
event such as a festival, subject to approval by the City. Such a facility is exempt from the
provisions of this chapter for up to three days before the special event begins and three days
after the special event ends.
J. A temporary wireless communication facility or COW for providing service during repair or
replacement of an existing facility for a period of up to 14 days.
Fr.K. Subject to compliance with all other applicable standards of this chapter, a building
permit and/or right-of-way permit application need not be filed for emergency repair or
maintenance of a facility until five business days after the completion of such emergency
activity. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
20.50.040 Prohibitions.
A. The following wireless communication facilities are prohibited in Edmonds:
1. Guyed towers.
2. Lattice towers.
B. Monopoles are prohibited in the following locations:
1. All residential zones (single-family (SF) and multifamily (MF));
2. Downtown waterfront activity center;
3. Public (P) and open space (OS) zoned parcels; and
Packet Pg. 128
5
9.1.a
4. Within the city rights -of -way. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 20111.
20.50.050 General macro facility siting criteria and design considerations.
A. The city of Edmonds encourages wireless communication providers to use existing sites or
more frequent, less noticeable sites instead of attempting to provide coverage through use of
taller towers. To that end, applicants shall consider the following priority of preferred locations
for wireless communication facilities:
1. Ce leeatien.Collocation, without an increase in the height of the building, pole
or structure upon which the facility would be located;
2. Ce-Iecat+en.Collocation, where additional height is necessary above existing building,
pole, or structure;
3. A replacement pole or structure for an existing one;
4. A new pole or structure altogether.
B. New monopole facilities must include mounts capable of accommodating at least one
other wireless providers^ lecati^^ shall be ^ ed fee all , ^less c catie^ facility
-1--.Te the greatest extent technically feasible, applicants for new meRepOle faCilities shall
be required te build mewnts capable ef aceemmedatiRg at least ene ether eaFri
C. Noise. Any facility that requires a generator or other device which will create noise audible
beyond the boundaries of the site must demonstrate compliance with Chapter 5.30 ECC, Noise
Abatement and Control. A noise report, prepared by an acoustical engineer, shall be submitted
with any application to construct and operate a wireless communication facility that will have a
generator or similar device. The city may require that the report be reviewed by a third -third -
party expert at the expense of the applicant.
D. Business License Requirement. Any person, corporation or entity that operates a wireless
communication facility within the city shall have a valid business license issued annually by the
city. Any person, corporation or other business entity which owns a monopole also is required
to obtain a business license on an annual basis.
E. Signage. Only safety signs or those mandated by a government entity with jurisdiction may
be located on wireless communication facilities. No other types of signs are permitted on
wireless communication facilities.
F. Any application must demonstrate that there is sufficient space for temporary parking for
regular maintenance of the proposed facility.
Packet Pg. 129
■
9.1.a
G. Finish. A monopole may be constructed of laminated wood, fiberglass, steel, or similar
material. The pole shall be a neutral color so as to reduce its visual obtrusiveness, subject to any
applicable standards of the FAA or FCC.
H. Design. The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors,
textures, screening and landscaping that will blend the facilities with the natural setting and
built environment.
I. Color. All antennas and ancillary facilities located on buildings or structures other than
monopoles shall be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the color of
the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and ancillary facilities as visually
unobtrusive as possible.
J. Lighting. Monopoles shall not be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA, FCC or other
government entity with jurisdiction. If lighting is required and alternative lighting options are
permitted, the city shall review the lighting alternatives and approve the design that would
cause the least disturbance to the surrounding area. No strobe lighting of any type is
permitted on any monopole. If FAA guidelines would require a strobe, the location shall be
denied unless no other site or combination of sites would provide adequate coverage in accord
with FCC requirements.
K. Advertising. No advertising is permitted at wireless communication facility sites or on any
ancillary structure or facilities equipment enclosure.
L. Equipment Enclosure. Each applicant shall use the smallest equipment enclosure practical
to contain the required equipment and a reserve for required ce Ier=atieRcollocation.
M. Radio Frequency Emissions Compliance. The applicant shall demonstrate that the project
will not result in levels of radio frequency emissions that exceed FCC standards, including FCC
Office of Engineering Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines
for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, as amended. Additionally, if
the director determines the wireless communication facility, as constructed, may emit radio
frequency emissions that are likely to exceed Federal Communications Commission
uncontrolled/general population standards in the FCC Office of Engineering Technology (OET)
Bulletin 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio
Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, as amended, in areas accessible by the general population,
the director may require post -installation testing to determine whether to require further
mitigation of radio frequency emissions. The cost of any such testing and mitigation shall be
borne by the applicant.
N. Landscaping and Screening.
1. The visual impacts of wireless communication facilities should be mitigated and
softened through landscaping or other screening materials at the base of a monopole,
facility equipment compound, equipment enclosures and ancillary structures. If the antenna
is mounted flush on an existing building, or camouflaged as part of the building and other
equipment is housed inside an existing structure, no landscaping is required. The director
or his designee may reduce or waive the standards for those sides of the wireless
Packet Pg. 130
7
9.1.a
communication facility that are not in public view, when a combination of existing
vegetation, topography, walls, decorative fences or other
features achieve the same degree of screening as the required landscaping; in locations
where the visual impact of the facility would be minimal; and in those locations where
large wooded lots not capable of subdivision and natural growth around the property
perimeter provide a sufficient buffer.
2. Landscaping shall be installed on the outside of fences in accordance with Chapter
20.13 ECDC. Existing vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent practicable and
may be used as a substitute for or as a supplement to landscaping or screening
requirements. The following requirements apply:
a. Type I landscaping shall be placed around the perimeter of the equipment cabinet
enclosure, except that a maximum 10-foot portion of the fence may remain without
landscaping in order to provide access to the enclosure.
b. Landscaping area shall be a minimum of five feet in width around the perimeter of
the enclosure.
c. Vegetation selected should be native and drought tolerant.
d. Landscaping shall be located so as not to create sight distance hazards or conflicts
with other surrounding utilities.
3. When landscaping is used, the applicant shall submit a landscaping bond pursuant to
ECDC 20.13.040.
4. The use of chain link, plastic, vinyl or wire fencing is prohibited. Ornamental metal or
wood fencing materials are preferred. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]
20.50.060 Permits and Shot Clocks.
A. No person may place, construct, reconstruct, modify or operate a wireless communication
facility subject to this chapter without first having in place a master permit agreement
pursuant to ECDC 20.50.020.0 and a permit issued in accordance with this chapter. Except as
otherwise provided herein, the requirements of this chapter are in addition to the applicable
requirements of this title and ECDC Title 18. Any wires, cables, conduit or equipment
associated with a wireless communication facility shall be subject to the requirements of
chapter 18.05 ECDC, unless wireless facilities are expressly exempted from a provision of
chapter 18.05 ECDC or the context necessitates that a provision of chapter 18.05 ECDC not
apply to wireless facilities
B. Applications will be reviewed based on the type of wireless communication facilities
requested to be permitted. Each wireless communication facility requires the appropriate type
of project permit review, as shown in Table A. In the event of uncertainty on the type of a
wireless facility, the director shall have the authority to determine what permits are required
for the proposed facility.
Packet Pg. 131
■
9.1.a
Table A
Building
Right -of-
FCC Shot
Permit
Way (ROW)
Clocks for
Request
Location
Required
Permit
Permit
Required
Review
Eligible facilities request
Existing
Yes, if on
Yes, if in
60 days
appFeved-
private
ROW
`"tower or
property
base station
New macro facility
Collocation
Yes, if any
Yes, if any
90 days
elements on
elements in
private
the ROW
property
New macro facility
New structure or
Yes, if any
Yes, if any
150 days
monopole
elements on
elements in
private
the ROW
property
New small ee44-wireless facility
Collocation
Yes, if on
Yes, if any
60 days
private
elements in
property
the ROW
New small ee44-wireless facility
New structure or
Yes, if any
Yes, if any
90 days
freestanding
elements on
elements in
small wireless
private
the ROW
facility --'
property
Temporary facility
Varies
Yes, if any
Yes, if any
Standard
elements on
elements in
permit
private
the ROW
quotes
property
a
Packet Pg. 132
9.1.a
C. Timelines.
1. Macro ee-14facilities.
The application review period begins when all required application materials have been
received and fees paid. If the City determines that the application is incomplete and
provides notice to the applicant within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of application,
the clock stops. The clock restarts when the City receives the applicant's supplemental
submission in response to the City's notice of incompleteness. For subsequent
determinations of incompleteness, the clock tolls (pauses) if the City provides written notice
within ten (10) days that a supplemental submission did not provide the requested
information.
2. Small c-e4wireless facilities.
The application review period begins when all required application materials have been
received and fees paid. If the City determines that the application is incomplete and
provides notice to the applicant within ten (10) calendar days of the date of application, the
clock stops. The clock resets to zero (0) when the City receives the applicant's supplemental
submission in response to the City's notice of incompleteness. For subsequent
determinations of incompleteness, the clock tolls (pauses) if the City provides written notice
within ten (10) days that a supplemental submission did not provide the requested
information.
D. Batched small e4l-wireless facility applications.
If an applicant is applying for a small wireless network in a contiguous service area, up to
45multiple small wireless facilities may be batched into one application, PROVIDED THAT the
application fee shall still be calculated as if the applications were submitted separately. The
director or his/her designee may approve, deny or conditionally approve all or any portion of
the small wireless facilities proposed in the application. The denial of one or more small
wireless facility locations within one submission shall not be the sole basis for a denial of other
locations or the entire batched application for small wireless facilities. Should an applicant file
a single application for a batch that includes both collocated and new structures for small
wireless facilities, the longer 90-day shot clock shall apply to ensure the City has adequate time
to review the new construction sites.
E. Any application submitted pursuant to this chapter for projects located on public or private
property shall be reviewed and evaluated by the director, or his designee. The director of
public works or his/her designee shall review all proposed wireless communication facilities
that are located partially or fully within the city rights -of -way. Regardless of whether the
director or the director of public works or their respective designees are reviewing the
application, all applications will be reviewed and evaluated pursuant to the provisions of this
chapter.
F. All applications for wireless communication facilities shall be reviewed for compliance with
the applicable design standards by the director or his/her designee.
G. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all other permits from any other appropriate
Packet Pg. 133
10
9.1.a
governing body with jurisdiction (i.e., Washington State Department of Labor and Industries,
Federal Aviation Administration, etc.).
H. No provision of this chapter shall be interpreted to allow the installation of a wireless
communication facility which minimizes parking, landscaping or other site development
standards established by the Edmonds Community Development Code.
I. Wireless communication facilities that are governed under this chapter shall not be eligible
for variances under Chapter 20.85 ECDC. Any request to deviate from this chapter shall be
based solely on the exceptions set forth in this chapter.
J. Third -Third -Party Review. Applicants may use various methodologies and analyses,
including geographically based computer software, to determine the specific technical
parameters of the services to be provided utilizing the proposed wireless communication
facilities, such as expected coverage area, antenna configuration, capacity, and topographic
constraints that affect signal paths. In certain instances, a third part third -party expert may be
needed to review the engineering and technical data submitted by an applicant for a permit.
The city may at its discretion require thiFd aarythird-party engineering and technical review as
part of a permitting process. The costs of the technical third pan third -party review shall be
borne by the applicant.
1. The selection of the thiFd aaAyLhircl-party expert is at the discretion of the city. The
third -party expert review is intended to address interference and public safety
issues and be a site -specific review of engineering and technical aspects of the proposed
wireless communication facilities and/or a review of the applicants' methodology and
equipment used, and is not intended to be a subjective review of the site which was
selected by an applicant. Based on the results of the expert review, the city may require
changes to the proposal. The thiFd-part third -party review shall address the following:
a. The accuracy and completeness of submissions;
b. The applicability of analysis techniques and methodologies;
c. The validity of conclusions reached;
d. The viability of other site or sites in the city for the use intended by the
applicant; and
e. Any specific engineering or technical issues designated by the city.
K. Any decision by the director or the director of public works shall be given substantial
deference in any appeal of a decision by the city to either approve, approve with conditions, or
deny any application for a wireless communication facility.
L. Notwithstanding other remedies that may be available under federal law, failure of the City
to issue permits within or otherwise comply with the FCC shot clock requirements does not
provide a "deemed" grant of approval for macro or small wireless facilities. No work may occur
until the permit issues.
-[Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
Packet Pg. 134
11
9.1.a
20.50.070 Application requirements.
The following information must be submitted as part of a complete application for a
wireless communication facility permit in the city of Edmonds:
A. Project description including a design narrative, technology description, and, for macro cell
facilities, c na collocation analysis indicating the alternative locations -and- +^r"491-bi-
considered;
B. Aerial photo or map showing entire proposed deployment (small wireless only)...;
Q-. C. Site information on scaled plans, including:
1. Site plan;
2. Elevation drawings;
3. Utility plan showing existing utilities, proposed facility location, and undergrounding;
4. Screening, camouflaging or landscaping plan and cost estimate (produced in
accordance with Chapter 20.13 ECDC), as appropriate;
D. Photos and photo simulations showing the existing appearance of t#e-each site and
appearance of the proposed installation from nearby public viewpoints;
-F-.E.Noise report (per ECDC 20.50.050(C)), if applicable;
G-.F. Radio Frequency (RF) emissions standards. The applicant shall provide the certification
of an RF engineer with knowledge of the proposed development that the small wireless facility
ee44-network will comply with RF standards adopted by the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC). The City recognizes that the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 gives the FCC sole
jurisdiction in the field of regulation of RF emissions and wireless facilities that meet FCC
standards shall not be conditioned or denied on the basis of RF impacts.
H-. G. For small wireless facility ee44-deployments, the following additional documentation shall
be provided as initial justification for the proposed location pursuant to the &icelocation
preference criteria set forth in ECDC 20.50.130.AB, as applicable:
im. im
- - .
-
-
Packet Pg. 135
12
9.1.a
7-1. For installations proposed for Location Preference #42 (Freestanding small
wireless facility or new street light), provide all of the following to the extent applicable
within 150 lineal feet of each proposed small wireless facility location:
a. WHERE NO POLES EXIST IN THE AREA: De,-H-Iml,,ntati n Full � „,- On u 1 -,nd u 2
abevejand
Via. Evidence that no utility poles, traffic 4g4tsignal poles, or street light poles exist
within 150 lineal feet in either direction of each proposed small wireless facility
location, as measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street; e-F
b. WHERE POLES EXIST THAT CANNOT FULLY CONCEAL A SMALL WIRELESSCE-L-L
FACILITY: Written documentation from gall pole owners e#�within 150 lineal
feet in either direction -of each proposed small wireless facility location, as
measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street,eF denying the
applicant's request to replace any of the existing poles that are not capable of
hosting a fully concealed small wirelessc-e4 facility with a new pole that is capable of
hosting a fully concealed small wirelessc-e4 facility on the grounds that no such
replacement pole is available on the market or due to other reasonably insoluble
problems expressed in writing by the pole owner;
c. WHERE POLES EXIST THAT CAN FULLY CONCEAL A SMALL WIRELESS GEI�FACILITY:
Written documentation from all owners of poles within 150 lineal feet in either
direction of each proposed small wireless facility location, as measured along the
right-of-way line for the applicable street, denying the applicant's request to install
the small wireless facility ee-within any such existing s+r�;;ght poles leeated v.oit ;n
IS(-) lopeal feet A-f PAPh 1;m;;Il woreler facility leeatieR, as MeaswFed aleRg the Fight
of way.
�2. For installations proposed for Location Preference #153 (On top of existing power
pole):
a. Documentation as required in 9G.1, u' and u.2 above; and
b. Evidence that the design standards for a freestanding small wireless facility chin
the right-of-way could not be met; and
c. Confirmation by the director of public works that a new street light pole capable of
hosting a fully concealed small wirelessc-e4 facility was not determined to be needed
or could not be located within 150 lineal feet in either direction of the proposed
Packet Pg. 136
13
9.1.a
small wireless facility location, as measured along the right-of-way line for the
applicable street.
For installations proposed for Location Preference #64 (In communication s
on existing power pole):
a. Documentation as required in #G.1, and G#.2, u 2 --d HA above; and
b. Evidence that no power poles, that would allow for installation on top of the pole,
single phase power pel exist within 150 lineal feet in either direction of each
proposed small wireless facility location, as measured along the right-of-way line for
the applicable street; or
c. Written documentation from the -all owners of the power poles within 150 lineal
feet in either direction of each proposed small wireless facility location, as measured
along the right-of-way line for the applicable street, ewne�denying the request to
install the small wireless facility on any such ey,, ^^ �i�^'^ �power poles -that
would allow for installation on top of the pole'^^,te,- ,.,ithin 150 lineal feet of each
prepesed small weless facility leGatieni �� red along the right of
14. 4. For installations proposed for Location Preference #-75 (Strand -mounted):
a. Documentation as required in G4.1, 4G.2, and 44G.3, H.", and H.5above; and
b. Evidence that no tr-,nSY,.,i«ien power poles, that would allow for installation within
the communication space, exist within 150 lineal feet in either direction of each
proposed small wireless facility location, measured along the right-of-way; or
c. Written documentation from gall owners of ther-ee powerp#a-,e poles within 150
lineal feet in either direction of each proposed small wireless facility location, as
measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street, eWReF denying the
request to install the small wireless facility on any such existing tFansmissie^ three
empower poles that would allow for installation within the communication space
,
aS
me -pis fired -,leRg the Fight ef way
�.H. Any other documentation deemed necessary by the director in order to issue a decision
[Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 20111.
20.50.080 Eligible facilities requests.
This section implements section 6409 of the Spectrum Act (codified at 47 U.S.C. 1455), which
requires the City of Edmonds to approve any eligible facilities request for a modification of an
existing tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of
such tower or base station.
A. Definitions. The following definitions only apply to eligible facilities requests as described
in this section and do not apply throughout this chapter.
1. Base Station is a structure or equipment at a fixed location that enables FCC -licensed or
authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a communications
network. The term does not encompass a tower as defined herein nor any equipment
associated with a tower. Base station includes, without limitation:
Packet Pg. 137
14
9.1.a
a. Equipment associated with wireless communications services as well as unlicensed
wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul.
b. Radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and back-up
power supplies, and comparable equipment, regardless of technological configuration
(including distributed antenna systems ("DAS") and small eerismall wireless facility
networks).
c. Any structure other than a tower that, at the time the relevant application is filed
(with jurisdiction) under this section, supports or houses equipment described in
subsections (A)(1)(a) and (b) of this section that has been reviewed and approved under
the applicable zoning or siting process, or under another State or local regulatory review
process, even if the structure was not built for the sole or primary purpose of providing
that support.
The term does not include any structure that, at the time the relevant application is filed
with the City under this section, does not support or house equipment described in
subsections (A)(1)(a) and (b) of this section.
2. Collocation. The mounting or installation of transmission equipment on an eligible
support structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals
for communication purposes.
3. Eligible Facilities Request. Any request for modification of an existing tower or base
station that does not substantially increase the physical dimensions of such tower or base
station, involving:
a. Collocation of new transmission equipment;
b. Removal of transmission equipment; or
c. Replacement of transmission equipment.
4. Eligible Support Structure. Any tower or base station as defined in this section;
provided, that it is existing at the time the relevant application is filed with the City.
5. Existing. A constructed tower or base station is existing if it has been reviewed and
approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, or under another State or local
regulatory review process; provided, that a tower that has not been reviewed and approved
because it was not in a zoned area when it was built, but was lawfully constructed, is
existing for purposes of this definition.
6. Site. For towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, the current boundaries of
the leased or owned property surrounding the tower and any access or utility easements
currently related to the site, and, for other eligible support structures, further restricted to
that area in proximity to the structure and to other transmission equipment already
deployed on the ground.
Packet Pg. 138
15
9.1.a
7. Substantial Change. A modification substantially changes the physical dimensions of an
eligible support structure if it meets any of the following criteria:
a. For towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, it increases the height of
the tower by more than ten (10) percent or by the height of one (1) additional antenna
array with separation from the nearest existing antenna, not to exceed twenty (20) feet,
whichever is greater; for other eligible support structures, it increases the height of the
structure by more than ten (10) percent or more than ten (10) feet, whichever is
greater.
4�—Changes in height should be measured from the original support structure
in cases where deployments are or will be separated horizontally, such as on
buildings' rooftops; in other circumstances, changes in height should be
measured from the dimensions of the tower or base station, inclusive of
originally approved appurtenances and any modifications that were approved
prior to the passage of the Spectrum Act;
b. For towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, it involves adding an
appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower
more than ten (10) feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of
the appurtenance, whichever is greater; for other eligible support structures, it involves
adding an appurtenance to the body of the structure that would protrude from the edge
of the structure by more than six (6) feet;
c. For any eligible support structure, it involves installation of more than one
equipment cabinet fer the technele y ir, elve 'the standard number of new equipment
cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed four cabinets; or, for towers in
the public streets and base stations, it involves installation of any new equipment
cabinets on the ground if there are no preexisting ground cabinets associated with the
structure, or else involves installation of ground cabinets that are more than ten (10)
percent larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets associated
with the structure;
d. It entails any excavation or deployment outside the current site;
e. It would defeat the concealment elements of the eligible support structure; or
f. It does not comply with conditions associated with the siting approval of the
construction or modification of the eligible support structure or base station equipment;
provided, however, that this limitation does not apply to any modification that is
noncompliant only in a manner that would not exceed the thresholds identified above.
B. Qualification as an Eligible Facilities Request. Upon receipt of an application for an eligible
facilities request, the Director will review the application to determine whether it qualifies as an
eligible facilities request.
Packet Pg. 139
16
9.1.a
C. Time Frame for Review. Within sixty (60) days of the date on which a network provider
submits an eligible facilities request application, the Director must approve the application
unless it determines that the application is not covered by this section.
D. Tolling of the Time Frame for Review. The sixty (60) day review period begins to run when
the application is submitted, and may be tolled only by mutual agreement by the Director and
the applicant or in cases where the Director determines that the application is incomplete. The
time frame for review of an eligible facilities request is not tolled by a moratorium on the
review of applications.
1. To toll the time frame for incompleteness, the Director must provide written notice to
the applicant within thirty (30) days of receipt of the application, clearly and specifically
delineating all missing documents or information required in the application.
2. The time frame for review begins running again when the applicant makes a
supplemental submission in response to the Director's notice of incompleteness.
3. Following a supplemental submission, the Director will notify the applicant within ten
(10) days that the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in
the original notice delineating missing information. The time frame is tolled in the case of
second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures identified in this subsection.
Second or subsequent notice of incompleteness may not specify missing documents or
information that was not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness.
E. Determination That Application Is Not an Eligible Facilities Request. If the Director
determines that the applicant's request does not qualify as an eligible facilities request, the
Director must deny the application.
F. Failure to Act. In the event the Director fails to approve or deny a request for an eligible
facilities request within the time frame for review (accounting for any tolling), the request is
deemed granted. The deemed grant does not become effective until the applicant notifies the
Director in writing after the review period has expired (accounting for any tolling) that the
application has been deemed granted.
G. To the extent feasible, additional antennas and equipment shall maintain the appearance
intended by the original facility, including, but not limited to, color, screening, landscaping,
camouflage, concealment techniques, mounting configuration, or architectural treatment.
[Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
20.50.090 New building -mounted macro wireless communication facility standards.
A. Generally. Wireless communication facilities located on the roof or on the side of the
building shall be grouped together, integrated to the maximum possible degree with the
building design, placed toward the center of the roof and/or thoroughly screened from
residential building views and from public views using radio frequency -transparent panels.
Building -mounted wireless communication facilities shall be painted with nonreflective colors
to match the existing surface where the antennas are mounted.
Packet Pg. 140
17
9.1.a
B. Height. The following requirements shall apply:
1. Downtown Waterfront/Activity Center (As Identified in the Edmonds Comprehensive
Plan). For buildings at, or which exceed, the height limit of the underlying zone, antennas
shall be flush -mounted and no portion of the antenna may extend above the building on
which it is mounted. For buildings below the height limit, antennas may be built to the
maximum height of the zone provided they are screened consistent with the existing
building in terms of color, architectural style and material. Flush -mounted antennas may
encroach into a required setback or into the city right-of-way if a right-of-way use
agreement is established with the city. Antennas shall not project into the right-of-way by
more than two feet and shall provide a minimum clearance height of 20 feet over any
pedestrian or vehicular right-of-way.
2. Outside the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. The maximum height of building -
mounted facilities and equipment shall not exceed nine feet above the top of the roof on
which the facility is located. This standard applies to all buildings regardless of whether
they are at or above the maximum height of the underlying zone. Such antennas must be
well integrated with the existing structure or designed to look like common rooftop
structures such as chimneys, vents and stovepipes.
C. Equipment Enclosure. Equipment enclosures for building -mounted wireless communication
facilities shall first be located within the building on which the facility is located. If an
equipment enclosure within the building is reasonably unavailable, then an equipment
enclosure may be incorporated into the roof design provided the enclosure meets the height
requirement for the zone. If the equipment can be screened by placing the equipment below
existing parapet walls, no additional screening is required. If screening is required, then the
screening must be consistent with the existing building in terms of color, architectural style and
material. Finally, if there is no other choice but to locate the equipment enclosure on the
ground, the equipment must be enclosed within an accessory structure which meets the
setbacks of the underlying zone and be screened in accordance with ECDC 20.50.050(N).
D. Feed Lines and Coaxial Cables. Feed lines and cables should be located below the parapet
of the rooftop, if present. If the feed lines and cables are visible from a public right-of-way or
adjacent property, they must be painted to match the color scheme of the building.
0
Packet Pg. 141
9.1.a
Acceptable Building -Mounted WCF
Unacceptable Building -Mounted WCF
[Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
20.50.100 New structure -mounted macro wireless communication facilities standards.
A. Generally. Wireless communication facilities located on structures other than buildings,
such as utility poles, light poles, flag poles, transformers, and/or tanks, shall be designed to
blend with these structures and be mounted on them in an inconspicuous manner.
1. Wireless communication facilities located on structures within unzoned city rights -of -
way adjacent to single-family residential (IRS) zones shall satisfy the following requirement
a. No metal pole or tower shall be used within the right-of-way adjacent to a single-
family zoned neighborhood unless required in order to comply with the provisions of
the State Electrical Code. Wooden poles of height and type generally in use in the
surrounding residential neighborhood shall be used unless prohibited by the State
Electrical Code.
2. Wireless communication facilities located on structures shall be painted with
nonreflective colors in a scheme that blends with the underlying structure.
B. Height.
1. The maximum height of structure -mounted wireless communication facilities shall not
exceed the maximum height specified for each structure or zoning district (rights -of -way
are unzoned); provided the wireless communication facility may extend up to six feet
above the top of the structure on which the wireless communication facility is installed.
Antennas and related equipment shall be mounted as close as practicable to the structure
2. Only one extension is permitted per structure.
3. If installed on an electrical transmission or distribution pole, a maximum 15-foot
vertical separation is required from the height of the existing power lines at the site (prior
to any pole replacement) to the bottom of the antenna. This vertical separation is intended
to allow wireless carriers to comply with the electrical utility's requirements for separation
Packet Pg. 142
19
9.1.a
between their transmission lines and the carrier's antennas.
C. Equipment Enclosure. Equipment enclosures shall first be located underground. If the
enclosure is within the right-of-way, the enclosure shall be underground. If there is no other
feasible option but to locate the equipment enclosure above ground on private property, the
equipment must be enclosed within an accessory structure which meets the setbacks of the
underlying zone and be screened in accordance with ECDC 20.50.050(N).
D. Feed Lines and Coaxial Cable. Feed lines and cables must be painted to closely match the
color scheme of the structure which supports the antennas.
E. Only wireless communication providers with a valid Fight ^f way use agFee'^^^^+master
permit shall be eligible to apply for a right-of-way construction permit, which shall be required
prior to installation of facilities within the city right-of-way and be in addition to other permits
specified in this chapter.
Acceptable Structure -Mounted WCF
20
Packet Pg. 143
9.1.a
Unacceptable Structure -Mounted WCF
[Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
20.50.110 New monopole-Me-u tee macro wereless faGili}standards.
men RtS a able of a e datiRg at least e PICIPIWARRI •-
-13A. No part of a monopole, antennas or antenna equipment may exceed the maximum height
4-allowed in the zone where the facility is located.
EB. Monopoles must be completed shrouded. All antennas, equipment and cables must be
concealed.
-DC. All monopole facilities must conform to the following site development standards:
1. To the greatest extent possible, monopole facilities shall be located where existing trees,
existing structures and other existing site features camouflage these facilities.
2. Existing mature vegetation should be retained to the greatest possible degree in order to
help conceal the facility.
3. Equipment Enclosure. The first preference is for the equipment enclosure to be located
underground. If the enclosure is within the right-of-way, the enclosure must be
underground. If there is no other choice but to locate the equipment enclosure on the
ground, the equipment must be enclosed within an accessory structure which meets the
setbacks of the underlying zone and be screened in accordance with ECDC 20.50.050(N).
Packet Pg. 144
21
9.1.a
Acceptable Monopole WCF
Unacceptable Monopole WCF
[Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
20.50.120 Temporary facilities.
A. The installation of a "cell -on -wheels" or COWS and the installation site shall comply with all
applicable laws, statutes, requirements, rules, regulations, and codes, including, but not limited
to, the Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code and National Electric Code.
BAIT COWS and related appurtenances shall be completely removed from the installation site
within 30 days of the date of the end of the emergency as determined by the mayor. [Ord.
3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
22
Packet Pg. 145
9.1.a
20.50.130 Small wireless standards and approval process.
Unlike macro facilities which are intended to provide c�wireless coverage over large areas,
the goal of a small wireless facility deployment is to provide additional capacity in localized
areas, including residential neighborhoods, using smaller antennas and equipment. The intent
of this section is to describe the City's location preferences for small wirelesses 4 facility
deployments and provide appropriate design standards to ensure that the negative visual
impacts of small wireless facilities are minimized. and the r;+„s i ng_teFm gear of „tilit„
A.- Permitted locations.
small weFeless facilities. IR this way, existiRg buildiRgS will be used where feasible and iRdividual
d pl,,,,,.,,eRtS irate their neighbeFhee s. Installation of small wireless facilities -on existing
buildings structures w " could whelp minimize the negative visual impact of additional
wires, antennas and equipment that may otherwise be placed on existing utility poles.
However, it is understood that a multi -node deployment may not be able to be located entirely
on zoned-buildingsgF�, feTas it may not be technically feasible to do so and in addition,
pFeperties because some property owners within the desired small wireless facility Ee4-
deployment area may not want to participate. -er because-ef technelegical facceFsinthat
6nstance, a -A mix of zoned property and right-of-way locations may be used.
1. Small wireless facilityee 4 attachments to buildings are permitted in any zone and are not
subject to the dispersion requirement below.
-1-.2. Fully concealed freestanding Stand-;4'A-.PP— SMa'Tcelismall wireless facilitiesy*efes
are permitted in anv zone (exceat Downtown Business) but are still subiect to the
dispersion requirement below.
3. Dispersion Requirement: No two small wireless facilities shall be located within 300
10AP__AI f,,,,r f -h .,rh,,,- ed- al Rg the right ef_way lin I 50feet radially.
PROVIDED THAT this dispersion requirement shall not apply to small wireless facilities
that are located pursuant to location preference #1, below.
2-.4. Downtown Business district (BD) zones shall be limited to building attachments
or hollow utility poles. Where a Sternberg street light exists, replacement or new
installation of a decorative street light shall match the style and character of the existing
Sternberg street lights, as determined by the Public Works Director, and shall be
designed to contain a small wireless facility in a fully concealed manner. Small wireless
facilities shall not be attached to Sternberg street lights that were not designed to host
fully concealed small wireless facilities.
23
Packet Pg. 146
9.1.a
5. In areas where utility systems are underground, small cell facility deployment will be
limited to existing buildings, new or replaced street lights and/or installation of
freestanding small cell facilities.
6. Small wireless facilities may not be located on sites identified on official local, state or
federal historic registries.
7. Small wireless facilities may not be located on wood poles that contain a street light.
B. Location preference hierarchy and analysis er*teF* ,
When locating small wireless facilities in the right-of-way, wWireless providers shall ate
site their r;"-rc-PI'small wireless f^^*'*+Yw*Fe'^« facilities pursuant to the following siting
preferences. These siting preferences are expressed {in descending order, starting with the
most preferred). Wireless providers may not descend to a lower preference in the list below
until they have determined that the higher preferences are not feasible in accordance with
ECDC 20.50.070.G. Failures to show lack of feasibility of a higher preference shall be grounds
for denial of an application.:
Location Preference #1— Hollow utility pole, fully eenee '^-
Location Preference #2 — Freestanding small wireless facility or new street light
Location Preference #3 — Existing power pole (installation on top of pole)
Location Preference #4 — Existing Dower pole (installation in communication space
Location Preference #5 — Strand -mounted
C. General Design Standards. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the followi
general design standards apply to all small wireless facilities.
1. Collocation. All new poles must be capable of accepting at least two wireless providers
Packet Pg. 147
24
9.1.a
in a completely concealed manner.
2. Ground mounted equipment in the rights -of -way is prohibited, unless the applicant can
demonstrate that pole mounted or undergrounded equipment is technically infeasible.
If ground mounted equipment is necessary, the equipment must be fully concealed.
Generators located in the rights -of -way are prohibited.
3. No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in violation of Chapter 5.30 ECC.
4. Replacement poles, new poles, and all equipment shall comply with the Americans with
Disabilities Act ("ADA"), city construction and sidewalk clearance standards, and state
and federal regulations in order to provide a clear and safe passage within the rights -of -
way.
5. Replacement poles shall be located as near as possible to the existing pole with the
requirement to remove the abandoned pole.
6. No signage, message, or identification other than the manufacturer's identification or
identification required by governing law is allowed to be portrayed on any antenna, and
any such signage on equipment enclosures shall be of the minimum amount possible to
achieve the intended purpose; provided, that signs are permitted as concealment
techniques where appropriate.
7. Antennas and related equipment may not be illuminated except for security reasons,
required by a federal or state authority, or unless approved as part of a concealment
element plan.
. ...... ..
25
Packet Pg. 148
9.1.a
FPrg-.
e) if concealment is net possible, the antennas must be camouflaged. The smallest feasible
Fneunting brackets must be used and the aRtennas must be painted and te)(twed te match
Q
Packet Pg. 149
26
9.1.a
w MEW
�wwww... ww�iwi
TT2#T22S ding a" nllcmAll . nlncs f I +..
I lug be seIrved by H lR dnrgFeY ,rd n p d fmhnr
�f fihnr 1c +n hn n,-rn.d
FIBER
SPLICEIPULL
BOX
FINAL 1
GRADE
ELECTRICAL--�_
CONDUIT
CANTENNA
UPPER POLE
EQUIPMENT CABINET
STANDARD
FOUNDATION
.!!Rl:E7SZS'i!...�l��.rS�4RS�Tl�:FI:�:'Ti7Sr.7RlR7�71:. .:F�7�1
T�RSS917:111TT■�T■��TTTS�RSlTS�:7�fiP.FiT.'J•:R7:TP.�. �T.�7■
Packet Pg. 150
27
9.1.a
Dee 1.,.,.,-,eR &R Specific Design Standards for -,;Mall ;.AAreles (Facilities in the Right -of -Way
z.
IA/i+hin the Fight f_ .
-3-.1. a -.-Location Preference #13 — Hollow utility r-pole. This option applies to any
existing pole in the right-of-way (power pole, street light pole, traffic light pole), that
could feasibly be replaced with a hollow pole designed to host small wireless facilities in
a fully concealed manner. In many, but not all instances, this location preference will
involve the replacement of a wood P444-pole with a hollow pole that serves the same
needs as its predecessor while also hosting small wireless facilities in a fully concealed
manner. EXiStiRg/Fepl-, -.,.J hello,., stFe t light . ele ., utility pole:
a. Combination nck� small wireless facility and power pole must meet the pole
owner's reauirements for power distribution. New combination ��Pllsmall
wireless facility and power poles must be designed to host small wireless facilities
from at least two carriers in a fullv enclosed manner. 5G antennas onlv may be
exposed until such time that the technology develops to make concealment of 5G
antennas feasible.
a,b. Combination small small wireless facility and streetlight pole should be
located where an existing streetlight pole can be utilized or removed and replaced
with a pole that allows for snqall celismall wireless facility installation in the same
location.
b-.C.Pole design shall match or be compatible with the aesthetics of existing streetlights
installed adjacent to the pole.
Packet Pg. 151
9.1.a
d. Where a Sternberg street light exists in the
downtown business district (BD) zones,
replacement or new installation of a
decorative street light shall he similar
+ematch the style and character a-sof the
existing Sternberg street lights, aeye4as
determined by the Public Works Director, and
shall be designed to contain a small wireless
facility in a fully concealed manner.
e. The
components shall be sized to be v III"
gpole shall have a streamlined
appearance similar to the pole in the FIBEF
5PLIC
embedded diagram, meted- her- to the BOX
right. For a combination pole to be FINALw[
considered visually pleasing, the transition
ELEC
between the equipment cabinet and upper CON[
pole should be considered. A decorative
ENNA
IAIRE
IAIRE MAST ARM
R POLE
WENT CABINET
DARD
DATION
transition shall be installed over the equipment cabinet upper bolts, or decorative
base cover shall be installed to match the equipment cabinet size.
f. The diameter of the upper pole shall be smaller than sealed At 8.5-te 0 75-the size Af
the equipment cabinet, with a 10 eArCh ter ^'iamete . All hardware
connections shall be hidden from view. No horizontal flat spaces greater than 1.5
inches shall exist on the equipment cabinet to prevent cups, trash, and other objects
from being placed on the equipment cabinet.
g. A+�4Internal divider s"a" separations of --electrical wiring and fiber to be provided
as required -byW the pole owner.
h. Weatherproof grommets shall be integrated in the pole design to allow cable to exit
the pole, for external shrouds, without water seeping into the pole.
The a�T�tal,'at+ens exT_t.Rg stFeet'ights the antenna shall either be fully
concealed within the pole or placed on top of the pole, based on technical feasibility.
A cantenna or canister antenna on top of an existing pole may not extend more than
Packet Pg. 152
29
9.1.a
six (6) feet above the height of the existing pole and the diameter may not exceed
the diameter of the top of the pole by more than two (2) inches. The antennas shall
be integrated into the pole design so that it appears as a continuation of the original
pole, including colored or painted to match the pole. All cabling and mounting
hardware/brackets from the bottom of the antenna to the top of the pole shall be
44�-concealed and integrated with the pole.
j.StFeet ,tUtility poles shall be located as follows:
In a manner that does not impede, obstruct, or hinder pedestrian or
vehicular travel.
In alignment with existing trees, utility poles, and streetlights.
W-.iii. Equal distance between trees when possible, with a minimum of 15-foot
separation such that no proposed disturbance shall occur within the critical
root zone of any tree.
Div. With appropriate clearance from existing utilities.
a+v. In compliance with clear zone requirements. Outside 30 feet eleaF sig4t
Zvi. 10-feet away from the intersection of an alley with a street.
k. All conduit, cables, wires and fiber must be routed internally in the utility pole.
2. Location Preference #24 - Freestanding small wireless facility or new street
light_
a. Freestanding Small small r^"�;Twireless facility.
The specifications provided in this section are for installations within the right-of-
way only. The accompanying diagram shows a typical pole and its elements.
i. Dimensional requirements:
a) A freestanding small wireless facility may not exceed 25 feet in height
measured from the top of the foundation to the top of the cantenna.
Packet Pg. 153
30
9.1.a
b) The equipment cabinet must be bety.o^^^ 16 ^ no greater than 20
inches in diameter.
c) The diameter of the upper pole shall be smaller than the equipment
cabinet. The pole shall be tapered to transition from the equipment
cabinet to the upper pole, as shown in the graphic below. The pole
diameter must be scaled so that no flat, horizontal surface larger than 1.5
inches exists between the equipment cabinet and upper pole.
eguaig„TeRt ea-hi.p.ette the W1919eF 190'e—The cantenna may not exceed 6-ft
in height.
ii. Appearance requirements:
a) The same pole aesthetic
must be used along
adjacent blocks to maintain
a cohesive appearance. If
freestanding small wireless
facilities already exist within
190#eetthe deplovment
area, then the new facility
shall be designed to match
the existing facilities as
much as Dracticable.-
b) All small wireless facil
carrier equipment must be
housed internal to the
equipment cabinet or
hidden within the cantenna.
FIBER
SPLICEIPULL
BOX
FINAL �
=E�
CANTENNA
UPPER POLE
EQUIPMENT CABINET
The cantenna, upper pole ELECTRICAL--,_
CONDUIT
and equipment cabinet
STANDARD
must be of the same brown FOUNDAMON
or Breen colors. the saa.m.e eo;pr unless otherwise aDgroved by the
Director.
c) All hardware connections shall be hidden from view.
Packet Pg. 154
31
9.1.a
d) No equipment maybe attached to the outside of the pole.
e) The freestandine small wireless facilitv must be served by underground
power and fiber, if fiber is to be connected.
Placement Location requirements:- PFeestandiRg small ^II_,- shall be
GeMpliaRee vVith the fell
a) Located such that they in no way impede, obstruct, or hinder the usual
pedestrian or vehicular travel, affect public safety, obstruct the legal
access to or use of the public ROW, violate applicable law, violate or
eenflutfail to substantially comply with public ROW design standards,
specifications, or design district requirements, violate the Federal
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or in any way create a risk to
public health, safety, or welfare.
b) Outside the downtown business district (BD) zones.
c) So as not to be located along the frontage of a Historic building, deemed
historic on a federal, state, or local level.
d) So as not to significantly create a new obstruction to property sight lines
e) In alignment with existing trees, utility poles, and streetlights.
gflEqual distance between trees when possible, with a minimum of 15-foot
separation such that no proposed disturbance shall occur within the
critical root zone of any tree.
g) With appropriate clearance from existing utilities.
Packet Pg. 155
32
9.1.a
h) In compliance with clear zone requirements.
vcrcsi cc3 v feet rclear sight triangle (fer basecabinets equal rcv oF grca ccr
�4110-feet away from the intersection of an alley with a street.
4iLOn the same side of the street as existing power lines, regardless of
whether power is underground or overhead;
b. New Street Light. The hollow utility replacern^n+ stFe ,+ light.pole requirements
are also applicable to the new street light ept+eRalternative, except that a street
light would be incorporated into the design of the facility. In addition, the
following applies:
i. A street light shall not be installed unless it has been identified by the
director of public works that a street light is necessary at the location in
which the ��PI'small wireless facility facility is proposed. A street light
may be required to be installed instead of a free-standing wireless facility-
m
c+ rr h rr:.,,.,.J I .J TY, ,.J +., r,+, Y, ,II I « faE30*+.
brackets, tFaRSitieR
hardware
r fer +
shrewd
frem the tee
and all ether
the
Fed a Gemp!
.,.•+*AIq to the +ep of the
of mast aFFn
c.- Location Preference #315 - Existing single se power pole (installation on top of
pole):
Packet Pg. 156
33
9.1.a
iv
u
A cantenna may not extend more than six (6) feet above the height of the
existing pole and the diameter may not exceed the diameter of the pole by
more than two (2) inches, measured at the top of the pole, unless the
applicant can demonstrate that
^ �^ ^^'^dtechnological
L.""CANTENNA
infeasibility. The antennas shall be P MOUNTED)
integrated into the pole design so that it
appears as a continuation of the original
LUMINAIRE & MASTS'
pole, including colored or painted to ARM
match the pole. All cabling and
mounting hardware/brackets from the EQUIPMENT SHROUD
WITH ANTENNA ($0E
bottom of the antenna to the top of the MOUNTED)
pole shall be (concealed. UTILITY POLE
Equipment enclosures and all ancillary
equipment and boxes shall be colored or
painted to match the color of the surface
of the wooden pole in which they are
attached. All related equipment shall not EQUIPMENT SHROUD
be mounted more than six (6) inches
from the surface of the pole, unless a
further distance is technically required, XCEL ENERGY METER
WITH DISCONNECT
and is confirmed in writing by the pole
SMALL CELL
Owner. FIBER
All cables and wires shall be routed ELECTRICAL
ELECT CONDUIT
through conduit along the outside of the
pole. The outside conduit shall be colored or painted to match the color of
the surface of the wooden pole. The number of conduit shall be minimized
to the number technically necessary to accommodate a small wireless facility
ee44-and shall not increase the number of conduit on an existing pole to more
than 32- conduit.
The visual effect of the small wirelessee44 facility on all other aspects of the
appearance of the wooden pole shall be minimized to the greatest extent
possible.
A wooden pole in a proposed location may be replaced with a taller pole for
the purpose of accommodating a small wireless Ge4-facility; provided, that
34
Packet Pg. 157
9.1.a
the height of any replacement pole may not exceed fifty (50) feet to the top
of the cantenna.
vi . The -reply emeRt pele shall r ply with the Cmty's sm dp—yV ,IL CI^- ;;RGe
requirev. eRtS and ADA requirements.
Zvi. The use of the pole for the siting of a small wirelessc-e 4 facility shall be
considered secondary to the primary function of the pole. If the primary
function of a pole serving as the host site for a small wireless ee4-facility
becomes unnecessary, the pole shall not be retained for the sole purpose of
accommodating the small wireless ee4-facility and the small wireless ee 4
facility and all associated equipment shall be removed.
d.- Location Preference #4b - Existing three phas power pole
(installation in communication space):
Antennas should be placed in an effort to minimize visual clutter and
obtrusiveness. Only one antenna array is permitted on each wooden pole.- _
Packet Pg. 158
35
9.1.a
+i-.i. The inside edge of a side mounted
canister antenna/equipment
shroud shall project no more than
twelve (12) inches from the surface
of the wooden pole.
4i-.ii. To the extent technically feasible,
Aantennas and equipment located
within a unified enclosure shall not
exceed four (4) cubic feet. Te-t#e-
extent possible, the unified
enclosure shall be placed so as to
appear as an integrated part of the
pole or behind banners or signs.
The unified enclosure may not be
placed more than six (6) inches
from the surface of the pole, unless
a further distance is technically
required and confirmed in writing
by the pole owner.
SMA
+v iii. Equipment enclosures and all FIBS
ancillary equipment and boxes shall ELE
be colored or painted to match the
color of the surface of the wooden
'OLE
ENT SHROUD
_NT SHROUD
ERGY METER
'CONNECT
pole in which they are attached. All related equipment shall not be mounted
more than six (6) inches from the surface of the pole, unless a further
distance is technically required, and is confirmed in writing by the pole
owner.
Div. All cables and wires shall be routed through conduit along the outside of the
pole. The outside conduit shall be colored or painted to match the color of
the surface of the wooden pole. The number of conduit shall be minimized
to the number technically necessary to accommodate a small eerismall
wireless facility and shall not increase the number of conduit on an existing
pole to more than 32- conduit.
v+v. The visual effect of the small wireless Ge4-facility on all other aspects of the
appearance of the wooden pole shall be minimized to the greatest extent
possible.
Packet Pg. 159
36
9.1.a
v4+vi. A wooden pole in a proposed location may be replaced with a taller pole for
the purpose of accommodating a small wireless Ge4-facility; provided, that
the height of any replacement pole may not extend more than ten (10) feet
above the height of the existing pole, unless a further height increase is
required and confirmed in writing by the pole owner and that such height
increase is the minimum extension possible to provide sufficient separation
and/or clearance from electrical and wireline facilities.
c808. Te-replacement p le shall r ply with the City's sod y.oalL GI -,raRe
vii. The use of the pole for the siting of a small wirelesses 4 facility shall be
considered secondary to the primary function of the pole. If the primary
function of a pole serving as the host site for a small wirelesses 4 facility
becomes unnecessary, the pole shall not be retained for the sole purpose of
accommodating the small wireless Ge44-facility and the small wireless ee44-
facility and all associated equipment shall be removed.
Packet Pg. 160
37
9.1.a
e.- Location Preference #5-7 - Strand -mounted.
Sm�eriSmall wireless facility facilities mounted on cables strung between
existing utility poles shall conform to the following standards:
UTILITY POLE
X91FINJ1,r1QM_3I:T@M91
EQUIPMENT SHROUD
xCEL ENERGY METER
WITH DISCONNECT
SMALL CELL
FIBER
ELECTRICAL
This graphic is intended to
represent a strand mount antenna.
To the extent technically feasible, antennas shall not exceed ,` ��
and shall net exceed one (1) cubic feet in volume.
Only one strand mounted facility is permitted between any two existi
op Ies.
iii. The strand mounted devices shall be placed as close as possible to the
nearest utility pole and in no event more than five feet from the pole unless
a greater distance is technically necessary or required for safety clearance
and confirmed in writing by the pole owner.
iv. No strand mounted device shall be located in or above the portion of the
Packet Pg. 161
9.1.a
roadway open to vehicular traffic.
V. Ground mounted equipment to accommodate such strand mounted facilities
is not permitted, except when placed in pre-existing equipment cabinets,
underground or on zoned orooerty.
vi. Pole mounted equipment shall meet the requirements of subsections (iii),
(iv) and (v) of subsection (d) above.
vii. Such strand mounted devices must be installed to cause the least visual
impact and with the minimum excess exterior cabling or wires (other than
the original strand) necessary to meet the technological needs of the facilit
e(^) Th s[� d- }} d- h II h I .d I ihl r the t
GT�TTC-StTVITQTRO'afTte �TC`OTCC T�TLTTfJC�'fa'CCCITITI.TIT�C-QT�JV�JTf.Tf�CO CTfl1TCQTCSC
utoloty pele, OA AA- - -M- M. +h- A f0yp- feet frA-RA the pole U Rless a gF at r
I
E. n,,yeler,Y,,��Specific Design Standards for FeF Small `^';r^I^r, Facilities Located Outside
the Right -of -Way.
39
Packet Pg. 162
9.1.a
1. On a Building.
OR a tiRg
-1a.4 Roof--mounted.-
i. a-�Small wireless f-aEi-y-facilities may be built to the maximum height of the
underlying zone (or use the height exception in Sub (c) below) provided they
are screened consistent with the existing buildine in terms of color.
architectural style and materials.
ch facilities must be completely concealed and well integrated with the
existing structure or designed and located to look like common rooftop
elements such as chimneys, elevator penthouses or screened HVAC
equipment.
iii. 4-Height exception. The maximum height for a small wireless facility above
the underlying zone maximum is 3 feet with a maximum footprint of 12 sq.
ft. in horizontal section.
2-b.-� Facade-mounted..-.-
ia-�Small wireless facility antennas may be mounted to the side of a building if
they do not interrupt and are integrated with the building's architectural
theme.
ii. b}New architectural features such as columns, pilasters, corbels, or similar
ornamentation that conceals the antennas should be used if it complements
the architecture of the existing building.
iii. 441f concealment is not aossible. the antennas must be camouflaged. The
smallest feasible mounting brackets must be used and the antennas must be
painted and textured to match the adjacent building surfaces.
iv. 4Facade-mounted antennas may encroach into a required setback or into
the city right-of-way. Antennas may not project into the right-of-way more
than twelve (12) inches and shall provide a minimum clearance heiiaht of 20
feet over any pedestrian or vehicular right-of-way.
V. 4-All other eauioment must be located within the buildine. screened by an
existing parapet, or completely concealed and well integrated with the
existing structure or designed and located to look like common rooftop
elements such as chimneys, elevator penthouses or screened HVAC
equipment. Exposed cabling/wiring is prohibited.
Packet Pg. 163
40
9.1.a
vi. #Height exception. Antennas may be located on buildings that are
nonconforming for height provided that they are constructed to be no taller
than the adjacent facade or an existing parapet. Equipment may be located
on a roof behind a parapet that is nonconforming for height. Vertical
expansion of the height nonconformity is prohibited.
2.
Freestandine small wireless facilitv. The specifications Drovided in this section are for
installations on zoned property only. Refer to subsection 20.50.130.D.2.aRh for
dimensional and appearance standards.
a. 3)—Placement requirements. Freestanding small wireless facilities shall be located as
follows:
Located such that thev in no wav impede. obstruct. or hinder the usual
pedestrian or vehicular travel, affect public safety, or violate applicable law.
ii. Within 5 feet of the street property line (right-of-way) and within 5 feet of a
side property line.
iii. So as not to significantly create a new obstruction to property sight lines.
iv. In alignment with existing trees, utility poles, and streetlights.
V. With appropriate clearance from existing utilities.
vi. In compliance with clear zone requirements.
vii. On the same side of the street as existing Dower lin
power is underground or overhead;
reeardless of whether
41
Packet Pg. 164
9.1.a
.........
I.
1 .
•Bill
. . .. ...
. .. ..
.
... .. . .. .
. .....
..
.. . ..
•MI
1.9l
. . .. . .
. . .
.
. .. ..
.
.. ..
. . . .
III r ll,« faCility a .,h r e ZeRed p lct the a plil,ireless
prev .J r shall p i.d p1aRa+iE)R f +h teehni --,I .diff„-wity ir, � �ffi.�iepA
Q
Packet Pg. 165
42
9.1.a
to
O_
Fights of way
aFe
pre-hi-bited.
fC
a]
d
N
to
O
u
n
federal
iR te
the
FegulatieRS
eFdeF
pFevide
a Glear
and
safe
passage
withiR
Fights ef way.
�d♦
V
rye r�
Tequireme Rt
to
remP7'e0"ve
ed
pel
C�
G
N
5. The desigR
c:Fiteria
as applicable
te small
cell facilities
deseFibed
heFei
R shall
be-
a
O
fadkoes
be
GeRSideFed
eeneealmeRt
elerneRts
and
such
small
cell
may
enly
expanded upon
0)
the
,
wheR
.,.difie-,+ieR
.deeS
.defeat
the
-,Iv,-
the
facility,
G1
REA
c
eRt el.,meRtS
of
2
V
i
7
a
T
the iRteRded
,
,
T
apprepriate.
L
Q
'
4)
V
�
ol.,m,,Rt plaR
E.
E.
CoaleaFm
RqeHMS
f.,r _PlAt_ ,.AA_a
_ .,
aFeg
Rt
ehihite
d
O
N
to
O
L
equipmeRt
and
cable, shall Ret
I
I
I
I
L
hl
I
uil.diRg
eF
UpeR
which
they
a
atta
-heel
O
rW
to
N
r
R
7
a tP_GhRelegieal
reg6i*FemeRt
en
the
Se.rvieepFevidei.
�
12—n0TiarEe�-equi-red
a -area areas
tk�et.r�
hrirci
utility
li.les-11aPe
eea
.
�
�.i
c
m
E
z
Q
Packet Pg. 166
43
9.1.a
Fight of way.
[04 3961 § 1, 2014; 9rd. 3945 § 2 (Att n), 2914
20.50.140 Abandonment or discontinuation of use.
A. At such time that a licensed carrier plans to abandon or discontinue operation of a wireless
communication facility, such carrier will notify the director by certified U.S. Mail of the
proposed date of abandonment or discontinuation of operations. Such notice shall be given no
less than 30 days prior to abandonment or discontinuation of operations.
B. In the event that a licensed carrier fails to give such notice, the wireless communication
facility shall be considered abandoned upon the discovery of such discontinuation of
operations.
C. Within 90 days from the date of abandonment or discontinuation of use, the carrier shall
physically remove the wireless communication facility. "Physically remove" shall include, but
not be limited to:
1. Removal of antennas, mounts or racks, the equipment enclosure, screening, cabling
and the like from the subject property.
2. Transportation of the materials removed to a repository outside of the city.
3. Restoration of the wireless communication facility site to its pre -permit or better
condition, except that any landscaping provided by the wireless communication facility
operator may remain in place.
4. If a carrier fails to remove a wireless communication facility in accordance with this
section, the city shall have the authority to enter the subject property and physically
remove the facility. Costs for removal of the wireless communication facility shall be
charged to the wireless communication facility owner or operator in the event the city
removes the facility. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 20111.
20.50.150 Maintenance.
A. The applicant shall maintain the wireless communication facility to standards that may be
imposed by the city by ordinance or through -permit condition. Such maintenance shall include,
but not be limited to, repair of damaged shrouds or enclosures, painting, structural integrity,
and landscaping.
B. In the event the applicant fails to maintain the facility, the city of Edmonds may undertake
enforcement action as allowed by existing codes and regulations. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord.
3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
20.50.160 Definitions.
A. Antenna(s). Any apparatus designed for the purpose of emitting radiofrequency (RF)
radiation, to be operated or operating from a fixed location pursuant to Commission
Packet Pg. 167
44
9.1.a
authorization, for the provision of personal wireless service and any commingled information
services.
B. "Cell -on -wheels (COW)" are used to provide temporary service, usually for special events,
h fer the installatie-nduring repair of a permanent wireless site, or in emergencies.
C. "Collocation" means the mounting or installation of an antenna on an existing tower,
building or structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals
for communications purposes, whether or not there is an existing antenna on the structure.
D. Completely concealed facility. A WCF where: (A) the antennas, mounting apparatus, and
any associated equipment are fully recessed/concealed from all sides with a structure that
achieves total integration with the existing building or structure; and (B) all cable is routed
internally or completely screened from view; and (C) the associated equipment is completely
within the building or structure, placed in an underground vault, or is within another element
such as a bench, mail box or kiosk.
E. "Distributed antenna system (DAS)" is a network of spatially separated antenna sites
connected to a common source that provides wireless service within a discrete geographic
area or structure.
F. Equipment. Any equipment, switches, wiring, cabling, power sources, shelters or cabinets
associated with an antenna, located at the same fixed location as the antenna, and, when
collocated on a structure, is mounted or installed at the same time as such antenna.
G. "Freestanding small r-en'small wireless facility-poe" is a freestanding structure which consists
of a single vertical hollow pole, fixed into the ground and/or attached to a foundation built for
the sole purpose of supporting and concealing small wireless antennas and associated
equipment.
H. "Guyed tower" means a monopole or lattice tower that is tied to the ground or other
surface by diagonal cables.
I. "Lattice tower" is a wireless communication support structure which consists of metal
crossed strips or bars to support antennas and related equipment.
J. "Licensed carrier" is a company authorized by the Federal Communications Commission to
build and operate a commercial mobile radio services system.
K. Macro cell facility (macro facility). A large wireless communication facility that provides
radio frequency coverage served by a high power cellular system. Generally, macro cell
antennas are mounted on ground -based towers, rooftops and other existing structures, at a
height that provides a clear view over the surrounding buildings and terrain. Macro cell facilities
typically contain antennas that are greater than three (3) cubic feet per antenna and typically
cover large geographic areas with relatively high capacity and are capable of hosting multiple
wireless service providers.
L. "Monopole" means a freestanding structure which consists of a single vertical pole, fixed
into the ground and/or attached to a foundation with no guy wires built for the sole or primary
purpose of supporting macro antennas and their associated equipment.
Packet Pg. 168
45
9.1.a
M. Poles. Utility poles, light poles or other types of poles, used primarily to support electrical
wires, telephone wires, television cable, lighting, or guide posts; or are constructed for the sole
purpose of supporting a WCF.
N. "Satellite earth station antenna" includes any antenna in any zoning district that:
1. Is designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service, including direct -to -home
satellite services, and that is one meter or less in diameter;
2. Is two meters or less in diameter in areas where commercial or industrial uses are
generally permitted;
3. Is designed to receive programming services by means of multi -point distribution
services, instructional television fixed services, and local multi -point distribution services,
that is one meter or less in diameter or diagonal measurement; and
4. Is designed to receive television broadcast signals.
O. Small wireless facility (or small cell node). A wireless facility that meets each of the
following conditions:
1. The facilities:
a. Are mounted on structures 50 feet or less in height including their antennas, or
b. Are mounted on structures no more than 10 percent taller than other adjacent
structures, or
c. Do not extend existing structures on which they are located to a height of more than
50 feet or by more than 10 percent, whichever is greater;
2. Each antenna associated with the deployment, excluding antenna equipment, is not
more than three cubic feet in volume;
3. All other wireless equipment associated with the structure, including the wireless
equipment associated with the antenna and any pre-existing associated equipment on the
structure, is no more than 28 cubic feet in volume;
4. The facilities do not require antenna structure registration under FCC rule;
5. The facilities do not result in human exposure to radiofrequency radiation in excess of
the applicable safety standards specified by FCC rule.
P. "Unlicensed wireless services" means the offering of communications services using duly
authorized devices which do not require individual licenses, but does not mean the provision of
direct- to -home satellite services.
Q. "Wireless communication facility (WCF)" means an unstaffed facility for the transmission
and reception of radio or microwave signals used for commercial communications. A WCF
provides services which include cellular phone, personal communication services, other mobile
radio services, and any other service provided by wireless common carriers licensed by the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). WCFs are composed of two or more of the
Packet Pg. 169
46
9.1.a
following components:
1. Antenna;
2. Mount;
3. Equipment enclosure;
4. Security barrier.
R. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), building -mounted" means a wireless
communication facility mounted to the roof, wall or chimney of a building. Also, those
antennas mounted on existing monopoles.
S. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), camouflaged" means a wireless communication
facility that is disguised, hidden, or integrated with an existing structure that is not a
monopole, guyed or lattice tower, or placed within an existing or proposed structure.
T. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), equipment enclosure" means a small structure,
shelter, cabinet, or vault used to house and protect the electronic equipment necessary for
processing wireless communication signals. Associated equipment may include air conditioning
and emergency generators.
U. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), monopole" means a wireless communication
facility not attached to a structure or building and not exempted from regulation under ECDC
20.50.030. Does not include ce leeat4encollocation of a facility on an existing monopole, utility
pole, light pole, or flag pole.
V. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), related equipment" is all equipment ancillary to a
wireless communication facility such as coaxial cable, GPS receivers, conduit and connectors.
W. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), structure -mounted" means a wireless
communication facility located on structures other than buildings, such as light poles, utility
poles, flag poles, transformers, and/or tanks.
X. "Wireless communication services" means any personal wireless services as defined in the
Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, including federally licensed wireless communications
services consisting of cellular services, personal communications services (PCS), specialized
mobile radio services (SMR), enhanced specialized mobile radio services (ESMR), paging, and
similar services that currently exist or that may be developed in the future. [Ord. 3961 § 1,
2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011].
Packet Pg. 170
47
10.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/26/2019
Discussion on updates proposed for Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.05 — Utility
Wires
Staff Lead: Phil Williams
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Megan Luttrell
Background/History
None.
Staff Recommendation
Authorization to prepare a draft ordinance for further discussion at a future City Council meeting.
Narrative
Staff is proposing updates to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.05 - Utility Wires to
incorporate aesthetic standards to minimize clutter in the right-of-way and work towards a goal of
undergrounding utilities. The updates will include camouflage requirements, removal of old poles,
abandonment of utility services, clarification of undergrounding requirements, etc. Existing conditions
will be presented with a preliminary discussion on code updates. An ordinance will then be drafted and
brought back to Council for further discussion at a later date.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Presentation
Packet Pg. 171
10.1.a
Edmonds City Council
March 26, 2019
Packet Pg. 172
CDC 18.05 — Utility Wires
PREVIOUS CODE UPDATES
➢ July 2011 -
• Revisions/references related to new code section:
ECDC Chapter 20.50 - Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF)
➢ November 2008 -
• Revisions related to WCF's (removed and/or amended by July 2011 updates)
➢ January 2006 -
Revisions related to WCF's (removed and/or amended by July 2011 updates)
► CODE UPDATE GOALS
➢ Incorporate aesthetic standards to minimize clutter in the right-of-way
➢ Address removal of old poles and restoration
➢ Clarify utility wire undergrounding requirements
➢ Clarify and/or add definitions
Packet Pg. 173
COC 005 - Clutter in the Riht-of-Wa
gy
I L I I
Ai
- S --rzz-
CDC 18.05 Conduit
CDC 18,005 - Splice BoxeOver-lashing
7
► Replace utility poles with hollow poles for full concealment
► Restrict over -lashing of existing utility wires
10.1.a
W
0
E
w
L
0
0
OL
0
L
Q
W
► Replace utility poles with hollow poles for full concealment (wire storage)
► Restrict size of loops or require wire storage
► Establish requirements for excess wires - neat and clean
► Replace utility poles with hollow poles for full concealment
Add penalties for failure to remove old poles
Move wires to PUD poles on one side of the street
Power
;f
Communications
J
."..A�i
c
0
E
w
L
0
0
CL
0
L
10.1.a
► ADA and Clear Zone Requirements
Old Pole
in
Sidewalk
c
O
E
M
w
L
O
O
New Pc
O
N
N
r
R
Q
7
C
O
4 �
O
N
3
V
f fA
de
E
w
a
E
fli.%
Packet Pg. 179