Loading...
2019-03-26 City Council Packeto Agenda Edmonds City Council snl. ,nyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 MARCH 26, 2019, 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 4. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2019 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2019 3. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 4. Windward Environmental - Request to hire a surveyor 5. Inter -local Agreement w/Edmonds School District for School Resource Officer (Scriber Lake HS) 5. PRESENTATIONS 1. Hearing Examiner Annual Report (10 min) 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Council Subcommittee Reports and Minutes (10 min) 8. ACTION ITEM 1. Resolution Requesting that the FCC Study Health Impacts of 5G Wireless Technology (5 min) 9. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing on Small Cell Update to the Wireless Regulations in Chapter 20.50 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. (45 min) 10. STUDY ITEMS 1. Discussion on updates proposed for Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.05 — Utility Wires (20 min) 11. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS 12. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 13. COUNCIL COMMENTS Edmonds City Council Agenda March 26, 2019 Page 1 14. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(1). 1S. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda March 26, 2019 Page 2 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2019 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 03-19-2019 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 3 4.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES MARCH 19, 2019 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Frances Chapin, Arts & Culture Manager Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Councilmember Dave Earling, Mayor Elected Officials Absent Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Mike Nelson, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM At 6:45 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5"' Avenue North, Edmonds. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room to interview Ashley Song, a candidate for appointment to the Edmonds Arts Commission. ADJOURN At 6:54 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 4 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 19, 2019 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 03-19-2019 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 5 4.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES March 19, 2019 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Michael Nelson, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember (by phone) Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Linda Coburn, Municipal Court Judge Sharon Whittaker, Court Administrator Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir. Shane Hope, Development Services Director Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks Director Jeanie McConnell, Development Program Mgr Rob English, City Engineer Mike Clugston, Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. Mayor Earling read the following statement: The Mayor and City Council and the Diversity Commission along with the citizens of Edmonds stand with our Muslim brothers and sisters in this time of grief and sorrow. Hate has no place in civilized society. We mourn for the lives lost in Christchurch, New Zealand and wish to be of service in any way possible. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. Councilmember Johnson participated by phone. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA, MOVING ITEM 5.2, E. WORKS/BARKER LANDSCAPE AMENDMENT #2, TO ACTION ITEMS AND 5.3, REPORT ON BIDS FOR THE DAYTON STREET UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT, TO STUDY ITEMS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 1 Packet Pg. 6 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2019 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 2019 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS 4. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 5. ILA VERDANT HEALTH COMMISSION 6. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MURRAYSMITH FOR FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR PROJECT 7. REPORT ON BIDS FOR THE 89TH PL W RETAINING WALL 8. URBAN FORESTER JOB DESCRIPTION APPROVAL 9. COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS 10. ARTS FESTIVAL AND MARKET EVENT CONTRACTS 11. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT TO ARTS COMMISSION 5. PRESENTATIONS COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO REORDER THE AGENDA TO MOVE UP THE TREE BOARD REPORT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1. EDMONDS CITIZENS' TREE BOARD PRESENTATION Tree Board Co -Chair Vivian Olson introduced the members of the Tree Board: • Bill Phipps, Co -Chair • Frank Caruso, Vice Chair • Steve Hatzenbeler • Barbara Chase • Doug Petersen • Gail Lovell • Suzanne Juergensen (Alt) • Diane Buckshnis (City Council Rep.) • Leslie Smith (Student Rep) Co -Chair Olson reviewed: • Main Mission o The City of Edmonds Tree Board actively encourages the planting, protecting and maintaining of trees for the long term benefit to our community • Year in Review - 2018 o Edmonds is now in its 8th year as a Tree City USA o Our 3rd Growth Award (meaning we worked hard!) o Earth Day - Yost Park Ivy pull: partnered with City Parks Dept. o Trees in downtown Edmonds identified with temporary name tags o Partnered with Edmonds in Bloom on their Garden Tour — 2nd time trees identified o Improved and expanded on the Tree Board website Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 2 Packet Pg. 7 4.2.a o Created a Trees for Small Spaces brochure and completed final draft of Before You Grab the Chainsaw trifold brochure o Arbor Day Planting Celebration at Meadowdale Park o Saturday Market Info Booth and Tree Raffle o Participated with the City on the formulation of an Urban Forest Management Plan o Initiated coordination with the Climate Protection Committee o Appointed a Student Representative o Rebranded the Tree Board, including development of a new logo Tree Board Vice Chair Frank Caruso reviewed: • Photographs of Tree Board activities o Tree tagging o Farmers Market booth o Meadowdale Arbor Day event • Tree Board Current Work o Finalize and distribute Small Trees brochure o Continue to provide input on the Urban Forest Management Program o Continue education and stewardship — Earth Day, Farmer's Market, Arbor Day o Continue to partner with Students Saving Salmon o Partner with Parks and Recreation Department on a workshop for tree choice (right tree, right place) and tree care Before You Grab that Chainsaw brochure 2019 Plans in Summary o Educate and assist through various activities and events including: ■ Earth Day event (City Park Clean-up) ■ Summer market ■ Downtown educational tree tags ■ Edmonds in Bloom garden tour with tree identification (again) ■ Arbor Day Tree planting with Parks Department ■ Workshop on tree choice and maintenance ■ Working with Parks on trees recommended for street trees Councilmember Tibbott asked how the information related to Tree City USA was collected. It was his understanding from previous years that it was Tree Board activities as well as other City activities. Co - Chair Olson relayed it was her understanding most of the information was collected by the Parks Department and it was related to per capita spending on trees, tree maintenance, outreach, etc. Edmonds achieved the Tree City USA designation again this year. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the Tree Board is a very fun, educated group who are trying to push right tree right place. The small tree brochure will be very helpful. She expressed her appreciation for the Tree Board and other volunteers. Councilmember Teitzel commented there was a hodgepodge of trees in the rights -of -way an asked what trees did well in an urban environment, did not raise the sidewalk, etc. Co -Chair Olson said there are experts on the Tree Board; Co -Chair Caruso and Board Members Peterson and Chase are Master Gardeners and they are working with Parks and Public Works to update the street tree list. Co -Chair Caruso said in addition to being a Master Gardner, he is also a plant pathologist so he is knowledgeable about tree diseases. 2. MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL REPORT Judge Linda Coburn reviewed: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 3 Packet Pg. 8 4.2.a Courts are an important part of our community because: o They protect our constitutional rights and due process under the law o They provide access to justice o They keep us safe and help us maintain civility o Everyone benefits from courts New mission statement o "Providing the community access to justice with respect and integrity." 2018 investments and improvements o Probation ■ Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT) - Of the 10 defendants who started in 2017: 5 graduated • 4 terminated • 1 still in the program - Of the 15 who started in 2018 early enough to have completed the six month program: • 6 graduated • 0 terminated • 8 still in the program - Of the 11 graduates: • 0 have had new convictions • 0 have had new charges ■ Introduced Probation Officer Omar Gamez o Pretrial services ■ Supervision before found guilty ■ Ensures community safe and avoids jail costs ■ Washington State auditor's office: "Reforming a bail practices in Washington" - On a typical day • 6,500 confined in jail statewide who have not been convicted of a crime and are in jail awaiting trial • Almost 3/4 of those awaiting trial were charged with non-violent crimes while 'h charged with only misdemeanors - After analyzing the risk, auditors concluded • 4,700 would be good candidates for pretrial services About 2,300 had a lower risk of reoffending and failing to appear in court; 2400 were higher risk defendants • Pretrial services offer an effective alternative to money bail ■ Edmonds Municipal Courts pretrial services - Regular office check -in - Monitoring abstinence - Service or treatment referrals - Court date reminders ■ One example - Strict conditions and daily reporting - Evaluation and treatment - No new charges since being released - Avoided more than 211 days in jail = $20,832 jail costs Expenditures Year Appropriation Expended Balance Percent Used 2018 $1,035,031 $995,469 $39,562 96% 2017 $1,016,040 $984,203 $31,837 97% • Filings Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 4 Packet Pg. 9 4.2.a Filings 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Filings 7,763 7,919 6,325 7,809 5,826 6,294 6,097 6,967 9,931 Civil Filings 6,152 6,401 5,034 6,494 4,795 5,387 5,171 6,119 8,992 Criminal Filings 1,611 1,518 1,291 1,315 1,031 907 923 840 939 o Increase in filings primarily due to: Type 2017 2018 Difference % Change DUI* 99 145 46 +46% Parking 2,113 4,486 2,373 +112% *Second highest number of DUI filings in the past eight years Law enforcement staffing make big difference in DUI filings Intake o Criminal Intake Criminal Intake 2015 Actual 2016 Actual 2017 Actual 2018 Actual Traffic $33,916 $35,464 $37,741 $36,683 DUI $9,194 $22,452* $10,452 $10,205 Non -Traffic $15,876 $11,061 $11,044 $16,135 TOTAL $58,986 $68,977 $59,237 $63,023 Adult Probation Service Charge $64,528 $66,778 $49,585 $55,140 *Note: The court received a $15,000 bail forfeiture payment in 2016, a significant portion of which was retained by the City o Infraction Intake Infraction Intake 2015 Actual 2016 Actual 2017 Actual 2018 Actual Non -Criminal Traffic $296,350 $267,506 $250,162 $299,607 Non -Traffic Infractions $1,130 $1,761 $2,544 $970 Parking $40,860 $46,129 $73,563 $162,287 TOTAL $338,340 $315,396 $326,269 $462,864 * Note: Historically the Court has inadvertently included a line item named "NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES" in the budget reports. This line item is actually civic building code violation penalties. The line item that is the Court's non -traffic infractions, is named " OTHER INFRACTIONS" in the accounting system o Other Intake Other Intake 2017 12018 1 Difference I Percent Change Passports $21,950 1 $21,570 1 -$380 2 % Note: While there was some increase, as expected in 2017 because of the 10 -year expiration of passports and a great number i n 2007, the increase was not as significant as anticipated. This is likely because there are now many other nearby c ties that also process passports o Overall Intake Annual Intake 2017 2018 Difference Percent Chan e Gross Total $973,227 $1,237,510 $264,283 +27% Net Total $589,988 $766,200 $176,212 +30% • Courts are not revenue centers o By statute, '[t]he court shall not order a defendant to pay costs unless the defendant is or will be able to pay them.' RCW 10.0 1. 160(3). To determine the amount and method for paying the costs, 'the court shall take account of the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that payment of costs will impose.' -- State v. Blazina, 182 Wn..2d 827, 838, 344 P.3d 680, 685 (2015) • E2SHB 1783 o Passed and became effect June 7, 2018 o Prohibits courts from imposing conviction fees and costs on indigents Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 5 Packet Pg. 10 4.2.a o Removed the 12% interest except restitution o Courts can still impose fines on indigents Statutory authority o "The legislature shall prescribe by law the jurisdiction and power of any of the inferior courts which may be established in pursuance of this constitution." -Article IV, Section 12 of the Washington State Constitution Credit Cards Annual 12015 12016 12017 12018 Service Fee 1$8,092 1$8,606 1$9,617 1$16,050 Recouped service fee 10 1$7,532 1$8,996 $12,877* *The increased $1 per transaction fee ( from $2 to $3) did not occur until Sept. 1, 2018 Paperless court Court Improvement fund Balance Balance End of 2017 63,029 2018 Contributions: $16,531 79,560 2018 Pa erless court expenditures $18,250 61,310 2019 Contributions to date $4,061 65,371 NOTE: The original decision package for the paperless court project was $70,821. The court has spent $43,779 thus far, leaving a balance of $27,042 the court anticipates spending in 2019 Separation of powers: Checks and balances o Executive o Judicial o Legislative Councilmember Tibbott referred to pretrial services, commenting he assumed that allowing someone to remain employed would assist them in avoiding criminal behavior later. Judge Coburn said Edmonds books its defendants into the Snohomish County Jail which previously had a work release program. Pretrial services may allow a defendant to remain employed and it is in everyone's best interest for people to have a paying job. The pretrial option allows supervision, ensuring they remain sober, as well as allows them to go to work and come to court until their case is resolved. Councilmember Tibbott asked how people responded to the flexibility of pretrial services. Judge Coburn said they are very appreciative of the opportunity to be released from jail and keep their job. It does not work for everyone, some people are released on pretrial services and if they do not report as required, a hearing is set and if they do not show up, a warrant is issued and they will spend time in jail with a bail amount. Pretrial services are a good option and she was hopeful it could be expanded. Council President Fraley-Monillas commended Judge Coburn for her passion for justice. She asked if there were any bills in the legislature this year related to the court. Judge Coburn said one of the bills is related to a uniform payment plan. Washington does not currently have a uniform court system; they are all separate jurisdictions and every court has its legal financial obligation and defendants must pay or be sent to a collection agency. It is often difficult for people who make payments to various courts and unless they make all the payments, they may not be able to get their license back. A unified payment system would also them to make one payment which would be distributed to jurisdictions, making it easier for defendants to manage and establish an amount and increasing the likelihood of collecting some money versus no money. There are also bills related to Driving with License Suspended 3, one version decriminalizes it only in certain circumstances. Similar bills have been proposed for several years. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed the legislature has been discussing criminal justice reform during at least the past two sessions. Councilmember Teitzel commented in some instances community service may be deemed an appropriate restitution for minor crimes. He asked what proportion of defendants who are sentenced to community Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 6 Packet Pg. 11 4.2.a service do not complete it. Judge Coburn said a significant number complete it but the alternative if they don't depends on how it was imposed. For example if jail time was converted to community service, they go to jail if they do not complete their community service. Councilmember Teitzel assumed it was a fairly small percentage of defendants that do not complete community service. Mr. Gamez said most defendants complete community service. Councilmember Nelson asked about the concept of mobile court. Judge Coburn explained Edmonds' courthouse is located in downtown which is great except it is not close to a major transportation hub and there is only one bus route down Main Street. That is significant because a high percentage of those in the criminal justice system are poor/indigent and a high percentage do not have a car or a driver's license. The more difficult it is to get to court, the more often they miss court and the more often they miss court, the more bench warrants are issued, the more bench warrants there are, the more people there are in jail and the more money the City spends to keep people in jail. Some of that could have been avoided if coming to court were easier. Another issue is the underlying issues of people involved in the criminal justice — addiction, mental health, requirements for tests, etc. When those conditions are not followed, a review hearing is held which requires them to come to downtown Edmonds. If they do not appear, the same cycle occurs. Judge Coburn explained the idea of community court is having court at least once in a while in a place that is easily accessible to the people who are involved in the criminal justice system. Edmonds encompasses a large area and extends beyond Hwy 9. A concept is being investigated whereby review hearings would be held on or near Hwy 99, making it easily accessible due to the numerous bus routes on Hwy 99. Such a location would also be closer to social service providers, substance abuse counselors, mental health counselors, testing, other agencies, etc. If all those services were available nearby the mobile court, it is a possibility when people come to the review hearing, all their issues could be addressed at that time and it would advance the reason why they are on probation. She summarized the hope was mobile court would, 1) address issues, 2) reduce the likelihood of them committing new crimes, and 3) reduce the need for them to spend time in jail. With the technology available today and efforts being tried in other jurisdictions, it is worthwhile investigating whether it would be beneficial to the City. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Judge Coburn's report and the statement, "According to the auditor's report, if local authorities across the state released all 2,300 lower -risk defendants through pretrial services, savings would total more than $6.1 million annually. If they also released the 2,400 higher -risk defendants through pretrial services, taxpayers would save an additional $6.4 million annually. She recognized Edmonds did not have a formal process but the Court currently squeezed pretrial services out of the existing one probation officer position. She asked if another probation officer was needed to assist in providing those services. Judge Coburn said she could always use a second probation officer. As the Court transitions to paperless and as staff s duties change, that is the time to analyze tasks and possibly devote more time to pretrial services. She will always do the maximum with what she has. The jail budget is not in the Court's budget. Although she does not consider jail costs in sentencing, the reality is those are costs, and the Court needs to be thoughtful in making decisions that are practical, beneficial and the most cost effective. Councilmember Mesaros commented pretrial services have economic benefits for the City as well as society at large. Keeping someone in their job benefits that individual as well as their employer as training someone to do their work is a cost to employer, a cost to the employee, a cost to the City which in total is a large societal cost. Investing in more staff support for the Court could be beneficial to the City. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Kari Marino, Bellevue, representing Verizon Wireless, commented getting this right is critical for citizens and businesses. Small wireless facilities are the basis for allowing wireless data service to expand where Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 7 Packet Pg. 12 4.2.a and when it's needed. Wireless data service is the way Smartphones provides critical services such as Goggle Maps navigation, video doorbell applications, wireless credit card payments, and personal conveniences such as fast video downloads, medical monitoring and ready access to the internet. It is also the foundation for 5G technology as it evolves and is deployed. She appreciated the Planning Board's careful deliberation and clear guidance to mitigate the risk related to the hierarchy suggested for small wireless facilities deployment locations. Small wireless facilities are generally designed to be deployed in the right-of-way and other locations are generally not feasible. Verizon will never consider installation of small wireless facilities on single family homes for both safety and logistical reasons. The Planning Board brought a common sense perspective to the possible negative community reaction to new poles in residential front yards. Staff has done extensive investigation on many aspects of small wireless facilities. Verizon is ready to work together to finalize a code that allows a clear path forward that's FCC compliant and that reflects the aesthetic values of Edmonds. She looked forward to collaborating on a deployment plan that serves citizens and businesses. She was available to staff for any necessary support to ensure a mutually beneficial outcome. Richard Bologna, Edmonds, commented Edmonds' population is approximately 41,500 with an average household size of 2.25, and the median annual household income is $76,000. Edmonds needs more low income housing as evidenced by the homeless, mentally ill, drug addicts and others that can be seen on the Hwy 99 corridor. In Edmonds, it is a supply and demand issue. Many people are moving into Snohomish County, but the number of housing units is not increasing which has led to steep hikes in rental prices. The rent for a 2 bedroom 1 bathroom apartment in Edmonds increased from $975/month in 2017 to $1225/month. The solution is to increase low income housing. The cost of housing in Edmonds has outpaced wages; to afford the rent on an average 2 bedroom apartment in Edmonds, one needs to earn at least $29/hour. The frail, disabled, elderly, drug addicts and chronic alcoholics will never get back into or compete in this workforce. People without housing are more likely to commit crimes, which requires the City to invest more in the criminal justice and hospitals. Wendy Shaw, Edmonds, read a letter sent to the Council yesterday regarding the proposed Citizen Housing Commission that was signed by 30 residents. As residents of Edmonds we are encouraged by the Council's current intent to create a Citizens Housing Commission as outlined in the agenda packet for the March 19' City Council meeting agenda packet. We request that the Council make creating this commission one of its top priority this spring with a goal of having it in place by June. Do not delay establishing this commission in order to capitalize on the momentum, public interest and input that has been generated by this important citywide issue. It is clear many Edmonds residents are interested and willing to participate in developing housing policy options for Council consideration. By including more residents in the process, it is our hope the commission will include a comprehensive cross section of Edmonds residents including a ratio of owners to renters which reflects the current mix in the City. Hopefully this will result in providing the Council with realistic housing policy options that will expand the supply of housing options while maintaining Edmonds' character and quality of life. We also encourage Council to direct the commission to consider all the infrastructure and needed service implications of any housing policy recommendation it creates in addition to being informed of current housing stock. We are encouraged by the City's intent to have the commission report progress to Council quarterly and host regular public outreach sessions. In order to broaden the pool of participants in the commission, we recommend those selected be residents not currently serve on any City boards or commissions and have not for the last two years. We also recommend the Council select alternates from each zone in case those selected are not able to complete their term of service. Regarding the outstanding questions of whether to use an outside facilitator, we recommend the Council first try to recruit a local, experienced person who is committed to an unbiased process. We also encourage the Council and Mayor to underwrite the postcard mailer to all households in Edmonds. The mailer should be unbiased and encourage open, thoughtful and original responses. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 8 Packet Pg. 13 4.2.a Dawn McCluskey, Edmonds, thanked the Tree Board for their presentation. In addition to new trees, she recommended consideration be given to old growth trees in the City. She was concern with new development where old homes are torn down and all the trees on the property, including 40-60 foot tall trees, are leveled. A prime example is the property at 9' & Pine where the entire lot was cleared. She assumed 4 lots planned on property at 7' & Spruce would be zero lot line and result in removal of all the trees including at least 5 that are over 50 feet tall. She suggested the Tree Board meet with the builder during the planning stage and request some of the trees be retained if possible. 7. ACTION ITEM 1. SEAVIEW PARK PLAYGROUND BID Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite introduced Deputy Parks Director Shannon Burley, advising this is her first project. Ms. Burley reviewed: • Background o Seaview Playground is 18 years old and was slated for replacement in 2019. Council adopted the replacement of the Seaview Park playground in the 2019 CIP and authorized a budget of $120,000 o Councilmember Nelson sought feedback on Parks and met with The Kuehn Family (Seaview residents) about the need for inclusive playgrounds in Edmonds o Following his research, Councilmember Nelson spearheaded a budget amendment to increase accessibility in our playgrounds o Council awarded this budget amendment of $200,000 to support development of inclusive playgrounds • Inclusive Play o Addressing the diverse developmental needs of children in our community by ensuring children of all abilities can interact, learn and play while nurturing physical, social -emotional, sensory, cognitive and communicative skill development • Process o Parks Department toured inclusive playgrounds January 16, 2019 o Issues the RFP on 1/22/19 o Received 11 submissions for review from 6 different manufacturers o Consulted Parks Department and two families that have children that would benefit from this playground ■ Narrowed to 3 options o Public vote on top 3 options ■ February 27 — March 1, 2019 ■ 899 unique respondents (in person and online ■ 349 from Seaview neighborhood ■ 397 comments • Winning Playground: AllPlay Systems o Cozy spots ■ Offering quiet or semi -enclosed places such as the crawl tube and SpinMAX pod provide areas where children can seek sensory relief o Social activities ■ Encouraging cooperation, the activity panels create social dialog through fantasy play. ■ These custom inclusive play panels offer a large variety of play opportunities while providing space for adaptive devices o Swinging ■ The Adaptive Swing features a molded seat, high back, adjustable harness and neutral body position Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 9 Packet Pg. 14 4.2.a ■ The Disk Swing allows multiple users and/or care givers to have fun and develop while body awareness o No fault safety surface ■ Latex free, non -toxic, no loose rubber specs ■ Porous & slip resistant, seamless & ADA accessible ■ Recycled / environmentally friendly, LEED compliant ■ 6-8' fall protection based on location ■ IPEMA certified and ASTM, CPSC compliant ■ Low maintenance, proven durability ■ Synthetic rubber top, bound by polyurethane o Climbing ■ Provides necessary development benefits such as balance, agility, upper and lower body strength and decision making skills ■ When children climb they develop confidence ad take age appropriate risk that help build skills to help them throughout their lives o Swinging ■ 4 belt swings will be added near the playground to serve the older children ■ In total the park will have the following swings - 4 belt swings - 1 toddler bucket swing - 1 ADA swing - 1 multi -purpose disc swing ■ The previous design had 3 belt swings and 1 toddler swing Finances o $209,908.62 for the project o Utilizing $90,000 of the $200,000 set aside to ensure fall surface is inclusive o Fall surface material and playground equipment cost about the same amount o Reminder is freight, tax, demo and installation • Additional upgrades o Planning improvements to the path from parking to the playground o Removal of trees that are damaging the sewer line and sidewalk. Replanting with the right trees in the right place. o Additional striping / marking of ADA parking spaces o Seaview restrooms were refurbished in 2018 o Seaview tennis courts will be resurfaced in 2019 • Timeline 0 8 weeks to manufacture equipment o Goal to install late May, prior to summer o Request bid be moved to consent agenda at the next meeting authorizing the Mayor to sign Council President Fraley-Monillas thanked staff for their efforts and Councilmember Nelson for his suggestions. As a Councilmember with a child with intellectual disabilities, she noted it can be difficult sometimes to have a child with intellectual or physical disabilities and even more challenging to normalize their world. She asked if the cozy spot could be bigger so parents could use them. She recognized the cozy spot would be great for those on the autism spectrum or who need relief from the noise. Councilmember Nelson commented every child should have an opportunity to play on a playground and it warmed his heart to see this come to life. He thanked Ms. Burley for her work. Councilmember Tibbott commented the playground design looks like fun and he anticipated the kids would enjoy it. He asked if the intent was to have the patterns on the surface that are shown in the illustration. Ms. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 10 Packet Pg. 15 4.2.a Burley said once the bid is approved, there will be an opportunity to look at the colors of the play structure and the fall materials. At this point there is some natural design that includes a stream and natural colors. Councilmember Tibbott observed the design on the surface could add to play dimension of playground and suggested adding hopscotch or foursquare to the graphic. He summarized the playground was a good idea and adds another dimension to play capabilities. He lives near Seaview Park and looked forward to seeing the playground installed. Councilmember Mesaros commented Seaview is a neighborhood park and it would be nice to see this inclusive approach in the City's destination parks as well. He asked how destination parks could be revamped to be inclusive and available to all residents and businesses. Ms. Hite said the Council included $200,000 in the 2019 budget; $90,000 of that was used for Seaview, leaving $110,000. Consideration will be given to other playgrounds as well as including an inclusive playground in Civic Park which will be a regional destination. One playground is replaced each year; funding in the CIP can include inclusive playground materials. Councilmember Mesaros realized it would take time to make the City's playground inclusive but it would be nice to include it in the CIP to illustrate the progress of improving parks. Councilmember Nelson said his intent was for this to be the start. Seaview was selected because it was the next playground to be upgraded. As playgrounds are upgraded each year, they could include inclusive playground materials. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO FORWARD THIS TO THE CONSENT AGENDA. Councilmember Teitzel relayed the presentation is very complete, he loved the design, and the financing package was complete. He was prepared to approve the proposal and bid as presented. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL AND BID AS PRESENTED AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SING THE CONTRACT. Ms. Hite thanked Council President Fraley-Monillas for allowing staff to bring this to full Council when they missed the Council committee meeting. Staff wanted to get the order placed so it can be installed this summer. Knowing the Council likes to have two touches before approving an item, it was planned to go to the Consent Agenda next week. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.' VOTE ON MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. E. WORKS/BARKER LANDSCAPE AMENDMENT #2 Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite explained this is an amendment to the contract for design services for the Waterfront Redevelopment in front of the Senior Center. The City hired Barker Landscape who has since merged with Environmental Works. The amendments change the name to Environmental Works/Barker Landscape and add $108,000 to their contract for design of the frontage improvements and the parking lot as approved by the Council in fall 2018. There is also an enhanced electrical design package due to interest from Parks and the Senior Center to add lighting to the parking lot to avoid any pedestrian safety issues in the parking lot with increased use of the Waterfront Center in the evening. There is budget authority within the current budget for the amendment based on Council action in fall 2018 and the 2019 budget. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 11 Packet Pg. 16 4.2.a Councilmember Teitzel clarified this proposal was decoupled from the Ebbtide walkway project. Ms. Hite agreed it does not include funds for the Ebbtide walkway. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE AMENDMENT #2 WITH ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS/BARKER LANDSCAPE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. STUDY ITEMS 3. REPORT ON BIDS FOR THE DAYTON STREET UTILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT Public Works Director Phil Williams relayed this was intended to be an action item. City Engineer Rob English explained this project includes rehabilitating and replacing water, sewer and storm utilities in the corridor. The project was initiated in August 2013 when a storm event caused a great deal of flooding downtown. That led to a study where evaluation of the storm drain system found several sections were under capacity and in need of replacement. In addition, the water and sewer pipes were installed in the 1920s — 1940s. That work was coupled with replacement of the storm drain to create one utility replacement project along the Dayton Street corridor. He reviewed: • Scope o Replace storm and water between 3rd & 9t' ■ 3800 feet water main ■ 3200 feet storm lines o Replace sewer between 3rd & 5th. o Rehabilitate sewer between 5th & 9th with trenchless cured -in place pipe process. o ADA Ramps at intersections of 6th, 7th, 8th & 9th. o Add sidewalk to the gap between 7th & 8th (450 feet) o Reconfigure intersection of 8th & Dayton ■ Bulb outs to house ADA ramps ■ Rebuild traffic circle o Full street reconstruction between 3rd & 6th o Pavement overlay between 6th & 9th Construction Schedule o Phase 1 (2019 Spring to Fall) ■ Construction between 3rd (west of) and 5th ■ Contractor Option Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) work east of 5th. o Phase 2 (2020 Spring to Fall) ■ Between 5th & 9th • Bid results Contractor Bid Results Amount Shoreline Construction $6,141,084 Karvel Construction $7,204,417 Engineers Estimate $6,777,231 • Construction Budget Description Amount Contract Award $6,141,084 Management Reserve (15%)* $921 200 Construction Mgmt, Inspection & Testing (15%) $92,200 Total $7,983,484 *Due to age of corridor Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 12 Packet Pg. 17 4.2.a • Construction Funding Funding Amount Water Utility Fund $2,741,035 Storm Utility Fund $2,734,890 Sewer Utility Fund $3,414,805 REET* *$160,000 TIB Complete Streets Grant** **$250,000 Total $9,300,730 *Street reconstruction between 5` & 6th **The range TIB has provided for the City's grant amount is $150,000 to $250,000. TIB is expected to announce the final amount in late March • Staff recommendation o Award a Contract to Shoreline Construction for $6,141,084 o Authorize a 15% Management Reserve of $921,200 Mr. Williams said the project will not include the following because there is no funding: • Replace the existing sidewalks on both sides of Dayton • Undergrounding utilities Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the REET funds were from REET 126. Mr. English answered it would be programmed from next year's overlay; there is $450,000 in REET 125 or $300,000 in REET 126. Councilmember Buckshnis said it was her understanding only REET 126 could be used for streets. Mr. English answered it could be funded from either. Councilmember Teitzel said this project was presented to the Parks & Public Works Committee last week; he and Councilmember Johnson had an opportunity to ask a number of technical and funding related questions and concluded the proposal was well put together and the funding appropriate. It is a major project so they directed it be presented to full Council. He relayed his support for the project. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if a 15% management reserve was typical. Mr. Williams answered it varies depending on the scope. This project includes unbuttoning the street from 3' to 9t1i; it is an old street with a lot of old utilities and may have abandoned utilities. Potholing was done to investigate but once the pavement is opened, some unexpected things may be discovered. He concluded the recommended 15% was reasonable. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked why the management reserve wasn't included in the contract. Mr. Williams said the intent was not to give the money to the contractor. This was basically the City's change purse so if unexpected costs arise, a change order can be executed and funds are available up to the limits in the purchasing policy. Council President Fraley-Monillas summarized 15% for this size project was normal. Mr. Williams said yes for this type of construction and the amount of underground risk. Councilmember Tibbott commented on the potential impact on businesses when the street is closed. He appreciated that the construction was being phased and asked if any of the management reserve could be used to keep access to businesses open. Mr. Williams said the intent is to have one lane of traffic open throughout construction although there could be an occasional day when that is not possible. If there is a need to deviate from that, the Council will be informed. They will also inform the public that businesses are open particularly during the first phase from 3' to 6t''. Several meetings have been held with businesses in the area to explain. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there was any intent to add vaults to capture water and allow it to percolate or would the water go straight into Puget Sound. Mr. Williams answered it will go the same place it goes Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 13 Packet Pg. 18 4.2.a now but via larger pipes and conveyance structures so it does not stay on the streets. The project does not include any infiltration galleries in the street. Councilmember Mesaros asked if the Council was authorizing the 15% Construction Management, Inspection and Testing tonight. Mr. English answered it is part of the budget; awarding the contract tonight includes construction management. Councilmember Mesaros asked what the scope of the budget would be if sidewalks and underground wiring were included. Mr. Williams answered it would be a very sizeable amount. Undergrounding of approximately 100 feet on each leg of the intersection at 76t' and 212" 100 feet cost approximately $750,000. Sidewalks cost at least $300/foot; the length of the project is 3,800 feet x $300 x 2. Councilmember Mesaros summarized it would more than double the budget. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE DAYTON STREET UTILITY PROJECT AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. Councilmember Johnson discontinued her participation by phone. 1. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION ON THE PLANNING BOARD'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE SMALL CELL UPDATE TO THE WIRELESS REGULATIONS IN CHAPTER 20.50 OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE Planner Mike Clugston reviewed: Project timeline: o January 15' — Council introduction o February 12' — Public hearing, approved interim ordinance o February 13' — Planning Board reviewed interim ordinance o February 27t' — Public hearing at Planning Board, forwarded recommendation to Council o March 19t' — Council discussion of Planning Board recommendation o March 26t' — Council public hearing on updated regulations o April 2" d — Updated ordinance on Consent for approval or sooner: Hearing before City Council o April 14t' — Local jurisdictions to have small cell aesthetic rules in place Small Cell is ... Antennas, Equipment & Support Structure o What? ■ Height — 50 ft +/- ■ Each antenna — 3 ft3 max ■ Equipment — 28 ft3 max ■ 4G now, 5G in future o Why, Where, How? ■ Off load macro service (capacity) & provide new coverage in some areas ■ Need to provide siting options across the City ■ Minimize visual impact - Appearance (camouflage, concealment) - Location (ROW, zoned) How to do Small Cell in Edmonds...? o Residential Areas with underground utilities o Commercial areas with underground utilities o Areas with existing air space clutter Interim Ordinance Location Priorities (Ord. 4141, February 12, 2019) Locate Outside the Right -of -Way Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 14 Packet Pg. 19 4.2.a 1. Existing building 2. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole (not on BD -zoned property) Locate Within the Right -of -Way 3. Existing or replaced Street Light Pole or Utility Pole (hollow poles) 4. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole or Street Light 5. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation on top of pole) 6. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation in communication space) 7. Strand -mounted (installation in communication space) Staff Recommendation at Planning Board (February 27, 2019) Locate Outside the Right -of -Way — locations are generally not technologically feasible 2. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole (not on BD -zoned property) Locate Within the Ri t-of-Way 3. Existing or replaced Street Light Pole or Utility Pole (hollow poles) 4. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole or Street Light 5. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation on top of pole) 6. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation in communication space) 7. Strand -mounted (installation in communication space) Planning Board Recommendation (February 27, 2019) Locate Outside the Right -of -Way Optional 1. Existing building 2. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole (not o BD zoned p pefty) Locate Within the Right -of -Way 3. Existing or replaced Street Light Pole or Utility Pole (hollow poles) 5. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation on top of pole) 4. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole or Street Light 6. Existing PUD Power Pole (installation in communication space) 7. Strand -mounted (installation in communication space) Planning Board Recommendation — February 27, 2019 o Locate small cell on zoned properties as an optional choice o Install antennas on top of wood poles prior to installing new freestanding small cell poles o Incorporate a public notification process if possible o Incorporate additional discretion for Director to approve innovative solutions of a similar scale and character Public Input Received o Two 5G-health comments at Planning Board public hearing o No studies have been done by FCC or other agencies on 5G-health o City of Portland passed resolution on March 13, 2019 asking FCC to consider 5G-health impacts o Existing FCC guidance applies and prohibits jurisdictions from regulating based on health if wireless providers comply with the guidance — staff verifies compliance during permit review New Information from Wireless Providers and Concealment Vendors o Preferred small cell height is 20' - 40' o Locating on SF residential structures is technologically impractical o Small cell on zoned property can be effective where buildings are close to ROW o Technology exists and/or is being developed to fully conceal 4G and 5G small cell installations (multiple providers and technologies in one structure) Development Program Manager Jeanie McConnell explained in addition to meeting with wireless providers and concealment vendors, staff also met with PUD. The preferred location for wireless vendors is to locate Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 15 Packet Pg. 20 on existing PUD poles. PUD has received applications and has developed policies. Ms. McConnell reviewed: • New information from PUD o Currently allow only one wireless provider to attach to a wood utility pole o Many wood poles in Edmonds are `full' and prevent installation of a wireless facility o Replacement of a wood pole with a new hollow pole (allowing for full concealment) could open up opportunities for small cell installations o Only qualified PUD line workers can perform work in supply space o PUD work on poles requires de-energization of cell equipment o Power shut down required for some work on cell facilities o PUD Engineering working on street light/small cell design • Wood Pole Replacement Option o Photograph - existing wood pole on Main Street o Photo simulation - Replacement with Steel pole (photo simulation) • Wood Power Pole vs Hollow Power Pole o Photograph - Small cell on wood power pole o Photo simulation - Small cell within a hollow power pole • Light Pole - Full Concealed o Photograph of small cell fully enclosed in a street light pole (Market Street in Kirkland) o Photograph of standard light pole (no small cell) • Camouflage on Existing Wood Utility Pole o Photographs of existing site and proposed site o Antennas visible on pole, conduit running up the side, equipment box on exterior o Painted brown to match wood pole • Small Cell Facility Options 1. Hollow Power Pole - full concealment 2. Freestanding Small cell - full concealment 3. Wood Power Pole - installation on top of pole 4. Wood Power Pole - installation in communication space 5. Stand Mount - attachment to wires Mr. Clugston reviewed: • Next Steps o Council to provide guidance on Location Priorities ■ Follow Planning Board guidance? - Remove Zoned Properties from the priority list and establish as Optional Only? - Swap #4 (freestanding small cell) and 45 (install on top of PUD wood power pole)? ■ Provide new ranking for location priorities? o Staff to update Interim Ordinance 4141 based on Council guidance o Council Public Hearing on March 26 o Local Jurisdictions to have aesthetic regulations in place by April 14, 2019 City Attorney Jeff Taraday emphasized the Council giving direction regarding their aesthetic preferences does not mean they are a fan of small cell. Councilmembers can be concerned about certain aspects of small cell, but an aesthetic choice needs to be made tonight. If the Council does not make the aesthetic choice, it will be made by the industry. The Council can give staff direction for drafting an ordinance the Council is comfortable with aesthetically; absent an ordinance, the industry will decide what the City looks like with regard to small cell. Councilmember Nelson referred to the FCC's aesthetic requirements: reasonable, no more burdensome than those applied to other types of infrastructure deployments, and published in advance. With that in mind, the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 16 Packet Pg. 21 4.2.a options are not as crucial compared to how many small cell facilities there will be and how big they will be. He referred to page 35 of the interim ordinance, Location Preference #2, Dimensional Requirements, a) a free-standing small cell may not exceed 30 feet in height from the top of foundation to top of the cantenna. The presentation indicated the preferred height was 20-40 feet. He asked if 30 feet was selected as an average. Mr. Clugston agreed it was at that time. Councilmember Nelson said if the industry's preferred height is 20-40 feet, he recommended 20 feet. Councilmember Nelson referred to placement requirements. Freestanding small cells shall be located as follows: Item I states no two freestanding small cell poles may be located within 300 lineal feet of each other as measured along the right-of-way line. He asked how that differed from the City of Denver that has a radius requirement versus the proposed lineal requirement. If two streets were parallel or crossing each other, he asked if there was a possibility they would be within 300 feet of each other. Mr. Taraday explained that placement requirement was drafted that way because it was staff's understanding small cell signals are weak enough they will not wrap around corners. To the extent a provider is trying to provide coverage within a right-of-way corridor, the relevant spacing is within that corridor. Whether it was possible at an intersection that one pole would go one way and another the other way, he agreed that was true and staff could tweak that in the code. Councilmember Nelson relayed Denver has a 250 foot radius requirement. Councilmember Nelson hoped in exchange for the use of the public right-of-way, the City was considering negotiating free or discounted service for schools, library, the ECA and other public entities that benefit the community. Councilmember Buckshnis preferred the free-standing small cell full concealment because it looks better. She recalled an issue with the master service agreement that allowed only one wireless provider per pole. She asked if it had been determined that all wireless providers could be located in one hollow pole. Mr. Clugston said in speaking with concealment providers, multiple providers can fit in some of concealment solutions and multiple 4G and 5G technology. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled Verizon stated they would not share their siting information. She asked if master agreements and mapping would be provided by all providers in order to determine how many poles will be deployed. She anticipated it would be more than 1,000. Mr. Taraday said no applications have been submitted and none of the three carriers have asked for a master use permit for the entire City; he suspected they were waiting until the ordinance is final. With regard to the number of poles, it depends on the timeline. In 50 years, the number could be huge. Councilmember Buckshnis said the current timeline is the next 3-5 years. Mr. Taraday said there was not a good way to estimate the number poles but no applications have been submitted. He approached this from the assumption that someday there would be small cell facilities on every block; 5G technology will be used to power self -driving cars; that will not work unless the service is everywhere. He said it should be assumed at some point they will be everywhere. Councilmember Buckshnis asked why rooftop pods or cupolas or wall mounted galleries have not been considered, noting the discussion has primarily been about hollow poles other than building near the post office with multiple antennas. Mr. Clugston agreed the Harbor Building was not a good look. The Planning Board's recommendation is to remove zoned property from the first choice, but it is still an option. Where buildings are close to the right-of-way, mounting antennas close to the roof edge or the side of building may be option in some areas. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the reason the Planning Board recommended removing locations outside of the right-of-way was because wireless providers would have to pay a fee to the property owner. Mr. Taraday said the pole owner will still be able to charge a modest fee. With regard to eliminating the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 17 Packet Pg. 22 4.2.a on -the -building option, the City hired its own RF engineer and learned that because of the way antennas transmit, if an antenna is mounted on a building, the residents of the building would not benefit from the signal. The assumption in the interim ordinance was property owners may be interested in hosting an antenna to have better access/coverage. That still could be true with the free standing pole in a front yard but the more staff talked to the RF engineer, they realized the people inside the building where an antenna is mounted will not benefit from it and the amount of money they can charge is probably very insignificant. Councilmember Buckshnis asked who will pay for the pole, whether it would be PUD and passed on to the ratepayer. Mr. Taraday said that is between PUD and the carriers to figure out but it won't be the City. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked for clarification why the Planning Board recommended removing locating on an existing building on private property. Mr. Clugston said staff learned from the City's wireless consultant that that was not feasible given the technology and strength of wireless signal in areas where there are setbacks. Where buildings are closer to the right-of-way, that could still be an option. Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed questions at the Planning Board such as what happened if there was an antenna on a building and the property was sold. She summarized not all the answers are available. Mr. Clugston agreed not all the questions have been answered, but with the information available, having zoned property as an option would work in some instances but would not be appropriate for all. That was why the Planning Board moved it out of the "required to look at places." The Planning Board's focus was on solutions within the right-of-way. Council President Fraley-Monillas preferred carriers be required to first look at private property. She agreed in many instances, that would not be an option. If she had to choose between the freestanding small cell facility options, she preferred 1 and 3. She found it presumptuous of the Planning Board to assume the facilities would be located in the public right-of-way considering there could be thousands of poles. Councilmember Teitzel said as an elected official, one of his primary responsibilities was the safety and well-being of his constituents in Edmonds. That is not necessarily the FCC's responsibility; they regulate communication technologies.. He asked the legal effects of the resolution that Portland passed regarding the potential health effects of small cell and whether Portland halted any deployments until that was resolved. Mr. Taraday explained Portland's resolution (8.1.k in the Council packet) is basically asking the FCC to update studies on potential health concerns arising from RF wireless emissions and to make their findings publicly available and to send the resolution Oregon's congressional delegation. Edmonds could adopt a similar resolution. There is nothing illegal about the resolution but it does not change the way small cell is regulated. It would just express concern about the health impacts and ask the FCC to pay attention and study it further. Councilmember Teitzel summarized Portland's resolution had no immediate effect relative to the April deadline to enact code changes. Mr. Taraday agreed it did not. Councilmember Teitzel asked if any other cities in Washington had raised the same health issue. Mr. Taraday said a number of cities in the United States have sued the FCC to challenge the order; some of those petitions raised health as basis for the concern. That lawsuit is pending in the 9t1i Circuit. There is some potential the court could order some relief. He was uncertain if any other Washington cities had adopted a resolution similar to Portland's. Hypothetically if the FCC paid attention to Portland's resolution and commissioned a study that determined 5G technology has a human health risk, Councilmember Teitzel asked if the FCC would halt further deployments or reverse those that had been installed. Mr. Taraday said what the FCC would do with that type of information would be speculation. He would like to think they would act responsibly and regulate in a way that's appropriate given whatever the health impact might be because they are statutorily charged with protecting the public from RF emission, but it does not appear they are that concerned about public interest. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 18 Packet Pg. 23 4.2.a Councilmember Teitzel was interested in at least making an attempt to raise that issue and get on record that Edmonds has a concern. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO DEVELOP A RESOLUTION SIMILAR TO PORTLAND'S EXPRESSING EDMONDS' CONCERN WITH HEALTH EFFECTS OF 5G WIRELESS AND ASK THE FCC TO COMMISSION STUDIES TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS HARM. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Mesaros asked how many existing power and street light poles there were in the City. Public Works Director Phil Williams said there are approximately 6,000 poles. Councilmember Mesaros asked how many existing cell towers there are. Mr. Clugston said there are 24 cell sites. Councilmember Mesaros referred to the freestanding small cell facility options, commenting there was one that looked like #2 in his neighborhood in Arizona. Scottsdale will be one of the pioneer cities for 5G for Verizon; option 2 is the primary one they use. His neighborhood in Scottsdale is newer and has underground wiring and the only poles are street lights which makes it easier to erect freestanding small cell poles because there is not the clutter of utility poles. He preferred options 1 and 2. Although many are interested in undergrounding utilities, the cost is prohibitive. With regard to Councilmember Nelson's suggestion to limit poles to 20 feet, Councilmember Mesaros preferred the flexibility of 20-25 feet. In a particular location with an obstructive view, 25 feet may be the appropriate height. Mr. Taraday assumed the height limit was related to free standing small cell poles. Councilmember Mesaros agreed. Mr. Taraday said part of the thinking of the 20-40 foot height limit was a pole at 30 feet would likely be tall enough to contain two carriers. When carriers share poles, they share it vertically; the taller a pole is, the more carriers can share one pole. A 20-foot pole would likely be a one carrier pole. He was not certain how tall a pole for two or three carriers would need to be but there is a relationship between height and the potential to share. Councilmember Mesaros summarized the shorter the pole, the more poles there would be. Mr. Taraday said that would be his assumption. Councilmember Mesaros asked if there was a way to get that data in order to make a good choice about pole height. Mr. Taraday said the more carriers that locate in one pole, the wider the pole also needs to be. Councilmember Mesaros asked if was two inches or two feet wider. Mr. Clugston did not know. He pointed out the FCC has said small cell could be up to 50 feet. Councilmember Mesaros asked the typical height of a utility pole in Edmonds. Ms. McConnell said an average of 45 feet. Councilmember Mesaros asked the approximate height of the poles in option 1 and 2. Ms. McConnell said while graphically they look about the same height, option 1, the hollow power pole, is approximately 40-45 and the free standing small cell is approximately 25-30 feet. Councilmember Mesaros observed the freestanding small cell is being used as a street light as well as a utility pole and the light shouldn't be at 20 feet. He summarized there are too many unknowns. Councilmember Tibbott said he and Councilmember Teitzel took a field trip to Seattle to look at installations and found it very instructive to see how they are set up. Of the three sites they visited, two had new poles, in one case there was a new pole next to an existing pole and both were full of utility equipment. One of the conclusions he reached was whenever utility companies are putting up new poles, the City should require it be a hollow pole. He liked the order of the poles on the small cell facilities options slide. The illustration with a cantenna on the top is better than what they saw in Seattle which looked more like option 4. He was not certain what language to include in the ordinance to require a hollow pole when a pole is replaced. Councilmember Tibbott relayed he also noticed 3-5 different strands of conduit on a single pole such as is illustrated on option 3 and actually option 3 is a minimalistic compared to what they saw in Seattle. He Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 19 Packet Pg. 24 4.2.a summarized if there was conduit, he preferred it be in one bunch versus individual strands. Councilmember Tibbott asked if the five photos on the Small Cell Facility Options page was the proposed order in the ordinance. Ms. McConnell answered yes, and those are focused on installations within the right-of-way and as recommended by Planning Board locations outside the right-of-way would only be an option. Mr. Taraday said staff s current recommendation is the order shown on the Small Cell Facility Options page in the presentation. The order in the Planning Board's recommendation, 1, 3, 2, 4, 5, is slightly different. Councilmember Tibbott said option 2 could potentially be on private property. He noted there are examples in the Pt. Edwards neighborhood where there are free standing poles and underground utilities. With regard to the Sternberg lighting on Main Street, Councilmember Tibbott was adamantly opposed to adding anything to those whether it was a cantenna on top or a box the outside. He did not see that restriction in the ordinance. The exception would be if all the Sternberg were replaced with a new standard that facilitated 5G installations and all were identical. Councilmember Teitzel referred to option 2 and asked if that was for a single small cell carrier. Ms. McConnel assumed the graphic was only one but that did not mean a freestanding small cell would be limited to one carrier. Councilmember Teitzel asked how it would look if two other carriers wanted to share that freestanding small cell, whether there would be boxes on the pole. Ms. McConnel said the intent for a free standing small cell, whether one carrier or multiple, would be concealment within pole. Councilmember Teitzel asked how the cantenna worked with more than one carrier using the freestanding pole. Ms. McConnell said vertical height is critical to allow stacking of multiple antennas on top. Councilmember Teitzel asked where the small cell equipment box was in option 2, noting he and Councilmember Tibbott saw rectangular small cell equipment boxes approximately 1 % x 3 feet on the poles in Seattle. Ms. McConnell did not know where it was located in that graphic; that is an image found on the web. It was her understanding freestanding small cells can be designed to house the equipment on the interior of the pole. Councilmember Nelson was reminded of a Donald Rumsfeld press briefing where he talked about known unknowns. He noted there was nothing in the materials about fees and he hoped there would be a cost study that included the City's costs for reviewing applications, field inspections, installations, repair, administration, public notification, etc. especially when there was a very limited timeframe to comply and it was unknown/unclear how many applications there would be and whether the City would need to hire additional staff. He said Denver's guidelines were very helpful in that they included a lot of visual explanations versus Edmonds' written explanation in the ordinance. He suggested having more visuals so it is clear what the City's wants esthetically. Council President Fraley-Monillas summarized there did not seem to be resolution among Councilmembers and there were still a lot of questions. She asked what staff planned to return with next week. Mr. Clugston said staff will try to incorporate the guidance Council provided into an updated ordinance for public hearing next week. Mr. Taraday invited the Council to make motions to clarify the drafting of an ordinance, noting the Planning Board's recommendation is different than the Small Cell Facility Options slide. His request for a motion was not to bind the Council to ultimately adopt that ordinance but to provide staff some direction regarding drafting the ordinance. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested staff return with answers to the Council's questions next week and the Council could make motions then. Mr. Taraday said there are several questions staff is unable to answer, such as how many poles there will be. With regard to aesthetics, the Council can choose the ranking on the Small Cell Facility Options page or the Planning Board ranking. What staff learned from the concealment vendor is that most of the facilities will be designed to the City's standards not vice versa; there is not a pole manufacture that has just what the City is looking for. The City is giving the providers Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 20 Packet Pg. 25 4.2.a an idea of what they want to see and they will design a pole that works for that. For example, the wood replacement pole in option 1 does not exist now but can be designed and manufactured. He summarized it is a complex ordnance and needs to be adopted by April 2' to have any validity. He was not happy to put the Council in this position but it is the FCC's order. He wanted to put the City in a position to actually regulate small cell instead of allowing small cell to regulate itself. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO ACCEPT STAFF RECOMMENDATION AS OUTLINED ON THIS PAGE (SMALL CELL FACILITY OPTIONS) FOR THE AESTHETIC ELEMENT IN THE CURRENT ORDINANCE. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked for clarification. Councilmember Buckshnis said there are so many unknowns but she wanted the best aesthetics for the City and felt the order on the Small Cell Facility Option page was better than the Planning Board's recommendation. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, THAT FOR FREE STANDING SINGLE CELL TOWERS WHICH MAY HAVE MULTIPLE ANTENNAS (FREESTANDING MEANS DO NOT HAVE STREET LIGHTS AND ARE NOT UTILITY POLES) BE LIMITED IN HEIGHT FROM 20 TO 25 FEET UNTIL MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE ABOUT MULTIPLE TOWERS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED TO INCLUDE IN THE ORDINANCE THAT PROVIDERS LOOK AT USING PRIVATE PROPERTY AND IF THAT IS NOT WORKABLE, GO TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. 2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING: ESTABLISHMENT OF A CITIZENS' HOUSING Councilmember Teitzel asked whether the formation of a Citizens Housing Commission should be done via ordinance or resolution, noting the intent is for a temporary commission that has a sunset date. It was drafted as a resolution but he was open to an ordinance if that was preferable. Development Services Director Shane Hope said either an ordinance or resolution was workable given that it is intended to be a short term commission. The advantage of an ordinance is it is codified; the advantage of a resolution is it provides more flexibility. Councilmember Teitzel asked if there was any legal reason for an ordinance to establish the commission. Mr. Taraday did not think so; it has been the City's norm, but this could be distinguished on the basis of it being temporary. Councilmember Teitzel read the following statement: "Council has heard significant input from our constituents over the past year —in town halls, workshops, public hearings, task force working sessions and via e mail and telephone calls —that the process for establishing an expanded array of housing options should include direct public input from across Edmonds. Our citizens have demanded to be directly involved in city decisions regarding how best to reasonably accommodate expected growth while preserving the charm and character of Edmonds. Three recurring themes have been clearly heard: 1) a Citizens' Housing Commission should be formed via an application process to allow interested citizens an opportunity to participate, 2) enough time should be allowed for the Commission to thoughtfully work through the process of developing housing policy recommendations for Council to consider (completing this process by the end of 2019 is not viewed as attainable) and 3) the Commission should consist of resident representatives from across Edmonds and that residents of the Edmonds Bowl should not be over -represented. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 21 Packet Pg. 26 4.2.a On February 19, Council considered a proposed process to establish a Citizens' Housing Commission to address these three themes. Based on input from Council on February 19, subsequent individual input from Councilmembers and additional input from citizens, the process to establish the Commission has been further refined for discussion and action this evening. Tonight, we have the opportunity to demonstrate we have incorporated public input concerning this issue in a meaningful way as we consider finalizing the process for establishing the new Citizens' Housing Commission. We have several things to accomplish this evening: First, we need to reach agreement on the elements of the resolution that will define the process for establishment of the Commission. These elements are shown at page 727 of our Council packet, and reflect Council input from the February 19 Council meeting. For instance, instead of one Commissioner being selected from each of the seven identified Edmonds zones, that number has been increased to two. Once Council votes to approve these elements, they will be forwarded to our city attorney to draft a resolution for final Council approval. Second, we need to reach agreement on the questions to be asked Commission applicants. Five of the application questions are standard questions asked of applicants for any Edmonds Commission, and two additional questions have been added that relate specifically to the Housing Commission. Based on Council input in the February 19 meeting, the additional questions initially proposed were pared back to these two. Third, Council should reach agreement regarding issuing a post card mailer to all Edmonds households to alert them to the Citizens' Housing Commission application process and deadlines. This process is intended to ensure all Edmonds citizens are made aware of the opportunity to apply for this important role. The cost of this mailer is anticipated to be less than $10,000 and will be paid from available Council contingency funds. Finally, Council should reach agreement to investigate retaining the services of a community engagement and process facilitator to assist the Commission with ensuring the community is kept fully apprised of the Commission's progress, with providing ample opportunity for direct public input, facilitating public open houses about this issue and to guide the Commission's efforts around development of housing policy options for Council consideration. With Council approval, requests for bids by interested and qualified parties will be issued. With that background, I ask the Council to take action on each of these items in order, beginning with the first item: discussion and finalization of the elements of the Citizens' Housing Commission resolution." Council President Fraley-Monillas said she had a number of revisions. First, she requested "affordable housing" be removed from the title as the intent was all housing to include low income housing, veterans housing, disabled housing, and at -market housing. Councilmember Teitzel said the intent of the commission was to focus on housing options across the spectrum in Edmonds and he preferred not to get into specifics in the title and simply call it the Citizens Housing Commission. Councilmember Buckshnis was satisfied with the document, felt a Citizens Housing Commission was needed, and people are motivated. She liked the mission statement which does not even mention affordable housing, she was satisfied with the objectives, with adding the two questions to the application (how long have you lived in Edmonds and do you rent or own your home), agreed with doing a postcard, and suggested wait until the commission is established and gelled before determining whether a facilitator is needed. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Mesaros referred to the suggestion during Audience Comments to appoint alternates and suggested having one alternate for each zone to replace a commissioner unable to attend a meeting. Most commissions with alternates expect them to attend meetings so they are up-to-date on discussions. He Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 22 Packet Pg. 27 4.2.a suggested each Councilmember appoint two members and one alternate from their zone The Mayor would appoint one member and an alternate. Council President Fraley-Monillas identified several amendments: • Remove "affordable housing" from the title • First paragraph, "Increase the supply of a€€ord-abl-housing to meet a diverse housing need • Bullet 4, rather than state the commission will meet the third Thursday of each month, state the commission will meet once per month and leave the meeting date up to the commission • Add "are you a landlord in Edmonds" to the information requested from applicants Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested public outreach sessions be held in each zone. She asked the cost of sending a postcard and for a facilitator. Development Services Director Shane Hope said the cost of sending a postcard to every address in the City is about $10,000. The cost of a facilitator depends on how much work they do, the community engagement process, etc. so it could range from $30,000 to $100,000. Councilmember Tibbott said theoretically an RFQ for a facilitator could attract someone from Edmonds who might choose to volunteer their time and the cost would be their expenses for conducting meetings. Ms. Hope assumed the Council was interested in a facilitator as well as a community engagement specialist who would work on web information and a variety of technical things in addition to setting up meetings, coordinating with staff on data collection, public outreach, etc. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there could be a separate facilitator and a public engagement person. Ms. Hope answered yes, they could be separate although they would need to coordinate. Councilmember Tibbott anticipated the public engagement process could be much shorter than the duration of the commission. He recommended separating those two roles and having a facilitator from the beginning to assist with formulating a work plan. He agreed with appointing alternates and recommended they receive meeting materials but not be seated at the table with commissioners. With regard to meeting on the third Thursday, it was Councilmember Tibbott's understanding City meeting rooms are full most nights and space was available on the third Thursday. Ms. Hope suggested the meeting date did not need to be included in the resolution but the notification could state the third Thursday would be the likely meeting date. Councilmember Tibbott asked who would assign Councilmembers to zones. Council President Fraley-Monillas said she will make those assignments. Councilmember Nelson was interested in having someone help with community engagement but did not see a facilitator as a value -add, commenting the commissioners will be able to proceed with Council direction. With regard to appointing alternates, he was skeptical about having 21 people at every meeting and suggested having a couple of alternates at large who can fill in as needed. Councilmember Mesaros commented on the importance of having a facilitator. He recalled during the merger of the two 911 boards, they tried to do it without a facilitator. Multiple meetings were held where there was a lot of discussion but they were unable to reach resolution. Once a facilitator was hired, the group was able to make decisions. A facilitator need not offer recommendations but helps the group move forward. The Snohomish County 911 Board has 15 members and 30 alternates (1st and 2nd alternates). The alternates sit on the outside and do not participate in discussion unless called upon. Only the board members participate in the meeting but having the alternates present allows them to step in if a board member is absent. He envisioned a commission with 15 members and alternates could function well. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Mesaros about alternates, noting the Salmon Recovery Council has several alternates. She recalled the first EDC had 21-22 members. She asked whether Ms. Hope could be the facilitator. Ms. Hope envision her role would be to show what information is Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 23 Packet Pg. 28 4.2.a available, make presentations about GMA, etc. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Ms. Hope thought the commission should have a facilitator. Ms. Hope answered yes, explaining she can provide expertise but it would be helpful to have a facilitator to run the meeting, keep them on track, etc. She recommended having a facilitator from the beginning. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed with having a professional facilitator who does not have any connection to Edmonds, noting after the last two groups, there was a lack of trust in the process. She suggested perhaps having a public hearing so all citizens have an opportunity for input into the process. Councilmember Teitzel summarized the changes the Council requested: • First three bullets remain unchanged • 4' bullet: "Commission will meet at least once per month at a time and day agreeable to the Commission" • 5t' bullet: "The Commission shall host public outreach session (open houses, town halls, etc.) once per quarter to provide updates on its process on developing housing policy options and recommendations. The Commission will define locations in Edmonds for these meeting, focusing on moving to various locations." 9t' bullet: The Commission will consist of 15 voting members and each Councilmember will select two appointees and one alternate per zone and the Mayor will select one appointee and one alternate. The Mayor's selection will be from the remaining pool of applicants after Councilmembers have made their decisions. Ex-officio members may be added at Council's discretion." COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO SEND THE RESOLUTION AS REVISED TO MR. TARADAY TO DEVELOP INTO A RESOLUTION TO BRING BACK TO THE COUNCIL. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO ADD TO THE COMMISSION APPLICATION, A QUESTION "ARE YOU A LANDLORD IN EDMONDS?" MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO REMOVE THE WORDS "AFFORDABLE HOUSING" FROM THE TITLE AND ANY PLACE ELSE IN THE DOCUMENT AND REPLACE IT WITH "DIVERSE HOUSING" WHICH COULD BE INTERPRETED FROM MARKET RATE TO VETERAN OR LOW INCOME HOUSING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, THAT THE COUNCIL DIRECT STAFF TO ISSUE AN RFP FOR A FACILITATOR FOR THE CITIZENS HOUSING COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED (5-1), COUNCILMEMBER NELSON VOTING NO. Councilmember Teitzel asked if the intent was a separate facilitator and person to focus on community engagement. Councilmember Mesaros recognized both skill sets were needed and suggested not deciding now whether that that was one person or two. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE DEVELOPMENT OF A POSTCARD MAILER PAID FOR WITH COUNCIL CONTINGENCY FUNDS TO APPRISE ALL EDMONDS CITIZENS OF THE AVAILABILITY OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS FOR THE CITIZENS HOUSING COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 24 Packet Pg. 29 4.2.a Council President Fraley-Monillas asked about having a public hearing on the document. Councilmember Teitzel said he has attended a number of meetings over the past year and a half and has heard a lot of public input, received a lot of phone calls and emails, heard public testimony during Council meetings, etc. It is time to move ahead and he was uncertain a public hearing was necessary at this point. UQlei IW4111UM01101DIDo49DI01:71R 1. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MINUTES This item was postponed to beginning of Council agenda next week. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported he attended the Lynnwood City Council meeting last night along with most of the entities working on the purchase of the Rodeo Inn property including Verdant and Edmonds School District. Lynnwood is doing a series of inspections on the property and hope to reach a conclusion in the next few weeks. The group is committed to moving ahead provided the property reports are satisfactory. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Buckshnis reappointed Nichol Hughes to the Economic Development Commission. She reminded of the public event, meeting at Holy Rosary, on Saturday at 10 a.m. to plant 150 native plants along Shell Creek with the Tree Board and Students Saving Salmon. Councilmember Mesaros reappointed Kevin Harris to the Economic Development Commission. Council President Fraley-Monillas thanked the City Council for reading their packets and for asking questions of staff in advance. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:35 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Nelson announced he will be submitting a budget request next week for additional police overtime up to $50,000 for targeted traffic enforcement along Hwy 99 and other pedestrian vulnerable areas for the next 6 months to prevent further loss of life and injury. He believed the City needed to move urgently on this issue. The City's 2018 Transportation Safety Plan lists engineering, education and enforcement actions needed to reach the goal of providing a safer transportation system. That plan reviews collision data from 2012-2016; over half the collisions have occurred on Hwy 99. In the section of Hwy 99 in Edmonds, there are four times more crashes than the average arterial roadway in the State of Washington. Of these crashes, eight involved pedestrians, four were jaywalkers and four were drivers failing to yield to pedestrians in crosswalks at intersections. Citywide, 40% of all collisions involve pedestrians; 60% occur during the daytime, 68% occur during clear days with dry conditions and 90% involve non -impaired driver or pedestrian. Since 2017 on Hwy 99, 12 pedestrians have been hit and 2 have been killed. Engineering is only one measure to improve traffic safety. He understood there were projects planned for Hwy 99 but enforcement was something that could be done now. Councilmember Teitzel reappointed Jamie Reece to the Economic Development Commission and thanked him for his continued service. Councilmember Teitzel reported on the Booker T Jones performance at the Edmonds Center for the Arts. He recognized the ECA staff and the over 125 volunteers who contribute their time at events. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 25 Packet Pg. 30 4.2.a 12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 14. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:32 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 19, 2019 Page 26 Packet Pg. 31 4.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #235949 through #236049 dated March 21, 2019 for $489,234.12 and wire payment of $12,175.62. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #63687 through #63692 for $571,197.35 and benefit checks #63693 through #63697 and wire payments of $581,182.16 for the pay period March 1, 2019 through March 15, 2019. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 03-21-19 wire 03-21-19 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-21-19 payroll summary 03-15-19 payroll summary 03-20-19 payroll benefit 03-21-19 Packet Pg. 32 4.3.a vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 235949 3/21/2019 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 71517 INV 71517 EDMONDS PD - RADIO L BIANCHI RADIO HOLDERS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 TIE FOR CEBAN 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 Tota I : 235950 3/21/2019 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 15-69326 PUNJABI INTERPRETER PUBLIC DI PUNJABI INTERPRETER PUBLIC DI 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 15-69563 KOREAN INTERPRETER COURT 03 KOREAN INTERPRETER COURT 03 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 15-69594 SPANISH INTERPRETER JAIL 03/15 SPANISH INTERPRETER JAIL 03/15 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 Total 235951 3/21/2019 069798 A.M. LEONARD INC CI19026669 PM: HOSE REEL WALL MOUNT PM: HOSE REEL WALL MOUNT 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 CI19028732 PM: HOSE REEL FREE STANDING,( PM: HOSE REEL FREE STANDING 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 235952 3/21/2019 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 19052 WWTP: 3/7/19 PEST CONTROL SEF 3/7/19 Pest Control Service 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total Page: 1 aD L 3 c �a .y Amoun 0 a aD r CU d 199.9E N 9.9� m 21.0( U 230.9° c c 162.7E sa 0 L 187.1, a E 181.3, U 4" 531.2( 0 0 0 L a 104.5( Q rn 271.0( N 375.5( A 0 E M 73.0( c 7.5, E 80.5: U �a Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 33 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 2 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 235953 3/21/2019 071634 ALLSTREAM 16000868 C/A 768328 0 m PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 960.1( u Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929-1 L 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 10.2� Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 10.2� Total: 980.6f u 235954 3/21/2019 065568 ALLWATER INC 030719059 FINANCE DEPT WATER c Finance dept water 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 79.4( -a 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 8.1 f o Total: 87.5f j, M 235955 3/21/2019 065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE 19-0216 HICKMAN PARK TREE SERVICE AN a HICKMAN PARK TREE SERVICE AN 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 1,175.0( U 10.3% Sales Tax c 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 121.0 70 19-0313 SHELL PARK II TREE REMOVAL 0 SHELL PARK II TREE REMOVAL a 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 350.0( Q 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 36.0E 19-3619 BALLINGER PARK TREE REMOVAL N BALLINGER PARK TREE REMOVAL A 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 935.0( N 10.3% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 96.3- fd Total: 2,711% }U, c 235956 3/21/2019 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 25215 BRONZE PLAQUE: SHANAFELT aD E BRONZE PLAQUE: SHANAFELT ME 127.000.64.575.50.35.00 520.0( Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 34 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235956 3/21/2019 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 235957 3/21/2019 076987 ANG, HUAY SIN 235958 3/21/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 10.3% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.35.00 Tota I : 7341 ART CLASS 7341 PRESCHOOL ART CLASS INS- 7341 PRESCHOOL ART: WINTER W 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 7345 ART CLASS 7345 PRESCHOOL ART CLASS INS- 7345 PRESCHOOL ART: BLENDING 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Tota I : 1991143183 WWTP: 3/6/19 UNIFORMS,TOWELS Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 1991143185 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1991153217 WWTP: 3/13/19 UNIFORMS,TOWEL Mats/Towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 4.3.a Page: 3 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 53.5E u 573.5E .L N m 242.0( v m c 189.0E 431.0E c �a 0 47.8E a 3.5( •� U 4.9 c Ta 0.3E p L a a Q 31.4, " rn 3.2z N M O V) 47.8E E 3.5( U c aD 4.9< E t U 0.3E Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 35 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235958 3/21/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 1991153218 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 1991153219 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1991158957 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE: PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE: 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE: 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE: 4.3.a Page: 4 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 51.5E 5.3 m 31.41 m c 3.2z c �a 6.1- o L 6.1- a E 6.1- 6.1- 0 �a 6.0£ o a a 0.1 m, Q rn 0.6< N 0.6< o 0.6< M 0.6' 0.6, t U �a Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 36 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 5 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 235958 3/21/2019 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) as 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6- -0 1991158958 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS L 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.0E FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 17.3z 10.3% Sales Tax U 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.5, 10.3% Sales Tax c 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.7E Total: 299.7E �a 235959 3/21/2019 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 16858 RANGER UNIFORM BADGES RANGER UNIFORM BADGES o 001.000.64.571.23.24.00 20.0( a 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.23.24.00 2.0£ Total: 22.01 0 235960 3/21/2019 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY 35347 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 01 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT 0" 0 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 106.41 a 36038 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT Al• Q' Q SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT Al` 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 106.4E r' 36176 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT/PI N SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT/PI M 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 218.9E N 36715 SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT PP E SPANISH INTERPRETER COURT Pl' 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 106.4� Total: 538.4E aD t 235961 3/21/2019 073834 BATTERIES PLUS P11899365 WWTP: 12V LEAD BATTERIES 12V LEAD BATTERIES Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 37 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 235961 3/21/2019 073834 BATTERIES PLUS (Continued) 235962 3/21/2019 002300 BEAVER EQUIPMENT SPECALITY CO 19014i 235963 3/21/2019 073062 BLUE FLAME 235964 3/21/2019 076986 BOWHEY, JENNIFER 235965 3/21/2019 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY BLD20190252 7335 ART CLASS 7258 7266 YOGA 7274 7270 YOGA 7278 YOGA CLASS PO # Description/Account 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total : WWTP: ROTORK REPLACEMENT N ROTORK REPLACEMENT MOTOR 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total REFUND: PERMIT WITHDRAWN Refund: Mechanical Permit WithdraN 001.000.257.620 Total 7335 ART CLASS INSTRUCTION 7335 SLIME EXTRAVAGANZA ART C 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total 7258 7266 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCT 7258 YOGA MON W/ KERRY CLASS 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7266 YOGA MON W/ KERRY CLASS 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7274 7270 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCT 7274 YOGA IGENTLE WED CLASS I 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7270 YOGA WED W/ KERRY CLASS 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7278 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTION 4.3.a Page: 6 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 439.0( 'D r U d 45.2, .L 484.2, N V m 373.0( m c 76.0( 46.2E 495.2° o 0 �a a 48.0( •E 48.0( U 4- 0 �a 78.0( a 78.0( Q rn 462.0( N M 0 368.5( 516.7E aD 731.5( t U �a Q Page: 6 Packet Pg. 38 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235965 3/21/2019 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 7282 7262 CLASS 235966 3/21/2019 069295 BROWN, CANDY 7329 BIRD CLASS 235967 3/21/2019 067947 BROWNELLS INC 16603252.01 235968 3/21/2019 076972 BUEHLMAIER, KAREN BLD20190236 235969 3/21/2019 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE 1061705 PO # Description/Account 7278 YOGA TH W/ KERRY CLASS II` 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7282 7262 PILATES AND YOGA CLA 7282 PILATES CLASS INSTRUCTIOI 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 7262 YOGA GENTLE MON CLASS IP 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 Total 7329 BIRD CLASS INSTRUCTION 7329 MORE AMAZING BIRDS! CLAS 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total INV 16603252.01 ACCT 00557761 EI SILI KROIL - 10 OZ 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 Total REFUND: APPLICATION ACCEPTEE Refund: application accepted in error. 001.000.257.620 Total PUBLISH PROJECT ONLINE FOR B ESJB.Publish Project Online for Bids 421.000.74.594.34.65.41 ESJB.Publish Project Online for Bids 422.000.72.594.31.65.41 ESJB.Publish Project Online for Bids 423.000.75.594.35.65.41 ESJB.Publish Project Online for Bids 126.000.68.595.33.65.41 4.3.a Page: 7 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 408.1( u 346.5( Y m t 372.4� u 3,205.8, 5 c a� 65.4E 65.4.' o 0 �a a 16.9E •� U 1.7E 0 18.7' 0 a a 95.0( Q 95.0( r' N ch 0 40.7E 40.7E c 40.7; E t 40.7 Q Page: 7 Packet Pg. 39 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235969 3/21/2019 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE 235970 3/21/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) FAC Roof Repair.Publish Project Onli 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 E7CD.Publish Project Online for Bids 126.000.68.595.33.65.41 Tota I : 19878578 COURT COPY MACHINE CONTRAC COURT COPY MACHINE CONTRAC 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 COURT COPY MACHINE BW METEI 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.23.512.50.45.00 19878579 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091 /0521 Finance dept copier contract charge 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 B&W Meter usage IRC5250 2/1/19 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 Color Meter usage IRC5250 2/1/19 - 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 19878581 PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON PARKS & REC C5250 COPIER CON 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 19878582 CANON 5250 Contract charge March 2019 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 Contract charge March 2019 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 Contract charge March 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 BW meter usage 2/2019 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 4.3.a Page: 8 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 0.3( u 45.0( 208.4( m v 59.5, a� 77.9' c �a 14.1; o L �a a 209.6" 74.0z u 4- 0 111.7E 0 L 40.7' a Q rn 373.2( N M 0 167.6E E 20.9E u 20.9E W E t 21.2< U M Q Page: 8 Packet Pg. 40 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235970 3/21/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) BW meter usage 2/2019 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 BW meter usage 2/2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 CLR meter usage 2/2019 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 CLR meter usage 2/2019 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 CLR meter usage 2/2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 19878583 WWTP: 3/2019 MO CHG+2-2019 ME 3/2019 Monthly Chg/ 2/2019 Meter U 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 19878584 CANON 2501F March 2019 contract charges 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 BW meter usage Feb 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 CLR meter usage Feb 2019 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 19878585 DSD BLDG LARGE COPIER CONTR DSD (Building) Large copier monthly 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 19878586 DSD (PLANNING) COPIER CONTRA DSD (Planning) Large Copier Montly 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 4.3.a Page: 9 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 2.6E u 2.6E N v 88.4( v 11.0E 4- m c 11.0E c 28.51 f° 0 L 3.51 a 3.5, U 4- 174.1( 0 Ta 0 26.4z a Q 2.1- c� 30.3E N M 0 6.0, M 44.6( a� E t 48.9 - Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235970 3/21/2019 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 235971 235972 235973 235974 3/21/2019 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 3/21/2019 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY 3/21/2019 035160 CITY OFSEATTLE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 19878587 19878588 19882579 7147 DRAWING 7154 DRAWING 7157 DRAWING RN22191020 9056920000 3/21/2019 074255 COALCREEK ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOC 120902-26 PO # Description/Account P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' P&R PRINTER IRC2501F CONTRAC' 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 PARKS IRC2501F COPIER CONTRAi PARKS IRC2501F COPIER CONTRAi 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 DSD (DEV SVCS) COPIER MONTHL DSD (Dev Svcs) Copier monthly conti 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 Total 7147 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP 7147 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 7154 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING C 7154 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 7157 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP 7157 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING IP 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total WWTP: CYLINDER RENTAL+HAZM) nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total WWTP: 1/9-3/13/19 FLOWMETER 8' 1/9-3/13/19 FLOW METER #879026 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 Total WWTP: 1/1 -2/24/19 TO 6.2018 & 7.2 4.3.a Page: 10 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 94.8E N 83.2� 814.71 2,668.8E c �a 0 418.0( �a a 61.0E 0 150.4E 0 629.5: c L Q Q Q 124.0( TT N 12.71 M 136.7 , N E 2 U 24.5 24.5, E t U �a Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 42 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 11 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 235974 3/21/2019 074255 COAL CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOC (Continued) 0 1/1 -2/24/19 TO 6.2018: $2100 & 7.20 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 6,000.0( u Total: 6,000.0( P 235975 3/21/2019 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC MAR-19 C/A CITYOFED00001 N Mar-19 Fiber Optics Internet Connect 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 408.4( r Jan-19 Fiber Optics Internet Overage 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 150.7E Total : 559.11 235976 3/21/2019 070753 CREAAFFILIATES LLC 190220-1 4TH AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDO 4TH AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDO — 125.000.64.594.76.65.41 1,521.2E Total: 1,521.2E a 235977 3/21/2019 074444 DATAQUEST LLC 8116 FEBRUARY BACKGROUND CHECK E FEB BACKGROUND CHECKS fd U 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 305.0( o Total: 305.0( 235978 3/21/2019 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 439100 TO 19-011ARSEN SHORT PLAT RE 0 L TO 19-01.1-arsen Short Plat Retaininc a 001.000.245.963 2,611.1 ' Q Total: 2,611.1: cn 235979 3/21/2019 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03 483533 INV 483533 CUSTOMER 3 26891 EE 04 CALIBRATE FH10284 c 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 70.0( CALIBRATE GHD-15003 E 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 70.0( U CALIBRATE GHD-20076 +: 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 70.0( a0i CALIBRATE GHD-20126 E t 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 70.0( um Q Page: 11 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 12 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 235979 3/21/2019 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03 (Continued) CALIBRATE SHED-04163 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 70.0( u FUEL SURCHARGE L 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 10.0( 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 37.0E Total: 397.0f u 235980 3/21/2019 068871 DOUG'S LYNNWOOD MAZDA PLN20180066 REFUND: HEARING EXAMINER FEE c Refund: Hearing examiner fees less 001.000.257.620 20.0( Total: 20.0( 235981 3/21/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7299 R RALPH 7299 R RALPH YOUTH SCHOLARSI 7299 R RALPH YOUTH SCHOLARSI a 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 66.0( Total : 66.0( •� 235982 3/21/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7115 N WUBNEH 7115 N WUBNEH YOUTH SCHOLAR 7115 N WUBNEH YOUTH SCHOLAR c 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 1i 75.0( o Total: 75.0( a a 235983 3/21/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7121 M RALPH 7121 M RALPH YOUTH SCHOLARSI Q 7121 M RALPH YOUTH SCHOLARSI c� 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 75.0( Total: 75.0( N M O 235984 3/21/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7121 T CORDOVA 7121 T CORDOVA YOUTH SCHOLAI 7121 T CORDOVA YOUTH SCHOLAI E 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 2 75.0( U Total : 75.0( c a� 235985 3/21/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7122 A NASSIRI 7122 A NASSIRI YOUTH SCHOLAR E 7122 A NASSIRI YOUTH SCHOLAR U 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 75.0( Q Page: 12 Packet Pg. 44 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 235985 3/21/2019 069523 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARS (Continued) 235986 3/21/2019 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 7123 S RAFIPOUR 235987 3/21/2019 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 235988 3/21/2019 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES 5-00080 5-10351 7047 DANCE 235989 3/21/2019 075136 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOC 144208 235990 3/21/2019 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 235991 3/21/2019 067042 FINAL TOUCH FINISHING 235992 3/21/2019 011900 FRONTIER Description/Account Total : 7123 S RAFIPOUR YOUTH SCHOLA 7123 S RAFIPOUR YOUTH SCHOLA 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 Total IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 INTERURBAN TRAIL INTERURBAN TRAIL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total 7047 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE INSTRI 7047 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE INSTRI 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total PROFESSIONAL SVCS: CLIMATE G Professional Services: Climate Goal: 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total EDH847704 CITY ORDINANCE 4145 CITY ORDINANCE 4145 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 Total 7166 ETIQUETTE 7166 ETIQUETTE CLASS INSTRUC- 7166 ETIQUETTE YOUNG LADIES 8 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total 253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE 4.3.a Page: 13 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 75.0( 0 U d L_ 75.0( 75.0( m z 51.2, m c 51.2, r- 102.4' — 0 L �a a 204.6( E 204.6( fd U 4- 0 �a 1,150.0( 1,150.0( a Q rn 29.2z N 29.2' c E 275.0( 275.0( E t U �a Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235992 3/21/2019 011900 FRONTIER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC RADIO LINE 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 425-712-8251 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC ALARM, FAX, PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC FIRE AND IN' 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 425-745-4313 CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 425-775-1344 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5 4.3.a Page: 14 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a aD 6.4', 'D r U d 24.4- 24.4- 19 m 24.4- v 24.4- c a� 24.4- �a 0 35.8( `>% M a 35.7E U 4- 17.2( 0 0 86.0', o a a 72.2E Q rn 72.2E N 96.3< o E M 139.0E Z c aD 73.0E t U �a Q Page: 14 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 235992 3/21/2019 011900 FRONTIER (Continued) 425-775-7865 235993 3/21/2019 076188 GARCIA, HELENA 7186 DRAWING CLASS 235994 3/21/2019 062383 HEPBURN SUPERIOR IN120154 235995 3/21/2019 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 44103 235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1021448 1024602 1071938 PO # Description/Account CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Total 7186 INTRO TO DRAWING CLASS II 7186 INTRO TO DRAWING CLASS II 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Total URN VAULT EXPANDABLE SAND URN VAULT EXPANDABLE SAND 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 Total EDMONDS WATERFRONT PARK RE EDMONDS WATERFRONT PARK RE 125.000.64.594.76.65.41 Total CITY PARK SHED - SUPPLIES City Park Shed - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 STORM - TV TRUCK SUPPLIES Storm - TV Truck Supplies 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.3.a Page: 15 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 68.5f u 71.4- Y 896.2f v m c 361.9( 361.9( c �a 0 547.3� a 547.35 E U 842.8E o 842.8E c 0 Q a Q 169.6E c� 16.9, N M 0 8.21 M 0.8' aD E t 238.0( Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 16 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 0 m 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 23.8( u 1095225 OLYMPIC BEACH - PROJECT L Olympic Beach - Project 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 39.9 , Y 10.0% Sales Tax 4) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 t 4.0( v 12130 CITY HALL - CAMERA PROJECT SU City Hall - Camera Project Supplies c 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 112.0E 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.2' 2021254 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES 0 City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 141.5" a 10.0% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 14.1E 'ca 2024500 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Shop Supplies 0 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 45.9 10.0% Sales Tax 0- 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.6( a 21586 FAC - SUPPLIES Q FAC - Supplies rn 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 29.9E 10.0% Sales Tax N 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.0( c 3021090 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.6E U City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 16.6z w 3024343 CITY PARK STORAGE BLDG SUPF E t City Park Storage Bldg - Supplies U �a Q Page: 16 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 17 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 0 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 49.7, -0 10.0% Sales Tax U 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 m 4.9 � .L 3024376 CITY PARK STORAGE SHED - SUPF City Park Storage Shed - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 79.5 � 10.0% Sales Tax U 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.9E 3071291 CITY PARK BLDG - SUPPLIES c City Park Bldg - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 153.7E c 10.1 % Sales Tax sa 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 15.51, 0 3071645 PLAZA RM - SUPPLIES Plaza Rm - Supplies a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 39.91 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.9� u 4010892 CITY PARK SHED BLDG SUPPLIES 0 City Park Shed Bldg Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 224.0, o 10.0% Sales Tax a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 22.4( Q 4010894 SEWER - SUPPLIES Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 18.3 � N 10.0% Sales Tax c 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.8Z 4014961 CITY PARK STORAGE SHED - SUPF City Park Storage Shed - Supplies U 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 162.3E 10.0% Sales Tax (D 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 16.21 E 4093667 LIBRARY - SUPPLIES U co Q Page: 17 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Library - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5022231 FAC MAINT - UNIT 42 SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Unit 42 Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5024064 CITY PARK BLDG - SUPPLIES City Park Bldg - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5024098 STORM - SUPPLIES Storm - Supplies 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 5024099 FAC MAINT - UNIT 95 SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Unit 95 Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5064565 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5072936 CITY HALL - KEY CARD CARMERAc City Hall - Key Card Carmeras Wirein 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.3.a Page: 18 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 160.7< u L 16.0-, N m 171.9, u 17.2( c a� c 22.1 < 0 L 2.2- a E 44.9 -, .� 4.5( 0 0 0 L 20.5- a Q 2.0E N 90.4E c 9.0f c 224.1 , E t 23.0E L) Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 5082192 CITY HALL - PROJECT City Hall - Project 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5161700 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5461634 CITY HALL - SINK City Hall - Sink 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6025081 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6063905 SEWER - SUPPLIES Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 6085663 WATER - SUPPLIES Water - Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 7020611 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 4.3.a Page: 19 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 33.1, 3.3, m 16.3E m c 1.6z c �a 445.2; 0 L 44.5, a E 106.81 u 0 10.6� > 0 L Q a 21.9-, Q rn 2.2( N M 0 39.9z E 2 3.9� U c 58.0z E U �a Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 7021964 7024906 7024952 7094543 7525352 7625216 81510 PO # Description/Account 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 CEMETERY - SUPPLIES Cemetery - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT - ICE MELT Fac Maint - Ice Melt 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 LIBRARY - SUPPLIES Library - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 MCH - SUPPLIES MCH - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 ROADWAY - SUPPLIES Roadway - Supplies 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 OLYMPIC BEACH PROJECT SUPPL Olympic Beach Project Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 OLYMPIC BEACH PROJECT Olympic Beach Project 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.3.a Page: 20 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 5.8( 'D r U d 60.3E N 6.0z v 120.61 c a� 12.01 �a 0 35.3: `>, M a 3.5: E U 45 49.8E 0 Ta 4.9� o a a Q 50.4E rn 5.0E N M 0 40.2- . �a 4.0, aD E t 469.2< u Q Page: 20 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 235997 3/21/2019 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 235998 3/21/2019 061013 HONEY BUCKET 235999 3/21/2019 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE 236000 3/21/2019 060165 HWAGEOSCIENCES INC 236001 3/21/2019 076069 ICOR TECHNOLOGY INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9020395 FAC MAINT UNIT 42 - SUPPLIES Fac Maint Unit 42 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9623585 FAC MAINT - TRUCK SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Truck Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.0% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total : 0550633432 HUTT PARK HONEY BUCKET HUTT PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Total BID-4089A BID/ED! REIMBURSEMENT FOR PR BID/Ed! reimbursement for prepayme 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 Tota I : 29121 ESKA.SERVICES THRU 2/28/19 ESKA.Services thru 2/28/19 421.000.74.594.34.65.41 Tota I : 2019232 INV 2019232 EDMONDS PD MINI DRIVE BELT/RUBBER CLEATS 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 Freight 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 Total 4.3.a Page: 21 Page: 21 Packet Pg. 53 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236002 3/21/2019 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 236003 3/21/2019 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 236004 3/21/2019 070250 IRON MOUNTAIN Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 3223051 P&R SUPPLIES: COPY PAPER P&R SUPPLIES: COPY PAPER 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 Total 1905701049777 INV 1905701049777 EDMONDS PD DRY0070 24 PACK OF AA BATTERIE 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 Total 201313189 05-17 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE 05-2017 Balance owing Off site data 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 201668280 07-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE Jul-2018 Off site data storage service 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 201686994 08-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE Aug-2018 Off site data storage servic 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 201719801 09-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE Sept-2018 Off site data storage servi( 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 201727677 10-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE Oct-2018 Off site data storage servic( 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 201755464 11-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE Nov-2018 Off site data storage servic 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 201792501 12-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE Dec-2018 Off site data storage servic 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 201839340 02-19 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SE 4.3.a Page: 22 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 79.9E u L 8.2L 88.2, m v 57.0( d 5.8 , 62.8 , 0 �a a 3.0' U 210.0� c �a 0 247.9E a a Q 314.1E N A 224.6E N E 2 273.4E U c (D E 165.0E Q Page: 22 Packet Pg. 54 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 23 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 236004 3/21/2019 070250 IRON MOUNTAIN (Continued) Feb-2019 Off site data storage service 512.000.31.518.88.41.00 230.9z Total: 1,669.4: 236005 3/21/2019 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 5294 FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC Mar-19 Fiber Optics Internet Connect 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 500.0( 10.3% Sales Tax 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 51.5( Total: 551.5( 236006 3/21/2019 076970 JOHNSON INDUSTRIES INC 24568 STORM - PARTS Storm - Parts 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 392.0( Freight 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 17.7( 10.3% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 42.2( Total: 451.9( 236007 3/21/2019 074417 LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTIAN SMITH 165 CONFLICT COUNSEL 8Z0551883 CONFLICT COUNSEL 8Z0551883 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 300.0( Total : 300.0( 236008 3/21/2019 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC 20383 expenses 01-2019 REIMBURSEMENT FOR EX 01-19 reimbursement for expenses - 1 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 300.0( Mar-19 03-19 LEGALS FEES 03-19 Legal fees 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 47,964.0( Total : 48,264.0( 236009 3/21/2019 076908 LONG-SCOTT, SHANE T SLS3/4-3/6/19 WWTP: SHANE LONG-SCOTT MILE SHANE LONG-SCOTT 3/4-3/6/19 MII Page: 23 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 24 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236009 3/21/2019 076908 LONG-SCOTT, SHANE T (Continued) 0 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 as 143.0( _0 Total: 143.0: m L_ 236010 3/21/2019 068443 MAIL N' STUFF SERVICES BID-4089 BID/ED! PRINTING AND DELIVERY BID/Ed! printing, address verification 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 234.2( Total : 234.Z 236011 3/21/2019 067235 MARYS TOWING INC 72729 INV 72729 EDMONDS PD CASE 19-1 m TOW BNY7548 BLACK AUDI- 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 189.0( 10.3% Sales Tax �a 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 19.4E _ Total: 208.4E �a 236012 3/21/2019 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 299716 PM SUPPLIES: SOD CUTTER a PM SUPPLIES: SOD CUTTER E 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 57.2( 2 10.3% Sales Tax 4- 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 5.8� o Total: 63.05 0 236013 3/21/2019 075590 MOBILE GUARD INV00470388 02-19 NETGUARD MONTHLY SERVI a NetGuard Monthly Service Building Q 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 39.0( c) NetGuard Monthly Service City Clerk 001.000.25.514.30.42.00 6.5( N NetGuard Monthly Service Communit o 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 6.5( E NetGuard Monthly Service City Counc M 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 19.5( NetGuard Monthly Service Court 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 6.5( E NetGuard Monthly Service Developm, 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 13.0( Q Page: 24 Packet Pg. 56 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236013 3/21/2019 075590 MOBILE GUARD Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) NetGuard Monthly Service Engineerir 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service Facilities 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service Finance 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service Human RE 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service Informatioi 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service Mayor's O 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service Parks 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service Parks 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service Parks 001.000.64.571.22.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service Police 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW Water 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW Sewei 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW Fleet 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 4.3.a Page: 25 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 97.5( u 58.5( N 6.5( v 6.5( 4- m c 19.5( m c 6.5( f° 0 L 6.5( a 13.0( E 6.5( ,- 0 312.0( > 0 39.0( a Q 3.2. rn 3.2.' 0 32.5( 6.5( c 19.5( t 6.5( Q Page: 25 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236013 3/21/2019 075590 MOBILE GUARD 236014 3/21/2019 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) NetGuard Monthly Service PW 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service PW Street 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 NetGuard Monthly Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 Total: WA33-781908 WWTP: EM3559 3HP ELECTRIC MC EM3559 3HP ELECTRIC MOTOR, FF 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 WA33-781938 WWTP: STD SMALL SPHER.ROL.BF STD SMALL SPHER.ROL.BRGS 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 WA33-781946 WWTP: SCJ 1-3/8 4-BOLT FLGS SCJ 1-3/8 4-BOLT FLGS - SHIPPED 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 4.3.a Page: 26 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 2.2f u 0.6E N 2.2E v 0.6E 4- m c 0.6z m c 6.5( f° 0 L 6.5( a 78.0( E 832.0( 0 �a 703.7( o a a 25.9E Q rn 75.1 E N M 0 220.6E E 22.7 U c a� 233.4z E U �a Q Page: 26 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236014 3/21/2019 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 236015 236016 236017 3/21/2019 075539 NATURE INSIGHT CONSULTING 3/21/2019 025690 NOYES, KARIN Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) WA33-781974 000 00 897 3/21/2019 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER February, 2019 PO # Description/Account 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 W WTP: SCJ 1-3/8 4 BOLT FLG SCJ 1-3/8 4 BOLT FLG - SHIPPED G 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PRi Tasks 1 - 4: Parks Project Mgmt and 125.000.64.576.80.41.00 Task 5: Engineering Dept Tasks 422.000.72.594.31.65.41 Total PRO SVCS - PLANNING BOARD MY Planning Board Minues 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 PROF SVCS: PLANNING BOARD M Professional Services: Planning Boai 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 PROF SVCS - HISTORIC PRESERVI Prof Svcs - Historic Preservation 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 Total COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSI` Emergency Medical Services & Traun 001.000.237.120 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 4.3.a Page: 27 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 195.5, 'D U m 44.1 E N 233.4z z U 26.51 m c 26.7E 1,808.1 f �a 0 1,187.5( a 250.0( 1,437.5( 0 7a 0 370.0( a a Q 333.0( r' N A 185.0( N 888.0( E 2 U c 860.7- t U 15,192.8E Q Page: 27 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236017 3/21/2019 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER (Continued) 236018 3/21/2019 076988 PACIFIC FLOWER FARMS 236019 3/21/2019 075183 PETERSON FRUIT CO Bus License refund 390698 PO # Description/Account Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.237.180 School Zone Safety Account 001.000.237.200 Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 Traumatic Brain Injury 001.000.237.260 Accessible Communities Acct 001.000.237.290 Multi -Model Transportation 001.000.237.300 Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis 001.000.237.170 WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 Domestic Violence Prevention 001.000.237.370 DNA Database Acct 001.000.237.400 Total LI Refund Cst #00006598 LI Refund Cst #00006598 001.000.257.310 MARCH FRUIT PICKUP FRUIT PICKUP FOR MARCH Total 4.3.a Page: 28 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m 253.0( u 92.3E N 4,056.5E U 205.0E m c 1,723.8, m c 339.4z f° 0 L 126.0E a 126.1- 393.7E ,- 0 1.8( > 0 524.3 a Q 1.9( 0) 4.6 , M 23,902.5, c V) E 2 U 50.0( 50.0( a0i E s U Q Page: 28 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 29 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236019 3/21/2019 075183 PETERSON FRUIT CO (Continued) 0 001.000.22.518.10.31.10 as 135.0f -0 Total: 135.0: m L_ 236020 3/21/2019 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY U578690 WWTP: HOFAHC110E CORROSION HOF AHCII OE CORROSION INHIB 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 508.5 1 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 52.3£ Total: 560.9! c 236021 3/21/2019 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2422756 ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 549.2, _ 2422756 ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE ca 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 a -135.3' 291104 ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAIL E ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I fd U 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 22.2' o ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS I 1i 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 22.2' o ALARM MONITORING FOR FIRE ST a 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 83.1( Q Fire Inspection FS 20 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 57.4( r' Fire Inspection Old Public Works N 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 44.2' c; Fire Inspection Yost Pool 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 48.4E E 31146525 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL is ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 12' U 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 155.& r- 730531 ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF E ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 51.5( Q Page: 29 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 30 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236021 3/21/2019 064088 PROTECTION ONE (Continued) 0 ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 51.5( u ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF L 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 46.3E ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF Y 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 59.2, ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF v 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 25.7E ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WOF c 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 23.1 � m Total: 1,104.81, c �a 236022 3/21/2019 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 19-0426 COURT SECURITY 03/01/2019-03/0£ o COURT SECURITY 03/01/2019-03/0£ L_, 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 1,746.2E a Total: 1,746.2° 236023 3/21/2019 076973 PYLES, GREGORY GPyles1-7-19 WWTP: AIRFARE/BAGGAGE FEES U AIRFARE $256.40 & BAGGAGE FEE c 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 316.4( 70 Total: 316.4( c L Q 236024 3/21/2019 076493 BEDSIDE CONSTRUCTION LLC ESKA.Pmt 11 ESKA.PMT 11 THRU 2/28/19 Q- Q E5KA.Pmt 11 thru 2/28/19 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 184,065.4' Total : 184,065.41 N 236025 3/21/2019 072733 SCHWING BIOSET INC 61421427 WWTP: 3-2019 RENTAL-HYDRAULI1 o 3-2019 RENTAL -HYDRAULIC POWE E 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 5,000.0( 'M Total: 5,000.0( 236026 3/21/2019 073574 SERVICE PLUMBING & HEATING BLD20190264 REFUND: PLUMBING PERMIT NOT Refund: Plumbing permit not needed E 001.000.257.620 148.0( um Q Page: 30 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 236026 3/21/2019 073574 073574 SERVICE PLUMBING & HEATING (Continued) 236027 3/21/2019 075628 SNO CO DEPT OF EMERG MGMT 1000495748 236028 236029 3/21/2019 075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC 2603 3/21/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 200202554 200496834 200650851 200651644 201184538 201383270 201431236 201441755 Description/Account Total ; 01-2019 EMERGENCY COMM & DIE 01-2019 Emergency Communication 001.000.39.525.60.41.50 Total PUBLIC DEFENDER CONTRACT - F FEB PUBLIC DEFENDER COSTS 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total WWTP: 2/6-3/6/19 FLOWMETER 10( 2/6-3/6/19 FLOW METER 2400 HIGI 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 CITY PARK RESTROOMS CITY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 HICKMAN PARK HICKMAN PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 CITY PARK GAZEBO CITY PARK GAZEBO 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 4.3.a Page: 31 aD L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 148.0( 0 U d L_ 13,273.7E 13,273.7E m v 26,265.2, m 26,265.2, c �a 16.6( o �a a 96.2- E U 19.6, c �a 0 a 1,017.6� Q rn 28.& N ch 0 17.1 18.3, aD E t 239.4E Q Page: 31 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236029 3/21/2019 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 236030 3/21/2019 037521 SNO CO TREASURER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 201453057 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 201790003 ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 202114484 CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHEL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 202289450 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 204425847 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 205184385 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / fV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 220547574 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 221732084 VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 VETERANS PLAZA METER 1000597 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Total 00479000100302 2019 FIRST HALF SURFACE WATEI 2019 Surface Water Charges - 23009 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 27043200300100 PARCEL 27043200300100 LAKE BAI Parcel 27043200300100 Lake Manac 001.000.39.576.90.41.50 27043200300200 PARCEL 27043200300200 LAKE BAI Parcel 27043200300200 Lake Manac 001.000.39.576.90.41.50 4.3.a Page: 32 a� L 3 c �a Amoun N 0 a m U m 61.6: N 20.2� 229.3f a� 83.9z 0 L 93.6� a E 26.1 ' u 0 �a 104.1E 0 a a Q 139.5( 2,212.6z N M O 199.0 -, E U 13.0z E t U 13.0z Q Page: 32 Packet Pg. 64 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236030 3/21/2019 037521 037521 SNO CO TREASURER 236031 3/21/2019 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER 236032 236033 3/21/2019 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) February 2019 SHD-01 JAN-DEC 2019 3/21/2019 075875 SOUND CLEANING RESOURCES INC 17979 3/21/2019 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 263924/1 263930/1 67391/4 67461/4 PO # Description/Account Total Crime Victims Court Remittance Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 Total HEALTH DISTRICT INTERLOCALAC Per Capita contribution per Interlocal 001.000.39.562.00.41.50 Total WWTP: 3/9/19 AIR DUCT CLEANINC 3/9/19 AIR DUCT CLEANING 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Total STORM - WORK WEAR - M JOHNS( Storm - Work Wear - M Johnson 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.7% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 STREET - WORK WEAR - B SANDE Street - Work Wear - B Sanders 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 9.7% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 STREET - WORK WEAR - C HIATT Street - Work Wear - C Hiatt 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 STREET - WORK WEAR - T HANSO Street - Work Wear - T Hanson 4.3.a Page: 33 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 225.1E 0 U d L_ 361.5, 361.5' m v 41,820.0( m 41,820.0( c �a 1,379.0( o �a 142.01 a 1,521.0' E U 4- 0 257.2' > 0 L 24.9E a Q rn 197.7, N 19.1E o E M 396.5' Z c 40.8z E t U �a Q Page: 33 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 34 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236034 3/21/2019 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS (Continued) 0 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 as 101.2z -0 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 m 10.4< .L 68091/4 WATER - WORK JEANS (5) K KUHN Water - Work Jeans (5) K KUhnhaUSE 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 249.7E 10.3% Sales Tax U 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 25.7, 68229/4 STORM - WORK WEAR - K HARRIS c Storm - Work Wear - K Harris °D 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 311.3( 10.3% Sales Tax sa 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 32.0E 0 68394/4 STREET - WORK WEAR - D BROWI Street - Work Wear - D Browning a 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 371.8( 10.3% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 38.3( u 68648/4 STORM - WRORK WEAR - T MOLE 0 Storm - Wrork Wear - T Moles 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 105.7E o 10.3% Sales Tax a 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 10.9( Q Total: 2,193.7: m 236035 3/21/2019 075009 SOUNDVIEW DESIGN STUDIO 00010902 SUMMER 2019 CRAZE DESIGN N SUMMER 2019 CRAZE DESIGN M 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 0 1,288.5( N Total : 1,288.5( .E 236036 3/21/2019 076974 STALBANS PARISH PLN20190001 REFUND: HEARING EXAMINER FEE U Refund: Hearing examiner fees less 001.000.257.620 35.0( E Total: 35.0( U �a Q Page: 34 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 35 a� L 3 Bank code : usbank c �a Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun N 236037 3/21/2019 076474 STROMME, JOANNE 7252 7249 YOGA 7252 7249 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCT 0 m 7252 YOGA TH W/ JOANNE CLASS 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 431.2( u 7249 YOGA TU W/ JOANNE CLASS L 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 392.7( 7255 YOGA CLASS 7255 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTION Y 7255 YOGA FRI W/ JOANNE CLASS 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 z 485.1( v Total : 1,309.0( m c 236038 3/21/2019 068360 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 100723 INV 100723 EDMONDS PD 20119-1E PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2.2 HR! 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 693.0( Total: 693.0( o 0 236039 3/21/2019 076975 TECH POWER SOLUTIONS 55453 HP NIMBLE STORAGE EQUIPMENTCL ca HP Nimble Storage equipment 512.100.31.594.18.64.10 52,195.0' •E 10.3% Sales Tax 512.100.31.594.18.64.10 5,376.0� c Total: 57,571.1, 236040 3/21/2019 075139 THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP INC 200603 E4FE.SERVICES THRU 3/1/19 0 a E4FE.Services thru 3/1/19 Q- Q 422.000.72.594.31.65.41 1,652.0( Total : 1,652.0( r' 236041 3/21/2019 076853 TRC ENVIRONMENTAL CORP 346433 WWTP: AIR MEASUREMENT TESTI N AIR MEASUREMENT TESTING SVC o 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 6,933.0( Total: 6,933.0( z 236042 3/21/2019 062949 UNIT PROCESS COMPANY 220/55011851 WWTP: AIR VALVES,MUFFLER PLA }; VALVES,MUFFLER PLATES,CTR (D 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 1,676.9 � E Freight U �a Q Page: 35 Packet Pg. 67 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 4.3.a Page: 36 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 236042 3/21/2019 062949 UNIT PROCESS COMPANY (Continued) 0 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 as 45.9( -0 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 m 177.41 .L Total: 1,900.31 y 236043 3/21/2019 075155 WALKER MACY LLC P3282.04-10 CIVIC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE m CIVIC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 125.000.64.594.76.65.41 3,234.9E Total: 3,234.95 c 236044 3/21/2019 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 62329 INV 62329 EDMONDS PD CASE 19-1 TOW CHEVY IMPALAAZM8736- 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 189.0( _ 10.4% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 19.6E a Total: 208.6E E 236045 3/21/2019 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 7623 INV 7623 EDMONDS PD - BUSINES, fd SET UP 4 NEW BUSINESS CARDS - 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 60.0( o PRINT 6 BUSINESS CARDS - 250 Ej > 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 0 125.1 E a PRINT 3 BUSINESS CARDS - 500 Ej Q- Q 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 62.5E 10.3% Sales Tax r' 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 25.5, Total: 273.2E M 0 236046 3/21/2019 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR TR-448636 WATER - WORK PANTS (5) - T NEL; Water - Work Pants (5) - T Nelson 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 215.9E 9.7% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 20.9E E TR-448748 STREET - WORK WEAR - T HANSO t Street - Work Wear - T Hanson Q Page: 36 Packet Pg. 68 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 236046 3/21/2019 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) TR-448792 TR-450057 TR-451943 TR-451956 TR-452357 236047 3/21/2019 076625 WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC 16340 16341 PO # Description/Account 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 9.7% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 STORM - WORK WEAR - B CLEMEI` Storm - Work Wear - B Clemens 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.7% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 STORM - WORK WEAR - J WHATM( Storm - Work Wear - J Whatmore 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.7% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 STORM - WORK WEAR - J WARD Storm - Work Wear - J Ward 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.7% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 STORM - WORK WEAR - T JUSTICE Storm - Work Wear - T Justice 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.7% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 STREET - WORK WEAR - S MERBA Street - Work Wear - S Merback 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 9.7% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 Total WINDWARD JAN. 2019 TASK 1 MAF Windward field work for Marsh study 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 WINDWARD JAN 2019 TASK 2 SITE Windward Marsh Study field work for 4.3.a Page: 37 a� L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 242.9', 'D r U d 23.5( N 404.9( t U 39.2E m c a� 355.3� �a 34.4, 0 L �a a 310.4- 30.1- u 4- 0 7a 304.1- o a a 29.5( Q rn 323.9( N M 0 31.4, N 2,366.8, •� c aD 6,781.2E E v �a Q Page: 37 Packet Pg. 69 vchlist 03/21 /2019 8:22:59AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 236047 3/21/2019 076625 WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC (Continued) 236048 3/21/2019 073018 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 236049 3/21/2019 051050 W YATT, ARTH U R D 100 Vouchers for bank code: usbank 100 Vouchers in this report 000062932772 27 PO # Description/Account 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 Tota PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER PM SUPPLIES: FERTILIZER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Tota REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 4.3.a Page: 38 aD L 3 c �a Amoun y 0 a aD 620.0( -0 1 : 7,401.2: m L_ N 522.9, z U 53.8E m c d 97.5( c �a 10.0' o 1 : 684.3, �a a E 2,499.9E U Total: 2,499.91 c Bank total : 489,234.1 c L Total vouchers : 489,234.1 a Q Page: 38 Packet Pg. 70 4.3.b vchlist 03/21 /2019 10:06:14AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 3212019 3/21/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 1558 BLUEBEAM MAINT, SERVER SWIT( BulkRegister.com - Domain Name 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 Bluebeam - Revu Standard maintena 512.000.31.518.88.48.00 Amazon - Comtrend Power over Ethe 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 ACCIS - 2019 Spring Conference for 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 CDW-G - Microsoft Surface Go w/cov 001.000.23.523.30.35.00 Newegg.com - Intel Compute Stick C; 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 Amazon - Jabra Pro 930 Wireless He 001.000.41.521.11.35.00 CDW-G - Microsoft Surface Go warra 001.000.23.523.30.48.00 Newegg.com - Microsoft Surface USE 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 BulkRegister.com - Domain Name 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 Amazon - Mitel Bluetooth handset 512.000.31.518.88.31.00 Amazon - Bluetooth handset - Qty 2 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 BulkRegister.com - Domain Name 512.000.31.518.88.49.00 ServerSupply.com - Cisco 512.100.31.518.88.35.00 2985 WWTP: SLNG-SCTT+JCASTRO TR/ Amazon: Visitor Sign In Book, Page 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 PSI: $100 fee for Johnathan Castro's 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 Page: 1 m L 3 c ea Amoun 00 0 a d 0 18.0( m =a 2,402.3' Y m 330.8( u 425.0( aD 701.5E c �a 583.1 ' o 139.41 a 156.1' M Z 49.6, IS R 30.1 - o L a a 131.2( Q rn 262.5, N 30.1' c m L 1,656.2( '3 c 146.8< E t 200.0( Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 71 vchlist 03/21 /2019 10:06:14AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 3212019 3/21/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Green River: Shane Long -Scott - WV\ 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 2985 WWTP: CREDIT FOR 1 PSI CHG AC PSI Website charged twice for Johna 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 4675 4675 PARKS CREDIT CARD AMAZON: DISCOVERY SUPPLIES: 1 001.000.64.571.23.24.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: HERBICIE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 INTERNATIONAL NW PARKS & REC 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 OFFICE DEPOT: PM SUPPLES: LAN 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 AMAZON: WOTS SUPPLIES: ACRYL 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GARMEW 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 AMAZON: DADDY DAUGHTER DAN, 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: WOTS SUPPLIES: SPEAK 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 AMAZON: DADDY DAUGHTER DAN, 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 OTC BRANDS: DADDY DAUGHTER 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: COLOR 1 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: PACKIN( 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: ENVELC 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: DRY ER) 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 4.3.b Page: 2 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a m 400.0( m L -100.0( ui Y m t 132.3( w m 165.2, 1,335.0( 89.3< �a a 28.6< E 61.6, U 0 65.3' 0 35.2£ a a Q 109.4E M 67.7, N M 9.6< m L 37.2E 3 c a� 32.9, E t 10.9- Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 72 vchlist 03/21 /2019 10:06:14AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 3212019 3/21/2019 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) SURVEY MONKEY: MONTHLY PLAN 001.000.64.571.21.49.00 PCC: DISCOVERY SUPPLIES: CUP; 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 ISSUU: DIGITAL CRAZE SUBSCRIP- 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 AMAZON: DISCOVERY SUPPLIES: 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 BROWN PAPER TICKETS: LEACH N 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: FRIDGE 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: LAWN & F 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: WEED KIL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GLOVES, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: HAND WA 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 VERDANT: HEALTHIER COMMUNIT 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: USB CAB[ 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 AMAZON: REC SUPPLIES: DIVIDER 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 4675 CREDIT FOR RETURNED ITEMS: Al AMAZON: RANGER UNIFORM RAIN 001.000.64.571.23.24.00 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: FRIDGE 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 5639 UPS FREIGHT CHARGES - PD CAST UPS Freight charges - PD Case #18-1 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 4.3.b Page: 3 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a m 40.8, m L 4.7< `a N Y 38.9E t 49.4, m c 73.4z 193.4( 44.9z Lm �a a 423.5, E 160.4z U 0 87.0� 0 L 98.0( a Q 16.5E M 46.2E N M O m -289.7, 3 -193.4( E t 76.0E Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 73 vchlist 03/21 /2019 10:06:14AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 3212019 3/21/2019 062693 US BANK (Continued) 6254 6254 HITE CREDIT CARD CAPITAL CAMPUS PARKING: OLYM 001.000.64.571.21.49.00 WRPA 2019 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 001.000.64.571.21.43.00 WRPA 2019 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 001.000.64.571.22.43.00 8296 WPTA CONFERENCE AND MEMBEF WPTA 2019 membership dues for S 001.000.31.514.20.49.00 WPTA conference registration for S 001.000.31.514.20.49.00 9573 GFOA CONFERENCE REGISTRATIC GFOA - Introduction to Governmental 001.000.31.514.23.49.00 Alaska Air - Air travel to GFOA 001.000.31.514.23.43.00 Total 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank Bank total 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers 4.3.b Page: 4 m L 3 c Amoun .y 0 a m 14.0( =a 290.3, ui Y m 576.3< w m 40.0( W 275.0( 0 L 85.0( sa a 280.6( .E 12,175.6: u 4- 12,175.6, o R 12,175.6: o a a Q M N M O d L 3 c as E a Page: 4 Packet Pg. 74 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project vi Funding Proiect Title Number Number a� STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E51FE E STIR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC Q. STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 E8FB STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB c tv SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA r U) STIR2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB y STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E41FA v STIR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA = WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC ui Y STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E51FA U STIR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA t r SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC c SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA STIR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5C13 tv — 0 WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4J1B tv STIR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC Q- STIR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA E SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC p L WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB Q Q WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA STIR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 E7DA rn r STIR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB r N M STIR 2017 Overlay Program i018 E7CA N SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA L � SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays i020 E7CC E STIR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA Z 0 WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays i019 E7CB L IL WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 y STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 E81FA >+ STIR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA r y STIR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB m L SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE u_ SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC m STIR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA E WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD v coo r Q WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC STIR 2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project c516 E8GA Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 75 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project vi Funding Proiect Title Number Number a� STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 E8FC E WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement c523 E8JA UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update s020 E8JB 3 WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA STIR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB STIR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD r o STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB y WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3JB STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD ui Y STIR 238th St. Island & Misc. Ramps i037 E8DC v STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA r c STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC STIR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 E8CA c STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA 0 STIR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC tv STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD Q- STIR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB E FAC AN Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA C STIR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STIR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB o L STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB °- CL STIR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB Q STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA r N M SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB N SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC E STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB Z 0 WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5JB a STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1 FM rn PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA >, STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 E5FC r y STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E41FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB L u_ STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB E FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB cvo PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB r r Q WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA STIR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 76 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STIR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E21FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E61FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E31FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E71FA STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E41LA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E51FD WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA STIR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STIR SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STIR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STIR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STIR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STIR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 77 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) E3DC W c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c430 SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)� FAC EXB c419 ESCO III Project 2014 Overlay Program . STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STR c453 Train Trench - Concept STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin ItS c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring 2015 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 78 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting N Funding Number Number Project Title d ontrols System Upgrades j= PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park Q. Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab 3 STIR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System 2015 Traffic Calming t=c STIR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program r o CL 2015 Waterline Overlays SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis y 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects a� STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects s Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) d c STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility d 12th Ave &Sierra Stormwater System Improvements NNEV c SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects — 0 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Ouffall Pipe Modifications Q- c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects E WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating C FAC E5LA c476 AN Upgrades - Council Chambers C solo Standard Details Updates Q STIR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Q i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program N M 2016 Waterline Overlays N SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays E E61 c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STIR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan Z O STIRE6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades a STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program N STM E6FA iol l Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive >, STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens � L STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update li STM E6FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project E c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project Q UTILITIES s013 Utility Rate Update WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 79 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Project Title E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza FAC Band Shell Replacement PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa 2017 Traffic Calming i021 STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STIR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program 2017 Waterline Overlays _ SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays IF i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STIR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW m013 IFDES (Students Saving Salmonl WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement c276 Dayton Street Plaza PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration i027 2018 Traffic Calming STIR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STIR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STIR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i033 ADA Curb Ramps STIR E8DC i037 238th St. Island & Misc Ramps s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71stAve Storm Improvements E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement UTILITIES E8J13 s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 80 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STIR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STIR E1 DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR E1 CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1 FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation STIR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STIR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park WTR E3J13 c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STIR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STIR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STIR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STIR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STIR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STIR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STIR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 81 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study STIR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STIR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects STIR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System STIR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating STIR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays FAC E5LA c476 AN Upgrades - Council Chambers PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II STM E6FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs SWR E6GC c492 2018 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement SWR E8GA c516 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project STM E8FB c521 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements WTR E8JA c523 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement STM E8FC c525 2019 Storm Maintenance Project STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays STIR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 82 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project WTR E6J13 i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects STIR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades STIR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program STIR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program WTR E7CB i019 2017 Waterline Overlays SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays STIR E7AA i021 2017 Traffic Calming STIR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades STIR E7DB i023 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program STIR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals STIR E7CD i025 89th PI W Retaining Wall STIR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements STIR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming STIR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive STIR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements STIR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program STIR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th STIR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project STIR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays STIR E9CA i036 2019 Overlay Program STIR E8DC i037 238th St.lsland & Misc. Ramps STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization UTILITIES E5NA solo Standard Details Updates SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update STIR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization STIR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM E8FA s018 2018 Lorian Woods Study UTILITIES E8J13 s020 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 83 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number FAC AN Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E51-A FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC ESCO III Proje c419 E3LB FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E41-A General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 � E8MA 0 PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA FAC Band Shell Replacement _ E6MB 0 c477 PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA PRK Waterfront Restoration m103=E7MA' PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC WTMT12th Ave Improvements & Sierra Stormwater System c484 STM 174th St. & 71st Ave Storm Improvements c521 E8FB STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E61FE STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA ■ STM 2018 Lorian Woods Study s018 E8FA STM 2019 Storm Maintenance Project c525 E8FC. STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 I E6FC. STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1 FM STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 E5FC. STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE Edmonds Marsh Feasibility _ E2FC. STM Study c380 STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD MTNKLID Retrofits Perrinville Basin E4FB Creek c434 STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA �TM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement E1 FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facilit 79 E5FD STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects w E5FB Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 84 4.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) Protect Engineering Accounting Project N Funding Protect Title Number Number d STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF j_ STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoratio c435 E4FC Q. STIR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC i STIR 2014 Chip Seal c451 E4CB STIR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA c to STIR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA r C STIR2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB d STIR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC. j d STIR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA L STIR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 _ E7DA. y A9 STIR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB s STIR 2017 Overlay Program = i018 v STIR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA d — c STIR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA CD STIR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB to STIR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA — O STIR2019 Overlay Program i036 E9CA >, tv =' STIR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD. STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC E v STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD. O STIR 238th St. Island & Misc Ramps i037 E8DC STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th AveAL E3DB. - O STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA Q �76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 ■ E8CA. Q STIR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA �84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th N M STIR 89th PI W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD L STIR 9th Avenue Improvement Project d STIR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE E STIR ADA Curb Ramps L STIR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB IL Audible Pedestrian Signals E7AB N STIR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA >+ STIR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancement i026 E7DC m STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB ss i Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA LL STIR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD = Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA d E STIR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD MTR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB Q STIR SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB MTR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 85 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 4.3.c Funding Protect Title STR Trackside Warning System STR Train 10 oncept STR Transportation Plan Update STR 220th Adaptive SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation SWR 2013 Sewerline Replac ojec SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Projec SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays SWR 2018 Sewerline Replacemer� SWR 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project ErWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Reha SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR Lake BallingerTrun SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update UTILITIES Standard Details Updates UTILITIES Utility Rate Update WTR 2014 Waterline Ov WTR 2015 Waterline WTR 2015 Waterline WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Projec WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement = WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications Protect Engineering Accounting Project Number Number c470 E5AA c453 E4DA c391 E2AA i028 E8AB c390 E2GB c398 E3GA i007 E5CC c441 E4GA. c469 E5GA i01 o =M E6CC. i013 E6GA r i020 i035 E8CE F c492 _ _ E6GC c516 E8GA E4GB c488 E6GB c461 E4GC 020 E8JB solo E5NA E013 E6JA c452 E4CC O475 E5CB c440 E4JB c460 E4JC i009 E6CB c468 E5JA i019 E7CB i014 E6JB i034 E8CD c493 E6JC c523 E8JA c498 E7JA c418 E3,113 c482 E5,113 c473 E5KA c446 E4HA c481 E5HA Revised 3/20/2019 Packet Pg. 86 4.3.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 917 (03/01/2019 to 03/15/2019) c Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount -ed2 REGULAR HOURS Educational Pav Correction 0.00 -156.28 111 ABSENT NO PAY LEAVE 56.00 0.00 120 SICK SICK LEAVE - L & 1 78.00 2,840.17 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 749.00 29,075.96 122 VACATION VACATION 867.49 35,235.36 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 117.00 4,756.49 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 33.00 1,128.95 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 226.76 8,554.57 129 SICK Police Sick Leave L & 1 24.00 926.62 130 COMP HOURS Holidav Compensation Used 10.25 359.43 131 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE 36.00 1,508.06 150 REGULAR HOURS Kellv Dav Used 105.00 4,359.61 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 325.77 14,902.59 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 37.00 2,435.16 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 17,372.70 679,002.53 195 REGULAR HOURS ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE 176.00 7,728.00 205 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME .5 19.00 314.37 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 7.00 253.76 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 24.00 1,289.31 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 16.00 1,505.42 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 194.00 14,251.38 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 26.25 1,913.35 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 170.00 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 132.04 275.39 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 1,422.11 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 664.48 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 39.25 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 358.00 0.00 606 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 2.0 6.50 0.00 acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 78.66 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 172.00 boc MISCELLANEOUS BOC 11 Certification 0.00 91.74 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstruction ist 0.00 117.51 03/21 /2019 Packet Pg. 87 4.3.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 917 (03/01/2019 to 03/15/2019) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 160.86 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 481.80 ctr MISCELLANEOUS CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM 0.00 160.00 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 111.20 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 1,075.64 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 723.91 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 829.56 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 5,166.66 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 217.06 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 709.37 Ig10 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 5.5% 0.00 148.17 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 958.20 Ig12 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 9% 0.00 5,734.58 Ig13 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 7% 0.00 1,733.25 Ig14 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 5% 0.00 1,322.33 Ig15 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 7.5% 0.00 381.68 Igo LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1 % 0.00 405.89 Iq5 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3% 0.00 556.00 Ig6 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv .5% 0.00 273.76 Iq7 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 1.5% 0.00 489.49 Iq9 LONGEVITY Lonqevitv 3.5% 0.00 104.93 mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 222.40 pds MISCELLANEOUS Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 101.78 phv MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,216.06 prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS ; 0.00 173.48 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5% 0.00 287.66 sgt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 173.48 sro MISCELLANEOUS School Resource Officer 0.00 111.20 str MISCELLANEOUS STREET CRIMES 0.00 462.88 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 352.51 03/21 /2019 Packet Pg. 88 4.3.d Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 917 (03/01/2019 to 03/15/2019) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours 21,036.01 Total Net Pay: Amount $841,022.49 $568,629.48 03/21 /2019 Packet Pg. 89 4.3.e Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 953 (03/20/2019 to 03/20/2019) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 122 VACATION VACATION 36.00 1,251.00 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 52.00 1,807.00 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 200.00 88.00 $3,258.00 Total Net Pay: $2,567.87 03/21 /2019 Packet Pg. 90 4.3.f Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 917 - 03/01/2019 to 03/15/2019 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 63693 03/20/2019 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 5,883.00 0.00 63694 03/20/2019 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 615.14 0.00 63695 03/20/2019 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 2,337.07 0.00 63696 03/20/2019 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 4,316.75 0.00 63697 03/20/2019 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 4,582.81 0.00 17,734.77 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 2851 03/20/2019 awc AWC 319,489.56 0.00 2854 03/20/2019 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 29,504.01 0.00 2855 03/20/2019 us US BANK 102,320.65 0.00 2856 03/20/2019 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 104,887.35 0.00 2859 03/20/2019 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 6,497.32 0.00 2860 03/20/2019 edm CITY OF EDMONDS 120.00 0.00 2861 03/20/2019 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 628.50 0.00 0.00 563,447.39 Grand Totals: 581,182.16 0.00 3/21 /2019 Packet Pg. 91 4.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Windward Environmental - Request to hire a surveyor Staff Lead: Maureen Judge Department: City Council Preparer: Maureen Judge Background/History Windward Environmental began a study of the Edmonds Marsh in the spring of 2018. When the schedule and scope of work was determined, the consultants did not include surveyors in their project budget. Precise height measurements of the marsh are needed to get accurate information from the installed data loggers, such as salinity, and a professional surveyor is required for this work The contract between the City of Edmonds and Windward contains the following language: Non - assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. In order for Windward to complete one of the project tasks, they are requesting permission to hire, at their expense, professional surveyors. Staff Recommendation Agree to allow Windward Environmental to subcontract surveyors of its chosing to get accurate measurements in the Marsh. Narrative Windward Environmental is requesting that Council allow them to subcontract the survey work in the field to a firm that specializes in surveying. Packet Pg. 92 4.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Inter -local Agreement w/Edmonds School District for School Resource Officer (Scriber Lake HS) Staff Lead: Jim Lawless Department: Police Services Preparer: James Lawless Background/History The Edmonds School District and the City have previously entered into inter -local agreements for the placement of a School Resource Officer within Edmonds Woodway High School. Budget authorization was given during the 2019 budgetary process for a second School Resource Officer to be assigned to Scriber Lake High School. Staff Recommendation It is the recommendation and request of staff that this inter -local agreement be approved by full Council via Consent Agenda, authorizing the Mayor's signature. Council President Fraley-Monillas agreed to this item being placed directly on the Consent Agenda. Narrative In 2018, the School Resource Officer position at Edmonds Woodway High School was re-established. Prior to the beginning of 2019 budgetary process, the Edmonds School District approached the department about establishing an SRO position at Scriber Lake High School. A decision package requesting an additional officer for reassignment was submitted and approved as part of the 2019 budget process. An inter -local agreement was prepared, mirroring the terms of the one authorized by the Council between the Edmonds School District and the City for the EWHS SRO position. The new agreement was approved as to form by the City Attorney and the agreement has also been approved and signed by the Edmonds School District. The agreement is attached. Attachments: ILA SRO Scriber Lake HS 20190321113521 Packet Pg. 93 4.5.a INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT And CITY OF EDMONDS For SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the Edmonds School District, hereafter referred to as "District", and the City of Edmonds, a Washington State municipal corporation, hereafter referred to as "Edmonds." RECITALS A. WHEREAS, the District and Edmonds desire to cooperate pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, Interlocal Cooperation Act, in order to make the most efficient use of their respective governmental powers within their jurisdictions; and B. WHEREAS, Edmonds and the District desire to re-establish a School Resource Officer Program (hereafter referred to as "Program,") to provide security, promote safety and serve as a positive resource to the District, the participating High School that is named in this Agreement and the surrounding neighborhood; and C. WHEREAS, Edmonds is willing to assign a uniformed Police Officer to serve as a School Resource Officer (hereafter referred to as "Officer") to be assigned to the High School location(s) specified herein in order to provide safety, patrol, and assist with certain related duties, in return for a rate of compensation to Edmonds that is agreed upon by the parties hereto. AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual representations and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Purpose. This Agreement is intended to increase security and safety for students, staff and property at Scriber Lake High School (the High School) located in the District through the assignment by Edmonds of one (1) experienced commissioned Edmonds Officer to service the location at the specified rate of compensation herein; 2. Term. This Agreement shall commence on August 16, 2019 and shall expire on June 30, 2022, unless otherwise terminated under the provisions of this Agreement. Two additional one-year extensions are allowed. Such extensions shall occur automatically and shall not require written notice of such extension. Should either party desire not to renew for the upcoming school year, such party must provide written notice by April 1 to the other of its intent not to renew. Upon expiration INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS 1 Packet Pg. 94 4.5.a of this Agreement and any extensions, all equipment furnished by Edmonds shall remain the sole property of Edmonds and any facilities, office equipment or other material support provided by the District shall remain the sole property of the District. 3. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. This Agreement is subject to funding, and either party may terminate with ten (10) days written notice due to lack of funding. If this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the school year by either party, it shall reimburse the other, on a prorated basis, the compensation paid for services not received or for services rendered and not yet compensated. 4. Duties of Officer. Edmonds shall assign the Officer to the High School to promote safety and serve as a positive resource to the District and the surrounding neighborhood. The duties and responsibilities of the Officer include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Perform the duties enumerated in the Edmonds Puiice Officer Job Description; b_ Patrol the High School and surrounding areas to identify, investigate, deter and prevent crimes, especially those incidents involving weapons, youth violence, harassment, gang involvement, drugs, or similar activities; C. Act as a liaison between the High School Administrators and Edmonds; d. Establish and maintain a working rapport with the High School administration, staff, and students; e. Provide school -based security during the regular school day and assist in the promotion of a safe and orderly environment at the High School. The Officer, however, shall not act as a disciplinarian. If the Officer is confronted with a non -criminal violation, such as a school rule violation, the Officer will inform the High School Administrators of the same and assist only for the purposes of providing security for school staff member(s) charged with enforcing school rules and providing testimony in a due process hearing. In the absence of a High School Administrator, the Officer may refer the matter to District administration; Assist in mediating disputes on campus, including working with students to help solve disputes in a non- violent manner; INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS 2 Packet Pg. 95 4.5.a g, Participate in the District multi -disciplinary threat assessment team; h. Act as a resource person in the area of law enforcement education at the request of staff, speak to classes on the law, search and seizure, drugs, motor vehicle laws, etc.; and, Perform other duties as mutually agreed upon by the Principal of the High School and the Officer, provided that the duty is legitimately and reasonably related to the Program as described in this Agreement and is consistent with federal and state law, local ordinances, and District and Edmonds policies, procedures, rules, and regulations. 5. Office Space and Supplies. District shall provide the following for the Officer's use at the High School, all at the District's cost: a. Private space with sufficient lighting and heat at the High School to be used by the Officer for general office purposes. b. Necessary office equipment and supplies, including but not limited to a locking cabinet, a desk, a telephone, and a computer. C. A portable radio for communication with High School personnel. 6. Independent Contractor. Edmonds and District understand and agree that Edmonds is acting as an independent contractor under the terms of this Agreement, with the following intended results: a. Control of personnel, standards of performance, discipline, and other aspects of performance of the Officer shall be governed solely by Edmonds; b. All persons rendering services hereunder shall be for all purposes employees of Edmonds; C. All liabilities for salaries, wages or any other compensation for the assigned Officer shall be the responsibility of Edmonds. 7. Supervision of Officer. The Officer shall remain an employee of Edmonds and is not an employee of the District. The Officer shall remain responsive to the supervision and chain of command of Edmonds. Edmonds shall be solely responsible for Officer's training, discipline, or dismissal. Any allegation of improper conduct shall be INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS 3 Packet Pg. 96 4.5.a referred by High School or District Administration to the Officer's immediate supervisor or directly to the Edmonds Chief of Police. 8. Scheduling of Officer. Edmonds agrees to assign an Officer to Scriber Lake High School during the regularly scheduled school year, for the term of this Agreement. The Officer will work at his/her assigned High School throughout the regularly scheduled school day, Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 3 p.m., less any scheduled vacation time, sick time, training time, court time, or any other police -related emergencies, such as civil disasters. When the Officer will not be on campus during his/her regular work hours during the school year, the Officer will advise the High School Principal in advance of the Officer's absence and a phone number where the Officer can be reached. On scheduled workdays when school is not in session, the Officer will work as assigned by Edmonds. a. Once assigned, the Officer should be available during normally scheduled work hours to attend District provided training which assists the officer in understanding safety and U I&dPIInaly f. rocedufes LillllLeU uy Me VIstrict o III elude; Right Response Training, District disciplinary, emergency preparedness, suicide prevention responsibilities, and threat assessment teams. b. The Officer should be available to attend a monthly District or regional SRO meeting to coordinate with other District SRO personnel. 9. Overtime. Officer shall not work any overtime without the prior approval of Edmonds. Overtime will be paid by Edmonds in accordance with Edmonds policies. The District is not responsible for any overtime cost unless requested by the District for special events or security. Overtime not related to the District incidents/activities shall not be billed to the District. 10. Selection. Edmonds and the District will cooperate in the selection of an Edmonds uniformed Officer to perform the services under this Agreement. Officer assignment vacancies likewise will be filled in accordance with this section. During the selection process Edmonds may use the following non-exclusive factors: a. Officer should be considered capable of conveying a positive police presence on the High School campus and in the community. b. Officer should have the ability to be a positive resource to the school, staff, students, parents, and residents in the surrounding neighborhood. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS 4 Packet Pg. 97 4.5.a c. Prior to appointment, the Officer shall complete the Basic SRO training course. The Officer should also attend the WA CJTC School Safety Officer Course #6216 as scheduling is available through the state. Both the District and Edmonds are committed to continual professional development training for the Officer. 11. Removal. If the District has cause to believe that a particular officer is not effectively performing in accordance with this Agreement, the Superintendent or designee may recommend in writing to Edmonds that the Officer be removed from the Program. Within ten business days after receiving the recommendation, the Superintendent or designee will meet with the Edmonds Chief of Police or designee to discuss the recommendation. If in the opinion of the Chief or the Superintendent, or their designees, the problem cannot be resolved, then the Officer shall be removed from the Program. Edmonds retains the right to remove or re -assign the appointed Officer as needed. Replacement of the Officer is subject to the above described Selection process. 12.Compensation. In consideration of Edmonds's assignment of the Officer to the Program, the District agrees to pay 50% of the salary and benefits of the actual assigned officer for the school year, for the term of this Agreement, as determined by Edmonds. The costs are the responsibility of the District to Edmonds. The parties understand and acknowledge that the sums provided under this Agreement only partially fund the position of one fulltime Officer to the High School and that Edmonds reserves the right to assign the Officer outside of regular school hours to other police duties as determined in the sole discretion of Edmonds. In addition, Edmonds reserves the right to assign the Officer to other police functions in the event of an emergent need, including but not limited to civil unrest or a natural disaster. The District and Edmonds agree to negotiate compensation and costs under the Agreement for any extension beyond the original Agreement term. All additional salary, wages, benefits, or other compensation of the Officer under this Agreement shall be the responsibility of Edmonds. In addition, the District agrees to pay Edmonds an annual police vehicle operation and maintenance fee of $2,000. This is 50% of the estimated cost to operate the vehicle for the school year. 13. Billing Period. Edmonds shall invoice the District twice a year. Invoices shall be delivered to the District on or before September 1 for the upcoming four months of service; and shall bill on or before January 1 for the remaining work to be completed during the final six months of service during that school year. Invoices shall be submitted in a form approved by the District, and shall specify the services to be performed, period of service and amount due. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS 5 Packet Pg. 98 4.5.a 14. Payment. District shall pay Edmonds within 30 days from the date of receipt of a proper invoice. Payments to Edmonds later than 30 days following the receipt of a proper invoice shall accrue interest at the rate of 12% per annum on the balance due. All payments shall first be applied to accrued interest. 15.No Third -Party Rights. The establishment of this Program and execution of this Agreement shall create no third -party rights. In particular, the parties agree by establishing this Program that no past practice has been created with respect to duty assignment, the maintenance of the Program, or to otherwise limit the management discretion of Edmonds under its Collective Bargaining Agreement. This Agreement further shall not create any third -party rights to the Officer or any other Officer of Edmonds, or to any other person. 16.Insurance and Indemnification. The parties shall separately maintain their own appropriate liability and casualty insurance policies as they, in their sole discretion, deem appropriate. The parties further agree that r_-_._•r:__aion h1a:1 b.. 'd„d for .o „♦• •'dial ly ern+ LIICIL IIIJ IIIUCII7I IIIIGd IIVII J11'Q 11 A/b t.11 VVil.YGIA 1V1, Gn�,G f..r� as .i�i7viliNp ny :�c.a forth below, and that the respective liability of the parties to each other and to third persons shall be deemed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The District will protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Edmonds, its officers, employees, or agents from any and all costs, claims, judgments or awards of damages arising out of, or in any way resulting from, negligent acts or omissions of the District, its officers, employees, or agents. Edmonds will protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the District, its officers, employees, or agents from any and all costs, claims, judgments or awards of damages arising out of, or in any way resulting from, negligent acts or omissions of Edmonds, its officers, employees, or agents. In the event of concurrent liability, the parties shall have the right of contribution in proportion to the respective liability of each party. Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to waive immunities established pursuant to state statutes or to create third party rights or immunities. 17. District Responsibility for Safety and Security. The parties understand and agree that the District retains its legal responsibility for the safety and security of the District, its employees, students and property, and this Agreement does not alter that responsibility. 18. Interview and Arrest Procedures. If the Officer plans to interview suspects or victims of crime, the Officer, to the extent practicable, will advise and work with the Principal to minimize disruption to the High School and other students. District employees will make parental notification of such interviews in accordance with District policies and procedures and applicable laws. The Principal or designee may request that she/he or a designee be present during the interview of a student. The presence of a District employee at an interview of a INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS 6 Packet Pg. 99 4.5.a student regarding a criminal matter shall make said employee subject to subpoena as a witness thereto. In the event the Officer arrests a student at the High School, the Officer shall notify the Principal or the Principal's designee as soon thereafter as practical. In the event that the arrested student is a juvenile, Edmonds will notify the parent or legal guardian pursuant to Edmonds policies and procedures. The District may also make notification as necessary under its own policies and procedures. 19. Release of Student Information. Upon request by Edmonds, the District will provide directory information relating to its students, to the extent permitted under District policy and state and federal law. Student information and databases will not be utilized by the Officer or by Edmonds for the enforcement of immigration laws or to obtain family data for the purposes of immigration enforcement. 20. Police Reports. The Officer shall provide the District with police reports to the extent permitted by state law and Edmonds policies and procedures. 21.Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 22. Recording. This Agreement shall be filed with the Snohomish County Auditor, or alternatively as provided by RCW 39.34 shall be posted on the District's or Edmonds' Website. 23. Notice. Notices under this Agreement shall be sent to the following: Edmonds Chief of Police PO Box 5008 Edmonds, WA 98046-5008 Superintendent Edmonds School District 20420 68th Ave. West Edmonds, WA 98036 24.Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire agreement between parties and supersedes and merges with any prior agreements of the parties, written or oral, with respect to the Program. This Agreement shall be amended only in writing with the written consent of the parties. This Agreement shall be interpreted in order to implement its central purpose, which is the creation of the Program and the underlying understanding that only Edmonds shall direct the police functions of the Officer. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS 7 Packet Pg. 100 4.5.a EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT Kristine McDuffy, SLt6elKendent Dated:. 3 ! ] 4 CITY OF EDMONDS David O. Earling, Mayor Dated: Attest/Authenticated: Scott Passey, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - EDMONDS 8 Packet Pg. 101 5.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Hearing Examiner Annual Report Staff Lead: Shane Hope Department: Planning Division Preparer: Rob Chave Background/History The City's Hearing Examiner provides an annual report on his activity. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative The Hearing Examiner is Phil Olbrechts. His annual report is attached. Attachments: Exhibit 1: 2018 Hearing Examiner Annual Report Packet Pg. 102 5.1.a MEMORANDUM DATE: March 20, 2019 TO: Edmonds City Council FROM: Phil A. Olbrechts — Hearing Examiner RE: Annual Report SUMMARY: Five hearing examiner decisions have been issued since the last annual report to the City Council dated February 15, 2018. One of the projects, a 13 lot preliminary plat, drew some public opposition based upon concerns typically associated with plats. No other project raised any public concern. Each decision is addressed in reverse chronological order below: Doug's Lynnwood Mazda (3/4/19): Approved design review and a design review exception to pedestrian/walkable design standards for an addition to Doug's Lynnwood Mazda located at 22130 Highway 99. The Applicant proposed an addition to the existing Mazda service building at 22133 Highway 99 together with an addition and remodel of the existing Mazda showroom to convert it into a Hyundai sales and service building. The requested design review exception was to ECDC 16.60.030(C)(1) and (2), which only authorizes a maximum of 60 foot separation from 50% of a building's fagade facing a street and its accompanying street frontage. The Applicant proposed to use this space for auto sales, which necessitated more than 60 foot separation from project buildings and street frontage. In order to qualify for the design review exception, the Applicant had to incorporate numerous pedestrian design features to compensate for the lack of building proximity to street frontage. These features included placing the active portions of the building, comprised of a glass encased showroom with a prominent bronze clad entry way, closest to the street frontage. These active portions were then connected to the street frontage via a well-defined walkway that was augmented with landscaping and seating areas. Overall, the City's efforts at encouraging pedestrian connectivity in its GC zone were highly successful for this project. St. Alban's Episcopal Church Conditional Use (3/4/19): Approved conditional use permit for pre-school use of the Sunday school wing of St. Alban's Episcopal Church, located at 21405 82nd Place West. Testimony was limited to staff, applicant and property owner (church). No more than 18 students would be present at church site at any one time. Surrounding uses are single-family residential, but church property is 2.5 acres in size with a significant amount of trees buffering the classroom site from adjoining residences. Westhaven Preliminary Plat (12/28/18): Approved preliminary plat division of 1.99 acre parcel into ten single-family lots. This was the only project of the last year that attracted any project opposition. Concerns included tree removal, habitat loss, drainage, traffic safety and noise. A couple conditions of approval were crafted to protect both on -site trees and the root system of off -site trees. Given the legal ambiguity of protecting off -site trees, the conditions of approval gave staff the option of either requiring protection of the tree roots from off -site trees or Packet Pg. 103 5.1.a Examiner Annual Report - 2 requiring notice to property owners of potential damage, allowing flexibility as necessary to address conditions during construction and associated legal rights and responsibilities. 244' Street Unit Lot Subdivision (10/25/18): Approved 11 lot unit subdivision. This was the City's second application of its unit lot subdivision ordinance to a preliminary plat. The project was already under review as an 11 unit detached single family dwelling complex on one lot in a multifamily zone. Building permits for the homes had already been filed as required by the unit lot subdivision ordinance and the purpose of the proposed unit lot subdivision was to create single lot ownership for each separate dwelling unit. No one other than staff testified at the hearing. Edmonds Woodway Hi!h School Athletic Field Improvements (9/11/18): Recommended approval to City Council of conditional use permit, two variances and design review for improvements to the athletic fields of Edmonds-Woodway High School at 7600 212th St. SW. Improvements included a synthetic turf multipurpose baseball field with football/soccer field and associated lighting and bleachers. Four tennis courts and associated lighting were proposed east of the athletic fields. Three batting cages are proposed south of the tennis courts. The conditional use application covered the proposed bleachers, playfield lighting and structures 25 to 60 feet in height (eight 50-foot lights around the tennis courts and 40-foot ball control fencing and netting around the baseball field). The height variance was for eight proposed 70-90 foot light poles surrounding the baseball/football/soccer fields (six 70-foot poles and two 90-foot poles). The setback variance was to reduce the street setback variance along 216th Street from 20 feet to 4 feet to accommodate the proposed batting cages. All public testimony was in support of the application. Packet Pg. 104 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Council Subcommittee Reports and Minutes Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation N/A. For information only. Narrative This is an opportunity for Councilmembers to report on items discussed at their subcommittee meetings held the previous week. The committee meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: FC031219 PPW031219 PSPP031219 Packet Pg. 105 7.1.a FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING March 12, 2019 Elected Officials Present Councilmember Diane Buckshnis (Chair) Councilmember Neil Tibbott* Council President Fraley-Monillas* Mayor Dave Earling* Councilmember Dave Teitzel* * attended a portion of the meeting Staff Present Scott James, Finance Director Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Jeannie Dines, Recorder Guests Ferrell Fleming, Executive Dir., Senior Center Daniel Johnson, Capital Project Manager Chris Wolfe, Accounting Mgr., Senior Center The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Council Chambers. The agenda was amended as reflected below. 3. New Budget in Brief Mr. James relayed the Finance Department created a new report, Budget in Brief. The intent was to increase financial transparency and awareness. He highlighted sections of the report: Message from the Mayor, Overview of the City, City Officials, Developing the City's Budget, Revenues and Expenses, Major Capital Projects, Comparison to Neighboring Cities (municipal property tax and general fund expenditures per capita) and Economic Impacts. A brief discussion followed regarding distribution of the Budget in Brief at the Mayor's State of the City and staff responsible for developing the it. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 5. Waterfront Center Financial Update Ms. Hite explained the City has a long term land lease with the Senior Center; the Center's goal is to raise enough money to demolish the current building and build the new Waterfront Center. The Senior Center has submitted for permits and wants to go to bid soon. The goal is to present the remaining decision points to Council in the next 1-2 months. Staff's recommendation is to forward financial update to full Council for discussion and approval. Remaining decision points for Council are: • Review and acceptance of the development and construction documents Final decision to give consent to demolish, construct, alter or change the property Farrell Fleming introduced Daniel Johnson and Chris Wolfe. Mr. Johnson reviewed fundraising: $2.43M has been raised since the last meeting for a total of $12,483,000: $1 M Rick Steves (total of $4M) $1 M John Osberg $200,000 Hazel Miller Foundation total of $500,000 $130,000 Local Rotary Clubs $100,000 Zevenbergen Foundation $2,430,000 Plans to reach $16M include: Packet Pg. 106 7.1.a 03/12/19 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2 Amount Source $1 M+ Individuals $500,000 Naming "Veterans Health & Wellness Center" (verbal offer) Interested in using H&W Center for veterans programs during City programmed hours $500,000 Local family interested in arts (pending) TBD Senior Center Board Members $2M Appropriation pending in State legislature $200,000 Application to Verdant TBD Snohomish Count TBD Foundations TBD Community Campaign Chris Wolfe reviewed the Edmonds Waterfront Center Cash Flow Projection, highlighting the following: • $142,000 Contingency added to Other Development Cost • Cash received has been detailed by source and quarter • Cash Flow projection assumes all known pledges and grants • State funds cannot be accessed until demonstrate have all funds available from gifts, pledges and/or financing to finish the project Senior Center representatives responded to questions regarding sources of the remaining $3.5M to be raised, flow of expenditures once the project starts, whether $113,000 for project management will be enough, the projected cost of furniture and equipment, and the 5% contingency. Mr. Wolfe reviewed revenues and expenses in the proforma, advising one of the key revisions was the addition of food service income. The feasibility report suggests a model where a caterer would do events, a cafe style lunch, and perhaps breakfast to dramatically increase the appeal and quality of food and still serve low income seniors. Senior Center representatives responded to questions regarding the subsidy for senior lunches, 7.5% commission on catering, the kitchen design, the budget for repairs and maintenance and for wages and benefits, new positions added, percentage of pledges that are uncollectible, flood insurance, the term of the $2M Semble loan, rental income during 2019 (first half of year in existing building) and 2020 (second half of year in new building), contingency if contaminants are found on the site. Mr. Johnson described Semble who facilitates financing for non -profits. In addition to donors, there are individuals/families who are supporters but may be more inclined to make a loan versus a contribution. As a project delivers on their promise, those lenders may waive interest or forgive a portion of the principal. He described the process for lenders and offered to provide a link to the Waterfront Center prospectus on Semble's website. Ideally there would be $1.5-$2M in interested lenders; those funds would not be used unless needed. Semble services the loans, monthly reporting, etc. Committee members requested the following for the presentation to full Council: • Add footnote regarding Other Resources on Cash Flow Projection regarding pending funding requests • Add footnote regarding the cost of financing • Provide documentation from WG Clark regarding expected cash requirements • For large contracts, Council would like to see signed contracts • Provide assumptions used in the proforma • Confirm insurance cost includes flood insurance • Provide link to Semble for the Waterfront Center a� r N M O U U_ c a� E U a r a Packet Pg. 107 7.1.a 03/12/19 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3 Rick Steves commented on the goal to develop the Waterfront Center free and clear as a gift to the community. He has donated $4M and is concerned about the momentum and the potentially of losing State funds. Mr. Hite described next steps; the state funding expires at the end of June 2019, permits have not issued yet but are expected soon, the financial update along with design development document approval will be presented to full Council; approval of consent to demo and construct will occur at a separate meeting. Discussion followed regarding the cost of the design contract and obtaining a guaranteed maximum cost. Action: Schedule for full Council on March 26th or April 2na 1. November, December, and January Monthly/Quarterly Financial Reports Mr. Turley and Mr. James highlighted Fund 112 interfund loans, REET revenues versus expenses, investment portfolio summary, construction sales tax, and regional economics. They responded to questions regarding the OVWD franchise, funds moved from the Opioid Response Fund to the Edmonds Marsh, and funds in the Homelessness Fund. Mr. James relayed plans to develop a Capital Projects Report with revenues, expenses, and a summary by fund and by project for consideration at a future Finance Committee meeting. Action: Present 2018 Year -End Report to full City Council 2. Fund Balance / Reserve Policy Discussion Mr. James provided background regarding the decision making behind the amended fund balance/reserve policy related to GASB 54, RCW 35A.33.145, GFOA's Fund Balance Best Practice cn guidelines and an article by Mike Bailey, "Which Financial Policies Work Best? It Depends." He also reviewed the City's past experience and other cities' fund balance targets. He reviewed amendments to the proposed Fund Balance Reserve Policy which calls for a total of 20% with 16% coming from the L) General Fund and the remaining coming from the Contingency Reserve; the current reserve totals 18%. He distributed a comparison of current Fund Balance Reserve 2007-2018. N r M Discussion included the current percentage in the reserve policy, reserve fund versus ending fund balance, information to include in a presentation to the Council, limit on contingency reserve per RCW `` 35A.33.145, limitations on reserve fund use, and eliminating the Risk Management Reserve. E Action: Schedule for full Council on March 26th r r Q 4. Parks Impact Fee Annual Financial Report Mr. James responded to questions regarding how park impact fees can be spent, projects that are budgeted to use park impact fees, and who decides which projects are funded with impact fees. Action: Schedule for full Council The meeting was adjourned at 9:34 p.m. Packet Pg. 108 PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING March 12, 2019 Elected Officials Present Councilmember Kristiana Johnson (by phone) Councilmember Dave Teitzel Staff Present Phil Williams, Public Works Director Rob English, City Engineer Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks Director Jerrie Bevington, Recorder The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Jury Meeting Room. The agenda was amended to move Items 2 and 3 following Item 7. Arts Festival and Market Event Contracts Ms. Burley presented contracts for the Market and the Arts Festival; contracts will be forthcoming for three more events later this year. The language in both contracts has been updated to reflect Resolution No. 1412, "Pursuant to the City's Resolution 1412 which prohibits the use of plastic straws, stirrers and cutlery at public events requiring a contract with the City, beginning in 2019 food vendors at this public event shall provide only certifiable compostable straws, stirrers and cutlery to event participants." Although the resolution states the ban will take effect in early 2020, the resolution also states single use plastic straws, plastic stirrers and plastic cutlery will not be allowed to be provided by vendors in 2019 and beyond at public events requiring a contract with the City. Other changes in the contracts are primarily dates. Councilmember Johnson proposed if vendors do not have compostable items, the City provide them as a courtesy, funded from the Council Contingency fund. Action: Presentation to full Council and potential action 4. Presentation of Supplemental Agreement with Murraysmith for Five Corners Reservoir Project Mr. English explained work has begun the 3MG tank; at this point the pit repairs and roof repairs that were occurred on the 1.5MG tank have not been necessary. Murraysmith did the design and has been providing construction support to staff; Supplemental Agreement 6 provides additional budget for: $ 6,500 RFIs and response to change order support $21,000 Construction observation (increased from 35 days to 50 days) $ 4,700 Construction Management (extended to 18 months) $33,201 Total $37,701 Supplemental Agreement 6 Mr. English explained a $4500 error was discovered in the fee matrix. He recommended it be placed in a management reserve in the event any issues arise; it will not be used if it is not needed. The cost is funded by the Water Utility Fund. Discussion followed regarding the number of supplements this large project has required. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda Packet Pg. 109 7.1.b 03/12/19 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2 5. Report on Bids for the 89th PI W Retaining Wall Mr. English displayed a photograph and described the location of the failing retaining wall at the end of the cul-de-sac on 89th Place. The adjacent pavement is failing due to the failure of the existing rockery and has been coned off to prohibit driving or parking. The City received 11 construction bids on February 28, 2019. The low bid was provided by Kamins Construction ($112,386); the engineers estimate was $125,386. The overall construction budget of $157,000 includes 20% construction management, inspection, testing, markup and a 20% management reserve. There was. $118,000 in REET funds originally budgeted for this project. The area includes a catch basin and discharge pipe into a creek so $31,400 in Citywide Drainage Improvements funds budgeted in 2019 can be transferred to this project. He recommended the remaining $600 be funded by REET via a First Quarter Budget Amendment. Staff responded to questions regarding staff's experience with Kamins Construction, access to the slope, replacing the rockery with a concrete block wall, and the status of the City's concrete crew. Mr. Williams advised this project would not be appropriate for the City's concrete crew. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 6. Report on Bids for the 238th St. SW Island Improvements & Pedestrian Curb Ramp Barrier Removals Project Mr. English explained the project scope is to reconstruct the traffic island and install landscaping on the south side of SR 104 on 238th St SW, an ADA walkway and curb ramps. The base bid includes the island and four pedestrian curb ramps at 71h & Alder. The engineer's estimate for the base bid is $199,214; the alternate bid is three additional ramps, two at 7th & Walnut and one at 6th & Walnut. The available construction budget is $252,000 of which $201,000 are CDBG funds and $50,000 REET funds. Bids are due March 21 It. If bids are within the construction budget, staff recommends award of the construction contract be placed on the April 2nd Consent Agenda. If bids are outside the construction budget, a presentation will be made to Council on April 9th. Discussion followed regarding a suggestion to include landscaping similar to the north side and the inability for the City's concrete crew to do this project due to CDBG funds. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 7. Report on Bids for the Dayton Street Utility Replacement Project Mr. English advised this is a water, stormwater and sewer utility replacement project on Dayton between 3rd and 9th Avenue and constructs a missing 450-foot section of sidewalk on Dayton west of 8th Avenue, the number one short sidewalk section in the 2015 Transportation Plan. The sidewalk is funded by a TIB Complete Streets Grant. Bids were opened today; two bids were received. The low bid was $6.14M by Shoreline Construction, the second bid was $7.16M by Kar-Vel Construction; the engineer's estimate was $6.77M. If the low bidder's document can be verified, he recommended a presentation to Council on March 191h. This project will be constructed over two years, west of 31 Ave to 5th Ave in 2019 and 511 Ave to 9th Ave in 2020. The project also includes reconstructing the road from 3rd to 6th Action: Presentation to full Council and potential action on March 19tn A brief recess was taken. 2. ILA Verdant Health Commission Ms. Hite relayed the City applied to Verdant and was awarded funding support for outdoor fitness zones in Mathay Ballinger Park in 2019 and in Civic Park in 2020. Snohomish County Health District identified Packet Pg. 110 03/12/19 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3 Mathay Ballinger Park as one of the higher health risk areas of Edmonds. The initial payment of $49,500 will be added to $75,000 in the capital fund to construct the zone in Mathay Ballinger. A second payment of $12,750 in July 2020 will be used to activate that zone (fund an instructor and free drop -in Saturday classes and orientations). A third payment of $107,750 in July 2021 will fund the full cost of the fitness zone in Civic Park. The ILA has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Discussion followed regarding equipment in the zone, indemnification against injury, and how the locations were selected. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 3. Environmental Works/Barker Landscape Amendment #2 Ms. Hite explained Barker Landscape was hired to do design development of the Waterfront Redevelopment project. Their original scope of work included the parking lot but did not include frontage improvements or lighting design plan. This amendment adds authority for design development of frontage improvements (Council approved design and construction of parking lot and frontage improvements in November 2018 and included funds in the 2019 budget). Barker Landscape merged with Environmental Works in October 2018; the City Attorney amended the contract to "Barker Landscape DBA Environmental Works." Ms. Hite advised another contract amendment will be presented in the future for Environmental Works/Barker Landscape to provide construction support. Action: Presentation to full Council for potential action The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Packet Pg. 111 7.1.c PUBLIC SAFETY, PERSONNEL & PLANNING COMMITTEE MEETING March 12, 2019 Elected Officials Present Councilmember Mike Nelson (Chair) Councilmember Neil Tibbott Staff Present Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. in the Police Training Room. 1. Urban Forester Job Description Approval Ms. Hite reviewed the Urban Forester job description and she and Ms. Hardie responded to Council questions. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda. The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Packet Pg. 112 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Resolution Requesting that the FCC Study Health Impacts of 5G Wireless Technology Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Preparer: Michael Clugston Background/History This is a new item. Staff Recommendation None. Narrative As part of the larger small cell wireless code update, potential health impacts of radio frequency (RF) emissions from future 5G wireless technology were raised. No studies on the relationship have been done to date. At the same time, the FCC preempts local governments from regulating wireless deployments on the basis of RF emissions and potential health impacts. On March 13, 2019, the City of Portland passed a resolution requesting that the federal government update older studies to address potential health risks of 5G radio frequency emissions and publish those findings. On March 19, Council requested a similar resolution be drafted for consideration. Two options are attached. Attachments: Resolution Version 1- 5G health federal preemption Resolution Version 2 - 5G health federal preemption Packet Pg. 113 8.1.a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, Requesting the FCC to perform and update studies on the potential health risks of 5G radio frequency emissions and publish such findings, as federal guidelines push for more rapid deployment of 5G within municipal boundaries. WHEREAS, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has jurisdiction over non-federal wireless facilities, authorizing and licensing all non-federal devices, transmitters, and facilities that generate Radio Frequency ("RF") radiation; and WHEREAS federal law preempts state and local governments, including the City of Edmonds, from considering health concerns in the regulation and placement of wireless facilities, so long as such facilities otherwise comply with applicable federal law, and WHEREAS the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to evaluate the effects of emissions from FCC -regulated transmitters on the quality of the human environment; and WHEREAS on August 1, 1996, the FCC adopted the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements' recommended Maximum Permissible Exposure limits for field strength and power density for the transmitters operating at frequencies of 300 kHz to 100 GHz; and WHEREAS the FCC in 2015 last updated guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields from wireless facilities, based primarily on recommendations of other federal agencies after reviews of prior scientific literature related to RF biological effects, primarily from the 1990's; and WHEREAS currently no federally -mandated RF exposure standards exist; and WHEREAS the FCC relies upon federal agencies with health and safety expertise, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration which have assigned roles in federal law for monitoring and investigating issues related to RF exposure; and WHEREAS the Government Accounting Office in 2001 prepared a report of its investigation into safety concerns related to mobile phones, and concluded that further research into wireless technology is needed, recommending the FDA take the lead in monitoring research results; and WHEREAS, in September 2017, 180 scientists and doctors from 36 countries sent an appeal to the European Commission recommending a moratorium on the roll out of 5G until potential hazards for human health and the environment had been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry; and WHEREAS, the results of the world's largest study on the link between RF radiation associated with 2G and 3G cell phones and cancer were released on November 1, 2018, by the National Toxicology Packet Pg. 114 8.1.a Program, an inter -agency program within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, found evidence of cancerous heart tumors, as well as some evidence of cancerous brain tumors, in male rats exposed to high levels of RF radiation like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones. However, researchers have cautioned that findings "do not apply to 4G or 5G technologies;" and WHEREAS on December 3, 2018, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal and Congresswoman Anna G. Eshoo co-authored a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr requesting the FCC and relevant health agencies provide them studies informing the FCC's 5F safety determination, and while they did receive a letter from the FCC on December 17, 2018, it had no mention of 5G safety testing; and WHEREAS the City of Edmonds recognizes broadband networks, both wired and wireless, as essential infrastructure fundamental to the future of Edmond's community members and businesses; and WHEREAS this Resolution of the City would permit the City to 1) advocate for updated studies on RF Exposure Limits, and (2) potentially influence the outcome of the proceeding for the benefit of Edmonds community members; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds City Council requests of the FCC that it work in cooperation with the FDA and other relevant federal agencies to revisit and update studies on potential health concerns arising from RF wireless emissions and in particular addressing emissions from 5G technology; and Section 2. The Edmonds City Council requests the FCC make the findings from such studies publicly available in a timely manner; and Section 3. The Mayor's Office shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be sent to all members of the FCC, to the FDA Commissioner, and to all members of the Washington Congressional Delegation. RESOLVED this day of March, 2019. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, DAVE EARLING ATTEST: Packet Pg. 115 8.1.a CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Pg. 116 8.1.b RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, (1) Requesting the FCC to perform and update studies on the potential health risks of 5G radio frequency emissions and publish such findings, and (2) Requesting Congress to determine the FCC has overstepped its bounds in its order titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment" effective January 14, 2019, and to adopt legislation clarifying that state or local laws are only preempted when they "essentially guarantee" rejection of all wireless applications or create an actual inability to provide service. WHEREAS, the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") has jurisdiction over non-federal wireless facilities, authorizing and licensing all non-federal devices, transmitters, and facilities that generate Radio Frequency ("RF") radiation; and WHEREAS federal law preempts state and local governments, including the City of Edmonds, from considering health concerns in the regulation and placement of wireless facilities, so long as such facilities otherwise comply with applicable federal law, and WHEREAS the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to evaluate the effects of emissions from FCC -regulated transmitters on the quality of the human environment; and WHEREAS on August 1, 1996, the FCC adopted the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements' recommended Maximum Permissible Exposure limits for field strength and power density for the transmitters operating at frequencies of 300 kHz to 100 GHz; and WHEREAS the FCC in 2015 last updated guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields from wireless facilities, based primarily on recommendations of other federal agencies after reviews of prior scientific literature related to RF biological effects, primarily from the 1990's; and WHEREAS currently no federally -mandated RF exposure standards exist; and WHEREAS the FCC relies upon federal agencies with health and safety expertise, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration which have assigned roles in federal law for monitoring and investigating issues related to RF exposure; and WHEREAS the Government Accounting Office in 2001 prepared a report of its investigation into safety concerns related to mobile phones, and concluded that further research into wireless technology is needed, recommending the FDA take the lead in monitoring research results; and WHEREAS, in September 2017, 180 scientists and doctors from 36 countries sent an appeal to the European Commission recommending a moratorium on the roll out of 5G until potential hazards Packet Pg. 117 8.1.b for human health and the environment had been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry; and WHEREAS, the results of the world's largest study on the link between RF radiation associated with 2G and 3G cell phones and cancer were released on November 1, 2018, by the National Toxicology Program, an inter -agency program within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, found evidence of cancerous heart tumors, as well as some evidence of cancerous brain tumors, in male rats exposed to high levels of RF radiation like that used in 2G and 3G cell phones. However, researchers have cautioned that findings "do not apply to 4G or 5G technologies;" and WHEREAS on December 3, 2018, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal and Congresswoman Anna G. Eshoo co-authored a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr requesting the FCC and relevant health agencies provide them studies informing the FCC's 5F safety determination, and while they did receive a letter from the FCC on December 17, 2018, it had no mention of 5G safety testing; and WHEREAS the City of Edmonds recognizes broadband networks, both wired and wireless, as essential infrastructure fundamental to the future of Edmond's community members and businesses; and WHEREAS, the FCC recently issued an Order titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment" effective January 14, 2019, wherein it clarified when the Telecommunications Act of 1996 preempts state and local regulations that may inhibit a mobile service provider's ability to provide a service to an area, adopting a "material inhibition" standard and applying it to limit fees a municipality can impose for use of its rights of way and limiting non -fee requirements such as undergrounding, aesthetics, and minimum spacing requirements; and WHEREAS, a number of municipalities have filed petitions for review in the Ninth Circuit, alleging the Order exceeds the FCC's statutory authority, is arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of discretion, and is otherwise contrary to law; and WHEREAS this Resolution of the City would permit the City to 1) advocate for updated studies on RF Exposure Limits, and (2) potentially influence the outcome of the proceeding for the benefit of Edmonds community members; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Edmonds City Council requests of the FCC that it work in cooperation with the FDA and other relevant federal agencies to revisit and update studies on potential health concerns arising from RF wireless emissions and in particular addressing emissions from 5G technology; and Section 2. The Edmonds City Council requests the FCC make the findings from such studies publicly available in a timely manner; and Section 3. The Edmonds City Council requests Congress determine the FCC has overstepped its bounds in its order titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment" effective January 14, 2019; and Packet Pg. 118 8.1.b Section 4. The Edmonds City Council requests Congress adopt legislation clarifying that state or local laws are only preempted when they "essentially guarantee" rejection of all wireless applications or create an actual inability to provide service. Section 5. The Mayor's Office shall cause a copy of this Resolution to be sent to all members of the FCC, to the FDA Commissioner, and to all members of the Washington Congressional Delegation. RESOLVED this day of March, 2019. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, DAVE EARLING ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Pg. 119 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Public Hearing on Small Cell Update to the Wireless Regulations in Chapter 20.50 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Preparer: Michael Clugston Background/History This topic was introduced to Council on January 15, 2019. Following a public hearing on February 12, Council adopted an interim wireless ordinance which included aesthetic standards and location preferences for small cell projects. The Planning Board reviewed the interim ordinance on February 13 and held a public hearing on February 27. After taking comment from the wireless industry and the public, the Board made a recommendation to Council for completion of a more long-term ordinance. On March 19, Council discussed the Planning Board's recommendation and directed staff to prepare an updated draft ordinance that reflected those discussions. Staff Recommendation Take testimony on the updated draft wireless ordinance (redline version attached). Direct staff to prepare a final ordinance for approval on April 2. Narrative On September 27, 2018 the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) issued a ruling (Order) titled "Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment". The Order adopted broad new rules limiting how state and local governments may treat applications for the installation of small cell wireless facilities to ensure deployment is not only allowed, but permitted within specific 'shot clocks'. The Order went into effect on January 14, 2019 and jurisdictions have a deadline of April 14, 2019 to adopt aesthetic standards for small cell installations. Given the very short time frame provided by the FCC, staff completed initial research about small cell technology and compiled a range of aesthetic standards for location and appearance, which the City Council approved in the form of an interim wireless ordinance on February 12, 2019 (Ord. 4141). The interim ordinance had the following features: 1) Location. A seven -step preference hierarchy was established where a wireless provider would have to analyze the use of each location in descending order and justify why the higher location could not be used: Locate Outside of the Right -of -Way 1. Existing Building 2. Freestanding Small Cell Pole Packet Pg. 120 9.1 Locate Within the Right -of -Way 3. Existing Street Light Pole or Utility Pole (hollow poles) 4. New Freestanding Small Cell Pole or Street Light 5. Existing PUD Single -Phase Pole (installation on top of pole) 6. Existing PUD Transmission Pole (installation in communication space) 7. Strand -mounted (installation in communication space) 2) Appearance. A range of concealment and camouflaging strategies were included with the intent of minimizing negative visual impacts, including air space clutter. The approved interim ordinance was forwarded to the Planning Board for its review. After a public hearing on February 27, the Board forwarded the following recommendation to Council: 1) Eliminate location priorities #1 and #2 (locating on zoned property). The use of zoned property would remain an option but it would not be required to step through the location list. Where buildings are close to the right-of-way, such as in the downtown area, zoned property may work for a small cell node just as it has for some macro cell sites. Full concealment options are available to closely match virtually any building material. 2) Place priority #5 (installation on the top of a PUD power pole) before priority #4 (freestanding small cell) in the preference hierarchy. The Board wanted to use existing infrastructure sites and see fewer purpose-built small cell poles. 3) If possible, incorporate a public notification process to let property owners in the vicinity know when a new small cell installation will be installed close by. With priority locations #1 and #2 becoming optional only, the wireless provider would no longer have to reach out to property owners to inquire about possible siting options. While siting on zoned property was not seen as a priority to the Board, neighborhood awareness remained a concern. The Board would like to see a requirement for wireless providers to give notice of upcoming deployments incorporated into the code. Given the short review timelines (shot clocks) required by the FCC, permitting will be managed through building and engineering permits and notice for ministerial permits would not otherwise be provided. All active permits, both applied and issued, can be viewed by the public on the City's permitting web page (Citizens Connect). 4) Add language that gives additional discretion to the Director to approve alternative design or measure outside of the proposed regulations. Assuming that wireless antennas and equipment will continue to evolve quickly, some flexibility would be useful. Public Input Received Two public comments were submitted at the Planning Board public hearing on February 27. Both comments were regarding the potential health impacts of small cell wireless and specifically 5G technology. Council members had also inquired about this. No studies specific to 5G and health impacts have been done by the FCC or other federal agencies. On March 13, 2019, the City of Portland passed a resolution requesting the FCC study 5G and health impacts - it is unknown whether any other jurisdictions have made such a request. Packet Pg. 121 9.1 The FCC provides health and safety guidance for radiofrequency (RF) emissions. As long as the wireless carriers meet that guidance, local jurisdictions cannot further regulate based on health impacts. As part of the application process for wireless installations, City code requires that carriers document compliance with the FCC standards, which staff verifies during permit review. Updated Information from the Council's 3/19 Meeti Since Council's approval of the interim wireless ordinance, staff was in discussion with professionals from the wireless industry, concealment technology providers, Snohomish County PUD, and the City's own wireless consultant to gain a better understanding of small cell technology and how each of the partners contributes to small cell deployment. For example, prior to the Planning Board hearing, it was learned that locating small cell on most single-family residential structures is technologically impractical. For that reason, staff recommended that the Planning Board consider removing Location #1 from the priority list. Other takeaways from these discussions included: 1) The preferred height for small cell is 20 - 40 feet. 2) Small cell can be located outside the right-of-way when buildings are close to it. 3) Technology exists and/or is being developed to fully conceal 4G and 5G small cell antennas and equipment. 4) PUD currently allows only one wireless provider to attach to a wood pole. 5) PUD indicates many utility poles in Edmonds are 'full'. Replacing a wood pole with a new hollow pole (allowing for full concealment) could open up opportunities for small cell installations. 6) PUD engineering staff is currently working on street light/small cell design. Council discussed this information along with the Planning Board's recommendation and provided staff with the following direction on what to include in an updated wireless ordinance: 1) Priority options 1 & 2 requiring small cell to be located outside of the right-of-way should be optional. Wireless providers will not need to analyze zoned parcels for small cell locations before analyzing locations in the right-of-way. 2) The code should reflect a preference for complete concealment over simple camouflage for installations in the right-of-way by recommending the following location preference order: hollow utility pole, freestanding small cell pole, on top of an existing wood pole; in the communication space on an existing wood pole; strand -mounted cells attached to wires. 3) Include provisions for collocation of carriers and technologies in order to minimize the overall number of small cell locations. 4) Bring back a resolution asking the FCC to study the health impacts of 5G technology. 5) Establish a 25-foot height limit for those freestanding small cell poles that do not include street lights. Several other matters were raised including: adding more graphics and pictures to the ordinance; fees and administration; using a radial rather than lineal dispersion requirement; and, not attaching to existing Sternberg lights and possibly developing a new lighting standard which would allow for concealed small cells. Using this guidance, staff prepared the attached draft updates to the wireless regulations (in redline Packet Pg. 122 9.1 format). The City Attorney also prepared a resolution regarding 5G and health impacts, which is included as a separate Action item on the Council's agenda. Staff will prepare a presentation for the March 26 public hearing summarizing this information and the changes to the draft ordinance. Attachments: Redlined updates to interim wireless ordinance (Ord. 4141) Packet Pg. 123 9.1.a ATTACHMENT A Chapter 20.50 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Sections: 20.50.010 Purpose. 20.50.020 Applicability. 20.50.030 Exemptions. 20.50.040 Prohibitions. 20.50.050 General macro facility siting criteria and design considerations. 20.50.060 Permits and shot clocks. 20.50.070 Application requirements. 20.50.080 Eligible facilities requests. 20.50.090 New building -mounted macro wireless communication facility standards. 20.50.100 New structure -mounted macro wireless communication facilities standards. 20.50.110 New monopole -Me --- P+^^' m. @ e r AG vog i r ^'^« faeolity standards. 20.50.120 Temporary facilities. 20.50.130 Small wireless facility standards (small cell). 20.50.140 Abandonment or discontinuation of use. 20.50.150 Maintenance. 20.50.160 Definitions. 20.50.010 Purpose. A. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate the placement, construction, modification and appearance of wireless communication facilities, in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public, while not unreasonably interfering with the deployment of competitive wireless communication facilities throughout the city. The purpose of this chapter may be achieved through adherence to the following objectives: 1. Protect residential areas and land uses from potential adverse impacts that wireless communication facilities might create, including but not limited to negative impacts on aesthetics, environmentally sensitive areas, historically significant locations, flight corridors, and health and safety of persons and property; 2. Establishment of clear and nondiscriminatory local regulations concerning wireless communication facilities and services that are consistent with federal and state laws and regulations; 3. Encourage providers of wireless communication facilities to locate facilities, to the extent feasi ble, in areas where the adverse impact on the public health, safety and Packet Pg. 124 1 9.1.a welfare is minimal; 4. For macro facilities, encourage the location of those facilities in nonresidential areas and allow m a c r o facilities in residential areas only when necessary to meet functional requirements of the communications industry as defined by the Federal Communications Commission; 5. Minimize the total number of macro facilities in residential areas; 6. Encourage and, where legally permissible, require cooperation between competitors and, as a primary option, joint use of new and existing towers, tower sites and suitable structures to the greatest extent possible, where doing so would significantly reduce or eliminate additional negative impact on the city; 7. Ensure wireless communication facilities are configured in a way that minimizes the adverse visual impact of the facilities, as viewed from different vantage points, through careful design, landscape screening, minimal impact siting options and camouflaging techniques, dispersion of unscreened features to lessen the visual impact upon any one location, and through assessment of teGhReleg .A+eptieRS SitiRg innovative siting techniques and sitiR . ^ sibilities beyeRd the 71 8. Enable wireless communication companies to enter into lease agreements with the city to use city property for the placement of wireless facilities, where consistent with other public needs, as a means to generate revenue for the city; 9. Balance the City's intent to minimize the adverse impacts of wireless communication facilities with the ability of the providers of communications services to deploy such services to the community quickly, effectively and efficiently; 10. Provide for the prompt removal of wireless communication facilities that are abandoned or no longer inspected for safety concerns and building code compliance, and provide a mechanism for the city to cause these abandoned wireless communication facilities to be removed as necessary to protect the citizens from imminent harm and danger; 11. Avoid potential damage to people and adjacent properties from tower failure and falling equipment, through strict compliance with state building and electrical codes; and 12. Disperse the adverse impacts of small rr-ellsmall wireless facility facilities as evenly as possible throughout the community, especially when joint use does not eliminate additional visual impact. B. In furtherance of these objectives, the city shall give due consideration to the zoning code, existing land uses, and environmentally sensitive areas when approving sites for the location of wireless communication facilities. C. These objectives were developed to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to protect property values, and to minimize and disperse visual impact, while furthering the Packet Pg. 125 2 9.1.a development of enhanced co m m u n i ca t ions services in the city. These objectives were designed to comply with the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and its implementing regulations. The provisions of this chapter are not intended to and any ambiguities herein shall not be interpreted in such a manner that would materially inhibit the deployment of wireless communication facilities. This chapter shall not be applied in such a manner as to unreasonably discriminate between providers of functionally equivalent wireless facilities. D. To the extent that any provision of this chapter or conflicts with any other city ordinance, this chapter shall control. Otherwise, this chapter shall be construed consistently with the other provisions and regulations of the city. E. In reviewing any application to place, construct or modify wireless communication facilities, the city shall act within federally required time periods. Any decision to deny an application shall be in writing, supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record. The city shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application in accordance with this title, this chapter, the adopted Edmonds comprehensive plan, and other applicable ordinances and regulations. F. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 20111. 20.50.020 Applicability. A. Except as provided herein, all wireless communication facilities shall comply with the provisions of this chapter. The standards and process requirements of this chapter supersede all other review process, setback, height or landscaping requirements of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). B. Environmental. All proposed installations are subject to a threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) according to Chapter 20.15A ECDC unless categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800. All proposals are subject to the critical areas requirements in Title 23 ECDC and the shoreline master program in Title 24 ECDC C. Master Permit Agreement Needed. 1. Consistent with chapter 35.99 RCW, any person, corporation or entity that proposes to locate any portion of a wireless communication facility within the city right-of-way must have a valid fully executed master permit with the city before submitting applications for right-of-way construction permits. 2. Wireless providers interested in obtaining a master permit must apply as follows to have a complete application: a. make application in writing to the city attorney c/o the city clerk's office; b. submit a proposed master permit form, PROVIDED THAT, this requirement shall no longer apply in the event that the city council has adopted a standard master permit template; c. submit three valid fully executed master permits that the provider has with other cities in Washington state, PROVIDED THAT, this requirement shall be excused to the Packet Pg. 126 3 9.1.a extent that the provider does not have sufficient valid master permits in other jurisdictions to meet that requirement; . ......... M11, MINIM. 3. After receipt of a complete application, the city attorney and wireless provider shall negotiate the terms of the master permit until they have agreed on terms that can be recommended to the city council for final approval. If the city attorney and wireless provider have not been able to reach agreement on the recommended terms of a master permit within 120 days of the date the complete application was submitted, the wireless provider may submit the provider's proposed master permit form to the council president directly and request that the provider's proposed master permit be added to a forthcoming city council agenda for consideration. The city council shall conduct a public hearing on the proposed master permit, including any renewal. 4. The final decision on any proposed master permit shall be subject to legislative discretion of the city council and the ordinance authorizing the master permit must be approved by a majority of the full council. Any denial of a proposed master permit must be supported by substantial evidence contained in a written record. 5. Any prior adoption by the city council of a master permit template, as contemplated in subsection C.2.b, above, is merely intended to facilitate future master permit negotiations and should in no way be seen as limiting the city council's legislative discretion to approve or reject a similar master permit that has come before the city council for action. 6. Master permit terms shall not exceed five years. Master permits shall require the City to be indemnified by the provider and that indemnification shall be support by insurance that names the City as an additional insured. D. Right -of -Way Construction Permit. A right-of-way construction permit is required prior to performing any work within the city right-of-way pursuant to ECDC Title 18.[Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. Packet Pg. 127 4 9.1.a 20.50.030 Exemptions. The following are exemptions from the provisions of this chapter: A. Radar systems for military and civilian communication and navigation. B. Handheld, mobile, marine and portable radio transmitters and/or receivers. C. Satellite antennas, including direct to home satellite services, and those regulated in ECDC 16.20.050(D). D. Licensed amateur (ham) radio stations and citizen band stations as regulated in ECDC 16.20.050 (E). E. Earth station antenna(s) one meter or less in diameter and located in any zone. F. Earth station antenna(s) two meters or less in diameter and located in the business and commercial zones. G. Routine maintenance or repair of wireless communication facilities. H. Emergency communications equipment or a COW or other temporary WCF during a declared public emergency. I. A temporary wireless communication facility or COW for providing coverage during a special event such as a festival, subject to approval by the City. Such a facility is exempt from the provisions of this chapter for up to three days before the special event begins and three days after the special event ends. J. A temporary wireless communication facility or COW for providing service during repair or replacement of an existing facility for a period of up to 14 days. Fr.K. Subject to compliance with all other applicable standards of this chapter, a building permit and/or right-of-way permit application need not be filed for emergency repair or maintenance of a facility until five business days after the completion of such emergency activity. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. 20.50.040 Prohibitions. A. The following wireless communication facilities are prohibited in Edmonds: 1. Guyed towers. 2. Lattice towers. B. Monopoles are prohibited in the following locations: 1. All residential zones (single-family (SF) and multifamily (MF)); 2. Downtown waterfront activity center; 3. Public (P) and open space (OS) zoned parcels; and Packet Pg. 128 5 9.1.a 4. Within the city rights -of -way. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 20111. 20.50.050 General macro facility siting criteria and design considerations. A. The city of Edmonds encourages wireless communication providers to use existing sites or more frequent, less noticeable sites instead of attempting to provide coverage through use of taller towers. To that end, applicants shall consider the following priority of preferred locations for wireless communication facilities: 1. Ce leeatien.Collocation, without an increase in the height of the building, pole or structure upon which the facility would be located; 2. Ce-Iecat+en.Collocation, where additional height is necessary above existing building, pole, or structure; 3. A replacement pole or structure for an existing one; 4. A new pole or structure altogether. B. New monopole facilities must include mounts capable of accommodating at least one other wireless providers^ lecati^^ shall be ^ ed fee all , ^less c catie^ facility -1--.Te the greatest extent technically feasible, applicants for new meRepOle faCilities shall be required te build mewnts capable ef aceemmedatiRg at least ene ether eaFri C. Noise. Any facility that requires a generator or other device which will create noise audible beyond the boundaries of the site must demonstrate compliance with Chapter 5.30 ECC, Noise Abatement and Control. A noise report, prepared by an acoustical engineer, shall be submitted with any application to construct and operate a wireless communication facility that will have a generator or similar device. The city may require that the report be reviewed by a third -third - party expert at the expense of the applicant. D. Business License Requirement. Any person, corporation or entity that operates a wireless communication facility within the city shall have a valid business license issued annually by the city. Any person, corporation or other business entity which owns a monopole also is required to obtain a business license on an annual basis. E. Signage. Only safety signs or those mandated by a government entity with jurisdiction may be located on wireless communication facilities. No other types of signs are permitted on wireless communication facilities. F. Any application must demonstrate that there is sufficient space for temporary parking for regular maintenance of the proposed facility. Packet Pg. 129 ■ 9.1.a G. Finish. A monopole may be constructed of laminated wood, fiberglass, steel, or similar material. The pole shall be a neutral color so as to reduce its visual obtrusiveness, subject to any applicable standards of the FAA or FCC. H. Design. The design of all buildings and ancillary structures shall use materials, colors, textures, screening and landscaping that will blend the facilities with the natural setting and built environment. I. Color. All antennas and ancillary facilities located on buildings or structures other than monopoles shall be of a neutral color that is identical to or closely compatible with the color of the supporting structure so as to make the antenna and ancillary facilities as visually unobtrusive as possible. J. Lighting. Monopoles shall not be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA, FCC or other government entity with jurisdiction. If lighting is required and alternative lighting options are permitted, the city shall review the lighting alternatives and approve the design that would cause the least disturbance to the surrounding area. No strobe lighting of any type is permitted on any monopole. If FAA guidelines would require a strobe, the location shall be denied unless no other site or combination of sites would provide adequate coverage in accord with FCC requirements. K. Advertising. No advertising is permitted at wireless communication facility sites or on any ancillary structure or facilities equipment enclosure. L. Equipment Enclosure. Each applicant shall use the smallest equipment enclosure practical to contain the required equipment and a reserve for required ce Ier=atieRcollocation. M. Radio Frequency Emissions Compliance. The applicant shall demonstrate that the project will not result in levels of radio frequency emissions that exceed FCC standards, including FCC Office of Engineering Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, as amended. Additionally, if the director determines the wireless communication facility, as constructed, may emit radio frequency emissions that are likely to exceed Federal Communications Commission uncontrolled/general population standards in the FCC Office of Engineering Technology (OET) Bulletin 65, Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, as amended, in areas accessible by the general population, the director may require post -installation testing to determine whether to require further mitigation of radio frequency emissions. The cost of any such testing and mitigation shall be borne by the applicant. N. Landscaping and Screening. 1. The visual impacts of wireless communication facilities should be mitigated and softened through landscaping or other screening materials at the base of a monopole, facility equipment compound, equipment enclosures and ancillary structures. If the antenna is mounted flush on an existing building, or camouflaged as part of the building and other equipment is housed inside an existing structure, no landscaping is required. The director or his designee may reduce or waive the standards for those sides of the wireless Packet Pg. 130 7 9.1.a communication facility that are not in public view, when a combination of existing vegetation, topography, walls, decorative fences or other features achieve the same degree of screening as the required landscaping; in locations where the visual impact of the facility would be minimal; and in those locations where large wooded lots not capable of subdivision and natural growth around the property perimeter provide a sufficient buffer. 2. Landscaping shall be installed on the outside of fences in accordance with Chapter 20.13 ECDC. Existing vegetation shall be preserved to the maximum extent practicable and may be used as a substitute for or as a supplement to landscaping or screening requirements. The following requirements apply: a. Type I landscaping shall be placed around the perimeter of the equipment cabinet enclosure, except that a maximum 10-foot portion of the fence may remain without landscaping in order to provide access to the enclosure. b. Landscaping area shall be a minimum of five feet in width around the perimeter of the enclosure. c. Vegetation selected should be native and drought tolerant. d. Landscaping shall be located so as not to create sight distance hazards or conflicts with other surrounding utilities. 3. When landscaping is used, the applicant shall submit a landscaping bond pursuant to ECDC 20.13.040. 4. The use of chain link, plastic, vinyl or wire fencing is prohibited. Ornamental metal or wood fencing materials are preferred. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011] 20.50.060 Permits and Shot Clocks. A. No person may place, construct, reconstruct, modify or operate a wireless communication facility subject to this chapter without first having in place a master permit agreement pursuant to ECDC 20.50.020.0 and a permit issued in accordance with this chapter. Except as otherwise provided herein, the requirements of this chapter are in addition to the applicable requirements of this title and ECDC Title 18. Any wires, cables, conduit or equipment associated with a wireless communication facility shall be subject to the requirements of chapter 18.05 ECDC, unless wireless facilities are expressly exempted from a provision of chapter 18.05 ECDC or the context necessitates that a provision of chapter 18.05 ECDC not apply to wireless facilities B. Applications will be reviewed based on the type of wireless communication facilities requested to be permitted. Each wireless communication facility requires the appropriate type of project permit review, as shown in Table A. In the event of uncertainty on the type of a wireless facility, the director shall have the authority to determine what permits are required for the proposed facility. Packet Pg. 131 ■ 9.1.a Table A Building Right -of- FCC Shot Permit Way (ROW) Clocks for Request Location Required Permit Permit Required Review Eligible facilities request Existing Yes, if on Yes, if in 60 days appFeved- private ROW `"tower or property base station New macro facility Collocation Yes, if any Yes, if any 90 days elements on elements in private the ROW property New macro facility New structure or Yes, if any Yes, if any 150 days monopole elements on elements in private the ROW property New small ee44-wireless facility Collocation Yes, if on Yes, if any 60 days private elements in property the ROW New small ee44-wireless facility New structure or Yes, if any Yes, if any 90 days freestanding elements on elements in small wireless private the ROW facility --' property Temporary facility Varies Yes, if any Yes, if any Standard elements on elements in permit private the ROW quotes property a Packet Pg. 132 9.1.a C. Timelines. 1. Macro ee-14facilities. The application review period begins when all required application materials have been received and fees paid. If the City determines that the application is incomplete and provides notice to the applicant within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of application, the clock stops. The clock restarts when the City receives the applicant's supplemental submission in response to the City's notice of incompleteness. For subsequent determinations of incompleteness, the clock tolls (pauses) if the City provides written notice within ten (10) days that a supplemental submission did not provide the requested information. 2. Small c-e4wireless facilities. The application review period begins when all required application materials have been received and fees paid. If the City determines that the application is incomplete and provides notice to the applicant within ten (10) calendar days of the date of application, the clock stops. The clock resets to zero (0) when the City receives the applicant's supplemental submission in response to the City's notice of incompleteness. For subsequent determinations of incompleteness, the clock tolls (pauses) if the City provides written notice within ten (10) days that a supplemental submission did not provide the requested information. D. Batched small e4l-wireless facility applications. If an applicant is applying for a small wireless network in a contiguous service area, up to 45multiple small wireless facilities may be batched into one application, PROVIDED THAT the application fee shall still be calculated as if the applications were submitted separately. The director or his/her designee may approve, deny or conditionally approve all or any portion of the small wireless facilities proposed in the application. The denial of one or more small wireless facility locations within one submission shall not be the sole basis for a denial of other locations or the entire batched application for small wireless facilities. Should an applicant file a single application for a batch that includes both collocated and new structures for small wireless facilities, the longer 90-day shot clock shall apply to ensure the City has adequate time to review the new construction sites. E. Any application submitted pursuant to this chapter for projects located on public or private property shall be reviewed and evaluated by the director, or his designee. The director of public works or his/her designee shall review all proposed wireless communication facilities that are located partially or fully within the city rights -of -way. Regardless of whether the director or the director of public works or their respective designees are reviewing the application, all applications will be reviewed and evaluated pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. F. All applications for wireless communication facilities shall be reviewed for compliance with the applicable design standards by the director or his/her designee. G. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all other permits from any other appropriate Packet Pg. 133 10 9.1.a governing body with jurisdiction (i.e., Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Federal Aviation Administration, etc.). H. No provision of this chapter shall be interpreted to allow the installation of a wireless communication facility which minimizes parking, landscaping or other site development standards established by the Edmonds Community Development Code. I. Wireless communication facilities that are governed under this chapter shall not be eligible for variances under Chapter 20.85 ECDC. Any request to deviate from this chapter shall be based solely on the exceptions set forth in this chapter. J. Third -Third -Party Review. Applicants may use various methodologies and analyses, including geographically based computer software, to determine the specific technical parameters of the services to be provided utilizing the proposed wireless communication facilities, such as expected coverage area, antenna configuration, capacity, and topographic constraints that affect signal paths. In certain instances, a third part third -party expert may be needed to review the engineering and technical data submitted by an applicant for a permit. The city may at its discretion require thiFd aarythird-party engineering and technical review as part of a permitting process. The costs of the technical third pan third -party review shall be borne by the applicant. 1. The selection of the thiFd aaAyLhircl-party expert is at the discretion of the city. The third -party expert review is intended to address interference and public safety issues and be a site -specific review of engineering and technical aspects of the proposed wireless communication facilities and/or a review of the applicants' methodology and equipment used, and is not intended to be a subjective review of the site which was selected by an applicant. Based on the results of the expert review, the city may require changes to the proposal. The thiFd-part third -party review shall address the following: a. The accuracy and completeness of submissions; b. The applicability of analysis techniques and methodologies; c. The validity of conclusions reached; d. The viability of other site or sites in the city for the use intended by the applicant; and e. Any specific engineering or technical issues designated by the city. K. Any decision by the director or the director of public works shall be given substantial deference in any appeal of a decision by the city to either approve, approve with conditions, or deny any application for a wireless communication facility. L. Notwithstanding other remedies that may be available under federal law, failure of the City to issue permits within or otherwise comply with the FCC shot clock requirements does not provide a "deemed" grant of approval for macro or small wireless facilities. No work may occur until the permit issues. -[Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. Packet Pg. 134 11 9.1.a 20.50.070 Application requirements. The following information must be submitted as part of a complete application for a wireless communication facility permit in the city of Edmonds: A. Project description including a design narrative, technology description, and, for macro cell facilities, c na collocation analysis indicating the alternative locations -and- +^r"491-bi- considered; B. Aerial photo or map showing entire proposed deployment (small wireless only)...; Q-. C. Site information on scaled plans, including: 1. Site plan; 2. Elevation drawings; 3. Utility plan showing existing utilities, proposed facility location, and undergrounding; 4. Screening, camouflaging or landscaping plan and cost estimate (produced in accordance with Chapter 20.13 ECDC), as appropriate; D. Photos and photo simulations showing the existing appearance of t#e-each site and appearance of the proposed installation from nearby public viewpoints; -F-.E.Noise report (per ECDC 20.50.050(C)), if applicable; G-.F. Radio Frequency (RF) emissions standards. The applicant shall provide the certification of an RF engineer with knowledge of the proposed development that the small wireless facility ee44-network will comply with RF standards adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The City recognizes that the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 gives the FCC sole jurisdiction in the field of regulation of RF emissions and wireless facilities that meet FCC standards shall not be conditioned or denied on the basis of RF impacts. H-. G. For small wireless facility ee44-deployments, the following additional documentation shall be provided as initial justification for the proposed location pursuant to the &icelocation preference criteria set forth in ECDC 20.50.130.AB, as applicable: im. im - - . - - Packet Pg. 135 12 9.1.a 7-1. For installations proposed for Location Preference #42 (Freestanding small wireless facility or new street light), provide all of the following to the extent applicable within 150 lineal feet of each proposed small wireless facility location: a. WHERE NO POLES EXIST IN THE AREA: De,-H-Iml,,ntati n Full � „,- On u 1 -,nd u 2 abevejand Via. Evidence that no utility poles, traffic 4g4tsignal poles, or street light poles exist within 150 lineal feet in either direction of each proposed small wireless facility location, as measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street; e-F b. WHERE POLES EXIST THAT CANNOT FULLY CONCEAL A SMALL WIRELESSCE-L-L FACILITY: Written documentation from gall pole owners e#�within 150 lineal feet in either direction -of each proposed small wireless facility location, as measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street,eF denying the applicant's request to replace any of the existing poles that are not capable of hosting a fully concealed small wirelessc-e4 facility with a new pole that is capable of hosting a fully concealed small wirelessc-e4 facility on the grounds that no such replacement pole is available on the market or due to other reasonably insoluble problems expressed in writing by the pole owner; c. WHERE POLES EXIST THAT CAN FULLY CONCEAL A SMALL WIRELESS GEI�FACILITY: Written documentation from all owners of poles within 150 lineal feet in either direction of each proposed small wireless facility location, as measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street, denying the applicant's request to install the small wireless facility ee-within any such existing s+r�;;ght poles leeated v.oit ;n IS(-) lopeal feet A-f PAPh 1;m;;Il woreler facility leeatieR, as MeaswFed aleRg the Fight of way. �2. For installations proposed for Location Preference #153 (On top of existing power pole): a. Documentation as required in 9G.1, u' and u.2 above; and b. Evidence that the design standards for a freestanding small wireless facility chin the right-of-way could not be met; and c. Confirmation by the director of public works that a new street light pole capable of hosting a fully concealed small wirelessc-e4 facility was not determined to be needed or could not be located within 150 lineal feet in either direction of the proposed Packet Pg. 136 13 9.1.a small wireless facility location, as measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street. For installations proposed for Location Preference #64 (In communication s on existing power pole): a. Documentation as required in #G.1, and G#.2, u 2 --d HA above; and b. Evidence that no power poles, that would allow for installation on top of the pole, single phase power pel exist within 150 lineal feet in either direction of each proposed small wireless facility location, as measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street; or c. Written documentation from the -all owners of the power poles within 150 lineal feet in either direction of each proposed small wireless facility location, as measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street, ewne�denying the request to install the small wireless facility on any such ey,, ^^ �i�^'^ �power poles -that would allow for installation on top of the pole'^^,te,- ,.,ithin 150 lineal feet of each prepesed small weless facility leGatieni �� red along the right of 14. 4. For installations proposed for Location Preference #-75 (Strand -mounted): a. Documentation as required in G4.1, 4G.2, and 44G.3, H.", and H.5above; and b. Evidence that no tr-,nSY,.,i«ien power poles, that would allow for installation within the communication space, exist within 150 lineal feet in either direction of each proposed small wireless facility location, measured along the right-of-way; or c. Written documentation from gall owners of ther-ee powerp#a-,e poles within 150 lineal feet in either direction of each proposed small wireless facility location, as measured along the right-of-way line for the applicable street, eWReF denying the request to install the small wireless facility on any such existing tFansmissie^ three empower poles that would allow for installation within the communication space , aS me -pis fired -,leRg the Fight ef way �.H. Any other documentation deemed necessary by the director in order to issue a decision [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 20111. 20.50.080 Eligible facilities requests. This section implements section 6409 of the Spectrum Act (codified at 47 U.S.C. 1455), which requires the City of Edmonds to approve any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. A. Definitions. The following definitions only apply to eligible facilities requests as described in this section and do not apply throughout this chapter. 1. Base Station is a structure or equipment at a fixed location that enables FCC -licensed or authorized wireless communications between user equipment and a communications network. The term does not encompass a tower as defined herein nor any equipment associated with a tower. Base station includes, without limitation: Packet Pg. 137 14 9.1.a a. Equipment associated with wireless communications services as well as unlicensed wireless services and fixed wireless services such as microwave backhaul. b. Radio transceivers, antennas, coaxial or fiber-optic cable, regular and back-up power supplies, and comparable equipment, regardless of technological configuration (including distributed antenna systems ("DAS") and small eerismall wireless facility networks). c. Any structure other than a tower that, at the time the relevant application is filed (with jurisdiction) under this section, supports or houses equipment described in subsections (A)(1)(a) and (b) of this section that has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, or under another State or local regulatory review process, even if the structure was not built for the sole or primary purpose of providing that support. The term does not include any structure that, at the time the relevant application is filed with the City under this section, does not support or house equipment described in subsections (A)(1)(a) and (b) of this section. 2. Collocation. The mounting or installation of transmission equipment on an eligible support structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communication purposes. 3. Eligible Facilities Request. Any request for modification of an existing tower or base station that does not substantially increase the physical dimensions of such tower or base station, involving: a. Collocation of new transmission equipment; b. Removal of transmission equipment; or c. Replacement of transmission equipment. 4. Eligible Support Structure. Any tower or base station as defined in this section; provided, that it is existing at the time the relevant application is filed with the City. 5. Existing. A constructed tower or base station is existing if it has been reviewed and approved under the applicable zoning or siting process, or under another State or local regulatory review process; provided, that a tower that has not been reviewed and approved because it was not in a zoned area when it was built, but was lawfully constructed, is existing for purposes of this definition. 6. Site. For towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, the current boundaries of the leased or owned property surrounding the tower and any access or utility easements currently related to the site, and, for other eligible support structures, further restricted to that area in proximity to the structure and to other transmission equipment already deployed on the ground. Packet Pg. 138 15 9.1.a 7. Substantial Change. A modification substantially changes the physical dimensions of an eligible support structure if it meets any of the following criteria: a. For towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, it increases the height of the tower by more than ten (10) percent or by the height of one (1) additional antenna array with separation from the nearest existing antenna, not to exceed twenty (20) feet, whichever is greater; for other eligible support structures, it increases the height of the structure by more than ten (10) percent or more than ten (10) feet, whichever is greater. 4�—Changes in height should be measured from the original support structure in cases where deployments are or will be separated horizontally, such as on buildings' rooftops; in other circumstances, changes in height should be measured from the dimensions of the tower or base station, inclusive of originally approved appurtenances and any modifications that were approved prior to the passage of the Spectrum Act; b. For towers other than towers in the public rights -of -way, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the tower that would protrude from the edge of the tower more than ten (10) feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance, whichever is greater; for other eligible support structures, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure by more than six (6) feet; c. For any eligible support structure, it involves installation of more than one equipment cabinet fer the technele y ir, elve 'the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed four cabinets; or, for towers in the public streets and base stations, it involves installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if there are no preexisting ground cabinets associated with the structure, or else involves installation of ground cabinets that are more than ten (10) percent larger in height or overall volume than any other ground cabinets associated with the structure; d. It entails any excavation or deployment outside the current site; e. It would defeat the concealment elements of the eligible support structure; or f. It does not comply with conditions associated with the siting approval of the construction or modification of the eligible support structure or base station equipment; provided, however, that this limitation does not apply to any modification that is noncompliant only in a manner that would not exceed the thresholds identified above. B. Qualification as an Eligible Facilities Request. Upon receipt of an application for an eligible facilities request, the Director will review the application to determine whether it qualifies as an eligible facilities request. Packet Pg. 139 16 9.1.a C. Time Frame for Review. Within sixty (60) days of the date on which a network provider submits an eligible facilities request application, the Director must approve the application unless it determines that the application is not covered by this section. D. Tolling of the Time Frame for Review. The sixty (60) day review period begins to run when the application is submitted, and may be tolled only by mutual agreement by the Director and the applicant or in cases where the Director determines that the application is incomplete. The time frame for review of an eligible facilities request is not tolled by a moratorium on the review of applications. 1. To toll the time frame for incompleteness, the Director must provide written notice to the applicant within thirty (30) days of receipt of the application, clearly and specifically delineating all missing documents or information required in the application. 2. The time frame for review begins running again when the applicant makes a supplemental submission in response to the Director's notice of incompleteness. 3. Following a supplemental submission, the Director will notify the applicant within ten (10) days that the supplemental submission did not provide the information identified in the original notice delineating missing information. The time frame is tolled in the case of second or subsequent notices pursuant to the procedures identified in this subsection. Second or subsequent notice of incompleteness may not specify missing documents or information that was not delineated in the original notice of incompleteness. E. Determination That Application Is Not an Eligible Facilities Request. If the Director determines that the applicant's request does not qualify as an eligible facilities request, the Director must deny the application. F. Failure to Act. In the event the Director fails to approve or deny a request for an eligible facilities request within the time frame for review (accounting for any tolling), the request is deemed granted. The deemed grant does not become effective until the applicant notifies the Director in writing after the review period has expired (accounting for any tolling) that the application has been deemed granted. G. To the extent feasible, additional antennas and equipment shall maintain the appearance intended by the original facility, including, but not limited to, color, screening, landscaping, camouflage, concealment techniques, mounting configuration, or architectural treatment. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. 20.50.090 New building -mounted macro wireless communication facility standards. A. Generally. Wireless communication facilities located on the roof or on the side of the building shall be grouped together, integrated to the maximum possible degree with the building design, placed toward the center of the roof and/or thoroughly screened from residential building views and from public views using radio frequency -transparent panels. Building -mounted wireless communication facilities shall be painted with nonreflective colors to match the existing surface where the antennas are mounted. Packet Pg. 140 17 9.1.a B. Height. The following requirements shall apply: 1. Downtown Waterfront/Activity Center (As Identified in the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan). For buildings at, or which exceed, the height limit of the underlying zone, antennas shall be flush -mounted and no portion of the antenna may extend above the building on which it is mounted. For buildings below the height limit, antennas may be built to the maximum height of the zone provided they are screened consistent with the existing building in terms of color, architectural style and material. Flush -mounted antennas may encroach into a required setback or into the city right-of-way if a right-of-way use agreement is established with the city. Antennas shall not project into the right-of-way by more than two feet and shall provide a minimum clearance height of 20 feet over any pedestrian or vehicular right-of-way. 2. Outside the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. The maximum height of building - mounted facilities and equipment shall not exceed nine feet above the top of the roof on which the facility is located. This standard applies to all buildings regardless of whether they are at or above the maximum height of the underlying zone. Such antennas must be well integrated with the existing structure or designed to look like common rooftop structures such as chimneys, vents and stovepipes. C. Equipment Enclosure. Equipment enclosures for building -mounted wireless communication facilities shall first be located within the building on which the facility is located. If an equipment enclosure within the building is reasonably unavailable, then an equipment enclosure may be incorporated into the roof design provided the enclosure meets the height requirement for the zone. If the equipment can be screened by placing the equipment below existing parapet walls, no additional screening is required. If screening is required, then the screening must be consistent with the existing building in terms of color, architectural style and material. Finally, if there is no other choice but to locate the equipment enclosure on the ground, the equipment must be enclosed within an accessory structure which meets the setbacks of the underlying zone and be screened in accordance with ECDC 20.50.050(N). D. Feed Lines and Coaxial Cables. Feed lines and cables should be located below the parapet of the rooftop, if present. If the feed lines and cables are visible from a public right-of-way or adjacent property, they must be painted to match the color scheme of the building. 0 Packet Pg. 141 9.1.a Acceptable Building -Mounted WCF Unacceptable Building -Mounted WCF [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. 20.50.100 New structure -mounted macro wireless communication facilities standards. A. Generally. Wireless communication facilities located on structures other than buildings, such as utility poles, light poles, flag poles, transformers, and/or tanks, shall be designed to blend with these structures and be mounted on them in an inconspicuous manner. 1. Wireless communication facilities located on structures within unzoned city rights -of - way adjacent to single-family residential (IRS) zones shall satisfy the following requirement a. No metal pole or tower shall be used within the right-of-way adjacent to a single- family zoned neighborhood unless required in order to comply with the provisions of the State Electrical Code. Wooden poles of height and type generally in use in the surrounding residential neighborhood shall be used unless prohibited by the State Electrical Code. 2. Wireless communication facilities located on structures shall be painted with nonreflective colors in a scheme that blends with the underlying structure. B. Height. 1. The maximum height of structure -mounted wireless communication facilities shall not exceed the maximum height specified for each structure or zoning district (rights -of -way are unzoned); provided the wireless communication facility may extend up to six feet above the top of the structure on which the wireless communication facility is installed. Antennas and related equipment shall be mounted as close as practicable to the structure 2. Only one extension is permitted per structure. 3. If installed on an electrical transmission or distribution pole, a maximum 15-foot vertical separation is required from the height of the existing power lines at the site (prior to any pole replacement) to the bottom of the antenna. This vertical separation is intended to allow wireless carriers to comply with the electrical utility's requirements for separation Packet Pg. 142 19 9.1.a between their transmission lines and the carrier's antennas. C. Equipment Enclosure. Equipment enclosures shall first be located underground. If the enclosure is within the right-of-way, the enclosure shall be underground. If there is no other feasible option but to locate the equipment enclosure above ground on private property, the equipment must be enclosed within an accessory structure which meets the setbacks of the underlying zone and be screened in accordance with ECDC 20.50.050(N). D. Feed Lines and Coaxial Cable. Feed lines and cables must be painted to closely match the color scheme of the structure which supports the antennas. E. Only wireless communication providers with a valid Fight ^f way use agFee'^^^^+master permit shall be eligible to apply for a right-of-way construction permit, which shall be required prior to installation of facilities within the city right-of-way and be in addition to other permits specified in this chapter. Acceptable Structure -Mounted WCF 20 Packet Pg. 143 9.1.a Unacceptable Structure -Mounted WCF [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. 20.50.110 New monopole-Me-u tee macro wereless faGili}standards. men RtS a able of a e datiRg at least e PICIPIWARRI •- -13A. No part of a monopole, antennas or antenna equipment may exceed the maximum height 4-allowed in the zone where the facility is located. EB. Monopoles must be completed shrouded. All antennas, equipment and cables must be concealed. -DC. All monopole facilities must conform to the following site development standards: 1. To the greatest extent possible, monopole facilities shall be located where existing trees, existing structures and other existing site features camouflage these facilities. 2. Existing mature vegetation should be retained to the greatest possible degree in order to help conceal the facility. 3. Equipment Enclosure. The first preference is for the equipment enclosure to be located underground. If the enclosure is within the right-of-way, the enclosure must be underground. If there is no other choice but to locate the equipment enclosure on the ground, the equipment must be enclosed within an accessory structure which meets the setbacks of the underlying zone and be screened in accordance with ECDC 20.50.050(N). Packet Pg. 144 21 9.1.a Acceptable Monopole WCF Unacceptable Monopole WCF [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. 20.50.120 Temporary facilities. A. The installation of a "cell -on -wheels" or COWS and the installation site shall comply with all applicable laws, statutes, requirements, rules, regulations, and codes, including, but not limited to, the Uniform Fire Prevention and Building Code and National Electric Code. BAIT COWS and related appurtenances shall be completely removed from the installation site within 30 days of the date of the end of the emergency as determined by the mayor. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. 22 Packet Pg. 145 9.1.a 20.50.130 Small wireless standards and approval process. Unlike macro facilities which are intended to provide c�wireless coverage over large areas, the goal of a small wireless facility deployment is to provide additional capacity in localized areas, including residential neighborhoods, using smaller antennas and equipment. The intent of this section is to describe the City's location preferences for small wirelesses 4 facility deployments and provide appropriate design standards to ensure that the negative visual impacts of small wireless facilities are minimized. and the r;+„s i ng_teFm gear of „tilit„ A.- Permitted locations. small weFeless facilities. IR this way, existiRg buildiRgS will be used where feasible and iRdividual d pl,,,,,.,,eRtS irate their neighbeFhee s. Installation of small wireless facilities -on existing buildings structures w " could whelp minimize the negative visual impact of additional wires, antennas and equipment that may otherwise be placed on existing utility poles. However, it is understood that a multi -node deployment may not be able to be located entirely on zoned-buildingsgF�, feTas it may not be technically feasible to do so and in addition, pFeperties because some property owners within the desired small wireless facility Ee4- deployment area may not want to participate. -er because-ef technelegical facceFsinthat 6nstance, a -A mix of zoned property and right-of-way locations may be used. 1. Small wireless facilityee 4 attachments to buildings are permitted in any zone and are not subject to the dispersion requirement below. -1-.2. Fully concealed freestanding Stand-;4'A-.PP— SMa'Tcelismall wireless facilitiesy*efes are permitted in anv zone (exceat Downtown Business) but are still subiect to the dispersion requirement below. 3. Dispersion Requirement: No two small wireless facilities shall be located within 300 10AP__AI f,,,,r f -h .,rh,,,- ed- al Rg the right ef_way lin I 50feet radially. PROVIDED THAT this dispersion requirement shall not apply to small wireless facilities that are located pursuant to location preference #1, below. 2-.4. Downtown Business district (BD) zones shall be limited to building attachments or hollow utility poles. Where a Sternberg street light exists, replacement or new installation of a decorative street light shall match the style and character of the existing Sternberg street lights, as determined by the Public Works Director, and shall be designed to contain a small wireless facility in a fully concealed manner. Small wireless facilities shall not be attached to Sternberg street lights that were not designed to host fully concealed small wireless facilities. 23 Packet Pg. 146 9.1.a 5. In areas where utility systems are underground, small cell facility deployment will be limited to existing buildings, new or replaced street lights and/or installation of freestanding small cell facilities. 6. Small wireless facilities may not be located on sites identified on official local, state or federal historic registries. 7. Small wireless facilities may not be located on wood poles that contain a street light. B. Location preference hierarchy and analysis er*teF* , When locating small wireless facilities in the right-of-way, wWireless providers shall ate site their r;"-rc-PI'small wireless f^^*'*+Yw*Fe'^« facilities pursuant to the following siting preferences. These siting preferences are expressed {in descending order, starting with the most preferred). Wireless providers may not descend to a lower preference in the list below until they have determined that the higher preferences are not feasible in accordance with ECDC 20.50.070.G. Failures to show lack of feasibility of a higher preference shall be grounds for denial of an application.: Location Preference #1— Hollow utility pole, fully eenee '^- Location Preference #2 — Freestanding small wireless facility or new street light Location Preference #3 — Existing power pole (installation on top of pole) Location Preference #4 — Existing Dower pole (installation in communication space Location Preference #5 — Strand -mounted C. General Design Standards. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, the followi general design standards apply to all small wireless facilities. 1. Collocation. All new poles must be capable of accepting at least two wireless providers Packet Pg. 147 24 9.1.a in a completely concealed manner. 2. Ground mounted equipment in the rights -of -way is prohibited, unless the applicant can demonstrate that pole mounted or undergrounded equipment is technically infeasible. If ground mounted equipment is necessary, the equipment must be fully concealed. Generators located in the rights -of -way are prohibited. 3. No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in violation of Chapter 5.30 ECC. 4. Replacement poles, new poles, and all equipment shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), city construction and sidewalk clearance standards, and state and federal regulations in order to provide a clear and safe passage within the rights -of - way. 5. Replacement poles shall be located as near as possible to the existing pole with the requirement to remove the abandoned pole. 6. No signage, message, or identification other than the manufacturer's identification or identification required by governing law is allowed to be portrayed on any antenna, and any such signage on equipment enclosures shall be of the minimum amount possible to achieve the intended purpose; provided, that signs are permitted as concealment techniques where appropriate. 7. Antennas and related equipment may not be illuminated except for security reasons, required by a federal or state authority, or unless approved as part of a concealment element plan. . ...... .. 25 Packet Pg. 148 9.1.a FPrg-. e) if concealment is net possible, the antennas must be camouflaged. The smallest feasible Fneunting brackets must be used and the aRtennas must be painted and te)(twed te match Q Packet Pg. 149 26 9.1.a w MEW �wwww... ww�iwi TT2#T22S ding a" nllcmAll . nlncs f I +.. I lug be seIrved by H lR dnrgFeY ,rd n p d fmhnr �f fihnr 1c +n hn n,-rn.d FIBER SPLICEIPULL BOX FINAL 1 GRADE ELECTRICAL--�_ CONDUIT CANTENNA UPPER POLE EQUIPMENT CABINET STANDARD FOUNDATION .!!Rl:E7SZS'i!...�l��.rS�4RS�Tl�:FI:�:'Ti7Sr.7RlR7�71:. .:F�7�1 T�RSS917:111TT■�T■��TTTS�RSlTS�:7�fiP.FiT.'J•:R7:TP.�. �T.�7■ Packet Pg. 150 27 9.1.a Dee 1.,.,.,-,eR &R Specific Design Standards for -,;Mall ;.AAreles (Facilities in the Right -of -Way z. IA/i+hin the Fight f_ . -3-.1. a -.-Location Preference #13 — Hollow utility r-pole. This option applies to any existing pole in the right-of-way (power pole, street light pole, traffic light pole), that could feasibly be replaced with a hollow pole designed to host small wireless facilities in a fully concealed manner. In many, but not all instances, this location preference will involve the replacement of a wood P444-pole with a hollow pole that serves the same needs as its predecessor while also hosting small wireless facilities in a fully concealed manner. EXiStiRg/Fepl-, -.,.J hello,., stFe t light . ele ., utility pole: a. Combination nck� small wireless facility and power pole must meet the pole owner's reauirements for power distribution. New combination ��Pllsmall wireless facility and power poles must be designed to host small wireless facilities from at least two carriers in a fullv enclosed manner. 5G antennas onlv may be exposed until such time that the technology develops to make concealment of 5G antennas feasible. a,b. Combination small small wireless facility and streetlight pole should be located where an existing streetlight pole can be utilized or removed and replaced with a pole that allows for snqall celismall wireless facility installation in the same location. b-.C.Pole design shall match or be compatible with the aesthetics of existing streetlights installed adjacent to the pole. Packet Pg. 151 9.1.a d. Where a Sternberg street light exists in the downtown business district (BD) zones, replacement or new installation of a decorative street light shall he similar +ematch the style and character a-sof the existing Sternberg street lights, aeye4as determined by the Public Works Director, and shall be designed to contain a small wireless facility in a fully concealed manner. e. The components shall be sized to be v III" gpole shall have a streamlined appearance similar to the pole in the FIBEF 5PLIC embedded diagram, meted- her- to the BOX right. For a combination pole to be FINALw[ considered visually pleasing, the transition ELEC between the equipment cabinet and upper CON[ pole should be considered. A decorative ENNA IAIRE IAIRE MAST ARM R POLE WENT CABINET DARD DATION transition shall be installed over the equipment cabinet upper bolts, or decorative base cover shall be installed to match the equipment cabinet size. f. The diameter of the upper pole shall be smaller than sealed At 8.5-te 0 75-the size Af the equipment cabinet, with a 10 eArCh ter ^'iamete . All hardware connections shall be hidden from view. No horizontal flat spaces greater than 1.5 inches shall exist on the equipment cabinet to prevent cups, trash, and other objects from being placed on the equipment cabinet. g. A+�4Internal divider s"a" separations of --electrical wiring and fiber to be provided as required -byW the pole owner. h. Weatherproof grommets shall be integrated in the pole design to allow cable to exit the pole, for external shrouds, without water seeping into the pole. The a�T�tal,'at+ens exT_t.Rg stFeet'ights the antenna shall either be fully concealed within the pole or placed on top of the pole, based on technical feasibility. A cantenna or canister antenna on top of an existing pole may not extend more than Packet Pg. 152 29 9.1.a six (6) feet above the height of the existing pole and the diameter may not exceed the diameter of the top of the pole by more than two (2) inches. The antennas shall be integrated into the pole design so that it appears as a continuation of the original pole, including colored or painted to match the pole. All cabling and mounting hardware/brackets from the bottom of the antenna to the top of the pole shall be 44�-concealed and integrated with the pole. j.StFeet ,tUtility poles shall be located as follows: In a manner that does not impede, obstruct, or hinder pedestrian or vehicular travel. In alignment with existing trees, utility poles, and streetlights. W-.iii. Equal distance between trees when possible, with a minimum of 15-foot separation such that no proposed disturbance shall occur within the critical root zone of any tree. Div. With appropriate clearance from existing utilities. a+v. In compliance with clear zone requirements. Outside 30 feet eleaF sig4t Zvi. 10-feet away from the intersection of an alley with a street. k. All conduit, cables, wires and fiber must be routed internally in the utility pole. 2. Location Preference #24 - Freestanding small wireless facility or new street light_ a. Freestanding Small small r^"�;Twireless facility. The specifications provided in this section are for installations within the right-of- way only. The accompanying diagram shows a typical pole and its elements. i. Dimensional requirements: a) A freestanding small wireless facility may not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the top of the foundation to the top of the cantenna. Packet Pg. 153 30 9.1.a b) The equipment cabinet must be bety.o^^^ 16 ^ no greater than 20 inches in diameter. c) The diameter of the upper pole shall be smaller than the equipment cabinet. The pole shall be tapered to transition from the equipment cabinet to the upper pole, as shown in the graphic below. The pole diameter must be scaled so that no flat, horizontal surface larger than 1.5 inches exists between the equipment cabinet and upper pole. eguaig„TeRt ea-hi.p.ette the W1919eF 190'e—The cantenna may not exceed 6-ft in height. ii. Appearance requirements: a) The same pole aesthetic must be used along adjacent blocks to maintain a cohesive appearance. If freestanding small wireless facilities already exist within 190#eetthe deplovment area, then the new facility shall be designed to match the existing facilities as much as Dracticable.- b) All small wireless facil carrier equipment must be housed internal to the equipment cabinet or hidden within the cantenna. FIBER SPLICEIPULL BOX FINAL � =E� CANTENNA UPPER POLE EQUIPMENT CABINET The cantenna, upper pole ELECTRICAL--,_ CONDUIT and equipment cabinet STANDARD must be of the same brown FOUNDAMON or Breen colors. the saa.m.e eo;pr unless otherwise aDgroved by the Director. c) All hardware connections shall be hidden from view. Packet Pg. 154 31 9.1.a d) No equipment maybe attached to the outside of the pole. e) The freestandine small wireless facilitv must be served by underground power and fiber, if fiber is to be connected. Placement Location requirements:- PFeestandiRg small ^II_,- shall be GeMpliaRee vVith the fell a) Located such that they in no way impede, obstruct, or hinder the usual pedestrian or vehicular travel, affect public safety, obstruct the legal access to or use of the public ROW, violate applicable law, violate or eenflutfail to substantially comply with public ROW design standards, specifications, or design district requirements, violate the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or in any way create a risk to public health, safety, or welfare. b) Outside the downtown business district (BD) zones. c) So as not to be located along the frontage of a Historic building, deemed historic on a federal, state, or local level. d) So as not to significantly create a new obstruction to property sight lines e) In alignment with existing trees, utility poles, and streetlights. gflEqual distance between trees when possible, with a minimum of 15-foot separation such that no proposed disturbance shall occur within the critical root zone of any tree. g) With appropriate clearance from existing utilities. Packet Pg. 155 32 9.1.a h) In compliance with clear zone requirements. vcrcsi cc3 v feet rclear sight triangle (fer basecabinets equal rcv oF grca ccr �4110-feet away from the intersection of an alley with a street. 4iLOn the same side of the street as existing power lines, regardless of whether power is underground or overhead; b. New Street Light. The hollow utility replacern^n+ stFe ,+ light.pole requirements are also applicable to the new street light ept+eRalternative, except that a street light would be incorporated into the design of the facility. In addition, the following applies: i. A street light shall not be installed unless it has been identified by the director of public works that a street light is necessary at the location in which the ��PI'small wireless facility facility is proposed. A street light may be required to be installed instead of a free-standing wireless facility- m c+ rr h rr:.,,.,.J I .J TY, ,.J +., r,+, Y, ,II I « faE30*+. brackets, tFaRSitieR hardware r fer + shrewd frem the tee and all ether the Fed a Gemp! .,.•+*AIq to the +ep of the of mast aFFn c.- Location Preference #315 - Existing single se power pole (installation on top of pole): Packet Pg. 156 33 9.1.a iv u A cantenna may not extend more than six (6) feet above the height of the existing pole and the diameter may not exceed the diameter of the pole by more than two (2) inches, measured at the top of the pole, unless the applicant can demonstrate that ^ �^ ^^'^dtechnological L.""CANTENNA infeasibility. The antennas shall be P MOUNTED) integrated into the pole design so that it appears as a continuation of the original LUMINAIRE & MASTS' pole, including colored or painted to ARM match the pole. All cabling and mounting hardware/brackets from the EQUIPMENT SHROUD WITH ANTENNA ($0E bottom of the antenna to the top of the MOUNTED) pole shall be (concealed. UTILITY POLE Equipment enclosures and all ancillary equipment and boxes shall be colored or painted to match the color of the surface of the wooden pole in which they are attached. All related equipment shall not EQUIPMENT SHROUD be mounted more than six (6) inches from the surface of the pole, unless a further distance is technically required, XCEL ENERGY METER WITH DISCONNECT and is confirmed in writing by the pole SMALL CELL Owner. FIBER All cables and wires shall be routed ELECTRICAL ELECT CONDUIT through conduit along the outside of the pole. The outside conduit shall be colored or painted to match the color of the surface of the wooden pole. The number of conduit shall be minimized to the number technically necessary to accommodate a small wireless facility ee44-and shall not increase the number of conduit on an existing pole to more than 32- conduit. The visual effect of the small wirelessee44 facility on all other aspects of the appearance of the wooden pole shall be minimized to the greatest extent possible. A wooden pole in a proposed location may be replaced with a taller pole for the purpose of accommodating a small wireless Ge4-facility; provided, that 34 Packet Pg. 157 9.1.a the height of any replacement pole may not exceed fifty (50) feet to the top of the cantenna. vi . The -reply emeRt pele shall r ply with the Cmty's sm dp—yV ,IL CI^- ;;RGe requirev. eRtS and ADA requirements. Zvi. The use of the pole for the siting of a small wirelessc-e 4 facility shall be considered secondary to the primary function of the pole. If the primary function of a pole serving as the host site for a small wireless ee4-facility becomes unnecessary, the pole shall not be retained for the sole purpose of accommodating the small wireless ee4-facility and the small wireless ee 4 facility and all associated equipment shall be removed. d.- Location Preference #4b - Existing three phas power pole (installation in communication space): Antennas should be placed in an effort to minimize visual clutter and obtrusiveness. Only one antenna array is permitted on each wooden pole.- _ Packet Pg. 158 35 9.1.a +i-.i. The inside edge of a side mounted canister antenna/equipment shroud shall project no more than twelve (12) inches from the surface of the wooden pole. 4i-.ii. To the extent technically feasible, Aantennas and equipment located within a unified enclosure shall not exceed four (4) cubic feet. Te-t#e- extent possible, the unified enclosure shall be placed so as to appear as an integrated part of the pole or behind banners or signs. The unified enclosure may not be placed more than six (6) inches from the surface of the pole, unless a further distance is technically required and confirmed in writing by the pole owner. SMA +v iii. Equipment enclosures and all FIBS ancillary equipment and boxes shall ELE be colored or painted to match the color of the surface of the wooden 'OLE ENT SHROUD _NT SHROUD ERGY METER 'CONNECT pole in which they are attached. All related equipment shall not be mounted more than six (6) inches from the surface of the pole, unless a further distance is technically required, and is confirmed in writing by the pole owner. Div. All cables and wires shall be routed through conduit along the outside of the pole. The outside conduit shall be colored or painted to match the color of the surface of the wooden pole. The number of conduit shall be minimized to the number technically necessary to accommodate a small eerismall wireless facility and shall not increase the number of conduit on an existing pole to more than 32- conduit. v+v. The visual effect of the small wireless Ge4-facility on all other aspects of the appearance of the wooden pole shall be minimized to the greatest extent possible. Packet Pg. 159 36 9.1.a v4+vi. A wooden pole in a proposed location may be replaced with a taller pole for the purpose of accommodating a small wireless Ge4-facility; provided, that the height of any replacement pole may not extend more than ten (10) feet above the height of the existing pole, unless a further height increase is required and confirmed in writing by the pole owner and that such height increase is the minimum extension possible to provide sufficient separation and/or clearance from electrical and wireline facilities. c808. Te-replacement p le shall r ply with the City's sod y.oalL GI -,raRe vii. The use of the pole for the siting of a small wirelesses 4 facility shall be considered secondary to the primary function of the pole. If the primary function of a pole serving as the host site for a small wirelesses 4 facility becomes unnecessary, the pole shall not be retained for the sole purpose of accommodating the small wireless Ge44-facility and the small wireless ee44- facility and all associated equipment shall be removed. Packet Pg. 160 37 9.1.a e.- Location Preference #5-7 - Strand -mounted. Sm�eriSmall wireless facility facilities mounted on cables strung between existing utility poles shall conform to the following standards: UTILITY POLE X91FINJ1,r1QM_3I:T@M91 EQUIPMENT SHROUD xCEL ENERGY METER WITH DISCONNECT SMALL CELL FIBER ELECTRICAL This graphic is intended to represent a strand mount antenna. To the extent technically feasible, antennas shall not exceed ,` �� and shall net exceed one (1) cubic feet in volume. Only one strand mounted facility is permitted between any two existi op Ies. iii. The strand mounted devices shall be placed as close as possible to the nearest utility pole and in no event more than five feet from the pole unless a greater distance is technically necessary or required for safety clearance and confirmed in writing by the pole owner. iv. No strand mounted device shall be located in or above the portion of the Packet Pg. 161 9.1.a roadway open to vehicular traffic. V. Ground mounted equipment to accommodate such strand mounted facilities is not permitted, except when placed in pre-existing equipment cabinets, underground or on zoned orooerty. vi. Pole mounted equipment shall meet the requirements of subsections (iii), (iv) and (v) of subsection (d) above. vii. Such strand mounted devices must be installed to cause the least visual impact and with the minimum excess exterior cabling or wires (other than the original strand) necessary to meet the technological needs of the facilit e(^) Th s[� d- }} d- h II h I .d I ihl r the t GT�TTC-StTVITQTRO'afTte �TC`OTCC T�TLTTfJC�'fa'CCCITITI.TIT�C-QT�JV�JTf.Tf�CO CTfl1TCQTCSC utoloty pele, OA AA- - -M- M. +h- A f0yp- feet frA-RA the pole U Rless a gF at r I E. n,,yeler,Y,,��Specific Design Standards for FeF Small `^';r^I^r, Facilities Located Outside the Right -of -Way. 39 Packet Pg. 162 9.1.a 1. On a Building. OR a tiRg -1a.4 Roof--mounted.- i. a-�Small wireless f-aEi-y-facilities may be built to the maximum height of the underlying zone (or use the height exception in Sub (c) below) provided they are screened consistent with the existing buildine in terms of color. architectural style and materials. ch facilities must be completely concealed and well integrated with the existing structure or designed and located to look like common rooftop elements such as chimneys, elevator penthouses or screened HVAC equipment. iii. 4-Height exception. The maximum height for a small wireless facility above the underlying zone maximum is 3 feet with a maximum footprint of 12 sq. ft. in horizontal section. 2-b.-� Facade-mounted..-.- ia-�Small wireless facility antennas may be mounted to the side of a building if they do not interrupt and are integrated with the building's architectural theme. ii. b}New architectural features such as columns, pilasters, corbels, or similar ornamentation that conceals the antennas should be used if it complements the architecture of the existing building. iii. 441f concealment is not aossible. the antennas must be camouflaged. The smallest feasible mounting brackets must be used and the antennas must be painted and textured to match the adjacent building surfaces. iv. 4Facade-mounted antennas may encroach into a required setback or into the city right-of-way. Antennas may not project into the right-of-way more than twelve (12) inches and shall provide a minimum clearance heiiaht of 20 feet over any pedestrian or vehicular right-of-way. V. 4-All other eauioment must be located within the buildine. screened by an existing parapet, or completely concealed and well integrated with the existing structure or designed and located to look like common rooftop elements such as chimneys, elevator penthouses or screened HVAC equipment. Exposed cabling/wiring is prohibited. Packet Pg. 163 40 9.1.a vi. #Height exception. Antennas may be located on buildings that are nonconforming for height provided that they are constructed to be no taller than the adjacent facade or an existing parapet. Equipment may be located on a roof behind a parapet that is nonconforming for height. Vertical expansion of the height nonconformity is prohibited. 2. Freestandine small wireless facilitv. The specifications Drovided in this section are for installations on zoned property only. Refer to subsection 20.50.130.D.2.aRh for dimensional and appearance standards. a. 3)—Placement requirements. Freestanding small wireless facilities shall be located as follows: Located such that thev in no wav impede. obstruct. or hinder the usual pedestrian or vehicular travel, affect public safety, or violate applicable law. ii. Within 5 feet of the street property line (right-of-way) and within 5 feet of a side property line. iii. So as not to significantly create a new obstruction to property sight lines. iv. In alignment with existing trees, utility poles, and streetlights. V. With appropriate clearance from existing utilities. vi. In compliance with clear zone requirements. vii. On the same side of the street as existing Dower lin power is underground or overhead; reeardless of whether 41 Packet Pg. 164 9.1.a ......... I. 1 . •Bill . . .. ... . .. .. . ... .. . .. . . ..... .. .. . .. •MI 1.9l . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . . . . III r ll,« faCility a .,h r e ZeRed p lct the a plil,ireless prev .J r shall p i.d p1aRa+iE)R f +h teehni --,I .diff„-wity ir, � �ffi.�iepA Q Packet Pg. 165 42 9.1.a to O_ Fights of way aFe pre-hi-bited. fC a] d N to O u n federal iR te the FegulatieRS eFdeF pFevide a Glear and safe passage withiR Fights ef way. �d♦ V rye r� Tequireme Rt to remP7'e0"ve ed pel C� G N 5. The desigR c:Fiteria as applicable te small cell facilities deseFibed heFei R shall be- a O fadkoes be GeRSideFed eeneealmeRt elerneRts and such small cell may enly expanded upon 0) the , wheR .,.difie-,+ieR .deeS .defeat the -,Iv,- the facility, G1 REA c eRt el.,meRtS of 2 V i 7 a T the iRteRded , , T apprepriate. L Q ' 4) V � ol.,m,,Rt plaR E. E. CoaleaFm RqeHMS f.,r _PlAt_ ,.AA_a _ ., aFeg Rt ehihite d O N to O L equipmeRt and cable, shall Ret I I I I L hl I uil.diRg eF UpeR which they a atta -heel O rW to N r R 7 a tP_GhRelegieal reg6i*FemeRt en the Se.rvieepFevidei. � 12—n0TiarEe�-equi-red a -area areas tk�et.r� hrirci utility li.les-11aPe eea . � �.i c m E z Q Packet Pg. 166 43 9.1.a Fight of way. [04 3961 § 1, 2014; 9rd. 3945 § 2 (Att n), 2914 20.50.140 Abandonment or discontinuation of use. A. At such time that a licensed carrier plans to abandon or discontinue operation of a wireless communication facility, such carrier will notify the director by certified U.S. Mail of the proposed date of abandonment or discontinuation of operations. Such notice shall be given no less than 30 days prior to abandonment or discontinuation of operations. B. In the event that a licensed carrier fails to give such notice, the wireless communication facility shall be considered abandoned upon the discovery of such discontinuation of operations. C. Within 90 days from the date of abandonment or discontinuation of use, the carrier shall physically remove the wireless communication facility. "Physically remove" shall include, but not be limited to: 1. Removal of antennas, mounts or racks, the equipment enclosure, screening, cabling and the like from the subject property. 2. Transportation of the materials removed to a repository outside of the city. 3. Restoration of the wireless communication facility site to its pre -permit or better condition, except that any landscaping provided by the wireless communication facility operator may remain in place. 4. If a carrier fails to remove a wireless communication facility in accordance with this section, the city shall have the authority to enter the subject property and physically remove the facility. Costs for removal of the wireless communication facility shall be charged to the wireless communication facility owner or operator in the event the city removes the facility. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 20111. 20.50.150 Maintenance. A. The applicant shall maintain the wireless communication facility to standards that may be imposed by the city by ordinance or through -permit condition. Such maintenance shall include, but not be limited to, repair of damaged shrouds or enclosures, painting, structural integrity, and landscaping. B. In the event the applicant fails to maintain the facility, the city of Edmonds may undertake enforcement action as allowed by existing codes and regulations. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. 20.50.160 Definitions. A. Antenna(s). Any apparatus designed for the purpose of emitting radiofrequency (RF) radiation, to be operated or operating from a fixed location pursuant to Commission Packet Pg. 167 44 9.1.a authorization, for the provision of personal wireless service and any commingled information services. B. "Cell -on -wheels (COW)" are used to provide temporary service, usually for special events, h fer the installatie-nduring repair of a permanent wireless site, or in emergencies. C. "Collocation" means the mounting or installation of an antenna on an existing tower, building or structure for the purpose of transmitting and/or receiving radio frequency signals for communications purposes, whether or not there is an existing antenna on the structure. D. Completely concealed facility. A WCF where: (A) the antennas, mounting apparatus, and any associated equipment are fully recessed/concealed from all sides with a structure that achieves total integration with the existing building or structure; and (B) all cable is routed internally or completely screened from view; and (C) the associated equipment is completely within the building or structure, placed in an underground vault, or is within another element such as a bench, mail box or kiosk. E. "Distributed antenna system (DAS)" is a network of spatially separated antenna sites connected to a common source that provides wireless service within a discrete geographic area or structure. F. Equipment. Any equipment, switches, wiring, cabling, power sources, shelters or cabinets associated with an antenna, located at the same fixed location as the antenna, and, when collocated on a structure, is mounted or installed at the same time as such antenna. G. "Freestanding small r-en'small wireless facility-poe" is a freestanding structure which consists of a single vertical hollow pole, fixed into the ground and/or attached to a foundation built for the sole purpose of supporting and concealing small wireless antennas and associated equipment. H. "Guyed tower" means a monopole or lattice tower that is tied to the ground or other surface by diagonal cables. I. "Lattice tower" is a wireless communication support structure which consists of metal crossed strips or bars to support antennas and related equipment. J. "Licensed carrier" is a company authorized by the Federal Communications Commission to build and operate a commercial mobile radio services system. K. Macro cell facility (macro facility). A large wireless communication facility that provides radio frequency coverage served by a high power cellular system. Generally, macro cell antennas are mounted on ground -based towers, rooftops and other existing structures, at a height that provides a clear view over the surrounding buildings and terrain. Macro cell facilities typically contain antennas that are greater than three (3) cubic feet per antenna and typically cover large geographic areas with relatively high capacity and are capable of hosting multiple wireless service providers. L. "Monopole" means a freestanding structure which consists of a single vertical pole, fixed into the ground and/or attached to a foundation with no guy wires built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting macro antennas and their associated equipment. Packet Pg. 168 45 9.1.a M. Poles. Utility poles, light poles or other types of poles, used primarily to support electrical wires, telephone wires, television cable, lighting, or guide posts; or are constructed for the sole purpose of supporting a WCF. N. "Satellite earth station antenna" includes any antenna in any zoning district that: 1. Is designed to receive direct broadcast satellite service, including direct -to -home satellite services, and that is one meter or less in diameter; 2. Is two meters or less in diameter in areas where commercial or industrial uses are generally permitted; 3. Is designed to receive programming services by means of multi -point distribution services, instructional television fixed services, and local multi -point distribution services, that is one meter or less in diameter or diagonal measurement; and 4. Is designed to receive television broadcast signals. O. Small wireless facility (or small cell node). A wireless facility that meets each of the following conditions: 1. The facilities: a. Are mounted on structures 50 feet or less in height including their antennas, or b. Are mounted on structures no more than 10 percent taller than other adjacent structures, or c. Do not extend existing structures on which they are located to a height of more than 50 feet or by more than 10 percent, whichever is greater; 2. Each antenna associated with the deployment, excluding antenna equipment, is not more than three cubic feet in volume; 3. All other wireless equipment associated with the structure, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre-existing associated equipment on the structure, is no more than 28 cubic feet in volume; 4. The facilities do not require antenna structure registration under FCC rule; 5. The facilities do not result in human exposure to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the applicable safety standards specified by FCC rule. P. "Unlicensed wireless services" means the offering of communications services using duly authorized devices which do not require individual licenses, but does not mean the provision of direct- to -home satellite services. Q. "Wireless communication facility (WCF)" means an unstaffed facility for the transmission and reception of radio or microwave signals used for commercial communications. A WCF provides services which include cellular phone, personal communication services, other mobile radio services, and any other service provided by wireless common carriers licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). WCFs are composed of two or more of the Packet Pg. 169 46 9.1.a following components: 1. Antenna; 2. Mount; 3. Equipment enclosure; 4. Security barrier. R. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), building -mounted" means a wireless communication facility mounted to the roof, wall or chimney of a building. Also, those antennas mounted on existing monopoles. S. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), camouflaged" means a wireless communication facility that is disguised, hidden, or integrated with an existing structure that is not a monopole, guyed or lattice tower, or placed within an existing or proposed structure. T. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), equipment enclosure" means a small structure, shelter, cabinet, or vault used to house and protect the electronic equipment necessary for processing wireless communication signals. Associated equipment may include air conditioning and emergency generators. U. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), monopole" means a wireless communication facility not attached to a structure or building and not exempted from regulation under ECDC 20.50.030. Does not include ce leeat4encollocation of a facility on an existing monopole, utility pole, light pole, or flag pole. V. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), related equipment" is all equipment ancillary to a wireless communication facility such as coaxial cable, GPS receivers, conduit and connectors. W. "Wireless communication facility (WCF), structure -mounted" means a wireless communication facility located on structures other than buildings, such as light poles, utility poles, flag poles, transformers, and/or tanks. X. "Wireless communication services" means any personal wireless services as defined in the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, including federally licensed wireless communications services consisting of cellular services, personal communications services (PCS), specialized mobile radio services (SMR), enhanced specialized mobile radio services (ESMR), paging, and similar services that currently exist or that may be developed in the future. [Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A), 2011]. Packet Pg. 170 47 10.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2019 Discussion on updates proposed for Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.05 — Utility Wires Staff Lead: Phil Williams Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History None. Staff Recommendation Authorization to prepare a draft ordinance for further discussion at a future City Council meeting. Narrative Staff is proposing updates to Edmonds Community Development Code Chapter 18.05 - Utility Wires to incorporate aesthetic standards to minimize clutter in the right-of-way and work towards a goal of undergrounding utilities. The updates will include camouflage requirements, removal of old poles, abandonment of utility services, clarification of undergrounding requirements, etc. Existing conditions will be presented with a preliminary discussion on code updates. An ordinance will then be drafted and brought back to Council for further discussion at a later date. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Presentation Packet Pg. 171 10.1.a Edmonds City Council March 26, 2019 Packet Pg. 172 CDC 18.05 — Utility Wires PREVIOUS CODE UPDATES ➢ July 2011 - • Revisions/references related to new code section: ECDC Chapter 20.50 - Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) ➢ November 2008 - • Revisions related to WCF's (removed and/or amended by July 2011 updates) ➢ January 2006 - Revisions related to WCF's (removed and/or amended by July 2011 updates) ► CODE UPDATE GOALS ➢ Incorporate aesthetic standards to minimize clutter in the right-of-way ➢ Address removal of old poles and restoration ➢ Clarify utility wire undergrounding requirements ➢ Clarify and/or add definitions Packet Pg. 173 COC 005 - Clutter in the Riht-of-Wa gy I L I I Ai - S --rzz- CDC 18.05 Conduit CDC 18,005 - Splice BoxeOver-lashing 7 ► Replace utility poles with hollow poles for full concealment ► Restrict over -lashing of existing utility wires 10.1.a W 0 E w L 0 0 OL 0 L Q W ► Replace utility poles with hollow poles for full concealment (wire storage) ► Restrict size of loops or require wire storage ► Establish requirements for excess wires - neat and clean ► Replace utility poles with hollow poles for full concealment Add penalties for failure to remove old poles Move wires to PUD poles on one side of the street Power ;f Communications J ."..A�i c 0 E w L 0 0 CL 0 L 10.1.a ► ADA and Clear Zone Requirements Old Pole in Sidewalk c O E M w L O O New Pc O N N r R Q 7 C O 4 � O N 3 V f fA de E w a E fli.% Packet Pg. 179