2018-03-27 City Council - Full Agenda-2068Agenda
Edmonds City Council
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
MARCH 27, 2018, 7:00 PM
Edmonds City Council Agenda
March 27, 2018
Page 1
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
4. PRESENTATIONS
1. Annual Report - South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue (30 min)
2. Annual Report from Economic Development Commission (20 min)
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON
THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2018
2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2018
3. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
4. Edmonds Public Facilities Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan
7. ACTION ITEMS
1. Marsh Study Budget Vote (5 min)
2. Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Homelessness Response (5 min)
3. Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Opioid Response (5 min)
4. Approval of Offer Letters to Fill Vacancies in Two Staff Positions (10 min)
8. STUDY ITEMS
1. Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
Activities (35 min)
9. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD & COMMITTEE MEETINGS
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(I).
13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE
SESSION.
Edmonds City Council Agenda
March 27, 2018
Page 2
ADJOURN
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Annual Report - South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue
Staff Lead: Fire Services
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
In 2005, the Washington State Legislature adopted a bill (HB 1756) that requires substantially career fire
departments to maintain policy establishing the existence of the fire department, identifying the
services provided and the basic organizational structure of the fire department, and the service
delivery/response time objectives for the fire department for those emergency services. This report is
intended to provide our elected officials and the community with a picture of how well the fire
department has performed in meeting the adopted response objectives.
Staff Recommendation
N/A. For information only.
Narrative
South Snohomish County Fire & Rescue will make a presentation on the 2017 comprehensive annual
report to the City on fire, paramedical services, training, prevention, and public educational activities.
Attendees will include:
Chief Bruce Stedman
Assistant Chief Doug Dahl
Assistant Chief Kevin Zweber
Deputy Chief Shaughn Maxwell
Deputy Chief Bob Eastman
Chair Jim Kenny
Vice Chair Ben Goodwin
Commissioner David Chan
Commissioner Christine Frizzell
Commissioner Jim McGaughey
Commissioner Bob Meador
Commissioner Richard Schrock
4.1
Packet Pg. 3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Annual Report from Economic Development Commission
Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty
Department: Economic Development
Preparer: Patrick Doherty
Background/History
The Economic Development Commission (EDC) is required, per ECC 10.75.030.B, to deliver an annual
report to the City Council during the first quarter of every year.
Staff Recommendation
Presentation only. No action required.
Narrative
EDC Chair Jamie Reece will deliver the required EDC annual report to the City Council at its Regular
Meeting of 3/27/18. A written copy of the report is attached here.
Attachments:
EDC Annual Report 3-18
4.2
Packet Pg. 4
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR EARLING AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JAMIE REECE, CHAIR, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SUBJECT: 2018 EDC Annual Report
DATE: MARCH 27, 2018
_____________________________________________________________________________________
It’s been an honor to work with a distinguished and dedicated group of citizen volunteers this
past year and to deliver this update on their behalf. In the past year of the Economic
Development Commission we’ve built on the first year of our renewed commission where we
considered the most beneficial elements of a new Civic Field for downtown vitality, downtown
parking, the Highway 99 Corridor Subarea Plan, and downtown pedestrian signage. In the
2017-18 cycle we’ve continued to monitor these issues, while focusing more on 6 other key
initiatives:
Development Feasibility - considering various obstacles to effective development
throughout Edmonds which could bring more diverse and vibrant shopping, working and
living opportunities. This includes our brief memo supporting the discussion and
consideration of a revision of the requirement for a minimum 15’ first floor height in the
BD1 zone. After considerable research, input and discussion we found the current code
may be stalling continued enhancement of, and in-fill development in, our otherwise
vibrant downtown. We also recommended engaging consultants to study the
redevelopment feasibility of the Five Corners commercial district, which has been
completed and the resulting report is working its way to City Council at this time.
Highway 99 Redevelopment - continued support for significant redevelopment of the
Highway 99 and adjacent zones through public forums and gatherings, as well as letters
of support for various initiatives being undertaken by the city. The Commission is hopeful
the new policies and changes will spark interest in a significant project in the near future
which will kick off a wave of redevelopment throughout the corridor which will bring
housing, shopping and work opportunities with excellent access to transit as well as the
parks, beaches and cultural opportunities throughout our town. The EDC cohosted a
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: EDC Annual Report 3-18 (Annual Report from Economic Development Commission)
Highway 99 Corridor Redevelopment Forum last Fall after Council approval of the
Subarea Plan.
Civic Facilities - our discussions of Highway 99 spurred conversation about the
potential benefits of potentially locating some city facilities along the Highway 99
corridor. We believe this would show support for renewal of this area, while providing
easier access to services for many citizens, and greater access to transit city staff in
addition to many other benefits for the economics and operations of our city government.
Arts & Culture - arts and culture are a major economic driver for our city attracting
tourists, citizens and companies, and we are working to support the further development
of our arts community. We are working to provide support for Edmonds becoming one of
Washington’s first Creative Districts, and are a considering the initial recommendations
stemming from the Economic Impact Study of Arts & Culture.
Affordable Housing - affordable housing is an economic development issue, and we
support the city’s initiatives to explore and implement solutions to provide more diverse
housing opportunities for our citizens. We believe this makes for a better community with
greater social and economic diversity, as well as a community which will attract great
companies and organizations who wish for their partners to live near work and connect
with their local community. We are working the Mayor’s housing task force on this
initiative, and look forward to supporting implementation of recommendations of the task
force when released later this year.
Technology & Participation in Government - during the course of this year, we
tackled a unique challenge of how to accommodate those EDC members wishing to
strike a balance between their vibrant careers demanding frequent travel, and their
desire to contribute to their community through local government. We worked through
this issue with open and frank discussions on the various benefits and risks of using
technology such as conference calls by (phone/video) for subgroup and commission
meeting. We’ve since passed our recommendations onto Council for further
consideration and change in code to ensure we enable all citizens of our community to
participate in our local government, even if their careers may require frequent travel. We
are thankful that City Council took our recommendation to heart and recently passed city
code amendments that will allow for such “remote” participation, within necessary
parameters, not only for the EDC but for all City Boards and Commissions.
As we look forward to the next year at the EDC, we’ll be continuing the discussions of:
Highway 99
Development Feasibility Issues
Civic Facilities
5 Corners Redevelopment
Arts & Culture
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: EDC Annual Report 3-18 (Annual Report from Economic Development Commission)
Tourism
As well as any other issues which may arise in the community or at the suggestion of
consideration by the Council or Mayor’s office. We encourage and appreciate your
thoughts, feedback and suggestions for our work, and hope for more communication this
coming year.
Before I wrap up, I’d like to acknowledge all of our Commissioners who’ve served these past
two years:
Aseem Prakash
Nicole Hughes
Matthew Waldron
Darrol Haug
Mike Schindler
Mary Monroe, Vice Chair
I’d also like to provide special thanks to two Commissioners who are leaving after the
conclusion of their 2-year terms:
George Bennett
Stephen Clifton
We will miss their energy and contributions to our meetings. We’ve also appreciated the great
contributions from our ex-officio liaison members and their occasional stand-ins during the year
including:
Neil Tibbott & Adrienne Fraley-Monillas - Edmonds City Council
Nathan Monroe & Phil Lovell - Planning Board
Bruce Faires & Bob McChesney - Port of Edmonds
Greg Urban - Edmonds Chamber of Commerce
With the departure of George and Stephen, the coming year will bring fresh perspectives to our
Commission. It’s my understanding we have already received numerous applications for new
members for the Commission, and we look forward to your upcoming appointments.
Finally, my message and update would be woefully incomplete if didn’t acknowledge the
wonderful Cindi Cruz and Patrick Doherty for their endless support in our efforts to contribute to
our community. Through my time on the EDC, I’ve truly expanded my appreciation for the talent,
dedication and incredible spirit of the staff of the City of Edmonds.
Thank you for the opportunity to serve, and for your service to the community. On behalf of my
fellow commissioners, we look forward to your open communication and input the coming year,
and to serving our community to increase economic opportunity and vitality.
4.2.a
Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: EDC Annual Report 3-18 (Annual Report from Economic Development Commission)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2018
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
03-20-2018 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes
6.1
Packet Pg. 8
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 1
+
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
MARCH 20, 2018
Elected Officials Present Staff Present
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember none
Mike Nelson, Council President
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Tom Mesaros, Councilmember
Dave Earling, Mayor
Elected Officials Absent
none
1. CALL TO ORDER/CONVENE IN JURY MEETING ROOM
At 6:45 p.m., the City Council Special Meeting was called to order by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds.
2. CANDIDATE INTERVIEWS FOR APPOINTMENT TO A CITY BOARD OR
COMMISSION
The City Council then adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room to interview Lindsey Crawford for an
open position on the Edmonds Sister City Commission.
ADJOURN
At 7:00 p.m., the meeting was adjourned.
6.1.a
Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Special Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of March 20, 2018
Staff Lead: Scott Passey
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes
6.2
Packet Pg. 10
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 1
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
March 20, 2018
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Michael Nelson, Council President
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
ALSO PRESENT
Noal Leonetti, Student Representative
STAFF PRESENT
Al Compaan, Police Chief
Linda Coburn, Municipal Court Judge
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir.
Shane Hope, Development Services Director
Scott James, Finance Director
Steve Fisher, Recycling Coordinator
Brian Tuley, IT Manager
Carolyn LaFave, Executive Assistant
Jen Machuga, Associate Planner
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present.
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Natalie Shippen, Edmonds, commented it was her understanding the Council was scheduled to hear a
money-making scheme that could affect the scale of business buildings in the Edmonds bowl. Before it was
approved, she recommended two changes, 1) require the Architectural Design Board (ADB) review all
suggestions that may affect the size and/or appearance of business buildings in the bowl as the ADB, not
the Economic Development Commission, is charged with reviewing proposals that have architectural
implications, and 2) require visual evidence of the proposal’s effect be include in the presentation. At one-
time artist renderings were provided; technology now exists to show exactly how a building or collection
of buildings will look from any angle. That technology could be used to warn and inform the ADB and
Edmonds residents of the consequences of deceptively simple proposals that may be proposed.
5. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 2
COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS,
TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda
items approved are as follows:
1. COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MARCH 13, 2018
2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS, WIRE PAYMENT AND PAYROLL DIRECT
DEPOSIT
3. JANUARY 2018 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
4. CONFIRM APPOINTMENT OF LINDSEY CRAWFORD TO THE EDMONDS SISTER
CITY COMMISSION
5. WOODWAY POLICE SERVICES INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT EXTENSION
6. ORDINANCE AMENDING ECC CHAPTER 5.14
7. AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE PROPERTY USE PERMIT ADDENDUM
FOR 4TH AVENUE PARKING LOT
8. ORDINANCE AMENDING PFD CONTINGENT LOAN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
9. POLICE DEPARTMENT SURPLUS PROPERTY
10. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO APPROVE A STREET DEDICATION ALONG
80TH AVE W ADJACENT TO 19325 80TH AVE W
6. PRESENTATIONS
1. MUNICIPAL COURT ANNUAL REPORT
Judge Linda Coburn introduced Sharon Wittaker, Court Administrator. Judge Coburn reviewed:
Courts are an important part of our community because:
o They protect our constitutional rights, provide access to justice, keep us safe and maintain
civility.
2017 investments and improvements
o Expansion of in-custody video court
o Consolidation of court forms
o Dedicated trial confirmation calendar
o Jury Management
o Infraction Payment Plan
o Traffic Infraction Deferrals
o Shredding Contract
o Consolidating infraction calendars
o Bail schedule
Daily judicial review of DUI and domestic violence
o Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT)
Expenditures
Item Appropriation 2017 Balance Percent Used
Grant Total $1,016,040 $984,203 $31,837 97%
Prof Serv (Security) $61,000 $58,062 $2,938 95%
Prof Serv (Interpreters $29,000 $26,405 $2,595 91%
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 3
Total filings 2010-2017
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
7,763 7,919 6,325 7,809 5,826 6,294 6,097 6,967
Civil filings 2010-2017
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
6,152 6,401 5,034 6,494 4,795 5,387 5,171 6,119
Criminal Filings 2010-2017
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1,611 1,518 1,291 1,315 1,031 907 923 840
Intake
Criminal Intake 2015 Actuals 2016 Actuals 2017 Actuals
Traffic $33,916 $35,464 $37,741
DUI $9,914 $22,452* $10.452
Non-Traffic $15,87 $11,061 $11,044
TOTAL $58,986 $68,977 $59,237
Adult Probation
Service Charge
$64,528 $66,778 $49,585
* Note: The court received a $15,000 bail forfeiture payment in 2016, a significant portion of which
was retained by the City
Infraction Intake 2015 Actuals 2016 Actuals 2017 Actuals
Non-Criminal Traffic $296,350 $267,506 $250,162
Non-Traffic Infractions* $1,130 $1,761 $2,544
Parking $40,860 $46,129 $73,563
TOTAL $338,340 $315,396 $326,269
* Note: Historically the Court has inadvertently included a line item named “Non-Traffic Infraction
Penalties” in the budget reports. This line item is actually civic building code violation penalties.
The line item that is in the Court’s non-traffic infractions is named “other infractions” in the
accounting system.
Other 2016 2017 Percent
Change
Passports $19,384 $21,950 13%
Note: while there was some increase as expected in 2017 because of the 10-year expiration of
passports and a great number in 2007, the increase was not as significant as anticipated. This is
likely because there are now many other nearby cities that also process passports. For example,
Lake Forest Park processes passports on Saturday.
Overall Intake
Annual Intake 2016 2017 Difference Percent
Difference
Gross Total $1,016,558 $973,227 -$43,331 -4%
Net Total $625,250 $588,988 -36,262 -6%
Why the net increase? Fewer criminal filings; Blazina; compliance with statutory authority
Courts are not revenue centers:
o By statute, '[t]he court shall not order a defendant to pay costs unless the defendant is or will
be able to pay them.' RCW 10.01.160(3). To determine the amount and method for paying the
costs, 'the court shall take account of the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of
the burden that payment of costs will impose.'
-- State v. Blazina, 182 Wn..2d 827, 838, 344 P.3d 680, 685 (2015)
E2SHB 1783
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 4
o Approved by the Senate and House, Governor expected to sign
o Provides better guidance to judges regarding who qualifies as not having the ability to pay and
the court is prohibited from imposing costs.
o Removes 24% interest rate except on restitution
Statutory Authority for municipal court
o “The legislature shall prescribe by law the jurisdiction and powers of any of the inferior courts
which may be established in pursuance of this constitution.”
- Article IV, Section 12 of the Washington State Constitution
Credit Cards
Annual 2015 2016 2017
Service Fee $8,092 8,606 $9,617
Recouped Service Fee 0 $7,532 $8,996
Paperless Court
Court Improvement Fund Balance Balance
End of 2016 $71,847
2017 Contribution: $16,711 $88,558
Paperless court expenditures: $25,529 $63,029
2018 Contributions to date: $4,138 $67,167
Anticipated 2018 Paperless Court Expenses: $48,105 $19,062
Note: Appropriated under Miscellaneous, but actual expenditures are posted based on type of
expenditure.
Separation of powers Checks and Balances
o Legislative
o Executive
o Judicial
Courts are important part of our community, not because they are a source of revenue but because
they make a difference.
Judge Coburn relayed the experience of Shane, Edmonds Municipal Court’s first MRT graduate: “I was
given the opportunity to participate in the MRT program and because of it my life is truly going in a forward
direction today…growing up in an abusive home I had these bad behaviors modeled to me and I was taught
that my feelings didn’t matter and to not talk about them[,w]hich resulted in me becoming passive
aggressive. I could only hold it in so long before I would burst with anger…My children became collateral
damage because of my inability to deal with my own life in a healthy way. So now I have to do everything
in my ability to bring healing in their lives and to stop the cycle of abuse so they don’t have to make the
same mistakes…Because Edmonds gave me the opportunity to change, my life is pretty amazing today and
I am so grateful. My relationship with my children is getting better by the day. I am in my first healthy
relationship. I am truly experiencing happiness.”
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if there had been any surprises during the past year in the types of
crimes, particularly opioid related. Judge Coburn responded it has been a constant since she became the
Municipal Court Judge in 2015 and even before; it is an ongoing, increasing problem that is the underlying
issue for many theft and property crimes and jail cannot fix that. Experts say that being in jail simply makes
an addict want it that much more when they get out; most people require medical treatment. While there
are procedures/treatments that help and medical responses that block the desire for the drug, the availability
is very limited. People appear before her regularly who want treatment but without the availability of
treatment beds, people often cannot be directed to services when they are willing to seek treatment. She
noted people fail treatment constantly but often succeed in the future. Opioid addiction requires serious
medical intervention.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 5
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if there have been any particular crimes due to homelessness in
Edmonds. Judge Coburn commented it is hard to say a crime is due to a person being homeless versus they
are homeless so they are dealing with finding a place sleep, stealing food and basic health needs, stealing
to sell for money for drugs, etc., and often do not remember their court date. Once they miss court, a bench
warrant is issued, they are booked into jail. Homelessness does not necessarily cause crime, but it is part of
the symptom of the issue that person is dealing with such as drug addiction and/or mental health.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Judge Coburn for developing a bail schedule and for doing the daily
reviews. She asked about the impacts to the court of E2SHB 1783. Judge Coburn answered she cannot
impose financial obligations on people who do not have the ability to pay. The bill speaks about costs but
there is a difference between costs and fines. The bill does not say a judge cannot impose a fine, but fines
are primarily discretionary. For the fines that are mandatory, the statute already states they are not
mandatory for those who are indigent. She anticipated there would be a decrease because the bill
definitively states if a person receives state assistance, they are considered indigent and the court is
prohibited from imposing any costs including public defender recoupment. The statue allows some
discretion regarding other ways to meet obligations such as community service. That is a hotly debated
issue among judiciary; there is disagreement regarding when it can be imposed and whether judges have
the statutory authority.
Councilmember Teitzel thanked Judge Coburn for the service she provides. He referred to her narrative that
states there were 2,113 parking infraction filings in 2017, recalling she said the average free for a parking
infraction is $40. He asked the cost to the court to hear a contested infraction. Judge Coburn responded it
was difficult to put a dollar figure on it because it included security, the clerk’s time and her time. A lot of
infractions have the option to have a written hearing. The benefit to the person is they do not have to come
to court, but they cannot appeal her decision. In an in-person contested infraction, her decision can be
appealed. There has been a huge increase in written hearings which is beneficial to the court because it does
not require scheduling court time or security.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to a statement in Judge Coburn’s narrative, “If the Court is not able to
obtain a certified or registered interpreter, then it may seek a qualified interpreter” and asked who
determines if an interpreter is qualified. Judge Coburn explained she qualifies them when swearing them in
by asking questions regarding their ability, education, number of time they’ve interpreted court before, etc.,
to make a record of their ability. The court is required to seek a certified or registered first interpreter first
and if that is not possible, the court can seek a qualified interpreter.
Councilmember Johnson recognized the number of innovative ideas Judge Coburn has implemented such
as the MRT program. She asked how many people are enrolled in the MRT program. Judge Coburn
answered there are currently six; the program is open to take out of jurisdiction people if space is available
and they pay the cost of the program. They want the program to be full because the benefit is peer to peer.
Councilmember Johnson commented it sounded like MRT was a life changer, at least for the one person
Judge Coburn highlighted. Judge Coburn acknowledged it would not work for everyone, people will fail to
complete, reoffend, etc., but it is promising, they talk to each other, and it can make a difference in a
person’s life.
Councilmember Johnson recognized cost savings for shredding and more video hearings. She asked if the
video in-custody hearings were sufficient to meet the needs of the jail. Judge Coburn answered yes as long
as Superior Court does not exceed their time. Councilmember Johnson asked if a paperless court would be
completed this year. Judge Coburn answered that is the goal, but she wants to proceed cautiously to ensure
it works long term. She is also pushing hard to have a public portal for public records. Once records are
digital, the public needs to have access to the digital files. The more access that attorneys, defendants and
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 6
the public have online, the fewer requests the court receives. Digital access is beneficial to the public as
well as improves court staff efficiency.
Councilmember Johnson expressed appreciation for her judicial review of DUI and domestic violence bail.
She observed many of the court’s expenses are related to security and asked how long police have been in
the courtroom. Judge Coburn answered police are actually outside the courtroom, staffing security that
everyone passes through in order to enter the courtroom. That security has been in place since before she
was the judge. Councilmember Johnson asked if that security is provided by patrol officers. Judge Coburn
explained the court contracts with a service that provides an off-duty officer 90% of the time; a different
service that provides security is used on jury trial Fridays when there is a smaller in-custody video calendar
for a shorter period of time.
Councilmember Mesaros recognized Judge Coburn’s commitment to service and reviewing bail hearings
every day.
Council President Nelson referred to Judge Coburn’s narrative that states the Snohomish County is no
longer offering work release which leaves only electronic monitoring to avoid jail. He asked why that was
done and what are longer term solutions. Judge Coburn said she could not speak for the Snohomish County
Sheriff’s Office who control the jail, but when that happened, several courts were very upset because judges
want to appropriately and reasonably sanction deserving defendants who have a job and allow them to keep
their job because if they are unemployed, they cannot pay their financial obligation, are statistically more
likely to reoffend, etc. When appropriate she uses electronic home monitoring but sometimes, based on the
offense, the sentence has to be jail which means that person will lose their job. She explained work release
allowed a person to go to work and return to jail after work. Work release is a valuable program and she
hopes it will be reinstated.
2. TREE BOARD PRESENTATION FOR 2017
Tree Board Chair Doug Peterson and Vice Chair Frank Caruso reviewed:
Members
o Doug Petersen, Chair
o Frank Caruso, Vice Chair
o Steve Hatzenbeler
o Vivian Olson
o Barbara Chase
o Bill Phipps
o Gail Lovell
o Suzanne Juergensen (Alternate)
o Diane Buckshnis (City Council Liaison)
Main Mission
o The City of Edmonds Tree Board actively encourages the planting, protecting and maintaining
of trees for the long-term benefit to our community
Year in Review
o Edmonds is now in its 7th year as a Tree City USA
Our 2nd Growth award (meaning we worked hard!)
o Earth Day - Hutt Park clean up: partnered with City Parks Dept, Earth Corp, Seaview Neighbors
and Cub Scouts
o Tree planting along Shell Creek partnering with Students Saving Salmon (two separate events)
o Trees in downtown Edmonds identified with temporary name tags
o Floretum Garden Club presentation on the importance of Tree Canopy
o Partnered with Edmonds in Bloom on their Garden Tour – 1st time trees identified!
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 7
o Arbor Day Planting Celebration at Hickman Park
o Saturday Market Info Booth and Tree Raffle
o Sponsor and assistance for Taming Bigfoot!
o Created a tri-fold brochure “almost ready” for publication about trees and “Before you Grab
the Chainsaw.”
o Created a Tree Board logo with our main mission statement: “Right Tree, Right Place”
Photographs of work meetings, Hutt Park Ivy Pull
Tree Board Current Work
o Educational outreach – TOP PRIORITY – Our residents should understand the value of our
trees and the environmental impact trees have on our community and overall climate
o Hoping to add a Student Representative to the Tree Board
o Reviewed the survey and will provide input on the Urban Forest Management Program
o Advancing our educational message with branding by use of our logo: “Right Tree, Right
Place”
o Distributing the Tri-Fold “Before you Grab the Chain-saw”
Information in tri-fold brochure
- Tree benefits
- Planning for the future
- Who to contact
- Vista Pruning
- Crown Cleaning
- Alternatives to cutting down trees
- Improve tree conditions
- Crown reduction
- Crown raising
Plans for the Year 2018
o Educate and Assist through various activities and events including:
Earth Day event (Yost Park Clean-up)
Summer market
Downtown educational tree tags
Edmonds in Bloom garden tour with tree identification (again)
Arbor Day Tree planting with Parks Department
At Councilmember Johnson’s request, Chair Peterson recognized Tree Board Members in the audience.
Councilmember Johnson recalled Barbara Tipton presenting the concept of a Tree Board to the City Council
eight years ago. She recognized the efforts of Councilmember Buckshnis, liaison to the Tree Board.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the April 2018 issue of the Rotarian magazine and the Year of Tree.
She was excited to continue working with the Tree Board in the coming year; board members are very
knowledgeable and are teaching her a lot.
Councilmember Tibbott observed the Tree Board has a number of volunteer activities and asked how other
organizations could assist with those. Chair Peterson answered they could contact the Tree Board via the
City’s website, the Board is always interested in volunteers. Councilmember Tibbott inquired about
upcoming events. Chair Peterson referred to items listed in their PowerPoint and said others may be
announced. The public is welcome to attend Tree Board meetings.
3. PRESENTATION OF RECENT ACTIONS & ACTIVITIES OF THE MAYORS' CLIMATE
PROTECTION COMMITTEE CPC)
Co-Chair Cynthia Pruitt reported:
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 8
Edmonds Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee formed in 2006 as a result of Edmonds signing
onto the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement
o Signed by 266 national mayors
Mission: Continue to support the Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee mission.
o Encourage citizens to be a part of the solution;
o Encourage City staff and citizens to conserve current resources;
o Work with the City Council to implement ideas;
o Effectively address the future impacts of climate change.
Projects Accomplished in 2017:
o Taming Bigfoot: Established a Steering Committee in partnership with the Interfaith Climate
Action group to present a friendly community competition and educational effort by having
teams engage in carbon emission reduction activities.
o Sustainable Heroes: Recognized the Students Saving Salmon. Also revisited the underlying
criteria on eligibility for this recognition and recently send out a solicitation for nominations
from the community.
o Resolution 1389: Started the discussion on CPC’s role as an advisory group as directed by
some sections of the Council resolution pertaining to greenhouse gas emission reduction and
renewable energy goals.
o Membership: Retained existing community membership, adding one additional member
during 2017 and two new members recently. The committee is served by three staff members,
a City Council representative and the Mayor.
Councilmember Buckshnis relayed the CPC meets first Thursday of every month at 8:45 a.m. She
recognized Executive Assistant Carolyn LaFave for her assistance.
Councilmember Teitzel thanked Co-Chair Pruitt and Co-Chair Steve Fisher, Recycling Coordinator for
their leadership on Taming Bigfoot, commenting he was anxious to see the data. He relayed public comment
at City Council meetings expressing concern about single use plastics in Edmonds, specifically plastic
straws and plastic eating utensils. Seattle plans to begin enforcing their ban on plastic straws and eating
utensils in July, Malibu’s ban will be enforced beginning in June, Hawaii is considering a statewide ban
and Scotland is considering a countrywide ban in 2019 which indicates momentum is building. In response
to citizens’ inquiries, he has been researching the issue and has begun the groundwork but needs assistance.
He asked if he could talk to the CPC at their next meeting regarding how they could partner with the Council
to move this initiative forward, specifically a ban in the near future on those products in Edmonds. Co-
Chair Pruitt said he could be on the agenda and they could discuss offline the materials that could be
provided to the CPC. Councilmember Teitzel said he would contact both Co-Chairs offline.
7. PUBLIC HEARING
1. PUBLIC HEARING FOR GUNN STREET VACATION (FILE NO. PLN20170052)
Associate Planner Jen Machuga relayed Ken Gunn has filed an application and petition to vacate that
portion of unopened right-of-way lying directly south of 10430 231st Street SW beginning at the western
boundary of that property and running east to the eastern boundary of 10410 231st Street SW. The properties
immediately adjacent to the proposed street vacation area are located within the single-family RS-8 zone
and are developed with single-family residences. There is also a private access tract to the north of the
subject right-of-way that is under common ownership by six of the adjacent property owners. The former
Woodway High School is located diagonally to the southeast of the proposed vacation area and is zoned
Open Space.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 9
The City Council is required to consider street vacations in a public hearing set by resolution. The City
Council passed Resolution No. 1402 on January 23, 2018 setting the public hearing for March 20, 2018.
The application submitted by Mr. Gunn included a petition signed by seven of the nine adjacent property
owners which represented more than two-thirds of the adjacent property owners as required by ECDC
20.70.050.B. Following issuance of the staff report to the Council, staff received an updated petition from
Mr. Gunn with signatures of the two remaining adjacent property owners which was provided to the Council
yesterday. She summarized the petition now contains signatures of all the adjacent property owners
including everyone who owns the access tract adjacent to the proposed street vacation.
Ms. Machuga displayed a map identifying the location of the area proposed to be vacated, updated to
identify the location of the properties whose owners have signed the petition. She displayed a survey of the
subject right-of-way which is 20 feet wide and approximately 320 feet in length for a total area of
approximately 6,415 square feet. The right-of-way is unopened and unimproved. The entire 20-foot width
was dedicated with the Sherwood Estates plat in 1970 which would cause all the land in the right-of-way
to be dedicated to the adjacent properties to the north if the vacation is approved.
She reviewed:
ECDC 20.70.020 – Criteria for Vacation
o The vacation is in the public interest
Removal of maintenance concerns for the City and/or liability from potential issues with
any existing or future vegetation
o No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation
No properties denied direct access as a result; all surrounding properties access from 231st
Street SW or Little John Court
ECDC 20.70.140 – Final Decision
o Following the public hearing, the city council shall:
1. Adopt an ordinance granting the vacation; or
2. Adopt a motion denying the vacation; or
3. Adopt a resolution of intent with specific conditions that must be met within 90 days
a. Either
i. Monetary compensation up to one-half fair market value
ii. Grant of substitute public right-of-way
iii. Any combination of a.i or a.ii totaling no more than one-half fair market value
b. Or grant an easement to the City in exchange for easement vacated
Utilities and Easements
o No existing public utilities
No need for easements to City
o Private Edmonds School District stormwater line
Easement to be reserved with subject vacation
Monetary Compensation
o Appraisal based on single-family use
o Pre-vacation
10410 231st St. SW = $407,000
10430 231st St. SW = $383,000
Access Tract = Not assessed
o Post Vacation
10410 231st St. SW = $424,600
10430 231st St. SW = $423,000
Access Tract = Not assessed
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 10
o Email confirmation from Snohomish County Assessor’s Office confirming they are not current
assessing the private access tract adjacent to the subject right-of-way and confirming no
additional value to the access tract via vacation
o Difference in total appraised value of $57,600
o Staff recommends compensation of one-half of appraised value = $28,800
Consistent with past practices and requirements of the code
Ms. Machuga relayed staff’s recommendation that Council adopt the resolution of intent to vacate with two
conditions as stated in the staff report, 1) payment of half the assessed value, and 2) easement to Edmonds
School District for the stormwater line.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed the property owners agreed to keep the right-of-way area intact
in the event the City needed to access it. Public Works Director Phil Williams clarified the proponent the
City has been working with expressed a willingness to work with the City after the vacation if there was a
public need to install a utility, but staff does not expect that will be necessary.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if that could have a cost to the City. Mr. Williams agreed it could,
the City would no longer have any rights to the property and would need to negotiate with the new owners.
He emphasized none of the City’s plans indicate a need to install any utilities in that area. Councilmember
Fraley-Monillas commented if the school district had a need, they would deal with the petitioners. Mr.
Williams agreed, explaining the property owners and the school district have 90 days to work out an
easement for the stormwater line.
Councilmember Teitzel asked if there have been any complaints from any residents in the immediate
neighborhood. Ms. Machuga answered the Planning Division received one comment letter from a neighbor
200 feet to the west expressing concern with the effect on their property. Councilmember Teitzel recalled
the resident was concerned it may increase their property value and hence their property taxes.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the school district’s easement and asked if the Council approves the
vacation, why is the City not involved in negotiations related to the stormwater easement. Mr. Williams
answered the City will not be a party to the negotiations or a signatory to the easement that the private
property owners grant to the school district but the City is requiring the easement be reserved before the
vacation can be finalized. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested vacating everything but that easement. Mr.
Williams said the entire 20 feet will be vacated. The data on this 52-year old stormwater line indicates it
was recently located by the applicant with ground penetrating radar. He anticipated the school district would
reserve an easement for the entire 20 feet to maintain the line if necessary. It is a privately-owned line, it is
not owned by the City.
Mayor Earling opened the public hearing and the public participation of the public hearing.
Ken Gunn, Edmonds, applicant for the right-of-way vacation, said he will be paying the full cost of
vacating the right-of-way. The staff report covers all the key issues and history. He explained why he wants
to vacate the right-of-way; his parents bought the house in 1979, they have since passed away and he has
lived in the house for the past 14 years. The lot is triangular shaped and his backyard is very shallow,
approximately 25 feet deep while his neighbors’ backyards are 50 feet deep. Adding the right-of-way would
extend his yard. All the adjacent property owners have signed the petition but he was aware people could
change their minds. If he encounters challenges during the process of securing the easement, he requested
an opportunity to consider a Plan B that would accommodate everyone involved. The steel line was installed
in at least 1966 which is when it showed up on the school survey, it has never been worked on and is still
active. It was never recorded on the property deed before it was Shorewood Estates, nor were any other
easements or roads. When Sherwood Estates was established, they noted the stormwater line between Lots
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 11
13 and 14 but not the private stormwater line in the right-of-way. When the school property was transferred
from the State Department of Natural Resources to the school district, easements were noted on the
quitclaim deed but the stormwater line was not. He encouraged the Council to approve the right-of-way
vacation, recognizing he may encounter challenges with getting the easement approved.
Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public hearing and remanded to Council for action.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked about the monetary compensation of half the difference in total appraised
value. Ms. Machuga said the code allows compensation of up to one half the value. The staff report included
a history of compensation back to 1998; the majority of street vacations paid half the appraised value. There
were 12 City-initiated street vacations in 1998 that did not require compensation; of the 11 other street
vacations, 9 were required to pay compensation, 6 of those paid ½ the assessed value and the other 3 paid
slightly less and 2 did not pay compensation, 1 of which was the right-of-way vacated for civic field.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON,
TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, STATING ITS
INTENT TO VACATE A PORTION OF UNOPENED RIGHT-OF-WAY ADJACENT TO THE
SOUTHERN BOUNDARIES OF 10410 AND 10430 231ST ST. SW UPON THE FULFILLMENT OF
CERTAIN CONDITIONS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. ACTION ITEMS
1. FAC PLAYGROUND BIDS
Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite explained the Frances Anderson Center playground went out to
bid in mid-January; 13 bids were received which staff reviewed based on a list of criteria in the RFP which
include best value for cost, creative design, play value, equipment quality (warranty and durability of
materials), references, and complimenting other City playgrounds. Staff narrowed the responses to five that
best fit the criteria. Large poster boards were put up at Frances Anderson Center and kids were invited to
vote for their favorite playgrounds as well as a press release and online voting. Notification of the
opportunity to vote was sent to the Edmonds Mom Facebook, posted on the City’s Facebook, etc. and 1200
votes were received.
Two of the playgrounds schematics rose to the top. Comments during the process expressed interest in
equal footprints for the 2-5-year-old and 5-12-year-old play areas due to the active daycare and Montessori
programs at Frances Anderson Center as well as making the playgrounds more accessible and possibly
including a sit spinner. The two top respondents were asked to modify their proposals within the City’s
budget to accommodate those requests. When the designs were returned, one vendor had included the sit
spinner and had equal footprints.
She displayed a site plan and identified the sit spinner, stand spinner, 2-5-year-old and 5-12-year-old play
areas and other components including drums and a xylophone. Staff invited the vendor to visit the site last
week and staff selected colors. She displayed a schematic of the playground layout with the selected colors,
commenting the colors blend well with the backside of the Frances Anderson Center and the new bandshell.
The design also includes 8-foot tall, 4 levels hex-nut climber that can accommodate up to 10 kids on each
level.
Ms. Hite requested the Council approve the bid for replacement of playground equipment at the Frances
Anderson Center. The 2018 budget includes $150,000 for the Frances Anderson Center Playground and it
is in the CIP for $150,000.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 12
COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO
APPROVE THE EXPENDITURE AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONTRACT.
Councilmember Johnson explained the Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee thought this was an
exciting project and since 1200 people participated in its selection, felt it was worthy of a short presentation
to the Council and community.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas expressed appreciation for the merry-go-round and other areas that can be
used by kids with physical disabilities. Ms. Hite assured the entire playground is accessible; areas that
would be more difficult include the hex climber but the lower clubhouse area, musical equipment, etc. are
accessible.
Council President Nelson commented it looks fabulous and he supported the motion.
Councilmember Teitzel commented the playground looked like a lot of fun. He recalled when his daughters
were 2-years old, they were not terribly coordinated. He expressed concern with the circular elevated steps
on the 2-year old playground. Ms. Hite answered all the playground equipment and vendors are certified
for safety for that age group. She assured that 2-5-year olds have tested the equipment and it would not
have passed muster if it was not safe. She clarified those mushroom pods and are very good for 2-5 years
to learn balance.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR NEW CITY TELEPHONE SYSTEM
IT Manager Brian Tuley reviewed the history of the legacy phone system:
Mitel, purchased 12/31/05 $186,000+
o 3 controllers
City Hall
Public Safety
Public Works
o $11,000 annual maintenance
2014 – System Errors on PS Controller
o No calls in or out to Public Safety
Lockup required hard restart on PS controller
o Old System Not Supported
o July 2014, system update $10,957
Updated controller
- So far behind, not maintainable
Software
Voicemail server
Annual maintenance dropped from $11,000 to $6,100
o Used legacy chassis – meant as 36-month band aid
Mr. Tuley reviewed the new phone system:
Selection – methodology
o Top rated vendor (Gartner Magic Quadrant)
o Cross departmental selection team
o Purchase via pre-vetted state contract
o Diagram of Gartner Magic Quadrant
Potential new phone systems
o Cisco – requested State contract price
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 13
o Mitel – required state contract price
o Avaya filed for bankruptcy 2017
o ShorTel acquired by Mitel 2017
o Microsoft based on Skype, and too dynamic a product
Cost comparison of Cisco and Mitel
Network Switches $7,000
Cisco Acquisition Cost Monthly 10-year total cost
Setup/Activation $40,000 $40,000
Hardware Maintenance (Annual) $45,515 $455,150
Sft Maintenance (Annual) 41,400 $14,000
Hardware $167,774 $167,774
Install/Training $45,515 $45,515
Freight $5,000 $5,000
Taxes $33,878 $80,746
Total $339,082 $808,185
Mitel Acquisition Cost Monthly 10-year total cost
Setup/Activation $1,226 $1,226
Monthly SIP Data $2,420 $290,400
Maintenance (36 mo) $16,450 $54,285
Install/Training $34,159 $34,159
Hardware $132,215 $132,215
Decrease 1 x T1 ($900) ($108,000)
Taxes $20,430 $44,876
Total $204,480 $1,520 $449,161
Cisco solution has physical hardware, uses existing telephone lines plugged into new hardware
Mitel solution runs as virtual server on existing infrastructure and uses data lines (SIP line) instead
of T1
Both vendors presented to staff selection team
o No appreciable difference in tool set
o Put the lower of the 2 into 2018 budget – decision package #120 $253,000
Final Price of Mitel system - $204,480
o Need network wiring additions
2016 – upgraded FAC
2017 – upgraded PW Admin
2017 – upgraded Park office
2018 – to do City Hall ($55k – have bid)
2018 – to do Public Safety
2018 – to do Treatment Plant
Timeline
o February through October
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if the new phone system was included in the 2018 budget. Mr. Tuley
advised it was.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to the cost comparison, expressing shock at the difference in the
maintenance costs over 10 years, Cisco was $469,000 and Mitel was $54,000. Mr. Tuley answered the
maintenance on Cisco system is on the physical hardware; Mitel is virtual and there is no additional physical
hardware other than phones.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 14
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONTRACT FOR THE NEW MITEL TELEPHONE SYSTEM.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
9. REPORTS ON COUNCIL COMMITTEES
1. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS AND MINUTES
Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee
Councilmember Tibbott reported on items the committee discussed:
Several items approved on consent
Frances Anderson Center Playground equipment – approved on agenda
Whether to study the EDC’s proposal to change the ground floor height in BD1 from 15 to 12 feet
o Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested review by ADB
o Councilmember Johnson recommended review by HPC
o Committee agreed to have HPC review and proposal will return to City Council
Streamline decision-making process for Public Works items that come to committee.
o Discussed dollar amounts and types of decisions
o Will be necessary with monthly committee meetings
No idling signs on Sunset Avenue –
o Staff installed signs on east side of street today
Public Safety & Personnel Committee
Councilmember Mesaros reported on items the committee discussed that were approved on tonight’s
Consent Agenda
Woodway Police Service Contract extended from March 31, 2018 to April 30, 2018
o Chief Compaan and Mr. Taraday are negotiating new agreement with the Town of Woodway
Ordinance amending ECC 5.14
o Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney informed City they will no longer accept any case
involving simple possession of Schedule 1 drugs in quantities of less than two grams.
o Code needs to be amended to allow prosecution of such cases in Municipal Court
Police Department surplus property.
o Committee asked Compaan to research donating laptops to Edmonds School District
Research found school district has no need for that type of laptop
Finance Committee
Councilmember Teitzel reported the committee discussed:
Ordinance amending PFD Contingent Loan Agreement – approved on Consent Agenda
Short-term PFD Bridge Loan Agreement
o Short term loan that will be reimbursed by grants the PFD has secured
o Requested PFD Board approve agreement and return to Council on Consent Agenda
Parking Lot on 4th Avenue
o Staff asked to research increasing the lease rate
January monthly financials – approved on Consent Agenda
Ordinances
o Edmonds Marsh – staff researching ability to accept online contributions
o Opioid Response Fund and Homelessness Relief Fund – draft ordinances will be reviewed by
Finance Committee
SERS radio replacement ($75 million)
o Explored possibility of increasing E911 fee but already at statutory maximum of $0.70 which
generates $7.1 million/year allocated to SNOCOM/SNOPAC
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 15
o Remaining funding sources are sales tax or property tax, citizens have indicated property taxes
becoming onerous
Capital Asset Policy
Prioritized work plan for policy updates
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling reported the Campbell home and grounds was officially added to the Edmonds Register of
Historic Places today. Assembled from a Montgomery Ward kit in 1922/1923 by the Gerdon Family, the
house was later owned by the late Betty Mueller and her husband and currently owned by Kurt and Cari
Campbell who are committed to maintaining and preserving its character.
Mayor Earling reported Top Pop is open. He stood in line the first day and met the co-owner; they are
excited to be open.
1l. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Mesaros recalled a few weeks ago a statement was made regarding the comments of Police
Chief Compaan related to the report that a student of color had been stopped and detained by Edmonds
Police for no apparent reason as he ran to soccer practice. This report was later determined to be false. Prior
to the discovery of all the facts, citizens were rightly concerned that this may have happened. He shared a
story of a doctor who rushed to the hospital answering an urgent call to save a young boy’s life. The boy’s
father asked him why it took him so long to arrive, didn’t he know his son’s life was in danger and didn’t
he have any sense of responsibility? The doctor responded he came as fast as he could, urged the father to
calm down so he could do his work. The father questioned this advice, whether the doctor could calm down
if his son was in this situation. The doctor assured he would do what he could and suggested in the meantime
the father pray for his son’s recovery. The surgery lasted several hours but was a success. The doctor told
the father his son would be fine and left the hospital. The father questioned the doctor’s hasty departure and
a nurse told him the doctor’s son had died a few days earlier in a car accident and the doctor was at his
funeral when the hospital called him.
Councilmember Mesaros suggested getting all the facts before making a judgment is an important lesson
in this story and in life. As social media sometimes does not get all facts right, people need to refrain from
making judgment. Chief Compaan’s comments supported the women and men who risk their lives every
day when others were rushing to judgment without all the facts. The Chief’s comments were not about
shaming anyone but about getting all the facts. Edmonds is fortunate to have police officers who serve the
City and its citizens daily and fortunate to have the leadership of the Chief and Assistant Chiefs.
Councilmember Buckshnis reported tomorrow is World Water Day and there will be a tour of the Edmonds
Marsh from 6-7 p.m. led by Susan Paine and Bill Anderson. She thanked the citizens who have already
donated to the Edmonds Marsh restoration.
Councilmember Teitzel reported tonight the Council approved a new Edmonds Sister City Commissioner,
Lindsey Crawford, who has a passion for Japan and its culture. As he listened to her interview as well as
the presentations by the Tree Board and the Climate Protection Committee, he was reminded of how his
appreciation for all the City’s volunteers.
Councilmember Johnson commented she can’t wait for spring. She wished Happy New Year to everyone
celebrating Nowruz, Persian New Year, which is based on the vernal equinox. Although President Trump
tweeted some negative comments, the celebration of Nowruz is 3,000 years old, predates the Islamic State
in the Middle East and is celebrated by 300 million people worldwide from the Baltic states to the Middle
East.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
March 20, 2018
Page 16
12. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION
PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
This item was not needed.
13. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION
This item was not needed.
14. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:07 p.m.
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 03-20-2018 Draft Council Meeting Minutes (Approval of Council Meeting Minutes)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #230303 through #230428 dated March 22, 2018 for $271,912.20 (re-issued
check #230303 $500.00). Approval of wire payment on March 19, 2018 of $417.67.
Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #63206 through #63213 for $530,432.99, benefit checks
#63214 through #63218 and wire payments of $569,840.42 for the pay period March 1, 2018 though
March 15, 2018.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non-approval of expenditures.
Attachments:
claim cks 03-22-18
wire 03-19-18
FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18
payroll summary 03-20-18
payroll benefit 03-20-18
6.3
Packet Pg. 27
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
1
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230303 3/19/2018 076484 LALLY - CHIU, SUSAN OTF OTF INSTALLATION
OTF INSTALLATION
117.100.64.573.20.41.00 500.00
Total : 500.00
230304 3/22/2018 076040 911 SUPPLY INC IN-11685 INV#IN-11685 - CRYSTAL - EDMONDS PD
BLAUER 8567 PANTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 179.98
BLAUER 8436 L/S SHIRT (CLASS A)
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 69.99
BLAUER 8446 S/S SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 129.98
NAME TAGS FOR S/S SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 16.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 39.60
INV#IN-11763 - ARVAN - EDMONDS PDIN-11763
BLAUER 4660 SOFTSHELL JACKET
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 119.99
BLAUER 9820 TAC SHELL JACKET
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 234.99
WATERPROOF PATCH
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.00
NAME TAGS FOR JACKETS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 16.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 38.10
INV#IN-11764 - DOMICO - EDMONDS PDIN-11764
BOSTON 6605 BKWEAVE BELT
001.000.41.521.11.24.00 21.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.24.00 2.10
INV#IN-11765 - ALLEN - EDMONDS PDIN-11765
BLAUER 8567 PANTS
1Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
2
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230304 3/22/2018 (Continued)076040 911 SUPPLY INC
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 179.98
BLAUER 8561 PANTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 84.99
BLAUER 8436 L/S SHIRT (CLASS A)
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 69.99
BLAUER 8446 S/S SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 129.98
BLAUER 8436 L/S SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 139.98
NAME TAGS FOR SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 32.00
CLIP ON NAVY TIE
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 9.99
BIANCHI 7950 DUTY BELT
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 64.75
BIANCHI LINER BELT
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 30.50
DANNER 43013 STRIKER BOOTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 219.95
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 96.21
INV#IN-11766 - CRYSTAL - EDMONDS PDIN-11766
SEW CHEVRONS ON SHIRTS
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 18.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.24.00 1.80
Total : 1,955.85
230305 3/22/2018 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 399111 PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL CUST 1-1
PM & SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL CUST
001.000.64.576.80.41.00 137.88
Total : 137.88
230306 3/22/2018 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 318871 P&R LEAGUE SHIRTS
P&R LEAGUE SHIRTS
2Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
3
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230306 3/22/2018 (Continued)061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX
001.000.64.571.25.31.00 78.65
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.25.31.00 8.18
Total : 86.83
230307 3/22/2018 070188 ACI MECHANICAL & HVAC SALES 179446-00 SEWER - LS 4 PART
Sewer - LS 4 Part
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 223.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 22.97
Total : 245.97
230308 3/22/2018 071634 ALLSTREAM 15232155 C/A 768328
PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service
512.000.31.518.88.42.00 957.81
Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929;
001.000.61.558.70.42.00 10.21
Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines
001.000.61.558.70.42.00 10.21
Total : 978.23
230309 3/22/2018 001528 AM TEST INC 103685 WWTP: 503 METALS
503 metals
423.000.76.535.80.41.00 110.00
Total : 110.00
230310 3/22/2018 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1990621343 WWTP: 3/14/18 UNIFORMS,TOWELS+MATS
Mats/Towels
423.000.76.535.80.41.00 106.38
Uniforms
423.000.76.535.80.24.00 3.50
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00 10.96
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.36
3Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
4
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230310 3/22/2018 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1990621344
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00 56.86
Total : 178.06
230311 3/22/2018 064341 AT&T MOBILITY 287282629476 WIRELESS SERVICE FOR AIRCARDS
Mobile Aircards
512.000.31.518.88.42.00 203.40
Total : 203.40
230312 3/22/2018 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 82101 UNITS E151,152RE, 153WR - CITY LOGOS
Units E151,152RE, 153WR - City Logos
511.100.77.594.48.64.00 330.00
10.3% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00 33.99
Total : 363.99
230313 3/22/2018 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 99343 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS
UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 91.61
UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 91.61
UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 94.39
UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 331.69
UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 331.69
10.1 % Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 9.25
10.1 % Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 9.25
10.1 % Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 9.54
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS99493
4Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
5
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230313 3/22/2018 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 127.07
UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 127.07
UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 130.91
UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 460.94
UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 460.94
10.1 % Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 12.83
10.1 % Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 12.83
10.1 % Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 13.23
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS99541
UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 90.72
UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 90.72
UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 93.48
UB Outsourcing area #
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 328.16
UB Outsourcing area #
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 328.15
10.1 % Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 9.16
10.1 % Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 9.16
10.1 % Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 9.45
OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS99609
5Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
6
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230313 3/22/2018 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 22.99
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 22.99
UB Outsourcing area #700 Printing
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 23.70
UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 103.64
UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 103.63
10.1 % Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.49.00 2.32
10.1 % Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.49.00 2.32
10.1 % Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.49.00 2.40
Total : 3,557.84
230314 3/22/2018 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 14434 BADGES
BADGES
117.200.64.575.50.49.00 147.80
10.4% Sales Tax
117.200.64.575.50.49.00 15.38
RANGER UNIFORM BADGES14482
RANGER UNIFORM BADGES
001.000.64.571.23.24.00 18.00
10.4% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.23.24.00 1.88
Total : 183.06
230315 3/22/2018 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0318 BACKGROUND CHECK SERVICES
Background check services
001.000.22.518.10.41.00 108.00
Total : 108.00
6Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
7
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230316 3/22/2018 073834 BATTERIES PLUS 263-283842 TRAFFIC - BATTERIES FOR SOLOR LIGHTS
Traffic - Batteries for Solor Lights
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 293.12
10.4% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 30.48
Total : 323.60
230317 3/22/2018 073041 BECK & ASSOCIATES PLLC BLD2016.1684 STRUCTURAL REVIEW BLD2016.1684
Professional services: BLD2016.1684
001.000.62.524.20.41.00 660.00
Total : 660.00
230318 3/22/2018 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 9692 E5JB.SERVICES THRU 2/23/18
E5JB.Services thru 2/23/18
421.000.74.594.34.65.41 570.56
E5JB.Services thru 2/23/18
423.200.75.594.35.65.41 570.56
E5JB.Services thru 2/23/18
422.000.72.594.31.65.41 570.56
Total : 1,711.68
230319 3/22/2018 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 11563 FLEET AUTO PROPANE 554.1 GAL
Fleet Auto Propane 554.1 Gal
511.000.77.548.68.34.12 763.18
FLEET AUTO PROPANE 573.5 GAL11605
Fleet Auto Propane 573.5 Gal
511.000.77.548.68.34.12 789.61
Total : 1,552.79
230320 3/22/2018 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 14532 E8CB.SERVICES THRU JANUARY 2018
E8CB.Services thru January 2018
112.000.68.595.61.65.41 2,427.05
E8CB.Services thru January 2018
125.000.68.542.30.41.00 4,449.33
E8CB.Services thru January 2018
126.000.68.542.30.41.00 8,873.47
7Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
8
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230320 3/22/2018 (Continued)073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC
E6JB.SERVICES THRU FEBRUARY 201714640
E6JB.Services thru February 2017
421.000.74.594.34.65.41 9,561.00
E8CB,SERVICES THRU FEBRUARY 201814647
E8CB.Services thru February 2018
112.000.68.595.61.65.41 977.69
E8CB.Services thru February 2018
125.000.68.542.30.41.00 1,792.32
E8CB.Services thru February 2018
126.000.68.542.30.41.00 3,574.49
Total : 31,655.35
230321 3/22/2018 002800 BRAKE & CLUTCH SUPPLY 596037 UNIT 95 - BRAKE PARTS
Unit 95 - Brake Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 364.68
10.1 % Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 36.83
Total : 401.51
230322 3/22/2018 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 6302 6305 6308 YOGA 6302 YOGA INSTRUCTION
6302 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00 808.50
6305 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00 623.70
6308 YOGA INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.27.41.00 364.10
Total : 1,796.30
230323 3/22/2018 076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC 5498135 ROADWAY - ASPHALT
Roadway - Asphalt
111.000.68.542.31.31.00 444.57
10.0% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00 44.46
ROADWAY - ASPHALT5498474
Roadway - Asphalt
8Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
9
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230323 3/22/2018 (Continued)076240 CADMAN MATERIALS INC
111.000.68.542.31.31.00 256.23
10.0% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.31.31.00 25.62
Total : 770.88
230324 3/22/2018 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 93571648 STORM - GRAVEL
Storm - Gravel
422.000.72.531.40.31.00 269.78
10.0% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00 26.98
Total : 296.76
230325 3/22/2018 061966 CAMP FIRE BOYS & GIRLS 6163 BABYSITTING 6163 BABYSITTING BASICS INSTRUCTION
6163 BABYSITTING BASICS INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00 350.00
Total : 350.00
230326 3/22/2018 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 18422006 INV#18422006 - EDMONDS PD
IR6255 COPIER RENT 03/01-03/31/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 151.87
B/W METER USE 02/01-02/28/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 49.10
IR3325 COPIER RENT 03/01-03/31/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 60.70
B/W METER USE 02/01-02/28/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 8.22
COLOR METER USE 02/01-02/28/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 70.90
IRC5240 COPIER RENT 03/01-03/31/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 160.00
B/W METER USE 02/01-02/28/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 9.74
COLOR METER USE 02/01-02/28/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 86.75
10.3% Sales Tax
9Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
10
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230326 3/22/2018 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 61.52
CONTRACT CHARGE COURT PHOTO COPY18422007
CONTRACT CHARGE COURT PHOTO COPY
001.000.23.512.50.45.00 59.52
BW METER USAGE COURT PHOTO COPY MACHINE
001.000.23.512.50.45.00 52.81
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.45.00 11.56
C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091/0521418422008
Finance dept copier contract charge
001.000.31.514.23.45.00 209.61
B&W Meter usage IRC5250
001.000.31.514.23.45.00 17.80
Color Meter usage IRC5250
001.000.31.514.23.45.00 59.10
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.45.00 29.51
CANON 525018422011
Contract charge March C5250
001.000.22.518.10.45.00 167.69
Contract charge March C5250
001.000.61.557.20.45.00 20.96
Contract charge March C5250
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 20.96
BW charges C5250 February
001.000.22.518.10.45.00 23.54
BW charges C5250 February
001.000.61.557.20.45.00 2.94
BW charges C5250 February
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.94
CLR charges C5250 February
001.000.22.518.10.45.00 81.56
CLR charges C5250 February
001.000.61.557.20.45.00 10.20
10Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
11
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230326 3/22/2018 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
CLR charges C5250 February
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 10.19
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.22.518.10.45.00 28.09
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.61.557.20.45.00 3.51
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 3.51
WWTP: 3/2018 MO CHG+2/2018 METER USE CON18422012
3/2018 MO CHG+2/2018 METER USE
423.000.76.535.80.45.00 171.02
CANON C250IF18422013
BW February charge C250IF
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 2.45
CLR February charge C250IF
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 24.74
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 5.53
March contract charge C250IF
001.000.21.513.10.45.00 26.44
CONTRACT CHRG., BW AND COLOR METER18422014
Contract chrg., BW and color meter
001.000.62.524.10.45.00 39.77
CONTRACT CHRG., BW, CLR METER CHARGE -18422015
Contract chrg., BW, CLR meter charge -
001.000.62.524.10.45.00 39.13
FLEET COPIER18422018
Fleet Copier
511.000.77.548.68.45.00 40.46
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.45.00 4.17
INV#18422021 - EDMONDS PD18422021
IRC5550 COPIER RENT 03/01-03/31/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 185.74
11Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
12
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230326 3/22/2018 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
B/W METER USE 02/01-02/28/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 31.68
COLOR METER USE 02/01-02/28/18
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 116.55
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00 34.40
WATER SEWER COPIER18422022
Water Sewer Copier
421.000.74.534.80.45.00 81.80
Water Sewer Copier
423.000.75.535.80.45.00 81.80
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.45.00 8.44
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.45.00 8.42
PW ADMIN COPIER18422023
PW Office Copier for
001.000.65.518.20.45.00 104.51
PW Office Copier for
111.000.68.542.90.45.00 59.23
PW Office Copier for
422.000.72.531.90.45.00 59.23
PW Office Copier for
421.000.74.534.80.45.00 41.81
PW Office Copier for
423.000.75.535.80.45.00 41.81
PW Office Copier for
511.000.77.548.68.45.00 41.79
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.65.518.20.45.00 10.76
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.45.00 6.10
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.45.00 6.10
12Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
13
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230326 3/22/2018 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.45.00 4.31
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.45.00 4.31
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.45.00 4.29
ENG COPIER MARCH 201818425853
Eng Copier March 2018
001.000.67.518.21.45.00 535.68
CONTRACT CHARGE, BW, COLOR METER USAGE18425854
Contract charge, BW, Color meter usage
001.000.62.524.10.45.00 691.76
Total : 3,989.03
230327 3/22/2018 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC LWM8990 CISCO AIRONET WIRELESS ACCESS POINT UNIT
Cisco Aironet 2802I Wireless Access
512.100.31.518.88.35.00 7,192.46
10.3% Sales Tax
512.100.31.518.88.35.00 740.82
CISCO WIRELESS CONTROLLER ADDITIVE CAPACLXC6111
Cisco 550 Series Wireless Controller
512.000.31.518.88.49.00 2,994.84
10.3% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.88.49.00 308.47
Total : 11,236.59
230328 3/22/2018 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY258558 WATER - SUPPLIES
Water - Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 98.20
10.4% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.21
Total : 108.41
230329 3/22/2018 076477 CLK CONSTRUCTION LLC E6MA.Pmt 1 E6MA.PMT 1 THRU 2/28/18
E6MA.Pmt 1 thru 2/28/18
13Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
14
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230329 3/22/2018 (Continued)076477 CLK CONSTRUCTION LLC
332.000.64.594.76.65.00 13,964.86
E6MA.Ret 1
332.000.223.400 -1,266.08
Total : 12,698.78
230330 3/22/2018 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC MAR-18 C/A CITYOFED00001
Mar-18 Fiber Optics Internet Connection
512.000.31.518.87.42.00 406.10
Total : 406.10
230331 3/22/2018 071417 CORE & MAIN LP I509607 STORM SUPPLIES
Storm Supplies
422.000.72.531.40.31.00 203.52
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00 20.96
STORM - PIPEI564479
Storm - Pipe
422.000.72.531.40.31.00 2,795.76
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.40.31.00 287.96
Total : 3,308.20
230332 3/22/2018 005965 CUES INC 500774 SEWER - COVER FOR DUC
Sewer - Cover for DUC
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 170.04
Freight
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 17.53
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 19.31
Total : 206.88
230333 3/22/2018 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3334619 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE AD FOR HOMELES
Daily Journal of Commerce ad announcing
001.000.11.511.60.41.00 200.00
E5FD.INVITATION TO BID3334711
14Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
15
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230333 3/22/2018 (Continued)006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
E5FD.Invitation to Bid
422.000.72.594.31.65.41 520.00
Total : 720.00
230334 3/22/2018 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2018020041 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 SWV#0098113-06
Scan Services for February 2018
512.000.31.518.88.42.00 285.00
Total : 285.00
230335 3/22/2018 006635 DEPT OF LICENSING DeLilla.PE License DELILLA.PE LICENSE RENEWAL
DeLilla.PE Licensing Renewal
001.000.67.518.21.49.00 116.00
Total : 116.00
230336 3/22/2018 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 18-3834 INV#18-3834 - EDMONDS PD
TRANSCRIPTION SMART #2018-03
001.000.41.521.21.41.00 122.40
TRANSCRIPTIONS CASE #18-0636
001.000.41.521.21.41.00 1,115.20
Total : 1,237.60
230337 3/22/2018 076497 DIPWEK, MARCUS 18CK12 CHUUKESE INTERPRETER COURT 03/14/2018
CHUUKESE INTERPRETER COURT 03/14/2018
001.000.23.512.50.41.01 90.00
Total : 90.00
230338 3/22/2018 076489 DUCKY'S OFFICE FURNITURE 00008177 CHAIR
CHAIR
001.000.64.571.21.35.00 259.16
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.571.21.35.00 26.69
Total : 285.85
230339 3/22/2018 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 1-82840 WWTP: WD40 & CLRN
WD40 & CLRN
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 94.04
15Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
16
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230339 3/22/2018 (Continued)007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.69
Total : 103.73
230340 3/22/2018 074302 EDMONDS HARDWARE & PAINT LLC 002685 PM: BATTERIES, CORDS
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.19
PM: BATTERIES, CORDS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 30.97
PM: TAPE, NIPPLE002687
PM: TAPE, NIPPLE
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 14.47
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.49
PM002688
PM
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.59
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.27
Total : 52.98
230341 3/22/2018 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 6226 RAFIPOUR 6226 SURI RAFIPOUR YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
6226 SURI RAFIPOUR YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP
122.000.64.571.20.49.00 75.00
Total : 75.00
230342 3/22/2018 038500 EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER 2018-03-01 03/18 RECREATION SERVICES CONTRACT FEE
03/18 Recreation Services Contract Fee
001.000.39.569.10.41.00 6,250.00
Total : 6,250.00
230344 3/22/2018 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 5-00080 IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE
IRRIGATION AT HWY 99/CITY LINE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 51.69
INTERURBAN TRAIL5-10351
16Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
17
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230344 3/22/2018 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
INTERURBAN TRAIL
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 47.59
MARINA BEACH PARK SPRINKLER6-00025
MARINA BEACH PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 179.15
FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS6-00200
FISHING PIER & RESTROOMS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 440.31
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPRINKLER6-00410
BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 363.48
ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS6-00475
ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 707.23
WWTP: 1/16-3/16/18 METER 2088: 200 2ND A6-01127
1/16-3/16/18 200 2ND AVE S / METER 2088
423.000.76.535.80.47.64 179.15
WWTP: 1/16-3/16/18 METER 9439: 200 2ND A6-01130
1/16-3/16/18 200 2ND AVE S / METER 9439
423.000.76.535.80.47.64 24.94
WWTP: 1/16-3/16/18 METER 5010484: 200 2N6-01140
1/16-3/16/18 200 2ND AVE S / METER
423.000.76.535.80.47.64 1,754.49
CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER6-01250
CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 179.15
CITY PARK PARKING LOT6-01275
CITY PARK PARKING LOT
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,250.62
CITY PARK SPRAY PARK6-01280
CITY PARK SPRAY PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 278.11
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKLER6-02125
PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 307.48
17Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
18
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230344 3/22/2018 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER6-02727
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 273.13
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE PARK SPRINK6-02730
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 273.13
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TH AVE N / ME6-02735
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TH AVE N /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,134.84
FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH AVE N / ME6-02736
FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH AVE N /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 14.25
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 76-02737
FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 891.94
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGATION 250 5TH6-02738
PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGATION 250
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 273.13
VETERANS PLAZA6-02745
VETERANS PLAZA
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 47.59
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 7096-02825
SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,067.17
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIRE 700 MAIN ST6-02875
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIRE 700 MAIN
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 24.94
DOWNTOWN RESTROOM6-02885
DOWNTOWN RESTROOM
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 315.08
FAC SPRINKLER6-02900
FAC SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 273.13
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / ME6-02925
FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST /
18Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
19
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230344 3/22/2018 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,880.26
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER6-03000
CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 502.26
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKLER6-03275
HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 179.15
MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER6-03575
MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 314.85
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / METE6-04127
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW /
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 819.89
FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TH ST SW /6-04128
FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TH ST SW
001.000.66.518.30.47.00 14.25
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER6-04400
SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 273.13
SEAVIEW PARK6-04425
SEAVIEW PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 524.14
SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER6-04450
SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 387.53
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / METE6-05155
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
001.000.65.518.20.47.00 160.75
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
111.000.68.542.90.47.00 610.85
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
421.000.74.534.80.47.00 610.85
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 610.85
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
19Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
20
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230344 3/22/2018 (Continued)008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
511.000.77.548.68.47.00 610.85
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW /
422.000.72.531.90.47.00 610.87
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW /6-05156
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW
001.000.65.518.20.47.00 1.78
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW
111.000.68.542.90.47.00 6.76
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW
422.000.72.531.90.47.00 6.76
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW
421.000.74.534.80.47.00 6.76
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 6.76
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 210TH ST SW
511.000.77.548.68.47.00 6.77
5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGATION6-06040
5 CORNERS ROUNDABOUT IRRIGATION
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 47.59
MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER6-07775
MATHAY BALLINGER SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 343.55
YOST PARK SPRINKLER6-08500
YOST PARK SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,225.74
YOST POOL6-08525
YOST POOL
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 278.11
Total : 22,392.78
230345 3/22/2018 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES 6158 6160 DANCE 6158 DANCE INSTRUCTION
6158 DANCE INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00 330.00
6160 DANCE INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00 180.00
20Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
21
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 510.00 230345 3/22/2018 008969 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES
230346 3/22/2018 076506 ESTATE OF MARGARET BREDIGER 8-35225 #0117912-OC-ST UTILITY REFUND
#0117912-OC-ST Utility refund due to
411.000.233.000 18.64
Total : 18.64
230347 3/22/2018 076504 ETHEL MOONS 8-50099 REFUND FOR OVERPAYMENT
Refund for overpayment
411.000.233.000 2,302.78
Total : 2,302.78
230348 3/22/2018 076483 EUROFINS FRONTIER GLOBAL SCI 8030208 WWTP: METHOD 30B TRAP ANALYSIS
METHOD 30B TRAP ANALYSIS
423.000.76.535.80.41.00 960.00
Total : 960.00
230349 3/22/2018 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH798614 LEGAL AD: PLN20180009
Legal Ad: PLN20180009 - Corier
001.000.62.558.60.41.40 49.88
E5FD.INVITATION TO BIDEDH799200
E5FD.Invitation to Bid
422.000.72.594.31.65.41 216.72
Total : 266.60
230350 3/22/2018 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU47969 SEWER - SUPPLIES
Sewer - Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 89.27
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.19
UNIT 78 - PARTSWAMOU48115
Unit 78 - Parts
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.52
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.67
WATER - SUPPLIESWAMOU48311
Water - Supplies
21Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
22
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230350 3/22/2018 (Continued)066378 FASTENAL COMPANY
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 192.98
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 19.88
PM: SUPPLIESWAMOU48387
PM: SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 17.26
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.78
Total : 337.55
230351 3/22/2018 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0586694 SEWER - PARTS
Sewer - Parts
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 31.07
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 3.20
WATER METER #2033 M-MTRECR/WP-01-0100587393
Water Meter #2033 M-MTRECR/WP-01-010
421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,358.40
#2031 M-MTRTRPL-0.625-010
421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,660.80
Water Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 180.00
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.34.30 310.98
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 18.54
WATER - FIRE HYDRANT REPLACEMENT0588584
Water - Fire Hydrant Replacement
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2,804.05
7.7% sales tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 215.92
Total : 6,582.96
230352 3/22/2018 067042 FINAL TOUCH FINISHING 6172 ETIQUETTE 6172 ETIQUETTE INSTRUCTION
6172 ETIQUETTE INSTRUCTION
22Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
23
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230352 3/22/2018 (Continued)067042 FINAL TOUCH FINISHING
001.000.64.571.22.41.00 275.00
Total : 275.00
230353 3/22/2018 076503 FISHER, STEVE 03082018 REIMBURSEMENT FOR TAMING BIGFOOT
Reimbursement for Taming Bigfoot - Door
421.000.74.537.90.49.00 35.13
Total : 35.13
230354 3/22/2018 011900 FRONTIER 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 34.02
TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 34.02
PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX, SPARE LINES425-712-8251
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION
001.000.65.518.20.42.00 16.61
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION
111.000.68.542.90.42.00 83.02
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 69.74
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 69.74
PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION
511.000.77.548.68.42.00 92.98
425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/INTERNET425-771-4741
425-771-4741 CEMETERY PHONE/INTERNET
130.000.64.536.20.42.00 128.66
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION425-775-1344
425-775-1344 RANGER STATION
001.000.64.571.23.42.00 68.07
CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5TH AVE N425-775-2455
CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM
001.000.66.518.30.42.00 64.97
Total : 661.83
23Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
24
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230355 3/22/2018 075538 GAMEZ, OMAR 03142018 MILEAGE FOR PROBATION MEETINGS
MILEAGE FOR PROBATION MEETINGS
001.000.23.523.30.43.00 64.31
Total : 64.31
230356 3/22/2018 070416 GOODSELL POWER EQUIPMENT INC 726841 WATER - CUT-OFF SAW
Water - Cut-off Saw
421.000.74.534.80.35.00 949.96
10.0% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.35.00 95.00
WATER - CUT-OFF SAW EXCHANGED DIFFERENCE727724
Water - Cut-off Saw Exchanged difference
421.000.74.534.80.35.00 90.00
10.0% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.35.00 9.00
Total : 1,143.96
230357 3/22/2018 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 143429 UNIT 88 - TIRES
Unit 88 - Tires
511.000.77.548.68.34.30 361.00
State Tire Fees
511.000.77.548.68.34.30 4.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.30 37.54
UNIT 102 - TIRES143679
Unit 102 - Tires
511.000.77.548.68.34.30 180.50
State Tire Fees
511.000.77.548.68.34.30 2.00
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.30 18.77
Total : 603.81
230358 3/22/2018 012190 GORSUCH, BRUCE 6162 GENEOLOGY 6162 GENEOLOGY INSTRUCTION
6162 GENEOLOGY INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00 117.00
24Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
25
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 117.00 230358 3/22/2018 012190 012190 GORSUCH, BRUCE
230359 3/22/2018 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 197170/1 WATER - WATER MAIN LEAK REPAIR
Water - Water Main Leak Repair
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 3,269.65
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 336.77
Total : 3,606.42
230360 3/22/2018 012560 HACH COMPANY 10868649 WWTP: FILTERS
Filters
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 132.50
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 43.75
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 18.15
Total : 194.40
230361 3/22/2018 060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 007I9865 WWTP: SOCKETS,PEELING PREP TOOL,HEATER I
SOCKETS, TOOL, PEELING PREP TOOL,
423.000.76.535.80.35.00 1,013.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.35.00 30.10
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.35.00 107.44
WWTP: VALVES007I9912
Valves
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 1,858.50
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 191.42
WWTP: PIPES,ELBOWS,COUPLINGS,TEES,VALVE007I9952
PIPES,ELBOWS,COUPLINGS,TEES
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 2,469.84
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 15.54
10.3% Sales Tax
25Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
26
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230361 3/22/2018 (Continued)060985 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 256.00
Total : 5,941.84
230362 3/22/2018 012900 HARRIS FORD INC 177898 UNIT 35 - SWITCH
Unit 35 - Switch
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.62
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.31
UNIT 93 - CHECK ASSEMBLY177981
Unit 93 - Check Assembly
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 43.54
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.53
Total : 62.00
230363 3/22/2018 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I4752669 WATER - REPAIR OF VALVE EXERCISER
Water - Repair of Valve Exerciser
421.000.74.534.80.48.00 1,105.00
8.9% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.48.00 98.35
Total : 1,203.35
230364 3/22/2018 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1011425 PS REMODEL SUPPLIES
PS Remodel Supplies
001.000.41.521.11.35.00 4.49
PS Remodel Supplies
001.000.41.521.11.31.00 4.49
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.35.00 0.45
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.31.00 0.45
FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES1022741
Fac Maint - Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 18.19
Library - Faucet
26Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
27
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230364 3/22/2018 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 74.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.22
FS 20 - FAUCET1024987
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6.40
FS 20 - Faucet
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 64.00
FAC MAINT UNIT 5 SUPPLIES20004
Fac Maint Unit 5 Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 28.21
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.82
FAC MAINT - UNIT 42 - SUPPLIES20016
Fac Maint - Unit 42 - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 156.73
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 15.67
FS 20 - SUPPLIES20064
FS 20 - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.98
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.20
FAC - BOILER RM SUPPLIES2012414
FAC - Boiler Rm Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 88.09
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.81
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES2012424
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 27.02
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.70
TRAFFIC - SIGN SHOP SUPPLIES2081509
27Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
28
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230364 3/22/2018 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Traffic - Sign Shop Supplies
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 19.44
10.0% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1.94
SEWER - SUPPLIES2081531
Sewer - Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 63.94
10.0% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 6.39
LIBRARY - SUPPLIES2586433
Library - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 72.33
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.23
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES3012286
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 51.99
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.20
WATER- SUPPLIES3023745
Water- Supplies
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 67.88
10.0% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.79
SEWER - SUPPLIES3023822
Sewer - Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 14.00
10.0% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.40
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES4023675
Traffic - Supplies
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 43.53
10.0% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 4.35
28Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
29
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230364 3/22/2018 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES5013404
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 33.51
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.35
LIBRARY - DIMMER PLATES5065169
Library - Dimmer Plates
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 42.72
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.27
SR CENTER - SUPPLIES5071405
Sr Center - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 44.84
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.48
SEWER - TV TRUCK SUPPLIES5094381
Sewer - TV Truck Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 123.88
10.0% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 12.39
PS - SUPPLIES5564132
PS - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 22.95
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.30
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES587794
Traffic - Supplies
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 17.92
10.0% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1.79
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES593199
Traffic - Supplies
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 5.94
10.0% Sales Tax
29Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
30
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230364 3/22/2018 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 0.59
FAC MAINT UNIT 95 SUPPLIES6013223
Fac Maint Unit 95 Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 74.87
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.49
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES6564013
Traffic - Supplies
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 26.98
10.0% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 2.70
FS 20 - SUPPLIES7013050
FS 20 - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 29.90
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.99
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES7022242
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 17.94
City Hall - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 21.94
PS - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30.97
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.09
FS 20 - SUPPLIES7024389
FS 20 - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30.14
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.01
FAC MAINT UNIT 42 - SUPPLIES7082113
Fac Maint Unit 42 - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 69.97
10.0% Sales Tax
30Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
31
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230364 3/22/2018 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.00
SR CENTER - SUPPLIES8022058
Sr Center - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 20.43
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 199.00
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 21.94
SEWER - SUPPLIES8050562
Sewer - Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 29.97
10.0% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 3.00
TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES8590638
Traffic - Supplies
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 19.94
10.0% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1.99
FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES9023120
Fac Maint Shop Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 26.68
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.67
FAC - FAUCET SUPPLIES9044632
FAC - Faucet Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 58.27
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.83
LIBRARY - SUPPLIES9562541
Library - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 88.69
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.87
Total : 2,032.53
31Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
32
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230365 3/22/2018 061013 HONEY BUCKET 0239290024 PARK SHOP HONEY BUCKET
PARK SHOP HONEY BUCKET~
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 393.61
WATER - HONEY BUCKET RENTAL FEES FOR0550583122
Water - Honey Bucket Rental Fees for
421.000.74.534.80.45.00 201.45
Total : 595.06
230366 3/22/2018 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 3078633 DSD - PREMIUM PAPER
DSD - premium paper
001.000.62.524.10.31.00 144.71
COURT OFFICE SUPPLIES3080347
COURT OFFICE SUPPLIES
001.000.23.512.50.31.00 62.85
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.23.512.50.31.00 6.47
Total : 214.03
230367 3/22/2018 070250 IRON MOUNTAIN 201547860 02-18 OFF SITE DATA STORAGE SERVICES
Feb-2018 Off site data storage services
512.000.31.518.88.41.00 208.57
Total : 208.57
230368 3/22/2018 069851 JACKYE'S ENTERPRISES INC 11417 STREET / STORM - WORK WARE LOGO'D
Street / Storm - Work Ware Logo'd
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 552.13
Street / Storm - Work Ware Logo'd
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 552.12
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 56.87
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 56.87
Total : 1,217.99
230369 3/22/2018 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 4810 FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNECTION
Mar-18 Fiber Optics Internet Connection
32Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
33
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230369 3/22/2018 (Continued)075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS
512.000.31.518.87.42.00 500.00
10.3% Sales Tax
512.000.31.518.87.42.00 51.50
Total : 551.50
230370 3/22/2018 069343 KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES INC I610000-1283 E6MA.TO 17-02,03,04&05.SERVICES THRU FEB
E6MA.TO 17-02,03,04&05.Services thru
332.000.64.594.76.65.41 582.85
Total : 582.85
230371 3/22/2018 073950 KUBWATER RESOURCES 07461 WWTP: POLYMER
Polymer
423.000.76.535.80.31.51 2,843.07
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.51 292.84
Total : 3,135.91
230372 3/22/2018 066522 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC 41576 WATER - EZ ST ASPHALT
Water - EZ St Asphalt
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1,440.24
10.0% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 144.02
Total : 1,584.26
230373 3/22/2018 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC Mar-18 03-18 LEGALS FEES
03-18 Legal fees
001.000.36.515.31.41.00 46,119.42
Total : 46,119.42
230374 3/22/2018 073471 MAIPI, XAVIER 1110 CHUUKESE INTERPRETER PROBATION
CHUUKESE INTERPRETER PROBATION
001.000.23.523.30.41.01 134.88
Total : 134.88
230375 3/22/2018 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC E0089851 PS - REMODEL PAINT SUPPLIES
PS - Remodel Paint Supplies
33Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
34
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230375 3/22/2018 (Continued)075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC
001.000.41.521.11.35.00 25.88
PS - Remodel Paint Supplies
001.000.41.521.11.41.00 25.87
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.35.00 2.59
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.41.00 2.59
PS - REMODEL PAINT SUPPLIESE0089888
PS - Remodel Paint Supplies
001.000.41.521.11.41.00 12.99
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.35.00 1.30
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.41.00 1.30
PS - Remodel Paint Supplies
001.000.41.521.11.35.00 12.99
CITY HALL - PAINT SUPPLIESE0090237
City Hall - Paint Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 21.99
10.0% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.20
Total : 109.70
230376 3/22/2018 068670 MARSHBANK CONSTRUCTION INC E1CA.PMT 13 E1CA.PMT 13 THRU 2/28/19
E1CA.Pmt 13 thru 2/28/19
112.000.68.595.33.65.00 15,872.18
Total : 15,872.18
230377 3/22/2018 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 28 REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
009.000.39.517.20.29.00 7,426.00
Total : 7,426.00
230378 3/22/2018 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 275281 STREET - SUPPLIES
Street - Supplies
34Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
35
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230378 3/22/2018 (Continued)020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
111.000.68.542.71.31.00 21.49
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.71.31.00 2.21
PM: SOD CUTTER276649
PM: SOD CUTTER
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 68.20
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00 7.02
Total : 98.92
230379 3/22/2018 076264 MONO ROOFTOP SOLUTIONS 24188 PS - ROOF AND GUTTER MAINT
PS - Roof and Gutter Maint
001.000.66.518.30.48.00 345.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.48.00 35.54
Total : 380.54
230380 3/22/2018 018950 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3276-786604 UNIT 95 - REAR SEAL
Unit 95 - Rear Seal
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 42.86
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.41
UNIT 95 - SEAL3276-786915
Unit 95 - Seal
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 42.86
10.4% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.46
Total : 94.59
230381 3/22/2018 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0495961-IN SEWER LS 7 - CH4 SENSOR
Sewer LS 7 - CH4 Sensor
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1,400.00
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 144.20
STORM - WORK JACKET0497650-IN
35Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
36
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230381 3/22/2018 (Continued)064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC
Storm - Work Jacket
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 42.45
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 4.37
SEWER - GAS MONITOR W/ CHARGER0499136-IN
Sewer - Gas Monitor w/ Charger
423.000.75.535.80.35.00 565.25
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.35.00 58.22
Total : 2,214.49
230382 3/22/2018 075539 NATURE INSIGHT CONSULTING 5 WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PROJ MGMT
Tasks 1 - 4: Parks Project Mgmt and
125.000.64.575.50.41.00 1,437.50
Total : 1,437.50
230383 3/22/2018 063034 NCL 403420 WWTP: NITR. INHIB, FECAL THERMOM
NITR. INHIB, FECAL THERMOM
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 193.25
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.00 20.40
Total : 213.65
230384 3/22/2018 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0650142-IN FLEET - FILTER INVENTORY
Fleet - Filter Inventory
511.000.77.548.68.34.40 59.98
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.34.40 6.18
Total : 66.16
230385 3/22/2018 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S8459860.001 WWTP: MOTOR
MOTOR
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 1,410.59
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 145.29
36Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
37
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230385 3/22/2018 (Continued)024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY
WWTP: SIEM HNF364RS8468555.001
SIEM HNF364R
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 319.28
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 32.89
WWTP: CREDIT MEMO S8472169.002 ISSUEDS8472169.001
CREDIT MEMO S8472169.002 ISSUED
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 492.70
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 50.75
WWTP: CREDIT AGAINST INV. S8472169.001S8472169.002
CREDIT AGAINST INV. S8472169.001
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 -492.70
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 -50.75
WWTP: ENETR POWERFLEXS8474375.001
ENETR POWERFLEX
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 413.11
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 42.55
Total : 2,363.71
230386 3/22/2018 075542 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 2343 TURF ANDERSON CENTER INFIELD REPAIRS
TURF ANDERSON CENTER INFIELD REPAIRS
125.000.64.576.80.31.00 1,600.00
10.3% Sales Tax
125.000.64.576.80.31.00 164.80
Total : 1,764.80
230387 3/22/2018 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 806 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 3/14/18
Planning Board Minutes 3/14/18
001.000.62.558.60.41.00 216.00
Total : 216.00
230388 3/22/2018 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 112423055001 WATER - WALL CLOCK
37Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
38
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230388 3/22/2018 (Continued)065720 OFFICE DEPOT
Water - Wall Clock
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 24.99
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2.57
INV#114465345001 ACCT#90520437 - EDMONDS114465345001
INK CARTRIDGE FOR LAB
001.000.41.521.80.31.00 23.13
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.80.31.00 2.38
INV#114465631001 ACCT#90520437- EDMONDS114465631001
REENFORCED TABS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00 15.98
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00 1.65
Total : 70.70
230389 3/22/2018 075065 PASSEY, SCOTT March 2018 LODGING AT WMCA CONFERENCE
Lodgeing at WMCA Conference, Pasco, WA
001.000.25.514.30.43.00 436.72
Total : 436.72
230390 3/22/2018 076505 PATRICIA TOMSETT 8-43000 REFUND FOR OVERPAYMENT
Refund for overpayment
411.000.233.000 184.52
Total : 184.52
230391 3/22/2018 065787 PATRIOT DIAMOND INC A08264 WATER - ASPHALT BLADES
Water - Asphalt Blades
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 310.00
Freight
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 20.00
Total : 330.00
230392 3/22/2018 073070 PERRINE, JULIE 6383 POTTERY PLAQUES 6383 POTTERY PLAQUES INSTRUCTION
6383 POTTERY PLAQUES INSTRUCTION
38Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
39
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230392 3/22/2018 (Continued)073070 PERRINE, JULIE
001.000.64.571.22.41.00 17.50
Total : 17.50
230393 3/22/2018 007800 PETTY CASH 01/23/18-03/20/20 JAN23 THRU MARCH20
Food for 2018 Corporal Assessment
001.000.22.521.10.49.00 47.40
Breakfast items for SGT Assessment Ctr
001.000.22.521.10.49.00 46.94
Lunch For Mayors Meeting Sound Transit
001.000.21.513.10.43.00 8.25
Mileage to pick up Framed Retirement
001.000.21.513.10.43.00 13.30
Mileage to Affordable Housing Meeing -
001.000.11.511.60.43.00 9.86
Refreshments for Waterfront Connector
112.000.68.595.33.65.41 104.40
Mileage to various meetings - Bertrand
001.000.67.518.21.43.00 43.66
Parking and Mileage to ICC Meeting -
001.000.67.518.21.43.00 45.02
Total : 318.83
230394 3/22/2018 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY P610298 STREET - TRAFFIC BOX COBRA HEADS
Street - Traffic Box Cobra Heads
111.000.68.542.63.31.00 4,134.80
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.63.31.00 425.88
PS - SUPPLIESP737064
PS - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 368.79
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 37.99
PS - SUPPLIESP823267
PS - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 142.44
39Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
40
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230394 3/22/2018 (Continued)028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 14.67
WWTP: BATTERIES,3M SUPER33+P851243
BATTERIES,3M SUPER33+
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 92.04
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 9.48
STREET - SUPPLIESP874677
Street - Supplies
111.000.68.542.63.31.00 110.16
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.63.31.00 11.35
WWTP: APP HUB200DN, XHHW-1 STRP881523
APP HUB200DN, XHHW-1 STR
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 26.91
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 2.77
STREET - SUPPLIESP884484
Street - Supplies
111.000.68.542.63.31.00 79.17
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.63.31.00 8.15
WWTP: ILS TA-0 MECH, ILS 5K-2 CU MECP892272
ILS TA-0 MECH, ILS 5K-2 CU MEC
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 77.89
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 8.02
WWTP: XHHW STRP895059
XHHW STR
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 57.77
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.00 5.95
STREET - PARTSP940400
Street - Parts
40Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
41
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230394 3/22/2018 (Continued)028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
111.000.68.542.63.31.00 57.37
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.63.31.00 5.91
Total : 5,677.51
230395 3/22/2018 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2422756 ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIBRARY
ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650
001.000.66.518.30.42.00 256.71
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WORKS OMC730531
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 36.28
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 36.28
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110
422.000.72.531.90.42.00 32.65
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110
111.000.68.542.90.42.00 41.72
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110
511.000.77.548.68.42.00 18.14
ALARM MONITORING PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110
001.000.65.518.20.42.00 16.32
Total : 438.10
230396 3/22/2018 076502 PRUITT, CYNTHIA 02132018 REIMBURSEMENT FOR TAMING BIGFOOT
Reimbursement for Taming Bigfoot - mini
421.000.74.537.90.49.00 11.03
REIMBURSEMENT FOR TAMING BIGFOOT10212017
Reimbursement for Taming Bigfoot -
421.000.74.537.90.49.00 36.09
Total : 47.12
230397 3/22/2018 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 18-0376 COURT SECURITY 02/26/2018-02/28/2018
COURT SECURITY 02/26/2018-02/28/2018
001.000.23.512.50.41.00 880.00
PROBATION SECURITY MRT 02/28/2018
41Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
42
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230397 3/22/2018 (Continued)070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE
001.000.23.523.30.41.00 55.00
COURT SECURITY 03/05/2018-03/09/201818-0445
COURT SECURITY 03/05/2018-03/09/2018
001.000.23.512.50.41.00 1,127.50
PROBATION MRT SECURITY 03/07/2018
001.000.23.523.30.41.00 68.75
Total : 2,131.25
230398 3/22/2018 030695 PUMPTECH INC 0126592-IN SEWER - SUPPLIES
Sewer - Supplies
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 346.00
Freight
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 8.32
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.31.00 36.49
Total : 390.81
230399 3/22/2018 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 00000181782 INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-BLADINE
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-BLADINE
130.000.64.536.20.34.00 125.00
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-AARING00000181783
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-AARING
130.000.64.536.20.34.00 125.00
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-MINER00000181784
INSCRIPTION SHUTTER/NICHE-MINER
130.000.64.536.20.34.00 125.00
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-CHELEMEDOS00000181785
MARKER/INSCRIPTION-CHELEMEDOS
130.000.64.536.20.34.00 537.00
Total : 912.00
230400 3/22/2018 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 0000051450 STORM SWEEPING DUMP
Storm Sweeping Dump
422.000.72.531.10.49.00 2,820.60
42Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
43
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
(Continued)Total : 2,820.60 230400 3/22/2018 062657 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY
230401 3/22/2018 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-017465 UNIT 436 - BATTERY
Unit 436 - Battery
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 99.76
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.28
Total : 110.04
230402 3/22/2018 066964 SEATTLE AUTOMOTIVE DIST INC S5-3071907 UNIT 454 - TRANSMISSON
Unit 454 - Transmisson
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2,395.12
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 246.69
Total : 2,641.81
230403 3/22/2018 065194 SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF AMERICA 0000162982 UNIT 98 - SMART COUNTER
Unit 98 - Smart Counter
511.000.77.548.68.35.00 1,000.00
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.35.00 22.70
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.35.00 105.34
Total : 1,128.04
230404 3/22/2018 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0225730-IN UNITS E149, 152PO - ION T SERIES SOLO
Units E149, 152PO - ION T Series Solo
511.100.77.594.48.64.00 396.00
10.3% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00 40.79
UNITS E151,154,157PO - ION T SERIES0225731-IN
Units E151,154,157PO - ION T Series
511.100.77.594.48.64.00 1,386.00
10.3% Sales Tax
511.100.77.594.48.64.00 142.76
Total : 1,965.55
43Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
44
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230405 3/22/2018 036955 SKY NURSERY T-1076393 FLOWER PROGRAM SEEDS, PERENNIALS
FLOWER PROGRAM SEEDS, PERENNIALS
125.000.64.576.80.31.00 97.59
10.3% Sales Tax
125.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.05
Total : 107.64
230406 3/22/2018 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2004-9683-4 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD / METER
LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD /
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 91.77
CITY PARK RESTROOMS2006-5085-1
CITY PARK RESTROOMS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 19.42
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP2006-5164-4
PARK MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 971.66
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / METER 100002007-2302-1
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 29.12
HICKMAN PARK2011-8453-8
HICKMAN PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 95.35
CITY PARK GAZEBO2013-8327-0
CITY PARK GAZEBO
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 16.60
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPIC VIEW D2014-3123-6
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLYMPIC VIEW
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 18.89
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / METER 100042014-4175-5
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / METER
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 234.77
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS2014-5305-7
CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD LIGHTS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 63.75
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST SW / MET2017-9000-3
ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ST SW /
44Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
45
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230406 3/22/2018 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
421.000.74.534.80.47.00 21.85
CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHELTER2021-1448-4
CITY PARK S RESTROOMS & SHELTER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 66.57
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / METER 100042022-8945-0
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / METER
111.000.68.542.64.47.00 99.84
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 190TH ST SW2025-4064-7
SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION 8100 190TH ST SW
001.000.64.576.80.47.00 18.32
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 102044-2584-7
LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER
423.000.75.535.80.47.10 103.09
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH ST SW / METE2205-4757-4
TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH ST SW /
111.000.68.542.63.47.00 64.30
Total : 1,915.30
230407 3/22/2018 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY I000465644 INV#I000465644 CUST#S0W5007 - EDMONDS PD
SOLID WASTE CHG CASE #18-5283
001.000.41.521.22.41.00 152.00
Total : 152.00
230408 3/22/2018 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 63234 INV#63234 - EDMONDS PD
LOCKER MAGNET - ALLEN
001.000.41.521.22.31.00 4.50
MAGMATE PLATES - ALLEN
001.000.41.521.22.31.00 6.00
Freight
001.000.41.521.22.31.00 3.50
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.31.00 1.44
Total : 15.44
230409 3/22/2018 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 104757 WWTP: 2/2018 ROLLOFF ASH DISPOSAL+TAXES
45Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
46
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230409 3/22/2018 (Continued)038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
2/2018 Ash disposal & taxes
423.000.76.535.80.47.65 3,278.14
Total : 3,278.14
230410 3/22/2018 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 38426/4 STORM - RETURNS
Storm - Returns
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 -16.90
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 -1.74
WATER - RETURNS40077/4
Water - Returnsg
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 -21.41
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 -2.21
STORM - EXCHANGE/RETURNS40517/4
Storm - Exchange/Returns
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 -26.04
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 -2.68
STREET - JACKET P JOHNSON50034/4
Street - Jacket P Johnson
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 61.75
10.3% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 6.36
WATER - 5 JEANS - S LEONARD50640/4
Water - 5 Jeans - S Leonard
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 249.75
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 25.72
STORM - TSHIRTS, HOODIE, 5 WORK JEANS -50650/4
Storm - TShirts, Hoodie, 5 Work Jeans -
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 297.93
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 30.69
FAC MAINT - COAT, JEANS - S BRINKLEY50735/4
46Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
47
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230410 3/22/2018 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS
Fac Maint - Coat, Jeans - S Brinkley
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 131.76
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 13.57
STORM - WORK T SHIRTS T MOLES50883/4
Storm - Work T Shirts T Moles
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 92.07
10.3% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 9.48
FAC MAINT - 1 JEANS - L LAFAVE51299/4
Fac Maint - 1 Jeans - L LaFave
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 43.25
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.24.00 4.45
WATER - 5 JEANS - J KOBYLK51646/4
Water - 5 Jeans - J Kobylk
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 217.44
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 22.40
Total : 1,135.64
230411 3/22/2018 073961 STAR RENTALS 291866-33 UNIT 13 - SUPPLIES
Unit 13 - Supplies
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 151.00
Freight
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.36
10.0% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.31.10 16.34
Total : 179.70
230412 3/22/2018 040916 TC SPAN AMERICA 80264 FLEET - WORK WARE
Fleet - Work Ware
511.000.77.548.68.24.00 525.60
10.3% Sales Tax
511.000.77.548.68.24.00 54.14
47Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
48
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230412 3/22/2018 (Continued)040916 TC SPAN AMERICA
WATER SEWER - WORK T SHIRTS80331
Water Sewer - Work T Shirts
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 717.20
Water Sewer - Work T Shirts
423.000.75.535.80.24.00 717.20
10.3% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 73.88
10.3% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.24.00 73.87
Total : 2,161.89
230413 3/22/2018 027269 THE PART WORKS INC INV23863 LIBRARY - SUPPLIES
Library - Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 66.49
Freight
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.07
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.68
YOST POOL PARTITIONSINV24004
YOST POOL PARTITIONS
125.000.64.594.75.65.00 6,969.90
10.3% Sales Tax
125.000.64.594.75.65.00 717.90
Total : 7,770.04
230414 3/22/2018 075850 TURLEY, DAVE March 2018 REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL
Reimbursement for travel to NW
001.000.31.514.23.43.00 277.76
Total : 277.76
230415 3/22/2018 070902 ULVESTAD, KAREN 6167 PHOTO 6167 DIGITAL PHOTO INSTRUCTION
6167 DIGITAL PHOTO INSTRUCTION
001.000.64.571.22.41.00 92.00
Total : 92.00
48Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
49
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230416 3/22/2018 043935 UPS 00002T4T13108 INV#00002T4T13108 - EDMONDS PD
UPS CHG - CASE #17-027417
001.000.41.521.10.42.00 50.32
Total : 50.32
230417 3/22/2018 062693 US BANK BID-1687/0907 FACEBOOK AD, MYEDMONDS NEWS SPONSORED AR
BID/Ed! Facebook ad,
140.000.61.558.70.41.40 199.64
BID/Ed! sponsored content/article in
140.000.61.558.70.41.40 55.00
Total : 254.64
230418 3/22/2018 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9803438227 C/A 671247844-00001
Cell Service-Eng
001.000.67.518.21.42.00 74.90
Cell Service Fac-Maint
001.000.66.518.30.42.00 75.91
Cell Service-PD
001.000.41.521.22.42.00 303.29
Cell Service-PW Street/Storm
111.000.68.542.90.42.00 18.68
Cell Service-PW Street/Storm
422.000.72.531.90.42.00 18.68
Cell Service-PW Water
421.000.74.534.80.42.00 18.68
Cell Service-PW Sewer
423.000.75.535.80.42.00 56.04
Cell Service-WWTP
423.000.76.535.80.42.00 18.68
Total : 584.86
230419 3/22/2018 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 201129830 INV 201129830 2187-1 GAGNER EDMONDS PD
DT GROUND SURVIV. - GAGNER
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 300.00
INV 201129859 DT LEVEL 2 2076-1 GAGNER E201129859
DT LEVEL 2 INSTRUCTOR - GAGNER
49Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
50
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230419 3/22/2018 (Continued)068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 350.00
INV 201129892 ADV COLLISION - BRUGGMAN E201129892
ADV. COLLISION INVEST. 0202-3
001.000.41.521.40.49.00 100.00
Total : 750.00
230420 3/22/2018 045912 WASPC DUES 2018-00364 INV 2018-00364 ASSOCIATE DUES MCCLURE -
ASSOCIATE DUES - MCCLURE
001.000.41.521.10.49.00 75.00
Total : 75.00
230421 3/22/2018 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 10523380 FAC MAINT - CLEANING SUPPLIES
Fac Maint - Cleaning Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1,067.36
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 109.94
FAC MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES10543915
Fac Maint Cleaning Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 170.00
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 17.51
FAC MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES10546132
Fac Maint Cleaning Supplies
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1,757.33
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.66.518.30.31.00 181.00
Total : 3,303.14
230422 3/22/2018 064800 WEHOP 637625 PM: FREIGHT
PM: FREIGHT 56336
001.000.64.576.81.31.00 186.90
10.3% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.81.31.00 19.25
FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS637912
FLOWER PROGRAM: PLANTS
50Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
51
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230422 3/22/2018 (Continued)064800 WEHOP
125.000.64.576.80.31.00 548.92
10.3% Sales Tax
125.000.64.576.80.31.00 56.54
Total : 811.61
230423 3/22/2018 069605 WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS 2018-EDM-FEB FIRE SPRINKLER REVIEW BLD2018.0133 MAGIC
BLD2018.0133 Magic Toyota - Fire
001.000.62.524.20.41.00 531.25
Total : 531.25
230424 3/22/2018 072627 WEST SAFETY SERVICES INC 7006256 MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINT
Monthly 911 database maint
512.000.31.518.88.48.00 100.00
Total : 100.00
230425 3/22/2018 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 23194 SENIOR CENTER PLANTS
SENIOR CENTER PLANTS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 70.50
7.7% sales tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.43
PUBLIC SAFETY JUNIPERS23230
PUBLIC SAFETY JUNIPERS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 33.50
7.7% sales tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.58
Total : 112.01
230426 3/22/2018 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR TR-353344 STORM - RETURNS
Storm - Returns
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 -89.99
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 -8.73
STREET - T SHIRTS & HOODIE - C HIATTTR-389554
Street - T Shirts & Hoodie - C Hiatt
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 125.95
51Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
52
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230426 3/22/2018 (Continued)072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR
9.7% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 12.22
STREET - 5 JEANS, JACKET - T BACHTR-390577
Street - 5 Jeans, Jacket - T Bach
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 376.10
9.7% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 36.48
STREET - WORK TSHIRTS - B SANDERSTR-390733
Street - Work TShirts - B Sanders
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 107.96
9.7% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 10.47
STORM - RAIN JACKET, BIB OVERALL, T'S,TR-390753
Storm - Rain Jacket, Bib Overall, T's,
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 568.68
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 55.16
STORM - TSHIRTS, JACKET, COVERALLS,TR-391665
Storm - TShirts, Jacket, Coveralls,
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 321.23
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 31.16
STORM - 5 JEANS, TSHIRTS, HOODY - J WARDTR-391793
Storm - 5 Jeans, TShirts, Hoody - J Ward
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 349.10
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 33.86
STORM - 5 JEANS, TSHIRTS, HOODY - M BROWTR-394246
Storm - 5 Jeans, Tshirts, Hoody - M
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 296.90
9.7% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 28.80
STREET - WORK JEANS 5 , OVERALL, HOODY,TR-394881
Street - Work Jeans 5 , Overall, Hoody,
52Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
53
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
230426 3/22/2018 (Continued)072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 414.79
9.7% Sales Tax
111.000.68.542.90.24.00 40.23
WATER- 2 OVERALLS, 1JEAN - J DANIELSTR-395536
Water- 2 Overalls, 1Jean - J Daniels
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 170.97
9.7% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.24.00 16.58
Total : 2,897.92
230427 3/22/2018 075743 WHISTLE WORKWEAR OF SHORELINE SHO-3107 STORM - 5 JEANS, TSHIRTS, HOODY, SAFETY
Storm - 5 Jeans, TShirts, Hoody, Safety
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 475.09
10.0% Sales Tax
422.000.72.531.90.24.00 47.51
SEWER - 5 JEANS - D CAWFORDSHO-3119
Sewer - 5 Jeans - D Cawford
423.000.75.535.80.24.00 205.15
10.0% Sales Tax
423.000.75.535.80.24.00 20.52
WATER - 5 JEANS - J BECKSHO-3135
Water - 5 Jeans - J Beck
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 193.45
10.0% Sales Tax
421.000.74.534.80.31.00 19.35
Total : 961.07
230428 3/22/2018 065869 WSNLA 300001136 EDHOUSE CPH CERT FEE
EDHOUSE CPH CERT FEE
001.000.64.576.80.49.00 60.00
Total : 60.00
Bank total : 272,412.20 125 Vouchers for bank code :usbank
272,412.20Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report 125
53Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/22/2018
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
54
8:06:49AM
Page:vchlist
Bank code :usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount
54Page:
6.3.a
Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: claim cks 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
03/19/2018Voucher ListCity of Edmonds111:33:59AMPage:vchlistBank code :usbankVoucherDateVendorInvoicePO #Description/AccountAmount3192018 3/19/2018076380 BETTER PROPERTIES METRO Mar 2018ACCT #00365662 4TH AVE PARKING LOT RENT4th Avenue Parking Lot Rent - March 2018001.000.39.542.64.45.00 417.67Total :417.67Bank total : 417.671 Vouchers for bank code :usbank417.67Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report11Page:6.3.bPacket Pg. 82Attachment: wire 03-19-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE
STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC
STM 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE
SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB
SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA
STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB
STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA
STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA
WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC
STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA
STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA
SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC
SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA
STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB
WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB
WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB
STR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC
STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA
SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA
SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC
WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC
WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB
WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA
STR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 E7DA
STR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB
STR 2017 Overlay Program i018 E7CA
SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA
SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays i020 E7CC
STR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA
WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays i019 E7CB
WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB
STR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA
STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB
SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE
STR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA
WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD
WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC
SWR 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC
WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB
STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD
STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB
WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB
STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC
STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)c485 E6DA
STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC
STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 E8CA
STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA
STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC
STR 89th Pl W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD
STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB
FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA
STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE
STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB
STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB
STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB
STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA
PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB
STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC
STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB
WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)c482 E5JB
STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM
PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA
STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c472 E5FC
STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE
FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB
STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC
General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB
FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB
PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB
WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating c473 E5KA
STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA
PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA
STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA
STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD
SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB
STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB
SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC
STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD
STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA
STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA
STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE
STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)m013 E7FG
STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA
STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN
STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC
FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA
STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD
WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA
STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB
STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB
UTILITIES Standard Details Updates s010 E5NA
STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB
STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG
STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD
STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA
STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB
STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH
STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA
STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA
STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA
STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB
UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA
PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA
STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF
PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA
STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC
WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA
PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements
STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update
STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project
STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project
STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program
STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals
WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays
STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project
STR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept
STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing
STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements
STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update
FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park
FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System
STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming
STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program
WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays
SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays
STR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project
General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating
FAC E5LA c476 A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers
UTILITIES E5NA s010 Standard Details Updates
STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program
WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays
SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays
STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan
STR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens
STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STM E6FE c491 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs
SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
SWR E6GC c492 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project
UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update
WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project
PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza
PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement
PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa
STR E7AA i021 2017 Traffic Calming
STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals
STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program
WTR E7CB i019 2017 Waterline Overlays
SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays
STR E7CD i025 89th Pl W Retaining Wall
STR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STR E7DB i023 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement
PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza
PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration
STR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming
STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive
STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program
STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays
SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays
STR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps
PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza
PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements
STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation
STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update
STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project
SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive
PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park
WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project
STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study
STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th
STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements
STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin
STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration
STM E4FD c436 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects
STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program
WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program
SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project
FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab
FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades
WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring
STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals
WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
STR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept
STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing
STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station
SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I
STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines
WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update
SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study
STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project
STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program
STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects
STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects
WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects
SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects
STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System
STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming
STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating
STR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project
WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays
FAC E5LA c476 A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers
PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement
General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis
STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility
PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza
WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications
WTR E5JB c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)
STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements
STR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)
STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements
SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II
STM E6FE c491 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs
SWR E6GC c492 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project
WTR E6JC c493 2018 Waterline Replacement Project
PRK E6MC c494 Yost Park Spa
STM E7FB c495 Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW
WTR E7JA c498 2019 Waterline Replacement
STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays
STR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Funding
Engineering
Project
Number
Project
Accounting
Number Project Title
WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays
SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays
STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive
STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens
SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project
WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects
STR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion
STR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STR E6DD i017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STR E7CA i018 2017 Overlay Program
WTR E7CB i019 2017 Waterline Overlays
SWR E7CC i020 2017 Sewerline Overlays
STR E7AA i021 2017 Traffic Calming
STR E7DA i022 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades
STR E7DB i023 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program
STR E7AB i024 Audible Pedestrian Signals
STR E7CD i025 89th Pl W Retaining Wall
STR E7DC i026 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
STR E8AA i027 2018 Traffic Calming
STR E8AB i028 220th Adaptive
STR E8CA i029 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements
STR E8CB i030 2018 Overlay Program
STR E8CC i031 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th
STR E8DA i032 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project
STR E8DB i033 ADA Curb Ramps
WTR E8CD i034 2018 Waterline Overlays
SWR E8CE i035 2018 Sewerline Overlays
STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)
PRK E7MA m103 Waterfront Restoration
STM E7FA m105 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization
UTILITIES E5NA s010 Standard Details Updates
SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study
UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update
STR E6AA s014 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization
STR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan
STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA
FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB
FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB
FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA
General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB
PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA
PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA
PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA
PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB
PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA
PRK Waterfront Restoration m103 E7MA
PRK Yost Park Spa c494 E6MC
STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE
STM 183rd Pl SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE
STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA
STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA
STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB
STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC
STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM
STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c472 E5FC
STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE
STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC
STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD
STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB
STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA
STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E6FA
STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE
STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon)m013 E7FG
STM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization m105 E7FA
STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN
STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC
STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD
STM Storm Drain Improvements @ 9510 232nd St. SW c495 E7FB
STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG
STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD
STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB
STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH
STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF
STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC
STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC
STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB
STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA
STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA
STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB
STR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC
STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA
STR 2017 Curb Ramp Upgrades i022 E7DA
STR 2017 Minor Sidewalk Program i023 E7DB
STR 2017 Overlay Program i018 E7CA
STR 2017 Traffic Calming i021 E7AA
STR 2018 Minor Sidewalk Project i032 E8DA
STR 2018 Overlay Program i030 E8CB
STR 2018 Traffic Calming i027 E8AA
STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD
STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC
STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB
STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99)c485 E6DA
STR 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements i029 E8CA
STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA
STR 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th i031 E8CC
STR 89th Pl W Retaining Wall i025 E7CD
STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB
STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE
STR ADA Curb Ramps i033 E8DB
STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB
STR Audible Pedestrian Signals i024 E7AB
STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA
STR Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements i026 E7DC
STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB
STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA
STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD
STR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization s014 E6AA
STR Minor Sidewalk Program i017 E6DD
STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB
STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding)
Funding Project Title
Project
Accounting
Number
Engineering
Project
Number
STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA
STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA
STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA
STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA
STR 220th Adaptive i028 E8AB
SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB
SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA
SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC
SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA
SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA
SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC
SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA
SWR 2017 Sewerline Overlays i020 E7CC
SWR 2018 Sewerline Overlays i035 E8CE
SWR 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB
SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB
SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB
SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC
UTILITIES Standard Details Updates s010 E5NA
UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA
WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC
WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB
WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB
WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC
WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB
WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA
WTR 2017 Waterline Overlays i019 E7CB
WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6JB
WTR 2018 Waterline Overlays i034 E8CD
WTR 2018 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC
WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement c498 E7JA
WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB
WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave)c482 E5JB
WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re-coating c473 E5KA
WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA
WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA
Revised 3/22/2018
6.3.c
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 03-22-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.)
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 866 (03/01/2018 to 03/15/2018)
Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description
Educational Pay CorrectionREGULAR HOURS-ed2 0.00 -156.28
NO PAY LEAVEABSENT111 24.00 0.00
NO PAY NON HIREDABSENT112 88.00 0.00
SICK LEAVESICK121 599.00 21,740.24
VACATIONVACATION122 842.62 35,848.73
HOLIDAY HOURSHOLIDAY123 75.75 2,927.43
FLOATER HOLIDAYHOLIDAY124 24.00 771.19
COMPENSATORY TIMECOMP HOURS125 68.13 2,318.85
Police Sick Leave L & ISICK129 113.00 4,735.54
Holiday Compensation UsedCOMP HOURS130 6.75 239.16
MILITARY LEAVEMILITARY131 12.00 450.29
WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEAVESICK135 2.50 110.18
BEREAVEMENTBEREAVEMENT141 9.00 306.15
Kelly Day UsedREGULAR HOURS150 160.00 6,702.44
COMPTIME BUY BACKCOMP HOURS152 2.91 78.55
FLOATER HOLIDAY BUY BACKHOLIDAY154 4.00 107.97
COMPTIME AUTO PAYCOMP HOURS155 100.19 4,799.09
VACATION PAYOFFVACATION158 100.43 2,710.88
MANAGEMENT LEAVEVACATION160 1.00 49.18
Fire Pension PaymentsREGULAR HOURS180 5.00 161.94
REGULAR HOURSREGULAR HOURS190 16,953.11 637,757.44
LIGHT DUTYREGULAR HOURS193 9.00 277.64
LIGHT DUTYREGULAR HOURS196 142.00 5,834.91
OVERTIME-STRAIGHTOVERTIME HOURS210 12.50 328.05
WATER WATCH STANDBYOVERTIME HOURS215 60.00 3,115.07
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANTMISCELLANEOUS216 15.00 1,478.21
OVERTIME 1.5OVERTIME HOURS220 138.75 9,158.44
OVERTIME-DOUBLEOVERTIME HOURS225 0.25 20.31
MISC PAYMISCELLANEOUS400 3.00 40.68
WORKING OUT OF CLASSMISCELLANEOUS410 0.00 148.54
SHIFT DIFFERENTIALSHIFT DIFFERENTIAL411 0.00 1,273.90
RETROACTIVE PAYRETROACTIVE PAY600 0.00 1,160.97
ACCRUED COMPCOMP HOURS602 35.75 0.00
ACCRUED COMP TIMECOMP HOURS604 104.50 0.00
03/22/2018 Page 1 of 3
6.3.d
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: payroll summary 03-20-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 866 (03/01/2018 to 03/15/2018)
Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description
ACCRUED COMP TIMECOMP HOURS606 0.25 0.00
ACCREDITATION PAYMISCELLANEOUSacc 0.00 106.71
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORTMISCELLANEOUSacs 0.00 151.43
BOC II CertificationMISCELLANEOUSboc 0.00 86.48
Collision ReconstructionistMISCELLANEOUScolre 0.00 114.63
TRAINING CORPORALMISCELLANEOUScpl 0.00 156.94
CERTIFICATION III PAYMISCELLANEOUScrt 0.00 554.28
CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAMMISCELLANEOUSctr 0.00 150.00
DETECTIVE PAYMISCELLANEOUSdet 0.00 108.48
Detective 4%MISCELLANEOUSdet4 0.00 1,049.38
EDUCATION PAY 2%EDUCATION PAYed1 0.00 775.08
EDUCATION PAY 4%EDUCATION PAYed2 0.00 953.94
EDUCATION PAY 6%EDUCATION PAYed3 0.00 5,236.23
FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAIDABSENTfmla 41.17 0.00
FAMILY MEDICAL/SICKSICKfmls 10.33 458.85
K-9 PAYMISCELLANEOUSk9 0.00 108.48
LONGEVITY PAY 2%LONGEVITYlg1 0.00 777.76
LONGEVITY 5.5%LONGEVITYlg10 0.00 144.57
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%LONGEVITYlg11 0.00 919.55
Longevity 9%LONGEVITYlg12 0.00 5,594.50
Longevity 7%LONGEVITYlg13 0.00 2,724.94
Longevity 5%LONGEVITYlg14 0.00 1,280.98
LONGEVITY 7.5%LONGEVITYlg15 0.00 372.38
Longevity 1%LONGEVITYlg4 0.00 329.97
Longevity 3%LONGEVITYlg5 0.00 325.44
Longevity .5%LONGEVITYlg6 0.00 321.73
Longevity 1.5%LONGEVITYlg7 0.00 712.12
Medical Leave SickSICKmels 253.00 8,019.36
Medical Leave VacationVACATIONmelv 84.00 2,330.52
MOTORCYCLE PAYMISCELLANEOUSmtc 0.00 216.96
Public Disclosure SpecialistMISCELLANEOUSpds 0.00 99.30
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAYMISCELLANEOUSphy 0.00 2,198.66
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SERGEANMISCELLANEOUSprof 0.00 169.24
SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5%MISCELLANEOUSsdp 0.00 279.29
03/22/2018 Page 2 of 3
6.3.d
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: payroll summary 03-20-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 866 (03/01/2018 to 03/15/2018)
Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANTMISCELLANEOUSsgt 0.00 169.24
STREET CRIMESMISCELLANEOUSstr 0.00 451.58
TRAFFICMISCELLANEOUStraf 0.00 333.49
Total Net Pay:$530,432.99
$782,278.18 20,100.89
03/22/2018 Page 3 of 3
6.3.d
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: payroll summary 03-20-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 866 - 03/01/2018 to 03/15/2018
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck #
63214 03/20/2018 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 5,459.00 0.00
63215 03/20/2018 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 533.50 0.00
63216 03/20/2018 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 1,981.68 0.00
63217 03/20/2018 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 4,661.50 0.00
63218 03/20/2018 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 4,058.20 0.00
16,693.88 0.00
Bank: wire - US BANK
Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck #
2688 03/20/2018 awc AWC 321,362.41 0.00
2691 03/20/2018 us US BANK 98,005.94 0.00
2692 03/20/2018 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 100,368.46 0.00
2693 03/20/2018 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 26,529.29 0.00
2696 03/20/2018 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 6,550.94 0.00
2697 03/20/2018 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 329.50 0.00
553,146.54 0.00
569,840.42 0.00Grand Totals:
Page 1 of 13/22/2018
6.3.e
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: payroll benefit 03-20-18 (Approval of claim, payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Edmonds Public Facilities Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan
Staff Lead: Scott James
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Dave Turley
Background/History
The Edmonds Public Facilities District (PFD) was awarded three grants; (1) $250,000 from Snohomish
County for the roof replacement project (2) $275,000 from Washington State for the roof replacement
project and (3) $125,000 for theater improvements.
Staff Recommendation
Council to pass attached Resolution authorizing the Mayor or their designee to sign an Interlocal Grant
Anticipation Loan Agreement with the PFD. Resolution added at request of City Attorney.
Narrative
The PFD was awarded three grants; (1) $250,000 from Snohomish County for the roof replacement
project (2) $275,000 from Washington State for the roof replacement project and (3) $125,000 for
theater improvements. All three grants are reimbursement grants. In other words, the PFD has to pay
the roof replacement and theater improvement expenses before they can bill the county or the state for
the grant proceeds. The PFD does not have the funds to pay the roof replacement or theater
improvement expenses, which drives the need for the interim financing from the City.
The timeline for the Grant Anticipation Loan is expected to begin in April of 2018 and end in August of
2018.
How the Grant Anticipation Loan will work Example:
(1) As an example, the PFD receives an invoice from their contractor for $50,000.
(2) The PFD will forward a copy of the invoice to City of Edmonds Finance Department.
(3) Finance will cut a check for $50,000 payable to the PFD upon receipt and verification of the invoice.
(4) The PFD will bill the grantor agencies for a total of $50,000.
(5) The PFD will pay the City the grant proceeds to the City upon receipt of the receive the grant
proceeds. The lapse time between the PFD billing the grant agencies and receipt of the grant proceeds
is approximately 3 to 4 weeks, based on past experience.
The attached Interlocal Grant Anticipation Loan Agreement authorizes the Mayor or their designee to
loan the PFD funds that will be paid back to the City with the PFD’s grant proceeds plus interest. The
ILA requires the PFD:
6.4
Packet Pg. 99
1) To provide the City with documentation supporting each loan request. This documentation
must include copies of invoices from vendor(s) contracted to replace the roof or expenses
related to the theater improvements.
2) The Agreement states that the PFD will bill the grantor agencies monthly or as invoices are paid.
3) The PFD will apply the entire grant proceeds received as payment to the City upon receipt of the
grant proceeds.
4) The interest rate charge will be set at the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool
(LGIP) monthly investment return rate.
Attachments:
PFD Bridge Loan Resolution
2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD
EPFD Minutes Excerpt PFD032218 re Bridge Loan Agreement (00000003)
6.4
Packet Pg. 100
RESOLUTION NO. 1406
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT WITH THE EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT TO
ALLOW THE CITY TO FACILIATE THE DISTRICT’S USE OF GRANT
FUNDS BY MAKING BRIDGE LOANS TO THE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the city council would like to enter into the attached interlocal agreement with the
Edmonds public facilities district for the reasons set forth in the attached recitals; now therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED. The city council hereby approves
and the mayor is authorized to execute the attached BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT by and
between THE CITY OF EDMONDS and THE EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT
relating to the following THREE GRANTS AWARDED TO THE EDMONDS PUBLIC
FACILITIES DISTRICT: (1) $250,000 FROM SNOHOMISH COUNTY; (2) $275,000 FROM
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; & (3) $125,000 FROM SNOHOMISH COUNTY.
RESOLVED this 27th day of March, 2018.
CITY OF EDMONDS
_________________________________
MAYOR, DAVE EARLING
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: March 23, 2018
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: March 27, 2018
RESOLUTION NO. 1406
6.4.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: PFD Bridge Loan Resolution (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
DRAFT 3/8/18
BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT
by and between
THE CITY OF EDMONDS
and
THE EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT
relating to the following
THREE GRANTS AWARDED TO THE
EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT:
(1) $250,000 FROM SNOHOMISH COUNTY &
(2) $275,000 FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
(3) $125,000 FROM SNOHOMISH COUNTY
Dated as of [_____], 2018
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
52974391.2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE 1. Recitals .................................................................................................................................................. 1
ARTICLE 2. Loans to the District; Repayment Terms ........................................................................................... 3
Section 2.1 Loans to the District ......................................................................................................................... 3
Section 2.2 Loan Procedures; Time and Amount of Loans ................................................................................. 3
Section 2.3 Covenants Regarding Debt Limit. .................................................................................................... 4
Section 2.4 Repayment Terms. ............................................................................................................................ 4
ARTICLE 3. Rights of City Upon Making Loans .................................................................................................... 5
Section 3.1 Rights of the City .............................................................................................................................. 5
ARTICLE 4. Remedies Upon Default ....................................................................................................................... 5
Section 4.1 Remedies of City on Default ............................................................................................................ 5
Section 4.2 Remedies of District on Default ....................................................................................................... 5
Section 4.3 No Remedy Exclusive ...................................................................................................................... 5
Section 4.4 No Implied Waiver ........................................................................................................................... 5
Section 4.5 Agreement to Pay Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses ............................................................................ 6
Section 4.6 Dispute Resolution ........................................................................................................................... 6
ARTICLE 5. Hold Harmless ...................................................................................................................................... 6
ARTICLE 6. Miscellaneous ........................................................................................................................................ 6
Section 6.1 Governing Law; Venue .................................................................................................................... 6
Section 6.2 Notices .............................................................................................................................................. 7
Section 6.3 Binding Effect .................................................................................................................................. 7
Section 6.4 Severability ....................................................................................................................................... 7
Section 6.5 Amendments. .................................................................................................................................... 8
Section 6.6 Waiver of Breach .............................................................................................................................. 8
Section 6.7 No Rights Created in Third Parties ................................................................................................... 8
Section 6.8 Time of Essence................................................................................................................................ 8
Section 6.9 Effective Date of and Termination of Agreement ............................................................................ 9
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF EDMONDS
AND
THE EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT
RELATING TO THE FOLLOWING
THREE GRANTS AWARDED TO THE
EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT:
(1) $250,000 FROM SNOHOMISH COUNTY &
(2) $275,000 FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
This BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is dated as of [_____], by and between THE CITY OF EDMONDS (the “City”), a code city organized under the laws of the State of Washington, the EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT (the “District”), a
municipal corporation established by the City of Edmonds and duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Washington (together, the “Parties”).
The City and the District enter into this Agreement solely for the purpose of facilitating the District’s use of certain grant funds that were awarded to the District for the purpose of replacing the roof on the Edmonds Center for the Arts.
The Parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. Recitals
The following facts and circumstances form the background of this Agreement:
1. The District is a duly organized and legally existing municipal corporation of the State of Washington. The District and the City are authorized by applicable provisions of state law, including chapters 35.57 and 35.59 RCW and RCW 82.14.390, to acquire, construct, own, remodel, maintain, equip, repair, and operate a regional center (including multipurpose community centers and special events centers) and related parking facilities.
2. The City and the District have the authority to enter into interlocal agreements under chapters 35.57, 35.59, and 67.28 RCW for joint and cooperative action, including provisions to finance joint or cooperative undertakings, multipurpose community centers, regional centers, and tourism-related facilities, and to provide for services to be provided by
one government to another.
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
2
3. The District’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) previously found and determined that the residents of the District and the region would benefit from the District’s acquisition, construction, operation, and maintenance of a performing arts center, known as the Edmonds Center for the Arts (the “Regional Center”), which provides for meetings,
conferences, community events, trade shows, and artistic, musical, theatrical, or other cultural exhibitions, presentations, or performances.
4. As authorized by RCW 35.57.040(1)(d) and RCW 82.14.390, the District has since 2001 imposed and collected a 0.033% sales and use tax to assist in financing the design, development, acquisition, construction, operation, and management of the Regional Center,
which taxing authority will expire when the bonds issued to finance or refinance the construction of the Regional Center and related parking facilities are retired, but not later than 2041, which is forty years after the tax was first collected.
5. The District has entered into the County PFD Agreement (the “County PFD Agreement”) with the City, the Snohomish County Public Facilities District (the “County
PFD”) and Snohomish County (the “County”), dated November 4, 2002, as amended, regarding the joint development and operation of the Regional Center and pursuant to which the City, the County PFD, and the County agreed to make payments to the District to support such joint development and operation, and pursuant to which the District has agreed to make certain payments to the City in support of the City’s Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding
Bonds, 2012 (the “City Bonds”) issued to refund bonds issued by the City pay a portion of the costs of acquisition and development of the Regional Center.
6. In Section C.1.(b) of the County PFD Agreement, the parties “reserve[d] the right to make or to agree to make, additional payments or transfers among themselves with respect to the Edmonds Center For the Arts, so long as such agreements and/or payments are
consistent with the terms of this Agreement.”
7. The District was awarded three grants to pay for replacing the roof of the Regional Center: (1) a $250,000 grant from Snohomish County; (2) a $275,000 grant from the State of Washington (3) a $125,000 grant from Snohomish County. All three grants are funded on a reimbursement basis. In other words, the District has to pay the roof replacement
expenses before the District can bill the county or the state for the grant proceeds. The combined total of the three grants described in this recital shall be referenced below as the Grant Funds.
8. The District does not have sufficient funds to pay the initial roof replacement expenses as required by the three grants. The District has requested that the City provide such
funds on an interim basis to serve as a bridge loan until the District can bill the two grant funding agencies and actually receive funds, incrementally, from the grant funding agencies.
9. The City is willing to provide such a bridge loan and has authorized the execution of this Agreement pursuant to Ordinance No. [_____], adopted on [_____], 2018.
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
3
ARTICLE 2. Loans to the District; Repayment Terms
Section 2.1 Loans to the District
The City shall lend money to the District at the times and in the amounts set forth in this
Section 2. The District shall borrow the amounts described above from the City pursuant to this Agreement for the purpose of paying the contractors and vendor who are performing the roof replacement work on the Edmonds Center for the Arts. The City irrevocably agrees to disburse all loans made hereunder directly to the District, and the District irrevocably agrees to
immediately apply all such amounts received by it for the purpose of meeting its obligations to
the contractors and vendors who are working on the Edmonds Center for the Arts roof project and in a manner that is consistent with the terms of the three grants. The aggregate principal amount of outstanding loans to be made by the City pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed $525,000. The loans authorized by this Section are intended to reflect the joint and
cooperative nature of the financing of the Regional Center pursuant to chapters 35.57, 35.59,
and 67.28 RCW.
Section 2.2 Loan Procedures; Time and Amount of Loans
(1) Payment Schedule. The District shall provide the City with an estimated payment schedule from the contractor(s) and vendor(s) doing the work before the work is
commenced. The payment schedule should be linked to construction progress milestones so the
payments made by the District do not get ahead of the work.
(2) Documentation of Construction Costs Incurred. The District’s contracts with its contractor(s) and vendor(s) shall require contractor(s) and vendor(s) to invoice the District no less frequently than once per month and in a format with sufficient detail to comply with any requirements of the granting agencies. Upon receipt of an invoice from a contractor or vendor,
the District shall immediately forward it to the City.
(3) Method of Obtaining Bridge Loan Funds. Invoices from contractor(s) and vendor(s) shall be sent by the District to the City Administrative Services Director by hand delivery or email (which email shall be promptly confirmed by telephone communication to the City Administrative Services Director). A copy of each such invoice also shall be mailed to the
City pursuant to Section 6.2. Any failure by the District to send such notices shall not nullify the City’s obligation to make loans to the District hereunder, but may result in a delay by the City in transferring loan amounts to the District. The City shall make a bridge loan to the District for the full amount of each invoice received within ___ business days of receiving the invoice. The
District shall then pay the contractor(s) and vendor(s) from its own account.
(4) Monthly Invoicing of Grant Agencies. The District shall, no less frequently than once a month, invoice the granting agencies seeking reimbursement pursuant to the terms of the grants for any amounts funded by the City pursuant to this Agreement.
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
4
(5) District’s Use of Grant Proceeds. Upon receiving grant proceeds from the granting agencies, the District shall transfer all such funds to the City within ___ business days. The District shall not use the Grant Funds for any purpose other than repayment to the City of the costs advances pursuant to this Agreement.
Section 2.3 Covenants Regarding Debt Limit.
(1) The District does not intend to submit this Agreement or any indebtedness created hereunder to qualified electors of the District for approval. Under RCW 35.57.030 and existing laws, the District may incur non-voted indebtedness in an aggregate amount equal to
one-half of one percent of the value of the taxable property within the District. In light of the foregoing, and to comply with RCW 67.28.130, to the extent that the District has agreed to obtain approval from third parties prior to incurring additional indebtedness, and to the extent that the indebtedness contemplated herein would violate the District’s earlier covenants to that effect, the District agrees to comply with the terms of its earlier covenants prior to seeking
funds from the city under this Agreement.
Section 2.4 Repayment Terms.
(1) Repayment Terms. The principal amount of each loan to the District hereunder, together with interest thereon calculated as set forth in subsection (2) of this Section, shall be repaid by the District from the Grant Funds described above. Such Grant Funds shall be applied
first, to costs owed to the City, second, to interest owed to the City on account of outstanding loans made under this Agreement, and third, to the principal of all outstanding loans made under this Agreement in the order in which such loans were made.
(2) Interest Rate. Each loan made under the terms of this Agreement will bear interest from the date of the loan until the date such loan is repaid. Interest on the loans will be
calculated on the basis of a 365/366-day year, for the actual number of days elapsed. The rate of interest borne by each loan hereunder shall be a variable rate equal to the monthly average rate of return on the State of Washington Local Government Investment Pool (or its successor), as determined as of the last day of each month in which a loan is outstanding, and shall change monthly as of the first day of each month in which a loan is outstanding. The City may in its
discretion charge a lower rate of interest. Absent manifest error, all calculations of the City Administrative Services Director shall be binding upon the District.
(3) Maturity. Unless paid earlier pursuant to subsection (1) of this Section, all loans hereunder shall mature on December 31, 2018. If any loan has not been repaid under this Agreement on the loan maturity date described in this Section, the remaining loan balance shall
be converted to a debt under the Contingent Loan Agreement then in effect between the City and the District and the City shall acquire an ownership interest in the Regional Center equal to the unpaid principal and interest due to the City on that loan maturity date, and the District shall execute and deliver a quitclaim deed and such other documents as may be necessary to convey
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
5
this interest to the City as described in the Contingent Loan Agreement, and the District’s obligation to repay the loan under this Agreement shall be discharged.
ARTICLE 3. Rights of City Upon Making Loans
Section 3.1 Rights of the City
If the City has made any loans to the District under this Agreement and such loans have not been repaid in full (whether or not the loan is in default), the City may have access to and inspect, examine, and make copies of the books and records and any and all accounts and data
of the District.
ARTICLE 4. Remedies Upon Default
Section 4.1 Remedies of City on Default
Upon the occurrence of a default by the District in its obligations hereunder, the City may proceed to protect and enforce its rights in equity or at law, either in mandamus or for the specific performance of any covenant or agreement contained herein, or for the enforcement of any other appropriate legal or equitable remedy, as the City may deem most effectual to protect and enforce any of its rights or interests hereunder; provided that the City may not enforce
repayment of the loans until the District has repaid in full of the principal of and interest on its outstanding bonds.
Section 4.2 Remedies of District on Default
Upon the occurrence of a default by the City in its obligations to make loans to the District hereunder, the District may proceed to protect and enforce its rights in equity or at law,
either in mandamus or for the specific performance of any covenant or agreement contained herein, or for the enforcement of any other appropriate legal or equitable remedy, as the District may deem most effectual to protect and enforce any of its rights or interests hereunder.
Section 4.3 No Remedy Exclusive
No remedy conferred upon or reserved to either party by this Agreement is intended to
be exclusive of any other available remedy or remedies, but each and every such remedy shall
be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given under this Agreement or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute, and either party hereto shall be free to pursue, at the same time, each and every remedy, at law or in equity, which it may have under this Agreement, or otherwise.
Section 4.4 No Implied Waiver
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
6
No delay or omission to exercise any right or power accruing upon any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver thereof, but any such right and power may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. For the exercise of any remedy, it shall not be necessary to give any notice, other than such notice
as may be expressly required herein.
Section 4.5 Agreement to Pay Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses
If a default arises under any of the provisions of this Agreement and either party hereto should employ attorneys or incur other expenses for the collection of amounts due under this Agreement or the enforcement of performance or observance of any obligation or agreement on
the part of the other party contained in this Agreement, on demand therefor, the nonprevailing party shall pay or reimburse the prevailing party for the reasonable fees of such attorneys and such other expenses so incurred.
Section 4.6 Dispute Resolution
The parties may mediate any dispute over the interpretation of any terms or conditions
under this Agreement. Mediation will be made available upon request of either party. The costs associated with any such mediation shall be shared equally by the parties.
ARTICLE 5. Hold Harmless
As between the City and the District, the District shall assume the risk of, be liable for,
and pay all damage, loss, cost, and expense of any party, including its employees, arising out of the performance of this Agreement, except that caused by negligence and/or willful misconduct solely of the City and its employees acting within the scope of their employment. The District shall hold harmless the City and its officers, elected officials, agents, and employees against all
claims, losses, suits, actions, costs, counsel fees, litigation costs, expenses, damages,
judgments, or decrees by reason of damage to any property or business and/or any death, injury, or disability to or of any person or party, including any employee, arising out of or suffered, directly or indirectly, by reason of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement or any act, error, or omission of the District or the District’s employees, agents, or
subcontractors, whether by negligence or otherwise, but only after the District has repaid in full
the principal of and interest on the District’s outstanding bond(s).
The District’s obligation shall include, without limitation, investigating, adjusting, and defending all claims against the City alleging loss from action, error, or omission or breach of any common law, statutory, or other delegated duty by the District or the District’s employees,
agents, or subcontractors.
ARTICLE 6. Miscellaneous
Section 6.1 Governing Law; Venue
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
7
This Agreement is governed by and shall be construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of Washington and shall be liberally construed so as to carry out the purposes hereof. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, any action under this Agreement shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of Washington in and for
Snohomish County.
Section 6.2 Notices
Except as otherwise provided herein, all notices, consents, or other communications required hereunder shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given if addressed and hand delivered or mailed by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested,
as follows:
To the City: City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Attention: Finance/Administrative Services Director
Email: [Scott.James@edmondswa.gov] Telephone: (425) 771-0240
To the District: Edmonds Public Facilities District 121 Fifth Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Attention: PFD Treasurer Email: [_____] Telephone: (425) 771-0240
The City or the District may designate any further or different addresses to which subsequent
notices, certificates, requests, or other communications shall be sent by giving notice of such
change to the other party. Notices shall be deemed served upon deposit of such notices in the United States mail in the manner provided above.
Section 6.3 Binding Effect
This Agreement shall be binding upon the City and the District and their successors.
This Agreement may not be assigned.
Section 6.4 Severability
In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof.
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
8
Section 6.5 Amendments.
This Agreement may be amended, changed, modified, or altered by an instrument in writing duly executed by the City and the District (or the successors in title of each). Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to amend any prior agreement between the parties, including
but not limited to the prior Contingent Loan Agreement between the City and the District and nothing herein is intended to adversely affect the security for any outstanding bond(s) of the District or tax exemption of interest on such bond(s).
Section 6.6 Waiver of Breach
No waiver of any breach of any covenant or agreement contained herein shall operate as
a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same covenant or agreement or as a waiver of any breach of any other covenant or agreement, and in case of a breach by either party of any covenant, agreement, or undertaking, the nondefaulting party may nevertheless accept from the other any payment or payments or performance hereunder without in any way waiving its right
to exercise any of its rights and remedies provided for herein or otherwise with respect to any
such default or defaults that were in existence at the time such payment or payments or performance were accepted by it.
Section 6.7 No Rights Created in Third Parties
The terms of this Agreement are not intended to establish or to create any rights in any
persons or entities other than the City, the District, and the respective successors and assigns of
each.
Section 6.8 Time of Essence
Time and all terms and conditions shall be of the essence of this Agreement.
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
9
Section 6.9 Effective Date of and Termination of Agreement
This Agreement shall take effect upon mutual execution. This Agreement shall terminate upon the occurrence of both of the following: 1) receipt by the District of all Grant Funds awarded to the District; and 2) either repayment in full of all principal of and interest on
the bridge loan(s), or, in the event that the Grant Funds are insufficient to all repayment in full, conversion of any outstanding balance on the bridge loans to interests in the property pursuant to the terms of the Contingent Loan Agreement then in effect. Article 5 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
ORAL AGREEMENTS OR ORAL COMMITMENTS TO LEND MONEY, EXTEND
CREDIT, OR FORBEAR FROM ENFORCING REPAYMENT OF A DEBT ARE NOT ENFORCEABLE UNDER WASHINGTON LAW.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the District have caused this Agreement to be executed in their respective names by their duly authorized officers, and have caused this Agreement to be dated as of the date set forth on the first page hereof.
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON
__________________________________ Mayor
Attest:
__________________________________
City Clerk
EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES
DISTRICT
_________________________________ President, Board of Directors
Attest:
_________________________________
Secretary, Board of Directors
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
ss.
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ____________ and _____________ are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that said persons signed this instrument, on oath stated that said persons were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Mayor and Clerk, respectively, of the CITY OF
EDMONDS, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, to be the free and voluntary act of such municipal corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated this ______ day of [_____], 2018.
(Signature of Notary)
(Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary) Notary public in and for the State of Washington, residing at
My appointment expires
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH
ss.
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ____________ and _____________ are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that
said persons signed this instrument, on oath stated that said persons were authorized to execute
the instrument and acknowledged it as the President and Secretary, respectively, of Board of Directors of the EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, to be the free and voluntary act of such municipal corporation for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated this ______ day of [_____], 2018.
(Signature of Notary)
(Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary) Notary public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
6.4.b
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: 2018-03-08 bridge loan agreement Edmonds PFD (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation Loan/Bridge Loan)
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes – Excerpt
March 22, 2018
Page 1
M I N U T E S
E X C E R P T
Edmonds Public Facilities District
Board of Directors Meeting
March 22, 2018
The Edmonds Public Facilities District Board meeting convened at 7:30 a.m. in the Maltby
Building, Room 108, 7020 196th St SW, Edmonds Community College.
EPFD Board Members Present ECA Staff Present
Mike Popke, President Joseph McIalwain, Executive Director
Larry Ehl, Vice President (via phone) Matt Keller, Director of Operations
Marla Miller Gillian Jones, Director of Programming
Kevin McKay
City Staff Present
EPFD Board Members Absent Scott James, Finance Director (Ex-Officio)
Patrick Mulva Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director
ECA Board Members Present
David Schaefer, ECA Treasurer
1. Call to Order
Board President Popke called the meeting to order.
5. PFD Board Business
Approve Bridge Loan from City of Edmonds Roofing Project and Theater
Production Equipment
Authorize to Sign Once Approved by City Council
Mr. Keller relayed an agreement has been drafted by the City Attorney and reviewed by ECA
staff. The function of the loan is as items are purchased and services rendered, ECA will provide
the invoice to the City who will remit funds to the ECA for payment of invoices, when the ECA is
reimbursed by state/county, the funds are returned to the City. The agreement is scheduled to be
an agenda item at City Council’s March 27 meeting; the Council requested the PFD Board
approve the agreement and provide the PFD meeting minutes for the Council packet. The action
requested from the Board is to approve the agreement and authorize the Board President and
Vice President to sign the agreement once approved by the City Council.
ECA Board Treasurer David Schaefer relayed the Admin/Finance Committee reviewed the
agreement and recommend approval.
Board Member Miller relayed concern with the provision in Section 2.4.3 that the PFD provide a
quitclaim deed equivalent to the amount of any debt not paid on schedule, which is essentially a
property transaction. Mr. James advised the City Attorney took that language from the existing
Contingent Loan Agreement (CLA) between the PFD and the City. There is little concern with
repayment as the funding source (grants) is guaranteed; however, this language provided some
6.4.c
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: EPFD Minutes Excerpt PFD032218 re Bridge Loan Agreement (00000003) (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes – Excerpt
March 22, 2018
Page 2
recourse in the event of non-repayment. Board Member Miller recommended the PFD’s bond
counsel review that language and advise whether it is an appropriate remedy for a public entity
to essentially use property for collateral for this type of loan.
Discussion followed regarding converting any non-repayment of the loan to debt under the CLA,
clauses in the CLA regarding additional issuances of debt, whether removing the language would
jeopardize Council approval of the agreement, when the roof project is scheduled to begin,
county/state AP turnaround time, preference to include a financial remedy in the agreement
instead of a property remedy, low risk of moving forward given the security of the funding and
discomfort with the inclusion of the quitclaim deed language.
BOARD MEMBER MCKAY MOVED APPROVAL OF THE BRIDGE LOAN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE EDMONDS PUBLIC
FACILITIES DISTRICT RELATING TO THE THREE GRANTS AWARDED FOR THE
ROOF PROJECT AND PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT PURCHASE. BOARD VICE
PRESIDENT EHL SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED (3-1), BOARD
MEMBER MILLER VOTING NO.
It was agreed staff would ask the PFD’s bond counsel to review the language and provide an
answer by 3:00 p.m. tomorrow; staff will communicate his response to PFD board members. Staff
will also provide board members the CLA document.
6.4.c
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: EPFD Minutes Excerpt PFD032218 re Bridge Loan Agreement (00000003) (Edmonds Public Facilities District Grant Anticipation
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Marsh Study Budget Vote
Staff Lead: Council Marsh Study Group
Department: City Council
Preparer: Maureen Judge
Background/History
Council voted on the scope and calendar for the Marsh Study with Windward Environmental, LLC at the
1/23/18 meeting and the Professional Services Agreement on 2/6/18.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Our consultant, Windward Environmental, is requesting changes to the agreement to include past items
discussed and studied by Council. The current agreement references Task 1. Windward would like to
include Tasks 2, 3, and 4 with their specific budget amounts in attachment Exhibit B. The request is to
vote to include these tasks, small language changes in the agreement and scope for clarity, and a new
project start date.
Attachments:
FINAL_Windward Professional Services Agreememt
Exhibit A Windward_Scope_final
Exhibit B_FINAL Edmonds Marsh Updated Budget
FINAL project sched table_3_21_18
7.1
Packet Pg. 117
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5the Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020
Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into between the City of
Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Windward Environmental, LLC,
hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”.
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of the Consultant
for services to the Edmonds City Council and the public related to performing a site-specific, planning-
level scientific study of the Edmonds Marsh that will:
1) assess and report the current state of the ecological functions of the Edmonds Marsh, including
but not limited to its: (a) biogeochemical functions, (b) hydrologic functions; and (c) food web and wildlife
habitat functions;
2) identify and report what properly functioning ecological conditions are for the Edmonds Marsh;
3) evaluate and report the range of buffer widths that will ensure effective site-specific buffer
functions for: (a) removing sediment; (b) removing excess nutrients, (c) removing toxics, (d) influencing
the microclimate, (e) screening adjacent disturbances to wildlife (including noise and light), (f) maintaining
habitat connectivity, and (g) maintaining habitat critical for the life needs of wildlife that utilize the
Edmonds Marsh including refuge/shelter, feeding, breeding, and distancing wildlife sensitive to human
activities;
4) analyze and report how the daylighting of Willow Creek may alter the Marsh’s environmental
conditions and how that may affect the location and ranges of buffer widths that are necessary for the
protection and maintenance of ecological functions;
5) analyze and report what vegetation enhancements are needed at the Edmonds Marsh and how
they may affect the location and ranges of buffer widths necessary for the protection and maintenance of
ecological functions;
6) analyze and report how the excavation of channels to extend tidal flow and increase capacity and
circulation within the Marsh (including the portion known as Shellabarger Marsh on the east side of
Highway 104) may affect environmental conditions and the location and ranges of buffer widths that are
necessary for the protection and maintenance of ecological functions;
7) utilize data from ongoing studies and collaborate with local citizens conducting studies and/or
observations at the Edmonds Marsh to determine baseline ecological conditions;
8) provide information on updating the City’s Shoreline Management Program in 2019;
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: FINAL_Windward Professional Services Agreememt [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
9) identify a scope and process, with options and recommendations, for developing a watershed
management study and strategy for the Edmonds Marsh; and
WHEREAS, Windward Environmental, LLC, is qualified and available to provide
those services under this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by
and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Scope of work. The Scope of Work shall include all services and material
necessary to accomplish the above-mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of
Services that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for
services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full
compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials,
supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement
shall be based on a time and expense basis as set forth on the fee schedule found in Exhibit B,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; provided in no event shall the
payment for work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of
$190,038.
B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for
payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount
for each voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City monthly
for services performed and accepted by the City. Billing shall be reviewed in conjunction with
the City’s warrant process. No billing shall be considered for payment that has not been
submitted to the City three days prior to the scheduled cut-off date. Such late vouchers will be
checked by the City and payment will be made in the next regular payment cycle.
C. The costs, records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to
be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three (3) years
after final payment. Copies shall be made available upon request.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: FINAL_Windward Professional Services Agreememt [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
3. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary
data and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation
for the services rendered by the Consultant under this Agreement shall be and are the property
of Consultant, provided that:
A. All final reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the
Consultant shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by
the City and shall at that date become the property of the City.
B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect,
review and subject to the approval of the Consultant, copy any work product.
C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in
the event that this Agreement shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided,
the work product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or
termination, shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary
shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of work done shall
be prepared at no additional cost.
4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by
this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required government approvals.
5. Hold Harmless agreement. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City
and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense
all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the Consultant’s
negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that nothing
herein shall require a Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from
claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the City, its agents, officers and
employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the
concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant’s agents or employees, and (b) the City, its agents,
officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon
such negligence (2) the costs to the City of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and
enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant’s negligence or the negligence of the
Consultant’s agents or employees.
6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall obtain
and keep in force during the terms of the Agreement, or as otherwise required, the following
insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner
pursuant to Title 48 RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker’s compensation and employer’s liability insurance as
required by the State.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: FINAL_Windward Professional Services Agreememt [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
B. Commercial general liability and property damage insurance in an
aggregate amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury, including
death and property damage. The per occurrence amount shall be written with limits no less
than one million dollars ($1,000,000).
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not
less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000) combined single limit.
($1,000,000).
D. Professional liability insurance in the amount of one million dollars
Excepting the Worker’s Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by
the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant
shall furnish the City with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the Agreement.
The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies
at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State
of Washington. The Consultant shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within
fourteen days of the execution of this Agreement to the City.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty days prior notice to the
City.
The Consultant’s professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under
this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified
elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant’s professional liability to third parties
be limited in any way.
7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex,
sexual orientation, marital status, veteran status, liability for service in the armed forces of the
United States, disability, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, or any other
protected class status, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification.
8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent
contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of
the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any
purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives
and subcontractors during the performance of this Agreement.
9. City approval of work. Notwithstanding the Consultant’s status as an
independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this Agreement must meet the
approval of the City.
10. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated without cause by the City at any
time during the term of the Agreement by ten (10) day written notice from the City to the Consultant.
If City so terminates this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: FINAL_Windward Professional Services Agreememt [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
stop all work herein and shall immediately cause its suppliers or subcontractors to
cease work. Unless the termination is for cause, the City shall determine and pay to Consultant the
percentage of the Agreement price equal to the percentage of conforming services performed and
goods delivered or partially manufactured prior to the delivery of City’s termination notice, plus
reasonable actual direct out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Consultant as a result of the
termination (excluding any lost profits).
11. Integration., The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this
document, Consultant’s Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A, and Consultant’s fee
schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties
and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict
between this written Agreement and provision of Exhibits A or B, this Agreement shall control.
12. Changes/Additional work. The City may engage Consultant to perform
services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to additional
compensation for authorized additional services or materials. The City shall not be liable for
additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is
approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are
encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Work, the City understands that a revision
to the Scope of Work and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph
shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render services, or the City to pay for services
rendered, in excess of the Scope of Work in Exhibit A, unless or until an amendment to this
Agreement is approved in writing by both parties.
13. Standard of care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary
knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and
any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a
professional manner consistent with sound practices, in accordance with the usual and customary
professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Work.
14. Non-waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any
time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
15. Non-assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be
assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City.
16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that it has not
employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely
for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration contingent upon or
resulting from the award of making this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the
City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion to deduct
from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: FINAL_Windward Professional Services Agreememt [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement
shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations
for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing
of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality
of services.
18. Notices. Notices shall be sent to the following address, with receipt of any
notice being deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice.
City of Edmonds Consultant
City of Edmonds Windward Environmental, LLC
121 Fifth Avenue North 200 West Mercer St., Suite 401
Edmonds, WA 98020 Seattle, WA 98119
425-771-0220 206-378-1364
DATED THIS DAY OF__________________ , 2018.
CITY OF EDMONDS WINDWARD ENVIRONMENTAL LLC
__________________________________________ _______________________________________
David O. Earling, Mayor By: ______________________________
Its:__________________________
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
___________________________________________
Scott Passey, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office of the City Attorney
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: FINAL_Windward Professional Services Agreememt [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss
COUNTY OF )
On this______ day of , 2018, before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared , to me known to be the
of the corporation that executed the
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary
act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath
stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the
corporate seal of said corporation.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
_____________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
7.1.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: FINAL_Windward Professional Services Agreememt [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
EXHIBIT A
200 West Mercer St. Suite 401 Seattle, WA 98119
Phone: 206.378.1364 Fax: 206.973.3048 www.windwardenv.com
SCOPE OF WORK
The goal of this Scope of Work is to provide a scientific baseline study of the Edmonds
Marsh for the city council along with related tasks as described below. The following
subsections describe the approach to the scope of work for the Edmonds Marsh Study.
The approaches for Components 1 through 4 (the required components from the Marsh
Study RFP) are described in the correspondingly numbered task sections. Methods for
the accomplishment of Components 5 and 9 are also included, described under Tasks 5
and 6, respectively. In general, Windward will implement these tasks in the order in
which they are listed; however, certain steps may be done in a different order. For
example, it may be determined that implementing Task 2 (Evaluation of Site-Specific
Buffers for Ecological Functions) prior to Task 1 (Baseline Analysis), will be valuable in
helping to inform the study design for Task 1. The primary point of contact for the City
of Edmonds shall be Maureen Judge, Executive Assistant to the City Council: (425) 771-
0248; Maureen.judge@edmondswa.gov.
Task 1: Baseline Analysis
The broad ecological functions currently being performed by the Edmonds Marsh and
Shellabarger/Stella’s Marsh will be evaluated by implementing a baseline wetland
monitoring study. Water level and quality, vegetation, and invertebrate1 data will be
collected, and bird2 and other wildlife surveys3 will be performed as part of the study.
In addition, conventional sediment chemistry data (e.g., total organic carbon [TOC],
grain size, etc.) will be collected, and sediment redox profiles will be determined.
Photos will also be taken at establish photo stations during each monitoring event.
The first step in completing this task will be to develop a baseline wetland monitoring
plan that will include detailed methods about how and when data will be collected. The
monitoring plan will be developed in coordination with the City Council, City staff and
other stakeholders to ensure that it meets the requested goals and objectives of the
baseline study. It is anticipated that the baseline study will be conducted over the
course of one year, in order to gather data about conditions within the Marsh during all
1 Collected invertebrates will be identified by the field crew to the lowest taxonomic level possible (e.g.,
Order).
2 Bird surveys (e.g., point count surveys) will be conducted by Windward and by qualified
volunteers/citizen scientists. Windward will oversee and coordinate these surveys.
3 Wildlife observations made at any time during monitoring events will be recorded in the field notebook
and summarized in the monitoring reports. Wildlife cameras will also be used to assist with
observations of animals using the marsh and its buffer areas.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Exhibit A Windward_Scope_final [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
February 6, 2018 Page 2
four seasons.4 The monitoring plan will further detail which monitoring parameters will
be collected when, and how frequently they will be collected throughout the year. It
will also identify specific monitoring locations for each of the metrics described herein,
and will expand on the monitoring methods to be followed. A major goal for the
monitoring plan will be to select and describe monitoring methods that are easy to
implement and that can be repeated easily so that comparative data can be collected in
the future.
Throughout the baseline monitoring year, the project manager and senior advisor will
apprise the City Council and attend quarterly council meetings as well as two or three
public meetings in order to provide project updates.
Task 2: Evaluation of Site-specific Buffers for Ecological Functions
This task will consist of two steps: 1) the preparation of a white paper summarizing the
available scientific literature on wetland buffer functions and recommended buffer
widths, and 2) a site-specific evaluation of the Marsh, its surrounding land uses and
land ownership, and opportunities for buffer restoration or enhancement. Windward
anticipates that while these steps will result in two separate deliverables, the site-
specific evaluation will rely heavily on the literature summarized in the white paper
when making recommendations about Marsh buffer widths and buffer restoration
opportunities.
The White Paper
The white paper will synthesize and summarize information about the functions and
recommended widths of wetland buffers; this information will be gathered from a
thorough review of scientific literature and guidance documents dealing with the topic.
Documents specific to the Pacific Northwest and western United States will be
prioritized. As much as possible, the white paper will include information about the
range of buffer widths necessary to support the following ecological functions:
1. Improving water quality (removing sediment, nutrients, and toxics)
2. Maintaining an appropriate microclimate
3. Providing a screen sufficient to prevent the disturbance of wildlife that use the
Marsh
4. Maintaining habitat connectivity and critical habitat for species that use the
Marsh as forage habitat, breeding habitat, and refuge/shelter
The white paper will also summarize the available information pertaining to buffer
widths that have been found to be insufficient to provide the four ecological functions
listed herein. Ideally, buffer width information will be summarized in a table that will
rate the quality of specific buffer width ranges as “high,” “medium,” or “low” for each
of the four ecological functions.
4 A tide gate currently alters natural tidal flow from November through March.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Exhibit A Windward_Scope_final [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
February 6, 2018 Page 3
Site-specific Evaluation
The site-specific evaluation of the Marsh will also evaluate the extent of the current
Marsh buffers, as well as land uses and ownership immediately adjacent to the Marsh,
extending at least 125 ft from the Marsh perimeter in all directions (125 ft is the
combined distance of the 110-ft buffer and 15-ft setback under the City’s current SMP
regulations for the Marsh). A map will be developed to clearly outline existing Marsh
buffers and illustrate adjacent land uses and ownership; this map will be based on the
map attached to this RFP. Any stormwater outfalls or areas where stormwater is known
to flow overland into the Marsh will also be mapped. The ability of existing Marsh
buffers to provide the four ecological functions listed will be evaluated by combining
findings from the white paper with information about existing buffer widths and
conditions. The site-specific evaluation will identify opportunities for buffer
modification and restoration, and will make specific recommendations for such
activities.
Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information
The information gathered during Tasks 1 and 2—such as the current conditions of the
Marsh and its existing buffers, as well as recommendations for restoration opportunities
within buffer areas—will be available to help inform the 2019 Shoreline Master Program
(SMP) update. Therefore, Task 3 will require a relatively low level of effort, which will
include summarizing pertinent information from Tasks 1 and 2 in a format that will be
easily incorporated into the 2019 SMP update. Windward will work with the City
Council and City staff to ensure that the information summarized as part of this task is
appropriate for incorporation into the 2019 SMP update.
Task 4: Willow Creek Daylighting Impacts
The Willow Creek daylighting project is expected to increase the Marsh’s inundation
area by approximately 2.5 ac, shift habitat areas that are currently freshwater and
dominated by cattail to salt marsh habitat, and improve fish access to both the creek
and the Marsh. Windward’s analysis will be based on the City’s current design for the
new daylighted channel through the Marsh, which will continue beyond the Marsh to
run midway through Marina Beach Park and discharge into Puget Sound to the south
of the Edmonds Marina.
Windward’s analysis will include recommendations for monitoring that could be
conducted after the daylighting project is complete, as well as recommendations for
native buffer plantings that could be installed along the daylighted creek banks.
Windward will analyze how the Willow Creek daylighting project will likely affect
ecological functions and conditions within the Marsh. We envision employing
modeling tools such as Resource Equivalency Analysis (REA) or Habitat Equivalency
Analysis (HEA), coupled with GIS, to quantitatively estimate the ecosystem service
units that will be gained. REA typically uses a resource metric that has had a population
or quantity change (e.g., number of juvenile Coho salmon, biomass of benthic
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Exhibit A Windward_Scope_final [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
February 6, 2018 Page 4
organisms). The models are used to examine the compare the quantity of habitat
services under current conditions to those expected to result from a future restored
condition (in this case, the Willow Creek daylighting project). HEA is a version of REA
that uses a habitat metric, such as acres of land, and analyzes a change in services
provided by that habitat.
Information gathered during Tasks 1 and 2 will be used to construct a GIS-based
REA/HEA model and reflect baseline Marsh services, including support of plant or
animal populations. Using the ecosystem changes that are anticipated to occur in the
Marsh in response to the daylighting of Willow Creek, the model will be used to reflect
the increased value of various metrics (i.e., productivity, biomass, etc.). The model will
also allow ecosystem service credits to be calculated once the City implements the
Willow Creek daylighting project. The quantity of ecosystem services generated by the
project will be derived by comparing the resource functions of the baseline Marsh
condition with the estimated future functions of the Marsh based on the literature and
best professional judgement.
Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project Impacts (Optional Component 5)
Using information gathered during Task 2, Windward will work to identify specific
areas around the Marsh where denser, more diverse, or otherwise better-quality
buffers—which can be installed through volunteer vegetation enhancement projects—
can serve to improve ecological functions within the marsh, or possibly reduce or
otherwise alter the buffer widths necessary to protect and maintain those functions. The
scope for this task will be developed further in the future in coordination with the City,
after Tasks 1-4 are underway.
Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed Management Study (Optional Component
9)
In order to help determine an initial scope and process for developing a long-term
watershed management study and strategy, Windward will work closely with the City
Council and City staff to ensure that we understand the broad range of issues related to
the Marsh and its watershed, and to identify the best options for engaging the public in
a management planning process. Information regarding the Marsh, Willow Creek, and
Shellabarger Creek provided in the City’s Shoreline Master Program Restoration Plan
(City of Edmonds 2015), Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (City of Edmonds
2016a), City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan (City of Edmonds 2016b), and Storm and
Surface Water Comprehensive Management Plan (Herrera and City of Edmonds 2010)
will also be reviewed to help establish the steps and scope of the study plan, and to
further develop a list of stakeholders. The scope for this task will be developed further
in the future in coordination with the City, after Tasks 1-4 are underway.
DELIVERABLES
The deliverables for each task are described below.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Exhibit A Windward_Scope_final [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
February 6, 2018 Page 5
Task 1
A baseline wetland monitoring plan will be developed to guide field data collection
efforts. The results of the baseline wetland monitoring study will be presented in a data
report. The report will include a qualitative evaluation of the ecological functions being
provided by the Marsh in its baseline condition, based on the data collected. For
example, for each metric monitored, the ecological functions of the Marsh can be rated
as “high,” “medium,” or “low” by comparing the baseline data for the Marsh to data
from one or more reference marshes or data in the scientific literature.
Task 2
The deliverables for this task will include the white paper summarizing available
scientific information about wetland buffer functions, and a technical report with
detailed maps presenting the results of the site-specific evaluation.
Task 3
The deliverables for this task will be text sections that can be directly incorporated into
the 2019 SMP update, as well as an updated GIS map of the Marsh and its surroundings
(if the City desires such a map to be included in the update).
Task 4
A technical memorandum will be prepared to describe the process used to develop the
REA/HEA model and the results of the modeling effort.
Task 5
The deliverable for this task will likely be a short report or technical memorandum
summarizing recommendations for vegetation enhancement projects around the Marsh
and the anticipated impacts of those projects. The appropriate deliverable will be
determined in consultation with the City as the scope for this task is further developed.
Task 6
The deliverable for this task will likely be a memorandum summarizing the goals and
plans for the Marsh, Willow Creek, and Shellabarger Creek specified in existing City
documents; an overview of stakeholders involved to-date in plans for the Marsh and its
tributaries; ideas for public outreach activities (e.g., online surveys, community
meetings) that could help further develop a strategy for the Marsh and its watershed;
and an outline of the scope and process that could be used to develop a long-term
watershed management study. The appropriate deliverable will be determined in
consultation with the City as the scope for this task is further developed.
SCHEDULE
All tasks associated with this project will be substantially completed by the end
of July 2019, as outlined in the project schedule table below, provided
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Exhibit A Windward_Scope_final [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
February 6, 2018 Page 6
that any specific tasks may be extended an additional two months as
necessary to effectively address the relevant issues.
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Exhibit A Windward_Scope_final [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Exhibit A: Edmonds Marsh Study SOW, Deliverables, and Schedule
February 6, 2018 Page 7
Table 2. Project schedule
Project Task/Milestone Estimated Initiation
Date
Kick-off Meeting with City January 1, 2018
Contract Approval by City by January 31, 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis – develop monitoring study
work plan
Prepare draft work plan March, 2018
City review of work plan April 19, 2018
Revise work plan per City comments May 2, 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis - field effort one field event per quarter for a year May 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis – data report
Prepare draft data report May 1, 2018
City review of data report June1, 2018
Revise data report per City comments June 16, 2018
Task 2: Evaluation of Wetland Buffers
Prepare draft deliverables March 1, 2018
City review of deliverables April 5, 2018
Revise deliverables per City comments April 19, 2018
Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information
Meet with City and prepare draft deliverables (text and map) August 16, 2018
City review of draft deliverables September 6, 2018
Revise deliverables per City comments September 20, 2018
Task 4: Analyze Impacts from Daylighting Willow Creek
using REA/HEA model
Develop model and draft tech memo February 2, 2019
City review of draft tech memo March 4, 2019
Revise tech memo per City comments March 19, 2019
Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project Impacts Draft tech memo June 1, 2018
City review of draft tech memo June 21, 2018
Revise tech memo per City comments July 4, 2018
Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed
Management Study
Meet with City and draft tech memo April 4, 2019
City review of draft tech memo May, 2019
Revise tech memo per City comments May15, 2019
Project completion
7.1.b
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Exhibit A Windward_Scope_final [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Staff Role Rate Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost
Senior Advisor 195.00 16 3,120$ 16 3,120$ 16 3,120$ 14 2,730$ 62 12,090$
Project Manager 155.00 40 6,200$ 40 6,200$ 40 6,200$ 20 3,100$ 140 21,700$
Field Lead 110.00/140.00 40 5,600$ 120 13,200$ 24 3,360$ 184 22,160$
GIS Analyst 130.00 20 2,600$ 20 2,600$ 28 3,640$ 68 8,840$
Project Scientist 95.00/120.00 60 7,200$ 116 11,020$ 80 9,600$ 256 27,820$
Editorial Staff 125.00 20 2,500$ -$ 20 2,500$ 40 5,000$ Admininstrative Support 115.00 4 460$ 8 920$ 4 460$ 16 1,840$
Total Labor 200 27,680$ 320 37,060$ 212 28,880$ 34 5,830$ 766 99,450$
Other Direct CostsField gear
Water quality/level data loggers (7) -
supplied -$ -$
Barometric pressure loggers (for WQ/water
level data loggers) (3) - supplied -$ -$
YSI Professional Plus Multiparameter®
water quality meter - supplied -$ -$
Sediment pH/ORP monitor (lump sum) $ 350 1 350$ 350$
Soil/sediment TOC and grain size analysis (per sample) $ 175 12 2,100$ 2,100$
High-precision GPS rental (unit/week) $ 300 1 300$ 300$ Staff gage materials (lump sum) $ 300 1 300$ 300$
Wildlife cameras (3) - supplied -$ -$
Travel Mileage $ 0.530 111.3 59$ 59$
Total ODCs 3,109$ 3,109$
Total Costs 27,680$ 40,169$ 28,880$ 102,559$
Notes and Assumptions:Project scientists will be charged at a rate of $95/hr for field work.
The Field Lead will be charged at a rate of $110/hr for field work.
Water level data loggers will be deployed continuously for the entire monitoring year.
It will take 2 field staff 3 days (working 10 hour days) to collect monitoring data during the second event.
It will take 2 field staff 2 days (working 10 hour days) to collect monitoring data during the third event.
It will take 2 field staff 1 day (working an 8-hour day) to collect monitoring data during the fourth event.
Each deliverable will undergo one round of client review and subsequent revisions.
Total
Work Plan Development Field Work (4 events)Data Report
Subtask 4
Attend City Council and Public Meetings
The baseline monitoring work plan will be written so that it can also be used for future monitoring events. The study will include Edmonds Marsh and
Shellabarger/Stella's Marsh.
It will take 2 field staff 5 days (working 10 hour days) to establish baseline monitoring locations, deploy data loggers, and to collect monitoring data during the first
event.
Field work budget also includes one hour/month per water quality/level data logger for maintenance and calibration (for months when no other data collection is
taking place).
Windward will be responsible for collecting water level and water quality measurements, redox observations, and vegetation data. Windward will also note any incidental wildlife observations made while in the field, will deploy and maintain the wildlife cameras, and will take photos from the photo stations during each
monitoring event.
Task 1 : Baseline Environmental Study -
Design and Implementation
Subtask 1 Subtask 2 Subtask 3
Citizen scientists (volunteers from the community) will help collect bird data (e.g., point count surveys), make additional wildlife observations, and possibly help
with additional photos and measurements at the water level gage stations. Windward will help coordinate and oversee these efforts.
Vegetation surveys will be conducted in spring and summer and will consist of 6 transects through the riparian/buffer zones up to the marsh edge, with 4
monitoring plots per transect. Vegetation within the marsh will be mapped using high-resolution aerial photos and ground truthing at strategic locations in the field.
A high-precision GPS unit will be needed for one week at the beginning of the field effort to establish sampling locations to be visited throughout the monitoring
year; the high-precision GPS will be able to produce sufficiently accurate location coordinates and elevation information.
A regular hand-held GPS unit will be sufficient for re-occupying sampling locations once they have been established.
Seven water quality/level data loggers will be purchased by the City to monitor water levels in the Marsh for extended periods of time throughout the monitoring year (it is likely that 5 will deployed and 2 will serve as spares). Three barometric pressure and temperature loggers, used to help establish the water quality
loggers, will also be purchased by the City.
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Exhibit B_FINAL Edmonds Marsh Updated Budget [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Staff Role Rate Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost
Senior Advisor 195.00 4 780$ 4 780$ 8 1,560$
Project Manager 155.00 20 3,100$ 20 3,100$ 40 6,200$
Field Lead 140.00
GIS Analyst 130.00 30 3,900$ 30 3,900$
Project Scientist 120.00 80 9,600$ 60 7,200$ 140 16,800$ Editorial Staff 125.00 24 3,000$ 16 2,000$ 40 5,000$
Admininstrative Support 115.00 4 460$ 4 460$ 8 920$ Total Labor 132 16,940$ 134 17,440$ 266 34,380$
Other Direct Costs
Travel
Mileage $ 0.530 35 19$ 35 19$
Total ODCs 19$
Total Costs 16,940$ 17,440$ 34,399$
Assumptions:Budget includes labor for one round of client review and subsequent revisions.
The site-specific evaluation will involve one day in the field to ground-truth information about the
buffers and surrounding land uses gathered during the mapping exercise.
Task 2 : Evaluation of Site-Specific
Buffers for Ecological Functions
Subtask 1 Subtask 2
TotalPreparation of White Paper Site-specific Evaluation
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Exhibit B_FINAL Edmonds Marsh Updated Budget [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Staff Role Rate Hours Cost
Senior Advisor 195.00 2 390$
Project Manager 155.00 8 1,240$
Field Lead 140.00
GIS Analyst 130.00 4 520$
Project Scientist 120.00 40 4,800$ Editorial Staff 125.00 8 1,000$
Admininstrative Support 115.00 2 230$ Total Labor 64 8,180$
Assumptions:Most of the information needed to complete this task will be gathered during Tasks 1 and 2.
This task will include consultation with the City to ensure deliverables prepared are as needed for the SMP document.
Task 3 : 2019 SMP Update
Information
Total
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Exhibit B_FINAL Edmonds Marsh Updated Budget [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Staff Role Rate Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost
Senior Advisor 195.00 30 5,850$ 12 2,340$ 42 8,190$
Project Manager 155.00 30 4,650$ 40 6,200$ 70 10,850$ Field Lead 140.00 -$ -$
GIS Analyst 130.00 40 5,200$ 20 2,600$ 60 7,800$
Project Scientist 120.00 40 4,800$ 90 10,800$ 130 15,600$
Editorial Staff 125.00 -$ 16 2,000$ 16 2,000$
Admininstrative Support 115.00 2 230$ 2 230$ 4 460$ Total Labor 142 20,730$ 180 24,170$ 322 44,900$
Assumptions:Each deliverable will undergo one round of client review and subsequent revisions.
This task will not require the collection of any additional field data.
The Tech Memo will include recommendations for monitoring to be conducted after the
daylighting project has been implemented.
TotalPrepare Tech MemoDevelop HEA or REA
ModelTask 4 : Willow Creek Daylighting
Impacts
Subtask 2Subtask 1
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Exhibit B_FINAL Edmonds Marsh Updated Budget [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
field hours for baseline analysis
initial setup of sampling stations and spring
event (water quality, vegetation, soils,
invertebrates, bird surveys, incidental
wildlife surveys, photo points and game
cams)50 field lead plus project scientist
summer event (same as spring)30 field lead plus project scientist
fall event (water quality, soils,
invertebrates, bird surveys, incidental
wildlife obs, photo points, game cams)10 project scientist x 2
winter event (water quality, soils, bird
surveys, incidental wildlife obs, photo
points, game cams)8 project scientist x 2
total 98 times 2 staff
maintenance of data loggers (for the year) -
maintain once per month, assume 5
hrs/month in months when full field event
not scheduled (one hour for each unit)40 assume can be done by one person - field lead
Total Field Hours 236
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Exhibit B_FINAL Edmonds Marsh Updated Budget [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
Task Budget
Task 1 102,559$
Task 2 34,399$
Task 3 8,180$
Task 4 44,900$
Task 5 TBD
Task 6 TBD
Total for Tasks 1-4 190,038$
7.1.c
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Exhibit B_FINAL Edmonds Marsh Updated Budget [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
,Table 2. Project schedule
Project Task/Milestone Estimated Initiation
Date
Estimated
Completion Date
Kick-off Meeting with City Council January 1, 2018 February 27, 2018
Contract Approval by City Council March 27, 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis – develop monitoring study
work plan
Prepare draft work plan May 7, 2018 June 1, 2018
City review of work plan June 4, 2018 June 15, 2018
Revise work plan per City comments June 18, 2018 June 29, 2018
Task 1: Baseline Analysis - field effort one field event per quarter for a year July 2018 June 2019
Task 1: Baseline Analysis – data report
Prepare draft data report July 1, 2019 August 2, 2019
City review of data report August 5, 2019 August 16, 2019
Revise data report per City comments August 19, 2019 August 30, 2019
Task 2: Evaluation of Wetland Buffers
Prepare draft deliverables April 9, 2018 May 4, 2018
City review of deliverables May 7, 2018 May 18, 2018
Revise deliverables per City comments May 21, 2018 June 1, 2018
Task 3: 2019 SMP Update Information
Meet with City and prepare draft deliverables (text and map) October 1, 2018 October 19, 2018
City review of draft deliverables October 22, 2018 November 2, 2018
Revise deliverables per City comments November 5, 2018 November 16, 2018
Task 4: Analyze Impacts from Daylighting Willow Creek
using REA/HEA model
Develop model and draft tech memo March 4, 2019 March 29, 2019
City review of draft tech memo April 1, 2019 April 12, 2019
Revise tech memo per City comments April 15, 2019 April 26, 2019
Task 5: Vegetation Enhancement Project Impacts Draft tech memo July 30, 2018 August 24, 2018
City review of draft tech memo August 27, 2018 September 14, 2018
Revise tech memo per City comments September 17, 2018 September 28, 2018
Task 6: Preparation for a Long-term Watershed
Management Study
Meet with City and draft tech memo May 1, 2019 May 31, 2019
City review of draft tech memo June 3, 2019 June 14, 2019
Revise tech memo per City comments June17, 2019 June 28, 2019
Final meetings, presentation, document revisions August 1, 2019 August 30, 2019
Project completion September 13, 2019
7.1.d
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: FINAL project sched table_3_21_18 [Revision 1] (Marsh Study Budget Vote)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Homelessness Response
Staff Lead: Mike Nelson
Department: City Council
Preparer: Maureen Judge
Background/History
On December 5, 2017 the City Council amended the 2018 City Budget and allocated $250,000 in funding
to help address local homelessness in our city and to make a meaningful and lasting reduction in the
number of homeless in Edmonds.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The request is to authorize to create and number a new fund to be known as the Edmonds
Homelessness Response Fund.
Attachments:
Updated Ordinance for Homelessness Response Fund
7.2
Packet Pg. 139
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS CITY CODE
TO CREATE A NEW HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, similar to many communities, Edmonds is experiencing an increase in
the number of homeless in need of assistance.
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2017 the City Council amended the 2018 City
Budget and allocated $250,000 in funding to help address local homelessness in
our city and to make a meaningful and lasting reduction in the number of homeless
in Edmonds.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Code is hereby amended to create a
new Chapter 3.XX Homelessness Response Fund to read as follows:
3.XX.010 Homelessness Response Fund
The Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized to create and
number a new fund to be known as the Edmonds Homelessness Response
Fund to provide moneys with which to alleviate the problem of
homelessness in Edmonds. Such fund may be supported by budget
appropriations from time to time from any tax or other revenue source not
restricted in use by law, or also may be supported by a transfer from other
unexpended or decreased funds made available by ordinance. Any moneys
in the fund at the end of the fiscal year shall not lapse except upon
reappropriation by the council to another fund in the adoption of a
subsequent budget. No transfer from this fund shall occur without the
express consent of the Edmonds city council in the form of a budget
appropriation or other authorizing ordinance.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being exempt under RCW 35A.11.090,
is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and
publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title..
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Updated Ordinance for Homelessness Response Fund (Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Homelessness Response)
APPROVED:
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Updated Ordinance for Homelessness Response Fund (Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Homelessness Response)
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the
title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS CITY CODE
TO CREATE A NEW HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE
FUND AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2018.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
7.2.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Updated Ordinance for Homelessness Response Fund (Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Homelessness Response)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Opioid Response
Staff Lead: Mike Nelson
Department: City Council
Preparer: Maureen Judge
Background/History
On December 5, 2017 the City Council amended the 2018 City Budget and allocated $250,000 in funding
to help address the growing opioid crisis in our community.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The request is authorize to create and number a new fund to be known as the Edmonds Opioid
Response Fund.
Attachments:
Updated Ordinance for Opioid Response Fund
7.3
Packet Pg. 143
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS CITY CODE
TO CREATE A NEW OPIOID RESPONSE FUND AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, opioid abuse is increasing throughout our city and is a significant
threat to our health and public safety.
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2017 the City Council amended the 2018 City
Budget and allocated $250,000 in funding to help address the growing opioid crisis
in our community.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Edmonds City Code is hereby amended to create a
new Chapter 3.XX Opioid Response Fund to read as follows:
3.XX.010 Opioid Response Fund
The Administrative Services Director is hereby authorized to create and
number a new fund to be known as the Edmonds Opioid Response Fund to
provide moneys with which to alleviate the problem of opioid addiction in
Edmonds. Such fund may be supported by budget appropriations from time
to time from any tax or other revenue source not restricted in use by law, or
also may be supported by a transfer from other unexpended or decreased
funds made available by ordinance. Any moneys in the fund at the end of the
fiscal year shall not lapse except upon reappropriation by the council to
another fund in the adoption of a subsequent budget. No transfer from this
fund shall occur without the express consent of the Edmonds city council in
the form of a budget appropriation or other authorizing ordinance.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being exempt under RCW 35A.11.090,
is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and
publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
7.3.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Updated Ordinance for Opioid Response Fund (Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Opioid Response)
MAYOR DAVE EARLING
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
7.3.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Updated Ordinance for Opioid Response Fund (Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Opioid Response)
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. __________
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the ____ day of ___________, 2018, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. _____________. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the
title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS CITY CODE
TO CREATE A NEW OPIOID RESPONSE FUND AND
FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this _____ day of ________________, 2018.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
7.3.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Updated Ordinance for Opioid Response Fund (Ordinance Establishing a Fund for Opioid Response)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Approval of Offer Letters to Fill Vacancies in Two Staff Positions
Staff Lead: Mary Ann Hardie
Department: Human Resources
Preparer: MaryAnn Hardie
Background/History
There are two top candidates (Lien and Rackleff) for two vacancies at the City (Environmental Program
Manager and Senior Construction Inspector) who have contingent job offers pending for the two
respective positions.
As part of the competitive hiring process and compensation package for these two positions, it would be
reasonable to: 1) waive the requirement for each candidate to wait until they have successfully
completed another new probation period to use and accrue vacation leave and, 2) to allow them to
accrue vacation in the new positions (should the offers be accepted) at their last vacation leave accrual
level (based on their years of service) at the time they separated from service with the City.
Per the Edmonds City Code (2.35.090), the Mayor has authority to provide such offer(s) subject to
Council approval. Both candidates worked previously in positions at the City.
If the offers are approved and accepted, Lien's position would be a promotion and Rackleff would be
returning to the position she previously held.
Staff Recommendation
Council approval of the offer letter terms (specific to waiving the probationary period specific to
vacation usage and allowance of accrual of vacation) that requires Council approval.
Narrative
Both candidates separated from service with the City in good standing and with good service records.
Lien, as a manager, would receive 5 additional days of vacation leave as exempt manager (for 21 total
days of leave). Rackleff would not accrue any additional days of vacation leave at this time.
The contingent offer letters are attached.
Attachments:
Lien, Kernen - Contingent Offer Letter
Rackleff, Alix - Contingent Offer Letter
7.4
Packet Pg. 147
7.4.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Lien, Kernen - Contingent Offer Letter [Revision 1] (Approval of Offer Letters to Fill Vacancies in Two Staff Positions)
7.4.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Lien, Kernen - Contingent Offer Letter [Revision 1] (Approval of Offer Letters to Fill Vacancies in Two Staff Positions)
7.4.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Lien, Kernen - Contingent Offer Letter [Revision 1] (Approval of Offer Letters to Fill Vacancies in Two Staff Positions)
7.4.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Lien, Kernen - Contingent Offer Letter [Revision 1] (Approval of Offer Letters to Fill Vacancies in Two Staff Positions)
7.4.b
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Rackleff, Alix - Contingent Offer Letter [Revision 1] (Approval of Offer Letters to Fill Vacancies in Two Staff Positions)
7.4.b
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Rackleff, Alix - Contingent Offer Letter [Revision 1] (Approval of Offer Letters to Fill Vacancies in Two Staff Positions)
7.4.b
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Rackleff, Alix - Contingent Offer Letter [Revision 1] (Approval of Offer Letters to Fill Vacancies in Two Staff Positions)
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 03/27/2018
Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed Activities
Staff Lead: Rob Chave
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Rob Chave
Background/History
The City Council Planning, Parks & Public Works Committee discussed this subject on October 10, 2017
and the full Council forwarded the issue to the Planning Board on October 17, 2017. An introductory
presentation was given to the Planning Board on January 10, 2018, with a follow-up discussion on
February 28, 2018. The Board held a public hearing and made its recommendation on March 14, 2018.
Staff Recommendation
N/A. A public hearing is scheduled for April 3, 2018.
Narrative
The Planning Board held a public hearing on this subject on March 14, 2018, and recommended that the
City Council amend the Critical Areas portion of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) to
provide for more flexibility in approving select vegetation removal with specified critical areas.
Please see the attached memo from staff discussing this subject. The Planning Board's proposed
amendment language is the same as included on the last page of the attached staff memo.
Exhibits:
1. Staff Memo
2. Planning Board minutes.
3. City Council agenda item and minutes
4. Comment letters
Attachments:
Exhibit 1: Staff Memo on CAO Allowed Activities - Select Vegetation Removal
Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes
Exhibit 3: Council Committee 2017-10-10 agenda item + minutes
Exhibit 4: Critical Area Comment Letters
8.1
Packet Pg. 155
Date: March 9, 2018
To: Edmonds Planning Board
From: Rob Chave, Planning Manager
Subject: Public Hearing:
Proposed Amendment to Critical Area Allowed Activities – ECDC
23.40.220(C)(8) Select Vegetation Removal Activities
_____________________________________________________________________________
Introduction
Section 23.40.220 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) is the allowed activities
section of the City’s critical area regulations. This section identifies certain activities within a critical area
and/or critical area buffer that may occur without the preparation of a critical areas report. The allowed
activities section applies to all critical areas and their associated buffers including landslide hazard areas,
erosions hazard areas, streams, and wetlands.
ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8) allows for select vegetation removal activities including the removal of invasive
species and hazardous trees. During the 2015-2016 Critical Area Ordinance update, the GAP Analysis
prepared by the City’s consultant, ESA, identified this section for a potential amendment noting the
following:
Also add a square foot threshold for limiting invasive vegetation removal activities. Language will be
developed during code revision stage, but suggest something similar to City of Seattle
Environmentally Critical Areas Code (SMC 25.09.320), which permits restoring or improving
vegetation and trees through invasive plant removal (by hand) to “promote maintenance or creation
of a naturally functioning condition that prevents erosion, protects water quality, or provides diverse
habitat… when the area of work is under one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet in area
calculated cumulatively over three (3) years…”
Following this recommendation, the 1,500 square foot limit was incorporated into ECDC
23.40.220(C)(8)(a) which states:
The removal of the following vegetation with hand labor and hand-held equipment when the area of
work is under 1,500 square feet in area as calculated cumulatively over three years:
The threshold was intended to ensure that removal of vegetation from large areas was first reviewed for
consistency with the City’s critical area regulations and with best management practices by a qualified
professional appropriate for the type of critical area.
MEMORANDUM
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Staff Memo on CAO Allowed Activities - Select Vegetation Removal (Review of Planning Board recommendation on
During a meeting of the City Council when a report on critical area regulations was being presented, a
citizen commented that the select vegetation removal section of the City's critical area regulations was a
concern. The citizen noted that the 1,500 sq. ft. limitation could act as a deterrent for some restoration
projects because the development of critical area reports adds time and costs that may be excessive for
the size and intent of the project, particularly when the project is being done by a non-profit or citizen
group with limited resources. The City Council referred this issue to the Planning Board for
consideration and recommendation.
Potential Alternatives
Three potential amendments where identified by Councilmember Buckshnis in her memo to the
Planning, Parks and Public Works committee for their October 10, 2017 meeting (see Attachment 3).
1. The first potential amendment was proposed by Joe Scordino who recommended adding the
following language to ECDC 23.40.200(C)(8)(a) in an email:
"The restriction on the area of work does not apply to bona fide habitat restoration projects
with restoration work conducted by a qualified organization and/or individuals experienced in
habitat restoration techniques."
This language was more recently updated to be proposed as:
“The restriction on the area of work does not apply to habitat restoration projects conducted by
qualified organizations and/or individuals experienced in habitat restoration techniques to
remove invasive or non-native species in order to plant or maintain native shrubs and trees."
The critical areas ordinance generally envisions habitat restoration projects to be consistent with
ECDC 23.40.005, which defines restoration as:
“Restoration” means the actions necessary to return a stream, wetland or other critical area to a
state in which its stability, functions and values approach its unaltered state as closely as
possible. For wetlands, restoration as compensatory mitigation may include reestablishment or
rehabilitation.”
The general concern is that the City will need to have confidence that restoration project actions
will be moving in the direction of returning the critical area or its buffer functions and values to its
unaltered state. “Allowed activities” are provided for in ECDC 23.40.220 if the activity has been
“reviewed and permitted or approved by the City of Edmonds…” and if the activity uses “best
management practices.” The main problem with the above language is that there is very little
guidance as to what a “qualified organization and/or individual” is.
2. The concept in potential amendment 1 above was expanded upon in an email from Mariska Kecskes
of Earthcorps who noted:
…the language proposed for future restoration projects needs a more institutional integration
beyond a line in the critical area regulations. So instead of just "these restrictions don't apply to
bona fide restoration projects," more deliberate language could be: "these restrictions don't
apply to habitat restoration projects that: A) are managed by an organization or individual who
has a standing agreement with the City; or B) have been approved by the appropriate city
department," or something along those lines. This would offer some direction to individuals
interested in projects. It would give folks the option of partnering with previously approved
qualified organizations while also allowing projects to be judged on a case by case basis, and it
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Staff Memo on CAO Allowed Activities - Select Vegetation Removal (Review of Planning Board recommendation on
would ensure that projects and those proposing them have City oversight before being
implemented. Of course, criteria would still need to be developed, and all this would totally
depend on capacity within the appropriate city department to evaluate the credentials of those
proposing projects and create formal agreements for participating organizations.
In this case, the City of Edmonds could identify some preapproved organizations that property
owners could work with on restoration projects and not be subject to the 1,500 square foot limit.
The idea is that these organizations would have experience with restoration projects and have
qualified professionals on staff or available to oversee the restoration projects. Organizations that
wanted to be on the City’s list of approved organizations would submit their credentials to the City
for review and then the City would need to maintain a list of qualified organizations. This is not
unlike a qualified professionals list. It could be updated annually or bi-annually to verify the
qualifications or add new organizations, as appropriate.
There would have to be some administration of a program like this; it is ultimately a policy call as to
whether this cost should be subsidized by the City (in the interest of encouraging restoration
projects) or some proportion charged to the restoration project proponent.
3. A third option is to use a different threshold (i.e. something greater than 1,500 square feet) before
requiring a detailed critical area review. At some point, a restoration project of a certain size may
be large enough that it should be designed and reviewed by a qualified professional to ensure the
removal of vegetation is conducted in accordance with the critical area regulations and best
management practices and to ensure any proposed replanting provides the functions and values
intended to protect the critical area. As noted in the introduction, the 1,500 square foot threshold
was lifted from Seattle’s critical area ordinance. Perhaps that is not the appropriate threshold or
maybe there are different thresholds that should apply to different critical areas (removing
vegetation in a landslide hazard area has different impacts than removing invasive species in a
wetland buffer). Because steep slopes have potential direct effects on life/safety, keeping a
relatively low threshold for that type of critical area may be appropriate. A different level could be
set for wetlands and streams, or the threshold could be applied to one year rather than the current
three-year cumulative total.
One of the goals of the Critical Areas ordinance is to encourage protection and restoration of critical
areas. Encouraging small-scale restoration projects by non-profits and citizen groups is a worthy goal.
However, not having some criteria for who is qualified to do the work, as well as identifying a limitation
on the amount of vegetation that may be removed before requiring a critical areas report, could lead to
unintended consequences that could negatively impact critical areas.
Taking the above discussion in mind, the Planning Board reviewed the issue at its February 28, 2018,
meeting and proposed the following changes to the critical areas provisions. Note that the draft
language only changes how projects in wetlands and streams are handled. Other critical areas, such as
landslide hazard areas; have potential life/safety issues that are of more concern.
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Staff Memo on CAO Allowed Activities - Select Vegetation Removal (Review of Planning Board recommendation on
23.40.220 Allowed activities.
A. Critical Area Report. Activities allowed under this title shall have been reviewed and permitted or approved by the city of Edmonds or other agency with jurisdiction, but do not require submittal of a critical area report, unless
such submittal was required previously for the underlying permit. The director may apply conditions to the underlying permit or approval to ensure that the allowed activity is consistent with the provisions of this title to
protect critical areas.
B. Required Use of Best Management Practices. All allowed activities shall be conducted using the best
management practices that result in the least amount of impact to the critical areas. Best management practices shall be used for tree and vegetation protection, construction management, erosion and sedimentation control, water
quality protection, and regulation of chemical applications. The city may observe or require independent inspection of the use of best management practices to ensure that the activity does not result in degradation to the critical area.
Any incidental damage to, or alteration of, a critical area shall be restored, rehabilitated, or replaced at the responsible party’s expense.
C. Allowed Activities. The following activities are allowed:
…
…
8. Select Vegetation Removal Activities. The following vegetation removal activities:
a. The removal of the following vegetation with hand labor and hand-held equipment when the area of
work is under 1,500 square feet in area as calculated cumulatively over three years:
i. Invasive and noxious weeds;
ii. English ivy (Hedera helix);
iii. Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, R. procerus);
iv. Evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus);
v. Scot’s broom (Cytisus scoparius); and
vi. Hedge and field bindweed (Convolvulus sepium and C. arvensis);
For activities intended to protect or restore habitat in wetlands or fish and wildlife habitat conservation
areas, vegetation removal under this section may exceed the 1,500 square foot limitation if:
i. The activity is proposed and managed by a non-profit or other organization, approved by the City,
that has demonstrated expertise and experience in the restoration or invasive removal activity; and,
ii. The project sponsor provides a specific proposal identifying the scope and location of the project,
provides for project supervision, and includes a monitoring and inspection schedule acceptable to the City and approved by the appropriate City department.
Removal of these invasive and noxious plant species shall be restricted to hand removal unless permits or approval from the appropriate regulatory agencies have been obtained for approved biological or chemical
treatments or other removal techniques. All removed plant material shall be taken away from the site and appropriately disposed of. Plants that appear on the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board list of
noxious weeds must be handled and disposed of according to a noxious weed control plan appropriate to
that species;
8.1.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Exhibit 1: Staff Memo on CAO Allowed Activities - Select Vegetation Removal (Review of Planning Board recommendation on
DRAFT Planning Board Minutes March 14, 2018 Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENTS TO THE CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE (CAO) ALLOWED ACTIVITIES/SELECT VEGETATION REMOVAL Mr. Chave recalled that the Board discussed this item at their February 28th meeting. He explained that, during a meeting with the City Council when a report on the CAO was being presented, a citizen raised a concern about the “Select Vegetation Removal” provision (ECDC 23.40.220.C.8). The citizen noted that the 1,500 square foot limitation could act as a deterrent for some restoration projects because the development of a Critical Area Report adds time and costs that may be excessive for the size and intent of the project, particularly when the project is being done by a non-profit or citizen group with limited resources. The City Council referred the issue to the Planning Board for consideration and a recommendation. They asked the Board to review the provision and see if some adjustments could be made so that restoration activities would not be hampered by the provision. Mr. Chave advised that ECDC 23.40.220.C.8 outlines the provisions for select vegetation removal activities and primarily governs situations where someone is attempting to remove and/or control invasive species. It applies to all critical areas, including wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat corridors and steep slopes. These activities can be performed as part of development, by a property owner, by a non-profit or other organization, by the City as part of parks maintenance activities, and with habitat restoration projects via partnerships between the City and local organizations. Mr. Chave explained that, as per the current code, restoration and/or vegetation removal projects over 1,500 square feet in area over a cumulative 3-year period require a Critical Area Report. Concern was raised that this might discourage some on-going restoration and/or vegetation removal activities. Non-profits have limited resources, and the provision could make it difficult for them to allocate resources to the actual activities if they are required to hire a consultant to prepare a report and supervise the activity. Mr. Chave reviewed that, at their last meeting, the Commission considered a number of options and agreed with the language contained in the draft amendment currently before the Board. He referred to the draft language included in the Staff Report. He advised that, as per the proposed amendment, the restriction on the area of work would not apply to habitat restoration projects conducted by qualified organizations and/or individuals who have experience in habitat restoration techniques to remove invasive or non-native species in order to plant or maintain native shrubs and trees. He emphasized that the amendment
would only change how projects in wetlands and streams are handled. Other critical areas, such as landslide hazard areas, have potential life/safety issues that are of more concern. For example, on steep slopes, it is important to make sure the slope remains stable and is not undercut in any way. He noted that even invasive species can help stabilize a slope, and it is important to make sure that removal activities to not create hazardous situation that result in erosion or slides. As currently proposed, Mr. Chave advised that for activities intended to protect or restore habitat in wetlands or fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, vegetation removal may exceed the 1,500-foot limitation if: 1. The activity is proposed and managed by a non-profit or other organization, approved by the City, that has demonstrated expertise and experience in the restoration or invasive removal activity, and 2. The project sponsor provides a specific proposal identifying the scope and location of the project, provides the project supervision, and includes a monitoring and inspection schedule acceptable to the City and approved by the appropriate City department. Mr. Chave said the general concern is that the City will need to have confidence that restoration project actions will be moving in the direction of returning the critical area or its buffer functions and values to its unaltered state. To do this, the City will need assurance that the organization or individual is qualified to do the project and provide the proper supervision. The proposed amendment provides clear guidance for staff to review and approve projects. Joe Scordino, Edmonds, said he is a retired fisheries biologist. For the past three years, he has been working with the Edmonds Woodway High School student group, Students Saving Salmon, which is interested in improving habitat for salmon. He said he has participated in multiple restoration projects in cooperation with EarthCorp and Sound Salmon Solutions, so he is very familiar with restoration efforts. He said he approached the City Council with a request that the provision be changed because it was impeding new restoration projects. He said he worked with the students last fall to do a parcel on private property at
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
DRAFT Planning Board Minutes March 14, 2018 Page 3
Holy Rosary Church but found that the 1,500 square foot limit was too restrictive. He commented that the restriction complicates projects and puts unnecessary burdens on groups or individuals who are trying to do something that benefits habitat. He pointed out that, currently, the provision only deals with removal of vegetation or invasive species and says nothing about replanting. That means that someone could remove vegetation from up to 1,500 square feet of area without replanting. This could be a problem on steep slopes in landslide hazard areas. He suggested that the provision was not well thought out from the beginning. Mr. Scordino said he supports the proposed amendment, which would no longer restrict habitat restoration projects in streams and wetlands without a consultant’s report. However, he suggested that the amendment should not apply to geographically unstable areas. These areas should require a consultant review to ensure that slope stability is maintained. Mr. Scordino advised that coordinating habitat restoration projects on private property using volunteers is not an easy task. For the project last fall, they started planning in April. He cautioned against having restrictions that confound and stifle the effort. He said he understands the City’s concern that the work should be planned and managed by qualified people, However, since the exception only applies to wetlands and streams, he suggested that the threshold be raised to 2,000 square feet annually as long as the projects include replanting of native species. He agreed that large projects should require additional professional assistance, but a 2,000 square foot area is not that large when you are talking about restoration where there is a lot of invasive species. You need to work large enough areas to make sure the invasive plants to not regenerate. He asked the Board to move its recommendation to the City Council now so that groups can begin planning restoration projects for this fall. THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. Board Member Robles recalled that at their last meeting, the Board discussed provisions for a larger area because of the repopulation problem associated with invasive species. However, he said he does not recall discussing a replanting requirement, which sounds like a good idea. He asked if additional language needs to be added to the draft amendment to address a replanting requirement. Board Member Lovell said he was not at the February 28th meeting, but he reviewed the minutes, specifically noting the comment made by Board Member Cloutier that since a review is required for anything over 1,500 square feet, it does not do any good to include a limit of 2,500 square feet as originally proposed. By the same token, he asked if it is inherently understood that replacement would be required for any project, regardless of size. He also asked if staff would do a more thorough, high-level review of very large projects or if the review criteria would be the same. Mr. Chave referred to the introductory language in ECDC 23.40.220, which states that activities allowed under the provision must be reviewed and approved by the City and may or may not require a Critical Area Report. It allows the Director to apply conditions to the approval, and the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) is required. BMPs would not allow someone to remove a bunch of vegetation along a stream bank and then leave it bare for an extended period of time. Staff would not approve this type of project. However, there may be situations where ivy is removed so that the underlying vegetation can grow and take over. As proposed, staff could actually work with proponents to determine if replanting is needed and what types of plants should be used. However, there needs to be a threshold in place. A 1,500 square foot threshold makes some sense because many of the streams are on downtown lots that are relatively small. A 1,500 square foot project on a 6,000 square foot lot is substantial. For project that go above the threshold, the City wants to see what is proposed to make sure some level of expertise is involved. However, a Critical Area
Report would not be required. Mr. Chave observed that people are looking out more and more for the streams and critical areas in their neighborhoods. When they see clearing activities, they often contact the City to find out what is going on. If they raise the threshold too high, the City will not know what is going on. He suggested that is it part of a good stewardship program to actually require people who want to do larger areas to coordinate with the City so everyone knows what is going on. He said he views this approach as a partnership rather than a regulation. Board Member Robles asked why it takes six months for an organization to go through the process to obtain City approval for a project. Mr. Chave clarified that Mr. Scordino was speaking to the coordination needed on behalf of the organization. It does not take the City six months to review a proposed project. Mr. Scordino’s point was it takes the organizations a long time to put projects together. Having regulations that require them to hire a consultant can add to the difficulty of putting a project
together. The proposed amendment would not require an elaborate consultant study. They just need to put down on paper
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
DRAFT Planning Board Minutes March 14, 2018 Page 4
what the project will be, how it will be managed, who will supervise, and who will do the work. It is a matter of submitting enough information for the City to be assured the project will be done correctly. Regarding the proposed 1,500 square foot threshold, Mr. Chave said it makes sense to have a limit. However, they can talk about what a reasonable threshold would be. He cautioned that he becomes more uncomfortable the higher the threshold is set. The City does not want to be enforcers when someone clears out vegetation without replanting and the streambank begins to erode. The work may be done by an innocent person who simply does not know that something needs to be done to stabilize the bank. Board Member Robles commented that it is great to see the community pull together to do projects like this. The last thing the City wants to do is put up roadblocks to this sort of environment. He would like to see the process streamlined as much as possible. Mr. Chave agreed and felt the proposed amendment would do just that. Chair Monroe observed that any project that requires the community to work together will likely be greater than 1,500 square feet. Mr. Chave agreed and reminded the Board that there would be no square foot limitation as long as the organization or individual submits a plan that is approved by the City. A Critical Area Report would not be required. For example, an organization could submit a plan to control vegetation in an area over the next three years. This enables the City to approve the entire project and the applicant would not have to submit an application each year. Chair Monroe expressed his belief that the two requirements would not be onerous. They are simply a check-in to make sure they are taking care of their critical area. Mr. Chave said organizations that do this work on a regular basis would not have difficulty providing the information required by the City. Chair Monroe asked if the City has received any feedback from the industry regarding the proposed amendments. Mr. Chave answered no but he does not believe they would be onerous or difficult to meet. Board Member Rubenkonig said she supports the proposed amendments, which are consistent with the direction recommended by City Council Member Buckshnis. The intent was that the provisions be supportive of responsible restoration and reduce the roadblocks that are in currently in place for good community organizations. However, there are a few issues she would like
staff to respond to.
• As to technique, when invasive species are removed according to BMPs, the area will immediately be planted with native plants. However, that is not specifically called out in the code language. She asked if replanting would be addressed in the plan submitted to the City for projects greater than 1,500 square feet. Mr. Chave said that is correct.
• What happens if a project stops and does not progress. Mr. Chave responded that these situations would be handled administratively by staff, and there are mechanisms in place to try to make sure that does not happen.
• As far as errors of omission, what happens to developers who post bonds that say the project will be completed or the bond will be forfeited. Mr. Chave said these concerns are typically associated with development projects, and most of the restoration projects that take place in the City are non-project situations. These issues would be handled administratively by staff and would not need to be addressed in the proposed amendment.
• Are there guaranteed results that the City would expect from a project over 1,500 square feet? If so, would this be part of the plan that is submitted to the City? Mr. Chave said the plan would describe the scope of the project, what they intend to do, how they will do it, and what the ultimate result will be. It may require more than a year to get a project done, so the City could inspect at the end of each phase. However, the Board is not being asked to become involved in that level of detail. Board Member Rubenkonig commented that the proposed amendment could be applicable in the following situations:
• A private land owner can decide to allow a volunteer group to come onto his/her property to do a restoration project.
• A private citizen can reach out to the City for direction on improving the habitat on the stream that crosses his/her property, and the City already serves in this capacity.
• The Parks Department has already received approval of a work plan that was prepared by a consultant to do restoration work around the Edmonds Marsh. Mr. Chave said the Parks Department would oversee and coordinate all of the activities that occur at the marsh consistent with the approved plan
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
DRAFT Planning Board Minutes March 14, 2018 Page 5
• A developer could request a non-profit group to be part of a restoration project on private property, and the proposed amendment would not preclude this. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if amending the CAO as proposed by staff would be consistent and compatible with a future potential amendment to the Shoreline Master Program. Mr. Chave answered that the amendment could be applied in the shoreline jurisdiction, but it would require a separate process. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the 1,500 square foot cumulative threshold would still apply. Mr. Chave said it would remain in the provision for steep slope situations, etc. It would also apply to activities along streams and in wetlands that do not meet the two criteria. Chair Monroe added that you could also submit a Critical Area Report for a larger project. Board Member Rubenkonig referred to Mr. Scordino’s request that the threshold be set at 2,000 square feet per year rather than a cumulative 1,500 square feet over a 3-year period. She noted that staff has recommended that the 3-year cumulative threshold remain as currently written. Mr. Chave said that, as currently written, the 1,500 square foot cumulative threshold would apply to steep slopes and would also be the default for any activity that does not meet the two criteria. However, there would be two other avenues to exceed the limit: hire a professional consultant to prepare a Critical Area Report or partner with an organization that can show it has expertise in these types of projects and submit a written plan. Chair Monroe reviewed that Mr. Scordino requested a larger threshold. It is really a question of whether the City wants to error on the side of being conservative or allow people to do whatever they want under 2,000 square each year. He pointed out that a 2,000 square foot per year threshold would equate to a total of 6,000 square feet over a 3-year period. This is a substantial change over the current restriction. Increasing the threshold would mean that anyone could do the work without requiring assistance from a professional consultant or qualified organization. Vice Chair Cheung voiced concern about raising the threshold, which would open it up for anyone to do the work, including those without expertise. Mr. Chave said the intent is to have the discussion up front, and point people doing larger projects to the right resources, etc. It is a lot easier to do this than having to deal with situations later on. They tried to make the provision the least difficult and onerous as possible. Board Member Robles said he would like to see an advantage given to professionals who want to work with the community, and it seems the proposed language would accomplish this goal. The limitations would not apply to projects that meet certain provisions. BOARD MEMBER RUBENKONIG MOVED THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE CRITICAL AREAS ORDINANCE (CAO) AS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND THAT IT BE NOTED THAT NO CHANGES WERE MADE TO THE LANGAUGE PRESENTED. VICE CHAIR CHEUNG SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Chair Monroe briefly reviewed the extended agenda, noting that a pre-presentation on the Housing Strategy would be provided on March 28th, along with a review and discussion of the Urban Forest Management Plan. This will give the Board an opportunity to provide feedback on the Housing Strategy before it is written in draft form for the public hearing. Board Member Rubenkonig asked when the Five Corners Subarea Plan would next appear on the Board’s agenda. Mr. Chave answered that the City Council still has to discuss the Board’s recommendation relative to the feasibility study and decide what action they want to have take place. All of this must occur before the issue comes back to the Board for further work. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Monroe did not provide any additional comments. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Lovell reported on his attendance at the February 21st Economic Development Commission meeting, where most of the discussion centered around two specific items the Commission has been dealing with. They made a
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
APPROVED Planning Board Minutes February 28, 2018 Page 6
BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER MOVED THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE STAFF’S ANALYSIS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA AS LISTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE TEN SUBJECT PROPERTIES FROM EDMONDS WAY CORRIDOR TO HIGHWAY 99 CORRIDOR. VICE CHAIR CHEUNG SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. DISCUSSION ON CRITICAL AREAS ALLOWED ACTIVITIES/SELECT VEGETATION REMOVAL Mr. Chave advised that this is a follow up to a previous Planning Board discussion about potential amendments to the Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO). A concern was brought to the City Council’s attention that the 1,500 square foot limitation could act as a deterrent for some restoration projects within critical areas or their buffers. As currently written, restoration work greater than 1,500 square feet over a three-year period requires a critical area report. It was pointed out that development of these reports adds time and cost that may be excessive for the size and intent of a project. This is particularly true with projects done by non-profit or citizen groups who have limited resources. The City has had good experiences working with citizen groups to remove invasive species and do appropriate planting and restoration efforts. The City Council forwarded the issue to the Planning Board to consider, and several options were provided. Staff is in favor of amending the CAO as appropriate to encourage restoration projects and has prepared draft language for the Board’s consideration. A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for March 14th. He referred to Page 73 of the Staff Report, which outlines the proposed amendment, which would add the following language to Section 23.40.220(C)(8)(a): “For activities intended to protect or restore habitat in wetlands or fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas,
vegetation removed under this section may exceed the 1,500 square foot limitations up to a maximum of 2,500 square feet annually, if i. The activity is proposed and managed by a non-profit or other organization approved by the City that
has demonstrated expertise and experience in the restoration or invasive removal activity.
ii. Provides a specific proposal identifying the scope ad location of the project, provides for project supervision, and a monitoring and inspection schedule acceptable to the City and approved by the
appropriate City department.” Mr. Chave noted that the new language would only apply to wetlands and streams and their buffers and not to steep slopes, where life safety issues must be considered. In these situations, it is critical to have a consultant report attached to each project to ensure that the work is done appropriately and safely. Mr. Chave explained that the intent is to have some limitations in place so you cannot do wholesale clearing of a large property, but the proposed new language would raise the limits fairly significantly. It also includes criteria for determining whether a project is good or not. The notion is that staff would review the qualifications and experience of the organization or group who is proposing the project, as well as the proposed plan and schedule to make sure what is being proposed is appropriate and that there will be appropriate supervision. Mr. Chave said the current language was crafted using the City of Seattle’s code as a reference. Since that time, the City of Seattle has eliminated the square foot limitation entirely. Staff is not entirely sure that the square footage limitation is necessary, but it was included for discussion purposes. Board Member Robles said that, as discussed previously, it would be helpful to have an inventory showing how much land in Edmonds has been designated as critical areas. This would give the Board a better idea of how broad the proposed change would apply throughout the City. The Board also indicated it would be appropriate to define the consultant qualifications and how staff assesses their credentials. Board Member Robles commented that some invasive species can represent a danger, and it might be appropriate to require a consultant to have “error and omission” insurance for these situations. However, he would not want this requirement to apply to all restoration projects. He commented that it would make sense to remove all of an invasive species as part of the same
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
APPROVED Planning Board Minutes February 28, 2018 Page 7
project regardless of the number of square feet. Otherwise, it will quickly grow back. He suggested a better approach would be to have a 2,500 square foot limitation for citizen or non-profit groups, but no limit for projects that are done by consultants who have error and omission insurance. He said that, overall, he supports the proposed amendments and staff’s efforts to seek a solution. Board Member Rosen recalled that, at the Board’s last discussion, concern was raised about how to make sure those doing restoration work are qualified and that they do what they say they are going to do. The Board also discussed the importance of having someone approve the process and plan. He appreciates that the proposed language addresses all of these issues. Chair Monroe suggested that Items i and ii seem redundant. Mr. Chave explained that individuals or organizations who clear invasive species from critical areas have to have some knowledge to make sure the project is done right. In some cases, replanting might be necessary, and there are experts and organizations who have done this type of work for a long time. They can train others on how to do it properly. While restoration projects are not usually difficult, it is important to know what you are doing. For example, there have been situations where people have removed invasive species without planting, and erosion has occurred. There can be negative impacts if projects are not done right. Mr. Chave said the City does not necessarily want to be in the business of cleaning and restoring critical areas, but they need to make sure, at the outset, that people know what they are doing. The proposed amendment will streamline the process and avoid enforcement issues later on. Enforcement issues are much more difficult to resolve than having some assurance that projects will be done right in the first place. Chair Monroe suggested that Item ii would provide that assurance, and perhaps Item i is unnecessary. Mr. Chave responded that Item ii does not identify who will do the work. It simply talks about what will be done. The City needs to make sure there is some training and level of understanding about what is involved in the project. Chair Monroe voiced concern that the term “demonstrate experience and expertise” is not well defined and can be subjective. Mr. Chave expressed his belief that staff would be able to apply the language as currently proposed. He agreed it may limit some types of people who can do the work without supervision, but it only applies to projects that exceed the threshold. It will not prohibit a property owner from cleaning up invasive species along his/her section of a stream. Board Member Robles pointed out that the Edmonds Marsh is extremely large. If the intent is to construct walking paths through it, it is likely that the amount of invasive species will increase. It will be important for the City to have the ability to eradicate these species on a large scale. He asked if there is a mechanism by which a project can exceed 2,500 square feet. Mr. Chave answered that larger-scale projects would require a critical area report. He noted that City recently approved the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department’s program for a series of activities that will take place around the marsh. The program was prepared by a consultant and identifies how the activities will be done and who will supervise. Board Member Cloutier pointed out that the 1,500 threshold would trigger additional review so the 2,500 threshold could actually be eliminated. Any work over 1,500 square feet will be reviewed by staff, and staff will determine if it is too little or too much. The remainder of the Board concurred. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Chair Monroe reviewed that the March 14th agenda will include a public hearing on proposed amendments to the Critical Areas
Ordinance addressing select vegetation removal as an allowed activity. It will also include a review and discussion about the Urban Forest Management Plan. The March 28th meeting will include a presentation and discussion about the draft Housing Strategy. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Monroe did not provide any additional comments. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None of the Board Member provided comments during this portion of the meeting.
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
APPROVED FEBRUARY 14TH
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
January 10, 2018
Vice Chair Cheung called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 – 5th Avenue North.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Matthew Cheung, Vice Chair Todd Cloutier Phil Lovell Daniel Robles Mike Rosen Carreen Rubenkonig Megan Livingston, Student Representative BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Nathan Monroe, Chair (excused) Alicia Crank (excused)
STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Jerrie Bevington, Video Recorder Karin Noyes, Recorder
Board Member Lovell welcomed Megan Livingston, a student at Edmonds-Woodway High School, as the new Student Representative serving on the Board. READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES Board Member Rubenkonig commented regarding the minutes, noting that many of the points brought up explained clearly the Architectural Design Board’s concerns and will serve the Board well in the future. Mr. Chave’s comments at the meeting were very pertinent relative to the challenges they will face when amending the Design Guidelines. BOARD MEMBER RUBENKONIG MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 13, 2017 BE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mariam Gold, Students Saving Salmon, said she was present to talk about potential amendments to the Critical Areas
Ordinance (CAO) relative to the removal of vegetation. She explained that last fall, Students Saving Salmon did a project at Shell Creek, near the Holy Rosary Church, where they removed invasive species and planted native species. This was done in conjunction with monthly water tests they do with Sound Salmon Solutions. She emphasized that habitat restoration is critical to protecting the salmon and natural environment. She said their project was going well until they ran into problems with code limitations. As per the current CAO, you can only remove invasive species from 1,500 square feet of property.
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
APPROVED Planning Board Minutes January 10, 2018 Page 2
The limit is intended to prevent soil erosion in the event that someone does not replace the invasive species with native plants. However, in their case, the project was restoring the habitat with natural species. The code limitation hampered their ability to do more to create a healthy environment for salmon, as well as other species that live in the streams. She asked that the Board recommend approval of an amendment that changes the limitation to exempt special habitat restoration projects. The change will allow them to make more of an impact on the environment without the negative consequences that the current limitation was created to protect against. Joe Scordino, Edmonds, said he is retired fishery biologist and a 38-year resident of Edmonds. He currently serves as a volunteer adult advisor for the Edmonds/Woodway High School Students Saving Salmon Club. He said he was also present to talk about proposed amendments to the CAO. He recalled that when the CAO was last updated, he made a specific request to the City Council that they reconsider the area limit and time frame because they would restrict habitat restoration. He recognized that the intent is to protect against potential erosion, but in the case of habitat restoration projects, native species are also planted as part of the work. The purpose of restoration projects is to improve habitat and make the streams healthy for salmon. The students’ work was well supervised by Sound Salmon Solutions and coordinated with the Edmonds Tree Board, City staff, and the Holy Rosary Church. Sound Salmon Solutions provided the native plantings, as well as the habitat technicians to ensure that the work was done properly. Mr. Scordino said he has worked with Sound Salmon Solutions, EarthCorps and others on habitat restoration projects. These expert groups know what needs to be done. He suggested that the ordinance should be changed to acknowledge that the restrictions are unnecessary for projects that are overseen by qualified habitat restoration experts. He asked that the Board consider a simple fix to the ordinance that does not add complexity or increase lead time and volunteer effort for getting habitat restoration work done. He said it is hard enough to coordinate getting funds for native plants, availability of habitat expertise, property owner involvement and approval and volunteers. It would not be appropriate to require them to go through additional “hoops” in order to complete a project that benefits the environment. He suggested the following amendment to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 23.40.220(C)(8)(a): “The restriction on the area of work does not apply to habitat restoration projects conducted by qualified organizations and/or individuals experienced in habitat restoration techniques to remove invasive or non-native species in order to plant or maintain native shrubs and trees.” Dawna Lahti, Edmonds, said she has been a resident of Edmonds for 35 years and is connected with the Students Saving Salmon project because she belongs to the Care of Creation group at Holy Rosary Church where the stream is located. She was able to observe the project as it progressed. She said she understands that human alteration of the environment can go awry; and unfortunately, that is what has happened in the past along the stream. They are learning more all the time as to how to repair these situations. She voiced concern that if the restoration project takes too long to complete because of the code limitations, students currently in the program will graduate and move on and the next students many not care as much. She summarized that they have a golden opportunity to do the right thing to repair the damage that was done before by well intentioned people who planted what they wanted without regard to what a stream requires. She agreed with Mr. Scordino that the solution should be simple so that the projects can go forward while there is the impetus and will to do them. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD There was no Development Services Director Report. PLANNING BOARD PRESENTATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL Board Member Rubenkonig announced that she and Chair Monroe would present the Planning Board’s report to the City Council on January 16th. HOUSING STRATEGIES UPDATE Mr. Chave reminded the Board that the Comprehensive Plan requires that the City develop a Housing Strategy by the end of 2019, and a Task Force has been appointed by Mayor Earling to move the project forward. The Task Force’s next meeting is scheduled for January 25th at 8:30 a.m. in the Brackett Meeting Room of City Hall. At the meeting, the consultant and City
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
APPROVED Planning Board Minutes January 10, 2018 Page 3
staff will bring forward a draft list of potential resources and tools to increase the supply of affordable housing and meet diverse needs. The discussion will be geared towards different types of housing, different income levels, opportunities for partnerships, etc. The public is invited to attend and the Board Members will receive an update following the meeting. Mr. Chave advised that a public open house would be scheduled a few months after the Housing Strategy Task Force Meeting to solicit public input on the tools being considered. Following the open house, the consultant will prepare a draft Housing Strategy for the Planning Board’s review in early spring. He noted that a special webpage has been created to provide information: https://www.edmondshousingstrategy.org/. Staff will notify the Board Members when new items are added to the site. Another update will also be provided to the Board in advance of the consultant’s presentation of the formal report. CRITICAL AREA ORDINANCE (CAO) AMENDMENT – SELECT VEGETATION REMOVAL Mr. Chave referred to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8), which is the allowed activities section of the City’s critical areas regulations. The section identifies certain activities within a critical area and/or critical area buffer that may occur without the preparation of a critical area report. The restriction in area that can be eligible for vegetation removal without a report from a qualified professional is a new provision added in the last major update of the CAO. Since the CAO was last updated, concern has been raised that this limitation (1,500 square feet over 3 years) is too restrictive and/or costly in some circumstances. The City Council has asked the Planning Board to review the limitation and forward a recommendation to them. Mr. Chave explained that the consultant who assisted the City with the last CAO update recommended the 1,500-square-foot limitation, which is consistent with the City of Seattle’s ordinance. As currently written, clearing of more than 1,500 square feet is allowed, but a critical area report from a qualified professional is required. He further explained that the intent of the restriction is to avoid situations of potential erosion when invasive species are removed from slopes or stream banks. It was felt that invasive species could be removed from small areas without disturbing much of the intact buffer, but there was concern about making sure people know what they are doing and have proper guidance when doing larger projects. He noted that the Staff Report outlines several options the Board could consider. However, it is important to make sure that larger projects have proper guidance. Describing the qualifications of the professional or organization will be very important. Staff intends to further refine the options based on feedback from the Board and present them for further discussion at the Board’s January 24th meeting. Board Member Lovell recalled that the Planning Board had numerous discussions relative to the CAO as part of its work on the Shoreline Master Program. One particular item of discussion at that time was that alder trees that are 2-inch caliper or smaller should be considered noxious plants. He asked if this was incorporated into the CAO. Mr. Chave answered that is it likely found in the definition section rather than the section currently under discussion. He agreed to find the reference and report back. Board Member Lovell summarized that the language change the Board is being asked to consider makes sense on the surface. However, if they want to allow clearing and replanting (restoration) within a critical area larger than 1,500 square feet, it should be done under the auspice of a qualified and experienced individual or organization. He asked if is possible for the City assemble a list of qualified individuals and organizations. Mr. Chave said the City could create a list of individuals and organizations that have worked with the City before, but they are not going to know all that may qualify. Therefore, there must be some sort of a process for determining whether or not a person or organization is qualified to oversee the work. It does not have to be an onerous process, but there needs to be some measure to provide assurance that the work will be overseen by qualified people. This could be as simple as requiring a resume or description of the organization or person that outlines their experience. Board Member Lovell agreed that a simple process should be incorporated to avoid situations of “weekend environmental warriors.” Board Member Lovel asked if there has been any discussion in house with respect to the City’s responsibility to supervise and inspect the projects. Mr. Chave agreed that supervision and inspection should be part of the equation. For example, the City could ask for a simple restoration plan to ensure that the plantings and species are appropriate. After a project is finished, City staff could inspect to make sure it was done according to the plan.
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
APPROVED Planning Board Minutes January 10, 2018 Page 4
Board Member Rubenkonig asked Mr. Chave to provide more information about how restoration work is done in the City. She noted that there are many different levels of restoration projects, ranging from small to large, on both private and public lands. Some are required as part of a development proposal and others are done by the Parks Department. However, many are done by individuals and groups, as well. Mr. Chave said the Parks Department does work in and around the Edmonds Marsh each year, which can be substantial. Students Saving Salmon have done a number of projects, as well. In addition, individual property owners have done work on their own stream frontages. Usually, they check with the City to find out what is required and if there are any restrictions, but sometimes people clear things away from stream banks without realizing that they need to plant something else so the stream bank does not erode. There are varying levels of projects, as well as expertise and knowledge. Many people are watching over the streams now, so it is not unusual for the City to hear about projects. This allows them to check in to make sure they are doing things right. Board Member Rubenkonig asked how the proposed amendment would impact work done by the Parks Department. Mr. Chave advised that the Parks Department is currently in the process of preparing a critical area report to identify all of the projects it expects to undertake over the next year. The report will be reviewed by the Planning Department to make sure it is consistent with the CAO before issuing approval for the range of projects. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the Parks Department is also subject to the 1,500-square-foot limitation. Mr. Chave answered affirmatively and said that is why they are doing a critical area report. Mr. Chave advised that, oftentimes, restoration work is required as part of a private development permit. In these cases, the developer must submit a critical area report. He cautioned that the proposed amendment must be crafted carefully so that these types of projects do not fall under the exemption, as well. However, he can see situations where a development has a lot of invasive species near a stream, and it may be appropriate for them to partner with a non-profit organization to accomplish the restoration work. But most of the time, developers will be wanting to clear a site for development, and a critical area report will be required to show how the restoration work will be accomplished. Board Member Rosen agreed with the concerns and suggestions raised by Board Member Lovell. He suggested that the draft amendment provided by staff should include the following elements: how the City will determine if an individual or organization is qualified, how the City recommends that supervision take place, and how the City will validate that a group or individual has kept its promises. Board Member Robles voiced concern that the City is being asked to allocate resources without having an accurate inventory. He asked what could be done to incentivize the collection of these resources. Board Member Lovell commented that the proposed amendment would only apply to areas within the City that have been categorized as critical area. Mr. Chave added that they usually fall on slopes or near streams. Board Member Rubenkonig referred to the Staff Report, which appears to identify the following five options for addressing the problems:
• Eliminate the area limitation for bona fide habitat restoration projects with restoration work conducted by a qualified organization and/or individual.
• Eliminate the area limitation for habitat restoration projects that are managed by an organization or individual who has a standing agreement with the City.
• Revise the area limit threshold number.
• Revise the area limit threshold limit when a restoration method is proposed.
• Retain the existing code language.
Board Member Robles felt that the code should provide sufficient flexibility to allow for vegetation removal to extend beyond 1,500 square feet. Vice Chair Cheung asked where the 1,500-foot limitation came from, and Mr. Chave answered that it was a standard from Seattle’s ordinance and was recommended by the consultant as a reasonable number. Mr. Chave reminded the Board that the process for amending the CAO is a bit different than the process used for most development code amendments. Following a public hearing before the Planning Board, the proposed amendment must be forwarded to the State Department of Ecology for review and approval before being presented to the City Council for final
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
APPROVED Planning Board Minutes January 10, 2018 Page 5
approval. The proposed amendment should also be considered as a potential amendment to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP), which triggers an entirely different process. He explained that the CAO applies to critical areas throughout the City, and the SMP applies to properties with the shoreline jurisdiction only. At this point, staff is only proposing an amendment to the CAO. Depending on how that goes, they could follow up with an amendment to the SMP when it is updated again in 2019. Board Member Rubenkonig summarized that the Board is looking at the concept of increasing the size of the threshold. In conjunction with this, they should consider the best way to make sure the City is comfortable with the process for vetting individuals and organizations identified to supervise a project. The Board could also consider additional criteria that removal of invasive species would be exempt from the area limitation as long as native species are planted to restore the area appropriately. Mr. Chave agreed to prepare draft language for the Board’s review at their next meeting based on the feedback provided. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Vice Chair Cheung reviewed that the January 24th agenda will include a final report on the Five Corners Development Feasibility Analysis and a study session on draft language to amend the Critical Areas Ordinance pertaining to select vegetation removal. The February 14th agenda will include a review and discussion of the Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) and a tentative public hearing on a draft amendment to the Critical Areas Ordinance pertaining to select vegetation removal. The February 28th meeting will include a public hearing on the UFMP and a discussion on code updates to permit decision making (ECDC 20.01.003(A). Board Member Rosen recalled that, at the last meeting, he inquired about when the Board would receive a report on the Economic Impact of Arts and Culture Study. He asked that staff work to add this to the extended agenda, noting that the consultant likely provided a timeline as part of the contract. Board Member Lovell asked if the Five Corners Development Feasibility Analysis would be presented by the consultant or staff. Mr. Chave answered that the work is being done by the consultant, but he does know if the consultant will make the actual presentation to the Board. Board Member Lovell also asked if the consultant would present the UFMP to the Board, and Mr. Chave said he was not sure if it would be presented by the consultant or staff. Board Member Lovell asked if the Tree Board would be represented at the February 14th and February 28th meetings at which the UFMP will be discussed. Board Member Robles said he knows that the Tree Board plans to be active in future discussions, and representatives from the Tree Board will be present at the Planning Board meetings when the topic is discussed. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Vice Chair Cheung did not provide any additional comments. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Lovell advised that he would take over the responsibility of being the liaison to the Citizens Economic Development Commission. Board Member Robles reported that he has met twice with the sign committee reviewing the gateway entry sign near Westgate where the road splits to the ferry and downtown. It is an interesting group of people and the artist is brilliant. The artist has come up with three or four designs, one of which was “out of the park.” He hasn’t seen the updated rendition, but the ideas thus far as very nice. The intent is for the sign design to reflect how the road splits in this location. Board Member Rubenkonig once again referred to the minutes from the joint Planning Board/ADB Meeting on December 13th. They contained excellent information that will be helpful for the Board when they move to the next part of the process. It was very interesting to review what was said that evening.
8.1.b
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Exhibit 2: Planning Board Minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8): Allowed
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/10/2017
Critical Area Ordinance Section 23.40.220(c)(7)(a) (15 min.)
Staff Lead: Councilmember Diane Buckshnis
Department: City Council
Preparer: Sandy Chase
Background/History
Council approved the Critical Area Ordinance
Staff Recommendation
None
Narrative
Current restoration project section 23.40.220(c)(7)(a) specifies only a length of 1,500 square feet can be
restored over a three year time frame. The reason for the restriction was to help ensure that large areas
or phases of restoration projects would have some governmental oversight and be reviewed for
consistency with best management practices. However, the limitation also means that some larger
restoration projects cannot proceed without special studies, which adds to the schedule and costs for
restoration.
Some language suggestions have been: "The restriction on the area of work does not apply to bona fide
habitat restoration projects with restoration work conducted by a qualified organization and/or
individuals experienced in habitat restoration techniques." Removing the limit and/or time frame allows
for the removing of invasive or non-native species in order to plant or maintain native shrubs and trees.
The suggested new language could help fix the CAO problem of limiting invasive plant removal beyond
1500 square feet during habitat restoration projects. Of note, is that plant removal in critical areas
needs to be restricted due to erosion and soil damage, but that concern is not necessarily reasonable for
habitat restoration projects where the invasive plants are being REPLACED with native plants. It is
believed that putting unnecessary restrictions on this type of habitat restoration projects is counter to
the CAO and SMP stated goal to encourage habitat restoration. Voluntary restoration work will not
occur if it requires people to go thru the CAO critical area permitting process, and that is to the
detriment of enhancing our critical areas in Edmonds.
Another suggestion is that the language proposed for future restoration projects, (especially by
individuals who maybe don't quite fit into the EarthCorps model of working with the City), is something
that needs a more institutional integration beyond a line in the CAO. So instead of just "these
restrictions don't apply to bona fide restoration projects," more deliberate language could be: "these
restrictions don't apply to habitat restoration projects that: A) are managed by an organization or
individual who has a standing agreement with the City; or B) have been approved by the appropriate
7.6
Packet Pg. 189
8.1.c
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Exhibit 3: Council Committee 2017-10-10 agenda item + minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to
city department," or something along those lines. This would offer some direction to individuals
interested in projects. It would give folks the option of partnering with previously approved qualified
organizations while also allowing projects to be judged on a case by case basis, and it would ensure that
projects and those proposing them have City oversight before being implemented. Of course a criteria
would still need to be developed, and all this would totally depend on capacity within the appropriate
city department (whether it be Parks or Planning) to evaluate the credentials of those proposing
projects and create formal agreements for participating organizations.
Another option is to use a different threshold, such as 3000 square feet instead of 1500 before requiring
a detailed critical area review.
Any updates to the critical area regulations must first go through a public process that includes a public
hearing and recommendation by the Planning Board, as well as submittal of a draft proposal to the state
for amending the regulations.
At this time, the PPP Committee may ask the Planning Board to consider the PPP Committee's
suggestion and bring back a recommendation to the full City Council. Alternatively, the PPP Committee
could choose to recommend that the full City Council formally ask the Planning Board to consider this
issue and provide a recommendation.
7.6
Packet Pg. 190
8.1.c
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Exhibit 3: Council Committee 2017-10-10 agenda item + minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to
10/10/17 PPP Committee Minutes, Page 2
development, Architectural Design Board review, lack of bicycle lanes on SR-104, and including graphics of the development in the Development Services Update (February 2018).
Action: Councilmember Johnson supported forwarding to full Council so the public could see the
materials; Councilmember Tibbott preferred the Consent Agenda. If on Consent Agenda, include the materials staff distributed in the packet.
4. Professional Services Agreement with MIG for the ADA Transition Plan
Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss reviewed the American’s with Disabilities Act; requirements
of the ADA Transition Plan; curb ramp evaluation; priority chart; and maps of high, medium and low
curb ramp and sidewalk and traffic signal barrier removal projects. He reviewed the total cost of upgrades ($151,500,000) and current annual budget ($220,000). The goal of the Plan is to identify a
strategy to remove barriers and establish a schedule and funding strategy. He reviewed a 15-year schedule for the projects by category, highlighted elements of the funding strategy and described public outreach.
Discussion included examples of sidewalk barriers, modifying priorities based on citizen requests, grant funds secured to improve pedestrian crossings including upgrading curb ramps, ADA plan for
City buildings and upcoming ADA plan for Parks, cost of this Plan, how priorities are determined, cost to have ADA ramps constructed by a contractor versus inhouse, additional staff required to do inhouse, and prioritizing short walkways.
Action: Schedule for full Council
5. Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project
Mr. English recalled the center joint repair did not meet strength testing at the end of project in 2016.
The contractor remobilized in July 2017 including conducting bond strength tests. In mid-September the contractor stated they would remedy the deficient repairs; the City’s consultant is evaluating their
proposed method. The request is an increase in budget authority of $75,000 for inspection, testing, etc.
Discussion followed regarding concern the proposed remedy will not meet testing standards, who
pays to remedy the deficient repair, and legal advice that the City give the contractor an opportunity to make the repair. Ms. Hite clarified the deficient repair affects the longevity of the fishing pier; it is not
in danger of being closed.
Action: Schedule for full Council next week
6. Critical Area Ordinance Section 23.40.220(c)(7)(a)
Mr. Lien explained there were public comments regarding this section (allowed activities) at the time of the CAO update. Allowed activities which include select vegetation removal such as hazard trees
and invasive species are not required to have a full critical areas report. Prior to the CAO update,
there was no limit on the amount of area that could be cleared. With the CAO update, a limit of 1500 within a 3-year cumulative period was established without a critical areas report. Removal of more
than 1500 requires a critical area report prepared by a qualified professional.
Revisions suggested in the agenda memo (prepared by Councilmember Buckshnis) included, 1)
adding “bona fide restoration projects,” 2) establishing a different threshold, 3) City select non-profit
organizations that do restoration projects and if a group works with them, a critical area report is not required. The origin of the1500 square foot limit was Seattle’s CAO. He suggested the PPP
committee request the Planning Board consider this issue and provide a recommendation.
8.1.c
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Exhibit 3: Council Committee 2017-10-10 agenda item + minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to
10/10/17 PPP Committee Minutes, Page 3
Mr. Lien relayed the agenda memo refers to the SMP and CAO. The SMP adopted a specific version of the CAO; changing the allowed activity provision in the COA does not change how the provision is
implemented in shoreline jurisdiction (which includes the Edmonds Marsh). He did not recommend amending the SMP until the 2019 update.
Discussion followed regarding the process for review and public hearing by the Planning Board and Council and review by the State, the recent critical areas report prepared and approved for removal of
invasive species in the Edmonds Marsh, and definition of a qualified professional in the CAO.
Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda to refer to Planning Board
The meeting was adjourned at 9:06 p.m.
8.1.c
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Exhibit 3: Council Committee 2017-10-10 agenda item + minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 17, 2017
Page 8
PUD is a public utility, different from PSE which owned by the Macquarie consortium, a large Australian
for-profit financial instruction. PSE continues to push natural gas, which is not natural; it is basically
methane which is 86 times worse than CO2 with regard to greenhouse gas. Taking into account methane
releases and leaks from the point of extraction, transportation and combustion, it is as bad or worse than
coal. Two-thirds of natural gas is fraked in the United States. He suggested Edmonds think about using less
natural gas and avoid getting electricity from gas powered plants. His house has a natural gas furnace and
he cannot afford to replace it with a more energy efficient system. Other cities including Vancouver BC
prohibit gas appliances in new residential and commercial buildings. He concluded “don’t by the Kool-Aid
from PSE.”
6. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, 2017
2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, 2017
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT
4. ACKNOWLEDGE THE RECEIPT OF CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES FROM JENNY
MURPHY (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), DELORES BJORBACK (AMOUNT
UNDETERMINED), BURGER KING (AMOUNT UNDETERMINED), AND RAMON
RAMOS TINOCO ($150,000.00)
5. AUGUST 2017 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
6. PERMIT SOFTWARE SYSTEM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (PSA) AND
BUDGET APPROVAL
7. CRITICAL AREA ORDINANCE SECTION 23.40.220(C)(8)(A) - SELECT VEGETATION
REMOVAL
8. SR-524 SPEED REDUCTION
9. UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN THE
PROVIDENCE/VERDANT HEALTH & SWEDISH/STEVENS CAMPUS
10. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO APPROVE RECORDING OF A PUBLIC
PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT ALONG EDMONDS WAY ADJACENT TO 10032 EDMONDS
WAY
11. AUTHORIZE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO DISPOSE OF SURPLUS
EQUIPMENT
7. PUBLIC HEARING
1. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION'S
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE ELIGIBILITY OF THE GERDON HOUSE
LOCATED AT 209 CASPERS STREET FOR LISTING ON THE EDMONDS REGISTER
OF HISTORIC PLACES
8.1.c
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Exhibit 3: Council Committee 2017-10-10 agenda item + minutes (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to
Comment on Agenda Item 8.B “Critical Area - Selective Vegetation Removal”
Planning Board Members, I am a retired fishery biologist and 38 year resident of Edmonds serving as a volunteer adult advisor to the Edmonds-Woodway High School ‘Students Saving Salmon’ club with whom I’ve
worked for almost 3 years on monitoring stream water quality in Edmonds and projects to restore
salmon and their habitat. I am the “citizen” referred to in the first paragraph of your Attachment 1 to Agenda Item 8.B who advised the Council “that the select vegetation removal section of the City's critical area regulations (ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8)) was a concern.”
I asked the Council to consider amending ECDC 23.40.220 (C)(8) because the ordinance does
not acknowledge that habitat restoration projects do need to occur over larger areas every year in order to be effective in restoring stream habitat for salmon. The restriction was added during the 2015/16 CAO update apparently over concerns about erosion from vegetation removal, but such concern should not apply to restoration projects whose objective is to replace invasive and non-
native plants with native vegetation. This restriction placed on habitat restoration work by
23.40.220(C)(8) is counter to CAO and SMP goals to encourage habitat restoration. ECDC 23.40.220 (C) (8) only allows “the removal of [invasive and non-native] vegetation with hand labor and hand-held equipment when the area of work is under 1,500 square feet in area as
calculated cumulatively over three years.” An amendment that removes the area limit and time
frame will allow bona fide habitat restoration projects to proceed to remove invasive or non-native species in order to plant or maintain native shrubs and trees. Such change is essential for habitat restoration work in Edmonds. Students Saving Salmon had to cease plans to restore to habitat to benefit juvenile salmon in an area of Shell Creek on Holy Rosary Church property.
Please consider a simple fix to the Ordinance that doesn’t add complexity or increase lead time and volunteer effort for getting habitat restoration work done. It is hard enough to coordinate getting funds for native plants, availability of habitat expertise (such as Sound Salmon Solutions or EarthCorps), property owner involvement and approval, and volunteer (students, in my case)
logistics coordinated without having to also go through additional ‘hoops’ in the Critical Area
Ordinance. Students Saving Salmon coordinated their last habitat restoration project with the Edmonds Tree Board, Sound Salmon Solutions, City staff, high school administrators and Holy Rosary Church, and it was a great success!
After talking to many about this CAO problem, I recommend the following sentence be added to
ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8)(a) so that habitat restoration projects are not unnecessarily restricted.
"The restriction on the area of work does not apply to habitat restoration projects conducted by qualified organizations and/or individuals experienced in habitat restoration techniques to remove
invasive or non-native species in order to plant or maintain native shrubs and trees." Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Joe Scordino
8.1.d
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Exhibit 4: Critical Area Comment Letters (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8):
January 8, 2018 Comment by Val Stewart
Dear esteemed Planning Board members,
I am aware that the January 10th Planning Board meeting has a
scheduled item for discussion regarding allowed activities in the CAO;
23.40.220.C.8.a. Having spent nearly a decade working on restoration
projects in Discovery Park for the City of Seattle and also with
Students Saving Salmon along with Sound Salmon Solutions, I wanted
to offer my perspective on criteria for invasive plant removal.
As you know, under the current CAO only 1,500 square feet of
vegetation (including invasive species) may be removed in a
cumulative three year period before a critical area report is required.
Both the size of the area and the 3 year period are extremely limiting
given the extent of restoration work that needs to be done in the City.
Planting of native species also needs to occur in a timely manner after
invasives removal. Having to go through the process of getting a
critical area report along with added expense will likely discourage
many projects from getting underway or continuing.
I agree with the proposed language: "these restrictions don't apply
to habitat restoration projects that: A) are managed by an
organization or individual who has a standing agreement with the City;
or B) have been approved by the appropriate city department”.
Restoration work should be conducted by a qualified organization
and/or individuals experienced in habitat restoration techniques. This
has certainly been the case with Earthcorps for instance, and Students
Saving Salmon in conjunction with Sound Salmon Solutions. Allowing
projects to be judged on a case by case basis would ensure that
projects and those leading them would have the necessary City
oversight. It is indeed important that the volunteers and supervisors
be trained in appropriate removal techniques, especially on slopes so
as not to destabilize them. Training in identification of invasives as
well as guidance in appropriate native species choices for replanting in
specific areas is also very important.
My hope is that you will take this under consideration and forward a
recommendation to City Council expeditiously. Thank you.
8.1.d
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Exhibit 4: Critical Area Comment Letters (Review of Planning Board recommendation on amendments to ECDC 23.40.220(C)(8):