Cmd051220EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
VIRTUAL ONLINE MEETING
APPROVED MINUTES
May 12, 2020
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Luke Distelhorst, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Laura Johnson, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Phil Williams, Public Works Director
Rob English, City Engineer
Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
ALSO PRESENT
Zach Bauder, Student Representative
The Edmonds City Council virtual online meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Mayor Nelson. The
meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Distelhorst read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the
original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip
Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We
respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection
with the land and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present, participating remotely.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
L. JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
5. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda item
approved is as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 5, 2020
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page I
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS JSUBMITTED TO PUBLICCOMMENTREDMONDSWA.GOV)
See Attached.
7. REPORTS (NOT INTENDED FOR ORAL PRESENTATION OR DISCUSSION PER
GUBERNATORIAL PROCLAMATION 20-28)
1. MARCH 2O20 QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT
8. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
1. PRESENTATION OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF LYNNWOOD
FOR THE BIKE2HEALTH PROJECT
City Engineer Rob English explained this will close out the Bike2Health project that added bike lanes on
212"' Street and 76t" Avenue as part of the 212" Street/76"' Avenue intersection project as well as new
signage at various locations around the City. The original interlocal agreement (ILA) with Lynnwood
expired on December 31, 2019. In order to bill the cost of four bike racks purchased in December 2019 as
well as a small amount of staff time, approximately $3500, approval of a revised ILA is required. Staff
recommends the revised ILA be moved to the May 19"' consent agenda.
Councilmember Distelhorst recalled Mr. Williams providing an update to the committee on a Sound
Transit grant opportunity for bike lanes. He asked if that would come to back to the committee or Council
at some point. Public Works Director Phil Williams said it was uncertain when that would be presented
due to the OPMA restrictions that the state is operating under. It was presented to the PPW Committee on
March 10"' and the committee's input included a desire to have public comment when it comes to the
Council. It will move forward to Council as soon as the requirement that the Council consider only
necessary and routine items is lifted.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented tonight's ILA does not have anything to do with what was
discussed by the PPW Committee in March. Mr. Williams agreed that was different than the Bike2Health
project.
2. REPORT ON BIDS FOR PHASE 1 STORM REPLACEMENT PROJECT
City Engineer Rob English reviewed:
• Replaces approximately 1400 feet of existing storm pipe in 88"' Avenue south of Olympic View
Drive
■ New 24-inch diameter pipe
• Photographs of existing corrugated metal pipe that is corroding, falling in on itself in a couple
locations and root intrusion into the pipe
• Project advertised in April
o Received 11 bid responses:
Contractor's Bid Results
Amount
Engineer's Estimate
$614, 000
Shoreline Construction
$549, 855
A-1 Landscapina
$555,015
Dungeness Construction
$574,838
Rodarte Construction
$578,399
Wellwest Construction
$595 411
Kamins Construction
$606,866
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 2
Plats Plus Inc.
$607,405
D&G Backhoe
$615,857
R att Construction
$683,620
A&M Construction
$686,308
Road Construction NW
$796,229
• Shoreline Construction is the contractor on Dayton Street and also secured the bid for the Phase 7
sewer replacement project
• Construction Budget
Item
Amount
Contract Award
$540 855
Construction M mt, Inspection & Testing..$108,000
Management Reserve 20%
$108,000
Total*
1 $756,855
*Project funded by Stormwater utility Funds (Fund 422)
• Staff recommendation
o Place the item on the May 19"' consent agenda to award a contract to Shoreline Construction
o Authorize a 20% Management Reserve of $108,000
Mr. Williams commented staff feels fortunate Shoreline Construction's bid was successful; they have
been marvelous to work with on the Dayton Street project, very receptive to property owners and
businesses in the areas where they are working, the public likes them, they responded well to COVID-19
situation, have done great work and are a very reasonable company to work with.
Councilmember L. Johnson referred to manholes along 88" Avenue and asked if those were sewer or
storm access. Mr. English answered they are structures built in the road that typically provide a
connection from the system that is being installed to a catch basin or other structure. Councilmember L.
Johnson suggested the gendered term "manhole" be replaced with a more specific term, such as sewer
hole, maintenance hole, or utility chamber. Mr. English agreed that could be done. Mr. Williams
commented they are usually called structures.
3. 2020 FACILITIES ENERGY SAVINGS REPORT AND WORKPLAN
Mr. Williams said this has been separated into two agenda items, 8.3 and 8.4. Agenda item 8.3 provides
background on the investment grade audit produced by McKinstry in anticipation of work to be done in
2020 under an ESCO project. This background information will help set the stage for making a decision
whether to move forward on the ESCO project this year. With regard to the necessary and routine element
of this, the report is necessary for the Council as decision -makers to put in context what is recommended
for action, perhaps next week. Receiving a report and getting information from staff is a routine part of
the Council's decision -making process and meets that criteria. The next agenda item where staff is
seeking a decision on a contract between the City and the Department of Enterprise Services (DES), an
addendum to an existing contract to add new scope to allow this ESCO project to move forward, is
necessary and advisable from the standpoint of City buildings are largely unoccupied. This report was
scheduled on the Council's agenda as soon as possible in hopes of taking advantage of this point in time.
Mr. Williams explained a large part of the project entails removing and replacing all the windows on the
east side of City Hall on the ground level and the upper two floors. If building were occupied, that would
be much more difficult, less efficient, less safe, and require contractors to interact with staff which
increases exposure. It is better for both the contractor and employees that that exposure not happen,
particularly during the governor's order. With regard to routine, the City has done at least nine ESCO
projects in last decade so they are relatively routine and have been a wonderful way to deliver capital
work. He concluded now is a necessary opportunity to move forward with this project.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 3
With regard to the necessary and routine analysis that he and Mr. Williams discussed, Mr. Taraday said it
was important to note that when these ESCO projects have come to Council over the past decade, they
generated very little controversy or public interest. That is not to say they are not important, but they are
not the kind of thing that brings out the masses. That is another factor that the attorney general has asked
the City to look at in determining if something qualifies as routine. Mr. Williams agreed past ESCO
projects have not generated public comment or opinion.
Mr. Williams introduced Thom Sullivan, Facilities Manager, and Grant Haag, Project Manager,
McKinstry. Mr. Haag introduced Andrew Williamson, Business Manager; Jerry Galvin, Project Director;
and Heramb Amonkar, Senior Energy Engineer, McKinstry
Mr. Williams reviewed:
• Executive Summary
o Together with the City, McKinstry & DES have produced an investment Grade Audit.
■ Expressed goals for this project include standardizing lighting lamps, lowering utility &
operational costs and reducing the City's carbon footprint.
• Using the DES Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) program, McKinstry
has completed an extensive study and investigation of energy upgrades for the City of
Edmonds.
■ A detailed Energy Services Proposal (ESP) is now provided. These proposed solutions
will result in:
- Lower energy use and energy cost
- Improved building system performance, comfort and occupant productivity
- Reduced operations and maintenance costs
- Utility rebates
• History
o City has completed at least 9 previous ESCO projects going back approximately 15 years -
these efforts have become "routine" for Edmonds
o ESCO project result in:
■ Guaranteed project quality
■ Guaranteed energy savings
■ Replacement of "end of life" equipment and systems
■ Energy subsidies from electric and gas utilities
o McKinstry competed the Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) in 2018 - cost = $51,000
o McKinstry completed an Investment Grade Audit submitted to City in June 2019 - cost =
$40,000
o Using this information McKinstry has now produced a detailed ESP (Scope of work + Gmax
cost +performance guarantee)
o DES has just reviewed this ESP and approved it in draft form for approval as an ESP to be
administered by DES
o Item 8.4 on tonight's agenda will discuss this ESP and ask Council to place it on consent at
next week's meeting
• Edmonds: FCA - 2018
o Graph of 5-year capital expenditures
o City Total CAPEX
■ Cost in Year 1 to bring all building to acceptable level: $6,360,822
■ Investment in Year 2: $755,281
■ Investment in Year 3: $712,767
■ Investment in Year 4: $1,183,026
■ Investment in Year 5: $675,342
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 4
o An annual $800k annual investment is still needed to maintain facilities infrastructure
independent of deferred maintenance based on existing facilities
• Cost of Delay
o At current funding levels, the cumulative cost of delay on deferred maintenance over the next
five years will be >$2,000,000
o Plus annual inflation on current deference maintenance backlog: $260,000 @ 4% annually
• Table 3.1 Energy Savings Summary
o Approximately $22,000/year
• Elemental Impact Calculator
o This annual emissions reduction is equivalent to:
■ 36 vehicles removed from roads, or
■ 696,372 miles not driven per year, or
■ 5,136 75-watt lightbulbs not energized, or
■ 18 average size houses removed from power grid, or
■ 51 acres of trees planted, or
■ 191,990 pounds of coal not burned per year
• ESCO Benefits
o Collaboration between owner, DES and an ESCO (McKinstry)
o ESCO ability to fast track
o Owner involved with contractor selection
o Owner involved with equipment selection
o One responsible entity (ESCO)
o Guaranteed:
■ Maximum project cost
■ Energy savings
■ Equipment/system performance
• What is DES's Role?
0 1986 RCW 39.35 — legislative authority to DES
o Prequalified providers
o Project oversight
o Contractual framework and coordinator
o Financial transparency
Existing ESA contract
o Action is to create addendum that adds the new scope of services and the costs and
guarantees.
Mr. Williams reviewed elements of the proposed scope:
• City Hall eastside windows
o Single pane storefront windows — energy & safety issues
o Leaking thermopane windows on floors 2 and 3
o $297,724
o Photo of damage caused by City Hall windows failed glazing and years of leaking
• Public Safety Building Storefront doors and windows
o $28,393
• Frances Anderson Center (FAC) Roof Replacement — mostly grant funded
o Photographs of condition
o $479,453
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked whether the FAC roof was the project for which the City
received a $350,000 state grant. Mr. Williams answered there is a total of $391,400 total available to be
spent on the roof.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 5
Councilmember Olson asked if there was a special account for the library roof replacement and if it
included the $391,000. Mr. Williams answered the Facilities Division does not have a dedicated
replacement fund for roofs. Councilmember Olson said there was a fund when the City first joined Sno-
Isle Library System. Mr. Williams answered this not the library roof; there is over $1M set aside for
capital replacements at the library. Councilmember Olson clarified this was the Frances Anderson Center
roof, not the library.
Councilmember Buckshnis said the $391,000 was an appropriation, not a grant. Mr. Williams agreed it
was a direct appropriation from the state capital budget. Councilmember Buckshnis commented part of
the FAC roof has solar panels and asked if solar panels would be considered in the roof replacement. Mr.
Williams said new roofs have been done on most of the lower classroom buildings; this is the main school
building which is the oldest building, and the gym. There will be a conversation with the solar
cooperative about the solar panels because the lease on the roof expires in approximately 60 days.
Councilmember Paine commented she is a member of that solar co-op and wondered if this roof project
would touch that part of the roof and whether anything could be placed on the historic building like
additional solar panels. Mr. Williams answered he doubted it due to the historic designation but that could
be researched. It would be great to find new opportunities to expand the City's solar involvement. The
solar cooperative owns the panels and are interested in either extending the lease or the City acquiring the
system from them.
Mr. Williams continued his presentation:
■ Lighting Upgrades
o Replace interior and exterior lighting with LED lamps and/or fixtures
o All interior T-8 and T-5 fluorescent tubes to be replaced with LED Type B tubes
■ Much longer life (1 OX), i.e. fewer replacements, labor savings/safety
■ Approximately 30% more efficient
■ Better light quality — broader spectrum
■ Dimmable
■ $684,708
■ Re -commissioning City Hall HVAC
o New Allerton digital control systems and software
o Once improvements are made to the building envelopment, the entire HVAC system will be
reprogrammed and air -flow balanced
o Improved comfort, predictability and efficiency
o $26,094
+ City + State + McKinstry = Safety First
o The implementation of these projects is lower risk and safer the sooner they are implemented
while most employees are not in City Hall or other buildings and less citizens are out in the
public space, and social distancing is greatest
o McKinstry will complete these routine and necessary projects while complying with all safety
requirements. McKinstry has successfully worked at jobsites continuously through the
pandemic and has required processes in place
Councilmember Buckshnis commented this was a great report including the pictures. The utility data
analysis that supports new lighting contains an amazing amount of data to make these recommendations.
She was very impressed with how this project was put together, how it reads and how it supports the
executive summary. She thanked McKinstry for a job well done. Mr. Williams agreed.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 6
Mr. Sullivan appreciated Councilmembers spending time on the report as there is a great deal of
significant data and it reads like technical manual. He appreciated McKinstry's lighting technician
reviewing building fixtures to identify opportunities. He concluded McKinstry is great to work with and
they obviously pulled all the technical information to make this a successful project.
Councilmember Distelhorst pointed out the most significant cost on the deferred maintenance is HVAC
and plumbing. He asked if there were any water efficiency projects and whether those would those
qualify under ESCO. Mr. Williams answered some improvements have been done in past ESCO projects
such as the electric motors that drive the pump stations for sewer and water; the City has received grants
and utility subsidies for that work. From a plumbing standpoint, one of the problems is just old and
corroded pipes which do not qualify as an ESCO project.
With regard to HVAC, Mr. Williams said there are significant issues at the Public Safety Building that
will need to be addressed in the not too distant future. At City Hall there are approximately 29 individual
condensing units on the roof; 1-2 of the units are replaced each year via the annual budget. Mr. Sullivan
advised there are a total of 30 including several in the garage. City Hall was a mixed use building at one
time so all the HVAC is individually zoned throughout the floors so it is not a central plant, more of a
residential model with a single condensing unit providing heating and cooling to a centralized air handler
for the floor rather than one big condensing unit or a chiller plant. It lends itself well to replacing units as
they run to fail. A future electrical retrofit of the building would be a good time to address the HVAC.
Mr. Williams said the Public Safety Building has a central system. Although it is one of the City's newer
buildings, there will need to be a strategy for upgrading the mechanical equipment in the relatively near
future.
Councilmember Olson commented there seem to be some inefficiencies in terms of occupancy in some
City buildings. She asked whether staff has thought about that and can assure investment are not being
made in buildings that may not be needed via reorganization of where entities work from. She cited City
Hall as an example. Mr. Williams said City Hall is a big part of the City's building infrastructure as are
the Public Safety Building, Public Works Building and Parks buildings. The City owns a number of small
buildings and significant investments have not been made in those. The facility condition assessment
indicated some of those may be running to fail. For example, significant funds have not been put into the
Boys & Girls Club or Senior Center due to the expectation they would be replaced.
Councilmember Olson commented although this is a difficult time financially for the City due to the
alteration of revenues during the pandemic, the City is very behind on facilities maintenance and electeds
were very aware that would need to be a priority. She cited the closure of the West Seattle bridge as an
example of what happens when things are neglected too long. She concluded facilities maintenance
cannot be ignored and gets more expensive over time. Mr. Williams agreed. He noted one of the things
that drew him to Edmonds was that the City did not own any bridges.
Councilmember Paine asked if there was any ability for the City to negotiate the cost, recalling the City
has gotten lower bids on recent projects and a staff was able to negotiate additional services on a recent
Parks project. She asked if that was a possibility on this project. Mr. Williams answered absolutely,
explaining McKinstry will work with the contractors; the City can influence that process to some extent
with regard to who is selected to do the work, but McKinstry guarantees the work. Any savings that are
generated will be shared with the City. The budget is adequate from McKinstry's standpoint because they
are willing to guarantee the work will be delivered for that price. He expected the project to come in less
than the amounts that were described, noting now was a good time to have work done.
Mr. Haag commented the beauty of the program is it is maximum cost so it can only go down. McKinstry
is conservative on the rebate numbers and the savings. Most of the subcontractors have been selected as
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 7
preferred vendors; if they realize savings, those are a straight passthrough to City as well as the energy
savings. If the energy savings are more than are guaranteed, the City keeps that. When McKinstry applies
for payment, they are all backed by invoices for actual expenditures.
Councilmember L. Johnson thanked Mr. Williams for the thorough and lengthy report. As an owner of a
commercial cleaning company, she could attest firsthand to the time it takes to change lightbulbs and the
difference it makes going from florescent to LED. Depending on the height and the equipment required,
changing one lightbulb can take an hour to change. She recognized the energy savings over a ten year
lifespan as well as the time savings.
Mr. Williams advised it was not necessary for Council to take action to accept the report. The report was
just background to prepare the Council for the next agenda item.
4. 2020 FACILITIES ENERGY SAVINGS CONTRACT ADDENDUM WITH
DEPARTMENT OF ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS
Public Works Director Phil Williams reviewed the riromsed Contract with DES:
Project
Cost
Frances Anderson Center Roof
$479,453
Commissionin,g City Hall HVAC
$26,094
City Hall Windows
$297,764
LED Replacements
$684,708
Public Safety Bld . Storefront windows and doors
$28,393
Total
$1,516,411
Mr. Williams explained there is $1.5M in the capital budget for 2020. There is also $391,400 in grant
funds to reduce that amount and another $74,200 grant from the State Historic Preservation Commission,
leaving a balance of approximately $1.072M. He requested Council place authorization for the Mayor to
approve the contract extension with DES on next week's consent agenda or action agenda.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented the only improvement that was on the CIP/CFP was the FAC
roof. She doubted the LED replacement would to be on CIF/CFP. Mr. Williams answered the FAC roof
was the only identified capital project listed specifically on the CIP. There are plug numbers in the CIP
for an annual capital investment for facilities. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled there was more detailed
data during last year's presentation and she suggested including that information into the CIP/CFP. Mr.
Williams said another facilities project that staff is trying to move forward is the City Hall elevator
replacement. It would be a good time to do that project with people out of the building. The Council may
hear more about that in the near future.
Council President Fraley-Monillas observed staff was seeking Council approval to put this on the consent
agenda next week. Mr. Williams answered on the consent agenda or on the full agenda for action if the
Council want to have further discussion.
Councilmember Distelhorst referred to the Request for Contract spreadsheet, and the column entitled
Inclusion Plan with percentages for minority -owned, woman -owned, veteran -owned, and
small/mini/micro businesses and asked why all the percentages were zero. Mr. Williams answered that is
to be determined depending on which vendors are selected. Mr. Haag explained ESCO allows selection of
select preferred vendors which has been done at the direction of the City. None of those qualify as
woman, minority or veteran owned under the state qualifications. These are DES goals that McKinstry
tries to match whenever possible. If McKinstry is directed to select a vendor that qualifies, that could be
done but at this point it did to fit what they were trying to achieve. DES has approved that for this project.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 8
Councilmember Paine asked when the improvements would be completed if the ESCO project is
approved. She asked if there was any obligation in the City's standard contracts to prioritize women and
minority -owned businesses. Mr. Williams answered the City has some policies which have been changed
over time. They were first added to the policy when Mike Cooper was mayor; changes have been made
since that make it more voluntary. It is encouraged, but it works on some projects and not as well on
others. He did not recall this coming on up on facilities projects in the past, but it has on transportation
and water, sewer and drainage projects.
Councilmember Paine suggested it was something to look at in the future. For Council President Fraley-
Monillas, Mr. Williams recalled it was related to all disadvantaged businesses. There are some state grant
programs that require a certain level of participation or proof that everything reasonable was tried to reach
that level but was unsuccessful. This is not one of those programs. Council President Fraley-Monillas
recalled that language was related to hiring apprentices. Mr. Williams said the apprenticeship program
was another addition to the City's policies. Council President Fraley-Monillas recalled that was changed
in the last five years. She suggested the Council consider that in the future.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled a couple years ago, then-Councilmember Teitzel, Mr. Williams, Mr.
James and she looked through the women and minority owned business policies. She agreed a lot depends
on the contract.
Council President Fraley-Monillas recalled the policy required any job over $100,000 hire a percentage of
apprentices and that was changed to a higher threshold. Mr. Williams recalled the threshold for
apprenticeships was changed to $1M. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if that was the same for
women and minority -owned businesses. Mr. Williams was not uncertain. Mr. Haag answered about 60%
qualify at some point during this program for the small business involvement percentage. Anything over
$1M, there is a plan to use a certain percentage of apprentices for trade skills.
Councilmember Olson asked about the earthquake retrofit needs for City Hall. Mr. Williams answered it
was his understanding City Hall was reviewed for seismic upgrades and it was either found adequate or
the needed improvements were made. The seismic codes change over time and may have changed since
City Hall was last evaluated. Councilmember Olson asked if staff could verify that. Mr. Williams agreed
to research. Mr. Sullivan advised City Hall was earthquake retrofitted before the City took occupancy;
that was one of the requirements for the sale. It has been periodically reviewed by the building
department, but he was unsure if they had recommendations for future retrofits.
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked whether the Council preferred to have this on the consent
agenda or as an action item. There was no consensus by Council and Council President Fraley-Monillas
advised it would be on next week's agenda.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested the Council vote on this because it is over $1M. Past Councils had a
practice of taking a vote if something was over a certain amount. She noted the Council could even vote
tonight.
With regard to the timeline, Mr. Haag advised the roof projects would be completed by the end of the
year so the grants do not disappear.
To Councilmember Buckshnis' suggestion to vote tonight, Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested
waiting a week to take action, recalling some Councilmembers preferred that. Mr. Williams asked if the
Council needed a presentation next week. Council President Fraley-Monillas answered no presentation
would be required, it would be scheduled for action on the agenda or on the consent agenda.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 9
Councilmember Paine suggested Items 8.1 and 8.2 also be added to the consent agenda. Council agreed.
Discussion Regarding the March 2020 Ouarterly Financial Reuo_ ri Beim un [lie Agenda as a Heyort
and Not for Oral Presentation or Discussion
Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed questions were raised by Councilmember Buckshnis before the
Council meeting regarding the March 2020 Quarterly Financial Report and asked City Attorney Jeff
Taraday to respond. Mr. Taraday explained the reason the quarterly financial report was presented as a
written report in the Council packet was he was following guidance from attorney general's office with
regard to the necessary and routine criterion the Council is supposed to be abiding by. That guidance,
specifically page 3 of the March 26"' guidance, states it may not be necessary for a board to hear regular
oral reports or presentations from its committees or staff at a meeting during the time the proclamation is
in effect and instead it can defer such presentations until a future meeting or have the reports submitted in
writing to the governing body. Under the OPMA, individual members of the governing body can
passively receive and individually review documents so long as a majority does to collectively intend to
meet to take action. He based his guidance on that excerpt.
Mr. Taraday said his advice is just advice and the City Council is not obligated to follow his advice. He is
trying to keep the Council out of trouble, and if there were an OPMA challenge to action taken at a
meeting, it is ultimately the Council who is on the hook not the City Attorney. His advice may be more
cautious than what is seen in other jurisdictions. With regard to what other jurisdictions are doing, the
Council does not know what advice they are getting from their City Attorney or whether the advice is
being followed. He cautioned Council against simply looking at other cities and concluding if City X is
doing something, then Edmonds should do it too.
With regard to the first quarter financial report, Mr. Taraday said Mr. James and he determined it was
unlikely any Council discussion would be necessary. The first quarter financial report did not contain any
COVID-related significance. The second quarter financial report will have much more COVID-related
financial data. Had staff been talking about the impacts of COVID on the City's finances, that would
absolutely be allowed under the OPMA proclamation. His cautious advice was to keep the first quarter
financial report as a written report and if the Council feels differently, they can indicate why they believe
discussion is necessary and proceed. He assured he was not trying to arbitrarily keep the Council from
talking about things, he was trying to keep the Council out of trouble.
Councilmember Buckshnis said as Mayor Nelson already stated, mistakes were made in Ordinance 4177.
She has researched a number of other cities and she and Mr. Taraday disagree about the importance of
accounting, financial management and fiscal responsibility. She referred to Category 1, those that are
necessary and routine to City Council actions, stating in her opinion financial review is necessary and
routine for the legislative body that governs the budget. Second, the investment portfolio shows the
COVID impacts and what is happening to benchmark rolling data and rates of return. Lynnwood is
having two special meetings per month that deal strictly with COVID-related financial issues and other
cities she researched are looking at fiscal yearend. Regardless of Mr. Taraday saying Edmonds should not
follow what other cities are doing and that he is erring on the side of caution, in her opinion, as a former
regulator and finance and numbers person, financial review, regardless of whether it is only 5-10 minutes,
is a necessary and routine City Council action and has been documented quarterly and monthly.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not think there was anything wrong with the Council discussing
the first quarter financial report. The quarterly report is good benchmark and it helps the Council
understand where the City is and where it is going in April. The Council should be afforded the
opportunity to discuss the first quarter financial report so she will agree to disagree with Mr. Taraday.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May ] 2, 2020
Page 10
This information is something that citizens are looking for and they want to understand how the City is
performing. That is COVID related because this is an economic crisis in addition to a pandemic.
Councilmember Buckshnis said Mayor Nelson has done a great job with the pandemic but now it is
becoming an economic crisis and the Council should be talking about it. Mr. Taraday agreed if the
Council was discussing the economic crisis related to the pandemic, that was fair game for discussion at a
Council meeting and he has never said otherwise. The standard with respect to necessary is not whether it
is necessary in general, but whether it is necessary now as opposed to can it wait until June when it may
be possible to have regular Council meetings. That is the standard the attorney general is asking
governing bodies to look at; is it necessary for Council to take action on it now as opposed to later.
Finally and most importantly, this is a Council decision, it is not a City Attorney decision. If the Council
decides he is being too cautious and conservative, the Council does not have to follow his advice. If the
agenda is published with something listed as a written report only, the Council can vote to change that.
Councilmember Paine said she appreciated this discussion around the financial reports as well as the work
Mr. Taraday does to keep the Council out of trouble. As Councilmember Buckshnis stated, the situation is
turning a bit of a corner and Councilmembers have obligations in terms of oversight of funds already
allocated for COVID response and that needs to come to the full Council for discussion. The Council also
needs to take on a larger awareness management of the next thing in terms of revenue and expenditures.
She agreed the Council should discuss what they want that to look like in the coming days. There are six
weeks of the second quarter left and citizens will be eager to hear about the City's future.
Council President Fraley-Monillas said she asked Mr. Taraday two months ago to review every agenda
item to ensure they meet the governor's directive. The first quarter financial report has nothing to do with
COVID, it is only through March and there were no COVID expenditures at that point. She agreed there
certainly will be COVID impacts in the second quarter financial report. With regard to citizens having an
opportunity, she pointed out citizens have an opportunity to read the financial report in the packet the
same as Councilmembers. She asked City Clerk Scott Passey if the Council reviewed quarterly budget
financial reports at Council meetings on a routine basis. Mr. Passey answered the committee does and it is
then scheduled on the consent agenda. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked whether any changes
were typically made to the quarterly report. Councilmember Buckshnis said there were not.
Council President Fraley-Monillas asked if the request was to have the first quarter financial report on the
agenda for Council discussion. Councilmember Buckshnis said yes. Council President Fraley-Monillas
agreed with Mr. Taraday that the first quarter financial report was not appropriate for Council discussion.
Mr. Taraday explained when he works with the directors to determine the Council agendas and whether
something qualifies as necessary and routine, he doesn't always have all the perspectives. There is an
internal necessary and routine analysis, but the Council may have a totally different necessary and routine
analysis and may be able to articulate reasons why something is necessary that may not come up at the
staff level. He did not mean to suggest that the internal staff level routine and necessary analysis was the
final say on the matter. If the Council feels something is necessary and staff felt it wasn't, he suggested
the Council bring it to his attention and he can help the Council articulate why it is necessary so they do
not get into trouble.
Councilmember Olson asked if the point of this discussion was deciding whether to have the first quarter
financial report on a future agenda for discussion. Council President Fraley-Monillas said Mr. Taraday
and Councilmember Buckshnis have already had this conversation and clearly they both still maintain
their position. As a member of the Finance Committee, Councilmember Olson said it would be routine for
the committee to discuss the report and she thought Committee of Whole was a substitute for committee
meetings. It is critical for Councilmembers to be knowledgeable about where the City is and has been
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 11
financially, particularly with the impacts that are coming. She was confident she could justify having the
report on the agenda for discussion.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented Mr. James came from Mukilteo and a lot of the City's policies are
from Mukilteo which is why she researched Mukilteo and provided links. Other cities are talking about
significant impacts to their budget and specifics related to there being an economic crisis as well as a
pandemic. This is what citizens are looking for and they want their legislators to have the discussion. She
agreed citizens and Councilmembers can read the report. The City should be patting themselves on the
back related to investments because the rolling benchmark is going down, but the City's investments are
in great shape. She noted Seattle and Lake Forest Park are talking about their financials at their meetings.
Mayor Nelson advised the administration is already planning to bring COVID-related financial
information to the full Council. If the Council wants to include the first quarter financial report included,
he was happy to include it. This meeting format is not conducive to public engagement or public
involvement. Tree governor waived the OPMA and directed that only absolutely essential things be
discussed when there is little public involvement. The idea is to wait to discuss things that are of public
interest when meetings can be held in a public space. Mr. Taraday agreed.
Councilmember Paine said the City is in a tough position where financial impacts will be occurring before
meetings can be held in a public setting. This has been a helpful discussion; more information is better
than less. She referred to Mr. Taraday's suggestion to talk with him to find the best ways to present this
information while staying out of trouble.
Councilmember L. Johnson asked if the discussion was related some Councilmembers questioning why
the Council did not discuss the first quarter financials in detail. She was uncertain why that would be
necessary, relaying her understanding that there will be COVID-related impacts in the second quarter.
Council President Fraley-Monillas recalled Councilmembers Distelhorst and Olson and she reviewed the
monthly financial report at the Finance Committee meeting and new Councilmembers had a lot of
questions. She suggested Councilmembers send their questions regarding the first quarter financial report
to Mr. James and copy her. If there are a lot of questions and Council does not understand the report, she
will bring it back to Council for review and discussion. She recognized although she has been reviewing
the quarterly reports for ten years and understands them, new Councilmembers may have questions.
Councilmember Buckshnis said the first quarter financial report is a good report. She did not want to wait
until June or never to discuss COVID-related financials which is why she brought up examples of other
cities who are discussing COVID-related financials.
Council President Fraley-Monillas a raised point of order that the first quarter financial report had nothing
to do with COVID. Councilmember Buckshnis said her point was other cities are discussing their
financials and Edmonds is not. She summarized financials related to COVID-19 should be discussed at
the legislative level.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson announced a new human services manager, Mindy Woods, has been hired. He looked
forward to her work in this important endeavor during this challenging time.
Mayor Nelson thanked the Edmonds Historical Museum for doing an outstanding job with the Garden
Market. Volunteers were helpful with enforcing social distancing and he was impressed with the amount
of citizen support, and compliance with social distancing and wearing masks.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 12
Mayor Nelson announced the train horns are again being used; due to the Dayton Street construction, the
power to the wayside track horns had to be cut for about 10 days.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Paine reported at yesterday's Port of Edmonds meeting, there were concerns expressed
about people walking along the Port marina walkway because not all of the waterfront is open for use.
That is a working dock where workers load boats in and out of the water.
Councilmember Olson thanked the Walt Disney Corporation for free streaming the Hamilton production
starting July Yd. Although not a substitute to Edmonds 41h of July, it was something to look forward to.
She thanked the Chamber for the amazing 4"' of July celebrations they have put on in the past. The
Chamber can use the public's support and she encouraged the public to join as citizen supporter, sign up a
business, sponsor a business that cannot currently afford their membership, or join as a canine supporter.
Councilmember L. Johnson hoped everyone had an opportunity to safely enjoy the gorgeous weather this
past weekend. She urged everyone to stay safe and be well.
Council President Fraley-Monillas reported on a meeting with the Snohomish County District and Dr.
Spitters; a new report is available that shows Snohomish County continues to do well with distancing and
staying home when possible but there was a spike that appeared to be from Easter weekend when people
may not have been maintaining distance or wearing appropriate face coverings. The district is expecting
another spike in two weeks due to Mother's Day. She urged the public to continue to maintain distance,
wear masks, and stay home whenever possible.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she was having trouble with her camera. She echoed the concerns raised
earlier about the Council being informed about the City's financial condition during the COVID crisis. As
the legislative body responsible for the City's budget, it's important for the Council to know what's going
on. Beyond the impacts of the health crisis, the City is facing unanticipated changes in its revenues and
expenses that may have impacts beyond the health crisis. The City Council should have regular updates
from the administration so the Council can do its job effectively and be responsible to citizens and
businesses. This information is necessary for the Council in dealing with the COVID-19 crisis and
subsequent financial updates. She was happy to hear the administration was planning to provide that
information in the future.
Councilmember K. Johnson said she has some concerns about the COVID-19 impacts in Edmonds. She
received a phone call from a constituent who raised concern about the Beacon article about hot spots in
two facilities in the Westgate area. It would be important to get more information on that to understand
how it happened, when it happened and why it wasn't reported earlier and she requested the Council's
public health representative look into that for her.
Councilmember Distelhorst said he visited the Edmonds Museum Farmers Market; he thanked the
volunteers for keeping everyone physically distanced, wearing face coverings and having soap available.
It was nice to have that opportunity to support those vendors. He relayed the Citizens Housing
Commission plans to meet this week; during this OPMA order, members have only been meeting in
policy groups to comply with governor's proclamation.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked the Council and the Mayor for giving her time to voice her opinion
regarding the Council looking at the City's financials from a COVID perspective. She hoped everyone
had had a great Mother's Day.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May ] 2, 2020
Page 13
Student Representative Bauder said one of the things that is making this quarantine easier for him is
knowing -in -fall or_perhaps_later he will_ he -going -to -college The, c_ollege-pro-ct s_is-ov-er_fo'-bm end he
will be attending Hillsdale College. Along the way he had considered the Naval Academy and he thanked
Councilmember Olson for answering his questions, He thanked Council President -Fraley-Monillas for -
calling Representative Jayapal's office and others to speak on his behalf. He was incredibly grateful for
their help and was happy with his college decision.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:51 p.m.
MICHAEL NELSON, MAYOR
SCOTT PASSEY, CITY CLERK
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 14
Student Representative Bauder said one of the things that is making this quarantine easier for him is
knowing in fall or perhaps later he will be going to college. The college process is over for him and he
will be attending Hillsdale College. Along the way he had considered the Naval Academy and he thanked
Councilmember Olson for answering his questions. He thanked Council President Fraley-Monillas for
calling Representative Jayapal's office and others to speak on his behalf. He was incredibly grateful for
their help and was happy with his college decision.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 8:51 p.m.
MICHAEL NELSON, MAYOR
Z; -
S ASSEY, CITY C
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 14
w
Public Comment for 5/12/20
5/12/20 Darrol Haug, Subject: Public Comment for Council Meeting 5/12/2020
For most of us we are about to pay our largest single bill of the year, our property taxes. Many
of us have lost our jobs, our savings, and some have lost their lives. It was truly sad to see
council first place the Q1 financials on the Consent Agenda and now it has been moved but per
the notes no discussion will occur. Yes, you have constraints about what can be discussed but
this is a "Committee of the Whole" session. You found ways to talk about bikes and
Lynwood, there must be something in the Q1 financials that would allow you to use this as a
"teaching moment" to help people learn a bit more about our complicated financials. You have
talked several times about Crisis Budgeting, setting funds aside for new needs, shifting money
once targeted to deal with homelessness to other purposes. Revenues in Q1 financials do not
even give a clue to the short falls that will be coming in revenues. REIT funds will drop, sales
taxes will decline, some local business will go out of business, we will likely have some vacant
space bringing hardship on our landlords. Other than that, no big deal. Council is projecting the
message that there is no need to even help the public understand the workings of our
finances. Do a Zoom meeting, 3 of your and staff could hold "teaching session"; City Budgets
101. You could do a survey to find out what the public would like to know and gather their ideas
on what should be our funding priorities. People are frightened, you can help.
5/11/20 Ken Reidy, Subject: Public Comment for May 12, 2020 City Council Meeting
On March 5, 2020, a Press Release was issued by the City of Edmonds that started off as
follows (highlighting added): FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: 5 March 2020 To: Media Contact:
Contact: Patrick Doherty 1 425-771-0251 1 patrick.doherty@edmondswa.gov Edmonds Mayor
Nelson Declares Emergency over COVID-19 Outbreak (Edmonds, WA) — Following a press
conference today with Snohomish County and Snohomish Health District officials, Edmonds
Mayor Mike Nelson has signed a proclamation declaring a state of emergency in the City of
Edmonds in response to increasing impacts of the COVID-19 (coronavirus) outbreak in
Snohomish and King Counties. The emergency declaration will allow for suspension of normal
procedures related to procurement and work assignments, may facilitate potential receipt of
state or federal funds, and will allow the city maximum flexibility to respond to this developing
situation. Forty days later, on April 14, 2020, 1 noticed that a late addition had been made to the
City Council Agenda for that night's Council Meeting. At 9:43 A.M. on 4/14/2020, 1 emailed the
following to City Council: I just noticed that an item related to ratification has been added to
tonight's Agenda. There is also a Memo from the City Attorney. The Memo does include one
thing that is true: The CEMP does state that "[t]he Proclamation of Local Emergency must be
ratified by the City Council as soon as practical following the emergency." I don't see any further
discussion in the Memo of one critical requirement in the CEMP — that it has to be done as soon
as practical following the emergency. As that wasn't done, I believe it very obvious that a new
Proclamation of Local Emergency must be made by Mayor Nelson that can be ratified by the
City Council as soon as practical following the emergency. Please also don't forget
that Ratification cannot be by inference - "ratification requires that the act to be ratified be
specifically acknowledged by the ratifying legislation. See generally 10 E. McQuillin, Municipal
Corporations § 29.10 (3d ed. 1981)." Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply
System, 102 Wn. 2d 874, 896 (Wash. 1984) Please don't be fooled by the statement that: "But if
the council would like to us to prepare a single purpose resolution that does nothing other than
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 15
expressly ratify the mayor's March 5, 2020 proclamation of emergency, we would be happy to
do that." The City Attorney and the Administration have no authority or ability to limit City
Council to any "single purpose". Such idea is ludicrous. Once Mayor Nelson issues a
Proclamation that Council can ratify as soon as practical, Council can make as many
modifications to that Proclamation as council wants — council is never limited in front of its
deliberations to a "single purpose". After Council has had a chance to do a comprehensive
review of the Proclamation, Council can modify it as much as Col.lncil feels is necessary. After
Council has had a chance to fulfill its legislative responsibility, a Resolution can be drafted that
includes every thing Council wants — Council can accomplish multiple tasks with its Ratification
should Council want to do so. The April 14, 2020 City Council Agenda Packet did not include an
actual copy of the Proclamation for City Council to review prior to considering ratification. The
April 14, 2020 City Council Agenda Packet did include the following on Packet Page 84
(highlighting added): B. Activation A Proclamation of regional or national crisis by City of
Edmonds Mayor, Washington State Governor or United States President has been issued, and
the crisis is expected to cause significant decline in the General Fund's revenue projections or
requiring significant increases in expenditures to respond to the crisis. The Mayor has the power
to declare the "Crisis" as a fiscal emergency based upon one of the following having occurred:
A natural catastrophe; • An immediate threat to health and public safety: or o Other significant
event such as war or economic depression.The Crisis declared by the Mayor must be approved
by a simple majority of the City Council. Once Council approves the Mayor's declaration and
when trigger points listed below have been met, activation of this Policy will become effective. If
Ratification can occur through conduct as argued by City Attorney Jeff Taraday, why does the
Proposed Crisis Financial Management Policy state that the crisis declared by the Mayor must
be approved by a simple majority of the City Council? On May 5111, 2020, City Attorney Jeff
Taraday was asked directly and clearly by City Councilmember Luke Distelhorst the following
question, a question City Attorney Jeff Taraday called a "great question": "What can the Mayor
Put Or not put in that Proclamation of Emergency? is it simply 'this is an emergency', full stop,
or could there be other items in there that maybe are considered items under the Order that do
require Council Ratification?" Mr. Taraday concluded his answer by representing that "The
Proclamation is just saying there's an Emergent) '. Councilmember Distelhorst responded with
"full stop, nothing more than that" and Mr. Taraday shook his head yes. This was a false
representation. The March 5, 2020 Press Release itself stated that The emergency declaration
will allow for suspension of normal procedures related to procurement and work assignments,
may facilitate potential receipt of state or federal funds, and will allow the city maximum flexibility
to respond to this developing situation. Another puzzling aspect of this is: Why did Mayor Mike
Nelson not correct Mr. Taraday's false representation during the May 5, 2020 City Council
Meeting? Mayor Nelson was the one who had made the Proclamation and one world hope he
fully understood that it was very broad and allowed for suspension of normal procedures
related to procurement and work assignments, facilitated potential receipt of state or federal
funds, and allowed the city maximum flexibility to respond to this developing situation. Please
request Mr. Taraday make full public disclosure as to why he represented that "The
Proclamation is just saying there's an Emergency" during the May 5, 2020 City Council
Meeting. Thank you.
5/9/20 Ken Reidy, Subject: Public Comment for May 12, 2020 City Council Meeting
The Draft City Council Meeting Minutes for May 5, 2020 contain the following: "Mr. Taraday said
the Council would not be able to avoid what was otherwise be a ratification -requiring order by
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 16
just including it in the initial proclamation. Anything that looked like an order would still have to
be ratified. The proclamation simply states there is an emergency." Please note — the initial
Proclamation is supposed to be done by the Mayor, not City Council, according to the CEMP.
(side note: the CEMP now appears to have not been reviewed and updated for 2019 as
required by WAC 118-30-060 which says the plan shall be reviewed and updated at least once
every two calendar years .... shall is mandatory.) So why did Mr. Taraday discuss Council
avoiding something in the initial Proclamation rather than the Mayor avoiding something in the
initial Proclamation? If he didn't discuss this — do the minutes need to be corrected?
Next, the statement that "The proclamation simply states there is an emergency" is not
accurate. Please include the March 5th Mayoral Proclamation of Emergency in the Meeting
Minutes for May 12th, 2020 so the public can easily see all the items included in that
Proclamation, especially the items included in Sections 2 and 3 of the Proclamation dated this
5th day of March, 2020 signed by Mike Nelson, Mayor of City of Edmonds. Section 3 ends with
the following in parentheses: "excepting mandatory constitutional requirements". Please
note also that Section 2 of the Mayor's March 5th Proclamation refers to the city's disaster
services coordinator. No such position exists. This is an example of what City Council could
have corrected during the ratification process had the March 5th Proclamation been brought to
Council for Ratification as soon as practical. Thank you.
5/8/20 Helen Hall, Subject: Agenda item for consideration
Two issues for consideration: 1. Close to auto/truck traffic the downtown streets between 4th
and 6th and Bell and Dayton, making it a pedestrian and bikes only zone. Rick Steves wrote a
column for the Edmonds Beacon talking about the idea of making the downtown area between
4th and 6th a walking and bike only area. This concept used in many European towns makes
the core of the city people and business friendly. Especially in these times, providing the
businesses room to spread into the street to provide dining at a safe distance in the open air
makes complete sense. I'm sure you saw the article, so let's talk about how we can make that
happen. There are so many pluses to this concept. I realize there may be traffic issues, but
believe those could be addressed. Think this could make Edmonds an even more outstanding
place to live and visit. 2. Make Sunset a pedestrian and bike street with local only traffic
permanent. I believe the majority of people in downtown area are so happy with Sunset Rd
being closed to thru traffic and would love to see that on a permanent basis. The parking on
Sunset was a problem and this closure has definitely been positive for walkers, bikers, and of
course the people living on the road. The only negative comments I have heard are regarding
accessibility for disabled that sat in their cars. The area is still accessible to disabled by parking
on side streets and in fact the city could put in more handicapped parking in the immediate area
to address that issue.
5/7/20 Ken Reidy, Subject: Re: Thank you and last week was a tough week
As I said near the end of my March 29, 2020 email below: Assuming Mr. Taraday is correct,
how long has our "current practice" been to not have an emergency operations board? Has our
Emergency Management Organization been inadequate and in violation of our Code? If so,
how long has our Emergency Management Organization been inadequate? As we entered
2020, were we prepared to deal with an Emergency? Was the City in compliance with
our CEMP and Chapter 6.60 ECC? The following is taken from a City of Edmonds Job Listing
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 17
with a job opening date of 1/18/2019: Coordinate with the Emergency Operations Board to
ensure that emergency preparedness activities in response to emergencies and disasters and
the coordination of the recovery from emergencies and disasters are effectively carried out
within the City of Edmonds.
httr):/Iagency.governmentmobs.com/edmondswa/iob bulletin. cfm?ioblD=2327531 &sharedWindo
w=0 As such, why would Mr. Taraday email Councilmember Diane Buckshnis on Tuesday,
March 24, 2020, that:"I removed the emergency operations board from the ordinance that
revised chapter 6.60 because the city, to my knowledge, no longer has such a board. I was
primarily trying to conform the ordinance to current practice." Next, Edmonds Resolution 1386 is
an official action of the Edmonds City Council and the Resolution itself clearly states that
"Washington State law requires the CEMP to be reviewed and updated at least once
every two calendar years". WAC 118-30-060 confirms that this is correct. WAC 118-30-060
Emergency plan states that: The plan shall be reviewed and updated at least once every
two calendar years.The City's current CEMP displayed on the City's website is dated January
of 2017, approved by City Council on April 18, 2017. At the latest, our CEMP had to be
reviewed and updated no later than April 18, 2019. Why wasn't this done? Has this failure
been reported to the State? WAC 118-30-060 Emergency plan also states that: No less than
once each calendar year, the operational capabilities shall be tested by an emergency
operations exercise or by an actual local emergency dec/aration.The City's website
indicates we participated in the Cascadia Rising earthquake readiness and response exercise in
June of 2016. Did the City of Edmonds conduct an emergency operations exercise in 2017?
2018? 2019? WAC 118-30-040 states that: Each political subdivision shall submit an
emergency management program paper annually to the director not less than sixty days
prior to the beginning of the calendar year. Have we been doing this? Please repeal highly
flawed Ordinance No. 4177 immediately. Please review and update our CEMP as soon as
possible as WAC 118-30-060 required this to have been done long ago. After reviewing and
updating the CEMP, please incorporate the updated CEMP and related plans/documents into
the Edmonds City Code via the Resolution and Ordinance process. Thank you.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
May 12, 2020
Page 18